My wife bought me the updated version of this for my 30th birthday. It’s all black, no date window, and old bulova logo. It’s so refreshing to see a channel with watches that doesn’t just show submariners, grand seikos and speed masters. Great channel
I really had a hard time deciding g between the black one and this one, but I use the date function too much to pass it by. I think the black version looks cleaner though.
@@JusttheWatch Original Bulova prototype doesn't have date window as well, however that's a strange move for Bulova to release 2017 version with no-date dial but only in black and polished instead of original sanded case.. When I was picking between new and old one, I ordered old just because I it's closer to original watch even with date window :D
I purchased the first version (45mm) on the leather strap in May 2018, and it's been an excellent watch that gives me a lot of pleasure. The original 1971 watch was over 43mm, so this is less than 2mm larger than that. It is a large watch, but not TOO large on my 7 inch wrist. I have several other watches from Seiko, Swatch and Pulsar which are similarly sized. I do prefer this 45mm version over the updated 43mm because the 45mm has the correct proportions, while the 43mm has the case diameter and lug-to-lug distance reduced, but kept the same diameter dial and crystal, and the same size crown and length of crown stem, so the crown protrudes more from the side of the case. Visually, the 45mm LOOKS more like the original despite the small difference in size. Build quality seems excellent, and the padded leather strap with it's basketweave pattern felt stiff at first but eventually conformed nicely to the shape of my wrist and became very comfortable. I've never even tried the NATO strap which was included with the watch. As you pointed out, the dial is simply stunning in it's detailing and legibility. Considering what you actually get for the price, I can't think of another analog chronograph which offers as much.
Yeah, I saw another video about the original they were auctioning off, and it was interesting how this one was specifically designed by Bulova in a (failed) attempt to get NASA to switch to using an American watch for the moon missions. They mentioned the pushers as a conscious design choice for that reason. Not that it's possible to tell, but the footage in the background is actually David Scott on the Apollo 15 mission, probably wearing the Bulova prototype.
This was a fun and interesting review. I found this watch in the last couple of days on on one of those more expensive British sites. This is the first review that mentioned that the pushers are hard to push to reach the engagement points. I decided to get this watch to have a bit of that unique history of a watch similar to that which went to the moon. I imagine the reliability of the watch will exceed that of the original movement of which your review reveals also was a mechanical movement. Presumably in a Lunar watch, was self-winding. This one was just a battery to be put in every so often. Thanks for the review and even showing different watch bands to give a little more depth than one normally sees in a review. Thank you. AF
You presume a watch worn on the Moon was self-winding? Wrong. NASA specifications called for hand wound watches because the agency presumed automatics would not work in zero-G. Obviously, the Moon is 1/6 G but getting back and forth is a long way in zero-G.
First of all have to say I really enjoyed your review. This watch came out after I had picked up a Bulova Marine Star which I so, and still do love. But this watch has so much history and is just so over the top cool. The look is aces, legible, black and white and frankly looks incredible. I ordered mine just a month ago and I have to say I agree with all of your thoughts. Barton straps on order, and also worried about the crystal. But this watch, for the price deserves to be worn and shown. I'm very thankful to Bulova for making this and doing it at a price point a humble person like me can afford. This is another watch that for the dough, to me, stands right up there and so punches above it's class. I love it.
I've handled both and I have to say that even though the Speedmaster has a much better finish and nicer surfaces, the Bulova did feel a lot more solid and durable on the bracelet. Two kinds of quality I guess.
Dave I’ve watched several reviews of this watch and I can say without a doubt that yours has been the best. Thank you for your excellence and care in providing this review.
I like Chronographs, one of my first decent watches 17 year's ago was the Speedmaster Moon and about 3yrs ago I was looking for some more 'moon' watches, looked at the Seiko but they were either too dodgy/expensive for the correct model and I then found the Bulova, loved the story (don't believe a word of it) and the look of the watch. Imported one from the USA to the UK via Amazon for about $250. I love the watch, I like decent quartz movements. the ease of use the accuracy, the detailing on the watch dial and layout is really well done. The watch wears smaller/better on a 3rd party NATO the two OE straps look nice but don't allow the watch to 'sit' properly. I do not like the polished or PVD versions. As ever it is all about branding for many watch wearers and if this had a different name on the dial it would be sold at x5+ the price The presentation box is cool and for the money paid the watch has prescence, provenance and great value.
Great review i did not own a quartz watch until I came across the Bulova high-precision movement is awesome, and the dial is unique & interesting I also own the 43mm Blue & White Panda version dial Bulova recently brought out they also do the Black dial version both true to the seize Commander Dave Scott wore on the Appolo 15 moon landing, all the best from the UK.
The watch worn on the moon was I think a 40mm. It was actually a Universal Geneve tri compax movement that Bulova cased, it was manual wind not automatic as you stated, as is the speedmaster. The timepiece Bulova officially submitted for NASA testing was a pocket watch, so it was removed from consideration. John Glenn wore a Heuer stopwatch on a homemade strap on Frendship 7, so it's not as unusual as it might seem at first. Interestingly, Bulova made the mission timer on both the CM and the LM, the latter of which failed on AP11 causing Armstrong to leave his Speedmaster aboard Eagle during the EVA, making Buzz's speedmaster the 1st watch worn on the moon. This is a giant watch. I have larger wrists and even so, it on the big side. I bought it because of the really cool story. From what I understand, Col Scott put it away in his safe after the mission and NASA kinda put a lid on him after the stamp scandal when they returned home and discouraged him from profiting from it further. Selling the watch or endorsing it would have done that. I've owned mine a few years and it's an interesting companion to my Speedmaster Professional. I dinged the side of the crystal the first few days after I got it, but so far that's the only time. I go through phases when I don't touch it for months, then I'll put it back into rotation for a while, typically on different strap. I've worn it on a rally strap mostly (that I bought for my speedy), but now I have it on a simple OD nylon seiko two piece strap I bought on Amazon for $20, and I get lots of compliments on it so I think we have a winner. I've often thought of selling it or gifting it since it sees only occasional wrist time, but I'm in a phase now that it wears well and I like more than I have. I think I'll keep it :) I do wish it was smaller. And I'd like it if it came with the dial that's on the subsequent black case version, with the original font and the no date window (which I have never set, it's so small and I did not know it was there the first year or two I owned it). These are really my only complaints on what is truly a lovely and interesting piece in my small collection. It is in fact very very accurate, the pushers are smooth and the chrono is crisp in operation. Oh! If you get it, you choose between the bracelet version or the strap version. The holes in the lugs are different or something, so the bracelet version stays on the bracelet it came on.. I did not care much for the straps that came with mine, but like the speedy they are strap monsters and you can easily put it on something else like I have done.
I really enjoyed the video. I’m a major fanboy of the Lunar Pro. Mine came with a high-polish case which I didn’t care for. I found someone to give it a satin polish which gave it a more authentic look. I was surprised that your video didn’t mention the great engraving on the back that really ramps up the association with Apollo XV. Also, you may not be aware that the 262khz movement was developed by Bulova for the entire space program and was used extensively in equipment requiring precision timing, including the Command modules as well as equipment on the ground. Given NASA’s use of Bulova timing devices it’s surprising that they didn’t go with Bulova watches for the astronauts, and they don’t make a bigger deal about the use of the 262 in the Space Program. Again, great video!
