FSU Law Professor Murder Trial Day 8 Witness: Spc Agt Patrick Sanford Part 6

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 160

  • @debikaip3699
    @debikaip3699 2 роки тому +31

    What a amazing judge 👍💯💯💯💯💯,
    he puts up with no nonsense, 👍 Touché
    the judge says it the way it is .
    Good for the judge,
    for taking control & holding onto it.
    Job well done judge 👍💯❤️

  • @Ferrucci_1666
    @Ferrucci_1666 4 роки тому +71

    This SPECIAL agent is laughing inside of his mind at these defense attorneys. He knows he's way ahead of their game. His smirking is hilarious.

  • @andante887
    @andante887 3 роки тому +22

    if u think that Wendi Adelson is implicated give me a thumb up..rookie defense lawyer has a brighter future..

  • @f.j282
    @f.j282 2 роки тому +14

    Magmanua defense lawyer tone of voice is cheeky and flagrant.
    He is rude to FBI agent. Not polite

  • @Mimi_1971
    @Mimi_1971 Рік тому +13

    This has got to be the absolute worst defense team I’ve ever seen. The defense wants to testify rather than ask questions. He hates getting smacked down.this attorney needs to be sanctioned

  • @sww3405
    @sww3405 3 роки тому +21

    Defense lawyer is so obnoxious.

  • @belmaomanovic8590
    @belmaomanovic8590 2 роки тому +15

    These defenses attorneys are trying to prove something that doesn’t exist 😩

  • @fabulouslyfeline8238
    @fabulouslyfeline8238 2 роки тому +16

    That attorney is naturally patronising. Thinks himself so far above others.

  • @GA-fz2wt
    @GA-fz2wt 2 роки тому +15

    This guy the agent is brilliant!

  • @redstar1959
    @redstar1959 3 роки тому +18

    This agent is very sharp, I like him

  • @stephenmulwitz378
    @stephenmulwitz378 5 років тому +22

    THE SPECIAL AGENT HAS TO GO THROUGH HUMILIATING TONE OF VOICE FROM THE INTERVIEW WHICH WOULD MAKE ANYONE IN HIS SHOES UNCOMFORTABLE!

  • @HannadayFLO
    @HannadayFLO 10 місяців тому +6

    Actually Katherine is much more cunning than Charlie. Katherine is totally central in this case. Wendi and Katherine.

  • @condor5635
    @condor5635 Рік тому +9

    10% of the conversation is ‘Correct me if I’m wrong…. ‘. What a joke

    • @HannadayFLO
      @HannadayFLO 10 місяців тому

      I'd say back "oh I will"😂

    • @joralemonvirgincreche
      @joralemonvirgincreche 6 місяців тому

      If I were a juror that would annoy me. Just ask a direct question. The Garcia lawyers are even worse: "You would agree with me...."

  • @courtneymcgivern
    @courtneymcgivern 5 років тому +63

    The defense is struggling. Props to this special agent for holding his own. Furthermore, the defense counsels attitude isn’t going to sit well with the jury. He should be careful that they find it disrespectful and trying to force truths that just aren’t there.

    • @akeshachapa
      @akeshachapa 5 років тому +6

      Courtney Agree!
      This judge is awesome.... He is definitely not buying into the defenses Bull crap!! They must not have real good law schools in Florida... These attorneys have no strategy at all... I bet these defense attorney's will definitely not be on Miami's Police Dept. And Florida FBI's good side at all!!
      The way their treating a special agent on the stand!! Lol

    • @robertdetore8047
      @robertdetore8047 5 років тому +7

      What is wrong w this attorney? Hes getting ready to go off the deep end... hes nuts! I bet the judge is gonna throw him out....

    • @robertdetore8047
      @robertdetore8047 5 років тому +5

      All these attorneys are awful. U r right the law schools must be bad.. he hasent a clue.. I'd him.

    • @zameredouglas6798
      @zameredouglas6798 5 років тому +6

      He's not sitting too well with the judge neither 😂

    • @bobbiehinds
      @bobbiehinds 5 років тому +2

      Yet, it was a hung jury....

