Can A Felon Use Wife's Gun To Defend Their Home?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,6 тис.

  • @USCCAOfficial
    @USCCAOfficial  2 роки тому +18

    Want MORE Tom Grieve Videos? Subscribe to his channel here: bit.ly/3xhJuBc

    • @soulseeker42388
      @soulseeker42388 2 роки тому +11

      I would say regardless of convicted felons laws.. they are all unconstitutional... the constitution says our right to own posses fire arms shall not be infringed apon.. even my state has it wrote in their constitution that it is a unalienable right to own a firearm... meaning not even Supreme Court laws are allowed to strip me of that right. Convicted felon or not..
      The the parts shall not be infringed apon and unalienable me can not be taken away.. and laws against felons owning a firearm is a direct violation of the civil rights act of 1964.. with discrimination against a person's past and punishing them for the rest of their life... that is also discrimination..
      It never says shall not be infringed upon unless you break the law.

    • @soulseeker42388
      @soulseeker42388 2 роки тому +5

      It is not what it is... if it has been that long and you have proven that you have changed... then that law can be fought with the civil rights act of 1964. Which makes it illegal to judge anyone based on their past. (Now I do believe that there should be a waiting period after conviction to restore the right to own a gun.. a ex felon should have to go a period of time with out breaking the law and veing convicted before they are restored... but I feel it is unconstitutional to 100% deny someone their right to self defense for life. Because of past mistakes in life.
      It just takes you lawyers. To actually take the time to find energy to fight for our constitutional right to never be infringed upon even in the circumstances that a felon is committed.... it takes a good defense lawyer to fight the state and federal government.. and fight for what is right not what is easy......

    • @Apolloneek
      @Apolloneek 2 роки тому

      Uscca ? I've heard felons are able to carry or use black power weapons ? Because supposedly under the law they're not firearms or guns right ?

    • @Krombop.M
      @Krombop.M 2 роки тому

      Every felon has the right to bear arms. No matter what the government thinks.
      Our rights are enherant, inalienable, and can not be taken from us..

    • @tax905972
      @tax905972 Рік тому

      COPS ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BE FRIENDS WITH KNOWN FELONS.

  • @hecdc305
    @hecdc305 2 роки тому +262

    Bottom line: I'll gladly do my time for gun possession knowing that I saved my family at home from an intruder.

    • @ModernMountainLiving
      @ModernMountainLiving 2 роки тому +6

      "Gladly" wouldn't be the word most would use. Sitting with your new friend Bubba contemplating that you were Justified in your actions but screwed because of it never qualifies the Gladly feeling. Right?

    • @aleiterful
      @aleiterful 2 роки тому +17

      “Sitting with your new friend bubba” you’re a bozo. This isn’t a sex crime. He didn’t snatch a purse. He defended his family from armed intruders. That is an honorable crime to be sitting in jail for. He won’t want or need for anything while he’s there.

    • @ModernMountainLiving
      @ModernMountainLiving 2 роки тому +3

      @@aleiterful Answers the question: "You have never been jailed for an alleged defensive gun crime"? So, take it from somebody that knows what he is talking about. Charges got dropped but I am still not "glad" about the experience.

    • @neruashikabi2409
      @neruashikabi2409 2 роки тому

      bottom line ...Bubba gonna get ur buttcheeks 🤣

    • @zayajordan6615
      @zayajordan6615 2 роки тому +4

      What happens if you go to jail and someone intrudes while you're locked up??.

  • @nintense1
    @nintense1 2 роки тому +1092

    Luckily I don’t have any criminal records, but if I would and have to protect myself or my family I would and deal with the consequences later.

    • @animeyhem9780
      @animeyhem9780 2 роки тому +64

      "Better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6."
      And yes, in the exigencies of the moment, you do what you have to do to save your family and then face the music afterward with a clear conscience knowing that what you did was right although technically not legal. You might not beat the felon in possession charge, but a fair-minded judge would likely give you a light sentence on that one.

    • @mhvisionzz9690
      @mhvisionzz9690 2 роки тому

      @@animeyhem9780 why go to jail for breaking the law ?

    • @1992airman
      @1992airman 2 роки тому +32

      @@mhvisionzz9690 I think it's better going to jail then having you and you're family dead. Regardless of the time and place going to jail after a self defense shooting is always a possibility. Especially if you know in the end you were in the right, going to jail for a bit shouldn't be a consideration when defending you/your family's lives.

    • @freekinfreak
      @freekinfreak 2 роки тому +9

      @@mhvisionzz9690 why die for not?

    • @animeyhem9780
      @animeyhem9780 2 роки тому +27

      @@mhvisionzz9690 because like it or not, in most states if you so much as touch a firearm as a convicted felon or otherwise prohibited person and the prosecution can prove you did so, you've just broken the law. The fact you did so under duress might, I say again might get you off on a technicality but I wouldn't bet the farm on it. Still, if my family was in danger and the only way I have to save them is using a gun and going to jail for it...choice made. At least my family would know i love them more than my freedom.

  • @treybecker5637
    @treybecker5637 2 роки тому +439

    My Dad is a felon and he shot someone who broke into his house with his wife’s gun and he went to jail for 45 days and then all charges were dismissed

    • @gensanchez9535
      @gensanchez9535 2 роки тому +16

      What state was that? Sir

    • @MrN75nokia
      @MrN75nokia 2 роки тому +18

      Your Dad was very lucky good for him

    • @treybecker5637
      @treybecker5637 2 роки тому +35

      This was in Texas back in 2006-7ish

    • @tman7390
      @tman7390 2 роки тому +1

      What state was this ?

    • @GlobalOutcast
      @GlobalOutcast 2 роки тому +19

      @@tman7390 he said texas, the comment right above yours also gives the year

  • @supergremlin6261
    @supergremlin6261 2 роки тому +363

    I’m a convicted felon, and my wife at the time had her concealed permit. We had 3 armed men break in “home invasion” my wife froze and the 3 armed people were in between my room and my kids on the other side of the house. I took a shot at the first guy and a shot at the 3rd guy. 3rd guy was hit in the chest. They arrested me for felon in possession of a firearm which eventually got dropped. But I did have to go through the legal system for everything to get worked out. And this is Florida with stand your ground law!

    • @WILD__THINGS
      @WILD__THINGS 2 роки тому +20

      ...and then you woke up.

    • @jusdon8711
      @jusdon8711 2 роки тому +7

      Good thing it wasn’t Massachusetts 🙏🏽

    • @olddave4833
      @olddave4833 2 роки тому +6

      @@allenshamon442 then you have to get it expunged in the Federal courts and Clinton put a stop to that.

    • @chuckyscutz6019
      @chuckyscutz6019 2 роки тому +2

      @@WILD__THINGS 😂😂😂😂💯

    • @heresjohnny7867
      @heresjohnny7867 2 роки тому +6

      I'm in Florida and I have been without my gun rights for over 30 years, completed my sentence 28 years and applied for a pardon in 2009 and April 2022 received a letter denying me a hearing for a pardon. My wife too I would fear would freeze if someone broke into the house.

  • @leftymac840
    @leftymac840 2 роки тому +187

    a felon who has paid his "debt" to society should get ALL his rights restored.
    also the law of NECESSITY means there is no law.

    • @TerryW251-d3c
      @TerryW251-d3c Рік тому +1

      I agree they need to do something about this law. Especially if whatever crime you committed that was charged a felony to you, and you did whatever had to and completed your sentence you should get all rights back. If your trouble was a non violent issue like having a little bit of drunks in your pocket, then definitely should get them back.

    • @SmallSpoonBrigade
      @SmallSpoonBrigade 9 місяців тому

      Most reasonable people would agree with that, the problem though is that there's a gap between when a felon is released and when they've fulfilled the obligations that they have as part of probation. That gets to be rather dicey as states may or may not require all of that portion to be completed in order to get some or all of your civil rights restored.

    • @MichaelScreamMachineEvans
      @MichaelScreamMachineEvans 9 місяців тому

      A non violent felon but a violent one no

    • @phlodel
      @phlodel 9 місяців тому

      serving prison sentences does not "Paid a debt to society." Felons incur a debt to society that they will never repay. They are not good citizens and should never be treated as such.

    • @neonjoe6180
      @neonjoe6180 8 місяців тому

      ​@MichaelScreamMachineEvans why not??
      Just let them come to my house!😂😂😂

  • @svrbr7481
    @svrbr7481 2 роки тому +740

    We need to go back to the days of giving people a firearm ,saddle, and gold piece when released from prison. Denying someone their second amendment right is unconstitutional. If they are that much of a danger to society they shouldn’t be let out.

    • @brianrich7828
      @brianrich7828 2 роки тому +24

      Exactly.

