7Artisans 10mm f/2.8 Fisheye lens review with samples
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
- Neat, a new fisheye lens, this time for full-frame cameras, makes a nice change!
Support this channel on Patreon, for all kinds of exclusive bonus content! / christopherfrost
All pictures taken by me on Sony a7R III and Sony a5100 cameras.
Equipment I use to make my videos (Amazon affiliate links):
Canon EOS R5: geni.us/CanonE...
Canon EF-RF Adaptor: geni.us/CanonE...
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 'Art': geni.us/Sigma5...
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM: geni.us/CanonR...
Marumi Fit and Slim CPL Filter: geni.us/Marumi...
AudioTechnica AT2020USB+ Microphone: geni.us/AT2020...
Rode Smartlav+ Microphone: geni.us/RodeSm...
Rode SC3 adapter: geni.us/RodeSC...
Zoom H1n Recorder: geni.us/ZoomH1...
DJI Mini 2 Drone: geni.us/DJIMin...
Music:
'Opportunity Walks', Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
creativecommons....
This is only guy I trust when it comes to lens reviews!
I would love to see a comparison to the TT artisans 11 mm Fisheye
Worth pointing out that it's slightly more expensive than the ttartisan 11mm f2.8, though the difference is small enough that most people would simply pick whichever one performs better, but Chris sadly hasn't reviewed that one so it's hard to tell.
Was going to say something similar, I have the 11mm and really enjoy it and would be curious how it compares to this 10mm. Although honestly because the 11 is cheaper that's probably the way to go for most people.
@@TaylorPassofaro mine is poor at open apertures, I have to shoot f8 and focus just before infinity then everythings fairly sharp on a Canon M200 is yours better than that? Dont know if Ive got a bad example
@@jukeboxjohnnie Ouch, might be a decentered version! I've had that happen, mine is nicely sharp at f2.8 but maybe I haven't pixel peeped enough! I also have a 12mm voightlander rectilinear lens and my 11mm beats it in performance but it's a bit unfair comparing fisheye to rectilinear.
On Sony alpha blogs review it seemed the 11 is sharper. But also actually more like 13 mm. The Samyang 12 was wider apparently. So. ..guess I would not go1 mm wider. ...now just wonder how true the 10mm is to it's number.
Great review again, I'm using the TT artisans 11 mm Fisheye on the Z7/Z6, works great for astro as well, its good in the corners. I could highly recommend that one for the Nikon system. Corncerning what I have seen on the Sony bodies it shows some field curvature due to a thicker sensor stack. This might also be the case for the 7 Artisans.
would you say the 10mm here is better than the 11mm?
@@future2300 This is a good review of the TT-Artisans 11mm f2.8 on a Sony and Leica sensor. Phillippe Reeve didn't test the 10mm 7 Artisans though. TT-Artisans seems to be cheaper and a bit better.
@@br2v ah, I frequent Phillippe Reeve also, but didn't see the 11mm. Was leaning to the 11mm too. Thanks!
I love the TT artisan 11mm f2.8 on my Sony. Relatively inexpensive but you get a fantastic build quality (without weather sealing and custom buttons tho) and great image quality as well.
@@br2v He tested the leica M mount adapted to Sony before the e mount came in. It's unclear that there would still be any field curvature on the emount verison.
I bought the 7artisan 7.5mm for aps-c. Best decision ever, so much fun!
I have a circular fisheye, it was fantastic fun for the 2 days I used it 😅
A circular fisheye is WAY less useful than a full frame. I have the 8-15mm Canon zoom fisheye and I'd say 97% of my photos with it are at 14 or 15mm where it covers the whole frame.
I used to own a 7D and on there it was FF at about 10mm, so the zoom was quite useful.
I tried my first fish eye with hero11 haha. Really unique view, this is even wider!
Would be interested to see how it compares to the Samyang 12mm f2.8 fisheye.
I have the Samyang myself but the small size of this TTartisan is really appealing to me as I mostly use mine for event photography
Great review! is this lens compatible with the sony a6400
Great review thanks!
Apologies for a NOOB question: I've seen an 11mm f/2.8 EF lens of this brand... Is it a different lens from the one being reviewed here?
Good lens and review!!
really loved it, adden to shoplist 😊
How would this compare to the TT Artisans 11mm f2.8?
I wonder if the vignetting/softness is so much of an issue if used on APSC? 15mm equivalent at that price would be a good buy
Can you test 7artisans 7.5 f/2.8 II APS-C ?🙏 please
FIRST. How many vids is this now Chris this week. Great lens for indoor.
Just got mine brand new and the aperture ring feels very tight from f2.8 to f4, then 4f to f22 is kinda smoother but overall feels weird and as if it's grinding something inside the lens as i turn it... Anyone noticed this? Did i get a defect lens?
Would love to see it compared to the Samyang 12mm f/2.8 Full frame fisheye.
Can it be used for virtual tours
With the very simple distortion (not "mustache-y") I wonder what photos or video from this lens would look like using post-processing to correct the distortion? My assumption is that image quality in the corners of a corrected image would be poor due to being stretched, but that's only an assumption with no real facts to go on.
You lose a lot of the wideness if you correct the distortion, as you'll have to crop quite heavily to keep the frame rectangular. You'd end up with far more in the frame if you used one of the Laowa Zero-D ultrawides instead, and they have the added bonus that you wouldn't have to correct all your footage afterwards. With so many good ultrawide rectilinear lenses on the market these days I'd only shoot fisheye if you want the distortion for artistic effect.
Hi, I would recommend to check a software called Fisheye-Hemi. There is also a great forum thread on fredmiranda online about de-fishing this type of lens with various software.
Fisheye Hemi can de-fish without stretching and much less cropping. Astro photographers use this to de-fish the foreground (search UA-cam).
I am using this with the 11mm 2.8 TT Artisan (around f4) for landscape and astro as I couldn't afford the Sigma 14mm for L-mount. Hope it helps!
@@Penguins247 i mean. Alot? A bit. At least in case of applying a Samyang 7.5mm profile in Lightroom to a 10mm f8 apsc fisheye on fullframe . And I think you gotta see some nuance there. You lose that resolution in the corners. Relevant for some, less so for others.
1:59 The image is literally alive and breathing, in and out... :))
Great review - out of interest how would you compare this to sigma 10 f2.8?
Does diffraction softness occur at the lower aperture end?
🔥🔥
this one vs the TTArtisan 11mm f/2.8
*¡Hola Christopher me gustaría que probarás la lente Meike 50mm f0.95!*
can you please review 7Artisans 7.5mm for APSC?
Pls next tokina 33mm and 56mm 1.4
is this good for videos ?
4:04 lol
I just do not like Fisheye at all. But I do love extreme wide angle.
jumped the gun because this was on sale for less than 200$.