Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Replayability features are FINALLY here in Gunner HEAT PC & New T-72 Variants & More | July Update
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 сер 2024
- Full Patch Notes: store.steampow...
Discord - / discord
Instagram / phanphantasy.gaming
Twitter - / phanphantasygg
Music - share.epidemic...
Let me know your thoughts on this big update!
Also, I'm almost at 10K, if you haven't sub, doo it! Thanks!
Man, this game just keeps getting better and better. A coop mode would be killer in this game.
Multiplayer even better
@@DankTank374it would actually threaten gaijins money flow forcing them to step it up on war thunder so yeah it would def be awesome
@@DankTank374 Both already on the roadmap, but they won't touch it until the core game and it's mechanics are fully realized.
In the day and age of 'eternal' early access titles this is a sound business decision, even from the players perspective.
Coop is (eventually) coming. Traditional multi-player (pvp) is very unlikely, as the devs have stated balancing would be nearly impossible, and trying to figure out how to allot tanks in a way that would make sense and be fun is difficult in a game like this.
this and the addition of leopards are what would bring me back to this game
I want leopard 1s really bad
soon
Let the devs cook
we all do, Leopard 1a1a, 1a1a 120mm, 1a5, 2k, and 2a3!
@@lordbumpy3634 this aint warthunder bruv
@@quan-uo5ws no one ask you
If only Gaijin put this much love into their game. I know this a Steam game but lord, it would be great on consoles.
They do like their game to some extent but they put the money first.
War thunder has come a long way since I started playing in 2016 and your lucky to have it. The game is so good just wish they would add UI for sim and mix nations so it's not just China and Russia against every single nation.
Gaijin puts a LOT of love into their game. WT as a game is GOOD. The problem is that it's an online game with heavy focus towards GRIND in order to get as much money from the players. If WT was a single player game with campaigns, custom missions and multiplayer, it would have ZERO competition.
Gaijin is a criminal company. Back in 2022 they were caught banning players randomly, committing fraud in the process.
US already had M774. It was the reserve round.
In this update it became the main round for the US while the M735 became the reserve
Tankograd autist sighted
i instantly clicked on it thinking this was war thunder... at least i discovered a new game
You won't regret it.
Bringing T80's to all the fights where T55's get bullied
Just bought it for 22EUR ( 10% off). Hope they will keep their promise and fully develop this game. Has a lot of promise.
dude have you seen the speed at which they release updates? Highly doubt they will abandon it lmao
Sure does. IF they stop being so stubborn and get rid of Unity. If they move the game to a better engine, it will TAKE OFF like a rocket.
@@xXturbo86Xx They should hire you. You seem like you know exactly what they need to take off, and exactly when they need it. Send them an e-mail with your CV and you got yourself a job as lead dev in no time, champ!
@@xXturbo86Xx there not going to move to a new engine
they know how to use unity and it's been doing them fine
they have no reason too
if they did they would have so a while ago
too late know considering how far they have gotten in development
@@xXturbo86Xx EFT is made on Unity so its a fine engine, not everything needs to be controlled and locked down like Unreal 5
Spg 9 looks epic 👍
Also a lot of the APFSDS round have been changed with the new patch
ammo changes:
(higher drag coef = more pen/velocity lost over distance)
M735: 379mm RHA @ 0m, drag coef of 0.25
M774: 440mm @ 0m (unchanged), drag coef increased (0.08 -> 0.25)
M833: pen decreased (500mm -> 480mm), drag coef increased (0.08 -> 0.25)
3BM32: 560mm @ 0m (unchanged), drag coef decreased (0.225 -> 0.16)
3BM22: 440mm @ 0m (unchanged), drag coef decreased (0.25 -> 0.16)
nice :)
this update was very much worth the waite
Thanks for the update. Still loving the channel
What the game needs is a full mission editor.