  • @bunnysmith-anderson726
    @bunnysmith-anderson726 9 місяців тому +5

    OMG.. This is THE WORST defense attorney that I’ve EVER seen or heard!!! He’s a “Charlie Adelson” of the legal field… obnoxious to say the least. Ugh 😩 did he really pass the bar?
    He’s rude and condescending towards someone who is more intelligent than he…
    Watching him cross the FBI agent is very painful 😖

  • @lynnjones5490
    @lynnjones5490 5 років тому +42

    3:02 this judge just ate his lunch. He is sharp as a blade. Whatever is his slight speech problem,it ain't got nothing to do with his brain and his ability to dish out the rule of law.

    • @pypes88
      @pypes88 4 роки тому

      Maybe the judge has an early onset of a neurological illness.

    • @TentinQuarantino_
      @TentinQuarantino_ 4 роки тому +4

      It’s a vocal tremor. Usually isolated to one or a few nerves. The medication for it gives worse side effects than the tremor itself in some people. I actually kind of like his voice with it, but my mom also has this condition and it drives me batshit when I hear her. 😂

    • @kccourt6910
      @kccourt6910 3 роки тому +11

      This judge is amazing, he does a lot of the other big high profile trials...He has Parkinson’s disease...In one of the other trials I’ve watched with him, he discusses it because he had a cold on top of it so he talked with the jury apologizing and saying it might be hard to hear him because has Parkinson’s and also a slight cold that day....I love this judge...it was great to
      finally get the answer of just what it was that made his voice shake....He’s just top notch...He’s so fair, really listens, and truly has a heart...even for these gang bangers, he’s kind and polite to them....Lotta care inside that man’s soul ❤️🙏🏻

    • @valeriejohnson5283
      @valeriejohnson5283 2 роки тому +2

      @@TentinQuarantino_ 😂😂🍺😎🍺God bless your mom.🙏An actress in the days gone by named Kathryn Hepburn suffered from the same condition. Your mom probably remembers her.😁

    • @kyleharr10
      @kyleharr10 Рік тому +3

      Why are people making a judgement on the judges "speech problem"? It didn't even cross my mind. The judge is so obviously professional and experienced and his supposed speech problem wasn't even a factor I considered whatsoever.

  • @vikaz3408
    @vikaz3408 5 років тому +26

    I really hate how the defense lawyer call FBI names.....

    • @reneec.venegas6560
      @reneec.venegas6560 2 роки тому +1

      They were intimidating when they arrested Katherine. Imo, they should have recorded both of their arrests.

  • @bjd1380
    @bjd1380 5 років тому +24

    I absolutely love this FBI agent. Katherines lawyer is TERRIBLE. He grasps at straws and gets disproven left and right !!!!

  • @georginabiggs7960
    @georginabiggs7960 3 роки тому +9

    Right right right is driving me mad. He makes it sound like a demand.

  • @iamnotatoy3521
    @iamnotatoy3521 3 роки тому +35

    This defense has undoubtedly been the worst I've ever heard from. Between the FBI acronym to summarizing a home as a "DOPE - I MEAN DOPE house" is so laughable. The Agent has down phenomenal at firing back and making it blatantly obvious he finds the defense to be a joke.

    • @kjnest
      @kjnest 2 роки тому +2

      That’s because it is!! Lol

    • @slim7435
      @slim7435 Рік тому +1

      The defense is a joke, defense attorney is very rude to the FBI agent!!! He didn't have to be so nasty to him!!!

    • @tracygreco6372
      @tracygreco6372 10 місяців тому

      So annoying, I cannot believe he passed the bar

  • @reneec.venegas6560
    @reneec.venegas6560 2 роки тому +15

    I find it sickening how they are getting all the poor low life's and not the rich low life's. Donna should have been wire tapped and Wendi should be wire tapped. Having Charlie in jail isn't good enough. They need to all be put in Jail. As someone noted the jury thinks Wendi is guilty and if that's true they could get a conviction.

