Do you still manually harden your own Firefox? Do you use a more automated method like Arkenfox? Or do you just use a browser that doesn't require it? Let me know down below! *👋pst. Check out the Techlore Patreon too if you like this content:* patreon.com/techlore
I stuck with FF for a long time because I don’t want a browser monoculture. But, Mozilla is abusive to their customer base and I am just tired of trying to defend them. I just go with Brave or Mullvad browser.
I do, though it mainly to give Firefox more of a facelift in terms of speed, privacy enhancements, and overall browser experience. It’s all done through Betterfox, a GH project that accomplishes the above through a user.js file in a minimalistic manner.
I actually use betterfox as it usually removes most of the annoying UI elements of firefox and it just works Arkenfox is actually too much dor for me 😅
I wish the same but can't get behind the awful Mozilla foundation. I have a crazy theory that the Mozilla and Google have agreed on a deal : google with pay them 400m USD and Mozilla will keep making firefox shittier
@@theworldoffun8997 how is Librewolf and mullvad based on the same tech as Chrome? Chrome uses the Chromium engine, while Firefox based browsers uses the Gecko one(iirc). Mullvad, Tor browser and Librewolf are all based on Firefox. Correct me if I'm wrong though.
Firefox is still great to support a browser with some real privacy potential while still having customizability and some conveniences like extensions Of course competition as well, makes everyone better
@@cringesh1t427 yo bro! I just check in once in a while. But the only thing you'll have to do is just run the libre wolf setup, the same way you download libre wolf itself. Otherwise i havent had any luck with their "auto-update" that comes with the program itself.
I couldn’t get temporary containers to work in the Mullvad Browser. The security levels and NoScript stuff make it weird to work with. Also, they missed ECH and a handful of other things. That said, LibreWolf, which is what I just switched to from manually hardened Firefox, is no angel either. Temporary Containers works, but they missed things in the about config too. This means combing through the options of interest and determining which ones would be visible to websites. Those options that websites can detect should be left alone to mitigate fingerprinting, while other options can be toggled for privacy/security/preference.
@@MrDowntemp0 Funny you mention that. I'm in the process of creating an issue on LibreWolf's Codeberg regarding some focus flickering for controls on the edge of the window.
The only thing I like about using a hardened Firefox with stuff like Arkenfox is I don’t have to think about updates, I don’t have to wait for that extra step of the fork updating with the latest Firefox update. I just wish there was a hardening option like Arkenfox for Chrome or even base Chromium
Apparently, the Mullvad browser is offered only as a tar and not in any repo, (official) flatpak or snap. This is a big issue for me as it will not update automatically via the normal means and not integrate with the system properly. Frankly, I was surprised by this.
Firefox with Strict and custom settings, Ublock Origin, and NoScript is my way to go Deletes cookies on exit except for websites I choose to stay logged in (understanding this heightens the chance of login session stealing) I want a browser on both Windows/Linux AND Android that syncs my bookmarks as a convenience and anti-phishing measure and Firefox has been great for that Librewolf not having auto-update and not officially on Android? Mullvad messing with window size? (i don't need *that* level of fingerprint resistance) Firefox is still damn fast on UA-cam for me and my websites don't break at all (other than VPN, Ublock, NoScript shenanigans) still have Mullvad and Tor in the small chances I'd want that bit more anonymity in ephemeral searches
i love how the same guy who moved to official roms for faster security patches or whatever but uses browsers that are literally just firefox with sensible defaults. by using a fork of firefox you're getting patches at least somewhat later than if you were just using a build of firefox. you could just transfer your profile across all your computers to avoid configuration while keeping literally all of your data
You can do whatever you want or need. If brave or other browsers are fine for you then go for it. If you want to use firefox and harden it a bit more or a lot more then go for it. Don't blindly follow whatever any youtuber tell you to do just because he thinks so.
0:01 my bet, the existence of Mullvad Browser and other alternative "pre-hardened" Firefox forks that lowers the barrier of entry for most people who care about their privacy and also for people who are fatigued with constantly having to harden Firefox manually 😅 (such as myself).
Unless we put sufficient work into solving the root issues, it's just gonna be an endless arms race. I burned out from caring early-on when so many didn't.
It's still good to understand the settings. This blind trust that "the browser takes care of it" is what let to the whole loss of privacy in the first place.
