Primary Arms PLxC 1-8 - The C Stands for Cooooooool

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 388

  • @Hoplopfheil
    @Hoplopfheil 2 роки тому +468

    This thing is impressive. I wish I liked LPVOs.

    • @thearsdfa
      @thearsdfa 2 роки тому +32

      LPVOs are dead

    • @FreedomFisher410
      @FreedomFisher410 2 роки тому +34

      People still have lpvos? I thought king Lucas told us to destroy or surrender them.. I love my new ACOG. 😂

    • @CRinJersey
      @CRinJersey 2 роки тому +19

      Hop likes this more than a Elcan 😂

    • @thomascking12
      @thomascking12 2 роки тому +28

      Lpvos are so last month.

    • @stryker607
      @stryker607 2 роки тому +17

      *Acog fanboys intensify

  • @crisincebu
    @crisincebu Рік тому +68

    The reason I like this is bcoz he's keeping his videos focused on the products he's reviewing. You don't have to watch some want to be special forces operator showing himself shooting and running around in battle gear . This is what I like to see, a review of the product and informative information 👏. I'm a subscriber now . 👍🇺🇸

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +7

      You don't have to listen to my reviews to learn everything you need from my videos. Show, don't tell.

    • @crisincebu
      @crisincebu Рік тому

      @C_DOES well if I don't listen to you then it would be hard to know what you describe and to hear your thoughts/ opinions on the product. 👍

  • @canine555
    @canine555 Рік тому +24

    You’re “phew, phew” gunshot sound effects were so good, I actually ducked and sought cover.

  • @fuzzyreticle
    @fuzzyreticle 2 роки тому +124

    Whoa. Your craft in producing content is impressive as hell. I wouldn’t ever consider purchasing an optic over $500 without first watching your review first.

    • @WalnutZen
      @WalnutZen 2 роки тому +17

      He's the only UA-camr that does reviews like this. We're thankful for you C

    • @RADIOACTIVEBUNY
      @RADIOACTIVEBUNY 2 роки тому +6

      Dark lord of optics is another one. He’s an optical engineer. Extraordinary info from him.

    • @WalnutZen
      @WalnutZen 2 роки тому +1

      @@RADIOACTIVEBUNY thank you for that brother

    • @WalnutZen
      @WalnutZen 2 роки тому

      @@RADIOACTIVEBUNY thank you for that brother

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +4

      Much obliged mate!

  • @brandonrupp5880
    @brandonrupp5880 2 роки тому +35

    This is on my list for a 14.5 build. I second your desire for a 2-12 built around the same platform. Locking turrets and keep it under 22 oz.

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +8

      I'm still hoping man

  • @mhughes1160
    @mhughes1160 2 роки тому +23

    To Primary Arms it would be a nice tool to be able to to see an in-depth review like this
    on every optic . Thanks for letting C_DOES review your scope

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +2

      Thanks mate!

  • @jklop7841
    @jklop7841 2 роки тому +10

    I made a comment on one of your videos years ago and I said something along the lines of “companies need to send this guy scopes to be reviewed”. I’m super happy this has been happening for you. Like I said in that same comment back then, no one shows the scope features and POV the way you do. Thank you.

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +3

      I remember that comment! I called it something along the lines like 'a life goal' some companies are proud to have me review their stuff. And for that, I'm very honored to be able to help out both that company, and the community

  • @InvidiousIgnoramus
    @InvidiousIgnoramus 2 роки тому +75

    I would like to see them add a 2-10 or 2-12 in a compact form factor, if possible. I feel that could be RELATIVELY possible.

    • @19Clutch69
      @19Clutch69 2 роки тому +1

      Worried about the same cons..wish for a bigger objective..

    • @InvidiousIgnoramus
      @InvidiousIgnoramus 2 роки тому +7

      @@19Clutch69 the objectives on MPVOs are bigger. A 2-10 is typically 40-44mm for the objective, although there are some in the upper 30s as well. Still a lot better than any LVPO.

