Having used the EOLAD 1 and 2 (we have both in the armory) it is actually a pretty incredible device. Provided it is mounted to a short riser (wilcox) and you don't c-clamp your rifle. The illuminator on the 2 is very capable, and I wish EOTECH still made a optic/laser combo today. Maybe we will have that discussion with them soon. And yes, we had to order over 500 EXPS3-1s to get them to bring that to the market. It's great under NVGs like you mentioned. We also have their grenade launcher sight - it's most practical application is firing munitions under NVGs passively. How practical is that? You guys can be the judge on that. Solid video, I learned stuff. -Lucas
Hyperfixating on guns and attachments due to autismo > having a mental breakdown on IG because you got your Ford Raptor stuck in the snow and a boomer on a turkey hunt had to pull your Gucci'd ass out
Upon learning that my EXPS2-0 was “not for serious buyers,” I immediately became nauseous, threw up in the nearest trashcan and put it up for sale online so that I can use the proceeds to debt fund an EXPS3-0. Thanks Hop.
@@coreyperez13yep, Holosun. Unfortunately America doesn't have the ability to mfg. emitters or chipsets while maintaining production rates and cost. I remember when Surefire used to be 100% American, but to keep up with the industry they too source product from Taiwan and most likely China. EOTech is 100% American and Aimpoint 100% Sweden. Most people here just shooting steel aren't worried about wether or not their optic can survive a 30 foot fall from a helicopter onto concrete before being washed into the ocean. Not to mention EOtech has had a lawsuit, Holosun hasn't. Even Trijicon is getting on board with Holosun tech after 3-5 years... Lol
Glock is way more confusing since they create a new number for compact models. Sig will at least note whether it's compact or not and even mentions the caliber like with the p320 10mm
Used a 512 in 2011 when issued a m249 with a para stock. Optic survived at least 9k rounds in it between multiple servicemembers, 2 deployments, and many gunnery qual ranges. Lives on today.
Someone I trust had just the opposite experience that you had as well as several of his teammates.He really didn't care because they had a big box of replacements. The newest variants fixed the durability and "other" issues. The model that offers a single dot is most likely its best offering available as of this posting.
@@1olddirtroadI'm sure that out of every thousand sights that are made, there's going to be a few that just fall apart in a few days and a few that will somehow be found in a tomb 2000 years from now and be fully functional lost tech
The only trouble I've had with my 512 from the mid-2000s was corroded contacts because I left the batteries in too long. The modestly priced replacement kit fixed it right up.
Memorizing and understanding the differences of all the EOkek models is like trying to understand the Porche's naming scheme. And just like Porsche, EOtech sights all kinds look the same with minor changes.
got myself a cheap 552 for airsoft/larping and its the most awesome thing ever. It was build in 09 and has a very little bit of delamination going on. coming from only cheap clones it's the most amazing thing ever
I have evolution gear xps's were the NV mode does work with nods and even my toy peq 15s from wadson also have working ir laser it's crazy how far a toy clone got as far as functions I would never mount them on a real gun mybe 22 and I have a 512 clone that's more then a decade old and has decent battery life but tempted to get a real 512 since there not 1000$
I am happy knowing that at one point in time, EoTech's main office was half an hour away from Trijicon's and I am hoping they had some epic softball games and snowball fights (both in Michigan)
My husband has a Meprolight MOR on his rifle that I got him as a wedding present when we got married. He went on and on about how his Israeli rifle should have a meprolight sight and I kept telling him no it was to expensive “when I already had bought it for him” he got so mad because I wouldn’t let him buy it and he cried when he opened it on our wedding day. I’ve shot it on his weapon and it’s amazing! The laser adjustment being synchronized with the dot adjustment is so cool! Hop if you get a chance to review or buy the MOR go for it!
I always wondered why anyone would get a single dot no circle Eotech instead of just getting a red dot. Never thought of the night vision reason. Entertaining and informative you are truly under appreciated.
The biggest reason is for those users who have a bit of astigmatism. For those users, a standard red dot becomes 2 (or more) dots that cannot be reconciled. The projection physics of a holographic sight eliminates this problem entirely.
I wish green got more love. Green reticles work better with my high powered glasses. Green shifts less through them. Red shifts twice as much and the opposite direction to how I'm turning my head. If you wear glasses, look at a gas station sign with green and red numbers. Turn your head and watch the numbers. You should see them shift opposite each other. It all depends on how thick your glasses are.
