Pro Artist vs A.I. Art 🖌️🤖 (WHO WINS?!)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 лют 2022
- If you haven't seen it a hundred times already, this AI art program has been BLOWING UP all over social media. Upload a selfie or full body pic and get a pretty dang cool generated art image from it! But what if the AI app and I used the same reference photo to create an illustration - who would win?!
Don't mind that the app takes about 5 seconds and I took like 3,000x longer 😂
! Reference model is: / dagamii
🎨 MY BRUSHES: rossdraws.com/products/brushes
(ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧ Links:
🚀 Discord Community! / discord
✦ Instagram - / rossdraws
✦ Twitter - / rossdraws
🌸 My debut artbook NIMA: rossdraws.com/nima
🤖 Twitch! / rossdraws
🎁 Merch / Tutorials - rossdraws.com/collections
💌 SEND ME THINGS:
RossDraws
3940 Laurel canyon blvd # 313
Studio city, CA 91604
#rossdraws #digitalart #AI - Розваги
WHO WINS???
Time is an important variable, so what are the conditions to "win"?
You of course. :)
The human touch. The assets applied from experience and mileage. This is what will always win. Ross, you're the best ✨
you
You’re the best! 👍
Nah man, 4 hours??? Wtf, that’s hella impressive alone 😭😭
I draw an egg in 2 hours💀
Same lmao 💀💀💀
Bro has been drawing the second they left the womb 😨
Today, I struggled to draw book for hour lol.. I know I'm not pro artist but I'm trying to practice lol...
@@arandootsarandano bruh, u guys can draw an egg? Sheesh
The AI one looks like someone just used a filter on the photo and called it a day. Your drawing took skill and effort to make.
I mean yeah? the filters are ai
That's literally what it is
@@technus147 Cartoon filters for digital cameras have existed a long time now.
This AI model is no better is his point.
The ai model probably just used images of people using regular cartoon filters.
This one was a filter, idk if this was the best example for AI art
Yeah, it's almost like the AI used a filter.
The thing that A.I. art lacks, is creativity.
No soul or energy, you can’t teach that.👈🏿🫡
I was searching for this comment
It's funny that you said it lacked creativity even though it literally shows creativity
Besides, AI cannot do anything without human art, so it's still just like all of us where we are inspired by arts from other people, that we create our own little thing,
That's the exact same thing as how a AI would be trained on many, many arts, just for the bot to be more creative and not be copwriting literally
@@NoahtheGameplayer it doesnt show any creativity, it just traced the drawing
AI should be used as a tool for inspiration or jokes
not ment to replace real hard work and talent
Yes
Preach
SAY IT LOUDER
SAY IT LOUDER TO PEOPLE WHO THINK AI IS ART!!
i don't have artistic talent
The real artist always wins
in creativity not the AI does have creativity I don't know out of nowhere you can put a flying cow behind an image
Stick man art is better than what AI could possibly fathom
Yah surez bur have some Ai app the make amazing draws.. and this is sux 😢
The AI can't make such conscious artistic choices like changing, exaggerating proportions, facial expressions, colors, lighting etc to make them more appealing / interesting than they were in the original photo.
The App changed my pretty brown eyes into blue ones though. 👀 Even though they are clearly brown. I was surprised lol It also made my lips fuller. So it does change things to make someone more appealing.
@@AllegraJina I'm not talking about such simple changes but just compare Ross' drawing to the AI one and analyze differences.
@@realswobby you don't need to convince me. I like his picture more and humans can still do better and more creative art than AI. It's just interesting to see that we're at this level that it looks like art.
@@AllegraJina what app is that lol I just knew from watching this vid
It actually can.
your drawing actually has life, the AI just replicated real life with no substance
lol 6 fingers and attached pupils to eyelids there always good at that.
Pro Artist. No competion.
Pesonally ai easily wins
@@Flxmeplxyz
Gross. Plagiarism software will never compare.
@@ashleydean8895 its just better in this one video
@@ashleydean8895 your bias, im honest.
@@Flxmeplxyz
It's not even about bias. Just LOOK at them. The AI gives her a lazy/apathetic look while having clouds that don't even look like clouds. The buildings are clipped, uneven, and have no discernable detail to them.
The actual drawing is filled with balanced lighting, accurate reflections, even windows, layers of shadow to outline the face better, and the clothes look less flat that the AI.
