SONY A6600 Vs. FUJI XT-4 | What APSC Camera is right for YOU!!!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 вер 2022
- SONY A6600 Vs. FUJI XT-4 for Photography and video test and Review for Portrait Photography
📸 My Lightroom Presets - geni.us/ccUXB
🎥 My Slog 3 & Cinema LUT's - geni.us/nNai
📚 Sony Camera Guides - geni.us/Jco1vd
🔧 My Gear List - geni.us/qtfMjre
🐇 How I effortlessly organise & cull my photos for free - bit.ly/3Rm0cta
📸 Follow My Instagram - bit.ly/47CtvyL
🔧 Gear Used in this Video
▸ Sony a6600 - geni.us/ZVCRy1C
▸ Samyang 24mm f1.8 - geni.us/4EWY0kK
▸ FUJI XT-4 - geni.us/Zapag7
▸ FUJI 23mm f2 -geni.us/0fNOi
▸ Sony A7IV (A-ROLL) - geni.us/eAA0
▸ CANON R6 (BTS) - geni.us/61KrZS
▸ RODE mic (on camera mic & studio) - geni.us/TNDA
🫶 THANKYOU 🫶
Carlo (BTS)
UA-cam - / carloobrien
Instagram - / carlo.obrien
Amanda (MODEL)
UA-cam - / @amandafotinos
Instagram - / amandafotinos
🔧 GEAR THAT I USE
▸ Main Photography Camera - geni.us/eAA0
▸ Main Video Camera Camera - geni.us/eAA0
▸ My Vlog/Photo/Video Camera - geni.us/YKnLw
⬇️ SONY Full Frame Lenses I Love
▸ My Most Used Lens - geni.us/Kgg0
▸ My Favourite Portrait lens - geni.us/xXoA
▸ My Favourite (BUDGET) Portrait lens - geni.us/SRuhEjf
▸ My Favourite 85mm - geni.us/CoSuuA
▸ My Favourite Wide Angle Prime - geni.us/ms9u1fU
▸ My Favourite Wide Angle Zoom - geni.us/7YkvXB0
▸ My Favourite Telephoto Zoom - geni.us/sJhCnJ3
⬇️ SONY APSC Lenses I Love
▸ My Most Used Lens - geni.us/8v0AR
▸ My Most Used Lens (BUDGET OPTION) - geni.us/CBvqKt
▸ My Favourite Portrait lens - geni.us/evHC7
▸ My Favourite 85mm (56mm APSC) - geni.us/k2azJw0
▸ My Favourite Wide Angle Prime - geni.us/VbSKrf
▸ My Vlogging Lens - geni.us/ejUROqC
▸ My Favourite Telephoto Zoom - geni.us/sJhCnJ3
🎒 What's In My Professional Camera Bag
▸ My Camera Bag - geni.us/UAE6fvO
▸ My Photography Camera - geni.us/eAA0
▸ My Main Lens - geni.us/Kgg0
▸ My Prime Lens - geni.us/CkjVuXQ
▸ My Flash - geni.us/YuuBt
▸ My SD Cards - geni.us/W1YBya
🎒 My "TRAVEL" Camera Bag
▸ My Camera Bag - geni.us/UAE6fvO
▸ My Compact Vlog/Photo/Video Camera - geni.us/YKnLw
▸ My Main Lens - geni.us/8v0AR
▸ My EDC Lens - geni.us/PAqBs
▸ My Vlog Lens - geni.us/ejUROqC
▸ My Telephoto Lens - geni.us/sJhCnJ3
▸ My SD Cards - geni.us/mGZjY
▸ My Mist Filters - geni.us/eE4IkU
▸ My ND Filters - geni.us/vy49Q3
▸ My Matt Box - geni.us/u2IIOxZ
▸ My Lav Mics - geni.us/J5ZmLu
▸ My On Camera Mic - geni.us/TNDA
▸ My Studio Mic - geni.us/EBQ6
▸ My Studio Light - geni.us/qwHQoy
▸ My Soft Box - geni.us/VIka
▸ My Tripod - geni.us/PgvWsV0
✖ Professional & Sponsorship Inquiries ✖
creativeculture.au@gmail.com
#fujixt4 #sonya6600 #portrait - Фільми й анімація
I love your channel so much!! hope to see you grow more the upcoming years
Thank you so much!! Hopefully Sony a6700 vs Fuji film xt5
Sorry about the Fuji color grade, the F-LOG conversion LUT didn’t work for some reason, must have been in the wrong colour gamet or something
Love the video Gerard !! Such a fun shoot thank you for having me 🤩
bro you did amazing, can't wait to help out and make some more videos yeooow
This video was a good attempt at comparing the two but it didnt feel like much of an equal comparison cos the treatment for each camera was different.