Hardening is one issue -- limiting supercookies is another --- which I have not seen you address. My Q is, if in your opinion, using agenda-based separate profiles (home//work for instance) may help in doing so, also if you know if there is a difference in "degrees of separation between Brave profiles vs. Firefox manager?
I will continue to use hardened Firefox Nightly for as long as my data is intact because I already did it and don't need to do it again, whenever I switch to a brand new system or set up someone else's I will install Mercury
Is there a real difference between mullvad and librewolf? I would love to see a video about that because in the current state those looks like 2 drops of water.
Librewolf from what I understand, is just regular Firefox for daily browsing, but with a bunch of privacy settings enabled by default. The mullvad browser seems to be a more Tor like browser, and is probably designed to browse the deepweb
the sad part is that the js files take time to update to newest Firefox releases, which means (unless they are a one-time install thing?) compromising security and staying a while without security updates. I just checked - both betterfox and arkenfox were updated a month ago, around 3 weeks after latest Firefox release (130). Arkenfox is still on 128, betterfox is on 129. Also, if this is recommended as an easy drag-and-drop way for regular people that are very new to privacy, I doubt that a lot of them would know that they need to check their browser release and the file's release. Which could mean browser breakage.
Where'd your "why i almost exclusively use brave" video go? Also, what would happen if you used ArkenFox on Brave or Mullvad? Would it harden them even better?
hi, a newbie question please -- as i am still learning security and privacy methodologies .. do i still need to use ublock origin when using TOR browser?
There are no "many great browser options". There are basiically two full-featurred browsers for Win/Lin/BSD - Chromium and Firefox, and all the rest are just derivatives unable to exist on their own. This is a ttragedy. Once Google pushes manifest v.3 down the throats of the "open and free" Chromium derivatives'' users, there will be a loud moan.
Not formally but yes definitely an interesting discussion! Brave's own documentation very clearly communicates it is not designed to offer the same level of anonymity as the official Tor Browser, just FYI.
The big minus for Librewolf is that it never opens maximized - I can't see any point for that. So if I use Librewolf I have no other choice like disable "strict privacy setting.
My setup so far: Brave for high privacy (decided to keep resist fingerprinting off so I can still use dark mode) Mullvad for extreme privacy (comes with RFP and letterboxing on by default and some other tweaks brave doesnt, basically just install and use) Tor for tinfoil hat privacy (everything above and more + routing through the onion network)
My biggest problem has been thinking of a way to abandon the Apple/MacOS password manager and use KeepassXC, in a way that I can keep the database synchronized on my computer and my phone (without having to upload it to Dropbox or Google drive, through local network maybe?)
You could use something like Strongbox w/ iCloud to sync between iOS/MacOS (very clean config and only the encrypted vault is stored in iCloud) or you could use Syncthing to do something a bit more DIY. Just some things to try!
Honestly I've never understood people who make hardening Firefox to be this deep integrated thing. At least in my opinion, if someone did one pass throught the Privacy and Security settings tab to set Tracking Protection to strict, untick the data collection stuff, ext, and installed Ublock, then that's pretty much 90% of what needs to be done taken care of. While I have no problem with something like Mullvad, what am I really getting privacy wise that I'm not already getting now (beyond some indirect fingerprinting protection)? Plus reading through some of the comments on this video, it seems like Arkenfox and Mullvad don't have auto updates (correct me if I'm wrong here) but if so then that seems like a pretty big security concern and a massive inconvinience to have to manually update.
I feel the same way. This whole concept of hardening really just sounds like overprotection at its finest. I value every critical detail about how, why, and if my browsers benefit my technological and privacy-focused needs, but not to the point that I'm going to put forth unnecessary effort to achieve that goal. Some things don't have to be rocket science.
I am ticked off at Brave for 2 reasons! One is after 2-3 weeks it slowed down so much that it's speed was like that of any browser out there. Two is the shield would make me aware that i had BAT to collect, so i collected it, but it was NOT put inside my Brave wallet.
@@rediffusion7996 Right now i am checking out Ulaa Browser, slimjet, and vivaldi. I am primarily looking for speed, and a browser that works flawlessly on the sites i go to daily and weekly.
@tristen_grant I just didn't get the point of auto-deleting your history after every session. Surely it doesn't protect you from google in any way. and my computer has a lock screen? I have, in the last 3 months, been taught. Always good to learn something new.
