@@Xiphactinus Of course! Neither of them is my favourite driver but they are much respectable. Still, the video is not about the driving differences, so I did not mention them.
@@oussamabendakir1453 Success is relative, and relative to its contemporaries the RB19 was basically untouchable. If we judged all previous F1 cars the way you did, then some of the most dominant and creatively-designed cars in F1 history (Lotus 49C, Ferrari F2003-GA, etc.) would be completely out of the running against cars just 2-3 years their junior.
Dominant only by wins and nothing else! Every time stat shows it’s far off being the most dominant car compared to its rivals! Don’t be sucked into the ‘agenda’
I said it then and i will say it now people don't realize how quick W11 actually was because we didn't get many crowd shots. We are now seeing that still it is unbeaten. Feels like men and machine in harmony the car is so complaint every direction change just happens
Reminder to this day the only car to produce downforce so high that they were forced to use Mediums in some quali as softs simply couldn't handle to loads
MP4/4 is officially the most dominant car ever, followed by W07 & F2002 as joint-second, so this comparison is more precisely about the, on average, fastest-ever & Red Bull Racing's most dominant car.
What would be even more interesting, is comparing one of the slowest cars on the grid this year to the fastest car in 2022 to see if they are as quick, I've always wondered that.
Knowing this years car is 1-1.5s faster than their 2023 counterparts(in some circuits) it’ll be fun to see how much closer the 2024 pole time will be with the W11
If only the new ground effect cars lose some weight, slow speed corners would be much better. Says, ditch the heavy hybrid and bring back V8. But for the "environment" right.
Hey Yelistener,is there any way to compare the two most consistent championship winning cars to date? (The overlooked F2002 with it's 100% of podiums in hands of Michael Schumacher in 2002 and the RB19 in hands of Max,that had all but one podium in 2023),i think Monza is the only track without major changes in 21 years,but I'm not sure if the telemetry for the F2002 is available.
You have Monza Canada and interlagos which are unchanged tracks in the last 21 years Suzuka (has been changed slightly since 2002 which 130r changing but by 2002 in the Ferrari 130r was already flat out) so might be worth an analysis too
@@RANDOMZBOSSMAN1I don't know how i forgot about those 3, I got blinded by the idea of the races remaining this season,and somehow ignored Interlagos (that aside of maybe some runoff areas,is completely unchanged).
Why there are always as "excuses" in this type of comparisons of this current generation of cars with those of 2020, is my opinion and not to criticize, but in all the videos of these comparisons there is an excuse to favor the ground effect cars, that the wind helped the W11, that the weight, if the weight change and affect but so are the regulations, the 2020 were much heavier than their predecessors and are much faster, other times it is the asphalt, which is 1 degree colder then it is already 1 second of advantage for the W11, also remember that the party mode of Mercedes in that year was banned after Belgium and precisely Mercedes wanted to demonstrate its full potential and that of its engine at Silverstone, they unleashed the party mode at its highest level, then why can not simply say that the W11 was so fast on the straights because of its engine.
The scary thing is the W11 could have gone faster still! Ham is pretty safe on many of those bends compared to Max using every inch of the track as usual.
And they said Lewis is a beast on qualifying😂 now that Russel is beating Lewis literally every qualifying session everything that we heard about how good Lewis is has gotten into another perspective
You are mistaken, smooth is fast, and if a driver is fighting the car, THATS slow and shows he could go faster without those mistakes. You got the other way around but its an easy mistake to make.
probably due to recency bias and the simple fact that these two cars are much faster, yet merely from the perspective of dominance, i would actually argue mercedes during 2014 ~ 2016 were more in the high ground
@@LouSassol69er I don't know about that, the W11 had some of the best aero in history. The thing was glued down no matter what, a true masterpiece. Pretty sure the Redbull was far ahead because Newey is the only one on the grid who has worked with ground effect regulations in the past (in the 90s) and the rest of the grid had to collect data to get to the same point. The W11 was pure domination even though every design development phase was on a level playing field.
