Top Atheists ADMIT It's "Not A Matter Of Evidence"
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 січ 2024
- Support my channel by getting Fishing Clash on your iOS/Android device for free fishingclash.link/DailyDoseOf...! Use my gift code WISDOM to get a $20 reward, and share your biggest catch in the pinned comment!
In this video, Richard Dawkins disparages "woke" gender theorists for denying biological difference between men and women. He is shocked that no matter what evidence, nothing could convince them away from their predetermined conclusions. Then, when it comes to God, he fails this very same test of intellectual integrity.
MY DOCUMENTARY FILM: vimeo.com/ondemand/miningforgod
INSTAGRAM: / the_daily_dose_of_wisdom
FACEBOOK: / dailydoseofwisdomofficial
TIKTOK: / the_daily_dose_of_wisdom
Support my channel by getting Fishing Clash on your iOS/Android device for free fishingclash.link/DailyDoseOfWisdom! Use my gift code WISDOM to get a $20 reward, and share your biggest catch in the pinned comment!
To be fair, Ken Ham, who created the creationist museum, has stated that no amount of evidence would ever convince him that God doesn’t exist. I think you’ll find scholars on both sides that are so rooted in their position that they close their mind to the possibility of any opposition.
@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom
Please create categorized playlists for your channels. I like to listen to your videos at night when I sleep. Keep up the good work.
@@Laughy-Flaaffy Are you a believer? If so, what evidence would convince you God didn't exist? If you're not, what would convince you he does?
Jesus Power ❤ Starts Now.
@@unitedstatesof Blessed be to all, in Revelation 13:1, the beast with 7 heads and 10 horns coming up out of the waters, multi-headed means political, singular is religious (being the anti-christ which is Satan).
7 dominions throughout the earth, 10 kings/world leaders, the waters are the people expecting to be raptured out of here in famous fly away doctrine, for it will be as in the days of Noah that Yeshua mentions in Matthew 24 (with there being many other references throughout the old and new testament concerning the end times, as Daniel is a overlap of Revelation, and Ezekiel speaks more on the end times then any other book in the Bible other then that great book Revelation, the unveiling/uncovering as for the entomology of the word itself), those who are taken abide under God's wrath.
The false/spurious messiah comes 1st in Rev. 12 on this earth for a 5 month period, Satan and the fallen angels will be cast to earth (for the angels are coming back to seduce the daughters of men as they did in Genesis 6), he is the son of perdition (perdition means to be put to death, for he has already been judged).
The harlot, the woman spoken of is that great city Babylon, babel=confusion (Satan is the author of confusion), God said "to come out of her" in Rev. 18:4 I believe, as well as He did Abraham. It's not until the son of perdition, after the 2nd woe, on the 7th trumpet is when Jesus returns, the Lord's Day (that 1000yr period in 2nd Peter 3:8, the day John was taken to in the spirit, even past where were at now), when Jesus returns the dead will rise in Christ mentioned in 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 (where most people cling to the Rapture Theory), and we will all (meaning everyone to have ever lived who has went before us and who remain), will be in the spirit.
Yeshua Messiah will reign here in the new Heaven in the new earth, then at the end of that period Satan will be let loosed a little while because God is fair and everyone will have a chance (not meaning a do what you want now and make up for it then, pertaining to those who have been unable to hear the good news of our Lord and Savior and will be tested by Satan as even Jesus was to set the example on how we combat our enemy today), and they will be tested by him and some will still even then choose to follow/worship Satan, then comes the Great White Throne Judgement prior to the eternity.
God is that consuming fire, you don't burn and are tortured in Hell forever and ever, your name is blotted out which is the eternal punishment, no longer existing, period, all souls return to whenst they came, for Jesus Himself would say depart from Me i never knew ye.
The mark of beast in the forehead are those without the seal of God in their foreheads (your brain, meaning the truth in your mind), the mark on their hands are those doing the work for the beast, not a tattoo of 666 or a computer chip implanted, many will be deceived and have no idea who they're working for or which kingdom they are advancing.
The 1st beast received a deadly wound on 1 of it's heads, a disagreement or falling out (as we even experience today), via the supernatural entity being Satan when he is cast out of Heaven entirely will come to solve the problem (world peace), no nations to wage war against 1 another we/they will all be as 1, a 1 world rule, under Satan (in the beast system).
The religious beast who was out of the earth (dust/physically you could say, not flesh for he is a cherubim as serveral are mentioned throughtout scripture), and cast to the earth, the anti-christ isn't a man, it's Satan (looks like a lamb (Jesus), spake like a dragon). He exercises all the powers of the 1st beast (to take advantage, coming to make peace, not war, because it will all come down to his worship, as we worship our almighty Father to whom he originally wanted to be evaluated above YHVH during his overthrow), and when the dragon healed the wound of the 1st beast, and all worshipped it (trampling like cattle, moths to a flame).
Many churches will become the harlot and whore after her, and oh how so difficult it will be to speak/preach against peace/ the wound was by the sword and it is truth, for they/ the world will hate you/us for standing on God's Word till the end.
Satan uses men just as God does and counterfeits all God does, some of the churches will do the work for him as they are openingly displaying now the Satanic infestation that is spreading like a contagion of death, they'll think your preaching against Jesus, our Messiah to come, for Babylon today is being revived to its fullest making the way and carving the path in blood for the false to come, so many will be deceived that you personally hold so near and dear to your heart, tell them now and let God's Word flow as you sound the alarm.
God i pray you open they're eyes, for Yeshua came to save, not to condemn the world and when He comes back, He will will return as our mighty king who the pharisees and scribes originally expected to see. He is our redeemer and this time, He is coming to rule with a rod of iron and wage war on His enemies.
Where will you be? Where do you stand? Who do you truly serve? It's His long-suffering and unimaginable love for us all that keeps this world together and 1 day His hand will be removed over the face of the earth, throughout the four corners as far as the eye can, time is running out and everyday im reminded as to who it is i need and why I need Jesus the Christ. I know if I can love you and fight for you, then so can God, for He loves so, so much more then you could ever image.
God bless you and Amen.
This is the equivalent of saying "if you showed me the murder weapon and it had suspects fingerprints on it, and they admitted they did it, that's not enough evidence to convince me. "
But you don’t have the murder weapon or the suspects finger prints.
@@DM-dk7js Not relevant. He admitted if we did, he would refuse to accept it. But, but, but... but what.
@@viktoriyaserebryakov2755but you don’t.
So you’re not in a position to brag or gloat now are you?
@viktoriyaserebryakov2755 we don't know what evidence would convince us but God would know.
With claim of God ..
You don't even have a murder!
A few months back, I was watching the debate between John Lennox and Richard Dawkins. When Richard said, NOTHING could convince him of the existence of God. That's when I knew it had absolutely nothing to do with evidence. They simply don't want there to be a God.
100%
Of course it also doesn’t help that there is no evidence.
@@ramigilneas9274 absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
He didn’t say that
I’ve watch that debate a million times
Anyone that says "nothing can convince me otherwise" is really showing that it's not the mind, it's the heart. Meaning: It's ones emotional state toward a subject that blinds them. (For those who lack logic in understanding this simple phrase)
Do you know the holy spirit tells people when they pray about the book of mormon, that it is the word of god? Seems like believing seems prone to a lot of errors.
Some atheist scientist literally once said "Even if this were true I still wouldn't believe it". Atheists engage in an unscientific behavior called "rejection without testing". There are many phenomena out there that have been tested and confirmed true, but atheists still don't believe them.
Psalms 14:1
The fool has said in his heart, There is no God.
