I'll never understand why "You Can't Do That" hasn't gotten the same recognition as the Beatles other early classics. It's SUCH a cool, rocking tune--might be my favorite early Beatles song!! And this performance is awesome---John starts the bridge too early--during the bridge George and Paul abandon the "Can't Do That" chorus--there's foulups all over the place but these guys were so friggin great they just rolled with it and made it work!! Their sound is raw and gritty as hell!! The universe was is cosmic alignment when these guys came together--no other band has or ever will equal them!!
My grandmother who was born in 19 0 3 used to tell me that The Beatles long hair was growing into their brain and by shaking their heads up-and-down they were causing brain damage and that's why they were singing like that . Years later when she passed I went through her garage and found a treasure trove Beatles albums and memorabilia. We had no clue how much she loved them and I think she was embarrassed to say so just because they had long hair. I still have all that and will pass it down to my kids
dogleg 1957 That's a nice story. Maybe she was kidding, the way adults will tease little one's imaginations. Either way, her love for the Beatles must have enriched her life.
Funny: After he sings the first verse of "You Can't Do That," John does his "soul shout" and steps away from the mic, expecting George's guitar solo. Just in time, he looks over at Paul, who's looking at him like, "Hey! second verse, buddy!" and John gets back to the mic in time to begin the second verse. Most of the fans never knew the difference. I love seeing spontaneous moments like that on stage; keeps things fresh and exciting....
That's the first thing I've noticed, I've been on the stage and these things happen to even the best. It's live so nobody gives a damn. ;D John was a great singer though.
I know, I love the freshness and rawness of this performance - wonky equipment and sound balance, forgetting lines and all... it just makes it all the more real, exciting and fun like you're there rather than at some artificially perfected modern concert, with a crew of 50+ to smooth out every technical glitch...
@Mark Radzin I hadn't noticed it honestly, but now that you mention it it is quite obvious. John is still kind of laughing about his mistake for the following 30 seconds.
Nick Fernandez Its a known fact.There are many articles about it. Lennon did not like the sound of his voice and loved to double-track his records. He would often ask the band's producer, George Martin, to cover the sound of his voice: "Can't you smother it with tomato ketchup or something?"
I was 19 when a saw an identical performance to this in the UK. I swear it changed my life. Its amazing I can still see this now because of UA-cam and I am 74 now.
This IS in the UK. To quote TheBeatleBible.com: "The Beatles topped the bill at the New Musical Express' 1963-64 Annual Poll-Winners' All-Star Concert, playing before an audience of 10,000 at the Empire Pool in Wembley, London." Maybe that's you in the audience. Cheers!
The Beatles had two AMAZING singers in the frontline. John and Paul were both on FIRE here... John is belting out "Twist and shout" while Paul is singing "Long Tall Sally" better than anybody in the world.
Their energy in this is fucking INSANE. And at the same time, all the things that went wrong are hilarious!!! This might just be my all time favorite Beatles live performance. It seriously kills me that going back in time isn't possible and I will never get to experience this magic in real time in this only life I have. PHYSICALLY pains me. Even though I didn't exist during all this, I miss them and the whole era SO badly every day it hurts. I'm sure other millennial Beatles fans can relate. And your friends-- they just don't get it.
If only they'd slipped in "I Wanna Be Your Man" into this set. Ringo always knocked that one out of the park. Energy off the charts. When I first became a Beatles fan many years ago, it was through the late-era songs, but I'll choose the Beatlemania stuff any day of the week now.
A very Professional band. They had style, they always gave their best, no mimicking... and their songs had beautiful lyrics and rhythm. The more I listen to them, the greater my admiration ...even at age 75.
@@pipeandslippersman The greatest rock and roll drummer of all time. And for the people who doubt his abilities? Well, they're obviously not drummers. Because drummers know and appreciate in awe, all that Ringo created/invented and which is still emulated today.
I recall, like it was yesterday, sitting right near the front row of the East Ham Granada, ( east London), in late 1963 as a 14 year old, accompanied by my older fifteen year old cousin Susan to watch this new group The Beatles, with their funny haircuts and Liverpudlian accents, that we had heard and read so much about. When the guys finally came on stage my ears were hit with what can only be described as a few hundred screaming banshees.....the atmosphere was incredible, so electrically charged, as I recall. Above the noise I could just about hear the band who, by today's standards, were playing Please Please Me off the backline and singing through the house PA system... given that they still sounded so raw and exciting and, to my eyes, very handsome and mature. Even at that early stage in their development their musical talent and engaging personalities were very evident. Little did I realise in December 1963 what impact these guys would have on the wider world during the rest of the decade which still resonates today. I also didnt realise then that, as a 70 year old I would be able to access their music and live performances through the miracle of computerisation and the Internet, something that would have been viewed as too far fetched to believe, certainly by the thinking of the early 60's. We have come a long way I am am still here drawing breath, thinking Im a teenager all over again....RIP John and George and thank you both for the music and the memories.....
John LOVED it when Paul really let go & really "threw it" (his voice)...Watch John's ecstatic expression as he watches his friend tear it up...John might not have said it much, but it's all there in his face...
I WAS THERE WHEN THE GREATEST POP BAND OF ALL TIME TOOK THE STAGE IT WAS ELECTRIC AND DEAFENING AND A GREAT N.M.E.WINNERS SHOW.ONE I REMEMBER WITH GREAT AND HAPPY MEMORIES.
The BEATLES were incredible when I was 14 and they are just as FANTASTIC and I am 72. There will NEVER be another Group that Approaches Their Volume of Superb, Iconic, Identifiable Music.
When I was still in diapers and my parents played Beatles music all the time in the house, I was always drawn more to John's voice. I didn't realize it then, of course, but as I got older and discovered which voice belonged to which Beatle, it was John's that had always made me happy as a baby/toddler. And now that I'm 45, I still find it soothing and familiar.
