Bezos’ ultimate ambition is to have orbiting space colonies and to transfer industrial processes into space. They’re laudable aims but so far progress at B O has been lethargic. The test firings of New Glenn and the BE7 lunar landing engine have been successful but Spacex is just so far ahead as to be practically uncatchable. We’re likely to see a Spacex space station well before B O launch anything that substantial into orbit. A happy, healthy and safe new year to all space enthusiasts. The next few years should be very interesting.
Blue origin shouldn't even be in a conversation presented here until they become motivated and learn to combine ideas with others...let's get real for once eh
Starlab is "same idea, different decade". Starship has good idea, but only 1/3 of each ship is usable. Vast Hub is like Legos in space and would be the best idea.
Good to see work done on space stations, the need will be great. We will need them around planets/moons we wish to explore. Also we will need them to establish bases around asteroids to be mined.
The world is going through another technology revolution on all fronts. There is no perfect plan and as humans, we learn by trial and error, yet still achieving mostly successes in the end.
A non-artificial gravity space station would only be an interim solution because it is pretty clear that without constant gravity even if only 1/3 g, we won't be able to keep people in space without damage to their health. First we use rotation gravity while we develop engine technology that can provide 1g acceleration for extended periods. Chemical rockets won't work in space even if they will continuento be used to haul stuff up the well. Once we have these 2 technologies we will be able to move around the solar system.
Four projects, each more interesting than the other, NASA's goal will be to allow each of these concepts to coexist and to be able to assemble into a single or double entity. Allow the compatibility of the different concepts on a common standard.
If you are going to have rotating space stations, it would be a good idea to develop a standard for bigger docking ports which can be walked/driven through - unless you like crawling from one room to another. Do this before all international competitors produce their own bespoke and incompatible designs.
There is already a standard set for devices/vessels that connect in space. i believe it was standardized in the late 2000s(2008?), Iirc. By in large space development is going to remain primarily funded and driven by governments as there is no viable options outside of governments for 3rd party private space developers to profit from. That will likely change however once we return to the moon and if a viable mining project becomes reality on the moon.
@@DotADBX The International Docking System Standard of 2010 gives a passage only 0.8m across. Too small to walk/drive through. The new standard would need to be at least 2m-3m.
@@DotADBX Eventually they will, after the existing docking port (can't change it because everyone is using it) is shown to be not up to the job and the first big module manufacturer develops their own which no-one else agrees to pay royalties for so each manufacturer develops their own. The subsequent difficulties will force cooperation.
@@clivemitchell3229 its probably more likely that SpaceX will create it since their long term focus after starship is facilities and infrastructure while most other sources are focused on delivery systems, modules, ground transport and other forms of technology in space.
I honestly can't believe how much people go on about New Glenn's roll in the future when BO hasen't even properly made it to space in over 2 decades of operation. Still got to wait until next week for proof of anything.
I am kinda disappointed that we are not going to try and preserve the space station for historical purposes. Would be a great opportunity to build an ecapsulating vessel to contain the agged space station as a defacto museum/training facility for space walking in a semi controlled environment.
@@MrEh5 cost would actually be pretty minimal encapsulate the space station to protect it from further damage from space and the value for keeping a piece of history that shows how much further we can go if we work together rather then fight each other intact is priceless. having a semi controlled environment for training for space walks in actual space has extreme benefits as well and would largely just be a side addition to the historical preservation side. globally we have collectively spent 150 billion $ (estimated cost in 2010 -- its very probable this piece of human engineering is closer to a trillion $ today) building this thing and now we are simply going to let it burn up in the atmosphere and its likely very few people are going to blink an eye or care about it. We are the closest we have ever been to an average person being able to access space then any other time in the history of space exploration and we are going to simply toss away one of if not the most important pieces of history humans have ever created simply because its old. The inherent value of a young adult or child one day being able to see this thing in real life to touch the history that it helped write has an incomprehensible amount of value to future generations and could easily be the thing that makes people dream bigger and be the ones that reach for a better tomorrow. its things like the ISS that makes humans feed our unquenchable desire to know more to be more to have more and without them honestly we likely would still be in caves today. the present has a eternal mandate to preserve the past for the future to learn from and to appreciate where we came from its how we evolve and become a better species.