Which "Holy spirit"? The same Mormons who claimed black people were cursed and polygamy is fine only to change these doctrines over time.
@@namasi7070 yup, that same spirit of god that had Moses rape 32,000 virgins and murder their families.
It was never about evidence. They admit even in the presence of evidence they wouldn’t believe. They want to live their life how they want.
I read a reprint of a newspaper article from the 1900s that referred to visual sightings of the Wright brothers, flying machine as “mass hysteria” because, as everyone knew, heavier than air flight was a scientific impossibility. Mass hysteria and hallucinations are always an easy out for those who want to reject claims rather than investigate them.
@@denvan3143It's proven now that group psychosis is not possible 😊 Psychiatrists agree on that.
@@Christine-te4mr You have never done magic mushrooms in a group then.
Yeah it's called SATAN
@@kos-mos1127you are correct, I have never done 'magic mushrooms' let alone in a group. Even with that fact established, I highly doubt that they will experience the same trip to confirm details of a 'mass hysteria' event
Every time I hear arguments like that I just recall reading the Great Divorce by CS Lewis. There is an apt allegory there about people choosing to remain in hell due to their preconceptions rather than choosing heaven due to the sufficient evidence available
Except there's no evidence. I could just as easily say, you choose to remain in Hel rather than accept the evidence for Odin and Thor and join them in Valhalla.
@@richardgregory3684 🫣 “there is no evidence “
covering your eyes and ears to evidence doesn’t make it go away and is quite lazy
What a silly comparison. Christianity is not a mythic system
@richardgregory3684 looking for evidence in spacetime for "something" (language conceived in spacetime is a poor tool) that transcends spacetime is futile. Logically, something outside of spacetime caused the Big Bang, the origin of spacetime. You don't have to believe it to be God, but I can't Logically deny a force that transcends spacetime caused spacetime to come into existence. Something out of nothing needs a cause logically.
What is evidence? Science cannot explain which came first DNA or proteins, the DNA is made of proteins but in order to make proteins DNA is required, is this acceptable evidence when the answer is outside of science, God created life complete with DNA's ability to build proteins and continue the cycle of life and now we have no paradoxical problem that science will never solve. Is this evidence for a creator?
Most people choose to what to believe, and then use their logic and reason to defend it, not the other way around.
Sad but true! Only God can cause blind eyes to see 🙏❤️
You don't really CHOOSE your beliefs. You are either convinced or you are not convinced. And, I would say say, you should be convinced for good reasons, and you should use the best methods we have for doing this.
And one of the best methods is to always be ready to change your mind when there is better evidence.
Typically, it is the theist who do not use the best methods and who would assert that there is nothing that would change their mind. Anybody (atheist or theist) who would not change their mind, in the light of the best evidence, is irrational.
Sadly, it is usually the theist that fits this category.
Actually no one chooses what to believe. Belief is an involuntary reaction brought about based on antecedent conditions. This is easily tested. Take something you currently do not believe in like Santa Claus. Now truthfully start believing Santa is real at this exact moment. Notice how you cannot voluntarily choose to believe.
@@Rotten9 No, people definitely choose their beliefs. Argued with plenty to be convinced of that.
And don't you think they were convinced they were right?
I find it fascinating that the answer to the question "if you saw X happen, would you then believe?" is more immediately "I would more likely believe I was crazy". I would want to ask "What if you turned to the person next to you and verified that they saw the same thing?" shared hallucinations are less likely to happen than them being crazy (as in not at all going to happen), yet they immediately make it subjective, and assume that they must be the only one experiencing the event.
That’s really good, I’d like to see the statistical chance for multiple people to see the same hallucination. I assume it would be impossible for a large population to experience the same hallucination at the exact same time.
@@calebpagan2226 You are exactly right. And over 500 (!!!) people saw the risen Jesus at the same time, and the Apostle Paul appeals to that: "Go ask them. most of them are still alive!"
When you don't believe just for the sake of not believing, it's ignorance at that point. Dawkins is no different from the people he criticizes for blind obedience.
I can tell you did not actually understand what Dawkins said.
It takes a brilliant mind to explain the unseen. First you have to believe what you physically can not comprehend, except the act of thinking itself. It is something you believe that you can not physically comprehend. Proving the unseen was not easy until it was.
@@rafaelgonzalez4175 It does not take a brilliant mind to explain the unseen. I have seen very dumb people talk about ghost, fairies, Gods, leprechauns, Big Foot and many other unseen things. Why would someone choose to believe in something beyond their comprehension? Typically, belief is grounded in reasons, which implies a level of understanding or comprehension. Believing in something incomprehensible equates to accepting it without any reason, as you can't grasp what you're believing in. It seems illogical to believe in something when you have no understanding or rationale behind that belief. Why would anyone adhere to such a practice?
That is like saying I beileve something is true, just because. You can't give a reason because that would require you to have comprehended something about the nature of that belief.
@@displacegamer1379 "I can tell you did not actually understand what the Bible said." Exact same thing. Can you even tell the difference between you and a blind follower?
@@dadofgio Who was talking about the bible? Also, you will have to explain further what you are asking in your last question.
Amazing video!
Im shocked that some people think these people are intellectuals.
Imagine spending ALL that money on education to concede that its not about evidence. No amount of evidence wont convince them? AND THEYRE MEANT TO BE SMART? LOL. This world is backwards and upside down!
Keep up the great work!
May JESUS bless you.
AMEN!
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
@@theartistcherrypi6454 AMEN!
Imagine that Christians actually believe they have the truth. The reality is Christians believe because they want to believe even when there is no evidence.
Here is a truth bomb. Christians do not use that same logic in everyday life. Christians live by trust and verification like everyone else. The show that just bring evidence that goes against their beliefs about Christianity than watch how they handle scientific evidence that goes against their beliefs.
Ever heard of a tu quoque fallacy, because that is what you are committing.
You definitely need to read Matthew 7: 1-5 because you believe a claim in an old book written by anonymous authors that 37.2 trillion dead and rotting eucaryotic cells magically came back to life, without even a mustard seed's worth of empirical evidence to support that belief.
It’s really a Moot point because there never has been and will be proof of any of the 3,000 or more gods,Plus you Theists are such hypocrites because there’s over 3,000 gods and you all claim every one of them is a False god and you base it on what,No Evidence to support there claim and yet you don’t understand why Atheists don’t believe in you’re god which shows Such Arrogant Hypocrisy,I’m an Atheist and if in my lifetime there was Irrefutable evidence for let’s just say the christian god I’d be the first to say well done you’ve proved there’s a god,I wouldn’t have any interest in it but I’d give credit where credits due so not all atheists share these guys opinions just for the record…
Is a person who is clinically mad capable of being aware that they are mad? This is just deliberate unbelief. I hope they change their mind before taking their last breath.
This really shows why so many atheist will not allow themselves the existence of a Creator…..
They don’t want there to be a Creator because they can’t stand the chance that they are WRONG in their belief……
It’s like a rebellious teenager believing WHOLEHEARTEDLY that they know more than their Parents & they shouldn’t have to obey them ….
How do we figure out what stories are true and what stories are not true?
It has to do with making an analogy with stories that we can believe happened, and an analogy with stories that we believe did not happen. And use the thousands, hundreds of thousands and millions of stories that humans have created, both true and not true.
Do we think the stories of the moon landings are true?
Do we think the stories of Star Trek are true?
Why do we think the moon landings and coming back to the Earth actually happened? Because Neil Armstrong was a great pilot of jets, Buzz Aldrin had a PhD from MIT in orbital mechanics. The Scientists and Engineers knew how to build rocket ships.