GPC 0321 John Lennon was special intriguing more than any of the Beatles controversial harsh political genius above the rest of the Beatles . Paul was maybe better to some people but John was a more much more complex individual I was ten years old when I heard of John Lennon and his music and he was the best
@@squiddywiddy0762 The Beatles were a marvel of all the right factors coming together at a point in time made for just such serendipity. Every time I think of them I'm in awe of all that came together... "Come together, right now, over me [us]".
@@milesprower6426 Later in their career Paul was asked if Ringo was the best drummer in the world. He replied "He's not even the best drummer in the Beatles". Still love Ringo's style tho.
When a kid, I first heard the Beatles and got under their spell - for ever.Under socialism in the USSR it was a gulp of fresh air, unknown freedom of soul, youth and talent...Then I studied English hard (under the Beatles' influence..). In the Soviet army I used to sing The Yellow Submarine while marching with my mates to the dining hall, the song ringing high and far all over the army grounds/ And the officers just smiled, they enjoyed the Beatles as well :))
Точно, точно... А я в армии на посту битловские тексты заучивал. Мать по моей просьбе прислала. Дома вручную переписывал и в армии( в гробу её видел) помогали эти сраные два года пережить.
Even though they had faulty equipment, they still got on with it! Can you imagine some Diva with a faulty earpiece or microphone? She'd storm off in a second! This, my dears, is true rock n' roll and that's why The Beatles are the best!
Debbie Prentice ~ What faulty equipment? You don't know what you're saying. They wouldn't go on stage with substandard equipment. The amps and guitars were well made, and among the best available.
PerformanceJust look at Ringo go, on Long Tall Sally! This is probably the best live performance I've ever seen of them. I'll never forget the impact of '64 Ed Sullivan of course, but this is the Beatles we've all read about, at their most live energetic. Wow!
The early Beatles had all the energy of rock and roll, combined with incredibly catchy pop melodies. I don't think anyone was able to put those two things together like that before the Beatles.
Nope, ONLY all the artists and bands The Beatles emulated and wanted to be like. Little Richard, Chuck Berry, Smokey Robinson and The Miracles, etc. The Beatles themselves say they simply worked to sound like soul artists. Every act, no matter how successful, was influenced by somebody else. The Beatles were no different. But at least they gave credit where it was due, both in interviews and by actually covering the songs of acts they idolized.
@@stannote8312 Earlier rock acts had the rock and roll energy. No way did they have the same songwriting talents as Lennon & McCartney. Chuck Berry & Little Richard could rock with the best of them, but they couldn't have written She Loves You, Can't Buy Me Love, I Want To Hold Your Hand, I Saw Her Standing There or more subtle pieces like If I Fell or Here There Everywhere.
The Beatles didn't invent the amalgamation of pop melody and rhythm. Motown was doing it long before the Beatles came along. Songwriters like Holland, Dozier & Holland, Smokey Robinson, Marvin Gaye, Robert Bates, etc.--all writers the Beatles emulated, if not covered outright, until they developed their own style. The Beatles were a phenomenon of popular music--POP, the very nature of which involves following musical trend. McCartney and Lennon went on to become brilliant writers with an intimatble, original style. But let's not imagine or pretend Motown, Burt Bacharach and other writers/producers out of NY's Brill Building weren't doing that stuff already. Don't take my word for it; Paul McCartney acknowledges these things over and again in a variety of literature, radio and TV interviews, including an interview in the book, "The Complete Beatles Recording Sessions," published a few years back by EMI. I always find it interesting that Beatles fans like to say how original the band was from the second it set foot onto the international spotlight, when not only does musical history but the Beatles themselves say otherwise. The Beatles' style was built on American soul, rockabilly and for melodics sake, the Great American Songbook. It's okay to acknowledge that. It doesn't make the group any less inventive and influential. @@prschuster
It's really incredible how four people could meet and stay together for 13 years I was 4 when the Beatles became famous Ringo Starr is still drumming today and Paul McCartney still tours occasionally too bless John and George I hope they're both rocking in heaven there will never be another group like The Beatles they changed the World forever.
So much energy from all of them in this live performance!! John absolutely slayed Twist and Shout. Then Paul matched his energy on Long tall Sally. Ringo really kept the energy going with his drumming absolutely fantastic! And Paul's voice on Long Tall Sally is incredible, how it goes from loud and raspy to smooth falsettos - incredible stuff.
THAT is an incredible performance, dodgy mics and all!!!! Lennon’s Twist and Shout is jaw dropping! Then Paul steps up and just hammers home Long Tall Sally, Ringo...WOW! And George keeping everything going cool as you like. The Beatles at their god damn best.
@@samueladams1775 I think the reference was to things like having to juggle broken mic stands left over from the previous group's performance, while continuing to play and sing flawless harmony, and also to the lower decibels than are typical today, having to do battle with the wall of screams from the crowd.. Personally I love the rawness and casualness of it all compared with higher tech offerings today with their massive production crews, where nothing is left to chance, although I suppose performers must prefer it like that. Yes, you're right, Vox made great amps! (There's a good doco on them somewhere in YT Land, if you haven't already seen it. :-)
This is their best concert EVER! Their professionalism shines through all the mike problems, mixing problems, verse mistakes, and all. It really shows how their Cavern days paid off.
I was born on the very same day The Beatles appeared live on The Ed Sullivan Show in the USA, Sunday, February 9th, 1964. Watched by a television audience of 73 million. Awesome! 😍💞
Out of thousands of performances, this is one of their best, and the most energetic. They are almost punk rock but with better vocals and much better songs. Tight as hell..jeez...
When I saw them in Atlanta in '65....all I remember is SCREAMING...and almost fainting...I was 13....I couldn't talk or think when we walked out of the stadium...I was in a daze..and oh so happy....lol...
+Billie Sumrell The Beatles were asked what place was their favorite to perform at. Their answer was... Atlanta because it was the first time they could hear themselves play. www.cbs46.com/story/24667227/beatles-atlanta-65-the-most-memorable-show-of-the-tour
You are so lucky, I wish I could be in The 60's to watch them in concerts, and I'm hoping to saw Paulie or Ringo if they still alive, omg, seriously, that's amazing😭💖.
