Sorry man, but i'm unsubscribing. You allways catch me clicking on yr video's, but it leads to dissapointment. Clickbait without actually new information other than your own speculation. Shame
With 150k+ subscribers, your silly & way-over-the-top titles and thumbnails are hurting your channel's growth. Your content isn't brainless fails... you're trying to capture a technical audience? Treat us as such. Enjoy: I HUMILIATED the comment section! bwahahaha! Once this video us done, I'm probably going to go HUMILIATE the toilet. Then I'll HUMILITATE my truck on my way to HUMILIATE my coworkers with my v9 Retaliation Engine. Over & Out & HUMILIATION!
Interesting video. i'm subscribed and watch you daily but your video titles are becoming increasingly clickbait. There was no revelation in this video, just a completely valid discussion of the hints and tidbits leaked over the past months. The video is fine. Just please stop using clickbait titles. i watch you because I trust the content of your videos but these clickbait titles will put off many who would otherwise subscribe. Thanks.
Clearly, SpaceX is always working on the "next" engine. That is how they've become the industry leader. But they haven't released any public info, and most of this video is pure speculation. It's clickbait, and I click. I get excited that new info is coming, only to be disappointed to hear the same regurgitated talking points. But, I do listen all the same, because in the process I do learn little nuggets of new info.
Hey Kevin and the team happy holidays. I've always had high regard for the Raptor family of engine's, it seems to be a top notch version for each iteration! I have no doubt it will expand further.
FYI: The level of integration SpaceX is using on raptor v4 (build all tubing into the walls of the engine) means disassembly to repair isn't in the cards. If there's an actual problem in engine hardware, the engine will be replaced, rather then fixed. (Comoared to a $100MM RS-25 for SLS) When you can build *200* Raptor 3's for the price of 1 RS-25 (SLS), you tell me ... If NASA decided to, they could replace $400MM of Rocketdyne RS-25's with $3MM of raptor engines. Let's wait to see what the new NASA admin pushes for, although SLS has become so insanely expensive, that I can't imagine SLS will survive. The crazy expensive Space Shuttle launches were an order of magnitude cheaper than SLS.
Those engines weigh about 3300 lbs.? Well that is a small car. Imagine 33 small cars pushing a 40 story building straight up. Booster is 23 stories high and the starship 17. I hope they reach their goal of 200 tons to orbit.
@@chrisg.475 we will improve this. Thanks for your feedback. It's generic. Not from the heart. I've seen it more than once, twice,thrice. They don't care.
A 330 tonne Raptor would give a 15.5% margin on 286 tonne thrust 35 Raptors will each need to deliver to create 10,000 tonne of thrust. No doubt we will get to a Raptor V10 as more knowledge is gained about materials, assembly and performance.
To make 44 launches with 33 raptors, you are gonna need to produce 4/day non-stop. This means some sort of Henry Ford assembly line operation, with more workers doing less steps each.
@@stewiesaidthat No math failure here, 44 x 33 is approx 4/day. Even at that rate, your fleet of boosters is only 44, no where near the planned fleet size of over 1000. To reach that fleet size, you need 22 years of 44 boosters/year. So, I think my number is rather low. Reuse only comes into play as your integrate 44 new boosters/year into your fleet. Initially re-flight might be higher since you fleet size is smaller, but will gradually reduce as you increase the fleet over the 22 years.
@ronwatkins5775 you really failed at math. Each booster is good for 100 launches. At 50 launches per year, that's two years of service before it needs to be replaced.
@@stewiesaidthat You need to double-check your own math. We are talking about building a fleet of 1000 vehicles per Elon. 33 engines * 44 launches (first year) = 1452 engines total for the first year. 1000 vehicles / 44 vehicles/year = 22.7 years to reach the 1000 fleet size. That's 32,960 total raptor engines to reach the 1000 fleet size. Note this is only for the booster, not including Starships engines. Re-use is great but has nothing to do with the 1000 fleet-size. Re-use in early years only slows down raptor production, which will extend the 22.7 years for a longer term. What im saying is that they need to boost raptor production in an assembly line fashion. You should not have dedicated line-staff working for hours on a single part of starship. An engine should be rapidly moving from station to station. That way, you have more efficiency in your line production rate.
@ronwatkins5775 you need to double-check YOUR math kiddo. Ford can build 1000 F-150s per day. That's per day. Sure, it might take a week from start to finish. But once assembly starts, engines can cranked out at upwards of thousands a day across various assembly lines. Do you know how many cars a day Tesla makes?
