I enjoyed going through this USCCA scenario-based training. As important as the gun is when it comes to self-defense, it's also about the training and ensuring you're prepared.
Keep going and don’t be discouraged At least your not going to jail. I now have a felony and a possibility of a 5 years prison sentence for using my firearm in self defense. Also keep in mind the state and prosecutors and police will do everything in there power to make you the aggressor. You keep training.
@@USCCAOfficial I just saw a commercial from your organization talking about how you do not have the right to open carry in Florida you absolutely do just like you had the right to conceal carry anywhere in any single state it is your right as a person to bear armaments armaments was a term to describe cannons back in the day which were the most powerful military equipment that they had so in translation from what the Constitution says every single person has the right to the best military equipment including nuclear weapons! The Constitution is the supreme law of the land any law that comes in conflict with the Constitution is to be treated as null and void! Also the Constitution is treated like a contract and when it comes to contract wall the person that did not create the contract or write up the contract has all discrepancies in their favor! The Constitution said nothing about having to conceal or open carry it just says you have the right to bear arms that means in every single way shape and form including every single piece of land in America including Banks and schools! A lot of people do not know their legal rights you do not try to fight anything in the lower courts... the people who win win on appeal. In other words if you have money then you can win if you don't then screw you peon!
I already respected Colion as an intelligent, level-headed, and knowledgeable commentator, but to see him humbled by the experience makes me admire him all the more
Yes. BUT,foremost we need to change law concepts where the aggressor is seen as defendant!We need prosecutors &grand juries who apply common Sense to situations.
We need this to show how the law is gonna try and screw you for trying to defend yourself in your everyday life. "We have to determine when there's a deadly threat!" Ummm, they weren't taking her to tickle her, and the first guy already killed someone!
As a newer gun owner, I really think we need more of this. Imagining a scenario is not the same as really seeing all the different moving parts of it and all the different ways it can go wrong for you. Thank you.
Yeah right, it is really hard in such situations to do the right thing. I mean critical thinking stops for most people at this moment, when a gun is drawn all you think is to survive, so you have to train your self to process those situations even by only watching videos. Having a gun is one thing but using it is the other and training is probably arround 90%. I life in Germany and here it is even harder as a gun owner, i cannot carry a gun but i can defend my home but even in that cases where someone is breaking into your home you have to think about thousands of possible scenarios. But yeah if i am really 100% sure that my life or the life of someone i love is in danger i would shoot.
This was awesome. Staged or not, that is closer than most people will be to a violent scenario like this. It was cool to hear Colion's thought process and see how he reacted knowing how well trained he is. His indication of how there is a lot more out of your control than you think, even with all the training is definitely eye opening.
That dude is trained???????????????????? WHAT???? Wow, if that's a normal reaction for a "well trained" individual, this video should be evidence against firearm carrying.
That 2nd scenario, never draw from the drop, which Colion never did and showed excellent restraint. He waited for the perfect opportunity. Love this video, very educational. More please.
Yes and no. He at one point reacted by reaching for his firearm but hesitated, indicating to the robber that he had a gun. The robber could've easily shot and killed him. So in that regard Colin made the mistake which could've cost him his life. Never draw from the drop, wait for your opportunity. Sometimes there is no window of opportunity and you have to comply.
I stopped video at 5 min 15 sec to say, most gun laws are made to do just this! make any one with a firearm not want to use it even if you are morally right, not to use it at all! The use of force with a firearm is so narrow to use it legally and the timing in which you are lawfully permitted is just absurd! I believe this to be by design. In short most gun laws are made to do 1 thing to a law abiding citizen, make them a felon in order to take away their constitutional right to bear arms!
It's all about balance. We want people to be able to defend themselves if they *have to*, but we don't want people running around committing extrajudicial killings. Thus, we end up with strict, narrow circumstances where lethal force is justified.
Most jobs tell their employees who carry not to do anything about a robber or someone trying to hurt someone which is basically saying hey if you or anyone else gets hurts oh well. I think that's just corporate bs and why wouldn't that be a form of negligence on the company's part?
Having reviewed many hours of YT videos as part of preparation for a variety of possible self/3rd party defense scenarios, this video is, in my mind, hands (and guns) down the best of the best. Watching Colion as he interacted with perps and bystanders in a very real world setting, with all of its unavoidable messiness and multiple moving parts, was very instructive. The opportunity to review each scenario in the presence of an articulate prosecutor & defense attorney is priceless. If Colion, as a respected, practiced and knowledgeable 2A advocate, can gain new perspective from this, the impact this has on the average viewer interested in legal defense is that much greater. Bravo on a great presentation. Please consider making this a regular USCCA series! A sincere thanks to Colion, Kevin, Tom and the team for an eye-opening 18 minutes.
The important thing to take away from this is he shot eight times and Miss six. As far as Target isolation is that the bathroom behind that thin little wall he just shot through six times?
The best live scenario I've seen to date! Glad I'm a uscca member & am able to watch and support informative videos like this. Colion much props for being a part of this video. The 2and scenario seemed put your mind in a real defensive moment because of the suddenness & being 2 criminals not 1.
We truly want to see and hear more realistic training scenarios like this, especially the most common types. There is always something for us to learn from them and remember.
First scenario: Utah is a stand-your-ground state, meaning there is no duty to retreat. So just because the GF made it out the door doesn't mean Colion gave up his right to self defense, or defense of another.
It depends in other states how you articulate. We’re you covering your GF, hoping to escape but things turned deadly too fast? Is your state where you can use deadly force to protect someone you don’t know? There was 4 innocents (assumed) in room yet. Cheater, blue shirt guy behind Colion, Colion, and employee. It might be enough that you were joining with cheater to stop robber without using deadly force. But robber drew, was threat. But some states that’s not going to fly well. So don’t go into details. Run things past Lawyer before details to the Police.
Those were two great scenarios. I've trained with those guns in shoot houses before. A lot different than hitting paper at the range. It's great training to be put in a stressful situation. Everyone reacts differently. Keep the great videos coming!
I don’t see it as fun like playing a video game. Its real life scenario which is frightening to think to be in. I don’t like the thought of having to kill someone but more importantly, I don’t want to be shot, lamed or killed from not having to incapacitate the perp trying to harm or kill me. Its stressful looking at it from all angles.
It would be really informative to see a random off duty Leo go thru a couple of these with the critique. Seeing the reaction/decision making and then talking it out is a powerful learning tool.
Be real. A LEO has qualified immunity. How many bullets did they put in that unarmed man? 60? As a civilian they are going to criticize you for a shot in that back because he's still up and moving. He can turn around and shoot and you have to wait until he does that. A cop has no such restriction.
