5800X3D & 4090 and don't know why the hell I should upgrade to a 9800X3D? I'd only upgrade selling the AM4 & 5800X3D and getting 1:1 AM5 with the 9800X3D.
@@SicSemperBeats Here in Norway the 9800x3d is 600 US dollars if I convert from Norwegian Krones. 5700x3d is 241 US dollars. Of course, 9800x3d is not in stock anyway. They are selling a ton of 5700x3d's now from the biggest webshop in Norway. They sell alot more now than before the 9800x3d came out. I think people already on AM4 realised how good the 5700x3d really is for gaming and how insanely overpriced the 9800x3d is right now. 7800x3d is crazy overpriced aswell, going for 537 US dollars in Norway, if I do the conversion. It is not in stock, just like the 9800x3d. 5700x3d is plenty in stock and at a good price. I like to compare the 5700x3d to the R7 7700, since they have the same amount of cores and threads. 7700 is maybe 10% faster overall if you are CPU limited in gaming. But it is also alot more expensive VS 5700x3d. R7 7700 non X goes for 331 US dollars if I convert. 90 Dollars more than the 5700x3d. For that price difference you could easily get a 32GB nice DDR4 kit or a nice 1TB M.2. Or even put the 90 dollars into a better GPU. For gaming AM4 is still plenty. Especially if you go 5700x3d/5800x3d.
That's why it'll be a long time until I upgrade my 5800 X3D. Because I play at 4K ultra and at that level you are a GPU bound so nothing you do with your CPU will make a damn difference so long as you have a decent one to begin with.
I've always preferred 1440p high refresh rate as the displays are just cheaper and better for eSports titles. Crazy how many games are CPU bottlenecked at that resolution
@skip485 1440 is perfect for desktop, and I do have two ultra wides at my desk I use, but that's more like 2K. I will occasionally game in my office. However, most of my gaming happens in the living room, and for that, I game on 4K.
Mostly true. But my 8-core 5800X3D became limited when I turned live weather and live traffic up in MSFS 2020 @ 4K. I upgraded to a 16-core 7950X3D in anticipation of MSFS 2024 with its better core utilization. I saw about a 15% gain in FPS with FS20, but I'm seeing pretty massive gains in FS24 @ 4K. My 3090 Ti gets a workout in both sims, for sure. Point is, CPU cores matter in some games more than others.
Yeah, true to a point but at some point in the future a game engine will saturate the CPU and you'll get dips at any resolution, which means even reducing it won't even help, but I'm hoping the time when games aren't playable on a 5800X3D are a long way off into the future 😅
Just remember, more ray tracing is coming. And that does place a heavier load on the CPU dependent on resolution. So if you like Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition or Spiderman, having a better CPU will help. I don't particularly care about it at the moment, but I probably will soon
@@freedomforall4470 the latest games have shown that there are differences (some would even call them big differences) between 5800x3d and 9800x3d when paired with 4070tiS and above. The cpu holds back these gpus because of RT and the way UE5 games are being made and it happens even in 4k. In 2k differences are bigger. But hey. We still talking about high refresh rate experience on both scenarios. The 5800x3d cache proved be a trully inovation making competition still with latest AMD cpus.
Please use Ultra settings at low resolutions when doing CPU tests. Ultra settings often include higher geometric density, farther draw distances, and better physics and AI (or at least more), all of which challenge the CPU more than the GPU.
@@Battal_Gazi Ultra settings use increased physics computations and AI routines that challenge the CPU as well as the GPU. It's still not all about the GPU, even on Ultra settings.
How is that? One of the best CPU’s if not the best with one of the best graphics cards what else would you recommend to not be bottleneck on either end?
What is crazy is how overpowered the current CPUs are, and even from past generations, like the 5000 series, a triple A game that goes between 100 fps and 120 is more than enough, it seems that people set the standard now at 200 fps, if not it is not optimal, it is surreal what has been achieved. We are oversaturated with technology and hardware that is more than overexploited and never before has consumerism had such a leading role. Companies and companies that now release new graphics cards and new overpowered CPUs every few months that make no sense for gaming, except spending huge amounts of money.👀
Those components are mainly for enthusiasts and real gamers, who require the best HW possible. It is common for other hobbies as well. What is your point then?
your out of touch with reality.... i have a 360 hz monitor and so do most of my friends... best cpu paired with best gpu in the world cant run 1% of games at 360 hz...