Elon didn't do ish, I want to see him get with the team and actually build an engine himself together with other engineers but unfortunately he is useless.
Why don't they replace the Raptor 3 cooling system. With one that takes advantage of all the work they have done with massive amounts of pressure. And repurpose the air that cools the thing down in a scramjet type of Rocketry? I think their cooling system is probably only scratching the surface of what you can achieve in atmospheric flight.
Before SpaceX even landed one Falcon 9 on a barge, successfully, for the first time, I had been predicting the Nanotechnologists to make their nano-manufacturing first, before SpaceX lands on a Human on Mars. I've stuck to my guns for all the way up to now. Unless a miracle happens, I'm expecting SpaceX to establish a permanent Human presence in space(on Mars, if not the Moon and Mars) before the Nano-Era officially happens. I'm kind of thinking Quantum Computers could maybe solve Drexlerian Nanotechnology sooner than later. But, Quantum Computers will only become really capable of solving science/engineering around 2026(one year from now). It might still happen. One thing is for sure, SpaceX and Science and technology can advance even beyond Raptor 3!
I should maybe mention A.I. A.I. companies will finish announcing all their top A.I. models in January. What happens next is anyone's guess. But, if the fact that openA.I. failed twice to make their project Orion work(I'm hearing openA.I tried to make project Orion and have it released like in October), then the next step in A.I. may prove far more difficult than anyone imagined. Project Orion looks like it was going to be far greater than o3, which everyone is buzzing about. But, they couldn't quite make it work - a measure of the difficulty of taking this next step in A.I. If openA.I. does successfully make project Orion, it would be the equivalent of Raptor 4 or 5(I'm tempted to say Raptor 3!). But, one thing is for sure, it will be monumental; and perhaps pretty hard to beat. OpenA.I.'s Orion might have the science and engineering ability to solve Drexlerian Nanotechnology? Maybe! I'm hearing OpenA.I. is currently optimistic they can release Orion in March to May/June/July timeframe(if everything goes well!). A.I. might still have something to say in whether Humanity can make Drexlerian Nanotechnology any time soon(as does, perhaps the Quantum Computers!)
My Scottish grandmother was born when horses powered human transportation and lived to see men standing on the moon. I saw those men on the moon while I was in college and expect to see men and women, after the Tesla Optimus robots have prepared the site, standing and residing on Mars. Thank you for your vision, Gottlieb Daimler, Henry Ford, Werner von Braun and Elon Musk. Without people like you we'd still be hunting with spears on horseback. We are all standing on the shoulders of our brightest forebears. I just want to live long enough to see humanity become a multiplanetary species.
I tend to think Raptor is not performing at it's lab tested ratings yet. Exhaust always appears methane rich and they increased the Methane vs. Lox ratio in block 2. Clearly signaling they need excess Methane and the engines are not running at peak efficiency or performance. I'm sure Raptor can achieve the things Elon says, but I don't think it's put in to practice, perhaps for safety margins or some other reason. IDK.
Just need something from SCIFI a moculat cutting tool than can reseal the cut to origonal strength. Or if its good enough then replacing it with a newer model will be cheaper and more efficient.
So... The Rocketdyne F-1 still outclasses the Raptors... kinda hard to pass up 1½ million pounds of thrust minimum for each engine...and no failures on 1960's slide-rule technology.
@pauldavidthomasfrodo yup, once. And still no failures... Slide-Ruler .. remember that. They were only used once... Because... Not retrieved. 50 years later and still not back... Pitiful
They are going to need that power to make it to the moon with all that heavy lead shielding they will need to survive the transit through the Van Allen belt with its intensely lethal radiation. They will also need it on the moon which has not only lethal radiation but 265F heat during the solar daytime. This will mandate the need for huge battery capacity in order to survive the heat / radiation combination prior to digging safer facilities below the lunar surface. The weight of lead shielding and batteries will mandate large fuel transfers. It remains to be seen if they can solve these huge hurdles.
flying and doing nothing makes this irrelevant. cargo to space , actual missions is what matters. so far this thing cant carry cargo so it is a waste of time.
Raptor 1 produced over 100 tonnes of thrust. Raptor 2 produced over 200 tonnes of thrust. Raptor 3 produces over 300 tonnes of thrust. See where this is going? I predict that Raptor 4 will produce over 400 tonnes of thrust. Eat that Bezos Engine #4!
