Top 10 Main Battle Tanks In The World 2021

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лип 2024
  • Top 10 Main Battle Tanks In The World 2021 - Often we receive many questions which is the best main battle tank in the world. Which is the greatest modern MBT and why. Currently top 10 best tanks in the world are these:
    NUMBER 10 T-90 (Russia)
    The T-90 is currently the only tank produced in quantity in Russia. It is not as sophisticated as its Western rivals, however it uses proven technology and is cost effective. Currently it is the most commercially successful main battle tank on the global market. Also it is one of the cheapest among modern MBTs.
    Number 9 OPLOT-M (Ukraine)
    With the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine continued development of a T-80UD main battle tank. Their latest version of this tank is the Oplot-M.
    Number 8 LECLERC (FRANCE)
    This French main battle tank entered service in 1992. Overall it is a successful design. A number of design features of the Leclerc were later used on other Western tanks. The Leclerc was used during a number of peacekeeping and military operations.
    Number 7 TYPE 90
    The Japanese Type 90 tank was developed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in cooperation with German Krauss-Maffei and MaK tank manufacturers. It has a number of external similarities with the German Leopard 2. The Type 90 was officially adopted by the Japanese Ground Self-Defense Forces in 1989. Full scale production commenced in 1992. At the time it was one of the most advanced and in fact the most expensive production MBT. Original Japanese army requirement was for 600 of these tanks, however only about 340 were built due to high unit price. This tank was never exported, as at the time Japan laws did not allow export of military equipment.
    Number 6 MERKAVA MK.4
    The Merkava Mk.4 is the latest Israeli main battle tank. It is a successor to the previous Merkava Mk.3. The Merkava Mk.4 was adopted in 2004.
    It is one of the most protected tanks in the world. This MBT has an unusual design with a front-mounted engine which gives the crew additional protection and chance to survive if the tank is knocked-out. Improved Merkava Mk.4 Meil Ruach tanks are fitted with a combat-proven Trophy active protection system, which destroys incoming anti-tank missiles and rockets. This tank is also well protected against air-launched guided missiles and advanced top attack anti-tank weapons.
    Number 5. ARMATA
    The Armata is a new Russian main battle tank of new generation. Pre-production tanks were first publicly revealed in 2015. In 2018 Russian MoD ordered a first batch of these new tanks. Exact order numbers were not disclosed but it is likely that around 60 tanks were ordered. First production tanks were planned to be delivered during the same year. Once in service, the Armata will gradually replace the ageing T-72, T-80 and T-90 tanks that become increasingly out-dated.
    Number.4 CHALLENGER 2
    It is a very capable tank. The Challenger 2 has the latest Chobham armor and is one of the most protected MBTs in the world today. It offers very high level of protection against direct fire weapons.
    Number.3 M1A2 SEP
    The M1A2 SEP is a successor to the M1A2 Abrams. This tank has incredible technology and armor. Also it has seen combat. It is one of the most feared MBTs.
    The M1A2 SEP offers significant protection against all well-known anti-tank weapons. This main battle tank uses advanced armor, reinforced with depleted uranium layers.
    Number 2. K2 BLACK PANTHER
    Currently the Black Panther is one of the most advanced main battle tank in the world, outclassing anything North Korea or China have. Furthermore it is the most expensive main battle tank to date. Deliveries of the K2 Black Panther tank commenced to the South Korean Army in 2016. As of 2017 at least 100 tanks were delivered. South Korean requirement is for around 300 of these new tanks. These will eventually replace the older K1 tanks.
    Number 1. LEOPARD 2A7+
    It is a recent version of the proven and successful Leopard 2 design. It has additional armor and updated electronics.
    The Leopard 2A7+ is well protected against conventional and urban warfare threats, such as RPG rounds and IEDs.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @Defense-TV
    @Defense-TV  4 роки тому +113

    Why Leopard 2 number one ---- Leopard 2 Main Battle Tank Revolution Histrory | From Leopard 1 To Leopard 2A7+ MBT >>> ua-cam.com/video/zqZ8bSSoVHc/v-deo.html

    • @jibeset
      @jibeset 4 роки тому +6

      Sure , they blew up in some magnificient fireworks in Syria.....LOL

    • @paperitgel98
      @paperitgel98 4 роки тому +3

      Why is the Type-90 there but not the Type-10? Its a far superior tank. you showed plenty of wrong footage of it already lol

    • @jibeset
      @jibeset 4 роки тому +8

      @@argumasch663 Idiot? I didn't insult you before , I'm not an expert like you maybe ....I was just for 12 years in French Foreign Legion Cavalry unit as reconnaissance vehicle commander ( the AMX 10RC)..so which one is the best?for my opinion , only combat proven MBT must be in this list , for the others(like the leopard 2A7 and also the french Leclerc) It's pure speculation.

    • @jibeset
      @jibeset 4 роки тому +9

      @@argumasch663 The Leopard 2A7 combat proven ? Where ? Which Army ?

    • @xxthemasterx3407
      @xxthemasterx3407 4 роки тому +16

      @@jibeset Leopard 2A6M is quite similar and e.g.for the Canadians it was very successful in Afghanistan.

  • @littletweeter1327
    @littletweeter1327 4 роки тому +401

    Just down here for the War Thunder historians.

    • @detectivepatchouli8266
      @detectivepatchouli8266 4 роки тому +5

      and leclerc was the worst...pffttt

    • @build2270
      @build2270 4 роки тому +16

      *Looks at Ariete*
      *Pukes*

    • @homelessstudio7960
      @homelessstudio7960 4 роки тому +4

      ^ ^ i think that those two comments up there are trolls, don't even bother.

    • @vscohawk9471
      @vscohawk9471 4 роки тому +3

      What happend to the Maus in WarThunder?

    • @build2270
      @build2270 4 роки тому +10

      @@vscohawk9471 Gone, Reduced to Atoms

  • @Ash-qc9os
    @Ash-qc9os 4 роки тому +124

    My brother in law was a reme and did 2 tours in Iraq, he told me this story.
    A Challenger 2 had a track damaged in Iraq at night and was in a particularly dangerous location so it was left with the crew still inside until morning when they could recover it. The crew were told to lock the hatches and wait it out. The next morning, when the team had come to recover the tank, the crew were inside playing cards and drinking tea. They were pounded on all night with small arms fire, rpg's and grenades, but nobody got in. The track was repaired and the tank drove home under it's own power. It was repaired and was back in use the following day. It literally had insurgents climbing all over it, trying their hardest to get in but they never did.
    If that doesn't show that it has good crew protection then i don't know what does.