Your statement would only make sense if each sector was exactly the same, only facing a different wind direction. In reality, they're not (even the track surface will be different due to bumps, etc), so wind will affect different portions of the track to different degrees.
@@rars0n since the track is mostly shaped in a square aspect ratio, headwind in one direction would almost certainly result in tail wind on a significant portion of the track, the effects would not be equal, but it also wouldn't be a huge differentiator unless the wind changes direction rapidly on a lap
@@chiefdenis Only 2 of the straight segments run roughly parallel to each other (Hangar and Hamilton). Further, the two DRS zones are roughly perpendicular, so if one has a headwind or tailwind, the other has a crosswind. Combine that with all the high-speed corners and that means that the track layout can indeed be significantly affected by wind direction. Remember also that he's comparing two different laps that happened 3 years apart, so wind conditions are totally different for the entirety of each lap.
How much would you say, all else being equal, wind affects lap time? Obviously circuit dependent, huge at Silverstone and probably Spa and means little to nothing at Monaco, but just curious. Reminds me of how big of a deal wind speed is in Olympic sprint events, if there is too much your time literally just does not count for world record purposes.
Could you also make a telemetry video on the whole Verstappen/Norris collision? If it is actually true that Max did not move his steering under braking?
Saying that the wind helped is kinda mid It wasn't the wind, the car was faster on corners than the rb19, on straight line the current gen of cars are faster than the old ones but they're slow on corners
Unless they bring back V10s I can’t see the class of 24 and onwards beating some of the W11 Records Especially Tracks with Slower Corners like Bahrain , Mugello Turkey 🇹🇷 flip even that Pole Valtari’s Austrian Pole 🥵
You’d be surprised to know that Perez is the one who’s constantly getting knocked out of Q1. In his ENTIRE MERCEDES CAREER Bottas made Q3 every single time
Because the overbody aero typically offer more stable and predictable/consistent downforce and the ground effect dependent cars can be very sensitive to changes in ride height and track surface irregularities. It's not really about the magnitude of the effect.
^Comment above is correct. Another reason is the cost cap. Back before it existed the top 3 teams were spending around $400 million per season to improve their cars, they were allowed to throw money into problems till a solution was found. With the cap being at $135m today on top of a limit to CFD testing it's a lot more cost effective for the teams to iterate proven designs than it is to innovate something that's theoretically better but unproven in the real world.
@@spangles7 Great points as well. Also the last few words of your comment made me think of something. Maybe the red bull, in terms of the undertray, doesn't necessarily yield the highest magnitude(I could be wrong), it could possibly be a case where the ground effect phenomena is more consistent compared to the competition.
@@Genshi54697 More like showing how incompetent Hamilton was. Sometimes got beaten by Bottas also. Max Verstappen would have buried Bottas alive and won every race with an such dominant car.
Wind had no bearing in Hamilton being faster, he is just faster and a better driver and loses less speed on the corners overall. It's pure skill, and to credit wind for performance is dishonest and doesn't give credit to Lewis's ability to drive faster.
It's always nice to compare different gen F1 cars but it's a little bit unfair. W11 was 50kg lighter and could use party mode. That's together at least worth 1.5 sec.
People discussing the difference between the cars, it's worth remembering that they are different regulations, the 2017-2021 regulations favored higher speeds in curves, but in the 2022-2025 regulations the cars have less downforce, which is why they are slower
Do you think that after your great breakdowns and explanations, you could let the split screen laps play out so we could see the difference in real time?
I think you should change the line wind helped w11 laptime to '' it was slightly a advantage for w11s laptime. The w11 is already faster and the wind would have just helped some mili seconds. Not even more than a second
Its really sad that the W11 doesnt exist anymore, they used the w11 chassi for the w12 and thats why max won in abu dhabi 2020 because the w11 was allready the w12 in that race
Uhm, not sure about that. In the 2020 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, Mercedes turned down their engines due to concerns over reliability. Specifically, Mercedes identified a potential issue with the MGU-K on one of their customer cars during the weekend, leading them to take precautionary measures to avoid a potential failure during the race. As a result, both Mercedes cars were running with reduced engine power to ensure they could finish the race without suffering from mechanical problems. Max had serious pace that race, but his comfortable win margin was helped by the decision mentioned above.