Why might we think that the stories of Star Trek are not true? Aside from the timeline problems. Because the stories don't contain knowledge on how to make Warp Drive Star Ships, Photon Torpedoes, Transporters. In order for us to think the stories of Star Trek are true, we would have to be able to build a Warp Drive Star Ship and fly to Vulcan and look and see if there is anybody there that looks like Spock. Then we might think that Star Trek is true.
It is all about knowledge vs story claims. In order for someone to turn a 3 day old stinky body to new again, that being would have to know a lot about the human body, about blood, skin, bones, eye balls, liver, heart, etc.. Did Jesus tell us anything about the human body? Anything about first aid that we humans can use? Anything about CPR? Anything that would start Science to research into starting Medical Science so humans can build hospitals, medical research facilities and ways to prevent diseases naturally?
All Jesus of Christianity gives us is Story Magic. Jesus of Christianity is a Supernatural Superhero. Jesus of Christianity is not a Nature's God.
Did Jesus tell us about Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Geology, Geography, etc.. If Jesus was a God, Jesus should have been able to fill entire books on economics, much more than Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, 1776. Instead of just telling people to give to the poor. If Jesus cared about humans, Jesus would have talked about how to build more wealth with good economic practices to build businesses and on how to make things.
Then lets understand Thomas Jefferson and his phrase in the Declaration of Independence of the United States, "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God." Thomas Jefferson did not think that Christianity is true. Jefferson knew that the stories of Christianity only gets to a human created story God, stories created by humans. Jesus is a Supernatural Superhero, who only knows Story Magic. Jefferson thought that a Nature's God would have knowledge of Nature. That is what the Philosophers of the Age of Enlightenment gave us, is to not believe in Supernatural Superhero Story Magic, but to build on knowledge of Nature and Reason. A phrase used to describe the Age of Enlightenment was 'Dare to Know.'
It is the Age of Enlightenment Philosophies that gave us the advances of Nature, like electricity, electronics and machine created power, medical care and medical hospitals. Not the Story Magic thinking from the ancient world.
No. It’s just because there’s a lack of evidence for *your* claims.
@@DM-dk7js Did you even read the title of this video let alone watch it and understand the actual point it's making?
@@crescentfuze NOPE, he is actually validating what i posted & hasn’t a clue that he is
@@bigtxsdudecause atheists are naturally dumb. Dawkins and Hitchens are no different. They have low iQs. They're just educated
I'm a Catholic and I went to church yesterday and it was packed. These demons will try to convince you that religion is disappearing whey in fact people want to reach to God more than ever before. People of Faith know that darkness wants to take over and they don't want to allow that.
I would have asked Atkins how he knows his rejection isn't proving he has already gone mad???
Jesus said; "If you were blind you would not be guilty but because you say you see... behold your sin is upon you...
Leave them to their own "wisdom"...
I hate watching these "educated professionals" use the Word of God for sport...
Do you believe in God or the claims of a man written bible? We know men wrote the bible. If God created the universe, we will find him there. Science is the only tool that effectively explains the universe.
@@JezuesChavezdid you watch the video? Dawkins comments in the first clip regarding skeletons is interesting to say the least.
@@namasi7070 Not sure how the skeletons portion has to do with belief? Paul was not convinced of "the evidence". Not only did he not believe "the evidence", he persecuted those who believed "the evidence". Once he started to preach the "risen Christ:" did he start pointing out "the evidence"? No! There is no evidence. The "risen Christ" was a revealed wisdom and not a historical event. God went around revealing Christ to these apostles, as Paul explains.
Jesus said .....
Who do Christians constantly try to use the bible as if its evidence?
Harry Potter said......
Jesus is a character in a book, a book that claims magic is real
@@crazyprayingmantis5596 Why do "self-gods" reject all the secular evidence that the Bible is fact?
Hey, you know those secret moments in the wee hours of the night when you wake up surrounded by the dark aloneness of your self and you are consumed by the nothingness of it all... Yeah, that's what you are left with when rejecting God...
Basically goes back to that they don’t want it to be true, which is sad.
yep. athiest have faith too. but a negative one.
He didn't say there's nothing that could convince him, he said he can't imagine know what the evidence would look like that would convince him.
So he's being a tab bit misrepresented here, details matter.
@@crazyprayingmantis5596 He’s a psychologist
Huge props to these gentlemen for making our life that much easier.
Since seeing this a few years back, I’ve laughed every time someone references Dawkins. He’s completely intellectually dishonest. He ruled out God from the beginning. I was an atheist for 19 years and now am a Christian. I didn’t rule out God and followed the evidence where it went. If Dawkins and other prominent atheists can’t do that, they’re not worth listening to on this subject.
The FALSE CLAIM of Atheists and Evolutionists against the CREATOR
is
the Creator's Sovereignty, will, and commandments are worthless and useless, no value whatsoever
The LIE of Atheists and Evolutionists
is
the Creator doesn't exist and even if existing is still unworthy and undeserving to be honored and respected as the True and Sovereign God
The FALSE CLAIM of all Christian and non-Christian Religions against JESUS CHRIST
is
Jesus Christ's authority and teachings about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" are worthless and useless, no value whatsoever
The LIES, FALSEHOODS, and UNBIBLICAL TEACHINGS and DOCTRINES of all Christian and non-Christian Religions
are
"Armageddon", "Trinity", "rapture", "heaven and hellfire", and "reincarnation"
DISHONOR and ETERNAL DEATHS as the CONSEQUENCES of DISOBEDIENCE and DEFIANCE
All Atheists, Evolutionists, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, and fanatics of all kinds of Religions
who let themselves be used by Satan the Devil to insult and oppose the Creator and his Christ
are
NOT ignorant and unaware
but
KNOW and fully aware
that
their Satanic arrogance and willful mockeries, opposition, DISOBEDIENCE and DEFIANCE of the Creator's Sovereignty and his Christ's authority and teachings
will bring them nothing but their own dishonor, disgrace, downfall and ETERNAL DEATHS, just worthless and useless dusts on earth forever
All Atheists, Evolutionists, and fanatics of all Christian and non-Christian Religions
are obviously
the haters, cruel, merciless, liars, and deceitful persons on earth
who
don't respect and value their own lives, dignities, and existence..... not bothered at all and just don't care even if they're lied to, deceived, and murdered by Satan the Devil, the Father of LIES and Murderer of human beings
ETERNAL LIFE and EXISTENCE on EARTH for WORSHIPPERS of the CREATOR and FOLLOWERS of JESUS CHRIST
Jesus Christ KNOWS
that the SUBMISSIVENESS and OBEDIENCE of lowly, ordinary, and kind persons on earth to his authority and teachings about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" as written in Matthew 28: 18, Luke 4: 43, and John 11: 25, 26
will
definitely bring them honor and the loving, kind, and merciful Creator's favor and reward of ETERNAL LIFE and existence without sufferings, pains, griefs, sickness, and death as written in Revelation 21: 3, 4
The Creator KNOWS
that all human beings will just become worthless and useless dusts on earth after their deaths just like the animals as written in Ecclesiastes 3: 19: 20 ; 9: 5, 6
but
he knows too that he will not let his loving, kind, and respectful worshippers who died recently and thousands of years ago like Abel, Noah, Abraham Sarah, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Job, Naomi, Ruth, King David, Daniel, Jesus Christ followers, and many others to remain as worthless and useless dusts on earth forever,
instead,
in the right and proper time,
he will let Jesus Christ RESURRECT them back to life so they can all happily and abundantly live and exist on earth forever as submissive and obedient subjects of the "KINGDOM of GOD" or His Kingdom
and fully enjoy his and his Christ's eternal love, kindness, goodness, generosities, compassions, favors, and blessings for eternity under the loving and kind rulership, guidance, and protection of Jesus Christ as his Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth as written in Revelation 11: 15.