    • @nicholasaudy6064
      @nicholasaudy6064 4 роки тому +17

      And the crew inside didn't fire back at the insurgents but instead drinks tea

    • @hellwithit
      @hellwithit 4 роки тому +19

      Ash good story. But that’s all it is. A good story! No tank is invulnerable to RPGs or anti tank missiles. Like8/10 lep lost in Iraq. M1A1 fares no better. Nor did the Russian T90 or its predecessor. Now. You look at Israelite armor. There’s a tank!!

    • @-lightningwill-6014
      @-lightningwill-6014 4 роки тому +4

      @@hellwithit But us british put the RPG fencing on our tanks so they are good

    • @hellwithit
      @hellwithit 4 роки тому +1

      -Lightning Will- for any action there is an equal and opposite reaction. A. E. ( I think?) you build higher. I go higher still. You want invincibility!! Drone armor! Then it doesn’t matter what kills it. Over come with numbers !! Only proven battle tactic that so far has worked out on the battle field.

    • @-lightningwill-6014
      @-lightningwill-6014 4 роки тому +1

      @@hellwithit Strategy works too and chill dude

  • @Bokilano
    @Bokilano 4 роки тому +145

    The Japanese wanted only 60 tanks but they produced 340???

  • @jungking4033
    @jungking4033 3 роки тому +19

    ALL the tanks above Except for K2 show only the marches on the flat soil.and when they shoot ,the targets are too near or are unseen... ,regrettable,

  • @hsiadarb8062
    @hsiadarb8062 3 роки тому +14

    Challenger 2 every time, crew safety. damage suffered in battle is repairable in the field unlike other tanks, well proven as a battle tank with a 120 mm Rifled barrel. 7.62 mm Coaxial chain gun. Accurate proven fire power, although an old design but no Challenger 2 has ever been destroyed by an enemy action to date.

  • @paperitgel98
    @paperitgel98 4 роки тому +229

    "Type-90" and then shows Type-10 footage lmao.

    • @bagofsunshine3916
      @bagofsunshine3916 4 роки тому +6

      ikr, wtf is this liist??

    • @andreactuel7209
      @andreactuel7209 4 роки тому +6

      And he is the only western tank with auto-loader ... lol and the Leclerc ???

    • @boyanrushkov1755
      @boyanrushkov1755 4 роки тому +1

      @@andreactuel7209 the leclerc didn't exist when the type 90 was built

    • @detectivepatchouli8266
      @detectivepatchouli8266 4 роки тому +5

      @@boyanrushkov1755 but type 90 is just basically Leopard 2A4

    • @VeXu666
      @VeXu666 4 роки тому

      @@andreactuel7209 autoloaders are very unreliable overall, they increase the weight (thus fuel consumption) of the tank and at worst cases when malfunctioning due damage, can make the whole tank useless.

  • @fernandezm3298
    @fernandezm3298 4 роки тому +19

    The Germans have always produced superb weapons.

  • @j.wagner6126
    @j.wagner6126 4 роки тому +205

    Man the japanese tank is allmosst completely made from Germans
    Edit: thanks for the likes

    • @vvitriol
      @vvitriol 4 роки тому +64

      Julian _TV oh god, who let them work together again?

    • @damaito1829
      @damaito1829 4 роки тому +1

      @@vvitriol 😂😂😂

    • @IamDogge
      @IamDogge 4 роки тому +6

      Julian _TV funny when the new supra has a german bmw motor in it

    • @stefanw3953
      @stefanw3953 4 роки тому +22

      Germans make the best stuff

    • @ice_coffee46
      @ice_coffee46 4 роки тому +4

      Are you a child? Please study.

  • @littleenglander.5029
    @littleenglander.5029 3 роки тому +17

    "This tank is very capable" is practically all that was said about the Challenger 2.

    • @rocketchicken5421
      @rocketchicken5421 2 роки тому +1

      This was just some subjective bull crap in the video.

  • @johnbodman4504
    @johnbodman4504 4 роки тому +3

    Well done, easy to follow.

  • @tunisiandom9318
    @tunisiandom9318 4 роки тому +43

    T-90 M is being produced two contracts have been signed ... Older T-90 variants will be upgraded to the M standard. And in Russia they are also producing T-72B3M and T-80BVM (for the extreme weather conditions). Just making these errors raises questions on how much effort was put into research for this video.

    • @tinydestroyer4672
      @tinydestroyer4672 4 роки тому +9

      @ghost24481 you are so dumb lmao. Ukraine never had t-90s to my knowledge. The most common tanks in lpr and dpr militias was the t-72 and t-72 b3. You clearly have no knowledge about tanks. They got most of their tanks from the many Ukranian soldiers who defected to the lpr and dpr.

    • @tasman006
      @tasman006 4 роки тому +1

      @@tinydestroyer4672 You forgot the T64 its true combat debut. The Ukrainians had an upgraded version called the Bulat. The IPR and DPR also had these from captured examples and also Russia gave some when they annexed Crimea from the Ukrainian's. T64 tanks in storage. This is known because some of these T64's where captured and the serial no well its the giveaway of where it came from. The Ukrainians also had only 10 Oplot tanks don't know if they where tested in battle and T80's which didn't take part in the war as far as I know.

    • @tinydestroyer4672
      @tinydestroyer4672 4 роки тому +5

      @@tasman006 thank you for correcting me. I just find it funny how people think Russia has this massive role in the Ukraine war sending tones of equipment. One guy once told me the Russians sent t-14s to Ukraine to see how they performed which is just crazy to me

    • @hunterbg7531
      @hunterbg7531 4 роки тому

      @@tinydestroyer4672 Wait the T-14 Armata has seen action in Donbass and how did it perform IA m just curious

    • @tinydestroyer4672
      @tinydestroyer4672 4 роки тому +3

      @@hunterbg7531 it was never there I was just talking about some idiot who said it was

  • @kriserauw5970
    @kriserauw5970 4 роки тому +20

    Germany has lost two WW and has again the best tank. Technologie runs thru german vains I guess.