Note on the 553. Mine broke while using it on a stribog, internal mirror fell off (it was 11 years old, not faulting the optic) but due to it being out of production, factory repairs were not an option, but they did give me a half off coupon to sucker me back in
I definitely wouldnt consider myself a serious user but i really like the 512. They have become very affordable over the last few years if you can catch them on sale.
Got damn I missed you Hop. Been binging all your videos. Definitely the most refreshing guntuber with no coping or shilling. Even though I’m not into NV and you hate the MP5 😢
I once heard the production offshoot from the in-line battery compartment to a transverse battery compartment was heavily influenced by the SCAR-H because it was so notorious for beating the shit out of every optic that was put on it. I am inclined to believe it because the DOD issued an open statement to all its optics contractors that every potential optic would be torture tested on the SCAR for longevity. Sounds more like a threat than a recommendation LOL.
Can always count on you for in depth overviews of optics... I love these and are really helpful for for when I want to find what product will fit best for those companies that just have overwhelming options.
@8:03 "NEUTRALIZE THE THREAT WITH TURBOCHARGED SPEED." Christ, why does the marketing have to so perfectly mirror the cringe in the community so often?
I've had my XPS-3 with a single dot for about 13 years and I bought it from someone else because wanted the donut of death. It has had at seen at least 15k rounds with the majority being on a SCAR-16. It has been a great optic. Sure the battery life sucks but it is by far my favorite non-magnified optic.
im gonna be real Hop as soon as eotech model numbers started getting listed off my eyes glazed over and I entered a fugue state, good video thanks for sharing
I can't wait for the new model to come out. I heard that they made the window smaller and added one more brightness setting. Seriously though. Eotech superiority.
My 556 Eotech is still running strong, 10,000 rounds + or - and still holds zero. It’s been almost a decade and I’ve only had to change out the CR123s a handful of times, and I still have a bunch of 2013-2014 Panasonic CR123s with a charge waiting to be used. Can’t complain really, fantastic quality and reliability.
I'm a member of a private sales group on FB for NV/Thermals and someone posted an Eolad up for sale a couple weeks ago. Cant remember the exact asking price, but it wasn't cheap. One of the coolest things I've seen even if its really just a novelty these days compared to modern stuff. Super rare though.
10:34 Sig actually used that same type of cross shaped reticle on the discontinued Romeo6 and some Romeo4 models. It looks clearer to my eye than the 2 MOA dot.
I bought a 512 with the XR308 4 years ago to pair with a SA-58 (PARA FAL) I tried to modernize. The gun didn’t work out too well. But the optic remains strong. Currently lives on top of a Bulgarian AK-74
@@jason200912 getting metal magazines that worked well was exceptionally difficult. But I was able to acquire at least 20 or so various metric pattern magazines (most from the Rhodesian bush war “Do we?”) and they held up fine but needed new followers and springs. For reliability sake, I only vetted around 12 of those mags out of the bunch I had that I deemed “ready for anything” I did have quite the number of polymer mags as well. Being the easiest to acquire but also the most lack luster “round spewing” wastes of time I’d ever bought. The main issue I was having with the weapon was the accuracy. With factory new M80 ball I’d get around 5 MOA and 6 MOA with surplus German M80 from the 1990s, but! the cycling/reliability of the weapon was the best. With .308 however the weapon would shoot around 2.5 MOA with either Hornady Black or Federal gold metal match, although they had better performance, the reliability went down the drain cycling 2-3 rounds and then failing to feed. I deemed both too expensive for a battle rifle modernization attempt and sold it last weekend mags, furniture, and all.
I still have a 553 and It still works just fine. I have not experienced any of the issues the 553 is reported to have. I have however never jumped out of aircraft with it, gone into subzero temperatures or put it on a 308 but other than that it still works great.
So I have one of those old N cell models (511). I tested it alongside an aimpoint T2 and an aimpoint PRO with my PVS14 and white phos BNVD's (2600 FOM) with fresh batteries in the eotech and at the lowest "daylight" setting it was to dim to be able to use with nods. The lowest setting was was in between 1-2 of the night vision modes on the T2. Significantly dimmer than your NV compatible example in the video. I don't live around a city so the only ambient light was roughly 1/2 moon and stars. Maybe the older 511 model gets dimmer than newer stuff.
I run that XR308 reticle on the 500-series for my RFB. I feed that thing Lake City M80, and for the .6 holdover, yeah, its kinda on. What helps is that I have run a G33 magnifier in series, so the reticle is also magnified. Its good enough for what I use it for. Holds zero just fine, and I love that it runs on ubiquitous AAs, even rechargeables.
