Dear Cindy Marie, with all due respect, your contention is called replacement Theology and has been debunked over 150 years ago. Please research your Theology.
@@jacobfeller2967 It actually says that we are God's Temple in the Bible so she is actually right. "Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you?" 1 Corinthians 3:16
Fort Antonio had to house 10,000 soldiers and their support and families. We also known that the fort set higher than the temple and it was attached to the fort via a bridge or ramp. We also know the temple had running spring water. There is not nor has there ever been a spring on the current beloved location. We also know according to Josephus that the temple was destroyed to bedrock.
They didn't call in 10,000 soldiers until the uprising. Most likely it was only a few hundred at the fort. The uprising could not have been started against multiple Roman legions. The other part you are missing is that any house in Jerusalem could be commandeered as housing for soldiers of the emperial army.
@@georgekirby7150 what i don’t know about this particular topic would fill volumes lol. Like so many millions or possibly billions of people, I find the tiny nation of Israel to take up a disproportionate amount of my time for reading about history and current news.
Jesus plainly made it clear that his kingdom was his father's kingdom, and that the temple of the lord resides within his people. There are billions of temples. Sadly many GOD won't occupy because people won't let him enter. Amen lord my GOD. The doors are open!!
Christ Jesus is "...a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed... But precious to us who believe.
If it's not their holiest site and only their 3rd holiest site, and their book has only been written 600 years later.... WHAT IN THE WORLD DO THEY WANT IN JERUSALEM? They must love war and the sword.
They trying hard to deny their root.. What a self hating.. Bio geographical study by elhaik 2013 of sheffield university has proved that askenazi dna matched 100% with armenia mountain jews.. The study used the same sample of zionist like behar and hummer.. The study of behar show maternal dna of askenazi were 100% european The paternal y dna show 10% origin of levant.. so..zionist used this 10% as proof they were israelite.. hillarious.. Yet they ignore the jewish law that jews can only be inherited through maternal!.. They never disclose the analysis of combine dna composition as what elhaik did.. using the same sample!! Yet the zionist denied it
Great video! Small correction: the three annual pilgrimages Jews made to the Jerusalem are Sukkot, Passover, and Pentecost (not yom kippur as mentioned)
Another bigger mistake is that Herod never tore down Zerrubavel and Ezra's Temple, not before or after his renovations. He only widened the Temple platform, not the Temple itself, whose measurements are prescribed in the original Testament(Torah).
@@jacobfeller2967 Herod did not renovate Zerubbabel's Temple. Herod had the Second Temple completely destroyed. Herod rebuilt, meaning he built his own Temple, which would be the Third Temple; In the likeness of the 1st Temple of Solomon. Herod even destroyed the very foundation that the Second Temple once stood on and Rebuilt, which would make it the Third Temple. Not the Second-Second Temple. Renovation does not include completely destroying a Temple and its foundation.
1 Chronicles 6:10 and Johanan begat Azariah, (he it is that executed the priest’s office in the temple that Solomon built in Jerusalem:) Ezra 5:14 And the vessels also of gold and silver of the house of God, which Nebuchadnezzar took out of the temple that was in Jerusalem, and brought them into the temple of Babylon, those did Cyrus the king take out of the temple of Babylon, and they were delivered unto one, whose name was Sheshbazzar, whom he had made governor; Ezra 5:15 and said unto him, Take these vessels, go, carry them into the temple that is in Jerusalem, and let the house of God be builded in his place. Ezra 6:5 and also let the golden and silver vessels of the house of God, which Nebuchadnezzar took forth out of the temple which is at Jerusalem, and brought unto Babylon, be restored, and brought again unto the temple which is at Jerusalem, every one to his place, and place them in the house of God. Psalm 68:29 Because of thy temple at Jerusalem shall kings bring presents unto thee.
@@paul678 After the Church is taken away and later when the times of the gentiles are fulfilled, Jesus will return to reign in Jerusalem. It is written. No imagined spiritual allegory can stop Him.
@@JaneH3675 yup I agree they put it all out there. But even those details are up for debate, not in my wheelhouse to act like I know, but fascinating to see how differently people interpret that verse, in particular
Eye witness Josephus, " The Romans left nothing above nor below ground of the temple, so much that if one came to Jerusalem they could ever believe a temple was ever there "
If the Arc of the Covenant is found, or just the thinnest bit of it, the Temple of the Jews can be founded in any place within the boundaries of King David’s Kingdom and not just on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.
Not only will it be found, but it will happen very soon. David is the one who conquers, who is given the white stone to slay the Goliath of nations, the beast. The name of the new Jerusalem is the City of David.