Fucking Lennon man, love that voice - mic was playing up on him, probably couldn't even hear himself, and yet he delivers a flawless live rendition of their biggest hit on the spot. *Nails* his 'oooohs' - I've seen him leave that to McCartney and Harrison in other performances; here he hits the note and kills it. Close to my favourite vocalist of all-time, and there's been some beauties.
That is soooo true. Lennon and MacCartney as a songwriters and musicians in the SAME BAND! Over the top talent in one band alone. A guy fan here from way back when I first saw them LIVE on Ed Sullivan in 1964.
Steve Arditi That’s why they switched mics. The solo, or lead, took the one on the left - facing them- The whole thing was a mine field...they made it through and then some!
@David Roberts Wait. So you believe that in 1966, John just lets this nobody who now looks and sounds like Paul, step in and take control of the direction of the band. George and Ringo, we are supposed to believe just went along, no questions asked. But it’s John Lennon who we are talking about. Half of the creative force behind the Beatles. The father of the band, if you will. The man known for his dagger-like tongue, quick wit, and short fuse. Yes, that John Lennon. Sure, he just said, "Great! Billy's taking over!" Sure he did. Stupid.
He never had confidence in his voice and usually double-tracked his vocals on the early albums. But as you can hear, in these far from ideal conditions, he could belt it out like no one else (well possibly Paul).
John had a perfect lead vocal on Twist 'n Shout- never once did it slack off or falter. Frankly, his vocal has more all around quality; the best rock lead voice. Paul's vocal is less full, and although he gets up there in higher notes, he loses density, it sounds good, but not full like John. Yet Paul's ballads are beautiful, because his voice is prettier. The point of a band or more than one is to increase but always have oneness, otherwise its a solo. And on that note🎶🎵, they were one. 😝💜💓😇
@@jo-annzinni3511 true. You can find people to imitate Paul and singers like Freddie Mercury and Robert Plant, and come within 90 percent or more to their voices. John on the other hand, after probably thousands upon thousands of tribute bands over 40 years, his voice is extremely difficult to come real close on. Its quite a sound.
Reading these witty and observant comments has certainly added to my enjoyment of this film. Thank you all from a life long Beatles fan now in his 60s reliving the most joyous times of his youth during these toughest years the world has seen in his lifetime. Stay at home. Stay safe and please continue to share your wit and keen observations. They lift all our spirits.
how great is john lennon his voice is so strong and his mic stand is broken- but he still sounds wicked .. and his lead gtr on 'you cant do that and long tall sally - his vocal on twist n shout -rocking
Take another look at "You Can't Do That". What you are seeing is not just a random floppy mike stand. What you are seeing is Paul, George, and probably Ringo playing a joke on John. The mike is prank one. Next is when John finishes the second verse and he does a sorta scream and pulls away from the mike in anticipation of an instrumental interlude. But, Paul and George rush right into the chorus. John rushes back to the mike, bewildered and looking for a clue from his band mates. He likely thinks he made a mistake. But it's just the guys screwing with his head.
@@winomaster I disagree, based on my own musical experiences. Vintage microphone clips screwed to the adjustable height pole of the mic stand. Whoever set up the stage didn't tighten Lennon's enough, and the moving cable (stage bounce) loosened it. You can't do much about it during the peformance of a song. Lennon acted like a pro and rolled with it, and tried to tighten it after You Can't Do That....but the damn thing loosened again....you can see this when George tried to tighten it during Twist & Shout. No prank...Lennon moved over to the better mic, which makes sense from a musician standpoint...lead singer should always get the best mic if a mic failure happens. As far as You Can't Do That....Lennon screwed up and thought the 3rd verse was done (he just finished the second) and expected George to solo....but Paul and George were correctly singing the bridge. An rare error made during the excitement of the NME Performance.
Not sure about that, but that is some unimpeachable footage ain't it. They really cut their teeth as a live act before they made it big; they'd have played literally thousands of ours lives before this gig. They went downhill as a live act over time because they just couldn't hear themselves - but I agree with Lennon's assessment that they were a good lil' rock n' roll outfit for a while there.
This is one of my all-time favourite Beatle concerts. It's like they were all mentally back in Hamburg the entire time -- that's how tight and energetic they were. Paul absolutely delivers the best-ever live version of "Long Tall Sally" and "Can't Buy Me Love," and I don't think I've heard better live vocals from John, even if the mic was annoyingly dodgy. George's solos are note-perfect as always. Also, Ringo is hitting those drums like he's got some kind of personal vendetta against them. Notice in the last bit of "Long Tall Sally" how John and George look at him when he starts in on the triplets. Yeah, he's really rocking it, they're thinking. It's wonderful! What an incredible drummer. P.S. Now, after that, who really cares that John couldn't remember his own song lyrics to save his life?
I love how after John says something to Paul after you can't do that - probably "say something, i have to adjust my mic - he just goes and says some meaningless random words and the audience of course goes heyyy
giligara30492 Ringo has said before that he had to hit ridiculously hard especially the snare so the guys could hear a beat the girls were so loud and lack of sound system.
This film made me appreciate my life even more amidst all the scandals and negativity existing in 2019, there's a blistening sense of peace knowing you can watch the beatles and other wonderful bands and music from any moment in time prior with a tap on your phone.
I'll never understand why "You Can't Do That" hasn't gotten the same recognition as the Beatles other early classics. It's SUCH a cool, rocking tune--might be my favorite early Beatles song!! And this performance is awesome---John starts the bridge too early--during the bridge George and Paul abandon the "Can't Do That" chorus--there's foulups all over the place but these guys were so friggin great they just rolled with it and made it work!! Their sound is raw and gritty as hell!! The universe was is cosmic alignment when these guys came together--no other band has or ever will equal them!!