This doesn't get shown enough. This is a whole system upgrade. New mobo, new DDR5 RAM... Once you are gaming at 4k, these new CPUs do very little, it is all GPU power. Tech 'Reviewers' usually just show low resolution performance and gloss over the fact that at 4k you will gain next to nothing performance wise unless you are using 10 year old CPUs.
I upgraded from 5800X3D with 3600 MHz CL 16 RAM to 9800X3D with 8000 MHz CL38 RAM and playing in 4K so you didn't have to! TLDR; I barely notice a difference with the same RTX 4090 GPU :P But surely there IS a difference in the 1% lows if that matters to you! A Big one too.
@spudbuilt4308 It is, but only in games prior to about 2022. Especially with all the unoptimized performance hogs that came out (stalker 2 and dragons dogma 2).
As owner of a 5800X3D ($320) paired with a Radeon 6800XT ($500) playing in 1080P at 144hz (IPS gaming Monitor) and 4K at 120Hz (LG OLED TV) I can attest it was money well spent. These 3D CPU's don't sweat at 4K, though I wish I saw more difference in the avg FPS in 4K, however the .1 and 1% lows difference were clear night and day between the two, yet I might wait to upgrade to AM5 depending how the new upcoming Video Cards perform as both NVidia (RTX 4 series) and AMD (Radeon RX 7 series) were disappointing in the mid high range. Seems I'll be keeping my AM4 system a couple more years :)
You would have to buy used. More realistically, you're looking for a 5700x3d now. Games would stutter less. Stuff like mmos or sims, you'd get fps boost.
@biturbo i think in benchmarks, on average, about 5% or less. 5800x3d is out of production. 5700x3d is still available. I just sold a 5800x3d like a month ago lol. For context, 5800x3d will sell for $250 used all day right now. High demand still. Ebay is higher. 5700x3d you can buy new for $200, or even less in places like Ali.
It's absolutely insane how much cooler the 9800x3d runs. The rearranged how the cache is layered if I believe. Recently made the upgrade to 9800x3d. 5800x3d is still a goated chip IMO
with Super Ultrawide @ 5120 x 1440 - will my system be more on the 1440 p or the 4 k spectrum when taking your benchmarks into consideration when it comes to Performance gain ?
More towards 4k. If you were on a WQHD monitor (3440 x 1440) then you would be pretty much in the middle. But our monitors (I have one too) are DQHD monitors with 5120 x 1440p resolution so it moves closer to 4k resolution performance wise.
Most of these games have build in benchmarks. You should've used them to get even more accurate results. If you're recording and benchmarking gameplay like in cyberpunk driving through the city, there are so many variables like different car density that can impact the results.
Considering the price difference, AM4 remains a solid choice. I would argue that the 5700X3D is actually a better option over the 5800X3D when it comes to price-to-performance again.
GOW 0.1% lows absolutely annihilates the 9800x3d but shines with the 5800x3d on every res except 4K where 9800x3d comes back. Glitch, bug or just ran once and reinstalled for those 2 resolutions?
Those 1% lows are really good on the 9800x3d but everything else doesnt really justify the purchase for me I was heavily considering upgrading my 5800x3d, but after watching this video i don't think i want to upgrade for a negligible performance boost since i game @1440p and 4k most of the time Though, those 1% lows are enticing they don't justify 800+ dollars for me.
Just the video I needed I'm a Ryzen 7 5800x3d owner with a 4070ti super OC now I know upgrading the 3d chip loos like every other generation I skipped the Ryzen 7 7800x3d and it was worth it. Unless you're gaming at 4k I'm 5120x1440 240hz so I will see a difference and there over clocking od ram and CPU definitely worth the upgrade
If you already have a 12th gen Intel or ryzen 5000 or newer cpu and game at 4k then upgrade your GPU first …. Once you got a 4090 are better GPU then maybe think about upgrading your cpu again the performance gains at 1440 and 4k are GPU bound at this point in time. PC gaming is in its golden age for sure
I'm trying to figure out why compare these two CPUs. I wouldn't upgrade from a R7 58003XD to a R7 98003XD. It's not worth it. The only upgrade worth considering from the R7 58003XD would be the R9 counterparts.