@@1stinlaw917 LEO's have absolutely no duty to act. Yeh supreme has ruled on that at least twice. Categorically they do not have to protect you under any circumstances unless you are in their custody.
Don't forget all the social media to create a character... which the prosecutor may use for or against. In the case of Colion, an anti gun prosecutor may say he trained his whole life to get in a gun fight with someone... overall this was an excellent scenario and video breakdown.
Ditto. I really wished Collin didn't say in this video "... and at that point I was just angry..." Imagine 10 yrs later [God forbid] that Collin does get into a real-life self defense shooting, and an anti-2A prosecutor is going to use what Collin said in this video against Collin, in portraying a personality/character...
@@reallifeengineer7214 You’d actually be surprised how uninformed and uneducated a prosecutor is when it comes to guns. I doubt they notice to be honest it’s nothing.
These role play scenarios are helpful to my mental training. Even though I am not going thru it myself, they help me consider different factors I may run in to so I can think how to respond before the situation arises. Don't know how I'll react until it happens, these help prepare as much as I can.
I was a victim in an armed robbery and I can totally relate to Colion's helplessness/anger/frustration emotion. You're so angry but there's nothing you can do. I was unarmed at the time. Maybe for that specific instance, it was a good thing. They only took wallets and jewelry and then left. While they were using guns to intimidate people, it might be argued that they didn't pose a deadly threat. Fortunately it all worked out. No one was hurt and the criminals were later caught. Interesting note: When the investigator asked me to describe the gun the bad guy pointed at me, I told him the man was holding a howitzer. Because when your on the wrong end of a gun, your eyes get wide and all you see it that barrel.
2 attorneys were part of this demo, (Colion Noir and Tom Grieve) and neither one commented that Colion should not have answered the question about how many shots he fired. That's the point of the legal coverage offered by USCCA: Inform the police in the most raw and short sentences that you needed to defend your life against criminal deadly assault. Period. Then inform them that you will cooperate once you speak to your attorney who would coach you about NOT trapping yourself with specific questions like how many shots were fired. Neither attorney saw that; they were too intent on showing Colion the mistake he made without pointing out how to correct it. Kevin representing USCCA should have also caught that.
This was a FILMED staged event, which it's main purpose was to inform us: the viewers. Of course in real life you're not going to say how many shots you fired, if you fired shots, or what your name is because as soon as the "authorities" show up, you STFU until YOUR attorney shows up. But that's what this video, HOPEFULLY, made everyone understand by proving that after a low stress (can you imagine a high stress) fatal situation where you shot some one up, YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE F YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, so that's why you/me/everyone needs to STFU until your attorney gets there. Remember, LEO gets 72HRS!!! of rest time after a shooting to get "their story" straight for this reason. take a wild guess how many hours we get?!
Are you serious? That was literally the first thing they mentioned. Kevin asked Colion how many times he fired. Colion answered "3", but he really fired 8 times. Then Kevin talked about answering questions like that without an attorney.
@@rick467 they could have articulated it better by saying to use your 5th correctly and not give a statement outside of “I feared for my life or the life of others and would like my attorney before answering any further questions.”
Great example on a legal point of view, but we need more videos like this one so all people that respect the rules have a better understanding what to do in this situation.... well done 👍👍👍👍
I can’t express how much I truly hope I never have to use my firearm in self defense or the defense of others. That is why we carry. For the possibility. But man I really hope I never have to. I hope to prove right all those people who say “ you don’t need a gun, you’ll never be in a situation where you need to use one”
I feel the same way. BUT: I wouldn’t hesitate for a second if I felt my life, or a loved one was in a life, or death situation. As a police officer would say: “ I was in fear for my life “, and do what was necessary to protect myself.
I carried for 5 years hoping I wouldn’t have to use it until the day came unexpectedly when I had to. Even though I was justified it still haunts me every day knowing that it could happen again.
USCCA, please make more live scenario videos like this one. It was cool to see Colion Noir's reaction in these scenarios. Maybe you should look into seeing if other popular UA-camrs such as Hickok 45 or Massad Ayoob, ect. would want to be put through scenarios as well.
Great scenarios. Yes, more please. Also, using Colion Noir was an added bonus for me. I watch all his videos and he is the voice of so many. Thanks for all you guys do at USCCA.
The prosecutor will not overlook the fact that Colion was wearing a USCCA shirt, a potential clue that Colion was eager to fight, shoot and then defend himself with a "Lawyer in a Box". Takeaway: Don't wear 2nd Amendment shirts, i.e."Protected by John Moses Browning", etc. When carrying concealed wear a Dad or Mom sweatshirt and no 2nd Amendment hats or bumper stickers, etc. Prosecutors get re-elected on percentage of won cases. They DO NOT honor your 1st Amendment right to wear a 2nd Amendment T-shirt, they will use it as evidence of propensity to kill. Full Disclosure: I'm not a lawyer, I'm a USCCA card carrying Dad.
Ladies and gentlemen great job love this love to see more of this. So much information goes into all this it's amazing how seconds could mean, life or death for you or for your loved ones. or a law-abiding citizen stay blessed stay safe be safe thank you for this great video
Scenario 1: Who drew his weapon first? If they guy that was having an argument with his GF/wife did, and the "bad guy" drew in self defense, then Colin may have fired on a guy that was just defending himself. Even though the "bad guy" was commiting a crime. Senerio 2: I think he did the best he could in the scenario. Great job
But isn't "self-defense" ruled out if your act of committing a crime is the underlying cause of the situation? Basically, you go in and are committing a robbery. You cannot, then, claim self-defense if someone draws a gun on you. They would not have drawn, if you weren't committing a crime to begin with. Also, the simple fact that you were in possession of a gun, during the commission of a crime, means it was a deadly-force incident on your part.
@@MSgt_D Did you watch the video? They went over that. Basically the robber has the right to self defence because he was not a threat to anyone's life until the other customer drew a gun on him. He was making verbal demands and escalated to yelling first, you cant shoot someone for verbal threats. This was an interesting scenario because its lose lose, Colion was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Colion either shoots the robber who is acting in self defence and is tried as a murderer or he shoots the other customer in defence of the robber and is either shot by the robber or maybe tried as an accomplice in the robbery.
