Dr. Brown I really appreciate your channel ! I’m a Christian and day questioned why the Jews do not accept Jesus as the messiah , so I searched and came across Tovias videos and they almost got me thinking maybe Jesus isn’t the messiah . Thank you for your videos on correcting him ! This has helped me a lot !
Tovia is one deceitful guy that can fool anyone. Check out ONE FOR ISRAEL, Behold Israel and Messiah of Israel. All based out of Israel with similar Message as Dr. Brown
Ashley y I comment on tovies channel its hard going jews are very stubborn and orthodox wont see scripture were Jesus might fill that text of being messiah but stick to a Ben David with a family jesus said I came in my Fathers name one comes in his own name him you will except and he will turn out to be the antichrist and believing him they also say Gd never put jesus name in the torah if Gd did that there were lots of jews at that time called Jesus they would argue I wonder which Jesus is it aunt jesses Jesus or brother billys Jesus lol they couldnt agree no its Jesus of Nazareth Gd bless.
@@ironstone_ Utter rubbish We are under the new covenant the old is done away with Israel was scattered because they rejected Gds son Jesus is everywere in the OT you cannot see him your blind spiriturally speaking but your next great event is to die then you will burn forever in Hell unless you get converted .
@@donnaburden.dip.d.analysis2148 * "Messianic Jews" are no longer Jewish because they have become Christians. It doesn't matter if they wear tallit, yamuke and zit-zits, that does not make them to be following the faith of their mothers and fathers. Name one prophesy that Yeshuah fulfilled!?
Dear brother Michael Brown we have a special respect for you in our hearts because we see always you defending our faith in our Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth. We learn new things from your debates and your messages. May God bless you and use you miraculously in the coming days.
It was these public statements that led me to you Dr. Brown a few months ago. I used to be a Rock drummer from a family of Rock drummers and I met Jesus in 92. I think I found you because of your story and the fact you used to be a drummer stood out to me for some reason 😄. You have been a great help in strengthening my faith - I find myself in the big apple today (I’m from London) listening to your channel feeling very blessed. Thank you sir for this excellent response to Tovias dismissal of the word
Christian Elliott * Rabbi Tovia Singer does not dismiss G-d's teachings ( is that what you are saying?) Yet if one studies these teachings of Dr. Brown's completely, one can more easily see that they are based on inaccuracies of the mistranslation of Holy Scriptures' references.
@@chaishalom8701 Really? I have been listening to Tovia Singer for a while now. What you are saying sounds like he has new material. Some links would be much appreciated.
Michael James * Rabbi Tovia Singer hasn't lied. He is explaining to those who have left Christianity (former Jews or those who have converted) and showing all the people who will listen, that the original Hebrew Bible - the Holy Scriptures contain the truth of G-d's message to his people Israel.
Hello Goodbye You need to realize that if Yeshua isn’t Messiah then there is no Messiah! Daniel 9:24-26 clearly says that Messiah had to come before the 2nd Temple was destroyed. That took place in 70 AD. Please repent and believe on Yeshua HaMashiach and what he has done for you! Yeshua is the promised Messiah of the Hebrew Bible and he is coming soon!!
I watched Dr.Brown and Tovia Singer and Dr.Brown has way stronger and more powerful reasons and explanations that just make sense. Tovia has weird arguments that he hypes up before he even gives them and when he does they are weak and you can tell by the look of their eyes Dr.Brown is way more happier than Tovia. You can tell Tovia is not a happy guy at all, not someone I want to learn from. Thank you Dr.Brown you are among the real Jews that actually embraced the promised Messiah when he came! That's why Hashem has blessed you so much, keep up the good work!
@Fred Ghoujeghi brother you do realise the apostles were all Jewish and it was the Pharisees who gave Jesus up to the Romans to be killed. The Tanakh is fulfilled in Christ, all prophecies point toward Him and the second temple fell in 70AD so if its not him its no one. Repent of this folly and accept Yeshua as your saviour.
@@GamingMaster13 ya sure burn for a billion x billion years and that's not even the start for not navigating correctly with limited intelligence in a world full of liars. Ya burn! BURN!!!!
The Lord has raised up a mighty warrior in the gospel and in His eternal truth through Yeshua the Messiah! It's amazing how the comments of Jewish man Singer leads to another Jewish man Brown bringing glory and honor to the One true God and Yeshua the the Messiah/ Christ. Bless the Lord our Savior and pray for the Jewish people that they will know their Messiah has come and will come again, pray Yeshua would be revealed to them and all the unbelieving world for God's glory!
@@Yce_Take Dude, you're an A hole because you have no idea what you're writing about...keep believing the lies you gullible fool.. You're cursed and blinded by the ONE.
Rabbi Eduardo Arroyo, we don't need to have a discussion about an obvious answer... besides that, you guys are always in this "competition mode" trying to prove yourselves right all the time... aren't you guys convinced of yourselves, that you always try to prove yourselves right? Listen, someone who puts on a tallit and a kippah, and uses Hebrew names to call fabricated characters of the New Testament cannot be called a rabbi by serious people. Or, if you were to dress in orange robes and shave your head and go live in the Himalaias, you couldn't be called a master monk. Be serious man!! If you want to become a rabbi, go study hard and abandon idolatry and paganism.... that's a good starting point. Until then, don't ridiculize yourself in front of the entire world. Think about it.
P C you say we don’t need to have a discussion about an obvious answer but you are discussing it. Why do you contradict yourself and break your own rules of engagement? I didn’t contact you you contacted me, if you don’t want to have the discussion then please sir, stop Talking. Either be about it or don’t. All of your statements I would love to address, but you don’t want to have the discussion that is on you.
For Rabbi Tovia Singer his partial spiritual blindness at the moment in time will be open in a BIG SURPRISE. That BLESSED DAY will surely come. Adonai Elohai YESHUA Ben Dovid will REVEAL HIMSELF PERSONALLY TO Tovia Singer and his friends.
Great study, thank you Dr. Brown. Concerning Psalm 22, Tovia assumes that the writers of the NT were just writing their own proof texts, from their own brain, but instead they wrote what the Spirit of God directed them to write. And God was never about proving Himself. In fact He sometimes hides things from the wise and prudent (Matthew 11:25, Isaiah 45:15). In the NT, just like the OT, God was never about listing points that show Himself to be true, or even listing proofs that show the scriptures are true. God may prove things at times, but that certainly is not the goal of either text (NT of OT).
@@nasdaqua*_ARE YOU CALLING GOD A LIAR? ACCORDING TO TORAH AND YOUR RABBIS IN YOUR TALMUD, MESSIAH ALREADY CAME THE FIRST TIME!_* Genesis 49:10 Targum Onkelos: He who exercised dominion shall not pass away from the house of Judah, nor the scribe from his children’s children forever, until Messiah shall come. Whose is the kingdom, and whom the peoples shall obey.[1] Targum Palestine: Kings shall not cease, nor rulers from the house of Judah, nor sopherim teaching the law from his seed, till the time that King Messiah shall come, who will arise from Judah.[2] Fragmentary Targum: King shall not cease from the house of Judah, nor scribes who teach the Torah from his children’s children, until the time of the coming of the King Messiah, to whom belongs the Kingdom, and to whom all dominions of the earth shall become subservient.[3] Rashi: until Shiloh comes [this refers to] the King Messiah, to whom the kingdom belongs,[4] Sanhedrin 98b: What is his [the Messiah’s] name? - The School of R. Shila said: His name is Shiloh, for it is written, until Shiloh come.”[5] Midrash Mishle: Rav Huna says “The Messiah is called by seven names and they are Yinnon, Tzidqenu [‘Our Justice’], Tzemach [‘Shoot’], Menahem [‘Comforter’], David, Shiloh, Elijah.”[6] Yalkut Shim. Ber.: ‘Judah is a young lion.’ That is Messiah the Son of David.[7] Midrash Rabbah: The rulership abideth with the tribe of Judah until the arrival of Shiloh i.e. Messiah.[8] Midrash Rabbah - Genesis: THE SCEPTRE [STAFF] SHALL NOT DEPRT FROM JUDAH alludes to the Messiah, son of David, who will chastise the State with a staff, as it says, Thou shalt break them with a rod [staff[ of iron (Ps. II, 9).[9] Midrash Rabbah - Lamentations: The school of R. Shila said: The Messiah’s name is ‘Shiloh,’ as it is stated, Until Shiloh come (Gen. XLIX, 10), where the word is spelt Shlh.[15] *SANHEDRIN* : Since👉 *_the Sanhedrin no longer had jurisdiction over capital offenses_* 👈, there is no practical utility in this ruling, which can become effective only in the days of the Messiah. Midrash Rabbah, Genesis XCIX, 8-9: … UNTIL SHILOH COMETH: he to whom kingship belongs (shelo). (Rather than transliterating into English “Shilo” as though it were a proper name, the Rabbis translated the exact meaning of “Shilo’ as “to whom it belongs/pertains.”)[18] Targum Jonathan: Kings shall not cease, nor rulers, from the house of Jehuda, nor sopherim teaching the law from his seed, till the time the King, the Meshiah, shall come, the youngest of his sons; and on account of him shall the peoples flow together. How beauteous is the King, and Meshiah who will arise from the house of Jehuda![19] *JERUSALEM TALMUD SANHEDRIN 41a* - _THE SCEPTER DEPARTED_ 👉 _"a little more than forty years before the destruction of the Temple, the power of pronouncing capital sentences was taken away from the Jews*_ .👈[20] Raymond Martin, Pugio Fidei, 872; Leipsic Edition: Rabbi Rachmon says, “ *_When the members of the Sanhedrin found themselves deprived of their right over life and death_* , a general consternation took possession of them; they covered their heads with ashes, and their bodies with sackcloth, exclaiming: ‘ 👉 *_Woe to us, for the scepter has departed from Judah, and the Messiah has not come!_* 👈’ *_MESSIAH CAME BUT THEY REJECTED HIM_*
@safwanibnemoattel ali The star of David is a relatively recent development and is not essential to Jewish belief. Moloch is certainly not the god of Israel. It says in the Bible that the Israelites are the chosen people of G-d who commanded the Israelites to destroy the altars of Moloch when they took over the land of Canaan (Israel).
I put your whole comment in quotes. How sarcastic can one be? Most likely "Rabbi Jesus" did not exist and you all are romantically attracted to a pagan idol. If he did live in the first century there is no historical evidence of that. The two so-called "historical " references were no doubt placed there later by Christians.
A certain verse comes to mind: For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.
@@Nicolai.c * He is trying to challenge people of faith to seriously consider the true message of the Holy One (it is not about "Jesus Christ"). The true message is the one as written in the Torah and the Tanaach. It is the message of a personal relationship of G-d with his people Israel. {hint it does not involve his son dying for mankind's sin. Nor does it involve this son rising from the dead!} Rabbi means teacher and requires specialized Jewish educational training called the Yeshiva. Any ole "Christian" Pastor is not a Rabbi.
@@AJBernard LOL no problem, either way this is a very complicated world and these discussions are very hard, and we have to hope that God points us in the right direction, all we can do i guess is try to be as honest and objective as humanly possible. Peace!
@@Mindhumble How do you call for the destruction of people who disagree with you in one post and then wish peace on someone who disagrees with you in the reply? You should pray about this. You are confused.
@@AJBernard I am arguing (or at least trying) to show the mistakes people make, as I'm sure you can understand from my point of view, doc brown is a "mesis" as in deutoronomy 13 and is leading well meaning searchers for the truth away from God into idolatry. So you can understand (i hope) why i hate doc brown immensely, as is instructed in that chapter. As king David said (i think psalms 138 or somewhere around there) i hate those who hate you with an absolute hate, and king Solomon says in Ecclesiastes chap 3, there is a time to love *and* a time to hate. I have genuine pain inside when i see the effect of his lies and therefore i feel i have to at least try to help genuine searching people to see his political spin for what it is. I only harbour hate against those who mislead others from the path of truth, not those who are confused or searching, and I'm sure God will take into account the confusion there is when judging those making a mistake.
@Devan Cherne * And I pray that you will continue on your spiritual journey towards the true Eternal one as I did after many years of Bible study and prayer.
PLEASE keep refuting Rabbi Singer! I would financially sponsor someone to do it, as I could afford it! A lot of his nonsense is not that complicated to address.
From the AskDrBrown Team: Dr. Brown has a detailed, 22-hour teaching series that refutes much of Rabbi Singer's material. Please write to info@askdrbrown.org to find out how you can help get this material to a greater audience.
Of course, when someone comes along dangling money in front of Mr. Brown's eyes, he is very quick to respond and capture another pray. Well done, Mr. Brown. You only prove to the world that church leaders have the same motifs... and those are FAR FROM PREACHING CHRIST.
I admire Dr. Michael Brown. He is God's wise man. He has the mind of Christ. He personifies the righteous Jew. Toviah Singer personifies the stiff-necked, disobedient Jews who deliberately close their eyes from the truth; he is like the rebellious Israelites whom God caused to die in the desert during Moses' time.
I really enjoy watching your show lots of great information although we differ on the rapture but we can agree to disagree on that God bless you and your ministry . Thanks allot
Yeshua said it best "If you believe Moses you would believe me for Moses wrote about me but since your hopes are set on Moses so he will be your judge" *Come Lord MESSIAH YESHUA* 🙏😇🙏😇🙏
Here's another, Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent! And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets...
Hi there Dr. Brown - I just wanted to tell you I very much appreciate your videos, _particularly_ these ones where you provide answers to those who attempt to cast doubt on what the prophets say concerning Jesus' Messiahship. Right on. THIS sort of thing is sorely lacking in modern evangelicalism, but so vitally important for believers in THE KING - and even doubly so today when we see the faith under attack... from within and without. _We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed._ 2PET 1:19 Blessings.
On another note, I just wish you'd not call Tovia, "Rabbi Singer"! I understand, I think, why you do but... _[They] love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues, And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi. But be not ye called Rabbi: for ONE is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren._ MAT 23:6ff I realize we sometimes do this out of a sort of deference and respect for men like Mr. Singer, but Rabbi Jesus is the ONE, and only one whose person and authority warrants this honorable title. _Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel._ JOHN 1:49 😊
@@AnHebrewChild * Rabbi Tovia Singer is truly a Rabbi from Aaron's bloodline. His biological Y chromosomes go back to him on his father's side. Jesus' do not. Because, Jesus, according to the "New Testament" scripture didn't have a father. He depends on another man's biological family tree to substantiate his claim of right bloodline for the Messianic line. That can not be done in Judaism! One must take his own bloodline from his actual father's DNA.
@@AnHebrewChild * "Learn" that your way of interpreting "New Testament scripture" is correct? You were quoting Matthew. And that book is really nothing "to learn" but only to accept even though with it's many, many anti-Jewish verses it is the most anti-G-d book that is there. I have been through so much studying of the Holy Scriptures and of the Christian Bible in my lifetime. You don't have any idea how much research, study, reading, concordance and Bible notes reading, sermon notes research and related books research that I have done to be able to confidently comment on this You Tube channel. You don't know my past nor do you know my present or future. So since you don't know - you have that unhelpful comment that you left which seems to only make you feel better about yourself. It doesn't inform or teach anyone else about the subject. Good day.
I have listened to many of Rabbi Singer's debates, and only a little of Dr. Brown. Both men of Jewish heritage who seem to be very intelligent and well-versed on the Torah/Old Testiment and know the Hebrew language. I cannot claim that I am a perfect judge of character, but as a college instructor who deals with numerous people I can usually discern sincerity and insincerity. Most students I encounter are honest and sincere, but I am almost always right in recognizing students that are dishonest and I have often caught them in the act of cheating. I have not personally met either one of these men, but Dr. Brown comes off as being completely sincere and honest. He also acts humble and tries to break down complicated scripture into simple terms. On the other hand, I cannot say the same for Rabbi Singer. He comes off as supercilious/self-righteous, deceitful and vendictive. He admitted in a Houston, TX debate that he had been harassed as a child by Christian children, and it was obvious that he still harbors resentment toward Christians to this day. If you watch many of his debates, you will notice a condescending sneer come across his face every time he feels he has made a good point. Whether you are Christian, Jew, Muslim, or otherwise---based on my observations, I recommend that you not trust Rabbi Singer.
Stacie, you come across as a very uncharitable and cynical individual. I've never noticed a "condescending sneer" on the rabbi's face (or Dr. Brown's). I suggest it this is entirely of your own vain imagining. Watch your tongue, because you are mean-spirited.
Absolutely true, and in this video tovia really got exposed very badly. And Tovia likes to wind up the christian person he is debating by saying "if you look at the bible", as if to suggest that they are not. I saw him debating shmuley boteach and he never did that he just talked normally.. Also Michael Brown has really strong academc qualfications in semitic languages, covering biblcial hebrew that tovia singer does not have. Tovia likes to play games like he knows the hebrew and the christian doesn't, but he can't do that with Dr Brown because Dr Brown knows the hebrew even better than Tovia Singer does. Dr Brown was even consulted in one of the bible translations. Some of the things tovia said about hebrew were so silly, Dr Brown totally exposed the giberrisih, rightly, as just embarrassing... I think you are right about the sneering, but 'd add that tovia is a complete showman. No wonder tovia has been running from debate with dr brown for decades. Their last debate was some time in the 90s.
@@boliussa , you are only hearing one side in this video - Dr. Brown's, so you are not in a position to claim that Tovia "got exposed badly." Tovia Singer is a Hebrew scholar (as is Michael Brown). Your statement that Brown knows Hebrew better than Tovia is misinformed and ignorant. In my opinion, Singer's argument is much stronger and cogent than Brown's. But I wouldn't be so ignorant as to say that either one is a better scholar than the other.
Paul Sandberg much stronger? Tovia refuses Debate Challenges from Brown why doesnt Tovia debate him? Because he knows Brown is right and he denies Jesus the messiah
I watch and enjoy both Dr. Brown and Rabbi Singer. Don't like the idea of it always being a "debate," like there's a winner or loser, but great "exhanges" to something bigger than all of us...That being said, enjoy your show...rr Normandy, Fr
i think it is unfair to criticise rabbi singer without him being able to respond. i tried to respond to a few unfair criticisms in an earlier comment, but the best way to do this is to have a live 1v1 debate and leave it to the observers to make their own conclusion.
@Mark Metternich The issue is who is telling the truth. You can hear everything rabbi singer says in his hundreds of videos, just search for the topic you are interested in. The problem with debates is that dr brown is an expert in debating technique and is also very charismatic, both are useful tools for convincing people you are right without necessarily being right. In a debate you can word something in a certain way to make it sound true and even oobvious, but only later when breaking down the idea then you see the flaw, but by that time it is too late as the damage is done and most people will generally not think too hard as they assume that the hashing out has been done completely by the debaters. Look up the concepts of rhetoric and sophistry to understand these ideas better. However there WAS a more controlled debate which bypasses these problems by a different rabbi and dr brown where they made videos to eachother and this way there was ample time to expose the mistakes/deception being made. ua-cam.com/video/zbjxF5sKxxM/v-deo.html&ab_channel=JewsforJudaism this is just one of the videos, im sure you can search for a full playlist.
"24 They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be: that the scripture might be fulfilled, which saith, They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots. These things therefore the soldiers did." (John 19:24) Yes, psalms 22 is quoted in the new testament
Tovi is either incompetent or a liar or both. To teach with “authority” like this and lie or not know what he is talking about is grossly negligent at best. Also to run from civil discourse and debate with Dr Brown speaks volumes. It makes me lose respect for the guy. Stand up, have a healthy debate, be honest and see what happens. That would be respectable.
