1. The entire prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27 covers a period of “seventy weeks.” This period applies to one complete, sequential block of time. This prophecy would start during the Persian period and would end during the time of the Messiah. 2. Logic requires that the 70th week follow immediately after the 69th week. If it does not, then it cannot properly be called the 70th week! 3. It is illogical to insert a 2,000-year gap between the 69th and the 70th week. No hint of this gap is found in the prophecy itself. There is no gap between the first 7 weeks and the following 62 weeks. Why insert one between the 69th and the 70th week? 4. Daniel 9:27 says nothing about a seven-year period of tribulation, or about any Antichrist 5. The focus of this prophecy is the Messiah, not the Antichrist. Modern interpreters have applied “the people of the prince” who would come to “destroy the city and the sanctuary” (verse 26) to the Antichrist. Yet the text does not say this. In the past, that sentence has been applied to the Romans, who under Prince Titus did “destroy the city and the sanctuary” in'‘A.D. 70 6. “He shall confirm the covenant.” Jesus Christ came “to confirm the promises made unto the fathers.” Romans 15:8. Nowhere in the Bible is Antichrist ever said to make or confirm a covenant with anyone! The word “covenant” always applies to the Messiah, never to the Antichrist! 7. “He shall confirm the covenant with many.” Jesus said, “This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.” Matthew 26:28. Jesus used the same words, because He knew that He was fulfilling Daniel 9:27! 8. “In the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease.” The 70th week was from A.D. 27 to 34. After three and a half years of ministry, Christ died in A.D. 31, “in the midst [middle] of the week.” At the moment of His death, “the veil of the temple was rent [torn] in twain from the top to the bottom.” Matthew 27. The Great Sacrifice had been offered! 9. “For the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate.” Jesus plainly applied this “abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet” (Matthew 24:15) to the time when His followers were to flee from Jerusalem before the destruction of the second temple in A.D. 70. Jesus told His 12 disciples, “When ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies [the Roman armies led by Prince Titus], then know that its desolation is near.” Luke 21:20, emphasis added. Those disciples did “see” those very events. Christ’s very last words to the Pharisees from inside the second temple were, “Behold, (Your house is left unto you desolate.” Matthew 23:38. Thus Daniel’s prophecy about Jerusalem becoming “desolate” was exactly fulfilled in A.D. 70! Jesus understood this perfectly. 10. Gabriel said that the 70'week prophecy specifically applied to the Jewish people (see Daniel 9:24). During the period of Christ’s public ministry of 3 1/2 years, the Master’s focus was largely upon “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 10:6). After His resurrection and then for another 3 1/2 years, His disciples preached mostly to Jews (see Acts 1-6). After that second 3 1/2-year period, in 34 A.D., the bold Stephen was stoned by the Jewish Sanhedrin (see Acts 7). This infamous deed marked the then-ruling Jewish leaders’ final, official rejection of the gospel of our Savior. Then the gospel went to the Gentiles. In Acts 9, Saul became Paul, the “apostle to the Gentiles” (Romans 11:13). In Acts 10, God gave Peter a vision revealing it was now time to preach to the Gentiles(see Acts l0:1-28). Read also Acts (l3:46) Thus approximately 3 1/2 years after the crucifixion-and at the end of the 70-week prophecy given for the Jewish people-the gospel shifted to the Gentiles exactly as predicted in Bible prophecy.
@@annigard8 About Daniel 9: Daniel was not praying about the end times or the antichrist but that he wanted to know what would happen to the Jews when they would be released from captivity in Babylon Daniel 9:27 says that he ‘confirms’ the covenant, which means that the covenant already existed. We only have to look back to Daniel 9:4 to see that Daniel is pleading with the Heavenly Father to remember His covenant of mercy to those who love Him. “And I prayed unto the LORD my God, and made my confession, and said, O Lord, the great and dreadful God, keeping the covenant and mercy to them that love him, and to them that keep his commandments.” Daniel 9:27 is not saying that the covenant only lasts for seven years, as so many people proclaim about a supposed antichrist 7-year peace treaty. And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease. The word ‘for’ was added by the translators. It’s simply saying that the covenant is confirmed in the seven years of the 70th week. And then it tells us when, in the middle of seven years, as Messiah’s blood sacrifice ended the need for temple animal sacrifices. "He shall confirm a covenant for ONE WEEK " It refers to the Messiah, who is the principal subject of the prophecy;and the work which, according to this,he was to perform was, during that "one week" to exert such an influence as would tend to establish a covenant between the people and God.
@@annigard8Christians blaspheme CHRIST work on the cross, calling Messiah in Dan. 9:27 anti-Christ. "And HE (Messiah) shall make a covenant (Isa. 55:1-7) with the many (Gentile believers) for one week (Passion Week), and in the midst of the week (Wednesday\Thursday Passover ) HE (Messiah) shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease (it is finished) and for overspreading abominations (Jews continuing animal sacrifices 40 years) HE (Messiah) shall make it (thy Holy City) desolate (void of Daniel's people) even until the consummation (70th week) and that determined (Lk. 21:24 Times of the Gentiles be fulfilled) shall be poured upon the desolate (Gospel poured upon the children of the desolate; Isa.54:1)". There is no definite article for "a prince" in the original Hebrew text; Dan. 9:26. Therefore "Messiah" is the antecedent to the pro-form "HE" in 9:27. Too many Christians follow this unbiblical Hal Lindsey garbage from his novel "Late Great Planet Earth". There will be no peace treaty with the antichrist nor a 3rd Temple built. The Mat. 24:15 sign will be soon after Israel annexes the 1\4 of Jerusalem trodden on by the Dragon beast Islam; Lk. 21\24, the will erect an Ezra 3 temporary altar on the Temple Mt to attempt another animal sacrifice. If in Judah and you see this abomination spoken by Daniel RUN FOR THE HILLS. Tiptop is in the baby butchering SDA anti-CHRIST cult that twist, spin, corrupt GOD's WORD. Steven's stoning date he assumes is made up SDA garbage and can't be calculated from the bible. Paul would go to the Jew first for decades.
@@tiptop9909 I would really really love to have a chat with you on the significant points you have raised, and possibly explore even further clarity with reference to prophets such as Ezra and others. Please let me know if you would care for such a pleasant discourse!
So glad to hear someone sees that the Prince in Daniel is The Christ and not the anti. When I was new many, years ago i saw this but the main stream churches were not teaching it
Revelation in Symbols and Signs has a deeper teaching of Revelation and Daniel. Verse by verse, chapter by chapter 🙏🙏 check it out. You won't be disappointed 🙏🙏
The following proves you are correct. Proof the 70th week of Daniel was fulfilled in the past: Based on Hebrews 12:22-24, the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26 cannot be separated from the New Covenant fulfilled by His blood at Calvary. See the words "church" and "mount Sion" and "new covenant" and "Jesus" and "blood" in the passage. Are we supposed to believe the angel Gabriel appeared to Daniel to reveal the timeline of the Messiah who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and then the angel failed to even mention the New Covenant. Or, is the covenant with the many in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the many in Matthew 26:28? The 1599 Geneva Bible is the Bible the Pilgrims brought to America, before John Darby showed up on our shores about the time of the Civil War. What was the earlier understanding of Daniel 9:27 found below in the notes of the 1599 Geneva Bible? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dan 9:27 And he shal confirme the couenant with many for one weeke: and in the middes of the weeke he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the ouerspreading of the abominations, he shall make it desolate, euen vntill the consummation determined shalbe powred vpon the desolate. Daniel 9:27 And he (a) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to (b) cease, (c) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make [it] desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate. (a) By the preaching of the Gospel he affirmed his promise, first to the Jews, and after to the Gentiles. (b) Christ accomplished this by his death and resurrection. (c) Meaning that Jerusalem and the sanctuary would be utterly destroyed because of their rebellion against God, and their idolatry: or as some read, that the plague will be so great, that they will all be astonished at them.
The command was issued to Nehemiah on Nisan 14th at the 9th hour 454 bc. 483 years latter messiah is cut off Nisan 14th at the 9th hour 31ad. The command was to repair the streets and walls to identify who and when it was issued to start the countdown.
"He" is already there and has been for centuries. He sits in the midst of the Body of Christ, which is the new temple of God, calling himself "Christ on earth".
quote----But there is a day coming in the future (2 Thessalonians 2:4) when the man of lawlessness sets himself in the temple "displaying himself as being god"-unquote ALREADY happening!!! >>>The Catechism of the Council of Trent, p 402 second revised edition says, "The Church of God has thought it well to transfer the celebration and observance of the Sabbath to Sunday!" And “Had she not such power, she could not have done that in which all modern religionists agree with her-she could not have substituted the observance of Sunday, the first day of the week, for the observance of Saturday, the seventh day, a change for which there is NO SCRIPTURAL AUTHORITY” - Stephen Keenan A Doctrinal Catechism p 174. >>>>What the Holy Bible says about the Roman Catholic Church and the Pope The Anti-christ sits in the temple of God proclaiming to be God….fulfilling 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4. ---“..the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, (not a physical temple, but Christ’s Church. Eph. 2:19-22) showing himself that he is God.” ---Pope Innocent III said “We may according to the fullness of our power, dispose of the law and dispense above the law. Those whom the Pope of Rome doth separate, it is not a man that separates them but God. For the Pope holdeth place on earth, not simply of a man but of the true God.” (Source: “Decretals of Greogory IX,” Book 1, chapter 3.) (Likely between 1200AD--1216AF) -->>>-Saint Pope Pius V blasphemed, “The Pope and God are the same, so he The title "Lord God the Pope" is found within a gloss of Extravagantes of Pope John XXII, title 14, chapter 4, (likely between 1550Ad & 1572AD) --->>>-In an Antwerp edition of the Extravagantes, the words, "Dominum Deum Nostrum Papam" (Our Lord God the Pope) can be found in column 153. In a Paris edition, they are found in column 140. has all power in Heaven and earth.” (Source: Pope Pius V, quoted in Barclay, Cities Petrus Bertanous Chapter XXVII: 218.) (likely between 1550AD and 1572AD) ---->>>>"Innocent III has written: "Indeed, it is not top much to say that in view of the sublimity of their offices the priests are so many gods." -The dignity of the priesthood by Liguori p, 36 >>>
@@mitchellosmer1293 Correct. This the very foundation of Protestantism. The Agents of Antichrist have been very successful, since then, of distorting Protestant end-times doctrine to make them forget that.
John Wesley (1703-1791) (Methodist): Speaking of the Papacy, John Wesley wrote, “He is in an emphatical sense, the Man of Sin, as he increases all manner of sin above measure. And he is, too, properly styled the Son of Perdition, as he has caused the death of numberless multitudes, both of his opposers and followers… He it is…that exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped…claiming the highest power, and highest honour…claiming the prerogatives which belong to God alone.” Antichrist and His Ten Kingdoms, by John Wesley, pg. 110.
Roger Williams (1603-1683) (First Baptist Pastor in America): Pastor Williams spoke of the Pope as “the pretended Vicar of Christ on earth, who sits as God over the Temple of God, exalting himself not only above all that is called God, but over the souls and consciences of all his vassals, yea over the Spirit of Christ, over the Holy Spirit, yea, and God himself…speaking against the God of heaven, thinking to change times and laws; but he is the son of perdition (II Thess. 2).” The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, by Froom, Vol. 3, pg. 52. The Westminster Confession of Faith (1647): “There is no other head of the church but the Lord Jesus Christ. Nor can the pope of Rome in any sense be head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin and son of perdition that exalteth himself in the church against Christ and all that is called God.” The Creeds of Christendom With a History and Critical Notes, by Philip Schaff’s, III, p. 658, 659, ch. 25, sec. 6.
But what about this: for this is what "I think" God has made me understood. Based on what God said: Numbers 23:19, Isaiah 46:9:10, Genesis 26:4, 28:14, Genesis 17:18-21,21:12 I came to understand that Allah, the "God" of Islam is not YHWH, the God of Abraham. The Arabs are not worshipping the God of their forefathers. For he reminded me of the Serpent who deceived Adam and Eve, that led to our fall. And Islam is misleading humanity, keeping people away from the offspring of Isaac and Jacob, A JEW, Jesus Christ, through whom all nations on earth will be blessed. It overshadow the Jew, promoting instead the offspring of Ishmael, Muhammad, to follow supposed to be for people to be blessed. And in defense of Catholicism (I'm now a born-again Christian), God did used the Roman empire to gather together the Scriptures and by its wide reach to spread Christianity farther and faster. They cannot be accused of killing to spread Christianity, for they had been doing it, conquering nations before they convert to Christianity, that's why they were in Israel and became an empire, and they even were persecuting Christians to stop Christianity. But the will of God prevailed. And God reiterated Jeremiah 31-35-37 His everlasting covenant with Israel Genesis 17:7, so why IF Allah is YHWH, are the Islamists conditioned to believe that God will reject Israel in the last days and they, the Muslims, his faithful followers will execute his judgement and destroy Israel? And why so much hatred for a small nation? Because they are the people of God? Or for the same reason that we are to bless them, the dragon hated them so? That God through Israel was able to become part of humankind, to save humanity? And hardcore Islamists would kill those who blaspheme Muhammad. 28:30
The 70 years of Babylonian subservience is the punishment for Israel's violation of the Land Sabbath, not the weekly Sabbath. Israel was commanded to sow and harvest for 6 years, but the land was to lay fallow during the 7th year, so the land itself can enjoy Sabbath.
I entertained this idea but it really doesn't make sense. The reason why the church may have believed this for 1800+ years is irrelevant. What matters is that, if we are truly the last generation, God said we would understand the prophecy in the last days. Daniel 12:4 (ESV): "But you, Daniel, shut up the words and seal the book, until the time of the end. Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase." You want proof that this hasn't been fulfilled yet? The nation of Israel has been reborn and is not even 100 years old yet. Now you might argue "Oh so early Christians were wrong this whole time?". Yeah, EXACTLY. Israel didn't exist back then so they had to come up with an interpretation that made sense to them, but we know now for sure this hasn't been fulfilled. Furthermore, Daniel 9:24 clarifies what is being achieved with the 70 weeks: Daniel 9:24 (ESV): “Seventy weeks are decreed about your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to put an end to sin, and to atone for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most holy place." I find it hard to believe that all of these things have been fulfilled when we have the remnant of Israel living in their land as of today.
When Jesus spoke of the abomination of desolation it was in answer to his disciples asking him what would be the signs of His coming and establishing of His kingdom. And Paul spoke of the abomination of desolation being followed by Jesus destroying the Antichrist with the brightness of his coming which would also entail the moon turning to blood the sun not giving light and the stars falling from the skies. He would gather His elect and appear in the air. None of these things happened in 70 A.D.
You are basing your eschatology on Darbyism or better yet futurism/dispensationalism, a system created in the early 1800's that is filled with so much nonsense it isn't even funny. The two methods of interpretation up into that time were Historicism and Allegory. It happened in 70 AD as foretold in Matthew 24 and Luke 21. The sun and moon turning dark and red is symbolism for divine judgment on Judah, the stars represent the 12 tribes of Israel. This symbolism was used in the Old Testament more than once. When Jesus sat at the right hand of the Father, He in effect became God, judge and ruler over the earth, taking the Father's place. There is no mention of an anti-Christ anywhere in Thessalonians 1 or 2. He was called the man of sin who sat in the temple calling himself God, which by Josephus' account occurred during the Jewish rebellion (apostasia) of 66/70 AD. Context, Symbolism, Literary Devices all a part of the Hebrew way of conveying prophecy. During the Jewish-Roman War (66/70 AD), there were two Zealot leaders who took their place in the temple: [1] The first one made the temple, including the inner court, his headquarters for about 3.5 years (from the fall of AD 66 until April AD 70). He was killed (destroyed, slayed by the brightness of His coming) in Jerusalem in AD 70. That was Eleazar ben Simon. [2] The second one took over the inner court about five months before the temple was destroyed, precisely when the Roman general, Titus, arrived and began his siege against Jerusalem (from April - August AD 70). He was captured, taken to Rome, and sentenced to life in prison. That was John Levi of Gischala. John Levi was not killed or destroyed, leaving Eleazar ben Simon as the obvious man of sin Paul was referring to in 2nd Thessalonians; Top Two Candidates for the Man of Lawlessness In this passage, Paul specifically stated that the man of lawlessness was one who: [1] “opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God” (verse 4); [2] “the Lord will consume with the breath (spirit) of His mouth (prophecy) and destroy with the brightness of His coming (God often used Gentile nations in order to bring judgment on His people) [vs 8]” Jesus' coming is seen in Daniel 7 as coming before the Father to receive His Kingdom). In Matthew 26:64: “You have said so,” Jesus replied. “But I say to all of you: From now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven."@@JamieElison
In Matthew 24 where Jesus makes reference to the abomination of desolation spoken by Daniel, Jesus is answering his disciples about the question of the sign of His second coming, the day he will return: Mat 24:11 "And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray. And because lawlessness will be increased, the love of many will grow cold. But the one who endures to the end will be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and THEN THE END will come. Mat 24:15 “So when you see the abomination of desolation spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. Mat 24:29 “Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. "
Hello, yes, the Great Tribulation is just ahead. But Shawn" 's Church has already been fulfilled from 538AD to 1798AD. Shawn's Church believes the Book of Revelation is past history except for the last part of the 6th seal and the 7th Trumpet. But their own Prophet, Ellen Harmon/White, wrote a letter in 1847 to Eli Curtis correcting Eli for teaching that Michael had stood up. She said that she was given a vision that Michael and the "time of trouble" was the future. She set aside Mr. Miller's understanding that brought this great disappointment in 1844. If you think your church has been given a Prophet, then first believe the Scriptures and then believe your Prophet if what they say agrees with the Bible.
You need to read it again more closely. Bear in mind, the disciples had just asked him specifically about the end of the Jewish state because he had just told them the temple would be destroyed and this would no doubt have brought images of Babylon destroying Solomon's temple to their minds. Matt 24:11, fulfilled: Simon Magus, Ebion, and Cerinthus, who denied the proper deity, and real humanity of Christ; Carpocrates, and the Gnostics his followers, the Nicolaitans, Hymcneus, Philetus, and others. Matt 24:15, fulfilled: "From signs, Christ proceeds to the immediate cause of the destruction of Jerusalem; which was, "the abomination of desolation", or the desolating abomination; or that abominable thing, which threatened and brought desolation upon the city, temple, and nation: by which is meant ... the Roman army...; see Luke 21:20 which was the , "the wing", or "army of abominations making desolate", Daniel 9:27. Armies are called wings, Isaiah 8:8 and the Roman armies were desolating ones to the Jews, and to whom they were an abomination; not only because they consisted of Heathen men, and uncircumcised persons, but chiefly because of the images of their gods, which were upon their ensigns: for images and idols were always an abomination to them ... and accordingly it is observed, that many did flee about this time; and it is remarked by several interpreters, and which Josephus (a) takes notice of with surprise, that Cestius Gallus having advanced with his army to Jerusalem, and besieged it, on a sudden, without any cause, raised the siege, and withdrew his army, when the city might have been easily taken; by which means a signal was made; and an opportunity given to the Christians, to make their escape: which they accordingly did, and went over Jordan, as Eusebius says (b), to a place called Pella; so that when Titus came a few mouths after, there was not a Christian in the city, but they had fled as they are here bidden to flee into the mountains." Matt 24:29, fulfilled: The sun darkened = His glory removed from their physical temple for good. The moon not giving light = Ceremonial law is no more. Power of heaven shaken = "all the ordinances of the legal dispensation; which shaking, and even removing of them, were foretold by Haggai 2:6 and explained by the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews, Hebrews 12:26 whereby room and way were made for Gospel ordinances to take place, and be established."
@@MagicMayers Thank you for your comment. You wrote, "Bear in mind, the disciples had just asked him specifically about the end of the Jewish state" I never read that in the Scriptures...please share what translation are you using? Let me copy the KJV text. Mat 24:3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world? The signs that Jesus/Yeshua spoke and recorded after this verse are a long list of signs or events that will take place during the LAST GENERATION LIVING ON EARTH AT THE SECOND COMING. Here is the text in Matt 24 that causes my current view. Mat 24:33 So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors. Mat 24:34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled. It may be helpful to try a method of sorting things out working backwards. I asked people to go to Rev. 19: 11-21 where the King of Kigns is seen leaving heaven. Study Revelation backward can help unstick us or give us confirmation we were right or we see a problem with our past view. Rev. 19:1-10 We read what fallow the destruction of a Great City in chapter 18. Rev 18:24 And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth. What is the name of this Great City? Read Rev. 11 where we read and find the name of a Great City. After reading about this city being burned and destroyed... Read Rev. 17 where it tells us who and why destroyed this Great City. In Re. 17 we also read about the purpose of a military gathering by the wicked who has a plan to attach Jesus/Yeshua from the Holy Land near Jerusalem when he arrives at the Second Coming. So the Dragon, Whore, Beast surely know the season of the Second Coming, and gather to be ready to fight. It is sad my Adventst brothers and sisters have been told the Book of Revelation has been fulfilled. Their reason is still holding unto Mr. William Miller's check list checked off Daniel 12:1 and also Matt 24 and all of Revelation except the last part of the 6th seal and 7th trumpet. They think the next thing on the list is the Second Coming. The Church no longer believes there own Prophet Mrs. White. In 1847 she wrote a letter to Eli Curtis which is easy to find online. Here she corrected Eli, said the she was given a vision that Michael had not stood up and the "time of trouble" was future. She just said Mr. Miller had it wrong. In another unpublished manuscript which most members never read Mrs Whtie wrote that God have covered Mr. Millers eyes that prevented him from understanding the times that he was using. But at the end of time God would reveal what had been hidden by Mr. Miller. Shalom/Peace
@@sunmoonstars8471 Sure, you have to go back to the end of chapter 23 which connects to the start of 24. Just before Jesus leaves the temple he laments that Jerusalem will be left desolate. As they're leaving, the disciples point out the marvelous buildings (which were probably the fanciest things some of them had seen) and he tells them the temple will be entirely destroyed too. Then the disciples come to him later, privately, asking about the end of the age and his coming because what he'd just said made them think that the end of the age was upon them if Jerusalem and the temple were going to be destroyed and therefore the Messiah must surely be about to set up his Kingdom on earth, which was true and his kingdom is being built as we speak, and a new temple made without hands from living stones, they just didn't understand at the time how things were going to be done.
@@sunmoonstars8471 the disciples asked him three questions you're only dealing with one of them!!! the last question what would happen at the (end of the world) which is Matthew 24:3.. which is Daniel 8: 17 Daniel 8:19 Daniel 8:23. When the (transgression of desolation) which is the (abomination of desolation Jesus is speaking about in Daniel 24:15)
G.Grennell Your explanation of the last seven years {week} is very weak. What is the abomination that makes desolate? You forgot to explain 9:27 which describes a desolator. It cannot be Titus, since he did not want to destroy the temple. If all this happened in 70 AD, then why has the Great Tribulation not occurred? And where is Jesus return, that was was to happen immediately after that? You have bought into a false teaching on this...there are other passages in Daniel which specifically project these events into the "end times" in Daniel 8. You need to study till it all fits every passage!!!
the problem with this view point in my humble opinion and I think is a BIG problem is when Jesus himself mentions the Daniel profecy in Matthew 24, when he very much describes the "end times" by saying on verses 21 and 22.. "21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. 22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. so, according to your viewpoint if Daniel 9 already happen, where does this Jesus's revelation of the "great tribulation" of future times fits into? I do believe we are living in a church age, a gap of some sort, and the 70th week of Daniel will probably start right after Jesus rapture his saints from this mad world we are living in right now that will actually get worse as we approach that time...
@josuecerqueira7191 If Daniel 9 is fullfilled what is Jesus refering to? He is refering to Daniel 12. Daniel 9 Is what Jesus did when he came the first time - Its Gods blueprint so to say and the devil always copying what God does. The copy is in Daniel 12. The key is in the end of it. The abomination in Daniel 12 is in Rev.13. Its no need to have a gap in the history. God has one prophecy about Jesus first coming and a timeline for that time and the people of that time to be able to understrand when the promised Messiah could be expected to come and some did. What he was meant to do including the new covenant and to end the sacrifice both spiritually and physically for those who rejected him and punish the jews for the rejection and scatter them all over the world and in that way prepare for the second coming. Give Jesus the glory for the Daniel 9 prophecy and dont give the devil any attention in his attempt to steal that prophecy from us. God also have a second proophecy which have some similarities with Daniel 9 in Daniel 12 which is for the second coming and those of us who are wise shall understand (verse10). This wisdom comes by the holy spirit of course. This is another timeline to help the believers to understand the timeline of the tribulation and of the second coming of Christ to understand the startevent wich happens shortly before the tribualation. The coming of the two witnesses, antichrist and "the woman" in Rev.12 in a few days row after about 70 days. To understand when the abomination is set up in Rev.13 and when Jesus will come to the exakt day. We can by study the other timelines and reading Rev.12 and 13 and 2 Thess. 2 understand what we need to know when we need it but only short before it starts. We can also by that understand that the shortened time Jesus talks about is when the mark of the beast is here and no one can buy or sell. By easily subtract we get 45 days. This is really helpful to know. If that time isnt shortened no flesh will survive. I think after 45 days at least half of the christians have been martured so if it only should be the double 90 days only a handfull will still be alive. Seven years no way! So when i had found out about Daniel 12 which God has given me I had no problem with go against the 70th week of Daniel teaching but better is to show whats right instead of saying its wrong. By the way Daniel 12:4 says "seal until the endtime". Many think they know much but still they know less than they think
According to you counting Jesus died at age 30 instead of 33, since according to your reasoning Jesus would have started His ministry at 27. Can you explain this you?
Daniel 11:21-24 And in his estate shall stand up a VILE PERSON, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: BUT HE SHALL COME IN PEACEABLY, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries. 22 And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflown from before him, and shall be broken; yea also the prince of the covenant. 23 And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people. 24 He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers’ fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time. KJV
@@MagicMayers NOPE, not already fulfilled, and Daniel prophecies through his visions, the coming of the antichrist, the seven year tribulation, and the END! Only 69 weeks have been fulfilled, leaving one week left to be fulfilled, a week of years, seven years. Daniel 8:24-26 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people. 25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand. 26 And the vision of the evening and the morning which was told is true: wherefore shut thou up the vision; for it shall be for many days. KJV Daniel 8:13-14 Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot? 14 And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed. KJV Daniel 12:11-13 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. 12 Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. 13 But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot AT THE END OF THE DAYS. KJV Daniel 9:27 KJV
@@nancyking2867 This was fulfilled in the days of the Maccabees. The early Christians did not and would not agree with you. You're repeating futurism which was invented c.1500s by the Jesuits in an effort to deflect attention away from the papacy as Antichrist. Jesus is Messiah the Prince and the 70th week is all about him.
I know why I wouldn't watch many more of your videos, you are wrong! The AC is coming and the verse is talking about the AC not Jesus. Although there may be a bit of an argument on when the rapture will happen if at all. There is still 1 more week of years for the Jews to fulfill and Jacob's trouble to come about.
Maybe you should listen to his logic. What you are teaching is what you've been taught, not something you have done on your own. Matthew 24 was speaking expressly about the 70 AD judgment on Jerusalem. I'm not a 7th Day Adventist and can see this. Could it be you who has been decieved?@teresasiner2308
@@Bruce.-Wayne Daniel 9 is written in chronological order. The 70th week is not spoken of until after Titus which is 70 A.D.. not one thing that he told you is the truth!
Friend, according to the "Book of Revelation", Paul is not an Apostle; he was missionary. There will be 12 Apostles name written in the foundations of the New Jerusalem that will descend to earth from heaven: that's what written in the Revelation. If Paul was an apostle, then there would have 13 tribes of Israels in OT. The fact is that there were only 12 tribes of Israel in OT. In NT 12 apostle are the replacement of the 12 tribes in OT.
@@farwestgarohills3831 That is why you need to rightly divide scripture. Paul is the Apostle to the Body of Christ. The Body of Christ is composed of all people (both Jews and Gentiles in the flesh) that live in the MYSTERY AGE called the Age of Grace. The Age of Grace was not part of Israel's PROPHETIC program found throughout the rest of the bible. We live in a parenthetical period of time that was HID IN GOD BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD. Israel's Prophetical program had been established SINCE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD. There are only 12 Apostles TO ISRAEL. There is only 1 Apostle TO THE BODY OF CHRIST. This means that Christians who are following the 12 Apostles are following the wrong doctrine. We are only to follow the doctrine taught by Paul. Our salvation is NOT THE SAME as their salvation....nor is our Gospel the same as their Gospel.
@@farwestgarohills3831 1 Corinthians 1:1 Paul, called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother, Ephesians 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to the saints which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus: Paul is not part of the 12 Apostles. Paul is THE Apostle to the Body of Christ. The 12 Apostles ARE NOT part of the Body of Christ.
During the rule of Cyrus, a decree was given by him to rebuild the Jerusalem and the temple but was never implemented. It was implemented only during the rule of the Artaxerxes II, who was also known as Ahasuerus, the husband of queen Esther. This date (537 BC) is not telling about Cyrus, but Artaxerxes II (is a title of the king, whose name was Ahasuerus).
You're correct and it seems the presenter misspoke or else mixed up his details when arriving at the name Artaxerxes. It's true that the 490 year count starts with Artaxerxes decree, but his decree is the final seal on his grandfather's original decree which had been stalemated up to that point. Really, the decree was triune in nature and spanned a generation i.e. 80 years. A decree declared beforehand by the Almighty which comes from the mouths of 3 witnesses...seems pretty scriptural to me. What he really should have said is that it was Artaxerxes decree which actually finally got the building completed AND restored Judah to autonomy. That's the key part.
@farwestgarohills3831 ... regardless of when the temple was finished, the prophesy is in reference to the decree to rebuild Jerusalem, and supposedly the Temple, which was in 537 by Cyrus, which means his numbers don't add up. His date 457 BC at 9:30 in the video is completely arbitrary in order to make his math work, which means his math doesn't work. The reign of Artaxerxes, from every source I've seen was 465 - 424 BC, which means again, his math doesn't add up. Unless you know where his 457 BC date came from, it seems to me he's inventing a clever system with a doubtful interpretation of Daniel 9.
@@MagicMayers... I just read Ezra 7, which he referenced, and Artaxerxes decree was not about building the temple, he was calling the Jews to Jerusalem and giving the gifts and utensils that were promised. It was the decree of Cyrus in 537 BC that was for rebuilding (Ezra 1:1-2), which means this guy's math doesn't work.
If the Book of Daniel, specifically Chapter 9 had already been fulfilled in 70 A.D. as claimed, then we should not think, that the Prophecy of Daniel is the SHADOW (correlation/parallelism) of the Book of Revelation and the Olivet Discourse of Christ Jesus, if that is the case...
So Matthew 24:3 doesn't apply to this ..and the (abomination of desolation) written in the book of Daniel ( like Jesus tells you to go find it in the book of Daniel ).that doesn't matter either!
the big problem with this interpretation is that Dan 9:24 has clearly not been fulfilled. 2nd problem is that Jesus never made a 1 week covenant with anyone. 3rd problem is that sacrifice and oblation didn't cease at Christ's crucifixion. others see the fulfillment of the 69 weeks when Jesus rode into Jerusalem on the donkey and was welcomed as the Messiah, which makes the crucifixion a few days later and not "middle of 70th week".
Daniel 9:24 is not presented as a set of criteria that will be fulfilled. It simply sets forth a time limit. The foretold crucifixion of Christ and ultimate destruction of Jerusalem and the temple in the same prophecy served to indicate that the criteria would not be met. Jesus defined his covenant (διαθήκης contract) "for (the) many" (mirroring that descriptor in Daniel 9:27 below) of the shedding of his blood for the forgiveness of their sins (i.e. the gospel/the new testament) at the last supper. [Mark 14:24, Matthew 26:28, parallel Luke 22:20] The Hebrew of 9:27 does not actually say "make" a strong covenant. It is more literally _"He will cause to be confirmed/strengthened covenant with regard to the many, one week"_ . The one week, or the seven years, in expanded prophetic terms, was constituted by his and his apostles' seven-year ministry following his baptism, in the middle of which he was killed. Jesus' sacrificial death made obsolete the temple sacrifices. Although the temple priests continued to inititate them, their efficacy was thenceforth nullified, as God no longer accepted them as valid transactions; thus the sacrifices ceased. Any who would propose a start of the 70th week as coinciding with any event (i.e. other than Christ's baptism) that would make the rest of the prophecy's otherwise perfectly visible fulfillment seem to fail are under the influence of those whose objective is exactly that.
@@mytwocents777 I addressed this in my other response to you so I don't want to repeat it all here. Succinctly, we cannot separate Daniel 9 from Daniel 7, 8 and 11. It is the little horn who *takes away the daily sacrifice* and throws truth to the ground.