I own both the Omega moon as well as this one. yes, Omega is better but not fair to compare a 5k+ watch to a $500 piece. I've had my Bulova moon since release... back when they could call it a moon watch, now "lunar pilot". anyway, great time piece. it's very well put together, surprisingly so. gorgeous design, very well executed, and ofcourse a very interesting history/story behind it. If you have interest in the moon landings, I think it's a worthy addition to anyone's collection. I have a 6.5" wrist and I think it looks fine. I have mine on a brown racing strap and it's an absolute knock out. oh and I'm still on the original battery. still going... and yes, I use the chrono function alot.
Yes, this watch is awesome. I have owned it and loved it. Unfortunately i let it go. I see they have a full blackout model now that im really tempted by. Great review and discussion as always!!😎👍👍
Really like this piece. Simple. Legible. Recently purchased one. Don't regret it because of the history (or what I'd like to term as the wris-tory) behind it. Awesome review. All the best to 'ya!!!
I recently discovered that there is another variant of this Lunar Pilot, the 96A225. It features a highly polished case and is 2mm thicker, otherwise the two are identical. The polished version has a real look of refinement, lacks the date complication and features the period correct Bulova font. I'm only mentioning this second model as I didn't even know that it is available when I ordered the 96B251, which IS a very good looking watch. However, I may have ordered this model instead, so if you like the look of a polished case, as I certainly do, it's good to know that you'd have a choice. Also, the 96A225 is listed on Amazon Prime for $83.97 less than the 96B251. It's a steal at $316.00 USD. Decisions, decisions!
I've had a hankering for a HAQ, I've just ordered one of these. It'll be the new star of my modest little collection. No radio reception, no Bluetooth, no GPS, _no problem_ 👍
Difference between this watch and the Speedmaster: Hype and brand label. Bulova is a great watch company as it is, but Omega makes their money, like Rolex, on branding. No saphire crystal for 10 times the price, and only winding. The Bulova gives you saphire and a state of the art quartz mvmt for 1/10 the price. Easy choice.
Very nice video. I especially enjoyed your in depth look at the features ie; the complications of the 3 sub dials but also multi level characteristics of the main dial itself. I have recently purchased the 96B251 and, like you've mentioned, I don't particularly like either of the two straps which came with the watch. (Nice to have to complete the set, but not to necessarily wear.) So I will be installing the Strapcode Miltat Super Engineer II. I think the bracelet's brushed finish will compliment the case's bead blasted look. Thank you for this well produced post!
I bought this model on its release in Australia & believe me I paid a LOT more than this current offering! Jump on board the “NASA EXPRESS”!😂 Seriously would think about buying another at this price!!! Love the rally strap by the way. And as I type I am waiting on a beautiful 2nd hand Omega Speedmaster! 😎👍🏻 Again though the Bulova is a favourite in my collection & recommend it thoroughly!!!
There's a few new models out there, including a polished version with a domed crystal instead of the protruding box cut sapphire. Gives it a little slimmer profile. Still I think this version is my favorite. Good luck with the Speedmaster, making me a little jealous over here!
Hi Dave & fellow Subs. I literally just peeled the stickers off my Bulova Luna Pilot 2 hours ago!, so I had to rewatch this fine review! First thoughts? It's BIG! I'm not really used to watches that fully encompass my wrist; I measure in at 8 1/4" and wear 38's and mostly 40mm pieces. The lug to lug distance is truly imposing, but it wears very comfortably on the leather, which is melding nicely after just a few quick hours. I haven't tried the 'NASA' strap yet, so I have something else to look forward to! I'm very impressed with everything from the box and general presentation to the quality of the finishing. The dial is a pure piece of artistry in design and finishing. The legibility is ridiculously good. Even the leather strap, which cops flack in many reviews, is a pleasant surprise (even though I will be swapping it out for nice slab of quality dark brown leather). My only niggle is that my chronograph hand isn't aligned perfectly - just a touch off centre. Of course it's only noticeable when I look for it,...but none of us like that. We really don't. But I'm sure I'll get past it in a few days and in a year I'll be fond of this little imperfection! So all in all, a big 👍🏼. This is my 2nd chronograph with serious ties to the history of space travel. A month or so ago I bought my 'Strela Cosmograph'. A limited edition (of 200) re-issue (in mecha-quartz) of the watch worn by Alexi Leonov during man's 1st ever EVA /Space Walk on 18 March 1965 during the USSR's Voshtok II mission. They were made by Julian Kauffman from the Poljot24.de website under licence from Strela. That too is a fine and very affordable watch with genuine space travel pedigree and well worth checking out. He's an independent operator who has some rarely seen watches at some really affordable prices. No : I'm not affiliated with him in any way,shape or form. I just think he's a very nice man running a small 2 man operation somewhere in Germany selling really cool and really accessible watches. If you are a fan of Dave's channel you'll probably be a fan of Julians website. 🙂
Sotiris Vramis - I've sorta got used to it. I'm not the most OCD guy in the world and It sort of makes the piece mine. As per, this is the most expensive quartz chronograph I own by a mile (and I own 4, 5 if you count Mecha-Quartz.) and it's the only one with the problem. A good argument to follow an affordable watch channel right there! And I'm guessing by micro -adjust you mean manually lining up the hand with rapid clicks of the start / stop pusher?
Great video and great watch. i received mine just a few days ago. Got it for under 300$ on Amazon. I keep hearing about the size issue but for me being 6`3 with large hands and wrists, its a perfect size. i immidiately swapped for the enclosed NATO strap since I could barely secure the original one in the first hole. A slightly longer strap would be appreciated! I also own a Bulova Presicionist with the curved crystal. Its an even more substantial piece but, again, fits us bigger guys quite perfect. Thanks!
Best bang for the buck of any watch I have ever owned. Including the big R , which are currently grossly overpriced. Adding to the panache is Bulova's pioneering work in electronic watch movements going back to the early 1960s. Take that, Oysterquartz !!
Saw your review, looked it up on Amazon, saw a used model for 279 picked up immediately. Even if I don’t like it I can flip it to save my losses. Still a stunning watch and can’t wait to receive it
I think it's a great chronograph for the price ($325), I also like the Seiko SNA411 ($225) and the Casio EF-547D ($100). But the Bulova is clearly much better than the other two. You get sapphire, blue lume, better quartz movement, more precise chronograph function, better box and accessories). The Seiko has a slide rule and a 200m water resistance, though. Curiously each is a homage of a better known watch: Speedmaster, Navitimer and the Carrera Chrono of 2010, respectively.
Great video and a beautiful watch! With that high frequency quartz movement, it just might be the best chronograph under $500. I might have to get one.
Lovely video. I've have three Bulova watches, and just love them... they are so underrated I feel, but that's okay, as it keeps them affordable. I do have one Percisionist chronograph, but seeing this, I really want one of there for no other reason than the history of the watch.
I had this watch .............. a fantastic watch that wears really comfortable and is incredibly accurate thanks to Bulova´s advanced quartz movement. One thing to be aware of though - If you want to be able to have the option to wear the watch on both a strap and the fantastic Bulova bracelet, you MUST buy the braclet version from start. I bought the strap version (got a great deal) planning to buy a bracelet later - however, to my dismay I found out that the holes for the springbars are placed differently on the strap version than on the bracelet version making it IMPOSSIBLE TO FIT A BRACELET ON THE STRAP VERSION afterwards !! For that reason I sold the watch again after a couple of months. It looks good on a black Marine Nationale strap with a red center stripe, though - I have that strap from Erika´s originals and it makes the watch even more comfortable !!