The fuji videos has the wrong WB on it, and the photos for both fuji n sony were not edited the same way. It would have made a better comparison if the treatments on each cam and their photo n video outputs were the same so we can really see the difference
Copy next time 😅
muchas gracias! es una excelente manera de ejemplificar la comparación de ambas cámaras!
Thanks
Love this video! I'll always be a Sony fan but this contents amazing! Keep it coming brother
thanks bro, more to come next week
Fuji looks more artistic, Sony looks more professional
100% I don’t think Fuji cameras make good Commercial cameras but they would be great for editorial work
I like that the Fuji doesn't over-sharpen face details. Makes for nicer highlight rolloff and just a more pleasing and filmic look.
I think your more pleased with the dynamic range of the sensor rather than sharpness of the lens which effects contrast
I have to say to say I love the Fujifilm cameras for pictures, the color science on Fujifilms cameras are way better than Sony prd. However, for video Sony is definitely better.
Yeah Fuji just hot different
Amazing video done with the xt4 how did you get such clean video... Was it exposed 70% on zebra and fuji eterna lut?
Just exposed by eye, I didn’t like the Fuji xt4 for video FYI
SONY A6600 Vs. FUJI XT-4. my main focus is for the camera to capture accurate scene when i capture jpeg. so, for that, which one is actually good? i'm trying to pick minimal editing while on trip
Fuji all day
Nice one bro! Can't wait to make some more vids together!
Yeah bro let’s goooo
simple...
6600 - auto focus, tracking hands down.
and the killer? fits into my cargo pants pocket.
Yeah bro, the a6600 is tiny and has way better autofocus
As a photographer I like the Sony flipscreen better, since it's centered and not to the side
mmmm, each to there own. I just prefer it for landscape and portrait photos, I can't get top down shots with a flip screen
Get the xt5 or xt3
@@liljaeger2k they can not selfie which is important for casual apsc users
@@marumaruko6512 sorry to say that , you can't find perfect match for upside, flip out and 3 way tilt.
But as you interested in some selfie then choose Fujifilm xe4.
Excelente analisis sera posible que pueda descargar o pasar los present que uso ? Gracias
Presets for sale link in description
As only a photographer, one that is deeply integrated in Lightroom and uses the cloud based workflow, the weird worms with fuji RAW+ Lightroom deal broke the XT4 for me. otherwise, I would have def went for the fuji. but for now I have a a6600.. but I can say I massively miss the Film Simulations and better UI of the XT-4 (I've owned it before.) I really wish I could've gone with fuji.. but the X-Trans issues kill it for me. I'm not willing to do anything different with my workflow either. Ugh. Glad to see the 6600 is amazing with images anyways, but it is an overpriced camera and quite dated, too.
Yeah I feel the same way bro, the a6600 is needing an upgrade asap
As a Sony user, yes.... The a6600 is dated and overpriced!
Yeah when is the 6700 coming
The worms don't exist unless you over sharpen, which nobody should be doing. LR handles X-Trans well enough in 2023. I've done lots of side by side comparisons with conversions using Iridient X Transformer and native RAF files.
@@professionalpotato4764 honestly I switched back to Fuji and I’m shooting with an x-s10 now. I did realize this that editing with Lightroom is entirely possible if you don’t over sharpen.
I look forward to a A6700 vs XT5 video before I part with my cash!
Yeah that’s coming soon, when I get my hands on the a6700
Can anybody tell me What’s the camera strap the UA-camr used on xt4?