The traditional temple mount in Jerusalem is not the site of the Jewish temples. It's instead Herod's fortified Wall elevated ruins of the Antonia Fortress complex. If anyone looks at the traditional temple mount from a military point of view, a person will notice the resemblance of it to a military fortication with the top of the parapet walls having spaced opening for Archer 🏹 from which to shoot down from. Massive Gates as found in castles. Independent water cisterns and storage systems like a military Base would have to survive a siege. The landing steps are spaced the same length of that of a horse 🐎. The size atop is sufficient to conduct horse mounted calvary attack practice and training exercises with horse's running at speed. If anyone looks at the size of any historical abandoned military castle, fort, Base one could see that the size of the traditional temple mount looks comparable to that a of military Fortress. Elevated above ground level for defensive protection and to be seen to project military power. The Romans did not only have 6000 foot soldiers to house but also horse mounted calvary soldiers which requires Large areas to be able to conduct military training exercises with the horses running at speed within the confined of the Fortress. Herod's temple is much smaller in size likely built in the City of David near the water spring in Jerusalem.
THIS A DOCUMENTARY, NOT A MOVIE. THE TEMPLE WAS NOT BUILT ON THE DOME OF THE ROCK, BUT RATHER ON ZION AT THE CITY OF DAVID NEXT TO THE Gihon Spring. ALL ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE AND NOT TRADITION.
Herod did not renovate Zerubbabel's Temple. Herod had the Second Temple completely destroyed. Herod rebuilt, meaning he built his own Temple, which would be the Third Temple; In the likeness of the 1st Temple of Solomon. Herod even destroyed the very foundation that the Second Temple once stood on and Rebuilt, which would make it the Third Temple. Not the Second-Second Temple. Renovation does not include completely destroying a Temple and its foundation.
@@gts3004 Who is nobody? There are plenty of people who agree with me. This isn't new or "my theory". And those who refuse to step up and speak the truth do so because they think Rabbis are the only authorities to speak on this topic. Is Solomon’s Temple historical? Is Zerubbabel's Temple historical? Is Herod's Temple historical? If Herod had Zerubbabel's Temple completely destroyed and replaced, then how do you calculate two Temples? That is three. If my first house is completely destroyed and I have to rebuild a new house, I won't say my First-Second house, it would be my Second house.
@@gts3004 It wasn't renovations. Try again. Do you know what a foundation for a building is? What is it? How do you replace a foundation without removing the building on top of it?
@@uview1 please explain may be I don't understand what your mean. What is until Rapture? I do believe in the rapture and the end of the church age which ofcause comes to an end with that Rapture. But for now in this dispensation of grace our body is the temple of God when the eternal Spirit of God dwells. This is Jesus told the samaritan woman by the Well that a time his coming when man need not go to Jerusalem to worship God but the true worshippers shall worship the Father in truth and in spirit. John 4:23.
@@uview1 You are absolutely on point with this. May the good Lord help us into His eternal Kingdom in Jesus name. Let's meet at the feet of Christ in rapture Brett. Do stay bless till then. Amen!
Not true, the disciples were Jewish and look at the book of Acts, the ones Peter preached to that accepted Jesus were also Jewish. Sadly, you are right that all of the Jewish people didn't accept their messiah.
Please remove this video and redo it because the temple has a flowing spring called Gihon spring and this spring is not under Dome of the Rock (Temple Mount) but in the City of David. It is from this spring water was use to cleanse many of the activities at the temple that would have been to far to the Haram Al Sherif area.
You've watched way too much Bob Carnuke. Hezekiah redirected the flow of the Gihon spring to the pool of siloam. At the sloap, going down to valley, is a century old trash heap. So the temple was built on top of a trash heap? There's no room! You need to research better and leave carnuke alone.
And right after the poor woman gave all of her money to the temple Jesus said “Not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.” although we are to tithe, we're not to go without so that others can live in opulence.
the bricks and the western wall is not part of the temple, the dome of the rock is not on top of the temple of history. the temples existed in the city of David which is south of there. so technically there is no reason why they cant build the 3rd temple. also there is no reason for wars as nothing is on the old temple foundation that is not Israel land anyway.
If King Herod built the Temple proper i.e. the sanctuary and tore down Zerubbabel's Temple after Herod built his Temple, to replace it, then by rights, and according to common sense logic and reason, Herod's Temple IS THE THIRD TEMPLE
You sir have a brain. Very rare nowadays. The theory is that since animal sacrifices continued it cannot be the Third Temple. That is complete nonsense. Jews were practicing animal sacrifices regardless of a Temple or not. Samaritans are still sacrificing lambs leading up to Passover.
cute video but inaccurate......scripture places ALL of the Temples south down in the City of David, just over the Gihon Spring and water gate.....which when Solomon built his Temple was within the walls of Jebus, now called Jerusalem, Zion, or the City of David.
What if they build their 3rd temple at Dome of Rock and came to know it was not original place of temple then what?? Morever they don't have Ark of Covenent
The current Temple Mount was actually the old Roman Fort Antonia where the Romans housed their thousands of troops. The Temple was "never" located where the modern-day Jews say that it was......on top of the Wailing Wall. Read your Bible, the Temple was located in the City of David further down the Hill from Mount Moriah. It's all in the Old Testament.