They used an Altered W11 chassis for 2021 and called it W12. There were regulations(targeting Mercedes) changes that were made regarding the floor area on the car... Ironically the place where the W11 generated the most downforce, more than any other car. They also had a rule which blocked any major development on the next car. The FIA knew what they were doing when they changed the rules, Mercedes had mastered the regulations nobody was catching them. Ferrari had to cheat to get close.. and Red Bull needed final hour regulation changes to compete and win.........due to Masi.
@Redeemed95 The 2021 regulations weren't to slow down Mercedes; they were to slow everyone down due to safety concerns, and they've been doing this for years. In 2019, 2020, and 2021, they introduced rules to slow the cars down or limit their rapid progression. Evidently, in 2020, it didn't work, so they made sure it did in 2021. Mercedes wasn't a target; everyone was affected, just that high-raked cars suffered less because of the nature of how they produce downforce.
@@raphaelsantiago9387 They were to slow Mercedes down. RedBull got faster after it then pair it with the engine development freeze AFTER Honda improved their engine
En la izquierda un coche que hizo la pole por 1 segundo, y a la derecha el que lo hizo por 2 décimas. Meterles en el mismo saco de dominancia es ridículo. Otra cosa es si hablamos de equipo en su conjunto, pero de coche es un insulto para el W11 ser comparado por el RB19
Bueno, se comparan estos 2 coches porque fueron 2 coches que dominaron en sus respectivas temporadas, el W11 en 2020 y el RB19 en 2023. Todo el mundo sabe que el W11 es muchísimo más rápido por la reglamentación de ese año y por la distancia que sacaba a sus rivales, pero en mi opinión es una comparación interesante comparar 2 coches que dominaron durante toda la temporada
@@magicencamar3216 no he dicho que no se comparen su velocidad, me refería a su dominancia, lo que le sacaban al resto de rivales. Que se compare la velocidad me parece interesante para ver las diferencias entre dos eras de la F1. Pero lo que me parece increíble, desde mi punto de vista, es que se comparen las dominancias de coches cuando Mercedes consiguió las 4 primeras posiciones en Hungría con los coches de 2020 y 2019 y siendo uno de ellos pilotado por Stroll y sacándole 1,3 al siguiente no Mercedes, eso creo que habla por si solo
@@jorgepedrazap totalmente, y aún hay que leer a gente decir que Mercedes no ha hecho el coche más dominante, y es que no sólo Mercedes hizo el W11, de 2014 a 2016 ganaban con una mano a excepción de muy pocas carreras
Be for real, it took pole position 13 times in a row, ended up taking 15/17 poles. It won 13/17 races and had a 254 points lead in the constructor's championship. It was a very dominant car
Yeah I understand what you mean, but the video is more to show how they compare in specific parts of the track, not overall. For instance the gap created at the final chicane would be less noticeable if the gap from T6 had remained throughout the video
F2004 with modern slicks would compete with RB19, cause it also lacks modern technology. W11 was the pinnacle of fastest track car ever which would maybe go on to beat Porsche Evo
@@manishapadave8390bro F2004 was extremely light and nimble making it very fast and it also had a monstrous V10, no way can RB19 pose a competition to it with slicks, and 2018 until 2020(maybe 21) f1 cars are faster than the Porsche 919 evo.
@@ibrahimalatrash8008 Shoot forgot about the weight!!! Sorry Yea then it would smoke 19, if they had that tech back in those days 04 would be the fastest machine on track no doubt.
The W11 is a beast. Perfect in every sense.
So this proves one is the car making the difference & the other it's the driver getting everything out of the car. 😂
@@absolutentity this again.........
🤦🏻♂️@@absolutentity
@@absolutentity are you choosing to be ignorant or what
Not discrediting Bottas but hey he's always right up there alongside LH in that W11 beast 🤷
All thanks to air quality during lockdown
😆
Damn 😂
The fans cheering soundwave must be the resistance
Lmao
are you being facetious?