When I was a christian minister/ theologist non denominational, I researched Through the Original Hebrew Writings of Our Holy Sage Rabainu Moshe The Redeemer Deliverer Messiah and Found out that The christian/catholic Versions Were ALL Incorrect.
Carl Johnson.......say what? you were a minister, thank God for the sifting; and now you are in the shadows, looking from the outside in, and deceived. I thank God he found you out, and removed you from a position of leading others astray.
i wouldnt call him pompous, go to any yeshiva where we use this type of rhetoric in analysing the oral law (talmud,mishna etc.) it is just a style. it sounds more like you are projecting here.
@@Mindhumble he's not only pompous but he is brainwashed like all of them that go to these Godless( absence of the presence of God) places to try and learn about God.
Through Jesus, the law of God extended from the Old Covenant to the whole world. It is the conquest of the world that makes the whole world subject to His own law.
The Nahal Hever Fragment from the Dead Sea Scrolls does say "K-A-R-U" like you say, Dr. Brown. I find it to be a big argument in favor of the "gouged my arms and legs" translation. On the other hand, I have trouble finding confirmation online that the 4Q88 fragment says "K-R-U". It would be helpful if someone would post or link to a photo of the 4Q88 fragment.
Unfortunately, this document, known as 4QPsf, becomes illegible at precisely this location in the text. The faded remnants of what may be כר (kr) are visible. according to this Source : "Dead Sea Scrolls, 4Q88 f1-2, 2:24-25, gives evidence that כרה was originally known by the scribes at Qumran. While the fragment is small and damaged, it has been transcribed by Ulrich’ as containing this line, כר[ו] ידי ורגלי Eugene Ulrich, The Biblical Qumran Scrolls: Supplements to Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 134 (Brill, 2010), p. 634. Anyway , Think that the reading " כארי" was absent in the original based on the parallism found in Ps 22:12-13 [ 13-14] Ps 22:21 Ps 22:16 [17] Ps 22:20 [ 21] David compared his enemies attack as of Bulls , Lion , Dogs in his complaints. Interestingly he repeated the same animals in his Supplications , in a reversed way , a sort of " Chiasm". Each animal finds its mate in the parallism ! In v12-13 [ 13-14 ] it has : - Bulls - Lion in v21 it repeats them in a reversed way : - Lion - Wild oxen in v16 [ 17 ] according to the Masoretic reading it has : - Dogs - Lion in v20 [ 21] , we are expecting that both animals are mentioned in a reversed way like the other one above , surprisingly the" Lion " isn't mentioned but only Dog . instead of Lion it has SWORD : - Sword ( Lion is expected to be mentioned in here if it would have been mentioned in the complaint) - Dog. Each animal has its couple : Bulls wild oxen Lion Lion Lion < => Sword ???? ( Problem) Dogs Dog. However if we put : They perforated Sword. That works!
@@rakovsky3901 But this כארו ( kaaru) they bore through or dig through ,..' , root : כרה ( karah) sounds bizarre to us ,may be due to the fact that we don't really know how it was once used in biblical time Just like in Zefania 2:6 , where this same verb " כרה " karah is used ," כרת " in the context that duzn fit its meaning . "Because Biblical Hebrew doesn't contain vowel markers, scholars can't be sure this is a unique word, a typo, or a strange usage of one of the other three forms of karah which typically mean "to dig," "to get by trade", and "banquet," none of which fits this context. If it is a unique word, this is the only time it's used in all of antiquity. The most common form of karah means "to dig," but here translators can't agree on whether it should mean "cottages" (ASV, KJV), "wells" (NIV), "camps" (NLT), "meadows" (ESV, ISV), "huts" (GNT), or "resting place" (DR) www.thealmightyguru.com/Wiki/index.php?title=List_of_biblical_words_with_uncertain_meanings
Thank you Dr. Brown. Please do more videos exposing Tovia Singer for all the deceptive lies he spews from his mouth. His words are like foul vomit to me as he blasphems our true Messiah the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ our King. On Christ the solid Rock I stand. Our risen Lord lives and is coming back soon for His bride. I pray Tovia. Singer repents and falls at the Saviors feet in humility.
9:47 logical fallacy number one: “argument from silence” - the problem is, Singer is still wrong, Jesus cries out the opening line found in Psalm 22 while on the cross.
j w - Have you read the gospels? If you have you’ll be familiar with the words of Jesus. “My God my God why have you forsaken Me”. You’ll notice they are exactly the same words used in the beginning of Psalm 22. Read Psalm 22 in light of what just happened to Jesus when He is saying that and you’ll have to at least agree that Jesus fits the description of the Psalm. I’ve actually done two videos over the topic- more geared towards Muslims but it might benefit you too. So there is my substance :) ua-cam.com/video/phignUxOsrs/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/_-TXEBLZKPs/v-deo.html Oh and I forgot, I wrote this article about it too: www.evernote.com/shard/s518/sh/a4d18020-e211-4999-8e97-962f8f9d7a99/5b3c66041d4bc9130e5a1892de9f5fe9
j w - Have you read the gospels? If you have you’ll be familiar with the words of Jesus. “My God my God why have you forsaken Me”. You’ll notice they are exactly the same words used in the beginning of Psalm 22. Read Psalm 22 in light of what just happened to Jesus when He is saying that and you’ll have to at least agree that Jesus fits the description of the Psalm. I’ve actually done two videos over the topic- more geared towards Muslims but it might benefit you too. So there is my substance :) ua-cam.com/video/phignUxOsrs/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/_-TXEBLZKPs/v-deo.html Oh and I forgot, I wrote this article about it too: www.evernote.com/shard/s518/sh/a4d18020-e211-4999-8e97-962f8f9d7a99/5b3c66041d4bc9130e5a1892de9f5fe9
Psalm 22 Here we find David in the greatest affliction. Hence the famous exclamation, which was afterward repeated by the Christian Savior in a similar situation: Eli, eli, lama sabachthani? My El, my El, why hast thou forsaken me? why dost not thou help me? why so far from the words of my roaring? Thus, David addressed the winter (El), but not for help, because, as he well knew, he might have cried both night and day, as he said he did, to the Elohim, who were far distant from him, without obtaining help until spring came - " thou hearest not." Hence, he prayed to Elohim prospectively, believing that when he could make them hear, help or summer would come. But while praising the Holy One of Israel (summer Sun), his mind suddenly reverted to his low condition, whence he exclaimed: "But I am a worm and not a man;" thus happily comparing his situation (that of the Sun in winter) to a worm in its chrysalid state during the winter. " He rolled on the Lord " (marginal reading), i.e., the Sun rolled through the heavens as we daily see it, and trusted that the Lord would at length bring him into the summer hemisphere. "Thou art he that took me out of the womb (of winter), and didst make me hope when I was upon my mother's breasts (shadi, the word so frequently translated Almighty). David, Christ, Ganymede (Joy-promoter), and many other Gods, were born at the winter solstice, where they were all, David among them, placed upon their mother’s lap. Hence David (vs. 10) says, "Thou art my God (my El) from my mother's belly" -mid-winter. Don't go off, for trouble is near, and there is none to help (vs. 11). Many strong bulls of Bashan have compassed me around. The dogs (Canis major and minor) have beset me (are come around opposite me): I am poured out like water, my strength is dried up, and I can count my bones (ribs). They part my garments among them, and cast lots (gamble, as the "bulls and bears" still do) upon my vesture (the crops). But, O my Lord, O my strength, haste thee to help me! My only one, deliver me from the dog, save me from the Lion's mouth (Leo roars as a lion), for thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns (the constellation Taurus). Then, Oh, then, will I praise thee in the midst of the congregation (the seven summer months), and show a line crop! Yes, then will I praise thee, and the meek (the people in winter) shall eat and be satisfied - filled. Bashan aka House of the Sun = "Summer," = spring equinox (River Jordan) to the autumn equinox (River Euphratess).
Just ask Tovia this question why would God allow the temple to be destroyed after Jesus ministry on earth and why God did not allow for it to be rebuilt?... ask yourself! Just think deep about it! Ask him that!
@@Qrayon Messiah is the seed of the woman (born without a man of sin). The Father of Messiah is God so Messiah is the first and the last Adam. Adam sinned and Messiah did not. Messiah can die for Adam be cause He is Adam without sin. Remember that all prophecy of Messiah is based on the very first prophecy of Messiah. Micah 5 2 says that a Ruler (King) from the days of forever will be born in Bethlehem. Daniel says all nations will serve the Son of Man who will also make an end of sin.
@@Qrayon you don't know what the prophets say, ask God to lift the scales from your eyes and the dark stronghold/s over you, then the light of the gospel can penetrate your heart
@@MRFITTA Ask G-d to lift the scale from YOUR eyes. According to prophecy, the Messiah will bring permanent world peace. The swords will be beat into plowshares. There will be no more war. Every living person will know G-d. The lion will lie down with the lamb. There will no longer be any desire to commit crimes or do any other evil. All the righteous since the beginning of the world will be resurrected. The Holy temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem. Did any of that happen when J.C. came along? No! Instead we got thousands of years of war after war after war, some of it in the name of Jesus! Does everyone know G-d? You know the answer is no, not even close! None of that has happened, because the true Messiah has not come yet.
@@Qrayon can you show the scriptures you are using to put forward your idea that Jesus would have to achieve all the prophets spoke of in one time frame......scriptures not your theory or thoughts.
Remember there Were Two kingdoms North & South That Were Dispersed. Kingdom of Yahudah were Brought Back As Promised. In Yeshyahu, Jeremiah,Ezekiel,etc.
That's ok, tell Rabbi Singer that he is fulfilling Bible prophecy that the Messiah would be a light to the Gentiles. We take Jesus, so you are doing exactly what the Bible said. Does he read the Bible? Does he not know that Japheth would dwell in the tents of Shem as Noah prophesied? We have fulfilled that as well. I don't think Rabbi Singer knows his own scriptures.
According to Bible prophecy Israel is meant to be a light unto the nations, and will be, especially in the messianic age. The Messiah will be their leader.
@@moorek1967 It was supposed to be the Jews, but that's what will happen in the not-too-distant future, as we are now in the end times. (Light unto the Nations = Light unto the Gentiles. How? The Hebrew word for "nations" is the same as the Hebrew word for "Gentiles".)
moorek1967, "gentiles" is a word that DOES NOT EXISTS IN HEBREW, NOR DOES IT APPEAR IN HEBREW SCRIPTURES. Wherever you read "gentiles" in your "Old Testament", the original word in Hebrew text reads "goyim", which means "NATIONS". And for the past 3,500 years Israel has been the light to the NATIONS, but the NATIONS like the darkness! What can we do?? Just teach!!!
What’s insane is... if you took what was said about Yeshua from the historians. It would give the same account as the four gospels. Who can deny that...
@@Qrayon*_ARE YOU CALLING GOD A LIAR? ACCORDING TO TORAH AND YOUR RABBIS IN YOUR TALMUD, MESSIAH ALREADY CAME THE FIRST TIME!_* Genesis 49:10 Targum Onkelos: He who exercised dominion shall not pass away from the house of Judah, nor the scribe from his children’s children forever, until Messiah shall come. Whose is the kingdom, and whom the peoples shall obey.[1] Targum Palestine: Kings shall not cease, nor rulers from the house of Judah, nor sopherim teaching the law from his seed, till the time that King Messiah shall come, who will arise from Judah.[2] Fragmentary Targum: King shall not cease from the house of Judah, nor scribes who teach the Torah from his children’s children, until the time of the coming of the King Messiah, to whom belongs the Kingdom, and to whom all dominions of the earth shall become subservient.[3] Rashi: until Shiloh comes [this refers to] the King Messiah, to whom the kingdom belongs,[4] Sanhedrin 98b: What is his [the Messiah’s] name? - The School of R. Shila said: His name is Shiloh, for it is written, until Shiloh come.”[5] Midrash Mishle: Rav Huna says “The Messiah is called by seven names and they are Yinnon, Tzidqenu [‘Our Justice’], Tzemach [‘Shoot’], Menahem [‘Comforter’], David, Shiloh, Elijah.”[6] Yalkut Shim. Ber.: ‘Judah is a young lion.’ That is Messiah the Son of David.[7] Midrash Rabbah: The rulership abideth with the tribe of Judah until the arrival of Shiloh i.e. Messiah.[8] Midrash Rabbah - Genesis: THE SCEPTRE [STAFF] SHALL NOT DEPRT FROM JUDAH alludes to the Messiah, son of David, who will chastise the State with a staff, as it says, Thou shalt break them with a rod [staff[ of iron (Ps. II, 9).[9] Midrash Rabbah - Lamentations: The school of R. Shila said: The Messiah’s name is ‘Shiloh,’ as it is stated, Until Shiloh come (Gen. XLIX, 10), where the word is spelt Shlh.[15] *SANHEDRIN* : Since👉 *_the Sanhedrin no longer had jurisdiction over capital offenses_* 👈, there is no practical utility in this ruling, which can become effective only in the days of the Messiah. Midrash Rabbah, Genesis XCIX, 8-9: … UNTIL SHILOH COMETH: he to whom kingship belongs (shelo). (Rather than transliterating into English “Shilo” as though it were a proper name, the Rabbis translated the exact meaning of “Shilo’ as “to whom it belongs/pertains.”)[18] Targum Jonathan: Kings shall not cease, nor rulers, from the house of Jehuda, nor sopherim teaching the law from his seed, till the time the King, the Meshiah, shall come, the youngest of his sons; and on account of him shall the peoples flow together. How beauteous is the King, and Meshiah who will arise from the house of Jehuda![19] *JERUSALEM TALMUD SANHEDRIN 41a* - _THE SCEPTER DEPARTED_ 👉 _"a little more than forty years before the destruction of the Temple, the power of pronouncing capital sentences was taken away from the Jews*_ .👈[20] Raymond Martin, Pugio Fidei, 872; Leipsic Edition: Rabbi Rachmon says, “ *_When the members of the Sanhedrin found themselves deprived of their right over life and death_* , a general consternation took possession of them; they covered their heads with ashes, and their bodies with sackcloth, exclaiming: ‘ 👉 *_Woe to us, for the scepter has departed from Judah, and the Messiah has not come!_* 👈’ *_MESSIAH CAME BUT THEY REJECTED HIM_* *_TOVIA GOES AGAINST HIS OWN TALMUD RABBIS_* 😂😂😂
Singer professes is to know what orthodox Christianity teaches when he is not even close at times. Singer himself claims that Christians take scripture out of its historical context. The Hebrew Bible is riddled with many many cases of that. Many of the prophets drew from the Torah and completely lifted the text from the Torah and put it is their messages. Where did Ezra 9:10-12? Where did that come from? Where did Amos 2:7 come from? Where did Amos 2:8 come from? Where did Amos 2:12 comes from? There are many more in Amos. There is not piece piece of evidence for a quote or anything in the Hebrew Bible that quotes of alludes to the Oral Torah? Singer has said they would not have known what to do without the Oral Torah. So if it is so clear in the Oral Torah then why such disagreement in the Misnah? Accordinhg to Gittin 9:10 what is correct reason why a man may get divorced. Then compare what the three rabbis mention to what the Torah teaches. Jesus taught what God wanted from the beginning but the Jews put in the Mishna what they claim God wanted from the beginning. God does not give three distinctly different interpretations of what he said. Jesus told the Pharisees that they did not know the scriptures nor the power of God.
6:00 that is tentative, it is not clear he is referring to the time mentioned in daniel. but i dont thing that was the main argument of rabbi singer, anyway. 16:30 I dont think Rabbi Singer wasnt referring to manuscripts, as these were generally buried (as they still are today) due to mistakes in them, he is referring to the masoretic texts which are in use around the world, by different sects of jews who have their own masoret "transmission of knowledge of torah from generation to the next" this includes yemenites who have been separated from the rest of the jewish diaspora since BEFORE jesus, and still all accepted texts are the same. to bring a few buried texts is not reasonable as there is only one original and it is much more likely to be the one received by all the bearers of the torah around the world, and not some isolated texts which are littered with mistakes. 20:20 that is clearly not what rabbi singer meant as you correctly point out, that is obvious that many roots have a second letter aleph. he meant this specific root which is "caf resh hey" which means to dig (your interpeting and pierce, which anyway is a stretch to interpret dig as pierce, as there are other words which mean pierce such as root "kuf bet hey" where c r h is exclusively referring to diggning holes in the ground and im not sure why rabbi singer didnt mention this point), and this root clearly has defined 3 letters and none of them is an aleph.
Mindhumble.....listen, whatever Singer believes or doesn't; one thing is for sure, he is an enemy of the people of God and misleading and deceiving them.
@@MRFITTA The implication of your statement is that since Singer is an enemy of your belief system, it is perfectly acceptable to misquote him and distort his words because it's for the greater good. If this is not your implication, please correct me.
@@tex959 God has one truth, and he has outlined it in the pages of the holy bible, beginning with Genesis, and it ends with the book of Revelation. its not 'my belief system' but his truth... Those who are sons of God, have come into relationship with him through faith in his Son, and we are from both Jew and Gentile people. He gives his children born by his Spirit his own indwelling presence which testifies to the truth, HIS TRUTH, not mans idealogy, theory or philosophy. Rabbi Singer, and all unbelievers alike either intentonally or in their ignorance( and pride) seem to think they know better, and so attempt to take on God, coming with their own intelligence and are only contradicting what he has laid out through Moses, the prophets, the psalms and the apostles writings/teachings found in the gospels and epistles And its not acceptable to lie( which is basically what it is to distort and misquote) against anyone just because we want the truth to be known - in direct answer to your question. Where has Rabbi Singer been misquoted, and his words distorted in this vid?
@@MRFITTA You: "Where has Rabbi Singer been misquoted, and his words distorted" -------- First, as Mindhumble points out in his comment @11:50 Rabbi Singer says, "Every single Bible in the whole world says the same word in Hebrew. not one Bible ever found said, "they pierced." Dr. Brown tries to imply that the Rabbi is saying that there is not one manuscript ever found with the phrase "they pierced." Dr. Brown continues to say @13:00 that there are "thousands of Masoretic manuscripts with all kinds of variations." The Rabbi is not referring to a dozen out of thousands of manuscripts, He was referring to "every Bible" uses the same word in Hebrew. Dr. Brown makes a big deal about this as if the Rabbi is being deceptive but I think Dr. Brown is misquoting him. 2nd, referencing what Mindhumble says about the video @20:20 when he says, " that is clearly not what rabbi singer meant as you correctly point out, that is obvious that many roots have a second letter aleph. he meant this specific root which is "caf resh hey" which means to dig".. Mindhumble explains further why the Rabbi is being misquoted. Dr. Brown is smart enough to know what The Rabbi is saying.
@@tex959 thats why my initial comment is 100% valid. At end of it all, when both parties have expressed their vierw, we must remain in the truth, Dr Brown is, Rabbi Singer isnt. Its irrelevant whether he 'wins' the debate, or scores brownie points, his overall aim is to disprove who Jesus is, and demolish the bible's message of salvation and redemption being possible only in his name. This is the reason God sent his Son - to save the world, the Jew first, and then the Gentile. Singer is an enemy of this, as his main mission is to 'thwart' ( a miserable fail ) people from among Israel from realising this.
What is funny is both translations seem to complement each other. If it didn't have huge implications it seems like it would just say "like a lion, they pierce (or dig at) my hands and feet.
Carl Johnson yes and know. Up to a point it finds fulfillment with Antiochus Epiphanies. It find another fulfillment in 70 A.D. but it finds a final fulfillment when a third temple is erected
This is a valid statement by the Rabbi, i have seen this video many times , the new testament is a sham , and will never hold up to the teachings of the Torah.