The biggest plus here is Firefox upping the privacy game a little for normies. Fair ways to go, but I'm not going to get my fiancée's parents to use Tor or Mullvad browsers, but i probably can talk them into firefox. The killer app features for me are MAC and temporary containers, along with full fat uBO, and all of thst works without a specially hardenes browser! Combine with the growth of things like Librewolf and Mullvad … there are soke pretty solid privscy options out there now.
sure they aren't like a lot of nice things and that's a bummer. But many of those software are available through Flathub or private repositories to allow easy update.
Using 'cover your tracks' I tested both mullvad and librewolf, and found them to be basically the same. (1) Is there any reason to prefer one over the other, (2) there is a multitude of dedicated containers addons (there is one which was promising, but not maintained - that promises temporary containers, which I guess all are, and also deletion of any and all data when tab is closed - any help in reducing the number of addons used to enforce containers, basically for any opened tab, will be appreciated.
@@tacticalcenter8658 D2D use-case, and clearweb, not so much, at least as far as I can see. You also missed the secondary info request completely. So on both, PLS try and elaborate.
The thing is that forks are not as good as the main product. Same with Linux distros. With the browsers the big projects are chrome / chromium and firefox. And with firefox forks I think is mostly some config files and extensions added. If you import your config files you have your Firefox condigured.
I have used many browsers over many years, been around before the internet. But i still prefer the looks of chromium, not chrome over firefox ui. I do use ungoogled chromium, are there better options for chromium fans? Also by having so many more options, since companies like Google are trying to find ways to get us to see even more ads, and get more data from us, what if in the future after years of getting used to not tweaking anything, they make it less and less private, because that's where the money is, and we've lost all ability to tweak our browsers for privacy? Think about that.
Although Firefox is still my primary browser [for the time being...], Brave is my secondary browser simple because some websites, especially online applications, are "Google Chrome friendly" and does not work well with Firefox. Chromium-based browsers are necessary in these cases.
floorp is better than all other alternatives such as librewolf etc but its quite unstable the ram consumption if ur a firefox liker get it,for chromium thorium is the best
But it doesn't have extensions on mobile. The built in adblocker still let's some ads in on some adult sites. No ads when using ff and ublock on mobile n pc.
u stated its silly 2 do it manually....and im never interested in what the "majority"....says or thinks or does.. but hey...nevermind , goodluck with ur channel c ya@@techlore
Let me guess, you don't see yourself as a target anymore and the risk is less so hardening isn't needed? Dude you could instead say hardening hampers usage. I'm sorry this sounds like your take of not recommending ROMs when you stopped using ROMs. Your choice of browser matters and right now the WebKit monopoly will end in Europe.
I'm scared of using TOR, not kidding. Like what of my ISP sees im connected to a TOR networks and sends feds to bust down my door and arrests me, whiling scanning through my entire shit, breaching my privacy before finding nothing illegal and lets me go. Still damages kinda done
Do you still manually harden your own Firefox? Do you use a more automated method like Arkenfox? Or do you just use a browser that doesn't require it? Let me know down below!
*👋pst. Check out the Techlore Patreon too if you like this content:* patreon.com/techlore
I stuck with FF for a long time because I don’t want a browser monoculture. But, Mozilla is abusive to their customer base and I am just tired of trying to defend them. I just go with Brave or Mullvad browser.
I do, though it mainly to give Firefox more of a facelift in terms of speed, privacy enhancements, and overall browser experience. It’s all done through Betterfox, a GH project that accomplishes the above through a user.js file in a minimalistic manner.
What are your thoughts about the browser Floorp or is this the first time hearing it?
I actually use betterfox as it usually removes most of the annoying UI elements of firefox and it just works
Arkenfox is actually too much dor for me 😅
I use librewolf nowadays,
I'll continue to use FX. I want to support the project so that Chrome doesn't have 100% market share.
I'm more concerned about the State and government than Google, but since Google works with them, so I should avoid it too.
I wish the same but can't get behind the awful Mozilla foundation. I have a crazy theory that the Mozilla and Google have agreed on a deal : google with pay them 400m USD and Mozilla will keep making firefox shittier
but you still does it bu using librewold, mullwad etc since they are based on the same tech
@@theworldoffun8997 how is Librewolf and mullvad based on the same tech as Chrome? Chrome uses the Chromium engine, while Firefox based browsers uses the Gecko one(iirc). Mullvad, Tor browser and Librewolf are all based on Firefox. Correct me if I'm wrong though.
Why not another gecko fork like Librewolf, Midori, Floorp, etc...