    • @gayanathaponso5158
      @gayanathaponso5158 2 роки тому +3

      Dude...mid power is what i want as well.

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +28

      I've talked to PA about this. They don't have any plans to create such a perfect optic

    • @19Clutch69
      @19Clutch69 Рік тому +6

      @@CDOES depressing..

  • @GLOCKZEVOZ9C
    @GLOCKZEVOZ9C Рік тому +5

    I think the fact that the ceo sent this out to you for a detailed review speaks to volumes saying I think we created something really great for the money now let's show the people thoroughly what we got and put it to the test. I can stand by that as far as a company and ceo is concerned.
    I like what these guys are doing.
    I'm between the credo 1-6 and this right now.
    I want the razor but brown isn't a color I want nore do I want the weight. I want light weight and battle capable. The rest is training with what you are working with. As always thank you for the great review!

  • @linkchen8245
    @linkchen8245 2 роки тому +34

    The biggest impact to me is that at 1500 price range there's finally one can compete with the razor gen 2 1-6, this having huge advantages with great ffp reticle, 2x more mag ,size and weight. GJ to PA and . Great reviewer as always ! I also like how optics makers give very clear info to the reviewer and user about pros and cons of the product like this.

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +7

      Thanks mate. I'd Love to see a lightweight sfp 1-6 plxc. Just to see how good it could be. Probably be a damn bit cheaper as well

    • @holdernewtshesrearin5471
      @holdernewtshesrearin5471 Рік тому +1

      If you ask me the PA SLX-1-8x ACSS 2nd focal plane LPVO is already a better option than the razor.
      2nd FP makes much more sense for a scope under 10x imo.

    • @ericschumacher5189
      @ericschumacher5189 11 місяців тому +1

      100% agreed; I hope they can make it happen….now with the NOVA out, I think people would like to see some hybrid of the two, if that’s possible.

  • @CRinJersey
    @CRinJersey 2 роки тому +11

    Great vid C
    I really enjoy the “all in one” longer video format
    Getting behind and using some lpvo’s for the first time last couple of months, I can appreciate your content so much more
    Keep up the excellent work!

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +2

      Thanks mate!

  • @BringerOfD
    @BringerOfD 2 роки тому +17

    Primary Arms has really impressed me with their scopes. The glass quality suffers just a little in comparison to scopes significantly more expensive, but that really only becomes a factor at dawn and dusk. Once into the actual night I feel like it doesn't really matter. If there's enough artificial light for a high end scope to work, it's enough light for a lower end scope to work just based on contrast. If there's no artificial light, well you can't see anything with any scope.

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +1

      Everything has its pros and cons when viewed properly. This is not without its flaws. But it's reasonably accepted for its price, build quality, and weight.

  • @andrewclodfelter3782
    @andrewclodfelter3782 2 роки тому +7

    Best optics reviewer on UA-cam. You have not only changed the game but now others are actually giving optic reviews with a look through the optic itself. No more going off the reviewers word. Thank you for that.

  • @GroinsItchin
    @GroinsItchin 2 роки тому +29

    A 2-12 in all they're ranges would be amazing!

    • @Ripper13F1V
      @Ripper13F1V 2 роки тому +3

      This is what I've been asking for. Argos BTRgII comes close, just want better build, glass, turrets, and more refined reticle. PA applying this to a 2x12 would indeed be amazing.

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +10

      Trek me about it. I'm trying to tell them it would sell so well

    • @FMDad-dm5qo
      @FMDad-dm5qo Рік тому

      That would be legit

  • @outboardprsnlstndup
    @outboardprsnlstndup 2 роки тому +5

    Yes and amen to a plx 1.5-10 or 2-12

  • @jtoole5639
    @jtoole5639 6 місяців тому +1

    This guy is the best on UA-cam at giving a detailed breakdown of optics’ pros and cons.