It’s a leather dual camera harness, linked in the description
Fuji has a vibe, but my feeling is that vibe is driving prices. I tried the Xt-30 which takes really nice pictures straight out of the camera, but returned it for bad ergonomics. Now I use the Sony A6400 and if I want that Fuji touch I take out a TTartisan lens, in a way those lenses add some softness and character to the pictures. Then edit the photos in lightroom to tweak the colors and it is pretty close to a Fuji. When I want to take good RAW's in fast environments with lots of info I just add a Sigma to the body.
I like Sony. I like Fuji (especially the looks of the hardware and JPG). But Sony is just more versatile for me.
Yeah I love fuji, but I have no use for them, they don’t do more only less than my Sonys
Good job 👍 dude
Thanks 😁
I might be wrong but, it looks as if Fuji has skin smoothing, is it right? The Sony was just sharper and detailed on the face of the model
It’s the lens bro, it’s really soft
massive plus for the a6600: 1. small size/weight along with much smaller lenses. For travelers this is a huge issue!!! Ergonomics are better--I can carry the a6600 along with even a large lens dangling it from my fingers from the fat right side bulging grip (with a wrist strap for safety) and it's comfortable. 2. battery life is amazing for travelers. 3. photo image quality is about the same, so size matters.
Yeah batteries on fujifilm sucks aye ahahahah
Fuji seems a bit more washed out and I saw the auto focus missing in video. Sony more contrasty.
Yeah 100% for video, the LOG LUT didn't work, must have a been a wrong setting somewhere. but the autofocus kinda sucks, that could also be the lens
I’d get both honestly, the Fuji is more of a ‘laid back’ camera & sony is more of a professional camera
That’s a good conclusion 😊
Selling xt4 due to iso and AF. Looking for video and photo solution.
Option A - a7iv for both
Option B - fx30 & a6600
Thoughts?
A7iv all day bro
Nice one bro 😎 Fuji ftw
ahahahah Fuji taking over lol
Both are great but I loved Sony results the most!
Yeah hard to compete, but the new Fuji cameras the released this year are wild
I have the a6400.. I don't know. Feel bored with it. Maybe going to xt4.
Yeah I feel the same way with the a6600, maybe the XT-5 will have better autofocus, then I might switch ahahahah
I'm kind of in the same boat with my a6600 and a7iii however, whenever I rent a Fuji I'm always let down by their inability to accurately track my subjects. From a look standpoint Fuji cameras are beautiful, and they produce great color, but my Sony's always perform superbly which is what really matters.
@@nwmi23 I'm thinking of switching from x-t3 to an a6600 actually. I just wish the video capability is 4K 60p. Fuji just has no reliable autofocus and I believe Sony has way sharper telephoto lens. Fuji does a lot of things well and I would love to keep it if it had superb autofocus and better telephoto lens (as well as overall better lens selection).
@@anonymousl5150 Maybe rent the X-H2S? Fujifilm does have better telephoto lens selections. The 100-400 and 150-600. It still doesn't track like the latest Sony's but it's decent. The a6600 video is really bad, with the rolling shutter. Just buy an FX30 if you're switching, no point buying a 2014 sensor in 2023.
@@professionalpotato4764 The XH2S is an overpriced camera that can't even stabilize as well as a xt4 and all its "upgraded" video capabilities are either nerfed in terms of noise (e.g 240p) or color grading restriction (4k 120p). The xf 100-400 is a mediocre lens in sharpness compared to sony full frames, hell it gets edged out even by sony apsc 70-350. The xf 150-600 is up to modern standards but has a f8 restriction, you're better off using sony 200-600 on an apsc body. Sensor technology hasn't changed much so I don't get your point. Sony apsc also has superior noise performance than Fuji at the same exposure, go look at Gerald Undone's comparison between xt30 and a6400. And reportedly the stacked sensor in the xh2s is somehow even muddier.
I personally find fuji to be better, but xt4 is expensive , XS10 is competitior of A6600. Straight out jpeg out of fuji are just awesome. I have Fuji XE4 and sony A7M3. Some how Fuji feels better.
Yeah I want to test out the XS20 vs the a6700
The Fuji has a more softer look more closer to film
You can soften the Sony in post, film isn’t actually soft. This statement is kinda getting me wound up to make a video about it
Both are good.