The actual art piece wins. Hands. Down.
as the AI obviously cant quite campete with artistic skill and stylization im still impressed by how good it mimics a semi-realistic art style
Fr it's kinda scary as an aspiring artist
yeah i was not expecting that accuracy from the ai
But it’s limited to the photo it’s converting, if te photo per se it’s bad, it’ll be bad and won’t compete
@@med-2014 but still, we can see how much technology has improved from 2010-2020,its going to get better in the next few years and that's terrifying
@@med-2014 sometimes it'll be a blob
The artist always wins. There’s nothin like seeing a human being put time and effort into their craft. Plus it's not fair to call AI art the same as what humans make. Truthfully, anything can be art, because there are many different forms of it. LIke pottery, sculpting etc. But I find it disrespectfull when people say AI is the same as human creativity. It is a different form of art that is completely different with how humans create. It is the same as hand-made goods that are compared to factory materials, they simply aren't the same.
The speedrun is a proof that it's art.
Not in business. Why pay him x amount of money and wait 2 days when I could get an app and have the same thing in a fraction of time?
@@sidjones16 AI CGI is not the same thing. Then you can say photography and photo editing is also the same. My point is the more there will be CGI the higher there will be the value for the real thing.
@@sidjones16 More and more artists are being fed to artificial intelligence, depriving them of their individuality.
This is actually soul murder.
A useful tool that is useful only when it is regulated and works for the benefit of humanity.
AI builds and generates new works by copying and combining other works by artists who have not given their consent to this
Yes, you can say that a person also kind of takes the work of other artists
But inspiration and copying are not the same thing.
@@Whatman11 a "souls" doesn't feed your stomach. Quit that BS about the artist "soul" nobody gives a sh¡t about that, specially employers
These challenges are cool and all but shoutout to kahma for the easy fancy photos thatll level up my LinkedIn for sure 😎
Real artists will always be better 💪
but not faster! If artists weren't scared out of their minds... then they would realize that their digital art programs have been part AI this whole time and would start incorporating it to make their workflow faster...same thing with traditional artists and digital art---stubbornly sticking to shovels when there are excavators is foolish while the rest of the world and the industries are speeding up because of ai.
The thing with A.I. art is that it misses a human touch that makes art so beautiful in my opinion.
So true 😔
I would say this defines the concept of art for ourselves, art should have its own background, concepts, sketches, experiments and formation. Of course, the development of AI promises many ruin, but it can also finally make us think about the true value of art.
bruh its an ai, art is not human is a thing lmao
It also fucked up the reflection on the buildings. Transparency instead of reflection
@@kawaiidere1023 i mean it make that art in 4 seconds, what will it do in 4 hours
The AI one looks like a sick filter though.
Does anyone know what the filter is called?
@@Jsjdn3555 its the cartoon filter on the app “prequel”
Exactly, a filter isn’t AI, but whatever gets the views I guess
@@silverblue73 Actually a filter is AI, all AI is, is a series of nodes with a number value and a bias value, linking to other nodes, and the image goes in, and this one was built so that another image comes out. It uses Convolution because it is an image recognition model. I had to make one for school, that's why I know....
Facts
That screen is GIANT
yeah i just tried looking at my own desk to see the scale AND BRO WHY DOES HE HAS AN 50 SQUARE FEET TABLE
Tbh i LOVE yours and damn 4 hours?! I couldnt in ten but one thing i noticed was yours looked like it was in shock more than the AIs but other than that yours is absolutely awesome
Personally liked yours better, not just because of the knowledge that's handmade but because when someone does the art of course can decide what and what not to add to make it more appealing while the auto generated one had little details that weren't as aesthetic.
Being able to choose where to lead the eye into the image and on what focus details and stuff is not something a camera/filter does but the person behind it and- I don't know, love your art as always
Wow that is so thoughtful and well analyzed when seeing the difference between Artist and AI ^^
You're totally right!!
I gotta be honest, gen z has absolutely destroyed the word "aesthetic" and I cannot look at that word without a negative feeling anymore
Also the style is just better lol, the AI just made the same picture but with paint haha
not only that, but his art is more lively! Also, the AIs art is "done" because it reached the capacity of it's capability. this dude's art is done because he thought that it's enough.
Not even gonna lie, the AI literally just traced the real image, gave no interesting lighting/shadows, and somehow made the real person look static and robotic (wonder why hmmmm?).