  • @brandonparrett2436
    @brandonparrett2436 2 роки тому +5

    I’m with you on the 2-12 maybe even 3-15 PLX

  • @COUREURSdesBOIS88
    @COUREURSdesBOIS88 3 місяці тому +1

    The production value of your reviews sets a whole new standard! The meticulous breakdown, attention to detail should be a case study on how these should be done! Thanks for the review-definitely helped me in my decision to finally pull the trigger on the PLX line.

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  3 місяці тому

      @@COUREURSdesBOIS88 cheers mate!

  • @fr3d_fly351
    @fr3d_fly351 2 роки тому +6

    So a mid-range reticle in an FFP optic that works best in the bottom half of its mag range?

  • @lawyerup1time785
    @lawyerup1time785 2 роки тому +2

    I have the prior version of the platinum one to eight and it’s one of the two or three best scopes. I have certainly the best lpvo I’ve ever tried only downside it was heavy, but I had everything else totally clear, daylight bright, amazing reticle

  • @user-vu1to8jd3t
    @user-vu1to8jd3t 2 роки тому +2

    Your thoughts mimic my own. I run mine on a 16" AR-10 with a piggybacked RDS. I leave the PLXc at about 4/5x. It really shines there While the RDS is best for CQB. If I'm prone, then I can crank the magnification, but offhand it's difficult above 6x. Total package with the Reptilia mount is still dainty compared to a Razor.

  • @trydentnation
    @trydentnation 2 роки тому +6

    I totally agree a 2-12 is an excellent middle ground. the 2 options I've found on the market are the Athlon Helos BTR 2-12 gen 2 and the Swampfox Kentucky Long 2-12. I think that both are good options and are at similar price points. I would love to see a direct comparison between the two on your channel.

    • @kacasio1
      @kacasio1 2 роки тому +1

      Throw in the Primary Arms GLx 2.5-10 with the ACSS MIL-Grid Griffin reticle.

  • @SH-mp1fx
    @SH-mp1fx 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you for this review. I really wish they can make a 3-15 plx at about 21 oz or less.

  • @C_oprator89
    @C_oprator89 2 роки тому +8

    You knocked this review out of the park. Awesome man. And if they made a plx 2-10 or 12 brother it would be king. Has anyone tried the Athlon helos 2-12? Idk I'm a die hard primary arms guy but between the glx and Athlon I really don't know. But regardless watched this entire video and just phenomenal job.

  • @mhughes1160
    @mhughes1160 2 роки тому +5

    Kudos to PA I’ve been looking at some of their scopes and would like to see quality reviews like C_DOES do before I purchase . Not just the high end products , but also the lower end budget friendly products I hope PA will send you more products to review in the near future

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +1

      PA has been very understanding and receptive of my findings, both good and bad. They want to make the best possible product for the community

  • @timfoster1599
    @timfoster1599 Рік тому +2

    Well, I don't even need an optic. However, stumbling across one of your videos has turned into my replacement for Yellowstone!
    Your videos are superb and lenght. I could watch an hour for a single review.
    Excellent time spent, and I believe we all appreciate your efforts!!!!

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +1

      🥰 What a compliment! Appreciated mate!

  • @JP-wl5vj
    @JP-wl5vj Рік тому +3

    I'm totally impressed by this scope and this review. I just assumed .... in my ignorance......that PA just made junk. But this comes out of Japan and the 1x image looks GREAT. And it is very LIGHT. Great scope and great review!

  • @user-hn9fr7mn3x
    @user-hn9fr7mn3x Рік тому +3

    Awesome reviews. I love how you put emphasis on eye box, which is probably the most important aspect of a lpvo run and gun scope.
    I’m searching for a lpvo, and this scope is high on my list. Love the light weight.
    What would you say is your top 3 lpvo scopes in regards to eye box?

  • @lawyerup1time785
    @lawyerup1time785 Рік тому +1

    I have the older plx 1-8 and it’s my fav scope by far just heavy. Been on a scar 17.

  • @FreedomFisher410
    @FreedomFisher410 2 роки тому +7

    Please tell us your thoughts on this vs NF NX8. Both premium 1-8 FFP compacts with xmas tree reticles. That would be a great comparison.

