Top 10 Close-In Weapon Systems In The World | Top CIWS Weapons

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 тра 2024
  • There are two types of CIWS systems. A gun-based CIWS usually consists of a combination of radars, computers, and rapid-firing multiple-barrel rotary cannons placed on a rotating turret. Missile-based CIWSs use either infra-red, passive radar/ESM, or semi-active radar terminal guidance to guide missiles to the targeted enemy aircraft or other threats. In some cases, CIWS are used on land to protect military bases. In this case, the CIWS can also protect the base from shell and rocket fire. A gun-based CIWS usually consists of a combination of radars, computers and rotary or revolver cannon placed on a rotating, automatically aimed gun mount. Examples of gun-based CIWS products in operation are:
    Credits:
    Rheinmetall:
    shorturl.at/psP27
    Denel:
    shorturl.at/hjryT
    Meroka:
    bit.ly/3ciK33N
    Sea Zenith:
    bit.ly/3cmUUtM
    Goalkeeper:
    bit.ly/3uRjKIJ
    Phalanx:
    bit.ly/3cmjdI2
    Type 730:
    bit.ly/3gfpVkw
    Kashtan:
    bit.ly/3prhl6b
    Pantsir-M:
    bit.ly/3imwB34
    The Buzz does not own the rights to these pictures or video clips, and no copyright infringement is intended. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images/clips to be credited/removed, or in case we miss out on mentioning your content in the description please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 973

  • @hellboystein2926
    @hellboystein2926 3 роки тому +398

    Pure rate of fire, is not a sufficient criteria: the Rheinmetall has 35mm with fragmenting Tungsteen sub-projectiles.

    • @Eradicator-jv9xr
      @Eradicator-jv9xr 3 роки тому +3

      Yes ik

    • @Eradicator-jv9xr
      @Eradicator-jv9xr 3 роки тому +3

      But that's for anti air you'll rely have to hook it up to a ciws radar and targeting system to actually use it to shoot down missiles n stuff

    • @kwtr1609
      @kwtr1609 2 роки тому +24

      @@Eradicator-jv9xr No, its an CIWS and CRAM system. It alreday has laser range systems and IR sensors. And of course, it needs a radar, basically every ship needs a radar

    • @kwtr1609
      @kwtr1609 2 роки тому +3

      And where is RAM and SeaRAM?

    • @Justineexy
      @Justineexy 2 роки тому +6

      Pure Fire rate is the Last line of defense for the CIWS.
      The Kashten and Pantsir Rely on their Missiles for Interception, But they rely on their Pure fire rate guns for the final stand, In other words, The ship relies on the CIWS as a final lien of defense, The CIWS it self relies on it's guns for the final lien of defense.

  • @gailmrutland6508
    @gailmrutland6508 3 роки тому +138

    *Rate of fire is one metric, and has several subcategories such as initial rate, sustained rate , burst rate and total magazine quantity. What matters is target acquisition, time on target and success rates of defeat, and YOUR order on "best"r would change dramatically measured by those meaningful metrics.*

    • @MrCastodian
      @MrCastodian 2 роки тому +1

      No, you THINK that, not the same as its correct.

    • @gtifighter
      @gtifighter 2 роки тому +6

      no, it wouldn't. Go cry because your Phalanx CWIS isn't the #1 on this planet...

    • @gen2mediainc.577
      @gen2mediainc.577 2 роки тому +7

      @@gtifighter yeah millennium gun is way cooler anyways

    • @huhummmmmmm
      @huhummmmmmm 2 роки тому +5

      @@MrCastodian Of course it was correct, it's simple logic. Grow up.

    • @FahrurRoziqin
      @FahrurRoziqin 2 роки тому

      @@gen2mediainc.577 Good design, i like it

  • @_556ms
    @_556ms 2 роки тому +18

    1st: fire rate is not a proper category
    the rheinmetall cannon is much more effective against aircraft and larger missiles
    2nd: the rheinmetall cannon is the mantis and comes from germany

  • @SunriseLAW
    @SunriseLAW 3 роки тому +104

    So many close-in weapon systems to choose from. Question is, what does my neighbor have?

    • @santochele1993
      @santochele1993 3 роки тому +1

      😄😄

    • @rupayanbandyopadhyay3578
      @rupayanbandyopadhyay3578 3 роки тому +5

      Obviously one of the Chinese made one.

    • @caliman8006
      @caliman8006 3 роки тому

      A "mini-pee-pee" close-in gun.

    • @AS-br8si
      @AS-br8si 2 роки тому

      But where u from?

    • @APersonOnYouTubeX
      @APersonOnYouTubeX 2 роки тому +2

      @@rupayanbandyopadhyay3578 nah China just sucks at actually choosing todo targets to test weapons on, honestly prob a nail gun

  • @1JackTorS
    @1JackTorS 3 роки тому +82

    You list everything in each gun's description except the caliber. I guess proofreading is a skill of the past.

    • @Qronos16
      @Qronos16 3 роки тому +8

      This video is incorrect on the listings

    • @Alexandre-ur7qb
      @Alexandre-ur7qb 3 роки тому

      mostly 20mm

    • @user-rm1bf4pp2g
      @user-rm1bf4pp2g 3 роки тому +3

      Russians use only 30mm with several types of ammunition thats all i know.

    • @tw4982
      @tw4982 3 роки тому +5

      Maybe the volume was turned down; my playback showed calibers in the sub-titles. Maybe not written, but it was described..