@@huffabubba7041 Yes, I watched the video. I live in Texas. I am NOT a lawyer. Under the Texas penal code, using deadly force in "self-defense" is not justified if the person using deadly force is in the act of committing a crime greater than a Class 3 Misdemeanor. In this scenario, the person was committing a 1st Degree Felony; i.e., an aggravated robbery.....a robbery while exhibiting a deadly weapon. Further, a person is justified in using deadly force: when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary: to prevent the other's imminent commission of aggravated robbery. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect a third person if: the actor reasonably believes that his intervention is immediately necessary to protect the third person.
@@MSgt_D Interesting, it makes sense that things would work that way in Texas. Here in Colorado we have more restrictions on when we can and cant use force and criminals have more protection.
What about red light incidents and road rage? I had someone follow my neighbor home over a driving incident and he was getting violent and angry. I was just a neighbor. We live in the country. It's like little cottages on a river. So there's a few neighbors. We all watch out for each other. very rare anything happens. But from time time we'll have a small incident. But I feel like road rage and red lights are getting deadly. What about people coming up to your car. Like a few people. Gangs are real.
@LuisB: As a disabled person myself, you pose a valid and thoughtful question. As someone also retired from working in criminal law (defense), my thoughts or response would be as follows: - As a disabled person (specifically with mobility limitations as in your question), the person using, or demonstrating capability to use deadly force would still have his/her actions evaluated by the imminent, deadly threat standard and the “rational, reasonable person” response in viewing the defender’s actions. The disabled person must still demonstrate that at the time he/she employed lethal force it was legally justified by virtue of imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to the defender or a third party. And his/her actions in using deadly force must have been reasonable. (I.e.: bad guy is laying face down after 1-2 rounds, but defender mag. dumps the attacker. A DA or Grand Jury panel is likely to view shots 1 and 2 as reasonable (assuming deadly threat), but discharge of rounds 3-15 as UNreasonable, possibly leading to changes. The disabled status of the defender is part of the totality of circumstances review, which should be done. Obviously a mobility limited, disabled person cannot flee in the same manner as an able bodied individual, and this should be taken into account. It’s not a justification for an otherwise unreasonable use-of-force, but it’s also a factor limiting the disabled person’s/defender’s options, and may mitigate toward a finding that the use-of-force was justified. That’s all just my opinion, based upon the laws in my state and my experiences. Others may disagree and each use-of-force incident, whether LE or civilian should be investigated independently and without bias (in a perfect world anyway). Be well.
I took a full day 8hr Simunition Scenario training taught by ret LE and it was by far the best training I've received. You never get second chances in real life. So valuable.
Really cool training. I have to say that these random scenarios really make you look at your areas and spaces you enter on daily basis and see them more differently. Personally I look for corners that's a little hidden but I still have a good view of the room. If I can't get where I want then I want to at least have a good view of the door. Not always able too but I try. I remember the story of how wild Bill Hickok was shot in the back.
This was great so much to learn from this. Would you guys mind doing another training scenario but this time have the good guy carry without one in the chamber. That way we can see the draw backs of that.
I keep my head on a swivel and constantly run scenarios in my head in different situations but running them in your head doesn’t compare to this type of training. I would love to do this training course! Training and preparedness is key to survival!!
The problem with running scenarios in your head is, you create a script. Then when something happens that doesn't follow the script, it takes a second to adjust.
The question we have to ask our prosecutors is … when will criminals stop being protected class of citizens!!! First scenario was absolutely a deadly force encounter until the bad guy leaves… I think we as a society need to be much much harder on the prosecutes to stop abusing their roles to gain political points!
Everyone in the coffee shop needs to decide if they are willing to rely on the bad guy's mercy to not kill them. Once someone draws a weapon and is acting aggressively, that is the decision you need to make.
Enjoy the videos. I understand the purpose of the video, Personally it feels slightly to "staged". However, what this entire thing is about is drastically important and knowledgeable information. Its nice to see Tom really play deep into the eyes of his former prosecutor days
I was thinking the same thing but this one specifically i think did a great job in presenting the trainee with a truly unexpected scenario that they had to react to in real time.
Although it may feel staged, the adrenaline and muscle memory are very real (which is what tends to get in the way in these incidents). Notice Colion reaching for a non existent mag reload at 1:46. His body thought it was real and that's the most important part I'd say. two cents.
I agree. I have a theory it’s because as a job cops deal with shootings all the time, and have been working with the judicial system for decades. They’ve had time to give themselves a buffer to be able to not overthink deadly situations and react. Who knows tho. It sucks for us civilians.
It IS that simple for common citizens. That is the requirement for deadly force for citizens as well. Reasonable fear that your life was in grave and immediate danger.
2nd scenario taught me another lesson....keep your wallet in the opposite pocket of your concealed piece (for me this will me hard to adapt) but what if they would have seen his firearm when he went for his wallet?
Very well thought out and very well done. It was very interesting and informative. Yes a gun in hand is a very effective tool but the most powerful tool you have is your mind because the ability to process what is happening and be able to make a split second judgement call is what it boils down to. I got so many chills in the 2nd scenario when colion hopped up and defend his lady and closed the distance between himself and perp. It was so well done! When it comes to human reaction so much can happen especially with adrenaline going.
This was, hands down, the best educational video I've seen in the gun community!!!!!!! I watch a hand full of gun community UA-cam channels, and found this to be even better than the cc video break downs. This would be a very helpful series with different guests from the gun community, like Donut Operator as a former officer, or Matt from demoRanch as a private citizen gun enthusiast , just to see the different mind set when caught is these scenarios. Colion was awesome as usual !! I wish there was a place that used scenarios like these for training. I can't express what a great idea this was Kevin
I'm watching this for the first time and it's been a year later! I actually conduct similar training as an armed officer in the state of Texas. It's really interesting that we as "law abiding citizens", have to justify our ability to defend ourselves and others, while witnessing a crime or felony. It's been a very real check to me and the other officers I work with on our approach, demeanor, and conduct even when the aggressive situation has been placed on us! Thanks for this video and I would love to see more!
Thank you so much for this. This is exactly the type of content / training I am looking for. Love the recap afterwards. Please post more scenarios. Thank you again!
This is worth saying since they already talked about how important to count your shots accurately but it's also important skill for a skilled gunfighter because not knowing when you're out of bullets will get you killed!!
I really miss these they bring a lot of the training to real life scenarios . stops you and makes you think about it and how would i have done it. Thank you all for this.
I had to pull out recently in self defense. Of course the "bad couple" falsely testified & I was locked up. Costing me thousands; while they laughed as they drove away.
I love this vedio . I wish I could take classes that have this sort of training. It's so much more realistic . I believe this sort of training would really make people get a better understanding of the reality of it.