    • @Rob-pu1mg
      @Rob-pu1mg 4 роки тому +2

      yeah we have good tanks but our regular infantry and airforce is fucked up

    • @sctm81
      @sctm81 2 роки тому

      That's how they were able to fight for 6 years

    • @Chineseconcrete
      @Chineseconcrete 2 роки тому

      Lol the challenger is better

  • @numberone3048
    @numberone3048 2 роки тому +10

    India currently operates 2078 T90 tanks, not 620.

  • @jameslol7589
    @jameslol7589 4 роки тому +101

    Idk man, super conq while spamming gold is pretty good.

    • @deepakthakur8781
      @deepakthakur8781 4 роки тому +2

      fv 215b 183 tho....

    • @jameslol7589
      @jameslol7589 4 роки тому +7

      @@deepakthakur8781 true true or just in a 15 man platoon of obj 279 e's would destroy the entire American Military lmao

    • @DOVM6336
      @DOVM6336 4 роки тому +4

      Lol world of tanks peasants

    • @jameslol7589
      @jameslol7589 4 роки тому +6

      @@DOVM6336 lmao ok Gerry no one asked you.

    • @deepakthakur8781
      @deepakthakur8781 4 роки тому +1

      @@jameslol7589 pair em with 15 man t95 cheiftain plat and they would destroy the whole world.

  • @lodgedz4995
    @lodgedz4995 4 роки тому +18

    1:26 You can faintly hear "Bravo Six".

  • @TheWuffball
    @TheWuffball 4 роки тому +18

    Germans and their tanks

  • @cherrypoptart2001
    @cherrypoptart2001 4 роки тому +133

    I bet RedEffect is laughing watching this list

    • @boudaakaranis8608
      @boudaakaranis8608 4 роки тому +16

      My opinion exactly. Especially when the Leclerc and oplot are better than the t-90....

    • @TheBurnknight
      @TheBurnknight 4 роки тому +6

      @@boudaakaranis8608 the t90 is outdated, though it is cheaper

    • @sheperddoggy
      @sheperddoggy 4 роки тому +8

      @@TheBurnknight The T-90MS is a perfectly capable tank, please read up

    • @TheBurnknight
      @TheBurnknight 4 роки тому +7

      @@sheperddoggy it is very capable indeed, but it isnt up to par with european and american tanks

    • @hotsingleplaguedoctorinarea
      @hotsingleplaguedoctorinarea 4 роки тому +4

      @@TheBurnknight pfffffffffffffft ahahahahhahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @luftwaffe5990
    @luftwaffe5990 4 роки тому +23

    German technology kingdom

  • @genetixL96A1
    @genetixL96A1 4 роки тому +9

    The Leclerc won the Iron spear competition in Adazi against Leopard 2, M1 abrams, challenger 2, PT91 and Ariete

    • @Sedna063
      @Sedna063 4 роки тому +4

      And Leopard won too many competitions to count.

    • @Spino2011
      @Spino2011 4 роки тому +2

      @@Sedna063 Yeah but when u have 4 crew member instead of 3 for the leclerc it's a lot easier to do the most part of competition events, respect for this leclerc crew !

    • @Sedna063
      @Sedna063 4 роки тому

      Antoine Duhautois that fourth man is the loader..... He loads the ammo. And he is better than an autoloader because he can do other stuff too.

    • @Spino2011
      @Spino2011 4 роки тому +2

      @@Sedna063 Yeah i know that's the loader and for some events it's a big advantage to have one more crew member like the SETC ... But during the Iron Spear it's the overall operatinal capabilities, so the fact that they are "only" 3 crew members may allows them to make faster decisions, reload etc...
      But at the very end every tank can be better than other depend of the crew, the situations etc..
      I just point that's very honorable for the leclerc to have been the best among others for this 2019 competiton

    • @Future183
      @Future183 2 роки тому

      the Leopard is wayyyyy better than a leclerc. the leopard is since 40 years on the top of the worlds best mbt and the leopard is more combatproofen. the leopard beats always the leclerc at the natotankcompetitions in terms of overall performance. the leclerc only beats the leopard in one thing, in terms of shooting but that doesnt really matter because the leopard has one hit win chance of nearly 100%, and overall performance is definitely more important than just shooting. besides that the leopard was buyed from almost 20 countrys and has always proved to be a reliable tank, the leclerc, on the other hand, was only bought twice and that was 20 years ago, since then nobody wanted the leclerc anymore. If a country wants to buy tanks, the leopard is always an option because it is cheap, reliable, and can muster almost the same effectiveness as the k2 black panther, for example.

  • @Tank_Kim
    @Tank_Kim 4 роки тому +20

    In this video, the K2 tank is supposed to replace the old K1 tank, but the priority is to replace the South Korea's (more older) M48A5K tank.

  • @user-ke6sx8ne6b
    @user-ke6sx8ne6b 3 роки тому +5

    Before long, the Korean Black Panther will be upgraded to the most advanced and powerful tank in the world.

  • @learnerm3120
    @learnerm3120 4 роки тому +10

    Saudi Arabia is not getting the Leopard Tanks from Germany because of Kashogi's murder and other human rights violations.

  • @Itachi21x
    @Itachi21x 4 роки тому +17

    German here.
    As much as I love the Leopard 2, the K2 Black Panther and the T14 Armata are superior as they have been developed relatively recently.

    • @Itachi21x
      @Itachi21x 4 роки тому +2

      I am not sure if the SU-57 was designed to be a air-superiority fighter. Not comparable to MBTs since they don't have different roles.

    • @alter5057
      @alter5057 3 роки тому

      @Drink Dawn I agree that how new or old the tank is does not correspond exactly with rankings. I just go by the rankings as it is, because probably the weapon experts examined the tanks and made their conclusions.

    • @alter5057
      @alter5057 3 роки тому +1

      @Humble Germany does make good tanks. Seems like Leopard 2 series was first created in 1970s, and the 2A7 version is ranked number 1. I give credit for that.
      Korea at this point does not have a lot to learn from Germany because K2 is currently #2. K2 Panther follows right after Leopard 2A7. Germany created tank Leopard 2, 50 years ago, but Korea apparently almost caught up currently. . Ranking is similar with artillary and IFV as well.

  • @manuelgozzi8485
    @manuelgozzi8485 4 роки тому +17

    In the section about the type 90 you are (for the most part) actually showing the type 10...

  • @canuck_gamer3359
    @canuck_gamer3359 4 роки тому +3

    I had to watch the same ad no fewer than 4 times in a video that was less than 20 minutes long. Okay, you got me this time but I won't be back.