    • @snowfa1155
      @snowfa1155 2 роки тому +1

      Especially the new NX8 1-8 with capped turrets and a new reticle

    • @19Clutch69
      @19Clutch69 2 роки тому

      Whoa! Id loved the f1 NX8 mpvo variants

  • @Sybertronic7
    @Sybertronic7 5 місяців тому +4

    Looking forward to your review of the upcoming SFP PLxC Nova! Did Primary Arms send you one by chance?

  • @garrickr5084
    @garrickr5084 5 місяців тому +1

    Absolutely fantastic video, brother! I truly appreciate all the work you do to review such a wide variety of more common (budget friendly) and rare high end (big $$$$) scopes. The direct comp with the SAI-6 was so interesting to me. Shows how incredibly next level the glass is on the SAI (imho). Looking forward to more bro. Cheers!

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  5 місяців тому +1

      Thank you kindly brother. The sai6 is top tier ffp 1-6. The reticle needs work tho.

  • @silly_ghillie
    @silly_ghillie 2 роки тому +1

    Brilliant review. Love the look of reticle on this.

  • @tymarkham3931
    @tymarkham3931 4 місяці тому +1

    You make the best optic videos, brother. Thanks for the information

  • @maxx236
    @maxx236 Рік тому +3

    Would you consider this to be a better buy than the Razor Gen II E 1-6? Both are pretty close if not the same in price.

  • @stevejordan9567
    @stevejordan9567 5 місяців тому +2

    Your reviews are so good. I wouldn’t buy anything without seeing your review.

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  5 місяців тому

      You flatter me 🥰

    • @stevejordan9567
      @stevejordan9567 5 місяців тому

      @@CDOES your knowledge base of optics is way beyond mine. It would be silly not to listen to someone who is behind glass very often.

  • @e7tegt503
    @e7tegt503 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the detailed review. I’ve had my eye on this for a while. It’s going to sit on a DD5 V3 in a high mount. Should do the job.

  • @JohnyBravo44
    @JohnyBravo44 Рік тому +2

    Meter BDC reticle is the way to go. Fantastic!

  • @ianmock2
    @ianmock2 Рік тому +2

    Man I wish you could review everything. Such great commentary.

  • @AAAA-qr9xk
    @AAAA-qr9xk 2 роки тому +1

    I just got mine mounted, it is an amazing pice of glass. Not perfect, 8x is very tight, but a hella find job they did

  • @stevekovarik9978
    @stevekovarik9978 Рік тому +1

    Great review. Love your format. Primary Arms is doing great things in the industry - truly disruptive and I appreciate them for that. It feels like PA listens to their end users (or maybe just uses some actual experience/logic) about 5x most other optic companies. So many SMH designs out there yet PA knocks it out of the park almost all of the time, even on their Chinesium stuff.

  • @chillumvillain6801
    @chillumvillain6801 2 роки тому +3

    Great video as always. I would love to hear your take on the VCOG 1-8 if you happen to get your hands on one in the near future.

    • @youngmonkey2504
      @youngmonkey2504 2 роки тому

      Such a cool scope, weighs more than a motherfucker though

  • @SnapD24
    @SnapD24 2 роки тому +1

    I've been waiting for this review for so so long. I've been on the fence on this scope for a while. Here's to hoping it's a home run.

  • @marcb1278
    @marcb1278 2 роки тому +1

    Chromatic Aberration was present 17:37, 20:03, however negligible for its purpose, it's there. The only way it gets eliminated is the use of Sapphire lens with higher RI but that'll increase weight and $$$ of course.

  • @thomashall41
    @thomashall41 2 роки тому +5

    This was the review I've been waiting for and it was definitely worth the wait! Many thanks for doing it. The comparisons were awesome, how would you compare this to the Razor Gen III? Especially interested in comparison to the eye box. Thanks!