    • @joelreed8940
      @joelreed8940 2 роки тому +18

      Just give a murderer a gun huh 😂😂🤦🏼‍♂️

    • @kyle5373
      @kyle5373 2 роки тому +2

      Seriously

    • @i-10haula88
      @i-10haula88 2 роки тому +116

      @@joelreed8940 the mass majority of felons haven't killed anyone.

    • @constitutionalrepublican1611
      @constitutionalrepublican1611 2 роки тому +33

      @@joelreed8940 if their released from jail, yes.

  • @jasonhughes3587
    @jasonhughes3587 2 роки тому +312

    All humans at all times have the right to defend their life and that of their loved ones. Laws and technicalities be damned, I will never be convinced of anything different.

    • @awatchmanoftrueisrael
      @awatchmanoftrueisrael 2 роки тому +3

      Real talk

    • @Living_Legend85
      @Living_Legend85 2 роки тому +3

      Our justice system is horrid... it is all to easy to become a ‘criminal’ if you’re poor. Get pulled over get a $400 ticket you can’t pay, then get license suspended, and still having to go to work you get pulled over for no tabs and then it just snowballs getting further and further behind. Lose yourself job etc

    • @jasonhughes3587
      @jasonhughes3587 2 роки тому +1

      @@Living_Legend85 I had this exact situation happen in my 20's. Getting off work at 2:30 am it's pretty much guaranteed you will be pulled over eventually. I got pulled over twice for the light over my license plate which was working fine. No insurance cause I was broke af, so in the snowball effect my license ended up suspended. Took me 2 years to get it fixed. More to the point, I have no criminal record because I am not a criminal, it's important to keep that distinction, poor is not an excuse to be a criminal. I spent 2 years homeless before I got my crap together, in that time I never became a criminal. Accidental felonies are very rare despite what some people try to push.

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 2 роки тому

      @@Living_Legend85 You don't need a lawyer to beat unlawful tickets. After beating one where the judge refused to jail cop for lying on the stand, I had to tell him he won't live to lie in court next time. He quit and left.

    • @dylanowens7902
      @dylanowens7902 2 роки тому +4

      @@robertsmith2956 ill take things that didn't happen for $500

  • @ChrisTopheRaz
    @ChrisTopheRaz 2 роки тому +136

    I wouldn’t even consider it. The lives of my wife and kid do, did, and will always be far more important to me than any law, by any agency, anywhere.

  • @NorthFloridaAirGunner
    @NorthFloridaAirGunner 2 роки тому +22

    I say "inalienable RIGHT(not priviledge)" and "shall not be infringed" means the felon with a gun law is null and void regardless of how people feel. Their fear does not over ride someone's rights. Plus, it's much better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6 any day.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 Рік тому +2

      And article 4 section 2 paragraph 1
      The citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states.
      14th amendment section 1
      NO STATE SHALL MAKE OR ENFORCE ANY LAW WHICH SHALL ABRIDGE THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES OF CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 Рік тому

      Therefore all gun control laws are illegal and void. Under article 4 section 2 paragraph 1,2nd amendment,14th amendment section 1 no judge, attorney general, district attorney, prosecutor has any legal lawful constitutional authority or jurisdiction to enforce any gun control laws whatsoever they are all state officials.

  • @ЯковН-ю9х
    @ЯковН-ю9х 2 роки тому +41

    If you don't want a murderer access guns again then why would you let him out?
    If you let a felon out after serving his full term, why would you restrict his natural rights?

    • @earthstewardude
      @earthstewardude 7 місяців тому +1

      The legal system is so effed up!

    • @ЯковН-ю9х
      @ЯковН-ю9х 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@earthstewardude yeah absolutely. but here is the problem - it always was effed up, is and always will be. Never expect your representative in Congress to represent you in lawmaking, paradoxically. And that's when the constituion and the amendments engage the game. Rights are more important and more universal than any law or any other legal acts.

    • @Fadamaster
      @Fadamaster 7 місяців тому

      Perfectly said

    • @thebusterdog921
      @thebusterdog921 3 місяці тому

      Hmm, because you forfeited your rights to possess a firearm?

  • @HunterCO1
    @HunterCO1 2 роки тому +603

    Felons can own guns it’s a constitutional right period. The second amendment doesn’t say if the government says it’s ok. It says SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!

    • @ggggloveking9419
      @ggggloveking9419 2 роки тому +47

      @@papimaximus95 I'm sure that would cut down on the number of stabbings

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 2 роки тому

      @@papimaximus95 They HAVE, and sure enough proof they NEED them to prevent rape, and attacks by guards.
      Carbine Williams got PARDONED for making the grandchild of the M1 in prison. An he was in prison for murder.
      Mobster Dillinger made a gun in prison as well, and they let him out for his ingenuity, not charged him with having a gun in prison.

    • @undergrdsynd_4444
      @undergrdsynd_4444 2 роки тому +7

      Robbers in prison robbing prisoners prisoners turning into robbers and robbing robbers 🤔 dog eat dog world! It works , good thing I'm not in a prison somewheres

    • @allahx13davinedarklorddami72
      @allahx13davinedarklorddami72 2 роки тому +52

      No such thing as constitutional rights. These are human rights aka constitutionally *protected inheritant rights*

    • @illvisonproductionsllc
      @illvisonproductionsllc 2 роки тому +5

      Right

  • @vaexplored
    @vaexplored 2 роки тому +225

    Several states also give felons the option to have their rights restored, so they should be looking into that as well. A good friend of mine had a felony on his record from a stupid decision he made when he was 18, and a few years ago his rights were restored. He grew up, he grew into a hard working and contributing member of society, and has maintained a clean record ever since. In 2019 his rights were officially restored, and he's now a legal gun owner with a valid concealed carry permit. He has the means to protect his wife and kids, and himself of course, and his home is now safer for them all.

    • @PaulA-ok4ky
      @PaulA-ok4ky 2 роки тому +6

      Was it a violent offense?

    • @chrlsraines
      @chrlsraines 2 роки тому +9

      MOST states do, & that applies to violent offenses as well!… Although that doesn’t normally apply to “repeat” offenders.

    • @zachdevine871
      @zachdevine871 2 роки тому +6

      I think most states it's not a process to restore your rights just takes a certain sum of time. But there is a way after 2/3 of that time is up you can legally go to court and pay lots of money to restore your rights a little early. At least in Oregon.

    • @chrlsraines
      @chrlsraines 2 роки тому +5

      I know that like you said in most states written into those laws are automatic renewal of rights after certain amount of time provided no further offenses have occurred. And there are procedures to file for restoration through other means as well. I image some of the more stringent states require the use of formal procedures, however it may be dependent on the actual criminal charge as to what is required.
      It’s another one of those “check your own state & local laws” deals.

    • @jgoose7126
      @jgoose7126 2 роки тому

      Unfortunately I believe Connecticut is one of those communists states that will snatch your 2A rights away for any reason and never give them back. There are a couple of states like that also. (Illinois....)

  • @Romi.Frentescu
    @Romi.Frentescu 2 роки тому +90

    It's never illegal to defend your life no matter what you done.

    • @KushNetwork23
      @KushNetwork23 2 роки тому +5

      Law might disagree with you

    • @Romi.Frentescu
      @Romi.Frentescu 2 роки тому +1

      I've been known the break the law a time or two. Lol

    • @FreedomInc
      @FreedomInc 2 роки тому +4

      ​@@KushNetwork23 lol,coward. of the men who founded this country had your mindset there would be british flags in all of our front yards right now

    • @FreedomInc
      @FreedomInc 2 роки тому

      100%

    • @scottm3552
      @scottm3552 2 роки тому +2

      @@KushNetwork23 wrong

  • @floodx4947
    @floodx4947 Рік тому +7

    Just thought I would share my story, in response to the "just don't become a felon" to show how "difficult" that can be. (sorry, long read that i will try to keep short)
    Prior to Missouri passing their "Prop B" concealed carry law in 2003, it was unlawful to have a firearm in a vehicle, that was concealed. One evening, I was stopped by Law Enforcement. To keep the story short, I will just say that it was a legitimate stop, but it was for nothing serious. My passenger in the car, who was an employee of mine that I had only known for less than 48 hours, ended up having several warrants, as well as a litany of illegal items on him. And, he was subsequently arrested.
    After he was arrested, the officer asked me if I had anything in the car ... firearms, drugs, nuclear weapon, etc. I answered honestly that there was a handgun, and that it was in a holster attached to the center console, and it was in "plain sight".
    Now .. here is where this goes off the rails. The officer determined that since he could not see the firearm, WITHOUT BENDING OVER, that it was not in "plain sight". Had my car had a sunroof, or
    been a convertible, it would have been. But since he had to bend over to see it through the window, it was "concealed".
    I was arrested for Felony (D) Unlawful Use of a Weapon, possession of a concealed firearm in a vehicle.
    I spent $18,000 on a defense attorney, and even with absolutely NO prior criminal record (this was the first time I had ever been in handcuffs), the prosecutor would not offer a plea bargain that did not include a Felony conviction. My "choice" at that time, were to take it to trial, and risk 5+ years in prison (as a 24 year old man, with 2 small children), or, plead guilty and serve no time, but have the "Scarlet F" on my chest for the rest of my life.
    So, I did. And here I am 20 years later, in a world that has gone mad, with no way to reasonably defend or protect myself or my family.
    AND ... if you really want the "cherry on top" ... After Missouri passed the Concealed Carry law in 2003 ... the "crime" that made me a felon, is no longer a crime. Even more absurd ... I fought this is court until AFTER Prop B passed, so it was not a crime when I was found guilty of it!