Two aero-perfection cars in two different generations. And as always, perfect video. Thanks
Two all-time greats at the wheel helps as well
@@Xiphactinus Of course! Neither of them is my favourite driver but they are much respectable. Still, the video is not about the driving differences, so I did not mention them.
I don't think the rb19 is aero perfection when with the exact same rules it's like half a second slower than all the 2024 top 4 team's cars
@@ahmetardasensoyooh lemme guess pls,
Vettle, Kimi, Schumi, Kubica, Button, Ervine, Versteppen, Montoya, Mika, Hill, Josie and Steward.
Am I close?
@@oussamabendakir1453 Success is relative, and relative to its contemporaries the RB19 was basically untouchable. If we judged all previous F1 cars the way you did, then some of the most dominant and creatively-designed cars in F1 history (Lotus 49C, Ferrari F2003-GA, etc.) would be completely out of the running against cars just 2-3 years their junior.
I miss the last generation of F1 cars. I know the racing wasn’t as great, but they looked really nice in my opinion!
Racing was greater than now
@@ABYTE64yeah your right racing was a bit better then
@@Serian-o1g battles were more intensive, more on the edge, but rarer
overtaking was a lot better with these smaller cars, these big cars are too heavy
The previous gen is, for me, the most beautiful generation of cars in F1 history... the W11 then...
In the W11, Hamilton just points and the car goes. It's amazing to see
Fastest F1 car ever vs the most dominant F1 car ever
Dominant only by wins and nothing else! Every time stat shows it’s far off being the most dominant car compared to its rivals! Don’t be sucked into the ‘agenda’
Also the fact w11 used hypersofts
@@GrilledPixeIs not hypersofts, pirelli brought c3's that week (i checked)
@@WeirdBrick It’s almost like you need wins to be dominant😱 thanks captain obvious
@@GrilledPixeIsthose were ditched at the end of 2018😭
I said it then and i will say it now people don't realize how quick W11 actually was because we didn't get many crowd shots.
We are now seeing that still it is unbeaten. Feels like men and machine in harmony the car is so complaint every direction change just happens
LH in W11 around SPA was something magnificent and terrifying at the same time
love the comparison and explanation, thanks for the videos as always!
Wish we could've seen the W11 around more circuits
Reminder to this day the only car to produce downforce so high that they were forced to use Mediums in some quali as softs simply couldn't handle to loads
this audio was super dank on headphones
MP4/4 is officially the most dominant car ever, followed by W07 & F2002 as joint-second, so this comparison is more precisely about the, on average, fastest-ever & Red Bull Racing's most dominant car.
i would like to see w11 vs 2024 pole cuz this years cars are even faster than 2023.Could this be the Next video?
should compare the Rb 2024 car to the 2023 car, would be interesting.
What would be even more interesting, is comparing one of the slowest cars on the grid this year to the fastest car in 2022 to see if they are as quick, I've always wondered that.
@@EM_Karting Why not both? :)
@@crescentfuze both what?
@@EM_Kartingboth what you said and what the original comment said
If qualy will be dry I expect a big improvement from the 2023 laptime like what happened at Suzuka, maybe we could see a 25.9
Please analyse the Norris/Verstappen incident in Austria and compare it to previous year at that corner. Would shut a lot of people up. Thanks 👍
Knowing this years car is 1-1.5s faster than their 2023 counterparts(in some circuits) it’ll be fun to see how much closer the 2024 pole time will be with the W11
if conditions are decent, this year's cars should be quite a bit faster than those of last year
Also dont forget party mode was allowed in 2020
Interesting how Max took the last corner in 4th gear when Lewis did it in 2nd. Gear ratio is different?
Amazing video. Thanks ❤for sharing
Why does the 2020 Merc sound like it's revving so much higher despite having the same PU?
