China's Catastrophic Oil & Gas Problem

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11 тис.

  • @PhilHug1
    @PhilHug1 2 роки тому +9593

    Good to see people talking about China's weaknesses instead of seeing them as a unstoppable force

    • @donnmckee4973
      @donnmckee4973 2 роки тому +748

      Except it's not much of a weakness. Especially now with Russia providing them discounted oil and gas. They were already building up the infrastructure so in a couple years this will no longer be a "weakness".
      Edit: the original comment was made less than 10 minutes after the release of the video and @Phillip wouldn't of had a clue the video included war scenarios so I'm responding to their comment as such.
      Edit:Edit: Disregard everything above. I made the comment quickly and without fully thinking it though. My apologies to everyone. Sorry @Phillip

    • @lazyboy8886
      @lazyboy8886 2 роки тому +50

      have you watched fox videos?

    • @u2beuser714
      @u2beuser714 2 роки тому

      Literally nobody considers them as "unstoppable force"
      Military ? "They have no experience , copy paste army"
      Economics? "Ponzi scheme"
      Innovation? "They only copy"
      Population? "Huge demographic crisis on the way"

    • @PhilHug1
      @PhilHug1 2 роки тому +675

      @@donnmckee4973 hundreds of miles of pipeline? In the event of war, sounds extremely vulnerable to outright attack or sabotage

    • @r.casagrande8689
      @r.casagrande8689 2 роки тому +316

      U see chinese products quality and you know their overall quality. They are far behind us.

  • @brunobernardicoutinho1741
    @brunobernardicoutinho1741 2 роки тому +2246

    My dude, this was simply amazing. Honestly. What unbelievable effort. The fact that this is free to watch is a blessing. The details, the narration, the illustrations, the sheer documentary-level quality of your content. That was astonishing. Congratulations and please, oh please, keep them coming.

    • @jonb3150
      @jonb3150 2 роки тому

      The video was ok, a bit over dramatic to be honest. But man, the way the guy speaks is unbearable. Why does he feel like he needs to narrate the video in a way that would make sense if retarded people or kids were watching.

    • @0v3r666
      @0v3r666 2 роки тому +15

      I mean they get paid, if they weren’t getting ad revenue you wouldn’t see this on UA-cam.

    • @bigbrainb-ryan
      @bigbrainb-ryan 2 роки тому +8

      Hell of a way to try get 👍. Anyone need tips on how to brown nose, ask Bruno.

    • @rogerbritus9378
      @rogerbritus9378 2 роки тому +31

      @@bigbrainb-ryan How much are you being paid by the Chinese to denigrate this effort? Or are you simply jealous of the view count this video has gotten (almost 2 million in a couple of days)?

    • @angryalientv4964
      @angryalientv4964 2 роки тому +3

      @@bigbrainb-ryan 😂

  • @wafiqal4818
    @wafiqal4818 2 роки тому +1446

    As a Malaysian, it is common to know that the Strait of Malacca has been one of the most strategic route since the Malacca Sultanate, but knowing China heavily rely on this route to import LNG really blows my mind, I just found out this today

    • @D3SUPREMACY
      @D3SUPREMACY 2 роки тому +51

      It always been. Portuguese control it for a long time. Demak Empire (Java) under Adipati Unus try to take it twice but sadly they got defeated by the Portugese.

    • @danielcobbins9050
      @danielcobbins9050 2 роки тому +36

      I don't see why China and Japan can't get their oil from Indonesia. Japan invaded Indonesia in 1942, for that very reason.

    • @wafiqal4818
      @wafiqal4818 2 роки тому +52

      @@danielcobbins9050 the bigger question is, why they dont get it from Russia? They are allies right but still wanna import from Middle East

    • @_helmi
      @_helmi 2 роки тому +54

      @@wafiqal4818 partly because Malaysia/Singapore are also part of the supply chain - crude oil from Middle East, refine in SE Asia then export to China/Japan. of course, many other factors are at play here.

    • @wafiqal4818
      @wafiqal4818 2 роки тому +30

      @Mk 🇷🇺 yeah its american propaganda ? Well same thing can be said with your statement, its just the Russian/Chinese propaganda right?

  • @PLPCPLAPD
    @PLPCPLAPD 2 роки тому +342

    Well, my head hurts a bit from all this information, but damn this was an illuminating video on the intricacies of Chinese energy strategies.

    • @EllissDee4you4me
      @EllissDee4you4me 2 роки тому +13

      In time, you not only get used to that headache but you also crave more head splitting reality. Learn as much as you can, and expand your understanding of what is actually going on in the world. It’s the greatest pastime.