    • @beavis4play
      @beavis4play 3 роки тому

      use adblock - it solves that problem

  • @dieuluimeme9996
    @dieuluimeme9996 4 роки тому +4

    Result of the iron spear 2019
    1 Leclerc
    2 léopard 2
    3 m1

    • @kris10annn14
      @kris10annn14 4 роки тому +1

      Leo 2A4 with a conscript crew. fyi

    • @dieuluimeme9996
      @dieuluimeme9996 4 роки тому +3

      is that an assertion?
      or an attempt to discredit the leclerc's victory? three countries participated with leopard2!

  • @elli003
    @elli003 4 роки тому +2

    Lab estimates for survivability and performance based on software analytics are likely inadequate for comparison. Only battle tested tanks need apply.

  • @Favoki
    @Favoki 4 роки тому +8

    I would like to comment about when you said the "Abrams has less fire power compared to Leopard 2a7 and K2 Black Panther because of slightly longer L/55 120mm"
    While the barrel of the Leopard 2a7 and K2 are longer, that is just to make up for the fact that they don't use depleted uranium shells. The Abrams has the same 120mm, but with DU shells instead of the longer barrel, and little is known about which can pen more.

    • @jungking4033
      @jungking4033 2 роки тому +1

      uranium shells are dangerous to the tank soldiers with the toxic materials.

    • @Tanker000
      @Tanker000 2 роки тому

      @@jungking4033 not reactive uranium

  • @IproDaniel1
    @IproDaniel1 4 роки тому +11

    Is this a meme video for RedEffect?

  • @SeeCapss
    @SeeCapss 4 роки тому +7

    LEOPARD with some OldSchool part include MG42 on the top of the TANK . . . TIGER, u're not alone buddy

  • @lisaruhm6681
    @lisaruhm6681 4 роки тому +8

    Interesting, that Germany partook in developing 3 od the top 10 tanks.

  • @dnedlew
    @dnedlew 3 роки тому +4

    The comparison should be between those tanks with actual combat experience, not ones that don't. Those tanks with none, are just wild guesses.

  • @boi9433
    @boi9433 4 роки тому +9

    The experts are in the comments, no need to watch the video

  • @2008mustapa
    @2008mustapa 4 роки тому +5

    man, you need to get your fact updated on some of the tanks. for e.g. t-90 has been upgraded so much .

  • @worldmilitarytoday4546
    @worldmilitarytoday4546 4 роки тому

    amazing tank

  • @ianhigson719
    @ianhigson719 4 роки тому +5

    Does the Challenger 2 hold the record for number of hand held anti tank projectiles fired at it and remain combat effective?

    • @chebb3699
      @chebb3699 4 роки тому

      Ian Higson not sure. It’s possible all I know is the challenger 2 and Abraham’s are beast when it comes to taking ieds some of the videos are pretty nutty

    • @terrywainman6050
      @terrywainman6050 4 роки тому +4

      Yes the challenger 2 which you are on about lost both tracks and through the night the energy shot out the view finders and i think it was about 70 plus rpgs they fired at it until they were rescued and it took 12 hrs to repair and it was back out with the rest of the challenger 2s.

    • @SplatDawg
      @SplatDawg 3 роки тому

      Seems like chobham armour ngl

  • @turse8201
    @turse8201 4 роки тому +47

    13:51 longest tank to tank kill was a challenger 1, not a challenger 2.

    • @jugganaut33
      @jugganaut33 4 роки тому

      Technically it was the same family of gun.

    • @turse8201
      @turse8201 4 роки тому +6

      @@jugganaut33 similar guns but still different. Challenger 2 has the L30A rifled gun while challenger 1 has the L11A5 gun. Still think they should have at least checked instead of shitting out this video filled with innacuracies

    • @SplatDawg
      @SplatDawg 3 роки тому +1

      @@turse8201 if the video was 100% accurate the challenger 2 would more than likely be higher due to its design, which mostly secretive

  • @chebb3699
    @chebb3699 4 роки тому +3

    Eh mbt’s now a days are all so good at their own things it’s kinda just opinion for Wich one is the best

  • @ghongu
    @ghongu 4 роки тому +1

    No way!
    That footage is from Estonia? for the challenger 2
    Challenger 2 driver here : D

    • @almac9203
      @almac9203 4 роки тому

      Is that the best tank in the world?

  • @sku32956
    @sku32956 3 роки тому +2

    I say give me the combat tested one that works really good

  • @jaehyung2737
    @jaehyung2737 4 роки тому +28

    Reason why K2 has the best Fire Control System is because Samsung is developing the hardware and software for K2

    • @JeanYouLuckyBoi
      @JeanYouLuckyBoi 4 роки тому

      thats cool

    • @gagamba9198
      @gagamba9198 4 роки тому +2

      The same Samsung that has to reply on google for the Android OS and Qualcomm for its chips? The same Samsung with its failed Tizen and Bada OS?
      In defence, Samsung relies on Thales (France) and Staco (US) for its ground force technology.
      Samsung has decent hardware and very good production, but lacks talent in software.
      _K2 has the best Fire Control System _
      K2 has an unproved FCS. Hard to call it best based on non performance.
      More Korean over-egged self puffery.

    • @gagamba9198
      @gagamba9198 4 роки тому +1

      _Samsung is not in the defense business at the momentarily._
      You'll need to deconflict that with this by jaehyung:
      _is because Samsung is developing the hardware and software for K2_
      BTW, Samsung is in the defence business presently and has been in it for decades, but K2 is mostly a Hyundai programme.
      Anyway, a test it just that. It have be stacked in the favour of one or the other due to the vast corruption in KSA and elsewhere in the Gulf where kickbacks are common.
      Real-world battle tested is what matters.

    • @gagamba9198
      @gagamba9198 4 роки тому +1

      @silva, address your complaint to jeahyung. He's the one asserting Samsung is "developing the hardware and software for K2." How it was doing so for HHI programme is left unsubstantiated. My comment was mocking him.
      Korea's defence products are mostly _unproved_ in battle. That KSA has bought some products does not change this fact.

    • @gagamba9198
      @gagamba9198 4 роки тому +1

      Still unproved in battle.

  • @Litwinus
    @Litwinus 4 роки тому +2

    I think Poland has a lot T-80 and Lepoard( You didn't mention it when listing countries).