@@Rapide568 we had engine modes in 2020
@@RANDOMZBOSSMAN1if only they didn’t ban the modes we could of seen the time at monza even faster then it was
@@sebfresh5899 Yup Monza and Spa suffered as a result
Perez’s results speak more about the dominance of RB19 than Max’s.
Yeah Perez had an awful season last year and still got P2 in the championship the RB19 was a truly special car
@@RANDOMZBOSSMAN1Let them deceive themselves
Verstappen 2022: 454 points, 15 wins
Verstappen 2023: 575 points, 19 wins
Perez 2022: 305 points, 2 wins
Perez 2023: 285 points, 2 wins
Red Bull 2022: 759 points, 17 wins
Red Bull 2023: 860 points, 21 wins
Ferrari 2022: 554 points, 4 wins
Ferrari 2023: 406 points, 1 win
Mercedes 2022: 515 points, 1 win
Mercedes 2023: 409 points, 0 wins
Perez got worse despite having a better car. They say Perez was the runner up, but it was because both Ferrari and Mercedes got worse.
yeah because Perez is absolute garbage now. it’s Max carrying the team
If only the new ground effect cars lose some weight, slow speed corners would be much better. Says, ditch the heavy hybrid and bring back V8. But for the "environment" right.
Hey Yelistener,is there any way to compare the two most consistent championship winning cars to date? (The overlooked F2002 with it's 100% of podiums in hands of Michael Schumacher in 2002 and the RB19 in hands of Max,that had all but one podium in 2023),i think Monza is the only track without major changes in 21 years,but I'm not sure if the telemetry for the F2002 is available.
You have Monza Canada and interlagos which are unchanged tracks in the last 21 years
Suzuka (has been changed slightly since 2002 which 130r changing but by 2002 in the Ferrari 130r was already flat out) so might be worth an analysis too
@@RANDOMZBOSSMAN1I don't know how i forgot about those 3, I got blinded by the idea of the races remaining this season,and somehow ignored Interlagos (that aside of maybe some runoff areas,is completely unchanged).
@@DerpSherman Haha it happens sometimes!
Hope you have a wonderful day 🙏🏽
@@RANDOMZBOSSMAN1Same for you! 👍
Why there are always as "excuses" in this type of comparisons of this current generation of cars with those of 2020, is my opinion and not to criticize, but in all the videos of these comparisons there is an excuse to favor the ground effect cars, that the wind helped the W11, that the weight, if the weight change and affect but so are the regulations, the 2020 were much heavier than their predecessors and are much faster, other times it is the asphalt, which is 1 degree colder then it is already 1 second of advantage for the W11, also remember that the party mode of Mercedes in that year was banned after Belgium and precisely Mercedes wanted to demonstrate its full potential and that of its engine at Silverstone, they unleashed the party mode at its highest level, then why can not simply say that the W11 was so fast on the straights because of its engine.
The wind, the wind, the wind.
So, if the wind wasn't as strong the redbull would be faster???
No.
it would be closer to the Mercedes.
It would be close to w11 but not faster than it
@@manishapadave8390Not even 1sec
@@No-Name360 Yea somewhere between 1.5 to 2 or maybe 2.1
how do you know? In aero dominated cars the wind can make a huge difference
The scary thing is the W11 could have gone faster still! Ham is pretty safe on many of those bends compared to Max using every inch of the track as usual.
And they said Lewis is a beast on qualifying😂 now that Russel is beating Lewis literally every qualifying session everything that we heard about how good Lewis is has gotten into another perspective
@@roy-yal cry 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@roy-yalcry
@@andrewmelton2686 like you do, my loyal servant🤣🤣🤣 keep making me laugh please and clean my house🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You are mistaken, smooth is fast, and if a driver is fighting the car, THATS slow and shows he could go faster without those mistakes. You got the other way around but its an easy mistake to make.
You would think that at +300kph, wind in any direction would become a head wind.