Good Morning, Kev. Is that what we are looking at Raptor 4 instead of a Raptor 3X. I like it.We knew there would be another version for sure. The Raptor engine series never get old. Does it? Grear Episode, Kev. You never disappoint. What's next on the horizon? With the constant new innovative way Musk's team keeps coming up with new welding techniques, SpaceX will also come up with new ways to disassemble the welded joints. He will make it as easy as unscrewing a bolt. The reporting you will do on this technique will be exciting to see. Your right when you say they are not just building rockets. I will carry one step farther. SpaceX is developing manufacturing method that will be carried deep into any manufacturing environment. I just hope the manufacturing industry in America is paying attention. Great Episode, Kev. You really make me think. Have a Great Day my Friend. 2 days left in 2024.
I understand tht we're still using Raptor 3 engines. I agreemore more on having a refueling system in the SPACE maybe in between to the Moon & Mars (the red planet), which is essential to prevent being stranded in the Space. For instance, here on Earthlings. I am driving neglecting to charge my Tesla. Or, my jeep, tht's out of gas 🙄 Of course, hell broke loose 😄. I am stranded. AHHA ❗️The Lyft 🌟 my savior. Thank U for looking up to the Star and beyond🌟👋✨️ ~kat 👽
The Chinese passed in recent years new legislation requiring companies there, whether foreign or domestic, to divulge proprietary secrets. One has to wonder about the conflicting position this puts Musk in regarding the conflict between his Chinese interests and his US interests, including more specifically the possible pressure to transfer information bearing on SpaceX technology? Along these lines, it would certainly be nice to know something about the details of all those secret meetings he's been having with foreign leaders, as he fails to disclose any information about them to US security agencies.
1st company allowed to do business in China without their government being part owners. In that respect, he's not stupid. China factory produces for Asian countries (includes Australia and NZ). German factory produces for Europe. US factory produces for US.
You need to expand past SpaceX all the time, there's plenty of other science things to bring along, SpaceX comes a bit boring after a while it's the same thing every time 😢😢😢😢😢
The channel is _literally_ called "Great SpaceX". If you want to see something different, you can just go to another channel. Personally, I clock out once they start talking about other rocket companies, because no one cares who won the silver medal.
In the US the police have an AI system that uses traffic cameras to do basically the same thing. It has been abused by the police. One sherriff used it to look up the his ex-wife's and boyfriends vehicles 250 times in less than a year. Humans aren't responsible enough!!
I wonder what happened to the chamber meltdown issues/concerns that came out in 2022 about the Raptor engine. Where those solved? I know there is no place for actual engineering issues in the middle of a North Korean style propaganda video but I think it would be interesting to address technical challenges when posting Starship news.
What a time to be alive ❤
❤️❤️❤️
❤️❤️❤️
Sorry man, but i'm unsubscribing. You allways catch me clicking on yr video's, but it leads to dissapointment. Clickbait without actually new information other than your own speculation. Shame
Did the same a while back. I check in but the nonsense titles or china bashing are annoying.
I agree. Same information repeated almost daily
Then there are the Great SpaceX copycats.
Absolutely nothing here about raptor 4
thanks for your videos. I appreciate the daily updates.
Raptor 4 is a straight pipe
Maybe
@@shaunnichols4664 glass pack
Clickbait again and again and again!
Unsubscribed
With 150k+ subscribers, your silly & way-over-the-top titles and thumbnails are hurting your channel's growth. Your content isn't brainless fails... you're trying to capture a technical audience? Treat us as such.
Enjoy:
I HUMILIATED the comment section! bwahahaha! Once this video us done, I'm probably going to go HUMILIATE the toilet. Then I'll HUMILITATE my truck on my way to HUMILIATE my coworkers with my v9 Retaliation Engine. Over & Out & HUMILIATION!
I changed this, hope you will continue to support us
Stop saying “SpaceX ….. HUMILIATED …….” In you titles. It’s below childish. It’s HUMILIATING. Love your channel but on the verge of unsubscribing.
I changed this, hope you will continue to support us
There is nothing new here. Just clickbait repeating for the sake of "content".
You've just lost me as a subscriber.
@Greatspacex, bless you at 12:00 lol
The weather in my place is quite cold these days, thank you for your attention.