The AI shouldnt be able to see through thick tree lines. In a lot of missions they basically have xray vision and 1 tap me when i shouldn't be visible even on IR due to the trees being shined upon by the sun
Edit: This was supposed to be a light hearted comment and not a foundation for a battlefield in the comments 🫤
the dev's are aware the A.I is not prefect
even then this is never going to %100 go away
@@samargrewal929 ik but it would be better if they at least try to optimize it, even if it doesn't change much
@@samargrewal929If they haven’t fixed such a basic thing then why are they adding more tanks and spg9s? Sounds like they need to fix basic stuff
@@Rokaize they have working on the a.i from the beginning my guy
what else do you want them do ?
if you are trying to make the A.I act like trained crew's when sometime stuff like that will happened
at the end of the day they are controlled by the computer there not a human player
@@samargrewal929 What I also meant in my original comment is that for example realistically if you see an enemy tank, you get to sth which happens to normal foot soldiers: Hunter's fever. Basically you get an adrenaline rush by seeing your potential target, and a way to imitate that could be for ex. when they see you they will wait for 1-2 seconds before firing. This should also maybe depend on a potential difficulty setting, where the higher the difficulty, the faster the AI response is
Still waiting for the Bundeswehr. I really want to play with Leopard 1's, Leopard 2A3 or A4's and Marders.
can't wait for one day be able to play the leopard 1 and 2
Don't get yourself too hyped up
This update took a looooooong time to release. I hope that the mission customizer will allow placement of units as well in the future...
Beeing able to decided what vehicles are in a mission is nice for youtibers who need a mission with certian vehicles in it :)
💯
Huh, the original T-72 should have an optical rangefinder.
The earlier ones did, but I guess this was just after.
they might have decided to not include it since the T-64A is already in-game
also the number of T-72s built with the TPD-2-49 rangefinder was quite small and when the TPD-K1 entered service older T-72s started to be retrofitted with the newer sight
@@samargrewal929 eh makes sense, either way i am still going to be playing mostly T-64s so its all good
they could have been czech produced with laser rangefinders. Besides, the laser rangefinder is simply slapped on top of the old rangefinder, its not an entirely new FCS.
TPD-K1 laser gunsight-rangefinder began to be installed on original T-72s (obj. 172M) in limited quantities in 1976, and as standard equipment since 1978.
Me want west Germans already
They will be added when there done
There are two things I'd like to see - but I acknowledge these are extremely unlikely.
The first is some new objectives and models for them. Like a battery of 9K52 Luna-M (Frog-7) rocket launchers have been detected by recon - break through with all haste before they can launch! Or interdict a convoy transporting SAMs, over-run a forward command outpost and its forest of antennas, and protect our forward air resupply point from an enemy attack.
I would also like to see the Developers create a resource package kit so they can license the engine to others. They are laser focused on 1985 Fulda gap, while so many others comment on how the engine would work for 1950s tech, or want to see the latest models of M1A2 and T-90. So make paralel production possible via the interested modders to have alternate games based on this engine. Yeah this probably involves a lot of lawyers, patents and copyrights so I wouldn't hold my breath - but seeing this tech for India-Pakistan conflicts, or some sort of Theoretical South American armored clash seems neat.
The first one seems like a cool objective idea.
The game engine uses Unity, which is already a popular game engine. As for the theatre, fulda gap is the first one as they continue to develop the game core. There may be DLCs in the future that will cover different places.
if it had a built in mission maker the replay-ability would SKYROCKET. The editor is a nice start though
Game is just going to get better!
Coop is the only thing needed for this to be an easy buy
its coming in the future
I cant wait until they add desert storm stuff
Highly unlikely as they don't to focuse on real conflicts
Also it's boring and not interesting
All it would be is a glorified training missions since that's how one sided it would be
If you want a NATO stompfuest play any version of the game before the Soviets where added and it was only the east Germans
Man all i need is first person view like in red orchestra 2 inside tanks❤
sadly never going to happen, the dev team doesn't have the budget or the ability to make interiors within a reasonable amount of time
so close to full mission editor!
It would be nice to have the ability to set waypoints for all friendly units and groups.
If this was War Thunder the entire war would be lost thanks to invincible BMPs popping M1 tanks with their machine guns from across the map.
that's what the game needed
I want a new pc to play this masterpiece
Once they add leopard 2a4 ill be so happy
@@ArctrooperHavoc the leopard 2 where are getting is not going to be a A4 the developer's themselves have confirmed it
It's going be eather a A3 or A2
Wish this had PVP.
