Awesome video, just one thing. Linguistics like Artefexian and Biblaridion say when there is a sound change there are no exceptions. So like if b --> p before nasal when stressed then all cases where b is before nasals and stressed B must become P. I just thought I should let you know
That's not necessarily true, and not what they mean by that. Practically any phonological condition is valid for a sound change to a fault. The "no exceptions" they refer to is that sound changes affect ALL words that satisfy the relevant condition of a sound change. And even then, that rule gets broken: In th-determiners (the, this, that, there, they, then, etc.) in English, θ becomes ð word-initially, and this only affects determiners, pronouns and other very commonly used words; I don't think any native English nouns, adjectives, verbs etc. exhibit this change. And this goes in the opposite direction, too: Sometimes you'll find a place name, personal name or some other kind of proper noun that resisted some sound changes.
As much as I respect Artefexian and Biblaridion, they sometimes make generalisations. It is possible to have a split sound change, where in some cases the sound changes while in other cases it does not. This can sometimes result from the change occurring in one dialect but not another, followed by a period of increased contact between the speakers of each dialect, leading to a compromised situation in which the sound change only appears in certain positions.
Just a note: q → ʔ is debuccalization not fortition [ʔ] and [q] are both voiceless stops they aren't that different in sonority.
You're awesome! I just watched the previous video five hours ago. Can't wait to see the next one 😃 Greetings from Hungary
tysm you need more views and subs
Great video
oh nice another vid :p
Awesome video, just one thing. Linguistics like Artefexian and Biblaridion say when there is a sound change there are no exceptions. So like if b --> p before nasal when stressed then all cases where b is before nasals and stressed B must become P. I just thought I should let you know
That's not necessarily true, and not what they mean by that. Practically any phonological condition is valid for a sound change to a fault. The "no exceptions" they refer to is that sound changes affect ALL words that satisfy the relevant condition of a sound change. And even then, that rule gets broken: In th-determiners (the, this, that, there, they, then, etc.) in English, θ becomes ð word-initially, and this only affects determiners, pronouns and other very commonly used words; I don't think any native English nouns, adjectives, verbs etc. exhibit this change. And this goes in the opposite direction, too: Sometimes you'll find a place name, personal name or some other kind of proper noun that resisted some sound changes.
@@aaronmyers6686 wow, you learn something new every day. Thanks for the information and the explaining of con-langing, God bless
As much as I respect Artefexian and Biblaridion, they sometimes make generalisations. It is possible to have a split sound change, where in some cases the sound changes while in other cases it does not. This can sometimes result from the change occurring in one dialect but not another, followed by a period of increased contact between the speakers of each dialect, leading to a compromised situation in which the sound change only appears in certain positions.
🅿