Step 1: Put your $200 speakers next to some $10 speakers. Step 2: Film a video pointing out how your $200 speakers are built better than the $10. Step 3: Profit.
@@14U2C they are on sale for 179 right now and it’s priced per pair not a single speakers. They are also 92db sensitivity. I honestly think for what you are getting it’s a decent deal and dude needs to eat also.
Build quality in a speaker is essential to how the speaker will perform , so do your research on the speakers you are going to purchase . And thats all i can say
Jerry Spann yes it does. The wizzer cone in the middle acts much like a tweeter, (low quality muffled one), to increase the higher frequencies to be usable. so while you may want to think of this as a midrange speaker, it was intended to be a "full range" driver, with of course limitati I ns on the low and high end... Such full range designs were very common, and are still often found in many applications.
Look up the original Morse brand 8" full range from the late 60s-early 70s. Widely used, very sensitive, and customizable as they were used by many manufacturers of console stereos from admiral to zenith.
Brandin Danesi I would not be surprised if they were used in budget guitar amps... they would be perfect for the job... I could be wrong but I think that one of my guitar amps are possibly using one of those! hmm now I'm tempted to find out... I have used that amp for many new years eve parties and while it wasn't Hifi... it did it's job well.... lots of noise and plenty loud...
Yes Sir.. you are 💯% right. Wish if did it with some testing. I consider this is the way to "tell" the speakers that I am going choose will look like. But in fact and like most of us it is different. Definitely depends on the setup as you mentioned and the projection of sound quality that follows. You are A Master on that. Really I have learned alot from your videos. But I have wish that you do more videos for the new swags. I need to get and add the new version but don't know exactly what is the difference between the new one and what I have.
What causes those lack of a better term fart noises a "blown" or damaged speaker makes when it seems there's no audible or feeling with your fingers of coil scratching when you push the cone in and out. I've had speakers/subs that sounded ok at low levels but as soon as I put a little more wattage or a little deeper bass note to it it started making those nasty fart noises kinda faint but noticable. What causes those noises?
@@EMFAudio Got it. My mistake. I watched you other video where you were talking about subwoofer cone size and displacement. I accidentally commented on the wrong video. Thanks for the response. Subscribed
That one thats shielded looks like it come out of an old getto blaster from the late 80 early 90s that one that has the dual cone is from like the late 70s early 80s LOL. YES I AM OLD
Darren Million that's what I said elsewhere... except the bit about being old LoL... that bigger one, the 8" is still being made and still being used today... most shopping centers use them to pipe music throughout the complex. they are cheap, they do their intended task well and they are extremely efficient all while being reliable... that's why they have stood the test of time.... just a good allrounder... next time you're at a major shopping center, look up and you just might find one looking back down at you LoL..
How about how to determine which subwoofer is louder by comparing specifications/parameters? I've always used displacement (Sd x Xmax) to make that determination, but I'm sure there is much more to it than that.
I believe in this video I touched on that ua-cam.com/video/ykPn0CpdrVQ/v-deo.html but the reality is there is no way to look at specs and say "yup, this is louder" without the application being in mind and specs being wildly different. Even if it is "louder", that doesn't tell you how it sounds. It could be 1 dB louder but sound like garbage.
The texturing on the plastic cone actually has a side benefit of reducing breakup and reflections. Probably not by much considering how flexible those cones probably are, but it does help them from sounding more awful than they already are. I also tried some time back to take something like that 8" full range driver and see if it could be modded to have even half decent sound for a home audio application. Not out of practicality, but just for the fun of it. And although bass is not really possible, they can be made to have a reasonably ear pleasing mid range which extendeds into the mid treble range... Of course it required some extensive cone treatments and suspension alterations...... But it was possible.. And of course, the whole effort is comparable to polishing a turd, as it can only be polished so much before it smears.... But it was a fun project to teach my son a little about how speakers and acoustics work, and I think that is what mattered. Now he is modding really high quality drivers and getting exceptionally good sound out of them!
I think your videos should include TSP, Distortion, FResponse, recommend Crossoverpoint (determined by Distortion and FResponse) and maybe even Klippel data, that way customer, would have an easier time picking the right speaker. To be real, I think all company videos should include that.
Those 3" and 4" speakers looked really nice. Would you be interested in retailing them on the open market any time soon, or are you bound by contract to only sell them to the manufacturer that has ordered them from you?
The production models have their logo on them so I couldn't sell them to the public without making a run with my logo on them, or at least no logo on them.
Another thing to note. A speaker can sound very good, up to the point where you exceed the design capabilities. What I mean is this; A speaker may indeed be very accurate at moderate or low volumes, but may not be capable of the power handling and/or excursion for higher volumes with the same accuracy. So a given speaker malty be one of the best for low volume listening, and be worthless any louder. Another thing to note, the size of the magnet does not mean it can also take more power. Power rating is a function of the coil winding(s) and cooling (if any). Over the years there have been many speaker designs. At a few points, some manufacturers played with larger magnet designs using the same components otherwise, just to increase the efficiency of the speaker. There were even designs that incorporated fixed electro-magnet coils with the fixed magnet to increase the efficiency and capabilities of the driver. There was also at least one design where a fixed coil was placed and driven opposite of the moving coil to increase efficiency and capability. But generally you can learn a lot by looking at the drivers, not the full story, but enough to let you know if it may be worth a listening test or not. The big thing is to first determine how it will be used and what it will need to meet for your application.