  • @pescad0
    @pescad0 Рік тому

    The illum cutting out on the leupold is a feature, it let's you know your off center and therefore you know you are minimizing parallax at distance if it's lit up

  • @JSCO-
    @JSCO- 2 роки тому +5

    This PLXC vs the Razor genII E 1-6, what's your pick?

    • @jeffreylc
      @jeffreylc 10 місяців тому

      The PLXC. Not even close.

    • @JSCO-
      @JSCO- 10 місяців тому

      @@jeffreylc bought one, totally agree

  • @MC-ei6jz
    @MC-ei6jz 2 роки тому +3

    Thanks for the review great job, although an 8x with a practically unusable 8x is a major bummer regardless of it's design. It's a 1-8x. May as well just buy a 1-5 or 6.

  • @Clover.field618
    @Clover.field618 2 роки тому +3

    Would really dig a comparison with the nx8

  • @holdernewtshesrearin5471
    @holdernewtshesrearin5471 Рік тому +1

    I wouldn't trade my PA ACSS optics for anything out there! Love them!

  • @stevenlewis6781
    @stevenlewis6781 2 роки тому +2

    Marshall, thank you for making this review possible. I have a POF Revolution DI that would be perfect for this optic if you're still feeling generous LoL!
    Jokes aside, the reviews on this channel are second to none. I've been waiting for this particular one for sure. Great review.

  • @ChrisWilliams-vm1do
    @ChrisWilliams-vm1do 5 місяців тому

    I have one of these. My first LPVO. It’s pretty fantastic.

  • @USMC444817
    @USMC444817 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you sir for the hard work that was put into this review. This has made a fantastic impact on my purchasing options going forward.

  • @justinrush6620
    @justinrush6620 2 роки тому +3

    Thanks for the review.
    This PLxC, or the Razor Gen2E for competition?

  • @emtothedee
    @emtothedee Рік тому +1

    On my plx c, I get a weird reticle reflection even on low brightness setting when wearing glasses. Almost like two horseshoe reticle connected to the center reticle. I get it sometimes without glasses on as well. Not sure if it’s a deal breaker yet

  • @stumpyhigginbottom3466
    @stumpyhigginbottom3466 2 роки тому +5

    The only reason all these good reviews haven't driven me to impulse buy one of these is the 24mm objective. So glad PA is still using 1990s-era ideas on that one part of the scope, because everything else looks amazing.
    Thanks for the great reviews, as always, C_Does!

    • @seijiroukikuoka5975
      @seijiroukikuoka5975 2 роки тому +2

      Did some research on objectives based on your comment. You might be onto something, though I wonder whether it's laziness or lack of technology that hinders...

    • @tonyd9799
      @tonyd9799 2 роки тому +9

      If you go bigger on the front objective (28mm 30mm) you need more exotic optical formulas and glass compositions to reduce distortion at 1X. A 2lb, $3k scope for a tiny bit more light gathering ability is one way to go. Or still spend $3k but sacrifice eye box / FOV etc for weight. Another way is to forget LPVOs and get a 1.5X-X or 2X-X and mount a reflex sight on top of it for 1X.
      You’ll end up with a similar cost and weight but with a massively bigger objective, much better light gathering, a better eye box at higher magnification, parallax adjustment…
      This is one of the most optically modern LPVOs available it’s just that the design parameters are relatively modest and realistic: “a red dot that can zoom in” not a proper scope that also happens to also be a red dot”

    • @seijiroukikuoka5975
      @seijiroukikuoka5975 2 роки тому

      @@tonyd9799 Then it sounds like we are still underdeveloped in those technologies, then. But when colleges are full of commies, of course developments suffer.

  • @borkwoof696
    @borkwoof696 2 роки тому +4

    Good to see an independent review on this as opposed to all the shill content out there

    • @sumblakdude9
      @sumblakdude9 2 роки тому +6

      I wouldn’t call 9 hole or Supersetca shills

    • @JGoodZX6R
      @JGoodZX6R 2 роки тому +3

      @@sumblakdude9 he means the obvious ones like Kotaboy, Rex, Countrymash, Military Arms, the douche ”Weapon Snatcher,” etc.