    • @alexanderbutler2989
      @alexanderbutler2989 2 роки тому

      yes I noticed that...I guess we're supposed to memorize it

  • @LaidbackLost
    @LaidbackLost 2 роки тому +5

    Congratulations on winning the award for poorest aged UA-cam video of 2022 April!

  • @XkMeng
    @XkMeng Місяць тому +2

    China's latest 1130b model should be at the top of the list. It is the only ciws system in the world with an independent AESA radar.

  • @MFitz12
    @MFitz12 3 роки тому +154

    I love these lists made by people who don't have a clue what they are on about. A CIWS system is not just a gun or gun mount. It is an integrated combination of weapon system, target acquisition and tracking system and fire control system. This video ignores two of the three. Then on top of that a system like Sea Zenith makes the list which is an acknowledged failure. Just a waste of time.

    • @ivanlagrossemoule
      @ivanlagrossemoule 3 роки тому +7

      At the same time people loving comparing 'spreadsheet' values of weapons and argue over them. If we didn't have this garbage content someone else would fill the gap.

    • @user-ox3bp4rz3n
      @user-ox3bp4rz3n 2 роки тому +3

      "A CIWS system is not just a gun or gun mount. It is an integrated combination of weapon system, target acquisition and tracking system and fire control system. " - let's say. But do you know any other systems from the list? For example, the presented Russian weapons systems?
      I did not go into the details of these systems, but I can give you an example of how our S-400 missile defense systems work (the best in the world, by the way, not counting the latest S-500 complex):
      S-300, S-400 have automatic interception modes, without the actions of maintenance personnel, and this is the main their mode.
      At the same time, any S-400 complex can not only shoot at other people's commands, but also manage a network of Anti-aircraft Missile Systems of various types: S-400, S-300, Pantsir-S1, Tor - M1, combining dozens of launchers with hundreds of missiles under its command.
      In this connection, I think that these systems are also part of a single network.

    • @jarink1
      @jarink1 2 роки тому +9

      @@user-ox3bp4rz3n Nikolai, thanks for a perfect example of a straw man argument. Russian long range SAMs are great, so Russian CIWS must be the best also?

    • @user-ox3bp4rz3n
      @user-ox3bp4rz3n 2 роки тому +3

      @@jarink1 First of all, you probably don't read well. I wrote there that our S-400 systems had the ability to control many other systems in an automated format. And this has been implemented for a long time.
      And when I wrote that our systems are the best, I wrote specifically about the S-300.. S-400 systems and so on.
      And not about CIWS systems.
      About CIWS systems, I said that in order to fully compare, you need to know their characteristics.
      And who is now a great example of a straw man here, me or you?

    • @jarink1
      @jarink1 2 роки тому +6

      @@user-ox3bp4rz3n Nick, you need to research what a "Straw man" argument is. до свидания

  • @timesof44
    @timesof44 2 роки тому +6

    Goalkeeper takes no prisoners, shoots first and doesn't ask any questions after. The top 2 look like something a Transformer would turn into.

    • @Austin-cx2xe
      @Austin-cx2xe 3 місяці тому +1

      The goalkeeper has no actual combat experience. Phalanx is not only the OG but easily the most combat approved and trusted CIWS with it just recently destroying Houthi anti ship missiles as a way to save missiles and money.

  • @Hamilton_ZA
    @Hamilton_ZA 3 роки тому +71

    South Africa we made it. 🇿🇦 🇿🇦 🇿🇦

    • @svmafs6401
      @svmafs6401 3 роки тому +12

      @Burak gö not everything is black or white..please check before speculating..

    • @Hamilton_ZA
      @Hamilton_ZA 3 роки тому +5

      Paid with my income tax money, sin tax money, fuel levy tax, VAT. MY MONEY MADE IT.

    • @svmafs6401
      @svmafs6401 3 роки тому +1

      @@Hamilton_ZA Unfortunately i cant argue with you on that one...our government is such

    • @mustafakemalataturk8013
      @mustafakemalataturk8013 3 роки тому +1

      Greetings from turkey

    • @iam3336
      @iam3336 3 роки тому

      @Burak gö said by beggar country like yours.

  • @eagol
    @eagol 20 днів тому +1

    Note that the latest sea test of the Chinese PLAN 003 aircraft carrier in early May 2024, the 1130 CIWS system came with a rectangular AESA radar antenna (old models are disc shape), can track and trace multi-targets and prioritize them at the same time.

  • @CoCoNutShovel
    @CoCoNutShovel Рік тому +4

    That scene from Hunter Killer will forever be implanted in my mind

  • @VahapOKUTAN.
    @VahapOKUTAN. 3 роки тому +35

    Turkey produced a new system called Gökdeniz. Gökdeniz may be at the top of the list because it has smart projectile launching capability, excellent software and powerful radars.

    • @annoyingbstard9407
      @annoyingbstard9407 3 роки тому +11

      😂

    • @tsugumorihoney2288
      @tsugumorihoney2288 3 роки тому +6

      this top based on CIWS "RATE OF FIRE" pls listen what author telling before typing something stupid

    • @muratyz6607
      @muratyz6607 2 роки тому +2

      @@tsugumorihoney2288 atış hızı tek başına hiçbirşey değildir..daha büyük kalibre daha fazla kinetik güç demektir..yazar listeyi yaparken en hızlıyı değil ..en iyi sistemleri göz önüne almalıydı..

    • @mr.t993
      @mr.t993 10 місяців тому

      Döner?