And week after it Max in RB16 beat that beast of an F1 car in the same circuit start from fourth position in very hot condition 🇳🇱🏆🦁
probably due to recency bias and the simple fact that these two cars are much faster, yet merely from the perspective of dominance, i would actually argue mercedes during 2014 ~ 2016 were more in the high ground
Doesn’t change the fact that W11 is fastest
Doesn't change the fact that RB19 is more of an aero masterclass
Ofc because of diffrent regulation , 2020 cars are all faster than 2023 car even rb lol
Every car in 2020 are faster than 2023 even a redbull
@@LouSassol69er I don't know about that, the W11 had some of the best aero in history. The thing was glued down no matter what, a true masterpiece. Pretty sure the Redbull was far ahead because Newey is the only one on the grid who has worked with ground effect regulations in the past (in the 90s) and the rest of the grid had to collect data to get to the same point. The W11 was pure domination even though every design development phase was on a level playing field.
U missed the point of the video glazer
Windiness isn't much of a differentiator because headwind and tailwind are experienced on different parts of the track across the whole lap
Your statement would only make sense if each sector was exactly the same, only facing a different wind direction. In reality, they're not (even the track surface will be different due to bumps, etc), so wind will affect different portions of the track to different degrees.
@@rars0n since the track is mostly shaped in a square aspect ratio, headwind in one direction would almost certainly result in tail wind on a significant portion of the track, the effects would not be equal, but it also wouldn't be a huge differentiator unless the wind changes direction rapidly on a lap
@@chiefdenis Only 2 of the straight segments run roughly parallel to each other (Hangar and Hamilton). Further, the two DRS zones are roughly perpendicular, so if one has a headwind or tailwind, the other has a crosswind. Combine that with all the high-speed corners and that means that the track layout can indeed be significantly affected by wind direction.
Remember also that he's comparing two different laps that happened 3 years apart, so wind conditions are totally different for the entirety of each lap.
How much would you say, all else being equal, wind affects lap time? Obviously circuit dependent, huge at Silverstone and probably Spa and means little to nothing at Monaco, but just curious. Reminds me of how big of a deal wind speed is in Olympic sprint events, if there is too much your time literally just does not count for world record purposes.
Motor Honda é um espetáculo de se ouvir
Could you also make a telemetry video on the whole Verstappen/Norris collision? If it is actually true that Max did not move his steering under braking?
Saying that the wind helped is kinda mid
It wasn't the wind, the car was faster on corners than the rb19, on straight line the current gen of cars are faster than the old ones but they're slow on corners
Unless they bring back V10s I can’t see the class of 24 and onwards beating some of the W11 Records Especially Tracks with Slower Corners like Bahrain , Mugello Turkey 🇹🇷 flip even that Pole Valtari’s Austrian Pole 🥵
Engines dont take corners, dumbass.
Max would have made Bottas look like Perez in that W11
You’d be surprised to know that Perez is the one who’s constantly getting knocked out of Q1.
In his ENTIRE MERCEDES CAREER Bottas made Q3 every single time
Why disrespect Bottas like that? Bottas was always solid at every qualifying session for Mercedes
Yep
if ground effect is so strong why do the positive downforce cars have such a large speed advantage in the corners
Because the overbody aero typically offer more stable and predictable/consistent downforce and the ground effect dependent cars can be very sensitive to changes in ride height and track surface irregularities. It's not really about the magnitude of the effect.
^Comment above is correct. Another reason is the cost cap. Back before it existed the top 3 teams were spending around $400 million per season to improve their cars, they were allowed to throw money into problems till a solution was found. With the cap being at $135m today on top of a limit to CFD testing it's a lot more cost effective for the teams to iterate proven designs than it is to innovate something that's theoretically better but unproven in the real world.
@@spangles7 Great points as well. Also the last few words of your comment made me think of something. Maybe the red bull, in terms of the undertray, doesn't necessarily yield the highest magnitude(I could be wrong), it could possibly be a case where the ground effect phenomena is more consistent compared to the competition.
If someone is faster than RB you always say it’s because of the wind 😂
Dominant w11 vs dominant driver MV33
Hamilton x W11 💀
Couldn't even get a podium in the first race💀
@@someonesch4361 that shows how tight the competition was in Hamilton's era 🗣️🗣️
@@Genshi54697 More like showing how incompetent Hamilton was. Sometimes got beaten by Bottas also.