I've mentioned the motor size doesn't indicate power handling, but power rating isn't from the coil alone either. If the motor is weak and you dump a bunch of power in it, it won't move enough to cool it. You also can't have a large coil with a small motor unless you're dealing with a cup style. In other words, if the motor is 3" diameter it won't have a 2" coil in it, so that's a good indicator of what's going on there.
So to be clear, on a manufacturers channel, we're supposed to make videos that don't have any of our product in them, ever? If it was an ad, would we have included 5 other speakers that aren't even remotely comparable in size, cost, or quality? You could literally interpret this video as "other stuff is cheaper, I'll buy that because it's cheap"
Did the cheap 4 inch and 8 inch speakers come from a Stern Pinball machine? I ask because those are the exact speakers Stern have used in their games for many years. While they didn't sound too bad inside a pinball cabinet (possibly helped with some EQ), once upgraded to better speakers, the difference is incredible! Stern were really pushing the limits of the 8 inch trying to make it act like a sub (which really didn't work and just caused horrible distortion). Seems like they have finally realized the error of their ways as Stern's newest games now use a proper LF driver in the cabinet and co-axial speakers in the back box that sound a thousand times better.
They are, and they still use them. Those speakers are in the Pro systems, the different ones you speak of are in the Limited systems. The speakers you get depends on the level of machine.
@@EMFAudio Thanks for the reply. I'm aware that only the Limited Edition models have an upgraded speaker package. However, ever since The Beatles Pinball was released late last year, Stern have been using a new 8 inch driver without a whizzer cone in their standard Pro games. It's unbranded and I'm sure it's still fairly cheap, but it sounds a heck of a lot better than the twin cone driver shown in this video. It can actually produce some decent low end! I believe the standard back box speakers have been changed too.
@@Chris-xk3bp Are you sure the machine wasn't upgraded after the fact? I feel extremely confident the speakers you see are the standard ones in machines shipping today.
@@EMFAudio No, it was defiantly stock as it's what was installed when the Beatles machine was unboxed, fresh from the factory. The standard Pro models of The Munsters and Black Knight: Sword of Rage also use the same new driver (I've assisted in setting up these games for a local pinball club). The new woofer looks fairly similar to the twin cone driver shown in this video, but it does have a few cosmetic differences and of course, no whizzer cone. You'll notice the difference in sound quality too when playing these new titles.
@@Chris-xk3bp That sounds like they're having some supply consistency issues because this machine was Aerosmith which they've been making for like 3 years now.
do one with odd shapes like 6x9's does the shape effect the sound quality? always done a circle type speaker as far back as i can remember and was going to be getting a 6x9 for a explorer i got , the stock sounds bad but thought maybe its the shape that could make it sound bad..... would that matter ?
also wattage is not the main driver of how powerful a speaker will sound, it is only half the story. you can have 20 watts play 98DB in all the same Spectrum as a 100 watts but will cost a lot more due to it being a better speaker. (the 20 watts) so what you need to look for is Decibels at Frequency First and the lower the Watts it takes to do them! (think about it, if you plug 5 of them, you get your 100 watts worth in watts BUT you have 5 times 98 DB filling the room... i think that might be more than 98 DB at that point.)
@@theepicslayer7sss101 You'd get a rude awakening if you looked at sensitivity, made a choice based on that to "spend less on an amp", then performed that test.
@@EMFAudio well you would not really save, those speakers cost a lot more. tho you also have to choose what size you would put in carefully and that will probably cost more than the Amp. by Example, my guitar Amp speakers from my "Traynor 15 inch X2 Yorkville 1970 Cabinet" are 37 watts RMS each, when the guitar AMP's tubes died, i used those in place of my 120 watts Subwoofers and unlike them, the speakers were making the whole house shake and sounded 10 times better... tho they only sounded good till 3KHz when put on the normal output of a stereo. (tho the guitar sounded amazing) now, they were not able to take the same power so now i cannot put the volume passed half, not that i need to at that level. so if i had many in series, i would probably make more than just my house shake and maybe the neighbors as well... i guess what i mean is if you take high quality speakers that take less watts for the same loudness and build a good cabinet, you can propel the whole range louder with less distortion and heat (amp) built in the house. (100 watts sounding like 500, in my case 37W RMS, 90W max, sounding like 200W max.) tho guitar speakers are a bad example for "what to look for" since they are build to project a certain range and they do not "look" like they would be loud. "www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/vintage-66-70-traynor-yt-15-guitar-129268777" if you want to take a look at how cheap they appear, they they make the paintings and glasses in the cupboards downstairs shake.
The 3" isn't for car audio. A speaker designed for cost and duty can be crap, when it's crap. Just because your budget is $1 doesn't mean it's not crap because it's the best you could do for $1.