Starfield the 9800x3d had terrible 0.1% lows in 4k compared to 5800x3d. There's definitely inconsistencies for the newer chip so no point in upgrading from 5700/5800x3d just for a handful of games from this review.
@@yosifvidelov i have no doubt about that. I was curious about the comparison between platforms both platforma with 4080s . Im super tempted to buy a 4080s 2nd hand from someone who has fomo on 5xxx series. I bet i can snipeit for about 600$ . Im waiting now for 5xxx series to come out :D
...I almost bought that this won't be a "yet another fake BS video" (as it was with the INTEL CPUs), but then I noticed some games with higher than low settings. So some results are corrupted again. Simple basics: if you want to compare pure CPU performance, than use the fastest GPU available on the market AND use the lowest possible game settings: However if you want to compare pure GPU performance, than use the fastest gaming CPU available on the market AND use the highest possible settings in the game. These kind of so called "benchmarks" are totally useless, especially if you have a mid range GPU only. In case you wanna get a PROPER benchmark and review, I strongly recommend to watch Hardware Unboxed for instance...
This entirely depends on the game. Most are very badly optimized nowadays or just cpu heavy, those will benefit from a faster cpu even above 1440p. Better 1% lows worst case.
@Muldeeer if u game mostly AAA titles at 3440p or 4k, u don't need a 3D chip, only 1080p and 1440p u will see benefits. triple AAA titles at 3440p and 4k u see maybe 2% difference which is nothing so it's not Worth it to get the 3d chip if u game at 3440p or 4k and u game heavy GPU titles
@@nephilimslayer You aren't understanding. It is more than average framerate. People are finding them useful at higher reslutions because there is a smoother framerate with 0.1% and 1% lows being higher.
5800X3D is truly the holy grail of AM4 chips
One of the all time CPU greats
5800X3D is a beast.
And I got it 😊
So happy I managed to get snag one (in Aug 2024) just before it went the way of the dinosaurs!
5800X3D & 4090 and don't know why the hell I should upgrade to a 9800X3D? I'd only upgrade selling the AM4 & 5800X3D and getting 1:1 AM5 with the 9800X3D.
If you play AAA games at 1440p or more, using high/ultra settings there is no point upgrading from a 5700x3d/5800x3d to the 9800x3d.
yea big price difference too. I gotta 5800x3d last week for $250. 9800x3d is $520 out the store lol
@@SicSemperBeats Here in Norway the 9800x3d is 600 US dollars if I convert from Norwegian Krones. 5700x3d is 241 US dollars. Of course, 9800x3d is not in stock anyway. They are selling a ton of 5700x3d's now from the biggest webshop in Norway. They sell alot more now than before the 9800x3d came out. I think people already on AM4 realised how good the 5700x3d really is for gaming and how insanely overpriced the 9800x3d is right now. 7800x3d is crazy overpriced aswell, going for 537 US dollars in Norway, if I do the conversion. It is not in stock, just like the 9800x3d. 5700x3d is plenty in stock and at a good price. I like to compare the 5700x3d to the R7 7700, since they have the same amount of cores and threads. 7700 is maybe 10% faster overall if you are CPU limited in gaming. But it is also alot more expensive VS 5700x3d. R7 7700 non X goes for 331 US dollars if I convert. 90 Dollars more than the 5700x3d. For that price difference you could easily get a 32GB nice DDR4 kit or a nice 1TB M.2. Or even put the 90 dollars into a better GPU. For gaming AM4 is still plenty. Especially if you go 5700x3d/5800x3d.
That's why it'll be a long time until I upgrade my 5800 X3D. Because I play at 4K ultra and at that level you are a GPU bound so nothing you do with your CPU will make a damn difference so long as you have a decent one to begin with.