If we just boost it to higher orbit then it would become a problem for future generations who might not have technology to safely bring it down in a controlled manner
@keithscott1926 Well, not everything worth preserving in history was made well. The leaning tower piza some of the pyramids and several other parts of history come to mind. This is likely the biggest problem with modern society. we don't see the inherent value in the things we create and are willing to let them die. There are thousands of websites online that have been completely lost to the dead web because of this issue. If we don't choose to preserve history, we will be doomed to repeat mistakes of the past.
That other comment, about the fantasy clip art, might've been a bit harsh but it has a point. Your channel certainly isn't the only one which mixes a serious audio track with that sort of random mix of serious relevant video with "fantasy clip art" video. Your channel tends to have some pretty decent content and it's clear you work on it, that Great SpaceX is not one of the many parasite channels. But if your video track was a bit more sedate and had fewer fantasy concept clips (like some of those space stations, for example) it might be taken more seriously. I understand, however, that to get and keep views, sometimes one has to hypnotize some of the viewers, kind of like Coco Melon but for grownups. I hope you experiment a find a more balanced style. I do appreciate the material, covering the different space station contenders. Maybe a deeper dive, with more closely coupled video with audio could attract a decent audience. It's a definite plus that you have a human narrator. The less AI involved in video production, the better the quality - AI is so incredibly mediocre. Don't let LLMs do too much writing and editing for you!
I think NASA has already chosen SpaceX as the next space station partner. But I'm all for competition. We should have multiple stations all of different designs.
I hope and pray , 2025 a great year for SpaceX CEO and SpaceX team with success abundance and achieve successfully their goals. Amen. ❤😂🎉God blessed SpaceX.
Any successor station needs artificial gravity. In addition to the health benefits, it would also enable running water so astronauts can stop pooing into vacuums and only taking sponge baths… 🤢
MOBILE SPACE STATION? GROWING FOOD IN ROUTE? Their sending groups of starships to Mars so why not tie them together in a Mars Gravity in route to Mars.
@ADobbin1 there are so many space companies now its hard to keep track either due to lack of money or failure of product. Even spacex third flight was either make it or go broke
The "Starlab" concept modules bring up an interesting question... how exactly will the design of Starship change when we get to the point of carrying payloads other than pancake shaped Starlink satellites? I don't think the "gaping clameshell" concept that I've seen will work with the current coverage of heat-shield tiles (which is more than 50% of the circumference everywhere and 70-75% near the forward flaps)
Research in freefall is one of the primary reasons for having a space station, spin grav would negate its purpose. Only the exact center of rotation would experience zero gravity.
A module in the middle containing a synchronous counter-rotating sleeve (i.e. non-rotating) would provide a microgravity environment together with artificial gravity in the outer modules, and no need for air-tight rotating joints.
Sierra Space should cancel their partnership with Blue Origin and leverage Space X’s capabilities. They could get a discount on Starship’s maiden flight. That would be a bold statement and would give them a legs up in this new segment.
There is no way a structure rotating around you will create gravity and attract your feet only... I must say again today. Try magnets in your shoe soles maybe. Or you will simply keep on floating around, no matter the speed of the thing you are in is rotating. :)
Space X , a big ss tank ( truck) add hatches and strong points. Macarno ! Build any habit you want and fit it out with what is needed good engineering ! KISS cheers
While building a space station from Starships has value ... but having enough of them to create comfortable 1/3 g spin gravity will take maybe 100 Ships. There really is not much value in creating spin gravity other then testing how well people will do in 1/3 gravity ... and with 1 RPM you want to limit the windows since the constant rotation can lead to motion sickness. I would suggest perhaps 3 Ships docked to a central hub.