  • @SmartrMelons
    @SmartrMelons Рік тому +9

    G. Gordon Liddy addressed this when he was convicted of a felony for the Watergate scandal. He was asked about defending his home using his wife's firearm. He said it was in the nightstand on her side of the bed, and he'd certainly use it if his, or wife's, life was in danger. I feel the same way. I don't think that any law should prevent a person from defending themselves. Nor would I care if it were 'against the law'.

    • @earthstewardude
      @earthstewardude Місяць тому +1

      When asked if he had any guns - G. Gordon Liddy said "no but my wife has a nice collection!"

  • @BooDamnHoo
    @BooDamnHoo 2 роки тому +158

    NOBODY loses their right of self defense ever. Unless the law is unjust and UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

    • @kentuckyrain2223
      @kentuckyrain2223 Рік тому +1

      Fact

    • @johnhalpin5204
      @johnhalpin5204 Рік тому +1

      you don't lose the right to self defense just maybe how you defend yourself

    • @BooDamnHoo
      @BooDamnHoo Рік тому +4

      @@johnhalpin5204 There can be no limit. Protecting your life isn't subject to how. Gun, knife, hammer, axe. Self defense is always a right. But in Britain you go to jail for it because you aren't citizens, you are property. SUBJECTS. Owned by your government.

    • @network263
      @network263 Рік тому

      Unless you a minorities and officers are racist kind.

    • @joezimmaro3630
      @joezimmaro3630 Рік тому

      Well the government can stop you from buying from ffls they can keep you from carrying for protection they’ll lock u up so yes they infringed upon that right long ago

  • @freedomfighter1861
    @freedomfighter1861 2 роки тому +48

    Says SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED! It’s that simple!

    • @thebusterdog921
      @thebusterdog921 3 місяці тому

      Next time you're standing before a judge as a felon is possession of a firearm, blurt out that nonsense about what it states in the 2nd amendment. And make sure you shout it out as your post implies. See how the judge reacts fool.

  • @dostres231
    @dostres231 2 роки тому +56

    Ex felon here from Commiefornia and let me tell y’all there’s resources out there that will help you reduce a felony to a misdemeanor and then expunge your record. ALL FOR FREE!!! I will for ever be so thankful and glad I could protect my family from any danger.

    • @werberderber6209
      @werberderber6209 2 роки тому +1

      I am glad you got your rights back, I am guessing you had to earn them and not you value them more than before.

    • @brazzknuckzz1619
      @brazzknuckzz1619 2 роки тому +2

      Same here, im eligible to get my record expunged now just dont know where to go, u got any resources?

    • @ljshoreslokal
      @ljshoreslokal 2 роки тому

      Congrats!! I committed my F in Commiefornia too but now I live in a different state (PNW). My F was over 20 years ago but I'm currently fighting to get it reduced then expunged and sealed to get my 2A rights back. It's expensive because I hired a lawyer, but worth it.

    • @dostres231
      @dostres231 2 роки тому +2

      @@brazzknuckzz1619 if you’re in SoCal look into Legal Aid Los Angeles or Legal Aid Orange County. I’m not sure if they have any at other places. They take care of everything and are very helpful. My probation ended 2015 and by Nov. 2018 I was cleared thank god I took care of that before all the shut downs!

    • @brazzknuckzz1619
      @brazzknuckzz1619 2 роки тому

      @@dostres231 right on ill look into it, im out of norcal, bay area. Ive got metlife looking around for me , but ill check that out

  • @ZombasticRex
    @ZombasticRex 2 роки тому +12

    Texas statute says 5 years after your conviction you are allowed to possess a firearm in your home for self-defense. I would like to see this lawyer discuss Texas law on this matter.

    • @casterakabadman805
      @casterakabadman805 2 роки тому +1

      Your good in Texas, like you said they actually respect an individual who's turned their life around. Not here in CA, they just want us to die or disappear.

    • @DonGearhart
      @DonGearhart 4 місяці тому

      So Texas statute is null and void BECAUSE it goes against the constitution.

  • @joechancio5177
    @joechancio5177 2 роки тому +17

    I always wondered this. But im not gonna hesitate to defend my family. Ill just have to let the courts figure it out.

  • @JamesSmith-fz1ip
    @JamesSmith-fz1ip 2 роки тому +40

    Who knows? With the ATF continually shifting the goalposts, we might all be felons soon.

    • @banderson4786
      @banderson4786 2 роки тому +6

      I truly believe that has been the plan for a very long time.

    • @LiveYourDream-h7e
      @LiveYourDream-h7e Рік тому +1

      You already are. Check out the book " Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds target the innocent."
      Trump is going through it now.

  • @johnbravo1005
    @johnbravo1005 2 роки тому +19

    The 2nd amendment doesn't bring up anything about felons. Felons not being able to have a firearm is unconstitutional.

  • @keithvaglienti1518
    @keithvaglienti1518 2 роки тому +51

    I can remember listening to G. Gordon Liddy's talk show on the radio and he was fond of observing that while he was prohibited from possessing firearms, Mrs. Liddy could and did own a number of guns and some of them were on his side of the bed.

    • @kellywalker8407
      @kellywalker8407 2 роки тому +8

      Brings back fond memories...lol
      "Now Mrs. Liddy owns many firearms".

    • @mrmasonry9792
      @mrmasonry9792 2 роки тому +8

      I miss the G man.........I still remain Virile, Vigorous and Potent on his behalf...

    • @mikemike8087
      @mikemike8087 2 роки тому +1

      So if I'm standing next to a police officer or someone else that has a gun I have access to it and if I needed to protect myself I will do it

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 2 роки тому

      @@mikemike8087 Plenty of case law of cops and bailiffs giving felons their guns. That is why I carry in court.

  • @jeremyaltom1303
    @jeremyaltom1303 2 роки тому +12

    That’s how most of us feel. There are a lot of “law abiding citizens “ out here out of cowardice and not out of some virtue that it’s morally wrong. Those types are the first to push for “felons” not having the right to self defense

    • @bigjohn8407
      @bigjohn8407 2 роки тому +1

      If heresay were a felony, they'd all be in the slammer.

  • @thabossdon
    @thabossdon 2 роки тому +6

    Every man has the right to protect his or herself, what has happened is due process is violated when a person is released, violating his or her rights by actually "denying them illegally" this constitutional right, meaning "ALL" the persons rights were "not" returned to him or her which is illegal & unconstitutional, upon his or her release. They cannot continue a persons punishment after the sentence is issued & served, which is what is being done. It's illegal to give a person some of there rights & not restore there rights to the fullest. Thats the most hypocritical thing to do to any man or woman. I wish folks will speak facts, even that needs to be addressed by the Supreme Court Judges. It's punishment after the fact.

  • @walkingwolf8072
    @walkingwolf8072 2 роки тому +84

    If your a felon in a state that outlaws all firearms including antique, get really good with a bow. I am not a felon, and I have bows ready for use in the home. There are a lot of advantages to the use of a bow for home defense. Number 1 is not getting stunned by the concussion from muzzle blast, number 2 is not having to worry about shooting the neighbors. The biggest it is legal for almost everybody even in states like Illinois. I was a police officer in Il. when two times juveniles used bows successfully to stop home invasions. Both invaders died from their wounds.

    • @Sainte305
      @Sainte305 2 роки тому +14

      A tactical crossbow is great for self defense in your home. I keep one and a large bowie knife in the house. Shoot, if a felon wanted a gun they could get a black powder revolver and carry that. A felon can own one in pretty much every state because they are not considered a firearm and there are ways to make ammunition that makes reloading quick and easy. Plus, old guns are just dern fun to shoot!!