Firefox is still great to support a browser with some real privacy potential while still having customizability and some conveniences like extensions
Of course competition as well, makes everyone better
Totally agree. I stopped using arkenfox and moved to LibreWolf. So nice to have most of the work done for me and my low threat model.
Does the auto librewolf updater work for you? Can't make it to work so i always have to manually install it
@@shqiptar03how do you manually update or know when to manually
Update libre wolf? Want to download it but can’t seem to find a video on it
@@cringesh1t427 yo bro! I just check in once in a while. But the only thing you'll have to do is just run the libre wolf setup, the same way you download libre wolf itself. Otherwise i havent had any luck with their "auto-update" that comes with the program itself.
I couldn’t get temporary containers to work in the Mullvad Browser. The security levels and NoScript stuff make it weird to work with. Also, they missed ECH and a handful of other things.
That said, LibreWolf, which is what I just switched to from manually hardened Firefox, is no angel either. Temporary Containers works, but they missed things in the about config too. This means combing through the options of interest and determining which ones would be visible to websites. Those options that websites can detect should be left alone to mitigate fingerprinting, while other options can be toggled for privacy/security/preference.
Have you raised these issues on their github? They might be able to make improvements.
@@MrDowntemp0 Funny you mention that. I'm in the process of creating an issue on LibreWolf's Codeberg regarding some focus flickering for controls on the edge of the window.
@OcteractSG write an issue about it they'll fix it.
what they miss? and please make a video about it
The only thing I like about using a hardened Firefox with stuff like Arkenfox is I don’t have to think about updates, I don’t have to wait for that extra step of the fork updating with the latest Firefox update.
I just wish there was a hardening option like Arkenfox for Chrome or even base Chromium
what is the link to arkenfox? and how do i use it?
Ungoogled Chromium
@@ccosmic7979 what? Is that something I need to search for?
@@ccosmic7979 Brave better
Apparently, the Mullvad browser is offered only as a tar and not in any repo, (official) flatpak or snap. This is a big issue for me as it will not update automatically via the normal means and not integrate with the system properly. Frankly, I was surprised by this.
If you use Arch with the AUR you can auto update using yay -Syu. Tar is the default package of arch and then the PKGBuild
Mint updates mullvad through its updater along with all flatpks. But I would avoid all $ystemd distros.
I recommend you check again. Both Librewolf and Mullvad are in the flathub.
@@tacticalcenter8658 What's the problem with systemd distros?
Firefox with Strict and custom settings, Ublock Origin, and NoScript is my way to go
Deletes cookies on exit except for websites I choose to stay logged in (understanding this heightens the chance of login session stealing)
I want a browser on both Windows/Linux AND Android that syncs my bookmarks as a convenience and anti-phishing measure and Firefox has been great for that
Librewolf not having auto-update and not officially on Android?
Mullvad messing with window size? (i don't need *that* level of fingerprint resistance)
Firefox is still damn fast on UA-cam for me and my websites don't break at all (other than VPN, Ublock, NoScript shenanigans)
still have Mullvad and Tor in the small chances I'd want that bit more anonymity in ephemeral searches
We need more clear comments like this, a gold find for beginners.
together with arkenfox settings ?
I think the hardening also includes disabling telemetry from Mozilla. You can check that out.
cool comment
i love how the same guy who moved to official roms for faster security patches or whatever but uses browsers that are literally just firefox with sensible defaults. by using a fork of firefox you're getting patches at least somewhat later than if you were just using a build of firefox. you could just transfer your profile across all your computers to avoid configuration while keeping literally all of your data
I don't think it's the case for Mullvad as it is backed up by the people at Tor, and that's the difference between Mullvad and other forks
Forks of any software usually has delays (of some days ) for security updates. Same applies for Firefox forks
You can do whatever you want or need. If brave or other browsers are fine for you then go for it. If you want to use firefox and harden it a bit more or a lot more then go for it. Don't blindly follow whatever any youtuber tell you to do just because he thinks so.
0:01 my bet, the existence of Mullvad Browser and other alternative "pre-hardened" Firefox forks that lowers the barrier of entry for most people who care about their privacy and also for people who are fatigued with constantly having to harden Firefox manually 😅 (such as myself).
Unless we put sufficient work into solving the root issues, it's just gonna be an endless arms race.
I burned out from caring early-on when so many didn't.