My grandmother who was born in 19 0 3 used to tell me that The Beatles long hair was growing into their brain and by shaking their heads up-and-down they were causing brain damage and that's why they were singing like that . Years later when she passed I went through her garage and found a treasure trove Beatles albums and memorabilia. We had no clue how much she loved them and I think she was embarrassed to say so just because they had long hair. I still have all that and will pass it down to my kids
dogleg 1957 That's a nice story. Maybe she was kidding, the way adults will tease little one's imaginations. Either way, her love for the Beatles must have enriched her life.
Funny: After he sings the first verse of "You Can't Do That," John does his "soul shout" and steps away from the mic, expecting George's guitar solo. Just in time, he looks over at Paul, who's looking at him like, "Hey! second verse, buddy!" and John gets back to the mic in time to begin the second verse. Most of the fans never knew the difference. I love seeing spontaneous moments like that on stage; keeps things fresh and exciting....
Well spotted!
That's the first thing I've noticed, I've been on the stage and these things happen to even the best. It's live so nobody gives a damn. ;D John was a great singer though.
I know, I love the freshness and rawness of this performance - wonky equipment and sound balance, forgetting lines and all... it just makes it all the more real, exciting and fun like you're there rather than at some artificially perfected modern concert, with a crew of 50+ to smooth out every technical glitch...
@@papercup2517 Yeah agree, and it's more inspiring... makes it look like anyone can have a go!
@Mark Radzin I hadn't noticed it honestly, but now that you mention it it is quite obvious. John is still kind of laughing about his mistake for the following 30 seconds.
Crazy to think John never liked his voice..I would kill for a voice like John Lennon’s
Lennon was the Beatles
how do you know he didn't like his voice?? It's hard to believe If you say it without evidence
Nick Fernandez Its a known fact.There are many articles about it. Lennon did not like the sound of his voice and loved to double-track his records. He would often ask the band's producer, George Martin, to cover the sound of his voice: "Can't you smother it with tomato ketchup or something?"
my name chef me too, my voice sounds like crap... i rlly want his voice
He liked his voice he just wanted it thicker, hence the double tracking and delay they added in the studio.
I was 19 when a saw an identical performance to this in the UK.
I swear it changed my life. Its amazing I can still see this now because of UA-cam and I am 74 now.
You're a lucky man! Kudos!
This IS in the UK. To quote TheBeatleBible.com: "The Beatles topped the bill at the New Musical Express' 1963-64 Annual Poll-Winners' All-Star Concert, playing before an audience of 10,000 at the Empire Pool in Wembley, London." Maybe that's you in the audience. Cheers!
amazing how time marches on. I was a little kid then loving the beatles and now could be their grandfathers
neil piper this is the UK with Murry the K ?
can you walk us through that, to the best of your recollection?
McCartney's vocals on "Long Tall Sally" are unbelievable.
triokanal い
triokanal ikr
triokanal that's because it's Billy Campbell
Fox 8ball not. This film in 1964. That's Paul.
triokanal
The Beatles had two AMAZING singers in the frontline. John and Paul were both on FIRE here... John is belting out "Twist and shout" while Paul is singing "Long Tall Sally" better than anybody in the world.
This is the best band on earth.
from Tokyo.
Agree with you: Best band on earth, from Vietnam!
@@yuuya2111
(^o^)v
Their energy in this is fucking INSANE. And at the same time, all the things that went wrong are hilarious!!! This might just be my all time favorite Beatles live performance. It seriously kills me that going back in time isn't possible and I will never get to experience this magic in real time in this only life I have. PHYSICALLY pains me. Even though I didn't exist during all this, I miss them and the whole era SO badly every day it hurts. I'm sure other millennial Beatles fans can relate. And your friends-- they just don't get it.
Cheer up, time travel will soon be possible. And maybe the world will be fun again someday soon.
Brilliant stuff
They seemed to get on great in those days and enjoyed , buzzed 😀
I know, their ENERGY is just out of this world!
If only they'd slipped in "I Wanna Be Your Man" into this set. Ringo always knocked that one out of the park. Energy off the charts. When I first became a Beatles fan many years ago, it was through the late-era songs, but I'll choose the Beatlemania stuff any day of the week now.
Paul McCartney has so much energy and passion in this performance
Cocaine is helluva drug
Good job inc. The real Paul ,faul is not funny
Paul had the energy and charisma that William lacks.
they semm scared..if i was the amanger id a pulled them
Shut up with the "Faul" B.S.
A very Professional band. They had style, they always gave their best, no mimicking... and their songs had beautiful lyrics and rhythm. The more I listen to them, the greater my admiration ...even at age 75.
Forgetting how the song goes ....
@@MrSahansdal long true
@@MrSahansdal perfectly normal my friend
Man... Paul's version for Long Tall Sally is so freaking awesome. This performance show us how they had fun playing together in the early years.
I love watching John fixing the microphone stand.
RINGO is kicking some serious ass
B Nurr don't think i've ever seen him as crazy as at the end of 'long tall sally'. he's going like keith moon!
@@pipeandslippersman The greatest rock and roll drummer of all time. And for the people who doubt his abilities? Well, they're obviously not drummers. Because drummers know and appreciate in awe, all that Ringo created/invented and which is still emulated today.
Expert guitar players, singers, and songwriters. This is the best rock band of all time. Perfectly syncopated
It's Oct 2022 and this performance still gives me shivers.
The energy in this concert is off the charts!!!