@@EMFAudio truth be told.... What you are missing is that there are horses for courses.... People get so caught up in marketing wank that if a product doesn't look strong and heavy... It must be crap. I would bet that the 8 inch in combination with the first cheap speaker through a two way crossover and an appropriate enclosure would produce amazing sound quality... I have a set of vintage Technics home Hifi speakers that have speakers in them that look literally just like what you have shown here and they are extremely efficient with a very strong mid bass punch... Would I use them in a car? Not without an enclosure.... They wouldn't even need a power amplifier either, the amplification from the head unit would be plenty.... The other benefits are the weight savings.... Lighter speakers, no amplifier to drive them and no electrical load on the alternator of the car so effectively you end up with a faster car and get more miles to the gallon.... So really, which are the better speakers? It's not always about maximum power output. It's about matching the components to deliver the sound quality that you should be getting at a sound pressure level that works best for you.... It means nothing to have the biggest and baddest components, so many people have spent so much money on what was meant to be the highest powered, best looking, only to come to the conclusion that it sounds like rubbish.... That's what you get when you are educated by marketing wank.... And I'm sorry but this video appears to be a poor form of marketing wank also.... If you wanted to do a comparison video, you should have stuck with car speakers, don't compare your car speakers with what is meant to be for home Hifi.... Even the OEM factory audio gear, they were designed to work well together and the only time that you should be making a comparison to the OEM factory speakers is if you can personally attest to a huge improvement with your speakers over the OEM's... Otherwise don't bother.
Nice vid....possibly a good video idea for you.....can u do a video showing every possible test you can do with a basic multimeter on subs, amps, both, whole system?
@@EMFAudio well pertaining to car audio....i only know of a few things u can do with a multimeter I don't know if there's more it's capable of doing....but just figured a video that shows them all instead of scattered all over YT....or any and all tests/readings with any meter.....or not hahaha
I’m looking for new subs for my show car. It’s not an audio comp car just a lowered Cadillac deville that’s been customized. I think I may go emf for my next subs. But I was hoping you’d sign the subs cone for me?
Making it neo wouldn't make it handle more power. It would require a different coil to take more power. People have been putting 100-125 watt per channel amps on SWAG's though.
@@EMFAudio I'm just joking. I was referring to the low wattage ones with small magnets. Bose usually have lots of small very cheap low wattage speakers and a larger sub in their set ups and sell the sets for absurdly high prices. Love your channel and all the great info you provide!
I would really like to know the origin story of EMF Audio and to know why u got into this industry and what was your background before the company, to get an in depth look at your drive to preach car audio gospel to the masses
The tricky thing with that is the microphone influence and the listening device influence. Majority of viewers are on phones so you may not be able to tell the difference in speakers on video.
Speakers are weird, I've heard old paper cone 6x9's in a pontiac 6000 that sound better than modern vehicles with higher end sound systems, I even had a pair of radioshack 15's with small motors that had incredible bass with a great sound. I have expensive carbon fiber component speakers in my car and they sound just ok. I think it's best just to listen before you buy.
I know exactly the speakers you're talking about if they're the factory ones. I think you're confusing "sounds better" with "more bass". They are incredibly bass heavy, but muddy as can be.
@@EMFAudio I thought they sounded good as well, but yes mostly because of bass, people who sat in the car thought it had a subwoofer. The biggest downside was accuracy on complex or fast changing frequencies which is to be expected from low wattage/small motors I suppose.
In the subwoofer world. Is there a best performing subwoofer in sealed box in an outdoor application Looking for a 800 w rms sub that has incredible sound. Going to be making a downfiring sub in a tour pack of a Harley......
You'd want something that is essentially marine rated, which is something I could make custom but not something we normally make. But, one consideration with that, 800 watts is roughly 80 amps of draw. Your motorcycle doesn't have the battery or charging power to support that. I suspect you have somewhere between 30-50 amps of charging, you can't realistically support more than about 300-400 watts of actual power.
The sound ordinance is simply the house brand, huge bang for the buck. Used many. All sizes. For under 50 bucks... U. S. Designed for sound quality... Built overseas for price.
That speaker is the highest efficiency and sounds absolutely terrible. It's the second worse sounding speaker in the bunch. Efficiency has nothing to do with sound quality and in often cases the less efficient speaker sounds better. And just for point of reference, the speaker you're talking about sells on the retail market for around $5.
@@EMFAudio It "sounds terrible" because it's meant for speech or low volume background music, not for car, HiFi or any high excursion applications. It's an intercom/PA speaker!
That's exactly how a lot of people end up buying garbage equipment. They look at the "build quality" not knowing what they're looking at, the price looks like a good deal when it's too good to be true, and RMS ratings are literally whatever the manufacturer decides to put on it. This has been displayed with Rockville lately.
@@EMFAudio I bought a cheap Chinese 10 inch underwear speaker about a month ago. Broke it in for 2 weeks. Still playing pretty good. Rated for 150rms, but I'm probably playing it around 125 or so. If you break them in right even the cheap crap will last
Yeah. That wouldn't make sense now that ya mention it. I wonder how the hell I got it in my head that they were soft domes in the first place? Oh well, they sound damn good. That's all that matters.