The only truly viable one of these four, for long term habitation, is the SpaceX model with its simulated gravity. Not to mention the size and roominess afforded from using StarShips, inked together. Think about it, these others are planning to use SpaceX’s starship to transport their modules “inside” of starships cargo hold. Starship’s size is staggering.
Why call it advanced when you still worry about bone density? Advancing,to an artificial gravity, scientific researchers might concentrate more on projects, dya think?
Ive not yet heard of any capability for Starship to "deploy" anything other than starlink. Is there going to be some sort of clam-shell to enable deployment of anything other than starlink?
Iirc elon suggested but did not confirm either a clamshell bay design or "sliding door" system on future starship designs. It is likely a clamshell design will happen first and likely quickly as the us military has many projects on the go that will require starship for delivery last i heard.
Okay here's what you need to know now this whole video I'm not even going to listen to it and I'm going to tell you why when you start building a car you don't scrap it halfway through and start building another that space station was designed for infinite growth it was designed to never wear out and be 100% modular we use the whole world's infrastructure of research and development battery to engineer that design and we didn't just use our world's knowledge we actively communicated with other group and found records and I know I sound a little bit nuts about that but I'm also the guy that put the black hole 1600 light years from Earth I just have to put that out there now to get rid of the political correct bulshit that I'm going to get hit with every one of them is just another module to go on the international space station the thing is a work in progress it is going to be turned into barge station barge the name of all kinds of different names but it's always a giant barge and all of the satellites that are going down in 2-hour lungs tearing us upare all supposed to be held up in space as a junkyard to both decoy all those fraudulently manufactured waste of public trust resource weapons platforms and proof of that people have been doing mass murder with silent Scopes we leave the burnt-out satellites up there we use their wreckage that was paid for in advance by public trust interest resources all the way around the block and we use that resource that was paid for to be up there as the resource that it is and we connect them all together and we build what's called an orbital ring and that's for space ships to dock transport car go into other vessels and come in and out of the atmosphere under control methods so we don't have mass slavery such as whole towns and villages uprooted and took away and used for slave labor and then just spaced cuz I know you guys are looking for I so mad and I got radius topic proof I can use out for a from 100% mental cognitive capabilities so you see some slur in because I'm highly pissed off but I am the guy who carries the title Lazarus the same strap you send pallets of wood down the road with that metal banding strap it absolutely amazing at holding those things together in fact it's absolutely perfect for making wicker furniture and then coming back with a spot welder
@shellac23 waste of public trust interest . The project was so big that there was several different ways we could go with it and we chose to all put in on one so we could all stick to it so we could all go up and we could all use it this included civilians this didn't know way mean monopolizing it just for government programs and select civilian programs and then having your way with...... Every one of these that you have shown was already shown on drawing boards 20 and 30 years back we voted on one plan that was more logistically sound for everyone we purposely engineered the modules to have many ty points these Thai points are supposed to be used for banding strap you know the strap that they use on lumber that they put on pallets and send down the road it's supposed to be used to make a wicker style frame with enough room between the frame and the station as you have it for a man to work in a space suit without need of Eva equipment without the propulsion deviceand as that they would make a wicker secondary Hull and put radiation shielding on it and begin turning it into what was known as barge and from there an orbital ring and while this might be news to some of you absolutely everybody involved voted for this via it was looked at everybody looked at it not just one person looked at it everybody looked at it and everybody used their religious prerogative to say let's do this and let's do that and let's do something else one nuclear engineer pulled out his handgun and said listen y'all I am not a member of your religion I am not making profit for myself or for anyone else I'm in this for the entire colony we're going to share this amongst ourselves I brought this to the table for all of us to look at and which one of these is more long-term and more long-lasting for