    • @jackpfister1798
      @jackpfister1798 2 роки тому +14

      That's fine
      But
      Not when the criminals have a glock with promag

    • @davidrdanner4232
      @davidrdanner4232 2 роки тому +3

      Try throwing knives, do practice and practice some more!

    • @tc6818
      @tc6818 2 роки тому +10

      Isn't that why the Dukes of Hazzard were so good with a bow?

    • @joshfde
      @joshfde 2 роки тому +21

      @@jackpfister1798 if they running pro mags you should be fine lmao

  • @grendul4497
    @grendul4497 2 роки тому +52

    Retired cop here. Yes. A felon can defend themselves with a gun if they are trying to protect themselves or another from death or great bodily harm. Sure, they are not supposed to be in possession of the gun, but, that which is necessary, is legal. If you got a new cop, sure, you may end up with a charge, but it would be kicked by the DA before it even got to trial. (generally)

    • @PrezVeto
      @PrezVeto 2 роки тому

      You presumably served in one of the states with a necessity defense. He mentioned that some states don't have one of those.

    • @davidfurniss4547
      @davidfurniss4547 2 роки тому

      NOT in the Communist State Of Connecticut! They have MANY Unconstitutional LAWS on the books and the Communist Legislators are adding more every year.
      Remember: The 2nd Amendment does NOT confer any Rights to anyone! The 2nd Amendment PROHIBITS any Government Actors (SHALL NOT) from trespassing on our RIGHT to Keep (own) and Bear (CARRY) arms (weapons of OUR Choosing)!
      ANY Congress Critter or Legislators who proposes a Gun Control LAW, or VOTES for a Gun Control LAW, has VIOLATED (330 MILLION Times) the United States Constitution AND committed a minimum of 330 MILLION Federal FELONIES under 18 USC Section 241 or 242, BOTH of which are punishable by 10 years in JAIL AND a Million Dollar FINE!
      Time to start holding CongressCritters and Legislators ACCOUNTABLE!
      BURY them UNDER a JAIL!

    • @grendul4497
      @grendul4497 2 роки тому

      @@jasonjjs8947 so you're saying that if someone is trying to kill a convicted felon, they are not allowed to protect their own life? A first year public defender could sneeze that case away.
      I've arrested people for straight up murder (on video) who walked away.
      Imagine if you had access to a machine gun illegally, but used it to defend your life. It's essentially the same thing in this case.

    • @grendul4497
      @grendul4497 Рік тому +1

      @@SwampOperator you’ll never retire from being a woman.

    • @Scott-bdixon
      @Scott-bdixon Рік тому +1

      Could you please tell me if you successfully completed a felony diversion can you own a firearm?

  • @xhag1x
    @xhag1x 2 роки тому +54

    Its really nice having this lawyer on here explaining the laws more clearly

    • @USCCAOfficial
      @USCCAOfficial  2 роки тому +6

      Thanks for the support!

    • @jameshayden4821
      @jameshayden4821 2 роки тому

      What does shall not be infringed mean in the Second Amendment?
      Security in this sense means "safekeeping, defense, and protection." Infringed simply means "to trespass or violate"; in this case, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be violated. no where in the 2a do i see the word unless i feel my rights have been infringed

  • @FelixUmbra
    @FelixUmbra 2 роки тому +8

    Issue that needs to be taken into Law:
    Crime, Time served and debts around that crime are paid, At that point all rights should be completely restored as if the crime never happened.
    I don't care if they spent 30 years in prison for murder, if they have their time served, fines paid, fees returned?
    They should have the right to be a normal citizen again.

  • @joycemyers8140
    @joycemyers8140 Рік тому +1

    From personal experience with this spouses gun issues. In Indiana you can't be living in the house if your spouse has a firearm or that meets the legal definition of felon in possession of a firearm and in my case it was more than 30 multi agency Armed agents from city state and ATF that hit my house shot my dogs and arrest d me for the possession charge and threatened two life sentences. Then a month later turn me over to the sheriff for state charges. No wife's gun anymore. They destroyed it supposedly. I ended up doing a 5 yr prison sentence for not even owning a gun

  • @letsgobrandon416
    @letsgobrandon416 2 роки тому +31

    And this is why criminal records are criminal. Once a felon, always a felon is not justice. There needs to be limits, such that after x years of no repeat the record is expunged

    • @picairphotography
      @picairphotography 7 місяців тому

      That's just another example of tyranny. If I was to catch a drug charge today, what baring would that have on a crime almost 20 years ago, as drugs we're perfectly legal until 1911 as long as they were correctly labeled. The only people who we're disarmed were the ones who held office, so they wouldn't forget this is a Republic. See how far we have stayed from being a free country? Nowadays fathers lose rights to their children and are bound by epos without having ever been charged with a crime, other than a family judges opinion. I'm standing up homy.

  • @foxtrot3362
    @foxtrot3362 2 роки тому +13

    I've been nonstop binging the videos, was just watching ask an attorney when this video was posted, thanks for all the great content!!

    • @USCCAOfficial
      @USCCAOfficial  2 роки тому +3

      Thank you for the kind words! We are happy to hear you are enjoying it!

    • @ModernMountainLiving
      @ModernMountainLiving 2 роки тому

      @@USCCAOfficial What if felony menacing charge is dropped but new charge of Disorderly Conduct(use of a swear word publicly) continues the original "any weapon" restraining order for misdemeanor three year non reporting probation? Under Colorado any defense of myself or any person is a Felony. Right?

  • @beaawsome2211
    @beaawsome2211 2 роки тому +20

    My favorite line ever is always "it depends" because it's just honesty. It's basically like saying "check with your local law" because that can change and even the circumstances can be different

    • @chrlsraines
      @chrlsraines 2 роки тому +2

      Yes. Even in the same jurisdiction, w multiple cases almost exactly identical, “it will depend”. Depends on the arresting/investigating officer, the particular Prosecutor, judge, defense attorney, every factor can cause a multitude of different outcomes.

    • @---cr8nw
      @---cr8nw 2 роки тому +4

      And, sadly, enforcement of laws is more of a variable than the laws themselves. The county you're in, and the officers on scene and the district prosecutor matter FAR more than if it's actually illegal.

    • @GM8101PHX
      @GM8101PHX 2 роки тому

      @@chrlsraines Each person can access the state revised statues on any issue including the use of deadly force by a convicted felon. Some are too lazy to sit and read them and be educated on the local laws. These laws are what the courts use in determining your innocence or guilt!!! In Arizona these laws are in the Revised Statues 1300 criminal series, easy to find and read!!! No man can resist Bear spray btw!!!!

    • @GM8101PHX
      @GM8101PHX 2 роки тому

      @@---cr8nw I differ, in the end you MUST be tried in a court of law, they rely on the revised statues period, no matter what the police or prosecutor says or does!!!

    • @---cr8nw
      @---cr8nw 2 роки тому

      @@GM8101PHX, that's just dumb.
      "Officer, I realize that you're trying to be lenient here, but I demand that I be arrested, charged, and tried so that your personal opinion on whether or not I committed a crime doesn't matter, only the revised statutes." ~ Gregory Miller

  • @dangerdoberman
    @dangerdoberman Рік тому +2

    I don't feel any crime should justify anyone losing their rights once they do their time.

  • @j.okroiag9368
    @j.okroiag9368 10 місяців тому +2

    Funny how all the felons get caught with their wives guns... "No, definitely not mine, officer. That's my wife's .50 Desert Eagle..." LMFAO

  • @mtthwpnn
    @mtthwpnn 2 роки тому +25

    "Maybe, it depends" doesn't perturb me as an answer. It shows how nuanced the law can be as it relates to individual cases.

    • @jdaniel4237
      @jdaniel4237 2 роки тому +1

      Maybe, but it depends.

    • @jameshayden4821
      @jameshayden4821 2 роки тому +1

      What does shall not be infringed mean in the Second Amendment?
      Security in this sense means "safekeeping, defense, and protection." Infringed simply means "to trespass or violate"; in this case, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be violated. no where in the 2a do i see the word unless i feel my rights have been infringed

  • @IrishAmericanMcCLanahan
    @IrishAmericanMcCLanahan 2 роки тому +18

    Regardless of this situation of defending you or your family. Government has no rights to infringe on yours or mine, Second Amendment or our Constitution !
    If you get a life sentence. You lost all rights as a free citizen! If you're released and stay clean after so many years as Law Abiding Citizen to your community. You should get your all rights back!

    • @ModernMountainLiving
      @ModernMountainLiving 2 роки тому

      Colorado sees a Prohibited Person as a life sentence regardless of how much time you did.