    • @PLPCPLAPD
      @PLPCPLAPD 2 роки тому +3

      @@EllissDee4you4me Indeed it is, I'm autistic and I have ADHD so learning about reality is not an option but a prerequisite for my well-being. The headaches I get from not understanding are far worse than the headaches from learning complex phenomenon :)

    • @douwesteen
      @douwesteen 2 роки тому

      Expanding the military until the country get bankrupt. Doomsday is coming

    • @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368
      @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 2 роки тому

      Not really a 'strategy' to say "ALL DIS BELONG ME NOW"

    • @HuyV
      @HuyV Рік тому +1

      My head hurts from the unprecedented usage of superlatives in all his videos 😆

  • @ck4797
    @ck4797 2 роки тому +2210

    If this form and presentation was available during my high school days, learning new things would have been easier.

    • @necroflounder
      @necroflounder 2 роки тому

      Learning regime propaganda? What "Holocaust" increases the population of said target? Neocons instigated 1 war, now they want a second, if you want to learn something, understand Project Mocking Bird is more effective in the UA-cam era than it ever was in the past.

    • @MbisonBalrog
      @MbisonBalrog 2 роки тому +5

      The vid is bogus. An extra few days around Oz or NZ should not matter

    • @hipotalamus
      @hipotalamus 2 роки тому +5

      @@MbisonBalrog considering they are at least neutral

    • @omniyambot9876
      @omniyambot9876 2 роки тому +33

      I like his videos. But reading books is absolute more efficient. The information is so dense.

    • @renaldiroekanto789
      @renaldiroekanto789 2 роки тому +3

      imagine the teacher just reading the book, while we all just want to go home and read it(potentially) there!

  • @luxuryhub1323
    @luxuryhub1323 2 роки тому +2539

    This production deserves to be longer . Everything was super detailed, educative and informative Thanks for this

    • @iwantgoals1566
      @iwantgoals1566 2 роки тому +19

      Always so nice I end up watching it twice.

    • @LavaCreeperPeople
      @LavaCreeperPeople 2 роки тому

      good, now the CCP will die faster than it already is

    • @soundscape26
      @soundscape26 2 роки тому +49

      Longer? It's almost 40 minutes.

    • @sanriosonderweg
      @sanriosonderweg 2 роки тому

      Why, look at what is going on, these channels are just banging the drums of war the regime is instigating.

    • @carterskindle7086
      @carterskindle7086 2 роки тому +42

      I disagree. 40 minutes is perfect.

  • @kevinm.5939
    @kevinm.5939 2 роки тому +2079

    I was active in the US Navy between 2011-2017, and did 2 deployments in amphibious fleets acting within the 5th fleet (Middle East) and 7th fleet (Pacific) in 2013 and 2016. We had to act as "presence of force" in the South China Sea during both deployments as we crossed through 7th fleet, and moored in multiple ports of the surrounding states. China always has multiple subs and spy planes following our fleets to act as bravado, but it's crazy how easily we could blockade China from our positions all throughout Southeast Asia, while the US literally sits on the complete other side of the world.

    • @sleepyjoe4529
      @sleepyjoe4529 2 роки тому +2

      That's why I dont blame them for taking up positions in the SCS, they know that Americans wants to keep them down. This is also why they have hypersonics ready to go in the SCS incase America gets uppity.

    • @Kunumbah1
      @Kunumbah1 2 роки тому

      A conventional war between the US and China would be the greatest loss of human life in the history of mankind and 95% of that would be Chinese.

    • @spicychad55
      @spicychad55 2 роки тому

      China would definitely lose a war with the US!

    • @kevinm.5939
      @kevinm.5939 2 роки тому +97

      @@sleepyjoe4529 Except that pendulum swings both ways. China's also attempting to "keep down" It's surrounding neighbors through influence of force and expansion. While the matter of arguing who's in the right is subjective, it seems that the US, it allies, and China's neighboring states are objectively viewed as more favorable in virtue in their defense against Chinese expansion than China's demands for control of the South China Sea.

    • @danielgarciainfante4138
      @danielgarciainfante4138 2 роки тому +57

      In part its true, China is vulnerable if they suffer a blockade, but the chinese goverment control a big part of mundial economy, and the key fact, the public debt. Probably the blockade of China is not a feasable option for the United States.

  • @PaulGuy
    @PaulGuy 2 роки тому +767

    Someone finally thought of the smaller US carriers. Most of the time, people only mention the supercarriers, but forget about the "helicopter" carriers, all of which either currently can or could easily be modified to carry Harriers and/or the F-35.

    • @Poctyk
      @Poctyk 2 роки тому +8

      US doesn't need to modify anything.