That whole stamp basket "can sound good" is bullshit, Arnie nudell would turn in his grave hearing your "stamp basket can sound good BUT" gibberish. Pretty much the entire older classic line of Infinity (IRS, RS, KAPPA, GAMMA, OMEGA, ectra) very well received and praised for its quality (* PS audio runs the IRS V as their reference system, those 12 inch graphite woofers are stamped baskets*) still WELL UP THERE IN PRICE! And hard to beat even by modern day speaker, mind you it's the entire DESIGN that does that stamped baskets are such a small useless point then.
I have a driver from a Panasonic enclosure that I put in a ported 1 cft box,. Very impressive low end excursion from a 6.5 inch woofer from a extremely mediocre brand
Something Told me from the beginning that you were not going to hook these things up that you were going to just basically talk so I listened for the first 45 seconds and then I skimmed the video to the middle then to the three quarters and then to the end I'm happy that I didn't watch it
I've been there but i noticed my hatchback i turned my subs off being curious i have 10 year old polk in the doors and a $18 speakers in the hatch because the plastic ones couldn't handle the sun and fell apart but wow im looking for some mtx or db drives for it soon because walmart sound wall has gotten me beat lmao
Also just bought a 96 buick lesabre-custom factory concert sound 2 system really good quality sounds as good as my mom's 06 Chrysler 300 that has lots of speakers 😆 but most my friends have terrible sounding systems like damn scrap it $20 speakers would be a upgrade for them
Give him a break it's not like everyone has their ideal studio when running a youtube channel. I'm sure he knows his mic isn't the best sounding, but it's definitely good enough to start putting content out there.
Please, send us a mic up to your standards to ensure we record audio where you'll be happy. Contact us for our shipping address so we can get on top of that. It must be a lavaliere, 1/8" phono.
Prolly not the best way to say it, but you had a good point. I don't know why these 'edumacators' don't actually demonstrate what they're talking about. How hard would it be to play a tune through the speakers after critiquing them? Lots of royalty free music to use out there.
Step 1: Put your $200 speakers next to some $10 speakers.
Step 2: Film a video pointing out how your $200 speakers are built better than the $10.
Step 3: Profit.
I dont mind it :D
@Conor Hanley Last I checked they were $350 for the Swag 6.5 Coaxials.
@@TheLionAndTheLamb777 can go grab some focal components for that price
@@14U2C they are on sale for 179 right now and it’s priced per pair not a single speakers. They are also 92db sensitivity. I honestly think for what you are getting it’s a decent deal and dude needs to eat also.
That first speaker you were showing.... i witnessed it break the windshield out of a car. Dude threw it pretty hard! Lmfao?
please mount them to an enclosure and play some test tones --> would be a nice follow up to this video :)
I'm 3 mins into the video and ROOTING for the little 4 watt to dominate it's larger competition!
That 3” is really neat
Thanks for the heart!
Great vid. I use midranges from 500hz to 8k.
The midbass From 50Hz to 500hz.
And the sub from 1hz to 50Hz.
What about the highs?
@@Pianiste221
Highs Selenium ST-200
8khz Up
Brilliant...that's what she said 😂😂😂😂great vid man
He said tight...hahahah aaaa huhuhu aaaa!
Build quality in a speaker is essential to how the speaker will perform , so do your research on the speakers you are going to purchase . And thats all i can say
That 8" looks like those ceiling speakers you find in office buildings, minus the 70volt transformer.
I thought is was from a practice amp for a guitar.
Jerry Spann yes it does. The wizzer cone in the middle acts much like a tweeter, (low quality muffled one), to increase the higher frequencies to be usable. so while you may want to think of this as a midrange speaker, it was intended to be a "full range" driver, with of course limitati I ns on the low and high end...
Such full range designs were very common, and are still often found in many applications.
Look up the original Morse brand 8" full range from the late 60s-early 70s. Widely used, very sensitive, and customizable as they were used by many manufacturers of console stereos from admiral to zenith.
@@denshi-oji494
Whizzer cones are not always bad sounding, some sound fairly good up to 15k
Brandin Danesi I would not be surprised if they were used in budget guitar amps... they would be perfect for the job... I could be wrong but I think that one of my guitar amps are possibly using one of those! hmm now I'm tempted to find out... I have used that amp for many new years eve parties and while it wasn't Hifi... it did it's job well.... lots of noise and plenty loud...
Yes Sir.. you are 💯% right. Wish if did it with some testing.
I consider this is the way to "tell" the speakers that I am going choose will look like.
But in fact and like most of us it is different. Definitely depends on the setup as you mentioned and the projection of sound quality that follows. You are A Master on that.
Really I have learned alot from your videos.
But I have wish that you do more videos for the new swags. I need to get and add the new version but don't know exactly what is the difference between the new one and what I have.
I think I can do a quick video on the differences, I may do that very soon.