Me also read about this sometimes back . Josephus says very clear ,after the siege of Jerusalem, he looked south from fortress Antonia and the destruction was so big that he couldn't even imagine the place where the temple stood. Because literally was not stone on stone anymore, exactly as Christ said. Read also an interesting stuff ,that the whole story about where was the temple are from a traveler,European if I remember well from the forth-fifth century (can't say the exact date cause read about long time back) who located the temple place where now is the Dome of Rock. How he figured it out - who knows ! If we think that romans after Jerusalem's destruction rebuilt the city in a totally different way.
This is what burnt offerings are if a man grows food is to take the best of what he grows and offered it to Lord to give to the poor not to set a fire which is the reason God was not pleased with Cane's burnt offerings cause Cane's offered God only the fruits from his field that was bad and was pleased with Abel's offering cause Abel took the best of his of his animals and offered them to God to give to the poor when you donate give your best as your burnt offerings to please God that's what a burnt offerings are the things you donate to the poor which was the purpose of the temple so people could gather together to offer their burnt offerings to God to give to the poor which is why Jesus Christ was angry with what he saw at the temple some were taken what was given to them as burnt offerings and sold the offerings that was given to them
@@TheZombieman87 Herod did not renovate Zerubbabel's Temple. Herod had the Second Temple completely destroyed. Herod rebuilt, meaning he built his own Temple, which would be the Third Temple; In the likeness of the 1st Temple of Solomon. Herod even destroyed the very foundation that the Second Temple once stood on and Rebuilt, which would make it the Third Temple. Not the Second-Second Temple. Renovation does not include completely destroying a Temple and its foundation.
The Muslim didn't exist at the time of the destruction so could not have built the dome over it. There is 600 years difference between the destruction ond the Muslim conquest
The temple where the Jews worshiped was destroyed by the Babylonian in 586 BC. Till today you will see the Jews praying and some crying at the western wall.(what is remaining of the Holy temple) Till today the Jews are the only people in the world who have no place to worship.
You sure is Harold's buildings or King Solomon blue prints ?? That he's taking the credit. My opinion is king Solomons blue prints because Solomon had the wisdom not only the temple he did more .
Earlier beleivers who knew the Truth tried to reveal that Sus in Hebrew means Horse. Sus in the blasphemous names Iesus (Greek), Hesus (Spanish Latino) , Jesus ( Latin and Engish) sus in Hebrew means Horse .
Christians are deceived and blinded by Satan who perverted the Bible (means Library), Satan hidden the Almighty Name of Our Savior Yahuah and replaced His name with blasphemous (disrespectful) names which are really names of false elohims, like Gadreel, Holi (Hindu god), Lord which means Master or Baal, Iesus, Hesus, Jesus (Sus means Horse in Hebrew which does not mean Savior, according to Psalm 33:17, A horse though mighty but its streangth can not save. Our Saviors real name is YahuShuah which means Yah is Salvation and Yahuah HaDebar which means The Word and also Yahuah the name of the Father which contained the message of Salvation.
Orthodox Jews who don't recognize Jesus ( Yeshua). Will burn in the hell. Jesus preached this all through the new Testament and nothing has changed. Unfortunately Othodox Jews don't understand this but Messianic Jews do. Some people don't even believe the current Jews are the Ancient Israelites of the Old Testament..
Correction... Herod's Temple?... the 2nd Temple was not built by King Herod, what he did was renovated only the 2nd Temple and extended the Area of the Temple Mount (Flatform and Gate walls) mostly on the North, South, and West sides of the Gatewalls... Facts and Truth, historically speaking... Amen.
Herod did not renovate Zerubbabel's Temple. Herod had the Second Temple completely destroyed. Herod rebuilt, meaning he built his own Temple, which would be the Third Temple; In the likeness of the 1st Temple of Solomon. Herod even destroyed the very foundation that the Second Temple once stood on and Rebuilt, which would make it the Third Temple. Not the Second-Second Temple. Renovation does not include completely destroying a Temple and its foundation.
@@Biblical_DNA FYI, The English word RENOVATED/REFURBISHED, does NOT mean TOTALLY REBUILT (New Construction), but it means IMPROVED (Partially rebuilt) the Existing 2nd Temple Building to create a better facade... The 2nd Temple Building (not the Temple mount) was already TOTALLY REBUILT (New Construction) and totally completed around Circa 516/515 B.C.E. (or 350 B.C.E.) under the appointed Jewish governor Zerubbabel after King Cyrus of Persian ordered the Israelites/Jews to totally rebuild (New Construction at the same location) the destroyed 1st Temple Building built by King Solomon between 1200 to 1000 B.C.E... King Herod the Great existed only around 72 B.C.E., and the 2nd Temple Building erected during the time of Zerubbabel was already existing at that time, but in 20 - 18 B.C.E., King Herod the great RENOVATED/REFURBISHED (partially rebuilt) the Existing 2nd Temple... King Herod never destroyed completely the 2nd Temple from the foundation, and start a new Construction from the new foundation to the building facade at the same site/location... King Herod just increased some parts/areas by strengthening the foundation and added/altered some precious stones, gems, woods, etc. to Enhance the Existing 2nd Temple to at least matched the Splendor Facade of King Solomon's 1st Temple Building that was destroyed by King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon around 587 or 586 B.C.E... Check and verify from the Historians, Bible Scholars, Theologians, and Archeologists regarding this matter...