Max Verstappen would have buried Bottas alive and won every race with an such dominant car.
@@gplatinumgamer1incomplete 😂 yeah sure
@@gplatinumgamer1 Verstappen sometimes got beaten by perez, u white supremacy agenda is out a control mate
do you have monza 2020 video? between ham and bottas?
How did verstappen defeat this car?! 😮
W11 VS RB19 VS RB20 in Austria?
Wind had no bearing in Hamilton being faster, he is just faster and a better driver and loses less speed on the corners overall. It's pure skill, and to credit wind for performance is dishonest and doesn't give credit to Lewis's ability to drive faster.
It's always nice to compare different gen F1 cars but it's a little bit unfair. W11 was 50kg lighter and could use party mode. That's together at least worth 1.5 sec.
Damn, redditors pulling numbers out of thin air.
Where'd you pull the 1.5s from, yo ass?
The RB 19 was 52kg heaver@@oransjball
@@Iceblock_1 We all know that. Hes making other assumptions. You internet experts gotta stop. You know barely nothing.
@@oransjball m8 i follow F1 since 2010 i know very much about F1
W11 VS RB19 VS SF-24 EVO
This year cars are much faster but still... Total carnage though 3, 4, 6 and 7
wdym? this years cars are slower bro, and if you dont believe me, Look at how many records is helf by 2020 cars especially the W11
@@monsterx1033 this year cars are much faster than 2023 is what I meant of course
@@Koziolrh oh thats on me brother😅
sorry for the misunderstanding
Naturally the British Biased weather favouring Hamilton with mostly tail-winds.
People discussing the difference between the cars, it's worth remembering that they are different regulations, the 2017-2021 regulations favored higher speeds in curves, but in the 2022-2025 regulations the cars have less downforce, which is why they are slower
Do you think that after your great breakdowns and explanations, you could let the split screen laps play out so we could see the difference in real time?
Yeah one of those were out of this world , the other one was just driven by verstappen
W11 tem mais aceleração além de ser mais leve, só q em retas longas ela tem menos velocidade final
how is f1 the pinnacle of motorsport but the telemetry doesn’t even show accurate brake pedal values
Brake pedal % values are meaningless by themselves and you should know that and also why
Mercedes turned into masked killers in 2020
I think you should change the line wind helped w11 laptime to '' it was slightly a advantage for w11s laptime. The w11 is already faster and the wind would have just helped some mili seconds. Not even more than a second
How do you get thos onboard
Its really sad that the W11 doesnt exist anymore, they used the w11 chassi for the w12 and thats why max won in abu dhabi 2020 because the w11 was allready the w12 in that race
Uhm, not sure about that. In the 2020 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, Mercedes turned down their engines due to concerns over reliability. Specifically, Mercedes identified a potential issue with the MGU-K on one of their customer cars during the weekend, leading them to take precautionary measures to avoid a potential failure during the race. As a result, both Mercedes cars were running with reduced engine power to ensure they could finish the race without suffering from mechanical problems. Max had serious pace that race, but his comfortable win margin was helped by the decision mentioned above.
They used an Altered W11 chassis for 2021 and called it W12. There were regulations(targeting Mercedes) changes that were made regarding the floor area on the car... Ironically the place where the W11 generated the most downforce, more than any other car. They also had a rule which blocked any major development on the next car.
The FIA knew what they were doing when they changed the rules, Mercedes had mastered the regulations nobody was catching them. Ferrari had to cheat to get close.. and Red Bull needed final hour regulation changes to compete and win.........due to Masi.
@Redeemed95 The 2021 regulations weren't to slow down Mercedes; they were to slow everyone down due to safety concerns, and they've been doing this for years. In 2019, 2020, and 2021, they introduced rules to slow the cars down or limit their rapid progression. Evidently, in 2020, it didn't work, so they made sure it did in 2021. Mercedes wasn't a target; everyone was affected, just that high-raked cars suffered less because of the nature of how they produce downforce.