Written by Uri Yosef, Psalms 22 - "Nailing" An Alleged Crucifixion Scenario Lesson notes fragments containing Psalms 22:17[16] were discovered among the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS). In the first fragment, which was found at Qumran (4QPs-f; known as the Qumran MS, the word in question is not preserved. In the second fragment, found at Nahal Hever (HHev/Se 4 (Ps); known as the Bar Kochba MS, the word is preserved. The fragment HHev/Se 4 (Ps) shows the Hebrew letters (kaf), (aleph), (resh), and what appears to be a somewhat elongated letter (yod), which some perceive to be the letter (vav).[3] Thus, the reading of this word would be either (ka'ari) or (ka'aru), respectively. Although the latter of these two renditions of the term has been the focus of much controversy and discussion, it is a fact that no root verb exists which contains the letter (aleph) in it, conjugated in this fashion (3rd-person, plural masculine gender, past tense), with the meaning of they pierced, as rendered in most Christian translations. Without the letter (aleph), and using, for the moment, the argument that the last letter [the elongated (yod)] is a (vav), the word would be (karu), for which the Hebrew root verb is (karah), [to] dig [in dirt], such as digging a ditch (e.g., Ps 57:7). In other words, (karu) has the meaning [they] dug [in dirt]. This verb is never used in the context of piercing, either literally or metaphorically, in any of its 15 applications in the Hebrew Bible. What could cause such a variation between the two terms (ka'ari) and (ka'aru), i.e., with an elongated letter (yod) that resembles the letter (vav)? Since the word (ka'aru) does not exist in the Hebrew language, the most plausible explanation is that such discrepancy is simply a case of scribal variation (or error). The word in Psalm 22 is ka'ari (lion) not karu (which means "to dig" BTW, as in digging a ditch, not pierce). The Dead Sea Scroll version of the Psalm has kaari, but some Xians think it is kaaru because the yod is longer than normal and can be mistaken for a vav. But here lies the problem: kaaru is NOT a word. There is no such word in Hebrew ancient or modern. Karu is a word -- but that isn't what is in the Dead Sea Scrolls or in any other Hebrew copy of the Psalm. Ka'aru is not a word but karu IS a word. Some Xians try and say that the word in Psalm 22 should be karu. The only problem is that karu doesn't mean "pierced" either. It means to dig". If you use its cognate 3rd person plural masculine gender "KARU" it translates to they dug. But note that kara or karu do not us the letter "aleph". Kaf-resh-vav is a word. Kaf-ALEPH-resh-vav is not a word. It is as if someone came upon dutg in English and wants to say it is dug. BTW the KJV translates ka'ari correctly in other places that arent proof texts misquoted by the GT. Numbers 23:24 (veka'ari), and I as a young lion Numbers 24:9 (ka'ari), like a lion Isaiah 38:13 (ka'ari), like a lion Ezekiel 22:25 (ka'ari), like a lion So the KJV translators correctly translated it until they got to Psalms 22:17[16] and suddenly the KJV doesn't know what it means and translates it as "they pierced." One more little bit of Hebrew grammar. If the word really was "pierced," (which we've proven it is not) the sentence would have an "et" to identify the direct object which would be
@@beng2729 Yes, it is. Look for it yourself. The Septuagint translation clearly says "oruxsan" Which in case you don't know. It means "to dig or pierce"
@@dibarra5461 There exists no Septuagint from the biblical era that contains Psalms. So please keep your modern Christian distortions of theology to yourself.
@@beng2729 Check it yourself, so many translations existed before the masoteric texts that were the ones who changed the word to "ka'ari". Before the 7th century, nobody argued that the word said "ka'aru". You're the one being stubborn.
Carl Johnson He has mate, he came and went, and will return to judge - and it won't be pleasant for unbelievers such as yourself if you die in sin - under the wrath of God.
You’re wrong. You’re reaching hard for this. The entire book of Isaiah is about the nation of Israel. Don’t you think that whoever wrote up the New Testament would purposely make references to Tanakh where it could be about Jesus? Don’t you think that the New Testament writers would purposely have their messiah quoting verses that could be about him? Listen...debate me if you want. I’m all for it. When you take a single verse or book out of context you can make it say whatever you want. Also, I haven’t heard of you before this day. But...Tanakh does not talk about the messiah having to atone for sins and be a human sacrifice. I want you to address every passage where God states that he isn’t a man. Also, let’s talk about the verses where he states that there are no other Gods but him. He is the only one, it’s all over Tanakh. How can you have so much knowledge but yet lack understanding? Do you really believe that God is three in one? Or, he would condone human cannibalism rituals? The eating of the body and drinking of the blood? Let’s also take note that the entire New Testament was written in Greek, not Hebrew. Let’s also take note that the Greko-Roman world loved polytheism. The Persians loved the good vs evil mythology. You sir are deceived and you’re deceiving others. I could twist any scripture I wanted to fit my agenda. That’s pretty easy and pastors do it every Sunday. Which by the way isn’t the real day we are supposed to keep Holy. Touch on that as well for me. I am very well versed. Please explain to your viewers how the entire New Testament is a pagan deity system. And most of it was written by a man named Paul. Not God. Just a bunch of letters where Paul states these things are his own opinions not commandments from God. We don’t even know who wrote the gospels, let’s alone if any information is correct in them. Also, a virgin birth? A lot of Roman leaders were said to be born of a virgin in ancient times. These are fairy tales for gentiles and a way to make money and control the world with a one world religion. Everyone in the Protestant movement all keep a lot of traditions from the Roman Catholic Church. Catholic means universal. Also, let’s tough on the fact that the anti-christ is exactly the same as the real Jewish messiah. Minus the voodoo powers from the fictional version of the devil. I’m sure you know what I’m speaking about. Let’s debate great one.
Dylan Broady, evangelicals like Dr Brown wrench verses from the Hebrew scriptures (Tenakh) out of context in order to shoehorn Jesus into them, where he clearly does not belong.
@@Yce_Take , listen friend, I would far rather accept prophet Isaiah's OWN definition of who the "servant", is in preference to your indocteinated opinion. Isaiah - the man who actually wrote the book! - tells us who the servant is over a dozen times, and his definition is invariable. Moreover, the "servant" is not associated with the term "messiah" in his book, and never called that. So even if you think Isaiah suffered a brain infarct when he wrote chapter 53, forgetting his previous definition, it would still not prove Jesus.
@@Yce_Take , bizarrely you reply: "No you won't." No I won't WHAT?? Where does Isaiah 49 tell us that God's righteous servant is messiah? Isaiah 49:3 once again spells out who the servant is (in case we needed reminding. You obviously do! ): "He said to me you are my servant, ISRAEL, in whom I will display my splendour." The obedient servant is the remnant of Israel saved from exile and brought back to Israel to fulfil God's plans for Israel. The servant is a plurality but metaphorized as a man (elsewhere in sccripture, Israel is metaphorized as "daugher of Zion", when the nation is treated as a "she"). Note that Jesus did not "bring back Judah to himself", nor did Jesus "gather Israel to himself" (verse 5).The return of the Jews from exile to Israel was the start of this fulfillment. For Jesus, it would be a completely failed prophecy. Verse 7 continues: "Kings will see you and rise up, pricnes will see and bow down, because of the LORD who is faithful, the Holy One of Israel who has chosen you." Kings or princes did not venerate Jesus! On the contrary, they bound and executed him! And God would not say to Himself, and neither would He need to, that He had "chosen you". If Jesus is God, why would God have to tell him, and how could God choose himself? Jesus would not even need to be "chosen" if he is God! Isaiah chapters 48-49 focus on the redeemed remnant of Israel, brought back to Israel. THE SERVANT IS NOT CALLED MESSIAH.
@@Yce_Take , and here's what the entire book of Isaiah says about the remnant of Jews saved from exile and returned to Israel to fulfill God's redemptive plan. The righteous remnant is all over the book of Isaiah. Indeed it the major theme: Isaiah 51:11: "The radeemed of the LORD returns; they will enter Zion with singing, everlasting joy will crown their heads, Gladness and joy will carry them, and sorrow and sighing pass away." Isaiah 60:1: "Arise, shine for your light has come, and the glory of the LORD rises upon you...Nations will come to your light, and kings to the brightness of your dawn...All assemble and come to you, your sons come from afar, your daughters carried on your arm.. ." IT'S ALL ABOUT THE REMNANT, WHO IS THE SERVANT, RETURNING FROM EXILE. Isaiah 61:3: "THEY will be called oaks of righteousness, the planting of the LORD, for the display of his splendour.. They will rebuild the ancient ruins and restore the places long devastated...Instead of their shame, my people will receive a double portion, and instead of disgrace, they will rejoice in their inheritance." Every following chapter is all about that remnant who will grow and prosper and be blessed by God. This precious remnant of Jews is the servant of Isaiah chapter 53. The servant is not a messiah, not an individual, and above all has nothing to do with Jesus. "Servant" and "messiah" are not associated or linked at all.
@@Yce_Take , Zion is a name for Jerusalem. Even in your pagan book of Revelation the kingdom of God descends from heaven down to earth - to Jerusalem. The kingdom of God is not some ethereal place in the sky, but is to come upon the earth, and even the NT teaches this (Rev. 21:3: "Now the dwelling place of God is with men, and He will live with them"). The rulership of earth will be from Zion/Jerusalem. The remnant of Jews is led back to Jerusalem, to fulfill prophecy. The kingdom of God is a physical reality on earth that will come to fruition. This physical reality is described in Isaiah chapter 65 (largely plagiarised by the NT book of the Revelation), in which God rejoices over Jerusalem And renews it, when there will be no more weeping, and old men will live out their years to the full (verse 20). So it is a physical reality located on earth blessed by the presence of God. Jesus fulfilled no messianic prophecy, and didn't even give a foretaste of the peace to come. WHO ARE THE OAKS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS IN ISAIAH 61:3? THEY REBUILD THE DEVASTATED CITIES AND WALLS. Instead of their shame (their exile and defeat), they receive a double portion, and instead of disgrace, they will rejoice in their inheritance (verse 7). The context doesn't fit Christians, and neither does the historical backdrop described. The only way that Christians can shoehorn Jesus into the Tenakh is by wrenching verses away from their context. There is nothing in the entire Tenakh - not a single verse - that prophesies or foresees Jesus. You cited Isaiah 65:15: _You will leave your name to my chosen ones as a curse...but to his servants he will give another name._ This other name is revealed in Isaiah 62:2 & 4 (normally kept in the Hebrew in most versions) - see below - which you missed. The name is not "Christian" or indicative of Christian. "Christians" would be out of context and moreover entirely unnecessary to presume. The verse means that the rebellious Israelites (who are not God's servants) will be used in contempt as an example when curses are uttered by the obedient Jews, who are God's elect. They are the remnant. The remnant will be given a second (or other) name to describe them (_not_ a replacement name). This name, revealed in Isaiah 62:4, is "hephzibah" (meaning "I delight in her"), and their land will be called "beulah" (meaning "married"). So the LORDtakes back Israel as his wife again, rejoicing in her. We see this same theme of God re-marrying Israel and His eternal love for her expressed in Isaiah 54: 6-10: " ISRAEL, you are like a young wife, deserted by her husband and deeply distressed. But the Lord calls you back to him and says: 7 “For one brief moment I left you; with deep love I will take you back. 8 I turned away angry for only a moment, but I will show you my love forever.” So says the Lord who saves you. 9 “In the time of Noah I promised never again to flood the earth. Now I promise not to be angry with you again; I will not reprimand or punish you. 10 The mountains and hills may crumble, _but my love for you will never end;_ I will keep forever my promise of peace.” So says the Lord who loves you. So we can see that God renews Israel as a people, starting from the returned remnant. YOU HAVE ENTIRELY MISUNDERSTOOD ISAIAH 65:15, AND YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE TENAKH IS TOO FEABLE TO ENABLE YOU TO MAKE THE CONNECTIONS WITH OTHER VERSES CLOSE BY, WHICH WOULD EXPLAIN THE VERSE YOU CITED. YOU ARE LIKE A BLINKERED HORSE, BUT _WILLFULLY_ BLINKERED, BECAUSE THE REALITY INTIMIDATES YOU, SO YOU HIDE FROM IT. YOU CAN'T FACE IT. YOU HAVE NO VALOUR, NO DECENCY, NO HONOUR.
At about 10:00 in, no, no one is lying, there's a greater problem. 2 Corinthians 3:14-16 - But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ. But to this day whenever Moses is read, a veil lies over their heart; but whenever a person turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away.
Dr. Brown is either lying or ignorant. Ka'ari (כארי) has an alef because it is the first consonant of the root word (ארי). The כis a prefix. Karu (כרו) does not have an alef. It comes from karah (כרה). The ו is a suffix. What do you mean "if the word for dig appears elsewhere without the alef"? Not a single instance of the particular word in the Tanach (Jeremiah 18:20, 18:22, Psalms 57:7, 119:85) has an alef. The word does not havean alef. There is no "elsewhere", we are talking about the actual instances in the Tanach of this word. And in none of those is there an alef.
"Ka'aru" (with an aleph) was an archaic spelling form of "karu". "Ka'aru" = "karu". Before the invention of vowel pointing by the Masoretes Hebrew spelling was much less consistent, with certain consonants being used to show vowel sounds. The oldest Hebrew scrolls contain many different spelling variations for the same words. Also the scholar Eugene Ulrich says in Psalm 22 in the Dead Sea Scrolls Bible that the Nahal Hever scroll says "pierced my hands and feet" as translated from "ka'aru".
Please, give us all a break... it is very amateurish for anyone to create a story based on prophecies made centuries earlier... ANYBODY could create a "fulfillment story" after the event had happened. My 6 year-old niece can come up with much better answers than your arguments, Mr. Brown. Whatever scholars said about their own opinion is completely irrelevant. What truly matters is the collection of original texts of the Hebrew Bible and the Jewish oral traditions. Without the oral law of the Jews, NONE after Jesus period would know even how to pronounce the words... all the translations of the Bible we see today rely FULLY on the oral tradition of the Jews. In Hebrew the verb "to be" is not written in the sentence (e.g. "Ani Patrick" would be translated literally into English as "I Patrick", instead of the correct way "I am Patrick"; or the question "Mi atah?", which would be translated literally as "Who you?" instead of the correct way "Who are you?"). Biblically we see this grammatical construction everywhere (e.g. "Tihyu kadoshim ki ani Kadosh", which literally would translate into English as "You shall be holy because I Holy", instead of the correct way "You shall be holy because I AM Holy"). So, your argument that Psalm 22 does not have the verb "to be" in "they ARE at my hand and my feet" is very, very incorrect as a support to your crooked theory that King David was prophesying about the death of JC. Besides that, David Hamelech wrote several passages using comparisons with a lion or lions to talk about his own enemies who aimed to destroy him. Even in this very Psalm 22, on the verse 14, David hamelech mentions about the "roaring lion" with the mouth open toward him... read Psalm 7:2, Psalm 10:9, etc. Hearing your arguments astonishes me for the level of misinformation and lack of knowledge in the Hebrew Scriptures that you display in your speech. Not to mention that you give more credit to scholars opinions than you'd give to the Word of G-d. To me it sounds like you are deliberately ignoring the Words of G-d to teach people idolatry and to go astray from the ways of the L-RD. Who cares about what the medieval scholars think of corrupted texts??? The Dead Sea scroll only proves that the Tanakh was kept intact by the Jewish people throughout at least 1100 years until that Dead Sea scroll was probably written. And still, the Jews before Jesus already read Psalm 22:17 exactly "Like a lion", as we still read it today... and this is what really matters. If one scribe made a mistake over one letter while producing the Dead Sea scroll (or not) is irrelevant. The book of Psalms is filled with comparisons of the enemies of king David to the "lion" or "lions". Why would you choose to argue over a clear point ("LIKE A LION") to prove your belief in Jesus ("THEY PIERCED"). Besides, NOWHERE in the Hebrew Scriptures is found any sentence telling anyone to BELIEVE AND WORSHIP the Messiah. Indeed, the word "mashiach" (messiah) appears in the Hebrew Bible 38 times, most of them in the book of Vaykrah (Leviticus), and none of them referring to the Jewish Messiah of end of times. The word "messiah" in the Hebrew Bible means "ANOINTEND" with oil, and nothing else... usually those anointed people were kings, prophets and high priests. Accept that Jesus is not on the Hebrew Scriptures and swallow your pride, Mr. Brown. The prophet Yeshayahu (Isaiah) made a prophecy about the name of King Cyrus of Persia at least 150 years before King Cyrus existed. How would Isaiah know the name of Cyrus at least 100 years before Cyrus was born?? Isaiah knew because that was a TRUE prophecy from G-D. In this same line of thought, why don't you ask yourself why Jesus name and all the things he supposedly would have accomplished later on was NEVER mentioned in the Hebrew Scriptures??? Would G-D have forgotten about Jesus (who would be G-d Himself, according to Christians) ?? If Jesus is G-d in the flesh, wouldn't have been wise of G-d to tell Moises and the entire nation of Israel at the Sinai that He would come later on and live in a human body and would adopt a name of Jesus, the same way that G-D revealed to Isaiah the name of King Cyrus 150 years before King Cyrus existed??? Please, give me a break with your Paul's pagan theology. By the way, the 70 weeks of Daniel are not 70 weeks, but they are 70 weeks of years (which can be read in Leviticus 25), where each day of the week is equal to 1 year. So, 70 weeks equals 70 x 7 (days, or in this case, years), which totals 490 years. This 70 weeks period was explicitly broken down into 7 weeks, 62 weeks and 1 week, explained below: First 7 weeks of years: from the first "word out" to give permission to the Jews to return from Babylon to Jerusalem to rebuilt it until the coming of an anointed prince (King Cyrus, who actually allowed the Jews to return from their captivity - please see Isaiah 45:1). 62 weeks of years: the city of Jerusalem and the Temple would be rebuilt during this period, but in troubles times (domination of the Persians, the Greeks, and then the Romans). Last week of years: ANOTHER anointed person, most likely the king of Israel at that time (as all the legitimate kings of Israel were anointed), or the High Priest (also anointed) of the Sanhedrin would be "CUT OFF" and eliminated. And ONLY AFTER THAT the people of a prince (Roman Empire) would come and destroy the city and the Temple (the second Temple, that was destroyed in the year 70 C.E.) Be aware that every time that the Hebrew Bible mentions the words "CUT OFF", is to refer to a wicked person. And you must know that in the beginning of the first century of Common Era, both the High Priest in the Sanhedrin (a Saducee), as well as the Ruler over Jerusalem were in alliance with the Emperor of Rome (Vespasian). They were wicked because they were allied with Romans. But if you go to Daniel 9:24, it says clearly that "70 weeks ARE DECREED upon thy people and thy holy city", and this is a DECREE of G-D. And during this period the people had the opportunity to finish transgression, end sin, repent, etc. ONLY AFTER THAT DECREED PERIOD (70 weeks of years) THE MASHIACH COULD COME, IF THE PEOPLE ISRAEL HAD DONE WHAT THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO DO... (but they didn't... for instance, sin and transgression was not finished during the 70 weeks period, actually it hasn't finished until today). Daniel 9 24 Seventy weeks are decreed upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sin, and to forgive iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal vision and prophet, and to anoint the most holy place. If any conclusion one can take from Daniel 9 is this one: THE JEWISH MESSIAH ONLY COULD COME AFTER THE PERIOD OF 70 WEEKS DECREED BY G-D UPON THE PEOPLE AND JERUSALEM, WHICH IS EXACTLY AFTER THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE AND THE CITY BY THE ROMANS IN THE YEAR 70 C.E. INDEED, THIS PROPHECY OF DANIEL 9 PROVES THE EXACT POINT THAT JESUS IS NOT THE JEWISH MESSIAH, as supposedly he would have lived and died at least 35 years BEFORE DE DESTRUCTION OF THE SECOND TEMPLE. May Hashem remove the scales that are over Christians' eyes, so they can look and see, and grab the Tzit-tzit of the garment of a Jew and say to him: "LET US GO WITH YOU, FOR WE KNOW THAT G-D IS WITH YOU". (Read Zecharyah). Just to let you know that the period between the destruction of the first Temple and the construction of the Second Temple was 70 years (period when Israel was exiled in Babylon), and the second Temple stood for 420 years exactly. 70 years + 420 years = 490 years, which is exactly the 70 weeks of years (70 x 7 = 490 years) DECREED upon Israel to finished transgression. No redemption could happen before the decreed period, and therefore, NO MESSIAH COULD COME BEFORE THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SECOND TEMPLE. Thus, Jesus WAS NOT the Jewish Messiah. Shalom, shalom!