@@mytwocents777 i understand all that, but it's too vague and loose. impossible to be able to determine the fulfillment of the prophecy. And Jesus New Covenant is for all and forever, not for many and for a week. and again, the sacrifices did not stop and that's what the prophecy said to look for. doesn't say to search for the mind of God to see if He accepts or rejects the daily sacrifices. not to mention that nothing else has come to pass by the end of the 70th week. it all has to be clearly observable or else it doesn't really inform us of anything. it either means what it says or forget it, cuz loosely we can all take it any way we want. that would just make all this man-made religion and i would stop paying attention to the Bible if anyone can make out of it anything they wanted.
Please see christadelphian bible study and Christadelphian videos for great learning worldwide speakers from Australia New Zealand and Europe and North America and South Africa and John Thomas wrote 'elpis Israel ' in 1848 shows the return of the Jews to Israel under a British mandate he actually foretold!
The prophecy deals with Messiah cut off to deal with the problem of sin and is risen from the dead and has brought in everlasting righteousness having sealed up the covenant in his blood please see christadelphian bible study and Christadelphian videos@@JamieElison
@Shawn Boonstra, I think your missing something for verse 27. I prefer the KJV bible Dan. 9:27 "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice AND the oblation to cease, AND for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate." Both the cessation of the sacrifice and oblation AND the making desolate an overspreading of abominations happened at the same time. At the crucifixion. You, yourself, showed how the Jewish Levitical system had become corrupt in Jesus' day. He even stated multiple times about "teaching for doctrines the commandments of men", "making void the law through their traditions", etc. This is why the word "abominations" is in the plural and "it" is singular. Individual laws in the Jewish Levitical/Mosaic law. It was ALL of the Levitical laws were made desolate as well as the laws concerning the sacrifices and oblations. The Handwriting of Ordinances (which Moses wrote in a book) that were nailed to the cross. The "He" in "He shall make it desolate" is the same "He" that confirms the covenant for one week and "He" causes the sacrifice and oblation to cease. Because the wording is similar to the "Abomination that maketh desolate" and the "Abomination of desolation" people think it must be the same thing. But one is a title giving to a singular power that makes things desolate. The other is something (in the plural) that is made desolate by the same "He" in verse 27. Would also have liked to hear you make mention that the word "determined" in verse 24 is a mistranslation. It is from the Hebrew word "ḥāṯaḵ" which means to "cut off", specifically "from the beginning of" something else. The translators of the KJV just couldn't figure out what Daniel's 70 weeks was cut off from so they substituted the word determined in it's place.
Jesus did confirmed the covenant for one week, from 27 Ad to 34 Ad. Jesus was crucified in the midst of that week. thus ending the sacrificial system. and in 34 Ad the Jews stoned Stephen to death and Paul told Acts 22:20- And when the blood of thy martyr Stephen was shed, I also was standing by, and consenting unto his death, and kept the raiment of them that slew him. Vs. 20-and he said unto me, Depart: for I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles. Thus ending the probation of the Jews to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, Dan. 9:24.
@davidstarr6604 ! He did not miss. In fact, you missed his explanation of that. Did you notice a chart, where there was written 27 AD and a cross? That chart was describing this verse. He knows the verse well as much as equal to his eloquence.
@@farwestgarohills3831 I saw that. And I noticed he is using the NKJV which translates "kānāp̄" as "wing" while the OLD KJV translates it as "overspreading". The idea being a "covering" like a hen covering her young with her wings. But in this context (Dan. 9:27) it is the abominations that have covered the land (Judea) in Jesus' time. He, ALSO, is confusing the text with the "abomination that maketh desolate" or the "abomination of desolation" (a reference to the coming anti-christ in Daniel 11:31, 12:11 and Matthew 24:15, Mark 13:14). They are not the same as the overspreading/wing of abominations in Dan. 9:27.
@@davidstarr6604 it most certainly is David ..Daniel 9:27 is the same abomination of desolation!! Jesus tells you that in Matthew. 24:15.. but you don't want to listen to Jesus!
Take note: During the time of Christ Jesus' ministry on Earth (1st Cent. A.D.), Prophet John the Baptist has the "SPIRIT of Elijah," according to the Bible, but not Prophet Elijah himself... just like Prophet Elisha got the Power of Elijah after he was taken by God through the chariot of fire, but not Prophet Elijah himself... At the End Times/Last Days/Aweson Dreadful Day, Prophet Malachi prophesied that God would send back Prophet Elijah himself (Body, Soul, Spirit, and Power that comes from God) to be one of God's WITNESSES (one of the 2 OLIVE Tress/2 Candlestands) according to Revelation 11... Facts and Truth, Biblically speaking... Amen and Amen...
Dear Shawn and readers. Dan 9:24: "Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city..." are the words Gabriel explained to Daniel. If we read the rest of this verse and apply the literal words without adding our own...Gabriel gave Daniel understanding in Daniel 9:24, 2 5, 26, 27 the understanding of Father's appointed times. These 70 weeks were 70 weeks of years or (7 0 X 7 = 490 years). They are also to confirm when the 2300 days fit into the appointed times. Dan 8:17 So he came near where I stood: and when he came, I was afraid, and fell upon my face: but he said unto me, Understand, O son of man: for at the time of the end shall be the vision. Dan 8:19 And he said, Behold, I will make thee know what shall be in the last end of the indignation: for at the time appointed the end shall be. Gabriel was very clear the 2300-day Prophecy given in Dan 8:9-14 is appointed for the "time of the end." Today, I have two major things I need help to make fit into Shawns' and the Adventist unmoveable 457 BC to 1844 AD time frame. 1. 457 BC was not the "time of the end" or "the appointed time of the end for this vision. 2. Daniel 8:9 shows the "Little Horn" power doing wicked deeds to God's people. The Little Horn began when the Greek Empire fell to the Little Horn power, which uprooted the other three horns that controlled the Greek Empire, and then the Roman Empire (Little Horn) began. 3. Daniel 2 gave us only 4 major Empires, and we have two legs, which advent teachers overlook. The Roman Empire The Western Roman Empire moved to the Eastern Roman Empire. The Western Roman Empire restored its power in the 1800s, and today, in Rome, Italy, the smallest and most powerful Nation in the World, and run by the most powerful man in the World. Who controls the Calendar controls the World, and we are already in a New World Order looking to have our US dollars changed to digital currency that will take another layer of slavery. Now let us move forward: Dan 9:26: "And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the City and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. " In verse 26, history has recorded that a (Roman) prince came and destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD. But we must be very honest with the words of Prophecy and stop listening to others who put words into our heads. Daniel 9:24 put the fall of Jerusalem inside of the 70-week Prophecy. It was supported again in Daniel 9:26 that the City and the sanctuary would be destroyed. Shawn and his Church has a problem: The fall of the City of Jerusalem and the Sanctuary will not fit within Shawn's or his Church's timeline, which ends 3.5 years after the Cross. Slow down and process these details, and pray for help. If I am wrong, then please correct me. I am so blessed when Father sends someone to turn me around. Shawn and the Seventh Day Adventist Church has held onto their teaching that began in 1844 and have not moved forward. I agree that if no new knowledge has been sent by the Father, we don't have more foundation stones. Shawn and his Church leadership apply the last 70th week or seven years to follow the 69th week. So they have the Cross in the midst of the last 70th week. Two significant questions Shawn B. can't answer: 1. Daniel 9:24: Were and when was the "Most Holy Anointed" that must fall within the 70th weeks? No Jesus will anoint the Most Holy on the 2300th day of this Prophecy at the end of the Great Tribulation of Matt 24. 2. Did Jesus/Yeshua anoint the Earthly Most Holy in Jerusalem when He walked upon the earth? No 3. Did Jesus/Yeshua anoint the Heavenly Temple's Most Holy, thus cleansing the Sanctuary each year on the Day of Atonement? No 4. If your answer to number 3 is yes, then you must believe there is an annual Day of Atonement in heaven when Jesus/Yeshua goes into the Most Holy on the Day of Atonement. What evidence do you have to support that understanding? 5. In Daniel 9:24 and 26, it is clear that the City of Jerusalam will be destroyed within that 70-week Prophecy. Please share with us how the math works for 70 AD to fall inside the 70-week forecast if your 70th weekends are 3.5 years after the Cross. I am not correcting you or your Church. That is the Holy Spirit's job. I always look for correction and will consider all your evidence to support your doctrine. I SEE YOU ARE OUTSIDE OF THE 70-WEEK PROPHECY BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE END OF THE 70 WEEKS AT THE STONING OF STEVEN. THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM IN 70 AD WILL NOT FIT ANYWHERE NEAR THE DEATH OF JESUS ON THE CROSS. As for me and my house, I will follow Jesus. Your Prophet Ellen White said that every generation would receive new light if they accepted the new light and walked in it; then there would be more light. This is following Jesus. Let us remember the story in the Exodus when Israel was led out of Egypt. They were to follow the Cloud by day and the Fire by night. They were moving forward. If they didn't progress, they would be left behind. If God's people stop moving forward on the pathway of truth when light is sent, Ellen White warned they would be very disappointed. God's judgments will begin in the House of God; it is a solemn duty to stand before the Father's flock and not be able to prepare the people for what will come upon God's people just ahead. I would love to sit with you and reason or speak on the phone. But it has been my experience that most Church leaders will have the same problem that the leaders in the Temple had. They try to prevent the people from receiving what is needed to prepare them for the Last Days. Jesus/Yeshua was an 'Outsider," and the Temple leaders saw his teachings as threatening. People mistakenly think their Church membership is a ticket into the Holy City. Church is a hospital where people find healing and how to walk out their lives in this crazy World. I must be careful not to reject the truth and be willing to be corrected. There is no time to be stiff-necked or stubborn today. God said people follow their traditions and deny his fact. Time is very short. Daniel 12 promised that some knowledge had been held back until the last days, then the Father would give understanding to those running to and fro seeking knowledge. Sorry, 1843/1844 were not the last days or the beginning of the previous days; they are not even the last years. 175 years have passed, and the SDA Church leaders have not led the flock even to the next campground. Why? Because they can't change. Like the Catholic Church, they are too big to change. Any change would cause people to leave the Church. When people grow up hearing the Church has truth, they follow their Church leaders. So, if a Church does make any changes, they are made very slowly over several generations. When the old guard dies off, then the Church can move something without many protesting. Today, many Adventist Pastors and members have come out of the Church for many reasons. In these last days, pray for the "Oil," if I am not Born Again with the Father's "Fire," I will not walk into the Holy City and be blessed with eternal life. I need the Father's "Fire" and the "Living Water" that Jesus/Yeshua said I must have to be saved. I must be born again and given a new heart, which is where our emotions or desires come from that drive our brain to operate everything. The Holy Spirit is the Fire, and I must keep the "Oil" full to keep the fire burning. I visit many different Churches and ask questions. The answers I receive tell me a lot. Please get ready, it is very late. The Church's view on the close of probation is incorrect. It is very near. It is so close, and millions will not be prepared. I have such a burden for all of Father's sheep and lambs. But today, Israel is more stubborn than Israel of the past. Sin has increased, and we are the weakest of all the generations. Mentally, physically, and spiritually. PRAY!!!!
*@sunmoonstars8471* You've mentioned the following, and I copied and pasted your very words: "Your Prophecy Ellen White said much about every generation would receive new light if that accepted the new light and walked in it then there would be more light given." *Quote close.* Now, I've just done a quick online search, and she also said the following: “I appreciate the truth, every jot of it, just as it has been given to me by the Holy Spirit for the last fifty years. *I desire every one to know that I stand on the same platform of truth that we have maintained for more than half a century.* That is the testimony I desire to bear on the day that I am seventy-eight years of age.” Letters and Manuscripts - Volume 20 (1905), Ms 142, 1905, par. 6 *She wrote the following in 1913:* - *“The increased light of the present day does not contradict or make of none effect the dimmer light of the past.”* The Signs of the Times August 26, 1913, paragraph 3. *The following statement was written in 1915.* - *“Let none seek to tear away the foundations of our faith,-the foundations that were laid at the beginning of our work, by prayerful study of the Word and by revelation. Upon these foundations, we have been building for more than fifty years. Men may suppose that they have found a new way, that they can lay a stronger foundation than that which has been laid; but this is a great deception. “Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid.” [1 Corinthians 3:11.] In the past, many have undertaken to build a new faith, to establish new principles; but how long did their building stand? It soon fell; for it was not founded upon the Rock."* Gospel Workers (1915 ed.), p. 307.1 *She died Feb. 13, 1915.* So, what is this new light you're suggesting? I've listened to numerous speakers from various denominations on this subject, and of all the controversial topics found in the Bible, none other has been so misunderstood, or abused than the prophecy known as Daniels 70 Weeks. I'm sure the readers and myself are extremely curious and would like to know your stand on this prophecy. *I am no theologian, please educate me and the rest of the readers.* You sound desperate to talk to Boonstra and teach him some new light.... or shall I say sharing the truth. Instead of leaving everyone wondering - why don't you do everyone a huge favor and give a proper analysis [line upon line, verse upon verse] of this prophecy beginning at the starting point to the very last week, known as the the70th week. Please quote from the Bible and historical sources only. Please provide the historical source/link and verses. You've addressed Shawn Boonstra and you type just about 814 words. I am sure you will be conservative and do at least a minimum of 2600 to 3500 words on the 70-Week Prophecy of Daniel. As I have mentioned above, I am no theologian but I am extremely curious what you have to say on this particular subject.
@seekertruth3577 well I am no theologian either. And regardless if you want to call it the 70th week of Daniel, or the Tribulation period, there is one truth, if you are an honest Christian, is that the final generation is the fig tree generation. That prophecy has been fulfilled in 1948 as Israel reinhabited the land. Not one line of scripture refering to the last days, especially Revalation could come to pass prior to the last generation being in the land. And there is without a doubt a 7 year Tribulation period which is the last 7 years of life as we know it on this planet. Now I don't know if you're SDA, and honestly the only 2 things I know about them is the observe the correct Sabbath, and everything about the last days they wrongfully direct to the Catholics. So in fact, this man in the video is incorrect. And if you need the scriptures to prove my point, I am happy to provide them with any questions you might have
@@chief270202 I am So blessed to have an independent Spirit-filled brother respond. I also agree the Fig Tree Prophecy is a time-appointed prophecy. The command by the UN was made in 1947, and it was fulfilled, if my memory is correct, on May 15, 1948. Here, Jesus/Yeshua spoke about all these signs that would occur during the last generation, and the end would come in that generation. So I searched in the Scriptures and found (I don't have the text right now) that the average age is three scores and ten, but if strong, found score. I first took 1947 + 70 years, which has already passed. Then, adding 80 years for being strong, and we land on 2027 AD. If we use 1948, we add 2028 AD for the end of that generation. So we are told before, "This generation shall not pass till all these things be fulfilled." I recently returned from spending almost 3 years living on top of a mountain in a jungle, and during lockdown, the Father assigned me the job of searching the Scriptures, and I was shown so many things during over 4,000 hours of study. I only use the Scriptures and would love to connect with you. You can reach me at protondotme and in front of the at lastseventhmonth. I would love to hear from you and share our present understanding. Peace/Shalom from a Bond Servant of the Most High
@@seekertruth3577 Thank you for your comments and for sharing some quotes. In November 2019, my Father sent me to the Philippines for almost three years. During the lockdown, I was told to study prophecy. I began reading through Genesis to Revelation every year using a reading plan. It has transformed my life and understanding. I claim to have only some truth and knowledge of correct reality. All praise and credit is sent to the Throne. Daniel's vision in chapter 8 and Daniel 9:24 - 27 are critical. Yes, every word spoken is vital, and Father never says idle words. I, too, am seeking knowledge and investigating others who have a testimony. The Holy Spirit is the only teacher, and I can only share my present testimony; it is always moving me forward. I am not in the same place I was six months ago. I am trying to follow Jesus/Yeshua and only focus on him. I respect my brothers and sisters, who also strive to follow. I would like to see another's testimony only after I finish a study to seek out another survey to search for a correction or addition. The end of my exail is: atproton dot c-m. Please add in front: LastSeventhMonth. I can respond to your request much easier for you. Peace/Shalom
The Lord Jesus Christ NEVER confirmed a covenant for 7 years. His covenant with the believers is for ETERNITY.. He started a NEW Covenant ( Jeremiah 31) which lasts for ETERNITY. Why should Dan 9/27 go back in time to AD 30 referring to the Messiah when Dan 9/26 clearly refers to an event that took place in AD 70 involving Roman Titus?? Follow the chronological time line from Dan 9/ 25-27 and you will see that Dan 9/27 would be out of sync if it referred to Lord Yeshua Messiah.
Methinks you need to look into literary styles and structures particular to the middle east instead of what seems to be a western eye. This is very similar to how Hebrew poetry uses chiasms to emphasize a point. In this instance, the emphasis is being placed on the Messiah being the one who is ultimately behind their destruction: 26 Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. 27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate. 26 tells us Messiah is cut off for others and that the city and sanctuary will be destroyed by the prince to come while 27 tells us specifically that Messiah will be cut off mid week at which point he causes the sacrifice and offerings to cease and that ultimately, he will destroy the city and temple because of their abominations. There's nothing out of sync here.
“If the plain sense makes good sense seek no other sense or you will get nonsense” absolutely profound. Thank you for this lesson. Those verses in Daniel make way more sense to me now. It always felt like there were a lot of hoops that many other teachers were jumping through to make this about the Anti-Christ and end times. Shalom
Here is how this works.. Neh 2:1 And it came to pass in the month Nisan, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king. From the month of Nisan unto Nisan, point A unto point B, exactly. ...from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build **Jerusalem** unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks..= 7 and 62 = From Nehemiah 2, 445bc subtract 483 converted to days = 173880 DAYS... MARCH 14 445bc to APRIL 6th 32 ad. Nisan 10 The triumphal entry In Luke 19
Thanks for your comment. The vision of Daniel 8 in verse 14 points to the vision being 2300 days long. The Adventist Church began that vision in 457 BC. There is some history behind why, but I will stick to the texts and history. Daniel chapter 8, as you read down the page, comes to the "little horn." throughout the past 200 years, the little horn has been considered the Holy Roman Empire. Here is the speaker's problem. The Roman Empire had not come to power; the Greek Empire was in control. The speaker is stuck with his traditions that began back in 1844. So where do these 2300 days fit? Answer: There are seven years of tribulation or some call time of trouble. Take 360 days/dates in a prophetic year X 7 years = 2520 days/dates in this tribulation, divided into two halves (see Daniel 9:27). Now lay out a timeline of 2520 days. Mark the middle with 1,260 on each side. The 2300 days end on the same date the 2520 ends, which is the end of the Great Tribulation. Do the math, and the "little horn" power will begin doing great evil, as is written before verse 14. Now, read after verse 14, and you will see the Angle Gabriel sent to Daniel to give him an understanding of this vision. Then Gabriel states two times this vision is for the last days of the end of time. One more critical detail. Daniel 9:24-27 Gabeirl returns to give Daniel more information connected to Daniel's end-time prophecy. Adventists claim the midst of the 70th week was the Cross. At my first look, it sounded good, but the details must be noticed. In the 70th week of Daniel's prophecy, the Adventists say Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD...how everything. You can't end the 70th week at the Cross and then say 70 AD fits into Daniel 9:26, where we are told the city is destroyed. Our trouble today is the same problem Israel has and has had from their beginning. People want a man to lead them instead of the Almighty Father and Son. Ask the honest question: Is the Adventist view starting this vision in the last days of 457 BC fit the literal meaning of what is written. It made sense for the religious group in 1844, but it is 2023, and we are not in the Kingdom yet. Today, the Adventist Church, like so many others, has some great truth, and they also get stuck with their doctrines cast into cement that can't be moved. Like the Catholic Church, they never change. The Adventist World Church is now over 22,000,000, so you don't grow that big without having something to offer. But they can't progress and follow the Cloud by day and the fire by night. So, most will be left behind thinking they are following Jesus because they believe their Church leaders are following Jesus. If the Church changed a central doctrine like the 2300-day view they have millions would leave their Church. Why? Because we are told that man would instead follow his traditions than his Creator. Shalom Pray for the wild Gentile branches and natural branches of the scattered house of Israel in all the Nations of this world. We are very close to the midst of Daniel's 70th week of the year. The wicked one has a full-court press and is moving us quickly to the final fulfillment of all things.
@@sunmoonstars8471 the 2300 days are actual days, not years. The day for a year nonsense of the SDA s, along with thier endless "saturday is true sabbath" fetish, is absurdist theology and unabashed judaizing . The only place in scripture where a week of seven days actually is seven years is Daniels seventy week prophecy which actually becomes 490 years long because it made no sense historically otherwise, and is backed up by Genesis 29:27, where a week isan ancient hebrew euphemism and also seven years long. Gods time is our time. God demands complete and thorough accuracy in prohetic time statements. Those who misinterpret or change HIS TIMES into times that suit thier errrors and bad theology are simply abominable. Leviticus 19:35, Proverbs 20:10 and 20:23. And a day is not 1000 years either in prophecy. Peter is not making this up. He is quoting the Psalmist in Psalm 90:4 and the Psalmist is actually saying that time does not matter to God in the light of his eternal nature, not according to His divine whimsical fantasies when it comes to prophetic statements. God is God, and he is true. He does not become a trickster or deceiver when it comes to prophecy . That is the sign of a false prophet. Man is the deceiver and liar and twists Gods word to suit his bad eschatology, at a detriment to himself and others.
@@sunmoonstars8471 Ths house of Israel was scattered and destroyed by 70AD. There are no lost tribes, only lost sinners. The national genealogies were all destroyed when the temple burned. And saying only God knows who or where they are today is simply shoring up the lost tribes myth, which then becomes another judaizing fable perpetrated on the gullible church. Paul clearly put his foot down against this sort of nonsense by saying in Galatians ch 4 ,that the cast out one had become those Jews who clinged to Mt Sinai, and refused to come to the New Zion. The Old system had become HAGAR, the one SENT AWAY. For Ishmael was not the child of promise. Isaac was. This was the reason the Jews hated and despised Paul to the point of death. 2000 years later, the church still doesnt seem to get Pauls main point.
I only wish that this man of God would read a little further to (Daniel 12:1-13.) Here Daniel prophecies the future judgment, the resurrection, the abomination of desolation, the 3 1/2 year war, and the second coming of Christ "apart from sin for salvation." This would be when Daniel would arise to his inheritance, his salvation. All these things would be finished as we read (Daniel 12:7.) Confirmed by Christ himself prior to His death in (Matthew 24:34) "all these things fulfilled." "It makes plain sense that the one that rose again, completed his task, like He said He would in their generation? (Matt 5:17-18)
@teresasiner2308 The faith of many will be destroyed when future events do not unfold as interpreted by the unstable rapture-centred dispensationalists. ✔️
@teresasiner2308 You are mislead of what the abomination in the tribulation is therefor you get things wrong. The abomination in the tribulation is not antichrist!! If its not him then what is it? Its an it! Hint: Its in the book of revelation. The bible never refers an abomination to a person. A person like antichrist will be a blasphemer not an abomination. You have listen to bad teaching. Read the bible your self and ask the Lord about understanding. Study what an abomination can be.
Okay smarty-pants how do you explain Matthew 24 verse 15 seems like he's referring to the very end of days and he refers back to Daniel and the abomination of desolation it seems like that passage of Daniel's is referring to the very end of days that Matthew 24 talkin about smarty pants
The word "anti" in antichrist does not mean someone who is going to be openly anti (against) Christ. That word "anti" in the original Bible language can actually mean "IN PLACE OF". So could the bible antichrist be someone who has actually put himself "in place of" Christ? Well, we have further Bible evidence to support this. In 1 John 2:18-19 it says that there were "many antichrists", who "WENT OUT FROM THE CHURCH". In other words, John is pointing to the fact that those "antichrists" were WITHIN THE CHURCH!! Not only that, but Paul in 2 Thess. 2:3-4 calls the man of sin the "son of perdition". Now there is only one other place in the Bible where the name "son of perdition" is used, and that is in John 17:12 talking about JUDAS! And what was Judas? A professing follower of Christ Jesus. Someone who deceived from WITHIN the "church". "The leader of the Catholic church is defined by the faith as the Vicar of Jesus Christ (and is accepted as such by believers). The Pope is considered the man on earth who TAKES THE PLACE of the Second Person of the omnipotent God of the Trinity." (John Paul II, Crossing the Threshold of Hope, p. 3, 1994). "ANTI" - Christ = "IN PLACE OF" Christ!
@rickswineberg Anti means both instead of and against Christ. The first beast in rev.13 is the AC. He is mentioned in some different ways depending of who describes him. Of course there is antichristly systems as RCC but John talks about many antichrists at his time but many more has passed since his time. John talks about the antichrist, so we shall know there is a special one who has a purpouse as Judas also had and is predicted to judgement to bring the fulfillment of prophecy to come to pass. He gets his power from the devil and its described in rev. 12 and 13 how that happens in the spiritual realms. In rev. 17 there 10 kings who have the same mind as him gives him their own thrones which is that they hand over their power to him. This is what the world will see. He is the rider on the white horse in rev.6 and the other horses is what happens becaurse of him. He is the devils copy of the rider of the white horse in the end of the book of revelation which of course is Jesus Christ coming as the king of kings to take over the reign of the earth. Antichrist can not be a system or many persons he is one man in one time and his time is 42 months and we see how he and the false prophet is cast in the lake of fire. The judgement of antichrist is the evidence that he is one man.
Jesus's ministry on Earth was ONLY for 3 Years...NOT 3 1/2 years. People need to do research on the Feasts of the Lord. Jesus was baptized on a Jewish Holiday...starting His ministry which only lasted 3 years.
Seeing another reference to abomination, desolation and tying it to Daniel 9:27 really helped me. The Romans were "the people of the Prince to come" because Jesus used them to destroy the temple the same way He used Nebuchadnezzar. Futurism is like trying to build a pyramid from the top brick down. On paper the pieces do fit, but in practicality, there is no truth to it at all. Since "the end of the war" does not really tie to any one war, that means the holy land is cursed. When Jesus went back to heaven we were to follow Him there in our referencing of spiritual things. Indeed the conflict between good and evil was taken to the next level as the church spread beyond the region of Palestine. And church history is a repeat of Old Testament Israel's history. The time of the Judges parallels the early church in that there was no central leader and persecution was from without. Then after 313 AD when Constantine legalized the church we have a parallel to the time of the kings. Evil kings persecuted the faithful within the church and the Popes played this role for centuries. The division between Catholic and Orthodox parallels the divided kingdom after Solomon. And the time the Jews had after the captivity that Daniel 9:24-27 covers very closely matches the time we have had since the Reformation began with Martin Luther.
It is past time for the SDA church to acknowledge the obvious- the movement to bring the Jews back to the Holy Land is nothing short of a movement of God. See Deuteronomy 30:3,4: Isaiah 11:10-12: Luke 21:24: Ezekiel 36:21-25
What's 70 a.d.. when Titus destroyed the temple.. the 70 week is written after that.. the guy is SDA! They believe in the false prophet Ellen and that's what he is saying!. Why? because he's .. destroying the 2300 days of Daniel 8!
@@JamieElison Ok? Take away Ellen White will not stop the fact that you STILL have to keep the Sabbath and the fact that the Bible prophesies a crisis of worship over the Sabbath in the last days.
@@JamieElison When will you evangelicals LEARN from 1 Peter 3:15 and answer why you believe what you believe with MEEKNESS and not with ad hominems and genetic fallacies???
@@ClayOfTheMaster well if your SDA.. and if that's what you're saying. We can't remove Ellen.. because that is where you get (everything )that you believe including the Sabbath you're standing behind!... So who's your 1844 Jesus ? ) a levite Jesus )or is He the Jesus of Hebrews 7?.. ((( that does nothing at the alter))).. from the tribe of Judah...?
So what your saying that Zechariah 14 has no meaning, Abba comes back at Meddigo. Valley of Jehoshaphat: the valley of Berachah (blessing). The general location of this valley is said to be around En Gedi (2 Chronicles 20). Either way, this would be somewhere west of the dead sea, which is south of Jerusalem. Valley of Megiddo: due just north of Jerusalem. Seeing how these are two different locations where Abba or Messiah are to engage the enemies, it is important to differentiate between what scriptures speak of what, which can be a bit confusing! It is also important do differentiate between these two battles. In the "valley of decision", Abba is going to pursue the nations after having driven them away from Jerusalem, and enter into final "judgement there", in that valley. However, the battle of armageddon is a response of the beast of Revelation and the world leaders, as a collective, with the intent of coming to fight Christ. From what I gather, Joel 1-2, Zech.14 speaks of Abbas return, thus Zech 14 would be His engaging of the enemies of Jerusalem who have surrounded her. Yet we have this verse... "For I will gather all the nations to battle against Jerusalem;"
The channel just popped up today. I expected the worst but was pleasantly surprised. There is a real sense of sadness that the simple story is not understood by so many true believers.
Yes, I agree. It seems the highly educated need to keep things complex so the average person will just accept what their pastor says. I love pastors working to build up the Kingdom as their first goal. Building the church membership is not always the same, but it should be. Too much business in the church. Meeting in our homes or outside under the trees might be a blessing. There is too much money to budget and keep these expensive buildings and utilities going when the money could be spent to reach the last. It seems the time for the Gentiles is closing. There needs to be more outreach.
It's funny how history repeats itself. Even now, there are people building and saying; the temple of the Lord are these. In Jan. our leader stood in a temple of God saying "I have come to redeem America and save the world." I now know who the son of perdition is, spoken by Paul the prophet in 2 Thess.2. Because what he said what he said, and i know it's already been done for me and you; he's saying he is God. Son of perdition. Utter destruction. Good-bye America. Maui was a shot over the bow. The times and seasons of judgment, has begun. "But I will punish you according the fruit of your doings, saith the Lord: and I will kindle a fire in the forest thereof, and it shall devour all things round about it." Jer.21:14
Amen brother I totally agree with your interpretation of this Daniel 70th week prophecy the only thing that came up differently in my Mathematics of the 70th week fulfillment is that when the Holy Ghost came at the day of Pentecost in 33ad that fulfilled God's promise to Israel I started with the commission of Ezra to leave Babylon and go to Jerusalem to get the house of God in order because there were still many Jews married to strange women and foreign women and relationships and Ezra was sent to put God's law in place in 458bc so 458bc to 30ad the year the Jesus was crucified is 487 years and you take 6 months from the 487 which leaves 486 years and six months that were fulfilled then 3 1/2 years that remained and the Holy Ghost came at the day of Pentecost in 33ad the stoning of Stephen did not have any significance in the fulfillment of the 70 week prophecy the significance for the Jews was once Christ had shed his blood for the many as he told his disciples that it is expedient that he go away for if he did not go away the Comforter would not come. And the reason I picked 458bc as the starting point for God's count down of the 70 weeks because the Bible says to seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness and all those other things shall be added unto you the building of the city and the land has no precedence over the Law of God and God used Ezra to do just that God bless your ministry! Amen 🙏!
My Brother, my heart leaps for joy when our Father makes divine appointments to bring us together to share our understanding with respect for what the Holy Spirit is doing in us and around us. Thank you for sharing. We all live with our English-translated Scriptures, and the Father knew how to protect HIs message. We were given rules off the pages of the Scriptures that will guide us into correct understanding. The Bible is also self-correcting if I use the rules. When Moses wrote the same warning we read at the end of Revelation that not one word be added or taken away, that warning was given for a reason. Daniel 7:25 points out the evil one will try to change "TIMES" and "LAWS," and he has succeeded in both. They are different, but some only point out one change from Sabbath Day to Sunday worship. Check out my response to a brother above for additional comments on this vital prophecy in Daniel 8 and Daniel 9:24-27. They are connected. If you look carefully, you will discover how to reach me. I just returned from Asia after spending over 4,000 hours on end-time prophecy. Much to share. Here is one question: The Lord returned to the Father and sat down on the Father's Throne, and they sat side by side. Where is that throne located? We all should know that the Father has another Throne in the Temple's Most Holy Place or some call Holy of Holies. Only the Father sits there, and Jesus/Yeshua only stands before the Father is never seen sitting there. You may be the first to get the correct answer. Since returning home, I have asked many people and am told no one ever thought to ask this question. Brother, THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON IN HEAVEN, AND WHAT EVENTS WILL CHANGE THERE, AND HOW IT WILL EFFECT US HERE. SHALOM
@@messengerisrael3817 Abrahams seed are those by faith in Christ. Galatians 3:7-9. The real Jew is heart cirumcised and not outwardly, but an inward change of heart and mind. Born again by His spirit, not by fleshly will. No one enters the kingdom without being born again. He spoke these words to the Jews. Those who claim to have the Father, but deny the SON, are both GODLESS AND ANTICHRIST. 1 John 2:22-23.
@@sunmoonstars8471 1 John 3:2 2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. We should not have to consider or worry about where Jesus is sitting exactly its not important to know for the Bible says to judge nothing before the time . And also its the Holy Ghost within a believer that teaches how to rightfully divide the word of Truth The Bible in an of itself does not teach because the Bible is just the record of the living Word red and black ink on white paper for Jesus said that it is the spirit that quickens the flesh profits nothing the words that I speak unto thee they are spirit and they are life. For there are many that believe in interpreting the Bible literally but the natural man receives not the things of the spirit of God because it's foolish to him neither does he know them because it's spiritually discerned . When this mortal take on immortality we will be totally different than this present mortal man . Amen 🙏!