People did the hardening tweaks without any idea what they're doing or if it's really needed and then they asked why this broke why that broke lol
when i first used it, i thought it was a "just works" typa deal. later, i found out that you had to configure it to your liking
The user.js does not work on 133.0 i got to do it manually.
It's still good to understand the settings. This blind trust that "the browser takes care of it" is what let to the whole loss of privacy in the first place.
Hardening is one issue -- limiting supercookies is another --- which I have not seen you address. My Q is, if in your opinion, using agenda-based separate profiles (home//work for instance) may help in doing so, also if you know if there is a difference in "degrees of separation between Brave profiles vs. Firefox manager?
I will continue to use hardened Firefox Nightly for as long as my data is intact because I already did it and don't need to do it again, whenever I switch to a brand new system or set up someone else's I will install Mercury
Is there a real difference between mullvad and librewolf? I would love to see a video about that because in the current state those looks like 2 drops of water.
mullvad has some weird, annoying resized window size
Both are very different
Mullvad has more fingerprinting resistance (I assume) since it is a collaboration with the Tor project
Librewolf from what I understand, is just regular Firefox for daily browsing, but with a bunch of privacy settings enabled by default. The mullvad browser seems to be a more Tor like browser, and is probably designed to browse the deepweb
the sad part is that the js files take time to update to newest Firefox releases, which means (unless they are a one-time install thing?) compromising security and staying a while without security updates. I just checked - both betterfox and arkenfox were updated a month ago, around 3 weeks after latest Firefox release (130). Arkenfox is still on 128, betterfox is on 129. Also, if this is recommended as an easy drag-and-drop way for regular people that are very new to privacy, I doubt that a lot of them would know that they need to check their browser release and the file's release. Which could mean browser breakage.
Where'd your "why i almost exclusively use brave" video go?
Also, what would happen if you used ArkenFox on Brave or Mullvad? Would it harden them even better?
have you tried floorp?
hi, a newbie question please -- as i am still learning security and privacy methodologies .. do i still need to use ublock origin when using TOR browser?
No, as having additional addon will change your fingerprint
There are no "many great browser options". There are basiically two full-featurred browsers for Win/Lin/BSD - Chromium and Firefox, and all the rest are just derivatives unable to exist on their own. This is a ttragedy. Once Google pushes manifest v.3 down the throats of the "open and free" Chromium derivatives'' users, there will be a loud moan.
If only DNS-level blocking was as popular as traditional ad blocking
@@visthjwhy?
What is the difference between librewolf and waterfox?
Water supports the Chrome Store addons
I'd like to see a review of Brave's Tor implementation compared to the official Tor Browser. Do you know of anyone that has done that?
Not formally but yes definitely an interesting discussion! Brave's own documentation very clearly communicates it is not designed to offer the same level of anonymity as the official Tor Browser, just FYI.
The big minus for Librewolf is that it never opens maximized - I can't see any point for that. So if I use Librewolf I have no other choice like disable "strict privacy setting.
these videos harden me 🌚
😂😂😂
💀
I can't ditch firefox bcz firefox logo harden me.
edging rn
@@iamakash_furry detected
My setup so far:
Brave for high privacy (decided to keep resist fingerprinting off so I can still use dark mode)
Mullvad for extreme privacy (comes with RFP and letterboxing on by default and some other tweaks brave doesnt, basically just install and use)
Tor for tinfoil hat privacy (everything above and more + routing through the onion network)
My biggest problem has been thinking of a way to abandon the Apple/MacOS password manager and use KeepassXC, in a way that I can keep the database synchronized on my computer and my phone (without having to upload it to Dropbox or Google drive, through local network maybe?)
You could use something like Strongbox w/ iCloud to sync between iOS/MacOS (very clean config and only the encrypted vault is stored in iCloud) or you could use Syncthing to do something a bit more DIY. Just some things to try!
@@techlore Interesting! I'll take a look, thanks :D
Brave's anti-fingerprinting is BS anyway, so don't worry.
Watching from Mullvad even though when I log in, Google tries to tell me my browser is insecure. 🤣
Honestly I've never understood people who make hardening Firefox to be this deep integrated thing. At least in my opinion, if someone did one pass throught the Privacy and Security settings tab to set Tracking Protection to strict, untick the data collection stuff, ext, and installed Ublock, then that's pretty much 90% of what needs to be done taken care of. While I have no problem with something like Mullvad, what am I really getting privacy wise that I'm not already getting now (beyond some indirect fingerprinting protection)? Plus reading through some of the comments on this video, it seems like Arkenfox and Mullvad don't have auto updates (correct me if I'm wrong here) but if so then that seems like a pretty big security concern and a massive inconvinience to have to manually update.