Salutioan Salut, you're very welcome. I've been nicely surprised with the impressive amount of people who are finally searching for the truth and understanding that Christianity is the path to idolatry that was built upon criminal adulteration of the Hebrew Holy Scriptures. Hopefully Mr. Brown one day will stop perpetuating the lies that he knows himself they are all lies. Let's spread the true Word of G-d, without reservations. Shalom, shalom!
@@pc6994 brown doesn't respond to you because he is busy debating someone with more knowledge than you like tovia. If brown shuts down tovia that easy what makes you think brown is gonna waste his time with someone who is less knowledgeable...?
Bobby lobby, Brown wastes his time regardless of debating with rabbi Singer, or with me, or anyone else. When someone sticks to a tempered document and calls that adulteration "his truth", that knowledge he holds is worth absolutely nothing. Mr. Brown is just one of the millions who are lost in complete darkness... together with you, apparently. Just to rectify your misrepresented statement, Mr. Brown DID NOT "shut down" rabbi Tovia Singer... Perhaps, besides being blind you are also deaf. Unlike yourself and Mr. Brown, the explanation I gave is just to inform about the tempering that Christianity did to the original Hebrew texts, and NOT to try to "convert you" (or anybody else) to Judaism, even because we are not looking for convertees. Rabbi Tovia Singer does not need to "win" a discussion with anyone, because he is debating to inform ignorant people (like yourself)... but Mr. Brown must "win" his debates because he NEEDS to convince many fools to believe in his pagan ideology. Thank you for your "heads up" though. Good luck with your beliefs in Mr. Brown's paganism.
YCE TAKE, I don't represent "that Biblical truth", but I do understand the truth of the ONLY ONE TRUE G-D. You believe in your truths or Mr. Brown's truths, it is not my business. I don't rely on translations (most of which are erroneous) to understand the Word of G-d, BH. I hope you can understand it too one day, without fighting or arguing. We are all part of a big family, and should learn from one another to become better people. If your beliefs lead you to become that better person, then they are good beliefs in my opinion. You don't need to be Jewish to be righteous, you just need to follow some basic principles... in my Bible, there are plenty of stories of sins, mistakes, wrongdoing, idolatry among my people (the Jews), but these stories are there for a huge purpose, to teach my people what we must not do, just because we learn not only from our own mistakes, but also by observing others' mistakes. Learn from your neighbor's mistakes and success, so you don't have too much trouble yourself with your growth pains. Thank you for your comments and for the opportunity to convey a point. Kind regards.
Respond to the Book of Tovia? There is no Book of Tovia. Rabbi Tovia Singer explains the Jewish perspective. The Tanaach (Holy Scriptures) that he quotes is the Hebrew version.
At the 4:06-4:13 mark in this video, Dr. Brown says, "But rather that what's clear is that the messiah had to come and accomplish his work of redemption that he had to come and make atonement for our sins" Clearly this verse says otherwise! 📖 𝐏𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐦𝐬 𝟒𝟗:𝟕 𝙣𝙤𝙣𝙚 [𝙣𝙤 𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙤𝙧 𝙗𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧] 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙗𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣𝙨 𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐎𝐌 his brother, nor give God an 𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓 for him;
25 When His disciples heard it, they were greatly astonished, saying, “Who then can be saved?” 26 But Jesus looked at them and said to them, “With men this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”
lol ka-aru meaning to dig is quite different from pierced and secondly the "ka" means LIKE...it's comparing one thing that can be like something else. You say there are thousands of Masoretic texts but less than 20 contain the phrase Ka-aru? I watched this entire video and it's quite laughable. "Ka-Aru" would make no sense in classical Hebrew even if it was intended. You are basically using only the texts that are sincerely questionable and in the minority...severe minority to prove your point. Genesis 26:25 uses the word וַיִּכְרוּ pronounced va-yich-ru. In some of the "questionable" manuscripts an Alef is present and therefore completely eradicates what you say. You also say that there are many Hebrew words that are not used anymore...well the Hebrew word דֶּקֶר which does mean pierced or wounded is not used anywhere here like in Isaiah 13:15. Lastly to anyone watching this video. You should be extremely skeptical of what this man is saying. Anyone who uses a severe minority of texts and most importantly unverifiable information like "there were words in Hebrew that are lost or never used" should be questioning anything this person says because you cannot verify if you are actually being deceived or not. I would quote Isaiah 55:7 to any Christian here who can read and understand what is being read. That verse should not exist in a Christian bible. Paul the apostle says you cannot follow the law period. Christians say that a sacrificial atonement is necessary to pardon you. READ Isaiah 55:7.
Avner Rosenstein....emm, I know Im not being decieved by Dr Brown because at the end of it all, he is defending the truth - Jesus is the Messiah, the prophets fortold of his death, and ressurection, they tell of righteous Israel - an individual who makes atonement for the sins of the whole world Apostle Paul talks to both Israel and Gentiles when he says no one can keep the law, or are you saying you perfecetly keep the law and commandments, please. And its not 'christians' who say that a sacrificial atonement, but rather God who gave his Son over as a sacrifice to make atonement You who are at odds with God and his word, not a good place to be.
@@MRFITTA Just because someone is defending Jesus doesn't mean they aren't lying and doesn't mean they aren't wrong. Michael brown is ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT on the pierced verse.
@@hitoshura2800 how so? So you are saying the bible is wrong then, because even if I dont take on board what Brown is saying, I have the bible itself. Sounds like you're either an unbeliever, or listen to too much if Singers nonsense, and need to be careful when siding with the enemies of God and the gospel - be warned.
Avner Rosenstein. You don't know what you're talking about regarding Isaiah 55:7, its only applicable today in light of Gods revelation of his Son, you cannot 'turn from your own thoughts' without the rebirth and subsequent regeneration. 'The mind of sinful(unregenerate) man is death, but the mind controlled by the Spirit is life and peace; the sinful mind(unregenerate) is hostile to God. It does not submit to Gods law, nor can it do so'
No Dan. If he is not there to slap what your tossing around down this accounts for nothing. Thanks for coming out. Keep defending the world wide idolatry. The worst kind. That centered around a man.
Rabbi Singer is absolutely correct. There is no such word in biblical or modern Hebrew. 8 times out 10 of thousands of texts that do not use the mistake that you base your argument on. It is quite clear that your version is incorrect.
+Ben g Been a while since I looked at this but Where on earth do you get the idea that there are tens of thousands of OT "texts", and of that line, and that that list showing 8, shows them all from the tens of thousands that you claim there are, but anyhow, tovia said it never occurs anywhere. And clearly the scholars that translated the Septuagint (before Jesus existed), took the non-masoretic version for that word. And Tovia's argument for saying there was no such word was complete gibberish. You might agree wth Tovia's conclusion, that it is what the majority masoretic has the word as, but the arguments he uses to support himself are full of lies that dr brown exposed.
@@MRFITTA followers of both are blind because if contrasting dr brown, his followers, dr singer, and his followers, dr brown knows biblical hebrew best, tovia singer a distant second, and almost all followers of each know almost nothing And quite possibly tovia singer's followers know more hebrew than dr brown's .. because many jews that run into tovia can at least read hebrew even if they don't know biblical hebrew that well. Dr Brown has really gone into some stuff that isn't known by most people.. includign most rabbis and most with an interest, would not know about.
@@boliussa I don't 'follow' Dr Brown, but he is in the truth, as are all born again believers, most of whom would agree with him. So you are incorrect in labeling Dr Browns 'followers' in the same bracket as Rabbi Singers. No one who agrees with Rabbi Singer can be right with God - this is the man who once said Jesus didnt exist
Why don't you include in your comment a quote from the video showing what you think he said that was incorrect. And does it not concern you that tovia was so wrong. Do you even admit that tovia was wrong and exposed here? You are too stupid and dishonest, so you don't even write an intelligent comment that quotes dr brown , where you thiink he is wrong, and backs up a point.
Everyone has thier bias. Tovia is correct about alot of Christian corruptions. And Brown is correct on somethings and wrong on others. Thats why every believer MUST study the living WORD for themselves. You are responsible for studying to show yourself approved. Every believer needs to drop thier ideology at the door and seek truth no matter where that leads you. Its very difficult to do once you've been brainwashed to see something that is not there. If the living WORD isn't formed in you then you are in trouble.
Dr Brown , when will Zech.14 come to pass?...before the Second Coming of Christ or at his appearance? Or is Zech.14 a distant prophecy which shall come to pass many years after Christ's 1st Millennial Reign? Which of the three is it? I believed the latter.
I believe in the second coming..in acts angels say Christ will return just as he left. He ascended from the Mt olives so he must descend to the Mt olives.
Yesterday afternoon, I personally asked Tovia Singer if he would debate Dr. Brown again and he said Dr. Brown edited out his comments from the recordings of the debates and attacked him on the air the week following the debate. Singer said he was not permitted on air to respond to the things Dr. Brown was attacking him on. Dr. Brown has said he's constantly tired to ask Singer to have a follow-up debate, yet Singer told me Brown never once asked him to debate since the two debates 30 years ago. Someone's not telling the truth.
Unfortunately, Rabbi Singer is not telling the truth, shockingly so. For details, see here: ua-cam.com/video/U5-TJPz6Y94/v-deo.html. Not only so, but numerous witnesses will confirm that they invited Rabbi Singer to debate me in a public forum but he refused. It's one thing to choose not to debate; it's another thing to lie about it. That's what needs to be exposed. Very sad.
Dr Brown's patience toward Tovia Singer's anti-christ mission demonstrates a character of God's mercy & patience. Tovia will fall , Dr Brown is an Israelite whereas Mr Singer is just a Pharisee (just a Jew) its terrible to see famous teachers like Tovia not knowing that the son of man refers to the prophecies given to Ezekiel in other words Ezekiel coming with the clouds as he was caried by the flying winged "objects" and landed at tel-aviv in our day. Also the temple description in the book of Ezekiel (son of man) is the very same abomination spoken of by prophet Daniel. I totally agree with Tovia singer Christians believe there is only one God , the God of Israel & there is only one Son of God, the man Jesus Christ
Carl Johnson......I've read your comments, and its clear you are confused and in the darkness, you need a powerful deliverance which only God is capable of. Seek him while you can still find him. Not even sure you can even do this now, having read about your 'christian' background. its virtually impossible for a person such as yourself to repent and return to the truth. Hope I'm wrong.
REVELATION 12:17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Yeshua The Rabbi's keep the tablets of stone and His blood (testimony) found on the mercy seat! I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced,
Daniel 9: Regarding Daniel 9 verses 24 - 27 As a jew you probably know the difference between שבועים (the agreculteral cycles) and שבועות (weeks). The hebrew text says שבועים Here's the math according to jewish count: Year 3339 the first temple is destroyed. Year 3409 the second temple is built due to koresh who was thought to be a saviour (by Isaiah) Between them 70 years = 10 agreecultural cycles. Year 3829 The destruction of the second temple. Between the destructions 490 Aka 70 cycles. 62 cycles (434 years)from the rebuilding of the second temple = 3843. Year 3843 the year that the anointed one (last high priest) parished and his sons did not enherit the priesthood = approximately 82 AD. 24: "to make ends of sin" - for only in state of purity can the second temple be built and the sacrificial system renewed (the sacrefices for unintentional transgressions, but one must also repent) 25: jerusalem will be starting its rebuilding 49 years after Koresh. 26 Messiah shall be cut off - in the hebrew it says - "the anointed one (the high priest) shall parish and there was non other" (JC was never anointed, nor as king, nor as priest) see as a continuation of 24, where the Holly of hollies was anointed as part of the priestly duties. 27: within three and a half years the high priest will no longer preform sacrificial rituals. That is not a prophecy about JC. Psalm 22 speaks only of king David Psalm 22:16 The word is like a lion ka-ari (כארי) The word they dug karu (כרו) roots from כ.ר.ה (dig). That word cannot and does not have no "א" in it. And you can see in all hebrew text including the Nahal Hever script that the א is there, which comes to show that the scribe meant to write the word כארי - like a lion. כִּי סְבָבוּנִי, כְּלָבִים: עֲדַת מְרֵעִים, הִקִּיפוּנִי; כָּאֲרִי, יָדַי וְרַגְלָי. The correct translation of this verse: Dogs have surrounded me; a band of evil men has encircled me, like a lion (meanning surrounding him), my hands and my feet (to show he is completely surrounded). And it has come to my intention that encient scribes often changed the "י" (Yod)in the endings of words to "ו" (Vav) since jews derive the correct pronunciation through the reading of the text, the same way English readers know how not to pronounce the "p" in pneumonia. If you're interested check for this title on UA-cam as well: Psalm 22 verse 16 The Nahal Hever Fragment - Proof! As to verse 2 in that psalm אֵלִי אֵלִי, לָמָה עֲזַבְתָּנִי This is the true translation of verse 2: My god my god why did you leave me (not forsaken !!!) Leaving is just a temporary state that suggests a return in the future, not as forsaken which means to completely abandone. The psalm speaks only of king David's troubles and his plea to god and later on in the psalm he gives praises to god. Nothing more This too is not a prophecy about JC.
Dr. Brown I really appreciate your channel ! I’m a Christian and day questioned why the Jews do not accept Jesus as the messiah , so I searched and came across Tovias videos and they almost got me thinking maybe Jesus isn’t the messiah . Thank you for your videos on correcting him ! This has helped me a lot !
Tovia is one deceitful guy that can fool anyone. Check out ONE FOR ISRAEL, Behold Israel and Messiah of Israel. All based out of Israel with similar Message as Dr. Brown
Ashley y I comment on tovies channel its hard going jews are very stubborn and orthodox wont see scripture were Jesus might fill that text of being messiah but stick to a Ben David with a family jesus said I came in my Fathers name one comes in his own name him you will except and he will turn out to be the antichrist and believing him they also say Gd never put jesus name in the torah if Gd did that there were lots of jews at that time called Jesus they would argue I wonder which Jesus is it aunt jesses Jesus or brother billys Jesus lol they couldnt agree no its Jesus of Nazareth Gd bless.
@@ironstone_ Utter rubbish We are under the new covenant the old is done away with Israel was scattered because they rejected Gds son Jesus is everywere in the OT you cannot see him your blind spiriturally speaking but your next great event is to die then you will burn forever in Hell unless you get converted .
Yeshuah wasn't the Mashiach because he didn't fulfill any of the prophesies in the Hebrew Bible.
@@donnaburden.dip.d.analysis2148 * "Messianic Jews" are no longer Jewish because they have become Christians. It doesn't matter if they wear tallit, yamuke and zit-zits, that does not make them to be following the faith of their mothers and fathers. Name one prophesy that Yeshuah fulfilled!?
Dear brother Michael Brown we have a special respect for you in our hearts because we see always you defending our faith in our Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth. We learn new things from your debates and your messages. May God bless you and use you miraculously in the coming days.
It was these public statements that led me to you Dr. Brown a few months ago. I used to be a Rock drummer from a family of Rock drummers and I met Jesus in 92. I think I found you because of your story and the fact you used to be a drummer stood out to me for some reason 😄. You have been a great help in strengthening my faith - I find myself in the big apple today (I’m from London) listening to your channel feeling very blessed. Thank you sir for this excellent response to Tovias dismissal of the word
Christian Elliott * Rabbi Tovia Singer does not dismiss G-d's teachings ( is that what you are saying?) Yet if one studies these teachings of Dr. Brown's completely, one can more easily see that they are based on inaccuracies of the mistranslation of Holy Scriptures' references.
@@chaishalom8701 Really? I have been listening to Tovia Singer for a while now. What you are saying sounds like he has new material. Some links would be much appreciated.
@@readmails3033 * Name your topic please.
@@chaishalom8701 why not start with his best refutation?
@@readmails3033 * So what do you mean by "his best refutation"?
There’s a reason Tovia has ran away from you Dr Brown..... YOU HAVE EXPOSED HIM OF HIS LIES!!
TRUE
Mr Brown is the Lier! he does not know hebrews!
@@GamingMaster13 yah! you are true lier!
Michael James * Rabbi Tovia Singer hasn't lied. He is explaining to those who have left Christianity (former Jews or those who have converted) and showing all the people who will listen, that the original Hebrew Bible - the Holy Scriptures contain the truth of G-d's message to his people Israel.
Hello Goodbye
You need to realize that if Yeshua isn’t Messiah then there is no Messiah!
Daniel 9:24-26 clearly says that Messiah had to come before the 2nd Temple was destroyed. That took place in 70 AD. Please repent and believe on Yeshua HaMashiach and what he has done for you! Yeshua is the promised Messiah of the Hebrew Bible and he is coming soon!!
I watched Dr.Brown and Tovia Singer and Dr.Brown has way stronger and more powerful reasons and explanations that just make sense. Tovia has weird arguments that he hypes up before he even gives them and when he does they are weak and you can tell by the look of their eyes Dr.Brown is way more happier than Tovia. You can tell Tovia is not a happy guy at all, not someone I want to learn from.
Thank you Dr.Brown you are among the real Jews that actually embraced the promised Messiah when he came! That's why Hashem has blessed you so much, keep up the good work!
Dr. Brown, you don’t understand how much you have benefited me in the face, God has saved me so greatly through your education
Dr. Brown you are the teacher I have been looking for, for some time!!! Blessings Sir.
I will tell every Christian I know to listen to Dr Brown's Channel. I always learn something. God Bless you Brother.
@@mikeizme20021 You do not even believe in hell
Amen brother. The followers of Yeshua are blessed with his works.
@Fred Ghoujeghi brother you do realise the apostles were all Jewish and it was the Pharisees who gave Jesus up to the Romans to be killed.
The Tanakh is fulfilled in Christ, all prophecies point toward Him and the second temple fell in 70AD so if its not him its no one. Repent of this folly and accept Yeshua as your saviour.
@Fred Ghoujeghi It will be Moses who will be your Accuser on the Day of Judgement for rejecting the Lord Jesus Christ(John 5:45)
@@GamingMaster13 ya sure burn for a billion x billion years and that's not even the start for not navigating correctly with limited intelligence in a world full of liars. Ya burn! BURN!!!!
The Lord has raised up a mighty warrior in the gospel and in His eternal truth through Yeshua the Messiah! It's amazing how the comments of Jewish man Singer leads to another Jewish man Brown bringing glory and honor to the One true God and Yeshua the the Messiah/ Christ. Bless the Lord our Savior and pray for the Jewish people that they will know their Messiah has come and will come again, pray Yeshua would be revealed to them and all the unbelieving world for God's glory!
jesus the FALSE MESSIAH NUM 23:19 how gullible people are to believe in myth and fables..it really amazes me...