Well yeah
Christ is coming back to establish God’s kingdom on earth.
His saints will literally rule with Him but under Him.
And all alive then shall see Him
Perhaps then our atheistic friends will have sufficient evidence to believe or they will call it madness still 😂
His entire life has been spent denying the existence of God and 2 seconds after he dies he’ll realize just how wrong he’s been and I can only imagine the look on his face.
not just denying Gods existence but writing a book and trying to convince everyone else that he doesn't exist that's like preaching an atheist religion. He's an evangelist for nothing.
@@marcusmuse4787 Very true.
Probably not tho.
So you can only find out once you brain no longer functions?
How could you possibly comprehend anything when the tool that is required to comprehend no longer functions?
@@crazyprayingmantis5596 No one’s brain does not stop working at death as we pass from death to life eternal and the only question is where you will spend eternity, either in Heaven or in Hell and waiting until after you die to find out is absolutely silly.
Look at the people all these new atheists are modeling after. This is literally what the new Atheists buy into. This is how they think, really!
they are anti theists. I saw kraus say it in a tiktok. not a good path to follow
@@conspiracy1914 Exactly!!
@@conspiracy1914why not? Theism is as corrupt as anything can possibly be as it relates to politics and every day life.
You'd be an anti theist if a different religion tried to impose it's ridiculous values on you too. 😅
Im not going to assume your religion, but we all know christians, muslims and jews dont see eye to eye. They are more than willing to violently express themselves 😅
Praying for you my brother in Christ. I can't imagine the attacks you probably come under. Thank you for these.
why would someone attach intellectual dishonesty though. Oh yeah, it's pretty obvious why.
I feel sorry for them
It's not about Atheism, it's about the career they made out of it. (Not to say that Christians do not fall on the same trappings though)
But truly, fame and fortune are their gods.
Its hysterical how they goad Christians for blind faith...but then Atheists do the exact same thing....blind faith in their religion that is based on obstinance, the same hard headed defiance they accuse christians of. lol
I feel sorry for people brainwashed by religion.
@@TheFracturedfuture same goes to you my friend. I feel sorry for you as well. But hey whatever makes you happy, you do you.
@@RyanSantos-cn5ij I'm not brainwashed though.
"Most people aren't on a truth quest. They're on a happiness quest."
“If Christianity were true, would you believe in it?”
"But if people who already have the light of nature turn away from that light, then God is under no obligation to get them any more light. More light is just gonna annoy them. They're just trying to suppress the light they already have."
- Frank Turek
"He has saved us and called us to a holy life-not because of anything we have done but because of his own purpose and grace. This grace was given us in Christ Jesus before the beginning of time"
2 Timothy 1:9
God is glorious
@@1stdebunkerAmen brother
Not only happiness, but temporary and illogical happiness.
Christianity is a man made believe system just like all other religions.
Exactly said!. It's what I've experienced myself talking to people about God and preaching the Gospel even if they don't plainly say it. They don't want to lose the throne of their lives, they don't want to be really accountable..
If they will not listen to Moses and the prophets, then they will not believe even if a man were raised from the dead.
If the most convincing or the most solid evidence can not convince them, then what's the point of engaging them in any debate or conversation whatsoever?
I say just leave them alone.
Except we have never seen any evidence for your specific God. Do you believe in the Mormon God, Muhammad, Buddha? Explain why
@@brianmesser12 That is not even the issue I am arguing for, you can believe we don't have evidence if you want to I am not worried about that right now. It's one thing to think we don't have evidence but it's another thing to say you'd never change your mind even if you got it.
I am simply saying if you already know you are going to reject the evidence even if it's presented to you then that is irrational and asenine position to take. By the way this is a hypothiesis of them getting this proof first hand, not through word of mouth, not via a recorded video online nor through a rumor we are talking about something you get to experience and see for yourself. So I am saying what's the point of asking for it, why bother believers with their endless debates, seminars and public speeches when they have set in their hearts that they will not believe regardless. I say just leave us alone then, do what you want to do, live how you want to live because it makes their arguements against theism pointless.
One more time I am not concerned whether or not you think we have evidence for God. Right now I can even yeild that there isn't just for the sake of this conversation.
However if a person can't even tell us what would count as convincing evidence then I would say to each of them the evidence is not the problem. It's YOU.
The point is not so much to change minds that are solidly closed, but instead to expose how vacuous the atheistic views of Dawkins and Atkins are.
@@garyjensen3004 They ask for evidence but they don't really want it.
If this is the mindset the likes of Dawkins have then ultimately they have wasted years debating creationists concerning the issue of evidence.
If God himself can not convince them through a first hand encounter then what are we really doing engaging in debates with them? I personally would advise any Christian not to debate any of them because this is not going anywhere.
@@jamesmagwenzi6058 if you saw convincing evidence of Allah would you convert to Islam?
This is maybe the best video I have ever seen on this channel. Excellent work, thank you for pulling this together
For some people, its not a matter of evidence, it's a matter of them just not wanting to believe.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God (Psalms 14)
The used car salesman said in his heart, you're getting a great deal. 😅
It's sad, but pride and self-love are stronger than avidences.
Richard Dawkins' cognitive dissonance is hard to even fathom. It literally leaves me speechless.
It is literally a religious fanaticism 😅
Summarised in two words: I won't.
The Dawkins Delusion
We all get to choose. We all get to live with our choice.
"Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our *a priori* adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door." (Atheist and biologist Richard Lewontin)
It sounds like the man is a complete moron.
Science is a discipline. It has never promised anything to anyone.
Scientific claims are against common sense but they are experimentally verified. So just because a claim is against common sense does not mean it's not factual. Claims that Christians make are not verifiable and against common sense.
It's unfortunate that they don't want to believe, their intelligence could have helped a lot of people.
Oh, how do you know they don't want to believe?
@Eliza-rg4vw Did you not watch the video? These guys literally said no amount of evidence would convince them otherwise. Dawkins even admits it goes against the grain of the scientific method, but he would dismiss every form of evidence as a hallucination or a magic trick. He clearly does not want to believe.
@@christopher19894 It wouldn't convince me =/= i dont want it. Two radically different things. Hence why i ask.
@@christopher19894
Pro tip: use their own arguments against them.
How would i know they aren't themselfs a hallucination or a magic trick.
Their 'intelligence' ?, these are the people who believe their brains aren't designed.
Thank you for this channel !
Thank you for your ministry 💖🙏💖🙏💖
“For those who do believe, no evidence is necessary. For those who don’t believe, no amount of evidence is possible.”
Evidence will cause those to accept the position because belief will no longer be required. Once you have evidence its out of the realm of belief and in the realm of facts.
@@kos-mos1127
Logical Belief exists. Athiests struggle with faith vs blind faith and conflate the 2.
@@kos-mos1127 ALL humas live by faith in the broad sense of confidence. ALL. We are mortal creatures with finite knowledge. The scientific enterprise itself is based on faith presuppositions, basic beliefs simply accepted a priori without "proof" or "evidence."