I would love to have some training like this. I have always had the mindset that I know exactly what I would do. Realistically, there are sooooo many things going on and its happening fast. These are life ending decisions, whether it's a death or life in prison. I loved this video and will be reaching out in my community to see if there are classes like this for the wife an I. Thanks for the video.
As a long time gun owner, I believe to possess sufficient training and I am aware of my 'level of 'skill' with handling, [accuracy and safety]. I've had dreams of "what if" and "how I would react if" **imagine a situation where I chose to stop the threat of imminent danger to my partner... I actually broke out into tears after hearing Colion's recount of his thoughts and emotions..... I cried really hard I'm 63 yrs old and treasure, respect, and train to 'deserve' owning my hand guns. BUT truly in my heart hope I never have to experience play possum or save my partner's [or appropriately any other person] life. Thank you for a Frightening refresher of what my Dad instilled in me 50 yrs ago when I first fired a weapon. "Fire your weapon at someone and the danger might stop...but for you everything has just begun". "Know what you're doing when there's no time to think twice"
OMG I love videos like this going into depth in the detail about a case scenario that could happen and explaining all possible scenarios thank you all so much
Lets give the prosecutor a gun in these scenarios and evaluate what he did or didn't do wrong. It's easy to judge somebody actions until they have to go thru it themselves. I will love to see that video created. Great job on this video Colion & USCCA!
Love this i would love to actually do this type of training. But honestly it doesn't matter as much where you shoot someone it's why you shot someone. An the shot to the back in the first scenerio can actually be very well explained.
I haven’t listened to your answer yet but my answer is when a person fears on immediate danger that would result in harm to themselves or their loved ones, or their abode. This could include a stranger if you are certain the person in danger is the good guy. For me personally the point I would be in danger might be before someone else would be. I am female, in my 60s, overweight, with bad knees and a heart condition, so running very far at all is not a valid option for me.
EXCELLENT! Thanks so much for this, I learned a lot; & seeing even Colion affected by the stress of a simulation...Yeh we ALL need clearer heads when carrying!
Thnk about the 4 safety rules of fire arms... treat all as though they are loaded, never point a weapon unless you are prepared to destroy your target, never put your finger on the trigger unless you are full prepared to destroy your target. SO, when someone has a weapon and displays it , see #1. they point it at you or a person, #2, and they have their finger on the trigger, #3. how long will you wait?
I posted this on Colion Noir's youtube.... Excellent video. I think you and the USCCA team should do more of these. The combination of video break down by Tom as defense and prosecuting attorney and you, an attorney with knowledge and firearms training in scenarios really makes one think . All I can think of is there is never enough firearms training and equally enough knowledge of the law in the state one resides. Thanks..
One thing needs to be pointed out for home self defense situations: I've seen people with signs like: "TRESPASSERS WILL BE SHOT -- SURVIVORS WILL BE SHOT AGAIN". If you ever need to shoot somebody in self defense, that sort of sign will never help your case... it can only hurt you.
At 10:09 blue shirt had no vest on and 10:10 he did. Also bad guy with the backpack had no vest and then a vest on. TV magic! That said, I'd like if they could've addressed if I was to shoot right after the cashier was shot (if an opportunity was present), was that the "correct" thing?
Want more Realistic Training Scenarios like this?
yes please! this was fantastic!
Yes
Hell yes
YES!!!!!!!
Yes please! This was most excellent and very educational. 👍
I enjoyed going through this USCCA scenario-based training. As important as the gun is when it comes to self-defense, it's also about the training and ensuring you're prepared.
On the first one you would of went to jail
Thank you Colion for doing this. But I didn't hear you say "Everyone should have an AR-15." :-/
Don’t worry you took him down Texas style
Keep going and don’t be discouraged
At least your not going to jail.
I now have a felony and a possibility of a 5 years prison sentence for using my firearm in self defense.
Also keep in mind the state and prosecutors and police will do everything in there power to make you the aggressor.
You keep training.
Always enjoyed the content Colion. Keep it coming. I can always count on you for a quality point of view about current issues.
This is a lot more realistic that simply talking about a scenario. I feel much better informed now- thanks tons!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Excellent demonstration needs to be required for all concealed carriers in the perspective state. SC, I would be justified in discharging my weapon.
@@USCCAOfficial I just saw a commercial from your organization talking about how you do not have the right to open carry in Florida you absolutely do just like you had the right to conceal carry anywhere in any single state it is your right as a person to bear armaments armaments was a term to describe cannons back in the day which were the most powerful military equipment that they had so in translation from what the Constitution says every single person has the right to the best military equipment including nuclear weapons! The Constitution is the supreme law of the land any law that comes in conflict with the Constitution is to be treated as null and void! Also the Constitution is treated like a contract and when it comes to contract wall the person that did not create the contract or write up the contract has all discrepancies in their favor! The Constitution said nothing about having to conceal or open carry it just says you have the right to bear arms that means in every single way shape and form including every single piece of land in America including Banks and schools! A lot of people do not know their legal rights you do not try to fight anything in the lower courts... the people who win win on appeal. In other words if you have money then you can win if you don't then screw you peon!
I already respected Colion as an intelligent, level-headed, and knowledgeable commentator, but to see him humbled by the experience makes me admire him all the more
Exactly you can tell Colion is a great guy very knowledgeable
We need more of this to learn the law in action
Hit that subscribe button and turn on notifications. We are posting 1 video every day for the next 60 DAYS!
Yes. BUT,foremost we need to change law concepts where the aggressor is seen as defendant!We need prosecutors &grand juries who apply common Sense to situations.
We need this to show how the law is gonna try and screw you for trying to defend yourself in your everyday life. "We have to determine when there's a deadly threat!" Ummm, they weren't taking her to tickle her, and the first guy already killed someone!
@@USCCAOfficial This should be done for qualifying for conceal carry. At least watching these types of scenarios and really learning about them.
As a newer gun owner, I really think we need more of this. Imagining a scenario is not the same as really seeing all the different moving parts of it and all the different ways it can go wrong for you. Thank you.
Yeah right, it is really hard in such situations to do the right thing. I mean critical thinking stops for most people at this moment, when a gun is drawn all you think is to survive, so you have to train your self to process those situations even by only watching videos. Having a gun is one thing but using it is the other and training is probably arround 90%. I life in Germany and here it is even harder as a gun owner, i cannot carry a gun but i can defend my home but even in that cases where someone is breaking into your home you have to think about thousands of possible scenarios. But yeah if i am really 100% sure that my life or the life of someone i love is in danger i would shoot.