@@Yce_Take Dude, you're an A hole because you have no idea what you're writing about...keep believing the lies you gullible fool.. You're cursed and blinded by the ONE.
@@Yce_Take * Take what you wrote to Pizza Rules over to your mirror! Every thing that you are saying to him applies to you.
@@nasdaqua look at the words you use ....im sure you have nothing to do with the God of israel
God bless your ministry Dr. Brown
Michael brown you are killing it!
Rabbi Eduardo Arroyo, what a CHUTZPAH calling yourself a "rabbi"!!! You definitely don't know what it is to be a true rabbi.
P C would you like to have the discussion in a public forum, moderated on whether I should be called rabbi or not?
Rabbi Eduardo Arroyo, we don't need to have a discussion about an obvious answer... besides that, you guys are always in this "competition mode" trying to prove yourselves right all the time... aren't you guys convinced of yourselves, that you always try to prove yourselves right?
Listen, someone who puts on a tallit and a kippah, and uses Hebrew names to call fabricated characters of the New Testament cannot be called a rabbi by serious people. Or, if you were to dress in orange robes and shave your head and go live in the Himalaias, you couldn't be called a master monk. Be serious man!! If you want to become a rabbi, go study hard and abandon idolatry and paganism.... that's a good starting point. Until then, don't ridiculize yourself in front of the entire world.
Think about it.
P C you say we don’t need to have a discussion about an obvious answer but you are discussing it. Why do you contradict yourself and break your own rules of engagement? I didn’t contact you you contacted me, if you don’t want to have the discussion then please sir, stop Talking. Either be about it or don’t.
All of your statements I would love to address, but you don’t want to have the discussion that is on you.
@@pc6994 said absolutely nothing lol
For Rabbi Tovia Singer his partial spiritual blindness at the moment in time will be open in a BIG SURPRISE. That BLESSED DAY will surely come. Adonai Elohai YESHUA Ben Dovid will REVEAL HIMSELF PERSONALLY TO Tovia Singer and his friends.
Great study, thank you Dr. Brown. Concerning Psalm 22, Tovia assumes that the writers of the NT were just writing their own proof texts, from their own brain, but instead they wrote what the Spirit of God directed them to write. And God was never about proving Himself. In fact He sometimes hides things from the wise and prudent (Matthew 11:25, Isaiah 45:15). In the NT, just like the OT, God was never about listing points that show Himself to be true, or even listing proofs that show the scriptures are true. God may prove things at times, but that certainly is not the goal of either text (NT of OT).
i needed to hear and see this - Thank You!
Excellent explanation with proof, it is clear to me.
Thank you again Dr. Brown!!!! Thank you!
thank him for what???
@@Yce_Take FK off faker...Brown is a fraud...Rabbi Singer wins all the time. Judaism is truth...your fake religion is just that.
@@nasdaqua*_ARE YOU CALLING GOD A LIAR? ACCORDING TO TORAH AND YOUR RABBIS IN YOUR TALMUD, MESSIAH ALREADY CAME THE FIRST TIME!_*
Genesis 49:10
Targum Onkelos:
He who exercised dominion shall not pass away from the house of Judah, nor the scribe from his children’s children forever, until Messiah shall come. Whose is the kingdom, and whom the peoples shall obey.[1]
Targum Palestine:
Kings shall not cease, nor rulers from the house of Judah, nor sopherim teaching the law from his seed, till the time that King Messiah shall come, who will arise from Judah.[2]
Fragmentary Targum:
King shall not cease from the house of Judah, nor scribes who teach the Torah from his children’s children, until the time of the coming of the King Messiah, to whom belongs the Kingdom, and to whom all dominions of the earth shall become subservient.[3]
Rashi:
until Shiloh comes [this refers to] the King Messiah, to whom the kingdom belongs,[4]
Sanhedrin 98b:
What is his [the Messiah’s] name? - The School of R. Shila said: His name is Shiloh, for it is written, until Shiloh come.”[5]
Midrash Mishle:
Rav Huna says “The Messiah is called by seven names and they are Yinnon, Tzidqenu [‘Our Justice’], Tzemach [‘Shoot’], Menahem [‘Comforter’], David, Shiloh, Elijah.”[6]
Yalkut Shim. Ber.:
‘Judah is a young lion.’ That is Messiah the Son of David.[7]
Midrash Rabbah:
The rulership abideth with the tribe of Judah until the arrival of Shiloh i.e. Messiah.[8]
Midrash Rabbah - Genesis:
THE SCEPTRE [STAFF] SHALL NOT DEPRT FROM JUDAH alludes to the Messiah, son of David, who will chastise the State with a staff, as it says, Thou shalt break them with a rod [staff[ of iron (Ps. II, 9).[9]
Midrash Rabbah - Lamentations:
The school of R. Shila said: The Messiah’s name is ‘Shiloh,’ as it is stated, Until Shiloh come (Gen. XLIX, 10), where the word is spelt Shlh.[15]
*SANHEDRIN* :
Since👉 *_the Sanhedrin no longer had jurisdiction over capital offenses_* 👈, there is no practical utility in this ruling, which can become effective only in the days of the Messiah.
Midrash Rabbah, Genesis XCIX, 8-9:
… UNTIL SHILOH COMETH: he to whom kingship belongs (shelo).
(Rather than transliterating into English “Shilo” as though it were a proper name, the Rabbis translated the exact meaning of “Shilo’ as “to whom it belongs/pertains.”)[18]
Targum Jonathan:
Kings shall not cease, nor rulers, from the house of Jehuda, nor sopherim teaching the law from his seed, till the time the King, the Meshiah, shall come, the youngest of his sons; and on account of him shall the peoples flow together. How beauteous is the King, and Meshiah who will arise from the house of Jehuda![19]
*JERUSALEM TALMUD SANHEDRIN 41a* - _THE SCEPTER DEPARTED_
👉 _"a little more than forty years before the destruction of the Temple, the power of pronouncing capital sentences was taken away from the Jews*_ .👈[20]
Raymond Martin, Pugio Fidei, 872; Leipsic Edition:
Rabbi Rachmon says, “ *_When the members of the Sanhedrin found themselves deprived of their right over life and death_* , a general consternation took possession of them; they covered their heads with ashes, and their bodies with sackcloth, exclaiming: ‘ 👉 *_Woe to us, for the scepter has departed from Judah, and the Messiah has not come!_* 👈’
*_MESSIAH CAME BUT THEY REJECTED HIM_*
Thanks Dr. Brown, this is amazing.
I have no idea how the Jews don’t see Jesus as their messiah 😪
Simple. Jesus does not fulfill messianic prophecy.
@safwanibnemoattel ali The star of David is a relatively recent development and is not essential to Jewish belief. Moloch is certainly not the god of Israel. It says in the Bible that the Israelites are the chosen people of G-d who commanded the Israelites to destroy the altars of Moloch when they took over the land of Canaan (Israel).
@safwanibnemoattel ali That's a lie. Moloch is not the god of the Jews.
@OTO TAKE Name one prophecy that JC has fulfilled.
@OTO TAKE I don't think so.
"Name one that he [JC] hasn't fulfilled."
Isaiah 2:4, to name but one.
Numbers 23:19 God is not a man, that He should lie, Nor a son of man.
Rabbi Singer doesn't want to admit that he doesn't know the Torah better than Rabbi Jesus Christ.
Bravo
I put your whole comment in quotes. How sarcastic can one be? Most likely "Rabbi Jesus" did not exist and you all are romantically attracted to a pagan idol. If he did live in the first century there is no historical evidence of that. The two so-called "historical " references were no doubt placed there later by Christians.
@@chaishalom8701 perhaps you can explain to me exactly who Joshua worships in Joshua 5:13-15...??
@@kjvacp • That most likely is the angel of the L-rd. Joshua shouldn't be worshipping the angel but the L-d of ghosts Himself!
Hosts not ghosts. (Dumb phone)
A certain verse comes to mind:
For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.
Rabbi Tovia Singer has helped me come out of idolotry and return to the one true God!
Mercy Fields he has deceived you. No doubt you are not a Bible scholar therefore, Tovia knew you were not able to question him and challenge him.
Don't call Tivia singer Rabbi. After all crazy lie he talk to destroy yeshua hamachiach! He needs to repent. If not The hell is waiting for him.
@@Nicolai.c * He is trying to challenge people of faith to seriously consider the true message of the Holy One (it is not about "Jesus Christ"). The true message is the one as written in the Torah and the Tanaach. It is the message of a personal relationship of G-d with his people Israel. {hint it does not involve his son dying for mankind's sin. Nor does it involve this son rising from the dead!}
Rabbi means teacher and requires specialized Jewish educational training called the Yeshiva. Any ole "Christian" Pastor is not a Rabbi.
@hood lam : Ok, and have you read - besides Isaiah 53, Isaiah 52 & Isaiah 54?
@hood lam * So if that is true, then how do you conclude that verse or those two verses are so important?
God Bless you, Dr. Brown. Thank you for your amazing ministry!!
May God when he finally destroys the liars and seducers like doc brown, do it in the face of all who believed in their twisted words.
@@Mindhumble Wow... ok, duder. Thanks for sharing your opinion.
@@AJBernard LOL no problem, either way this is a very complicated world and these discussions are very hard, and we have to hope that God points us in the right direction, all we can do i guess is try to be as honest and objective as humanly possible. Peace!
@@Mindhumble How do you call for the destruction of people who disagree with you in one post and then wish peace on someone who disagrees with you in the reply?
You should pray about this. You are confused.
@@AJBernard I am arguing (or at least trying) to show the mistakes people make, as I'm sure you can understand from my point of view, doc brown is a "mesis" as in deutoronomy 13 and is leading well meaning searchers for the truth away from God into idolatry. So you can understand (i hope) why i hate doc brown immensely, as is instructed in that chapter. As king David said (i think psalms 138 or somewhere around there) i hate those who hate you with an absolute hate, and king Solomon says in Ecclesiastes chap 3, there is a time to love *and* a time to hate. I have genuine pain inside when i see the effect of his lies and therefore i feel i have to at least try to help genuine searching people to see his political spin for what it is. I only harbour hate against those who mislead others from the path of truth, not those who are confused or searching, and I'm sure God will take into account the confusion there is when judging those making a mistake.
Absolutely fabulous book written on the 70 weeks prophecy of Daniel was written by Sir Robert Anderson entitled "The Coming Prince."
The day i turn to christianity is the day a jew believes jesus was their messiah...hallelujah christian bruthaaaa!!!
Dr Michael Brown convinced me from dropping out of Christianity. I praise God for you my brother
@Devan Cherne * And I pray that you will continue on your spiritual journey towards the true Eternal one as I did after many years of Bible study and prayer.
You will know the truth, and the truth will make you free!!!!!!!!
@Devan Cherne * And I went from Messianic "Judaism" to real Judaism in my spiritual journey. And I am happy, free, and content. Baruch Ha Shem!!!
@@billburkhalter411 * Dr. Michael Brown works for the church.
@@chaishalom8701 What convinces you of Judaism?
PLEASE keep refuting Rabbi Singer! I would financially sponsor someone to do it, as I could afford it! A lot of his nonsense is not that complicated to address.
From the AskDrBrown Team: Dr. Brown has a detailed, 22-hour teaching series that refutes much of Rabbi Singer's material. Please write to info@askdrbrown.org to find out how you can help get this material to a greater audience.
@@LFTV he's a self hating Jew...all of his nonsense can be disputed by Torah scholars ..
@@LFTV hey Brother , i couldn't find any material about tovia singer other than youtube content . Could you please help me out?
Of course, when someone comes along dangling money in front of Mr. Brown's eyes, he is very quick to respond and capture another pray. Well done, Mr. Brown. You only prove to the world that church leaders have the same motifs... and those are FAR FROM PREACHING CHRIST.
@@LFTV What is the name of the 22-hour teaching series? Thank you!
Am your student sir. Learning a lot from your channel and building my Christian apologetics arsenal
I admire Dr. Michael Brown. He is God's wise man. He has the mind of Christ. He personifies the righteous Jew. Toviah Singer personifies the stiff-necked, disobedient Jews who deliberately close their eyes from the truth; he is like the rebellious Israelites whom God caused to die in the desert during Moses' time.
"The stiff-necked, disobedient Jews" ... How Christian of you...Sheesh.
I really enjoy watching your show lots of great information although we differ on the rapture but we can agree to disagree on that God bless you and your ministry . Thanks allot
Excellent......amazing. Prophecy.....before jeru and temple destroyed He Comes
Jesus , I know you love this Rabbi Singer , but please forgive me! I just can’t stand this man. Help me see him through your eyes , Amen!
I'm not jesus but look at tovia singer, lost and as a little child and have feelings for him like your own 6 year old who's going against you
Lol at least your honest
I have the same problem, it's when someone is sooooo puffed up, arrogant, unloving, one-way-onlynes.--d
@Melvin Carter • G-d doesn't hate his people - he loves them!
@Melvin Carter • Only the pagan gods have sons.
That poor man who "studied" what he calls "the Christian testament" and so confidently and blithely dismisses Christianity...
Daniel 9:27 was Fulfilled before The Destruction of The 2cnd Temple of HASHEM.
Yeshua said it best "If you believe Moses you would believe me for Moses wrote about me but since your hopes are set on Moses so he will be your judge"
*Come Lord MESSIAH YESHUA* 🙏😇🙏😇🙏
Here's another,
Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.
And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent!
And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets...
... neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.
@@AnHebrewChild Amen 🙏
@@JRTIGER07 🙏🏼 Be blessed.
I see why Rabbi Tovia has vehemently avoided debating Dr Brown. He's waiting until he finds an explanation to Daniel 9
Lol😂, exactly
There is a huge explanation of Daniel 9 . Jews for Judaism wrote out every understanding of Daniel 9.
Hi there Dr. Brown - I just wanted to tell you I very much appreciate your videos, _particularly_ these ones where you provide answers to those who attempt to cast doubt on what the prophets say concerning Jesus' Messiahship. Right on. THIS sort of thing is sorely lacking in modern evangelicalism, but so vitally important for believers in THE KING - and even doubly so today when we see the faith under attack... from within and without.
_We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed._ 2PET 1:19
Blessings.
On another note, I just wish you'd not call Tovia, "Rabbi Singer"! I understand, I think, why you do but...
_[They] love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues, And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi. But be not ye called Rabbi: for ONE is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren._ MAT 23:6ff
I realize we sometimes do this out of a sort of deference and respect for men like Mr. Singer, but Rabbi Jesus is the ONE, and only one whose person and authority warrants this honorable title.
_Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel._ JOHN 1:49
😊
@@AnHebrewChild * Rabbi Tovia Singer is truly a Rabbi from Aaron's bloodline. His biological Y chromosomes go back to him on his father's side. Jesus' do not. Because, Jesus, according to the "New Testament" scripture didn't have a father. He depends on another man's biological family tree to substantiate his claim of right bloodline for the Messianic line. That can not be done in Judaism! One must take his own bloodline from his actual father's DNA.
@@chaishalom8701 you’ll learn. In time.
I did. Cheers
@@AnHebrewChild * "Learn" that your way of interpreting "New Testament scripture" is correct? You were quoting Matthew. And that book is really nothing "to learn" but only to accept even though with it's many, many anti-Jewish verses it is the most anti-G-d book that is there. I have been through so much studying of the Holy Scriptures and of the Christian Bible in my lifetime. You don't have any idea how much research, study, reading, concordance and Bible notes reading, sermon notes research and related books research that I have done to be able to confidently comment on this You Tube channel. You don't know my past nor do you know my present or future. So since you don't know - you have that unhelpful comment that you left which seems to only make you feel better about yourself. It doesn't inform or teach anyone else about the subject. Good day.
@@AnHebrewChild * Everyone, read my answer to his reply and original post to this video.
I have listened to many of Rabbi Singer's debates, and only a little of Dr. Brown. Both men of Jewish heritage who seem to be very intelligent and well-versed on the Torah/Old Testiment and know the Hebrew language. I cannot claim that I am a perfect judge of character, but as a college instructor who deals with numerous people I can usually discern sincerity and insincerity. Most students I encounter are honest and sincere, but I am almost always right in recognizing students that are dishonest and I have often caught them in the act of cheating.
I have not personally met either one of these men, but Dr. Brown comes off as being completely sincere and honest. He also acts humble and tries to break down complicated scripture into simple terms. On the other hand, I cannot say the same for Rabbi Singer. He comes off as supercilious/self-righteous, deceitful and vendictive. He admitted in a Houston, TX debate that he had been harassed as a child by Christian children, and it was obvious that he still harbors resentment toward Christians to this day. If you watch many of his debates, you will notice a condescending sneer come across his face every time he feels he has made a good point. Whether you are Christian, Jew, Muslim, or otherwise---based on my observations, I recommend that you not trust Rabbi Singer.
Stacie, you come across as a very uncharitable and cynical individual. I've never noticed a "condescending sneer" on the rabbi's face (or Dr. Brown's). I suggest it this is entirely of your own vain imagining. Watch your tongue, because you are mean-spirited.
Absolutely true, and in this video tovia really got exposed very badly. And Tovia likes to wind up the christian person he is debating by saying "if you look at the bible", as if to suggest that they are not. I saw him debating shmuley boteach and he never did that he just talked normally.. Also Michael Brown has really strong academc qualfications in semitic languages, covering biblcial hebrew that tovia singer does not have. Tovia likes to play games like he knows the hebrew and the christian doesn't, but he can't do that with Dr Brown because Dr Brown knows the hebrew even better than Tovia Singer does. Dr Brown was even consulted in one of the bible translations. Some of the things tovia said about hebrew were so silly, Dr Brown totally exposed the giberrisih, rightly, as just embarrassing... I think you are right about the sneering, but 'd add that tovia is a complete showman. No wonder tovia has been running from debate with dr brown for decades. Their last debate was some time in the 90s.
@@boliussa , you are only hearing one side in this video - Dr. Brown's, so you are not in a position to claim that Tovia "got exposed badly." Tovia Singer is a Hebrew scholar (as is Michael Brown). Your statement that Brown knows Hebrew better than Tovia is misinformed and ignorant. In my opinion, Singer's argument is much stronger and cogent than Brown's. But I wouldn't be so ignorant as to say that either one is a better scholar than the other.
Paul Sandberg much stronger? Tovia refuses Debate Challenges from Brown why doesnt Tovia debate him? Because he knows Brown is right and he denies Jesus the messiah
Paul Sandberg Brown is older then Tovia and still messed him up in the debate and know Tovia always refuses or ignores Browns Debate order Oh come on
I Love to see Dr. Brown debate Rabbi Tovia Singer
I watch and enjoy both Dr. Brown and Rabbi Singer. Don't like the idea of it always being a "debate," like there's a winner or loser, but great "exhanges" to something bigger than all of us...That being said, enjoy your show...rr Normandy, Fr
i think it is unfair to criticise rabbi singer without him being able to respond. i tried to respond to a few unfair criticisms in an earlier comment, but the best way to do this is to have a live 1v1 debate and leave it to the observers to make their own conclusion.
@Mark Metternich The issue is who is telling the truth. You can hear everything rabbi singer says in his hundreds of videos, just search for the topic you are interested in. The problem with debates is that dr brown is an expert in debating technique and is also very charismatic, both are useful tools for convincing people you are right without necessarily being right. In a debate you can word something in a certain way to make it sound true and even oobvious, but only later when breaking down the idea then you see the flaw, but by that time it is too late as the damage is done and most people will generally not think too hard as they assume that the hashing out has been done completely by the debaters. Look up the concepts of rhetoric and sophistry to understand these ideas better. However there WAS a more controlled debate which bypasses these problems by a different rabbi and dr brown where they made videos to eachother and this way there was ample time to expose the mistakes/deception being made. ua-cam.com/video/zbjxF5sKxxM/v-deo.html&ab_channel=JewsforJudaism this is just one of the videos, im sure you can search for a full playlist.