    • @GA-fz2wt
      @GA-fz2wt Рік тому +1

      Did you hear today, that Katie is being transfered to the court for Charlie's trial in October?
      I wonder if she's done a deal?

  • @juliarosecastillo4464
    @juliarosecastillo4464 2 роки тому +8

    The Judge is right for saying that " i dont know what you're takling about". This defense guy is the worsed. So annoying

  • @rosemaryduncan7280
    @rosemaryduncan7280 2 роки тому +5

    That male lawyer is exhausting

  • @kalona111
    @kalona111 Рік тому +7

    Omg, Katie’s lawyer (male next to her) thinks he’s “all that”. 😂😂 so condescending.

  • @tracygreco6372
    @tracygreco6372 11 місяців тому +5

    This defense attorney is a complete joke. does he realize what a fool he is making of himself? Agent Sanford is so patient, I don't know where he pulled that patience from Even the judge has had just about enough of this as well. He's not putting up with all this fairytale defense.😳

  • @BELTED007
    @BELTED007 5 років тому +36

    Gees getting good to watch now. Really enjoy this fbi guy.

  • @slim7435
    @slim7435 Рік тому +4

    I wonder if the defense attorneys ever look at all the evidence!!! It seems like they don't!!!!

  • @kjnest
    @kjnest 2 роки тому +14

    Love this agents attitude towards this attorney! He along with the jury realizes how much of jackass he is!! He is wrong on so many things! Did he even do any investigation???

    • @tracygreco6372
      @tracygreco6372 11 місяців тому

      WTH??? this attorney is a complete joke

  • @sonjaheck3156
    @sonjaheck3156 11 місяців тому +2

    seems absolutely insane that NO one would have thought to take a pic of that letter to mom Adelson, or that any/all interviews would not be taped. That kind of blows my mind in this day and age.

  • @kjnest
    @kjnest 2 роки тому +8

    Both these defense attorneys are the worst I have ever witnessed!!!! Both so terrible ! Would not hire ether one to walk my dog!! They would make poor public pretender’s!!

  • @michellededmon6711
    @michellededmon6711 3 роки тому +9

    If looks could kill, this agent would’ve been done killed this defense attorney!

  • @dianawright8334
    @dianawright8334 2 роки тому +16

    As a Natural born citizen of the US taking the murder of Dan Markel out of this. I have paid my taxes paid for all of my children s needs and I didn’t deal drugs. It makes me sick that all walks of life take advantage of the Government and leave people who really need and deserve the benefits high and dry. Then on top of all of their criminal behavior, they bankrupt the State they live in prosecuting them

  • @VegasCyclingFreak
    @VegasCyclingFreak 5 років тому +13

    This guy doing the questioning really doesn't need to make statements like "federal bureau of intimidation" and the like.

    • @glitter7777
      @glitter7777 3 роки тому +6

      Yeah def not winning any popularity contests with the jury I would imagine.

    • @marshapieroni6677
      @marshapieroni6677 2 роки тому +2

      Is that why the judge chewed him out?

  • @shonamacintosh5177
    @shonamacintosh5177 2 роки тому +7

    This lawyer has a very unfortunate and condescending way of speaking . I wish he would stop saying “ right” I think he’s making a real fool of himself .

    • @artieborko4988
      @artieborko4988 Рік тому

      His way of speaking is by design- he’s trying to sow seeds of doubt into the jury’s mind. By constantly speaking in a condescending tone, it subconsciously plant’s negative feelings towards the agent/prosecutors and the way they’ve gathered evidence in this case, or I believe that was his goal, anyway. And it seems to have worked in this trial, at least.

  • @brendalevings2427
    @brendalevings2427 Рік тому +3

    Defense attorney needs to repeat law school. FBI witness lhao inside.

  • @anovemberstar
    @anovemberstar 2 роки тому +6

    Thank god that, unlike the jury, I could ast forward most of this and move on. That lawyer, not only is he an a'hole, he's boring, repeatative, and I'm sure, put the jury to sleep.