I recall, like it was yesterday, sitting right near the front row of the East Ham Granada, ( east London), in late 1963 as a 14 year old, accompanied by my older fifteen year old cousin Susan to watch this new group The Beatles, with their funny haircuts and Liverpudlian accents, that we had heard and read so much about. When the guys finally came on stage my ears were hit with what can only be described as a few hundred screaming banshees.....the atmosphere was incredible, so electrically charged, as I recall. Above the noise I could just about hear the band who, by today's standards, were playing Please Please Me off the backline and singing through the house PA system... given that they still sounded so raw and exciting and, to my eyes, very handsome and mature. Even at that early stage in their development their musical talent and engaging personalities were very evident. Little did I realise in December 1963 what impact these guys would have on the wider world during the rest of the decade which still resonates today. I also didnt realise then that, as a 70 year old I would be able to access their music and live performances through the miracle of computerisation and the Internet, something that would have been viewed as too far fetched to believe, certainly by the thinking of the early 60's. We have come a long way I am am still here drawing breath, thinking Im a teenager all over again....RIP John and George and thank you both for the music and the memories.....
Watching it on youtube is fine and dandy, but I'd give it all to go through time and watch them live.
John on Twist and Shout is one of the greatest Beatles performances
John LOVED it when Paul really let go & really "threw it" (his voice)...Watch John's ecstatic expression as he watches his friend tear it up...John might not have said it much, but it's all there in his face...
Janet Cooper Where at in the viswo? Any timestamps?
@@mikeytrains1
@ 3'49"... it's the bridge that he forgot "everybody's green...."
I WAS THERE WHEN THE GREATEST POP BAND OF ALL TIME TOOK THE STAGE IT WAS ELECTRIC AND DEAFENING AND A GREAT N.M.E.WINNERS SHOW.ONE I REMEMBER WITH GREAT AND HAPPY MEMORIES.
+KONNEENN You were very fortunate!
rock
Was this before or after they came to (conquered) the US?
Wow you were very lucky!!!
O m g you saw john and paul o m g i will cry.
I like how Ringo gradually increases how passionately he shakes his head
If I was ever gifted the chance to travel through time, I would be front row at a Beatles concert.
The BEATLES were incredible when I was 14 and they are just as FANTASTIC and I am 72. There will NEVER be another Group that Approaches Their Volume of Superb, Iconic, Identifiable Music.
John's vocals always had a kind of undefinable, ethereal quality to me
I love
Never cheese 🧀 always honest and raw not perfect but awesome
He was the best of all time.
When I was still in diapers and my parents played Beatles music all the time in the house, I was always drawn more to John's voice. I didn't realize it then, of course, but as I got older and discovered which voice belonged to which Beatle, it was John's that had always made me happy as a baby/toddler. And now that I'm 45, I still find it soothing and familiar.
GPC 0321 John Lennon was special intriguing more than any of the Beatles controversial harsh political genius above the rest of the Beatles . Paul was maybe better to some people but John was a more much more complex individual I was ten years old when I heard of John Lennon and his music and he was the best
Really they changed my life when I was 13! In 1965! In the USSR! Beatles forever!
Omg, look at Ringo playing those drums with raw energy, "Twist and Shout" and "Long Tall Sally" were his best performances here! What a beast! ✨
Nobody comes close! Who else wrote all their own music, played it, and sang / performed it with so much charisma?
Well, most of it. Two these are not theirs.
@@MrSahansdal I'm pretty sure he meant just in general of their whole catalog
@@squiddywiddy0762 The Beatles were a marvel of all the right factors coming together at a point in time made for just such serendipity. Every time I think of them I'm in awe of all that came together... "Come together, right now, over me [us]".
Holy cow! This one may be the best of their recorded concerts. Long Tall Sally blows the lid off the place. Ringo almost breaks Earth orbit.
Thank you guys for making our stay on the blue planet so much better...
i totally agree
that about sums it up!
beautifully put
Amen to that!
Truth INDEED AMEN
The best that’s ever been. There will never be another Beatles.
10:30 Ringo: beast mode activated
😂😂😂
Ringo is the best drummer of them all.
And John like wow Ringo
@@milesprower6426
Later in their career Paul was asked if Ringo was the best drummer in the world. He replied "He's not even the best drummer in the Beatles".
Still love Ringo's style tho.
Lol yeah, thought Ringo's head was gonna fall off
John is absolutely KILLIN' it.
your joke is sick mate.
James Smith
Sacha Touille
...ou ça grattouille ?
Allan Cerf Boy, I'll say!
Pinoy bold movies tripple xxx
Pinoy bold movies tripple xxx
When a kid, I first heard the Beatles and got under their spell - for ever.Under socialism in the USSR it was a gulp of fresh air, unknown freedom of soul, youth and talent...Then I studied English hard (under the Beatles' influence..). In the Soviet army I used to sing The Yellow Submarine while marching with my mates to the dining hall, the song ringing high and far all over the army grounds/ And the officers just smiled, they enjoyed the Beatles as well :))
Точно, точно... А я в армии на посту битловские тексты заучивал. Мать по моей просьбе прислала. Дома вручную переписывал и в армии( в гробу её видел) помогали эти сраные два года пережить.
@@user-wv7mu1yw9s Точно,точно-в СССР все было сраное,а вот Битлы покруче Иисуса Христа,не говоря уже о Моцарте с Бетховеном!
@@user-is4cu2gp1b , всё не было сранным, но развалилась сравдепия и туда ей и дорога.
Dang. That is so cool.
Igor Ingvar Woah, you were in the Soviet military?! How was it?!
I saw Beatles live 1965 at Hammersmith Odeon London . Memory for lifetime!
I love that the stage is so flumsy the mics are rocking around. The harmony mic goes out and John still sounds great.
Even though they had faulty equipment, they still got on with it! Can you imagine some Diva with a faulty earpiece or microphone? She'd storm off in a second! This, my dears, is true rock n' roll and that's why The Beatles are the best!
Shows also that they truely loved what they were doing
Debbie Prentice ~ What faulty equipment? You don't know what you're saying. They wouldn't go on stage with substandard equipment. The amps and guitars were well made, and among the best available.
Richard Starkey MBE .....You Sir are one rocking kick ass drummer
Rolling-stonrslastlive
PerformanceJust look at Ringo go, on Long Tall Sally! This is probably the best live performance I've ever seen of them. I'll never forget the impact of '64 Ed Sullivan of course, but this is the Beatles we've all read about, at their most live energetic. Wow!