@@jvlp2046 I have all the evidence that it was REBUILT from a BRAND NEW Foundation. Stop your ignorant lies that it was refurbished and renovation. It had nothing to do with renovation. It was a BRAND NEW Temple!
@@jvlp2046 You might can spread those lies with the uneducated people but not this guy! Herod waited until all of the materials were consolidated before completely DESTROYING Zerubbabel's(Second) Temple. Just because you rebuild a building on the same property DOES NOT mean it is the same building. There was no Second-Second Temple. There was the First Temple of Solomon. Second Temple of Zerubbabel. Third Temple of Herod. Stop hating on a Idumean Jew. Herod was raised Jewish by a Jewish mother. Deuteronomy 23:7 Thou dost not abominate an Edomite, for thy brother he is;
@@Biblical_DNA There were NO PROPHECIES that a Jewish Puppet King (King Herod the Great) would completely destroy/demolish the 2nd Temple Building erected in the time of Zerubabbel from the foundation, in other words, not a single stone unturned/toppled, then erected a New Construction from a new foundation of the new plan design and new facade of the Temple Building at the same site/location, that makes it the 3rd Temple that the Roman Legion had completely destroyed in around 70 A.D... and not the 2nd Temple building... TOTALLY RIDICULOUSLY LUNACY! No Israelites/Jews would ever approve of completely destroying their own Jewish 2nd Temple Structure, but only by RENOVATION/ALTERATION/REFURBERATION... Facts and Truth, Logically, Historically, and Biblically speaking... Amen.
LOVE the ending about the living temple!!
Many do not realize that we are God's living temple. Thank you for this interesting video and God bless ✝️🙏😇
Dear Cindy Marie, with all due respect, your contention is called replacement Theology and has been debunked over 150 years ago. Please research your Theology.
@@jacobfeller2967 It actually says that we are God's Temple in the Bible so she is actually right. "Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you?" 1 Corinthians 3:16
We are that temple that God is building one at a time
Amen and stay blessed! HALLELUYAH!
Wonderful documentary.
Brilliant.Thank you.
Fort Antonio had to house 10,000 soldiers and their support and families. We also known that the fort set higher than the temple and it was attached to the fort via a bridge or ramp.
We also know the temple had running spring water.
There is not nor has there ever been a spring on the current beloved location. We also know according to Josephus that the temple was destroyed to bedrock.
They didn't call in 10,000 soldiers until the uprising. Most likely it was only a few hundred at the fort. The uprising could not have been started against multiple Roman legions. The other part you are missing is that any house in Jerusalem could be commandeered as housing for soldiers of the emperial army.
@@georgekirby7150 what i don’t know about this particular topic would fill volumes lol.
Like so many millions or possibly billions of people, I find the tiny nation of Israel to take up a disproportionate amount of my time for reading about history and current news.
2nd Chronicles 3:1
Another bob carnuke brain washed victims.
so the priests lived throughout the land. thank you for that bit of info. that clears up something for me.
Is it because in the bible you read about priests being at other places that were not Jerusalem?
Thankyou god bless very good
Jesus plainly made it clear that his kingdom was his father's kingdom, and that the temple of the lord resides within his people. There are billions of temples. Sadly many GOD won't occupy because people won't let him enter. Amen lord my GOD. The doors are open!!
Christ Jesus is "...a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed... But precious to us who believe.
He also made it clear He will return for Israel.
If it's not their holiest site and only their 3rd holiest site, and their book has only been written 600 years later.... WHAT IN THE WORLD DO THEY WANT IN JERUSALEM? They must love war and the sword.
It might not even be that. Muhammad’s supposed ascent to heaven is now doubted as to whether it was even anywhere outside the Arabian peninsula.
whats a temple for without the ark of the covenant. no matter the grandness of the temple, it remains only a human architecture
Exactly. There is no reason whatsoever for a third temple with out the ark. The ark was the entire reason the temple was built in the first place.
@@wizzardofpaws2420 Jews will still offer animal sacrifices.
@@wizzardofpaws2420 They know where the ark is located - have known it for 20 years. It is in Jerusalem.
Humbly ask Jesus and he will answer
excellent video
why do you leave out Zerubbabels temple?? It was blessed and God told him to build it.
probably because it was not as glorious as the one that Solomon built.
Nicely done, although the foundation stone is the threshing floor of King David and is not located under the Dome of the Rock.
Very well made and informative! Thanks so much!
So interesting
My Father every things know✝️
Thankyou for this
May Israel rebuilt their third temple soon Amen
Bless you Israel people always and prosperity
what does the talmud say about non jews right to live?