  • @CabsAndEthel
    @CabsAndEthel 2 роки тому +6

    This lawyer is rude

  • @johnallen2771
    @johnallen2771 5 років тому +7

    My dad was in the FBI back in the early 50s. I have always thought that the FBI held onto a certain form of professionalism that was well above what's normally found at the state or local levels. Even today, the FBI is well respected in the world of forensic work, identification, kidnapping, interstate flight and many others. But I wonder if they are getting too far flung in the cases they work on. That tends to muddle their high standards. We should have another law enforcement agency, don't create a new one but use an existing one, to help out on local cases like this. I understand it was all part of a Latin Kings RICO act investigation, but you get my point.

    • @danieltadros3262
      @danieltadros3262 5 років тому +2

      Did you know that when the FBI was first formed they were not permitted to carry firearms. I do agree with your statement about the FBI. I will also say it is the law enforcement agency I trust the most.

    • @johnallen2771
      @johnallen2771 5 років тому +3

      @@danieltadros3262 I didn't know that about the FBI. My dad said you had to either be an accountant or have been to law school to be in the FBI. I guess those were the only two categories.

    • @danieltadros3262
      @danieltadros3262 5 років тому +2

      @@johnallen2771 It took several years after the FBI was formed before they were allowed to carry firearms. If you google history of FBI the story comes up. The secret service is the oldest law enforcement agency. It was formed during the civil war by president Lincoln.

    • @susanashley9571
      @susanashley9571 2 роки тому +1

      We have the Texas Rangers. Might be helpful if more states had their own Rangers. sj

  • @kjnest
    @kjnest 2 роки тому +5

    This Attorney Decoss should write a book on fairytales!! He is ridicules!!

  • @lifesabeach7416
    @lifesabeach7416 5 років тому +10

    28:37 statement and the witness reaction at 28:44 was EPIC! This case is getting interesting!

    • @TheDestiny8ball
      @TheDestiny8ball 5 років тому

      Cheryl Efficace it was 😂😂😂😂😂😂lmao

    • @stephmullin9709
      @stephmullin9709 3 роки тому

      I just wish where the beginning is !!!

    • @hasick
      @hasick 2 роки тому

      That line was in an X-Files episode

    • @Carolinec222
      @Carolinec222 2 роки тому

      He falls for it again at 52:37🤣🤣
      Dacoste is a hoot!

  • @kjnest
    @kjnest 2 роки тому +5

    The attorney tried to slip in a fast one saying that they mention Kats name the detective says your incorrect instead of the fool of an attorney saying ya your right I am wrong he says ok let’s talk about that!! LMFAO what a clown!!

  • @artieborko4988
    @artieborko4988 Рік тому +5

    Absolutely wild some of the things attorney Decoste said. Playing on what the acronym “FBI” stands for not just once but TWICE, is just crazy disrespectful to the court. I thought the 2nd go around when he characterized it to mean “Federal Bureau of Intimidation” that the judge was gunna go ape sh*t.
    I understand WHY he (Decoste) is doing what he’s doing here, with the constant rhetorical questions and condescending tone- however, it was over the top. And he’s very lucky this judge (largely) took mercy on him- because he deserved to be brutally admonished by that point.

  • @Louielinguini
    @Louielinguini Рік тому +1

    Something I can’t help bearing in mind as daily working relations in criminal cases defense attorneys before the judge come and go, while the state an ever presence before same judge.

  • @guillecrespo
    @guillecrespo Рік тому +3

    Katherine's defends attorney is so bad and he pretends to be very knowledgeable and only makes a full of himself. Most of the times he's wrong. I love the FBI agent, so patient with this lousy defense attorney

  • @vlogsquad7259
    @vlogsquad7259 5 років тому +6

    Correct me if i am wrong,this defences attorney is a baump!!!!

  • @maliamarin5718
    @maliamarin5718 2 роки тому +3

    Is wire tapping legal?

    • @jasoncolegrove5032
      @jasoncolegrove5032 2 роки тому +3

      Yes it is if you get a warrant to wire tap the phones you can bug the phones.