*ALL Conceal Carry Training MUST HAVE scenario based training like this.*
This was awesome. Staged or not, that is closer than most people will be to a violent scenario like this. It was cool to hear Colion's thought process and see how he reacted knowing how well trained he is. His indication of how there is a lot more out of your control than you think, even with all the training is definitely eye opening.
"staged or not"?
@@AshDub86 Yes, obviously this was a staged incident in a controlled environment. But regardless of that fact, it was still educational.
That dude is trained???????????????????? WHAT????
Wow, if that's a normal reaction for a "well trained" individual, this video should be evidence against firearm carrying.
That 2nd scenario, never draw from the drop, which Colion never did and showed excellent restraint. He waited for the perfect opportunity. Love this video, very educational. More please.
But he telegraphed that he had a gun. Why wouldn't the robber take Colion's gun ?
Yes and no. He at one point reacted by reaching for his firearm but hesitated, indicating to the robber that he had a gun. The robber could've easily shot and killed him. So in that regard Colin made the mistake which could've cost him his life. Never draw from the drop, wait for your opportunity. Sometimes there is no window of opportunity and you have to comply.
@@adamgardener8624 Good way to catch a bullet
OK, this scenario was GREAT!!!! I love the REAL responses! Watch the facial expressions. EXCELLENT USCCA!
Thanks for the support Scott!
I stopped video at 5 min 15 sec to say, most gun laws are made to do just this! make any one with a firearm not want to use it even if you are morally right, not to use it at all! The use of force with a firearm is so narrow to use it legally and the timing in which you are lawfully permitted is just absurd! I believe this to be by design. In short most gun laws are made to do 1 thing to a law abiding citizen, make them a felon in order to take away their constitutional right to bear arms!
Not in Florida lol
@@dl30wpb Kentucky too lol. We're a stand your ground state as well haha.
It's all about balance. We want people to be able to defend themselves if they *have to*, but we don't want people running around committing extrajudicial killings. Thus, we end up with strict, narrow circumstances where lethal force is justified.
Most jobs tell their employees who carry not to do anything about a robber or someone trying to hurt someone which is basically saying hey if you or anyone else gets hurts oh well. I think that's just corporate bs and why wouldn't that be a form of negligence on the company's part?
There should be absolutely no duty to flee. If someone shoots someone committing a crime with a gun, fair game.
Second scenario: Correct, never draw from the drop. Feign compliance until there is the opportunity for a surreptitious draw. Well done by Colion.
Having reviewed many hours of YT videos as part of preparation for a variety of possible self/3rd party defense scenarios, this video is, in my mind, hands (and guns) down the best of the best.
Watching Colion as he interacted with perps and bystanders in a very real world setting, with all of its unavoidable messiness and multiple moving parts, was very instructive.
The opportunity to review each scenario in the presence of an articulate prosecutor & defense attorney is priceless.
If Colion, as a respected, practiced and knowledgeable 2A advocate, can gain new perspective from this, the impact this has on the average viewer interested in legal defense is that much greater.
Bravo on a great presentation. Please consider making this a regular USCCA series!
A sincere thanks to Colion, Kevin, Tom and the team for an eye-opening 18 minutes.
Look up - first person defender - if you have not saw these before
The important thing to take away from this is he shot eight times and Miss six. As far as Target isolation is that the bathroom behind that thin little wall he just shot through six times?
The best live scenario I've seen to date! Glad I'm a uscca member & am able to watch and support informative videos like this. Colion much props for being a part of this video. The 2and scenario seemed put your mind in a real defensive moment because of the suddenness & being 2 criminals not 1.
We truly want to see and hear more realistic training scenarios like this, especially the most common types. There is always something for us to learn from them and remember.
First scenario: Utah is a stand-your-ground state, meaning there is no duty to retreat. So just because the GF made it out the door doesn't mean Colion gave up his right to self defense, or defense of another.
It depends in other states how you articulate. We’re you covering your GF, hoping to escape but things turned deadly too fast? Is your state where you can use deadly force to protect someone you don’t know? There was 4 innocents (assumed) in room yet. Cheater, blue shirt guy behind Colion, Colion, and employee. It might be enough that you were joining with cheater to stop robber without using deadly force. But robber drew, was threat. But some states that’s not going to fly well. So don’t go into details. Run things past Lawyer before details to the Police.
Those were two great scenarios. I've trained with those guns in shoot houses before. A lot different than hitting paper at the range. It's great training to be put in a stressful situation. Everyone reacts differently. Keep the great videos coming!
Absolutely fantastic video. Please do more of these.
bruh this looks so fun and interactive. It would definitely be good practice for self defense scenarios
Thanks for the support!
@@USCCAOfficial hell yea no problem
I don’t see it as fun like playing a video game. Its real life scenario which is frightening to think to be in. I don’t like the thought of having to kill someone but more importantly, I don’t want to be shot, lamed or killed from not having to incapacitate the perp trying to harm or kill me. Its stressful looking at it from all angles.
@@soulbreeda okay I understand that but you can still have fun even when the training exercise is serious bruh
It would be really informative to see a random off duty Leo go thru a couple of these with the critique. Seeing the reaction/decision making and then talking it out is a powerful learning tool.
Put a hand sanitizer dispenser on the wall and see if they use it
B. Meyrs, smart idea.
Be real. A LEO has qualified immunity. How many bullets did they put in that unarmed man? 60? As a civilian they are going to criticize you for a shot in that back because he's still up and moving. He can turn around and shoot and you have to wait until he does that. A cop has no such restriction.
Civilians and LEOS are scrutinized different ...LEOS have the duty to act...civilians can escape if they choose.
@@1stinlaw917 LEO's have absolutely no duty to act. Yeh supreme has ruled on that at least twice. Categorically they do not have to protect you under any circumstances unless you are in their custody.
Don't forget all the social media to create a character... which the prosecutor may use for or against. In the case of Colion, an anti gun prosecutor may say he trained his whole life to get in a gun fight with someone... overall this was an excellent scenario and video breakdown.
I hope he does more of the these videos then lol.
I always think that about guntubers
Not really it all depends on the situation. I’ve been through this (not fun) my training was never mentioned.
Ditto. I really wished Collin didn't say in this video "... and at that point I was just angry..."
Imagine 10 yrs later [God forbid] that Collin does get into a real-life self defense shooting, and an anti-2A prosecutor is going to use what Collin said in this video against Collin, in portraying a personality/character...
@@reallifeengineer7214 You’d actually be surprised how uninformed and uneducated a prosecutor is when it comes to guns. I doubt they notice to be honest it’s nothing.
I watched this video earlier on Colion Noir’s channel and right after the video I went and signed me & my wife up for USCCA.