the overall colony which one is more reusable continuing to burn our trash because we feel as though that we can't make any money off it and we don't want to hand it off to the right people we just rather burn the satellite by letting it drop into orbit it goes right into people's lungsinstead of wasting that resources we decided we would continue to reuse it we would make a junkyard and make an orbital ring where does the orbiting and where does not taking the stuff and doing with it as you were contract to do where is your follow contract law now I know senators and law enforcement in North Florida have a problem not killing civilians we've got an issue with them following contract law in the state of Florida but this is global not just the United States not just us the whole world silent scope warfare was held we doctored history to remove it so we'd stop having PTSD victims yes the grandchild of the guy that did it as his father before him did it strategically to keep Monopoly he does it too only he's done it for fun since 1981 luckily he's got the exact mental condition and an exact same shape because he got it at the exact same time at the exact same party as Donald f****** Trump I'm not supposed to tell you how I know all this stuff but I'm telling you it's all going to become modules to the space station or it's going to get shot the f*** down
You need to start learning to fix things in space instead of spending fuel and time bring it back to Earth to Repair. what will you do if a staRSHIP ON MARS NEEDS REPAIR ?? BRING IT BACK TO EARTH !!!!!
Too long, Didn't watch. Suggestion: declare the 4 options in a single "slide", then bookmark each described option. that way we can jump to what interests us more.
Bezos’ ultimate ambition is to have orbiting space colonies and to transfer industrial processes into space. They’re laudable aims but so far progress at B O has been lethargic. The test firings of New Glenn and the BE7 lunar landing engine have been successful but Spacex is just so far ahead as to be practically uncatchable. We’re likely to see a Spacex space station well before B O launch anything that substantial into orbit. A happy, healthy and safe new year to all space enthusiasts. The next few years should be very interesting.
Starship space station is the best idea.
Starship could be altered into a large inflatable and extendable
Blue origin shouldn't even be in a conversation presented here until they become motivated and learn to combine ideas with others...let's get real for once eh
Interesting, but you forgot Axiom. They will probably have their first module up before anyone else.
I hope so
First works are conducted now by Thales Alenia Space in Italy.
Starlab is "same idea, different decade". Starship has good idea, but only 1/3 of each ship is usable. Vast Hub is like Legos in space and would be the best idea.
good review!
Good to see work done on space stations, the need will be great. We will need them around planets/moons we wish to explore. Also we will need them to establish bases around asteroids to be mined.
The world is going through another technology revolution on all fronts. There is no perfect plan and as humans, we learn by trial and error, yet still achieving mostly successes in the end.
Can you point me to the "Advanced Life Support Systems" that have already been made?
I will find more about this! thanks your question
A non-artificial gravity space station would only be an interim solution because it is pretty clear that without constant gravity even if only 1/3 g, we won't be able to keep people in space without damage to their health. First we use rotation gravity while we develop engine technology that can provide 1g acceleration for extended periods. Chemical rockets won't work in space even if they will continuento be used to haul stuff up the well. Once we have these 2 technologies we will be able to move around the solar system.
Four projects, each more interesting than the other, NASA's goal will be to allow each of these concepts to coexist and to be able to assemble into a single or double entity. Allow the compatibility of the different concepts on a common standard.
Hopefully, they all will succeed
If you are going to have rotating space stations, it would be a good idea to develop a standard for bigger docking ports which can be walked/driven through - unless you like crawling from one room to another. Do this before all international competitors produce their own bespoke and incompatible designs.
There is already a standard set for devices/vessels that connect in space. i believe it was standardized in the late 2000s(2008?), Iirc.
By in large space development is going to remain primarily funded and driven by governments as there is no viable options outside of governments for 3rd party private space developers to profit from.
That will likely change however once we return to the moon and if a viable mining project becomes reality on the moon.
@@DotADBX The International Docking System Standard of 2010 gives a passage only 0.8m across. Too small to walk/drive through. The new standard would need to be at least 2m-3m.