@@justin10292000 All human lives by trust but verify. No one will question something that is likely to happen. An unlikely event is going to be questioned. Someone claiming that God revealed himself to them will be questioned because the implausibility of the claim. Also God lacks explanatory and predictive power so it’s useless as an a priori. Matter is accepted as an apriori because it explains what things are made of and has predictive power. You can take matter and build frameworks that allow us to manipulate the world.
Soon as there is evidence the evidence doesn't matter. These guys think they know better no matter what the facts point to. They don't want to believe period. So they will find out the hard way.
🎯
You can't have evidence for the supernatural. That's the point.
@@spacemoose4726 It's unexplained and although they know how it might be caused they are unwilling to admit it. So call it whatever you want the results are there and science ca't explain it. And just because a bunch of people with limited minds and limited views say something can't happen, doesn't mean squat, because it has already happened.
@@christophercoughlin9493 They are saying they wouldn't be able to distinguish it from something natural, like an hallucination. If you have a vision of Jesus, how would you know you're not just hallucinating? They're not saying it can't be real. They're saying they don't know how to distinguish it from something we know is real, like an hallucination. It's an honest answer.
This is the problem with supernatural claims. Even if they are true, we don't have good evidence because the natural explanations are more likely, and we know those are real. Also, the supernatural can explain literally anything. Maybe the earth is flat and God is making us think it's round for some reason that makes sense to him? Something that can explain everything like that really explains nothing.
@@spacemoose4726 right. They are more so saying that there is no such thing as evidence for god. What could possibly happen on earth that would be evidence that a specific god exists that wouldn’t still require faith to believe, I’d argue there is nothing.
There are some hearts that will *NEVER* accept the gospel even if you preached till you were blue in the face or showed the most compelling evidence. The only evidence left, sadly, is hell’s furious flames.
You don't know who wrote the gospels. The first copies of Mark say nobody saw jesus resurrection at the tomb? Then in mark 9 Mary saw him at tomb. Seems like someone changed the story?
The most obvious would be someone moved jesus body to another tomb
False dichotomy.
@@brianmesser12 When you take that stance, you call the God of the Bible a LIAR, and He HATES lies! Listen, Jesus Christ is coming back. There’s a reason why scripture says the earth will mourn. People who spent their whole lives denying Him will *SEE* Him with their own eyes and believe me, no one will be able to call it *MADNESS!*
@@J-aiJ-ai I think it would've been more fruitful as a fellow Christian to address his points as well as make yours.
The ultimate in logic and reason ...surely !
Atheism isn't the lack of belief
It's the rejection
Rejection of claims based on a lack of evidence.
@@DM-dk7js Based on lack of evidence? First off, you didn't watch the video. Secondly, how unscientific of you. That's not the scientific process.
the last thing that they believe is in science or logic. truly lost they are
It depends on who is defining the word Atheism. Some say lack of belief, some say rejection. It is up to the atheist to define what they mean when they say Atheism. Much like how there are many types of Christians, and each denomination has deferring understanding of what it truly means to be Christian. But they all call themselves Christians. Ironically, it's often Christians themselves who label other Christians as not real Christians simply because their beliefs don't align perfectly with their own.
@@viktoriyaserebryakov2755the video surely doesn’t have evidence god exists so what’s the point of saying that?
You know what's really madness? "Scientists, experts, & researchers" Trying their hardest attempt to disprove peaceful faith. Instead of attempting to put an end to the (evil) they so much complain about ALL THE TIME. But That's just me...😅
You are right. I find it funny that these so called "atheists" works so much to disprove God existence, and try so hard to ridicule christianity even though they don't believe God exists.
@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom
Please create categorized playlists for your channels. I like to listen to your videos at night when I sleep. Keep up the good work.
John 12:39-40
“Therefore they could not believe, because that Esaias said again, He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.”
Basically, they don't know how the confounded thing got there, but however it got there, God didn't do it.
Basic exactly that. Christian do not know how the confounded thing got there so because they do not know it must be God. This is why it is called God of the gaps.
@@displacegamer1379 Same as Time of the gaps. No way of proving the origin of life and we don't know but it can't be a higher power per the atheist.
@@beadoll8025 I have never heard of "time of the gap" but I may find a way to use it in the future. Good thinking. It seems to me that you're interpreting the word proving in a very specific context. Accepting this interpretation, I concur that proving the origin of life is unfeasible. As an atheist, I acknowledge the possibility of various explanations, including the possible involvement of a higher power like extraterrestrial entities, or even creation by a deity. The key aspect of my stance is the use of "could" rather than "did." By saying could, I'm simply acknowledging the lack of contradiction in these possibilities.
The critical difference in my approach, compared to the God of the gaps arguments often used in Christian discourse, is the certainty of the claim. God of the gaps typically asserts that God did do it, filling in the unknowns with definitive claims about God's actions. In contrast, my position is about considering potential explanations without asserting them as certainties. It's about suggesting what might explain the unknown, rather than definitively stating what does.
As soon as you go from "I do not know but this could be an explanation" to "God did it" you are now doing God of the gaps.
The thing is, we're not invoking God based on what we don't know, but on what we do know. That is not God of the Gaps in any way, shape, or form.
For instance, I know that life, as noted by the law of biogenesis, only comes from other life, so it couldn't have popped in unaided. I also know that something cannot create itself, including the universe, as demonstrated by the laws of thermodynamics. Its cause has to have been something outside of it, and possessing limitless power. It has to have been personal, orderly, omniscient, and holding the power of being within itself (ie self-existant, an uncaused cause). That's one example of how the Christian arrives at God as the cause for the existence of life and the universe, based on what we know from what we have observed of the world around us.
@@displacegamer1379
@@beadoll8025time of the gaps isn’t a thing, dawg.
I really like Peter Boghosian, the way he discusses people’s beliefs with them. Although he is an ardent atheist, he talks with all kinds of people on all issues.
There was something I read in psychology cursorily. A paraphrase like "the lunatic never knows he is mad."
So, for someone to have a true supernatural experience, they would never be able write it off as mental projection.
And it certainly wouldn't be corroborated by multiple other people.
Thank YOU for these awesome vids!
I wonder if when they are in hell they will still think it's halucination
At that point the unquenchable eternal flames will feel very real but sadly, it will be too late 😢
Hell is made up.
@@kos-mos1127
Just cuz u say it is dont mean it is.
@@kos-mos1127
how do you know that? bcuz u SAID SO!! lool
@@drillyourarguments Sure it does. If you want assert that unquenchable eternal flames await those who do not believe in God. I can just as well deny the existence of hell.
Anything that can be argued into existence can be argued out of existence.
I grew up in an atheist society, a Soviet Socialist one, and any religion was prohibited… I can’t express how helpful was that upbringing for finding God. I’m so grateful to all atheists for pointing clearly the way to God!
Explain pls ?
@bvaradinov
All that happened to you was you traded one dogma for another. The first one was imposed on you the second one you duped yourself.
@@Rotten9 I’d say that all that happened to you didn’t make you wiser, but more terrified to live a purposeful life. And I say that because I see that you have no idea what “dogma” is, and that you’re lacking life experience which would have taught you that the existence is far more complex than the few empty slogans you try to hide behind so to find comforting explanations about subjects which are far beyond your ability to comprehend. Don’t try act like if you know it all…
@@chamilleleonne To explain how the death cult called “Marxism”, which is based on Dialectical Materialism, which by itself is based on Darwin’s Evolutionary theory, affects the mentality? It makes people cruel, that’s the simplest to say. If they stop value every human life as unique experience given by God, people stop value the very essence of being human… and turn evil.
@@Rotten9 atheism is a dogma based on blind faith. I don't have enough blind faith to be an atheist. Do YOU?