What causes those lack of a better term fart noises a "blown" or damaged speaker makes when it seems there's no audible or feeling with your fingers of coil scratching when you push the cone in and out. I've had speakers/subs that sounded ok at low levels but as soon as I put a little more wattage or a little deeper bass note to it it started making those nasty fart noises kinda faint but noticable. What causes those noises?
That sounds like a mechanical failure, like spider loose from the former, cone loose from the former, cone damage, etc.
Nice video. So for lower frequency bass should i go for the fat taller surrounds?
That is definitely not the only factor. Also remember that mids aren't for producing bass frequencies.
@@EMFAudio Got it. My mistake. I watched you other video where you were talking about subwoofer cone size and displacement. I accidentally commented on the wrong video. Thanks for the response. Subscribed
That one thats shielded looks like it come out of an old getto blaster from the late 80 early 90s that one that has the dual cone is from like the late 70s early 80s LOL. YES I AM OLD
Darren Million that's what I said elsewhere... except the bit about being old LoL... that bigger one, the 8" is still being made and still being used today... most shopping centers use them to pipe music throughout the complex. they are cheap, they do their intended task well and they are extremely efficient all while being reliable... that's why they have stood the test of time.... just a good allrounder... next time you're at a major shopping center, look up and you just might find one looking back down at you LoL..
Obviously the bigger is better. That 8" will flex my car! Oh? Wait? It's tied for the worst? Then I'll take the nice co-axial please!
How about how to determine which subwoofer is louder by comparing specifications/parameters? I've always used displacement (Sd x Xmax) to make that determination, but I'm sure there is much more to it than that.
I believe in this video I touched on that ua-cam.com/video/ykPn0CpdrVQ/v-deo.html but the reality is there is no way to look at specs and say "yup, this is louder" without the application being in mind and specs being wildly different. Even if it is "louder", that doesn't tell you how it sounds. It could be 1 dB louder but sound like garbage.
That 4 inch looks like the driver out of a minimus 7 realistic speaker.
Jerry Spann I had a pair from 1976ish. Lasted for years!
DAM8658 the real question is how did they sound? were they as bad as we are led to believe?
@KGB2101 it seems that plenty of people had them... I remember seeing them in the Tandy catalogue years ago..
The texturing on the plastic cone actually has a side benefit of reducing breakup and reflections. Probably not by much considering how flexible those cones probably are, but it does help them from sounding more awful than they already are. I also tried some time back to take something like that 8" full range driver and see if it could be modded to have even half decent sound for a home audio application. Not out of practicality, but just for the fun of it. And although bass is not really possible, they can be made to have a reasonably ear pleasing mid range which extendeds into the mid treble range... Of course it required some extensive cone treatments and suspension alterations...... But it was possible.. And of course, the whole effort is comparable to polishing a turd, as it can only be polished so much before it smears.... But it was a fun project to teach my son a little about how speakers and acoustics work, and I think that is what mattered. Now he is modding really high quality drivers and getting exceptionally good sound out of them!
I think your videos should include TSP, Distortion, FResponse, recommend Crossoverpoint (determined by Distortion and FResponse) and maybe even Klippel data, that way customer, would have an easier time picking the right speaker.
To be real, I think all company videos should include that.
Those 3" and 4" speakers looked really nice. Would you be interested in retailing them on the open market any time soon, or are you bound by contract to only sell them to the manufacturer that has ordered them from you?
The production models have their logo on them so I couldn't sell them to the public without making a run with my logo on them, or at least no logo on them.
Another thing to note. A speaker can sound very good, up to the point where you exceed the design capabilities. What I mean is this; A speaker may indeed be very accurate at moderate or low volumes, but may not be capable of the power handling and/or excursion for higher volumes with the same accuracy. So a given speaker malty be one of the best for low volume listening, and be worthless any louder.
Another thing to note, the size of the magnet does not mean it can also take more power. Power rating is a function of the coil winding(s) and cooling (if any). Over the years there have been many speaker designs. At a few points, some manufacturers played with larger magnet designs using the same components otherwise, just to increase the efficiency of the speaker. There were even designs that incorporated fixed electro-magnet coils with the fixed magnet to increase the efficiency and capabilities of the driver. There was also at least one design where a fixed coil was placed and driven opposite of the moving coil to increase efficiency and capability.
But generally you can learn a lot by looking at the drivers, not the full story, but enough to let you know if it may be worth a listening test or not. The big thing is to first determine how it will be used and what it will need to meet for your application.
I've mentioned the motor size doesn't indicate power handling, but power rating isn't from the coil alone either. If the motor is weak and you dump a bunch of power in it, it won't move enough to cool it. You also can't have a large coil with a small motor unless you're dealing with a cup style. In other words, if the motor is 3" diameter it won't have a 2" coil in it, so that's a good indicator of what's going on there.