Thank you Dr.Mixhael
Well done Dr. Brown very kind and strong in the Lord sir
"24 They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be: that the scripture might be fulfilled, which saith, They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots. These things therefore the soldiers did."
(John 19:24)
Yes, psalms 22 is quoted in the new testament
Tovi is either incompetent or a liar or both. To teach with “authority” like this and lie or not know what he is talking about is grossly negligent at best. Also to run from civil discourse and debate with Dr Brown speaks volumes. It makes me lose respect for the guy. Stand up, have a healthy debate, be honest and see what happens. That would be respectable.
When I was a christian minister/ theologist non denominational, I researched Through the Original Hebrew Writings of Our Holy Sage Rabainu Moshe The Redeemer Deliverer Messiah and Found out that The christian/catholic Versions Were ALL Incorrect.
Carl Johnson.......say what? you were a minister, thank God for the sifting; and now you are in the shadows, looking from the outside in, and deceived.
I thank God he found you out, and removed you from a position of leading others astray.
it's good that we finally have a learned messianic Jew like Dr Brown to put those pompous rabbinic rabbis on the spot.... well done Dr Brown.
i wouldnt call him pompous, go to any yeshiva where we use this type of rhetoric in analysing the oral law (talmud,mishna etc.) it is just a style. it sounds more like you are projecting here.
@@Mindhumble he's not only pompous but he is brainwashed like all of them that go to these Godless( absence of the presence of God) places to try and learn about God.
@@MRFITTA projection (look it up)
@@Mindhumble 'brainwashed' go look that up.
pompous messianic self hating Jew, Brown, is just that...and totally misinformed.
Through Jesus, the law of God extended from the Old Covenant to the whole world.
It is the conquest of the world that makes the whole world subject to His own law.
I love it when Dr. Brown lectures MR Singer!
Even if you read it
“Like a lion, my hands my feet”
five verses down it reads
“Save me from the mouth of the lion.”
It still makes complete sense.
The Nahal Hever Fragment from the Dead Sea Scrolls does say "K-A-R-U" like you say, Dr. Brown. I find it to be a big argument in favor of the "gouged my arms and legs" translation.
On the other hand, I have trouble finding confirmation online that the 4Q88 fragment says "K-R-U". It would be helpful if someone would post or link to a photo of the 4Q88 fragment.
Unfortunately, this document, known as 4QPsf, becomes illegible at precisely this location in the text. The faded remnants of what may be כר (kr) are visible.
according to this Source :
"Dead Sea Scrolls, 4Q88 f1-2, 2:24-25, gives evidence that כרה was originally known by the scribes at Qumran. While the fragment is small and damaged, it has been transcribed by Ulrich’ as containing this line, כר[ו] ידי ורגלי
Eugene Ulrich, The Biblical Qumran Scrolls: Supplements to Vetus Testamentum, Vol. 134 (Brill, 2010), p. 634.
Anyway ,
Think that the reading " כארי" was absent in the original based on the parallism found in
Ps 22:12-13 [ 13-14] Ps 22:21
Ps 22:16 [17] Ps 22:20 [ 21]
David compared his enemies attack as of Bulls , Lion , Dogs in his complaints.
Interestingly he repeated the same animals in his Supplications , in a reversed way , a sort of " Chiasm".
Each animal finds its mate in the parallism !
In v12-13 [ 13-14 ] it has :
- Bulls
- Lion
in v21 it repeats them in a reversed way :
- Lion
- Wild oxen
in v16 [ 17 ] according to the Masoretic reading it has :
- Dogs
- Lion
in v20 [ 21] , we are expecting that both animals are mentioned in a reversed way like the other one above , surprisingly the" Lion " isn't mentioned but only Dog . instead of Lion it has SWORD :
- Sword ( Lion is expected to be mentioned in here if it would have been mentioned in the complaint)
- Dog.
Each animal has its couple :
Bulls wild oxen
Lion Lion
Lion < => Sword ???? ( Problem)
Dogs Dog.
However if we put :
They perforated Sword.
That works!
@@nashashbel6922 Great explanation!
@@rakovsky3901
But this כארו ( kaaru) they bore through or dig through ,..' , root : כרה ( karah) sounds bizarre to us ,may be due to the fact that we don't really know how it was once used in biblical time
Just like in Zefania 2:6 , where this same verb " כרה " karah is used ," כרת " in the context that duzn fit its meaning .
"Because Biblical Hebrew doesn't contain vowel markers, scholars can't be sure this is a unique word, a typo, or a strange usage of one of the other three forms of karah which typically mean "to dig," "to get by trade", and "banquet," none of which fits this context.
If it is a unique word, this is the only time it's used in all of antiquity.
The most common form of karah means "to dig," but here translators can't agree on whether it should mean "cottages" (ASV, KJV), "wells" (NIV), "camps" (NLT), "meadows" (ESV, ISV), "huts" (GNT), or "resting place" (DR)
www.thealmightyguru.com/Wiki/index.php?title=List_of_biblical_words_with_uncertain_meanings
Thank you Dr. Brown. Please do more videos exposing Tovia Singer for all the deceptive lies he spews from his mouth.
His words are like foul vomit to me as he blasphems our true Messiah the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ our King.
On Christ the solid Rock I stand.
Our risen Lord lives and is coming back soon for His bride.
I pray Tovia. Singer repents and falls at the Saviors feet in humility.
9:47 logical fallacy number one: “argument from silence” - the problem is, Singer is still wrong, Jesus cries out the opening line found in Psalm 22 while on the cross.
Singer is ALWAYS right...your homeboy, Brown , is ALWAYS wrong!
j w - impressive argument. You’ve obviously rebutted me....
@@ASKTruthApologetics i always try to impress...not that your argument is any more impressive or of substance.
j w - Have you read the gospels? If you have you’ll be familiar with the words of Jesus. “My God my God why have you forsaken Me”. You’ll notice they are exactly the same words used in the beginning of Psalm 22.
Read Psalm 22 in light of what just happened to Jesus when He is saying that and you’ll have to at least agree that Jesus fits the description of the Psalm.
I’ve actually done two videos over the topic- more geared towards Muslims but it might benefit you too. So there is my substance :)
ua-cam.com/video/phignUxOsrs/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/_-TXEBLZKPs/v-deo.html
Oh and I forgot, I wrote this article about it too:
www.evernote.com/shard/s518/sh/a4d18020-e211-4999-8e97-962f8f9d7a99/5b3c66041d4bc9130e5a1892de9f5fe9
j w - Have you read the gospels? If you have you’ll be familiar with the words of Jesus. “My God my God why have you forsaken Me”. You’ll notice they are exactly the same words used in the beginning of Psalm 22.
Read Psalm 22 in light of what just happened to Jesus when He is saying that and you’ll have to at least agree that Jesus fits the description of the Psalm.
I’ve actually done two videos over the topic- more geared towards Muslims but it might benefit you too. So there is my substance :)
ua-cam.com/video/phignUxOsrs/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/_-TXEBLZKPs/v-deo.html
Oh and I forgot, I wrote this article about it too:
www.evernote.com/shard/s518/sh/a4d18020-e211-4999-8e97-962f8f9d7a99/5b3c66041d4bc9130e5a1892de9f5fe9
Psalm 22
Here we find David in the greatest affliction. Hence the famous exclamation, which was afterward repeated by the Christian Savior in a similar situation: Eli, eli, lama sabachthani? My El, my El, why hast thou forsaken me? why dost not thou help me? why so far from the words of my roaring? Thus, David addressed the winter (El), but not for help, because, as he well knew, he might have cried both night and day, as he said he did, to the Elohim, who were far distant from him, without obtaining help until spring came - " thou hearest not." Hence, he prayed to Elohim prospectively, believing that when he could make them hear, help or summer would come. But while praising the Holy One of Israel (summer Sun), his mind suddenly reverted to his low condition, whence he exclaimed: "But I am a worm and not a man;" thus happily comparing his situation (that of the Sun in winter) to a worm in its chrysalid state during the winter. " He rolled on the Lord " (marginal reading), i.e., the Sun rolled through the heavens as we daily see it, and trusted that the Lord would at length bring him into the summer hemisphere.
"Thou art he that took me out of the womb (of winter), and didst make me hope when I was upon my mother's breasts (shadi, the word so frequently translated Almighty). David, Christ, Ganymede (Joy-promoter), and many other Gods, were born at the winter solstice, where they were all, David among them, placed upon their mother’s lap. Hence David (vs. 10) says, "Thou art my God (my El) from my mother's belly" -mid-winter. Don't go off, for trouble is near, and there is none to help (vs. 11). Many strong bulls of Bashan have compassed me around. The dogs (Canis major and minor) have beset me (are come around opposite me): I am poured out like water, my strength is dried up, and I can count my bones (ribs). They part my garments among them, and cast lots (gamble, as the "bulls and bears" still do) upon my vesture (the crops).
But, O my Lord, O my strength, haste thee to help me! My only one, deliver me from the dog, save me from the Lion's mouth (Leo roars as a lion), for thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns (the constellation Taurus). Then, Oh, then, will I praise thee in the midst of the congregation (the seven summer months), and show a line crop! Yes, then will I praise thee, and the meek (the people in winter) shall eat and be satisfied - filled.
Bashan aka House of the Sun = "Summer," = spring equinox (River Jordan) to the autumn equinox (River Euphratess).
Just ask Tovia this question why would God allow the temple to be destroyed after Jesus ministry on earth and why God did not allow for it to be rebuilt?... ask yourself! Just think deep about it! Ask him that!
Yeah and why has there been no prophet for 2000 years.
Tovia Singer is looking for a man of sin to be his "messiah". Only God Himself can make an end of sin and bring peace.
Nowhere do the prophets say the Messiah will be perfectly free of sin. The Messiah will be a human being, not G-d.
@@Qrayon Messiah is the seed of the woman (born without a man of sin). The Father of Messiah is God so Messiah is the first and the last Adam. Adam sinned and Messiah did not. Messiah can die for Adam be cause He is Adam without sin. Remember that all prophecy of Messiah is based on the very first prophecy of Messiah. Micah 5 2 says that a Ruler (King) from the days of forever will be born in Bethlehem. Daniel says all nations will serve the Son of Man who will also make an end of sin.
@@Qrayon you don't know what the prophets say, ask God to lift the scales from your eyes and the dark stronghold/s over you, then the light of the gospel can penetrate your heart
@@MRFITTA Ask G-d to lift the scale from YOUR eyes. According to prophecy, the Messiah will bring permanent world peace. The swords will be beat into plowshares. There will be no more war. Every living person will know G-d. The lion will lie down with the lamb. There will no longer be any desire to commit crimes or do any other evil. All the righteous since the beginning of the world will be resurrected. The Holy temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem.
Did any of that happen when J.C. came along? No! Instead we got thousands of years of war after war after war, some of it in the name of Jesus! Does everyone know G-d? You know the answer is no, not even close!
None of that has happened, because the true Messiah has not come yet.
@@Qrayon can you show the scriptures you are using to put forward your idea that Jesus would have to achieve all the prophets spoke of in one time frame......scriptures not your theory or thoughts.
Love Sam!
Remember there Were Two kingdoms North & South That Were Dispersed. Kingdom of Yahudah were Brought Back As Promised. In Yeshyahu, Jeremiah,Ezekiel,etc.
That's ok, tell Rabbi Singer that he is fulfilling Bible prophecy that the Messiah would be a light to the Gentiles. We take Jesus, so you are doing exactly what the Bible said. Does he read the Bible? Does he not know that Japheth would dwell in the tents of Shem as Noah prophesied? We have fulfilled that as well.
I don't think Rabbi Singer knows his own scriptures.
According to Bible prophecy Israel is meant to be a light unto the nations, and will be, especially in the messianic age. The Messiah will be their leader.
@@Qrayon Yes, but who has been the light to the Gentiles for the last 2,000 years?
@@moorek1967 It was supposed to be the Jews, but that's what will happen in the not-too-distant future, as we are now in the end times. (Light unto the Nations = Light unto the Gentiles. How? The Hebrew word for "nations" is the same as the Hebrew word for "Gentiles".)
moorek1967, "gentiles" is a word that DOES NOT EXISTS IN HEBREW, NOR DOES IT APPEAR IN HEBREW SCRIPTURES. Wherever you read "gentiles" in your "Old Testament", the original word in Hebrew text reads "goyim", which means "NATIONS".
And for the past 3,500 years Israel has been the light to the NATIONS, but the NATIONS like the darkness! What can we do?? Just teach!!!
What’s insane is... if you took what was said about Yeshua from the historians. It would give the same account as the four gospels. Who can deny that...
Your statement is not based on historical evidence or any factual information that is actually available based on the truth.
Dr. Brown rocks😎
Rocks in his head.
@@Qrayon*_ARE YOU CALLING GOD A LIAR? ACCORDING TO TORAH AND YOUR RABBIS IN YOUR TALMUD, MESSIAH ALREADY CAME THE FIRST TIME!_*
Genesis 49:10
Targum Onkelos:
He who exercised dominion shall not pass away from the house of Judah, nor the scribe from his children’s children forever, until Messiah shall come. Whose is the kingdom, and whom the peoples shall obey.[1]
Targum Palestine:
Kings shall not cease, nor rulers from the house of Judah, nor sopherim teaching the law from his seed, till the time that King Messiah shall come, who will arise from Judah.[2]
Fragmentary Targum:
King shall not cease from the house of Judah, nor scribes who teach the Torah from his children’s children, until the time of the coming of the King Messiah, to whom belongs the Kingdom, and to whom all dominions of the earth shall become subservient.[3]
Rashi:
until Shiloh comes [this refers to] the King Messiah, to whom the kingdom belongs,[4]
Sanhedrin 98b:
What is his [the Messiah’s] name? - The School of R. Shila said: His name is Shiloh, for it is written, until Shiloh come.”[5]
Midrash Mishle:
Rav Huna says “The Messiah is called by seven names and they are Yinnon, Tzidqenu [‘Our Justice’], Tzemach [‘Shoot’], Menahem [‘Comforter’], David, Shiloh, Elijah.”[6]
Yalkut Shim. Ber.:
‘Judah is a young lion.’ That is Messiah the Son of David.[7]
Midrash Rabbah:
The rulership abideth with the tribe of Judah until the arrival of Shiloh i.e. Messiah.[8]
Midrash Rabbah - Genesis:
THE SCEPTRE [STAFF] SHALL NOT DEPRT FROM JUDAH alludes to the Messiah, son of David, who will chastise the State with a staff, as it says, Thou shalt break them with a rod [staff[ of iron (Ps. II, 9).[9]
Midrash Rabbah - Lamentations:
The school of R. Shila said: The Messiah’s name is ‘Shiloh,’ as it is stated, Until Shiloh come (Gen. XLIX, 10), where the word is spelt Shlh.[15]
*SANHEDRIN* :
Since👉 *_the Sanhedrin no longer had jurisdiction over capital offenses_* 👈, there is no practical utility in this ruling, which can become effective only in the days of the Messiah.
Midrash Rabbah, Genesis XCIX, 8-9:
… UNTIL SHILOH COMETH: he to whom kingship belongs (shelo).
(Rather than transliterating into English “Shilo” as though it were a proper name, the Rabbis translated the exact meaning of “Shilo’ as “to whom it belongs/pertains.”)[18]
Targum Jonathan:
Kings shall not cease, nor rulers, from the house of Jehuda, nor sopherim teaching the law from his seed, till the time the King, the Meshiah, shall come, the youngest of his sons; and on account of him shall the peoples flow together. How beauteous is the King, and Meshiah who will arise from the house of Jehuda![19]
*JERUSALEM TALMUD SANHEDRIN 41a* - _THE SCEPTER DEPARTED_
👉 _"a little more than forty years before the destruction of the Temple, the power of pronouncing capital sentences was taken away from the Jews*_ .👈[20]
Raymond Martin, Pugio Fidei, 872; Leipsic Edition:
Rabbi Rachmon says, “ *_When the members of the Sanhedrin found themselves deprived of their right over life and death_* , a general consternation took possession of them; they covered their heads with ashes, and their bodies with sackcloth, exclaiming: ‘ 👉 *_Woe to us, for the scepter has departed from Judah, and the Messiah has not come!_* 👈’
*_MESSIAH CAME BUT THEY REJECTED HIM_*
*_TOVIA GOES AGAINST HIS OWN TALMUD RABBIS_* 😂😂😂
@@Qrayon*_THOSE WHO FOLLOW TOVIA HAVE ROCKS IN THEIR HEADS LOL_*
@@ChristianGirlwhoLovesJesus Don't just follow Tovia. Look up the chapters and verses that he cites, and see for yourself that he speaks the truth.
Singer professes is to know what orthodox Christianity teaches when he is not even close at times. Singer himself claims that Christians take scripture out of its historical context. The Hebrew Bible is riddled with many many cases of that. Many of the prophets drew from the Torah and completely lifted the text from the Torah and put it is their messages. Where did Ezra 9:10-12? Where did that come from? Where did Amos 2:7 come from? Where did Amos 2:8 come from? Where did Amos 2:12 comes from? There are many more in Amos.
There is not piece piece of evidence for a quote or anything in the Hebrew Bible that quotes of alludes to the Oral Torah? Singer has said they would not have known what to do without the Oral Torah. So if it is so clear in the Oral Torah then why such disagreement in the Misnah? Accordinhg to Gittin 9:10 what is correct reason why a man may get divorced. Then compare what the three rabbis mention to what the Torah teaches. Jesus taught what God wanted from the beginning but the Jews put in the Mishna what they claim God wanted from the beginning. God does not give three distinctly different interpretations of what he said. Jesus told the Pharisees that they did not know the scriptures nor the power of God.
6:00 that is tentative, it is not clear he is referring to the time mentioned in daniel. but i dont thing that was the main argument of rabbi singer, anyway. 16:30 I dont think Rabbi Singer wasnt referring to manuscripts, as these were generally buried (as they still are today) due to mistakes in them, he is referring to the masoretic texts which are in use around the world, by different sects of jews who have their own masoret "transmission of knowledge of torah from generation to the next" this includes yemenites who have been separated from the rest of the jewish diaspora since BEFORE jesus, and still all accepted texts are the same. to bring a few buried texts is not reasonable as there is only one original and it is much more likely to be the one received by all the bearers of the torah around the world, and not some isolated texts which are littered with mistakes.
20:20 that is clearly not what rabbi singer meant as you correctly point out, that is obvious that many roots have a second letter aleph. he meant this specific root which is "caf resh hey" which means to dig (your interpeting and pierce, which anyway is a stretch to interpret dig as pierce, as there are other words which mean pierce such as root "kuf bet hey" where c r h is exclusively referring to diggning holes in the ground and im not sure why rabbi singer didnt mention this point), and this root clearly has defined 3 letters and none of them is an aleph.
Mindhumble.....listen, whatever Singer believes or doesn't; one thing is for sure, he is an enemy of the people of God and misleading and deceiving them.
@@MRFITTA The implication of your statement is that since Singer is an enemy of your belief system, it is perfectly acceptable to misquote him and distort his words because it's for the greater good. If this is not your implication, please correct me.
@@tex959 God has one truth, and he has outlined it in the pages of the holy bible, beginning with Genesis, and it ends with the book of Revelation. its not 'my belief system' but his truth...
Those who are sons of God, have come into relationship with him through faith in his Son, and we are from both Jew and Gentile people.
