Have you been watching the same trial bc this investigator as been ripped bits unless your a lover of the police this cop is filthy the poor girl is innocent
@@seriouslyitslegit3753 you must not have seen the re-trial because, spoiler alert, baby girl was found guilty. As a matter of fact, I am a “lover” of the police, but more importantly, I’m a lover of justice.
@@michellededmon6711 A guilty verdict does not always mean justice was done. It does, of course, show the jury was in agreement and that this is our jury system and any lawyer will tell you that it doesn’t always work but works most times. I don’t think KM should have been found guilty in the second trial bc I didn’t see proof above and beyond reasonable doubt.
Charlie and his mother, Donna, but that's as far as the murder convictions are going to go. Wendi didn't know about it until after the crime occurred. She broke the law helping them cover it up. I curious to see how that will all play out. Their father also found out afterwards and didn't help authorities. If I were in that situation I certainly wouldn't help law enforcement prosecute my loved ones.
I hope so…. The wheels of justice have moved very slowly in this case but they are rolling down that hill… Wendy and Donna A. I can’t wait to watch you in your trial.
This defense attorney should do his homework before coming to trial or maybe go back to law school, He doesn't seem to know enough and is wasting everybody's time, and has an attitude of talking to the Spc agent as if he was wrong. Special Agent Sanford is amazing!
The prosecutor asks the judge for permission to approach the witness with documents, but the defense does not. He acts like he owns the courtroom. He needs an attitude adjustment.
Boy, that Defense Attorney really "killed"(pun intended) his client's chances! He didn't ask questions! He made statements with a "Right?" at the end. It was all so confusing as he looped from statement to statement!
Prosecutor and agent agree that club Fate doesn’t allow employees to keep their own cash tips. That’s why I give them no credibility. If they can’t be honest about employees keeping their tips then I don’t believe anything they claim.
On credit cards no nut through the credit cards yes. Thst doesnt mean people dont keep the cash that some clients give them. These employers do get over by not letting g them know how many each gets every single time, I'm sure they kept some if that, just like the ladies and some men of course keep their cash. They do t pay these employees much, it's sometimes based in the tips. Back then I dont think they were so much register receipt tips.
And I think the defense asks EVERY one if them! I know they're trying their hardest to prove their clients are innocent but DANG! I've had to skip ahead a lot. I'm tired of listening to their stupid questions, worded differently.
The defense attorney stopped a question immediately after teo coughs were heard and asked the judge for a brief moment. Was that a signal to watch about questikns involving her mother? Anyone know who did the coughing? Just wondering.
These defense guys are clowns. Every single sentence is reaching for straws. Useless statements. ‘ isn’t it true that Mr. Rivera mows his grass with the Snapper, 7.25 hp? ‘. I rest my case your honor
How this defense attorney is allowed to make such a fool of himself leads me to believe the Judge has tremendous patience. Agent Sanford does an amazing job in spite of this rediculous questioning throwing his theory against the wall hoping it would stick. I wouldn't hire him even for free. He railroads his own analogy of the facts. Annoying to listen to.
I can't believe that the FBI/police never searched Garcia and Rivera's apartments for that gun and just took Rivera at his word that he threw it in the lake. Why would he show them where the gun actually was and make the case against him even stronger?
they spend probably tens of thousands of dolllars on this elaborate sting operation.... and then THREE OUT OF FOUR TIMES the target suspects call the undercover number NOBODY PICKS UP THE PHONE. the recordings of those conversations would have made their case. for all the time and money spent, this investigation was seriously shoddy.
artnixie yes yes yes! I thought about that too! Like y’all set up all this crap and number and when the people call the damn phone y’all don’t even answer..!? Why!? But then they set up the voicemail.... SO I then thought well maybe they the cops could get into trouble some how some way if to much was said or something idk. Something is up with that.