    • @artieborko4988
      @artieborko4988 Рік тому +2

      With probable cause and a warrant signed by a judge, they sure are. The judge will usually set a time frame that the wire can remain up and functional. Once that time expires, the agents (or PD/whichever agency is investigating) must go back to the judge and justify additional, again using probable cause.
      Or at least that way it supposed to work!

  • @CaliforniaAvocado
    @CaliforniaAvocado 3 роки тому +6

    Why didn't they get wiretaps on Donna and Wendi

  • @cbean0017
    @cbean0017 2 роки тому +6

    This lawyer is reaching. And is a name caller. Pos

  • @patriciahappe852
    @patriciahappe852 2 роки тому +1

    39:47 Decoss says ur honor “PP” judge shud have said “ r u asking for a break?” 😂

  • @galacticmaya73
    @galacticmaya73 3 роки тому +7

    It sounds like this def atty's strategy is entirely about throwing out innuendos about biased intent by lawful authorities, not caring if it is stricken or not, just to plant the idea in the minds of the jurors and detract from the real issues here. Very poor strategy, imo, Just the facts, please.

    • @HannadayFLO
      @HannadayFLO 10 місяців тому

      It only serves to show he is not up to standard. Ex disrespectful and rude.

  • @loganhensley1042
    @loganhensley1042 5 років тому +7

    Sorry but the effed up that whole bump when Charlie called and the agent specifically said Katie and Tato and Tuto. Of course its going to end up with them AFTER they specifically say their names on that call. Garcia and Magbanua attorney should be arguing THAT! I don't do anything illegal and neither does my family but if someone gave my mom a letternand mention 3 people i know regardless if they did anything wrong or not you bet your ass im giving that paper to them so they can see it and telling them what this person said. It would have been EVIDENCE if they never mentioned Katie or the two guys and THEN it ended up in their hands.

  • @Itsjustme115
    @Itsjustme115 2 роки тому +1

    I have questions as to why this agent would not record the "confession" of this murder! Lead investigator no report no recording bc he was not in Fed custody that's laughable

  • @kymanizmama
    @kymanizmama 2 роки тому +2

    There is so much bias in this entire trial its ridiculous

  • @Aliyah.and.friends
    @Aliyah.and.friends 9 місяців тому +1

    Is this judge annoying or is it just me cause he really bothers me

  • @elizabethkavanagh3411
    @elizabethkavanagh3411 4 роки тому +1

    FBI should have records in front off him ...don't you

  • @evernit
    @evernit Рік тому +3

    28:36 *1ST TRY:* It's a Federal Bureau of Investigation, right? Not the Federal Bureau of _Imagination..._
    52:37 *2ND TRY:* Federal Bureau of Investigation, right? Not the Federal Bureau of _Intimidation._ 😅🤣

  • @margaretlee-reed814
    @margaretlee-reed814 5 років тому +9

    The hard evidence is against Wendi Adelson …. so, why was everyone wire tapping Charlie? What we haven't heard are the phone calls between Charlie and Wendi at this time. Or, Donna Adelson and Wendi Adelson. (After listening to the evidence just in this trial it is obvious Wendi's phone calls should have been monitored.) Charlie speaks to Donna and Donna speaks to Wendi but, we have no idea what's being exchanged. And, now that everyone knows the significance of Wendi's claim about TV's and hitmen and Jeffrey L. and TV repairman and TPD interview about Jeffrey L. …. and then Donna calls Charlie whispering about TV's, the letter and this TV will cost 5K and this involves you and me and I think you know what I'm talking about.

    • @stephenmulwitz378
      @stephenmulwitz378 5 років тому +2

      I DO NOT THINK THAT THEY HAVE EVIDENCE AGAINST WENDI ADELSON BUT RATHER SUSPECT OTHER PEOPLE IN HER FAMILY!

    • @TouchGrass144
      @TouchGrass144 3 роки тому +5

      They had phone calls between the Adelsons but the judge didn't allow them because they didn't include the defendants. When and IF they ever prosecute the Adelsons I'm sure we will get to hear all those phone calls

    • @margaretlee-reed814
      @margaretlee-reed814 3 роки тому

      @@TouchGrass144 You think? We'll see.