  • @Putins-mustache
    @Putins-mustache 2 роки тому +22

    Сorrection : "Duet" double rate of fire АК-630М-2 = 10 000 with two AO-18KD rotary cannons. Visually "Duet" differs from "Roy" in having a new mount with a stealthy low RCS design compared with the more traditional rounded AK-630 mounts.

    • @user-tr4bk6js4q
      @user-tr4bk6js4q 2 роки тому +2

      хороший резак у китайцев тоже супер

    • @hasnitamatisa6132
      @hasnitamatisa6132 2 роки тому

      How many ammo it had?

    • @Putins-mustache
      @Putins-mustache 2 роки тому +2

      @@hasnitamatisa6132 4000
      6 bursts of 400 shots with breaks of 5-6 or 200 shots with breaks of 1-1.5 seconds (information for one gun)

    • @hasnitamatisa6132
      @hasnitamatisa6132 2 роки тому

      Hopefully can it can hit target with eased. Loading another 4K ammo may take some time and seriuos labour.

  • @dodgex6592
    @dodgex6592 3 роки тому +15

    There is useless info about length and weight, but no info about caliber that more important

    • @Tuglife912
      @Tuglife912 3 роки тому +2

      Most are 30mm and our Mk.15 Phalanx is 20mm

    • @cgi2002
      @cgi2002 2 роки тому

      Weight is important, some of these systems are too heavy to be fitted to lighter ships, and some aren't the complete system, just the "gun" unit, they rely on a ship having an active search radar installed that they can be linked to. Some are also only part of the CIWS, many have a second missile based component thats installed seperately from the gun (or entirely independantly for both parts).
      A good example is the Phylanx is only part of the US CIWS, there is the C-RAM system too thats installed alongside it on many ships to act as the longer range compnent of the CIWS.
      Length (and height) while sounding useless, also is important, they affect the weapon placement aboard ship. If its too long it can't be installed in certain places as the barrels may collide with the ships structure, height means they can't be installed in certain places without disrutping the ships radar/communications or in heavier systems the ships stability.
      They sound like stupid stats but they really aren't.
      Also calibre was listed when you listen to the video, just not on the stats that were printed, bit of an oversight admittedly.

  • @Braun30
    @Braun30 3 роки тому +12

    Drawings seemed like a selection of new Daleks for Dr. Who.

  • @mc-foxy
    @mc-foxy 3 роки тому +84

    The Oerlikon Millennium Gun or „MANTIS“ is from Germany, not swiss. Its from Rheinmetall Defense, a german Company.

    • @khushaljaiswal0002
      @khushaljaiswal0002 3 роки тому +9

      It's a licensed production of Swiss gun

    • @Lofwyrf
      @Lofwyrf 3 роки тому +27

      Oerlikon was bought by Rheinmetall in 1999 so it's not licensed nor is it not a Swiss Company
      Now it is Rheinmetall Air Defence AG Part of Rheinmetall German.
      Rheinmetall Air Defence AG
      Birchstrasse 155
      8050 Zürich
      Schweiz
      So a Swiss Company belonging to a German company

    • @rex_5553
      @rex_5553 3 роки тому

      The Oerlilkon is mounted also on PT boats.

    • @mofleh177
      @mofleh177 3 роки тому +5

      @@khushaljaiswal0002 Ironically the original Oerlikon designer was German but had to register the patent and start the company in Switzerland because the 1919 armistice after WW1 forbids Germany from making such weapons.

    • @Braun30
      @Braun30 3 роки тому +1

      It was designed in Switzerland and is built in Switzerland.
      Belonging to a entity which happens to be abroad doesn't give the nationality.
      Otherwise we should talk about Lamborgini, that great German car, just like Rolls Royce, same origin.

  • @supermom7407
    @supermom7407 3 роки тому +8

    AK 630 so cute but deadly

    • @briananthony4044
      @briananthony4044 3 роки тому

      It is a really light turret, no wonder Russian ships are covered in them.

    • @Ivan0vsky
      @Ivan0vsky 3 роки тому

      Дуэт more efficiently. Duet is super!

    • @briananthony4044
      @briananthony4044 3 роки тому

      @@Ivan0vsky Yes I have seen that one. Nice compact unit. 10,000 rpm

    • @Justineexy
      @Justineexy 2 роки тому +1

      @@briananthony4044 Why not add more if you can! Russian navy doctrine
      (Just a joke)

  • @williamang9649
    @williamang9649 3 роки тому

    Right timing, couldn't be better then now to be recommended to watch 👍😋.

  • @yournemesis2454
    @yournemesis2454 3 роки тому +8

    I hope we get the pantasir m in our next gen frigates and destroyers like p18

  • @FahrurRoziqin
    @FahrurRoziqin 2 роки тому +9

    AK-630 look very simple and just 1m short for that rank tbh but its effective
    Also i like the design of millenum Gun

  • @franciscoavila7730
    @franciscoavila7730 2 роки тому +30

    The Meroka system was decommissioned many years ago, it was never updated or functional in reality, only on paper, currently it is only "dead weight" in the war ships that it was installed.

    • @peterpain6625
      @peterpain6625 Рік тому +1

      Same as the chinese and russian paper guns i suppose :)

    • @josuea1911
      @josuea1911 Рік тому +1

      @@peterpain6625 cope much ?

    • @NeelMarathe-wx1iq
      @NeelMarathe-wx1iq 11 місяців тому

      ​@@josuea1911No, kind of correct actually. Maintenance standards are horrible.