Education and intelligence don't equate with wisdom and spiritual insight! This video makes that abundantly clear.
After their death standing at judgment, I wonder if they’d maintain these views.
Hopefully it won’t come to that, though. I hope they all open their eyes and see what they’ve been missing all their lives.
They profess to be wise, but are fools.
Goes both ways
@@user-qg1kb8ih3gno it doesn’t. True believers don’t profess to know more than God. That’s your people.
Everytime I hear this conversation I think about the story of the rich man and Lazarus in Luke 16.
Some people have hardened their heart so much they are unfortunately beyond reach💔
Approaching a question with only two possible answers, convinced of one of those answers to begin with, will color, or affect, the outcome of the experiment.
"I am so smart that I cannot trust my own senses."
Psalm 14:1 is true.
That’s exactly what a skeptic would say. It’s pretty intelligent to be aware that our senses can fail.
What unnecessary insult.
Yes, our senses can be tricked. Is it that difficult to comprehend?
@@DM-dk7js
"It’s pretty intelligent to be aware that our senses can fail. " Then evalooshun believers should not believe in evalooshun.
The cognitive dissonance is astonishing!
On both sides atheist and theist we are all the same just indoctrinated differently.
@@MrFireman164I
"Indoctrination" exists. That does not prove the Truth of anything. Genetic fallacy.
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fool…
That is not at all what irony is. I believe the turn of events you described would be best classified as "completely expected".
- Yui
Had a friend something similar saying he refused to believe in anything that has an element of faith. I ask if his athesist, then he is believing on faith that there is no higher power.
Faith is believing something *without* good evidence for it. Atheism is a *disbelief*, faith has nothing to do with it. This is a common mistake made by theists.
@@jannenreuben7398
but you have faith that your car, computer, electric appliances will work tomorrow, and not, say, be stolen by sentient cockroaches, right?
@drillyourarguments I have seen no evidence that sentient cockroaches exist so I have no reason to believe they will interfere with my stuff tomorrow. That isn't the same thing as having faith. I would have to believe in them to have faith.
@@drillyourargumentsbecause of their repeated and continual efforts to perform as intended. Not through faith.
@@drillyourargumentsread his definition again: faith is belief WITHOUT evidence.
Expecting your car to start is not faith when evidence suggests it will. That evidence is it starting for the last 5 years without a hitch (as an example).
I would also add that faith is not synonymous with belief in God. It’s often associated with it, but trying to get an Atheist to admit they have faith in something does not prove God nor does it strengthen any argument for the existence of one. 🤷🏻♂️
They show their true colors upfront.
Cognitive scientist: All the evidence suggests that people don't actually change their minds based on evidence. The human mind is a social mind - we are much better at arguing for our points of view than we are at making logical conclusions based on evidence
Person B: I am not convinced.
Those two are special specimens... Not only do they get science wrong, but their sheer ignorance is baffeling to me. As a physicist its crazy to me, that they think we know anything at all 😅
The fact that a person can be punished for eternity is one of the many reasons why a person would not want to worship your god, if any evidence actually supports its existence.
Thats like saying someone is a good parent because they send someone to torture their kid all day after they disobeyed them.
So the logical choice according to you is to stick the head in the sand.
"God dont tickle meh feelz so i resist Him"
@@drillyourargumentstorturing someone for not thinking the way you do is very akin to fascism, is it not?
You don’t think the way I do? You don’t worship my imaginary friend? Well you’re gonna burn forever in pain and torment.
Sounds like fascism at worst psychopathic at best.
It's not 'God punishing you for eternity' it's being removed from God once departed from earth, and being at the mercy of bodies who have no care or love for you, or 'hell'
Also it turns out that if we don't worship God we are worshipping something else. either money, fornication, career, whatever gets you you out of bed...
once i found God i felt no longer bound by the desires and stresses, nothing comes close to having a relationship with God, there is nothing I would trade it for
@@TheWordisGod
100% true ^
That is not objective,
That is obsession.
Great video. Makes me think of Luke 16:31 💙🙏
I got an interesting reply from someone a couple of days ago referring to God and science.He admitted that it was possible for a supernatural all powerful being but there was no proof or science to support it therefore no reason to believe.Amazing!
I've watched many of your videos but never commented...just wanted to say thank you for your time. You have a great logical, thorough process of actually thinking (a rare skill nowdays) about a topic, and the videos you make do a nice job of demonstrating this.
I appreciate that! Thank you
@@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom Josh Sparrow covers R Dawkins doing the all seeing eye and more.
It hurts to see that people go to this length just to tell God "no" with no aparent reason or rationale. Could they have been dont wrong at an early age? Maybe. But these guys seem to just have what could be thought of as a lazy or absolute denial. They dont want evidence, because they just dont want to bellieve. Ive yet to hear their reason for such. Theres got to be something in them that stands in the way of a "yes" for God
Sheer arrogance.
Thanks for another good video
What are these guys going to believe when they have to be held accountable for their beliefs?
Held accountable by whom? By a god that hides himself and then gets vindictive when he can't be found?
Eventually every knee will bow and every tongue will confess, Jesus is Lord. Some will rejoice in affirmation, more will experience the deepest of agonies as they do so and go to an eternal demise. There is not choice, only those two options, none will be able to not believe in that day.
@@grantm6514 He reveals Himself to all who seek, I know my Lord. Those who cannot find Him choose to not see Him, often with a perverse vigor.
@@JB-mg5lwfalse.
@@grantm6514 Be honest with yourself have you truly searched for him? My father had a friend who never came to Jesus as far as we know. He said he read a book that told him all about that stuff. (in his words) My father asked him did you ever read the Bible and search there? No he said. My father told him why don’t you look and search there?
Open question for Christians: if Vishnu appeared and spoke to you, would you abandon Christianity and convert to Hinduism?
Lol
😂
Let him appear first
@@akingbilegabriel7035 But if he did appear...would you?
i'd ask him if Jesus was Lord and if Jesus laid down His own bodily life for humans.
if the entity says 'no', he is an antiChrist and an evil being.
@@drillyourarguments This is the answer of a simpleton with the mind of a child.
@@nitsujism
so you resort to the ad hominem fallacy. Nice argument. lol
Totally unscientific to say such things, great clips..
Then why isn't there evidence? Apologists typical answer for the hiddenness of God is, "it would interfere with free will." If no evidence would sway them anyway, then shouldn't God be making appearances on Earth all the time?
"Man will believe anything, as long as it's not in the Bible.” - Napoleon Bonaparte. (Allegedly). Traced to GK Chesterton.
Napoleon Bonaparte.. “The Bible is no mere book, but a Living Creature, with a power that conquers all that oppose it.” (The original French shown in a reply).
Not to be insensitive, women too.
The Bible cannot conquer me. I am inevitable.
@@kos-mos1127
You will acknowledge God is real one day.
@@kos-mos1127The Bible is not to conquer but to save.
what are the sources of these quotes?
@@billjohnson9472 L'Évangile n'est pas un livre : c'est un être vivant, avec une action, une puissance, qui envahit tout ce qui s'oppose à son extension. -- Napoléon Bonaparte, Corsica, memoire.
“When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything.”
― G.K. Chesterton
So I'll give the respective quotes accordingly. I couldn't find a French quote linking Napoleon to the Chesterton quote, suggesting it might be a Chesterton original.