Yup, I think the xt5 is the beat
@@gerardneedham I stick with xt4.
i dont like articulating screen its my thing but i think it ruins the whole retro concept and i never use it anyway
XT5 let’s goo
Articulating screen actually fits the retro concept even more. You can flip it around and use it like a true SLR with only a viewfinder.
i chose sony, that's great camera
yeah man, I just works
Have both . For Raw I prefer the Sony and jpg the Fuji
Yesss same, the raw files on Fuji is time consuming
@gerardneedham what do you mean the Raw fuji being time consuming?
that fuji lens is not so good att the distance you want to be at shootikg faces.
samyang lenses also have a certain look to them. I went for a samyang 85mm over the 85mm gm for this reason.
test is interesting but there is a lot of valuables making the only conclusion I can make is that it looks different.
colors in video with fuji looks off. Alot of magenta I have never experienced that Been along time user of both Sony and Fuji
Flip out screens are the worst when you rig your camera out, all camera shout have the Sony a7r v screen!
If only every camera could have that screen
Sony A6400 ? Cause I am planning to buy
Yes basically the same camera
Sony updated their color science after 6600, not fully fair lol
Yeah the new A6700 looks great
unfortunately I prefer the image of the sony, in photo as in video
Yeah me too 🙊
@@gerardneedham After seeing many other videos on the A6600, it's rare that it comes out as well as in this video. You make us forget that it's 8 bit
Sony takes sharper pictures, Fuji has nicer colors.
Yeah that Fuji lens was actually pretty bad aye
@@gerardneedham Yes, the effect of the lens is great, but I think, in general, the fujis draw a little like watercolor. I was able to clearly notice this. My 10 year Nikon camera is definitely sharper 🙂
Nikon sharper than Sony? Come on ahahahah nah any camera can take sharp photos, if you have a good lens and nail the focus plus exposure ect
@@gerardneedham No, I did not speak for Sony. Sharper than Nikon Fuji. 🙂
@@shujtr This is entirely dependent on the lens and not the sensor. Doesn't matter what brand it is. No such thing as "sharp" sensors.
Kiedy katal.strofę..
K
And yes, you used the wrong lens on the Fuji for this comparison. That old 23mm f/2 is notoriously soft on close up portraits, or even not so close up. Pair the XT4 with the new 23mm f/1.4 and you'd be amazed at the difference.
That 23mm is sharp, just tested it on the xt5
theres something i dont really like on the fujis. The entire point for me to look at a sony a6xxx is because i want something small, however fujis designs are almost too large again, dials on top (wich i like tho) add size to its height and all that and a cm here and there and then youre almost at a dslr body size again... i much more prefer something i can put in my pocket like the sony.
Also, to me the entire selling point of fujis in camera editing and simulation and shooting jpg... i m not buying it. i dont like stuff i dont have control over either. i will send my files to lightroom and photoshop ANYWAYS..so the ability to have ''kind of instagram filter jpgs'' is entirely pointless to me and not a selling point at all.
also availability? maybe? i dont know. fujifilm is kind of like.. leica or apple... ''fancy hipster gear everyone wants because it looks cool'' That in return drives pricing. There are less fujis around and if lets say its a year of fuji hype because someone on youtube for example, its really hard to get used gear for a good price because there is less available for higher prices. i mean look at those x100v s for example, they sell almost more than msrp on the used marked around here. And stuff like that makes it very hard to rely on the used market. i cant be like: ''next year i want to buy this lens'' because maybe next year they are way more expensive or none available. while on the other hand on sony, there are so many sonys around, you can ALLWAYS go to the used market and find some good deal without looking around for long for a relatively stable price or they even go down in price. its just a way more thriving market.
the third point might be... false. i dont know. its just a weird feeling i have about used fujis.
Fuji is definitely aiming for a different market, Well Sony’s are more commercial. So yeah 100% agree
@@gerardneedham well its a hard decision for sure. i kind of like them both. how do the fujis handle manual lenses and adaptations? because something i really enjoy is collecting old vintage lenses on garage sales and stuff and just experiment with them.
@@MaybeTiberius Fuji's are pretty compact. They have so many lines, X-E, X-T, X-Pro. Just find one that fits your needs. The X-T5 is amazingly compact, smaller and lighter than the X-T4. If you don't like the EVF hump, then you're not gonna like the camera industry. Because you either buy the a6600, a7c, or a Leica. There's literally nothing in between. Not sure if you would be willing to pay 20x the cost just for "compactness".