He gives his children born by his Spirit his own indwelling presence which testifies to the truth, HIS TRUTH, not mans idealogy, theory or philosophy.
Rabbi Singer, and all unbelievers alike either intentonally or in their ignorance( and pride) seem to think they know better, and so attempt to take on God, coming with their own intelligence and are only contradicting what he has laid out through Moses, the prophets, the psalms and the apostles writings/teachings found in the gospels and epistles
And its not acceptable to lie( which is basically what it is to distort and misquote) against anyone just because we want the truth to be known - in direct answer to your question.
Where has Rabbi Singer been misquoted, and his words distorted in this vid?
@@MRFITTA
You: "Where has Rabbi Singer been misquoted, and his words distorted"
-------- First, as Mindhumble points out in his comment @11:50 Rabbi Singer says, "Every single Bible in the whole world says the same word in Hebrew. not one Bible ever found said, "they pierced." Dr. Brown tries to imply that the Rabbi is saying that there is not one manuscript ever found with the phrase "they pierced." Dr. Brown continues to say @13:00 that there are "thousands of Masoretic manuscripts with all kinds of variations." The Rabbi is not referring to a dozen out of thousands of manuscripts, He was referring to "every Bible" uses the same word in Hebrew. Dr. Brown makes a big deal about this as if the Rabbi is being deceptive but I think Dr. Brown is misquoting him.
2nd, referencing what Mindhumble says about the video @20:20 when he says, " that is clearly not what rabbi singer meant as you correctly point out, that is obvious that many roots have a second letter aleph. he meant this specific root which is "caf resh hey" which means to dig".. Mindhumble explains further why the Rabbi is being misquoted.
Dr. Brown is smart enough to know what The Rabbi is saying.
@@tex959 thats why my initial comment is 100% valid. At end of it all, when both parties have expressed their vierw, we must remain in the truth, Dr Brown is, Rabbi Singer isnt.
Its irrelevant whether he 'wins' the debate, or scores brownie points, his overall aim is to disprove who Jesus is, and demolish the bible's message of salvation and redemption being possible only in his name.
This is the reason God sent his Son - to save the world, the Jew first, and then the Gentile.
Singer is an enemy of this, as his main mission is to 'thwart' ( a miserable fail ) people from among Israel from realising this.
What is funny is both translations seem to complement each other. If it didn't have huge implications it seems like it would just say "like a lion, they pierce (or dig at) my hands and feet.
The Abomination of Desolation has Already Happened
Carl Johnson yes and know. Up to a point it finds fulfillment with Antiochus Epiphanies. It find another fulfillment in 70 A.D. but it finds a final fulfillment when a third temple is erected
dr brown our national treasure
thank you dr brown, please , please, get him ,(Tovar) to debate you. God bless you.---d
This is a valid statement by the Rabbi, i have seen this video many times , the new testament is a sham , and will never hold up to the teachings of the Torah.
Written by Uri Yosef, Psalms 22 - "Nailing" An Alleged Crucifixion Scenario Lesson notes
fragments containing Psalms 22:17[16] were discovered among the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS). In the first fragment, which was found at Qumran (4QPs-f; known as the Qumran MS, the word in question is not preserved.
In the second fragment, found at Nahal Hever (HHev/Se 4 (Ps); known as the Bar Kochba MS, the word is preserved.
The fragment HHev/Se 4 (Ps) shows the Hebrew letters (kaf), (aleph), (resh), and what appears to be a somewhat elongated letter (yod), which some perceive to be the letter (vav).[3] Thus, the reading of this word would be either (ka'ari) or (ka'aru), respectively.
Although the latter of these two renditions of the term has been the focus of much controversy and discussion, it is a fact that no root verb exists which contains the letter (aleph) in it, conjugated in this fashion (3rd-person, plural masculine gender, past tense), with the meaning of they pierced, as rendered in most Christian translations.
Without the letter (aleph), and using, for the moment, the argument that the last letter [the elongated (yod)] is a (vav), the word would be (karu), for which the Hebrew root verb is (karah), [to] dig [in dirt], such as digging a ditch (e.g., Ps 57:7). In other words, (karu) has the meaning [they] dug [in dirt]. This verb is never used in the context of piercing, either literally or metaphorically, in any of its 15 applications in the Hebrew Bible.
What could cause such a variation between the two terms (ka'ari) and (ka'aru), i.e., with an elongated letter (yod) that resembles the letter (vav)? Since the word (ka'aru) does not exist in the Hebrew language, the most plausible explanation is that such discrepancy is simply a case of scribal variation (or error).
The word in Psalm 22 is ka'ari (lion) not karu (which means "to dig" BTW, as in digging a ditch, not pierce).
The Dead Sea Scroll version of the Psalm has kaari, but some Xians think it is kaaru because the yod is longer than normal and can be mistaken for a vav.
But here lies the problem: kaaru is NOT a word. There is no such word in Hebrew ancient or modern. Karu is a word -- but that isn't what is in the Dead Sea Scrolls or in any other Hebrew copy of the Psalm.
Ka'aru is not a word but karu IS a word. Some Xians try and say that the word in Psalm 22 should be karu. The only problem is that karu doesn't mean "pierced" either. It means to dig". If you use its cognate 3rd person plural masculine gender "KARU" it translates to they dug. But note that kara or karu do not us the letter "aleph".
Kaf-resh-vav is a word. Kaf-ALEPH-resh-vav is not a word. It is as if someone came upon dutg in English and wants to say it is dug.
BTW the KJV translates ka'ari correctly in other places that arent proof texts misquoted by the GT.
Numbers 23:24 (veka'ari), and I as a young lion
Numbers 24:9 (ka'ari), like a lion
Isaiah 38:13 (ka'ari), like a lion
Ezekiel 22:25 (ka'ari), like a lion
So the KJV translators correctly translated it until they got to Psalms 22:17[16] and suddenly the KJV doesn't know what it means and translates it as "they pierced."
One more little bit of Hebrew grammar. If the word really was "pierced," (which we've proven it is not) the sentence would have an "et" to identify the direct object which would be
Wrong, the very Septuagint, written hundreds of years before Jesus, had the word ka´aru and it translated to the greek word "pierce" or "make a hole".
@@dibarra5461
No such word and no Septuagint with Psalms .
@@beng2729 Yes, it is. Look for it yourself. The Septuagint translation clearly says "oruxsan"
Which in case you don't know. It means "to dig or pierce"
@@dibarra5461
There exists no Septuagint from the biblical era that contains Psalms. So please keep your modern Christian distortions of theology to yourself.
@@beng2729 Check it yourself, so many translations existed before the masoteric texts that were the ones who changed the word to "ka'ari". Before the 7th century, nobody argued that the word said "ka'aru". You're the one being stubborn.
Basically Tovia has been known to lie
This was helpful, thanks.
Dr brown, could you do a video on the reliability of the septuagent sometime, thanks.
St. Luke's Guild * The current "Septuagint" bears no resemblance to the original that was translated in no longer ago than 285 B.C.E.
@@chaishalom8701 the dead sea scrolls agrees with the Septuagint in many places like Deuteronomy 32:8, so you're not entirely correct.
@@Christian_Maoist. * Does the 'Christian "New Testament" versions agree with the "Dead Sea Scrolls"?
@@Christian_Maoist. * You are not entirely correct.
@@chaishalom8701 Not the point that was being made. Cope more, Jew
Out Prophets said No Such Thing As We Would Reject Our True Jewish Messiah king Rabainu, No Messiah has Appeared Yet.
Carl Johnson He has mate, he came and went, and will return to judge - and it won't be pleasant for unbelievers such as yourself if you die in sin - under the wrath of God.
You’re wrong. You’re reaching hard for this. The entire book of Isaiah is about the nation of Israel. Don’t you think that whoever wrote up the New Testament would purposely make references to Tanakh where it could be about Jesus? Don’t you think that the New Testament writers would purposely have their messiah quoting verses that could be about him? Listen...debate me if you want. I’m all for it. When you take a single verse or book out of context you can make it say whatever you want. Also, I haven’t heard of you before this day. But...Tanakh does not talk about the messiah having to atone for sins and be a human sacrifice. I want you to address every passage where God states that he isn’t a man. Also, let’s talk about the verses where he states that there are no other Gods but him. He is the only one, it’s all over Tanakh. How can you have so much knowledge but yet lack understanding? Do you really believe that God is three in one? Or, he would condone human cannibalism rituals? The eating of the body and drinking of the blood? Let’s also take note that the entire New Testament was written in Greek, not Hebrew. Let’s also take note that the Greko-Roman world loved polytheism. The Persians loved the good vs evil mythology. You sir are deceived and you’re deceiving others. I could twist any scripture I wanted to fit my agenda. That’s pretty easy and pastors do it every Sunday. Which by the way isn’t the real day we are supposed to keep Holy. Touch on that as well for me. I am very well versed. Please explain to your viewers how the entire New Testament is a pagan deity system. And most of it was written by a man named Paul. Not God. Just a bunch of letters where Paul states these things are his own opinions not commandments from God. We don’t even know who wrote the gospels, let’s alone if any information is correct in them. Also, a virgin birth? A lot of Roman leaders were said to be born of a virgin in ancient times. These are fairy tales for gentiles and a way to make money and control the world with a one world religion. Everyone in the Protestant movement all keep a lot of traditions from the Roman Catholic Church. Catholic means universal. Also, let’s tough on the fact that the anti-christ is exactly the same as the real Jewish messiah. Minus the voodoo powers from the fictional version of the devil. I’m sure you know what I’m speaking about. Let’s debate great one.
Dylan Broady, evangelicals like Dr Brown wrench verses from the Hebrew scriptures (Tenakh) out of context in order to shoehorn Jesus into them, where he clearly does not belong.
@@Yce_Take , listen friend, I would far rather accept prophet Isaiah's OWN definition of who the "servant", is in preference to your indocteinated opinion. Isaiah - the man who actually wrote the book! - tells us who the servant is over a dozen times, and his definition is invariable. Moreover, the "servant" is not associated with the term "messiah" in his book, and never called that. So even if you think Isaiah suffered a brain infarct when he wrote chapter 53, forgetting his previous definition, it would still not prove Jesus.
@@Yce_Take , bizarrely you reply: "No you won't." No I won't WHAT??
Where does Isaiah 49 tell us that God's righteous servant is messiah? Isaiah 49:3 once again spells out who the servant is (in case we needed reminding. You obviously do! ):
"He said to me you are my servant, ISRAEL, in whom I will display my splendour."
The obedient servant is the remnant of Israel saved from exile and brought back to Israel to fulfil God's plans for Israel. The servant is a plurality but metaphorized as a man (elsewhere in sccripture, Israel is metaphorized as "daugher of Zion", when the nation is treated as a "she").
Note that Jesus did not "bring back Judah to himself", nor did Jesus "gather Israel to himself" (verse 5).The return of the Jews from exile to Israel was the start of this fulfillment. For Jesus, it would be a completely failed prophecy. Verse 7 continues:
"Kings will see you and rise up, pricnes will see and bow down, because of the LORD who is faithful, the Holy One of Israel who has chosen you."
Kings or princes did not venerate Jesus! On the contrary, they bound and executed him! And God would not say to Himself, and neither would He need to, that He had "chosen you". If Jesus is God, why would God have to tell him, and how could God choose himself? Jesus would not even need to be "chosen" if he is God!
Isaiah chapters 48-49 focus on the redeemed remnant of Israel, brought back to Israel. THE SERVANT IS NOT CALLED MESSIAH.
@@Yce_Take , and here's what the entire book of Isaiah says about the remnant of Jews saved from exile and returned to Israel to fulfill God's redemptive plan. The righteous remnant is all over the book of Isaiah. Indeed it the major theme:
Isaiah 51:11: "The radeemed of the LORD returns; they will enter Zion with singing, everlasting joy will crown their heads, Gladness and joy will carry them, and sorrow and sighing pass away."
Isaiah 60:1: "Arise, shine for your light has come, and the glory of the LORD rises upon you...Nations will come to your light, and kings to the brightness of your dawn...All assemble and come to you, your sons come from afar, your daughters carried on your arm.. ." IT'S ALL ABOUT THE REMNANT, WHO IS THE SERVANT, RETURNING FROM EXILE.
Isaiah 61:3: "THEY will be called oaks of righteousness, the planting of the LORD, for the display of his splendour.. They will rebuild the ancient ruins and restore the places long devastated...Instead of their shame, my people will receive a double portion, and instead of disgrace, they will rejoice in their inheritance."
Every following chapter is all about that remnant who will grow and prosper and be blessed by God.
This precious remnant of Jews is the servant of Isaiah chapter 53. The servant is not a messiah, not an individual, and above all has nothing to do with Jesus. "Servant" and "messiah" are not associated or linked at all.
@@Yce_Take , Zion is a name for Jerusalem. Even in your pagan book of Revelation the kingdom of God descends from heaven down to earth - to Jerusalem.
The kingdom of God is not some ethereal place in the sky, but is to come upon the earth, and even the NT teaches this (Rev. 21:3: "Now the dwelling place of God is with men, and He will live with them"). The rulership of earth will be from Zion/Jerusalem. The remnant of Jews is led back to Jerusalem, to fulfill prophecy. The kingdom of God is a physical reality on earth that will come to fruition. This physical reality is described in Isaiah chapter 65 (largely plagiarised by the NT book of the Revelation), in which God rejoices over Jerusalem And renews it, when there will be no more weeping, and old men will live out their years to the full (verse 20). So it is a physical reality located on earth blessed by the presence of God. Jesus fulfilled no messianic prophecy, and didn't even give a foretaste of the peace to come.
WHO ARE THE OAKS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS IN ISAIAH 61:3? THEY REBUILD THE DEVASTATED CITIES AND WALLS. Instead of their shame (their exile and defeat), they receive a double portion, and instead of disgrace, they will rejoice in their inheritance (verse 7). The context doesn't fit Christians, and neither does the historical backdrop described. The only way that Christians can shoehorn Jesus into the Tenakh is by wrenching verses away from their context. There is nothing in the entire Tenakh - not a single verse - that prophesies or foresees Jesus.
You cited Isaiah 65:15: _You will leave your name to my chosen ones as a curse...but to his servants he will give another name._
This other name is revealed in Isaiah 62:2 & 4 (normally kept in the Hebrew in most versions) - see below - which you missed. The name is not "Christian" or indicative of Christian. "Christians" would be out of context and moreover entirely unnecessary to presume. The verse means that the rebellious Israelites (who are not God's servants) will be used in contempt as an example when curses are uttered by the obedient Jews, who are God's elect. They are the remnant. The remnant will be given a second (or other) name to describe them (_not_ a replacement name). This name, revealed in Isaiah 62:4, is "hephzibah" (meaning "I delight in her"), and their land will be called "beulah" (meaning "married"). So the LORDtakes back Israel as his wife again, rejoicing in her. We see this same theme of God re-marrying Israel and His eternal love for her expressed in Isaiah 54: 6-10:
" ISRAEL, you are like a young wife,
deserted by her husband and deeply distressed.
But the Lord calls you back to him and says:
7 “For one brief moment I left you;
with deep love I will take you back.
8 I turned away angry for only a moment,
but I will show you my love forever.”
So says the Lord who saves you.
9 “In the time of Noah I promised
never again to flood the earth.
Now I promise not to be angry with you again;
I will not reprimand or punish you.
10 The mountains and hills may crumble,
_but my love for you will never end;_
I will keep forever my promise of peace.”
So says the Lord who loves you.
So we can see that God renews Israel as a people, starting from the returned remnant.
YOU HAVE ENTIRELY MISUNDERSTOOD ISAIAH 65:15, AND YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE TENAKH IS TOO FEABLE TO ENABLE YOU TO MAKE THE CONNECTIONS WITH OTHER VERSES CLOSE BY, WHICH WOULD EXPLAIN THE VERSE YOU CITED.
YOU ARE LIKE A BLINKERED HORSE, BUT _WILLFULLY_ BLINKERED, BECAUSE THE REALITY INTIMIDATES YOU, SO YOU HIDE FROM IT. YOU CAN'T FACE IT.
YOU HAVE NO VALOUR, NO DECENCY, NO HONOUR.
At about 10:00 in, no, no one is lying, there's a greater problem.
2 Corinthians 3:14-16 - But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ. But to this day whenever Moses is read, a veil lies over their heart; but whenever a person turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away.
Dr. Brown is either lying or ignorant.
Ka'ari (כארי) has an alef because it is the first consonant of the root word (ארי). The כis a prefix.
Karu (כרו) does not have an alef. It comes from karah (כרה). The ו is a suffix.
What do you mean "if the word for dig appears elsewhere without the alef"? Not a single instance of the particular word in the Tanach (Jeremiah 18:20, 18:22, Psalms 57:7, 119:85) has an alef. The word does not havean alef. There is no "elsewhere", we are talking about the actual instances in the Tanach of this word. And in none of those is there an alef.
A Jewish man makes the most spirited and erudite defenses of the faith while "our own scholars" are busy undermining and countersignaling it.
"Ka'aru" (with an aleph) was an archaic spelling form of "karu".
"Ka'aru" = "karu".
Before the invention of vowel pointing by the Masoretes Hebrew spelling was much less consistent, with certain consonants being used to show vowel sounds. The oldest Hebrew scrolls contain many different spelling variations for the same words.
Also the scholar Eugene Ulrich says in Psalm 22 in the Dead Sea Scrolls Bible that the Nahal Hever scroll says "pierced my hands and feet" as translated from "ka'aru".
Rabbi Tovia is good when talking with the unlearned, but he cannot handle someone who has studied the WORD seriously.
Please, give us all a break... it is very amateurish for anyone to create a story based on prophecies made centuries earlier... ANYBODY could create a "fulfillment story" after the event had happened. My 6 year-old niece can come up with much better answers than your arguments, Mr. Brown.
Whatever scholars said about their own opinion is completely irrelevant. What truly matters is the collection of original texts of the Hebrew Bible and the Jewish oral traditions. Without the oral law of the Jews, NONE after Jesus period would know even how to pronounce the words... all the translations of the Bible we see today rely FULLY on the oral tradition of the Jews.
In Hebrew the verb "to be" is not written in the sentence (e.g. "Ani Patrick" would be translated literally into English as "I Patrick", instead of the correct way "I am Patrick"; or the question "Mi atah?", which would be translated literally as "Who you?" instead of the correct way "Who are you?"). Biblically we see this grammatical construction everywhere (e.g. "Tihyu kadoshim ki ani Kadosh", which literally would translate into English as "You shall be holy because I Holy", instead of the correct way "You shall be holy because I AM Holy"). So, your argument that Psalm 22 does not have the verb "to be" in "they ARE at my hand and my feet" is very, very incorrect as a support to your crooked theory that King David was prophesying about the death of JC.
Besides that, David Hamelech wrote several passages using comparisons with a lion or lions to talk about his own enemies who aimed to destroy him. Even in this very Psalm 22, on the verse 14, David hamelech mentions about the "roaring lion" with the mouth open toward him... read Psalm 7:2, Psalm 10:9, etc.
Hearing your arguments astonishes me for the level of misinformation and lack of knowledge in the Hebrew Scriptures that you display in your speech. Not to mention that you give more credit to scholars opinions than you'd give to the Word of G-d. To me it sounds like you are deliberately ignoring the Words of G-d to teach people idolatry and to go astray from the ways of the L-RD.
Who cares about what the medieval scholars think of corrupted texts???
The Dead Sea scroll only proves that the Tanakh was kept intact by the Jewish people throughout at least 1100 years until that Dead Sea scroll was probably written. And still, the Jews before Jesus already read Psalm 22:17 exactly "Like a lion", as we still read it today... and this is what really matters. If one scribe made a mistake over one letter while producing the Dead Sea scroll (or not) is irrelevant. The book of Psalms is filled with comparisons of the enemies of king David to the "lion" or "lions".