    • @RJT80
      @RJT80 2 роки тому +62

      The USMC specifically has been well ahead of the curve. They've been moving back to their roots for several years now and have been toying around with some next level stuff. A lot of the drone use we're seeing in Ukraine has already been tested by Marines going back several years. They are increasing the size of the fireteam to make use of these small surveillance drones that can also pack a top down punch using remote grenades. They want close air support on multiple scales. Keep in mind it was the USMC that first experimented with close air support in WW1. So now an assistant squad leader will help with mission critical and future cyber warfare capabilities on the squad leaders right shoulder, and a dedicated drone operator with 40mm remote grenades and likely other portable suicide drones on the squad leaders left shoulder. Every single squad will have the new Carl Gustaf. That's a lot of punch. Bye bye light machine gun. Every Marine sans the Gustaf gunner has the ability to lay down suppressing fire with the M27. They not only ditched their tanks but are also in the process of ditching most tubed artillery in favor of HIMARS which they proved can be fired from moving ships. Also eyeing the ballistic missiles in a shipping container concept. They are restructuring for island fights in a major way and with some serious ingenuity.

    • @danthemansmail
      @danthemansmail 2 роки тому

      Harriers are no more. F35s suck. Try again.

    • @alanlight7740
      @alanlight7740 2 роки тому +46

      @@RJT80 - speaking of island fights, the U.S. has the only military in the world with a history of serious island hopping capability. While the Japanese occupied many islands it was seldom in the face of more than token resistance - and besides, those who got island experience were almost entirely annihilated by the U.S. in the course of the war.
      When I was a kid I read a bunch of books about that campaign that had been written by veterans with young readers in mind, and the ingenuity of American soldiers was amazing. In many cases they simply built the equipment they needed for a particular landing when the need arose, in theatre.

    • @spacecraftcarrier4135
      @spacecraftcarrier4135 2 роки тому +17

      Technically if one thinks of aircraft carriers as being able to host fighter jets instead of just helicopters, then yea, the smaller LHA & LHDs of the US Navy counts.
      And recently the US Navy managed to bolster their arsenal further by successfully testing out the conversion of their 2 America-class LHAs, USS America & USS Tripoli, into being able to host 20 F-35Bs. So now the number of US carriers that can send F-35 jets into combat have increased from 11 to 13, without even building any new carrier.
      And the number of those LHAs will gradually increase overtime.
      Another thing this video didn't mention is Japan's Navy ("Self-Defense Force"). The Japanese are now even converting their 2 largest helicopter carriers into aircraft carriers to also being able to host and operate F-35Bs, and additionally the Japanese Navy has about as many destroyers, frigates and submarines as the Royal Navy & French Navy combined. All of Japan's naval assets will definitely be in full support of the US Navy in the event of war with China and their misguided fantasies of invading Taiwan.

  • @SAA91DK
    @SAA91DK 2 роки тому +720

    your videos become more like a documentary episode of around 40 min each rather than a UA-cam video. Good work

    • @raifikarj6698
      @raifikarj6698 2 роки тому +15

      Because currently youtube algorithm reward Watch time than view count so expect a longer video format than usual 10 minutes de facto format that persist since 2014. So youtuber either make 1 minute interesting video for gain subscriber but shit pay or longer video.

    • @Homer-OJ-Simpson
      @Homer-OJ-Simpson 2 роки тому +10

      @@raifikarj6698 I would think 2 parts would be better for the algorithm. It's also harder to get people to watch 40min YT videos but I'm guessing they are sacrificing some potential financial earrings in order to produce more quality content which can be considered better in the long run.
      Most of these similar youtube channels seem to stick to 15-25min. I believe even RLL use to do that until recently.

    • @soundscape26
      @soundscape26 2 роки тому +3

      @@raifikarj6698 40 minutes is way too long for a video on this topic... most people see the total duration and click away. With a better script this could've been a 20-minute one.

    • @ducko-chan6285
      @ducko-chan6285 2 роки тому

      @Mela (AMAZING CONTENT) no you're not

    • @shivpatel5413
      @shivpatel5413 2 роки тому

      @@Homer-OJ-Simpson so what bro, you can always speed up the video itself, PLUS it’s always been like that ever since a couple of years ago; also I’m not sure what your fussing & hates all about bro! F u bro !

  • @ojas8578
    @ojas8578 2 роки тому +1030

    That strait is the reason why India has so much potential and is looking to upgrade the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

    • @u2beuser714
      @u2beuser714 2 роки тому

      India will be isolated by the west for its stance on russia ukraine war.India , in essence, isnt a western friendly by any stretch of the imagination

    • @bharatigawde8112
      @bharatigawde8112 2 роки тому +34

      Surrender modi 🤡

    • @SherlockHolmes-rl1lg
      @SherlockHolmes-rl1lg 2 роки тому +33

      What about indigenous people of Nicobar Andaman and rare plants and animals

    • @PutXi_Whipped
      @PutXi_Whipped 2 роки тому +1

      India is a failed state. There is not once city in India that is as clean or as magnificent as a Tier 4 city in China. Not one.

    • @rohan14040
      @rohan14040 2 роки тому

      @@SherlockHolmes-rl1lg fuck environment,at the end the thing which matters is economic prosperity.