So to be clear, on a manufacturers channel, we're supposed to make videos that don't have any of our product in them, ever? If it was an ad, would we have included 5 other speakers that aren't even remotely comparable in size, cost, or quality? You could literally interpret this video as "other stuff is cheaper, I'll buy that because it's cheap"
Did the cheap 4 inch and 8 inch speakers come from a Stern Pinball machine? I ask because those are the exact speakers Stern have used in their games for many years. While they didn't sound too bad inside a pinball cabinet (possibly helped with some EQ), once upgraded to better speakers, the difference is incredible! Stern were really pushing the limits of the 8 inch trying to make it act like a sub (which really didn't work and just caused horrible distortion). Seems like they have finally realized the error of their ways as Stern's newest games now use a proper LF driver in the cabinet and co-axial speakers in the back box that sound a thousand times better.
They are, and they still use them. Those speakers are in the Pro systems, the different ones you speak of are in the Limited systems. The speakers you get depends on the level of machine.
@@EMFAudio Thanks for the reply. I'm aware that only the Limited Edition models have an upgraded speaker package. However, ever since The Beatles Pinball was released late last year, Stern have been using a new 8 inch driver without a whizzer cone in their standard Pro games. It's unbranded and I'm sure it's still fairly cheap, but it sounds a heck of a lot better than the twin cone driver shown in this video. It can actually produce some decent low end! I believe the standard back box speakers have been changed too.
@@Chris-xk3bp Are you sure the machine wasn't upgraded after the fact? I feel extremely confident the speakers you see are the standard ones in machines shipping today.
@@EMFAudio No, it was defiantly stock as it's what was installed when the Beatles machine was unboxed, fresh from the factory. The standard Pro models of The Munsters and Black Knight: Sword of Rage also use the same new driver (I've assisted in setting up these games for a local pinball club). The new woofer looks fairly similar to the twin cone driver shown in this video, but it does have a few cosmetic differences and of course, no whizzer cone. You'll notice the difference in sound quality too when playing these new titles.
@@Chris-xk3bp That sounds like they're having some supply consistency issues because this machine was Aerosmith which they've been making for like 3 years now.
EMF, what's your opinion on Focal Polyglass 6.5 inch mids?
I have no experience with them.
A massive audio 10" with carbon fiber was the best sounding sub I ever had with very deep bass.
do one with odd shapes like 6x9's does the shape effect the sound quality? always done a circle type speaker as far back as i can remember and was going to be getting a 6x9 for a explorer i got , the stock sounds bad but thought maybe its the shape that could make it sound bad..... would that matter ?
Cone shape can matter, that would be difficult to show variance data and I'd have to use the same speaker line in two different sizes to show it.
also wattage is not the main driver of how powerful a speaker will sound, it is only half the story. you can have 20 watts play 98DB in all the same Spectrum as a 100 watts but will cost a lot more due to it being a better speaker. (the 20 watts) so what you need to look for is Decibels at Frequency First and the lower the Watts it takes to do them! (think about it, if you plug 5 of them, you get your 100 watts worth in watts BUT you have 5 times 98 DB filling the room... i think that might be more than 98 DB at that point.)
Sensitivity doesn't tell how it sounds either. PA drivers sound terrible but have a higher sensitivity than a dynamic driver that sounds good.
@@EMFAudio hence why i precised and emphasized on the "Spectrum" of frequencies. being the same.
@@theepicslayer7sss101 You'd get a rude awakening if you looked at sensitivity, made a choice based on that to "spend less on an amp", then performed that test.
@@EMFAudio well you would not really save, those speakers cost a lot more. tho you also have to choose what size you would put in carefully and that will probably cost more than the Amp.
by Example, my guitar Amp speakers from my "Traynor 15 inch X2 Yorkville 1970 Cabinet" are 37 watts RMS each, when the guitar AMP's tubes died, i used those in place of my 120 watts Subwoofers and unlike them, the speakers were making the whole house shake and sounded 10 times better... tho they only sounded good till 3KHz when put on the normal output of a stereo. (tho the guitar sounded amazing) now, they were not able to take the same power so now i cannot put the volume passed half, not that i need to at that level.
so if i had many in series, i would probably make more than just my house shake and maybe the neighbors as well...
i guess what i mean is if you take high quality speakers that take less watts for the same loudness and build a good cabinet, you can propel the whole range louder with less distortion and heat (amp) built in the house. (100 watts sounding like 500, in my case 37W RMS, 90W max, sounding like 200W max.)
tho guitar speakers are a bad example for "what to look for" since they are build to project a certain range and they do not "look" like they would be loud.
"www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/vintage-66-70-traynor-yt-15-guitar-129268777"
if you want to take a look at how cheap they appear, they they make the paintings and glasses in the cupboards downstairs shake.
So to recap the video, the 3 x EMF speakers they manufacture are super quality, whereas the other two random speakers they found, are not.
There is 1 EMF speaker in that bunch, 2 out of 6 speakers had branding on them. If the 2 we OEM were EMF speakers they'd say EMF on them.
That 3in for a bmw refit or rebuild kit? And each of those speakers were designed with cost and duty in mind. So to say there crap is wrong.
The 3" isn't for car audio. A speaker designed for cost and duty can be crap, when it's crap. Just because your budget is $1 doesn't mean it's not crap because it's the best you could do for $1.
self promotion be like.....