  • @emmanuelgoldstein3682
    @emmanuelgoldstein3682 2 роки тому +40

    Felons can possess firearms in some states after a period of time has elapsed after the full discharge of their sentences. While federally illegal, the states that "allow" you to exercise your "rights" are not compelled to follow the enforcement of such illegal laws.

    • @godfreyvonnordeck2056
      @godfreyvonnordeck2056 2 роки тому +4

      What states allow this? Do you know?

    • @emmanuelgoldstein3682
      @emmanuelgoldstein3682 2 роки тому +5

      @@godfreyvonnordeck2056 I believe most states have some form of "rights" restoration for non-violent felons. Check your state's laws to be sure.

    • @godfreyvonnordeck2056
      @godfreyvonnordeck2056 2 роки тому +1

      I tried to get an expungement for a work related license but after $2000 legal fees no luck the judge denied it

    • @Sainte305
      @Sainte305 2 роки тому +9

      @@zacsdiyguns Texas is 5 years after successful completion of all convicted agreements; meaning probation/parole, fines, restitution & court fees. Alaska is immediate and, unlike Texas, you can carry your firearms outside of the home. Alaska considers it a right to survival because of how desolate much of the state is. You wouldn't want to be barred from owning a gun and run into a bear or something and be defenseless. There are other states too, but check your state for guidance.

    • @Sainte305
      @Sainte305 2 роки тому +4

      Texas is 5 years after successful completion of all convicted agreements; meaning probation/parole, fines, restitution & court fees. Alaska is immediate and, unlike Texas, you can carry your firearms outside of the home. Alaska considers it a right to survival because of how desolate much of the state is. You wouldn't want to be barred from owning a gun and run into a bear or something and be defenseless. There are other states too, but check your state for guidance.

  • @Ashmedai999
    @Ashmedai999 2 роки тому +9

    I feel that banning all felons from owning weapons is discriminatory and is by my opinion murder on the governments side for taking away someone’s right to defend themselves with a firearm and don’t try and argue they don’t need a gun to defend themselves cause what if the person trying to kill them has a gun🤷‍♂️

  • @glennbacon-u5c
    @glennbacon-u5c Рік тому +3

    In Alaska it is unlawful for a felon to knowingly reside in a dwelling where there is a firearm capable of being concealed.

  • @wod5203
    @wod5203 2 роки тому +18

    The larger question is, whether or not we can rely on the legal system for anything anymore....

  • @PumpkinDefender
    @PumpkinDefender 2 роки тому +89

    If a convicted felon cannot be trusted to possess a firearm, then they should not be released from prison.

    • @catwoman2596
      @catwoman2596 2 роки тому +3

      Valid point

    • @joeschnapps1712
      @joeschnapps1712 2 роки тому +2

      How do you determine that? Someone can be a model prisoner and tell the parole board all the right things, and go right back to crime as soon as they are released.

    • @animeyhem9780
      @animeyhem9780 2 роки тому +2

      And therein lies the problem...no one "serves" their full sentence anymore, what with parole, overcrowding of prisons, COVID emergency releases and time off for good behavior. Plus, with conditional releases you may not have your 2A rights restored until you pay restitution or fulfill other prerequisites for the restoration of your rights.
      Point being, just because you were released doesn't mean you've quite yet finished paying off your debt to society.

    • @ericschneider8524
      @ericschneider8524 2 роки тому +6

      Exactly. You are either a danger to society or you're not.

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 2 роки тому

      @@joeschnapps1712 and how is that anyone's fault but the parole boards? THEY should be charged not the felon.

  • @stevenmichaeli8472
    @stevenmichaeli8472 2 роки тому +15

    G. Gordon Liddy was once asked, "You're a felon. How can you put out all these instructional videos on different guns since you can't own any?". His reply, "Mrs. Liddy can own 36".

  • @lfreeman202
    @lfreeman202 2 роки тому +1

    You and your spouse would have to say (and stick to the story) that you only gained accessto the safe- via key or code - at the time of the break-in. The feds say, as soon as you have knowledge and access to a firearm, that you are in possession. So knowing the code and knowing a firearm is in the safe at the same time is possession in their eyes. Yet, if you have to defend yourself in an immediate threat situation such as a home invasion, you can receive the firearm from authorized person for the purpose of defending your life or the life of another. BUT, YOU BOTH WOULD HAVE TO SAY YOU ONLY GAINED THE KEY OR CODE AS THE ARMED BREAK-IN WAS OCCURRING.

  • @aydenvlogs638
    @aydenvlogs638 2 роки тому +12

    This is crazy! I’m from Connecticut and my house was broken into…almost became a home invasion. My wife had her gun license & her weapon was in her safe. Long story short I was arrested 3 days later fought the case and lost. I end up doing a year behind this. We became victims to a burglary & end up being a suspect for possession my wife legal firearm. They never followed up on looking for the suspects but open a case on me.

    • @chumlee8844
      @chumlee8844 2 роки тому +3

      So sorry. That's just wrong. We the people need to start enforcing the constitution.

    • @williamclayton9566
      @williamclayton9566 Рік тому +1

      Which is easier, hunting down the perp of your almost home invasion, or finding you on a silver platter?
      There's your answer.

  • @jimbeaux89
    @jimbeaux89 2 роки тому +51

    When I got out of the military, (12 yrs ago) I caught my girlfriend in bed with another guy. I took her $2,500 les Paul guitar, and pawned it. I was facing grand theft, which was a felony. I also got a few misdemeanors around that time, like a DUI, and disorderly conduct. Anyway, I am so thankful that the judge dropped that felony to a misdemeanor, because I now have a wife and children and quite a collection of guns to defend them and our home. I was a different person than I am now (thank you Jesus). My life would’ve been so different if she (the judge) would’ve kept that as a felony. I love my family, but I love the 2nd amendment and having the ability to defend my livelihood.

    • @nickgates4387
      @nickgates4387 2 роки тому +2

      Last time I checked a DUI is a felony not a misdemeanor. And if it’s not that’s a damn shame

    • @nameredacted1176
      @nameredacted1176 2 роки тому

      @@nickgates4387 nobody cares about the opinion of a bot who literally created a UA-cam account to be provocative. Go try to get laid or attempt showing up to work at a del taco or something. You’re gonna be second string your whole life boy.

    • @factsnotfeelingssendit5961
      @factsnotfeelingssendit5961 2 роки тому +5

      @@nickgates4387 first time DUI isn't a felony. Think it's 2nd or 3rd

    • @jordanreynolds6802
      @jordanreynolds6802 2 роки тому +1

      Better read that form closer it ask have u ever been under indictment for a crime in which the Judge could have imprisoned you for more than 2 years might wanna check with a lawyer first

    • @jordanreynolds6802
      @jordanreynolds6802 2 роки тому +1

      If u buy a new gun from a store I mean

  • @ravenconces6820
    @ravenconces6820 2 роки тому +82

    Would love to see you also talk about restoration of rights, which is another factor on people with felonies can gain access back to their right to possess a weapon potentially.

    • @JivedSonen
      @JivedSonen 2 роки тому +4

      Some felons don't have that option....some felonies are on the "zero tolerance" list and rights can NEVER be restored.... Even if the original charge had NOTHING to do with guns, voting, or international travel🤷

    • @newguy9554
      @newguy9554 2 роки тому +2

      @@JivedSonen federal felonies is a lifelong sentence. State felons depending on the states but generally 7 to ten years after the incident or completion of the sentence you can ( with a lawyer ) have the felony removed. Repeat offenders are another subject.

    • @newguy9554
      @newguy9554 2 роки тому +5

      And to be clear on the federal I feel it's unjust to put a lifelong sentence on anyone that has a federal felony that was convicted with a victimless crime that didn't involve a firearm.

    • @JivedSonen
      @JivedSonen 2 роки тому

      @@newguy9554 yes I'm fully aware of all that but there is a list of non expungable felonies, such as violent crimes like aggravated assault........ Of course they may be different for other states but I live in Tennessee

    • @FrankieJames7
      @FrankieJames7 2 роки тому

      @@JivedSonen yes that is true. I was charged with felony assault and had to fight it in jail till they reduced it to a misdemeanor, but that also included a felony meth lab conviction with a set aside agreement. Felony assaults in most states are hated by the system, so you best not do it, don't get caught, or be prepared for the jail time

  • @thepunadude
    @thepunadude 2 роки тому +12

    NOTHING IN 2A THAT SEZ A 'FELON' CANT HAVE A 'PIECE'. THAT MY FRIEND IS THE BOTTOMLINE!

  • @TakeNoShitgang444
    @TakeNoShitgang444 Рік тому +1

    I'd like to know where in the 2nd amendment it says that a felon cannot possess a firearm.What happened to "shall not be infringed"?.And isn't the constitution the supreme law of the land?