Very good work on yours. I love the expression, the background, the coloring and shading, the GORGEOUS highlights on her hair, ahh-- I just love it!
??? Why are people shittinf over ai? Obviusly it won't be as good as real art, but why people want to compete
@@sheryboom678 people are upset because AI uses the work of actual artists, who put actual time into their work, and copies it. No thought is put into it, no time is put into it(other than making the AI itself), and its downright just disrespectful towards the artists who don't want to be apart of this AI nonsense.
You can like AI, you can dislike AI, but there's always one fact that is almost impossible to disagree with; it'd be perfectly fine if it didn't take from artists who don't want to be apart of it. It's disrespectful and literally takes business away from people who actually care about what they're putting out, which isn't something AI can understand.
@@7secouds607 Uhm... What? That's not how AI works tho?
One ai learns what is art and what is not.
Then another that is randomly made, start to bump out images. They start as random noise, the AI that knows how art looks like, rewards or punishes the creating AI, until it learn to create propper images.
The images are only required so that the first AI knows what is and what is not. Even if we ban that, the second one will still be available.
@@sheryboom678 My brother in christ, there's literally people typing artists names in Art AIs and the AIs give result, and for that the AI need to search through the internet, take several arts of this creator without their consent and mash it all to create something ""new""
Also, the problem are not the AIS itself, they are a good experiment on the capabilities of ai. the problem is it feeding on artists and copying them+people using it to sell art that they did not even drew. and claiming the art "their own" that is both a disrespect to the AI creators and artists it fed on.
It is good for ai art standards but comparing it to man made artwork it just has no charming characteristics as the art style is just a traced form of the image itself
The artist one feels more alive while the ai just looks flat
Ai in my opinion could NEVER replace what a person can create! So much more life can be seen in the drawing! 🤩🤩
AI - lifeless
artist - warm and lively
You can just ask the AI to make warm and lively art. Instead of asking it to recreate a photo, you ask "recreate this selfie in a colorful and expressive style" and it does. you just have to know how to work around GPT.
cope
@@nipnop4954The only response you could come up with was “cope”?
@@itzmeolivia enough to upset u so i guess
@@nipnop4954 u didn't tho, just shows ur ignorant.
Actual person knows how to put some personality into their work, who wouldve guessed haha
Yeah, I've been looking at several AI images and after a while they all look the same, they all use the same semi-realistic technique, the same poses, expression, and color schemes, it doesn't create anything new.
With art you can always create new things, different color palettes and poses. Also, apparently you need to try about 200 times to get something decent :b it's not worth it from where you see it.
@@gatonegro2151 ikr like how is that even enjoyable, just draw it at that point
@Snowy They still shouldn't claim it as their own, and also should keep in mind that most of them were trained on stolen art from real people
To be honest the girl was emotionless in the photo already and the artist changed that while the AI didn't
🤯
True art will always be better and win honestly toward AI art. ✨❤️💖💜
I’m sorry, only four hours? I expected like twelve! I think yours is better, ngl. There’s much more attention to little details, rather than just the big picture. Not to mention the clouds and buildings in the ai image look super off for some reason. You nailed it though! Very nice :D
HOW DO YOU MAKE SOMETHING LIKE THAT IN ONLY 4 HOURS AND A HALF?? that's the most mind blowing thing for me. That's barely enough time for me to block and choose the right colors xd
The most important Way to achieve that is to use good programs and the most important thing is to get the control as you control your hands, to control your tables and the program. And painting obviously.
Practise and patience most AI users are rushing the process because they can’t draw and feel hopeless to learn it
@@damnman7226 Or they have actual jobs and not enough money on the side to throw 200 bucks for 4 hours of an artist's work for a pinup.
Practice. Lots of practice!
the person who made this art, made another arts too, it just have experience
The Artist definitely wins. He put a lot of details and crafts to his art work. No matter how long it takes.
No robot will defeat human creativity
AI never wins. Real artists will always be better.
You win. And not just ‘cause you’re the actual artist, but because it genuinely looks better. You’re very talented!
Thank you for actually saying reasons instead of another bland comment, sure AI images can’t beat artist, but those comments might as well be AI generated because of how repetitive they are with nearly no differences and actual clear opinions
4.5 seconds and another 5 minutes of refining and editing and the ai art would look just as good if not better. If you do art for personal reasons then go right ahead, but I can't see anyone trying to monetize off art spending 4+ hours on something that will take 5 minutes
That's not true. It's not a matter of editing the piece, it's a matter of both pieces being in fundamentally different styles. There are issues and downsides to the AI generated piece that can't be fixed in 5 minutes.@@cameron9292
Yup
@@cameron9292 have you considered that they may not just do it for money, but because they love doing art?