Kinda weird that I hit pause on the video, hit the bathroom and grabbed a snack and came back, only to be told to take a bathroom break and get a snack. Huh
The last Bushnell Holosight that looks like a 511 without the shroud does get dim enough for night vision (in the dark for real) but has no NV button. My theory is when Eotech started to make their own and wanted to charge more for night vision compatible models they neutered this functionality to further separate their product lines but it was definitely there in the early days.
@@HoplopfheilI can't say for sure but my Bushnell at max is about the same as the 16/20 daylight setting on my EXPS3. From my research (which is a random Google search that came up with a Calguns forum thread), "The Eotech uses their Rev F technology (starting in 2005), which greatly extends battery life and gives a much wider range of reticle brightness, including more brightness at the high end, and has improved buttons. The Bushnells use the pre-Rev F technology still, with shorter battery life and less brightness range" so it should be expected the Bushnell maxes out at a lower brightness.
I have an early production 553 and the battery terminals broke away (the plastic fatigued and broke off where the springs attached to the battery box) inside of about 10000 rounds mounted on a regular CQBR upper. EOTech repaired it free of charge, of course, and I am glad that I am was a professional that might actually rely on that sight for my survival when it broke.
I prefer having only a Circle as reticle as this enables me to see the center of the target, this might not be for everyone but to me it just feels very natural and intuitive. Oh, and if any sight/optics manufacturing company happens to read this comment, red colored reticles is just soooo mainstream! ;)
After watching what my coworker went through with Eotech, I lost interest in them. They don't really stand behind their product, and when my coworkers 512 died after being shot maybe once or twice, he was told that it would cost 80 bucks for it to be fixed. That's a big no from me, and he said he's likely going to sell it, and buy a different optic from a company that actually stands behind what they put out.
I hope someday when it becomes commercially aviable you will cover some stuf about Mepro M22. Maybe it fixes M21 problems who knows. Had 1 (M21) and I wasn't too happy. Then I bought Vortex UH-1 (worst mistake of my life, unusable with Nigh Vision) and then I finally made a good decision and bought EXPS3 with circle-1 dot and Aimpoint 3XMag with Unity mount (In freedom currency I paid about 750$ used)
The #1 thing you can't intellectualize but got to get hands on with is how your eyes work with sighting. I really struggle with most red dots for some reason or another. I also struggle more with some magnified optics than others. I have an exceptional ability to use irons for pistol while threat focusing both eyes open... don't ask me how, but red dots be damned, lol. Why bring that up here, this optic is a god send for me on a rifle.
I use an EXPS2 with the green reticle. Serious use or not, I will never go back to using a red reticle EOTech, green is just superior in every way if you're not using night vision.
Hop what a wealth of knowledge! I bought a Bushnell holosight AA 520021 when pressing the down button the Ring of Death disappears and has 5 clicks not visible but when I use gen3 WP pvs-14's I can see the ring that gets lesser with each press of the down arrow. It's useable and doesn't overpower nods, it was born Sept 9 2004 maybe since it was a really late model?. It was $200 with my ffl's from Jerry's or Nationwide (now Kimber). I don't need the hood for another $290, shoulda bought more! Thanks
I have an N type that I got back in 08/09 still works good. Down side is it'll kill batteries even when it is off in less than a month so I have to store it empty.
The general rule is the simpler a product is, the less it probably sucks. If you have an optical that is also a laser and also an ir illuminator it probably does all of those things very poorly
my astigmatism plays hell with holo sights and whenever I see how they are supposed to look on film I become jealous of all you people with normal shaped eyes.
Thanks for the video, im a special kind of stupid that wasn't aware of the bottom part of the circle reticle is meant to be used as a close quarter reference point
It would be nice if EOTech started to make different colored and different reticle optics. Limited production run of some of them obviously but it would be cool to see happen. Make the collectors go wild over them.
I unironically went for the NV compatible "Serious buyers" models of Eotechs not because I actually plan to use night vision any time soon, but because of the water proof rating. Water ingress from humidity is a problem I've seen happen with cheap scopes once they hit 20+ years old. The seals on the lenses fail and you get humidity inside which can fog the inside of the lens with temperature fluctuations and later condensate into droplets that can stain the inside of the the glass; both of which are extremely annoying and can render an optic useless. My theory is that the better the waterproof/resistance rating of an optic the longer it will last before humidity works its way inside. Also knowing the optic is less likely to be affected by heavy rain is also nice.