The early Beatles had all the energy of rock and roll, combined with incredibly catchy pop melodies. I don't think anyone was able to put those two things together like that before the Beatles.
Ya think?
Nope, ONLY all the artists and bands The Beatles emulated and wanted to be like. Little Richard, Chuck Berry, Smokey Robinson and The Miracles, etc. The Beatles themselves say they simply worked to sound like soul artists. Every act, no matter how successful, was influenced by somebody else. The Beatles were no different. But at least they gave credit where it was due, both in interviews and by actually covering the songs of acts they idolized.
@@stannote8312 Earlier rock acts had the rock and roll energy. No way did they have the same songwriting talents as Lennon & McCartney. Chuck Berry & Little Richard could rock with the best of them, but they couldn't have written She Loves You, Can't Buy Me Love, I Want To Hold Your Hand, I Saw Her Standing There or more subtle pieces like If I Fell or Here There Everywhere.
The Beatles didn't invent the amalgamation of pop melody and rhythm. Motown was doing it long before the Beatles came along. Songwriters like Holland, Dozier & Holland, Smokey Robinson, Marvin Gaye, Robert Bates, etc.--all writers the Beatles emulated, if not covered outright, until they developed their own style. The Beatles were a phenomenon of popular music--POP, the very nature of which involves following musical trend. McCartney and Lennon went on to become brilliant writers with an intimatble, original style. But let's not imagine or pretend Motown, Burt Bacharach and other writers/producers out of NY's Brill Building weren't doing that stuff already. Don't take my word for it; Paul McCartney acknowledges these things over and again in a variety of literature, radio and TV interviews, including an interview in the book, "The Complete Beatles Recording Sessions," published a few years back by EMI. I always find it interesting that Beatles fans like to say how original the band was from the second it set foot onto the international spotlight, when not only does musical history but the Beatles themselves say otherwise. The Beatles' style was built on American soul, rockabilly and for melodics sake, the Great American Songbook. It's okay to acknowledge that. It doesn't make the group any less inventive and influential. @@prschuster
@@stannote8312 It's tru that they took a lot from Motown- so you're right.
Johns vocals!! WOW
iambeyondfake c dave clark five
Dave Clark Five SUCKED.
Very powerful
Wow indeed, and also Wow to Paul's blistering rendition of Long Tall Sally which must have nearly set his tonsils alight
No Paul’s 😍
It's really incredible how four people could meet and stay together for 13 years I was 4 when the Beatles became famous Ringo Starr is still drumming today and Paul McCartney still tours occasionally too bless John and George I hope they're both rocking in heaven there will never be another group like The Beatles they changed the World forever.
So much energy from all of them in this live performance!! John absolutely slayed Twist and Shout. Then Paul matched his energy on Long tall Sally. Ringo really kept the energy going with his drumming absolutely fantastic! And Paul's voice on Long Tall Sally is incredible, how it goes from loud and raspy to smooth falsettos - incredible stuff.
Paul shaking his bass at 8:00.
Ringo is doing Keith Moon in long tall sally before there even was a Keith Moon. Superb
THAT is an incredible performance, dodgy mics and all!!!! Lennon’s Twist and Shout is jaw dropping! Then Paul steps up and just hammers home Long Tall Sally, Ringo...WOW! And George keeping everything going cool as you like. The Beatles at their god damn best.
You got that right---after all these years, it's STILL the Beatles and everyone else...CASE CLOSED.
Simply the best! Forever a Beatlemaniac❤️
when i found out about the Beatles I was around twelve and they changed my life and inspired me now i am 15 and making my first record in my band.
Gee I loved those days that they worked so well together. Wish John and George were still here!
I feel the same way.
Kim Carletto I think they definitely would have had a reunion by now. They’d sorted a lot of their problems by the time John died.
If only we could have them come back for 24 hours
An amazing band.
Not just one guy & friends.
John Lennons singing voice is to die for. SO SMOOTH!
Even with poor equipment they still performed like kings.
Why you say that
VOX wasn't a bad amp. It actually had a good sound Problem was, no PA system. They all had excellent equipment.
@@samueladams1775 I think the reference was to things like having to juggle broken mic stands left over from the previous group's performance, while continuing to play and sing flawless harmony, and also to the lower decibels than are typical today, having to do battle with the wall of screams from the crowd..
Personally I love the rawness and casualness of it all compared with higher tech offerings today with their massive production crews, where nothing is left to chance, although I suppose performers must prefer it like that.
Yes, you're right, Vox made great amps! (There's a good doco on them somewhere in YT Land, if you haven't already seen it. :-)
PaperCup f
Mach Schau!
This is my favorite live Beatles footage ever. They just burn through it!!
They always gave their very best.
George's SOLOs!!! Really rocked!!! Really WOW!
55 years later...….still the gold standard.
And always will be ✌
@@tonyfrancesco3701 nothig left to say! Without the fab Four the world woud not be the same..
@@driftwoodization Music certainly wouldn't be!!
Die introductie is ook geweldig
Q q q1 111 + 1 111 11 + 1 11 111 1,11 1 11 1Q q1 1 q1 1 1 11 1 1111 +11111 11 1 1 111 11 1 +111 111 11 1 1111 1 1 q11q q11 1 1q111 111 11111111 1q11 1111 1 111 1 q1q^@@brianhiggins3090 .
Ringo gettin' down on Long Tall Sally! Damn!
it´s a punk rocker
Mesmerizing-This concert shows you just how great they were as a live band.
Even with that precarious gear they sound amazing. Ringo was a beast , George solos were amazing. Paul and John vocals pure Rock and Roll 🎸
John on his game and Paul the great showman it’s beatles giving maybe their best live performance.
This is their best concert EVER! Their professionalism shines through all the mike problems, mixing problems, verse mistakes, and all. It really shows how their Cavern days paid off.