And this is why AI will never replace real artists.
The AI art was sharp but I really liked the results from kahma as well, way more natural vibes perfect for online dating.
This gives me hope that ai art won't replace human art. Great work!
Being realistic, It probably will in future, I can imagine companies abusing of that, they already doesnt like to pay artists as they deserve...
It probably will as the other comment said
@Mit You have a point there, but I feel like cartoons are safe from being ai generated (for now).
In the future, perhaps, but I think that by then they had also restricted and regulated more it use. Besides, at the moment the IAs are still very limited to one pose and expression, and the fact that you cannot have copyright of the IA images will make many companies not interested.
it will lol, the technology its not so advanced yet, lol artist are easily replaceable
The human hand is filled with love and passion while the code of an AI is nothing more than just obedience
cope
@@nipnop4954 ai isn't going away, just like no one has been able to stop file sharing through torrents for example.
However if it weren't for all the hours put in by humans learning to create beautiful art the ai would have had nothing to learn from and you wouldn't be able to mash something good looking up on your own with a few keywords. So I can't help but find the people that are going around telling people to "stop learning how to draw because AI can do it for you" to be complete asstards (also the process of creating something gives artists a hit of dopamine, can serve for relaxation & therapy etc).
And people going on strike and whatnot to put a stop to Ai should just focus on potential ways to make use of it going forward, or if they really hate the idea of the art being fed to it find some way to hide it.
You’re so right! I’m really looking forward to using AI art to assist me in the future. It’ll be way easier to make backgrounds and reference photos!
Guys stop replying to nipnop. He is a bot replying with the same thing under every comment.
@@prithyachan333 bots stay winning 😁
Who wins? The pro artist who uses AI as a tool to enhance their artistic capabilities rather than just use the AI, or just use traditional means. The best artists out there right now are the ones combining the two mediums.
Bro yours is like a billion times superior in many ways.
Ai generated arts may take less than a minute to complete, but a handmade, brain-worked, human touch artwork is what gives life and perfection to it.
Despite AI looking so amazing and beautiful, they still lack at composing or presenting nicely.
This isn’t entirely true, at least not with Stable Diffusion
This video is over a year old. We have style adapters and instant concept transfer.
It just really depends on the client at this point when you want a human-made work, go for it and pay some artist. But i f you want AI art then it's fine go for it. Theres no way no one will prefer real human artist from time to time. Its like why would you want a person to do photorealism of your photo when you can just take a the reference picture and put black and white filter on it?
Fr
And they can't draw hands either.
The Ai art feels uncanny, only a real artist can catch the vibe and meaning of art
Sounds like cope to me
@@ishowsokkanah ai art is soulless
@@ZHIEND_ I can show you ai art and tell its not ai and you won't now difference.
@@ishowsokka I know, I already experienced that. It's soulless not because It looks bad. It could look awesome but still not hold value as soon as I realize it's AI because It's just pixels, It's not a work. I like to look at art and go "yes, someone who is like me drew that", It makes me respect the person behind it, It's some form of a communication.
You are uncanny.
The 4 hours one looks like it’s staring into your soul
AI art looks like a filter or special effects done to a photo
Ai art is just too precise at what it does to the point it loses the stylistic part of Art
Your art feels so alive and colorful! While the AI art feels dark and dull… you definitely win for me!
Edit: looks like world war 3 started in the replies- i just wanted to share my opinion but i guess some random kids wanted to start some kind of argument :-:
The AI art could be touched up in 1/2 hr to be almost the same. But, if the AI art is so bad then artists have nothing to complain about.
@@blurtam188 They have the right to complain because of every Artist uses social media or have much followers some works for industries and they need to feed themselves if companies see AI makes art faster they don't care and some already doing that because "If it's faster it's better" at least better for them but not for Artist. They got to be constant feat whether the company will like the sht or their customers would like it or not. They have the constant fear of doing anything wrong and try their best to be good especially because of AI it has increased even more
@@justaloserrr is that supposed to be his problem? Your problem that you choose a artist as a career path and not a hobby. Don't be surprised when people invent something practical.