Definitely loving the defense attorney. He's the type you want if you're in trouble. If she's convicted he'll have several points for appeal due to some of the judges rulings. Very interesting trial
Thank you for pointing out the obvious!! So many people have said this judge and the prosecution is great….I couldn’t disagree more! The judge is SO BIASED it’s unreal!! 😤. It’s like people are watching a totally different trial!! Every time the defense objects, the judge overrules and when the prosecution objects, surprise…surprise, the judge sustains the ruling! This is SO frustrating!! The one thing that gives me a little peace is that at least this trial ends in a mistrial…we’ll see what happens in the retrial!!
While I disagree, to some extent, with that he was overall smug- I 100% agree about the making faces to the jury. That’s amateur hour stuff and the judge obviously didn’t catch it, otherwise I would’ve expected a harsh and well deserved admonishment to have been handed out.
@@1Life2Live007 that “someone” would be the jury- and his smirks/playing eye-footsie with the members of the jury is obscene. That should’ve never happened and if the judge would’ve seen it (not sure how he didn’t) he should’ve harshly admonished the agent.
Something fishy with this whole Luis Rivera proffer. Not recorded every time. State made him change his story to fit the story the state needed. Several times. I’ve listened to all this over and over. His testimonies are all over the place and detective is cocky
I have watched this trial for like a 100 hours and the case against Katie Magbanua has a million holes and inconsistencies. As one little example it is very easy for a Bottle girl/Barmaid to pocket over $1K/shift at this club. That tip check that bounced is a creditcard transaction commission only! The wiretaps show repeatedly that she is CLUELESS (at the time) Charlie was involved in homicide and ANY club girl in Miami dating a L.K associate is absolutely going to talk in code on telephone about even the temperature outside! Everything in every convo showed clearly her anger and belief was some punk punk doing extortion and MULTIPLE times she told the dentist to call the cops on the situation. The girl is being framed to force her to testify against something she wasnt aware of "at the time". And now she is confirming her belief the dentist did it in open court? This smells REAL bad. On top of it she is supposedly showing the WHOLE jail population her boobs and proclaiming that the "murder" paid for them? NO Way. This is for sure FRAME-UP. 100%
😂🤣💀 Katherine is the most obvious one she should’ve just plead and not went to trial with all the evidence they have against her...She would’ve easily gotten an offer for her to just flip and serve a lower sentence so she can, hopefully, one day, see her kids again...Bro, u must be friends with Katie if u’ve watched so much of this case and can’t see that Katie & Charlie are the easiest to convict in this carnival of a trial!!!! These lawyers are idiots!
@@kccourt6910 1. I think that retrial will prove Rivera’s claims about Katie was coerced perjury. 2. Phone convos/ records withheld by the prosecution will exonerate Katie. 3. The cash she came into will be shown to truly come from stashed away under the table bottle service tips.
@@kccourt6910 I have watched every video and study every aspect of this case including new evidence that will be introduced on retrial and most importantly critical information that the prosecution failed to submit to the defense that will all but clear Katie. With that said you will be very surprised that your prejudice in this case will end up in shambles. You should really focus your concern about who is NOT being prosecuted and why. The prosecution gambled that Katie was somehow involved, flipped the shooter in an effort to deal in Katie to give up Charlie but that was a bet really gone wrong. She had no evidence/proof/knowledge to do the deal.
Wow, this FBI guy is lame. Can’t even remember how many times the UC was called?! He doesn’t seem to remember or to know much of anything about his case. He is a really “special” agent.
Dawn Bird remeber this case was 5yrs ago a human brain 🧠 can only remember certain things not all. They have other cases they working on so remember all cases is not something people are good at.
@@cindydalton9608 they do when they are under oath in a court proceeding. An interrogation is different (when they are the interrogator), but when they testify in court under oath, they have to tell the truth. The judge decides what the defense and prosecution are allowed to ask a witness, but once asked, they have to tell the truth. If one of the attorneys asks something outside of what’s been agreed to or ordered by the court, they can object to the question.
Very impressive testimony by Case Agent Patrick Sanford.
He recorded those previous meetings, or notes were taken. He’s a liar.
He's brilliant, I could listen to him everyday.
He's very cool under pressure
I could’ve listened to the special agent all day. He was on his toes, well prepared, and didn’t allow the defense attorney to bully him.