@clivemitchell3229 do you think in the future they won't make a new standard?
@@DotADBX Eventually they will, after the existing docking port (can't change it because everyone is using it) is shown to be not up to the job and the first big module manufacturer develops their own which no-one else agrees to pay royalties for so each manufacturer develops their own. The subsequent difficulties will force cooperation.
@@clivemitchell3229 its probably more likely that SpaceX will create it since their long term focus after starship is facilities and infrastructure while most other sources are focused on delivery systems, modules, ground transport and other forms of technology in space.
I honestly can't believe how much people go on about New Glenn's roll in the future when BO hasen't even properly made it to space in over 2 decades of operation. Still got to wait until next week for proof of anything.
It won't matter who's the best. Just the fastest
fast and efficient
I am kinda disappointed that we are not going to try and preserve the space station for historical purposes.
Would be a great opportunity to build an ecapsulating vessel to contain the agged space station as a defacto museum/training facility for space walking in a semi controlled environment.
Who is going to pay for that?
The Russian module are not in very good shape and they need to be removed. The Russian module were not built very good.
@@MrEh5 cost would actually be pretty minimal encapsulate the space station to protect it from further damage from space and the value for keeping a piece of history that shows how much further we can go if we work together rather then fight each other intact is priceless.
having a semi controlled environment for training for space walks in actual space has extreme benefits as well and would largely just be a side addition to the historical preservation side.
globally we have collectively spent 150 billion $ (estimated cost in 2010 -- its very probable this piece of human engineering is closer to a trillion $ today) building this thing and now we are simply going to let it burn up in the atmosphere and its likely very few people are going to blink an eye or care about it.
We are the closest we have ever been to an average person being able to access space then any other time in the history of space exploration and we are going to simply toss away one of if not the most important pieces of history humans have ever created simply because its old.
The inherent value of a young adult or child one day being able to see this thing in real life to touch the history that it helped write has an incomprehensible amount of value to future generations and could easily be the thing that makes people dream bigger and be the ones that reach for a better tomorrow.
its things like the ISS that makes humans feed our unquenchable desire to know more to be more to have more and without them honestly we likely would still be in caves today.
the present has a eternal mandate to preserve the past for the future to learn from and to appreciate where we came from its how we evolve and become a better species.
If we just boost it to higher orbit then it would become a problem for future generations who might not have technology to safely bring it down in a controlled manner
@keithscott1926 Well, not everything worth preserving in history was made well.
The leaning tower piza some of the pyramids and several other parts of history come to mind.
This is likely the biggest problem with modern society. we don't see the inherent value in the things we create and are willing to let them die.
There are thousands of websites online that have been completely lost to the dead web because of this issue. If we don't choose to preserve history, we will be doomed to repeat mistakes of the past.
why have 1 when you can have 4 at quadruple the cost...
That's why NASA is looking to private space stations
@@colonbina1I am so jazzed about the future of humans in space...but I personally aint goin there for like...until uhhh million before me have
Happy New year to everyone
Happy new year!!! Thanks all for your support
That other comment, about the fantasy clip art, might've been a bit harsh but it has a point. Your channel certainly isn't the only one which mixes a serious audio track with that sort of random mix of serious relevant video with "fantasy clip art" video. Your channel tends to have some pretty decent content and it's clear you work on it, that Great SpaceX is not one of the many parasite channels. But if your video track was a bit more sedate and had fewer fantasy concept clips (like some of those space stations, for example) it might be taken more seriously. I understand, however, that to get and keep views, sometimes one has to hypnotize some of the viewers, kind of like Coco Melon but for grownups. I hope you experiment a find a more balanced style. I do appreciate the material, covering the different space station contenders. Maybe a deeper dive, with more closely coupled video with audio could attract a decent audience. It's a definite plus that you have a human narrator. The less AI involved in video production, the better the quality - AI is so incredibly mediocre. Don't let LLMs do too much writing and editing for you!