  • @ETC_Rohaly_USCG
    @ETC_Rohaly_USCG Місяць тому

    I'm retired now, but the sea whiz that we had was dang impressive.

  • @engineer0831
    @engineer0831 2 роки тому

    Thanks for video ))

  • @lupodimontenero661
    @lupodimontenero661 3 роки тому +8

    and Breda, OTO Melara, Leonardo? and anyway, I agree with 1zanglang, Helboy Stein, Player 55 Redcrafter. A CIWS has an acquisition system and a fire control system which is the most important part of the CIWS system followed by the ammunition, the gun itself only comes in 3rd place. the Leonardo 76/62 Super Rapido, for example, can use, in anti-missile mode of short / very short range ships, the DART projectiles, a guided ammunition and therefore to correct the route even in flight by directing it to the target, they are non-calibrated projectiles with respect to to the cannon, which can correct their trajectory to counter the maneuvers of the target missile and intercept it. Furthermore, in the 30 - 40 mm class, the Breda Dardo with a maximum range of 12500 m can engage flying targets at a longer USEFUL distance than any existing pariclass. useful distance = maximum range minus 25 - 30%

    • @nhatpham2206
      @nhatpham2206 Рік тому

      OTO Melara is a vulcan canon

    • @epicjager2899
      @epicjager2899 9 місяців тому

      @@nhatpham2206 have you ever seen a 76mm vulcan? cuz i didn't

  • @1zanglang
    @1zanglang 3 роки тому +76

    Rating these weapons only by rate of fire is just stupid.

    • @andr3onn854
      @andr3onn854 3 роки тому +1

      Ikr

    • @danielbromwich1827
      @danielbromwich1827 3 роки тому +7

      Also using the listed effective range values is pointless. Russia for example always has much lower standards for what constitutes "effective range". the 30×165mm rounds used in their listed CIWS have a lower muzzle velocity and worse ballistic coefficient than the 30×173mm round used in the Goalkeeper, yet they state their effective range as 4000m compared to Goalkeepers 2500m.

    • @1zanglang
      @1zanglang 3 роки тому +4

      @@danielbromwich1827 Absolutely correct.

    • @Eradicator-jv9xr
      @Eradicator-jv9xr 3 роки тому +1

      @@danielbromwich1827 she's probably too lazy to calculate those herself

    • @adrianpovazan3183
      @adrianpovazan3183 3 роки тому +1

      Yes but Russia would be also on the top.

  • @DreadX10
    @DreadX10 3 місяці тому

    My boarding team was firing 170 rounds per second during a mad-minute (the fastest way to get all the ammo out of the magazines after deployment).
    According to you, this was the best CIWS ever......

  • @venkateshmadewar7865
    @venkateshmadewar7865 3 роки тому +1

    Am searching ciws weapon video u made it for me 😍😍😍😘😘😘

  • @juho1057
    @juho1057 2 роки тому +123

    There WAS six AK-630 onboard russian cruiser Moskva... It got hit TWICE and those systems could not do anything!

    • @NewMusicWeekly
      @NewMusicWeekly 2 роки тому +24

      We may never learn if all six AK-630s failed to activate, some activated but failed to destroy the incoming missile, or were all busy engaging drones.

    • @razorm1195
      @razorm1195 2 роки тому +47

      Self claimed ukrainian

    • @jtrx753
      @jtrx753 2 роки тому +14

      @@razorm1195 Self claimed expert keyboard warrior

    • @garrenali3301
      @garrenali3301 2 роки тому

      Mmmmmmm maybe its jammed so it cant firing the missile

    • @sovietunion9131
      @sovietunion9131 Рік тому +58

      I think Western Propogenda hadn't told you Ukraine launched almost 20-25 neptune missiles to destroy Moskva Cruiser
      AK-630 Destroyed 3-5 Neptune Missiles
      S-300 destroyed more than 15 neptune missiles
      Only 2 missiles had passed AA system, One missile done some miner damage but second missile hit the ammunition area where P-1000 were stored.

  • @AAdB72
    @AAdB72 3 роки тому +6

    Spanish CIWS Meroka is the old one.
    Escribano has developed for the Spanish Navy (Armada) the Sentinel TAO (GAU 12/U gun + 4 Mistral III missiles) and the Sentinel 25 RFG (only GAU 12/U gun)
    It will be great if you update de TOP 10 CIWS with the new weapons

    • @pacojones4074
      @pacojones4074 3 роки тому +1

      Ni yo lo hubiera dicho mejor 😉😁

    • @AAdB72
      @AAdB72 3 роки тому +2

      @@pacojones4074 de hecho si podrías jajaja
      Luego me fijé que la versión inicial llevará el cañón rotatorio tipo GAU-12/U con 5 tubos pero está previsto mejorarla pasando al modelo GAU-22/A y reduciendo a 4 tubos.

    • @pacojones4074
      @pacojones4074 3 роки тому +1

      @@AAdB72 créeme, ni aun así yo lo hubiera hecho mejor 😉😅

  • @PunishSlave
    @PunishSlave 3 роки тому

    Buen video

  • @swapnilkadam8094
    @swapnilkadam8094 3 роки тому +7

    Awesome video, nice information,
    Love from Mumbai as well as Thane, India!!

  • @dylanlim7647
    @dylanlim7647 3 роки тому +5

    Even so, for everyone mad that its by rate of fire, You have to admit that the PANTSIR M is scary

    • @turkishcypriot8013
      @turkishcypriot8013 3 роки тому +1

      Pantsir easy target for Turkish drone Bayraktar TB-2 watch the videos.