  • @nicologervasini7422
    @nicologervasini7422 4 роки тому +4

    I don't know man, but to be fair, from the voices that are around, like the front protection of the crew or the new dart projectile, and since it is a brand new design, i think that the Armata should be rated higher than the Chally 2, that has still a rifled gun, and i know that it is very good but the chobham armor is from the '60s dude, and it hasn't got an autoloader
    Edit: grammar

    • @nicologervasini7422
      @nicologervasini7422 4 роки тому

      @Bo Pik ok, sorry, but still, it is outdated, and it can be penetrated by many modern rounds

  • @arandomguyfromthecountryca706
    @arandomguyfromthecountryca706 4 роки тому +5

    This Moment when you See the japanese Tank and expects to be a Leo

  • @lappilappland3708
    @lappilappland3708 3 роки тому +3

    And now comes the Leo 3 with a mighty 130 mm Canon...

  • @strawberrydragon1
    @strawberrydragon1 4 роки тому +20

    Nobody cares which tank is better; they are all good. Everyone cares about the competence of the people commanding/crewing them, because that is the deciding factor.

    • @mrbasshead403
      @mrbasshead403 4 роки тому

      I can't speak on other tanks as far as training.
      But the Abrams platform is easy to learn.
      And as far as maintenance the Abrams dosent really require that much in a combat setting.
      Shit we pulled and r place an engine in 45 mins. To get that tank fmc.
      Besides maintenance really fall down to the crew that has the tank.
      The Abrams will tell you if she is sick lol

    • @j.wagner6126
      @j.wagner6126 4 роки тому

      You only said this because you Land lost

    • @yurisabrori
      @yurisabrori 4 роки тому

      There aren't any good mbt anymore, because the expensive and mass production factor. In the middle of the war, mbt should produce with cheaper and faster production. Not some millions dollar and few months production

    • @strawberrydragon1
      @strawberrydragon1 4 роки тому

      Yuris Abrori there still needs to be SOME quality though. Then T-34 could be mass produce and spammed, because numbers right? Replacing the tanks isn’t the only problem, what about the men to crew the new tanks?

    • @yurisabrori
      @yurisabrori 4 роки тому

      @@strawberrydragon1 tank does not need crew anymore this day. Could use remote control with assisted a.i. Armored self destruct vehicle with mass production is more terrifying weapon than mbt. Spam exploding tank

  • @whiteyblack1468
    @whiteyblack1468 4 роки тому +1

    about OPLOT. You show video of "T-84 Oplot" in Strong Europe Tank Challenge 2018. Which is not a MBT OPLOT, you can find some videos from Thailand with this tanks

  • @juhsdkw
    @juhsdkw 4 роки тому +1

    What type of t-90?

  • @battleaxe51
    @battleaxe51 4 роки тому +12

    Why was the run film effect added? Just leave the clear picture alone.

    • @shlug
      @shlug 3 роки тому

      Copyright, I think

    • @greenjoon1
      @greenjoon1 3 роки тому

      I totally agree. so annoying.

  • @xisotopex
    @xisotopex 3 роки тому +6

    you can build a new tank far quicker than you can train a competent crew. what is the reason for low survivability in the russian tanks? if you are going to lose the vehicle might as well try to keep the crew alive.

  • @franciscopearce8059
    @franciscopearce8059 4 роки тому +1

    Number.4 M1A2 SEP Number .3 CHALLENGER 2 .

  • @haruplays2573
    @haruplays2573 3 роки тому +1

    can't wait for leopard 3 note or leopard 3 ultra

  • @davelee4885
    @davelee4885 4 роки тому +23

    Challenger 1 still holds the record for the longest range tank on tank kill

    • @wondeboy12
      @wondeboy12 4 роки тому +4

      @Peter J Mallia Ok Mr internet expert clearly Afagnistan, Kosovo & Bosnia where the Leopard 2 has served are not wars.
      As for the Leclerc clearly the Persian Gulf, Lebanon & Yemen are not a wars either lol
      You must be a bull with a bowl problem because you are spouting bullshit allover this comment section.

    • @JK-hd9raton
      @JK-hd9raton 4 роки тому +1

      @@wondeboy12 The Yemeni Civil War is a real open war against a conventional army, the Emirati Leclerc tanks have been under heavy fire many times, some of them damaged by rocket fire

  • @MakaveliBV007
    @MakaveliBV007 4 роки тому +5

    1:03 romania number plate :))

  • @rafaelquinones5110
    @rafaelquinones5110 4 роки тому

    Tanks are cool.I love tanks....I love tanks video games 😊

  • @hafidzatmaja3532
    @hafidzatmaja3532 3 роки тому +1

    Loved The Germany Products🇩🇪

  • @hurl3y629
    @hurl3y629 4 роки тому +16

    I am not having the Challenger 2 MBT at the No.4 spot. Not having it.

    • @chebb3699
      @chebb3699 4 роки тому +2

      Yeah I agree the challenger Leo and Abrams should be within top 3 then again the black panther looks effective but I guess war will tell

    • @Cafferssss
      @Cafferssss 4 роки тому +2

      @@chebb3699
      Leopard 2 #1
      Challenger 2 #2

    • @chebb3699
      @chebb3699 4 роки тому +2

      Caffers good opinion I kinda agree. But yeah there insane tanks. I’m in the U.S and the Leo 2 and chally 2 are Nutty looking. The turret cheeks are just so different from one another it’s cool to look at em all. But It all comes down to variables though with tanks. A lot of variables. This is why I think tanks are opinion based to a degree . Like a tiger one and a Leo . Ya Leo is better but a much closer comparison like abrams and chally. Then that is so close that variables in combat take it away imo

    • @SplatDawg
      @SplatDawg 3 роки тому

      @@Cafferssss I wish I could disagree due to the difference between the two as the challenger does have things the Leo doesn't and the same is back, the Abrams (if someone what's to talk about that) is just a down graded challenger from what ik. But overall I say the Leo and chally are about the same. (In my opinion any ways)

  • @CFMLEAP
    @CFMLEAP 4 роки тому +8

    In one encounter within an urban area, a Challenger 2 came under attack from irregular forces with machine guns and rocket propelled grenades. The driver's sight was damaged and while attempting to back away under the commander's directions, the other sights were damaged and the tank threw its tracks entering a ditch. It was hit by 14 rocket propelled grenades from close range and a MILAN anti-tank missile. The crew survived, safe within the tank until it was recovered for repairs, the worst damage being to the sighting system. It was back in operation six hours later. One Challenger 2 operating near Basra survived being hit by 70 RPGs in another incident.
    She may be a slow tank but the Challenger 2 is an absolute beast. I don’t know about you but if I were going to war in a tank I would pick the Challenger. Not a single tank lost to enemy fire in its whole service in the British Army.