Have you been watching the same trial bc this investigator as been ripped bits unless your a lover of the police this cop is filthy the poor girl is innocent
@@seriouslyitslegit3753 you must not have seen the re-trial because, spoiler alert, baby girl was found guilty. As a matter of fact, I am a “lover” of the police, but more importantly, I’m a lover of justice.
@@michellededmon6711 A guilty verdict does not always mean justice was done. It does, of course, show the jury was in agreement and that this is our jury system and any lawyer will tell you that it doesn’t always work but works most times. I don’t think KM should have been found guilty in the second trial bc I didn’t see proof above and beyond reasonable doubt.
@@seriouslyitslegit3753 “ripped to bits”......? Can you expand on that analysis?
@@eileenie3101 She is definitely guilty, she is the middle man (woman), without her the two that did the job didn’t even know the victim
The civil trial is going to be a no brainer. The Adelsons are toast!
Charlie and his mother, Donna, but that's as far as the murder convictions are going to go. Wendi didn't know about it until after the crime occurred. She broke the law helping them cover it up. I curious to see how that will all play out. Their father also found out afterwards and didn't help authorities. If I were in that situation I certainly wouldn't help law enforcement prosecute my loved ones.
I hope so…. The wheels of justice have moved very slowly in this case but they are rolling down that hill… Wendy and Donna A. I can’t wait to watch you in your trial.
The gigs up … whole family should be in jail for life.
Great testimony. The laughing and smiling with the jury was a cherry on top. Defense wasn’t great
This defense attorney should do his homework before coming to trial or maybe go back to law school, He doesn't seem to know enough and is wasting everybody's time, and has an attitude of talking to the Spc agent as if he was wrong. Special Agent Sanford is amazing!
OMG....exactly!
That male attorney is doing way too much. "Objection, weird blinking!"
The prosecutor asks the judge for permission to approach the witness with documents, but the defense does not. He acts like he owns the courtroom. He needs an attitude adjustment.
The special agent is brilliant, cool, I keep watching this video for his accurate answers in just a word or two with a smile.Truth on his side.
Defense attorney needs to think before he speaks
FBI AGENT ROCKS... I LOVE HOW HE STAND UP TO THE BULLY LAWYER.
He lies and mislead the jury
Your a numb skull if you think this guy is legit he’s filthy he knows it an so dose the judge that’s why the judge keeps cutting the. Defence off
He's professional cool and knows his stuff & has seen & heard all the evidence. I like him.
Agent Sandford is brilliant and the way Christopher DeCoste speaks to him, Agent is always polite and professional. Nice guy. 👍
I hope to one day meet a guy half as smart as this special agent. Wow. So smart.
I'm sorry, I just love the Special FBI Agent.
Defense law very unintelligent
Boy, that Defense Attorney really "killed"(pun intended) his client's chances! He didn't ask questions! He made statements with a "Right?" at the end. It was all so confusing as he looped from statement to statement!
I concur !
The defense attorney has no communication skills.
take a shot every time the judge says 'over-ruled'
The defense lawyer yelled back at the judge and now the judge is PISSED! lol everything is 'over-ruled'
Prosecutor and agent agree that club Fate doesn’t allow employees to keep their own cash tips. That’s why I give them no credibility. If they can’t be honest about employees keeping their tips then I don’t believe anything they claim.
On credit cards no nut through the credit cards yes. Thst doesnt mean people dont keep the cash that some clients give them. These employers do get over by not letting g them know how many each gets every single time, I'm sure they kept some if that, just like the ladies and some men of course keep their cash. They do t pay these employees much, it's sometimes based in the tips. Back then I dont think they were so much register receipt tips.
Wow this Judge Takeshi no nonsence from decoste
There are a lot of questions on this case, lots of questions.....
And I think the defense asks EVERY one if them! I know they're trying their hardest to prove their clients are innocent but DANG! I've had to skip ahead a lot. I'm tired of listening to their stupid questions, worded differently.
Agent Sanford is a boss. This ain't his first rodeo.
This agent is very likable. Very smart 35:28
The defense attorney stopped a question immediately after teo coughs were heard and asked the judge for a brief moment. Was that a signal to watch about questikns involving her mother? Anyone know who did the coughing? Just wondering.