They trying hard to deny their root..
What a self hating..
Bio geographical study by elhaik 2013 of sheffield university has proved that askenazi dna matched 100% with armenia mountain jews..
The study used the same sample of zionist like behar and hummer..
The study of behar show maternal dna of askenazi were 100% european
The paternal y dna show 10% origin of levant.. so..zionist used this 10% as proof they were israelite.. hillarious..
Yet they ignore the jewish law that jews can only be inherited through maternal!..
They never disclose the analysis of combine dna composition as what elhaik did.. using the same sample!!
Yet the zionist denied it
When Christ comes back, the Temple will be rebuilt then.
@@lonfromdadiaspora That's the millennial temple described in Eze 40+
Before that, Israel will build one at the start of the 7yr tribulation.
@@lonfromdadiaspora wrong, very wrong
Praise Yah in all things
Great video! Small correction: the three annual pilgrimages Jews made to the Jerusalem are Sukkot, Passover, and Pentecost (not yom kippur as mentioned)
Another bigger mistake is that Herod never tore down Zerrubavel and Ezra's Temple, not before or after his renovations. He only widened the Temple platform, not the Temple itself, whose measurements are prescribed in the original Testament(Torah).
@@jacobfeller2967 Herod did not renovate Zerubbabel's Temple. Herod had the Second Temple completely destroyed. Herod rebuilt, meaning he built his own Temple, which would be the Third Temple; In the likeness of the 1st Temple of Solomon. Herod even destroyed the very foundation that the Second Temple once stood on and Rebuilt, which would make it the Third Temple. Not the Second-Second Temple. Renovation does not include completely destroying a Temple and its foundation.
I just loveeee the tabernacles
😮❤
Were there images of cherubim in Herod's Temple?
Realize that it is called the Temple Mount, not the Mosque Mount...
1 Chronicles 6:10
and Johanan begat Azariah, (he it is that executed the priest’s office in the temple that Solomon built in Jerusalem:)
Ezra 5:14
And the vessels also of gold and silver of the house of God, which Nebuchadnezzar took out of the temple that was in Jerusalem, and brought them into the temple of Babylon, those did Cyrus the king take out of the temple of Babylon, and they were delivered unto one, whose name was Sheshbazzar, whom he had made governor;
Ezra 5:15
and said unto him, Take these vessels, go, carry them into the temple that is in Jerusalem, and let the house of God be builded in his place.
Ezra 6:5
and also let the golden and silver vessels of the house of God, which Nebuchadnezzar took forth out of the temple which is at Jerusalem, and brought unto Babylon, be restored, and brought again unto the temple which is at Jerusalem, every one to his place, and place them in the house of God.
Psalm 68:29
Because of thy temple at Jerusalem shall kings bring presents unto thee.
very good, loved it
Truly the Lord God Almighty will dwell in this earth
That won't happen except in your dreams.
Don't You know we are God living temple
@@paul678 After the Church is taken away and later when the times of the gentiles are fulfilled, Jesus will return to reign in Jerusalem. It is written.
No imagined spiritual allegory can stop Him.
@@uview1 he returned in 70 ad,all is fulfilled.
@@stereotype5868 You can say whatever you can think of, but for it to be true it must be based out of Scripture. Try again.
Lots of people think the Temple Mount was actually the Roman fortress Antonia, and the temple may have been located elsewhere
2nd Chronicles 3:1 tells you exactly where the temple was built.
@@JaneH3675 yup I agree they put it all out there. But even those details are up for debate, not in my wheelhouse to act like I know, but fascinating to see how differently people interpret that verse, in particular
Agreed. And anything, ANYTHING that has been hidden, will be revealed by GOD ALMIGHTY HIMSELF in these last days.
Eye witness Josephus, " The Romans left nothing above nor below ground of the temple, so much that if one came to Jerusalem they could ever believe a temple was ever there
"
" Could never beleive"
If the Arc of the Covenant is found, or just the thinnest bit of it, the Temple of the Jews can be founded in any place within the boundaries of King David’s Kingdom and not just on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.
Not only will it be found, but it will happen very soon. David is the one who conquers, who is given the white stone to slay the Goliath of nations, the beast. The name of the new Jerusalem is the City of David.
The traditional temple mount in Jerusalem is not the site of the Jewish temples. It's instead Herod's fortified Wall elevated ruins of the Antonia Fortress complex. If anyone looks at the traditional temple mount from a military point of view, a person will notice the resemblance of it to a military fortication with the top of the parapet walls having spaced opening for Archer 🏹 from which to shoot down from. Massive Gates as found in castles. Independent water cisterns and storage systems like a military Base would have to survive a siege. The landing steps are spaced the same length of that of a horse 🐎. The size atop is sufficient to conduct horse mounted calvary attack practice and training exercises with horse's running at speed. If anyone looks at the size of any historical abandoned military castle, fort, Base one could see that the size of the traditional temple mount looks comparable to that a of military Fortress. Elevated above ground level for defensive protection and to be seen to project military power. The Romans did not only have 6000 foot soldiers to house but also horse mounted calvary soldiers which requires Large areas to be able to conduct military training exercises with the horses running at speed within the confined of the Fortress. Herod's temple is much smaller in size likely built in the City of David near the water spring in Jerusalem.