    • @Ivan0vsky
      @Ivan0vsky 3 роки тому +2

      @@turkishcypriot8013 Old Pantsyr S-1, no one S-2 or a SM or M

    • @acemipenguen7318
      @acemipenguen7318 2 роки тому +1

      @@Ivan0vsky old or new bom bom bom.

    • @Ivan0vsky
      @Ivan0vsky 2 роки тому +2

      @@acemipenguen7318 only in your dreams

    • @cgi2002
      @cgi2002 2 роки тому +1

      @@turkishcypriot8013 you mean the video which when you actually watch it shows that active S-1's killed upwards of 40 Bayraktars without loss later on, and the early losses to those drones were against S-1's that weren't active at the time. Before you boast about your drones effectiveness, make sure your drones actually engaging targets that are setup to shoot back, because when it does, it loses, badly.

  • @daknytt
    @daknytt 2 роки тому +3

    Proud of Mzansi🇿🇦 for making it on the top 10👊

  • @taddyllaneta4466
    @taddyllaneta4466 3 роки тому +22

    Lol. The top gun should be the Russian Duet CIWS

  • @user-ck2ei7xh3e
    @user-ck2ei7xh3e 2 роки тому +23

    "Дуэт" где???

  • @ayonnion1078
    @ayonnion1078 3 роки тому +3

    4 Phalanx ciws 😍

  • @praetor9822
    @praetor9822 2 роки тому +3

    I am Heavy Weapons Guy. And this is my weapon.

  • @jameswaterfield
    @jameswaterfield 2 місяці тому

    Recent history, disproves #6, #2 and #1

  • @player55redcrafter8
    @player55redcrafter8 3 роки тому +15

    You didn't add the DARDO ciws, I'm pretty much a fan of large caliber ciws like the 40mm

  • @royhsieh4307
    @royhsieh4307 3 роки тому +8

    imagine similar systems introduced in ww2:
    kamikazers: we quit

    • @racismceo797
      @racismceo797 2 роки тому +4

      they had pretty good AA back then tho

    • @Deimnos
      @Deimnos 2 роки тому

      well if you wanna see something like that animated, but it is agaisnt a US Navy attack flight in WW2, you can check it out here, but it doesnt have subtitles. It isnt realistic, but it gives you the Basic Idea (and it doesn't just involve the CIWS system):
      ua-cam.com/video/3YmKg61JEqI/v-deo.html

  • @rex_5553
    @rex_5553 3 роки тому +9

    In the thumbnail & Timestamp 4:46 the Top 4 is the iconic US Model CWIS Phalanx Minigun, seen on all destroyer-type ships.

  • @ronaldwhite1730
    @ronaldwhite1730 2 роки тому

    Thank you

  • @sarahbethsmile
    @sarahbethsmile 2 роки тому +16

    What happens when we get the kashtan ciws and put it on tracks? Bam,we got the Tunguska anti everything

    • @xmeda
      @xmeda 2 роки тому +1

      Too large, heavy and recoil is too much for such small vehicle.

    • @profo4544
      @profo4544 2 роки тому +2

      @@xmeda Recoil? compared to a tank on tracks? what are u talking about lmao those missiles and guns arent putting out that much recoil lmfao.

    • @gourmetbanana
      @gourmetbanana 2 роки тому

      Except against Turkish drones...

  • @texasranger24
    @texasranger24 2 роки тому +11

    This list is incredibly misleading. Some of these systems were already outdated 30 years ago, while the Nr 10 Millennium Gun has individually programmed explosive ammo, the newest radar and computers and the highest range. Leading to the best hits per shots fired ratio. Only lasers or even more advanced future guns will be better.

  • @doneckford1189
    @doneckford1189 3 роки тому +5

    The AK-630 reminds me of a Dalek

  • @joshuas640
    @joshuas640 2 роки тому

    What do you edit on ?

  • @fastacker2
    @fastacker2 Рік тому +2

    Rank them based on speed of killing the target. Not rate of fire.

  • @TD_JR
    @TD_JR 2 роки тому +15

    I'd think accuracy and tracking are ahead of ROF in terms of purpose.

    • @sonson9876
      @sonson9876 2 роки тому

      If you spit double the rounds a minute accuracy gets a bit meaningless.. And if you wanna go by accuracy, the Millenium gun would be top 5 just because of the type of ammo it uses

    • @narobii9815
      @narobii9815 2 роки тому

      It's also a lot harder to get good numbers on accuracy and tracking for a simple youtube video. Hence why they stated this is how we will rank them, not this is the best ranking. It's used to give order. One could argue size or weight should play a bigger role.

    • @samulivainionpaa9338
      @samulivainionpaa9338 2 роки тому +5

      @@sonson9876 Well, Moskva went down to subsonic ASM's, so it appears so that accuracy and tracking matter more

  • @rager1969
    @rager1969 Рік тому +3

    I think the cannon used in the A-10 is the same as the one in the Goalkeeper.

  • @Krypton1996
    @Krypton1996 3 роки тому

    Please make a video about Top 10 RCWS.

  • @AlexanderSixtyFour
    @AlexanderSixtyFour Рік тому

    yeah! On Mokba works pretty well!

  • @jamison884
    @jamison884 2 роки тому +3

    The weapons systems are arranged by rate of fire, and even then, the US/NATO Phalanx comes in 4th on this list. Only Russian and Chinese designs ahead of it. I'll just go ahead and take that US option, you other guys can have the Russian and Chinese models.