    • @seanhazelwood3311
      @seanhazelwood3311 4 роки тому

      We know the Challenger has the best armor. The M1 just has everything else.

    • @terrywainman6050
      @terrywainman6050 4 роки тому

      @@seanhazelwood3311 the challenger 2 has a more powerful gun than the Abrams because its rifled which means it has greater muzzle velocity than a smooth bore gun. The suspension on the challenger 2 is as good or even better than the Abrams. The engine on the Abrams is a great let down as you need a convoy of fuel trucks to keep them running, the challenger 2 engine is only 1200 cc but it's very reliable and still quite fast and it can go much farther in mpg than the Abrams. I would certainly agree that the electronics on the Abrams are much better than the challenger 2 but with the upgrades on the challenger 2 to start soon it will easily beat the Abrams and put it on a level par or better than the leopard.

    • @thedukle8791
      @thedukle8791 4 роки тому

      @@terrywainman6050 Abrams' barrel is not rifled because a smoothbore allows for the use of a greater variety of ammo types

    • @seanhazelwood3311
      @seanhazelwood3311 4 роки тому

      @@terrywainman6050 We don't need the hotter main gun because only the M1 and Challenger have enough armor to worry about. Plus, the rifled gun wears out faster and needs more cleaning/maintenance. The Challenger suspension is close, but with it's much slower ground speed it's a moot point. The US doesn't rely on mpg because we have plenty of fuel. We want speed and HP, and no MBT on earth will outrun an M1A3. Our support vehicles have trouble keeping up with it. You're correct about the Leopards electronics, but the Challenger isn't even close at present. The Leopard can't do 60+ mph over desert terrain, so it naturally can't guarantee a hit at that speed. The M1 Can.

    • @seanhazelwood3311
      @seanhazelwood3311 4 роки тому

      @@thedukle8791 I forgot about that part, thanks.

  • @Spector_Cheese
    @Spector_Cheese 4 роки тому +2

    Glad to see my country tank :D
    K2-Black panther

  • @gm5564
    @gm5564 3 роки тому

    The British Challenger 2 comes with the constant smoke generator system?

  • @craneliu290
    @craneliu290 2 роки тому +4

    Isn't Arjun the world's best tank ever? It's the upgraded version of Leopard, and can beat Chinese ZTZ 99A easily, isn't it? Tell me that's right.

    • @Nisssssss1
      @Nisssssss1 2 роки тому +2

      What the.... most of people in the world already know arjun is junk

  • @haigboulter181
    @haigboulter181 4 роки тому +13

    Considering that the challenger 2 is more reliable and has never been destroyed in combat, how did the Abrams beat it?

    • @smooth_sundaes5172
      @smooth_sundaes5172 4 роки тому +2

      Agreed, best tank for crew survivability. and still up there once its upgrading is carried out. It's amusing how much of a death trap Russian made tanks are compared to the latest western tanks.

    • @johndavidson4127
      @johndavidson4127 4 роки тому +4

      @@smooth_sundaes5172 T-34 was a death trap compering to german Panthers and Tigers but results were saying that a lot of death traps could defeat strongest land army with best panzers.

    • @johndavidson4127
      @johndavidson4127 4 роки тому +2

      @@smooth_sundaes5172 And I don't understand how Armata T-14 so low in the list ? I would understand if it weren't in the list at all due to the lack of information and the fact that it was never seen in the battle. But if you look just on papers it is most efficient tank out of this list.

    • @user-wb1ww1py2f
      @user-wb1ww1py2f 4 роки тому

      Beeing not destroyed by old T-55 T-62 and downgraded T-72 is not a big achievement like even AMX-10 and AMX-30 slapped the ass of those tanks in DS1

    • @IamDogge
      @IamDogge 4 роки тому

      Haig Boulter communism.

  • @kingchooet9966
    @kingchooet9966 2 роки тому +1

    You forgot to mention the Oplot M can only use older APFSDS rounds in comparence to for example the T-90.

  • @tompalmer5986
    @tompalmer5986 3 роки тому

    I'm wondering about the likelihood of an Abrams M1A2 catching on fire when it is hit. Is the crew protected from that? Why didn't we use a diesel engine when a diesel engine performs just as well and gets better mileage?

  • @InquisitorBoomBoom
    @InquisitorBoomBoom 4 роки тому +20

    German MBT comes at top spot*
    Rommel: happy voices*

    • @user-nf9by2xh2l
      @user-nf9by2xh2l 4 роки тому

      The Inquisitor
      Rommel 「I want to ride the Reopard 2 !!!」

    • @InquisitorBoomBoom
      @InquisitorBoomBoom 4 роки тому

      @@user-nf9by2xh2l I wanna try his gun and also drive it in the neighbourhood!!

  • @user-kg8yy4tp2b
    @user-kg8yy4tp2b 4 роки тому +6

    6:56 Type 10 not 90

  • @aminuddinahamadsalleh5687
    @aminuddinahamadsalleh5687 3 роки тому

    What number for PT 91M from Poland?

  • @franscobben9044
    @franscobben9044 4 роки тому

    good

  • @Hugo-kz9bi
    @Hugo-kz9bi 4 роки тому +10

    Leclerc would obliterate any of them but sure, it has the fastest killing ratio so in a real fight it would be the best suited to take all of them out in the shortest amount of time

    • @homelessstudio7960
      @homelessstudio7960 4 роки тому +4

      I think everyone has a fav tank and it varries, i totally respect your opinion, you're talking facts right here. I respect any tanks for what they are made to be, leclerc on paper is "probably" lacking armour because that's how the french fights. Simply does it, Leclerc, Abrams, Leo, Chally etc.... They all are the same to me, i respect tanks like you should respect your ennemies in battle. They're all amazing.

    • @Sedna063
      @Sedna063 4 роки тому

      Honestly, I think you are wrong. Can it kill the others? Not so sure given that Abrams employs a very thick armour and the Challenger II is renowned for crew protection. Leopard's turret is basically impenetrable by any tank right now. But they can all pen the Leclerc I would guess. Just by looking at the weight, obviously it is a tad smaller but weighs a lot less. And then this turret looks very vulnerable.
      Obviously we can't really access it because all armour values are classified. I would though say that it is a good tank but if it can destroy the others, not so sure.