@@sunmoonstars8471 Well I believe you are wrong because the bible plainly tells us that Jesus was seated on the right hand of God. Mark 16:19, Mark 14:62, Matthew 26:64, Luke 22:69, Hebrews 10:12, Hebrews 1:13, Matthew 22:44, Luke 20:42,
An important reason why many Christians view the last seven years of Daniel 9's prophecy as yet future is precisely because of how Jesus himself applies it. This teacher handles Daniel 9 like many preterists do and attempts to align it with the destruction of the temple in 70AD. Jesus however tells His disciples in Matthew 24 that when they (Israel) see the "abomination of desolation" that they are to flee to the mountains in all haste, for then there will be tribulation unlike anything that had ever occurred previously, or will ever occur again in all the world (see Matthew 24:15-22). You cannot say this of 70AD, for as many Jews as were killed by the Romans at that time, far worse things took place in World War II when six million Jews were brutally treated and murdered. This dwarfs the number of Jews believed killed in 70AD. So clearly, 70AD was not the worse tribulation that the Jews would ever face and it was not global in scope, nor did the other signs Jesus refers to, including His return, take place at that time, as recorded in the remainder of Matthew 24. The events of 70AD could not therefore fulfill Jesus' own words from verse 15 on in Matthew's gospel. The reason for adopting a future position therefore, in which anti-Christ makes a covenant with many, is not to follow some tradition or sub-cultural view within Christendom as suggested, but because of what the text actually says.
The 7th day sabbath starts in the morning at sunrise, according to the KJV Bible. Genesis ch 1 and 2: 1-3, Exodus ch 16, Matthew 28: 1-7, Mark 15:25 and 33-34, Mark: 16: 1-7, Luke 24: 1-7, and John 20: 1-19. KJV Bible
@@stophatin1354 quote--Genesis ch 1 and 2: 1-3, >>unquote> Gen 1:5, 1:8, 1:13, 1:19, 1:23, 1:31--ALL say evening (darkness) and the morning (light). Matt 28:1 Matthew 28:1 New International Version Jesus Has Risen 28 After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb. (AFTER-----First day of the week the whole world KNOWS that is Sunday) ----Mark 15:25----Mark 15:25 New International Version 25 It was nine in the morning when they crucified him Yes--Friday morning!!! >>Mark 15:33-34 New International Version The Death of Jesus 33 At noon, darkness came over the whole land until three in the afternoon. 34 And at three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” (which means “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”). Friday afternoon--what is now called Good Friday!!! >>>Jesus Has Risen Mark 16:1 When the Sabbath was over, >>>Luke 24:1-7 New International Version Jesus Has Risen 24 On the first day of the week, very early in the morning, Sunday morning--we call Easter >>>John 20:1-19 New International Version The Empty Tomb 20 Early on the first day of the week, while it was still dark, Sunday morning!! So, what is the problem???
@@stophatin1354 quote----well you're disagreeing with Kjv Scripture and GOD Himself, not me.--unquote Nope--Only because you are taking verses OUT of context. ALL through Gen 1--it says Evening (darkness) and Morning (daylight) Sunset to sunset
Thank you so very much for the clearest presentation of this that I have heard. I have believed this way for only about a year or two now, and I’m embarrassed to say that, even though when I was taught the more common way, even though I questioned it because it just didn’t seem to make sense to separate The 70th week from the 69th week, I never did further research. Shame on me and I’m glad that I have a better understanding now. Thank you.
Your're welcome, and all glory and thanks go to the Father's Throne. I am only try to run to an fro seeking knowledge. Yes, when the Cloud brought Israel to the Jordan River to cross over into the Promised Land, the lack of Faith caused God to turn them away to be led in the wilderness until all the 20+-year-old people died for not believing and trusting. Those under 60 years old 40 years later crossed over into the Promised Land without seeing death. This is a prophetic picture of a delay, and this delay we have been in is about to end. The generation born in 1947/1948 will not pass away before Jesus' Second Coming. The strong generation we find written to be fourscore or 80 years. Read and understand the Fig Tree prophecy in Matt 24 and learn who the Fig Tree is and what is hidden in the parable. There are seven years of Tribulation or 2520 days & nights. The seven years are divided into two parts. The first part is a lesser time of trouble or, some say, little time of trouble. The second half is the last 1,260 days or 42 months of the Great Tribulation and also the same time when Michael stands up for the last 1,260 days & nights. Ask me for a timeline my Father had given me when I was sent to Asia to live on a jungle mountaintop for almost three years during the pandemic. Find me: Last seventh month at proton. Me: Remove all the spaces.
I completely share your sentiments, and has been my experience too! Unfortunately, it has now caused devision among family members who refuse to know the facts and continue to hold to the false interpretation, which I don't understand! I guess it's pride! Personally I'd rather know the truth rather than believe a lie.
@@mikewood3309 thats interesting. Where i live,this is not even a thing of discussion. (A separate cattle of fish challenge) Certainly not a church or personal point causing family division/issues. Careful about judging the pride/motive of fellow christians in the body for bothering to share their different understandings or background learned material.
I'm sorry, but when someone spends 20 minutes getting to the point, they are usually trying to convince someone of something that is not true. The analysis of the 70-week prophecy given here was fine up until the 69th week. After that the logic and biblical analysis falls completely apart. Your explanation of the 70th week is completely inconsistent with the text of Daniel 9:27. The text CLEARLY indicates that the "prince who will come" will cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease in the MIDST of the week, i.e. 3 1/2 years into that period of 7 years. If the 70th week was the 7 years following Jesus' death, as you state, that would put it around 30 AD. This is inconsistent with Daniel's text. in 30 AD, the sacrifices were still going strong in the temple. They did not cease until 70 AD, when the temple was destroyed. This make is impossible that your interpretation is true. Your explanation is also inconsistent with Jesus' statement about the abomination of desolation. Contrary to what you stated, when Jesus spoke of the abomination of desolation spoken by Daniel, it was NOT in the context of His prediction of the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. His statement about the destruction of the temple was in Mat. 24:2. His statement about the abomination of desolation was not until verse 15, immediately after he spoke about the time of the END, which is referring to the time immediately before His second coming. The verse immediately preceding says: "And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the END come." (Mat 24:14) It is you who are the one who gets this prophecy wrong.
@@blustarmarketinsights6914 You are conflating two things. The PEOPLE of the prince that shall come destroyed the temple in 70AD. That is Daniel 9:26. Verse 27 has not been fulfilled yet. The "prince that shall come" is not Titus. It is the same one who "confirms" a covenant. Titus had nothing to do with any covenant. This is a future event. Paul refers to this future event in 2 Thes. 2, where he calls this "prince that shall come" the "son of perdition," "the man of sin," and "that wicked one." This son of perdition will sit in the temple of God and declare that he is God and will exalt himself above all that is called god. Titus did not do any of those things. He fulfilled verse 26 but not verse 27. The Book of Revelation also speaks of this event and calls this "prince who will come" the beast. In Revelation, we see this Wicked One will create an image, which shall be given the power of speech and will be worshiped by the whole world. The false prophet, who works with The Beast, will force people to worship The Beast and the Image of The Beast and will force the world to take a mark, which will be necessary to buy or sell anything. Those who take this mark will lose all hope of salvation and will be cast into the lake of fire. These are all future events and were not fulfilled by Titus.
Not conflating, the he is the subject which is the messiah and he uplifts or strengthens the existing covenant which Hebrew verb is used throughout the Old Testament when gods does the same. The prince is better translated front commander and is fulfilled in Titus and the people are the Romans. Chiastic structure confirms also, the man of sin was recorded in Josephus work as one who went into the temple and proclaimed himself god right before its destruction. Beasts are always major powers not men. The false prophet has two horns like the ram did in Daniel 8 which was the medo Persian alliance your eschatology was made up in the early 1800’s by John Darby and makes no sense whatsoever. @@dooglitas
@@blustarmarketinsights6914 You are ignoring what I said and continuing to simply state your opinion again. You originally stated that the "he" was "the people of the prince." Now you are saying it is the Messiah. Putting aside the fact that you contradicted yourself, both are wrong. The "he" is referring back to the prince of the people who destroyed Jerusalem. You state: "The prince is better translated front commander and is fulfilled in Titus and the people are the Romans." Again, you contradict yourself. Now you are saying that "he" is Titus. Obviously, Titus was not the Messiah. You state: " Chiastic structure confirms also, the man of sin was recorded in Josephus work as one who went into the temple and proclaimed himself god right before its destruction." I don't know what "chiastic structure" you are referring to. You make a vague mention of "one who went into the temple and proclaimed himself god right before its destruction." I cannot find any reference to this event. In the time of the Maccabees, Antiochus Epiphanes entered the temple and sacrifice a pig on the altar. However, so far as I know, he did not proclaim himself as a god. The offering was made to Zeus, I believe. The temple was not destroyed at that time. I can find no reference to Titus entering the temple and proclaiming himself God. You gave no reference. So unless you can give me that reference, I shall ignore that claim. You state: "Beasts are always major powers not men." This is not true. Often that is the case, but it is not ALWAYS true. The two beasts in Revelation chapters 13-16 are clearly individuals. There is no logical reason to equate the fact that the false prophet in Rev. has two horns with the vision of the ram in Daniel simply because they both have two horns. Everything in Rev. 13-16 indicates that the false prophet is an individual, not some political power. In fact the title "false prophet" is an indication of it being an individual. False prophets in scripture are ALWAYS individuals. In the vision of the ram in Daniel 8, the TEXT actually TELLS us that the ram represents the Medo-Persian empire. In sharp contrast, there is NOTHING in the text of Rev. 13-16 that even remotely indicates that the false prophet is a major world power, and everything indicates it is an individual. So your argument is a false argument. You state: "your eschatology was made up in the early 1800’s by John Darby and makes no sense whatsoever." This is both untrue and irrelevant. When a certain doctrine was codified has no bearing on the truthfulness of it. Second, your claim that my eschatology "makes no sense whatsoever" is also false. It makes very good sense. It is your eschatology that is confused and contradictory.
Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks (27 AD): the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. 26 And after threescore and two weeks (after 27 AD) shall Messiah be cut off (31 AD), but not for himself: and the people (Romans) of the prince (Titus) that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary (August and September 70 AD); and the end thereof shall be with a flood (Biblical imagery of an army), and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. 27 And he (Messiah, which is the only pronoun of the previous subjects, that being the Messiah and the Romans) shall confirm (make strong, uplift) the covenant (New Covenant) with the many (Jews: 27-34 AD) for one week (the final 70 week): and in the midst of the week (31 AD) he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease (fig. fail to have any meaning), and for the overspreading (Heb. kanaph = lateral edge of an army) of abominations (Heb. shikoots =idolatrous = Romans) he shall make it desolate (have no meaning), even until the consummation (70 AD), and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.@@dooglitas
The Apostle Paul provides a clear indication of when the rapture will occur. The Man of Lawlessness 2 Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering to Him: 3 Do not be deceived in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion happens and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the one destined for destruction. 4 He will oppose and exalt himself above everything that is called God or is worshiped, setting himself up in God’s temple and proclaiming himself to be God. Daniel indicates that this event will occur at the midpoint of the seven-year tribulation, which contradicts your teaching. This makes you a last days false teacher that Jesus warned us about in Luke 21. Bruce
THANK YOU! That’s what I’ve been saying for decades! People got that idea from the ‘Left Behind’ books and movies. Drove me crazy every time I heard someone repeat that lie. I kept thinking, the passage of scripture clearly refers to the Messiah since it actually said so, so why do people say antichrist in place of the word Messiah? People heard that lie so long, they believe it no matter what the passage of scripture actually says.
The agents of the Antichrist, in the 16th century, during the Reformation, developed the Futurist end-times view (not for their own people, but for the Protestants). This primitive futurism eventually took root in Protestant thought and developed, largely in the mid-1800s, into what is now called Dispensationalism. The objective is to deceive Bible-based Christians into perpetually looking for the Antichrist to come some time in the future, after certain events in Jerusalem occur, and for a period of 7 years which is nowhere stated in scripture, and, even better, to convince them of a pre-tribulation rapture, by twisting the interpretations of the prophecies of Daniel and of John (Revelation) to agree with that objective. Although many Protestant pastors innocently promulgate this eschatology, because it is what they were taught, there have been others who, for centuries, have deliberately deceived the flock.
Daniel 9:26-27 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate. Who are the people of the prince? Christians? You think Christians destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 AD? History says it was the Romans who did it. Romans who were pagans and idolaters. Are you claiming that pagan Romans are the people of Jesus? "the PEOPLE of the prince shall destroy the city and the sanctuary" The people of God were always Israel. Do you claim that Israel destroyed their own temple? According to history, Rome destroyed the 2nd Temple. The "prince" of Rome was Caesar....Render unto Caesar what is Caesar and to God what is God's. "Prince Messiah" is not "prince that shall come". The person who confirms the covenant does it for the OVERSPREADING OF ABOMINATIONS. If you think that the prince that shall come is Jesus...you are claiming Jesus performs abominations.
Very interesting mention you made of the Israelites "like a bride" being returned in humiliation for betraying the covenant (to be a nation of priests and prophets, keeping Gods Laws). You make the distinction of Abraham being Chaldean quite correctly so, and so they return to what was once Chaldea (then Assyria under the Babylonians, Shalmanesar etc) (also mentioned in 2 Esdras). Now with that in mind, consider the claim by the later Islamic prophet Muhammad pbuh, of the "NIGHT JOURNEY" to Jerusalem and his ascension to the heavens on a mystical angelic divine figure, Buraq, was during a time where Islam itself had not even taken any of it's current shape or form but rather was a revelation of reviving the scriptures sent down before i.e Authentic Torah, Psalms (which were said to have been destroyed with the destruction of the Temple, later revealed anew / afresh to the prophet Ezra and his scribes who then established the religious council reformation of Judaism that sets aside temple rituals for the divinely ordained INDIVIDUAL WORSHIP (The Amidah etc). Following on this fact, the night journey of the Islamic prophet who was a descendant of Abraham and essentially genetic cousin of the Israelites (semites) was before the establishment of actual Islam as we know it, and a sign or miracle that was signalling divinely TO the people OF THE BOOK primarily (Jews and Gentile followers of Christ). The journey to Jerusalem all of a sudden while the man was in his bed at the time, approached by this angelic figure/creature to carry him to the SACRED HOUSE (MAQDIS) of Jerusalem where he sees for himself the remains of the temple ruins which he describes after to the Jews of Medina for proof, but also where this Ishmaelite messenger.. meets ALL OF HIS Isaac cousins, all of the prophets of the Israelites that God had favoured the once chosen nation with. He then prays with them and shortly after this brief encounter with the numerous band of prophets of Israel (that the nation of Islam, cousins of the Israelites inherit as an essential pillar of faith - Ezekiel, Ezra, further mention they will also believe in the signs/miracles though they have not witnessed, and they will glorify the name of the Lord to the end of times*), Muhammad then ascends to the heavens on this mystical creature yet again for some interesting encounters through each of the 7 'heavens" before reaching the Lote Tree to receive fresh commandments, instructions for this final restoration and reformation of the religion of Abraham for ALL nations and peoples, not only the once chosen people.* Now what is even more interesting is also the fact that Jerusalem since the time of Ezra, after the destruction of the Temple - was the direction of individual worship ritual. When Muhammad meets all of the other prophets (probably in a realm of spirits, metaphysical*) the angel Gabriel instructs him, who is now the end of the line of prophets standing in rows to praise their Lord, to turn around and face the direction of the OTHER HOLY GROUND, that was built by Abraham HIMSELF even before the Temple of Jerusalem was built. (Book of 2 Esdras makes mention of this during conversations with God, The Lord refers to sacred grounds that He has 'kept' for himself, protected and sanct till the rapture). When this instruction is revealed to all of the prophets of Israelites and Ishmaelite (about 3 only I believe?) then Muhammed finds himself not as the last in line, but now as the first, typically meaning the leader of the congregation for prayer. And they all oblige in joy. This scene can be interpreted as follows: The prophecies by previous prophets of Israel concerning the 3rd temple that will be for all believing nations and peoples will be built under the banner of the final revelation that does confirm all of the previous authentic scripture and revelations, that confirms Jesus the Messiah and his miraculous birth and signs of divine support to convince the house of David to follow him, and confirms the Psalms as well as later revelations of Ezekiel, Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezra (the forgotten crucial link in Abrahamic faiths!!) - Simply put, the Night Journey of Ascension from Jerusalem by Muhammad was a clear indication of the divine order and plan of the Lord to restore the temple, under the banner of Monotheism, the reformed laws that unite all people's without exclusivity. And indeed it was so, that some years after Muhammad pbuh died, that his legacy..rather the legacy of the originator of Monotheism, Abraham pbuh, were successful in entering and conquering without war or violence on hallowed grounds.. to take Jerusalem, and begin the construction of the house of worship once again. (Believe this is mentioned in Bible as well, 'and the time shall pass and the courts shall make judgement to pass the holy temple to the believers'? I think this verse may refer to the ONLY NON VIOLENT possession of the temple mount, which was during the Caliph Umar) .. whence the 3rd temple alluded to in scriptures then began, if you fully appreciate the legacy of Monotheism to begin with Abraham and not an exclusively Jewish proposition/ideology :)
You can't get from 457 BC in the spring of the year to the fall of 1844 with 2,300 it's impossible!!. (((There's 4 years and 28 days. Between the ending date of the 69th week and the cross. )))....April the 25th in the year 31.. ((((that's not in the middle of any seven!!!!)))
Starting in 457 B.C. & adding 2,300 years brings us to 1843, until we account for the lack of "Year 0", which gets us 1844. The reason for the Spring-to-Autumn transition is that this prophetic timeline began with the conclusion of 457's Passover (you can see it at the end of Ezra 6, right before the events of Ezra 7 in which Ezra arrives with the King’s missive), & culminates with 1844's Day of Atonement, the day when the sanctuary is cleansed. As for the extraneous 4 years & 28 days, I believe the removal sets us to only 3 years & 28 days, which falls within the 4th year of the 7-year period, therefore the middle of the "week".
@@johnl.6731 yeah but Ezra chapter 7 verse 9 says it's the first day of the first month)!( when the decree goes forth. ).The decree is the (command ).the command is what he had in his hand when he left. Daniel 9:25 says when the (command goes fourth) you got to listen to what Jesus Christ actually is telling you. The (first day of the first month. Is Nissan one) established by Exodus 12:2..( is New Year's Day for the Jews). On the Jewish calendar at that time. There's no zero between A.D. and B.C. and( there is no number on the Jewish calendar to match it.)! So to establish what you're trying to say what year is it on the Jewish calendar today(. 2 days ago was New Year's Day on the old calendar for for Israel )..(Nissan 1).... So to establish what year it is( on the Jewish calendar) you have to add. 2024 to 3760 which is. BC 1.. when you do that you get 5784.. that is the (present day (Jewish year.) To get 457 b.c. you( subtract 457) from 3760. That number is (3303..) so to get 1844 ....you add 1844.. to 3760 which is 5604... Subtract 3303 from 5604 (and it's going to show you you're not telling the truth..)!!!! you've (created a zero theology) it doesn't exist! B.C. 1 is 3760 A .d.1 is 3761... You got to stop breaking the 9th commandment you technically don't exist!
@JamieElison @JamieElison You are correct in pointing out Ezra 7:9; I was mistaken in my Passover statement, & therefore off by 14 literal (non-prophetic) days. However, the end of this prophecy remains the Day of Atonement, as that is when sanctuary-cleansing occurs. As for the second matter, one still encounters this "year zero" problem because the Jewish calendar has no B.C./A.D. crossover point. One must subtract 457 from 3,760 to get 3,303. But because the 457 in question is B.C. (negative count), it's subtraction from 3,760 (A.D.-equivalent positive count) still results in a discrepancy of 1 year.
@@johnl.6731 you're not in your right mind ..go read what I wrote again..(. Negative count as nothing to do with it!!). The Jewish calendar is the way you established this!! that's what it was when the prophecy was written !!!you're (trying to create confusion). by what you're doing! ( I am not going to let it happen here)... I have studied Daniel 8 for 50 years.. (you don't even know what it means!)!!!!!! That sanctuary in Daniel 8 has not even been built yet...! And it's not about salvation!!!! you can't have it both ways.! If you're going to add (another year )you're going to be at the the spring of the (Year 28 ).for your Daniel 9:27 concept)! it's not going to work! if you're trying to fix your 2300 days. And claiming it ends up in October ! You can't get to the fall....which no Day of atonement (ever is recorded that late in the year!)... It starts (in the spring of the Year!.)! Day of atonement hardly ever goes past the end of September! AD and BC is established for Jesus birthday that's one day that's a.d.1 New Year's!.. you're not speaking a year for that particular one day! You got to stop listening to your false prophet!
@JamieElison I will use a simple example. Let's say I live in the year 10 B.C. (aka -10), & I age 10 years. That puts me in the year 1 A.D. But wait! I thought -10+10=0, right? How can -10+10=1?
Here is how this works.. Neh 2:1 And it came to pass in the month Nisan, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king. From the month of Nisan unto Nisan, point A unto point B, exactly. ...from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build **Jerusalem** unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks..= 7 and 62 = From Nehemiah 2, 445bc subtract 483 converted to days = 173880 DAYS... MARCH 14 445bc to APRIL 6th 32 ad. Nisan 10 The triumphal entry In Luke 19
@@carlcizek2189 except you stole that from the British guy from the 1800s. And your short 6.9 years ..you'd be shoveling snow in the middle of the summer you're not following the timeline that's actually given!
Am i missing something here, or are you pulling my leg? Jesus said, "So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ a spoken of through the prophet Daniel-let the reader understand- then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. Let no one on the housetop go down to take anything out of the house. Let no one in the field go back to get their cloak. How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! Pray that your flight will not take place in winter or on the Sabbath. For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now-and never to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened." Matthew 24:15-22. You state in your video, at 22 minutes and 12 seconds that what Jesus said,(when He was referring to "abomination that causes desolation" )has nothing to do with the final events... and yet, Jesus clearly alludes in the above passage that this indeed is the end time event. I am not saying what you are saying is wrong or is in error regarding Daniel's revealed prophesy and its correct application... however, for you to make a statement that is in clear contradiction to what Jesus said... Would you explain how to reconcile this problem?
He was warning that people in front of him of what is going to happen in their time around 70ad. The message he gave us right and hated by modern day believers. Thousands of pastors are teaching the left behind sham.
@roywhite8504 If Jesus was speaking of AD 70, then explain why Jesus said that this abomination of desolation would bring the greatest tribulation EVER, in all of history. I can debunk your theory in just four letters WWII. WWII is a sign of what's coming next. God gave us a clear sign that the antichrist is going to be very real by giving us a Hitler character, killing ~6 millions of Jews. Hitler was an antichrist but only an archetype of the one spoken of in the scriptures. Only ~1.1 million people died in the AD 70 siege. Therefore, unless WWII was the thing Jesus was speaking of, then the worst is still yet to come. WWII has been the worst yet. But since there was no abomination in the holy place, the teachings you refuse to believe are most likely accurate. There's no way around it. The wonderful thing is that all of scripture backs it up, too! I don't understand how some don't see it.
@@roywhite8504 Except, that is NOT what Jesus said. Jesus was answering the disciple's question regarding END TIMES, NOT what will happened in 70 A.D. Notice that Jesus did not make any distinction in His description of the things that will happen in the end times that is separate from the destruction of the temple. If what you say is true, then all the events described by Jesus would have happened at the time of temple's destruction, no? By the way, i believe we will go through tribulation, pre trib is just a feel good fantasy not rooted in Scripture.
🤨So YOU’RE saying that the abomination of desolation that Jesus spoke about in Matt24:15 is the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD. That interpretation presents a BIG PROBLEM! Jesus said in Matt24:15,21 that when we see the abomination spoken of by Daniel the prophet, THEN shall be great tribulation such as was not since the beginning of the world to this this, no nor ever shall be. Jesus was quoting Dan12:1. And we know from Dan12:6-7 and related scriptures that the great tribulation shall last for 1,260 days. And FINALLY, Jesus said in Matt24:29-31 that the “Rapture” shall happen IMMEDIATELY AFTER those days of tribulation.
Happy Sabbath. Brother Shawn, I can not tell you how happy I am that new episodes are airing. I am thankful and grateful for your efforts. This is another outstanding and well researched episode. God bless you.
Thank you for your kind words. We're glad to be back with season 6 of Authentic with Shawn Boonstra! We're even more grateful these episodes are blessing you! 😀
I really enjoyed the way you laid out this prophesy. Revelation and Daniel remain my favourites and have studied bothbrather extensively since '64. God bless your work.
For you, it may be "another understanding". But for me, it is the same understanding that I have from my childhood. For, this is the teaching I received in my schooling.
@@VoiceOfProphecy Shawn Boonstra, just want to encourage you to keep the fire going and encourage the sheep to follow Jesus/Yeshua for he only will help the Bride of 144,000 to be a overcomes as Jesus was a overcome. It not popular today to teach there will be a semnant that will overcome sin by the indwelling power of the same Holy Spirit that anointed Jesus and gave him power to overcome all sin, and to help him stand stiffly and fulfill the Passover Lamb and also be our Morning and Evening Lamb for sins we are not able to confess. With much respect I do understand your personal view of the 2300 day prophecy and your understanding of Daniel 9:24-27. I have worked very hard to try to make it work according to your start time of 457 BC which was still during the Greek Empire. So the "Little Horn" we see doing evil in Daniel 8 leading up to verse 14 I see no way to apply the Roman Empire which is the last of the four major Empires of Daniel chapters 2; 7; 8; and Revelation chapters 13; 17; 18; and 19:2. Your Church today is too big to change a foundation doctrine that sets your apart from other Christian Churches. We all know the Catholic Church never changes and it's top down leadership model has been the Adventist model for many years. My understanding is that I must be a Bond Servant of the Most High fully surrendered and following the Cloud by day and the fire by night. Progress through 42 camping locations before Israel was allowed to cross over into the Promise Land. When I see a Church moving forward following Jesus/Yeshua I could follow that Church. I not looking for a perfect Church with perfect members. But I don't only audit a Churches doctrine, I audit what a Church has done, what they are doing today, and where they are headed. You and I know no Church will save us, it is only a hospital to help people get better so they can go to work for the Kingdom. Shawn here is a question I have after spending almost three years in the Philippines in a remote area studying prophecy for over 4,000 hours. Can you tell me where was the Father's Throne where Jesus say at the right hand of the Father. They sat side by side. I am sure you will point to the Father's Throne in heaven in the Temple outside of the Holy City. Here is the key to a big problem: Most believe Jesus returned and worked in the 1st Compartment called the Holy place where Aaron's sons interceeded for personal sins of Israel, except when the High Priest was in the Most Holy once a year. Then no personal confessions were allowed and not one Morning or Evening Lamb can be ollered on that Holy Day. So where was the First Father's Throne located. I know you will not guess by saying in the Holy place I think your educated on this topic, except you may not have been asked this question. The Bridegoom is coming for His perfect Bride who will live though the Great Tribulation and is only numbered to be 144,000 in number. If the Church today is teaching that number is symbolic they are not reading and following the rules of biblical inturpatation, and they have tossed their own prophet Ellen Harmon/White under the bus.
The 70 week happens after 70 AD.. Daniel 9 is written in chronological order. The he in Daniel 9 is the he of Daniel 11:21 ((that wins the kingdom of the world buy flatteries) and is the (prince of the covenant) of Daniel 9:27 )!!!in verse 22 ,23. This guy's not coming from Jesus Christ!
Daniel 11:31 "And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they SHALL PLACE the abomination that maketh desolate." The AOD is a thing, not an event. It's an idol that is worshipped. Jesus warned of this, and Rev. 13 describes it during the 70th week.
@@farwestgarohills3831 you got to stop breaking the 9th commandment .that's all the SDA has ever done!. The first one was saying 457 BC. In the spring of the year you can get to 1844 with 2300 (it's impossible) and that's what created the foundation of the lie. that you're spinning right now!
@@jimbob1644 Where did I break the 0th commandment. You know what happened to Jews for rejecting God's messengers, and at last His Son whom He sent fo give His blood for therm? THEY WERE DESTROYED. You also will destroyed same manner for rejecting the truth being given to you.
@@farwestgarohills3831 well...l to start with your confession of faith says the investigative judgment is the truth.!!!. and the investigative judgment says the second Goat of Leviticus 16:10( is the devil for the atonement..) which is Jesus Christ Himself ( 1st Peter 2:24) and He does Isaiah 43 verse 25. And you're saying that doesn't happen.!! You also say that you can get from 457 B.C. in the spring of the year to the fall of 1844 with 2300. To create the cult( that your false prophet made that false Jesus )..that I just told you you about.. not one thing that you teach and not one thing that you say. In its entirety ...is the truth... you break the ninth commandment every time you speak.. like Jesus told the Pharisees... the very words that you're using. John 8: 44
@@jimbob1644 Can you prove it where it is written "the goat is Jesus Christ"? You people don't understand anything of the Bible; but go on saying blah! blah! blah!. Do you know the meaning of a CULT? You don't. I tell you. CULT IS A GROUP OF PEPLE WHO DEVIATE FROM THE ORIGINAL FAITH. What is the original faith? ALL ORIGINAL CHURCHES KEEPT THE SABBATH. But you CATHOLICS and so-called PROTESTANTS, deviated from that original faith. THE BIGGEST CULTS ARE THE CATHOLICS AND SUNDAY WORSHIPING PROTESTANTS. You must know it. 2 Thissalonian 2:9-12 says, because you people did not receive the love of truth, GOD HIMSELF will send a STRONG DELUSION, that you may CONTINUE TO BELIEVE THE LIES, so that YOU MAY BE DAMNED. What is the truth. Jesus is the truth. His law and His Sabbath is the truth of the Bible, which you all rejected. YOU MAY BE ALREADY DAMNED.
If Jesus would have returned 2 days after going went to heaven forty days after his resurrection. No one would have thought twice about a two day gap. However, 2000 is a gap that doesn’t go unnoticed. Peter said be not ignorant of this one thing to God a day is 1000 years and a 1000 years is a day. Either way we look at it it’s only been two days. The only reason this makes sense is because Peter told us not to be ignorant meaning this information better not go unnoticed. If God says a day is 1000 years then to us this should be very important because it’s only been 2 days (2000 years) since the Lord left the Mount of Olive with a promise he would return quickly.
I feel the same. I'm not sure how anyone can think Revelation already happened. Yeah, there are some things that seemed to be fulfilled in 70ad, but certainly most of it wasn't (on top of the fact that best evidence is that revelation was written after 70ad). Instead it seems like 70ad just mirrors the future event, something that seems common in scripture. I have zero clue exactly what will happen, though I think some things are pretty clear. I would never state my opinions with the certainty displayed in this video. It makes me think of all those before the return of the Jews to Isreal who redefined the prophecies of Revelation to focus on the church instead of Isreal because they thought it was impossible that after 2000 years Isreal would become a nation again. I get that some things might have been muddled together that shouldn't, but I would never confidently declare which things those are as the potential for partial fulfillment is pretty strong.