    • @jasoncolegrove5032
      @jasoncolegrove5032 2 роки тому +2

      Because he is the one who bought and paid for the murder

    • @HannadayFLO
      @HannadayFLO 10 місяців тому

      @@jasoncolegrove5032we got the money from the lady (Wendi)

  • @kjnest
    @kjnest 2 роки тому +1

    All these people and money the FBI used when they could had used an external microphone and a cell phone?? What a waste of time and money to make these people seem like it was a big operation and they were important!!!!

  • @suzieb8366
    @suzieb8366 3 роки тому +3

    WhatsApp is now booming !

  • @margaretlee-reed814
    @margaretlee-reed814 5 років тому +1

    A guy CALLED the Dental Institute looking for Harvey …. but, Charlie tells his mother he knows who it is and then turns around and tells Katherine to find out who the F*CK it is! Are they talking about a phone call to Harvey now or the bump letter?
    What 'guy' called the Harvey institute?
    The undercover cop in the bump gave them a number to call him. HE wasn't calling them.
    So, what in the world are they talking about?
    Why would a phone call to Harvey Adelson be significant? Did the person say anything? Get a hold of Harvey? What were they talking about …. that would be important or relevant to this case?

    • @marshapieroni6677
      @marshapieroni6677 2 роки тому +2

      Garcia called the elder Adelson, thinking it was the younger Adelson, out of jealousy. Not really case related but...at the time, he didn't know he had killed someone for Katie's boyfriend "the dentist"

  • @hall2ify
    @hall2ify 3 роки тому +3

    Why didn't sigfredo not blow the lid on the adelsons if they were involved

    • @sallyramage8439
      @sallyramage8439 2 роки тому +2

      Did he not talk about it in jail with his cellmate?

    • @GA-fz2wt
      @GA-fz2wt Рік тому +1

      Because they were paying for Katherine's lawyers.

  • @twelch8367
    @twelch8367 Рік тому

    I would never talk to a FBI person they sound so shady.tape the interview they won't so they can make the narrative.

  • @Andrew-ho6uj
    @Andrew-ho6uj 11 місяців тому

    this guy and his clicking pen, 😖

  • @maliamarin5718
    @maliamarin5718 2 роки тому +4

    This judge does seem very bias for the prosecution! I’ve never seen a judge ask witnesses random questions to explain themselves! Isn’t that what the attorneys are for?! I would think this case has a good case for appeal!

    • @marshapieroni6677
      @marshapieroni6677 2 роки тому +5

      He allows jurors to ask any remaining questions they have, and I think it's a very good idea. I like and respect this judge. Have heard him in other cases.

    • @kjnest
      @kjnest 2 роки тому +4

      He not asking the questions they are questions from the jury!! That’s what they down here!

  • @Pinayukoz4108
    @Pinayukoz4108 11 місяців тому

    From the get go they’re already caught … why will Charlie call Katherine? Because she’s involved he could’ve rang up any other Ex but it was Katherine he did so it’s the obvious she’s in it. Including Charlie’s mother Donna and hey Wendi knows it too for sure but she got away

  • @hittheheadlines2942
    @hittheheadlines2942 2 роки тому +5

    Because she knows nothing of the murder, Katie has no idea that Charlie, in phoning her, is fishing for information: Is this his hitman extorting money or is it an FBI sting? Katie and Sigfredo are both mentioned specifically by the "Undercover" and Charlie is well aware of this. He is desperate to know the source of the note which is why he pushes and pushes Katie to investigate. Katie, oblivious to the truth and increasingly concerned for her family's safety, is extremely reluctant to get involved in what she perceives as another family's problems

  • @pmac5621
    @pmac5621 5 років тому +5

    Smarmy witness

    • @TheDestiny8ball
      @TheDestiny8ball 5 років тому

      P Mac 💯💯🤬😡

    • @GA-fz2wt
      @GA-fz2wt 2 роки тому +4

      Because he's certain of what went on & he knows the truth he's spot on, I like him.