I feel the same way. This whole concept of hardening really just sounds like overprotection at its finest. I value every critical detail about how, why, and if my browsers benefit my technological and privacy-focused needs, but not to the point that I'm going to put forth unnecessary effort to achieve that goal. Some things don't have to be rocket science.
I am ticked off at Brave for 2 reasons! One is after 2-3 weeks it slowed down so much that it's speed was like that of any browser out there. Two is the shield would make me aware that i had BAT to collect, so i collected it, but it was NOT put inside my Brave wallet.
What are you using these days, my brother?
@@rediffusion7996 Right now i am checking out Ulaa Browser, slimjet, and vivaldi. I am primarily looking for speed, and a browser that works flawlessly on the sites i go to daily and weekly.
Why do you have 3 browsers? Tor for tor stuff, and non-tor for daily use makes sense to me, but what's the third one for?
Brave for sites you want to save data with, and mullvad for general browsing and clearing at the end of the session
@@aguyonyoutube1131 TIL you can setup a browser to auto-delete any and all history once you close it. the more you know!
@tristen_grant I just didn't get the point of auto-deleting your history after every session. Surely it doesn't protect you from google in any way. and my computer has a lock screen?
I have, in the last 3 months, been taught. Always good to learn something new.
The biggest plus here is Firefox upping the privacy game a little for normies. Fair ways to go, but I'm not going to get my fiancée's parents to use Tor or Mullvad browsers, but i probably can talk them into firefox. The killer app features for me are MAC and temporary containers, along with full fat uBO, and all of thst works without a specially hardenes browser! Combine with the growth of things like Librewolf and Mullvad … there are soke pretty solid privscy options out there now.
What is hardening?
It means changing configuration options to increase privacy and security
What do you say to the people that say Tor is a Honeypot?
ua-cam.com/video/15Zks95SZ3s/v-deo.html
native tab grouping (panorama) and webGL/webGPU performance are still missing for me on firefox :(
If you're on an Intel GPU, you probably want to switch to Fedora as they compiled Firefox with the webGL flag removed.
firefox has fingerprint that is hard to randomize
did firefox file for bankrupcy? i love this browser and afraid its going away
Firefox are activelly supported by linux distros, FX forks are not
sure they aren't like a lot of nice things and that's a bummer. But many of those software are available through Flathub or private repositories to allow easy update.
Great video!
Floorp is also good , u can use it as well
WaterFox any good?
Controversial!! but not terrible
Why is the fox on fire anyway?
I use FX on my home computers, chromium based on my work computers.
Floorp needs to get tested
Why not Waterfox?
For now I have nothing to complain about Firefox with Arkenfox
Mullvad Browser doesn't work in restricted areas without VPN.
Probably because of the DoH or something like that, but i'm not sure.
ill never leave FF.....using it since 1997
Brave is sketchy as f, has been from the start. I wouldn't touch it.
Meh, firefox still has the best extension support
I love LibreWolf
Can't you create an account in the browser mulvad and liberwolf to save bookmarks and ... ? Or I can't find it ?
i think there are/were trust reasons for it
I want to do the opposite, I want to unharden chrome, I want to be tracked more.
🙂
Mozilla is an embarrassment of a company.
My Firefox is so hard right now
floorp is great, and you can spoof different devices/operating systems. based on FF
Using 'cover your tracks' I tested both mullvad and librewolf, and found them to be basically the same. (1) Is there any reason to prefer one over the other, (2) there is a multitude of dedicated containers addons (there is one which was promising, but not maintained - that promises temporary containers, which I guess all are, and also deletion of any and all data when tab is closed - any help in reducing the number of addons used to enforce containers, basically for any opened tab, will be appreciated.
They are very different.
@@tacticalcenter8658 D2D use-case, and clearweb, not so much, at least as far as I can see. You also missed the secondary info request completely. So on both, PLS try and elaborate.
@@tacticalcenter8658 could you please explain why?
@@geikisaisho why do you need someone to explain it to you? Lol nob.
@@tacticalcenter8658 yeah honestly i'm pretty new to all this sorry i really do need explaining
I actually didnt care if they collect my porn history tho
Be sure that you have no plans to run for political office!