BACK WHEN I WAS ATHEIST I READ / HEARD EVERY ARGUMENT 4 GOD & STILL DIDNT BELIEVE💯😮💨ITS LIKE THEY SAID ITS NO AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE OR SIGNS THAT COULD HAVE CONVINCED ME GOD WAS REAL💯
IT WASNT UNTIL LAST YEAR WHEN I FINALLY FORGAVE MY DAD, LITERALLY AS SOON AS I DID THAT I FELT THE PRESENCE OF GOD IMMEDIATELY COME OVER ME & FELL DOWN IN TEARS💯
THATS WHAT GOD IS‼️THERE ISNT ANY SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE OR PROOF THAT CAN CONVINCE AN UNBELIEVER😮💨ITS ONLY ONCE U TRULY SEEK GOD & FEEL HIM ON A PERSONAL LEVEL WILL U COME 2 BELIEVE💯🙏🏾🙏🏾
AMEN!!!
Writing in all caps makes you very convincing
@@DM-dk7js PPRECIATE U💯EVERYBODY SAYS THAT BUT I DONT UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE LOVE 2 CRY ABOUT GRAMMAR IN UA-cam COMMENT SECTIONS
@@waff6ix STOP YELLING AT ME!
Nothing exists if you refuse to believe it. Passing on is the only way to know anything for sure.
POV: “Peter, would you ever believe in God?”
Peter Atkins: “God forbid” 😂
This is wild!
I really do think that most atheists reject God because they know that if God exists, it means that they aren't the smartest beings in the universe.
And they don’t want accountability for their actions. They are their own god
Nope.
It’s because there’s no evidence he exists.
It’s literally that simple. Don’t overthink it.
@@DM-dk7js there is tons of evidence… I don’t think you know the definition of that word….
@@MrSimpogeplease provide one ton of the tons (plural) of evidence. As I already asked you in a different comment. Respectfully.
@@DM-dk7js look around you. You can’t really think that all this came from nothing and by accident, can you? Would you take me seriously if I said a Lego plant exploded, some wind came, fire, lightning, and a Lego space shuttle fully functional was left over? That takes a lot of faith 😉
Claims are not evidence. Claims have to be tested.
The FALSE CLAIM of ATHEISTS and EVOLUTIONISTS about the CREATOR'S SOVEREIGNTY
is
the Creator's Sovereignty, will, and commandments are worthless and useless, no value whatsoever
The LIE of ATHEISTS and EVOLUTIONISTS
is
the Creator doesn't exist and even if existing is still unworthy and undeserving to be honored and respected as the True and Sovereign God
The FALSE CLAIM of RELIGIONS about JESUS CHRIST'S AUTHORITY and TEACHINGS
is
Jesus Christ's authority and teachings about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" are worthless and useless, no value whatsoever
The LIES, FALSEHOODS, and UNBIBLICAL TEACHINGS and DOCTRINES of RELIGIONS
are
"Armageddon", "Trinity", "rapture", "heaven and hellfire", and "reincarnation"
DISHONOR and ETERNAL DEATHS as the CONSEQUENCES of DISOBEDIENCE and DEFIANCE
VS.
ETERNAL LIFE and EXISTENCE on EARTH as FAVOR and REWARD for SUBMSSIVENESS and OBEDIENCE
All Atheists, Evolutionists, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, and fanatics of all kinds of Religions
who are being used by the Father of LIES and Murderer of human beings, Satan the Devil to insult and oppose the Creator and his Christ
DON'T KNOW and just CAN'T UNDERSTAND
that their Satanic arrogance, hatred, and willful mockeries, opposition, DISOBEDIENCE and DEFIANCE of the Creator's Sovereignty and his Christ's authority and teachings
will bring them nothing but their own dishonor, disgrace, downfall and ETERNAL DEATHS, just worthless and useless dusts on earth forever
while
the SUBMISSIVENESS and OBEDIENCE of lowly, ordinary, and kind persons on earth to the authority and teachings of Jesus Christ about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" as written in Matthew 28: 18, Luke 4: 43, and John 11: 25, 26
will
definitely bring them honor and the loving, kind, and merciful Creator's favor and reward of ETERNAL LIFE and existence without sufferings, pains, griefs, sickness, and death as written in Revelation 21: 3, 4
The Creator KNOWS
that all human beings will just become worthless and useless dusts on earth after their deaths just like the animals as written Ecclesiastes 3: 19: 20 ; 9: 5, 6
but
he knows too that he will not let his loving, kind, and respectful worshippers who died recently and thousands of years ago like Abel, Noah, Abraham Sarah, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Job, Naomi, Ruth, King David, Daniel, Jesus Christ followers, and many others to remain as worthless and useless dusts on earth forever,
instead,
in the right and proper time,
he will let Jesus Christ RESURRECT them back to life so they can all happily and abundantly live and exist on earth forever as submissive and obedient subjects of the "KINGDOM of GOD" or His Kingdom
and fully enjoy his and his Christ's eternal love, kindness, goodness, generosities, compassions, favors, and blessings for eternity under the loving and kind rulership, guidance, and protection of Jesus Christ as his Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth as written in Revelation 11: 15.
So have you tested the claims that says Alexander the Great conquered Persia???
@@jaflenbond7854there’s the copy paste spammer
@@therick363 ETERNAL LIFE and EXISTENCE on EARTH for all LOWLY, ORDINARY, KIND, and RESPECTFUL EARTHLY BEINGS
Jesus Christ KNOWS
that lowly, ordinary, kind, and respectful persons on earth who rejected Atheism, Evolutionism, and Religious Fanaticism as worthless, without any value whatsoever
and
willingly submit instead to his authority and believe his teachings about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" as written in Matthew 28: 18, Luke 4: 43, and John 11: 25, 26
will
definitely bring themselves honor and the loving, kind, and merciful Creator's favor and reward of ETERNAL LIFE and existence without sufferings, pains, griefs, sickness, and death as written in Revelation 21: 3, 4
The Creator KNOWS
that all human beings will just become worthless and useless dusts on earth after their deaths just like the animals as written in Ecclesiastes 3: 19: 20 ; 9: 5, 6
but
he knows too that he will not let his loving, kind, and respectful worshippers who died recently and thousands of years ago like Abel, Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Job, Naomi, Ruth, King David, Daniel, Jesus Christ's followers, and many others to remain as worthless and useless dusts on earth forever,
instead,
in the right and proper time,
he will let Jesus Christ RESURRECT them back to life so they can all happily and abundantly live and exist on earth forever as submissive and obedient subjects of the "KINGDOM of GOD" or His Kingdom
and fully enjoy his and his Christ's eternal love, kindness, goodness, generosities, compassions, favors, and blessings for eternity under the loving and kind rulership, guidance, and protection of Jesus Christ as his Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth as written in Revelation 11: 15.
@@jaflenbond7854thanks for showing everyone you’re just a spammer.
Very ironic indeed as they say “a revealing answer”
Inspiring Philosophy channel has made a great video on how it's not Christianity that's anti science but that their is a an anti Christian sentiment in academic circles
Michael Jones is awesome
Christians are anti science
Hence why it’s not a lack of evidence it’s a moral disposition to cling to one’s own presuppositions without any level of openness to another worldview.
No different than Christopher Hitchens last interview before he died in his atheism. He said he wouldn’t be servile to God even if it meant he was going to hell.
I 100% agree. I try to tell Christians this all the time. It is their moral disposition to cling to one’s own presuppositions without any level of openness to another worldview. Christian just do not want to hear it.
No it’s a lack of evidence.
@@displacegamer1379 You're presupposing you're not doing this as well. Everyone has a disposition to opposing argumentation. Why do you think so many people in their error are pro-choice?