  • @mayofficialsnhangthu7084
    @mayofficialsnhangthu7084 3 роки тому +32

    Love Russia from Laos 🇱🇦 ❤️🇷🇺

  • @vadim-2068
    @vadim-2068 2 роки тому

    pantsyr-m looks cool !

  • @siorenz9055
    @siorenz9055 2 роки тому +1

    Huraaaaa😎😎😎

  • @rollerrollerichson6258
    @rollerrollerichson6258 3 роки тому +34

    Sea Zenith was developed from Oerlikon Contraves, Swiss. Its not a Turkish gun but it is used on old Turkish frigates from Germany like TCG Oruc Reis.

    • @zamazingotv2149
      @zamazingotv2149 3 роки тому +2

      Who say this?

    • @rollerrollerichson6258
      @rollerrollerichson6258 3 роки тому +2

      @@zamazingotv2149 What do you mean? The company is from swiss (today, Rheinmetall) and they developed this product. There are all infos, do your research.

    • @zamazingotv2149
      @zamazingotv2149 3 роки тому +1

      @@rollerrollerichson6258 just motor from germany rein metal but all guns from self turkey

    • @zamazingotv2149
      @zamazingotv2149 3 роки тому +1

      @@rollerrollerichson6258 and now turkey dont need tank motor from germany because turkey do it to 1600 ps a motor from bmc company

    • @rollerrollerichson6258
      @rollerrollerichson6258 3 роки тому +8

      @@zamazingotv2149 You do not need a tank engine for a CIWS. I just say, this is not a Turkish made weapon system, it is from a swiss company, used on Turkish ships they bought from Germany. The Turkish made Gökdeniz CIWS also uses an Oerlikon Gun, produced under license. Now, Oerlikon is part of a German subcompany from Getmanys Rheinmetall, also located in Swiss.
      By the way, if the BMC tank engine will fulfill the needs as a reliable engine will need time, as well as the powerpack.

  • @nikialexa5654
    @nikialexa5654 2 роки тому +5

    *TOP 10 RATE OF FIRE CIWS IN THE WORLD*
    There i fix the title..

  • @ozdemirdiner1528
    @ozdemirdiner1528 3 місяці тому

    Unfortunately video has wrong information. Sea Zenith system is used by Turkish Navy only MEKO class frigates. Origin is Switzerland (Oerlikon Contraves). Turkey has their own system called as GOKDENIZ. System is brand new system which is using Atom Smart Ammunition.

  • @Kalle56
    @Kalle56 2 роки тому

    if the hoseir m is as prone to errors as the hoseir s2, then you have a problem.
    I know one is a ground-based air defense system and the other is a close-in weapon system, anyway

  • @williamdossantos369
    @williamdossantos369 2 роки тому +30

    Rússia🇷🇺 com 3 dos 10 sistemas anti aéreo, parabéns Russia por sua inovação, Brasil🇧🇷 minha terra amada, um dia chegamos lá

    • @usuariopimba707
      @usuariopimba707 2 роки тому +3

      Na real seria 4, porque os russos também tem o AK630 M1-2.

    • @AlexAlex-jz4eo
      @AlexAlex-jz4eo Рік тому +1

      Russia in real life not even in the list 😂😂 Moskva is now down with the fishes🤣🤣

  • @ctg3254
    @ctg3254 3 роки тому +10

    Love from assam nice information

  • @robertwillis4061
    @robertwillis4061 2 роки тому

    And the UK has nothing you would think with BAE systems being into so many different pieces of Military equipment, they would have something in this field.

  • @howardpowell9673
    @howardpowell9673 3 роки тому

    Kool

  • @abdullahzaif6097
    @abdullahzaif6097 2 роки тому +8

    Love Turkey from Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇹🇷

  • @akashnepak504
    @akashnepak504 2 роки тому +6

    Goalkeeper has better tracking capability than phalinx

    • @randykitchleburger2780
      @randykitchleburger2780 2 роки тому +1

      I wouldn't doubt it to be an honest 🇺🇸

    • @profo4544
      @profo4544 2 роки тому +2

      Larger caliber size to, but its made off of the design of the phalanx, if u think the phalanx the US employs doesnt use some improved tech ur naive, i hear the phalanx is very twitchy, seems soulless, it can move extremely fast. The the phalanx im sure has some classified tech in it, the ones we employ atleast, maybe not the ones we export.

    • @pieterveenders9793
      @pieterveenders9793 Рік тому +5

      @@profo4544 Incorrect, Goalkeeper has no relation with Phalanx. The Dutch designed it from the ground up with the exception of buying its gun from GE to save money on cost of scale (the Netherlands has no manufacturers producing multi-barrelled autocannons, and setting that up themselves would cause a huge increase in the per unit costs, hence it was cheaper to just buy that abroad). And the Dutch have always been ahead of the US by 5-10 years when it comes to naval sensors such as radar. Precisely those sensors are the reason why Goalkeeper is so much better, it has unparallelled accuracy as a result.

    • @jimmys1558
      @jimmys1558 7 місяців тому +1

      @@pieterveenders9793 We bought the gun from USA, made rest ourselves. i believe its the same gun thats fitted on an A-10

    • @user-ji7qy2vc8x
      @user-ji7qy2vc8x 3 місяці тому

      I agree. Goalkeeper is the best!