Interesting video. i'm subscribed and watch you daily but your video titles are becoming increasingly clickbait. There was no revelation in this video, just a completely valid discussion of the hints and tidbits leaked over the past months. The video is fine. Just please stop using clickbait titles. i watch you because I trust the content of your videos but these clickbait titles will put off many who would otherwise subscribe. Thanks.
I changed this, hope you will continue to support us
Clickbait title, empty content
Clearly, SpaceX is always working on the "next" engine. That is how they've become the industry leader. But they haven't released any public info, and most of this video is pure speculation.
It's clickbait, and I click. I get excited that new info is coming, only to be disappointed to hear the same regurgitated talking points. But, I do listen all the same, because in the process I do learn little nuggets of new info.
There is no Raptor 4. SpaceX revealed nothing of the sort.
Why not?
Stop with the humiliated. Its lame and nobody was humiliated. There are better ways to say that.
Thanks for your comment 👍
“With great power comes great responsibility.” -Uncle Ben.
Raptor 4 to the moon 👍🇺🇲🤠
Nice ❤i’a from romania
Have a good day, my friend!!!
Based on the weld statement and the rapid build cadence, seems like if it doesn’t work it’s discarded. Don’t think there’s an unweld procedure.
There is no actual info on a "Raptor 4" engine. Just guesses about design trends
First Elon bought X and now he launched the XAI303e token this year is crazy
Raptoe 3 was never even used in a flight...now they have 4?
This is a plan
Great Spacex, when approximately will starship block 2 launch?
It will be launched in Flight 7, maybe right in January
NET 10/01/25
1/11
Hey Kevin and the team happy holidays.
I've always had high regard for the Raptor family of engine's, it seems to be a top notch version for each iteration! I have no doubt it will expand further.
Great video can yoy tell me when is the raptor 5 ready 🤔
The potential of XAI303e is unreal! Excited to see where this goes after watching your video!
Great video. Enjoyed thanks.
Thanks for watching!
"The best part is no part at all", Elon Musk. God Bless to all.
Great comment 👍
"SpaceX Revealed New Raptor 4" is a lie.
Looking forward to raptor 3 being used, much less raptor 4. Faster production is more intriguing and allows faster production
FYI: The level of integration SpaceX is using on raptor v4 (build all tubing into the walls of the engine) means disassembly to repair isn't in the cards. If there's an actual problem in engine hardware, the engine will be replaced, rather then fixed. (Comoared to a $100MM RS-25 for SLS)
When you can build *200* Raptor 3's for the price of 1 RS-25 (SLS), you tell me ...
If NASA decided to, they could replace $400MM of Rocketdyne RS-25's with $3MM of raptor engines. Let's wait to see what the new NASA admin pushes for, although SLS has become so insanely expensive, that I can't imagine SLS will survive. The crazy expensive Space Shuttle launches were an order of magnitude cheaper than SLS.
excited to see where it all goes.
Regarding flanges....a different flange design used while in a prototype stage can mitigate heat issues at connecting points.
Musk said he thought he could get the Raptor to 350 tons. I think he said that is close to its limits.
Starship needs the extra thrust otherwise they ain't going anywhere
So how strong do you think it needs to be?
400 tons per raptor 1,200kg weight @@colonbina1
I’m sure your expert words on UA-cam will be resonating with the space x team .
@@deanpierre-f4x really dude so you think the spacex team superseeeds the laws of physics
@@colonbina1 depends on the total weight
Maybe stop using the word “HUMILIATED” on every video you publish.
Humiliated? No, there’s no need to use that word. Challenged? Yes, they’re all trying to make progress. Let’s be nice. 😊
I changed this, hope you will continue to support us
Can't believe I almost missed out on Cardano and XAI303e! Thanks for the heads-up in your video!
It would be nice to see Space X get its own rotary detonation engine, maybe a Raptor X
Those engines weigh about 3300 lbs.? Well that is a small car. Imagine 33 small cars pushing a 40 story building straight up. Booster is 23 stories high and the starship 17. I hope they reach their goal of 200 tons to orbit.
I just unsubscribed again. Im sick of your click bait lies
We will impove this, thanks your feedback
I have to agree. Super weak. LOADs of BS filler followed by a little speculation way behind the curve and full of BS clips/photos
@@chrisg.475 we will improve this. Thanks for your feedback. It's generic. Not from the heart. I've seen it more than once, twice,thrice. They don't care.
Spaceflight is really looking up! Ahem. I'll see myself out.....