I've always preferred 1440p high refresh rate as the displays are just cheaper and better for eSports titles. Crazy how many games are CPU bottlenecked at that resolution
@skip485 1440 is perfect for desktop, and I do have two ultra wides at my desk I use, but that's more like 2K. I will occasionally game in my office. However, most of my gaming happens in the living room, and for that, I game on 4K.
видете че тварится старый проц на равне с новым а если нет разницы тогда зачем платить больше?
Mostly true. But my 8-core 5800X3D became limited when I turned live weather and live traffic up in MSFS 2020 @ 4K. I upgraded to a 16-core 7950X3D in anticipation of MSFS 2024 with its better core utilization. I saw about a 15% gain in FPS with FS20, but I'm seeing pretty massive gains in FS24 @ 4K. My 3090 Ti gets a workout in both sims, for sure.
Point is, CPU cores matter in some games more than others.
Yeah, true to a point but at some point in the future a game engine will saturate the CPU and you'll get dips at any resolution, which means even reducing it won't even help, but I'm hoping the time when games aren't playable on a 5800X3D are a long way off into the future 😅
I bought a 5800X3D on launch.
In December 2024, for 1440P or more gaming (which I do) I still don't have a reason to upgrade.
Solid AM4 gains.
5800X3D excelent for 4k
And still great for 2k native :)
you dont need a 5800x3d to run 4k..... any random 6 cores cpu that released rencent years can do the job
Just remember, more ray tracing is coming. And that does place a heavier load on the CPU dependent on resolution. So if you like Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition or Spiderman, having a better CPU will help. I don't particularly care about it at the moment, but I probably will soon
@@freedomforall4470 the latest games have shown that there are differences (some would even call them big differences) between 5800x3d and 9800x3d when paired with 4070tiS and above. The cpu holds back these gpus because of RT and the way UE5 games are being made and it happens even in 4k. In 2k differences are bigger. But hey. We still talking about high refresh rate experience on both scenarios. The 5800x3d cache proved be a trully inovation making competition still with latest AMD cpus.
Yeah cause of the "excellent" gpu. run a lower one things change.
1% lows gain for 9800x3D are insane especially in TLOU and Cyberpunk.. Brutal MVP gaming CPU. Glad i managed to snatch a 9800x3d myself.
how did you get one? in-stock luck or any strategy
@james3414 in stock luck, next day all was sold out. Now everywhere is sold out. Pure luck.
600$ cpu for play in 1080p lmao 😂😂😂
@@Devil1nside974ah another one that has zero clue about how CPUs are tested. You poor person. 😂
The .1 percent lows also
Please use Ultra settings at low resolutions when doing CPU tests. Ultra settings often include higher geometric density, farther draw distances, and better physics and AI (or at least more), all of which challenge the CPU more than the GPU.
But ultra settings are GPU dependent
@@Battal_Gazi
Not in all games. And not every setting is. There is nuance.
@@Battal_Gazi Ultra settings use increased physics computations and AI routines that challenge the CPU as well as the GPU. It's still not all about the GPU, even on Ultra settings.
gonna keep my 5800x3d for awhile I guess
I upgraded from the 5800x3d to the 9800x3d running on an RTX 4090. GPU is the bottleneck. So the upgrade was an irrelevant waste of money.
How is that? One of the best CPU’s if not the best with one of the best graphics cards what else would you recommend to not be bottleneck on either end?
I'm about to buy a 5700x3d just cause it's a solid cheap deal 179.99 at micro
@@pmazurek559 I have a 4090 also. Thank you so much for your sacrifice.
@@pmazurek559depends on the resolution your gaming on. No way GPU was the bottle neck at 1080pz
What is crazy is how overpowered the current CPUs are, and even from past generations, like the 5000 series, a triple A game that goes between 100 fps and 120 is more than enough, it seems that people set the standard now at 200 fps, if not it is not optimal, it is surreal what has been achieved.
We are oversaturated with technology and hardware that is more than overexploited and never before has consumerism had such a leading role.
Companies and companies that now release new graphics cards and new overpowered CPUs every few months that make no sense for gaming, except spending huge amounts of money.👀
Those components are mainly for enthusiasts and real gamers, who require the best HW possible. It is common for other hobbies as well. What is your point then?