These role play scenarios are helpful to my mental training. Even though I am not going thru it myself, they help me consider different factors I may run in to so I can think how to respond before the situation arises. Don't know how I'll react until it happens, these help prepare as much as I can.
We need more and more of these training scenarios, people can never be educated enough on this topic. Thank you for the great video!
I was a victim in an armed robbery and I can totally relate to Colion's helplessness/anger/frustration emotion. You're so angry but there's nothing you can do. I was unarmed at the time. Maybe for that specific instance, it was a good thing. They only took wallets and jewelry and then left. While they were using guns to intimidate people, it might be argued that they didn't pose a deadly threat. Fortunately it all worked out. No one was hurt and the criminals were later caught.
Interesting note: When the investigator asked me to describe the gun the bad guy pointed at me, I told him the man was holding a howitzer. Because when your on the wrong end of a gun, your eyes get wide and all you see it that barrel.
2 attorneys were part of this demo, (Colion Noir and Tom Grieve) and neither one commented that Colion should not have answered the question about how many shots he fired. That's the point of the legal coverage offered by USCCA: Inform the police in the most raw and short sentences that you needed to defend your life against criminal deadly assault. Period. Then inform them that you will cooperate once you speak to your attorney who would coach you about NOT trapping yourself with specific questions like how many shots were fired. Neither attorney saw that; they were too intent on showing Colion the mistake he made without pointing out how to correct it. Kevin representing USCCA should have also caught that.
This was a FILMED staged event, which it's main purpose was to inform us: the viewers.
Of course in real life you're not going to say how many shots you fired, if you fired shots, or what your name is because as soon as the "authorities" show up, you STFU until YOUR attorney shows up.
But that's what this video, HOPEFULLY, made everyone understand by proving that after a low stress (can you imagine a high stress) fatal situation where you shot some one up, YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE F YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, so that's why you/me/everyone needs to STFU until your attorney gets there.
Remember, LEO gets 72HRS!!! of rest time after a shooting to get "their story" straight for this reason.
take a wild guess how many hours we get?!
Are you serious? That was literally the first thing they mentioned. Kevin asked Colion how many times he fired. Colion answered "3", but he really fired 8 times. Then Kevin talked about answering questions like that without an attorney.
@@rick467 they could have articulated it better by saying to use your 5th correctly and not give a statement outside of “I feared for my life or the life of others and would like my attorney before answering any further questions.”
@@rick467 but lying about it makes it worse... The best bet is to not answer or just say idk ...
@@rick467 thats the thing when asked he answered immediately. And he got it wrong. So it was best not to answer. But nobody said that out loud.
Great example on a legal point of view, but we need more videos like this one so all people that respect the rules have a better understanding what to do in this situation.... well done 👍👍👍👍
When the prosecution loses their case against Colion, they should go to jail too, for trying to protect criminals on some B.S. technicalities.
Send the lawmakers who made n signed the laws liable too
@@SRP3572 Accountability... what a novel concept!
You make too much sense, so you'll never be a profitable Lawyer.
Agreed!
That's literally their job, my guy. A lawyer that acts against his client breaks down the very principle of law and order.
I can’t express how much I truly hope I never have to use my firearm in self defense or the defense of others. That is why we carry. For the possibility. But man I really hope I never have to. I hope to prove right all those people who say “ you don’t need a gun, you’ll never be in a situation where you need to use one”
I feel the same way. BUT: I wouldn’t hesitate for a second if I felt my life, or a loved one was in a life, or death situation. As a police officer would say: “ I was in fear for my life “, and do what was necessary to protect myself.
I carried for 5 years hoping I wouldn’t have to use it until the day came unexpectedly when I had to. Even though I was justified it still haunts me every day knowing that it could happen again.
USCCA, please make more live scenario videos like this one. It was cool to see Colion Noir's reaction in these scenarios. Maybe you should look into seeing if other popular UA-camrs such as Hickok 45 or Massad Ayoob, ect. would want to be put through scenarios as well.
Great scenarios. Yes, more please. Also, using Colion Noir was an added bonus for me. I watch all his videos and he is the voice of so many.
Thanks for all you guys do at USCCA.
The prosecutor will not overlook the fact that Colion was wearing a USCCA shirt, a potential clue that Colion was eager to fight, shoot and then defend himself with a "Lawyer in a Box". Takeaway: Don't wear 2nd Amendment shirts, i.e."Protected by John Moses Browning", etc. When carrying concealed wear a Dad or Mom sweatshirt and no 2nd Amendment hats or bumper stickers, etc. Prosecutors get re-elected on percentage of won cases. They DO NOT honor your 1st Amendment right to wear a 2nd Amendment T-shirt, they will use it as evidence of propensity to kill.
Full Disclosure: I'm not a lawyer, I'm a USCCA card carrying Dad.
Just the fact that this video has to be made and law abiding gun owners need to get insurance like USCCA shows the system is unjust and a joke.
Ladies and gentlemen great job love this love to see more of this. So much information goes into all this it's amazing how seconds could mean, life or death for you or for your loved ones. or a law-abiding citizen stay blessed stay safe be safe thank you for this great video
Scenario 1: Who drew his weapon first? If they guy that was having an argument with his GF/wife did, and the "bad guy" drew in self defense, then Colin may have fired on a guy that was just defending himself. Even though the "bad guy" was commiting a crime.
Senerio 2: I think he did the best he could in the scenario. Great job
Cheater boyfriend definitely escalated the situation.
But isn't "self-defense" ruled out if your act of committing a crime is the underlying cause of the situation?
Basically, you go in and are committing a robbery. You cannot, then, claim self-defense if someone draws a gun on you. They would not have drawn, if you weren't committing a crime to begin with.
Also, the simple fact that you were in possession of a gun, during the commission of a crime, means it was a deadly-force incident on your part.
@@MSgt_D Did you watch the video? They went over that. Basically the robber has the right to self defence because he was not a threat to anyone's life until the other customer drew a gun on him. He was making verbal demands and escalated to yelling first, you cant shoot someone for verbal threats. This was an interesting scenario because its lose lose, Colion was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Colion either shoots the robber who is acting in self defence and is tried as a murderer or he shoots the other customer in defence of the robber and is either shot by the robber or maybe tried as an accomplice in the robbery.
@@huffabubba7041 Yes, I watched the video.
I live in Texas. I am NOT a lawyer. Under the Texas penal code, using deadly force in "self-defense" is not justified if the person using deadly force is in the act of committing a crime greater than a Class 3 Misdemeanor.
In this scenario, the person was committing a 1st Degree Felony; i.e., an aggravated robbery.....a robbery while exhibiting a deadly weapon.