❤️❤️❤️
Raptor 4? Raptor 7! …stupid clickbait. Bye🙄
Fully 3D printed/sintered engines. Him and I have already conversed about this possible derivative. 2021
❤️❤️❤️
Your video convinced me to invest in XAI303e! Let’s see how high it can go!
Raptor 4 should be the little engine that can.
Bring on the unibody raptor! Letssss goooooo
Awesome!
Yeah
Bought XAI303e after watching your video, super excited!
Unscribed
I changed this, hope you will continue to support us
Bye 👋 😂
I solely believe XAI303e will do 20x after its launch price, the hype is high and its community are not relenting.
A 330 tonne Raptor would give a 15.5% margin on 286 tonne thrust 35 Raptors will each need to deliver to create 10,000 tonne of thrust.
No doubt we will get to a Raptor V10 as more knowledge is gained about materials, assembly and performance.
Wow😱
Will all that extra trust from the Raptor 4 create additional heat destruction to the OLM?
To make 44 launches with 33 raptors, you are gonna need to produce 4/day non-stop. This means some sort of Henry Ford assembly line operation, with more workers doing less steps each.
Somebody failed math.
The Raptor engine is designed to be reused 100 times without rebuilding
@@stewiesaidthat No math failure here, 44 x 33 is approx 4/day. Even at that rate, your fleet of boosters is only 44, no where near the planned fleet size of over 1000. To reach that fleet size, you need 22 years of 44 boosters/year. So, I think my number is rather low. Reuse only comes into play as your integrate 44 new boosters/year into your fleet. Initially re-flight might be higher since you fleet size is smaller, but will gradually reduce as you increase the fleet over the 22 years.
@ronwatkins5775 you really failed at math. Each booster is good for 100 launches. At 50 launches per year, that's two years of service before it needs to be replaced.
@@stewiesaidthat You need to double-check your own math. We are talking about building a fleet of 1000 vehicles per Elon. 33 engines * 44 launches (first year) = 1452 engines total for the first year. 1000 vehicles / 44 vehicles/year = 22.7 years to reach the 1000 fleet size. That's 32,960 total raptor engines to reach the 1000 fleet size. Note this is only for the booster, not including Starships engines. Re-use is great but has nothing to do with the 1000 fleet-size. Re-use in early years only slows down raptor production, which will extend the 22.7 years for a longer term. What im saying is that they need to boost raptor production in an assembly line fashion. You should not have dedicated line-staff working for hours on a single part of starship. An engine should be rapidly moving from station to station. That way, you have more efficiency in your line production rate.
@ronwatkins5775 you need to double-check YOUR math kiddo.
Ford can build 1000 F-150s per day. That's per day. Sure, it might take a week from start to finish. But once assembly starts, engines can cranked out at upwards of thousands a day across various assembly lines. Do you know how many cars a day Tesla makes?
Elon didn't do ish, I want to see him get with the team and actually build an engine himself together with other engineers but unfortunately he is useless.
Why don't they replace the Raptor 3 cooling system. With one that takes advantage of all the work they have done with massive amounts of pressure. And repurpose the air that cools the thing down in a scramjet type of Rocketry?
I think their cooling system is probably only scratching the surface of what you can achieve in atmospheric flight.
so tired of these ai generated youtube pages that offer no information.
What do I think if Raptor 4? Umm.... the only info you gave on Raptor 4 is that it might have 330 tons of thrust. So.... I guess it's.... Good?
❤️❤️❤️
This is click bait bullshit
Thanks for sharing! Bought XAI303e, expecting 10x returns! 🚀 Coinbase, Bybit, Binance to list soon.
I’m all in on XAI303e after seeing your analysis! This could be a game changer!
I love how you broke down the XAI303e project in your video! Can’t wait to see it skyrocket!
Before SpaceX even landed one Falcon 9 on a barge, successfully, for the first time, I had been predicting the Nanotechnologists to make their nano-manufacturing first, before SpaceX lands on a Human on Mars.
I've stuck to my guns for all the way up to now. Unless a miracle happens, I'm expecting SpaceX to establish a permanent Human presence in space(on Mars, if not the Moon and Mars) before the Nano-Era officially happens.
I'm kind of thinking Quantum Computers could maybe solve Drexlerian Nanotechnology sooner than later. But, Quantum Computers will only become really capable of solving science/engineering around 2026(one year from now). It might still happen. One thing is for sure, SpaceX and Science and technology can advance even beyond Raptor 3!