  • @ThorDyrden
    @ThorDyrden Місяць тому

    Simply choosing rate of fire as sole metric is not sufficient (as most comments point out). Like kids comparing cars solely based on horsepower.
    One aspect missed e.g. is: These canons fire short bursts of maybe 1s. The rotary canons usually have a higher rate of fire - but they need time to start rotation, before they fire. So if you loose 500ms of the 1s burst - this meens a weapons-system firing from ms 1 can have half the fire-rate and still put out the same amount of rounds... and it has a lower latency.

  • @beautifulpakpk1594
    @beautifulpakpk1594 3 роки тому +2

    Turkey is very good for weapons. Any explanations? Industry?

  • @nathanruben3372
    @nathanruben3372 3 роки тому +7

    Turkey has built a navy variant of korkut close air defence system which is called gokdeniz. New ships will be carrying this new gun system. Check it out.

  • @the_once-and-future_king.
    @the_once-and-future_king. 2 роки тому +6

    Maybe you could show them being fired? Think your viewers would like that.

    • @DreadX10
      @DreadX10 3 місяці тому

      It was already too much trouble to look up the barrel-length of the goalkeeper. While it only required one more click on the link to the GAU-8 avenger.....

  • @m83fan84
    @m83fan84 3 роки тому +2

    where is chinese Type1130?

  • @lucadelgaudio8782
    @lucadelgaudio8782 4 місяці тому

    And then the 76/62 italian otomelara is on the Olympus of ciws, better not to forget it anymore

  • @Ceyhanl-se6vv
    @Ceyhanl-se6vv 3 роки тому +6

    🇹🇷 Gökdeniz Korkut-D not Zenith

  • @renato3177
    @renato3177 2 роки тому +4

    This list is incorrect. Missing the 76mm OTO Melara Super Rapido used by almost all western navies.

    • @wellerocks
      @wellerocks 2 роки тому +2

      and the Bofors 57mm. This youtuber just read a list on fastest firing guns, and assumed that's how you reliably take down targets.

    • @satyajeetbhosale7134
      @satyajeetbhosale7134 Рік тому

      It's not ciws..it is mrg

  • @christopherchartier3017
    @christopherchartier3017 5 місяців тому

    It’s only 10,000 rpm because it’s just two AK-630’s. And honestly, idk why it needs missiles. The US navy gets around this by using ESSM short range interceptor missiles in combination with the tried and true Phalanx, but I guess Russia just wants to “add more gun”

  • @xxdausxx200
    @xxdausxx200 2 роки тому

    love the arma 3 footage

  • @jacobt6412
    @jacobt6412 2 роки тому +7

    You would think the Phalanx would be in the top 2 because of its proven record but instead unproven weapon systems get the top 3. Very strange.

    • @jacobt6412
      @jacobt6412 2 роки тому

      @@RobertLutece909 Yeah you right, my bad.

    • @profo4544
      @profo4544 2 роки тому +3

      From what i hear it moves the fastest and its impressively twitchy and responsive nowadays, the footage of alot of the ones u see are from when they first came out, These things used to be famous for not working at all on shipsn when they first were employed, now they much more reliable.

    • @jacobt6412
      @jacobt6412 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@profo4544 They're employed in US bases as well because they're quite good at their job against artillery and other projectiles.
      The US Army loves them.

    • @pieterveenders9793
      @pieterveenders9793 Рік тому +2

      The list is clearly incorrect anyway, considering Goalkeeper is much better than Phalanx and yet somehow Phalanx ranks right above it.

  • @slomo49
    @slomo49 3 роки тому +16

    the weakness of the US Phalanx model is that it only holds 900 shells and runs empty very quickly

    • @Aadiotygod25dada
      @Aadiotygod25dada 2 роки тому +3

      and 20mm

    • @grigorispanousis9745
      @grigorispanousis9745 2 роки тому +3

      @@Aadiotygod25dada theres no issue with it being a 20mm

    • @reahs4815
      @reahs4815 2 роки тому +5

      @@grigorispanousis9745 larger caliber means longer range and each round is more effective if its for example a shrapnel round

  • @user-nr1dx8ni2t
    @user-nr1dx8ni2t 3 роки тому +1

    Millennium Gun 射撃動画に度肝抜かれました!軍艦の砲塔・攻撃機の背中にオンブ・軽戦闘車輌型・陣地の守り…etc 重量3.3t!オールマイティな使い方が可能なCIWSです!(o´∀`)b

  • @jeffersonchau7171
    @jeffersonchau7171 2 роки тому +2

    It's interesting on How the Swiss make guns but don't fight with them

  • @Propapanda0213
    @Propapanda0213 3 роки тому +5

    This video is hilarious.

    • @Propapanda0213
      @Propapanda0213 2 роки тому

      @Alex ur dad is

    • @Propapanda0213
      @Propapanda0213 2 роки тому

      @Alex this vid is full of wrong data, dunno why you get pissed off

    • @Justineexy
      @Justineexy 2 роки тому +1

      @Alex You're rude.

    • @Justineexy
      @Justineexy 2 роки тому +1

      @Alex wrong what? You're the one that is rude.

    • @Justineexy
      @Justineexy 2 роки тому

      @Alex See, rude.

  • @jataalaterenal3907
    @jataalaterenal3907 3 роки тому +6

    🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @entropy_of_principles
    @entropy_of_principles 3 роки тому

    There are not so many, even ten, a curious top

  • @6ixss
    @6ixss 3 роки тому

    Its scary that #1 seems like a Robot :P

  • @paulw6057
    @paulw6057 2 роки тому +3

    AK-630, otherwise known as a Dalek.