I recently got my ha ds on a marine Nationale strap from LuffStraps and it's awesome on the Lunar Pilot. I think that type of strap is the perfect match for it, both for comfort and style.
ps other cool space watches that aren't bank breakers are Gagarin's schturmanski, Vostok's (MIR space station ), Fortis (bit more pricey but still used), The Seiko "Pogue"(more expensive )...any other affordable space watch suggestions? Cheers mate keep up the good work 👍👍
I gave it a shot on my frail 6 1/4 inch wrist today, thinking it'll look stupid anyway... 'Lo and behold, it was quite alright! Granted it would've been better in a smaller package, but I didn't mind it that much anymore (at least for this particular watch)! Maybe it's the oval shape of my wrist? Or is it the downward sloping case? I don't really know what exactly makes wearing this watch possible, but now I'm seriously considering adding this watch to my collection! My point is, if you see one in a mall or something, do try it on. It just might work out for you!
That's funny! Every time you say the name David Scott, you sound different as normal!!! A little editing here? But great video , once again, as being used to whenever I watch ! Now to the watch, I used to own one, but after a couple of month decided to sell it , like most of the people here. The reason was the unusual ticking of the second hand. If it weren't for that two times a second ticking, I would have kept it definitely.
I just got this watch. It arrived about an hours ago. So many people mentioned that it was a very large watch, and that if it had been smaller it would be more popular. IDK perhaps I have been wearing a Garmin Fenix 3 since I began running Altra's in '15. It seem small compared to the Garmin. That being said I felt that it was kinda small to me. Seems like a nice watch. My watch has a leather NATO style band. I thinks I am going to get another type of band. I spent a little more by getting it from Macy's. You can find it cheaper. I still plan to get an Omega Moon Watch.
I always wanted an Omega Speedmaster, but that real-deal moonwatch was mechanical (manual) wind (I'm forgetful) and the domed Hessalite (plastic) crystal was easily scratched (and apparently subject to total failure). So I bought a metal bracelet edition of David Scott's Bulova "Lunar Pilot" Moon Watch which came in handy for him when the crystal popped right off his "Speedy" on Apollo 15. After all, the Bulova replica had the latest 262 mhz crystal freq counter, so it just had to be more accurate. I've even got an old vintage tuning-fork Spaceview Bulova, so I am all about accuracy. This was to be a watch I would use regularly, especially when my Apple watch is on the charger, which is most every night. (Who else, besides Apple, makes a gizmo that has to be charged at least 3 time a week, but can't be used while it's being charged?) But then I digress. This was a big deal to me. I got the version with the metal bracelet and with the big velcro space-suit band, and the little took-kit for changing them out. It looked like a real The big disappointment was: the Bulova's luminosity in the hands and dial is virtually non-existent. So much for a night-watch. I've heard others complain of this. I should have done more research. I want to know what time it is when it's dark too. Is that asking too much? When it comes to watches, I follow Gene Krantz's NASA mission control rule # 1: failure is not an option. So I'm back to using a. 29-year old TAG/Heuer SEL that does much better, not only with hand/dial luminosity (which I tested), but also in several other ways: 1) The Heuer allows me to change time zones forward or backward without freezing the seconds and thus losing precise time sync ala the Bulova. What's the point of 262 mhz? 2) The Heuer has an hour hand that's shaped different than the minute hand, whereas the Bulova has identical width hands and an hour hand that virtually touches dial (too long) dial markers at 1,2,4,5,7,8,10 & 1, making it look like a minute hand. 3) The Heuer has a bigger date window, not set at a 45 degree angle, and not recessed so that it's often obscured by the shadow of the dial, ala the Bulova. 4) The Heuer has a bracelet that not only lets you change the number of links, but also lets you fine tune the overall length in less than full-link increments. 5) The Heuer is not a mish/mash of satin vs. brushed vs polished stainless steel. It's a forward looking design with it's own distinguishable bracelet - quite well integrated. 6) The Heuer's crystal is slightly recessed, and thus the edges are not exposed to being chipped, as apposed to the ugly and protruding sandblasted edge of the Bulova's crystal. 7) The Heuer is certified to 200 maters, not just 50 meters like the Bulova, which basically disqualifies the Bulova as a dive watch. 8) The Heuer starts skipping second hand movement to show battery exhaustion. The more seconds skipped, the weaker the battery. The Bulova (per the manual) just stops with no warning. Period. Like a car that just runs out of gas, with no warning indication. 9) The Heuer is apparently better sealed, whereas the Bulova hss 4 tiny slotted/bevel-head screws on the back, near the stem and the stopwatch pushbuttons. This is certainly four cases of opportunity for failure from a case integrity point of view, and possibly explains the 50 meter rating. 10) The Heuer lets me re-sync the watch to the time signal, because I can use the stopwatch as a reference to the time signal, and the stopwatch function is not killed on the 2nd stem stop, which is necessary on most watches for everything except a date advance. 11) The Heuer has the adjustable outer bezel event timer with ratchet mechanism. I realize that this is a key dive watch function, and the Bulova is clearly not a dive watch, but the functionality does come in handy as an easy-to-interpret event timer. As far as the accuracy - I literally can't tell the difference after 3 months. Both were set to the WWV radio signal, and are still less than a fraction of a second different. Other than that, I like the Bulova as a addition to my collection of space stuff and watches, but not enough to wear it every day, So 'll go with my 1990 vintage "Aryton Senna" watch (which still works like a champ 3 decades on) instead of a 2019 replica of David Scott's back-up watch from 58 years ago.
I have a Bulova Sea King which I absolutely love, and I was thinking of saving up for the lunar Pilot, but I notice it seems to have the same movement as the Sea King(except for a date window), For some reason that is making me hesitate. I don't know why because some expensive watches use a common movement, but being familiar with the movement makes it almost not a new(to me) watch.
Great review! I got the black versión of Bulova moon watch, and I love it. One of the best looking watches... Accurate, with heritage, beautiful... What else can you ask for?
Do you recall whether this watch measures split time? Is the bottom pusher always a reset pusher whether the tachymeter is ticking or is stopped? Im worried my chronograph is missing a split time function (fake?). Much appreciated
I have the black edition and it's a great watch. First point...IT IS NOT TOO BIG! Okay I have a 6.5" wrist (just) and its fine. The black finish is amazing and it feels such a solid watch, no need to worry about this one. The timing accuracy is amazing. Makes any automatic or manual feel like a antique toy in terms of "accurate timepiece". It's funny after wearing automatics, having a watch that keep spot on time is a real thrill. The only three things I would change is improve the lume, it's a bit pathetic, yes it lasts a while but you really have to 'charge it up'. Give all models the plain Bulova logo and make it 22mm for the strap.
I actually like this watch more than the Speedmaster. The precisionist movement gives it something special while the Speedmaster must be hand-wound because it's not even an automatic winder.
I added a Beads of Rice bracelet that REALLY makes this watch pop! I found the Omega to be a little harder to read than this Bulova. And to be honest, the 262 kHz movement is pretty amazing.
Got the anniversary set at AAFES at Andrew's AFB. For 400.. I love this thing. I just need a new strap...but can't find one I want the same with the crystal uhf freq on the band
I’m torn between this and the seiko srpa21. Yes, they’re totally different watches but they fit my current modest budget. I’m starting to lean towards the bulova tough. Good vid
I have this watch with a stainless band, it pops. People today doubt that we even got to the moon. My watch has the dates of the landing and eva for the Apollo 15.
I love this watch except for the size. I wish Bulova would make at least a 42 mm version for us normal-sized wrist people. I'm a big fan of the Ultra High-Frequency movements. I typically don't like quartz watches but the UHF is very cool. I also like its history. Thanks for doing this review.