  • @ralphm6901
    @ralphm6901 2 роки тому +2

    A friend of mine has a rifle and a shotgun. He told me once that if anyone tried breaking in and got shot while doing it, his wife would definitely be holding the gun when the police showed up. Neither of them are felons, they just had a plan of action in the event of a home invasion. Regardless of who fired the gun, they'd tell the cops it was her.

  • @neverlistentome
    @neverlistentome 2 роки тому +23

    When you were discussing probation/parole officer, I was surprised you didn't mention the lower burden of proof to convict when someone is under supervision. (Preponderance of guilt vs reasonable doubt)

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 2 роки тому

      Just call your parole officer to the stand. Easy enough to prove he wasn't supervising anything.

    • @jameshayden4821
      @jameshayden4821 2 роки тому +1

      What does shall not be infringed mean in the Second Amendment?
      Security in this sense means "safekeeping, defense, and protection." Infringed simply means "to trespass or violate"; in this case, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be violated. no where in the 2a do i see the word unless i feel my rights have been infringed

    • @ModernMountainLiving
      @ModernMountainLiving 2 роки тому

      Preponderance is Only for Civil NOT Criminal Cases.

    • @neverlistentome
      @neverlistentome 2 роки тому

      @@ModernMountainLiving No it's not. When you are already on supervision, it's is the standard used to revoke. Look it up. However I should have said revoke not convict in my op.

  • @danielpadgett2831
    @danielpadgett2831 2 роки тому +10

    Why is this even a question weather your a felon or not your going to protect your family regardless of the consequences I would hope.

  • @afoot4silver800
    @afoot4silver800 2 роки тому +5

    In California you can become a felon at the stroke of a legislator’s pen and not even know it.

    • @werberderber6209
      @werberderber6209 2 роки тому

      I quit visiting Kommiefornia years ago, I take my dollars somewhere else.

  • @jayvaxquex6672
    @jayvaxquex6672 2 роки тому +2

    Buddy of mine is a convicted felon and was shot in a strip club, he pulled his gun and shot and killed the attacker. And the court dismissed the case for self defense and defense of a third party even tho he was a felon. I live in Texas. Idk how this would go down anywhere else

  • @babymonkeymoments
    @babymonkeymoments Рік тому

    18 U.S.C. 922(g) is the federal law that prohibits anyone ever convicted of any felony to ever possess any firearm either inside or outside of his home. The federal punishment for firearm possession by a felon is up to 10 years in prison.

  • @david-468
    @david-468 2 роки тому +4

    I’ve recently read texas gun law as I’m looking to move, and it says you can be a felon and buy firearms as long as it’s been 5 years from probation/prison period, and it wasnt a violent crime, which I’m not a felon but I like that law/stipulation

  • @abbottadventures8741
    @abbottadventures8741 2 роки тому +12

    i was 18 when i made my stupid mistake and stole something if it was valued at $20 less it wouldn't have been a felony and i had to wait till i was 33 to get it off my record i feel bad for the states that don't allow it to ever come off 2 years of not being a felon under my belt and my life has changed drastically some people dont understand the true challenges that it puts in your life but getting rid of my record was the best thing that ever happened to me

    • @catwoman2596
      @catwoman2596 2 роки тому +2

      That really shouldn't be a felony...imo

    • @troydeschane635
      @troydeschane635 2 роки тому +2

      Good for you I hope you keep it up.

    • @mhvisionzz9690
      @mhvisionzz9690 2 роки тому +1

      Damn u stole a slice of pizza

    • @abbottadventures8741
      @abbottadventures8741 2 роки тому +1

      @@catwoman2596 if i worked for the government it would have been called misappropriation of funds and a class b misdemeanor but because it was a store i worked at and not a government job it was class a felony theft

    • @abbottadventures8741
      @abbottadventures8741 2 роки тому +1

      @@mhvisionzz9690 lmao

  • @shawng746
    @shawng746 2 роки тому +9

    It depends... However, If I were in that situation and my family's lives were in danger, I'll be taking that chance. I will serve some time to ensure that my family is protected.

  • @mikea1893
    @mikea1893 8 місяців тому +1

    if you had a felony but it got expunged from the state or the president were do you stand (felony for weed) 20 + years ago?

  • @antonioquijas8033
    @antonioquijas8033 2 роки тому +1

    What happens when the original case you got your gun right's taken away have been dismissed and or expunged? Can that person regain gun right's again?

  • @DaveL9170
    @DaveL9170 2 роки тому +29

    Yes, there is a something called “the defense of necessity”. It basically means in lay terms that the criminal act you committed is justified because if you had not done so the outcomes would have been far worse. This is settled law in every jurisdiction.

    • @daithi1966
      @daithi1966 2 роки тому +6

      They couldn't charge you with murder for protecting yourself, but it doesn't mean they still couldn't charge you with illegally possessing the firearm.

    • @Hothenrik
      @Hothenrik 2 роки тому

      Justified criminal acts. Hmmm....sounds like what the democrats like to do, like decriminalizing what the CRIMINALS do. Just let 'em go and do whatever they want.🤨

    • @---cr8nw
      @---cr8nw 2 роки тому +3

      @@daithi1966, the point is that you can argue that you possessed the firearm out of necessity and had you not broken that law in an effort to defend yourself, you would likely be dead. The trouble comes down to access. That defense might work if, in the moment of peril, you said to your wife, "hand me your gun." It wouldn't work if you had access to the gun OUTSIDE of the moment of peril.

    • @DaveL9170
      @DaveL9170 2 роки тому +3

      @@---cr8nw and that’s why we have jury nullification

    • @jameshayden4821
      @jameshayden4821 2 роки тому +1

      What does shall not be infringed mean in the Second Amendment?
      Security in this sense means "safekeeping, defense, and protection." Infringed simply means "to trespass or violate"; in this case, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be violated. no where in the 2a do i see the word unless i feel my rights have been infringed

  • @ChristianConstitutionalist3192
    @ChristianConstitutionalist3192 2 роки тому +37

    The 2nd Amendment Protects An Individuals Right To Defend Themselves From Violent Criminals And Tyrants (Foriegn Or Domestic).
    The 2nd Amendment Also Protects An Individuals Right To Own And Carry ANY Firearm, Firearm Part, WMD, Knives, Firearm Accessory, Body Armor, And Ammunition They Want; Regardless Of Their Past (Even If The Where In Prison For A Horrible Crime).

    • @GM8101PHX
      @GM8101PHX 2 роки тому

      However State law at least for Arizona a gun friendly state states that a person convicted of a felony may not have possession of a firearm of any type. You will go to prison if caught. There are other weapons useful in warding off a person kicking your door down. Here in Arizona I have security doors on all three exits, these swing out, thus can not be kicked in. Then I have steel entry doors with solid frames using 3 inch screws to strengthen the door against forced entry, my windows have roll down shutter or impact proof steel screens securing all windows. The general construction of the house is concrete block so the walls are fine as they are. I am not a felon, but a retired law enforcement officer. I have two aluminum baseball bats to go to before my gun. My gun is a Springfield .45 ACP loaded and chambered with hollow point bullets. I have sensor controlled flood lights around the exterior of the house, just green grass that you can not hide in, and cameras feeding to a DVR that records them. I will also be buying a can of Bear Spray for outdoor use!!!! The bats and spray are lawfully possessed weapons.

    • @jameshayden4821
      @jameshayden4821 2 роки тому +2

      What does shall not be infringed mean in the Second Amendment?
      Security in this sense means "safekeeping, defense, and protection." Infringed simply means "to trespass or violate"; in this case, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be violated. no where in the 2a do i see the word unless i feel my rights have been infringed

    • @Rightly_Divided
      @Rightly_Divided 2 роки тому +2

      @@GM8101PHX Yeah well not everyone has such luxury of security

    • @jimmygrant424
      @jimmygrant424 2 роки тому +3

      @@Rightly_Divided aparently only retired cops can afford it

    • @diablo4166
      @diablo4166 2 роки тому +2

      @@GM8101PHX a cop that doesn't want to use his gun to kill someone that funny

  • @EscapeEFT
    @EscapeEFT 2 роки тому +14

    Question. Why are you still a felon if you payed your doe to society in jail?

    • @catwoman2596
      @catwoman2596 2 роки тому +4

      Because this isn't America anymore...

    • @cbbees1468
      @cbbees1468 2 роки тому

      @@catwoman2596 Well to be fair, many violent felons don't serve that much time due to Leftist DA's and judges.

    • @cbbees1468
      @cbbees1468 2 роки тому

      @@catwoman2596 Possibly, but I'm referring to the crazy situation of where you have cops playing catch and release with violent felons because Leftist DA's or judges give them lenient sentences. This is one of the reasons why a crime wave is taking over the US.