I should maybe mention A.I. A.I. companies will finish announcing all their top A.I. models in January. What happens next is anyone's guess. But, if the fact that openA.I. failed twice to make their project Orion work(I'm hearing openA.I tried to make project Orion and have it released like in October), then the next step in A.I. may prove far more difficult than anyone imagined.
Project Orion looks like it was going to be far greater than o3, which everyone is buzzing about. But, they couldn't quite make it work - a measure of the difficulty of taking this next step in A.I.
If openA.I. does successfully make project Orion, it would be the equivalent of Raptor 4 or 5(I'm tempted to say Raptor 3!). But, one thing is for sure, it will be monumental; and perhaps pretty hard to beat. OpenA.I.'s Orion might have the science and engineering ability to solve Drexlerian Nanotechnology? Maybe! I'm hearing OpenA.I. is currently optimistic they can release Orion in March to May/June/July timeframe(if everything goes well!).
A.I. might still have something to say in whether Humanity can make Drexlerian Nanotechnology any time soon(as does, perhaps the Quantum Computers!)
My Scottish grandmother was born when horses powered human transportation and lived to see men standing on the moon. I saw those men on the moon while I was in college and expect to see men and women, after the Tesla Optimus robots have prepared the site, standing and residing on Mars.
Thank you for your vision, Gottlieb Daimler, Henry Ford, Werner von Braun and Elon Musk. Without people like you we'd still be hunting with spears on horseback. We are all standing on the shoulders of our brightest forebears. I just want to live long enough to see humanity become a multiplanetary species.
When do they need to be ready for the moon and their NASSA contract?
Raptor 4 in 26
I hope so
I tend to think Raptor is not performing at it's lab tested ratings yet. Exhaust always appears methane rich and they increased the Methane vs. Lox ratio in block 2. Clearly signaling they need excess Methane and the engines are not running at peak efficiency or performance. I'm sure Raptor can achieve the things Elon says, but I don't think it's put in to practice, perhaps for safety margins or some other reason. IDK.
Just need something from SCIFI a moculat cutting tool than can reseal the cut to origonal strength. Or if its good enough then replacing it with a newer model will be cheaper and more efficient.
The latter. Yes.
So... The Rocketdyne F-1 still outclasses the Raptors... kinda hard to pass up 1½ million pounds of thrust minimum for each engine...and no failures on 1960's slide-rule technology.
And they are used how many times..... Once...
@pauldavidthomasfrodo yup, once. And still no failures... Slide-Ruler .. remember that. They were only used once... Because... Not retrieved. 50 years later and still not back... Pitiful
Is that all the thruster you can muster:)
So Raptor 4 NIT revealed:-(
I can't tell you what I think of raptor 4 because you have not shown us it ! ROFL 🤣
They are going to need that power to make it to the moon with all that heavy lead shielding they will need to survive the transit through the Van Allen belt with its intensely lethal radiation. They will also need it on the moon which has not only lethal radiation but 265F heat during the solar daytime. This will mandate the need for huge battery capacity in order to survive the heat / radiation combination prior to digging safer facilities below the lunar surface. The weight of lead shielding and batteries will mandate large fuel transfers. It remains to be seen if they can solve these huge hurdles.
👍👍👍
I think the BE4 has a lot of easily upgradable parts. There are to many. Not easy to upgrade something with only a few parts.
Simple. BE-4 costs $7m. Raptor 3 about $350k. Buy 20.
❤
Have a good day
Big invest this technology advancement please sir please
I hope so
The only thing humiliating here is the garbage content.
Total waste of my time watching this. Less than half of your videos are worth watching. It may be time to unsubscribe
Alguém assistindo??🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
I think the paper need to be released to the public they are out to the rich and others and we need to know
Raptor 4? No, that’s a lie. You’re a joke.
Thank you for the announcement video for Elon Musk's XAI303e Token!!! Finally they got into crypto...can't wait to see what's next
flying and doing nothing makes this irrelevant. cargo to space , actual missions is what matters. so far this thing cant carry cargo so it is a waste of time.
Raptor 1 produced over 100 tonnes of thrust. Raptor 2 produced over 200 tonnes of thrust. Raptor 3 produces over 300 tonnes of thrust. See where this is going? I predict that Raptor 4 will produce over 400 tonnes of thrust. Eat that Bezos Engine #4!