I was born on the very same day The Beatles appeared live on The Ed Sullivan Show in the USA, Sunday, February 9th, 1964. Watched by a television audience of 73 million. Awesome! 😍💞
Unmatched..No other band today or any other time can match the Beatles' skills or creativity
Out of thousands of performances, this is one of their best, and the most energetic. They are almost punk rock but with better vocals and much better songs. Tight as hell..jeez...
@Bobby They knew each other so well on stage, they could overcome any miscues with a glance or nod, amazing band.
Tight is an understatement! FANTASTIC! 😁❤
Washington first Us concert is Best ever performed in the Universe
Their first concert in Washington was the most energetic
@@lazzarodelgado1373 Also like that swedish TV ................ so epic
When I saw them in Atlanta in '65....all I remember is SCREAMING...and almost fainting...I was 13....I couldn't talk or think when we walked out of the stadium...I was in a daze..and oh so happy....lol...
Woaw, amazing you saw the beatles in live !!
You are a VERY lucky person! I wish I could have been there! I'm 10 and I love The Beatles. Music today is terrible! ; (
+Billie Sumrell The Beatles were asked what place was their favorite to perform at. Their answer was... Atlanta because it was the first time they could hear themselves play.
www.cbs46.com/story/24667227/beatles-atlanta-65-the-most-memorable-show-of-the-tour
Dear N Hall.
I just wanted you to know that you're a little cancer.
You are so lucky, I wish I could be in The 60's to watch them in concerts, and I'm hoping to saw Paulie or Ringo if they still alive, omg, seriously, that's amazing😭💖.
Fucking Lennon man, love that voice - mic was playing up on him, probably couldn't even hear himself, and yet he delivers a flawless live rendition of their biggest hit on the spot. *Nails* his 'oooohs' - I've seen him leave that to McCartney and Harrison in other performances; here he hits the note and kills it.
Close to my favourite vocalist of all-time, and there's been some beauties.
They always gave their very best.
This band really kicked ass. Age, time, or what ever. Music. They are dam good! Period.
There is no group that even compares to the Fabulous Beatles, never has been and never will.
That is soooo true. Lennon and MacCartney as a songwriters and musicians in the SAME BAND! Over the top talent in one band alone. A guy fan here from way back when I first saw them LIVE on Ed Sullivan in 1964.
Rock and Rolla's Ayatollahs!!!!
bts is better ( to me)
Saw them live in 65
The Rolling Stones had the Beatles beat by a mile. Stones have the brilliant dark edge that the Beatles had never been able to achieve. Case closed.
Lot of energy and their cohesiveness is fantastic. Best band in the world now and forever.
You would think the mic stands would be adjusted. She loves you verse three done twice. No one noticed. The greatest band ever.
"Twist and Shout"--this performance shows why John Lennon was the greatest rock n roll singer who ever lived.
Absolutely, this is peak Lennon vocals
Kakakaka. Really? Paul had the better voice and range!
@@ttmcl98 Yes☺
Я плау
Я на них вырос
Long tall Sally is one of my favourite little Richard songs and these boys nailed it. So proud of these scousers
This is the best live show ive have ever seen from the lads. The boys are back in Hamburg. Such emotion and energy. They sure were something.
vocal harmonies and adjoining vocal parts were an essential overlooked talent in these boys.
No guitar techs, stage crew, roadies, etc....to take care of Lennon's spinning mic....biggest act in the world at the time.....unbelievable!
No monitors either.
Steve Arditi That’s why they switched mics. The solo, or lead, took the one on the left - facing them- The whole thing was a mine field...they made it through and then some!
Today’s “ artists” would’ve stopped the show. And sued the venue.
marc Bolan had the same problem 8 years later at the Wembley pool London with telegram sam.
@@chrisnnh Yeah, notice how it didn't even really phase them. "This mic's crap. Let's switch." Not their first rodeo, as they say.
Can't Do That -- Look At John! THIS John was THE BEST! Healthy. Magnetic. Wow.
Beatles Forever! I love you John, Paul, George and Ringo❤❤❤❤
Pink Tulip yes unfortunately I was born in the wrong time frame but still enjoy the music very much
fuck the beatles shit rubish very old fashin.
We'll never ever have a group like this again. The best ever. Lucky to have lived in the 60's. What happened to music. These days . So sad.
George’s lead guitar solos in the songs were pretty spot on !
What a magical time in the history of music. They are like....something still unexplainable
Never forget it. There will never be another band that comes close to them.
Paul is amazing
And Jhon
@David Roberts stfu
@David Roberts Wait. So you believe that in 1966, John just lets this nobody who now looks and sounds like Paul, step in and take control of the direction of the band. George and Ringo, we are supposed to believe just went along, no questions asked. But it’s John Lennon who we are talking about. Half of the creative force behind the Beatles. The father of the band, if you will. The man known for his dagger-like tongue, quick wit, and short fuse. Yes, that John Lennon. Sure, he just said, "Great! Billy's taking over!" Sure he did. Stupid.
The best there ever was. Never to be equaled. What a great time to be around, thank you God.
tony francesco this happened once before when I came to your door no reply
John what a powerful voice he had!
One of the best Beatles live performance. Ringo Starr fantastic.
John messed up on You Can't Do That. Priceless.
So much talent. They transcend. They had it all: looks, talent, vibe, production, right-place-at-the-right-time, etc. Amazing!
Hey Michael do you know a Graham monfils
The moptops
God we all thought PAUL was so BEAUTIFUL
Look at RINGO GO
Oh fuck look at Geoge go to
Awesome footage of the greatest band ever fantastic BEATLES
his voice on twist and shout was unreal.
He never had confidence in his voice and usually double-tracked his vocals on the early albums. But as you can hear, in these far from ideal conditions, he could belt it out like no one else (well possibly Paul).