Cornuke has been proven wrong.
Why do you have inside the temple statues it that look Egyptian?
the original israelites were kinda a confederacy of canaanites, sumerian outlaws, and egyptian slaves.
THIS A DOCUMENTARY, NOT A MOVIE. THE TEMPLE WAS NOT BUILT ON THE DOME OF THE ROCK, BUT RATHER ON ZION AT THE CITY OF DAVID NEXT TO THE Gihon Spring. ALL ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE AND NOT TRADITION.
He knew it was to be destroyed
Herod did not renovate Zerubbabel's Temple. Herod had the Second Temple completely destroyed. Herod rebuilt, meaning he built his own Temple, which would be the Third Temple; In the likeness of the 1st Temple of Solomon. Herod even destroyed the very foundation that the Second Temple once stood on and Rebuilt, which would make it the Third Temple. Not the Second-Second Temple. Renovation does not include completely destroying a Temple and its foundation.
Well how come nobody agrees with you if thats true ?
@@gts3004 Who is nobody? There are plenty of people who agree with me. This isn't new or "my theory". And those who refuse to step up and speak the truth do so because they think Rabbis are the only authorities to speak on this topic. Is Solomon’s Temple historical? Is Zerubbabel's Temple historical? Is Herod's Temple historical? If Herod had Zerubbabel's Temple completely destroyed and replaced, then how do you calculate two Temples? That is three. If my first house is completely destroyed and I have to rebuild a new house, I won't say my First-Second house, it would be my Second house.
@@Biblical_DNA when Herod came to power, was Zurabbels temple there? He might have only renovated and expanded the existing complex .
@@gts3004 It wasn't renovations. Try again. Do you know what a foundation for a building is? What is it? How do you replace a foundation without removing the building on top of it?
I have A problem with the amount of workers question how ❓ do they feed although workers good luck
Although I like your ending, the living temple of God is the body of christ whom we are. We are individual temple where the Holy Spirit dwell.
Yes but that is until the rapture and end times of the gentile age. Sadly you don't understand.
@@uview1 please explain may be I don't understand what your mean. What is until Rapture? I do believe in the rapture and the end of the church age which ofcause comes to an end with that Rapture. But for now in this dispensation of grace our body is the temple of God when the eternal Spirit of God dwells. This is Jesus told the samaritan woman by the Well that a time his coming when man need not go to Jerusalem to worship God but the true worshippers shall worship the Father in truth and in spirit. John 4:23.
@@vicbade9702 okay that's good. I just meant after the Resurrection of the Church, God will deal with Israel and a physical temple again.
@@uview1 You are absolutely on point with this. May the good Lord help us into His eternal Kingdom in Jesus name. Let's meet at the feet of Christ in rapture Brett. Do stay bless till then. Amen!
@@vicbade9702 Amen brother!!
So sad the Jews rejected their messiah. He came to HIS OWN and his own received him not.
Not true, the disciples were Jewish and look at the book of Acts, the ones Peter preached to that accepted Jesus were also Jewish. Sadly, you are right that all of the Jewish people didn't accept their messiah.
Please remove this video and redo it because the temple has a flowing spring called Gihon spring and this spring is not under Dome of the Rock (Temple Mount) but in the City of David. It is from this spring water was use to cleanse many of the activities at the temple that would have been to far to the Haram Al Sherif area.
You've watched way too much Bob Carnuke. Hezekiah redirected the flow of the Gihon spring to the pool of siloam. At the sloap, going down to valley, is a century old trash heap. So the temple was built on top of a trash heap? There's no room!
You need to research better and leave carnuke alone.
Jesus knows every temple built on earth. Jesus Christ is holy, holy, and when Jesus sees the new temple, I hope that he will be pleased.
And right after the poor woman gave all of her money to the temple Jesus said “Not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.” although we are to tithe, we're not to go without so that others can live in opulence.
the bricks and the western wall is not part of the temple, the dome of the rock is not on top of the temple of history. the temples existed in the city of David which is south of there. so technically there is no reason why they cant build the 3rd temple. also there is no reason for wars as nothing is on the old temple foundation that is not Israel land anyway.
Wrong location... The temple sat 600 hundred feet south of the mount over the gihon springs.
If King Herod built the Temple proper i.e. the sanctuary and tore down Zerubbabel's Temple after Herod built his Temple, to replace it, then by rights, and according to common sense logic and reason, Herod's Temple IS THE THIRD TEMPLE
You sir have a brain. Very rare nowadays. The theory is that since animal sacrifices continued it cannot be the Third Temple. That is complete nonsense. Jews were practicing animal sacrifices regardless of a Temple or not. Samaritans are still sacrificing lambs leading up to Passover.