I think Musk said 350 is the theoretical limit or very close to it. Still worthy to be called 4.0
Bullshit! This is such a shame
I will change this, thanks your feedback
Good Morning, Kev. Is that what we are looking at Raptor 4 instead of a Raptor 3X. I like it.We knew there would be another version for sure. The Raptor engine series never get old. Does it? Grear Episode, Kev. You never disappoint. What's next on the horizon? With the constant new innovative way Musk's team keeps coming up with new welding techniques, SpaceX will also come up with new ways to disassemble the welded joints. He will make it as easy as unscrewing a bolt. The reporting you will do on this technique will be exciting to see. Your right when you say they are not just building rockets. I will carry one step farther. SpaceX is developing manufacturing method that will be carried deep into any manufacturing environment. I just hope the manufacturing industry in America is paying attention. Great Episode, Kev. You really make me think. Have a Great Day my Friend. 2 days left in 2024.
Thanks for your comment ❤️
@@colonbina1 Tell me what you think, Kev.
I understand tht we're still using Raptor 3 engines.
I agreemore more on having a refueling system in the SPACE maybe in between to the Moon & Mars (the red planet), which is essential to prevent being stranded in the Space.
For instance, here on Earthlings. I am driving neglecting to charge my Tesla. Or, my jeep, tht's out of gas 🙄 Of course, hell broke loose 😄. I am stranded.
AHHA ❗️The Lyft 🌟 my savior.
Thank U for looking up to the Star and beyond🌟👋✨️
~kat 👽
Thanks for your support
So much click baits on this channel
More clickbait…unsubscribed!!!!
@12:00 🤧
🤫🤫🤫
What's with the BS videos? Unsubscribed
We will impove this, thank your feedback.
Why do you always say someone is humiliated
I changed this, hope you will continue to support us
This channel has turned into nothing more than another clickbait. Slideshow
Nuclear engin
It will be the future
XAI303e is definitely on my radar now! Appreciate the insights from your video!
I also find this channel full of bullshit and click bait. Time to unsubscribe.
I changed this, hope you will continue to support us
What happens to all of the earlier versions of the raptor. 1 and 2 ? do they use them or scrap them or sell them?
I think SpaceX will modify them
why are you lying again. you are ruining your channel.
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
Follow
“As it turns out, future versions of Raptor will ultimately exceed 700k lb-F!” (Raptor 3 produces 350 lb-f). Brainless fkkup. Go ahead and leave
This channel has ALWAYS been like this. He isn't just now ruining his channel.
I changed this, hope you will continue to support us
@@friendryan Elon stated, “Later raptor versions will surpass 400 lb-ft of thrust…”. Version 3 is at 350 lb-ft, you uneducated j/A&$…
The Chinese passed in recent years new legislation requiring companies there, whether foreign or domestic, to divulge proprietary secrets. One has to wonder about the conflicting position this puts Musk in regarding the conflict between his Chinese interests and his US interests, including more specifically the possible pressure to transfer information bearing on SpaceX technology? Along these lines, it would certainly be nice to know something about the details of all those secret meetings he's been having with foreign leaders, as he fails to disclose any information about them to US security agencies.
1st company allowed to do business in China without their government being part owners. In that respect, he's not stupid.
China factory produces for Asian countries (includes Australia and NZ).
German factory produces for Europe.
US factory produces for US.
Your video on XAI303e really opened my eyes to the possibilities in the crypto market!
You need to expand past SpaceX all the time, there's plenty of other science things to bring along, SpaceX comes a bit boring after a while it's the same thing every time 😢😢😢😢😢
I will find more about this, thanks your interesting information
The channel is _literally_ called "Great SpaceX". If you want to see something different, you can just go to another channel. Personally, I clock out once they start talking about other rocket companies, because no one cares who won the silver medal.
No wonder your subscribers are stuck. I warned you many time but you didn't listened.
I changed this, hope you will continue to support us
In the US the police have an AI system that uses traffic cameras to do basically the same thing. It has been abused by the police. One sherriff used it to look up the his ex-wife's and boyfriends vehicles 250 times in less than a year. Humans aren't responsible enough!!
I wonder what happened to the chamber meltdown issues/concerns that came out in 2022 about the Raptor engine. Where those solved? I know there is no place for actual engineering issues in the middle of a North Korean style propaganda video but I think it would be interesting to address technical challenges when posting Starship news.