@@justaloserrr Everybody has the right to complain. Others have the right to ignore those complaints if it's just a bunch of gate keepers complaining about not being able to charge the plebs for the privilege to explore art. Be better, not bitter.
@@blurtam188 AI art uses art from other creators without permission or compensation…
"Ai is gonna replace even the best artists"
The best artists:
Absolutely beautiful ❤ Yours is way better hands down! ❤
Even when the IA looks pretty good, yours have more personality, and details like the changes in the background, that generally makes it look more alive and dynamic. The IA one looks kind of stiff at least in comparasion
And personally I I like the lightning technique they did
The AI looks cool today but so many people are using it that it´s gonna turno unto some generic crap, An artist Style will not
Yeah.
Thats already generic xD I loved first time thou
AI can create different styles. An AI can make anime from regular photos for example.
@@bemlok it does not create. It tries to replicate styles. But it does not have it´s own.
@@santiagobojorquez What is create a style? To create, a human need to practice using references, things that we saw, experiences that we had, practicing using principle of drawing, design, painting.
And actually, a good way of creating your own style is replicate styles. There's a book called "steal like an artist" that explains this concept. Steal, replicate, until you create your own style.
Machine learning works in the same.
Your drawing has more emotion to it. You are the real winner.
The pro artist portrait will always be worth more.
no competition here, artist win every time. i love seeing the human and stylistic touch you put into your work ❤️
PLUS! Making art from scratch is so satisfying for my soul. It makes you view the piece as ART rather than as a PRODUCT.
RAHH YOURS IS SO BEAUTIFUL!! :3
Ai "art" shouldn't even be called art.
Next to yours, it was easy to notice these flaws in the AI's:
-the eyes look lifeless
-skin lacks pigmentation and color variety
-the hair looks matted/discolored/thin
-jacket is textureless as a garbage bag and looks like one too
-Sis are those clouds? I don't think so
And that's just the tip of the iceberg
Jeah thats totaly true but who knows when do they fix these
It also reminds me of semirealistic art styles
The eyes look almost exactly as the original image...
Depends on how many iterations the AI had tbh.
@@porkoltkecske1296 Yeah, that just frightens me, right now i'm an art student and i need at least 5 to 7 years to reach my full potential. But the developments of technology knows no bound, so i'm afraid that i'm striving forward just to see a death's end.
You win by far! AI has nothing on a real human’s hard work
I also think the drawn one is better because of the style, but saying that the ai doesn’t take work is a straight up lie. Some one probably took a long time to code the ai itself especially one that is that good. It is a human’s hard work
@@idk_juliet9544 now compare the hard work of a prompt to a professional drawing
@@idk_juliet9544 now compare the hard work of a prompt to a professional drawing
@@anaelsimas2278it’s probably about equivalent effort…. But 1 ai developer is probably more valuable to society than 1 artist.
Real human but product is like Animation.
I feel like AI just lacks soul like the drawing that you made feels like you put work into it. You know you put your love into it. AI just looks like you generated it and called it a day.
You win for sure! The expression you have captured in her eyes is intriguing. With the AI - her eyes look dead or bored.
There’s so much more life in yours, I’d say definitely you won, you spent a nice amount of time to create something worth winning!
the artist's piece pulls a lot more attention from the little detail all the way down to the model staring directly at you and the clarity of the background as well
YOUR SO TALENTED,EVEN YOURS LOOK LIKE AI 😭😭😭😭
Ross Wins. AI Always Loses.
You win! As an artist I feel so much anger towards ai art. It can’t quite catch that beautiful side of handmade art. 🍷🗿
🍷🗿
i feel like people are gonna use ai and pretend they drew it themselves and boom no effort at all
@@cawsomeaolin sadly people already do that
Cry more
@@cawsomeaolin happens all the time on art station and the company isn't doing anything to stop it.
*Now draw her stealing the Chaos Emeralds.*
🤣🤣🤣
Now draw her bombing an island.
One turned it into a picture with random lines added, one turned it into an actual original drawing.
The bottom one looks more AI than AI itself 😂❤
I think your art wins, because the person you drew shows more emotion than the AI art, like look at that emotionless woman 🧐
The original photo looks like that lol the artist actually gave the photograph more emotion than it had originally
Untrue lol speaking Outta ass be like
exactly the artist gave it so much emotion and depth.
fr fr…they’ll just be another emotionless robot with no fucking shit
It's because AI does something called over fitting. To put it simply, it tries to mimic the source image too closely. Humans are able to control how closely they mimic the source image.