Time stamp?
@@kerrib256810.56
These defense guys are clowns. Every single sentence is reaching for straws. Useless statements. ‘ isn’t it true that Mr. Rivera mows his grass with the Snapper, 7.25 hp? ‘. I rest my case your honor
How this defense attorney is allowed to make such a fool of himself leads me to believe the Judge has tremendous patience. Agent Sanford does an amazing job in spite of this rediculous questioning throwing his theory against the wall hoping it would stick. I wouldn't hire him even for free. He railroads his own analogy of the facts. Annoying to listen to.
Yep judge Hankinson was great judge. He stopped the bs of lawyers. 😊
He didnt go to the workplace?
I / WE HAVE A NEW HERO! -- S
Defense attorney is SO BAD
That check was phony from Club Med.
Sustained.
Over ruled
I have that same drawing on my frig with a magnet from my 5 year old grand niece! 😂🤣😂
Now let's arrest Epstein's clients.
Is this defense or prosecution?
Frank Clough defense
Defense for Katherine
Katherine is aka Kattie
Judge punishment for absorb statements by defense lawyer is going to rule against him right or wrong
Judge sure likes the prosecution.
It's something wrong about this dude just evil.
Terrise Johns 💯💯👿
I can't believe that the FBI/police never searched Garcia and Rivera's apartments for that gun and just took Rivera at his word that he threw it in the lake. Why would he show them where the gun actually was and make the case against him even stronger?
they spend probably tens of thousands of dolllars on this elaborate sting operation.... and then THREE OUT OF FOUR TIMES the target suspects call the undercover number NOBODY PICKS UP THE PHONE. the recordings of those conversations would have made their case. for all the time and money spent, this investigation was seriously shoddy.
artnixie yes yes yes! I thought about that too! Like y’all set up all this crap and number and when the people call the damn phone y’all don’t even answer..!? Why!? But then they set up the voicemail.... SO I then thought well maybe they the cops could get into trouble some how some way if to much was said or something idk. Something is up with that.
The guy that did answer the one time was straight amateur.
@@caps201 true. he put on a fake tough guy accent after a couple of sentences. he says TO THE DENTIST "I talked to the dentist...who is this?"
No one TRIED to call them except Charlie. They lied about calling "Sandy"
@@marshapieroni6677 exactly. Kate lied to charlie multiple times about calling the number because she was, im assuming, scared to dial it.
Over ruled
This Christopher decass tried to falsely fail the detective...nice try
Lady of justice tipped way to much on the prosecution side. Don't even J walk in Tallahassee
Definitely loving the defense attorney. He's the type you want if you're in trouble. If she's convicted he'll have several points for appeal due to some of the judges rulings. Very interesting trial
Totally 100% agree with you this cop is filthy and this judge is filthy as well
Thank you for pointing out the obvious!! So many people have said this judge and the prosecution is great….I couldn’t disagree more! The judge is SO BIASED it’s unreal!! 😤. It’s like people are watching a totally different trial!! Every time the defense objects, the judge overrules and when the prosecution objects, surprise…surprise, the judge sustains the ruling! This is SO frustrating!! The one thing that gives me a little peace is that at least this trial ends in a mistrial…we’ll see what happens in the retrial!!
In 2023 you will see how wrong you are.
Funny on redirect he remembers all kinds of stuff but on cross he can't remember his own name
The prosecution is way to wishy washy and so is the Judge. The defense is wonderful but f up by corruption
Agent Sanford fails to understand how mentioning Katie and Sigfredo completely corrupted the bump
This judge is so bias against the defense
Yeah cause they are tools
@@2legit2Kwit…LOL
My goodness this agent is smug as hell. Jump to conclusions much? He needs to be reprimanded for making faces at the jury...
the haglin 💯💯💯AMEN!!!!! He is REPULSIVE POS!!!🤬😡
While I disagree, to some extent, with that he was overall smug- I 100% agree about the making faces to the jury. That’s amateur hour stuff and the judge obviously didn’t catch it, otherwise I would’ve expected a harsh and well deserved admonishment to have been handed out.