Herod melech Yisrael Chai Chai vickaiyam!
True, I watched the movie on Jesus, I am a Xavierian. I love Jesuits. True My Lord
cute video but inaccurate......scripture places ALL of the Temples south down in the City of David, just over the Gihon Spring and water gate.....which when Solomon built his Temple was within the walls of Jebus, now called Jerusalem, Zion, or the City of David.
What if they build their 3rd temple at Dome of Rock and came to know it was not original place of temple then what?? Morever they don't have Ark of Covenent
The current Temple Mount was actually the old Roman Fort Antonia where the Romans housed their thousands of troops. The Temple was "never" located where the modern-day Jews say that it was......on top of the Wailing Wall. Read your Bible, the Temple was located in the City of David further down the Hill from Mount Moriah. It's all in the Old Testament.
2nd Chronicles 3:1
Me also read about this sometimes back . Josephus says very clear ,after the siege of Jerusalem, he looked south from fortress Antonia and the destruction was so big that he couldn't even imagine the place where the temple stood. Because literally was not stone on stone anymore, exactly as Christ said. Read also an interesting stuff ,that the whole story about where was the temple are from a traveler,European if I remember well from the forth-fifth century (can't say the exact date cause read about long time back) who located the temple place where now is the Dome of Rock. How he figured it out - who knows ! If we think that romans after Jerusalem's destruction rebuilt the city in a totally different way.
Jakar usse kah do andhe dekhte hain langade chalte Hain kudi park saaf striyon Sajan mein hai yahan na inmein se ache hain✝️✝️✝️
This is what burnt offerings are if a man grows food is to take the best of what he grows and offered it to Lord to give to the poor not to set a fire which is the reason God was not pleased with Cane's burnt offerings cause Cane's offered God only the fruits from his field that was bad and was pleased with Abel's offering cause Abel took the best of his of his animals and offered them to God to give to the poor when you donate give your best as your burnt offerings to please God that's what a burnt offerings are the things you donate to the poor which was the purpose of the temple so people could gather together to offer their burnt offerings to God to give to the poor which is why Jesus Christ was angry with what he saw at the temple some were taken what was given to them as burnt offerings and sold the offerings that was given to them
Please anyone here give the date exactly the temple was built.. and where is the source water to supply all nation jew people prayer during the time?
516 BCE for the Temple itself and about 20 BCE for the Herodian update.
@@TheZombieman87 Herod did not renovate Zerubbabel's Temple. Herod had the Second Temple completely destroyed. Herod rebuilt, meaning he built his own Temple, which would be the Third Temple; In the likeness of the 1st Temple of Solomon. Herod even destroyed the very foundation that the Second Temple once stood on and Rebuilt, which would make it the Third Temple. Not the Second-Second Temple. Renovation does not include completely destroying a Temple and its foundation.
If King David could not build the Temple because he was a warrior, then it's ok for a non-Jew like Herod to build the Temple?
Herod was a Idumean Jew! Herod was raised Jewish.
some body needs check history of this was finshed till 300 ad temple zero was the temple Jesus used
2nd Chronicles 3:1
That's Wong that land is for Farrow's those people could not build none of those
Saudi Arabia is the next holly land just as Israel and Jerusalem
I believe that is for muslims not for Jewish people or Christians
you guys think palestine conspired with the romans to destroy solomon's temple then built their own dome over it?..
The Muslim didn't exist at the time of the destruction so could not have built the dome over it. There is 600 years difference between the destruction ond the Muslim conquest
Of course they hated Herod especially after he killed all the newborn!!!
I'd love to know why Israelites think they're Gods Chosen
@libramagyk
Deuteronomy 7:6
1 Peter 2:9-12
2 Samuel 7:24
Daniel 2:44
Romans 9:4
John 4:22
Deuteronomy 32:9-10
Zechariah 2:7-8
The temple where the Jews worshiped was destroyed by the Babylonian in 586 BC.
Till today you will see the Jews praying and some crying at the western wall.(what is remaining of the Holy temple) Till today the Jews are the only people in the world who have no place to worship.
Does anybody else think that King Herod kind of looks like Vladimir Putin
It wasn't on the Mount, silly !!! It was beside the Roman fort Antonia !!! 😂😂😂
You sure is Harold's buildings or King Solomon blue prints ?? That he's taking the credit. My opinion is king Solomons blue prints because Solomon had the wisdom not only the temple he did more .
That is your opinion!!!
Didn't the Aztecs pull the hearts out of sacrificial victims rather than slaughtering lambs?
The Vikings did the same.
Protestants, doesn’t it concern you that you don’t have access to a tabernacle? Should raise an eyebrow…
Earlier beleivers who knew the Truth tried to reveal that Sus in Hebrew means Horse. Sus in the blasphemous names Iesus (Greek), Hesus (Spanish Latino) , Jesus ( Latin and Engish) sus in Hebrew means Horse .