  • @manta1969manta
    @manta1969manta 3 роки тому +3

    Russians know how to do

  • @bronis_lav
    @bronis_lav Рік тому +1

    You missed ak630m2 duet. But just look how ak630m fire, doesn't it looks like it underestimated compare to the higher tiers

  • @fabianbenitez8609
    @fabianbenitez8609 3 роки тому +2

    Excellent video 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

  • @27rus63
    @27rus63 3 роки тому +5

    I read that we have started developing a supersonic cartridge in Russia, I do not know the caliber, but it is known that the conventional barrel of the weapon is enough for 20-30 shots. the information is old.

    • @beebeebooboo4888
      @beebeebooboo4888 3 роки тому +1

      Oh so like every other bullet that breaks the sound barrier

    • @pcmattress5221
      @pcmattress5221 2 роки тому

      @@beebeebooboo4888 You can't expect people from countries with no civilian semi-auto rifle ownership to know about things like that.

    • @ricardomartins8765
      @ricardomartins8765 2 роки тому

      Great video but this one is better: ua-cam.com/video/Xio4w8k3kD8/v-deo.html

  • @amankaushik4371
    @amankaushik4371 3 роки тому +3

    Love from india

  • @H.P206
    @H.P206 3 місяці тому +1

    where is the mantis air defence system?

  • @trollllllll4499
    @trollllllll4499 3 роки тому +1

    Now we have korkut to replace CIWS and sea zenith

  • @clangerbasher
    @clangerbasher 3 роки тому +6

    Phalanx at 4? Really? Is it the clever 20mm rounds? No because it can only fire solids. Can it be directed at all angles? No. It would barely scrape the top ten.

    • @mhero6865
      @mhero6865 3 роки тому +6

      Many of the others barely qualify as prototype or BETA models. Well over 1,000 of Phalanx systems have been fielded and millions of rounds have been fired through them. And only about 1/2 of the nations on this list have real navies. Again more internet pipe dream lists that never take into account real world application. Much like Armata until you field and use these systems in the ecosystem they would exist you don't know how well it works.

    • @danny5637
      @danny5637 2 роки тому

      @@mhero6865 500 M1a2 sep+

    • @reahs4815
      @reahs4815 2 роки тому

      @@danny5637 yea cuz russia have only 20 tanks lol

    • @undercover1790
      @undercover1790 Рік тому +1

      @@reahs4815 Thousands of tanks!!!1!1 yet half of them don't work, a quarter are really old soviet models and the rest of the semi modern ones are being slowly picked off in Ukraine.

  • @user-fj2vi2qd8f
    @user-fj2vi2qd8f 3 роки тому +6

    Перевод , где перевод?
    Инглиш нихт понемейт.

    • @user-fj2vi2qd8f
      @user-fj2vi2qd8f 3 роки тому +1

      @@010joejoe
      Шпрейхен зи дойч.

    • @user-fj2vi2qd8f
      @user-fj2vi2qd8f 3 роки тому +3

      @@010joejoe
      Я я , капуть

    • @user-ec4vk5yw6n
      @user-ec4vk5yw6n 3 роки тому +1

      😁

    • @gjfjdjd
      @gjfjdjd 2 роки тому +1

      Пусть учат Рашен прекрашен😃

  • @daskissenwurdegecaged-snai3265

    bruh the ak-630 should be on 2nd place since its max rpm is literrally higher than 5th 4th and 3rd ciws, and we sort here by rpm, right?

    • @Yessir1506
      @Yessir1506 Рік тому +1

      And the ammo size is bigger than the ones in the phalanx

  • @drdavidstr
    @drdavidstr 2 роки тому +1

    South african CIWS throws spears

  • @surachaiplangthaisong1685
    @surachaiplangthaisong1685 3 роки тому +3

    Pantsir-M very​ good​

    • @Faruk1243gm
      @Faruk1243gm 3 роки тому

      very good????? turkish Bayraktar TB2 KILLING ALL PANSTIR

    • @paulziberth1148
      @paulziberth1148 3 роки тому +1

      Почему в Сирию перестали летать?!
      Боитесь?!

    • @dodgex6592
      @dodgex6592 3 роки тому +2

      @@Faruk1243gm lol all pantsir? They destroyed some of them some of them because of useless crew. After that Pantsir destroyed several Bairaktars and they stopped flying because they lost a lot

    • @alexjakobsson1171
      @alexjakobsson1171 3 роки тому +2

      @@Faruk1243gm Красуха 4 навырубала этих рактаров херову тучу, че не летаете то аа ?

    • @Justineexy
      @Justineexy 2 роки тому +1

      @@Faruk1243gm Lol, Pantsir-M is on the gorshkov, In other words, The Pantsir-M is only installed on ships that are in the Baltic and artic, So how did a Turkish drone flew to the baltic/Artic to hit a Russian ship?

  • @user-leshiy99rus
    @user-leshiy99rus 2 роки тому +6

    Finally, a more or less perfect video. Thank you for not putting the United States in the first place. As for weapons, the Russian Federation is out of competition. We can bend everyone!
    ;)

  • @yusufmartapura6702
    @yusufmartapura6702 3 роки тому +1

    Millenium gun👍

  • @hilairelaplume1616
    @hilairelaplume1616 Рік тому +1

    This is like the equivalent of saying an Uzi is better than an M4 in a desert