Why would you choose to argue over a clear point ("LIKE A LION") to prove your belief in Jesus ("THEY PIERCED"). Besides, NOWHERE in the Hebrew Scriptures is found any sentence telling anyone to BELIEVE AND WORSHIP the Messiah. Indeed, the word "mashiach" (messiah) appears in the Hebrew Bible 38 times, most of them in the book of Vaykrah (Leviticus), and none of them referring to the Jewish Messiah of end of times. The word "messiah" in the Hebrew Bible means "ANOINTEND" with oil, and nothing else... usually those anointed people were kings, prophets and high priests.
Accept that Jesus is not on the Hebrew Scriptures and swallow your pride, Mr. Brown.
The prophet Yeshayahu (Isaiah) made a prophecy about the name of King Cyrus of Persia at least 150 years before King Cyrus existed. How would Isaiah know the name of Cyrus at least 100 years before Cyrus was born??
Isaiah knew because that was a TRUE prophecy from G-D.
In this same line of thought, why don't you ask yourself why Jesus name and all the things he supposedly would have accomplished later on was NEVER mentioned in the Hebrew Scriptures???
Would G-D have forgotten about Jesus (who would be G-d Himself, according to Christians) ?? If Jesus is G-d in the flesh, wouldn't have been wise of G-d to tell Moises and the entire nation of Israel at the Sinai that He would come later on and live in a human body and would adopt a name of Jesus, the same way that G-D revealed to Isaiah the name of King Cyrus 150 years before King Cyrus existed???
Please, give me a break with your Paul's pagan theology.
By the way, the 70 weeks of Daniel are not 70 weeks, but they are 70 weeks of years (which can be read in Leviticus 25), where each day of the week is equal to 1 year. So, 70 weeks equals 70 x 7 (days, or in this case, years), which totals 490 years. This 70 weeks period was explicitly broken down into 7 weeks, 62 weeks and 1 week, explained below:
First 7 weeks of years: from the first "word out" to give permission to the Jews to return from Babylon to Jerusalem to rebuilt it until the coming of an anointed prince (King Cyrus, who actually allowed the Jews to return from their captivity - please see Isaiah 45:1).
62 weeks of years: the city of Jerusalem and the Temple would be rebuilt during this period, but in troubles times (domination of the Persians, the Greeks, and then the Romans).
Last week of years: ANOTHER anointed person, most likely the king of Israel at that time (as all the legitimate kings of Israel were anointed), or the High Priest (also anointed) of the Sanhedrin would be "CUT OFF" and eliminated. And ONLY AFTER THAT the people of a prince (Roman Empire) would come and destroy the city and the Temple (the second Temple, that was destroyed in the year 70 C.E.)
Be aware that every time that the Hebrew Bible mentions the words "CUT OFF", is to refer to a wicked person. And you must know that in the beginning of the first century of Common Era, both the High Priest in the Sanhedrin (a Saducee), as well as the Ruler over Jerusalem were in alliance with the Emperor of Rome (Vespasian). They were wicked because they were allied with Romans.
But if you go to Daniel 9:24, it says clearly that "70 weeks ARE DECREED upon thy people and thy holy city", and this is a DECREE of G-D. And during this period the people had the opportunity to finish transgression, end sin, repent, etc. ONLY AFTER THAT DECREED PERIOD (70 weeks of years) THE MASHIACH COULD COME, IF THE PEOPLE ISRAEL HAD DONE WHAT THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO DO... (but they didn't... for instance, sin and transgression was not finished during the 70 weeks period, actually it hasn't finished until today).
Daniel 9
24 Seventy weeks are decreed upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sin, and to forgive iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal vision and prophet, and to anoint the most holy place.
If any conclusion one can take from Daniel 9 is this one: THE JEWISH MESSIAH ONLY COULD COME AFTER THE PERIOD OF 70 WEEKS DECREED BY G-D UPON THE PEOPLE AND JERUSALEM, WHICH IS EXACTLY AFTER THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE AND THE CITY BY THE ROMANS IN THE YEAR 70 C.E.
INDEED, THIS PROPHECY OF DANIEL 9 PROVES THE EXACT POINT THAT JESUS IS NOT THE JEWISH MESSIAH, as supposedly he would have lived and died at least 35 years BEFORE DE DESTRUCTION OF THE SECOND TEMPLE.
May Hashem remove the scales that are over Christians' eyes, so they can look and see, and grab the Tzit-tzit of the garment of a Jew and say to him: "LET US GO WITH YOU, FOR WE KNOW THAT G-D IS WITH YOU". (Read Zecharyah).
Just to let you know that the period between the destruction of the first Temple and the construction of the Second Temple was 70 years (period when Israel was exiled in Babylon), and the second Temple stood for 420 years exactly. 70 years + 420 years = 490 years, which is exactly the 70 weeks of years (70 x 7 = 490 years) DECREED upon Israel to finished transgression. No redemption could happen before the decreed period, and therefore, NO MESSIAH COULD COME BEFORE THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SECOND TEMPLE. Thus, Jesus WAS NOT the Jewish Messiah.
Shalom, shalom!
Thank very very much for this good answear to mr. Brown . John
Salutioan Salut, you're very welcome. I've been nicely surprised with the impressive amount of people who are finally searching for the truth and understanding that Christianity is the path to idolatry that was built upon criminal adulteration of the Hebrew Holy Scriptures.
Hopefully Mr. Brown one day will stop perpetuating the lies that he knows himself they are all lies.
Let's spread the true Word of G-d, without reservations.
Shalom, shalom!
@@pc6994 brown doesn't respond to you because he is busy debating someone with more knowledge than you like tovia. If brown shuts down tovia that easy what makes you think brown is gonna waste his time with someone who is less knowledgeable...?
Bobby lobby, Brown wastes his time regardless of debating with rabbi Singer, or with me, or anyone else. When someone sticks to a tempered document and calls that adulteration "his truth", that knowledge he holds is worth absolutely nothing.
Mr. Brown is just one of the millions who are lost in complete darkness... together with you, apparently. Just to rectify your misrepresented statement, Mr. Brown DID NOT "shut down" rabbi Tovia Singer... Perhaps, besides being blind you are also deaf.
Unlike yourself and Mr. Brown, the explanation I gave is just to inform about the tempering that Christianity did to the original Hebrew texts, and NOT to try to "convert you" (or anybody else) to Judaism, even because we are not looking for convertees. Rabbi Tovia Singer does not need to "win" a discussion with anyone, because he is debating to inform ignorant people (like yourself)... but Mr. Brown must "win" his debates because he NEEDS to convince many fools to believe in his pagan ideology.
Thank you for your "heads up" though.
Good luck with your beliefs in Mr. Brown's paganism.
YCE TAKE, I don't represent "that Biblical truth", but I do understand the truth of the ONLY ONE TRUE G-D. You believe in your truths or Mr. Brown's truths, it is not my business. I don't rely on translations (most of which are erroneous) to understand the Word of G-d, BH. I hope you can understand it too one day, without fighting or arguing. We are all part of a big family, and should learn from one another to become better people. If your beliefs lead you to become that better person, then they are good beliefs in my opinion.
You don't need to be Jewish to be righteous, you just need to follow some basic principles... in my Bible, there are plenty of stories of sins, mistakes, wrongdoing, idolatry among my people (the Jews), but these stories are there for a huge purpose, to teach my people what we must not do, just because we learn not only from our own mistakes, but also by observing others' mistakes.
Learn from your neighbor's mistakes and success, so you don't have too much trouble yourself with your growth pains.
Thank you for your comments and for the opportunity to convey a point. Kind regards.
Ohhhhhhhhh, Yeshuah himself mentions and quotes. Not the spin doctors who wrote the text. Thanks for clearing it up. Feel so enlightened.
Pls keep responding to tovia, if possible respond to the book of tovia: lets get biblical, would be a help for me :)
Respond to the Book of Tovia? There is no Book of Tovia. Rabbi Tovia Singer explains the Jewish perspective. The Tanaach (Holy Scriptures) that he quotes is the Hebrew version.
At the 4:06-4:13 mark in this video, Dr. Brown says, "But rather that what's clear is that the messiah had to come and accomplish his work of redemption that he had to come and make atonement for our sins" Clearly this verse says otherwise! 📖 𝐏𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐦𝐬 𝟒𝟗:𝟕 𝙣𝙤𝙣𝙚 [𝙣𝙤 𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙤𝙧 𝙗𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧] 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙗𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣𝙨 𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐎𝐌 his brother, nor give God an 𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓 for him;
25 When His disciples heard it, they were greatly astonished, saying, “Who then can be saved?”
26 But Jesus looked at them and said to them, “With men this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”
But God will ransom my soul from the power of Sheol, for he will receive me. Psalm 49:15
How do you read Daniel 9 and still remain so blind? Lol
lol ka-aru meaning to dig is quite different from pierced and secondly the "ka" means LIKE...it's comparing one thing that can be like something else. You say there are thousands of Masoretic texts but less than 20 contain the phrase Ka-aru? I watched this entire video and it's quite laughable. "Ka-Aru" would make no sense in classical Hebrew even if it was intended. You are basically using only the texts that are sincerely questionable and in the minority...severe minority to prove your point.
Genesis 26:25 uses the word וַיִּכְרוּ pronounced va-yich-ru. In some of the "questionable" manuscripts an Alef is present and therefore completely eradicates what you say. You also say that there are many Hebrew words that are not used anymore...well the Hebrew word דֶּקֶר which does mean pierced or wounded is not used anywhere here like in Isaiah 13:15.
Lastly to anyone watching this video. You should be extremely skeptical of what this man is saying. Anyone who uses a severe minority of texts and most importantly unverifiable information like "there were words in Hebrew that are lost or never used" should be questioning anything this person says because you cannot verify if you are actually being deceived or not. I would quote Isaiah 55:7 to any Christian here who can read and understand what is being read. That verse should not exist in a Christian bible. Paul the apostle says you cannot follow the law period. Christians say that a sacrificial atonement is necessary to pardon you. READ Isaiah 55:7.
Avner Rosenstein....emm, I know Im not being decieved by Dr Brown because at the end of it all, he is defending the truth - Jesus is the Messiah, the prophets fortold of his death, and ressurection, they tell of righteous Israel - an individual who makes atonement for the sins of the whole world
Apostle Paul talks to both Israel and Gentiles when he says no one can keep the law, or are you saying you perfecetly keep the law and commandments, please.
And its not 'christians' who say that a sacrificial atonement, but rather God who gave his Son over as a sacrifice to make atonement
You who are at odds with God and his word, not a good place to be.
@@MRFITTA
Just because someone is defending Jesus doesn't mean they aren't lying and doesn't mean they aren't wrong. Michael brown is ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT on the pierced verse.
@@hitoshura2800 how so? So you are saying the bible is wrong then, because even if I dont take on board what Brown is saying, I have the bible itself.
Sounds like you're either an unbeliever, or listen to too much if Singers nonsense, and need to be careful when siding with the enemies of God and the gospel - be warned.
Avner Rosenstein. You don't know what you're talking about regarding Isaiah 55:7, its only applicable today in light of Gods revelation of his Son, you cannot 'turn from your own thoughts' without the rebirth and subsequent regeneration.
'The mind of sinful(unregenerate) man is death, but the mind controlled by the Spirit is life and peace; the sinful mind(unregenerate) is hostile to God. It does not submit to Gods law, nor can it do so'
Michael you need to get the audio and video into sync.
Not Human Blood, You Need TOO Reread The Book of Leviticus.
No Dan. If he is not there to slap what your tossing around down this accounts for nothing. Thanks for coming out. Keep defending the world wide idolatry. The worst kind. That centered around a man.
Rabbi Singer is absolutely correct. There is no such word in biblical or modern Hebrew. 8 times out 10 of thousands of texts that do not use the mistake that you base your argument on. It is quite clear that your version is incorrect.
+Ben g Been a while since I looked at this but Where on earth do you get the idea that there are tens of thousands of OT "texts", and of that line, and that that list showing 8, shows them all from the tens of thousands that you claim there are, but anyhow, tovia said it never occurs anywhere. And clearly the scholars that translated the Septuagint (before Jesus existed), took the non-masoretic version for that word. And Tovia's argument for saying there was no such word was complete gibberish. You might agree wth Tovia's conclusion, that it is what the majority masoretic has the word as, but the arguments he uses to support himself are full of lies that dr brown exposed.
@@boliussa so true, but his followers are as blind as he is.
@@MRFITTA followers of both are blind because if contrasting dr brown, his followers, dr singer, and his followers, dr brown knows biblical hebrew best, tovia singer a distant second, and almost all followers of each know almost nothing And quite possibly tovia singer's followers know more hebrew than dr brown's .. because many jews that run into tovia can at least read hebrew even if they don't know biblical hebrew that well. Dr Brown has really gone into some stuff that isn't known by most people.. includign most rabbis and most with an interest, would not know about.
@@boliussa I don't 'follow' Dr Brown, but he is in the truth, as are all born again believers, most of whom would agree with him.
So you are incorrect in labeling Dr Browns 'followers' in the same bracket as Rabbi Singers.
No one who agrees with Rabbi Singer can be right with God - this is the man who once said Jesus didnt exist
I'm a christian but Rabbi Tovia has a point. I saw the debate on Dr. Brown and Rabbi Tovia destroyed him.
Silent Lurker I think people should hear it by themselves cause my opinion is diferent from yours
The OP isn’t Christian he’s a Jew or rock kisser.
No Sorry Mr. Brown Your Wrong with This Information.
Why don't you include in your comment a quote from the video showing what you think he said that was incorrect. And does it not concern you that tovia was so wrong. Do you even admit that tovia was wrong and exposed here? You are too stupid and dishonest, so you don't even write an intelligent comment that quotes dr brown , where you thiink he is wrong, and backs up a point.
Prove it
Everyone has thier bias. Tovia is correct about alot of Christian corruptions. And Brown is correct on somethings and wrong on others. Thats why every believer MUST study the living WORD for themselves. You are responsible for studying to show yourself approved. Every believer needs to drop thier ideology at the door and seek truth no matter where that leads you. Its very difficult to do once you've been brainwashed to see something that is not there. If the living WORD isn't formed in you then you are in trouble.
Heyyyyyy Sam Shamoun @ 47:20 praise the Lord!
Dr Brown , when will Zech.14 come to pass?...before the Second Coming of Christ or at his appearance? Or is Zech.14 a distant prophecy which shall come to pass many years after Christ's 1st Millennial Reign? Which of the three is it? I believed the latter.
I believe in the second coming..in acts angels say Christ will return just as he left. He ascended from the Mt olives so he must descend to the Mt olives.
Tovia is a deciever and very twisted individual.
Singer is a slippery little dude
Yesterday afternoon, I personally asked Tovia Singer if he would debate Dr. Brown again and he said Dr. Brown edited out his comments from the recordings of the debates and attacked him on the air the week following the debate. Singer said he was not permitted on air to respond to the things Dr. Brown was attacking him on.
Dr. Brown has said he's constantly tired to ask Singer to have a follow-up debate, yet Singer told me Brown never once asked him to debate since the two debates 30 years ago. Someone's not telling the truth.
Unfortunately, Rabbi Singer is not telling the truth, shockingly so. For details, see here: ua-cam.com/video/U5-TJPz6Y94/v-deo.html. Not only so, but numerous witnesses will confirm that they invited Rabbi Singer to debate me in a public forum but he refused. It's one thing to choose not to debate; it's another thing to lie about it. That's what needs to be exposed. Very sad.
@@LFTV Blessed is he who Truly comes in the name of the Lord.
Dr Brown's patience toward Tovia Singer's anti-christ mission demonstrates a character of God's mercy & patience. Tovia will fall , Dr Brown is an Israelite whereas Mr Singer is just a Pharisee (just a Jew) its terrible to see famous teachers like Tovia not knowing that the son of man refers to the prophecies given to Ezekiel in other words Ezekiel coming with the clouds as he was caried by the flying winged "objects" and landed at tel-aviv in our day. Also the temple description in the book of Ezekiel (son of man) is the very same abomination spoken of by prophet Daniel. I totally agree with Tovia singer Christians believe there is only one God , the God of Israel & there is only one Son of God, the man Jesus Christ
The Voice is not sinking with Mr.Brown
Offerings WILL Continue Even though The Final Temple Era
Carl Johnson......I've read your comments, and its clear you are confused and in the darkness, you need a powerful deliverance which only God is capable of.
Seek him while you can still find him.
Not even sure you can even do this now, having read about your 'christian' background. its virtually impossible for a person such as yourself to repent and return to the truth.
Hope I'm wrong.
REVELATION 12:17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Yeshua The Rabbi's keep the tablets of stone and His blood (testimony) found on the mercy seat! I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced,
Has this video been overdubbed ?
Daniel 9:
Regarding Daniel 9 verses 24 - 27
As a jew you probably know the difference between שבועים (the agreculteral cycles) and שבועות (weeks).
The hebrew text says שבועים
Here's the math according to jewish count:
Year 3339 the first temple is destroyed.
Year 3409 the second temple is built due to koresh who was thought to be a saviour (by Isaiah)
Between them 70 years = 10 agreecultural cycles.
Year 3829 The destruction of the second temple.
Between the destructions 490 Aka 70 cycles.
62 cycles (434 years)from the rebuilding of the second temple = 3843.
Year 3843 the year that the anointed one (last high priest) parished and his sons did not enherit the priesthood = approximately 82 AD.
24: "to make ends of sin" - for only in state of purity can the second temple be built and the sacrificial system renewed (the sacrefices for unintentional transgressions, but one must also repent)
25: jerusalem will be starting its rebuilding 49 years after Koresh.
26 Messiah shall be cut off - in the hebrew it says - "the anointed one (the high priest) shall parish and there was non other" (JC was never anointed, nor as king, nor as priest) see as a continuation of 24, where the Holly of hollies was anointed as part of the priestly duties.
27: within three and a half years the high priest will no longer preform sacrificial rituals.
That is not a prophecy about JC.
Psalm 22 speaks only of king David
Psalm 22:16
The word is like a lion ka-ari (כארי)
The word they dug karu (כרו) roots from כ.ר.ה (dig).
That word cannot and does not have no "א" in it.
And you can see in all hebrew text including the Nahal Hever script that the א is there, which comes to show that the scribe meant to write the word כארי - like a lion.
כִּי סְבָבוּנִי, כְּלָבִים: עֲדַת מְרֵעִים, הִקִּיפוּנִי; כָּאֲרִי, יָדַי וְרַגְלָי.
The correct translation of this verse:
Dogs have surrounded me; a band of evil men has encircled me, like a lion (meanning surrounding him), my hands and my feet (to show he is completely surrounded).
And it has come to my intention that encient scribes often changed the "י" (Yod)in the endings of words to "ו" (Vav) since jews derive the correct pronunciation through the reading of the text, the same way English readers know how not to pronounce the "p" in pneumonia.
If you're interested check for this title on UA-cam as well:
Psalm 22 verse 16 The Nahal Hever Fragment - Proof!
As to verse 2 in that psalm
אֵלִי אֵלִי, לָמָה עֲזַבְתָּנִי
This is the true translation of verse 2:
My god my god why did you leave me (not forsaken !!!)
Leaving is just a temporary state that suggests a return in the future, not as forsaken which means to completely abandone.
The psalm speaks only of king David's troubles and his plea to god and later on in the psalm he gives praises to god. Nothing more
This too is not a prophecy about JC.
Tovia Singer is making very fine job of making ass of himself.