    • @augusgus1776
      @augusgus1776 4 роки тому +2

      The fact all the comments are forgetting is that the Leclerc is the only tank in the world who is able to shoot while driving fast with the quite same higher precision than if it was not moving. That make him way harder to destroy compared to all the others who needs to stop which make them an easy target.

    • @augusgus1776
      @augusgus1776 4 роки тому +2

      Luca Nope that’s the Leclerc not the leopard

    • @Sedna063
      @Sedna063 4 роки тому

      Augustin Merle Any proof for tgat particular statement? Or a madeup story?

  • @eliottladray1172
    @eliottladray1172 3 роки тому +6

    i don't understand why the leclerc is only 3 on 10and why the leclerc isn't powerful
    the leclerc s2 XLR is better than any mbt he got the best gun as well as the best mobility

    • @Future183
      @Future183 2 роки тому

      . the Leopard is wayyyyy better than a leclerc. the leopard is since 40 years on the top of the worlds best mbt and the leopard is more combatproofen. the leopard beats always the leclerc at the natotankcompetitions in terms of overall performance. the leclerc only beats the leopard in one thing, in terms of shooting but that doesnt really matter because the leopard has one hit win chance of nearly 100%, and overall performance is definitely more important than just shooting. besides that the leopard was buyed from almost 20 countrys and has always proved to be a reliable tank, the leclerc, on the other hand, was only bought twice and that was 20 years ago, since then nobody wanted the leclerc anymore. If a country wants to buy tanks, the leopard is always an option because it is cheap, reliable, and can muster almost the same effectiveness as the k2 black panther, for example.

  • @Grandizer8989
    @Grandizer8989 4 роки тому

    I’ll go up against any of these with my Smasher any day

    • @leichen4805
      @leichen4805 4 роки тому

      why isn't it nerfed yet? Stupid wg.

  • @westprogamer3294
    @westprogamer3294 3 роки тому +2

    The Challenger 2 can also be used to fumigate against mosquitoes.

  • @shakkirptb
    @shakkirptb 4 роки тому +3

    Middle East native: its Qatar
    American Karen: no no it is Cattaaaaaaar

  • @augusgus1776
    @augusgus1776 4 роки тому +4

    The fact this video is forgetting about the Leclerc is that it is the only tank in the world who is able to shoot while driving fast with the quite same higher precision than if it was not moving. That make him way harder to destroy compared to all the others who needs to stop which make them an easy target.

    • @jrufussimonsen4718
      @jrufussimonsen4718 4 роки тому +2

      NO it is not.

    • @Sedna063
      @Sedna063 3 роки тому

      You want to tell me a moving gun is more accurate than a resting gun?

    • @Future183
      @Future183 2 роки тому

      the Leopard is wayyyyy better than a leclerc. the leopard is since 40 years on the top of the worlds best mbt and the leopard is more combatproofen. the leopard beats always the leclerc at the natotankcompetitions in terms of overall performance. the leclerc only beats the leopard in one thing, in terms of shooting but that doesnt really matter because the leopard has one hit win chance of nearly 100%, and overall performance is definitely more important than just shooting. besides that the leopard was buyed from almost 20 countrys and has always proved to be a reliable tank, the leclerc, on the other hand, was only bought twice and that was 20 years ago, since then nobody wanted the leclerc anymore. If a country wants to buy tanks, the leopard is always an option because it is cheap, reliable, and can muster almost the same effectiveness as the k2 black panther, for example.

  • @encryptededdiemurphy6197
    @encryptededdiemurphy6197 3 роки тому

    Did anyone else see the dud smoke on the black panther? Are the smoke canisters reliable

  • @rinsedpie
    @rinsedpie 4 роки тому +1

    Excellent video thank you

  • @Combatwombat-sn7ng
    @Combatwombat-sn7ng 4 роки тому +5

    u know u play too much war thunder when it takes less than a second to recognize the BMP at 3:24

  • @gamerx112
    @gamerx112 3 роки тому +4

    germany, please never stop being the tank masters of the west.

  • @jasonking0510
    @jasonking0510 4 роки тому

    Man I miss gunnery...

  • @HenryElfin
    @HenryElfin 4 роки тому +1

    The more I got into the video the more I'm like what???? And for the first time in my life, I agree with most people in the comment section of a UA-cam video where most people have a solid agreement on a certain opinion. Humanity may still have hope yet

  • @peterleadley7103
    @peterleadley7103 4 роки тому +5

    Interesting video and comments. Rating tanks by their technology or engineering is an exercise in hypothesising. In WW2 the German Tiger was the biggest, strongest, best armoured and with more fire power than any other tank in the world. It was up against Sherman's and T34's, both vastly inferior, but by sheer weight of numbers these tanks slaughtered the Tiger fleet. China may not have a tank listed in this 'Top Ten', but you can bet your eye teeth they have thousands of them.

  • @wertushka2715
    @wertushka2715 4 роки тому +4

    There's nothing in the video. The characteristics of the tanks have not been disclosed. And on high places put cars that did not even show themselves. In general paid govt

  • @Djungelskog69
    @Djungelskog69 4 роки тому +2

    Depleted uranium amor
    I SURE DO LOVE ME SOME OF THAT AMERICAN FREEDOM

  • @vinvanid
    @vinvanid 3 роки тому

    18:32 I don't know whether other tank can do that cool thing or not..
    The hull is stay at one point while the body moving ?? Awesome Leopard !!!

    • @mEmEzMaN...
      @mEmEzMaN... 3 роки тому +1

      You mean neutral steer
      Wvery tank has that its been there since ww2

    • @SplatDawg
      @SplatDawg 3 роки тому

      Yea pretty much most British can do that

    • @vinvanid
      @vinvanid 3 роки тому

      @@mEmEzMaN... but never seen tanks do that so fluidly.. can you give me other video that demonstrate that other tank can do that too ?