The Seagull 1963 was the other Chronograph I seriously considered. But I just really liked the history and style of the Bulova better, and I thought the uhf quartz movement would be more reliable. But if I were going to get a second chronograph in this price range, that Sea Gull would probably be at the top of my list. I love th Baltic too, but it's pushing a little higher than I'm willing to pay. Their Aquascaphe on the other hand... that's sort of tempting.
@@JusttheWatch indeed.. the Bulova is great, and atleast is has some lumination, the Sea Gull is less practical at low light conditions and the 1963 history is actually made up.. since it doesn't really resemble the original Chinese pilot watch.
I'm so intrigued by that high frequency quartz movement. I generally stay away from quartz watches unless there's something special about them (i.e. the legacy of Timex, solar quartz watches, or Bulova's high frequency quartz with hand sweep). Unfortunately, I have tiny wrists, at just about 6.75 inches. The Lunar Pilot is beautiful, I love the hand sweep, etc., but it's just too big. I have an Invicta Pro Diver on my wrist right now, and it's 48mm lug-to-lug, and it's just a hair below too big. I know the Precisionist is cheaper, smaller, and has the same movement, which is what I'm most intrigued by.
its a big watch. but i still wear my tissot prs516 with similar size once in a while. i wear it coz it pleases me. id buy this watch if one gets around.
Went back and watch this I’m now buying the smaller version(finally!). I owned this watch for a short period of time and I really wanted it to fit… I had a larger than average wrist and it just simply was too large. It sits flat on the wrist and has an extremely long lug to lug. It was simply unwearable an overhang on both sides of the wrist. It’s obvious that they finally listened and have now made a more wearable model!
I have this watch. I like it, but I wish the Chrono was 30 min instead of 60, that is, so the markings could have been further spaced out (pun not intended) to provide better legibility. I find it difficult to see which exact minute I’m counting. The minute sub dial also sweeps, and I think a ticking minute counter would have provided better accuracy as well. But overall I love the piece. Good review!
Yeah I have to squint to see the minutes too. But I use it to time sermons which usually last longer than 30 minutes so I'm glad to have the 60 minute timer.
Yeah, those trade offs (30 vs 60) are the nuances that make collecting so fun. Finding that perfect watch. And loving the imperfect ones for trying. Cheers!
Thanks for the video, I might have to get the black pvd version....oh yes just because of all the arrogant Omega owners that think they have the only watch in the world you bet I would by this instead.. Plus I can't really afford the other one. 😂
The Seiko Flightmaster is under $200, is a chronograph and also features a circular slide rule that does math, conversions, a host of things plus it is an accurate quartz watch. Its dial is very busy but functional.
Love the watch. The only thing I don't like is the 60 minute dial is not very legible. The 60 minute hand for the minute subdial movement doesn't step from minute to minute. On a speedy, the minute subdial is only 30 minutes which makes reading minutes easier. In this watch they ditched the "hours" subdial for a 1/20th second subdial and squeezed an additional 30 minutes into the minute subdial. This makes it hard to read. Especially when the minute hand is right around 2 to 3 minutes past the last 5 minute subdivision. Is this 7 or 8 minutes..... Is this 22 or 23 minutes......hmmm.
I’ve met Buzz Aldrin I should have asked him his thoughts on this watch ! Great review stunning review & such historic lhjstory greatvtknseevghe hjgh quality build & size on the wrist looks great on hhe cloth strap refreshing compared to bracelets that I hate, I f I buy a ticket from Elon to go to Mars I will take it with me 😁🙏, great review defjnately going to put it to my collection shame it’s not an automatic, it’s pricy too but you get a thousand plus watch for under 500£ thank you for a good Detailed review I feel I know jtvbetter now thank you Sadly I can’t afford the Omega Speed master professional moon watch 😥😱more please.
Nice video as always this watch will definitely go on my wish list.after paying all the Bill's and kids clubs fees and mortgage payments. But I do like both original straps so that's a bonus. Thanks for the video.carl from UK.
@@JusttheWatch hi changed my mind I'm going for the seiko save the ocean turtle,blue dial automatic. Rubber strap.great looking watch.would like to see you review this piece. Regards Carl.
As i can't afford the Omega speedmaster, i start to look at this one, but never make the step. I bought an Alpha Chronograph to make me wait and think, but now i'm lost. I have to try it to see if the size fit on my wrist.
Yeah I think size is the only real concern with this one. If it fits your wrist, and it's something you're interested in, there's not really any downside.
Totally agree. I have the Speedmaster Professional as well as the Bulova Lunar Pilot. The build quality on the Bulova is equal to the Omega. I agree with you about a 12 hours counter. Really needed. I have the bracelet model, which I love. The bracelet is premium-quality.
Ughhhh i want this watch bad. But with a 6.75” wrist its too big sadly...this would be perfect too as im a college student and definitely can’t afford an Omega Speedmaster
My wife bought me the updated version of this for my 30th birthday. It’s all black, no date window, and old bulova logo. It’s so refreshing to see a channel with watches that doesn’t just show submariners, grand seikos and speed masters. Great channel
I really had a hard time deciding g between the black one and this one, but I use the date function too much to pass it by. I think the black version looks cleaner though.
@@JusttheWatch Original Bulova prototype doesn't have date window as well, however that's a strange move for Bulova to release 2017 version with no-date dial but only in black and polished instead of original sanded case.. When I was picking between new and old one, I ordered old just because I it's closer to original watch even with date window :D
I had both versions in the shopping cart and didn't even realize the updated one is missing the date window. Thanks man!
It was my 30th watch too
The black version has been discontinued so consider yourself very lucky and probably have an appreciating asset
I purchased the first version (45mm) on the leather strap in May 2018, and it's been an excellent watch that gives me a lot of pleasure. The original 1971 watch was over 43mm, so this is less than 2mm larger than that. It is a large watch, but not TOO large on my 7 inch wrist. I have several other watches from Seiko, Swatch and Pulsar which are similarly sized. I do prefer this 45mm version over the updated 43mm because the 45mm has the correct proportions, while the 43mm has the case diameter and lug-to-lug distance reduced, but kept the same diameter dial and crystal, and the same size crown and length of crown stem, so the crown protrudes more from the side of the case. Visually, the 45mm LOOKS more like the original despite the small difference in size. Build quality seems excellent, and the padded leather strap with it's basketweave pattern felt stiff at first but eventually conformed nicely to the shape of my wrist and became very comfortable. I've never even tried the NATO strap which was included with the watch. As you pointed out, the dial is simply stunning in it's detailing and legibility. Considering what you actually get for the price, I can't think of another analog chronograph which offers as much.
I've been looking at this one myself for a while. I just love the pushers on it. Well done, and love the moon landing images in the background.
Yeah, I saw another video about the original they were auctioning off, and it was interesting how this one was specifically designed by Bulova in a (failed) attempt to get NASA to switch to using an American watch for the moon missions. They mentioned the pushers as a conscious design choice for that reason. Not that it's possible to tell, but the footage in the background is actually David Scott on the Apollo 15 mission, probably wearing the Bulova prototype.
Love the editing and the way you told the story. Appreciate the effort.