You buy these CPUs to future proof your system a bit so that all you need are GPU upgrades for the next 7 or 8 years
@@forog1 It depends on your needs basically. Many experienced players demand better performance on their rigs.
your out of touch with reality.... i have a 360 hz monitor and so do most of my friends... best cpu paired with best gpu in the world cant run 1% of games at 360 hz...
@@joshuajones5791 если ты играешь в CS2, Volorant, Pubg и другой киберспорт - зачем тебе 360Hz в Cyberpunk 2077?) 🤷♂️
5800x3d is simply too good. Especially if you game at 4k
This doesn't get shown enough. This is a whole system upgrade. New mobo, new DDR5 RAM... Once you are gaming at 4k, these new CPUs do very little, it is all GPU power. Tech 'Reviewers' usually just show low resolution performance and gloss over the fact that at 4k you will gain next to nothing performance wise unless you are using 10 year old CPUs.
I'll stick with my 5800x3d for the time being. As a 4k single player gamer I'm usually gpu bound with my 4070 ti super anyway.
I upgraded from 5800X3D with 3600 MHz CL 16 RAM to 9800X3D with 8000 MHz CL38 RAM and playing in 4K so you didn't have to! TLDR; I barely notice a difference with the same RTX 4090 GPU :P But surely there IS a difference in the 1% lows if that matters to you! A Big one too.
I don't believe you launched it on AM5, 8000 MHz RAM, what motherboard do you have?
@@TheBiakoo ASUS X870E Hero why?
Upgrades my i7 8700k to the 9800x3d. 3070 not a 1440p card but the 1% lows are massively improved at 344px1440p
the 3070 is a 1440p card, what planet you on?
@spudbuilt4308 It is, but only in games prior to about 2022. Especially with all the unoptimized performance hogs that came out (stalker 2 and dragons dogma 2).
But....But.....most everybody plays at 1080p low settings with their 4090.
No most . The only ones that play at 1080 low settings with a high end card are fps competitive players . CS2 / Call of Duty etc .
Its the way that u make cpu compares dog.
THX👌 super video
Welcome 😊
As owner of a 5800X3D ($320) paired with a Radeon 6800XT ($500) playing in 1080P at 144hz (IPS gaming Monitor) and 4K at 120Hz (LG OLED TV) I can attest it was money well spent.
These 3D CPU's don't sweat at 4K, though I wish I saw more difference in the avg FPS in 4K, however the .1 and 1% lows difference were clear night and day between the two, yet I might wait to upgrade to AM5 depending how the new upcoming Video Cards perform as both NVidia (RTX 4 series) and AMD (Radeon RX 7 series) were disappointing in the mid high range.
Seems I'll be keeping my AM4 system a couple more years :)
If i upgrade a 3800x with 5800x3d do you think is a good upgrade for my AM4? I have 2080S
You would have to buy used. More realistically, you're looking for a 5700x3d now. Games would stutter less. Stuff like mmos or sims, you'd get fps boost.
@@sodapopinksi667 how much difference from 5700x3d and 5800x3d?
@biturbo i think in benchmarks, on average, about 5% or less. 5800x3d is out of production. 5700x3d is still available. I just sold a 5800x3d like a month ago lol. For context, 5800x3d will sell for $250 used all day right now. High demand still. Ebay is higher. 5700x3d you can buy new for $200, or even less in places like Ali.
It's absolutely insane how much cooler the 9800x3d runs. The rearranged how the cache is layered if I believe. Recently made the upgrade to 9800x3d. 5800x3d is still a goated chip IMO
with Super Ultrawide @ 5120 x 1440 - will my system be more on the 1440 p or the 4 k spectrum when taking your benchmarks into consideration when it comes to Performance gain ?
More towards 4k. If you were on a WQHD monitor (3440 x 1440) then you would be pretty much in the middle. But our monitors (I have one too) are DQHD monitors with 5120 x 1440p resolution so it moves closer to 4k resolution performance wise.
