The Chang'e 6 mission has made a stunning revelation: why are American scientists angry?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лип 2024
  • Lunar exploration dispute: Why is the U.S. eager to share China's lunar soil samples?
    NASA Administrator: China invited 30 countries to study lunar soil, except the U.S., which is unreasonable!
    "Does the U.S. want to cooperate with China now?" "China's Chang'e 6 and Chang'e 5 lunar soil samples have garnered attention from global scientists. However, at this moment, the U.S. suddenly issued an open letter, expressing a desire to share lunar soil samples with China, offering aerospace supplies in exchange for China's retrieved lunar soil samples." However, behind this letter lies a blatant provocation. As one of the only two countries in possession of lunar samples, the U.S. clearly does not want to see progress in China's aerospace industry. NASA, the agency responsible for the U.S. space program, even self-deprecatingly commented, "Is it because our American astronauts didn't bring back lunar soil that we're causing trouble for you?"
    Is this true, dear viewers? Welcome back to our channel! I am delighted to share and discuss today's topic with you: why did China not invite the U.S. to cooperate in researching lunar soil samples, which has stirred up a great deal of controversy? What does the change in the U.S.'s attitude towards China's lunar exploration program reflect about international relations? What significance does China's success in its lunar exploration program have for its future aerospace development?
    The aforementioned open letter has caused a stir in China. While the U.S. is entitled to apply for lunar soil samples from China, China has no reason to apply to the U.S., which has left the U.S. feeling unhappy and aggrieved. The head of NASA also publicly stated, "Faced with China's strong aerospace industry, the U.S. is simply unable to cooperate with China and can only watch as you bring back lunar soil samples. Why is this?"
    China has made significant progress in its lunar exploration program, successfully bringing back lunar soil samples from Chang'e 5 and 6, which has attracted global attention from the scientific community. However, the U.S., expressing dissatisfaction with not being invited to participate in lunar soil research, reveals deeper issues in Sino-U.S. relations in the aerospace field.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 97

  • @cam35mm
    @cam35mm 10 днів тому +56

    Clearly a rich spoiled brat is jealous.

    • @verypleasantguy
      @verypleasantguy 10 днів тому

      Spoiled brat is not rich anymore

    • @JonyC6969
      @JonyC6969 9 днів тому +9

      To be rich one must be debt free. When you can’t afford to pay even the interest on your debt you are not even poor let alone rich.

  • @jeffreystliow
    @jeffreystliow 10 днів тому +43

    Why bother with American Lunar Sample ? Just collect what u need from the grounds of Hollywood, central Los Angeles.

    • @willengel2458
      @willengel2458 9 днів тому +1

      rumor has it, uncle scam gave China small amount of petrified wood.

  • @bbharatillusion4574
    @bbharatillusion4574 10 днів тому +24

    A shameless USA episode of a declining great power..

  • @user-od5sy3oq5i
    @user-od5sy3oq5i 10 днів тому +26

    Repeal the Wolf Amendment and apologise first then China can think about it about cooperating .

  • @nelsonsim
    @nelsonsim 9 днів тому +31

    The United States has historically viewed China with disdain due to its communist government. Under the Wolf Amendment, the U.S. passed legislation to prevent China from becoming a space exploration partner. However, this only served to strengthen China's resolve, much like what happened with Huawei. The company improved significantly despite American sanctions. Now, the focus is on chips and electric vehicles. When will this end? It likely won't, as Washington seems to overlook that for the past decade, China has been producing six to seven times more STEM graduates than the U.S., despite having a population only four times larger. Each year, China produces more STEM graduates than the U.S. and EU combined. How can China be stopped?

    • @josephlau9585
      @josephlau9585 9 днів тому +9

      Excellent write up with valuable information.

    • @peanut0brain
      @peanut0brain 8 днів тому

      China = unstoppable freight train

    • @IbnBahtuta
      @IbnBahtuta 8 днів тому +10

      The Chinese see it more historically, from the behaviours shown to them by America in the past right up to today.
      What goes around comes around, and I don't think they have even started yet.

  • @IbnBahtuta
    @IbnBahtuta 9 днів тому +14

    The reason is the American on-goal laughingly called the Wolf Amendment.

  • @loktom4068
    @loktom4068 10 днів тому +26

    "little joe blows Byedung" has Hollywood lunar soil to swap for China's lunar soil.

    • @user-xw5fs3ye2w
      @user-xw5fs3ye2w 10 днів тому

      美国人担心中国人会把监听器埋在月球土壤样品中,所以美国拒绝中国赠送月球样品。

  • @karchi12
    @karchi12 9 днів тому +17

    China should never tempted by the saying that everything collected from the moon belongs to the whole world, because the US never has such righteous announcement before and now.