At least im pretty sure this is how it works. Don't quote me on anything.
@@cythism8106 Very soon, AI will be able to do so too. I even think it is able to do so right now, but you have to tell it what to do. In this case, they told the AI to just make it cartoonish, not to be original, so this is the result.
I love being a actual artist
Dude the real art looks SOOO much better than the AI. To quote Toy Story.
“You can’t rush art.”
You made really good art
Your artwork is for sure better! It's way more lively and colourful, and it's also more meaningful because you took the time and effort to draw it from scratch, rather than a computer just generating a stylized image.
My thing with AI art is that there's basically no thought given to the details of images or why things are the way they are. When something is made by a human artist, all those elements always have consideration so much that under scrutiny, everything look good to the eyes.
Scrutinizing AI art always turns up tiny weird details or general forms that just don't really make *that* much sense to humans (imo)
Like the AI's clouds for example.... yours just look SO much better and more natural
Didn't even notice the clouds at first! Spot-on!
Some people just too stupid to realize not all AI in the same lv. If you know the stabledisfusion you will know why several artist was kickass. They salary too expensive and too slow, company just take some shit head photoshop player and use AI
Because its the human using the ai that creates the final outcome.
Ai don't care so you have to put effort into to understand how the tool works
Yeh, I want to be an author but I don't think anyone can really do my book covers so I guess I'LL just use AI.
I used AI and I wanted a girl but it came out with three arms I was like. "Bro what the heck is this?" So I kept trying, but it is a lot faster.
@@NinjaHeartI hope you're only using AI as an idea generator rather than just using the image itself
Obviously you won sis, LOOK AT THEM BUILDINGS IN THE AI ONE 😭
How about add a third challenger…a purely practical artist. You know, pen, paint, canvas only. Even the “Pro Artist” here has half his work done with computer assistance.
In the 80s, I was a Graphic Artist for a Screen Printing company. Everything I did was with pen, ink, vellum, and cameras (to create the final images to be burned onto the mesh). I created corporate and private logos, t-shirt designs, banners, billboards, signs, basically anything you can think of. Even the curved letters on hats and Ts were done by hand, using protractors, rulers, and freehand much of the time.
In 1988, we paid $28k for a computer to assist in our imaging creation and of course storage, accounting, business management. I recall it was $150 for each new “text” we wanted to use. It was very useful in creating curved, dimensional, or warped lettering, and Clip Art was a big time saver, but overall, I still pretty much would freehand draw 80-90% of each finished image. Then scan the image and produce the final film for burning screens.
Creating a four color processed image, by hand, was an incredibly challenging task. Computers certainly helped in that aspect, but to me, the cost benefit never made sense. They spent what equaled 16 months of my salary to assist me in what I already did. Keep in mind this was the mid to late 80s, in SC, so we didn’t make much, lol.
Your art is more "live" and it have something special)))
The thing is that they set the eyes perspective as it looks down on you whilst the ai has the eyes looking straight whilst not bring the point of focus. So in comparison ai is the girl looking at their phone the artist is the girl looking at you
Pro artist, of course
AI’s shall never compare to our superior minds, no matter how many times I’ve lost to an AI at chess (I’ve lost a lot of games)
Fear fear tin
Unfortunately AI is made from our minds though. An artist even trained it to draw like kim jung gi…I hate people
@@jinsakai409 Wow. I don't know what to say except I'll just keep my head down away from the thunderstorm of worries I have about thid AI stuff and hope when I become an adult seriously needing to make momey, AIs don't snatch my hopes and dreams away
@@CrimsonDawn-ou4og, bro, just listen, I'm fucking wanna die because of AI, I already spend 1,5 year studying, drawing, I was hopefull about my future skill, I thought i will grow up in my skills and I will making NSFW stuff and earn money on it. And now, from outta nowhere appears that fucking AI that already can generate UNLIMITLESS NSFW stuff, sure, AI still can't generate exactly what client want but I'm fucking scary that as soon as possible he will be able DO THAT and digital artist will be no more need for it because, like who would waste 50-100$ to commision with real artist for 1 art when there is exist AI, that for 25$ per mounth can generate ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING YOU WANT
@@art25 an AI can only do so much
You can't tell it to make the hair look like this or have the shoes look like that. Sure they can toon real photos but I'm positive there will be a lot of aspects it can't take. That and /or people will see reasons why commissioning a person just works a lot better. I've been drawing for 5 years now so I can't quit because some AIs popped up out of nowhere.... Oh well. Just gotta see what the future holds I guess
The artist, no matter how long the work always pays off.