What kind of terrible coming does the 5800 have? 85C. Mine never touches 60C while gaming
this cant be max settings or is it?
so upgrades now depend on your monitors fps max, so if your doing 4k gaming just hold fast
What cpu should I pair with 4070ti super for 1440p? Im building complet new pc
i run a 5800x3d with my 4070 ti s, but you could use a 5700x3d with little fps drop off. if choosing the 5800x3d keep the temp below 80 deg C
I was trying desperately to get a 9800 to upgrade from a 5800, i play @4k120 so this video just saved me ~800$
Nice and clean, good job
As a 4k gamer ( using DLSS whenever i can) the difference at 1440/4k between a 5800X3D and 9800X3D is definitely not worth the cost.
Most of these games have build in benchmarks. You should've used them to get even more accurate results. If you're recording and benchmarking gameplay like in cyberpunk driving through the city, there are so many variables like different car density that can impact the results.
Considering the price difference, AM4 remains a solid choice. I would argue that the 5700X3D is actually a better option over the 5800X3D when it comes to price-to-performance again.
It's obvious that in 4K the 4070 is a limiting factor. You need a 4090 for that.
*5090...
I've still got my trusty 4790 and 1080ti
GOW 0.1% lows absolutely annihilates the 9800x3d but shines with the 5800x3d on every res except 4K where 9800x3d comes back. Glitch, bug or just ran once and reinstalled for those 2 resolutions?
Those 1% lows are really good on the 9800x3d but everything else doesnt really justify the purchase for me
I was heavily considering upgrading my 5800x3d, but after watching this video i don't think i want to upgrade for a negligible performance boost since i game @1440p and 4k most of the time
Though, those 1% lows are enticing they don't justify 800+ dollars for me.
Just the video I needed I'm a Ryzen 7 5800x3d owner with a 4070ti super OC now I know upgrading the 3d chip loos like every other generation I skipped the Ryzen 7 7800x3d and it was worth it. Unless you're gaming at 4k I'm 5120x1440 240hz so I will see a difference and there over clocking od ram and CPU definitely worth the upgrade
If you already have a 12th gen Intel or ryzen 5000 or newer cpu and game at 4k then upgrade your GPU first …. Once you got a 4090 are better GPU then maybe think about upgrading your cpu again the performance gains at 1440 and 4k are GPU bound at this point in time. PC gaming is in its golden age for sure
the 5800x3d needs to be kept under 80degC for best performance - based on my testing. your 1080p testing was
above 80degC
1% lows are significantly better that's why it's still very good in 4k. I've switch to the 9800x3d from the 9700x and the experience was way smoother
yes but on low settings.. I would like to see how tests look on ultra..
@ i dont play on low settings, it's always high to ultra in 4k and i paired it with a 4090. The 9800x3d does not seem to stutter at all
A comparison with 4K DLSS/FSR/XESS Performance mode would be useful.
hm my CPU-Z Benchmarks are quite lower than yours... I got 8275 multi and 775 single
THANK YOU FOR THIS'
I'm trying to figure out why compare these two CPUs. I wouldn't upgrade from a R7 58003XD to a R7 98003XD. It's not worth it. The only upgrade worth considering from the R7 58003XD would be the R9 counterparts.
I have 5800x 3d 7900xt and 4k 240 monitor. For me does not seem worth upgrading cpu. Ill be gpu bound most of the time
Like to see those low temps compared to 5800x3D
All these games are gpu based wouldve been cool to see more cpu based games like rust day z or tarkov
Starfield the 9800x3d had terrible 0.1% lows in 4k compared to 5800x3d. There's definitely inconsistencies for the newer chip so no point in upgrading from 5700/5800x3d just for a handful of games from this review.
Cpu only better for higher fps. 4k games or mainly gpu bound
Col PC ci gioco solamente, e gioco in 4K con una 4080 super, mi tengo il 5800 x3D ancora per 100 anni! 😆
А если 5800 разогнать ?
Your 4070ti is limiting the ture power of 9800x3d.
not in 4k.
What cpu should I pair with 4070ti super for 1440p? Im getting new build
@@Danny_79 R7 7700 will do the job.