The W11 car still exists
@@raphaelsantiago9387
They were to slow Mercedes down. RedBull got faster after it then pair it with the engine development freeze AFTER Honda improved their engine
En la izquierda un coche que hizo la pole por 1 segundo, y a la derecha el que lo hizo por 2 décimas. Meterles en el mismo saco de dominancia es ridículo.
Otra cosa es si hablamos de equipo en su conjunto, pero de coche es un insulto para el W11 ser comparado por el RB19
Bueno, se comparan estos 2 coches porque fueron 2 coches que dominaron en sus respectivas temporadas, el W11 en 2020 y el RB19 en 2023. Todo el mundo sabe que el W11 es muchísimo más rápido por la reglamentación de ese año y por la distancia que sacaba a sus rivales, pero en mi opinión es una comparación interesante comparar 2 coches que dominaron durante toda la temporada
@@magicencamar3216 no he dicho que no se comparen su velocidad, me refería a su dominancia, lo que le sacaban al resto de rivales. Que se compare la velocidad me parece interesante para ver las diferencias entre dos eras de la F1.
Pero lo que me parece increíble, desde mi punto de vista, es que se comparen las dominancias de coches cuando Mercedes consiguió las 4 primeras posiciones en Hungría con los coches de 2020 y 2019 y siendo uno de ellos pilotado por Stroll y sacándole 1,3 al siguiente no Mercedes, eso creo que habla por si solo
@@jorgepedrazap totalmente, y aún hay que leer a gente decir que Mercedes no ha hecho el coche más dominante, y es que no sólo Mercedes hizo el W11, de 2014 a 2016 ganaban con una mano a excepción de muy pocas carreras
W11 is the best of all car, but isn't dominant
Be for real, it took pole position 13 times in a row, ended up taking 15/17 poles. It won 13/17 races and had a 254 points lead in the constructor's championship. It was a very dominant car
Lewis: this car is slow toto
Me: man this guy is a whinger
Yelistener:
And F1 wants to make the lap times even slower..
Yea, sad
Finally you upload something that isn't about how Checo has become worse and bring you views
Its the driver not the car
Would be nice if you name these corners correct, not just Turn 9, 10, 11. They have a name for no reason
The new regs suck! And its gonna suck even more from 2026. We are witnessing the live murder of F1.
Yeah they suck the ground a lot obviously cuz they are ground effect cars
I'm with you 😢
f1 died in 2014 when they introduced the v6t engines.
@@x_aquatix_xwhen the v8s left 😢
@@x_aquatix_x and gave a free pass to dominate because they wanted a fake multichampion.
Imagine how fast the W11 would be with Max driving🤯
You mean slower? 🤔
slower?
They are great cars that sound really bad :(
Why are you closing the visual gap in favor of visual references. it feels awful.
Yeah I understand what you mean, but the video is more to show how they compare in specific parts of the track, not overall. For instance the gap created at the final chicane would be less noticeable if the gap from T6 had remained throughout the video
Ground effect F1 cars are simply rubbish. Crap rule set - pointless. Slow and heavy, and absolutely enormous.
f
"The fastest car ever" in my arguable opinion is the F2004 but alright
F2004 with modern slicks would compete with RB19, cause it also lacks modern technology. W11 was the pinnacle of fastest track car ever which would maybe go on to beat Porsche Evo
People over exagerate f2004 power. It's faster on straight lines but w11 is faster on corners
@@manishapadave8390bro F2004 was extremely light and nimble making it very fast and it also had a monstrous V10, no way can RB19 pose a competition to it with slicks, and 2018 until 2020(maybe 21) f1 cars are faster than the Porsche 919 evo.
@@sanandreasgd7148true that
@@ibrahimalatrash8008 Shoot forgot about the weight!!! Sorry
Yea then it would smoke 19, if they had that tech back in those days 04 would be the fastest machine on track no doubt.
Even compared to the previous gen the new cars look fat and heavy