This was a fun and interesting review. I found this watch in the last couple of days on on one of those more expensive British sites. This is the first review that mentioned that the pushers are hard to push to reach the engagement points. I decided to get this watch to have a bit of that unique history of a watch similar to that which went to the moon. I imagine the reliability of the watch will exceed that of the original movement of which your review reveals also was a mechanical movement. Presumably in a Lunar watch, was self-winding. This one was just a battery to be put in every so often. Thanks for the review and even showing different watch bands to give a little more depth than one normally sees in a review. Thank you. AF
You presume a watch worn on the Moon was self-winding? Wrong. NASA specifications called for hand wound watches because the agency presumed automatics would not work in zero-G. Obviously, the Moon is 1/6 G but getting back and forth is a long way in zero-G.
First of all have to say I really enjoyed your review. This watch came out after I had picked up a Bulova Marine Star which I so, and still do love. But this watch has so much history and is just so over the top cool. The look is aces, legible, black and white and frankly looks incredible. I ordered mine just a month ago and I have to say I agree with all of your thoughts. Barton straps on order, and also worried about the crystal. But this watch, for the price deserves to be worn and shown. I'm very thankful to Bulova for making this and doing it at a price point a humble person like me can afford. This is another watch that for the dough, to me, stands right up there and so punches above it's class. I love it.
I've handled both and I have to say that even though the Speedmaster has a much better finish and nicer surfaces, the Bulova did feel a lot more solid and durable on the bracelet. Two kinds of quality I guess.
Dave I’ve watched several reviews of this watch and I can say without a doubt that yours has been the best. Thank you for your excellence and care in providing this review.
I like Chronographs, one of my first decent watches 17 year's ago was the Speedmaster Moon and about 3yrs ago I was looking for some more 'moon' watches, looked at the Seiko but they were either too dodgy/expensive for the correct model and I then found the Bulova, loved the story (don't believe a word of it) and the look of the watch. Imported one from the USA to the UK via Amazon for about $250. I love the watch, I like decent quartz movements. the ease of use the accuracy, the detailing on the watch dial and layout is really well done. The watch wears smaller/better on a 3rd party NATO the two OE straps look nice but don't allow the watch to 'sit' properly. I do not like the polished or PVD versions. As ever it is all about branding for many watch wearers and if this had a different name on the dial it would be sold at x5+ the price The presentation box is cool and for the money paid the watch has prescence, provenance and great value.
Great review i did not own a quartz watch until I came across the Bulova high-precision
movement is awesome, and the dial is unique & interesting I also own the 43mm Blue & White Panda version dial Bulova recently brought out they also do the Black dial version both true to the seize Commander Dave Scott wore on the Appolo 15 moon landing,
all the best from the UK.
The watch worn on the moon was I think a 40mm. It was actually a Universal Geneve tri compax movement that Bulova cased, it was manual wind not automatic as you stated, as is the speedmaster. The timepiece Bulova officially submitted for NASA testing was a pocket watch, so it was removed from consideration. John Glenn wore a Heuer stopwatch on a homemade strap on Frendship 7, so it's not as unusual as it might seem at first. Interestingly, Bulova made the mission timer on both the CM and the LM, the latter of which failed on AP11 causing Armstrong to leave his Speedmaster aboard Eagle during the EVA, making Buzz's speedmaster the 1st watch worn on the moon.
This is a giant watch. I have larger wrists and even so, it on the big side. I bought it because of the really cool story. From what I understand, Col Scott put it away in his safe after the mission and NASA kinda put a lid on him after the stamp scandal when they returned home and discouraged him from profiting from it further. Selling the watch or endorsing it would have done that.
I've owned mine a few years and it's an interesting companion to my Speedmaster Professional. I dinged the side of the crystal the first few days after I got it, but so far that's the only time. I go through phases when I don't touch it for months, then I'll put it back into rotation for a while, typically on different strap. I've worn it on a rally strap mostly (that I bought for my speedy), but now I have it on a simple OD nylon seiko two piece strap I bought on Amazon for $20, and I get lots of compliments on it so I think we have a winner.
I've often thought of selling it or gifting it since it sees only occasional wrist time, but I'm in a phase now that it wears well and I like more than I have. I think I'll keep it :)
I do wish it was smaller. And I'd like it if it came with the dial that's on the subsequent black case version, with the original font and the no date window (which I have never set, it's so small and I did not know it was there the first year or two I owned it). These are really my only complaints on what is truly a lovely and interesting piece in my small collection. It is in fact very very accurate, the pushers are smooth and the chrono is crisp in operation.
Oh! If you get it, you choose between the bracelet version or the strap version. The holes in the lugs are different or something, so the bracelet version stays on the bracelet it came on.. I did not care much for the straps that came with mine, but like the speedy they are strap monsters and you can easily put it on something else like I have done.
It was 43.5 mm not 40mm!
@@NathanChisholm041 thank you!
I really enjoyed the video. I’m a major fanboy of the Lunar Pro. Mine came with a high-polish case which I didn’t care for. I found someone to give it a satin polish which gave it a more authentic look.
I was surprised that your video didn’t mention the great engraving on the back that really ramps up the association with Apollo XV.
Also, you may not be aware that the 262khz movement was developed by Bulova for the entire space program and was used extensively in equipment requiring precision timing, including the Command modules as well as equipment on the ground. Given NASA’s use of Bulova timing devices it’s surprising that they didn’t go with Bulova watches for the astronauts, and they don’t make a bigger deal about the use of the 262 in the Space Program.
Again, great video!
I own both the Omega moon as well as this one. yes, Omega is better but not fair to compare a 5k+ watch to a $500 piece. I've had my Bulova moon since release... back when they could call it a moon watch, now "lunar pilot". anyway, great time piece. it's very well put together, surprisingly so. gorgeous design, very well executed, and ofcourse a very interesting history/story behind it. If you have interest in the moon landings, I think it's a worthy addition to anyone's collection. I have a 6.5" wrist and I think it looks fine. I have mine on a brown racing strap and it's an absolute knock out. oh and I'm still on the original battery. still going... and yes, I use the chrono function alot.
Yes, this watch is awesome. I have owned it and loved it. Unfortunately i let it go. I see they have a full blackout model now that im really tempted by. Great review and discussion as always!!😎👍👍
Really like this piece. Simple. Legible. Recently purchased one. Don't regret it because of the history (or what I'd like to term as the wris-tory) behind it. Awesome review. All the best to 'ya!!!
I own this same piece and love it. The history behind it is stunning as well. The movement is acuurate to 10 + or - per yr.
Yeah, this ones going to stick around in my collection for a long time. I can't think of any chronograph I would seriously consider replacing it with.
I recently discovered that there is another variant of this Lunar Pilot, the 96A225. It features a highly polished case and is 2mm thicker, otherwise the two are identical. The polished version has a real look of refinement, lacks the date complication and features the period correct Bulova font. I'm only mentioning this second model as I didn't even know that it is available when I ordered the 96B251, which IS a very good looking watch. However, I may have ordered this model instead, so if you like the look of a polished case, as I certainly do, it's good to know that you'd have a choice. Also, the 96A225 is listed on Amazon Prime for $83.97 less than the 96B251. It's a steal at $316.00 USD. Decisions, decisions!
This is not only the best chronograph under $500, but one of my all time favorites.
I've had a hankering for a HAQ, I've just ordered one of these. It'll be the new star of my modest little collection.
No radio reception, no Bluetooth, no GPS, _no problem_ 👍
Great review man! Love your production. Very professional. At $300 from Amazon it’s a no-brainer.
Difference between this watch and the Speedmaster: Hype and brand label. Bulova is a great watch company as it is, but Omega makes their money, like Rolex, on branding. No saphire crystal for 10 times the price, and only winding. The Bulova gives you saphire and a state of the art quartz mvmt for 1/10 the price. Easy choice.