@@EMFAudio truth be told.... What you are missing is that there are horses for courses.... People get so caught up in marketing wank that if a product doesn't look strong and heavy... It must be crap. I would bet that the 8 inch in combination with the first cheap speaker through a two way crossover and an appropriate enclosure would produce amazing sound quality... I have a set of vintage Technics home Hifi speakers that have speakers in them that look literally just like what you have shown here and they are extremely efficient with a very strong mid bass punch... Would I use them in a car? Not without an enclosure.... They wouldn't even need a power amplifier either, the amplification from the head unit would be plenty.... The other benefits are the weight savings.... Lighter speakers, no amplifier to drive them and no electrical load on the alternator of the car so effectively you end up with a faster car and get more miles to the gallon.... So really, which are the better speakers? It's not always about maximum power output. It's about matching the components to deliver the sound quality that you should be getting at a sound pressure level that works best for you.... It means nothing to have the biggest and baddest components, so many people have spent so much money on what was meant to be the highest powered, best looking, only to come to the conclusion that it sounds like rubbish.... That's what you get when you are educated by marketing wank.... And I'm sorry but this video appears to be a poor form of marketing wank also.... If you wanted to do a comparison video, you should have stuck with car speakers, don't compare your car speakers with what is meant to be for home Hifi.... Even the OEM factory audio gear, they were designed to work well together and the only time that you should be making a comparison to the OEM factory speakers is if you can personally attest to a huge improvement with your speakers over the OEM's... Otherwise don't bother.
You know what that speaker with the shielding broke a window to my windshield...
I still don’t know why my neighbor threw a speaker at my car.
Nice vid....possibly a good video idea for you.....can u do a video showing every possible test you can do with a basic multimeter on subs, amps, both, whole system?
You mean everything you could use one for?
@@EMFAudio well pertaining to car audio....i only know of a few things u can do with a multimeter I don't know if there's more it's capable of doing....but just figured a video that shows them all instead of scattered all over YT....or any and all tests/readings with any meter.....or not hahaha
@@scrapenbass493 I gotcha, I'll add it to the list.
I’m looking for new subs for my show car. It’s not an audio comp car just a lowered Cadillac deville that’s been customized. I think I may go emf for my next subs. But I was hoping you’d sign the subs cone for me?
Just looking at it cannot tell you the correct things. Looking at the important parts and details are the ones that ensures you can pick the best.
How about a neo 6.5 sawg with 100 plus rms i am looking into up grade my 6.5s
Making it neo wouldn't make it handle more power. It would require a different coil to take more power. People have been putting 100-125 watt per channel amps on SWAG's though.
the only two that I would go with is the 6.5 and the 4 inch
What are these 1mm tingamafoos, Bose speakers? They look like Bose quality.
I don't know which one you're referring to but none are labelled Bose.
@@EMFAudio I'm just joking. I was referring to the low wattage ones with small magnets. Bose usually have lots of small very cheap low wattage speakers and a larger sub in their set ups and sell the sets for absurdly high prices. Love your channel and all the great info you provide!
3in is the Doberman pinscher of 8 inch subs.
I would really like to know the origin story of EMF Audio and to know why u got into this industry and what was your background before the company, to get an in depth look at your drive to preach car audio gospel to the masses
Prepare to have your mind blown ua-cam.com/video/WSt77OxmElU/v-deo.html
12v talk
I say the midrange sound depends on the enclosure type and size
I was hoping you were going to play them... would have been cool tbh but great video
The tricky thing with that is the microphone influence and the listening device influence. Majority of viewers are on phones so you may not be able to tell the difference in speakers on video.
Great video
Speakers are weird, I've heard old paper cone 6x9's in a pontiac 6000 that sound better than modern vehicles with higher end sound systems, I even had a pair of radioshack 15's with small motors that had incredible bass with a great sound. I have expensive carbon fiber component speakers in my car and they sound just ok. I think it's best just to listen before you buy.
I know exactly the speakers you're talking about if they're the factory ones. I think you're confusing "sounds better" with "more bass". They are incredibly bass heavy, but muddy as can be.
@@EMFAudio I thought they sounded good as well, but yes mostly because of bass, people who sat in the car thought it had a subwoofer. The biggest downside was accuracy on complex or fast changing frequencies which is to be expected from low wattage/small motors I suppose.
@@95TurboSol Actually, the same reasons they were bass heavy is the same reasons they were muddy.
@@EMFAudio Loose cone and low watt?
@@95TurboSol Low Fs, high Vas. Power doesn't mean it can't be accurate and small motor doesn't mean weak motor. Gauss matters.
Carbon fiber nomex honeycomb sounds GREAT!!!
In the subwoofer world. Is there a best performing subwoofer in sealed box in an outdoor application
Looking for a 800 w rms sub that has incredible sound. Going to be making a downfiring sub in a tour pack of a Harley......
@@megganlogan5593 HAHA
Shit y u bstin I got 2 12s n my Harley with a 2.5k pushing them n a 1.5 cube box n each saddle box on each side hitting numbers
You'd want something that is essentially marine rated, which is something I could make custom but not something we normally make. But, one consideration with that, 800 watts is roughly 80 amps of draw. Your motorcycle doesn't have the battery or charging power to support that. I suspect you have somewhere between 30-50 amps of charging, you can't realistically support more than about 300-400 watts of actual power.