    • @godfreyvonnordeck2056
      @godfreyvonnordeck2056 2 роки тому +1

      In my case it was considered a victimless crime no jail time only community service and a $2500 fine but the judge in Maryland won’t allow an expungement

  • @kennethfrancis6209
    @kennethfrancis6209 2 роки тому +1

    Got a felony at 18 years old... now 35... PA... did time, walked off probation.. never in trouble again.. please someone help me im now in ohio state.

  • @unspokentruths6416
    @unspokentruths6416 2 роки тому +1

    If I were a felon but my wife owned a firearm, I think I would be safe and just go ahead and buy a cap and ball revolver for myself so I never have to worry about going to jail for defending my family. Keep in mind laws are different in each state but between them being considered antiques (even though they are reproductions), using black powder and them not using cartridges, federal law doesn't consider them firearms. Instead of using cartridges or smokeless powder like a modern firearm, each component has to be carried and loaded separately (the primer, black powder and projectile). There are definitely downsides to using them, they are usually just 6 shots and take forever to reload (to get around it people buy multiple cylinders, keep them loaded and switch out entire cylinder when they need more ammo), they are black powder so they get really bad fowling, they leave a massive cloud of smoke after you fire it and they aren't as powerful as modern smokeless cartridge firearms (but they are still deadly) but if it meant I could defend my family without going to jail I would deal with it. You can even get these absolutely massive airguns that fire .50-.75 caliber bullets that have enough oomph that you can hunt medium game or defend yourself with it.

  • @chrlsraines
    @chrlsraines 2 роки тому +7

    The part I just “LOVE” is the word “interpret” the law. Laws are written in PLAIN LANGUAGE so they don’t have to be “interpreted”! The law IS what the law IS.
    Having said this, there is written law, there is practiced law, & then there is interpreted law. This is one of the BIGGEST problems with our legal system.
    A thousand different people can read the same paragraph & there will be 995 different interpretations of that paragraph.

    • @molonlabe8470
      @molonlabe8470 2 роки тому +2

      Laws are written in a different language called legalese.

    • @ModernMountainLiving
      @ModernMountainLiving 2 роки тому

      @@molonlabe8470 Legalese is the use of a triple negative sentence. Nothing Plain about that but plain wrong on purpose.

  • @GunSam
    @GunSam 2 роки тому +4

    I have seen the "better things to focus on" thing before. State cops asking if my felon cousin has possession of a gun (not my gun), and not being able to prove it and being like "I don't care if he shoots YOUR guns on your property". We live in a rural area where no one is shot ever - and especially not from a felon acquiring a gun illegally, it's unheard of so why push it.

    • @davidriley6843
      @davidriley6843 2 роки тому

      You have some awesome and informative videos.

  • @Stevie8654
    @Stevie8654 2 роки тому +12

    Defending the lives of your family is the right move no matter the consequences.

  • @edsal26
    @edsal26 3 місяці тому

    When I went through recruit school we had a trooper who thought our school. He was famous for his statement “ yes you can but you better be right” or “ I don’t think so”

  • @stevemiller.
    @stevemiller. 2 роки тому +2

    Well ive been curious about traveling because if i remember right Minnesota and michigan dont recognize Wisconsin's ccw

  • @MeikoMiha
    @MeikoMiha 2 роки тому +8

    Simple, you don't have knowledge of what's in the box or the code. but under stress, you guessed the code was your wedding date and preceded to protect your family. anyone can make a educated guess

  • @terrykeever3280
    @terrykeever3280 2 роки тому +5

    In my state of NC, some jurisdictions allow felons to have black powder wealons, crossbows, and regular bow and arrows. Some don't. I've been expecting a lawsuit, but if there has been one, I haven't heard about it. But then most felons don't have money for appeals.

  • @johnchamberlain5435
    @johnchamberlain5435 2 роки тому +16

    "A well regulated militia, being necessary to a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Notice that nowhere in the Second Amendment is there any exception made regarding criminal background. Also, people change. Someone who was found guilty of a felony decades ago could very well have become quite a different person. That being said, what kind of man would stand idly by, while his family (or self, for that matter) was assaulted, because some law says he isn't allowed to do something about it? "Sorry, kids. You're on your own. The guys in the black robes have tied my hands," said no one ever.

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 2 роки тому

      Other wise every escaped slave who touched a gun fighting the Confederacy would be in jail.
      What kind of man. he ran for gov of massachusettes. Said nope not even if they were raping his wife.
      Don't think it was Tax On Gas, but same race.

    • @44icehouse
      @44icehouse 2 роки тому

      💯💯💯💯💯

  • @Pharto_Stinkus
    @Pharto_Stinkus 7 місяців тому +1

    The government doesn't have the right to tell you who you are allowed to marry (outside of age/relation), and they don't have the right to deprive a law-abiding citizen of their 2a rights. So, it seems to me that by proxie, they can't tell a felon they can't live in a house with a gun.

  • @user-tw5dk1zo3m
    @user-tw5dk1zo3m Рік тому +1

    In Tennessee if you have a DUI wreck with injuries but no deaths plead guilty to a felony to avoid jail time and get 2 years probation can you get your gun rights restored

  • @dannytravis7118
    @dannytravis7118 2 роки тому +4

    Something I would recommend checking in to is some states or jurisdictions may allow for felonies to get expunged from someone's record and they could have rights to possess a gun again. What do you know about this. I live in Kentucky and have heard that if certain criteria is met that it's possible in Kentucky. Personally I don't know or need to know I haven't committed a felony yet I'm aware of. I think it might be a video worth doing if it's true to help someone who may have had a dui and felony eluding the police conviction or something like that even more stupid just not violent. Some people could get their rights reinstated by getting their records cleared up.

  • @TheBoxingChamp01
    @TheBoxingChamp01 2 роки тому +22

    YES EVERY PERSON HAS A RIGHT TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AND FAMILIES AT THEIR HOMES, IF THE LAW DISAGREE'S WITH THAT, THAT LAW NEEDS TO CHANGE. IT IS OUR GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO PROTECT OURSELVES AND OUR FAMILIES ANYWHERE AND NO MATTER WHAT AMEN! 🙏🙏🙏

    • @ww11gunny
      @ww11gunny 2 роки тому +3

      Since god doesn't exist there can't be god given rights.

    • @TheBoxingChamp01
      @TheBoxingChamp01 2 роки тому +4

      @@ww11gunny IF GOD DIDNT EXIST, YOU WOULDNT EITHER, MY STATEMENT IS FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE COMMON SENCE. 🙏👍💯

    • @ww11gunny
      @ww11gunny 2 роки тому

      @@TheBoxingChamp01 god doesn't exist and I do so your argument is wrong.

    • @billsanders5067
      @billsanders5067 2 роки тому +1

      It is not a God given right, it is a common law right!

    • @TheBoxingChamp01
      @TheBoxingChamp01 2 роки тому +1

      @@billsanders5067 Incorrect, its from the Constitution, the Constitution was written by ideas according to The Holy Bible, do ur research, u must be a Democrat, ant God. So sad

  • @DLFerg0369
    @DLFerg0369 2 роки тому +6

    I was tired of asking my lawyer questions and getting "It depends" as an answer. So I asked him, "What is 2+2?". Well he told me, "Well, it depends..."

    • @werberderber6209
      @werberderber6209 2 роки тому +2

      it does depend, is he using standard math or common core math.

  • @Rumplestiltskin777
    @Rumplestiltskin777 2 роки тому +1

    If your a felon your wife aint even allowed to store a gun in the house

  • @lfreeman202
    @lfreeman202 2 роки тому +1

    Also, I believe a lifetime ban on gun ownership is unconstitutional. I don't see where the constitution provides for a secondary lifetime punishment outside of what your sentence says. Once your sentence is complete, all rights constitutional rights should be fully restored.

  • @JoeMama-kw4up
    @JoeMama-kw4up 2 роки тому +7

    They really need to change what a felony is cause something simple is stupid compared to some of the extreme

    • @marcusharley3064
      @marcusharley3064 2 роки тому

      Yea, I kicked a dudes car door back in 1988, and because it exceeded $500 dollars, i was labeled a felon.

  • @chrisgabbert658
    @chrisgabbert658 2 роки тому +4

    It’s funny how multiple times felons are released on the streets and the charges are dropped by a DA .

  • @TanSauNg2008
    @TanSauNg2008 2 роки тому +9

    Let try another question: Let's say I am a person in Texas, have no criminal record whatsoever. I didn't have a gun on me when a crime happened. But at that moment, a pre-convicted felon found a gun somewhere and was willing to let me use that gun to defend myself and him.
    Will I and him get into any trouble with that situation?