  • @DTreatz
    @DTreatz 2 роки тому +1

    He did the review! 😁😁

  • @jamesmikell6773
    @jamesmikell6773 Рік тому +2

    I really wish that primary arms would have used something like the nova reticle in this optic. Had they done that this choice would be a no brainer. between this and the razor 1-6 what would be your pick? the extra 2x doesn't make a whole lot of difference as most my shooting is 300yds and in. and the weight difference for me doesn't sway me one way or the other. appreciate all your content.

  • @seanwhite304
    @seanwhite304 2 роки тому

    This is by far one if the best bang for your buck

  • @JGoodZX6R
    @JGoodZX6R Рік тому +2

    13:50 shows one of my gripes with this scope. I didn’t notice it in those video before I purchased mine, but if my head is ever so slightly off in the small eyebox, the reticle pulls/doubles. Look at the vertical ranging bars and you’ll see what im talking about.

  • @SparkyMTB
    @SparkyMTB Рік тому +3

    When he’s doing the shooting test.. the ‘pew pew’ that has to be a reference to Danny DeVito in ‘Its Always Sunny…’ when they are at Laser Tag.. pew pew 😅

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  Рік тому +1

      So anyway, I started Blasting!

  • @JW11595E
    @JW11595E 2 роки тому +6

    I wonder what this thing in a 34mm tube would be like? I too would love to see a solid 2-12x would be great, I really just wish the credo 2-10x didn’t have its issues but because that thing has the ideal reticle imo for that type of optic.

  • @benoswald9431
    @benoswald9431 2 місяці тому +2

    Will you do a review on the PLXC SFP NOVA??? need the comparison to help make up my mind

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  2 місяці тому +1

      @@benoswald9431 the full review is on the way!

  • @michaelcheshareck3275
    @michaelcheshareck3275 2 роки тому

    Good timing, right as I have one loaded in my cart trying to make a decision

  • @navyman8903
    @navyman8903 2 роки тому +8

    I think you may have been a little too nice on this. You didn't cover the door frames or windowsills not lining up like you normally would. I had a feeling the eyebox was too tight on this one, and it was. I can't run it like that, I'm about to pitch the Razor Gen III for this reason. Looks like I'm going to be getting a SAI 6, and an ATACR 1-8. Thanks for getting it out and saving me from being upset with it. The 8x is too fuzzy, and the eyebox is not where it's at.

    • @ericanderson524
      @ericanderson524 2 роки тому +3

      I returned my plx 1-8 because the eyebox was very tight at 8x, and more tight than the sai 1-6 overall. What’s the point of 8x if it’s not very usable? Still have my sai 1-6 but I’m considering getting rid of it since I’m not convinced lpvos are for me. I piggyback a t2 so a mpvo seem s better for me with the exception that a lpvo gives me a backup 1x sighting system.

    • @MexicanNinja82
      @MexicanNinja82 2 роки тому +1

      My offer still stands brotha, I’ll send you mine to do your review.

    • @navyman8903
      @navyman8903 2 роки тому +1

      @@MexicanNinja82 I still appreciate it, but I would be worried about depriving you of the optic and I'm super careful with things that aren't mine/would be worried I would scratch it or something. Then my father would teleport to wherever I am just to give me whoopins for not listening to him lol.

    • @dminus6390
      @dminus6390 2 роки тому +1

      Have you seen the dark lord of optics review? Just another knowledgeable opinion. I am really impressed with my copy, I have not noted and fuzziness at the top end. The eye box is tight but that just a trade off made to keep it so small and light. Fov and eyebox are much better than the nx8 which I would say is the main competitor.

    • @ComeOnPelican91
      @ComeOnPelican91 2 роки тому +1

      Thought about trying some mvpo's since lvpos were cancelled by metoo? CDoes likes the swampfox kentucky long

  • @Mills141
    @Mills141 2 роки тому +1

    I've been looking forward to this...