@@Jsmith0819 The prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27, has been fulfilled. Yet the 70 weeks time period was purposely separated into 7 + 62 + 1. This means that the 70th week will be granted to Israel the second time to confirm the Covenant (New) with GOD. Israel is the firstborn nation of all nations before GOD. Ex.4:22 They get to receive the double. Deut.21:17 They have received the double for their sins, and they will also receive the double for blessings. Isa.40:1-2 ; 61:7 They are now back in their land and it is ripe time for them to receive the double for the Gospel. Acts.3:26 ; Isa.62:1-4 ; Rom.11:15, 25-26 The final 7 years will be divided into two 3.5 years period. The first period is the Ministry of the 2 witnesses. Rev.11:1-7 The 2nd period is the rise of the man of sin, the son of perdition who would occupy Jerusalem and kill the 2 witnesses. Rev.13:1-5
But you ARE missing the future part. The part seems most are. The beginning is Daniel admitting all of the iniquities. And reason always for Captivity...a PUNISHMENT FOR SINS. BUT THIS SIN OVERFLOWS. In Amos. 3 Transgressions. But the 4th overflows the Judgement.. And each prophet.. even Esdras 2.. Show one that has its Strength Given to by another. In Zachariah 12 2&3..in KJV its not left out. How ones Supporting Israel will be chewed to bits. In...a mouth of a Bear...being given permission to eat much flesh. When it's IN HER MOUTH..?? A Horn. One stronger. But the goat is beaten down.. Both HORNS. And another stand being Given Dominion.. Greek Isopsephia shows one whose name not using vowels...since not used in Hebrew at the time.. and this the Greek calculations used at the time...according to Aristotle. The False Prophet to US.. I KNOW.. The antichrist as well. Only more explanation on omitted names of his actual 8 Heresies of Irenaeus wrote that 666 would be in GREEK. Mohammad bin Salman bin Abdulaziz bin Abdul Rahman (bin Faisal bin Turki bin Abdullah bin Mohammed bin Saud)mom Part of name used..the Main Parts..leaving out son of ect.. But is 666 in Greek AND Roman.. The one I KNOW is our false prophet. Name without vowels but is only in Greek. Mohammad Salman Abdulaziz Saud but no vowels or Double M's MHMD SLMN BDLZZ SD But if u don't See a Horid Transgression going on. The 4th that OVERFLOWS why God says enough.. Might need watch Breaking the Silence. Get it from the horses own mouths. Or The General's Son. Cuz both govt have told us lies.. My dad was NSA in 1967.. and the USS LIBERTY SURVIVORS DON'T LIE...and tho Reagan tried to have the records RECLASSIFED.. they are not. But the INTENTIONAL ATTACK ON OUR AMERICAN SPY SHIP...AND ALL THAT THE ATTACK TELLS. Wake Up to hard sad TRUTHS of that..and maybe u can open eyes of the lies that are going on.. The Rabbis say. When Gaza falls. The Moshiach IMMEDIATELY WILL COME... Cuz I've read how Damascus might not Mean Damascus..maybe like Damascus Road.. But as for 27AD When Jesus THEN went into the Temple after the 40 days of Temptations. On the Last Jubilee. He read Isaiah. And at THAT point. It was Already Done. Shake hands. It's taken care of. Tho fulfilled on the cross. It was PUT AS FACT. He took first half of week. Satan gets the last. And my hypothesis. Based on 27 not 30 AD.. And seeing Israel the Bear we the Lion the man. U can guess. And MBS the leopard. But if a Ravenous Wolf given 70 years and by 80 is a BURDEN TO ALL according to Moses. Well. Daniel IS Prophecy It SAYS so. But the Wings of the Abomination is what is going on now. And the Lies of govt. Told in Amos. End times too. But I admit. It is hard knowing we ain't not only just not wearing white hats... We FULLY DESERVE TO HAVE TO GO TRU these tribulations for our part in this Horrible sin.. the 4th one
Sorry, brother, you couldn't be more wrong. 70th week aside, the is 100% 7 years that will be the book of Revelation, and Daniel is almost a mirror copy
Yes he is wrong, Jesus read from the book of isiah and stopped at a comma, The last week is on pause. The books of Revelation, 2nd Thes and Matthew 24 all tie together with the book of Daniel. This reminds me of the Catholic teaching of Revelation. Sorry Brother. don't agree.
@@dmw6539This is 7th day adventist teaching. As soon as I heard 5 minutes of his teaching I had a hunch he was SDA, so I looked him up and wasn't surprised to find that he is.
This is exactly how Luther, calvin and all the reformers interpreted daniel 9. Even isaac newton wrote a book on daniel 9 and came upwith the same conclusion. Your modern futurist interpretation was actually developed by the catholic church suring the counterreformation of the 16th century. It was then further developed by Darby and Schofield but this video represents the original protestant understanding. Why have a gap? Makes no logical sense.
@bwevemuzk are you aware of the 2nd call to rebuild Jerusalem in 1539 by the Ottoman ruler Soluimon I? If you add 490 years, you get 2029. Minus 7 years you get 2022. In 2022 Pope Frances signed a 7 year climate covanant with many leaders and religious leaders of the world called Laudato Si. So no, I am not going by what any past people taught. The 70th week could not come to pass until after the fig tree generation was back in the land. Neither can any Revelation prophecy. The last 7 years of the 6000 years the planet has been in existance will close with Daniel's 70th week, also known as the 7 years of tribulation. 1260 days of Tribulation, 1260 days of Great Tribulation, and 75 days of Wrath that will be the first 75 days of the Millennial reign. The rapture will happen on the last day of Great Tribulation, at the final Trump, which is the 7th Trumpet Judgement Revelation 11:18, which will be on the Feast of Trumpets 2030. Does that clear thing up any?
There are many things you say that do not add up with what the bible says. You used matt 23:37-38 to say that the house of Israel was left desolate, but you left out the final verse in Matthew 23. Verse 39 which states that the Jews will one day acknowledge Jesus. This will happen at the second coming. So, for you to not read and explain the full passage is a total dishonesty. 👎🏻 Secondly, concerning the 70th week, You can’t prove it’s been fulfilled because the nation of Israel isn’t restored to God yet. The 70 weeks prophesy is an answer to Daniel’s prayer. Daniel wanted the restoration of his people, so he prayed for it. He confessed their sin and wanted God to forgive them. Read daniel 9: 1-23 and see for yourself. So then God sends his angel to give the 70 weeks prophesy as an answer to Daniel's prayer. By the end of the 70 weeks prophecy Israel has to: 1. Finish the transgression 2. Make end of sin 3. make reconciliation for iniquity 4. Bring everlasting righteousness (everlasting righteousness for the Jews) 5. seal up prophesy and vision 6. Anoint the most holy place. So, when did these things happen? The point of this prophesy is for God to restore the Jews and seal up all their restoration prophesies. None of it has happened yet. This prophesy was determined for “YOUR PEOPLE ( ISRAEL) and YOUR HOLY CITY” (JERUSALEM) Dan 9:24. We know Daniel's people is ISRAEL. (Dan 9:20 ). Israel is in spiritual blindness partially now and will continue to do so until God's done dealing with gentiles. Rom 11:25 -36. Sorry but your view is inconsistent with the scripture because clearly Israel has to be redeemed by the end of the 70th week and this didn’t happen. Actually the complete opposite happened. They rejected their messiah so God set them aside temporarily. Your view of the last week is so messed up. You mentioned that The covenant in verse 27 is a reference to the new covenant with God’s chosen people. However, anyone who actually pays attention to what it clearly says can understand that it cannot be God’s new covenant because God's new covenant lasts forever whereas the one in Daniel 9:27 is only for one week or 7 years. An everlasting covenant and a covenant confirmed for one week ( 7 years) ARE NOT THE SAME. If this is God’s new covenant, then it is limited to 7 years. You and i are not part it because we are 2000 years late. Are you just gonna pretend you don't see this huge difference? And finally, you skipped the fact that verse 26 mentions the prince of the people who destroyed Jerusalem. Who destroyed Jerusalem? The romans. The prince who confirmes the covenant in verse 27 is the prince of the romans. He is the antecedent of the “ He” in verse 27. Therefore it cannot be Jesus. Jesus doesn’t come from the roman empire. The antichrist does.
Dan. 9:25 underscores the 490 years from the decree to rebuild Jerusalem. Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent decrees the rebuild of the Holy area in 1537 AD. The time of this prophecy period is now coming to the conclusion. The Second Advent is upon us.
"The abomination of the DESOLATOR"... That is what it says in the original Hebrew. 100% a reference to the antichrist in a yet future time. Also, Jesus said "not one stone" would be left standing on another, yet the wailing wall still stands. This prophecy has not yet been fulfilled. It will be when New Jerusalem settles down on the temple mount.
I just did some quick research. The western wall or what we refer to as the Wailing Wall was not a part of the Jewish temple. It was a part of the temple complex and was a part of a structure that supported the temple, but not a part of the temple itself. So, no future antichrist. when Jesus said no stone would be left upon another his prophecy came true. No stone was left of the original actual temple.
The wailing wall today was built by King Herod in the 1st century BC as a retaining wall and was NOT the temple mount or the temple that was destroyed in 70 AD by Titus. Daniel 9 does not mention any anti-christ. It does mention the prince of the people to come and that was Titus, almost 2000 years ago. Apart from that Daniel 9 was all about Jesus Christ NOT about anti-christ. All of Daniel 9 is about 'The Messiah'' Read the whole chapter. Read it from the Septuagint. Google Septuagint. It's not the abomination of the desolator It's the abomination that makes desolate. What is the abomination? = The Jews rejected their Messiah What is the desolation? = God abandoned the earthly city pf Jerusalem for becoming a harlot. Read Deuteronomy 28 The blessings and the curses if they obeyed or disobeyed. It has been fulfilled. Just as the prophets and Jesus said.
What are you referencing because I can not find it anywhere saying desolator? Furthermore, the wailing wall is not where not temple sat, the wailing wall is a foundational structure where the roman barracks stood. You can look up archeological evidence to see where the temple was.
Good Today ! __ " Jesus the Christ of GOD ", a simple trueth easily found in the early Writtings of the Jewish Be-Livers of the " Way, Trueth, Life ". __ humbly, neighbour daniel __ p.s. thanks for increasing knowledge in this our troubled time .
The phrase "of the prince" is only used in the Bible 3 times, and each of those times it's used to refer to the/an antichrist: Job 21:28 For you say, ‘Where is the house of the prince? And where is the tent, The dwelling place of the wicked?’ Proverbs 25:7 For it is better that he say to you, “Come up here,” Than that you should be put lower in the presence of the prince, Whom your eyes have seen. (this is a reference to the rapture of the Church "Come up here" vs. going through the Tribulation with antichrist/prince) Daniel 9:26 “And after the sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself; And the people of the prince who is to come Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end of it shall be with a flood, And till the end of the war desolations are determined. It's clear from the text in Daniel that he is being given prophecy for the end of the age. Also, you're really making an almost impossible stretch by picking out the martyrdom of Stephen 3.5 years after Christ. Why? It's because it fits your 70th week. It doesn't make sense. Jesus didn't confirm a covenant for 7 years. Why would he? There is nothing to suggest that Stephen's death marks the end of the 70th week of Daniel. Look at the current events. The United Nations is meeting in a few weeks to confirm a 7 year covenant with many, right after the Feast of Trumpets. One last thing: of course the first 1800 years of Christians didn't see things the way we see them. These things were sealed up unto the time of the end. We are the last generation.
The impossible stretch is mis translating Daniel 9:24-27 and stretching the 70th week to an unknown future date. It is a deception and has been unashamedly been taught from the Synagogue of Satan for the past 150+ years.
I would say that a more impossible stretch would be to believe that, when God prophetically said 490 years, what he really meant was, 483 + [2,000 or more, indefinite] + 7.
@@mytwocents777 He laid out a 6,000 year plan for mankind beginning with the creation week. There is ample evidence of this. Yet you’ve picked out one death and claimed it wraps up one of the most significant prophecies in the entire Bible. Come on.
@@mikesandlin2967 I am familar with the theory that there is to be 6,000 years of worldly existence, followed by a 7th millennium of existence with Christ; correlating with the six days of creation followed by the seventh-day Sabbath. Some even propose that Adam's lifetime of around 930 years - in this sense - literally fulfilled God's declaration of, "on that day you shall surely die", rather than simply meaning that his eventual death would become assured on that day, taking the first 1,000 years of mankind as the 1st millennial day of the abovementioned plan. I find it all very intriguing and, although I don't see direct statements supporting it in scripture, I also don't see a reason to reject this notion. However, I also don't see any reason that the directly-indicated period of 490 years (prophetically enumerated as 70 weeks) as the time limit for Daniel's people to acknowledge their Messiah should be interpreted as something other than 490 years, and certainly not as a period at least four times longer than what God actually indicated. I don't see how the face-value understanding of 490 years discussed in Daniel 9 has any conflict, or any immediate relationship, to the 6,000+1,000 theory, though. The prophecy of Daniel 9 is not pointing to the end of time or demarcating the last day of mankind on earth; rather only as far as to the rejection of the Messiah by the Judahites by the end of that 490th year and the destruction which would come upon them consequent to that. History shows that Christ did incarnate toward the end of that 490 years, was rejected and killed, and that Jerusalem was destroyed a few decades later. The prophecy was fulfilled.
@@mytwocents777 The prophecy forbids the interpretation that it’s already been fulfilled. It has not. Just read it and this becomes clear. “Seventy weeks are determined For your people and for your holy city, To finish the transgression, To make an end of sins, To make reconciliation for iniquity, To bring in everlasting righteousness, To seal up vision and prophecy, And to anoint the Most Holy.” These things have not happened. You’re cherry picking an event, 1 martyr out of how many?… to suggest that completed Daniels 70th week. Wrong! The end of this prophecy is not Stephen being killed. That makes no sense. The timeline is fairly clear: Messiah cut off, not for himself = 30AD. The people of the prince (antichrist)… destroy the sanctuary = 70AD destruction of Jerusalem. THEN…… he shall confirm a covenant with many (1st seal broken, antichrist revealed, Tribulation begins = 2023? You’re taking the covenant and saying it happened before the 69th week. And that somehow the prince is Jesus. No. This is false on so many levels it’s borderline heresy.
Please see christadelphian bible study and Christadelphian videos for great learning worldwide speakers from Australia New Zealand and Europe and North America and South Africa 😊
You got it right. Nowhere in daniel chapter 9 is the word antichrist ever used. The prince in chapter 9 is referring to Jesus and his 7 year earthly ministry. This is also where most people get a 7 year tribulation teaching from in regards to the future. But there is no biblical basis for it.
Jesus ministry started when he was baptized, he did not live 7 years after his baptism. Antichrist should get 7 years also, he is the opposite of Christ. Daniel never used the word antichrist in any of his chapters. Antichrist is a new testament description. Messiah had not existent in the old testament. Daniel refer to him as a horn in Daniel 7:24-25, king in 11: 31-37. The 7 year covenant is Daniel chapter 7, confirmed by the same vision John had in Revelation chapter 13.
@@davidmcpott1924 The romans NEVER had ten rulers at the same time: Name them. John had the same vision, so the 7th trumpet prophecy has been fulfilled also and the 3rd woe ?
Ser daniel 9.:26 "AND AFTER 62 WEEKS AN ANOINTED ONE SHALL BE CUT OFF AND SHALL HAVE NOTHING. AND THE PEOPLE OF THE PRINCE WHO IS TO COME SHALL DESTROY THE CITY AND THE SANCTUARY. ITS END SHALL COME WITH A FLOOD, AND TO THE END THERE SHALL BE WAR DESOLATIONS ARE DECREED" An anointed one or in the kjv its messiah the prince shall be cut off but not for his own sake. Certainly refers to Jesus. The people of the prince that shall come refers to the jewish war when in 70 ad. Titus under the reighn of vespaisian ran sacked the jewish temple according to the prophesy which Jesus gave in MATT.24 WILL GET BACK TO YOU ON DANIEL 9:27.
@@BrentSteinberg There shall be 7 weeks and 62 weeks 9:25 Afrer the 62 weeks the Messiah shall be cutoff, also Isaiah 53:8 He was cutoff from the living for the transgressions of my people He was stricken not the middle of the 70th week. Nissan 14, 69th week day of crucifixion.(30-33AD) His ministry did not last 7 years , he was not 37 years old when he died. 9:26 is 70AD The Messiah was cutoff after 69 weeks before verse 26 (70AD) He cannot appear in the middle of the week in verse 27
READ EVERYTHING IN CONTEXT=== 14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come. 15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) DID THE GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM GET PREACHED THROUGHOUT THE WORLD BEFORE THE ROMANS SACKED JERUSALEM???=== 21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. 22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. WERE THE DAYS SHORTENED THEN???
Shwan, I like your dedication to this topic and the presentation is very attractive. Your historical facts from Babylonian, Medo-Persion and the Roman is far from being actual. The fact that you seem to ignore the fact that from chapter 8 to the end the book is written in Hebrew (Israel) and from 2-7 in Aramaic (Gentiles) it poses a big dilemma. Maybe you can help with the discrepancies created by this presentation. From Oregon, USA.
There was a second decree to rebuild the walls in 1535 by the Ottomans. It took all of 62 weeks but by then, Jerusalem was reunited with Israel. Then 7 weeks later we had two signs. The sign of the Virgin described in Rev 12. And the embassy move that sounds like planting their tents between the seas. So according to the second timeline and if it was telling the truth about natural birth, then he’s here already. Isa 40 says the punishment on Jerusalem was doubled. This explains why there’s 62 and 7. Messiah comes after both.
Read this article it will help you understand the 70 weeks of Daniel 9. Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy. RIGHT ON TIME PROPHECY. DANIEL 9:24, 25. What event and date were to mark the starting point for the 2,300-year and 490-year prophecies (Daniel 9:25)? Answer: The starting event was a decree from Persian King Artaxerxes authorizing God’s people (who were captive in Medo-Persia) to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the city. The decree, found in Ezra chapter 7, was issued in 457 bc-the seventh year of the king (verse 7)-and was implemented in the autumn. Artaxerxes began his reign in 464 bc. . The angel said that 69 prophetic weeks, or 483 literal years (69 x 7 = 483), added to 457 bc would reach to the Messiah (Daniel 9:25). Did it? . The angel said that 69 prophetic weeks, or 483 literal years (69 x 7 = 483), added to 457 bc would reach to the Messiah (Daniel 9:25). Did it? Answer: Yes! Mathematical calculations show that moving ahead 483 years from the fall of 457 bc reaches the fall of ad 27. (Note: There is no year 0.) The word “Messiah” includes the meaning of “anointed” (John 1:41, margin). Jesus was anointed with the Holy Spirit (Acts 10:38) at His baptism (Luke 3:21, 22). His anointing took place in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar (Luke 3:1), which was ad 27. And to think that the prediction was made more than 500 years before! Then Jesus began to preach that “the time is fulfilled.” He thus confirmed the prophecy (Mark 1:14, 15; Galatians 4:4). So Jesus actually began His ministry by clearly referring to the 2,300-year prophecy, stressing its importance and accuracy. This is awesome and thrilling evidence that: A. The Bible is inspired. B. Jesus is the Messiah. C. All other dates in the 2,300-year/490-year prophecy are valid. What a firm foundation on which to build! We have now considered 483 years of the 490-year prophecy. There is one prophetic week-seven literal years-left (Daniel 9:26, 27). What happens next and when? Answer: Jesus was “cut off” or crucified “in the middle of the week,” which is three and a half years after His anointing-or the spring of ad 31. Please notice that the gospel is revealed in verse 26: “After the sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself.” No-praise God!-when Jesus was cut off, it was not for Himself. He “who committed no sin” (1 Peter 2:22) was crucified for our sins (1 Corinthians 15:3; Isaiah 53:5). Jesus lovingly and willingly offered His life to save us from sin. Hallelujah! What a Savior! Jesus’ atoning sacrifice is the very heart of Daniel chapters 8 and 9. The disciples preached to multitudes of Jews. The disciples preached to multitudes of Jews. . Since Jesus died after three and a half years, how could He “confirm the covenant with many” (KJV) for all of the final seven years, as the prophecy in Daniel 9:27 mandates? Answer: The covenant is His blessed agreement to save people from their sins (Hebrews 10:16, 17). After His ministry of three and a half years ended, Jesus confirmed the covenant through His disciples (Hebrews 2:3). He sent them first to the Jewish nation (Matthew 10:5, 6) because His chosen people still had three and a half years remaining of their 490-year opportunity to repent as a nation. After the stoning of Stephen, the disciples began preaching to the Gentiles. After the stoning of Stephen, the disciples began preaching to the Gentiles. When the 490-year period of final opportunity for the Jewish nation ended in the fall of ad 34, what did the disciples do? Answer: They began preaching the gospel to other people and nations of the world (Acts 13:46). Stephen, a righteous deacon, was publicly stoned in ad 34. From that date onward, the Jews, because they collectively rejected Jesus and God’s plan, could no longer be God’s chosen people or nation. Instead, God now counts people of all nationalities who accept and serve Him as spiritual Jews. They have become His chosen people-“heirs according to the promise” (Galatians 3:27-29). Spiritual Jews, of course, include Jewish people who individually accept and serve Jesus (Romans 2:28, 29). After AD 34, how many years of the 2,300-year prophecy remained? What is the ending date for the prophecy? What did the angel say would happen on that date (Daniel 8:14)?
@@ebbygshreve9577 I’m not so sure god doesn’t have a soft spot for the Jewish people. Jesus was also the Atonement goat that was sacrificed. It’s a two part deal though and the scapegoat was supposed handed over to a caretaker who would take the goat into the wilderness. He was then supposed to let the goat go free. But instead, the rabbis figured it would be better to just lead the scapegoat over a cliff because they didn’t want it to wander back to the city. The Jews rejected the sacrifice but instead made him their national scapegoat. His name is a curse word there. Anyone associated with Christianity is ostracized. That temple was destroyed because Jesus did end the sacrifice but also because they did not follow the strict commandments of the most important of sacrifices. Eventually they’ll come to their senses. That’s why it says ‘they will look upon him whom they’ve been piercing and mourn for him like the firstborn son.’ When they repent, it will be easier for them to swap goats. Stop making him the villain and appreciate what he attempted to do in confirming the new covenant. Yes it look like the ones who thought they’d be first are coming in dead last. It’s not the Jewish people’s fault. It’s the wayward rabbis leading the blinded. Pat yourself on the back but give some space for the Jewish people stuck in Judaism. I still think my interpretation is better than yours in explaining why it took 62 weeks to rebuild Jerusalem. I also believe hod doesn’t mess up and leave things undone. He knew it would take a couple try’s to wake up those hardened rabbis to loosen their iron grip on those people.
I believe that Daniels prayer and realisation that 70 literal years of bondage were over , it was not a vision and it has nothing to do with 70 weeks of Dan 9:24-27. If we read 9:21 -23 we see that Daniels problem was a vision of chapter 8 that he didn’t understand, even after Gabriel tried to explain it to him. So Gabriel flew swiftly and informed Daniel that he has come to make Daniel understand the matter and consider the vision he has seen in chapter 8:11-19. This vision was (verses 17-19)for time of the END, the last END, at the time appointed shall the END be. And when disciples asked Jesus how will they know the end and the sigh, Jesus said plainly when you see abomination of desolation( means false god that destroys)spoken of by Daniel standing where it ought not…. You start counting Daniel 12:11. This is what we need to look for, it’s plain talk and it’s Jesus talking, I’d believe that any day over any other writer. So I believe that Daniel 9 is talking about false messiah, Jerusalem and Gods people at the very end, last 490 days before Jesus comes the second time. If you read revelation 11:3-13,2 literal witnesses will be living in the last 3.1/2 years in Jerusalem and they will be killed by the BEAST in Jerusalem where our Lord was crucified(vs7 and 8)in the middle of last week. Beast and they that dwell on the earth shall rejoice over them, they shall send gifts one to another rejoicing because these 2 prophets tormented them that dwell on the earth. It’s as simple as that, read it as it says, God made it plain for us. I believe like bible says; wise will understand but the wicked will not. Blessings
This is seventh day Adventist teaching. It is wrong. The man of lawlessness is stopped by Christ himself at the His second coming. That puts all of Daniels 7 weeks still into the future. This whole teaching is false. And the fact that SDA still adheres to the Jewish law of sabbath keeping clearly violates the teachings of Paul that the Church, the Body of Christ , is not under law, but grace. And every example of the Body of Christ meeting is on the first day of the week … Sunday. Not that that is prescriptive, but it is the example of the 1st century church. Mixing law and grace is heresy. Beware the SDA!
The Temple was NOT on the Temple mount. “How is the gold become dim! how is the most fine gold changed! the stones of the sanctuary ARE POURED OUT IN THE TOP OF EVERY STREET.” (Lam 4:1, KJV) The Lord has accomplished His fury; He has poured out his fierce anger, and has kindled a fire in Zion, and IT HAS DEVOURED THE FOUNDATIONS thereof.” (Lam 4:11, KJV) This was the first Temple. The same thing happened to the second Temple. Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, THERE SHALL NOT BE LEFT HERE ONE STONE UPON ANOTHER, THAT SHALL NOT BE THROWN DOWN. (Mat 24:1-2, KJV)“ And as they went about to kill him,(Paul) tidings came unto the chief captain of the band, that all Jerusalem was in an uproar. Who immediately took soldiers and centurions, AND RAN DOWN UNTO THEM: and when they saw the chief captain and the soldiers, they left beating of Paul.” (Act 21:31-32, KJV) And when he had given him licence, Paul STOOD ON THE STAIRS, and beckoned with the hand unto the people. And when there was made a great silence, he spake unto them in the Hebrew tongue, saying,” (Act 21:40, KJV) The wood paneling was covered in gold. This gold melted when the burned the Temple because this was the last place the the Jews ran for their lives. The Roman's then disassembled all of the foundations to retrieve the gold.
I don't understand all the hullabaloo in the comments. What the Bible says is as written in this perspective, not to mention the huge gap that this whole discussion fills! Be blessed.
Here is how this works.. Neh 2:1 And it came to pass in the month Nisan, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king. From the month of Nisan unto Nisan, point A unto point B, exactly. ...from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build **Jerusalem** unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks..= 7 and 62 = From Nehemiah 2, 445bc subtract 483 converted to days = 173880 DAYS... MARCH 14 445bc to APRIL 6th 32 ad. Nisan 10 The triumphal entry In Luke 19
Interesting use of "Clearly" The Roman! Yes Clearly? Which Roman? The LORD God is God of god's, King of kings and Lord of lord's! All shall worship Him who made the Heaven and the Earth and sea. Remember the words of the apostles of the Lord Jesus Christ. 1 John 5:19-21 NKJV We know that we are of God, and the whole world lies under the sway of the wicked one. [20] And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us an understanding, that we may know Him who is true; and we are in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and eternal life. [21] Little children, keep yourselves from idols. Amen.
If you try to teach history.. You have only 2 options. Teach from the evolution based narrative that acedemia says is history..which just about every church does!! Look at the back of just about every bible..you see maps and so called places men of scripture traveled to. Which is ALL THEORY!!! Or... Option 2.. Teach what the Holy Spirit reveals to you...not just mens doctrines. But I don't see that happening. Men have to much pride in what they THINK they "know".. Lol
Here's the error with this teaching. Daniel speaks of the abomination of desolation in Daniel chapter 9 and 11. The prince in Dan 9:26 is different from the "he" that confirms the covenant with Israel for 1 week (7 yrs)...and it's not Jesus. Although Antiochus Epiphanies is a partial fulfillment in history. It is ONLY that. It was seen as a future event from Daniel's perspective. It was also seen as a future event from Christ's perspective as well. Paul's writing speaks of events of Daniel's 70th as a future event from his perspective 2 Thess 2. The Apocalypse (Revelation) mentioned the abomination of desolation as well, but using different terms in Rev 13. The date of his writing is around 95-96 AD... LONG after the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD. John saw the abomination of desolation as a future event from his perspective. Here's a hint: the abomination of desolation is NOT the destruction of the temple
This makes absolutely zero sense. How could it be talking about the second temple being destroyed if that happened 40 years after Christ was crucified?? You forgot to verify your week year math! This is why nobody teaches it this way. Because the prophetic stopwatch was paused when Christ came into Jerusalem on the donkey
This guy I'm not sure if he's sent by the Devil Himself or not.. only God knows!.. Daniel 9 is written (in chronological order) the 70th week does not occur till after 70 AD.) The (abomination of desolation) is written in the book of Daniel 3 times in the . In the exact words.. and once as a ( transgression of desolation.)This guy could not interpret Daniel 8 if he had to..!. The 2300 days destroy everything this guy is saying ,an Revelation chapter 11!. Coming from somebody that studied this ...three times longer than this guy is old! ..Does he want to make money off a video for for preterists?
Dude, There was no church at that time…..Daniel’s prophecies were for his people…..Israel……Judah. Even Jesus in Matt 24 is talking to the Jews…..no church there again…..you have to rightly divide the word….times and dispensations…
The EU is the western leg of Nebuchadnezzars image and Constantinople is the eastern leg which will work together obtaining power for about an hour to fight Jesus Christ whom God sends back from heaven to set up the everlasting kingdom of God on earth Daniel 2:44
The teaching that the Antichrist will come in the future is not a modern understanding. Irenaeus, a 2nd century Christian who learned from Polycarp, a disciple of John, wrote about this in Against Heresies Book 5: Chapter 25 1. "And not only by the particulars already mentioned, but also by means of the events which shall occur in the time of Antichrist is it shown that he, being an apostate and a robber, is anxious to be adored as God; and that, although a mere slave, he wishes himself to be proclaimed as a king. For he (Antichrist) being endued with all the power of the devil, shall come, not as a righteous king, nor as a legitimate king, [i.e., one] in subjection to God, but an impious, unjust, and lawless one...4. "The Lord also spoke as follows to those who did not believe in Him: "I have come in my Father's name, and ye have not received Me: when another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive," calling Antichrist "the other," because he is alienated from the Lord...Chapter 30:4 "But when this Antichrist shall have devastated all things in this world, he will reign for three years and six months, and sit in the temple at Jerusalem; and then the Lord will come from heaven in the clouds, in the glory of the Father, sending this man and those who follow him into the lake of fire; but bringing in for the righteous the times of the kingdom, that is, the rest, the hallowed seventh day; and restoring to Abraham the promised inheritance, in which kingdom the Lord declared, that "many coming from the east and from the west should sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob." These things Irenaeus wrote in the 2nd century AD. You can find his writings at earlychristianwritings(dot)com
The rulers of the temple were Idumeans, the leader being Herod. Thats why Jesus said, you say you are, but are not. The rulers said they were of Abraham, Jesus agreed, they said they had never been in captivity. Jesus didn't question that answer, God said, if you don't accept the Son, I never knew you. The Wheat and the Tares, the Wolf and the Sheep, is the deception, that the church has been blinded by, with some fairytale outcome, that doesn't match, by their fruits you shall know them. Arabs and Jews have the same Haplogroup J, lived together for 1350 years. DNA is God's building blocks of creation, they are both from Ishmael, who also had 12 sons.
Revelation 17:4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: Revelation 17:5 And upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon The Great, The Mother Of Harlots And Abominations Of The Earth. Revelation 21:27 And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.
You've got a mistake here at 17:19. Daniel 9:25 says "anointed,." Anointed does not in any way mean "Messiah." You have a falsely translated English language bible there.
1. The entire prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27 covers a period of “seventy weeks.” This period applies to one complete, sequential block of time. This prophecy would start during the Persian period and would end during the time of the Messiah.
2. Logic requires that the 70th week follow immediately after the 69th week. If it does not, then it cannot properly be called the 70th week!
3. It is illogical to insert a 2,000-year gap between the 69th and the 70th week. No hint of this gap is found in the prophecy itself. There is no gap between the first 7 weeks and the following 62 weeks. Why insert one between the 69th and the 70th week?
4. Daniel 9:27 says nothing about a seven-year period of tribulation, or about any Antichrist
5. The focus of this prophecy is the Messiah, not the Antichrist. Modern interpreters have applied “the people of the prince” who would come to “destroy the city and the sanctuary” (verse 26) to the Antichrist. Yet the text does not say this. In the past, that sentence has been applied to the Romans, who under Prince Titus did “destroy the city and the sanctuary” in'‘A.D. 70
6. “He shall confirm the covenant.” Jesus Christ came “to confirm the promises made unto the fathers.” Romans 15:8. Nowhere in the Bible is Antichrist ever said to make or confirm a covenant with anyone! The word “covenant” always applies to the Messiah, never to the Antichrist!
7. “He shall confirm the covenant with many.” Jesus said, “This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.” Matthew 26:28. Jesus used the same words, because He knew that He was fulfilling Daniel 9:27!
8. “In the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease.” The 70th week was from A.D. 27 to 34. After three and a half years of ministry, Christ died in A.D. 31, “in the midst [middle] of the week.” At the moment of His death, “the veil of the temple was rent [torn] in twain from the top to the bottom.” Matthew 27. The Great Sacrifice had been offered!
9. “For the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate.” Jesus plainly applied this “abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet” (Matthew 24:15) to the time when His followers were to flee from Jerusalem before the destruction of the second temple in A.D. 70. Jesus told His 12 disciples, “When ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies [the Roman armies led by Prince Titus], then know that its desolation is near.” Luke 21:20, emphasis added. Those disciples did “see” those very events. Christ’s very last words to the Pharisees from inside the second temple were, “Behold, (Your house is left unto you desolate.” Matthew 23:38. Thus Daniel’s prophecy about Jerusalem becoming “desolate” was exactly fulfilled in A.D. 70! Jesus understood this perfectly.
10. Gabriel said that the 70'week prophecy specifically applied to the Jewish people (see Daniel 9:24). During the period of Christ’s public ministry of 3 1/2 years, the Master’s focus was largely upon “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 10:6). After His resurrection and then for another 3 1/2 years, His disciples preached mostly to Jews (see Acts 1-6). After that second 3 1/2-year period, in 34 A.D., the bold Stephen was stoned by the Jewish Sanhedrin (see Acts 7). This infamous deed marked the then-ruling Jewish leaders’ final, official rejection of the gospel of our Savior. Then the gospel went to the Gentiles. In Acts 9, Saul became Paul, the “apostle to the Gentiles” (Romans 11:13). In Acts 10, God gave Peter a vision revealing it was now time to preach to the Gentiles(see Acts l0:1-28). Read also Acts (l3:46) Thus approximately 3 1/2 years after the crucifixion-and at the end of the 70-week prophecy given for the Jewish people-the gospel shifted to the Gentiles exactly as predicted in Bible prophecy.
Yup. But the bible doesn't say THE antichrist is coming... It says MANY ANTICHRISTS ALREADY IN THE WORLD.
1john 2.18-22. And 4.3
So what is the 'one week' in the 'He shall confirm a covenant for one week?'
@@annigard8
About Daniel 9: Daniel was not praying about the end times or the antichrist but that he wanted to know what would happen to the Jews when they would be released from captivity in Babylon
Daniel 9:27 says that he ‘confirms’ the covenant, which means that the covenant already existed. We only have to look back to Daniel 9:4 to see that Daniel is pleading with the Heavenly Father to remember His covenant of mercy to those who love Him.