Very nice video. I especially enjoyed your in depth look at the features ie; the complications of the 3 sub dials but also multi level characteristics of the main dial itself. I have recently purchased the 96B251 and, like you've mentioned, I don't particularly like either of the two straps which came with the watch. (Nice to have to complete the set, but not to necessarily wear.) So I will be installing the Strapcode Miltat Super Engineer II. I think the bracelet's brushed finish will compliment the case's bead blasted look. Thank you for this well produced post!
Amazingly accurate. I teamed it with a Bond Nato and it works on my smaller wrist. Nice, well produced review.
It looks so good on NATOs, I love it.
Great review and video! Definitely have to add to my “watch “ list
Wow! This video is 4 years old ! And the watch is still a best seller and worth the money.
I bought this model on its release in Australia & believe me I paid a LOT more than this current offering! Jump on board the “NASA EXPRESS”!😂 Seriously would think about buying another at this price!!! Love the rally strap by the way. And as I type I am waiting on a beautiful 2nd hand Omega Speedmaster! 😎👍🏻 Again though the Bulova is a favourite in my collection & recommend it thoroughly!!!
There's a few new models out there, including a polished version with a domed crystal instead of the protruding box cut sapphire. Gives it a little slimmer profile. Still I think this version is my favorite. Good luck with the Speedmaster, making me a little jealous over here!
Excellent, thorough, and well-produced video ... two thumbs up
Hi Dave & fellow Subs.
I literally just peeled the stickers off my Bulova Luna Pilot 2 hours ago!, so I had to rewatch this fine review!
First thoughts?
It's BIG!
I'm not really used to watches that fully encompass my wrist; I measure in at 8 1/4" and wear 38's and mostly 40mm pieces. The lug to lug distance is truly imposing, but it wears very comfortably on the leather, which is melding nicely after just a few quick hours.
I haven't tried the 'NASA' strap yet, so I have something else to look forward to!
I'm very impressed with everything from the box and general presentation to the quality of the finishing. The dial is a pure piece of artistry in design and finishing. The legibility is ridiculously good. Even the leather strap, which cops flack in many reviews, is a pleasant surprise (even though I will be swapping it out for nice slab of quality dark brown leather).
My only niggle is that my chronograph hand isn't aligned perfectly - just a touch off centre. Of course it's only noticeable when I look for it,...but none of us like that. We really don't. But I'm sure I'll get past it in a few days and in a year I'll be fond of this little imperfection!
So all in all, a big 👍🏼.
This is my 2nd chronograph with serious ties to the history of space travel.
A month or so ago I bought my 'Strela Cosmograph'.
A limited edition (of 200) re-issue (in mecha-quartz) of the watch worn by Alexi Leonov during man's 1st ever EVA /Space Walk on 18 March 1965 during the USSR's Voshtok II mission. They were made by Julian Kauffman from the Poljot24.de website under licence from Strela. That too is a fine and very affordable watch with genuine space travel pedigree and well worth checking out. He's an independent operator who has some rarely seen watches at some really affordable prices.
No : I'm not affiliated with him in any way,shape or form. I just think he's a very nice man running a small 2 man operation somewhere in Germany selling really cool and really accessible watches. If you are a fan of Dave's channel you'll probably be a fan of Julians website. 🙂
Vanguard Coffee House you can micro adjust ! No problem at All , will align prrfectly
Sotiris Vramis - I've sorta got used to it. I'm not the most OCD guy in the world and It sort of makes the piece mine.
As per, this is the most expensive quartz chronograph I own by a mile (and I own 4, 5 if you count Mecha-Quartz.) and it's the only one with the problem.
A good argument to follow an affordable watch channel right there!
And I'm guessing by micro -adjust you mean manually lining up the hand with rapid clicks of the start / stop pusher?
I just put mine on a Bond style NATO with charcoal pvd hardware and it looks so good! Fits my 8 inch wrist perfectly!
Great video and great watch. i received mine just a few days ago. Got it for under 300$ on Amazon. I keep hearing about the size issue but for me being 6`3 with large hands and wrists, its a perfect size. i immidiately swapped for the enclosed NATO strap since I could barely secure the original one in the first hole. A slightly longer strap would be appreciated! I also own a Bulova Presicionist with the curved crystal. Its an even more substantial piece but, again, fits us bigger guys quite perfect. Thanks!
I put mine on one of those elastic straps that seem to be all the rage right now. Wears incredibly comfortably and really looks good on the watch.
Great review! My favorite quartz watch , I really am tempted by the newest version with the polished case.
lou diamond phillips is doing watch reviews?!?!
Best bang for the buck of any watch I have ever owned. Including the big R , which are currently grossly overpriced.
Adding to the panache is Bulova's pioneering work in electronic watch movements going back to the early 1960s. Take that, Oysterquartz !!
Saw your review, looked it up on Amazon, saw a used model for 279 picked up immediately. Even if I don’t like it I can flip it to save my losses. Still a stunning watch and can’t wait to receive it
Buy several, flip them and save even more losses!
I think it's a great chronograph for the price ($325), I also like the Seiko SNA411 ($225) and the Casio EF-547D ($100).
But the Bulova is clearly much better than the other two. You get sapphire, blue lume, better quartz movement, more precise chronograph function, better box and accessories). The Seiko has a slide rule and a 200m water resistance, though.
Curiously each is a homage of a better known watch: Speedmaster, Navitimer and the Carrera Chrono of 2010, respectively.
@Ginsung it is.i like the looks but its too big
Love this watch, the entire product and its packaging screams luxury. The box this comes in, for its price, is wonderful.
Love this watch, just wish I had the wrists to pull off a 45mm
L W I have 7 and looks perfect, agree that on smaller may look too big
Great video and a beautiful watch! With that high frequency quartz movement, it just might be the best chronograph under $500. I might have to get one.
Thank you very much. You are the only one, who showed this watches in darkness
Lovely video. I've have three Bulova watches, and just love them... they are so underrated I feel, but that's okay, as it keeps them affordable. I do have one Percisionist chronograph, but seeing this, I really want one of there for no other reason than the history of the watch.
Hi! Nice review. Does the large 2nd hand stop after 60 minutes? If so why?
Because of your review, I bought this watch. Thank you!
I’ve never owned a quartz chrono.. Do you have to worry about battery drain with too much chrono usage?
Very well done review!
Lots of information, and detail.
She's gorgeous, man!
Just got mine with the bracelet. I love it. Big, but so am I. Just plain cool..
I had this watch .............. a fantastic watch that wears really comfortable and is incredibly accurate thanks to Bulova´s advanced quartz movement. One thing to be aware of though - If you want to be able to have the option to wear the watch on both a strap and the fantastic Bulova bracelet, you MUST buy the braclet version from start. I bought the strap version (got a great deal) planning to buy a bracelet later - however, to my dismay I found out that the holes for the springbars are placed differently on the strap version than on the bracelet version making it IMPOSSIBLE TO FIT A BRACELET ON THE STRAP VERSION afterwards !! For that reason I sold the watch again after a couple of months.
It looks good on a black Marine Nationale strap with a red center stripe, though - I have that strap from Erika´s originals and it makes the watch even more comfortable !!
I recently got my ha ds on a marine Nationale strap from LuffStraps and it's awesome on the Lunar Pilot. I think that type of strap is the perfect match for it, both for comfort and style.
Awesome watch, love the style. I'm thinking to buy one, but not sure if the stainless steel version or the two straps version. what do you recomend?