FYI in reference to that 552 with the XR308 reticle: Those are km, but in standard distance. .6km is about 2k feet, .9km is nearly 3k ft, and 1.2km is nearly 4k ft.
Having used the EOLAD 1 and 2 (we have both in the armory) it is actually a pretty incredible device. Provided it is mounted to a short riser (wilcox) and you don't c-clamp your rifle. The illuminator on the 2 is very capable, and I wish EOTECH still made a optic/laser combo today. Maybe we will have that discussion with them soon. And yes, we had to order over 500 EXPS3-1s to get them to bring that to the market. It's great under NVGs like you mentioned. We also have their grenade launcher sight - it's most practical application is firing munitions under NVGs passively. How practical is that? You guys can be the judge on that. Solid video, I learned stuff. -Lucas
I don’t know 🤔🤔🤔
I mean, incredibly useful for guys with grenade launchers
Ofc you have it 😩
How's the cult?
@@Fury-161 wait what?
“It’s my autism, I get to pick the fixation”
R E A L
Hyperfixating on guns and attachments due to autismo > having a mental breakdown on IG because you got your Ford Raptor stuck in the snow and a boomer on a turkey hunt had to pull your Gucci'd ass out
100%
Felt that
Special interest sir. -weaponized autism actual.
Upon learning that my EXPS2-0 was “not for serious buyers,” I immediately became nauseous, threw up in the nearest trashcan and put it up for sale online so that I can use the proceeds to debt fund an EXPS3-0. Thanks Hop.
"Look here's the deal. Poor kids can have just as many holographic aiming devices and night vision as white kids." Hoppler Biden
Same here.. 🥴
101 on How to artificially increase the price of a product
I got mine on a cyber Monday sale. I ain’t teasing that thing in.
Got my exps 3-0 for 549 on sale at palmetto state
EOTech, Sig, Holosun are in a neck and neck arms race to make the most confusing naming schemes for their optics
Ok cadet didn’t you learn any OPSEC at the academy
Holosun?
Facepalm
You should upgrade to a 2 series...
Disney wishes their cinematic universe had such depth
@@coreyperez13yep, Holosun. Unfortunately America doesn't have the ability to mfg. emitters or chipsets while maintaining production rates and cost.
I remember when Surefire used to be 100% American, but to keep up with the industry they too source product from Taiwan and most likely China.
EOTech is 100% American and Aimpoint 100% Sweden. Most people here just shooting steel aren't worried about wether or not their optic can survive a 30 foot fall from a helicopter onto concrete before being washed into the ocean. Not to mention EOtech has had a lawsuit, Holosun hasn't. Even Trijicon is getting on board with Holosun tech after 3-5 years... Lol
Glock is way more confusing since they create a new number for compact models. Sig will at least note whether it's compact or not and even mentions the caliber like with the p320 10mm
Used a 512 in 2011 when issued a m249 with a para stock. Optic survived at least 9k rounds in it between multiple servicemembers, 2 deployments, and many gunnery qual ranges. Lives on today.
Someone I trust had just the opposite experience that you had as well as several of his teammates.He really didn't care because they had a big box of replacements.
The newest variants fixed the durability and "other" issues.
The model that offers a single dot is most likely its best offering available as of this posting.
…yeah BUT THAT was “only” REAL-world..like the “military” or something. That doesn’t count, not like L’arping and such..(as I understand it anyway)
@@1olddirtroadI'm sure that out of every thousand sights that are made, there's going to be a few that just fall apart in a few days and a few that will somehow be found in a tomb 2000 years from now and be fully functional lost tech
@@BoomchacleFor the price of these they had better not be falling apart.
The only trouble I've had with my 512 from the mid-2000s was corroded contacts because I left the batteries in too long. The modestly priced replacement kit fixed it right up.
okay I think I finally got it, for example the exps2-2 is good for night vision, serious use, and uses AAs?
Have you considered all that a Bushnell TRS-25 can offer you
If I bought an XPS2 even though I don't need more than that Hop would still make fun of me...
Wow
@@HoplopfheilTRS25 is like Glock. Sure better things may exist now but the design still works and has been working for several years. 🤷🏻♂️
@@Sig_P229Glock is the aimpoint pro. Bushnell trs25 is a s&w sigma
I pity the fool who doesn't have a Biohazard reticle in the case of a Zombie Apocalypse. How are you meant to take out zombies without one?