“And I prayed unto the LORD my God, and made my confession, and said, O Lord, the great and dreadful God, keeping the covenant and mercy to them that love him, and to them that keep his commandments.”
Daniel 9:27 is not saying that the covenant only lasts for seven years, as so many people proclaim about a supposed antichrist 7-year peace treaty.
And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease.
The word ‘for’ was added by the translators. It’s simply saying that the covenant is confirmed in the seven years of the 70th week. And then it tells us when, in the middle of seven years, as Messiah’s blood sacrifice ended the need for temple animal sacrifices.
"He shall confirm a covenant for ONE WEEK "
It refers to the Messiah, who is the principal subject of the prophecy;and the work which, according to this,he was to perform was, during that "one week" to exert such an influence as would tend to establish a covenant between the people and God.
@@annigard8Christians blaspheme CHRIST work on the cross, calling Messiah in Dan. 9:27 anti-Christ.
"And HE (Messiah) shall make a covenant (Isa. 55:1-7) with the many (Gentile believers) for one week (Passion Week), and in the midst of the week (Wednesday\Thursday Passover ) HE (Messiah) shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease (it is finished) and for overspreading abominations (Jews continuing animal sacrifices 40 years) HE (Messiah) shall make it (thy Holy City) desolate (void of Daniel's people) even until the consummation (70th week) and that determined (Lk. 21:24 Times of the Gentiles be fulfilled) shall be poured upon the desolate (Gospel poured upon the children of the desolate; Isa.54:1)".
There is no definite article for "a prince" in the original Hebrew text; Dan. 9:26. Therefore "Messiah" is the antecedent to the pro-form "HE" in 9:27.
Too many Christians follow this unbiblical Hal Lindsey garbage from his novel "Late Great Planet Earth". There will be no peace treaty with the antichrist nor a 3rd Temple built. The Mat. 24:15 sign will be soon after Israel annexes the 1\4 of Jerusalem trodden on by the Dragon beast Islam; Lk. 21\24, the will erect an Ezra 3 temporary altar on the Temple Mt to attempt another animal sacrifice. If in Judah and you see this abomination spoken by Daniel RUN FOR THE HILLS.
Tiptop is in the baby butchering SDA anti-CHRIST cult that twist, spin, corrupt GOD's WORD. Steven's stoning date he assumes is made up SDA garbage and can't be calculated from the bible. Paul would go to the Jew first for decades.
@@tiptop9909 I would really really love to have a chat with you on the significant points you have raised, and possibly explore even further clarity with reference to prophets such as Ezra and others. Please let me know if you would care for such a pleasant discourse!
That is completely wrong. It is very unlikely that Revelation was written before 70 AD.
So glad to hear someone sees that the Prince in Daniel is The Christ and not the anti. When I was new many, years ago i saw this but the main stream churches were not teaching it
The antichrist is mentioned in Revelation 13 💯🙏
Revelation in Symbols and Signs has a deeper teaching of Revelation and Daniel. Verse by verse, chapter by chapter 🙏🙏 check it out. You won't be disappointed 🙏🙏
and the people of the prince are the - jews
@@DavidKing-qd3sp hey you got to stop breaking the ninth commandment!
The following proves you are correct.
Proof the 70th week of Daniel was fulfilled in the past:
Based on Hebrews 12:22-24, the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26 cannot be separated from the New Covenant fulfilled by His blood at Calvary. See the words "church" and "mount Sion" and "new covenant" and "Jesus" and "blood" in the passage.
Are we supposed to believe the angel Gabriel appeared to Daniel to reveal the timeline of the Messiah who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and then the angel failed to even mention the New Covenant. Or, is the covenant with the many in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the many in Matthew 26:28? The 1599 Geneva Bible is the Bible the Pilgrims brought to America, before John Darby showed up on our shores about the time of the Civil War. What was the earlier understanding of Daniel 9:27 found below in the notes of the 1599 Geneva Bible?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan 9:27 And he shal confirme the couenant with many for one weeke: and in the middes of the weeke he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the ouerspreading of the abominations, he shall make it desolate, euen vntill the consummation determined shalbe powred vpon the desolate.
Daniel 9:27
And he (a) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to (b) cease, (c) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make [it] desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
(a) By the preaching of the Gospel he affirmed his promise, first to the Jews, and after to the Gentiles.
(b) Christ accomplished this by his death and resurrection.
(c) Meaning that Jerusalem and the sanctuary would be utterly destroyed because of their rebellion against God, and their idolatry: or as some read, that the plague will be so great, that they will all be astonished at them.
The command was issued to Nehemiah on Nisan 14th at the 9th hour 454 bc. 483 years latter messiah is cut off Nisan 14th at the 9th hour 31ad. The command was to repair the streets and walls to identify who and when it was issued to start the countdown.
But there is a day coming in the future (2 Thessalonians 2:4) when the man of lawlessness sets himself in the temple "displaying himself as being god"
"He" is already there and has been for centuries. He sits in the midst of the Body of Christ, which is the new temple of God, calling himself "Christ on earth".
quote----But there is a day coming in the future (2 Thessalonians 2:4) when the man of lawlessness sets himself in the temple "displaying himself as being god"-unquote
ALREADY happening!!!
>>>The Catechism of the Council of Trent, p 402 second revised edition says, "The Church of God has thought it well to transfer the celebration and observance of the Sabbath to Sunday!" And “Had she not such power, she could not have done that in which all modern religionists agree with her-she could not have substituted the observance of Sunday, the first day of the week, for the observance of Saturday, the seventh day, a change for which there is NO SCRIPTURAL AUTHORITY” - Stephen Keenan A Doctrinal Catechism p 174.
>>>>What the Holy Bible says about the Roman Catholic Church and the Pope
The Anti-christ sits in the temple of God proclaiming to be God….fulfilling 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4.
---“..the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, (not a physical temple, but Christ’s Church. Eph. 2:19-22) showing himself that he is God.”
---Pope Innocent III said “We may according to the fullness of our power, dispose of the law and dispense above the law. Those whom the Pope of Rome doth separate, it is not a man that separates them but God. For the Pope holdeth place on earth, not simply of a man but of the true God.” (Source: “Decretals of Greogory IX,” Book 1, chapter 3.) (Likely between 1200AD--1216AF)
-->>>-Saint Pope Pius V blasphemed, “The Pope and God are the same, so he The title "Lord God the Pope" is found within a gloss of Extravagantes of Pope John XXII, title 14, chapter 4, (likely between 1550Ad & 1572AD)
--->>>-In an Antwerp edition of the Extravagantes, the words, "Dominum Deum Nostrum Papam" (Our Lord God the Pope) can be found in column 153. In a Paris edition, they are found in column 140. has all power in Heaven and earth.” (Source: Pope Pius V, quoted in Barclay, Cities Petrus Bertanous Chapter XXVII: 218.) (likely between 1550AD and 1572AD)
---->>>>"Innocent III has written: "Indeed, it is not top much to say that in view of the sublimity of their offices the priests are so many gods." -The dignity of the priesthood by Liguori p, 36
>>>
@@mitchellosmer1293 Correct. This the very foundation of Protestantism. The Agents of Antichrist have been very successful, since then, of distorting Protestant end-times doctrine to make them forget that.
John Wesley (1703-1791) (Methodist):
Speaking of the Papacy, John Wesley wrote, “He is in an emphatical sense, the Man of Sin, as he increases all manner of sin above measure. And he is, too, properly styled the Son of Perdition, as he has caused the death of numberless multitudes, both of his opposers and followers… He it is…that exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped…claiming the highest power, and highest honour…claiming the prerogatives which belong to God alone.” Antichrist and His Ten Kingdoms, by John Wesley, pg. 110.
Roger Williams (1603-1683) (First Baptist Pastor in America):
Pastor Williams spoke of the Pope as “the pretended Vicar of Christ on earth, who sits as God over the Temple of God, exalting himself not only above all that is called God, but over the souls and consciences of all his vassals, yea over the Spirit of Christ, over the Holy Spirit, yea, and God himself…speaking against the God of heaven, thinking to change times and laws; but he is the son of perdition (II Thess. 2).” The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, by Froom, Vol. 3, pg. 52.
The Westminster Confession of Faith (1647):
“There is no other head of the church but the Lord Jesus Christ. Nor can the pope of Rome in any sense be head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin and son of perdition that exalteth himself in the church against Christ and all that is called God.” The Creeds of Christendom With a History and Critical Notes, by Philip Schaff’s, III, p. 658, 659, ch. 25, sec. 6.
But what about this: for this is what "I think" God has made me understood. Based on what God said: Numbers 23:19, Isaiah 46:9:10, Genesis 26:4, 28:14, Genesis 17:18-21,21:12 I came to understand that Allah, the "God" of Islam is not YHWH, the God of Abraham. The Arabs are not worshipping the God of their forefathers. For he reminded me of the Serpent who deceived Adam and Eve, that led to our fall. And Islam is misleading humanity, keeping people away from the offspring of Isaac and Jacob, A JEW, Jesus Christ, through whom all nations on earth will be blessed. It overshadow the Jew, promoting instead the offspring of Ishmael, Muhammad, to follow supposed to be for people to be blessed. And in defense of Catholicism (I'm now a born-again Christian), God did used the Roman empire to gather together the Scriptures and by its wide reach to spread Christianity farther and faster. They cannot be accused of killing to spread Christianity, for they had been doing it, conquering nations before they convert to Christianity, that's why they were in Israel and became an empire, and they even were persecuting Christians to stop Christianity. But the will of God prevailed. And God reiterated Jeremiah 31-35-37 His everlasting covenant with Israel Genesis 17:7, so why IF Allah is YHWH, are the Islamists conditioned to believe that God will reject Israel in the last days and they, the Muslims, his faithful followers will execute his judgement and destroy Israel? And why so much hatred for a small nation? Because they are the people of God? Or for the same reason that we are to bless them, the dragon hated them so? That God through Israel was able to become part of humankind, to save humanity? And hardcore Islamists would kill those who blaspheme Muhammad. 28:30
The 70 years of Babylonian subservience is the punishment for Israel's violation of the Land Sabbath, not the weekly Sabbath.
Israel was commanded to sow and harvest for 6 years, but the land was to lay fallow during the 7th year, so the land itself can enjoy Sabbath.
Why not both?
I entertained this idea but it really doesn't make sense.
The reason why the church may have believed this for 1800+ years is irrelevant. What matters is that, if we are truly the last generation, God said we would understand the prophecy in the last days.
Daniel 12:4 (ESV): "But you, Daniel, shut up the words and seal the book, until the time of the end. Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase."
You want proof that this hasn't been fulfilled yet? The nation of Israel has been reborn and is not even 100 years old yet.
Now you might argue "Oh so early Christians were wrong this whole time?". Yeah, EXACTLY. Israel didn't exist back then so they had to come up with an interpretation that made sense to them, but we know now for sure this hasn't been fulfilled.
Furthermore, Daniel 9:24 clarifies what is being achieved with the 70 weeks:
Daniel 9:24 (ESV): “Seventy weeks are decreed about your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to put an end to sin, and to atone for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most holy place."
I find it hard to believe that all of these things have been fulfilled when we have the remnant of Israel living in their land as of today.
When the comment section is left on that's a good sign.
Yep. I find that a lot of sites that I would love to respond to, have their comments turned off.
Keep in mind that a lot of sites contain false teachings and they leave room for comments.
Bruce
When Jesus spoke of the abomination of desolation it was in answer to his disciples asking him what would be the signs of His coming and establishing of His kingdom. And Paul spoke of the abomination of desolation being followed by Jesus destroying the Antichrist with the brightness of his coming which would also entail the moon turning to blood the sun not giving light and the stars falling from the skies. He would gather His elect and appear in the air. None of these things happened in 70 A.D.
If you understand what truly occurred in those days yes the symbolism fits perfectly
@@blustarmarketinsights6914 except it didn't happen yet!
You are basing your eschatology on Darbyism or better yet futurism/dispensationalism, a system created in the early 1800's that is filled with so much nonsense it isn't even funny. The two methods of interpretation up into that time were Historicism and Allegory. It happened in 70 AD as foretold in Matthew 24 and Luke 21. The sun and moon turning dark and red is symbolism for divine judgment on Judah, the stars represent the 12 tribes of Israel. This symbolism was used in the Old Testament more than once. When Jesus sat at the right hand of the Father, He in effect became God, judge and ruler over the earth, taking the Father's place. There is no mention of an anti-Christ anywhere in Thessalonians 1 or 2. He was called the man of sin who sat in the temple calling himself God, which by Josephus' account occurred during the Jewish rebellion (apostasia) of 66/70 AD. Context, Symbolism, Literary Devices all a part of the Hebrew way of conveying prophecy. During the Jewish-Roman War (66/70 AD), there were two Zealot leaders who took their place in the temple:
[1] The first one made the temple, including the inner court, his headquarters for about 3.5 years (from the fall of AD 66 until April AD 70). He was killed (destroyed, slayed by the brightness of His coming) in Jerusalem in AD 70. That was Eleazar ben Simon.
[2] The second one took over the inner court about five months before the temple was destroyed, precisely when the Roman general, Titus, arrived and began his siege against Jerusalem (from April - August AD 70). He was captured, taken to Rome, and sentenced to life in prison. That was John Levi of Gischala. John Levi was not killed or destroyed, leaving Eleazar ben Simon as the obvious man of sin Paul was referring to in 2nd Thessalonians; Top Two Candidates for the Man of Lawlessness
In this passage, Paul specifically stated that the man of lawlessness was one who:
[1] “opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God” (verse 4);
[2] “the Lord will consume with the breath (spirit) of His mouth (prophecy) and destroy with the brightness of His coming (God often used Gentile nations in order to bring judgment on His people) [vs 8]” Jesus' coming is seen in Daniel 7 as coming before the Father to receive His Kingdom). In Matthew 26:64: “You have said so,” Jesus replied. “But I say to all of you: From now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven."@@JamieElison
In Matthew 24 where Jesus makes reference to the abomination of desolation spoken by Daniel, Jesus is answering his disciples about the question of the sign of His second coming, the day he will return:
Mat 24:11 "And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray. And because lawlessness will be increased, the love of many will grow cold. But the one who endures to the end will be saved.
And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and THEN THE END will come.
Mat 24:15 “So when you see the abomination of desolation spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains.
Mat 24:29 “Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. "
Hello, yes, the Great Tribulation is just ahead. But Shawn" 's Church has already been fulfilled from 538AD to 1798AD. Shawn's Church believes the Book of Revelation is past history except for the last part of the 6th seal and the 7th Trumpet.
But their own Prophet, Ellen Harmon/White, wrote a letter in 1847 to Eli Curtis correcting Eli for teaching that Michael had stood up. She said that she was given a vision that Michael and the "time of trouble" was the future. She set aside Mr. Miller's understanding that brought this great disappointment in 1844.
If you think your church has been given a Prophet, then first believe the Scriptures and then believe your Prophet if what they say agrees with the Bible.
You need to read it again more closely.
Bear in mind, the disciples had just asked him specifically about the end of the Jewish state because he had just told them the temple would be destroyed and this would no doubt have brought images of Babylon destroying Solomon's temple to their minds.
Matt 24:11, fulfilled: Simon Magus, Ebion, and Cerinthus, who denied the proper deity, and real humanity of Christ; Carpocrates, and the Gnostics his followers, the Nicolaitans, Hymcneus, Philetus, and others.
Matt 24:15, fulfilled: "From signs, Christ proceeds to the immediate cause of the destruction of Jerusalem; which was, "the abomination of desolation", or the desolating abomination; or that abominable thing, which threatened and brought desolation upon the city, temple, and nation: by which is meant ... the Roman army...; see Luke 21:20 which was the , "the wing", or "army of abominations making desolate", Daniel 9:27. Armies are called wings, Isaiah 8:8 and the Roman armies were desolating ones to the Jews, and to whom they were an abomination; not only because they consisted of Heathen men, and uncircumcised persons, but chiefly because of the images of their gods, which were upon their ensigns: for images and idols were always an abomination to them ... and accordingly it is observed, that many did flee about this time; and it is remarked by several interpreters, and which Josephus (a) takes notice of with surprise, that Cestius Gallus having advanced with his army to Jerusalem, and besieged it, on a sudden, without any cause, raised the siege, and withdrew his army, when the city might have been easily taken; by which means a signal was made; and an opportunity given to the Christians, to make their escape: which they accordingly did, and went over Jordan, as Eusebius says (b), to a place called Pella; so that when Titus came a few mouths after, there was not a Christian in the city, but they had fled as they are here bidden to
flee into the mountains."
Matt 24:29, fulfilled: The sun darkened = His glory removed from their physical temple for good. The moon not giving light = Ceremonial law is no more. Power of heaven shaken = "all the ordinances of the legal dispensation; which shaking, and even removing of them, were foretold by Haggai 2:6 and explained by the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews, Hebrews 12:26 whereby room and way were made for Gospel ordinances to take place, and be established."
@@MagicMayers Thank you for your comment. You wrote, "Bear in mind, the disciples had just asked him specifically about the end of the Jewish state" I never read that in the Scriptures...please share what translation are you using?
Let me copy the KJV text.
Mat 24:3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?
The signs that Jesus/Yeshua spoke and recorded after this verse are a long list of signs or events that will take place during the LAST GENERATION LIVING ON EARTH AT THE SECOND COMING. Here is the text in Matt 24 that causes my current view.
Mat 24:33 So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.
Mat 24:34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
It may be helpful to try a method of sorting things out working backwards. I asked people to go to Rev. 19: 11-21 where the King of Kigns is seen leaving heaven. Study Revelation backward can help unstick us or give us confirmation we were right or we see a problem with our past view.
Rev. 19:1-10 We read what fallow the destruction of a Great City in chapter 18.
Rev 18:24 And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.
What is the name of this Great City? Read Rev. 11 where we read and find the name of a Great City.
After reading about this city being burned and destroyed... Read Rev. 17 where it tells us who and why destroyed this Great City.
In Re. 17 we also read about the purpose of a military gathering by the wicked who has a plan to attach Jesus/Yeshua from the Holy Land near Jerusalem when he arrives at the Second Coming. So the Dragon, Whore, Beast surely know the season of the Second Coming, and gather to be ready to fight.
It is sad my Adventst brothers and sisters have been told the Book of Revelation has been fulfilled. Their reason is still holding unto Mr. William Miller's check list checked off Daniel 12:1 and also Matt 24 and all of Revelation except the last part of the 6th seal and 7th trumpet. They think the next thing on the list is the Second Coming.
The Church no longer believes there own Prophet Mrs. White. In 1847 she wrote a letter to Eli Curtis which is easy to find online. Here she corrected Eli, said the she was given a vision that Michael had not stood up and the "time of trouble" was future. She just said Mr. Miller had it wrong.
In another unpublished manuscript which most members never read Mrs Whtie wrote that God have covered Mr. Millers eyes that prevented him from understanding the times that he was using. But at the end of time God would reveal what had been hidden by Mr. Miller.
Shalom/Peace
@@sunmoonstars8471 Sure, you have to go back to the end of chapter 23 which connects to the start of 24. Just before Jesus leaves the temple he laments that Jerusalem will be left desolate. As they're leaving, the disciples point out the marvelous buildings (which were probably the fanciest things some of them had seen) and he tells them the temple will be entirely destroyed too.
Then the disciples come to him later, privately, asking about the end of the age and his coming because what he'd just said made them think that the end of the age was upon them if Jerusalem and the temple were going to be destroyed and therefore the Messiah must surely be about to set up his Kingdom on earth, which was true and his kingdom is being built as we speak, and a new temple made without hands from living stones, they just didn't understand at the time how things were going to be done.
@@sunmoonstars8471 the disciples asked him three questions you're only dealing with one of them!!! the last question what would happen at the (end of the world) which is Matthew 24:3.. which is Daniel 8: 17 Daniel 8:19 Daniel 8:23. When the (transgression of desolation) which is the (abomination of desolation Jesus is speaking about in Daniel 24:15)
G.Grennell Your explanation of the last seven years {week} is very weak. What is the abomination that makes desolate? You forgot to explain 9:27 which describes a desolator. It cannot be Titus, since he did not want to destroy the temple. If all this happened in 70 AD, then why has the Great Tribulation not occurred? And where is Jesus return, that was was to happen immediately after that? You have bought into a false teaching on this...there are other passages in Daniel which specifically project these events into the "end times" in Daniel 8. You need to study till it all fits every passage!!!
the problem with this view point in my humble opinion and I think is a BIG problem is when Jesus himself mentions the Daniel profecy in Matthew 24, when he very much describes the "end times" by saying on verses 21 and 22..
"21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.
so, according to your viewpoint if Daniel 9 already happen, where does this Jesus's revelation of the "great tribulation" of future times fits into?
I do believe we are living in a church age, a gap of some sort, and the 70th week of Daniel will probably start right after Jesus rapture his saints from this mad world we are living in right now that will actually get worse as we approach that time...
@josuecerqueira7191 If Daniel 9 is fullfilled what is Jesus refering to? He is refering to Daniel 12. Daniel 9 Is what Jesus did when he came the first time - Its Gods blueprint so to say and the devil always copying what God does. The copy is in Daniel 12. The key is in the end of it. The abomination in Daniel 12 is in Rev.13.
Its no need to have a gap in the history. God has one prophecy about Jesus first coming and a timeline for that time and the people of that time to be able to understrand when the promised Messiah could be expected to come and some did. What he was meant to do including the new covenant and to end the sacrifice both spiritually and physically for those who rejected him and punish the jews for the rejection and scatter them all over the world and in that way prepare for the second coming.
Give Jesus the glory for the Daniel 9 prophecy and dont give the devil any attention in his attempt to steal that prophecy from us.
God also have a second proophecy which have some similarities with Daniel 9 in Daniel 12 which is for the second coming and those of us who are wise shall understand (verse10). This wisdom comes by the holy spirit of course. This is another timeline to help the believers to understand the timeline of the tribulation and of the second coming of Christ to understand the startevent wich happens shortly before the tribualation. The coming of the two witnesses, antichrist and "the woman" in Rev.12 in a few days row after about 70 days.
To understand when the abomination is set up in Rev.13 and when Jesus will come to the exakt day. We can by study the other timelines and reading Rev.12 and 13 and 2 Thess. 2 understand what we need to know when we need it but only short before it starts. We can also by that understand that the shortened time Jesus talks about is when the mark of the beast is here and no one can buy or sell. By easily subtract we get 45 days. This is really helpful to know. If that time isnt shortened no flesh will survive. I think after 45 days at least half of the christians have been martured so if it only should be the double 90 days only a handfull will still be alive. Seven years no way!
So when i had found out about Daniel 12 which God has given me I had no problem with go against the 70th week of Daniel teaching but better is to show whats right instead of saying its wrong.
By the way Daniel 12:4 says "seal until the endtime". Many think they know much but still they know less than they think
According to you counting Jesus died at age 30 instead of 33, since according to your reasoning Jesus would have started His ministry at 27.
Can you explain this you?
Daniel 11:21-24 And in his estate shall stand up a VILE PERSON, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: BUT HE SHALL COME IN PEACEABLY, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.
22 And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflown from before him, and shall be broken; yea also the prince of the covenant.
23 And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.
24 He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers’ fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time. KJV
Already fulfilled prior to Jesus' day. This is about Antiochus Epiphanes.
@@MagicMayers NOPE, not already fulfilled, and Daniel prophecies through his visions, the coming of the antichrist, the seven year tribulation, and the END!
Only 69 weeks have been fulfilled, leaving one week left to be fulfilled, a week of years, seven years.
Daniel 8:24-26 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.
26 And the vision of the evening and the morning which was told is true: wherefore shut thou up the vision; for it shall be for many days. KJV
Daniel 8:13-14 Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot?
14 And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed. KJV
Daniel 12:11-13 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.
12 Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days.
13 But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot AT THE END OF THE DAYS. KJV
Daniel 9:27 KJV
@@nancyking2867 This was fulfilled in the days of the Maccabees.
The early Christians did not and would not agree with you.
You're repeating futurism which was invented c.1500s by the Jesuits in an effort to deflect attention away from the papacy as Antichrist.
Jesus is Messiah the Prince and the 70th week is all about him.
Correct@@MagicMayers
@@nancyking2867 that was really good. I've studied that for 50 years .can you tell me the 2300 days?
I know why I wouldn't watch many more of your videos, you are wrong! The AC is coming and the verse is talking about the AC not Jesus. Although there may be a bit of an argument on when the rapture will happen if at all. There is still 1 more week of years for the Jews to fulfill and Jacob's trouble to come about.
Finally someone speaking the truth!
Maybe you should listen to his logic. What you are teaching is what you've been taught, not something you have done on your own. Matthew 24 was speaking expressly about the 70 AD judgment on Jerusalem. I'm not a 7th Day Adventist and can see this. Could it be you who has been decieved?@teresasiner2308
Yes, it could not have been any clearer than this....
@@Bruce.-Wayne Daniel 9 is written in chronological order. The 70th week is not spoken of until after Titus which is 70 A.D.. not one thing that he told you is the truth!
Paul WAS NOT a missionary. He was THE APOSTLE to the Gentiles.
The 12 Apostles were apostles TO ISRAEL.
Friend, according to the "Book of Revelation", Paul is not an Apostle; he was missionary. There will be 12 Apostles name written in the foundations of the New Jerusalem that will descend to earth from heaven: that's what written in the Revelation. If Paul was an apostle, then there would have 13 tribes of Israels in OT. The fact is that there were only 12 tribes of Israel in OT. In NT 12 apostle are the replacement of the 12 tribes in OT.
@@farwestgarohills3831 That is why you need to rightly divide scripture.
Paul is the Apostle to the Body of Christ.
The Body of Christ is composed of all people (both Jews and Gentiles in the flesh) that live in the MYSTERY AGE called the Age of Grace.
The Age of Grace was not part of Israel's PROPHETIC program found throughout the rest of the bible.
We live in a parenthetical period of time that was HID IN GOD BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD.
Israel's Prophetical program had been established SINCE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD.
There are only 12 Apostles TO ISRAEL.
There is only 1 Apostle TO THE BODY OF CHRIST.
This means that Christians who are following the 12 Apostles are following the wrong doctrine.
We are only to follow the doctrine taught by Paul.
Our salvation is NOT THE SAME as their salvation....nor is our Gospel the same as their Gospel.
@@farwestgarohills3831
1 Corinthians 1:1 Paul, called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother,
Ephesians 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to the saints which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus:
Paul is not part of the 12 Apostles. Paul is THE Apostle to the Body of Christ.
The 12 Apostles ARE NOT part of the Body of Christ.
The video says at 17:58 that Artaxerxes was ruling in 537 BC. This is not true. Cyrus was ruling in 537 BC.
During the rule of Cyrus, a decree was given by him to rebuild the Jerusalem and the temple but was never implemented. It was implemented only during the rule of the Artaxerxes II, who was also known as Ahasuerus, the husband of queen Esther. This date (537 BC) is not telling about Cyrus, but Artaxerxes II (is a title of the king, whose name was Ahasuerus).
@@farwestgarohills3831 the 537 date could not be speaking of Artaxerxes I or II because neither was alive in 537.
You're correct and it seems the presenter misspoke or else mixed up his details when arriving at the name Artaxerxes. It's true that the 490 year count starts with Artaxerxes decree, but his decree is the final seal on his grandfather's original decree which had been stalemated up to that point. Really, the decree was triune in nature and spanned a generation i.e. 80 years. A decree declared beforehand by the Almighty which comes from the mouths of 3 witnesses...seems pretty scriptural to me.
What he really should have said is that it was Artaxerxes decree which actually finally got the building completed AND restored Judah to autonomy. That's the key part.
@farwestgarohills3831 ... regardless of when the temple was finished, the prophesy is in reference to the decree to rebuild Jerusalem, and supposedly the Temple, which was in 537 by Cyrus, which means his numbers don't add up. His date 457 BC at 9:30 in the video is completely arbitrary in order to make his math work, which means his math doesn't work. The reign of Artaxerxes, from every source I've seen was 465 - 424 BC, which means again, his math doesn't add up. Unless you know where his 457 BC date came from, it seems to me he's inventing a clever system with a doubtful interpretation of Daniel 9.
@@MagicMayers... I just read Ezra 7, which he referenced, and Artaxerxes decree was not about building the temple, he was calling the Jews to Jerusalem and giving the gifts and utensils that were promised. It was the decree of Cyrus in 537 BC that was for rebuilding (Ezra 1:1-2), which means this guy's math doesn't work.
If the Book of Daniel, specifically Chapter 9 had already been fulfilled in 70 A.D. as claimed, then we should not think, that the Prophecy of Daniel is the SHADOW (correlation/parallelism) of the Book of Revelation and the Olivet Discourse of Christ Jesus, if that is the case...
So Matthew 24:3 doesn't apply to this ..and the (abomination of desolation) written in the book of Daniel ( like Jesus tells you to go find it in the book of Daniel ).that doesn't matter either!
the big problem with this interpretation is that Dan 9:24 has clearly not been fulfilled. 2nd problem is that Jesus never made a 1 week covenant with anyone. 3rd problem is that sacrifice and oblation didn't cease at Christ's crucifixion. others see the fulfillment of the 69 weeks when Jesus rode into Jerusalem on the donkey and was welcomed as the Messiah, which makes the crucifixion a few days later and not "middle of 70th week".
Plus Christ was cut off after the 62 weeks (7 weeks + 62 weeks = total of 69 weeks). This still leaves one _full_ week.
Daniel 9:24 is not presented as a set of criteria that will be fulfilled. It simply sets forth a time limit. The foretold crucifixion of Christ and ultimate destruction of Jerusalem and the temple in the same prophecy served to indicate that the criteria would not be met.
Jesus defined his covenant (διαθήκης contract) "for (the) many" (mirroring that descriptor in Daniel 9:27 below) of the shedding of his blood for the forgiveness of their sins (i.e. the gospel/the new testament) at the last supper. [Mark 14:24, Matthew 26:28, parallel Luke 22:20]
The Hebrew of 9:27 does not actually say "make" a strong covenant. It is more literally _"He will cause to be confirmed/strengthened covenant with regard to the many, one week"_ .
The one week, or the seven years, in expanded prophetic terms, was constituted by his and his apostles' seven-year ministry following his baptism, in the middle of which he was killed.
Jesus' sacrificial death made obsolete the temple sacrifices. Although the temple priests continued to inititate them, their efficacy was thenceforth nullified, as God no longer accepted them as valid transactions; thus the sacrifices ceased.
Any who would propose a start of the 70th week as coinciding with any event (i.e. other than Christ's baptism) that would make the rest of the prophecy's otherwise perfectly visible fulfillment seem to fail are under the influence of those whose objective is exactly that.
@@mytwocents777 I addressed this in my other response to you so I don't want to repeat it all here. Succinctly, we cannot separate Daniel 9 from Daniel 7, 8 and 11. It is the little horn who *takes away the daily sacrifice* and throws truth to the ground.
@@mytwocents777 i understand all that, but it's too vague and loose. impossible to be able to determine the fulfillment of the prophecy. And Jesus New Covenant is for all and forever, not for many and for a week. and again, the sacrifices did not stop and that's what the prophecy said to look for. doesn't say to search for the mind of God to see if He accepts or rejects the daily sacrifices. not to mention that nothing else has come to pass by the end of the 70th week. it all has to be clearly observable or else it doesn't really inform us of anything. it either means what it says or forget it, cuz loosely we can all take it any way we want. that would just make all this man-made religion and i would stop paying attention to the Bible if anyone can make out of it anything they wanted.
@@boltingpuppies Please see my response to your previous one, concerning this point.
The temple is in heaven,😮 no more Earth 🌎 three times you're out😅 it's not going to happen 😔 Revelation says temples in heaven hello 🤗 your critic ❓🤔🧐
Thank you so much, just come on your page and saw this awesome teaching. It actually helps me.
Except he did not tell you the truth. Daniel 9 is written in chronological order. The 70 week does not happen till after Titus which is 70 a.d.
Please see christadelphian bible study and Christadelphian videos for great learning worldwide speakers from Australia New Zealand and Europe and North America and South Africa and John Thomas wrote 'elpis Israel ' in 1848 shows the return of the Jews to Israel under a British mandate he actually foretold!
The prophecy deals with Messiah cut off to deal with the problem of sin and is risen from the dead and has brought in everlasting righteousness having sealed up the covenant in his blood please see christadelphian bible study and Christadelphian videos@@JamieElison
There is only 3 and 1/2 years of Tribulation. 42 months. 1260 days. Time, times and half time.
@Shawn Boonstra, I think your missing something for verse 27. I prefer the KJV bible Dan. 9:27 "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice AND the oblation to cease, AND for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate." Both the cessation of the sacrifice and oblation AND the making desolate an overspreading of abominations happened at the same time. At the crucifixion. You, yourself, showed how the Jewish Levitical system had become corrupt in Jesus' day. He even stated multiple times about "teaching for doctrines the commandments of men", "making void the law through their traditions", etc. This is why the word "abominations" is in the plural and "it" is singular. Individual laws in the Jewish Levitical/Mosaic law. It was ALL of the Levitical laws were made desolate as well as the laws concerning the sacrifices and oblations. The Handwriting of Ordinances (which Moses wrote in a book) that were nailed to the cross. The "He" in "He shall make it desolate" is the same "He" that confirms the covenant for one week and "He" causes the sacrifice and oblation to cease.