I love your art , it's just the eyes
love the AI art style but with a real person they simply have so much ability to add "more" to a drawing with their own style and touches (more exaggerated light, different brush textures, different colors) whereas AI tends to be too consistent and can cause a piece to look flat, and it can only convert what it's given.
The ai art won't have the same feeling as the drawn one
not yet
@@nocbvideos6458 i hope whoever develops them be able to do that dies from cancer or something
@@nocbvideos6458 never will
@@kittenkenoobi6294 Uhh... We're already there. Given a proper model, AI surpasses human capability. It can use the best patterns of every art that has existed in its influence. As we have more time to train better models, it's only getting better.
Don't try to outrun a car, you won't win. AI will do what people do, but better.
@@Icewind007hell no are you a robot or something?
OF COURES ITS GONNA BE THE ARTISTS WORK LIKE LITERALLY ALL THE DETAILS AND TEXTURES FOR 4 HOURD THAS JUS HARD WORK BOI ❤️
ofcourse artist! ai might be hard to code but also the coder had effort on that like how you draw!!
Definitely the artist , no doubt. No matter if any artist is not good enough to make better than AI but still that effort , that emotion means alot ✨
Pro artist wins hands down
Art takes time and effort, and the results pay off far more. The artist wins!
The 4 hour one has so much more than the ai one and litterally 10 times better so of course ya win!
Any art done by a human hand with blood sweat and tears is obviously the winner here.
LIKE BRO LOOK AT LEONARDO DA VINCI HE DRAWS LIKE A PRINTER-
@Steepshine • 핈 lol-
The art he made wins by a mile. Too bad that someone might have fed it to an AI machine already... This whole situation is just devastating for artists.
its actually becoming more and more devastating for AI devs rn, bcs of all the lawsuits and copyright claims. Commercially, AI is pretty much dead alrdy.
The art >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AI
The clouds in ai art💀
The A.I.: "Oh, yeah you really beat me! By any chance can I examine it further?"
Thats the smartest joke i have ever seen.
No one can replace real artist's art
Thank you for helping spread the message of the importance and value of actual human artists. Brilliant work here, even disregarding the short amount of time it took for you to create this. Also, that drawing monitor you've got doesn't make me jealous... definitely not even a little.
The drawing is better than the ai, I love it
You! The real artist always win! 👨🎨 🎉
AI better back off! 😂
Lmao cope harder
@@oess855 You probably use AI to do your homework. LoOk MoMmY iM LEaRnInG! 🤡🤪
@@akeyoakate9280 i graduated school 2 years ago💀 fym homework💀
@@akeyoakate9280 keep huffing on that copium tho
@@oess855 and keep defending your deepfake AI porn addiction
There are so many good “drawings” or “paintings” or “arts” coming from AI, which is amazing to say the least.
But I’d always prefer something that was made by another artist, not only because it is honsetly one of the thing that helped me to get connected with some new friends with the same interest! But also their sheer passion that they show while doing their artworks that captivated me with these art community! I could only wish to do the same.
And also to support another artist by commissioning them of course :D
Ive seen a few anime style generated stuff. While some of it looks good, often times there are errors here and there.
You won The moment you made that circle
def pro artist because u put time and effort for it while ai did it instantly also YOU ARE SO UNDERATTED
As good as ai art gets, it will never be as good as a real artist
You made this statement 4months ago
Yes and…..
@@Quibrae AI art arguably has advanced more than this
@@topguyz1045 ok and….
@@Quibrae By now due to the continueos training of AI image models, the replication of such works can be easily performed.
In addition, artists who are concerned with commercial use of art commissions may no longer be in high demand as commercially large quantities of demanded art can now be produced without necessarily making use of much efforts. Thereby yielding more results that the average freelance artist
Ai art should be a new tool for artists not a replacement. Never. Also your drawing looks amazing love it !
Whoever asked for AI to even do what it currently does _has_ no artistic talent. Fact is, real artists never needed, wanted or asked for AI.
Yours has the handmade look to it, ai doesn't have hands so it cant haha, real art will always be 🔛🔝!!!
Personally I think yours win as the person in your drawing actually looks alive