  • @TKTK-sw3tq
    @TKTK-sw3tq Рік тому +12

    The first responder price for the PLXc drops down to $1,099 so I think it’s an absolute must if you have that.

  • @ElTejon47901
    @ElTejon47901 2 роки тому

    So love mine. It is on my HCS Mk12 now. May get another.

  • @K0gashuk0
    @K0gashuk0 2 роки тому +1

    That is awesome. I love primary arms. I love their products at their price point. But at $1500 I would buy a trijicon. Now... I have said that before about Holosun VS trijicon and I now how Holosuns on my carry gun over the RMR just because of the battery accessibility and the solar backup.

  • @TheHateHarbinger
    @TheHateHarbinger 2 роки тому

    Pew! Pew, pew pew!
    Thank you for being your genuine self.

  • @atr00157
    @atr00157 3 місяці тому +1

    @C_does any short thoughts on plxc nova? Have the slx now

  • @eddieg9951
    @eddieg9951 Рік тому +1

    What’s up C ? I’ve been shooting for years in all different exercises and guns. I’ve just recently decided to rescope my AR . I really appreciate your dedication toward scope reviews!!! My choice before coming to your channel was the primary arms GLX FFP 1-6 x24 ACSS Raptor -M6. I haven’t received it yet , but already wishing I didn’t order it. May even send it back before I mount it. I sure would like to know what your go to , best scope in FFP would be. Anyway thanks again for your great work !!
    PS. Did you ever do a review on Burris XTR II 1-5-24 ?

  • @mhughes1160
    @mhughes1160 2 роки тому

    Another great in-depth review and a nice looking optic thanks

  • @ulrikerudel6859
    @ulrikerudel6859 Рік тому +1

    here for the pews

  • @bearwoolsey9949
    @bearwoolsey9949 2 роки тому

    Been waiting on this C_DOES review

  • @georgestratakos4161
    @georgestratakos4161 2 роки тому +2

    Can you get yours hands on the Steiner 1-6 KC-1?

  • @sissydreams7494
    @sissydreams7494 2 роки тому +1

    AWESOME Review! I have a HK SL8 and need a scope. I was thinking of getting a Trijicon Credo 1-8x28mm (with the 34mm tube, but not the HD model). I also wanted the Swampfox 2-12x44mm Kentucky Long; however, the large objective lens and necessary high mounting on a stupidly high rifle rail might be a problem. Any suggestions?

  • @ignaciogodinez8217
    @ignaciogodinez8217 7 місяців тому +1

    As always, good review. I am undecided whether to go with this lpvo or the vortex razor 1-6!!!!! Both are same price range. Honest question, what would you get? Razor or this one?

    • @CDOES
      @CDOES  7 місяців тому

      Depends on the roles, and personal preference. Its a really hard decision between those two for me to answer without knowing the setup and intended use case.

  • @Super61Blackhawk
    @Super61Blackhawk 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent review as usual. Will you review a Eotech Vudu 1-10?

  • @KB-gu2sc
    @KB-gu2sc 24 дні тому

    Fantastic review!

  • @snowfa1155
    @snowfa1155 2 роки тому +1

    Been waiting for your review on this C. I'm between this and the updated NX8 -1-8

    • @snowfa1155
      @snowfa1155 5 місяців тому

      @@ChappySinclair Nothing yet. Being patient for the right scope for me and my setup. Viper pst II 1-6 has been 100% solid, though lacks capability at 400+ that I want. Top contender is actually the Leupold mk4hd 2.5-10. Just waiting for pr2 reticle, but that may be forever.

    • @snowfa1155
      @snowfa1155 5 місяців тому

      @@ChappySinclair I've seen both now. They are honestly both excellent. If that is what is the best for your setup, and you understand the trade-offs', you won't be disappointed in either. I realized i wanted more glass and magnification, especially with a offset/12' red dot. The trade off with weight and size it worth it to me and where I shoot 95% of the time.