Because the wording is similar to the "Abomination that maketh desolate" and the "Abomination of desolation" people think it must be the same thing. But one is a title giving to a singular power that makes things desolate. The other is something (in the plural) that is made desolate by the same "He" in verse 27.
Would also have liked to hear you make mention that the word "determined" in verse 24 is a mistranslation. It is from the Hebrew word "ḥāṯaḵ" which means to "cut off", specifically "from the beginning of" something else. The translators of the KJV just couldn't figure out what Daniel's 70 weeks was cut off from so they substituted the word determined in it's place.
Jesus did confirmed the covenant for one week, from 27 Ad to 34 Ad. Jesus was crucified in the midst of that week. thus ending the sacrificial system. and in 34 Ad the Jews stoned Stephen to death and Paul told Acts 22:20- And when the blood of thy martyr Stephen was shed, I also was standing by, and consenting unto his death, and kept the raiment of them that slew him. Vs. 20-and he said unto me, Depart: for I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles. Thus ending the probation of the Jews to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, Dan. 9:24.
@@ebbygshreve9577 I completely agree.
@davidstarr6604 ! He did not miss. In fact, you missed his explanation of that. Did you notice a chart, where there was written 27 AD and a cross? That chart was describing this verse. He knows the verse well as much as equal to his eloquence.
@@farwestgarohills3831 I saw that. And I noticed he is using the NKJV which translates "kānāp̄" as "wing" while the OLD KJV translates it as "overspreading". The idea being a "covering" like a hen covering her young with her wings. But in this context (Dan. 9:27) it is the abominations that have covered the land (Judea) in Jesus' time. He, ALSO, is confusing the text with the "abomination that maketh desolate" or the "abomination of desolation" (a reference to the coming anti-christ in Daniel 11:31, 12:11 and Matthew 24:15, Mark 13:14). They are not the same as the overspreading/wing of abominations in Dan. 9:27.
@@davidstarr6604 it most certainly is David ..Daniel 9:27 is the same abomination of desolation!! Jesus tells you that in Matthew. 24:15.. but you don't want to listen to Jesus!
Take note: During the time of Christ Jesus' ministry on Earth (1st Cent. A.D.), Prophet John the Baptist has the "SPIRIT of Elijah," according to the Bible, but not Prophet Elijah himself... just like Prophet Elisha got the Power of Elijah after he was taken by God through the chariot of fire, but not Prophet Elijah himself...
At the End Times/Last Days/Aweson Dreadful Day, Prophet Malachi prophesied that God would send back Prophet Elijah himself (Body, Soul, Spirit, and Power that comes from God) to be one of God's WITNESSES (one of the 2 OLIVE Tress/2 Candlestands) according to Revelation 11... Facts and Truth, Biblically speaking... Amen and Amen...
Dear Shawn and readers. Dan 9:24: "Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city..." are the words Gabriel explained to Daniel. If we read the rest of this verse and apply the literal words without adding our own...Gabriel gave Daniel understanding in Daniel 9:24, 2 5, 26, 27 the understanding of Father's appointed times. These 70 weeks were 70 weeks of years or (7 0 X 7 = 490 years). They are also to confirm when the 2300 days fit into the appointed times.
Dan 8:17 So he came near where I stood: and when he came, I was afraid, and fell upon my face: but he said unto me, Understand, O son of man: for at the time of the end shall be the vision.
Dan 8:19 And he said, Behold, I will make thee know what shall be in the last end of the indignation: for at the time appointed the end shall be.
Gabriel was very clear the 2300-day Prophecy given in Dan 8:9-14 is appointed for the "time of the end." Today, I have two major things I need help to make fit into Shawns' and the Adventist unmoveable 457 BC to 1844 AD time frame. 1. 457 BC was not the "time of the end" or "the appointed time of the end for this vision. 2. Daniel 8:9 shows the "Little Horn" power doing wicked deeds to God's people. The Little Horn began when the Greek Empire fell to the Little Horn power, which uprooted the other three horns that controlled the Greek Empire, and then the Roman Empire (Little Horn) began. 3. Daniel 2 gave us only 4 major Empires, and we have two legs, which advent teachers overlook. The Roman Empire The Western Roman Empire moved to the Eastern Roman Empire. The Western Roman Empire restored its power in the 1800s, and today, in Rome, Italy, the smallest and most powerful Nation in the World, and run by the most powerful man in the World. Who controls the Calendar controls the World, and we are already in a New World Order looking to have our US dollars changed to digital currency that will take another layer of slavery.
Now let us move forward:
Dan 9:26: "And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the City and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. "
In verse 26, history has recorded that a (Roman) prince came and destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD. But we must be very honest with the words of Prophecy and stop listening to others who put words into our heads.
Daniel 9:24 put the fall of Jerusalem inside of the 70-week Prophecy. It was supported again in Daniel 9:26 that the City and the sanctuary would be destroyed.
Shawn and his Church has a problem: The fall of the City of Jerusalem and the Sanctuary will not fit within Shawn's or his Church's timeline, which ends 3.5 years after the Cross.
Slow down and process these details, and pray for help. If I am wrong, then please correct me. I am so blessed when Father sends someone to turn me around.
Shawn and the Seventh Day Adventist Church has held onto their teaching that began in 1844 and have not moved forward. I agree that if no new knowledge has been sent by the Father, we don't have more foundation stones. Shawn and his Church leadership apply the last 70th week or seven years to follow the 69th week. So they have the Cross in the midst of the last 70th week.
Two significant questions Shawn B. can't answer:
1. Daniel 9:24: Were and when was the "Most Holy Anointed" that must fall within the 70th weeks? No Jesus will anoint the Most Holy on the 2300th day of this Prophecy at the end of the Great Tribulation of Matt 24.
2. Did Jesus/Yeshua anoint the Earthly Most Holy in Jerusalem when He walked upon the earth? No
3. Did Jesus/Yeshua anoint the Heavenly Temple's Most Holy, thus cleansing the Sanctuary each year on the Day of Atonement? No
4. If your answer to number 3 is yes, then you must believe there is an annual Day of Atonement in heaven when Jesus/Yeshua goes into the Most Holy on the Day of Atonement. What evidence do you have to support that understanding?
5. In Daniel 9:24 and 26, it is clear that the City of Jerusalam will be destroyed within that 70-week Prophecy. Please share with us how the math works for 70 AD to fall inside the 70-week forecast if your 70th weekends are 3.5 years after the Cross.
I am not correcting you or your Church. That is the Holy Spirit's job. I always look for correction and will consider all your evidence to support your doctrine.
I SEE YOU ARE OUTSIDE OF THE 70-WEEK PROPHECY BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE END OF THE 70 WEEKS AT THE STONING OF STEVEN. THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM IN 70 AD WILL NOT FIT ANYWHERE NEAR THE DEATH OF JESUS ON THE CROSS.
As for me and my house, I will follow Jesus. Your Prophet Ellen White said that every generation would receive new light if they accepted the new light and walked in it; then there would be more light. This is following Jesus. Let us remember the story in the Exodus when Israel was led out of Egypt. They were to follow the Cloud by day and the Fire by night. They were moving forward. If they didn't progress, they would be left behind.
If God's people stop moving forward on the pathway of truth when light is sent, Ellen White warned they would be very disappointed. God's judgments will begin in the House of God; it is a solemn duty to stand before the Father's flock and not be able to prepare the people for what will come upon God's people just ahead.
I would love to sit with you and reason or speak on the phone. But it has been my experience that most Church leaders will have the same problem that the leaders in the Temple had. They try to prevent the people from receiving what is needed to prepare them for the Last Days. Jesus/Yeshua was an 'Outsider," and the Temple leaders saw his teachings as threatening.
People mistakenly think their Church membership is a ticket into the Holy City. Church is a hospital where people find healing and how to walk out their lives in this crazy World. I must be careful not to reject the truth and be willing to be corrected. There is no time to be stiff-necked or stubborn today. God said people follow their traditions and deny his fact.
Time is very short. Daniel 12 promised that some knowledge had been held back until the last days, then the Father would give understanding to those running to and fro seeking knowledge. Sorry, 1843/1844 were not the last days or the beginning of the previous days; they are not even the last years. 175 years have passed, and the SDA Church leaders have not led the flock even to the next campground. Why? Because they can't change. Like the Catholic Church, they are too big to change. Any change would cause people to leave the Church. When people grow up hearing the Church has truth, they follow their Church leaders. So, if a Church does make any changes, they are made very slowly over several generations. When the old guard dies off, then the Church can move something without many protesting. Today, many Adventist Pastors and members have come out of the Church for many reasons.
In these last days, pray for the "Oil," if I am not Born Again with the Father's "Fire," I will not walk into the Holy City and be blessed with eternal life. I need the Father's "Fire" and the "Living Water" that Jesus/Yeshua said I must have to be saved. I must be born again and given a new heart, which is where our emotions or desires come from that drive our brain to operate everything. The Holy Spirit is the Fire, and I must keep the "Oil" full to keep the fire burning. I visit many different Churches and ask questions. The answers I receive tell me a lot.
Please get ready, it is very late. The Church's view on the close of probation is incorrect. It is very near. It is so close, and millions will not be prepared. I have such a burden for all of Father's sheep and lambs. But today, Israel is more stubborn than Israel of the past. Sin has increased, and we are the weakest of all the generations. Mentally, physically, and spiritually. PRAY!!!!
*@sunmoonstars8471* You've mentioned the following, and I copied and pasted your very words: "Your Prophecy Ellen White said much about every generation would receive new light if that accepted the new light and walked in it then there would be more light given." *Quote close.*
Now, I've just done a quick online search, and she also said the following: “I appreciate the truth, every jot of it, just as it has been given to me by the Holy Spirit for the last fifty years. *I desire every one to know that I stand on the same platform of truth that we have maintained for more than half a century.* That is the testimony I desire to bear on the day that I am seventy-eight years of age.” Letters and Manuscripts - Volume 20 (1905), Ms 142, 1905, par. 6
*She wrote the following in 1913:* - *“The increased light of the present day does not contradict or make of none effect the dimmer light of the past.”* The Signs of the Times August 26, 1913, paragraph 3.
*The following statement was written in 1915.* - *“Let none seek to tear away the foundations of our faith,-the foundations that were laid at the beginning of our work, by prayerful study of the Word and by revelation. Upon these foundations, we have been building for more than fifty years. Men may suppose that they have found a new way, that they can lay a stronger foundation than that which has been laid; but this is a great deception. “Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid.” [1 Corinthians 3:11.] In the past, many have undertaken to build a new faith, to establish new principles; but how long did their building stand? It soon fell; for it was not founded upon the Rock."* Gospel Workers (1915 ed.), p. 307.1
*She died Feb. 13, 1915.* So, what is this new light you're suggesting?
I've listened to numerous speakers from various denominations on this subject, and of all the controversial topics found in the Bible, none other has been so misunderstood, or abused than the prophecy known as Daniels 70 Weeks. I'm sure the readers and myself are extremely curious and would like to know your stand on this prophecy. *I am no theologian, please educate me and the rest of the readers.* You sound desperate to talk to Boonstra and teach him some new light.... or shall I say sharing the truth. Instead of leaving everyone wondering - why don't you do everyone a huge favor and give a proper analysis [line upon line, verse upon verse] of this prophecy beginning at the starting point to the very last week, known as the the70th week.
Please quote from the Bible and historical sources only. Please provide the historical source/link and verses.
You've addressed Shawn Boonstra and you type just about 814 words. I am sure you will be conservative and do at least a minimum of 2600 to 3500 words on the 70-Week Prophecy of Daniel.
As I have mentioned above, I am no theologian but I am extremely curious what you have to say on this particular subject.
The day of Pentecost came in 33ad which fulfilled the 70th week prophecy
@seekertruth3577 well I am no theologian either. And regardless if you want to call it the 70th week of Daniel, or the Tribulation period, there is one truth, if you are an honest Christian, is that the final generation is the fig tree generation. That prophecy has been fulfilled in 1948 as Israel reinhabited the land. Not one line of scripture refering to the last days, especially Revalation could come to pass prior to the last generation being in the land. And there is without a doubt a 7 year Tribulation period which is the last 7 years of life as we know it on this planet. Now I don't know if you're SDA, and honestly the only 2 things I know about them is the observe the correct Sabbath, and everything about the last days they wrongfully direct to the Catholics. So in fact, this man in the video is incorrect. And if you need the scriptures to prove my point, I am happy to provide them with any questions you might have
@@chief270202 I am So blessed to have an independent Spirit-filled brother respond. I also agree the Fig Tree Prophecy is a time-appointed prophecy. The command by the UN was made in 1947, and it was fulfilled, if my memory is correct, on May 15, 1948. Here, Jesus/Yeshua spoke about all these signs that would occur during the last generation, and the end would come in that generation. So I searched in the Scriptures and found (I don't have the text right now) that the average age is three scores and ten, but if strong, found score.
I first took 1947 + 70 years, which has already passed. Then, adding 80 years for being strong, and we land on 2027 AD. If we use 1948, we add 2028 AD for the end of that generation. So we are told before, "This generation shall not pass till all these things be fulfilled."
I recently returned from spending almost 3 years living on top of a mountain in a jungle, and during lockdown, the Father assigned me the job of searching the Scriptures, and I was shown so many things during over 4,000 hours of study. I only use the Scriptures and would love to connect with you. You can reach me at protondotme and in front of the at lastseventhmonth. I would love to hear from you and share our present understanding. Peace/Shalom from a Bond Servant of the Most High
@@seekertruth3577 Thank you for your comments and for sharing some quotes. In November 2019, my Father sent me to the Philippines for almost three years. During the lockdown, I was told to study prophecy. I began reading through Genesis to Revelation every year using a reading plan. It has transformed my life and understanding. I claim to have only some truth and knowledge of correct reality. All praise and credit is sent to the Throne.
Daniel's vision in chapter 8 and Daniel 9:24 - 27 are critical. Yes, every word spoken is vital, and Father never says idle words.
I, too, am seeking knowledge and investigating others who have a testimony. The Holy Spirit is the only teacher, and I can only share my present testimony; it is always moving me forward. I am not in the same place I was six months ago. I am trying to follow Jesus/Yeshua and only focus on him. I respect my brothers and sisters, who also strive to follow. I would like to see another's testimony only after I finish a study to seek out another survey to search for a correction or addition. The end of my exail is: atproton dot c-m. Please add in front: LastSeventhMonth. I can respond to your request much easier for you. Peace/Shalom
Yes! Stop looking for another rebuilt temple and the anti Christ and instead plow forward in Jesus
I do not agree. Abomination of desolation is the mark of the beast sitting in the temple of the Holy Spirit.
Thank you brother
Dan 9:27 not yet fulfilled.
The Lord Jesus Christ NEVER confirmed a covenant for 7 years. His covenant with the believers is for ETERNITY.. He started a NEW Covenant ( Jeremiah 31) which lasts for ETERNITY. Why should Dan 9/27 go back in time to AD 30 referring to the Messiah when Dan 9/26 clearly refers to an event that took place in AD 70 involving Roman Titus?? Follow the chronological time line from Dan 9/ 25-27 and you will see that Dan 9/27 would be out of sync if it referred to Lord Yeshua Messiah.
Methinks you need to look into literary styles and structures particular to the middle east instead of what seems to be a western eye. This is very similar to how Hebrew poetry uses chiasms to emphasize a point. In this instance, the emphasis is being placed on the Messiah being the one who is ultimately behind their destruction:
26 Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
26 tells us Messiah is cut off for others and that the city and sanctuary will be destroyed by the prince to come while 27 tells us specifically that Messiah will be cut off mid week at which point he causes the sacrifice and offerings to cease and that ultimately, he will destroy the city and temple because of their abominations. There's nothing out of sync here.
Thank you again, Paster Boonstra! For the clarity of our Lord's prophetic message.
“If the plain sense makes good sense seek no other sense or you will get nonsense” absolutely profound. Thank you for this lesson. Those verses in Daniel make way more sense to me now. It always felt like there were a lot of hoops that many other teachers were jumping through to make this about the Anti-Christ and end times. Shalom
Here is how this works..
Neh 2:1 And it came to pass in the month Nisan, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king.
From the month of Nisan unto Nisan, point A unto point B, exactly.
...from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build **Jerusalem** unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks..= 7 and 62 =
From Nehemiah 2, 445bc subtract 483 converted to days = 173880 DAYS...
MARCH 14 445bc to
APRIL 6th 32 ad. Nisan 10
The triumphal entry In Luke 19
Thanks for your comment. The vision of Daniel 8 in verse 14 points to the vision being 2300 days long. The Adventist Church began that vision in 457 BC. There is some history behind why, but I will stick to the texts and history. Daniel chapter 8, as you read down the page, comes to the "little horn." throughout the past 200 years, the little horn has been considered the Holy Roman Empire. Here is the speaker's problem. The Roman Empire had not come to power; the Greek Empire was in control. The speaker is stuck with his traditions that began back in 1844.
So where do these 2300 days fit?
Answer: There are seven years of tribulation or some call time of trouble. Take 360 days/dates in a prophetic year X 7 years = 2520 days/dates in this tribulation, divided into two halves (see Daniel 9:27). Now lay out a timeline of 2520 days. Mark the middle with 1,260 on each side. The 2300 days end on the same date the 2520 ends, which is the end of the Great Tribulation. Do the math, and the "little horn" power will begin doing great evil, as is written before verse 14.
Now, read after verse 14, and you will see the Angle Gabriel sent to Daniel to give him an understanding of this vision. Then Gabriel states two times this vision is for the last days of the end of time. One more critical detail. Daniel 9:24-27 Gabeirl returns to give Daniel more information connected to Daniel's end-time prophecy.
Adventists claim the midst of the 70th week was the Cross. At my first look, it sounded good, but the details must be noticed. In the 70th week of Daniel's prophecy, the Adventists say Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD...how everything. You can't end the 70th week at the Cross and then say 70 AD fits into Daniel 9:26, where we are told the city is destroyed. Our trouble today is the same problem Israel has and has had from their beginning. People want a man to lead them instead of the Almighty Father and Son.
Ask the honest question: Is the Adventist view starting this vision in the last days of 457 BC fit the literal meaning of what is written.
It made sense for the religious group in 1844, but it is 2023, and we are not in the Kingdom yet.
Today, the Adventist Church, like so many others, has some great truth, and they also get stuck with their doctrines cast into cement that can't be moved. Like the Catholic Church, they never change. The Adventist World Church is now over 22,000,000, so you don't grow that big without having something to offer. But they can't progress and follow the Cloud by day and the fire by night. So, most will be left behind thinking they are following Jesus because they believe their Church leaders are following Jesus. If the Church changed a central doctrine like the 2300-day view they have millions would leave their Church. Why? Because we are told that man would instead follow his traditions than his Creator. Shalom
Pray for the wild Gentile branches and natural branches of the scattered house of Israel in all the Nations of this world. We are very close to the midst of Daniel's 70th week of the year. The wicked one has a full-court press and is moving us quickly to the final fulfillment of all things.
@@sunmoonstars8471 the 2300 days are actual days, not years. The day for a year nonsense of the SDA s, along with thier endless "saturday is true sabbath" fetish, is absurdist theology and unabashed judaizing . The only place in scripture where a week of seven days actually is seven years is Daniels seventy week prophecy which actually becomes 490 years long because it made no sense historically otherwise, and is backed up by Genesis 29:27, where a week isan ancient hebrew euphemism and also seven years long.
Gods time is our time. God demands complete and thorough accuracy in prohetic time statements. Those who misinterpret or change HIS TIMES into times that suit thier errrors and bad theology are simply abominable. Leviticus 19:35, Proverbs 20:10 and 20:23.
And a day is not 1000 years either in prophecy. Peter is not making this up. He is quoting the Psalmist in Psalm 90:4 and the Psalmist is actually saying that time does not matter to God in the light of his eternal nature, not according to His divine whimsical fantasies when it comes to prophetic statements. God is God, and he is true. He does not become a trickster or deceiver when it comes to prophecy . That is the sign of a false prophet. Man is the deceiver and liar and twists Gods word to suit his bad eschatology, at a detriment to himself and others.
@@sunmoonstars8471 Ths house of Israel was scattered and destroyed by 70AD. There are no lost tribes, only lost sinners. The national genealogies were all destroyed when the temple burned. And saying only God knows who or where they are today is simply shoring up the lost tribes myth, which then becomes another judaizing fable perpetrated on the gullible church. Paul clearly put his foot down against this sort of nonsense by saying in Galatians ch 4 ,that the cast out one had become those Jews who clinged to Mt Sinai, and refused to come to the New Zion. The Old system had become HAGAR, the one SENT AWAY. For Ishmael was not the child of promise. Isaac was. This was the reason the Jews hated and despised Paul to the point of death. 2000 years later, the church still doesnt seem to get Pauls main point.
Moses/Joshua
David/Solomon
John/Jesus
Peter/Paul
Church/144,000
Patterns
In the apocrypha it gives the same explanation as you. That the 70 weeks are tied to the messiah Jesus time on earth
☑ Thank you Praise God ❗😊
May God bless All who hear and receive and obey these Prophecies ✝️ 🙏
I only wish that this man of God would read a little further to (Daniel 12:1-13.) Here Daniel prophecies the future judgment, the resurrection, the abomination of desolation, the 3 1/2 year war, and the second coming of Christ "apart from sin for salvation." This would be when Daniel would arise to his inheritance, his salvation. All these things would be finished as we read (Daniel 12:7.) Confirmed by Christ himself prior to His death in (Matthew 24:34) "all these things fulfilled." "It makes plain sense that the one that rose again, completed his task, like He said He would in their generation? (Matt 5:17-18)
@james-cq3mi Daniel 12 is key esp. v. 10-12
This episode is like a breath of fresh air. So very clearly and wonderfully explained. ✔️
Its not comprehensive..or all inclusive..
Except for the annoying ads
@teresasiner2308 The faith of many will be destroyed when future events do not unfold as interpreted by the unstable rapture-centred dispensationalists. ✔️
@teresasiner2308can you give me the verse in the Bible that says you're going to heaven?
@teresasiner2308 You are mislead of what the abomination in the tribulation is therefor you get things wrong. The abomination in the tribulation is not antichrist!! If its not him then what is it? Its an it! Hint: Its in the book of revelation. The bible never refers an abomination to a person. A person like antichrist will be a blasphemer not an abomination. You have listen to bad teaching. Read the bible your self and ask the Lord about understanding. Study what an abomination can be.
Okay smarty-pants how do you explain Matthew 24 verse 15 seems like he's referring to the very end of days and he refers back to Daniel and the abomination of desolation it seems like that passage of Daniel's is referring to the very end of days that Matthew 24 talkin about smarty pants
The word "anti" in antichrist does not mean someone who is going to be openly anti (against) Christ. That word "anti" in the original Bible language can actually mean "IN PLACE OF". So could the bible antichrist be someone who has actually put himself "in place of" Christ? Well, we have further Bible evidence to support this. In 1 John 2:18-19 it says that there were "many antichrists", who "WENT OUT FROM THE CHURCH". In other words, John is pointing to the fact that those "antichrists" were WITHIN THE CHURCH!! Not only that, but Paul in 2 Thess. 2:3-4 calls the man of sin the "son of perdition". Now there is only one other place in the Bible where the name "son of perdition" is used, and that is in John 17:12 talking about JUDAS! And what was Judas? A professing follower of Christ Jesus. Someone who deceived from WITHIN the "church".
"The leader of the Catholic church is defined by the faith as the Vicar of Jesus Christ (and is accepted as such by believers). The Pope is considered the man on earth who TAKES THE PLACE of the Second Person of the omnipotent God of the Trinity." (John Paul II, Crossing the Threshold of Hope, p. 3, 1994).
"ANTI" - Christ = "IN PLACE OF" Christ!
@rickswineberg Anti means both instead of and against Christ. The first beast in rev.13 is the AC. He is mentioned in some different ways depending of who describes him. Of course there is antichristly systems as RCC but John talks about many antichrists at his time but many more has passed since his time.
John talks about the antichrist, so we shall know there is a special one who has a purpouse as Judas also had and is predicted to judgement to bring the fulfillment of prophecy to come to pass. He gets his power from the devil and its described in rev. 12 and 13 how that happens in the spiritual realms.
In rev. 17 there 10 kings who have the same mind as him gives him their own thrones which is that they hand over their power to him. This is what the world will see. He is the rider on the white horse in rev.6 and the other horses is what happens becaurse of him. He is the devils copy of the rider of the white horse in the end of the book of revelation which of course is Jesus Christ coming as the king of kings to take over the reign of the earth.
Antichrist can not be a system or many persons he is one man in one time and his time is 42 months and we see how he and the false prophet is cast in the lake of fire. The judgement of antichrist is the evidence that he is one man.
Jesus's ministry on Earth was ONLY for 3 Years...NOT 3 1/2 years. People need to do research on the Feasts of the Lord. Jesus was baptized on a Jewish Holiday...starting His ministry which only lasted 3 years.
Seeing another reference to abomination, desolation and tying it to Daniel 9:27 really helped me. The Romans were "the people of the Prince to come" because Jesus used them to destroy the temple the same way He used Nebuchadnezzar. Futurism is like trying to build a pyramid from the top brick down. On paper the pieces do fit, but in practicality, there is no truth to it at all. Since "the end of the war" does not really tie to any one war, that means the holy land is cursed. When Jesus went back to heaven we were to follow Him there in our referencing of spiritual things. Indeed the conflict between good and evil was taken to the next level as the church spread beyond the region of Palestine.
And church history is a repeat of Old Testament Israel's history. The time of the Judges parallels the early church in that there was no central leader and persecution was from without. Then after 313 AD when Constantine legalized the church we have a parallel to the time of the kings. Evil kings persecuted the faithful within the church and the Popes played this role for centuries. The division between Catholic and Orthodox parallels the divided kingdom after Solomon. And the time the Jews had after the captivity that Daniel 9:24-27 covers very closely matches the time we have had since the Reformation began with Martin Luther.
Excellence in understanding
@@mytwocents777 Thank you, God is the true teacher of course.
@@MrLesonfireforGod Amen, brother
John Wycliff is like the morning star of the reformation, long before Luther.
Wow
It is past time for the SDA church to acknowledge the obvious- the movement to bring the Jews back to the Holy Land is nothing short of a movement of God. See Deuteronomy 30:3,4: Isaiah 11:10-12: Luke 21:24: Ezekiel 36:21-25
Excellent lesson.
What's 70 a.d.. when Titus destroyed the temple.. the 70 week is written after that.. the guy is SDA! They believe in the false prophet Ellen and that's what he is saying!. Why? because he's .. destroying the 2300 days of Daniel 8!
@@JamieElison Ok? Take away Ellen White will not stop the fact that you STILL have to keep the Sabbath and the fact that the Bible prophesies a crisis of worship over the Sabbath in the last days.
@@JamieElison When will you evangelicals LEARN from 1 Peter 3:15 and answer why you believe what you believe with MEEKNESS and not with ad hominems and genetic fallacies???
@@ClayOfTheMaster well if your SDA.. and if that's what you're saying. We can't remove Ellen.. because that is where you get (everything )that you believe including the Sabbath you're standing behind!... So who's your 1844 Jesus ? ) a levite Jesus )or is He the Jesus of Hebrews 7?.. ((( that does nothing at the alter))).. from the tribe of Judah...?
@@JamieElison Why the the 3 paragraph marks? Was that purposeful? You do know that it is an anti-semitic identifier yes?
So what your saying that Zechariah 14 has no meaning, Abba comes back at Meddigo.
Valley of Jehoshaphat: the valley of Berachah (blessing). The general location of this valley is said to be around En Gedi (2 Chronicles 20). Either way, this would be somewhere west of the dead sea, which is south of Jerusalem.
Valley of Megiddo: due just north of Jerusalem.
Seeing how these are two different locations where Abba or Messiah are to engage the enemies, it is important to differentiate between what scriptures speak of what, which can be a bit confusing!
It is also important do differentiate between these two battles. In the "valley of decision", Abba is going to pursue the nations after having driven them away from Jerusalem, and enter into final "judgement there", in that valley.
However, the battle of armageddon is a response of the beast of Revelation and the world leaders, as a collective, with the intent of coming to fight Christ.
From what I gather, Joel 1-2, Zech.14 speaks of Abbas return, thus Zech 14 would be His engaging of the enemies of Jerusalem who have surrounded her. Yet we have this verse... "For I will gather all the nations to battle against Jerusalem;"
The channel just popped up today. I expected the worst but was pleasantly surprised. There is a real sense of sadness that the simple story is not understood by so many true believers.
Yes, I agree. It seems the highly educated need to keep things complex so the average person will just accept what their pastor says. I love pastors working to build up the Kingdom as their first goal. Building the church membership is not always the same, but it should be. Too much business in the church. Meeting in our homes or outside under the trees might be a blessing. There is too much money to budget and keep these expensive buildings and utilities going when the money could be spent to reach the last. It seems the time for the Gentiles is closing. There needs to be more outreach.
Yeah but SDA.. is not a church ..nor does it have the real Jesus of the Bible yet!
It's funny how history repeats itself. Even now, there are people building and saying; the temple of the Lord are these. In Jan. our leader stood in a temple of God saying "I have come to redeem America and save the world." I now know who the son of perdition is, spoken by Paul the prophet in 2 Thess.2. Because what he said what he said, and i know it's already been done for me and you; he's saying he is God. Son of perdition. Utter destruction. Good-bye America. Maui was a shot over the bow. The times and seasons of judgment, has begun. "But I will punish you according the fruit of your doings, saith the Lord: and I will kindle a fire in the forest thereof, and it shall devour all things round about it." Jer.21:14
Amen brother I totally agree with your interpretation of this Daniel 70th week prophecy the only thing that came up differently in my Mathematics of the 70th week fulfillment is that when the Holy Ghost came at the day of Pentecost in 33ad that fulfilled God's promise to Israel I started with the commission of Ezra to leave Babylon and go to Jerusalem to get the house of God in order because there were still many Jews married to strange women and foreign women and relationships and Ezra was sent to put God's law in place in 458bc so 458bc to 30ad the year the Jesus was crucified is 487 years and you take 6 months from the 487 which leaves 486 years and six months that were fulfilled then
3 1/2 years that remained and the Holy Ghost came at the day of Pentecost in 33ad the stoning of Stephen did not have any significance in the fulfillment of the 70 week prophecy the significance for the Jews was once Christ had shed his blood for the many as he told his disciples that it is expedient that he go away for if he did not go away the Comforter would not come.
And the reason I picked 458bc as the starting point for God's count down of the 70 weeks because the Bible says to seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness and all those other things shall be added unto you the building of the city and the land has no precedence over the Law of God and God used Ezra to do just that
God bless your ministry!
Amen 🙏!
My Brother, my heart leaps for joy when our Father makes divine appointments to bring us together to share our understanding with respect for what the Holy Spirit is doing in us and around us.
Thank you for sharing. We all live with our English-translated Scriptures, and the Father knew how to protect HIs message. We were given rules off the pages of the Scriptures that will guide us into correct understanding. The Bible is also self-correcting if I use the rules. When Moses wrote the same warning we read at the end of Revelation that not one word be added or taken away, that warning was given for a reason. Daniel 7:25 points out the evil one will try to change "TIMES" and "LAWS," and he has succeeded in both. They are different, but some only point out one change from Sabbath Day to Sunday worship.
Check out my response to a brother above for additional comments on this vital prophecy in Daniel 8 and Daniel 9:24-27. They are connected.
If you look carefully, you will discover how to reach me. I just returned from Asia after spending over 4,000 hours on end-time prophecy. Much to share.
Here is one question: The Lord returned to the Father and sat down on the Father's Throne, and they sat side by side. Where is that throne located? We all should know that the Father has another Throne in the Temple's Most Holy Place or some call Holy of Holies. Only the Father sits there, and Jesus/Yeshua only stands before the Father is never seen sitting there. You may be the first to get the correct answer. Since returning home, I have asked many people and am told no one ever thought to ask this question. Brother, THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON IN HEAVEN, AND WHAT EVENTS WILL CHANGE THERE, AND HOW IT WILL EFFECT US HERE. SHALOM
@@messengerisrael3817 The elect in Christ are the true ISRAEL OF GOD. The zionist state of 1948 is the deception of satan upon the church.
@@messengerisrael3817 Abrahams seed are those by faith in Christ. Galatians 3:7-9. The real Jew is heart cirumcised and not outwardly, but an inward change of heart and mind. Born again by His spirit, not by fleshly will.
No one enters the kingdom without being born again. He spoke these words to the Jews. Those who claim to have the Father, but deny the SON, are both GODLESS AND ANTICHRIST. 1 John 2:22-23.
@@sunmoonstars8471
1 John 3:2
2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
We should not have to consider or worry about where Jesus is sitting exactly its not important to know for the Bible says to judge nothing before the time .