You're wrong about film simulations. You have full control over it. There are recipes you can play with, and parameters to adjust. Idk about you but personally I always shoot RAW + Jpegs whether it's for work or casual. The Fuji jpegs are great for immediate social media uploads. My camera is set to always transfer via bluetooth to my smartphone when turned off. And I still have the RAW files to edit for prints and photobooks. Also filters and profiles are entirely different things. Go lookup Samuel Streetlife where he mentions what's wrong with presets/filters ua-cam.com/video/xx9i-BDozAc/v-deo.html
Profiles remap colour data to a different colour and they obey certain relationship rules. Filters/presets merely transform the data without regard for the relationship to each other. This is important if you know colour theory. E.g. a typical overused teal/orange or muted greens+boosted brown preset will not account for the other colours in the gamut. Each preset/filter cannot be used on every photo, but every photo can use any film simulation profiles without looking weird. There's also the advantage if you're shooting casually. Imagine editing thousands of photos after a trip. How are you going to keep the look consistent? Because a preset won't do it. It gets time consuming and isn't worth the time imo as I'm not being paid for it.
Fujifilm has most of their models available. The X100V is only 1 product. Everything else sells for normal prices on the used market, about 60-80% msrp depending on condition. BHPhoto always has good deals on used items. I bought most of my Fuji kit used. X-T4, 35mm f/2, 18mm f/1.4 (legendary lens). Only my Tamron 17-70 is bought brand new. Just be careful where you buy them. Another source I buy from is Japanese ebay sellers. Japanese people take care of their gear and are far more trustworthy.
As for manual lenses, you'll not likely find any other camera better. Fujifilm even has digital split prism and microprism manual focusing aids from the film SLR/rangefinder days, which is unique in the entire camera industry. www.jmpeltier.com/fujifilm-manual-focus-assist-modes/
Combined with far more advanced EVFs than anything in Sony's at the same price, you'll enjoy vintage lenses more on Fujifilm bodies. Not a SINGLE Sony body uses 3.67mil dot EVF or higher for under $2,500. I've used Olympus OM lenses and Helios 44M with great success.
Fuji had better color science . Sony has so tech/ digital look
I see how you see that
Sony ❤
All day
Thanks for the video... i hit the like button..
But one hits the like 2nd time.. it will remove the 1st likr... resulting in no like..
I double hit the like button for this comment 😱
Fujifilm wins
Yahhhh
Coming from the Fuji XT-1, it's great. However, I didn't see updating to an XT-4, and as you say, the Fuji dials are cool, but mostly pointless. That is unless you just dig the authenticity of them. Fact is, with dials switched to Apperture, Shutter, and ISO, and I need to jump to Aperture or shutter only. It takes longer on a Fuji (Chasing "A's") Period. I can simply change the mode dial. But you never hear that. As to lenses, both are very good with the slight advantage of Sony being able to take any share of the market it wants. Like Zeiss glass? There's WAY more to pick from with the Sony. The Focus speed and accuracy of the Sony is way more accurate. When all is said and done, it's the photos that do the talking. That said, I'm still glad I'm keeping my Fuji, but way happier, I moved on to a Sony A6600. Good review!
Awesome mate glad to hear it
gerard. we only want to know one thing. does your model shave below the equator. and do you?
Inappropriate
@@gerardneedham yup. totally inappropropo. but that's not an answer. we the public demand an answer. since you are in our arena. we need to know.
Sony’s photos are just more artificial looking
Yeah I guess so
Is this Sooc sony color is sucks
Sooc?
dude you don't even know the basic rules of how to pose, how to shoot, how to edit...
and comparing cameras? com'on
Where is your UA-cam channel or your Photography company? I think im doing pretty well making $150k per year with photography and growing my UA-cam channel at the same time
@@gerardneedham
Rule number 1: Photography, fundamentally an art form, transcends the mere references to your UA-cam channel and income. They do not inherently signify a profound comprehension of the artistic elements and principles that underlie this discipline.
In my view, an individual lacking a fundamental understanding of art may not be adequately positioned to make meaningful comparisons among cameras from renowned manufacturers.
Enjoy your channel.