  • @Beltfedshooters
    @Beltfedshooters 5 місяців тому +1

    When you going to do the 1-8 Nova reticle?

  • @distilledfreedom1840
    @distilledfreedom1840 3 місяці тому

    The fact they have a life time warranty is The major selling point for me. I just ordered this thing. It better be good as it cost more than my rifle.

  • @waterplant6832
    @waterplant6832 5 місяців тому +1

    any time frame for a review on the new plxc nova?

  • @lawyerup1time785
    @lawyerup1time785 Рік тому

    Brother been following you for a minute, keep it up!

  • @IamLaR1
    @IamLaR1 Рік тому +1

    The Pew Pew is classic...I think you got them all in the garage bro. Good hunting.

  • @ReflectStudios
    @ReflectStudios 2 роки тому

    I was waiting for this one, I literally just bought this exact LPVO.

  • @paulyp9853
    @paulyp9853 2 роки тому +3

    I have two of these on two DD AR15's (Raptor Reticle). I have them for about 2-3 months on Badger Ordnance mounts. I also have offset red dots on both setups.
    Anyway.......The PLX 1-8x is just a great optic and it was money well spent. I actually purchased both them before there was too much info on it. Of late I have seen several excellent reviews from some YT'ers that I really respect their opinion. CDoes being one of them for certain.
    The use of the Chevron Reticle make this optic fairly easy to use. PA just did a great job.
    I have read some comments that say "it not being day light bright makes it a non starter". I dont understand that logic but to each their own I guess. I believe its plenty bright enough, and to be honest I dont have the illumination on 95% of the time. The 4 heavy lines leading to the center reticle make it easy to use without being daylight brigh.
    I know I will probably be in the minority with this opinion, but shortly after I bought these I was able to look behind a Vortex Razor 1-10x LPVO. I just was not impressed with that at all. Again to each their own.
    Bottom line is if you are thinking about getting this optic - I believe you will be really happy with the purchase.

  • @NikolausLife
    @NikolausLife 2 роки тому +3

    PLEASEEEEEEEEEE PRIMARY! Please give us a 2-12 that is light weight! 🙏

  • @1DavidMarshall
    @1DavidMarshall 6 місяців тому

    Well done video sir. Ty

  • @TacticalTack
    @TacticalTack 2 роки тому +4

    I'd love to see a PLX second focal plane 1-6 or 8. I have this compact scope and its amazing, but i wonder what they could do with a top quality sfp scope.

  • @VICTOR14ALPHA
    @VICTOR14ALPHA 2 роки тому

    Good job!
    Very serious and honest
    Thanks u sir

  • @josephrizzo7500
    @josephrizzo7500 2 роки тому +1

    Great review as always. Any plans on doing the vudu 1-10 in the future?

  • @millbean13
    @millbean13 Рік тому +1

    Pew pew, pew pew. Lol 😅😅my favorite part

  • @monocogenit1
    @monocogenit1 Рік тому

    Another excellent video. Thanks.

  • @nexus6999
    @nexus6999 2 роки тому

    Great review, thank you

  • @Nodoyleyamshack1985
    @Nodoyleyamshack1985 2 роки тому

    Aimpoint needs to take notes on packaging! I thought I ordered a knock off when my m5s arrived. Very nice optic, even better video!

  • @nisky4129
    @nisky4129 Рік тому +2

    How would I go about getting in touch with you if I wanted to send you my unopened NF nx8 1-8 w/ FC-Dmx reticle to review/compare to this? I wouldn’t be asking for anything in return, not even a shoutout or anything lol. You have such good quality videos and I just would love to see how it stacks up.

  • @jbg7676
    @jbg7676 4 місяці тому

    How does the eye relieve compare to a strike eagle and the razor? I have the strike eagle 1x8 but it’s hard to use with such a tight eye relief. The gen 2 razor is better but I don’t like it or the reticle.
    Thank you I appreciate your feedback.