Further, a person is justified in using deadly force: when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary: to prevent the other's imminent commission of aggravated robbery.
A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect a third person if: the actor reasonably believes that his intervention is immediately necessary to protect the third person.
@@MSgt_D Interesting, it makes sense that things would work that way in Texas. Here in Colorado we have more restrictions on when we can and cant use force and criminals have more protection.
This was FANTASTIC!!! Loved seeing C.N. in these scenarios. Get more 2A advocates to do these types of scenarios!!!
What this scenario taught me is that prosecutors are almost as evil as the shooters.
You taught me that Democrats really are asses. 😏
Fr
I'm a school Safety Security Officer...you NEED these videos!!!
What about red light incidents and road rage? I had someone follow my neighbor home over a driving incident and he was getting violent and angry. I was just a neighbor. We live in the country. It's like little cottages on a river. So there's a few neighbors. We all watch out for each other. very rare anything happens. But from time time we'll have a small incident.
But I feel like road rage and red lights are getting deadly. What about people coming up to your car. Like a few people. Gangs are real.
I enjoy Colion's UA-cam content and the USCCA videos with Tom Grieve. What gets measured and analyzed gets improved on. Bravo.
If a person in Colion's position was disabled and "leaving" was not an option, hos much would the merits change?
@LuisB: As a disabled person myself, you pose a valid and thoughtful question. As someone also retired from working in criminal law (defense), my thoughts or response would be as follows:
- As a disabled person (specifically with mobility limitations as in your question), the person using, or demonstrating capability to use deadly force would still have his/her actions evaluated by the imminent, deadly threat standard and the “rational, reasonable person” response in viewing the defender’s actions. The disabled person must still demonstrate that at the time he/she employed lethal force it was legally justified by virtue of imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to the defender or a third party. And his/her actions in using deadly force must have been reasonable. (I.e.: bad guy is laying face down after 1-2 rounds, but defender mag. dumps the attacker. A DA or Grand Jury panel is likely to view shots 1 and 2 as reasonable (assuming deadly threat), but discharge of rounds 3-15 as UNreasonable, possibly leading to changes. The disabled status of the defender is part of the totality of circumstances review, which should be done. Obviously a mobility limited, disabled person cannot flee in the same manner as an able bodied individual, and this should be taken into account. It’s not a justification for an otherwise unreasonable use-of-force, but it’s also a factor limiting the disabled person’s/defender’s options, and may mitigate toward a finding that the use-of-force was justified. That’s all just my opinion, based upon the laws in my state and my experiences. Others may disagree and each use-of-force incident, whether LE or civilian should be investigated independently and without bias (in a perfect world anyway). Be well.
@@andycraddock7677 thank you for your time and response
I'm glad I'm part of this uscca and paying my monthly dues. I need to continue to watch and go into the web site and watch their training videos.
This is so damn good to see. Thank you! Please do more of these!!
Right on, you got it. 👍 Lets Go Brandon!! 👍 C'mon man!! haha
I took a full day 8hr Simunition Scenario training taught by ret LE and it was by far the best training I've received. You never get second chances in real life. So valuable.
That's why you have the right to remain silent! Don't say anything but "LAWYER"!
Invoke th 5th
Really cool training. I have to say that these random scenarios really make you look at your areas and spaces you enter on daily basis and see them more differently. Personally I look for corners that's a little hidden but I still have a good view of the room. If I can't get where I want then I want to at least have a good view of the door. Not always able too but I try. I remember the story of how wild Bill Hickok was shot in the back.
This was great so much to learn from this. Would you guys mind doing another training scenario but this time have the good guy carry without one in the chamber. That way we can see the draw backs of that.
I keep my head on a swivel and constantly run scenarios in my head in different situations but running them in your head doesn’t compare to this type of training. I would love to do this training course! Training and preparedness is key to survival!!
The problem with running scenarios in your head is, you create a script.
Then when something happens that doesn't follow the script, it takes a second to adjust.
The question we have to ask our prosecutors is … when will criminals stop being protected class of citizens!!! First scenario was absolutely a deadly force encounter until the bad guy leaves… I think we as a society need to be much much harder on the prosecutes to stop abusing their roles to gain political points!
Please more of this. This was fantastic. Thanks for joining Colion.
Everyone in the coffee shop needs to decide if they are willing to rely on the bad guy's mercy to not kill them.
Once someone draws a weapon and is acting aggressively, that is the decision you need to make.
This was SO informative! Thank you for all you do to keep us alive and out of the clink!
Smh this is why world we live in courts are more gravitated to theatrics and cater to the criminal smh
Absolutely. Let's think about the mistakes we might make BEFORE we make them.
Enjoy the videos. I understand the purpose of the video, Personally it feels slightly to "staged". However, what this entire thing is about is drastically important and knowledgeable information. Its nice to see Tom really play deep into the eyes of his former prosecutor days
I was thinking the same thing but this one specifically i think did a great job in presenting the trainee with a truly unexpected scenario that they had to react to in real time.
Although it may feel staged, the adrenaline and muscle memory are very real (which is what tends to get in the way in these incidents). Notice Colion reaching for a non existent mag reload at 1:46. His body thought it was real and that's the most important part I'd say. two cents.
This is excellent to help you see and feel what can happen versus what should happen.
Use the police defense that has resulted in no charges: I feared for my life. Now, why can't it be that simple for common citizens?
He's coming right for us!
I agree. I have a theory it’s because as a job cops deal with shootings all the time, and have been working with the judicial system for decades. They’ve had time to give themselves a buffer to be able to not overthink deadly situations and react.
Who knows tho. It sucks for us civilians.
It IS that simple for common citizens. That is the requirement for deadly force for citizens as well. Reasonable fear that your life was in grave and immediate danger.
@@aliceakosota797 😂😂😂
2nd scenario taught me another lesson....keep your wallet in the opposite pocket of your concealed piece (for me this will me hard to adapt) but what if they would have seen his firearm when he went for his wallet?
Very well thought out and very well done. It was very interesting and informative. Yes a gun in hand is a very effective tool but the most powerful tool you have is your mind because the ability to process what is happening and be able to make a split second judgement call is what it boils down to. I got so many chills in the 2nd scenario when colion hopped up and defend his lady and closed the distance between himself and perp. It was so well done! When it comes to human reaction so much can happen especially with adrenaline going.
Excellent! These scenarios really brought out some feelings and insight about using your weapon. Lots of great comments too.
Keep up the good work!
That demonstration was absolutely awesome and on-point!! Thanks to all three of you for that!