I will improve this, thanks
Unless the next station is a rotation station to make gravity they are wasting their time.
I think NASA has already chosen SpaceX as the next space station partner. But I'm all for competition. We should have multiple stations all of different designs.
I hope and pray , 2025 a great year for SpaceX CEO and SpaceX team with success abundance and achieve successfully their goals. Amen. ❤😂🎉God blessed SpaceX.
Most experiments and possible future manufacturing doesn't require artificial gravity and actually needs the lack of gravity.
Haven is the best bet
Yes, Haven-1 is a good start and a good test for the late 2020s.
The two that are a long lasting practical solution are SpaceX Starship and Vast 🙂
❤spaceX by far has the most potential of all...I would consider a joint venture with Inflatable modules with the Star Ship
Any successor station needs artificial gravity. In addition to the health benefits, it would also enable running water so astronauts can stop pooing into vacuums and only taking sponge baths… 🤢
Hello HAL. 8:41
I don't care which new station as long as it has a laboratory from which something horrible and lethal can escape.
We will need to wait for a long time
Happy New Year Kevin
Happy New Year 🎆
MOBILE SPACE STATION?
GROWING FOOD IN ROUTE?
Their sending groups of starships to Mars so why not tie them together in a Mars Gravity in route to Mars.
Need to be thinking what is the largest inflatable Starship can deliver or perhaps the largest inflatable integrated into a Starship station module.
vast looks like a great contender
Imagine a pizza delivery from earth to space station 😮
it's already happened, search it up
What about AXIOM?
I believe they went bankrupt though I might be thinking of someone else.
@ADobbin1 axiom space are in production of suits, space stations and laboratories
@@IronManHoddy so I'm thinking of someone else then.
@ADobbin1 there are so many space companies now its hard to keep track either due to lack of money or failure of product. Even spacex third flight was either make it or go broke
Just give it to spaceX. You know it's going to be light years ahead of the competition and lower cost
What about Blue Origin??🤣🤣🤣
The "Starlab" concept modules bring up an interesting question... how exactly will the design of Starship change when we get to the point of carrying payloads other than pancake shaped Starlink satellites? I don't think the "gaping clameshell" concept that I've seen will work with the current coverage of heat-shield tiles (which is more than 50% of the circumference everywhere and 70-75% near the forward flaps)
Research in freefall is one of the primary reasons for having a space station, spin grav would negate its purpose. Only the exact center of rotation would experience zero gravity.
A module in the middle containing a synchronous counter-rotating sleeve (i.e. non-rotating) would provide a microgravity environment together with artificial gravity in the outer modules, and no need for air-tight rotating joints.
@@clivemitchell3229 And if the rotating structure isn't perfectly balanced at all times ...
I like the inflatable module space station, which also can be rotated in a wheel to produce centrifugal gravity
Was that clip supposed to be starship dropping out of warp? kinda a stretch.
Axios?
axiom, a space company
I wouldn't even think twice. I'd be going with Space X's sollution.
I thought I heard that B.O had pulled out of the orbital reef station.
So far, it's not official. Orbital Reef is still a plan.
SpaceX space stations in various orbits are mentioned in the recent FCC application for flight 7.
They have missed one "Axiom"
I'll dedicate another episode to Axiom.
Put them all up there. I could see having one in lunar orbit.
Sierra Space should cancel their partnership with Blue Origin and leverage Space X’s capabilities. They could get a discount on Starship’s maiden flight. That would be a bold statement and would give them a legs up in this new segment.
Seems to be old news
For you
Not a believer in Axiom?
They are doing pretty well, but need a lot of support from SpaceX
I'll dedicate another episode to Axiom.
I don't know why, I got a feeling SpaceX will be the winner!
I think vast is the clear winner
Why do you think that?