You might have an amp that says 2,500 watts on it, but I assure you, you don't have 2,500 watts.
No now I'm getting roughly 45orms but have a lot of custom fab to do it video coming soon
The sound ordinance is simply the house brand, huge bang for the buck. Used many. All sizes. For under 50 bucks... U. S. Designed for sound quality... Built overseas for price.
That 3 inch is so cute.
The top left speaker probably has the highest efficiency of them all... Probably sounds fairly good.
That speaker is the highest efficiency and sounds absolutely terrible. It's the second worse sounding speaker in the bunch. Efficiency has nothing to do with sound quality and in often cases the less efficient speaker sounds better. And just for point of reference, the speaker you're talking about sells on the retail market for around $5.
@@EMFAudio
It "sounds terrible" because it's meant for speech or low volume background music, not for car, HiFi or any high excursion applications. It's an intercom/PA speaker!
Generally i look at the price , build quality and RMS
That's exactly how a lot of people end up buying garbage equipment. They look at the "build quality" not knowing what they're looking at, the price looks like a good deal when it's too good to be true, and RMS ratings are literally whatever the manufacturer decides to put on it. This has been displayed with Rockville lately.
@@EMFAudio I bought a cheap Chinese 10 inch underwear speaker about a month ago. Broke it in for 2 weeks. Still playing pretty good. Rated for 150rms, but I'm probably playing it around 125 or so. If you break them in right even the cheap crap will last
No more soft dome tweets in the SWAGs? That makes me sad.
They never had soft domes. They wouldn't be marine rated if they were. Our hard domes just don't sound like garbage :-)
Yeah. That wouldn't make sense now that ya mention it. I wonder how the hell I got it in my head that they were soft domes in the first place? Oh well, they sound damn good. That's all that matters.
I'm gonna say: yes. Most certainly! If you know what to look for. Without watching
You should watch.
@@EMFAudio i did, i like!
That whole stamp basket "can sound good" is bullshit, Arnie nudell would turn in his grave hearing your "stamp basket can sound good BUT" gibberish. Pretty much the entire older classic line of Infinity (IRS, RS, KAPPA, GAMMA, OMEGA, ectra) very well received and praised for its quality (* PS audio runs the IRS V as their reference system, those 12 inch graphite woofers are stamped baskets*) still WELL UP THERE IN PRICE! And hard to beat even by modern day speaker, mind you it's the entire DESIGN that does that stamped baskets are such a small useless point then.
2 or 1
I have a driver from a Panasonic enclosure that I put in a ported 1 cft box,. Very impressive low end excursion from a 6.5 inch woofer from a extremely mediocre brand
Something Told me from the beginning that you were not going to hook these things up that you were going to just basically talk so I listened for the first 45 seconds and then I skimmed the video to the middle then to the three quarters and then to the end I'm happy that I didn't watch it
Lol you couldn’t say it better ‘that’s why she said’
fun
Put a 10K amp to the first speaker
EMF = Electro Mufuqin' Fields lol
quality is very subjective.. first you set standard , only then you can say this or that is good or bad. :(
That is very true. Frequently I have people tell me their _______ sounds great but they've never heard better to know how bad it sounds.
I've been there but i noticed my hatchback i turned my subs off being curious i have 10 year old polk in the doors and a $18 speakers in the hatch because the plastic ones couldn't handle the sun and fell apart but wow im looking for some mtx or db drives for it soon because walmart sound wall has gotten me beat lmao
Also just bought a 96 buick lesabre-custom factory concert sound 2 system really good quality sounds as good as my mom's 06 Chrysler 300 that has lots of speakers 😆 but most my friends have terrible sounding systems like damn scrap it $20 speakers would be a upgrade for them
😁
that 8 looks like a p.a. speaker designed for voice
It is, and where it was pulled out of was using it as a sub.
love how wank your mic sounds when talking about sound quality of various speakers
Give him a break it's not like everyone has their ideal studio when running a youtube channel. I'm sure he knows his mic isn't the best sounding, but it's definitely good enough to start putting content out there.
yeah..shut the fuck up you massive pussy
Please, send us a mic up to your standards to ensure we record audio where you'll be happy. Contact us for our shipping address so we can get on top of that. It must be a lavaliere, 1/8" phono.
Too much waffling and repeating the same observations over and over.
Blah blah blah blah blah. Jesus Christ move it along.
There's millions of other UA-cam vids to watch besides this one 😂.. don't have to be here
My apologies, I was feeling extra impatient that day.
@@shalamahthebrew5553 Or you can just STFU and let people vent as they please haha indeed...youtube police is not needed here either.
@@MichelLinschoten not entertaining you, have a great day
Prolly not the best way to say it, but you had a good point. I don't know why these 'edumacators' don't actually demonstrate what they're talking about. How hard would it be to play a tune through the speakers after critiquing them? Lots of royalty free music to use out there.