@@ruiliang3785 the 9800x3d is not even fast enough to push a full load out of the 4070 ti super..."limiting the true power" 😂
@@zackfair8407 full idiot. The 4090 is not even fast enough to get the 9800x3D start sweating
So, 5800x3d still a beast
yeah and that beast still slaying those frames, ima keep mine for yearrrrrs b4 I even think of upgrading
such good channel
ваш экзепляр 5800x3d сбрасывает частоты, мой держит при любой нагрузке 4450 это еще минимум +5%
with 4090 the gap is gonna be even bigger
Where 7800x3d?
So don’t replace my 5800x3D since I game at 4K?
Got it.
1% low so much better even in 4K
Ah damn now i'm curious how it would've performed with 4080s :))
It performs perfect i have a 4080 and 9800x3D and it pushes the GPU to its ultra limit.
@@yosifvidelov i have no doubt about that. I was curious about the comparison between platforms both platforma with 4080s . Im super tempted to buy a 4080s 2nd hand from someone who has fomo on 5xxx series. I bet i can snipeit for about 600$ . Im waiting now for 5xxx series to come out :D
I had 5800x3d with 32gb 3600 and 4080super.Today arrived the 9800x3d with taichi lite x870E and 32gb 6400!!!!My god i love it!!!!!
9800X3D 4K +3fps…. Well I’d stay on AM4
...I almost bought that this won't be a "yet another fake BS video" (as it was with the INTEL CPUs), but then I noticed some games with higher than low settings. So some results are corrupted again. Simple basics: if you want to compare pure CPU performance, than use the fastest GPU available on the market AND use the lowest possible game settings: However if you want to compare pure GPU performance, than use the fastest gaming CPU available on the market AND use the highest possible settings in the game. These kind of so called "benchmarks" are totally useless, especially if you have a mid range GPU only. In case you wanna get a PROPER benchmark and review, I strongly recommend to watch Hardware Unboxed for instance...
and the gpu is clearly mentioned in the title and the thumbnail...
Nonsense
Compare it to the 7800x3D -- you'll barely see any difference.
Ясно, буду сидеть дальше на 5800x3d
Why is your 5800x3d running so hot? 🤨
3d chips are only for 1080 and 1440p, if u game at 3440p or 4k u are fine with any 8core cpu
This entirely depends on the game. Most are very badly optimized nowadays or just cpu heavy, those will benefit from a faster cpu even above 1440p. Better 1% lows worst case.
@Muldeeer if u game mostly AAA titles at 3440p or 4k, u don't need a 3D chip, only 1080p and 1440p u will see benefits.
triple AAA titles at 3440p and 4k u see maybe 2% difference which is nothing so it's not Worth it to get the 3d chip if u game at 3440p or 4k and u game heavy GPU titles
@@nephilimslayer You aren't understanding. It is more than average framerate. People are finding them useful at higher reslutions because there is a smoother framerate with 0.1% and 1% lows being higher.
@johnboylan3832 triple AAA titles there's no difference at 3440p
it depends on what games
@nephilimslayer The difference is there on the video you are commenting on. Look again at the 0.1% and 1% lows.
I don't believe my eyes at 4k
How can you buy a 9800X3D when AMD can't even produce enough cpus to meet demand!
I giochi vanno testati in 720 o 1080 oltre non ha senso .
GPU bottleneck for the r7 9800x3d
I play in 4K that’s why I never upgraded my system and my tv only goes to 60fps soooooo
You are testing with a 4070 card lol
It's almost like 4080 (it's a slightly cut 4080 lol) Same memory, same bus!!!
@@HopletSplayserovich yeah and the same AD103 core of 4080
@@HopletSplayserovich doesn’t matter. Can’t do a fair comparison of cpu’s with a GPU bottleneck.
@@HopletSplayserovichU dint have a clue about the difference.My god sog shits kids everywhere.
Y donde esta la comparacion de fortnite??? Te ganaste un dislike!! :(
your gpu is 100% no diffrence
makes 0 importance at 4k
You have did wrong test for cpu! You NEED to use Ray Tracing when is available because this stuff use even CPU!
Where is intel? Oh i am gonna get fried🤣
Fake video, i just swapped from 5800x3d to 9800x3d and its way 40% faster
can you please watch the video carefully...
And understand it