This was, hands down, the best educational video I've seen in the gun community!!!!!!! I watch a hand full of gun community UA-cam channels, and found this to be even better than the cc video break downs. This would be a very helpful series with different guests from the gun community, like Donut Operator as a former officer, or Matt from demoRanch as a private citizen gun enthusiast , just to see the different mind set when caught is these scenarios. Colion was awesome as usual !! I wish there was a place that used scenarios like these for training. I can't express what a great idea this was Kevin
Please more videos like this, its nice to see all sides of the legal argument and what a defensive scenario could turn out to be down the line
I'm watching this for the first time and it's been a year later! I actually conduct similar training as an armed officer in the state of Texas. It's really interesting that we as "law abiding citizens", have to justify our ability to defend ourselves and others, while witnessing a crime or felony. It's been a very real check to me and the other officers I work with on our approach, demeanor, and conduct even when the aggressive situation has been placed on us! Thanks for this video and I would love to see more!
Thank you so much for this. This is exactly the type of content / training I am looking for. Love the recap afterwards. Please post more scenarios. Thank you again!
This is worth saying since they already talked about how important to count your shots accurately but it's also important skill for a skilled gunfighter because not knowing when you're out of bullets will get you killed!!
We definitely need more videos like this and also more available training like this
I really miss these they bring a lot of the training to real life scenarios . stops you and makes you think about it and how would i have done it. Thank you all for this.
Great exercise! I shared this with my Facebook firearm community.
Love these types of videos. The breakdown after is one of the best things. Talking it out gets me thinking about what I need to train through.
I had to pull out recently in self defense. Of course the "bad couple" falsely testified & I was locked up. Costing me thousands; while they laughed as they drove away.
👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾 Great scenarios and breaking down what the legal consequences can be. Switching up scenarios was great 2 different looks. 💯💯
This was really informative. Great video. This shows how huge a responsibility it is to carry a gun.
I just love Colion Noir. He is so very professional at what he does.
I love this vedio . I wish I could take classes that have this sort of training. It's so much more realistic . I believe this sort of training would really make people get a better understanding of the reality of it.
I would love to have some training like this. I have always had the mindset that I know exactly what I would do. Realistically, there are sooooo many things going on and its happening fast. These are life ending decisions, whether it's a death or life in prison. I loved this video and will be reaching out in my community to see if there are classes like this for the wife an I. Thanks for the video.
As a long time gun owner, I believe to possess sufficient training and I am aware of my 'level of 'skill' with handling, [accuracy and safety].
I've had dreams of "what if" and "how I would react if" **imagine a situation where I chose to stop the threat of imminent danger to my partner...
I actually broke out into tears after hearing Colion's recount of his thoughts and emotions..... I cried really hard
I'm 63 yrs old and treasure, respect, and train to 'deserve' owning my hand guns. BUT truly in my heart hope I never have to experience play possum or save my partner's [or appropriately any other person] life. Thank you for a Frightening refresher of what my Dad instilled in me 50 yrs ago when I first fired a weapon. "Fire your weapon at someone and the danger might stop...but for you everything has just begun".
"Know what you're doing when there's no time to think twice"
OMG I love videos like this going into depth in the detail about a case scenario that could happen and explaining all possible scenarios thank you all so much
Loved it. This kind of video needs to be wide spread. Excellent work folks.
Lets give the prosecutor a gun in these scenarios and evaluate what he did or didn't do wrong. It's easy to judge somebody actions until they have to go thru it themselves. I will love to see that video created. Great job on this video Colion & USCCA!
Excellent work, USCCA crew! These scenarios and the analyses following are integral to a person's CC education. Thank you!
Love this i would love to actually do this type of training. But honestly it doesn't matter as much where you shoot someone it's why you shot someone. An the shot to the back in the first scenerio can actually be very well explained.
It doesn't work that way...the criminals are protected more than the citizens.
I haven’t listened to your answer yet but my answer is when a person fears on immediate danger that would result in harm to themselves or their loved ones, or their abode. This could include a stranger if you are certain the person in danger is the good guy.
For me personally the point I would be in danger might be before someone else would be. I am female, in my 60s, overweight, with bad knees and a heart condition, so running very far at all is not a valid option for me.
EXCELLENT! Thanks so much for this, I learned a lot; & seeing even Colion affected by the stress of a simulation...Yeh we ALL need clearer heads when carrying!
This is very useful, getting to see decision making in real time and analyzing it afterwards. I would definitely like to see more of these videos.
Colion please do more videos like this we would really appreciate your input under stressful situations
The world NEEDS more of this style training and awareness. And putting “needs” in all caps doesn’t do it justice.
Thnk about the 4 safety rules of fire arms... treat all as though they are loaded, never point a weapon unless you are prepared to destroy your target, never put your finger on the trigger unless you are full prepared to destroy your target. SO, when someone has a weapon and displays it , see #1. they point it at you or a person, #2, and they have their finger on the trigger, #3. how long will you wait?
This was really good thank you all for shining light on these kinds of events, very informative, I’d love to see you guys do more of these… thank you
I love this. I felt this. I know what it's like to 2nd guess your decision to draw or not. My palms are sweating. Good video guys.👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
This is one of my favorite USCCA videos. Job well done!
Thank you for your support, Keith. We're glad you enjoyed it.
I'm enjoying this and I'm glad Colion joined forces. Good to see what my subscription goes toward. Happy subscriber
I posted this on Colion Noir's youtube....
Excellent video. I think you and the USCCA team should do more of these.
The combination of video break down by Tom as defense and prosecuting
attorney and you, an attorney with knowledge and firearms training in
scenarios really makes one think . All I can think of is there is never
enough firearms training and equally enough knowledge of the law in the
state one resides. Thanks..
Great and illuminating presentation. Thank you!
One thing needs to be pointed out for home self defense situations: I've seen people with signs like: "TRESPASSERS WILL BE SHOT -- SURVIVORS WILL BE SHOT AGAIN". If you ever need to shoot somebody in self defense, that sort of sign will never help your case... it can only hurt you.
Great training . Need this type of training if you carry. Thanks for do
this video.
That was awesome. Definitely do more of those! Good good training tools.
This video was amazing, can you have more of these kind of seneriao videos?
I've never seen anything like this before, very interesting! Thanks for sharing!!
At 10:09 blue shirt had no vest on and 10:10 he did. Also bad guy with the backpack had no vest and then a vest on. TV magic! That said, I'd like if they could've addressed if I was to shoot right after the cashier was shot (if an opportunity was present), was that the "correct" thing?
This really helps out! Thank you for these real life scenarios.