And also its the Holy Ghost within a believer that teaches how to rightfully divide the word of Truth The Bible in an of itself does not teach because the Bible is just the record of the living Word red and black ink on white paper for Jesus said that it is the spirit that quickens the flesh profits nothing the words that I speak unto thee they are spirit and they are life.
For there are many that believe in interpreting the Bible literally but the natural man receives not the things of the spirit of God because it's foolish to him neither does he know them because it's spiritually discerned .
When this mortal take on immortality we will be totally different than this present mortal man .
Amen 🙏!
@@sunmoonstars8471 Well I believe you are wrong because the bible plainly tells us that Jesus was seated on the right hand of God. Mark 16:19, Mark 14:62, Matthew 26:64, Luke 22:69, Hebrews 10:12, Hebrews 1:13, Matthew 22:44, Luke 20:42,
An important reason why many Christians view the last seven years of Daniel 9's prophecy as yet future is precisely because of how Jesus himself applies it. This teacher handles Daniel 9 like many preterists do and attempts to align it with the destruction of the temple in 70AD. Jesus however tells His disciples in Matthew 24 that when they (Israel) see the "abomination of desolation" that they are to flee to the mountains in all haste, for then there will be tribulation unlike anything that had ever occurred previously, or will ever occur again in all the world (see Matthew 24:15-22).
You cannot say this of 70AD, for as many Jews as were killed by the Romans at that time, far worse things took place in World War II when six million Jews were brutally treated and murdered. This dwarfs the number of Jews believed killed in 70AD. So clearly, 70AD was not the worse tribulation that the Jews would ever face and it was not global in scope, nor did the other signs Jesus refers to, including His return, take place at that time, as recorded in the remainder of Matthew 24. The events of 70AD could not therefore fulfill Jesus' own words from verse 15 on in Matthew's gospel. The reason for adopting a future position therefore, in which anti-Christ makes a covenant with many, is not to follow some tradition or sub-cultural view within Christendom as suggested, but because of what the text actually says.
Absolutely well said!
Jesus used a common hyperbolic idiomatic phrase that is actually used in the Old Testament. Go look
Happy Sabbath Jason 🙌🏾🎊✨️
The 7th day sabbath starts in the morning at sunrise, according to the KJV Bible.
Genesis ch 1 and 2: 1-3,
Exodus ch 16,
Matthew 28: 1-7,
Mark 15:25 and 33-34,
Mark: 16: 1-7,
Luke 24: 1-7, and
John 20: 1-19.
KJV Bible
@@stophatin1354 I'll agree to disagree 😊
@@dougitoonsdesigns well you're disagreeing with Kjv Scripture and GOD Himself, not me.
@@stophatin1354 quote--Genesis ch 1 and 2: 1-3, >>unquote>
Gen 1:5, 1:8, 1:13, 1:19, 1:23, 1:31--ALL say evening (darkness) and the morning (light).
Matt 28:1 Matthew 28:1
New International Version
Jesus Has Risen
28 After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb.
(AFTER-----First day of the week the whole world KNOWS that is Sunday)
----Mark 15:25----Mark 15:25
New International Version
25 It was nine in the morning when they crucified him
Yes--Friday morning!!!
>>Mark 15:33-34
New International Version
The Death of Jesus
33 At noon, darkness came over the whole land until three in the afternoon. 34 And at three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” (which means “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”).
Friday afternoon--what is now called Good Friday!!!
>>>Jesus Has Risen
Mark 16:1 When the Sabbath was over,
>>>Luke 24:1-7
New International Version
Jesus Has Risen
24 On the first day of the week, very early in the morning,
Sunday morning--we call Easter
>>>John 20:1-19
New International Version
The Empty Tomb
20 Early on the first day of the week, while it was still dark,
Sunday morning!!
So, what is the problem???
@@stophatin1354 quote----well you're disagreeing with Kjv Scripture and GOD Himself, not me.--unquote
Nope--Only because you are taking verses OUT of context.
ALL through Gen 1--it says Evening (darkness) and Morning (daylight)
Sunset to sunset
Thank God! I'm finally watching a video that understands exactly what the Scriptures say. Thank you for letting the Bible interpret itself.
Thank you so very much for the clearest presentation of this that I have heard. I have believed this way for only about a year or two now, and I’m embarrassed to say that, even though when I was taught the more common way, even though I questioned it because it just didn’t seem to make sense to separate The 70th week from the 69th week, I never did further research. Shame on me and I’m glad that I have a better understanding now. Thank you.
Please read my comment.
Your're welcome, and all glory and thanks go to the Father's Throne. I am only try to run to an fro seeking knowledge. Yes, when the Cloud brought Israel to the Jordan River to cross over into the Promised Land, the lack of Faith caused God to turn them away to be led in the wilderness until all the 20+-year-old people died for not believing and trusting. Those under 60 years old 40 years later crossed over into the Promised Land without seeing death. This is a prophetic picture of a delay, and this delay we have been in is about to end. The generation born in 1947/1948 will not pass away before Jesus' Second Coming. The strong generation we find written to be fourscore or 80 years. Read and understand the Fig Tree prophecy in Matt 24 and learn who the Fig Tree is and what is hidden in the parable.
There are seven years of Tribulation or 2520 days & nights. The seven years are divided into two parts. The first part is a lesser time of trouble or, some say, little time of trouble. The second half is the last 1,260 days or 42 months of the Great Tribulation and also the same time when Michael stands up for the last 1,260 days & nights. Ask me for a timeline my Father had given me when I was sent to Asia to live on a jungle mountaintop for almost three years during the pandemic.
Find me: Last seventh month at proton. Me: Remove all the spaces.
I completely share your sentiments, and has been my experience too! Unfortunately, it has now caused devision among family members who refuse to know the facts and continue to hold to the false interpretation, which I don't understand! I guess it's pride! Personally I'd rather know the truth rather than believe a lie.
@@mikewood3309 thats interesting.
Where i live,this is not even a thing of discussion. (A separate cattle of fish challenge)
Certainly not a church or personal point causing family division/issues. Careful about judging the pride/motive of fellow christians in the body for bothering to share their different understandings or background learned material.
this is SDA church and correct
I'm sorry, but when someone spends 20 minutes getting to the point, they are usually trying to convince someone of something that is not true. The analysis of the 70-week prophecy given here was fine up until the 69th week. After that the logic and biblical analysis falls completely apart. Your explanation of the 70th week is completely inconsistent with the text of Daniel 9:27. The text CLEARLY indicates that the "prince who will come" will cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease in the MIDST of the week, i.e. 3 1/2 years into that period of 7 years. If the 70th week was the 7 years following Jesus' death, as you state, that would put it around 30 AD. This is inconsistent with Daniel's text. in 30 AD, the sacrifices were still going strong in the temple. They did not cease until 70 AD, when the temple was destroyed. This make is impossible that your interpretation is true.
Your explanation is also inconsistent with Jesus' statement about the abomination of desolation. Contrary to what you stated, when Jesus spoke of the abomination of desolation spoken by Daniel, it was NOT in the context of His prediction of the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. His statement about the destruction of the temple was in Mat. 24:2. His statement about the abomination of desolation was not until verse 15, immediately after he spoke about the time of the END, which is referring to the time immediately before His second coming. The verse immediately preceding says:
"And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the END come."
(Mat 24:14)
It is you who are the one who gets this prophecy wrong.
Not the prince but the people of the prince or better translated front commander fulfilled by Titus and the Roman army
@@blustarmarketinsights6914 You are conflating two things. The PEOPLE of the prince that shall come destroyed the temple in 70AD. That is Daniel 9:26.
Verse 27 has not been fulfilled yet. The "prince that shall come" is not Titus. It is the same one who "confirms" a covenant. Titus had nothing to do with any covenant. This is a future event.
Paul refers to this future event in 2 Thes. 2, where he calls this "prince that shall come" the "son of perdition," "the man of sin," and "that wicked one." This son of perdition will sit in the temple of God and declare that he is God and will exalt himself above all that is called god.
Titus did not do any of those things. He fulfilled verse 26 but not verse 27. The Book of Revelation also speaks of this event and calls this "prince who will come" the beast. In Revelation, we see this Wicked One will create an image, which shall be given the power of speech and will be worshiped by the whole world. The false prophet, who works with The Beast, will force people to worship The Beast and the Image of The Beast and will force the world to take a mark, which will be necessary to buy or sell anything. Those who take this mark will lose all hope of salvation and will be cast into the lake of fire.
These are all future events and were not fulfilled by Titus.
Not conflating, the he is the subject which is the messiah and he uplifts or strengthens the existing covenant which Hebrew verb is used throughout the Old Testament when gods does the same. The prince is better translated front commander and is fulfilled in Titus and the people are the Romans. Chiastic structure confirms also, the man of sin was recorded in Josephus work as one who went into the temple and proclaimed himself god right before its destruction. Beasts are always major powers not men. The false prophet has two horns like the ram did in Daniel 8 which was the medo Persian alliance your eschatology was made up in the early 1800’s by John Darby and makes no sense whatsoever. @@dooglitas
@@blustarmarketinsights6914 You are ignoring what I said and continuing to simply state your opinion again. You originally stated that the "he" was "the people of the prince." Now you are saying it is the Messiah. Putting aside the fact that you contradicted yourself, both are wrong. The "he" is referring back to the prince of the people who destroyed Jerusalem.
You state: "The prince is better translated front commander and is fulfilled in Titus and the people are the Romans." Again, you contradict yourself. Now you are saying that "he" is Titus. Obviously, Titus was not the Messiah.
You state: " Chiastic structure confirms also, the man of sin was recorded in Josephus work as one who went into the temple and proclaimed himself god right before its destruction." I don't know what "chiastic structure" you are referring to. You make a vague mention of "one who went into the temple and proclaimed himself god right before its destruction." I cannot find any reference to this event. In the time of the Maccabees, Antiochus Epiphanes entered the temple and sacrifice a pig on the altar. However, so far as I know, he did not proclaim himself as a god. The offering was made to Zeus, I believe. The temple was not destroyed at that time. I can find no reference to Titus entering the temple and proclaiming himself God. You gave no reference. So unless you can give me that reference, I shall ignore that claim.
You state: "Beasts are always major powers not men." This is not true. Often that is the case, but it is not ALWAYS true. The two beasts in Revelation chapters 13-16 are clearly individuals. There is no logical reason to equate the fact that the false prophet in Rev. has two horns with the vision of the ram in Daniel simply because they both have two horns. Everything in Rev. 13-16 indicates that the false prophet is an individual, not some political power. In fact the title "false prophet" is an indication of it being an individual. False prophets in scripture are ALWAYS individuals. In the vision of the ram in Daniel 8, the TEXT actually TELLS us that the ram represents the Medo-Persian empire. In sharp contrast, there is NOTHING in the text of Rev. 13-16 that even remotely indicates that the false prophet is a major world power, and everything indicates it is an individual. So your argument is a false argument.
You state: "your eschatology was made up in the early 1800’s by John Darby and makes no sense whatsoever."
This is both untrue and irrelevant. When a certain doctrine was codified has no bearing on the truthfulness of it. Second, your claim that my eschatology "makes no sense whatsoever" is also false. It makes very good sense. It is your eschatology that is confused and contradictory.
Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks (27 AD): the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
26 And after threescore and two weeks (after 27 AD) shall Messiah be cut off (31 AD), but not for himself: and the people (Romans) of the prince (Titus) that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary (August and September 70 AD); and the end thereof shall be with a flood (Biblical imagery of an army), and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
27 And he (Messiah, which is the only pronoun of the previous subjects, that being the Messiah and the Romans) shall confirm (make strong, uplift) the covenant (New Covenant) with the many (Jews: 27-34 AD) for one week (the final 70 week): and in the midst of the week (31 AD) he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease (fig. fail to have any meaning), and for the overspreading (Heb. kanaph = lateral edge of an army) of abominations (Heb. shikoots =idolatrous = Romans) he shall make it desolate (have no meaning), even until the consummation (70 AD), and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.@@dooglitas
Very well said brother Shawn and well done. God bless this ministry.
The Apostle Paul provides a clear indication of when the rapture will occur.
The Man of Lawlessness
2 Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering to Him:
3 Do not be deceived in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion happens and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the one destined for destruction. 4 He will oppose and exalt himself above everything that is called God or is worshiped, setting himself up in God’s temple and proclaiming himself to be God.
Daniel indicates that this event will occur at the midpoint of the seven-year tribulation, which contradicts your teaching.
This makes you a last days false teacher that Jesus warned us about in Luke 21.
Bruce
THANK YOU! That’s what I’ve been saying for decades! People got that idea from the ‘Left Behind’ books and movies. Drove me crazy every time I heard someone repeat that lie. I kept thinking, the passage of scripture clearly refers to the Messiah since it actually said so, so why do people say antichrist in place of the word Messiah? People heard that lie so long, they believe it no matter what the passage of scripture actually says.
So when was the Great tribulation and his gathering his believers unto himself. Your still here.
@@Gazman67 This interpretation does not presume that the great tribulation has concluded or that Christ has already come to gather his faithful.
The agents of the Antichrist, in the 16th century, during the Reformation, developed the Futurist end-times view (not for their own people, but for the Protestants). This primitive futurism eventually took root in Protestant thought and developed, largely in the mid-1800s, into what is now called Dispensationalism. The objective is to deceive Bible-based Christians into perpetually looking for the Antichrist to come some time in the future, after certain events in Jerusalem occur, and for a period of 7 years which is nowhere stated in scripture, and, even better, to convince them of a pre-tribulation rapture, by twisting the interpretations of the prophecies of Daniel and of John (Revelation) to agree with that objective. Although many Protestant pastors innocently promulgate this eschatology, because it is what they were taught, there have been others who, for centuries, have deliberately deceived the flock.
Daniel 9:26-27 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
Who are the people of the prince? Christians? You think Christians destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 AD?
History says it was the Romans who did it. Romans who were pagans and idolaters.
Are you claiming that pagan Romans are the people of Jesus?
"the PEOPLE of the prince shall destroy the city and the sanctuary"
The people of God were always Israel. Do you claim that Israel destroyed their own temple?
According to history, Rome destroyed the 2nd Temple. The "prince" of Rome was Caesar....Render unto Caesar what is Caesar and to God what is God's.
"Prince Messiah" is not "prince that shall come".
The person who confirms the covenant does it for the OVERSPREADING OF ABOMINATIONS. If you think that the prince that shall come is Jesus...you are claiming Jesus performs abominations.
Jesus makes a covenant with one 7 and then breaks it?
Very interesting mention you made of the Israelites "like a bride" being returned in humiliation for betraying the covenant (to be a nation of priests and prophets, keeping Gods Laws). You make the distinction of Abraham being Chaldean quite correctly so, and so they return to what was once Chaldea (then Assyria under the Babylonians, Shalmanesar etc) (also mentioned in 2 Esdras). Now with that in mind, consider the claim by the later Islamic prophet Muhammad pbuh, of the "NIGHT JOURNEY" to Jerusalem and his ascension to the heavens on a mystical angelic divine figure, Buraq, was during a time where Islam itself had not even taken any of it's current shape or form but rather was a revelation of reviving the scriptures sent down before i.e Authentic Torah, Psalms (which were said to have been destroyed with the destruction of the Temple, later revealed anew / afresh to the prophet Ezra and his scribes who then established the religious council reformation of Judaism that sets aside temple rituals for the divinely ordained INDIVIDUAL WORSHIP (The Amidah etc). Following on this fact, the night journey of the Islamic prophet who was a descendant of Abraham and essentially genetic cousin of the Israelites (semites) was before the establishment of actual Islam as we know it, and a sign or miracle that was signalling divinely TO the people OF THE BOOK primarily (Jews and Gentile followers of Christ).
The journey to Jerusalem all of a sudden while the man was in his bed at the time, approached by this angelic figure/creature to carry him to the SACRED HOUSE (MAQDIS) of Jerusalem where he sees for himself the remains of the temple ruins which he describes after to the Jews of Medina for proof, but also where this Ishmaelite messenger.. meets ALL OF HIS Isaac cousins, all of the prophets of the Israelites that God had favoured the once chosen nation with. He then prays with them and shortly after this brief encounter with the numerous band of prophets of Israel (that the nation of Islam, cousins of the Israelites inherit as an essential pillar of faith - Ezekiel, Ezra, further mention they will also believe in the signs/miracles though they have not witnessed, and they will glorify the name of the Lord to the end of times*), Muhammad then ascends to the heavens on this mystical creature yet again for some interesting encounters through each of the 7 'heavens" before reaching the Lote Tree to receive fresh commandments, instructions for this final restoration and reformation of the religion of Abraham for ALL nations and peoples, not only the once chosen people.*
Now what is even more interesting is also the fact that Jerusalem since the time of Ezra, after the destruction of the Temple - was the direction of individual worship ritual. When Muhammad meets all of the other prophets (probably in a realm of spirits, metaphysical*) the angel Gabriel instructs him, who is now the end of the line of prophets standing in rows to praise their Lord, to turn around and face the direction of the OTHER HOLY GROUND, that was built by Abraham HIMSELF even before the Temple of Jerusalem was built. (Book of 2 Esdras makes mention of this during conversations with God, The Lord refers to sacred grounds that He has 'kept' for himself, protected and sanct till the rapture). When this instruction is revealed to all of the prophets of Israelites and Ishmaelite (about 3 only I believe?) then Muhammed finds himself not as the last in line, but now as the first, typically meaning the leader of the congregation for prayer. And they all oblige in joy.
This scene can be interpreted as follows:
The prophecies by previous prophets of Israel concerning the 3rd temple that will be for all believing nations and peoples will be built under the banner of the final revelation that does confirm all of the previous authentic scripture and revelations, that confirms Jesus the Messiah and his miraculous birth and signs of divine support to convince the house of David to follow him, and confirms the Psalms as well as later revelations of Ezekiel, Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezra (the forgotten crucial link in Abrahamic faiths!!) -
Simply put, the Night Journey of Ascension from Jerusalem by Muhammad was a clear indication of the divine order and plan of the Lord to restore the temple, under the banner of Monotheism, the reformed laws that unite all people's without exclusivity. And indeed it was so, that some years after Muhammad pbuh died, that his legacy..rather the legacy of the originator of Monotheism, Abraham pbuh, were successful in entering and conquering without war or violence on hallowed grounds.. to take Jerusalem, and begin the construction of the house of worship once again. (Believe this is mentioned in Bible as well, 'and the time shall pass and the courts shall make judgement to pass the holy temple to the believers'? I think this verse may refer to the ONLY NON VIOLENT possession of the temple mount, which was during the Caliph Umar) .. whence the 3rd temple alluded to in scriptures then began, if you fully appreciate the legacy of Monotheism to begin with Abraham and not an exclusively Jewish proposition/ideology :)
You can't get from 457 BC in the spring of the year to the fall of 1844 with 2,300 it's impossible!!. (((There's 4 years and 28 days. Between the ending date of the 69th week and the cross. )))....April the 25th in the year 31.. ((((that's not in the middle of any seven!!!!)))
Starting in 457 B.C. & adding 2,300 years brings us to 1843, until we account for the lack of "Year 0", which gets us 1844. The reason for the Spring-to-Autumn transition is that this prophetic timeline began with the conclusion of 457's Passover (you can see it at the end of Ezra 6, right before the events of Ezra 7 in which Ezra arrives with the King’s missive), & culminates with 1844's Day of Atonement, the day when the sanctuary is cleansed.
As for the extraneous 4 years & 28 days, I believe the removal sets us to only 3 years & 28 days, which falls within the 4th year of the 7-year period, therefore the middle of the "week".
@@johnl.6731 yeah but Ezra chapter 7 verse 9 says it's the first day of the first month)!( when the decree goes forth. ).The decree is the (command ).the command is what he had in his hand when he left. Daniel 9:25 says when the (command goes fourth) you got to listen to what Jesus Christ actually is telling you. The (first day of the first month. Is Nissan one) established by Exodus 12:2..( is New Year's Day for the Jews). On the Jewish calendar at that time. There's no zero between A.D. and B.C. and( there is no number on the Jewish calendar to match it.)! So to establish what you're trying to say what year is it on the Jewish calendar today(. 2 days ago was New Year's Day on the old calendar for for Israel )..(Nissan 1).... So to establish what year it is( on the Jewish calendar) you have to add. 2024 to 3760 which is. BC 1.. when you do that you get 5784.. that is the (present day (Jewish year.) To get 457 b.c. you( subtract 457) from 3760. That number is (3303..) so to get 1844 ....you add 1844.. to 3760 which is 5604... Subtract 3303 from 5604 (and it's going to show you you're not telling the truth..)!!!! you've (created a zero theology) it doesn't exist! B.C. 1 is 3760 A .d.1 is 3761... You got to stop breaking the 9th commandment you technically don't exist!
@JamieElison @JamieElison You are correct in pointing out Ezra 7:9; I was mistaken in my Passover statement, & therefore off by 14 literal (non-prophetic) days. However, the end of this prophecy remains the Day of Atonement, as that is when sanctuary-cleansing occurs.
As for the second matter, one still encounters this "year zero" problem because the Jewish calendar has no B.C./A.D. crossover point. One must subtract 457 from 3,760 to get 3,303. But because the 457 in question is B.C. (negative count), it's subtraction from 3,760 (A.D.-equivalent positive count) still results in a discrepancy of 1 year.
@@johnl.6731 you're not in your right mind ..go read what I wrote again..(. Negative count as nothing to do with it!!). The Jewish calendar is the way you established this!! that's what it was when the prophecy was written !!!you're (trying to create confusion). by what you're doing! ( I am not going to let it happen here)... I have studied Daniel 8 for 50 years.. (you don't even know what it means!)!!!!!! That sanctuary in Daniel 8 has not even been built yet...! And it's not about salvation!!!! you can't have it both ways.! If you're going to add (another year )you're going to be at the the spring of the (Year 28 ).for your Daniel 9:27 concept)! it's not going to work! if you're trying to fix your 2300 days. And claiming it ends up in October ! You can't get to the fall....which no Day of atonement (ever is recorded that late in the year!)... It starts (in the spring of the Year!.)! Day of atonement hardly ever goes past the end of September! AD and BC is established for Jesus birthday that's one day that's a.d.1 New Year's!.. you're not speaking a year for that particular one day! You got to stop listening to your false prophet!
@JamieElison I will use a simple example. Let's say I live in the year 10 B.C. (aka -10), & I age 10 years. That puts me in the year 1 A.D.
But wait! I thought -10+10=0, right? How can -10+10=1?
Amen 🙏 that was very enlightening! I'm very blessed. Happy Sabbath. 🙏💯👋
Here is how this works..
Neh 2:1 And it came to pass in the month Nisan, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king.
From the month of Nisan unto Nisan, point A unto point B, exactly.
...from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build **Jerusalem** unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks..= 7 and 62 =
From Nehemiah 2, 445bc subtract 483 converted to days = 173880 DAYS...
MARCH 14 445bc to
APRIL 6th 32 ad. Nisan 10
The triumphal entry In Luke 19
@@carlcizek2189 except you stole that from the British guy from the 1800s. And your short 6.9 years ..you'd be shoveling snow in the middle of the summer you're not following the timeline that's actually given!
@@jimbob1644
You mean Sir Robert Anderson? I didn’t steal anything, its called being educated.
@@carlcizek2189if you were educated you wouldn't be breaking the 9th commandment every time you speak!
@@JamieElison
do the math.
Am i missing something here, or are you pulling my leg? Jesus said, "So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ a spoken of through the prophet Daniel-let the reader understand- then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. Let no one on the housetop go down to take anything out of the house. Let no one in the field go back to get their cloak. How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! Pray that your flight will not take place in winter or on the Sabbath. For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now-and never to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened." Matthew 24:15-22. You state in your video, at 22 minutes and 12 seconds that what Jesus said,(when He was referring to "abomination that causes desolation" )has nothing to do with the final events... and yet, Jesus clearly alludes in the above passage that this indeed is the end time event. I am not saying what you are saying is wrong or is in error regarding Daniel's revealed prophesy and its correct application... however, for you to make a statement that is in clear contradiction to what Jesus said... Would you explain how to reconcile this problem?
Absolutely well said!
The destruction of the temple and the end of sacrificial system. Lahaye and Lindsey have people all messed up with pre trib nonsense.
He was warning that people in front of him of what is going to happen in their time around 70ad. The message he gave us right and hated by modern day believers. Thousands of pastors are teaching the left behind sham.
@roywhite8504 If Jesus was speaking of AD 70, then explain why Jesus said that this abomination of desolation would bring the greatest tribulation EVER, in all of history. I can debunk your theory in just four letters WWII.
WWII is a sign of what's coming next. God gave us a clear sign that the antichrist is going to be very real by giving us a Hitler character, killing ~6 millions of Jews. Hitler was an antichrist but only an archetype of the one spoken of in the scriptures.
Only ~1.1 million people died in the AD 70 siege. Therefore, unless WWII was the thing Jesus was speaking of, then the worst is still yet to come. WWII has been the worst yet. But since there was no abomination in the holy place, the teachings you refuse to believe are most likely accurate. There's no way around it. The wonderful thing is that all of scripture backs it up, too! I don't understand how some don't see it.
@@roywhite8504 Except, that is NOT what Jesus said. Jesus was answering the disciple's question regarding END TIMES, NOT what will happened in 70 A.D. Notice that Jesus did not make any distinction in His description of the things that will happen in the end times that is separate from the destruction of the temple. If what you say is true, then all the events described by Jesus would have happened at the time of temple's destruction, no? By the way, i believe we will go through tribulation, pre trib is just a feel good fantasy not rooted in Scripture.
Superb lesson. Amen
🤨So YOU’RE saying that the abomination of desolation that Jesus spoke about in Matt24:15 is the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD. That interpretation presents a BIG PROBLEM! Jesus said in Matt24:15,21 that when we see the abomination spoken of by Daniel the prophet, THEN shall be great tribulation such as was not since the beginning of the world to this this, no nor ever shall be. Jesus was quoting Dan12:1. And we know from Dan12:6-7 and related scriptures that the great tribulation shall last for 1,260 days. And FINALLY, Jesus said in Matt24:29-31 that the “Rapture” shall happen IMMEDIATELY AFTER those days of tribulation.
Happy Sabbath. Brother Shawn, I can not tell you how happy I am that new episodes are airing. I am thankful and grateful for your efforts. This is another outstanding and well researched episode. God bless you.
Thank you for your kind words. We're glad to be back with season 6 of Authentic with Shawn Boonstra! We're even more grateful these episodes are blessing you! 😀
I really enjoyed the way you laid out this prophesy.
Revelation and Daniel remain my favourites and have studied bothbrather extensively since '64.
God bless your work.
For you, it may be "another understanding". But for me, it is the same understanding that I have from my childhood. For, this is the teaching I received in my schooling.
@@VoiceOfProphecy Shawn Boonstra, just want to encourage you to keep the fire going and encourage the sheep to follow Jesus/Yeshua for he only will help the Bride of 144,000 to be a overcomes as Jesus was a overcome. It not popular today to teach there will be a semnant that will overcome sin by the indwelling power of the same Holy Spirit that anointed Jesus and gave him power to overcome all sin, and to help him stand stiffly and fulfill the Passover Lamb and also be our Morning and Evening Lamb for sins we are not able to confess.
With much respect I do understand your personal view of the 2300 day prophecy and your understanding of Daniel 9:24-27. I have worked very hard to try to make it work according to your start time of 457 BC which was still during the Greek Empire. So the "Little Horn" we see doing evil in Daniel 8 leading up to verse 14 I see no way to apply the Roman Empire which is the last of the four major Empires of Daniel chapters 2; 7; 8; and Revelation chapters 13; 17; 18; and 19:2.
Your Church today is too big to change a foundation doctrine that sets your apart from other Christian Churches. We all know the Catholic Church never changes and it's top down leadership model has been the Adventist model for many years.
My understanding is that I must be a Bond Servant of the Most High fully surrendered and following the Cloud by day and the fire by night. Progress through 42 camping locations before Israel was allowed to cross over into the Promise Land.
When I see a Church moving forward following Jesus/Yeshua I could follow that Church. I not looking for a perfect Church with perfect members. But I don't only audit a Churches doctrine, I audit what a Church has done, what they are doing today, and where they are headed. You and I know no Church will save us, it is only a hospital to help people get better so they can go to work for the Kingdom.
Shawn here is a question I have after spending almost three years in the Philippines in a remote area studying prophecy for over 4,000 hours.
Can you tell me where was the Father's Throne where Jesus say at the right hand of the Father. They sat side by side. I am sure you will point to the Father's Throne in heaven in the Temple outside of the Holy City. Here is the key to a big problem: Most believe Jesus returned and worked in the 1st Compartment called the Holy place where Aaron's sons interceeded for personal sins of Israel, except when the High Priest was in the Most Holy once a year. Then no personal confessions were allowed and not one Morning or Evening Lamb can be ollered on that Holy Day.
So where was the First Father's Throne located. I know you will not guess by saying in the Holy place I think your educated on this topic, except you may not have been asked this question.
The Bridegoom is coming for His perfect Bride who will live though the Great Tribulation and is only numbered to be 144,000 in number. If the Church today is teaching that number is symbolic they are not reading and following the rules of biblical inturpatation, and they have tossed their own prophet Ellen Harmon/White under the bus.
The 70 week happens after 70 AD.. Daniel 9 is written in chronological order. The he in Daniel 9 is the he of Daniel 11:21 ((that wins the kingdom of the world buy flatteries) and is the (prince of the covenant) of Daniel 9:27 )!!!in verse 22 ,23. This guy's not coming from Jesus Christ!
Daniel 11:31 "And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they SHALL PLACE the abomination that maketh desolate." The AOD is a thing, not an event. It's an idol that is worshipped. Jesus warned of this, and Rev. 13 describes it during the 70th week.
You can preach your SDA point of view, it's your right. It doesn't mean that you ARE right.
He is right, indeed. You are telling he is wrong, as the Jews told that Jesus was wrong.
@@farwestgarohills3831 you got to stop breaking the 9th commandment .that's all the SDA has ever done!. The first one was saying 457 BC. In the spring of the year you can get to 1844 with 2300 (it's impossible) and that's what created the foundation of the lie. that you're spinning right now!
@@jimbob1644 Where did I break the 0th commandment. You know what happened to Jews for rejecting God's messengers, and at last His Son whom He sent fo give His blood for therm? THEY WERE DESTROYED.
You also will destroyed same manner for rejecting the truth being given to you.
@@farwestgarohills3831 well...l to start with your confession of faith says the investigative judgment is the truth.!!!. and the investigative judgment says the second Goat of Leviticus 16:10( is the devil for the atonement..) which is Jesus Christ Himself ( 1st Peter 2:24) and He does Isaiah 43 verse 25. And you're saying that doesn't happen.!! You also say that you can get from 457 B.C. in the spring of the year to the fall of 1844 with 2300. To create the cult( that your false prophet made that false Jesus )..that I just told you you about.. not one thing that you teach and not one thing that you say. In its entirety ...is the truth... you break the ninth commandment every time you speak.. like Jesus told the Pharisees... the very words that you're using. John 8: 44
@@jimbob1644 Can you prove it where it is written "the goat is Jesus Christ"? You people don't understand anything of the Bible; but go on saying blah! blah! blah!.
Do you know the meaning of a CULT? You don't. I tell you.
CULT IS A GROUP OF PEPLE WHO DEVIATE FROM THE ORIGINAL FAITH.
What is the original faith? ALL ORIGINAL CHURCHES KEEPT THE SABBATH.
But you CATHOLICS and so-called PROTESTANTS, deviated from that original faith.
THE BIGGEST CULTS ARE THE CATHOLICS AND SUNDAY WORSHIPING PROTESTANTS. You must know it.
2 Thissalonian 2:9-12 says, because you people did not receive the love of truth, GOD HIMSELF will send a STRONG DELUSION, that you may CONTINUE TO BELIEVE THE LIES, so that YOU MAY BE DAMNED.
What is the truth. Jesus is the truth. His law and His Sabbath is the truth of the Bible, which you all rejected. YOU MAY BE ALREADY DAMNED.
If Jesus would have returned 2 days after going went to heaven forty days after his resurrection. No one would have thought twice about a two day gap. However, 2000 is a gap that doesn’t go unnoticed. Peter said be not ignorant of this one thing to God a day is 1000 years and a 1000 years is a day. Either way we look at it it’s only been two days. The only reason this makes sense is because Peter told us not to be ignorant meaning this information better not go unnoticed. If God says a day is 1000 years then to us this should be very important because it’s only been 2 days (2000 years) since the Lord left the Mount of Olive with a promise he would return quickly.
The Book of Revelation tends to disagree with the position that the 70 weeks of Daniel has been full filled already.
I feel the same. I'm not sure how anyone can think Revelation already happened. Yeah, there are some things that seemed to be fulfilled in 70ad, but certainly most of it wasn't (on top of the fact that best evidence is that revelation was written after 70ad). Instead it seems like 70ad just mirrors the future event, something that seems common in scripture. I have zero clue exactly what will happen, though I think some things are pretty clear. I would never state my opinions with the certainty displayed in this video. It makes me think of all those before the return of the Jews to Isreal who redefined the prophecies of Revelation to focus on the church instead of Isreal because they thought it was impossible that after 2000 years Isreal would become a nation again. I get that some things might have been muddled together that shouldn't, but I would never confidently declare which things those are as the potential for partial fulfillment is pretty strong.