One of my grail watches at any price point. Very very cool indeed 👍Thankyou for the review
ps other cool space watches that aren't bank breakers are Gagarin's schturmanski, Vostok's (MIR space station ), Fortis (bit more pricey but still used), The Seiko "Pogue"(more expensive )...any other affordable space watch suggestions? Cheers mate keep up the good work 👍👍
Glad you enjoyed the review, and I hope you can get your hands on one someday soon!
I gave it a shot on my frail 6 1/4 inch wrist today, thinking it'll look stupid anyway...
'Lo and behold, it was quite alright! Granted it would've been better in a smaller package, but I didn't mind it that much anymore (at least for this particular watch)! Maybe it's the oval shape of my wrist? Or is it the downward sloping case? I don't really know what exactly makes wearing this watch possible, but now I'm seriously considering adding this watch to my collection!
My point is, if you see one in a mall or something, do try it on. It just might work out for you!
That's funny! Every time you say the name David Scott, you sound different as normal!!! A little editing here?
But great video , once again, as being used to whenever I watch !
Now to the watch, I used to own one, but after a couple of month decided to sell it , like most of the people here. The reason was the unusual ticking of the second hand. If it weren't for that two times a second ticking, I would have kept it definitely.
I just got this watch. It arrived about an hours ago. So many people mentioned that it was a very large watch, and that if it had been smaller it would be more popular. IDK perhaps I have been wearing a Garmin Fenix 3 since I began running Altra's in '15. It seem small compared to the Garmin. That being said I felt that it was kinda small to me. Seems like a nice watch. My watch has a leather NATO style band. I thinks I am going to get another type of band. I spent a little more by getting it from Macy's. You can find it cheaper. I still plan to get an Omega Moon Watch.
Are there any special maintenance for these high-frequency Quartz??
no
I always wanted an Omega Speedmaster, but that real-deal moonwatch was mechanical (manual) wind (I'm forgetful) and the domed Hessalite (plastic) crystal was easily scratched (and apparently subject to total failure). So I bought a metal bracelet edition of David Scott's Bulova "Lunar Pilot" Moon Watch which came in handy for him when the crystal popped right off his "Speedy" on Apollo 15. After all, the Bulova replica had the latest 262 mhz crystal freq counter, so it just had to be more accurate. I've even got an old vintage tuning-fork Spaceview Bulova, so I am all about accuracy.
This was to be a watch I would use regularly, especially when my Apple watch is on the charger, which is most every night. (Who else, besides Apple, makes a gizmo that has to be charged at least 3 time a week, but can't be used while it's being charged?) But then I digress.
This was a big deal to me. I got the version with the metal bracelet and with the big velcro space-suit band, and the little took-kit for changing them out. It looked like a real
The big disappointment was: the Bulova's luminosity in the hands and dial is virtually non-existent. So much for a night-watch. I've heard others complain of this. I should have done more research. I want to know what time it is when it's dark too. Is that asking too much? When it comes to watches, I follow Gene Krantz's NASA mission control rule # 1: failure is not an option. So I'm back to using a. 29-year old TAG/Heuer SEL that does much better, not only with hand/dial luminosity (which I tested), but also in several other ways:
1) The Heuer allows me to change time zones forward or backward without freezing the seconds and thus losing precise time sync ala the Bulova. What's the point of 262 mhz?
2) The Heuer has an hour hand that's shaped different than the minute hand, whereas the Bulova has identical width hands and an hour hand that virtually touches dial (too long) dial markers at 1,2,4,5,7,8,10 & 1, making it look like a minute hand.
3) The Heuer has a bigger date window, not set at a 45 degree angle, and not recessed so that it's often obscured by the shadow of the dial, ala the Bulova.
4) The Heuer has a bracelet that not only lets you change the number of links, but also lets you fine tune the overall length in less than full-link increments.
5) The Heuer is not a mish/mash of satin vs. brushed vs polished stainless steel. It's a forward looking design with it's own distinguishable bracelet - quite well integrated.
6) The Heuer's crystal is slightly recessed, and thus the edges are not exposed to being chipped, as apposed to the ugly and protruding sandblasted edge of the Bulova's crystal.
7) The Heuer is certified to 200 maters, not just 50 meters like the Bulova, which basically disqualifies the Bulova as a dive watch.
8) The Heuer starts skipping second hand movement to show battery exhaustion. The more seconds skipped, the weaker the battery. The Bulova (per the manual) just stops with no warning. Period. Like a car that just runs out of gas, with no warning indication.
9) The Heuer is apparently better sealed, whereas the Bulova hss 4 tiny slotted/bevel-head screws on the back, near the stem and the stopwatch pushbuttons. This is certainly four cases of opportunity for failure from a case integrity point of view, and possibly explains the 50 meter rating.
10) The Heuer lets me re-sync the watch to the time signal, because I can use the stopwatch as a reference to the time signal, and the stopwatch function is not killed on the 2nd stem stop, which is necessary on most watches for everything except a date advance.
11) The Heuer has the adjustable outer bezel event timer with ratchet mechanism. I realize that this is a key dive watch function, and the Bulova is clearly not a dive watch, but the functionality does come in handy as an easy-to-interpret event timer.
As far as the accuracy - I literally can't tell the difference after 3 months. Both were set to the WWV radio signal, and are still less than a fraction of a second different.
Other than that, I like the Bulova as a addition to my collection of space stuff and watches, but not enough to wear it every day, So 'll go with my 1990 vintage "Aryton Senna" watch (which still works like a champ 3 decades on) instead of a 2019 replica of David Scott's back-up watch from 58 years ago.
Just got one two days ago. Love it! Nice vid. Thanks!
I have a Bulova Sea King which I absolutely love, and I was thinking of saving up for the lunar Pilot, but I notice it seems to have the same movement as the Sea King(except for a date window), For some reason that is making me hesitate. I don't know why because some expensive watches use a common movement, but being familiar with the movement makes it almost not a new(to me) watch.
The crystal is a little over sized..... but not necessarily a deal breaker! Great intuitive video on a great piece of space travel!
Great review! I got the black versión of Bulova moon watch, and I love it. One of the best looking watches... Accurate, with heritage, beautiful... What else can you ask for?
Hi, what about that raised crystal? I wanna buy it but very scared not to drop it, if i chip it i am done! What do you think. Thanks
Love the sweep but a pity I hv small wrists.
When the options for big girth came up.
I ticked something else instead of wrists.
I have baobab ankles.
Do you recall whether this watch measures split time? Is the bottom pusher always a reset pusher whether the tachymeter is ticking or is stopped? Im worried my chronograph is missing a split time function (fake?). Much appreciated
I have the black edition and it's a great watch. First point...IT IS NOT TOO BIG! Okay I have a 6.5" wrist (just) and its fine. The black finish is amazing and it feels such a solid watch, no need to worry about this one. The timing accuracy is amazing. Makes any automatic or manual feel like a antique toy in terms of "accurate timepiece". It's funny after wearing automatics, having a watch that keep spot on time is a real thrill. The only three things I would change is improve the lume, it's a bit pathetic, yes it lasts a while but you really have to 'charge it up'. Give all models the plain Bulova logo and make it 22mm for the strap.
Lume? Nobody ever wore a watch on the surface of the Moon in the dark.
@@larrysmith6797 What's that got to do with the price of fish?
I actually like this watch more than the Speedmaster. The precisionist movement gives it something special while the Speedmaster must be hand-wound because it's not even an automatic winder.
Because NASA specified hand wound, genius.
Such an underrated watch !