    • @ksanghue5340
      @ksanghue5340 9 днів тому

      It's true they belongs to the world so, what's wrong with saying that. Now China did not deny any country from cooperating with, especially the US. It's the US's government stopped themselve from working with China. Since that happened, so why should China want to invite them? More often than not, some of their politicians or their media may twist or write negative stories against China over this. Do you know that, there is a law in the US that banned any American from working with China in space exploration? The China was painfully humiliated again at that time.

  • @dbestplanner
    @dbestplanner 9 днів тому +13

    The wolf amandment makes China move forward quickly in the space sector

  • @akoto03378
    @akoto03378 9 днів тому +18

    no mention of the US' Wolf Amendment. Incomplete.

  • @MASMIWA
    @MASMIWA 10 днів тому +44

    The US has not shared with China, especially in the ISS. So, the US has set the character of space collaboration between China and the US. If I remember correctly China DID share moon samples last time with the US.

  • @FredJones-lo2df
    @FredJones-lo2df 10 днів тому +30

    Keep soaring upward Asia.❤

  • @desmond7914
    @desmond7914 10 днів тому +56

    To US, China is at least 20 - 30 years behind in space tech. Based on this assumption, US manufactured the narrative that China may steal US space technology if there is cooperation. Even then, US failed to land on the moon, not once but twice in 2024. The first mission in January 2024 failed to reach the moon and landed on planet Earth instead. While the second mission in April 2024 used its solar panels as the landing gear, thereby crushing them. For China, all their landers landed perfectly and flawlessly on the moon, not only on the near side but on the far side as well. China also landed flawlessly on planet Mars in its debut. But before that landing, Blinken smeared China blatantly in their Alaska meeting that the Chinese lander could not land on Mars while US already exploring that planet.

    • @user-xw5fs3ye2w
      @user-xw5fs3ye2w 10 днів тому +15

      科技是一门非常纯净的艺术,然而今天美国的科技被政治污染了。

    • @verypleasantguy
      @verypleasantguy 10 днів тому

      @@user-xw5fs3ye2w 美国的良知已经荡然无存了

    • @tkh2944
      @tkh2944 10 днів тому +15

      The US believe that the world exclusively revolve around them😂

    • @JonyC6969
      @JonyC6969 9 днів тому +12

      Only planet USA ever landed on is planet earth.

    • @josephlau9585
      @josephlau9585 9 днів тому +6

      Very insightful.

  • @kentteng3571
    @kentteng3571 10 днів тому +11

    Failed to mention about the "wolf" set by us government

  • @yawsimwoon9083
    @yawsimwoon9083 8 днів тому +6

    Since usa apollo missions landed on the moon so many times, they can go to the moon again to obtain more, why bother to ask China?

    • @josephsamoto2408
      @josephsamoto2408 7 днів тому

      yaw, ils mendient parce qu'ils n'ont jamais allé sur la lune.

  • @colinlee9678
    @colinlee9678 9 днів тому +6

    It is only fair for this very small limited lunar sample to be shared with only those who have truly cooperated and contributed to China's space program! It would be very unfair to share with those didn't cooperate and didn't contribute!

  • @resnica3557
    @resnica3557 9 днів тому +19

    Your video is rather dubious, let me put it most courteously.
    You were spinning the words of cooperation round and round, one way or the other, throughout the entire video, yet you failed to tell people what physically stands as obstacle to genuine cooperation:
    [1] the Wolf Amendment of 2011.
    [2] US's flat rejection to China's wish to participate in the building of the so-called International Space Station, ISS.
    and many other things.

    • @josephsamoto2408
      @josephsamoto2408 7 днів тому

      resnica, j'enrichie votre commentaire en disant que la vérité de la station spatiale est russe.

  • @alanwang5066
    @alanwang5066 9 днів тому +7

    envious, jealous and hateful

  • @cosmic24680
    @cosmic24680 9 днів тому +6

    The Americans will never share anything especially with China if it thinks China gain more advantages and benefits over them. To deal with the US China has also be careful and wise to examine the sharing of knowledge and materials will somehow put China interest and security in jeopardy. This is what the US will always do when dealing with China

    • @yeohongeng528
      @yeohongeng528 8 днів тому

      The members os US scientific community should be happy that China did invite them in the moon soil that brought back by Chang'e 6. If did this community would be committed a crime against the Wolf Amendments 201.

  • @ccchu3954
    @ccchu3954 9 днів тому +5

    It was always America's decision to decouple, sanction and exclude China from its space programs. Therefore it is only fair that China is not obliged to share the fruits of its labour with the smartest and greatest space force in the universe.

  • @khp61212
    @khp61212 8 днів тому +4

    if usa has the sample,,, do you guys think usa will share with china?...