    • @steventanner864
      @steventanner864 2 роки тому +5

      I live in Texas and a felon. Look up the law it’s kind of different than most state’s.

    • @catwoman2596
      @catwoman2596 2 роки тому +3

      That's kinda far fetched...

    • @frankbeardsley2941
      @frankbeardsley2941 2 роки тому +4

      Who the hell cares? You use whatever is at hand.

    • @maritzanieves8317
      @maritzanieves8317 2 роки тому +1

      In Texas is different law's

    • @MrN75nokia
      @MrN75nokia 2 роки тому +1

      Let’s twist that up just a bit more

  • @HorrorFXDesigns
    @HorrorFXDesigns 8 місяців тому +1

    In Texas felons can possess and use firearms on their own property if their felony conviction was not for rape, murder, or armed robbery and their conviction date is more than 10 years old and they completed that sentence more than 5 years ago. They just cannot buy a gun, carry a gun in public, or use/possess their firearm off of their own property. There are actually a bunch of states with these laws that allow felons to use and possess firearms on their own property. Yes, technically federal law prohibits this and supercedes state law, but the federal government usually let's states handle their own firearms laws the same way they allow states to have legalized marijuana despite weed being illegal at the federal level. They just stay out of it.

    • @mathewelledge6649
      @mathewelledge6649 7 місяців тому

      This is true to an extent. Federal firearm laws supersede all state firearm laws. So every time a felon is found in possession of a gun, even in Texas on their property, they go to jail.

    • @HorrorFXDesigns
      @HorrorFXDesigns 7 місяців тому

      @mathewelledge6649 I addressed this in my original comment. Yes, federal law supercedes state law, but just like state marijuana laws that have made weed legal in that state despite marijuana being illegal at the federal level the federal government just stays out of it and let's the state handle these matters using their own state and local laws. I actually have experience with this. My brother in law, who's a convicted felon(2 felony convictions in 1998), shot a person breaking into their home with his wife's .38 back in 2015. The shooting was not only ruled justified by local law enforcement, but he also was not charged for being in possession of the firearm despite them being fully aware of his criminal history. They also never seized the firearm, and it's still in their home to this day. For a felon who meets the criteria to possess a firearm in their home in the state of Texas to be charged at the federal level the ATF or FBI would have to get involved in the case and then be extremely overzealous about enforcing federal firearms laws in that particular case. The same way the DEA won't charge a person in possession of marijuana in a state where weed is legal the same will happen in 99.9% of cases where the ATF or FBI is involved in a state level firearms case.

    • @mathewelledge6649
      @mathewelledge6649 7 місяців тому

      @@HorrorFXDesigns I have experience in this too. I was in federal prison with tons of Texans with felon in possession of a firearm. Project safe neighborhoods is a program all Texas inmates attend. It’s basically four hours of them telling you you’re going to jail if you’re even near a gun.

  • @IHWKR
    @IHWKR 2 роки тому +3

    I remember recently (within a year or so) there was that guy that was barred from firearms but used one to defend himself (I believe in his own home) and I'm pretty sure New York was charging him for murder. Absolutely abhorrent to think common sense can put you behind bars for life.

  • @teddyneil5527
    @teddyneil5527 2 роки тому +5

    Good information, I’m lucky my Record is clean but if I had to defend my family I would if I had a felony

  • @deanlovett7985
    @deanlovett7985 2 роки тому +6

    I will do anything possible in the defense of my family, including breaking the law and giving my life.

  • @AndrewR15
    @AndrewR15 2 роки тому +4

    Could you explain "Duty to Retreat laws" in a video and what you think of them, can someone get in trouble if they use lethal force?

    • @werberderber6209
      @werberderber6209 2 роки тому +1

      Duty to retreat laws suck.

    • @GM8101PHX
      @GM8101PHX 2 роки тому +1

      In Arizona we NO duty to retreat what so ever, not the room or home. If you enter my home uninvited it will not go well for the intruder, I have two aluminum baseball bats in my bedroom and getting a can of Bear Spray.

  • @leeknighton5113
    @leeknighton5113 2 роки тому +1

    Hey mr depends or Mr. maybe, does VA have this necessary law? But if I’m at the point where I’m grabbing my wife’s conceal carry weapon I’ll be willing to take the firearm 5 year mandatory sentence to protect my wife and son

  • @That1E_K1129
    @That1E_K1129 2 роки тому +1

    You have to have a pistol permit to own a pellet gun there. The gun laws are crazy in NJ.

  • @alfredhughes578
    @alfredhughes578 2 роки тому +5

    Based on the salt and pepper shaker example the felon living in the same residence as his wife, which can have legal possession of a firearm, is committing felonious possession of a firearm by living in the residence. I think he will be in deep do doo if he uses the firearm. Rather to be tried by twelve than carried by six.

    • @catwoman2596
      @catwoman2596 2 роки тому

      That was my understanding as well. I wonder how the he and the lawyer missed that????????

  • @johncox2865
    @johncox2865 2 роки тому +4

    No, Kevin. It is not possible to change the past.
    "It is what it is"? EXCUSE'A ME? What Tom has just said is that there is no criminal justice system in this country.
    For the record, I have had one minor misdemeanor in my 70 years. Nothing more.

  • @FrankieJames7
    @FrankieJames7 2 роки тому +4

    I am a convicted felon and own guns and can buy guns at the gun store. Most states have laws that allow a restoration of full rights and citizenship that will set aside your conviction after a while. I was convicted of misdemeanor assault against my neighbor and felony meth lab charges, the felony was set aside and I can buy guns. I am pretty sure, after 10 years of any felony you are not a prohibited person anymore

    • @llbmke
      @llbmke Рік тому

      Which state do you reside in, if you don't mind me asking?

  • @Ali-Muscle
    @Ali-Muscle 2 роки тому +1

    I’m not a felon….. but a felon should have a right to defend their life. If they’re that bad of a felon then they should never of gotten a out date to society. Everyone should have the legal right to defend his or herself. They should not be allowed to buy unregistered firearms . Like, a felon should be banned from buying from gun shows or an individual seller. All of their firearms should have to be registered . That should be their only restrictions.

  • @Justlooking2030
    @Justlooking2030 2 роки тому +1

    If a person has abided by all laws for 20yrs or more after completion of all sentences. How is it justified or legal to not have your Constitutional right to self-defense? Where's all the 2nd amendment folks and why hasn't anyone challenged these laws as UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the 2nd amendment. In days past you did your time move on and life continued.

  • @mattwesley4435
    @mattwesley4435 2 роки тому +5

    I have to agree with some of the comments below. if you are young and dumb, and get a felon, 10 to 15 yrs down the road it should go away.
    the actual process to a pardon is not guaranteed. you can apply for a pardon from the governor of your state. however its not guaranteed the governor will sign it. it should be streamlined more efficiently

    • @ljshoreslokal
      @ljshoreslokal 2 роки тому

      Pardons are rare, typically if your felony is a wobbler (can be reduced), then the best path is to petition a judge to have your felony reduced to a misdemeanor. If granted, you're instantly no longer a felon. You'd need to update the feds database and after a few months you should be able to pass a background check. This is what I'm currently doing myself.

  • @duncandogster
    @duncandogster 2 роки тому +5

    It would seem lawful that any American whom was in fear for their life should have use of any means to protect his life and the life of others. There is no constitutional provision to deny the 2nd Amendment to people whom are still Americans. Wouldn't the court have to expatriate the person in order to deny their constitutionally protected rights?

    • @brianrich7828
      @brianrich7828 2 роки тому

      Still pay taxes,can vote after a period of time. No reason felons can't have firearms.

  • @joshaubrey8235
    @joshaubrey8235 2 роки тому +4

    I don't care if somebody was coming for my family I would gladly do the time for felon in possession but let me just make this clear I am a law-abiding citizen

    • @brianrich7828
      @brianrich7828 2 роки тому

      I wouldn't gladly go. Injustice is still injustice.

  • @Michiganbreadboyz_bt8919
    @Michiganbreadboyz_bt8919 2 роки тому

    I am a felon and would in a heartbeat defend my family and probably go to prison later which is so sad because I’m a good working man. I’m not a thief or addict but I did have a rough childhood that stuck with me into my early adulthood 18-21. Made some mistakes and went to prison. Since getting out I have not been in any trouble and should 100% have my gun rights back. The same reason they said that special licenses for carry were shot down is the same reason felons should be able to earn their rights back. They looped it with the 14th amendment basically saying if one person can have something so should the next. End of story it is unconstitutional for felons to not be able to defend themselves