Patterns.
Also, fig tree.
There has to be a remnant from Israel that formed in 1947 to be witnesses.
@@Jsmith0819
The prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27, has been fulfilled. Yet the 70 weeks time period was purposely separated into 7 + 62 + 1. This means that the 70th week will be granted to Israel the second time to confirm the Covenant (New) with GOD.
Israel is the firstborn nation of all nations before GOD. Ex.4:22
They get to receive the double. Deut.21:17
They have received the double for their sins, and they will also receive the double for blessings. Isa.40:1-2 ; 61:7
They are now back in their land and it is ripe time for them to receive the double for the Gospel. Acts.3:26 ; Isa.62:1-4 ; Rom.11:15, 25-26
The final 7 years will be divided into two 3.5 years period. The first period is the Ministry of the 2 witnesses. Rev.11:1-7
The 2nd period is the rise of the man of sin, the son of perdition who would occupy Jerusalem and kill the 2 witnesses. Rev.13:1-5
But you ARE missing the future part. The part seems most are.
The beginning is Daniel admitting all of the iniquities. And reason always for Captivity...a PUNISHMENT FOR SINS.
BUT THIS SIN OVERFLOWS.
In Amos. 3 Transgressions.
But the 4th overflows the Judgement..
And each prophet.. even Esdras 2..
Show one that has its Strength Given to by another.
In Zachariah 12 2&3..in KJV its not left out. How ones Supporting Israel will be chewed to bits.
In...a mouth of a Bear...being given permission to eat much flesh. When it's IN HER MOUTH..??
A Horn. One stronger. But the goat is beaten down.. Both HORNS.
And another stand being Given Dominion..
Greek Isopsephia shows one whose name not using vowels...since not used in Hebrew at the time.. and this the Greek calculations used at the time...according to Aristotle. The False Prophet to US.. I KNOW..
The antichrist as well. Only more explanation on omitted names of his actual 8
Heresies of Irenaeus wrote that 666 would be in GREEK.
Mohammad bin Salman bin Abdulaziz bin Abdul Rahman (bin Faisal bin Turki bin Abdullah bin Mohammed bin Saud)mom
Part of name used..the Main Parts..leaving out son of ect..
But is 666 in Greek AND Roman..
The one I KNOW is our false prophet. Name without vowels but is only in Greek.
Mohammad Salman Abdulaziz Saud
but no vowels or Double M's
MHMD SLMN BDLZZ SD
But if u don't See a Horid Transgression going on. The 4th that OVERFLOWS why God says enough..
Might need watch Breaking the Silence. Get it from the horses own mouths.
Or The General's Son.
Cuz both govt have told us lies..
My dad was NSA in 1967.. and the USS LIBERTY SURVIVORS DON'T LIE...and tho Reagan tried to have the records RECLASSIFED.. they are not.
But the INTENTIONAL ATTACK ON OUR AMERICAN SPY SHIP...AND ALL THAT THE ATTACK TELLS.
Wake Up to hard sad TRUTHS of that..and maybe u can open eyes of the lies that are going on..
The Rabbis say.
When Gaza falls. The Moshiach IMMEDIATELY WILL COME...
Cuz I've read how Damascus might not Mean Damascus..maybe like Damascus Road..
But as for 27AD
When Jesus THEN went into the Temple after the 40 days of Temptations.
On the Last Jubilee. He read Isaiah. And at THAT point.
It was Already Done.
Shake hands. It's taken care of. Tho fulfilled on the cross.
It was PUT AS FACT.
He took first half of week. Satan gets the last.
And my hypothesis. Based on 27 not 30 AD..
And seeing Israel the Bear we the Lion the man. U can guess.
And MBS the leopard.
But if a Ravenous Wolf given 70 years and by 80 is a BURDEN TO ALL according to Moses.
Well. Daniel IS Prophecy
It SAYS so.
But the Wings of the Abomination is what is going on now.
And the Lies of govt. Told in Amos. End times too.
But I admit. It is hard knowing we ain't not only just not wearing white hats...
We FULLY DESERVE TO HAVE TO GO TRU these tribulations for our part in this Horrible sin.. the 4th one
Sorry, brother, you couldn't be more wrong. 70th week aside, the is 100% 7 years that will be the book of Revelation, and Daniel is almost a mirror copy
Yes he is wrong, Jesus read from the book of isiah and stopped at a comma, The last week is on pause. The books of Revelation, 2nd Thes and Matthew 24 all tie together with the book of Daniel. This reminds me of the Catholic teaching of Revelation. Sorry Brother. don't agree.
@@dmw6539This is 7th day adventist teaching. As soon as I heard 5 minutes of his teaching I had a hunch he was SDA, so I looked him up and wasn't surprised to find that he is.
This is exactly how Luther, calvin and all the reformers interpreted daniel 9. Even isaac newton wrote a book on daniel 9 and came upwith the same conclusion. Your modern futurist interpretation was actually developed by the catholic church suring the counterreformation of the 16th century. It was then further developed by Darby and Schofield but this video represents the original protestant understanding. Why have a gap? Makes no logical sense.
@bwevemuzk are you aware of the 2nd call to rebuild Jerusalem in 1539 by the Ottoman ruler Soluimon I? If you add 490 years, you get 2029. Minus 7 years you get 2022. In 2022 Pope Frances signed a 7 year climate covanant with many leaders and religious leaders of the world called Laudato Si. So no, I am not going by what any past people taught. The 70th week could not come to pass until after the fig tree generation was back in the land. Neither can any Revelation prophecy. The last 7 years of the 6000 years the planet has been in existance will close with Daniel's 70th week, also known as the 7 years of tribulation. 1260 days of Tribulation, 1260 days of Great Tribulation, and 75 days of Wrath that will be the first 75 days of the Millennial reign. The rapture will happen on the last day of Great Tribulation, at the final Trump, which is the 7th Trumpet Judgement Revelation 11:18, which will be on the Feast of Trumpets 2030. Does that clear thing up any?
@@bwevemuzkgap is for the gentiles
There are many things you say that do not add up with what the bible says.
You used matt 23:37-38 to say that the house of Israel was left desolate, but you left out the final verse in Matthew 23. Verse 39 which states that the Jews will one day acknowledge Jesus. This will happen at the second coming.
So, for you to not read and explain the full passage is a total dishonesty. 👎🏻
Secondly, concerning the 70th week, You can’t prove it’s been fulfilled because the nation of Israel isn’t restored to God yet. The 70 weeks prophesy is an answer to Daniel’s prayer. Daniel wanted the restoration of his people, so he prayed for it. He confessed their sin and wanted God to forgive them. Read daniel 9: 1-23 and see for yourself. So then God sends his angel to give the 70 weeks prophesy as an answer to Daniel's prayer. By the end of the 70 weeks prophecy Israel has to:
1. Finish the transgression
2. Make end of sin
3. make reconciliation for iniquity
4. Bring everlasting righteousness (everlasting righteousness for the Jews)
5. seal up prophesy and vision
6. Anoint the most holy place.
So, when did these things happen? The point of this prophesy is for God to restore the Jews and seal up all their restoration prophesies. None of it has happened yet.
This prophesy was determined for “YOUR PEOPLE ( ISRAEL) and YOUR HOLY CITY” (JERUSALEM) Dan 9:24. We know Daniel's people is ISRAEL. (Dan 9:20 ). Israel is in spiritual blindness partially now and will continue to do so until God's done dealing with gentiles. Rom 11:25 -36.
Sorry but your view is inconsistent with the scripture because clearly Israel has to be redeemed by the end of the 70th week and this didn’t happen. Actually the complete opposite happened. They rejected their messiah so God set them aside temporarily.
Your view of the last week is so messed up. You mentioned that The covenant in verse 27 is a reference to the new covenant with God’s chosen people.
However, anyone who actually pays attention to what it clearly says can understand that it cannot be God’s new covenant because God's new covenant lasts forever whereas the one in Daniel 9:27 is only for one week or 7 years. An everlasting covenant and a covenant confirmed for one week ( 7 years) ARE NOT THE SAME.
If this is God’s new covenant, then it is limited to 7 years. You and i are not part it because we are 2000 years late. Are you just gonna pretend you don't see this huge difference?
And finally, you skipped the fact that verse 26 mentions the prince of the people who destroyed Jerusalem. Who destroyed Jerusalem? The romans. The prince who confirmes the covenant in verse 27 is the prince of the romans. He is the antecedent of the “ He” in verse 27. Therefore it cannot be Jesus. Jesus doesn’t come from the roman empire. The antichrist does.
I love your visuals, really helps to make things come to life. Thanks for your good explanation of a confusing topic!
And all he did was confused you more .but you don't know it!
Dan. 9:25 underscores the 490 years from the decree to rebuild Jerusalem. Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent decrees the rebuild of the Holy area in 1537 AD. The time of this prophecy period is now coming to the conclusion. The Second Advent is upon us.
"The abomination of the DESOLATOR"... That is what it says in the original Hebrew. 100% a reference to the antichrist in a yet future time. Also, Jesus said "not one stone" would be left standing on another, yet the wailing wall still stands. This prophecy has not yet been fulfilled. It will be when New Jerusalem settles down on the temple mount.
is the Wailing Wall part of the actual temple or is it part of the outer wall that is before or surrounded the temple?
I just did some quick research. The western wall or what we refer to as the Wailing Wall was not a part of the Jewish temple. It was a part of the temple complex and was a part of a structure that supported the temple, but not a part of the temple itself. So, no future antichrist. when Jesus said no stone would be left upon another his prophecy came true. No stone was left of the original actual temple.
The wailing wall today was built by King Herod in the 1st century BC as a retaining wall and was NOT the temple mount or the temple that was destroyed in 70 AD by Titus.
Daniel 9 does not mention any anti-christ.
It does mention the prince of the people to come and that was Titus, almost 2000 years ago.
Apart from that Daniel 9 was all about Jesus Christ NOT about anti-christ.
All of Daniel 9 is about 'The Messiah'' Read the whole chapter. Read it from the Septuagint. Google Septuagint.
It's not the abomination of the desolator
It's the abomination that makes desolate.
What is the abomination? = The Jews rejected their Messiah
What is the desolation? = God abandoned the earthly city pf Jerusalem for becoming a harlot.
Read Deuteronomy 28 The blessings and the curses if they obeyed or disobeyed.
It has been fulfilled. Just as the prophets and Jesus said.
Prophecy was fulfilled in 70 AD. Jerusalem and the Temple were destroyed.
What are you referencing because I can not find it anywhere saying desolator?
Furthermore, the wailing wall is not where not temple sat, the wailing wall is a foundational structure where the roman barracks stood. You can look up archeological evidence to see where the temple was.
Good Today ! __ " Jesus the Christ of GOD ", a simple trueth easily found in the early Writtings of the Jewish Be-Livers of the " Way, Trueth, Life ". __ humbly, neighbour daniel __ p.s. thanks for increasing knowledge in this our troubled time .
The phrase "of the prince" is only used in the Bible 3 times, and each of those times it's used to refer to the/an antichrist:
Job 21:28 For you say, ‘Where is the house of the prince? And where is the tent, The dwelling place of the wicked?’
Proverbs 25:7 For it is better that he say to you, “Come up here,” Than that you should be put lower in the presence of the prince, Whom your eyes have seen. (this is a reference to the rapture of the Church "Come up here" vs. going through the Tribulation with antichrist/prince)
Daniel 9:26 “And after the sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself; And the people of the prince who is to come Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end of it shall be with a flood, And till the end of the war desolations are determined.
It's clear from the text in Daniel that he is being given prophecy for the end of the age.
Also, you're really making an almost impossible stretch by picking out the martyrdom of Stephen 3.5 years after Christ. Why? It's because it fits your 70th week. It doesn't make sense. Jesus didn't confirm a covenant for 7 years. Why would he? There is nothing to suggest that Stephen's death marks the end of the 70th week of Daniel. Look at the current events. The United Nations is meeting in a few weeks to confirm a 7 year covenant with many, right after the Feast of Trumpets.
One last thing: of course the first 1800 years of Christians didn't see things the way we see them. These things were sealed up unto the time of the end. We are the last generation.
The impossible stretch is mis translating Daniel 9:24-27 and stretching the 70th week to an unknown future date. It is a deception and has been unashamedly been taught from the Synagogue of Satan for the past 150+ years.
I would say that a more impossible stretch would be to believe that, when God prophetically said 490 years, what he really meant was, 483 + [2,000 or more, indefinite] + 7.
@@mytwocents777 He laid out a 6,000 year plan for mankind beginning with the creation week. There is ample evidence of this. Yet you’ve picked out one death and claimed it wraps up one of the most significant prophecies in the entire Bible.
Come on.
@@mikesandlin2967 I am familar with the theory that there is to be 6,000 years of worldly existence, followed by a 7th millennium of existence with Christ; correlating with the six days of creation followed by the seventh-day Sabbath. Some even propose that Adam's lifetime of around 930 years - in this sense - literally fulfilled God's declaration of, "on that day you shall surely die", rather than simply meaning that his eventual death would become assured on that day, taking the first 1,000 years of mankind as the 1st millennial day of the abovementioned plan.
I find it all very intriguing and, although I don't see direct statements supporting it in scripture, I also don't see a reason to reject this notion.
However, I also don't see any reason that the directly-indicated period of 490 years (prophetically enumerated as 70 weeks) as the time limit for Daniel's people to acknowledge their Messiah should be interpreted as something other than 490 years, and certainly not as a period at least four times longer than what God actually indicated.
I don't see how the face-value understanding of 490 years discussed in Daniel 9 has any conflict, or any immediate relationship, to the 6,000+1,000 theory, though.
The prophecy of Daniel 9 is not pointing to the end of time or demarcating the last day of mankind on earth; rather only as far as to the rejection of the Messiah by the Judahites by the end of that 490th year and the destruction which would come upon them consequent to that.
History shows that Christ did incarnate toward the end of that 490 years, was rejected and killed, and that Jerusalem was destroyed a few decades later. The prophecy was fulfilled.
@@mytwocents777 The prophecy forbids the interpretation that it’s already been fulfilled. It has not. Just read it and this becomes clear.
“Seventy weeks are determined
For your people and for your holy city,
To finish the transgression,
To make an end of sins,
To make reconciliation for iniquity,
To bring in everlasting righteousness,
To seal up vision and prophecy,
And to anoint the Most Holy.”
These things have not happened. You’re cherry picking an event, 1 martyr out of how many?… to suggest that completed Daniels 70th week. Wrong! The end of this prophecy is not Stephen being killed. That makes no sense.
The timeline is fairly clear:
Messiah cut off, not for himself = 30AD.
The people of the prince (antichrist)… destroy the sanctuary = 70AD destruction of Jerusalem.
THEN…… he shall confirm a covenant with many (1st seal broken, antichrist revealed, Tribulation begins = 2023?
You’re taking the covenant and saying it happened before the 69th week. And that somehow the prince is Jesus.
No. This is false on so many levels it’s borderline heresy.
Please see christadelphian bible study and Christadelphian videos for great learning worldwide speakers from Australia New Zealand and Europe and North America and South Africa 😊
You got it right. Nowhere in daniel chapter 9 is the word antichrist ever used. The prince in chapter 9 is referring to Jesus and his 7 year earthly ministry. This is also where most people get a 7 year tribulation teaching from in regards to the future. But there is no biblical basis for it.
I agree. Satan literally hijacked Daniel 9:27 and twisted it around and it’s very much still being taught.
Jesus ministry started when he was baptized, he did not live 7 years after his baptism.
Antichrist should get 7 years also, he is the opposite of Christ.
Daniel never used the word antichrist in any of his chapters. Antichrist is a new testament
description. Messiah had not existent in the old testament. Daniel refer to him as a horn
in Daniel 7:24-25, king in 11: 31-37. The 7 year covenant is Daniel chapter 7, confirmed by the
same vision John had in Revelation chapter 13.
@@davidmcpott1924
The romans NEVER had ten rulers at the same time: Name them.
John had the same vision, so the 7th trumpet prophecy has been fulfilled also
and the 3rd woe ?
Ser daniel 9.:26 "AND AFTER 62 WEEKS AN ANOINTED ONE SHALL BE CUT OFF AND SHALL HAVE NOTHING. AND THE PEOPLE OF THE PRINCE WHO IS TO COME SHALL DESTROY THE CITY AND THE SANCTUARY. ITS END SHALL COME WITH A FLOOD, AND TO THE END THERE SHALL BE WAR DESOLATIONS ARE DECREED" An anointed one or in the kjv its messiah the prince shall be cut off but not for his own sake. Certainly refers to Jesus. The people of the prince that shall come refers to the jewish war when in 70 ad. Titus under the reighn of vespaisian ran sacked the jewish temple according to the prophesy which Jesus gave in MATT.24 WILL GET BACK TO YOU ON DANIEL 9:27.
@@BrentSteinberg
There shall be 7 weeks and 62 weeks 9:25
Afrer the 62 weeks the Messiah shall be cutoff, also Isaiah 53:8
He was cutoff from the living for the transgressions of my people He was stricken
not the middle of the 70th week. Nissan 14, 69th week day of crucifixion.(30-33AD)
His ministry did not last 7 years , he was not 37 years old when he died.
9:26 is 70AD
The Messiah was cutoff after 69 weeks before verse 26 (70AD)
He cannot appear in the middle of the week in verse 27
READ EVERYTHING IN CONTEXT=== 14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) DID THE GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM GET PREACHED THROUGHOUT THE WORLD BEFORE THE ROMANS SACKED JERUSALEM???=== 21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. WERE THE DAYS SHORTENED THEN???
Happy Sabbath y'all.
Not h
Where I am just yet
Happy Sunday to you too!
Shwan, I like your dedication to this topic and the presentation is very attractive. Your historical facts from Babylonian, Medo-Persion and the Roman is far from being actual. The fact that you seem to ignore the fact that from chapter 8 to the end the book is written in Hebrew (Israel) and from 2-7 in Aramaic (Gentiles) it poses a big dilemma. Maybe you can help with the discrepancies created by this presentation. From Oregon, USA.
There was a second decree to rebuild the walls in 1535 by the Ottomans. It took all of 62 weeks but by then, Jerusalem was reunited with Israel. Then 7 weeks later we had two signs. The sign of the Virgin described in Rev 12. And the embassy move that sounds like planting their tents between the seas. So according to the second timeline and if it was telling the truth about natural birth, then he’s here already. Isa 40 says the punishment on Jerusalem was doubled. This explains why there’s 62 and 7. Messiah comes after both.
Read this article it will help you understand the 70 weeks of Daniel 9.
Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy. RIGHT ON TIME PROPHECY. DANIEL 9:24, 25.
What event and date were to mark the starting point for the 2,300-year and 490-year prophecies (Daniel 9:25)?
Answer: The starting event was a decree from Persian King Artaxerxes authorizing God’s people (who were captive in Medo-Persia) to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the city. The decree, found in Ezra chapter 7, was issued in 457 bc-the seventh year of the king (verse 7)-and was implemented in the autumn. Artaxerxes began his reign in 464 bc.
. The angel said that 69 prophetic weeks, or 483 literal years (69 x 7 = 483), added to 457 bc would reach to the Messiah (Daniel 9:25). Did it?
. The angel said that 69 prophetic weeks, or 483 literal years (69 x 7 = 483), added to 457 bc would reach to the Messiah (Daniel 9:25). Did it?
Answer: Yes! Mathematical calculations show that moving ahead 483 years from the fall of 457 bc reaches the fall of ad 27. (Note: There is no year 0.) The word “Messiah” includes the meaning of “anointed” (John 1:41, margin). Jesus was anointed with the Holy Spirit (Acts 10:38) at His baptism (Luke 3:21, 22). His anointing took place in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar (Luke 3:1), which was ad 27. And to think that the prediction was made more than 500 years before! Then Jesus began to preach that “the time is fulfilled.” He thus confirmed the prophecy (Mark 1:14, 15; Galatians 4:4). So Jesus actually began His ministry by clearly referring to the 2,300-year prophecy, stressing its importance and accuracy. This is awesome and thrilling evidence that:
A. The Bible is inspired.
B. Jesus is the Messiah.
C. All other dates in the 2,300-year/490-year prophecy are valid. What a firm foundation on which to build!
We have now considered 483 years of the 490-year prophecy. There is one prophetic week-seven literal years-left (Daniel 9:26, 27). What happens next and when?
Answer: Jesus was “cut off” or crucified “in the middle of the week,” which is three and a half years after His anointing-or the spring of ad 31. Please notice that the gospel is revealed in verse 26: “After the sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself.” No-praise God!-when Jesus was cut off, it was not for Himself. He “who committed no sin” (1 Peter 2:22) was crucified for our sins (1 Corinthians 15:3; Isaiah 53:5). Jesus lovingly and willingly offered His life to save us from sin. Hallelujah! What a Savior! Jesus’ atoning sacrifice is the very heart of Daniel chapters 8 and 9.
The disciples preached to multitudes of Jews.
The disciples preached to multitudes of Jews.
. Since Jesus died after three and a half years, how could He “confirm the covenant with many” (KJV) for all of the final seven years, as the prophecy in Daniel 9:27 mandates?
Answer: The covenant is His blessed agreement to save people from their sins (Hebrews 10:16, 17). After His ministry of three and a half years ended, Jesus confirmed the covenant through His disciples (Hebrews 2:3). He sent them first to the Jewish nation (Matthew 10:5, 6) because His chosen people still had three and a half years remaining of their 490-year opportunity to repent as a nation.
After the stoning of Stephen, the disciples began preaching to the Gentiles.
After the stoning of Stephen, the disciples began preaching to the Gentiles.
When the 490-year period of final opportunity for the Jewish nation ended in the fall of ad 34, what did the disciples do?
Answer: They began preaching the gospel to other people and nations of the world (Acts 13:46). Stephen, a righteous deacon, was publicly stoned in ad 34. From that date onward, the Jews, because they collectively rejected Jesus and God’s plan, could no longer be God’s chosen people or nation. Instead, God now counts people of all nationalities who accept and serve Him as spiritual Jews. They have become His chosen people-“heirs according to the promise” (Galatians 3:27-29). Spiritual Jews, of course, include Jewish people who individually accept and serve Jesus (Romans 2:28, 29).
After AD 34, how many years of the 2,300-year prophecy remained? What is the ending date for the prophecy? What did the angel say would happen on that date (Daniel 8:14)?
@@ebbygshreve9577 I’m not so sure god doesn’t have a soft spot for the Jewish people. Jesus was also the Atonement goat that was sacrificed. It’s a two part deal though and the scapegoat was supposed handed over to a caretaker who would take the goat into the wilderness. He was then supposed to let the goat go free. But instead, the rabbis figured it would be better to just lead the scapegoat over a cliff because they didn’t want it to wander back to the city. The Jews rejected the sacrifice but instead made him their national scapegoat. His name is a curse word there. Anyone associated with Christianity is ostracized. That temple was destroyed because Jesus did end the sacrifice but also because they did not follow the strict commandments of the most important of sacrifices. Eventually they’ll come to their senses. That’s why it says ‘they will look upon him whom they’ve been piercing and mourn for him like the firstborn son.’ When they repent, it will be easier for them to swap goats. Stop making him the villain and appreciate what he attempted to do in confirming the new covenant. Yes it look like the ones who thought they’d be first are coming in dead last. It’s not the Jewish people’s fault. It’s the wayward rabbis leading the blinded. Pat yourself on the back but give some space for the Jewish people stuck in Judaism.
I still think my interpretation is better than yours in explaining why it took 62 weeks to rebuild Jerusalem. I also believe hod doesn’t mess up and leave things undone. He knew it would take a couple try’s to wake up those hardened rabbis to loosen their iron grip on those people.
Repent!
I believe that Daniels prayer and realisation that 70 literal years of bondage were over , it was not a vision and it has nothing to do with 70 weeks of Dan 9:24-27.
If we read 9:21 -23 we see that Daniels problem was a vision of chapter 8 that he didn’t understand, even after Gabriel tried to explain it to him.
So Gabriel flew swiftly and informed Daniel that he has come to make Daniel understand the matter and consider the vision he has seen in chapter 8:11-19.
This vision was (verses 17-19)for time of the END, the last END, at the time appointed shall the END be.
And when disciples asked Jesus how will they know the end and the sigh, Jesus said plainly when you see abomination of desolation( means false god that destroys)spoken of by Daniel standing where it ought not….
You start counting Daniel 12:11.
This is what we need to look for, it’s plain talk and it’s Jesus talking, I’d believe that any day over any other writer.
So I believe that Daniel 9 is talking about false messiah, Jerusalem and Gods people at the very end, last 490 days before Jesus comes the second time.
If you read revelation 11:3-13,2 literal witnesses will be living in the last 3.1/2 years in Jerusalem and they will be killed by the BEAST in Jerusalem where our Lord was crucified(vs7 and 8)in the middle of last week.
Beast and they that dwell on the earth shall rejoice over them, they shall send gifts one to another rejoicing because these 2 prophets tormented them that dwell on the earth.
It’s as simple as that, read it as it says, God made it plain for us.
I believe like bible says; wise will understand but the wicked will not.
Blessings
This is seventh day Adventist teaching. It is wrong. The man of lawlessness is stopped by Christ himself at the His second coming. That puts all of Daniels 7 weeks still into the future. This whole teaching is false. And the fact that SDA still adheres to the Jewish law of sabbath keeping clearly violates the teachings of Paul that the Church, the Body of Christ , is not under law, but grace. And every example of the Body of Christ meeting is on the first day of the week … Sunday. Not that that is prescriptive, but it is the example of the 1st century church. Mixing law and grace is heresy. Beware the SDA!
The Temple was NOT on the Temple mount.
“How is the gold become dim! how is the most fine gold changed! the stones of the sanctuary ARE POURED OUT IN THE TOP OF EVERY STREET.” (Lam 4:1, KJV)
The Lord has accomplished His fury; He has poured out his fierce anger, and has kindled a fire in Zion, and IT HAS DEVOURED THE FOUNDATIONS thereof.” (Lam 4:11, KJV)
This was the first Temple. The same thing happened to the second Temple.
Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, THERE SHALL NOT BE LEFT HERE ONE STONE UPON ANOTHER, THAT SHALL NOT BE THROWN DOWN.
(Mat 24:1-2, KJV)“
And as they went about to kill him,(Paul) tidings came unto the chief captain of the band, that all Jerusalem was in an uproar. Who immediately took soldiers and centurions, AND RAN DOWN UNTO THEM: and when they saw the chief captain and the soldiers, they left beating of Paul.” (Act 21:31-32, KJV)
And when he had given him licence, Paul STOOD ON THE STAIRS, and beckoned with the hand unto the people. And when there was made a great silence, he spake unto them in the Hebrew tongue, saying,” (Act 21:40, KJV)
The wood paneling was covered in gold. This gold melted when the burned the Temple because this was the last place the the Jews ran for their lives.
The Roman's then disassembled all of the foundations to retrieve the gold.
Around MM 12:00 the music playing-who is that? Love the soundtrack.
I don't understand all the hullabaloo in the comments. What the Bible says is as written in this perspective, not to mention the huge gap that this whole discussion fills! Be blessed.
Here is how this works..
Neh 2:1 And it came to pass in the month Nisan, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king.
From the month of Nisan unto Nisan, point A unto point B, exactly.
...from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build **Jerusalem** unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks..= 7 and 62 =
From Nehemiah 2, 445bc subtract 483 converted to days = 173880 DAYS...
MARCH 14 445bc to
APRIL 6th 32 ad. Nisan 10
The triumphal entry In Luke 19
@@carlcizek2189 you're closer right in the uploader but you still got the wrong starting date!
Interesting use of "Clearly" The Roman! Yes Clearly? Which Roman? The LORD God is God of god's, King of kings and Lord of lord's! All shall worship Him who made the Heaven and the Earth and sea. Remember the words of the apostles of the Lord Jesus Christ.
1 John 5:19-21 NKJV
We know that we are of God, and the whole world lies under the sway of the wicked one. [20] And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us an understanding, that we may know Him who is true; and we are in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and eternal life. [21] Little children, keep yourselves from idols. Amen.
If you try to teach history.. You have only 2 options. Teach from the evolution based narrative that acedemia says is history..which just about every church does!! Look at the back of just about every bible..you see maps and so called places men of scripture traveled to. Which is ALL THEORY!!! Or... Option 2.. Teach what the Holy Spirit reveals to you...not just mens doctrines. But I don't see that happening. Men have to much pride in what they THINK they "know".. Lol
Here's the error with this teaching. Daniel speaks of the abomination of desolation in Daniel chapter 9 and 11. The prince in Dan 9:26 is different from the "he" that confirms the covenant with Israel for 1 week (7 yrs)...and it's not Jesus. Although Antiochus Epiphanies is a partial fulfillment in history. It is ONLY that. It was seen as a future event from Daniel's perspective. It was also seen as a future event from Christ's perspective as well. Paul's writing speaks of events of Daniel's 70th as a future event from his perspective 2 Thess 2. The Apocalypse (Revelation) mentioned the abomination of desolation as well, but using different terms in Rev 13. The date of his writing is around 95-96 AD... LONG after the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD. John saw the abomination of desolation as a future event from his perspective. Here's a hint: the abomination of desolation is NOT the destruction of the temple
This makes absolutely zero sense. How could it be talking about the second temple being destroyed if that happened 40 years after Christ was crucified?? You forgot to verify your week year math! This is why nobody teaches it this way. Because the prophetic stopwatch was paused when Christ came into Jerusalem on the donkey
This guy I'm not sure if he's sent by the Devil Himself or not.. only God knows!.. Daniel 9 is written (in chronological order) the 70th week does not occur till after 70 AD.) The (abomination of desolation) is written in the book of Daniel 3 times in the . In the exact words.. and once as a ( transgression of desolation.)This guy could not interpret Daniel 8 if he had to..!. The 2300 days destroy everything this guy is saying ,an Revelation chapter 11!. Coming from somebody that studied this ...three times longer than this guy is old! ..Does he want to make money off a video for for preterists?
Dude, There was no church at that time…..Daniel’s prophecies were for his people…..Israel……Judah. Even Jesus in Matt 24 is talking to the Jews…..no church there again…..you have to rightly divide the word….times and dispensations…
Dear brethren and sistren, learn historical Bible prophecy fulfillment from David Nikao Wilcoxson...
The EU is the western leg of Nebuchadnezzars image and Constantinople is the eastern leg which will work together obtaining power for about an hour to fight Jesus Christ whom God sends back from heaven to set up the everlasting kingdom of God on earth Daniel 2:44
Indigo children. ~490 yr cycle. Virginia Treaty three charters. Delores Canon 3 waves, etc... 2x 1,000 yr reign
The teaching that the Antichrist will come in the future is not a modern understanding. Irenaeus, a 2nd century Christian who learned from Polycarp, a disciple of John, wrote about this in Against Heresies Book 5:
Chapter 25 1. "And not only by the particulars already mentioned, but also by means of the events which shall occur in the time of Antichrist is it shown that he, being an apostate and a robber, is anxious to be adored as God; and that, although a mere slave, he wishes himself to be proclaimed as a king. For he (Antichrist) being endued with all the power of the devil, shall come, not as a righteous king, nor as a legitimate king, [i.e., one] in subjection to God, but an impious, unjust, and lawless one...4. "The Lord also spoke as follows to those who did not believe in Him: "I have come in my Father's name, and ye have not received Me: when another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive," calling Antichrist "the other," because he is alienated from the Lord...Chapter 30:4 "But when this Antichrist shall have devastated all things in this world, he will reign for three years and six months, and sit in the temple at Jerusalem; and then the Lord will come from heaven in the clouds, in the glory of the Father, sending this man and those who follow him into the lake of fire; but bringing in for the righteous the times of the kingdom, that is, the rest, the hallowed seventh day; and restoring to Abraham the promised inheritance, in which kingdom the Lord declared, that "many coming from the east and from the west should sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob."
These things Irenaeus wrote in the 2nd century AD. You can find his writings at earlychristianwritings(dot)com
The rulers of the temple were Idumeans, the leader being Herod. Thats why Jesus said, you say you are, but are not. The rulers said they were of Abraham, Jesus agreed, they said they had never been in captivity. Jesus didn't question that answer, God said, if you don't accept the Son, I never knew you. The Wheat and the Tares, the Wolf and the Sheep, is the deception, that the church has been blinded by, with some fairytale outcome, that doesn't match, by their fruits you shall know them.
Arabs and Jews have the same Haplogroup J, lived together for 1350 years. DNA is God's building blocks of creation, they are both from Ishmael, who also had 12 sons.
Revelation 17:4
And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:
Revelation 17:5
And upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon The Great, The Mother Of Harlots And Abominations Of The Earth.
Revelation 21:27
And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.
You've got a mistake here at 17:19. Daniel 9:25 says "anointed,." Anointed does not in any way mean "Messiah." You have a falsely translated English language bible there.