That would be awesome if it auto detected and changed reticle based on infected or not lol. Regular reticle-human, biohazard-infected.
According to Max Brooks, an iron sighted M1 carbine
Take out?
Naw, them zombies DiGiorno.
The zombie apocalypse occurs 24-7 in every lumpenprole urban area of woke America.
@@Enjoyer.762 jesse what the fuck are you talking about?
If someone gave Hop a million dollars, he’d find something wrong with it.
$100 bills? Too hard to spend.
$20 bills? Too many bills.
That's.... why I'm here
@@ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz
What about 50s?
@@salacommander2674 unusable in vending machines 😡
50 dollar bills? He would have to say they gave him a million of the ugliest president ever printed on money
These optics deep dives just scratch my specific autism really well. Never knew that I wanted to know this information. Thanks blud 🙏🏻
Like you, i also want my optics simple AF in reticle, no buttons in sight and specific model
Real talk: we need a return of actual 3D holographic sights. The really old EOTech Precursor shouldn't have been the only one to feature that trick.
This
It was wild seeing that for the first time and then realizing it was on a sight from 25 years ago.
Why haven’t they done the rising line yet? It’s actually such a nice reticle.
Memorizing and understanding the differences of all the EOkek models is like trying to understand the Porche's naming scheme. And just like Porsche, EOtech sights all kinds look the same with minor changes.
He forgot one of the most ancient recticle, the bow recticle which is like regular recticle but also has a second circle you need to align.
Yeah Porch is crazy 👌
There is an S in Porsche.
@@Valorius porchs
@@von... That would be...incorrect.
“Steiner+Eotech optic is obscure, too expensive, extremely rare and probably doesn’t work well”
Future Hop video prediction
6:47 - Socko Dork Thirty, on station.
14:06 - Solar-powered, Auto-Brightness Socko. (Surprised Hop's a fan of this model.)
this is the only part of the video I cared to pay attention to
got myself a cheap 552 for airsoft/larping and its the most awesome thing ever. It was build in 09 and has a very little bit of delamination going on. coming from only cheap clones it's the most amazing thing ever
I have evolution gear xps's were the NV mode does work with nods and even my toy peq 15s from wadson also have working ir laser it's crazy how far a toy clone got as far as functions I would never mount them on a real gun mybe 22 and I have a 512 clone that's more then a decade old and has decent battery life but tempted to get a real 512 since there not 1000$
where'd you get it?
Finally a Rosetta Stone for EOTECH model numbers
I am happy knowing that at one point in time, EoTech's main office was half an hour away from Trijicon's and I am hoping they had some epic softball games and snowball fights (both in Michigan)
Come for optics autism. Stay for Kitteh. Comment for Algorithm. Beg for PDP review
My husband has a Meprolight MOR on his rifle that I got him as a wedding present when we got married. He went on and on about how his Israeli rifle should have a meprolight sight and I kept telling him no it was to expensive “when I already had bought it for him” he got so mad because I wouldn’t let him buy it and he cried when he opened it on our wedding day. I’ve shot it on his weapon and it’s amazing! The laser adjustment being synchronized with the dot adjustment is so cool! Hop if you get a chance to review or buy the MOR go for it!
"Go Wild with the Magic of Holography" was EOTech's original catchphrase.
I always wondered why anyone would get a single dot no circle Eotech instead of just getting a red dot. Never thought of the night vision reason. Entertaining and informative you are truly under appreciated.
The biggest reason is for those users who have a bit of astigmatism. For those users, a standard red dot becomes 2 (or more) dots that cannot be reconciled. The projection physics of a holographic sight eliminates this problem entirely.
I wish green got more love. Green reticles work better with my high powered glasses. Green shifts less through them. Red shifts twice as much and the opposite direction to how I'm turning my head.
If you wear glasses, look at a gas station sign with green and red numbers. Turn your head and watch the numbers. You should see them shift opposite each other. It all depends on how thick your glasses are.
As someone who also memorized Al three generations of S&W automatic model numbers, this is deeply satisfying. Good work Hop.
Note on the 553. Mine broke while using it on a stribog, internal mirror fell off (it was 11 years old, not faulting the optic) but due to it being out of production, factory repairs were not an option, but they did give me a half off coupon to sucker me back in
This is the exact kind of comment I search for and love to see. Good information here for people who don’t have an eotech yet
@@c-jam6392 they’re pretty awesome
did the same for me and a 2006 model i bought the day before. still got a refund for it tho. @@c-jam6392
I definitely wouldnt consider myself a serious user but i really like the 512. They have become very affordable over the last few years if you can catch them on sale.