@SG-xi5dx they have a decent and hopefully realistic goal, and as far as I can see has actual hardware
I'd prefer to see a permanent base on the moon next over a new space station.
There is no way a structure rotating around you will create gravity and attract your feet only... I must say again today. Try magnets in your shoe soles maybe. Or you will simply keep on floating around, no matter the speed of the thing you are in is rotating. :)
No the whole body exhibits a downward force (outward from the center of rotation). Ever been on a roller coaster? Or an elevator?
Space X , a big ss tank ( truck) add hatches and strong points. Macarno ! Build any habit you want and fit it out with what is needed good engineering ! KISS cheers
While building a space station from Starships has value ... but having enough of them to create comfortable 1/3 g spin gravity will take maybe 100 Ships. There really is not much value in creating spin gravity other then testing how well people will do in 1/3 gravity ... and with 1 RPM you want to limit the windows since the constant rotation can lead to motion sickness. I would suggest perhaps 3 Ships docked to a central hub.
where are all these space stions go .
what's going to happen is one will get government contracts and the others will get corporate backing for R&D into manufacturing in space.
The only truly viable one of these four, for long term habitation, is the SpaceX model with its simulated gravity. Not to mention the size and roominess afforded from using StarShips, inked together. Think about it, these others are planning to use SpaceX’s starship to transport their modules “inside” of starships cargo hold. Starship’s size is staggering.
Vast will win.
Better than Starship??
Alguém assistindo??🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
How about they put one person on the moon. how about that first?
A Smart organization would detach all those expensive solar panels and the power module and store them in orbit for the next station.
Too bad everyone couldn’t work together to build a station.
Like ISS? Russia doesn't like this
@colonbina1 Nope, the companies.
Oh! We have Orbital Reef designed by Blue Origin and Sierra Nevada Corporation's Sierra Space?
@@colonbina1 if spacex wasn't purposely excluded their would be something in orbit by now
Babylon 1
most real is space x station witch gravity
Why call it advanced when you still worry about bone density? Advancing,to an artificial gravity, scientific researchers might concentrate more on projects, dya think?
Vast!
space x making ds9 just need the pylons
Why is "modular" something to brag about?
Isn't it already the standard?
2001 Space Odyssey
Haven
Ive not yet heard of any capability for Starship to "deploy" anything other than starlink. Is there going to be some sort of clam-shell to enable deployment of anything other than starlink?
Iirc elon suggested but did not confirm either a clamshell bay design or "sliding door" system on future starship designs.
It is likely a clamshell design will happen first and likely quickly as the us military has many projects on the go that will require starship for delivery last i heard.
Your example and video showing this concept is not correct with your narration
Okay here's what you need to know now this whole video I'm not even going to listen to it and I'm going to tell you why when you start building a car you don't scrap it halfway through and start building another that space station was designed for infinite growth it was designed to never wear out and be 100% modular we use the whole world's infrastructure of research and development battery to engineer that design and we didn't just use our world's knowledge we actively communicated with other group and found records and I know I sound a little bit nuts about that but I'm also the guy that put the black hole 1600 light years from Earth I just have to put that out there now to get rid of the political correct bulshit that I'm going to get hit with every one of them is just another module to go on the international space station the thing is a work in progress it is going to be turned into barge station barge the name of all kinds of different names but it's always a giant barge and all of the satellites that are going down in 2-hour lungs tearing us upare all supposed to be held up in space as a junkyard to both decoy all those fraudulently manufactured waste of public trust resource weapons platforms and proof of that people have been doing mass murder with silent Scopes we leave the burnt-out satellites up there we use their wreckage that was paid for in advance by public trust interest resources all the way around the block and we use that resource that was paid for to be up there as the resource that it is and we connect them all together and we build what's called an orbital ring and that's for space ships to dock transport car go into other vessels and come in and out of the atmosphere under control methods so we don't have mass slavery such as whole towns and villages uprooted and took away and used for slave labor and then just spaced cuz I know you guys are looking for I so mad and I got radius topic proof I can use out for a from 100% mental cognitive capabilities so you see some slur in because I'm highly pissed off but I am the guy who carries the title Lazarus the same strap you send pallets of wood down the road with that metal banding strap it absolutely amazing at holding those things together in fact it's absolutely perfect for making wicker furniture and then coming back with a spot welder
What? I got about half way through reading this and gave up
@@shellac23 he has a channel with several videos.