John had a perfect lead vocal on Twist 'n Shout- never once did it slack off or falter. Frankly, his vocal has more all around quality; the best rock lead voice. Paul's vocal is less full, and although he gets up there in higher notes, he loses density, it sounds good, but not full like John. Yet Paul's ballads are beautiful, because his voice is prettier. The point of a band or more than one is to increase but always have oneness, otherwise its a solo. And on that note🎶🎵, they were one. 😝💜💓😇
@@jo-annzinni3511 true. You can find people to imitate Paul and singers like Freddie Mercury and Robert Plant, and come within 90 percent or more to their voices. John on the other hand, after probably thousands upon thousands of tribute bands over 40 years, his voice is extremely difficult to come real close on. Its quite a sound.
@@nthdegree1269 except Julian. Young Jules inherited old Dads pipes.
With ALL the audience yelling and screaming, without monitors or anything like that... The Beatles were the best band in live!
Brilliant live tight tight band
Saw them live when they began .. They were THE BAND
Ringo was going nuts during long tall sally
Lysol yes original head banger!!
Pete could never have driven this beat like Ringo did.
Erro Pete knew one beat.
Nothing has ever added as much pleasure, delight and mystic to our world as these 4 gorgeous lads did.
SO many years ago. They had a special magic and excitement to them.
theyre music is loved still by some beautiful people ( coz they listen to these musicians)
Long Tall Sally was a blistering performance it doesn't get any better than that. Still the fabulous four superb
I used to think Little Richard’s was the definitive cover. Not after I heard this performance by Paul! Wow!!
@@kennethpalmowski-wolfe7923 same
Reading these witty and observant comments has certainly added to my enjoyment of this film.
Thank you all from a life long Beatles fan now in his 60s reliving the most joyous times of his youth during these toughest years the world has seen in his lifetime.
Stay at home. Stay safe and please continue to share your wit and keen observations. They lift all our spirits.
Hello! Thank you for sharing your feelings. I've been a fan since 13 and now I am 30... I know I'll love the boys my whole life!
Wow!!!! The Beatles!!!! Love them!!! My group!! Wont never be another group like em!! Never!!
how great is john lennon his voice is so strong and his mic stand is broken- but he still sounds wicked .. and his lead gtr on 'you cant do that and long tall sally - his vocal on twist n shout -rocking
Oh yeah! The stage was so flimsy that the mike stands are rocking in time with the Beatles stomping feet. They just rocked on!!!
Take another look at "You Can't Do That". What you are seeing is not just a random floppy mike stand. What you are seeing is Paul, George, and probably Ringo playing a joke on John. The mike is prank one. Next is when John finishes the second verse and he does a sorta scream and pulls away from the mike in anticipation of an instrumental interlude. But, Paul and George rush right into the chorus. John rushes back to the mike, bewildered and looking for a clue from his band mates. He likely thinks he made a mistake. But it's just the guys screwing with his head.
@@veritas1002 Gee, that's an awefull convincing argument you make there.
@@winomaster I disagree, based on my own musical experiences. Vintage microphone clips screwed to the adjustable height pole of the mic stand. Whoever set up the stage didn't tighten Lennon's enough, and the moving cable (stage bounce) loosened it. You can't do much about it during the peformance of a song. Lennon acted like a pro and rolled with it, and tried to tighten it after You Can't Do That....but the damn thing loosened again....you can see this when George tried to tighten it during Twist & Shout. No prank...Lennon moved over to the better mic, which makes sense from a musician standpoint...lead singer should always get the best mic if a mic failure happens. As far as You Can't Do That....Lennon screwed up and thought the 3rd verse was done (he just finished the second) and expected George to solo....but Paul and George were correctly singing the bridge. An rare error made during the excitement of the NME Performance.
@Ivan You guys are right. It was John's mistake.
John's voice was amazing in Twist & Shout...the best concert that The Beatles ever played
I'm better
@@brucezuccaro4584 Shut up.
@@brucezuccaro4584 Don't lie to yourself, dude. You aren't better than John.
Bruce Zuccaro you are dreaming and you are about to wake up and apologize to the Zeus of rock 🎸
Not sure about that, but that is some unimpeachable footage ain't it.
They really cut their teeth as a live act before they made it big; they'd have played literally thousands of ours lives before this gig.
They went downhill as a live act over time because they just couldn't hear themselves - but I agree with Lennon's assessment that they were a good lil' rock n' roll outfit for a while there.
Paul kills it on Long Tall Sally...one for the ages...what a vocal performance and then to Can't Buy Me Love...Wow...
There songs are magical and never will there be another singing group like them!
Paul's vocals on Long Tall Sally
This is one of my all-time favourite Beatle concerts. It's like they were all mentally back in Hamburg the entire time -- that's how tight and energetic they were. Paul absolutely delivers the best-ever live version of "Long Tall Sally" and "Can't Buy Me Love," and I don't think I've heard better live vocals from John, even if the mic was annoyingly dodgy. George's solos are note-perfect as always. Also, Ringo is hitting those drums like he's got some kind of personal vendetta against them. Notice in the last bit of "Long Tall Sally" how John and George look at him when he starts in on the triplets. Yeah, he's really rocking it, they're thinking. It's wonderful! What an incredible drummer.
P.S. Now, after that, who really cares that John couldn't remember his own song lyrics to save his life?
You Can't Do That: John fucked up, he expected the solo instead of the chorus after the second verse. Anyway, still great as always.
I love how after John says something to Paul after you can't do that - probably "say something, i have to adjust my mic - he just goes and says some meaningless random words and the audience of course goes heyyy
i liked how the microphone kept moving. hilarious!
giligara30492 Ringo has said before that he had to hit ridiculously hard especially the snare so the guys could hear a beat the girls were so loud and lack of sound system.
MrLikeAsatellite And then he followed up with "Cause I'm the one who love your love" wicked funny
This film made me appreciate my life even more amidst all the scandals and negativity existing in 2019, there's a blistening sense of peace knowing you can watch the beatles and other wonderful bands and music from any moment in time prior with a tap on your phone.
Authentic talent, John was strugling with the mic and sang 3 demanding songs for his voice in a row.