This man, is constantly smirking . What a slimy creep he is !!!!!!
He's FBI, so...
He thinks he's all that and a bag of chips.
@@Patricia-kb5qv I guess I'm in the minority here.... I be think he's pretty hot. And I love his smugness. LOL
He’s communicating with someone sitting to his left. That’s why..
@@1Life2Live007 that “someone” would be the jury- and his smirks/playing eye-footsie with the members of the jury is obscene. That should’ve never happened and if the judge would’ve seen it (not sure how he didn’t) he should’ve harshly admonished the agent.
Something fishy with this whole Luis Rivera proffer. Not recorded every time. State made him change his story to fit the story the state needed. Several times. I’ve listened to all this over and over. His testimonies are all over the place and detective is cocky
I have watched this trial for like a 100 hours and the case against Katie Magbanua has a million holes and inconsistencies. As one little example it is very easy for a Bottle girl/Barmaid to pocket over $1K/shift at this club. That tip check that bounced is a creditcard transaction commission only! The wiretaps show repeatedly that she is CLUELESS (at the time) Charlie was involved in homicide and ANY club girl in Miami dating a L.K associate is absolutely going to talk in code on telephone about even the temperature outside! Everything in every convo showed clearly her anger and belief was some punk punk doing extortion and MULTIPLE times she told the dentist to call the cops on the situation. The girl is being framed to force her to testify against something she wasnt aware of "at the time". And now she is confirming her belief the dentist did it in open court? This smells REAL bad. On top of it she is supposedly showing the WHOLE jail population her boobs and proclaiming that the "murder" paid for them? NO Way. This is for sure FRAME-UP. 100%
😂🤣💀 Katherine is the most obvious one she should’ve just plead and not went to trial with all the evidence they have against her...She would’ve easily gotten an offer for her to just flip and serve a lower sentence so she can, hopefully, one day, see her kids again...Bro, u must be friends with Katie if u’ve watched so much of this case and can’t see that Katie & Charlie are the easiest to convict in this carnival of a trial!!!! These lawyers are idiots!
@Charles X Right?! 😂
@@kccourt6910 1. I think that retrial will prove Rivera’s claims about Katie was coerced perjury. 2. Phone convos/ records withheld by the prosecution will exonerate Katie. 3. The cash she came into will be shown to truly come from stashed away under the table bottle service tips.
@@mpantony9684 hahaha welp, that’ll be a true miracle for her but it’s not at all likely....Have u watched all the videos of the wire taps yet??
@@kccourt6910 I have watched every video and study every aspect of this case including new evidence that will be introduced on retrial and most importantly critical information that the prosecution failed to submit to the defense that will all but clear Katie. With that said you will be very surprised that your prejudice in this case will end up in shambles. You should really focus your concern about who is NOT being prosecuted and why. The prosecution gambled that Katie was somehow involved, flipped the shooter in an effort to deal in Katie to give up Charlie but that was a bet really gone wrong. She had no evidence/proof/knowledge to do the deal.
Wow, this FBI guy is lame. Can’t even remember how many times the UC was called?! He doesn’t seem to remember or to know much of anything about his case. He is a really “special” agent.
Dawn Bird remeber this case was 5yrs ago a human brain 🧠 can only remember certain things not all. They have other cases they working on so remember all cases is not something people are good at.
Hell I’d be surprised if anybody can remember everything, every single detail that happened 5years ago...
@@luisbaez7180 his memory is selective
Fbi doesn't have to legally say all of there evidence.
@@cindydalton9608 they do when they are under oath in a court proceeding. An interrogation is different (when they are the interrogator), but when they testify in court under oath, they have to tell the truth. The judge decides what the defense and prosecution are allowed to ask a witness, but once asked, they have to tell the truth. If one of the attorneys asks something outside of what’s been agreed to or ordered by the court, they can object to the question.
Judges voice is so awful no wonder that juror was sick he’s making me feel sick too what’s up with him he must be single
He had Parkinson’s. He was married. He passed away.
Silly immature comment.