  • @SmellGoodTravelWell
    @SmellGoodTravelWell 2 роки тому

    OVERRULED... 🤣

  • @mariajacobellis1298
    @mariajacobellis1298 2 роки тому

    4:51 4.24.2022
    ★ph'KING D'GZ INTO OBEDIENCE.

  • @heidiangvik8571
    @heidiangvik8571 5 років тому +1

    This is a easy case - all this is just to Get the leader of the latin king gang

  • @debchiu
    @debchiu 11 місяців тому +1

    The FBI guy is typical; arrogant.

  • @mrmark2169
    @mrmark2169 2 роки тому

    I believe this judge was alot of the reason there was a hung jury in this 1st trial

    • @josephinecoale7204
      @josephinecoale7204 Рік тому +1

      What did the judge have to do with the juror saying she didn’t want her kids to be without both parents thats why she hung the jury

    • @HannadayFLO
      @HannadayFLO 10 місяців тому +1

      @@josephinecoale7204disgraceful!

  • @hittheheadlines2942
    @hittheheadlines2942 3 роки тому +4

    Classic case of Confirmation Bias. The FBI pulled the theory of Katherine being involved out of thin air. Then they interpreted the phone taps in a way that confirmed their beliefs
    I would say the very fact that Charlie called Katie at all proves she wasn't involved
    Unfortunately Charlie made both his mum and Katie look guilty with his calls, codes and secret meetings when in reality neither of them had anything to do with the murder

    • @deannawiederhold333
      @deannawiederhold333 3 роки тому +5

      Is that why Katie is still sitting in prison awaiting a New trial? And I have heard other judges give this Judge high praise for being fair and ruling by the rule of Law.

    • @hittheheadlines2942
      @hittheheadlines2942 3 роки тому

      @@deannawiederhold333 Georgia has travelled so far down the wrong road pursuing Katie it's difficult for her to admit that Katie wasn't actually involved ... that's why she is still in prison

    • @sallyramage8439
      @sallyramage8439 2 роки тому +1

      It is my opinion after studying this murder since 2014, that, sadly, Kathryn is involved and does have full knowledge. What is very sad is that the Dentist brother of Ms Adelson deliberately involved her and USED her. However $100,000.00 was involved. So they are all guilty- Charles Adelson, Kathryn M, her Garcia and the other jailbird glad for the money. The most evil murderous culprit is Adelson who hired the hitmen- had he not met KATHRYN, he would have found someone else to kill Markel. He himself moves in dubious circles and must know many criminals who deal in drugs; guns; money; plus dodgy business persons . I wonder if he ever had time to carry out Continuous Professional Development in Dentistry.?? One lesson we can take away is -do not be fooled by people with money. Eat cheap food rather than date scamp's. Many 'successful' businessmen are tricky, dodgy, law-breaking middle-class with no consciences.

    • @marshapieroni6677
      @marshapieroni6677 2 роки тому +10

      Katie was very very much involved.

    • @jasoncolegrove5032
      @jasoncolegrove5032 2 роки тому +8

      @@hittheheadlines2942 if she's not involved then why was she convicted in her retrial

  • @hittheheadlines2942
    @hittheheadlines2942 2 роки тому +1

    Law enforcement's goal for the bump was to generate conversation between two co-conspirators in a murder-for-hire, but they achieved exactly the opposite
    What law enforcement get, what we hear in the wire taps and restaurant recording, is two people never once talking about the murder or related topics. Katie, obviously, because she wasn't involved, so has no knowledge of the murder, and Charlie thinks this is people extorting his family for reasons he can't work out
    Because Katie's name is mentioned by the undercover during the bump, Charlie has no understanding that the note, this guy (the undercover) is actually related to the murder of Dan Markel
    Law enforcement unknowingly framed Katie for the murder. It's a classic case of confirmation bias - create a theory and use corrupted "evidence" to fit that theory, thus convicting an innocent girl