Haven’t been in the loop but is there any word on a real mission editor? I need something to actually keep me playing the game.
Core game needs to be finished before we get any mission editors. So probably not any time soon.
I want to know if the Chieftain would get added
the brits where not in fulda during 85 so no
if they decide to do a NORTHTAG expansion after 1.0 when ya since they fit
I think there is a mod that ads it, but as the other person said - not every army was present in this area of operations.
That is completely false not sure where you got that from
?
@@robingrewal8103 Who was this directed at?
Ill buy only when they add vehicle interirors
so never then
@@harveyknguyen their playerbase would massively increase if they did so
@@mysteriumxarxes3990 the dev team is 10 guys, only 3 of them are full time and all of them don't have much experience in Unity or the time to do it
also what makes you think the playerbase would increase because of it
No game has done what War Thunder is capable of YET, but give it some time and this will become Gaijin's competitor for sure. I'm just glad they're going to have some market competition. Maybe this will kick some sense into Gaijin and improve their game instead of milk it to death... Keep supporting the devs!!!
gunner heat pc is not trying to be a war thunder competitor and that's not going to change
@@samargrewal929 It will, they have mods and 2ndly there will be COOP, when that releases alot of people are gonna drop that grind fest, pay to win vehicle crap and come to GHPC
I wish this game would have a ww2 DLC. It would be awesome to play this game as a sherman tank in france
if they did ww2 every tank would play like the T-55 in-game
this means the verity of FCS's showed in-game and how the vehicle's that use would play differently to one another would be very limited compared to the current Fulda gap 1985 setting
also ww2 has been done death while barely anything does cold war stuff
Still no infrantry?
probably will get cut tbh been years with no updates
My issue with GHPC is it just feels disjointed. No tactics really. The enemy just rushes so does team AI. It needs more that’s more cat mouse hiding waiting style missions😊
the A.I will be reworked in the future
right know it entirely relays on way point's to move around the map
@@samargrewal929 ah ok I was unaware of that actually. Ok well in that case I can understand they are still working on it and it’s forgiven. lol I thought the AI was just that bad.
@@masterman3178 where quite good at shooting and will react when taking fire
but they can't make any plan and maneuver around the map by themselves
Sadly M1 and M1IP where ammo nerfed...xD I still will play with mod M1A1 xD
Iraq
I hope this game kills war thunder one day
All well and good but its just the same tanks on the same tiny map flighting the same repetitive battles. Steel Fury is a much better game at this point and it was released in 2010! The devs in Gunner HEAT seem to be putting all their efforts in the wrong place (building more tanks) when they should be focusing on expanding the world variety, adding troops and ways to create realistic battles not small skirmishes. At this point its not worth buying the game because after about 5-6 battles you've done basically everything there is to do in the game.
they have been working on infantry for the lest two mouths where just not ready
also look at the roadmap forehead
it's has expanded campaign on there
and the game is in early access so ya of course the game is going be incomplete. do i really have to tell you that ?
steel fury was not
@@samargrewal929 yes but there's one map even the last item on the roadmap multiplayer shows the exact same map so its basically a sandbox where you repeat the same mission on the same map just with different tanks. There isn't much strategy or planning or solid goals in the game other than drive to one area shoot tanks or BMPs with different optics or weapons and repeat.
Bit miffed when games say "new vehicle" and mean new variants
I want AbramsX
out timeframe
and AbramsX is just a technology demonstrator so it's not going to enter service
they’re adding it next update
@@basedguy89 thank you Mr Based you are a patriot
@@magnusred2945 you got ticked
bro pulled that out of know where
and also it's complete BS
there are no plans for AbramsX and the tank will likely never come to the game since the tank is likely never to be adopted
just like most if not all technology demonstrator
Unity looks so bad. It's unfortunate that the developers are so stubborn and refuse to use a better engine.
it's the engine they have the most experience with as well as where the project started from the very beginning and there not going to change because of someone else's opinion
and even if they did it would not be worth it