Got me feeling some type of way with the "not for serious buyers" bit 😢. I got the green one because green pops out better for me on bright days.
Same
Hop uploads video about something I’m to poor to own.
Me: “Fascinating.”
Very solid video! Thanks Hop!
-Caleb
When I was a boy, my father bought me that biohazard reticle! Wish we hadn't sold it. That zombie craze was a fun time in the firearm world
Got damn I missed you Hop. Been binging all your videos. Definitely the most refreshing guntuber with no coping or shilling. Even though I’m not into NV and you hate the MP5 😢
He already has a boyfriend.
“Those people tested it in a Walmart parking lot and at about 3:00 in the afternoon”
I love it.
My KSG won't be complete until it has a zombie reticle EOTech perched on it.
I once heard the production offshoot from the in-line battery compartment to a transverse battery compartment was heavily influenced by the SCAR-H because it was so notorious for beating the shit out of every optic that was put on it. I am inclined to believe it because the DOD issued an open statement to all its optics contractors that every potential optic would be torture tested on the SCAR for longevity. Sounds more like a threat than a recommendation LOL.
"mom the new EOTECH lore just dropped"
Can always count on you for in depth overviews of optics... I love these and are really helpful for for when I want to find what product will fit best for those companies that just have overwhelming options.
Hop is my favorite lesbian on this platform! I especially love these autistic optic breakdowns
I was very happy to have just scored a 556.A65 for my first attempt at clooning. The Steiner R1X is similar to the Brownells CQB dot stack.
@8:03 "NEUTRALIZE THE THREAT WITH TURBOCHARGED SPEED." Christ, why does the marketing have to so perfectly mirror the cringe in the community so often?
In awe of the on paper features of this EOLAD
@14:14 The cat is chillin'
Lookin like he had some cat nip & lovin' life!!
Best EoTech run down I've ever seen. Thank you.
Love the sarcasm peppered throughout your videos!!!
I've had my XPS-3 with a single dot for about 13 years and I bought it from someone else because wanted the donut of death. It has had at seen at least 15k rounds with the majority being on a SCAR-16. It has been a great optic. Sure the battery life sucks but it is by far my favorite non-magnified optic.
yooo the reticle at 1:49 is actually amazing.
Hop,
Thank you for what you do!
On another note, the amount of Advil I just took to follow this is dangerous, but I stayed till the end.
"Wild With The Magic Of Holography" has got to be a prog rock song title.
So do you like EOTech?
What kind of question is that
im gonna be real Hop as soon as eotech model numbers started getting listed off my eyes glazed over and I entered a fugue state, good video thanks for sharing
I can't wait for the new model to come out. I heard that they made the window smaller and added one more brightness setting. Seriously though. Eotech superiority.
As soon as you pulled up the punnet square it all made sense. Med school trauma.
Came for the title, stayed for the Punnett square
My 556 Eotech is still running strong, 10,000 rounds + or - and still holds zero. It’s been almost a decade and I’ve only had to change out the CR123s a handful of times, and I still have a bunch of 2013-2014 Panasonic CR123s with a charge waiting to be used. Can’t complain really, fantastic quality and reliability.
I'm a member of a private sales group on FB for NV/Thermals and someone posted an Eolad up for sale a couple weeks ago. Cant remember the exact asking price, but it wasn't cheap. One of the coolest things I've seen even if its really just a novelty these days compared to modern stuff. Super rare though.
EOTech is proud to announce the EOWyn, the first optic designed for killing Nazgul!
“But no living man am I!”
10:34 Sig actually used that same type of cross shaped reticle on the discontinued Romeo6 and some Romeo4 models. It looks clearer to my eye than the 2 MOA dot.
“Just for the sort of person impressed by the word blackout”
I feel like I just went to EOTech college. Thank you for the instruction.