@shellac23 waste of public trust interest . The project was so big that there was several different ways we could go with it and we chose to all put in on one so we could all stick to it so we could all go up and we could all use it this included civilians this didn't know way mean monopolizing it just for government programs and select civilian programs and then having your way with...... Every one of these that you have shown was already shown on drawing boards 20 and 30 years back we voted on one plan that was more logistically sound for everyone we purposely engineered the modules to have many ty points these Thai points are supposed to be used for banding strap you know the strap that they use on lumber that they put on pallets and send down the road it's supposed to be used to make a wicker style frame with enough room between the frame and the station as you have it for a man to work in a space suit without need of Eva equipment without the propulsion deviceand as that they would make a wicker secondary Hull and put radiation shielding on it and begin turning it into what was known as barge and from there an orbital ring and while this might be news to some of you absolutely everybody involved voted for this via it was looked at everybody looked at it not just one person looked at it everybody looked at it and everybody used their religious prerogative to say let's do this and let's do that and let's do something else one nuclear engineer pulled out his handgun and said listen y'all I am not a member of your religion I am not making profit for myself or for anyone else I'm in this for the entire colony we're going to share this amongst ourselves I brought this to the table for all of us to look at and which one of these is more long-term and more long-lasting for the overall colony which one is more reusable continuing to burn our trash because we feel as though that we can't make any money off it and we don't want to hand it off to the right people we just rather burn the satellite by letting it drop into orbit it goes right into people's lungsinstead of wasting that resources we decided we would continue to reuse it we would make a junkyard and make an orbital ring where does the orbiting and where does not taking the stuff and doing with it as you were contract to do where is your follow contract law now I know senators and law enforcement in North Florida have a problem not killing civilians we've got an issue with them following contract law in the state of Florida but this is global not just the United States not just us the whole world silent scope warfare was held we doctored history to remove it so we'd stop having PTSD victims yes the grandchild of the guy that did it as his father before him did it strategically to keep Monopoly he does it too only he's done it for fun since 1981 luckily he's got the exact mental condition and an exact same shape because he got it at the exact same time at the exact same party as Donald f****** Trump I'm not supposed to tell you how I know all this stuff but I'm telling you it's all going to become modules to the space station or it's going to get shot the f*** down
🇮🇸🇮🇸🇮🇱🇺🇲🇺🇲🇮🇪🇮🇱🇮🇸🇮🇱🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
You need to start learning to fix things in space instead of spending fuel and time bring it back to Earth to Repair. what will you do if a staRSHIP ON MARS NEEDS REPAIR ?? BRING IT BACK TO EARTH !!!!!
cuanto humo lpm hace como 20 años que anuncian estaciones nuevas jajajajaja
Too long, Didn't watch. Suggestion:
declare the 4 options in a single "slide", then bookmark each described option. that way we can jump to what interests us more.
Or you could treat your ADHD.
Get rid of the useless ISS already!
Useless??
Are you kidding?
also what about luner starship if it needs repair are you going to scrap it then Launch another one ???? Ever heard of a space DOCK!!!!
sorry , i can't take your fantasy clip art seriously.
Well, considering none of them are actually floating around up there, hence no photos, what do you have against silhouette clip art?
jajajajaja wont work
This film is corrupt
No it's making possible what you want to be imposable LOL
I know and possess something Elon wants worth more than buying the presidency.
I think SpaceX should buy Haven out and mash the 2 designs
🤔🤔🤔