Just saying.
Good video.
Great video Henry, keep up the good work!
My comments keep turning off on ALL of the videos I make, please tell me what I'm doing wrong.
Put your viewer ages on the videos to 13+
Debian + Firefox
Tails + Tor 👌🙏
The thing is that forks are not as good as the main product. Same with Linux distros.
With the browsers the big projects are chrome / chromium and firefox. And with firefox forks I think is mostly some config files and extensions added.
If you import your config files you have your Firefox condigured.
True
That is not true in any sense
privacytest site is gone
harden deez...
Arkenfox's user js is trash since it does not saves corrected settings, it just overrides your setup
cringe
I have used many browsers over many years, been around before the internet. But i still prefer the looks of chromium, not chrome over firefox ui. I do use ungoogled chromium, are there better options for chromium fans? Also by having so many more options, since companies like Google are trying to find ways to get us to see even more ads, and get more data from us, what if in the future after years of getting used to not tweaking anything, they make it less and less private, because that's where the money is, and we've lost all ability to tweak our browsers for privacy? Think about that.
Brave
UnGoogled Chromium hasn't been updated for a long long time. And it doesn't have any sec/priv options.
TY mate Great Vid.
"I have no reason to tell you why you shouldn't." Hmmmm let's see if I can think of something... Funded by the DoD? xD C'mon now!
I use Floorp
Try Floorp
Can it sync data across devices like Chrome and Firefox can?
Brave and Tor browsers the best 💪🏻
in my opinion yes, what you prefer?@@tacticalcenter8658
Tor is not my favourite. I don't use it as a daily driver.
Metapod! Use harden!
Wtf is firefox hardening
it makes it more private and stops it from collecting data
Tor browser is hardened Firefox
Is it?
I prefer Brave over firefox.
Hardening is not necessary.
Never was for me. I prefer browsers not to break sites.
Love God
Many websites do not work properly on Firefox. Why should anyone use it? It is not a good advice.
Although Firefox is still my primary browser [for the time being...], Brave is my secondary browser simple because some websites, especially online applications, are "Google Chrome friendly" and does not work well with Firefox. Chromium-based browsers are necessary in these cases.
floorp is better than all other alternatives such as librewolf etc but its quite unstable the ram consumption if ur a firefox liker get it,for chromium thorium is the best
Its ESR 😢
thorium sucks its very insecure.
Floorp and theroum are not anywhere near better.
@@vendetta.02 thats a small minority group im not having any issues
I've been deleting ff cookies, since before you've been in diapers, and keep doing so :)
or use Brave... lol
@tristen_grant that you can easily never use, I never do, it never bothered me, not even a splash screen.
It's literarily a no-problem.
@tristen_grant What are your favorites?
I use Brave now. Doesn't even need to install an adblocker.
But it doesn't have extensions on mobile. The built in adblocker still let's some ads in on some adult sites. No ads when using ff and ublock on mobile n pc.
not private
@@TimV777who tf cares about adult sites? Your adiction is not our problem
Hardened firefox sounds like a pokemon
Brave - no, thanks.
Harden yourself. That's what matters.
and i love manually setting it up .....why is it silly ......what a crap channel bro
No one's taking away your option of manually setting it up? (as directly stated in the video)-but not everyone wants to. In fact, that's the majority.
u stated its silly 2 do it manually....and im never interested in what the "majority"....says or thinks or does..
but hey...nevermind , goodluck with ur channel c ya@@techlore
Thank you Henry!💻🖱🚀
Let me guess, you don't see yourself as a target anymore and the risk is less so hardening isn't needed? Dude you could instead say hardening hampers usage. I'm sorry this sounds like your take of not recommending ROMs when you stopped using ROMs. Your choice of browser matters and right now the WebKit monopoly will end in Europe.
I wish Mozilla was working more on Firefox and less on other non browser social projects.
1st
I'm scared of using TOR, not kidding. Like what of my ISP sees im connected to a TOR networks and sends feds to bust down my door and arrests me, whiling scanning through my entire shit, breaching my privacy before finding nothing illegal and lets me go. Still damages kinda done
17 seconds ago
👋
do people really take this glowie seriously ?
Show us were the glowies touched you.
Yes 💯
mozilla donated some radical groups (e.g BLM) either
Not all BLM members are radical, though?
Oh, le horror.
Too long. Video is 5 min max
What the fuck is hardening
Random useless dumb arguments.