@@DM-dk7js Yeah I'm sure fulfilled prophecy is totally not evidence. And read it yourself before calling it "crypic" and "could be anyone" because it's very obvious if you know the context.
So, I am forced to conclude that you can play with madness.......
It’s not really that they don’t believe, it’s that that don’t want to believe
Perhaps the question to ask them is, "If you discover that God is real, would you want to have a relationship with Him?"
As far as the evidence part, when pressed on who or what they think God is, there never seems to be an answer. You can't look for something that you don't have a profile of. And in some cases, it's also that they have the wrong profile.
Given the lack of evidence, who decides what the correct profile is?
Unfortunately, the first book should describe his mindset perfectly. Put opposite sexes together, naked and idle, then presenting them a forbidden fruit.
His grudge against disobedience is most enduring, going on seven thousand years.
@@avishevin1976 What does lack of evidence mean? Evidence for what exactly? How are you defining God?
Asking who gets to decide the correct profile might as well be asking who to put your faith in. And if I name one, there's a possibility that you or anyone will reject the person and their authority. So, off the bat, that's a bad question.
@@JiraiyaSama86
That's what I was getting at. Apologists always presume their choice of deity is the only possibly option, and their way of relating to it is the only possible way.
@@elmercoblentz9432 It was a test. Choice was offered.
You are likely comparing God's anger to human anger. A human's anger is not always righteous and can often be capricious. God's anger is righteous as He is perfect.
Disobeying God leads to further distance from Him, which ultimately leads to the ultimate death.
This man is working hard 👍💪
It's a matter of ideology. Always has been. Always will be. Those who can admit this will be better off. Those who can't will forever be stuck in the hamster wheel of their own making, and will spend every waking moment trying to rationalize the running from an inevitable truth.
New rule: If you will reject the argument, regardless of how truthful the argument or the person presenting it is, the fact you reject the argument means absolutely nothing.
When push comes to a hit across the jaw with irrefutable reasoning and logic, it boils down to how the feelings match and the comfort the evidence, regardless of the soundness or vagueness of the extraordinary evidence being presented, is what will depend on if they will accept the information.
Intellectual suicide before dedication to what is, even when it comes to what their are faced with, what does this say of their behavior of theirs in their own field of study.
This is very telling of the caliber of academics they claim themselves to be which makes their take on matter isolated and within their own fields of study extremely questionable.
All their kicking and screaming against God's existence, all for not, worthless waist of time to keep aging men busy and whilst they tried, especially Richard, to undermine God like the ignorance of old, but they and many others invertadly becoming some of the greatest evangelicals in the modern age. Bringing attention to people regarding our Father, they never would have sought Him out on their own terms without presenting such absurdities.
And when up against a wall, they lack the appropriate capacity to address the questions without using second hand quotes from equally ignorant people who never fully challenged themselves to the ideas wrestling with not only the ideas that deals with God, but that address His existence and the reality which is Him.
God has not been shown to be real. So there is no irrefutable reason and logic that God is real. There is no evidence for God and the supernatural. Claims in and of themselves are not evidence they warrant investigation but on their own they are not evidence.
The existence of the Universe cannot be used as evidence for God. Just by studying basic philosophy you will see why. Immanuel Kant talks about the infinity of worlds. He is the Christian philosopher you have to thank for epistemology. Kant warned about using the Universe to prove God because he foresaw it would lead to the downfall of Christianity. So he was smart in defining God as the good.
The burden of proof rests on the person or persons making a particular claim, as they are responsible for producing evidence proving that claim, not the opposing party who is questioning them with skepticism because they see zero evidence in favor of the claim. It's sad that I even have to point this out, however, not surprising.
Truly is crazy making. Strong delusion
I think it's useless to sit and discuss with the atheist the existence of God Almighty. Their minds are quite made up, and they are not young minds. Can't teach an old dog new tricks. As for me, everything is in the hand of The Most High GOD.
Could say the same thing about Christians
@@user-qg1kb8ih3gIt's true that many of us are convinced and are no longer seeking. When you find Jesus you find fulfillment so we no longer need to keep seeking.
@@user-qg1kb8ih3gI have an honest question. It makes sense to me as a Christian why we would want to talk to others about God's plan for reconciliation. But what is the atheists motive for Atheistic Evangelism? Why do atheists go so hard to convert others to their opinions or worldview?
@@kladies3021 I think its just about truth. If someone is wrong about something you tend to want to help them realise they are wrong. I think we should always be trying to believe more true things and less false things. I think also that the idea of faith causes a lot of harm to a lot of people all over the world (not necessarily by Christian’s , mostly muslims) so an attempt to get rid of gods is an attempt to make the world a better place. There will never be peace on earth when two groups of people both have faith they are fighting for the right god. For these reasons…
@@kladies3021we just want you to use your brains and realize you’re likely being fooled.
If any human awaits evidence for Gods existence, and authority, they will certainly get it, but by that time, their allegiance to said authority, will have already been ultimately rejected.
You do not, by Divine Authority, get to have it both ways. The qualitative nature of God is directly accessible, the perfection of His Plan is determinable, that is the standard, science does
not have the power, or authority to alter the rules by which God applies it. God must represent to humans a mutually exclusive response, in order to existentially prove what might otherwise
be disingenuously hidden from other humans. Stubborn Pride does fall within the metric of behavior, which God can allow to continue. It is a qualitative expression which is at stake.
Can you break this down a bit I don't understand
@@viyusavery248 The morality proof test we all endure here on earth cannot be circumvented. We either resolve in our own mind Gods perfect plan, and accept His Divine Authority, and Will, or we reject it. I do not know the outcome of each souls decision, whether before they die in the flesh they will accept or reject, but I am convinced that God knows the intent of every soul, and they who through pride reject Gods Sovereignty in this life will suffer the consequences of that rejection without the ability to say they were not warned. Should the thing formed say to He who formed him, why have you made me thus. We do not have the intellectual capacity to question God. We have the book which expresses His intentions, and attributes is we will search it out. This decision cannot be forced, it must be by each, a willing decision to submit to Divine Authority. The complete revelation of God, His Son, and His Spirit, can be found in The Bible, the only thing that stands in the way is human pride which either denies His existence, or proclaims "We will not have Him to rule over us".
@@michaelyork4554k
@@michaelyork4554 oh ok thanks
@@michaelyork4554 Divine Authority is the most pathetic reason to believe in God. A God such as that should be stripped naked and paraded around the streets and forced to live with that shame everyday.
Even the Jews witnessed a miracle at the hands of Jesus and then decided it was more probably that he was using demonic forces rather than heavenly power.
My mind still loops itself around that detail every time someone says they would believe in God if they saw something miraculous.
The look on Richard’s face when he realizes the story is about him not believing in God!😂
The scientific method is the pursuit of truth, except when those truths show the fallibility of the scientific method.
Is there a better method than the scientific method for demonstrating what is best known about the natural world?
@@Rotten9 Man exists in at least 3 worlds at the same time.
@@OperationsAndSmoothProductions
I don't even know that means. And what does it have to do with my question?
@@Rotten9 exactly.
@@OperationsAndSmoothProductions
I still don't get it.
Dawkins is right, supernatural intervention is always the least probable explanation for anything, so hallucination will always be the more likely explanation.
The "big bang" is literally a supernatural event. Nothing explodes into everything.
Where did the energy to create the event come from?
Super-natural, or above nature. It's never happened again.
Strawman@@richardwebb9532
Faith is a matter of the free will. That is why God will condemn us righteously, if we do not want to believe in Him.
He keeps asking us to believe, in so many ways He does that, and we can say yes or no.
It is.