Definitely deserves to be a tip top contender for say a top 10 watches you can own for under 500$
I added a Beads of Rice bracelet that REALLY makes this watch pop! I found the Omega to be a little harder to read than this Bulova. And to be honest, the 262 kHz movement is pretty amazing.
Got the anniversary set at AAFES at Andrew's AFB. For 400.. I love this thing. I just need a new strap...but can't find one I want the same with the crystal uhf freq on the band
I’m torn between this and the seiko srpa21. Yes, they’re totally different watches but they fit my current modest budget. I’m starting to lean towards the bulova tough. Good vid
Oh tough choice, and yeah those are two totally different watches! Either would be a good choice.
I have this watch with a stainless band, it pops. People today doubt that we even got to the moon. My watch has the dates of the landing and eva for the Apollo 15.
I love this watch except for the size. I wish Bulova would make at least a 42 mm version for us normal-sized wrist people. I'm a big fan of the Ultra High-Frequency movements. I typically don't like quartz watches but the UHF is very cool. I also like its history. Thanks for doing this review.
It's actually a 1/20th of a second (0.05s) subdial at 3'o clock.
Nice Piece Love Bulova!
This and the Tissot Seastar are my 2 fav Quartz Chronos.Tissot is a few buck more but wears better IMO.
I thought the Bulova Accutron astronaut was used in space?
Great review, very cool piece!
Some other option and very affordable would be the Sea Gull 1963
and the Baltic microbrand
( Baltic offers different vintage look Chrono dials )
The Seagull 1963 was the other Chronograph I seriously considered. But I just really liked the history and style of the Bulova better, and I thought the uhf quartz movement would be more reliable. But if I were going to get a second chronograph in this price range, that Sea Gull would probably be at the top of my list. I love th Baltic too, but it's pushing a little higher than I'm willing to pay. Their Aquascaphe on the other hand... that's sort of tempting.
@@JusttheWatch indeed.. the Bulova is great, and atleast is has some lumination, the Sea Gull is less practical at low light conditions and the 1963 history is actually made up.. since it doesn't really resemble the original Chinese pilot watch.
How are you getting the large second hand to move without the chronograph going?
great review and one of your coolest videos :)
I'm so intrigued by that high frequency quartz movement. I generally stay away from quartz watches unless there's something special about them (i.e. the legacy of Timex, solar quartz watches, or Bulova's high frequency quartz with hand sweep). Unfortunately, I have tiny wrists, at just about 6.75 inches. The Lunar Pilot is beautiful, I love the hand sweep, etc., but it's just too big. I have an Invicta Pro Diver on my wrist right now, and it's 48mm lug-to-lug, and it's just a hair below too big. I know the Precisionist is cheaper, smaller, and has the same movement, which is what I'm most intrigued by.
There is at least a third watch on the moon, a Seiko. Cool video, good job!
You are talking about the Seiko 6139 Pogue ? As far as i know that watch never went to the moon, just in space.
@@Mondi1911 Yes, you are right, I got it wrong.
its a big watch. but i still wear my tissot prs516 with similar size once in a while. i wear it coz it pleases me. id buy this watch if one gets around.
Went back and watch this I’m now buying the smaller version(finally!). I owned this watch for a short period of time and I really wanted it to fit… I had a larger than average wrist and it just simply was too large. It sits flat on the wrist and has an extremely long lug to lug. It was simply unwearable an overhang on both sides of the wrist. It’s obvious that they finally listened and have now made a more wearable model!
You had a larger wrist...and now you don't?
I have this watch. I like it, but I wish the Chrono was 30 min instead of 60, that is, so the markings could have been further spaced out (pun not intended) to provide better legibility. I find it difficult to see which exact minute I’m counting. The minute sub dial also sweeps, and I think a ticking minute counter would have provided better accuracy as well. But overall I love the piece. Good review!
Yeah I have to squint to see the minutes too. But I use it to time sermons which usually last longer than 30 minutes so I'm glad to have the 60 minute timer.
Yeah, those trade offs (30 vs 60) are the nuances that make collecting so fun. Finding that perfect watch. And loving the imperfect ones for trying. Cheers!
The version without date is a bit nicer and more balanced. And more true to the original. But i love all of them 😁
Awesome review man!
Thanks for the video, I might have to get the black pvd version....oh yes just because of all the arrogant Omega owners that think they have the only watch in the world you bet I would by this instead.. Plus I can't really afford the other one. 😂
Just ordered it .
It's on special price 279 US dollars on jomoshop
That's a great deal!
Might i suggest the Tissot v8 automatic chronograph from Jama for $329.
The Seiko Flightmaster is under $200, is a chronograph and also features a circular slide rule that does math, conversions, a host of things plus it is an accurate quartz watch. Its dial is very busy but functional.
people who buy this this wants a piece of history.different mindset.if its practicallity i would go with flightmaster or nighthawk
Love the watch. The only thing I don't like is the 60 minute dial is not very legible. The 60 minute hand for the minute subdial movement doesn't step from minute to minute. On a speedy, the minute subdial is only 30 minutes which makes reading minutes easier. In this watch they ditched the "hours" subdial for a 1/20th second subdial and squeezed an additional 30 minutes into the minute subdial. This makes it hard to read. Especially when the minute hand is right around 2 to 3 minutes past the last 5 minute subdivision. Is this 7 or 8 minutes..... Is this 22 or 23 minutes......hmmm.
I’ve met Buzz Aldrin I should have asked him his thoughts on this watch ! Great review stunning review & such historic lhjstory greatvtknseevghe hjgh quality build & size on the wrist looks great on hhe cloth strap refreshing compared to bracelets that I hate, I f I buy a ticket from Elon to go to Mars I will take it with me 😁🙏, great review defjnately going to put it to my collection shame it’s not an automatic, it’s pricy too but you get a thousand plus watch for under 500£ thank you for a good Detailed review I feel I know jtvbetter now thank you
Sadly I can’t afford the Omega Speed master professional moon watch 😥😱more please.
Nice video as always this watch will definitely go on my wish list.after paying all the Bill's and kids clubs fees and mortgage payments. But I do like both original straps so that's a bonus. Thanks for the video.carl from UK.
Thabks Carl! Glad to hear you got your priorities straight, hope you can get around to picking this guy up!
@@JusttheWatch hi changed my mind I'm going for the seiko save the ocean turtle,blue dial automatic. Rubber strap.great looking watch.would like to see you review this piece. Regards Carl.
Nice video. How long does its battery last?
Not sure. I've had mine for a little less than a year, so far its still going strong.
Great Review
Ya it definitely fits your wrist nicely. To big for me but it's cool watch ⌚😎
Will this watch be suitable for a 7 inch wrist? I’m concerned about the size but i really want the watch :(
I think you can get away with it. I have a 7.5 inch and I think it wears great.
I like it. Nice job.
How long willl last battery in constant chromograf mode
As i can't afford the Omega speedmaster, i start to look at this one, but never make the step. I bought an Alpha Chronograph to make me wait and think, but now i'm lost. I have to try it to see if the size fit on my wrist.
Yeah I think size is the only real concern with this one. If it fits your wrist, and it's something you're interested in, there's not really any downside.
It would be great if it had a 12-hour chronograph like the original..
Totally agree. I have the Speedmaster Professional as well as the Bulova Lunar Pilot. The build quality on the Bulova is equal to the Omega.
I agree with you about a 12 hours counter. Really needed. I have the bracelet model, which I love. The bracelet is premium-quality.
Ughhhh i want this watch bad. But with a 6.75” wrist its too big sadly...this would be perfect too as im a college student and definitely can’t afford an Omega Speedmaster