  • @gabrielpyh5608
    @gabrielpyh5608 9 днів тому +5

    Elon Musk will fetch the 2 astronauts home if Boeing is willing to pay 3.5b.

  • @benglimann1602
    @benglimann1602 8 днів тому +5

    What happened to the "Wolf Amendment". Americans are prohibited by law NOT to cooperate with China on any space exploration. The prohibition is so strict till the level of not even the supply or purchase of items as small as a screw.

  • @user-ey2io5of2d
    @user-ey2io5of2d 9 днів тому +1

    Us did bring back samples, they did not want to share.

    • @teatree6228
      @teatree6228 6 днів тому

      Usa bring back fake samples

  • @billyesomann
    @billyesomann 6 днів тому +1

    Ask yourself shamefully, where is Wolf's amendment

  • @limts9613
    @limts9613 5 днів тому

    It makes one wonders whether US had actually landed on the MOON ???

  • @zhantangbai7295
    @zhantangbai7295 6 днів тому

    It would be better to bring the two stranded astronauts back to Earth first. Getting the lunar soil will not help the moon landing technology at all, and South Korea’s fantasy technology is not needed.

  • @tonyberet309
    @tonyberet309 9 днів тому

    the pronounce of Chang-Eh is incorrect. To pronounce 嫦娥 (cháng é), start with a "cha" sound, like the "cha" in "cha-cha", then add the "ng" sound, cha + ng.

  • @AJQwertyu
    @AJQwertyu 6 днів тому

    You reap what you sow....

  • @goolooggg9005
    @goolooggg9005 5 днів тому

    US to do own moon landing & samples extraction, with its Apollo skills a piece of (moon) cake NO? 😂

  • @KurniaLim
    @KurniaLim 6 днів тому

    US want some soil? Didn't Neil Armstrong bring back a bit moon soil? He can put pole and us flag on the moon but not getting any soil?😅😅 Or maybe he landed on grand canyon 😊..
    US can't even get their astrononout from ISS, they need russia to do it, why? You can go to the moon and back but can't even get back from ISS? Sounds absurd

  • @user-sf1nq9uj7p
    @user-sf1nq9uj7p 9 днів тому +2

    One has to question the United States: Why, after its first lunar landing in 1969 and some lunar rock and soil samples were retrieved, that the other successive 5 trips to the lunar surface only resulted in the same rock collecting expedition and there was no attempt in even building a simple lunar base there? Six very expensive trips which became more like tourist visitations with a few scientific "experiments" carried out there like playing a golf shot. Not what one would call really "moonshaking" event. Did NASA lose its ability to imagine and visualize big things back then?
    Okay - the first trip there was like Christopher Columbus first landing on the New World. Fair enough. Can't expect too much being done except bringing back some soil and rock samples. However, 5 other trips, mostly to do the SAME thing - collect rocks and soil samples and that's all? They didn't even tried to tow one of the spent rocket booster shells to the moon and simply dropping it onto the surface (remember the moon's lower gravity), turn the material into a primitive "hut"! No wonder NASA began to lose the imagination of the American public as well and so, by the time Apollo 13 came around, Americans were more interested in watching television reruns than in the lunar mission as NASA's budget shrank more and more. Sometimes, bold plans can result in bold budgets provided.
    When President JFK announced his "we shall go to the moon" many thought he was crazy or maybe a bit insane. However, it was a bold and brassy plan that he has not only made but very well detailed and costed - and it gripped the imagination of the American public (as well as the rest of the world). Deadbeats will always be there to criticize anything and there were deadbeats back then who claim the the money would be better spent on the poor. However, even with NASA's budget cut and slashed, the poor is still there - which shows the fruitless critique against having NASA's "big" budget which was used to actually make life better for all of humankind.

  • @teatree6228
    @teatree6228 6 днів тому

    1 micro gm of fake moon rock to usa like apollo moon mission in hollywood

  • @waynethorpe1341
    @waynethorpe1341 10 днів тому +2

    China is too nice.
    They will.

    • @verypleasantguy
      @verypleasantguy 10 днів тому

      The Chinese leadership are too timid

    • @milexiangyangli5666
      @milexiangyangli5666 10 днів тому

      I - Doubt - It - ❌️❌️❌️❌️❌️ - (China) - 🇨🇳 🇨🇳 🇨🇳 🇨🇳 🇨🇳 - (Learns) - From - (History) - ✅️ ✅️ ✅️ ✅️ ✅️ - While - (The - US) - 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 - (Just - Don't) - ❌️❌️❌️❌️❌️ - (Repeating) - (The - Same) - (Mistake) - (Over) - & - (Over) - (Again) - with - (Every - President) - 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 -

    • @ronni9443
      @ronni9443 10 днів тому

      China diplomacy vs US diplomacy

    • @teatree6228
      @teatree6228 6 днів тому +1

      They must not