I bought a 512 with the XR308 4 years ago to pair with a SA-58 (PARA FAL) I tried to modernize. The gun didn’t work out too well. But the optic remains strong. Currently lives on top of a Bulgarian AK-74
Did the gun jam too much
@@jason200912 getting metal magazines that worked well was exceptionally difficult. But I was able to acquire at least 20 or so various metric pattern magazines (most from the Rhodesian bush war “Do we?”) and they held up fine but needed new followers and springs. For reliability sake, I only vetted around 12 of those mags out of the bunch I had that I deemed “ready for anything” I did have quite the number of polymer mags as well. Being the easiest to acquire but also the most lack luster “round spewing” wastes of time I’d ever bought. The main issue I was having with the weapon was the accuracy. With factory new M80 ball I’d get around 5 MOA and 6 MOA with surplus German M80 from the 1990s, but! the cycling/reliability of the weapon was the best. With .308 however the weapon would shoot around 2.5 MOA with either Hornady Black or Federal gold metal match, although they had better performance, the reliability went down the drain cycling 2-3 rounds and then failing to feed. I deemed both too expensive for a battle rifle modernization attempt and sold it last weekend mags, furniture, and all.
@@jason200912 In short. Half jamming half being inaccurate
I still have a 553 and It still works just fine. I have not experienced any of the issues the 553 is reported to have. I have however never jumped out of aircraft with it, gone into subzero temperatures or put it on a 308 but other than that it still works great.
>punnett square
See, Mom?
I learn more than just swearing and violence from guntube!
Aimpoint should make a Eotech clone and Eotech should make an Aimpoint clone
XR308 guy here, had it five years. Being a weirdo I love the sight setup.
So I have one of those old N cell models (511). I tested it alongside an aimpoint T2 and an aimpoint PRO with my PVS14 and white phos BNVD's (2600 FOM) with fresh batteries in the eotech and at the lowest "daylight" setting it was to dim to be able to use with nods. The lowest setting was was in between 1-2 of the night vision modes on the T2. Significantly dimmer than your NV compatible example in the video. I don't live around a city so the only ambient light was roughly 1/2 moon and stars. Maybe the older 511 model gets dimmer than newer stuff.
It's definitely possible your sight is failing with age. When the nitrogen falls out they get much dimmer.
Delta Force ASQD alum....EO Tech eas the primary optic in my time 2002-2012 and still the gold standard in the Unit..cheers
No lpvo?
I want a reticle like they have on the Russian OKP-7. It's a goofy optic, but that reticle is just *chef's kiss
Exactly!
I run that XR308 reticle on the 500-series for my RFB. I feed that thing Lake City M80, and for the .6 holdover, yeah, its kinda on. What helps is that I have run a G33 magnifier in series, so the reticle is also magnified.
Its good enough for what I use it for. Holds zero just fine, and I love that it runs on ubiquitous AAs, even rechargeables.
Kinda weird that I hit pause on the video, hit the bathroom and grabbed a snack and came back, only to be told to take a bathroom break and get a snack. Huh
11:46 No way! I always thought that the "Biohazard" Eotech recital was an April fools joke perpetuated by fud-lore.
Holosun needs to get into the LPVO market. Their solar panels could solve most of the battery life issues that everyone complains about on lpvo’s
The last Bushnell Holosight that looks like a 511 without the shroud does get dim enough for night vision (in the dark for real) but has no NV button. My theory is when Eotech started to make their own and wanted to charge more for night vision compatible models they neutered this functionality to further separate their product lines but it was definitely there in the early days.
It's possible your optic has lost its nitrogen purge, which will make the entire thing much dimmer.
@@HoplopfheilI can't say for sure but my Bushnell at max is about the same as the 16/20 daylight setting on my EXPS3. From my research (which is a random Google search that came up with a Calguns forum thread), "The Eotech uses their Rev F technology (starting in 2005), which greatly extends battery life and gives a much wider range of reticle brightness, including more brightness at the high end, and has improved buttons. The Bushnells use the pre-Rev F technology still, with shorter battery life and less brightness range" so it should be expected the Bushnell maxes out at a lower brightness.
I'm looking at grabbing an eotech for my 11.5 so this breakdown of the ridiculous range in models is appreciated
6:50 Good thing I'm already on the toilet
Great job Hop! Subscribed ! You answered a lot of great questions people have had.
HOP is acting like he just got his unsolicited AARP magazine.
I have an early production 553 and the battery terminals broke away (the plastic fatigued and broke off where the springs attached to the battery box) inside of about 10000 rounds mounted on a regular CQBR upper. EOTech repaired it free of charge, of course, and I am glad that I am was a professional that might actually rely on that sight for my survival when it broke.
my dad won one of those zombie reticle eotechs in a raffle in 2011. he sold it for like $300 and didnt even tell me he had it till he sold it.
Love my old eotech 512 , and will probably be getting a newer model next year, great vid, Hop!