  • @ryoukato4
    @ryoukato4 4 роки тому +36

    "Type 90..." *shows Type 10*
    I think you've quickly looked at some information on UA-cam videos instead of doing proper research on these tanks. The only difference between you and those videos is you didn't use a robotic voice 🤷‍♂️

    • @user-ud9hm6vv9c
      @user-ud9hm6vv9c 4 роки тому +2

      Well, actually nobody cares about self-defensing(which doesn't have outstanding performance) mbt in Japan tho
      Oh, Abe is trying to make Japan capable of attacking as well... maybe some countries have to actually care about it in near future

    • @ryoukato4
      @ryoukato4 4 роки тому +4

      @@user-ud9hm6vv9c I have no idea what your reply is to my comment? Non of the things you mention I am talking about 😊

    • @WillArtie
      @WillArtie 4 роки тому

      @@ryoukato4 i get a few replies like that sometimes. You make a comment and get a reply that doesn't seem for you. Maybe a UA-cam bug where the comment was put in the wrong place? Happened to me a few weeks ago. I was thinking "what are they talking about!?". Anyways... yes I am at least happy to hear a real human voice. The robot voices are sounding better, but it's just so impersonal. Cheers!

  • @Schtevs
    @Schtevs 4 роки тому +7

    When you make so many footage mistakes it does not sounds credible. Just some propaganda. Also, nowhere is mentioned that all tanks have a 4 kms target limit, while T14 Armata can go up to 8.

    • @martincruickshank9830
      @martincruickshank9830 4 роки тому

      Armata is a prototype, battle untested. The Tiger 2 had 152 mm hull armor, the Maus had 200(?)mm of hull armor BUT was never battle tested. Deal with it.

  • @yusufziyaunsal516
    @yusufziyaunsal516 4 роки тому +1

    Did you check Turkish New Operated Tank ‘Altay’ I seems it can be in top10, It has all stats like a German Leopard and can be use from command post without crew

    • @emircanayyldz7814
      @emircanayyldz7814 4 роки тому

      its already on the list, its korean k2 Black panther, altay's armour is just a bit more upgraded.

    • @yusufziyaunsal516
      @yusufziyaunsal516 4 роки тому

      Emircan Ayyıldız all of tanks are similar so thats not a point but I understand the reason why they didint put it that was Altay tank still is a prototype

    • @emircanayyldz7814
      @emircanayyldz7814 4 роки тому

      @@yusufziyaunsal516 no, I'm not saying that they did not include altay because it's still in the prototype stage. and of course, not every tank is similar. I am saying that altay tank is already on the list as one of the best tanks because altay tank is built by the license and technology transfer from the south korean tank, k2 black panter. a perk for having a good relationship with another country. outside of engine (working on an indigenous engine) and the main canon, turkey will be able to produce most of the tank's parts indigenously. which means the subsystems of the tank will be produced by turkish defence companies like aselsan, roketsan, havelsan etc. and thanks to boron element, the altay's composite armour will be one of the strongest armours ever made. so don't worry, your tank is in the list as k2 black panter.

  • @dinovelopment8290
    @dinovelopment8290 3 роки тому +1

    Why does this guy sound like infographic show, is it just me?

  • @aytek98
    @aytek98 4 роки тому +5

    Hastily put together list, lots of errors but most surprising is why a next gen tank like armata is so down on the list ( we get it disclosed information) it is a tank built up from scratch, put aside your bias

    • @andrewaustin6369
      @andrewaustin6369 4 роки тому +1

      There are some problems with the Armata mainly the advanced systems that are required not currently being ready for testing much less deployment.

    • @Realist1775
      @Realist1775 4 роки тому +2

      Agreed about the author's bias and I am sure he has videos about BMW and Mercedes also. If this was based on aesthetics, the Armata is last on the list. It's an ugly beast, but so was the T-34 and we all know how feared it was by German generals. Russians tend to produce really good equipment at a fraction of the cost and time compared to the "West". I was in the Marine Corps infantry 2003-2007 and I liked the Abrams, but it is complicated, consumes tons of fuel and has an astoundingly hot signature due to the turbine. Heat guided ordnance is very attracted. I never saw a leopard or a challenger, but I can imagine they are equal, if not better than the Abrams. Alas, pretty sure the Armata will be a game changer in the tank world when the full capabilities are released.

  • @user-fl6qt8ir2s
    @user-fl6qt8ir2s 3 роки тому +3

    6:59 This is type10

  • @Kampfgruppe9260
    @Kampfgruppe9260 Рік тому +2

    K2 Black Panther 👍

  • @flyingsac
    @flyingsac 4 роки тому +1

    How bout the VT4

  • @SantiagoP.2006
    @SantiagoP.2006 3 роки тому +6

    didnt talk of the t14 because is the best, americans dont take in count cost you can build 3 t90 or 1 m1abhrams

    • @Sedna063
      @Sedna063 3 роки тому

      T14 will just be a small production with not even 100 planned....

    • @SantiagoP.2006
      @SantiagoP.2006 3 роки тому

      @@Sedna063 thats by now, Russia has no necessity to produce hundreds of tanks and fall in debt like the US

    • @Sedna063
      @Sedna063 3 роки тому

      @@SantiagoP.2006 Russia doesn't have the funds and a demographic bomb ticking.
      Russia initially planned 2000 T14..... Then oil prices dropped.

    • @SantiagoP.2006
      @SantiagoP.2006 3 роки тому

      @@Sedna063 that was months ago...

    • @elliottzhou
      @elliottzhou 3 роки тому

      And u know the funny thing is he put the Korea tank as the second best one which actually is the mini size of m1a2......

  • @JT-gq8wv
    @JT-gq8wv 4 роки тому +3

    Well done. useful comparative data.Thank You. I subscribed.

  • @user-cz3ey3zk1v
    @user-cz3ey3zk1v 4 роки тому +2

    Is the c1 a good tank?

    • @Sebastian-yl7nq
      @Sebastian-yl7nq 4 роки тому +1

      The Italian Ariete?

    • @wondeboy12
      @wondeboy12 4 роки тому

      It's a good tank, it's seen battles in the middle east with no reported losses & proved to be decently accurate when firing also.
      Waiting on that upgrade they are working on though, should improve it's game considerably.

  • @zarpp9411
    @zarpp9411 4 роки тому

    I didn't know so many military experts would gather here.

  • @999oj
    @999oj 3 роки тому +3

    Aramata tank of Russia 🇷🇺 is the most beautiful tank I have seen so far. The design is sick as hell.

    • @markqqq_
      @markqqq_ 3 роки тому

      I like how a tank with a meter of rhae against apfsds and the strongest apfsds projectile in the world isn't number 1

  • @thinkglobally3596
    @thinkglobally3596 4 роки тому +21

    Not even close to professional.

  • @user-kp4cz4xt8v
    @user-kp4cz4xt8v 4 роки тому +1

    Good to see that type 99 is not on the list