You bob carnuke supporters need to re-resesrch and quit listening to him. There wasnt enough room ppl. Re-think
Christians are deceived and blinded by Satan who perverted the Bible (means Library), Satan hidden the Almighty Name of Our Savior Yahuah and replaced His name with blasphemous (disrespectful) names which are really names of false elohims, like Gadreel, Holi (Hindu god), Lord which means Master or Baal, Iesus, Hesus, Jesus (Sus means Horse in Hebrew which does not mean Savior, according to Psalm 33:17, A horse though mighty but its streangth can not save. Our Saviors real name is YahuShuah which means Yah is Salvation and Yahuah HaDebar which means The Word and also Yahuah the name of the Father which contained the message of Salvation.
Orthodox Jews who don't recognize Jesus ( Yeshua). Will burn in the hell. Jesus preached this all through the new Testament and nothing has changed. Unfortunately Othodox Jews don't understand this but Messianic Jews do. Some people don't even believe the current Jews are the Ancient Israelites of the Old Testament..
Jews temple
Greed gluttony pride
Correction... Herod's Temple?... the 2nd Temple was not built by King Herod, what he did was renovated only the 2nd Temple and extended the Area of the Temple Mount (Flatform and Gate walls) mostly on the North, South, and West sides of the Gatewalls... Facts and Truth, historically speaking... Amen.
Herod did not renovate Zerubbabel's Temple. Herod had the Second Temple completely destroyed. Herod rebuilt, meaning he built his own Temple, which would be the Third Temple; In the likeness of the 1st Temple of Solomon. Herod even destroyed the very foundation that the Second Temple once stood on and Rebuilt, which would make it the Third Temple. Not the Second-Second Temple. Renovation does not include completely destroying a Temple and its foundation.
@@Biblical_DNA FYI, The English word RENOVATED/REFURBISHED, does NOT mean TOTALLY REBUILT (New Construction), but it means IMPROVED (Partially rebuilt) the Existing 2nd Temple Building to create a better facade... The 2nd Temple Building (not the Temple mount) was already TOTALLY REBUILT (New Construction) and totally completed around Circa 516/515 B.C.E. (or 350 B.C.E.) under the appointed Jewish governor Zerubbabel after King Cyrus of Persian ordered the Israelites/Jews to totally rebuild (New Construction at the same location) the destroyed 1st Temple Building built by King Solomon between 1200 to 1000 B.C.E...
King Herod the Great existed only around 72 B.C.E., and the 2nd Temple Building erected during the time of Zerubbabel was already existing at that time, but in 20 - 18 B.C.E., King Herod the great RENOVATED/REFURBISHED (partially rebuilt) the Existing 2nd Temple... King Herod never destroyed completely the 2nd Temple from the foundation, and start a new Construction from the new foundation to the building facade at the same site/location... King Herod just increased some parts/areas by strengthening the foundation and added/altered some precious stones, gems, woods, etc. to Enhance the Existing 2nd Temple to at least matched the Splendor Facade of King Solomon's 1st Temple Building that was destroyed by King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon around 587 or 586 B.C.E...
Check and verify from the Historians, Bible Scholars, Theologians, and Archeologists regarding this matter...
@@jvlp2046 I have all the evidence that it was REBUILT from a BRAND NEW Foundation. Stop your ignorant lies that it was refurbished and renovation. It had nothing to do with renovation. It was a BRAND NEW Temple!
@@jvlp2046 You might can spread those lies with the uneducated people but not this guy! Herod waited until all of the materials were consolidated before completely DESTROYING Zerubbabel's(Second) Temple. Just because you rebuild a building on the same property DOES NOT mean it is the same building. There was no Second-Second Temple. There was the First Temple of Solomon. Second Temple of Zerubbabel. Third Temple of Herod. Stop hating on a Idumean Jew. Herod was raised Jewish by a Jewish mother.
Deuteronomy 23:7
Thou dost not abominate an Edomite, for thy brother he is;
@@Biblical_DNA There were NO PROPHECIES that a Jewish Puppet King (King Herod the Great) would completely destroy/demolish the 2nd Temple Building erected in the time of Zerubabbel from the foundation, in other words, not a single stone unturned/toppled, then erected a New Construction from a new foundation of the new plan design and new facade of the Temple Building at the same site/location, that makes it the 3rd Temple that the Roman Legion had completely destroyed in around 70 A.D... and not the 2nd Temple building... TOTALLY RIDICULOUSLY LUNACY!
No Israelites/Jews would ever approve of completely destroying their own Jewish 2nd Temple Structure, but only by RENOVATION/ALTERATION/REFURBERATION... Facts and Truth, Logically, Historically, and Biblically speaking... Amen.
WRONG 😂
*Aqsa Mosque will remain until the Day of Judgment, you can't achieve your dirty intentions nationalist Jews*
What are the dirty intentions you speak of?
don't you guys want some new stuff? this crap is so old to the universe. if we don't come up with new......reset.