I prefer having only a Circle as reticle as this enables me to see the center of the target, this might not be for everyone but to me it just feels very natural and intuitive. Oh, and if any sight/optics manufacturing company happens to read this comment, red colored reticles is just soooo mainstream! ;)
After watching what my coworker went through with Eotech, I lost interest in them. They don't really stand behind their product, and when my coworkers 512 died after being shot maybe once or twice, he was told that it would cost 80 bucks for it to be fixed. That's a big no from me, and he said he's likely going to sell it, and buy a different optic from a company that actually stands behind what they put out.
Used a eotch 2 tours in iraq. Never had an issue with using nods on level 1 or 2 day light settings
This might sound trivial but in the realm of "optics with laser built in" Zenitco makes one afaik.
I hope someday when it becomes commercially aviable you will cover some stuf about Mepro M22. Maybe it fixes M21 problems who knows. Had 1 (M21) and I wasn't too happy. Then I bought Vortex UH-1 (worst mistake of my life, unusable with Nigh Vision) and then I finally made a good decision and bought EXPS3 with circle-1 dot and Aimpoint 3XMag with Unity mount (In freedom currency I paid about 750$ used)
The #1 thing you can't intellectualize but got to get hands on with is how your eyes work with sighting.
I really struggle with most red dots for some reason or another. I also struggle more with some magnified optics than others. I have an exceptional ability to use irons for pistol while threat focusing both eyes open... don't ask me how, but red dots be damned, lol.
Why bring that up here, this optic is a god send for me on a rifle.
I use an EXPS2 with the green reticle. Serious use or not, I will never go back to using a red reticle EOTech, green is just superior in every way if you're not using night vision.
The 2 is fine. You think this guy hop is a serious user? Watch his theatrical moves like removing a mag, checking it and re inserting it..
“Babe wake up, Hop dropped another Eotech video”
“If it ain’t broke….”
im sure its not just me but the older one with the longer battery storage looks better than the wnewer ones
Hop what a wealth of knowledge!
I bought a Bushnell holosight AA 520021 when pressing the down button the Ring of Death disappears and has 5 clicks not visible but when I use gen3 WP pvs-14's I can see the ring that gets lesser with each press of the down arrow. It's useable and doesn't overpower nods, it was born Sept 9 2004 maybe since it was a really late model?. It was $200 with my ffl's from Jerry's or Nationwide (now Kimber). I don't need the hood for another $290, shoulda bought more! Thanks
Ill only be running exps-2s on my airsoft guns from now on. Thanks for the insight.
I have an N type that I got back in 08/09 still works good. Down side is it'll kill batteries even when it is off in less than a month so I have to store it empty.
The general rule is the simpler a product is, the less it probably sucks. If you have an optical that is also a laser and also an ir illuminator it probably does all of those things very poorly
Something kinda funny about paying close to $1k in some cases for a piece of tech that’s been the exact same since the 90s
11:44 Hah, I had written a comment saying: "Hey, remember that zombie one?"
Good thing I watched the video, and didn't just post that.
my astigmatism plays hell with holo sights and whenever I see how they are supposed to look on film I become jealous of all you people with normal shaped eyes.
I feel you, my dominant eye has an astigmatism at the end of the severity range.
Based fellow kitty companion enjoyer 🤝
Thanks for the video, im a special kind of stupid that wasn't aware of the bottom part of the circle reticle is meant to be used as a close quarter reference point
Believe it or not, Taran Butler might’ve also helped the EXPS 3-1 be sold commercially seeing as he also sells it on his website.
It would be nice if EOTech started to make different colored and different reticle optics. Limited production run of some of them obviously but it would be cool to see happen. Make the collectors go wild over them.
My addiction to night vision IR illuminators and IR lasers makes me desire the EOLAD even though its probably terrible and I don't actually need it.
I unironically went for the NV compatible "Serious buyers" models of Eotechs not because I actually plan to use night vision any time soon, but because of the water proof rating. Water ingress from humidity is a problem I've seen happen with cheap scopes once they hit 20+ years old. The seals on the lenses fail and you get humidity inside which can fog the inside of the lens with temperature fluctuations and later condensate into droplets that can stain the inside of the the glass; both of which are extremely annoying and can render an optic useless.
My theory is that the better the waterproof/resistance rating of an optic the longer it will last before humidity works its way inside. Also knowing the optic is less likely to be affected by heavy rain is also nice.
FYI in reference to that 552 with the XR308 reticle: Those are km, but in standard distance. .6km is about 2k feet, .9km is nearly 3k ft, and 1.2km is nearly 4k ft.