  • @jasonhott1678
    @jasonhott1678 Рік тому

    Thanks!

  • @RealTragoe2
    @RealTragoe2 2 роки тому +655

    A 40 minute video from RealLifeLore? HELL YEAH!!

    • @AzoreanEye
      @AzoreanEye 2 роки тому +1

      Yaaa and every second is precious with this guy

    • @memorymeme51
      @memorymeme51 2 роки тому +4

      @Mela (AMAZING CONTENT) Prove it

    • @tamimatharemadi
      @tamimatharemadi 2 роки тому +2

      @Mela (AMAZING CONTENT) then prove it by releasing videos on nubula

    • @soundscape26
      @soundscape26 2 роки тому +8

      You guys are replying to a bot... LOL

    • @LavaCreeperPeople
      @LavaCreeperPeople 2 роки тому

      good, now the CCP will die faster than it already is

  • @Tarkov.
    @Tarkov. 2 роки тому +1857

    When you first said "12 mile zones" and then showed the economic zones, hoo boy I got really confused thinking the south china sea was much smaller than I ever imagined.

    • @mineking2302
      @mineking2302 2 роки тому

      @Mela (AMAZING CONTENT) not true shut up bot

    • @mineking2302
      @mineking2302 2 роки тому +81

      +ratio

    • @BRad-cq9px
      @BRad-cq9px 2 роки тому +179

      @Mela (AMAZING CONTENT) If you really were better, you wouldn’t be begging for subs in his comment section

    • @therealmistermemer
      @therealmistermemer 2 роки тому +67

      @@BRad-cq9px It's a bot, ignore it.

    • @ericmcguire9573
      @ericmcguire9573 2 роки тому +35

      The economic exclusion zone is 200 nautical miles.

  • @theentitledsiriowlsx
    @theentitledsiriowlsx 2 роки тому +85

    I'm sorry to say this but my Malaysian friend told me that Malaysia and Brunei overlapped EEZ claims that were settled decades ago. He says to me that, Brunei agree to recognise the Limbang district in Sarawak to be part of Malaysia in exchange for Malaysia recognising Bruneian EEZ claim.

    • @xfrombfb9109
      @xfrombfb9109 2 роки тому +3

      Oh interesting

    • @MrPaxio
      @MrPaxio 2 роки тому +3

      yeah... i keep wondering where he finds all these details and exact numbers or percentages, meanwhile i cant even find any statistics about violent crime in Japan other than literally one that shows favorable gun crime.

    • @benjaminpolitics
      @benjaminpolitics 2 роки тому +6

      @@MrPaxio A lot of his content is sadly really misinformed, he literally made an episode on his streaming service where he literally forgot to say that the reeducation camps in xingjiang were abolished at the end of 2019, he also forgot to say it in this video. sometimes it seems he lies just to make the west seem more correct then the east...

    • @AhmadAliff
      @AhmadAliff 2 роки тому +1

      Malaysian here - that was done during the time of Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi, when the Malaysian government ceded some of the oil wells in Malaysian EEZ to Brunei, so the Brunei will recognise Limbang as Malaysian. For non-Malaysians, Limbang is an exclave outside Sarawak (Malaysia)-Brunei border. The people of Limbang had to cross the Brunei border to get to the other side of Malaysia; the other possible way is through the jungle. However, as a plot twist - from what I have read - Brunei did not explicitly recognise Limbang as Malaysian despite these exchange. Nevertheless, Malaysia and Brunei still have a very cordial relationship.

    • @huangec
      @huangec 2 роки тому

      @@benjaminpolitics what I really cannot understand is how the critical importance of Xinjiang can inexplicably become the reason for a supposed genocide of Uyghurs. Shouldn't be an incentive to treat them well instead? What he says about this issue makes no sense to me.

  • @nicocorbo4153
    @nicocorbo4153 2 роки тому +3

    thank you for creating such a comprehensive geopolitical video with great graphics. additional support for shedding light on the Uyghur genocide

  • @MadPutz
    @MadPutz 2 роки тому +526

    The Japanese Empire had a shortage of oil as well and sanctions. The reason for the attack on Pearl Harbor was a pre-emptive knockout of the Pacific response fleet because they needed to conquer specific Australian and other south east asian territories that refined oil.

    • @matimi0sbackflip455
      @matimi0sbackflip455 2 роки тому +43

      And they lost

    • @K3V1N117
      @K3V1N117 2 роки тому +40

      And as far as I can recall, they failed primarily because they did not get the fuel depot was at Pearl Harbor and none of our carriers were hit there.

    • @damiion666
      @damiion666 2 роки тому +36

      @@K3V1N117 even if they hit our existing carriers at pearl, we would have produced replacements and then some within a couple of months.

    • @DSTKO-w7z
      @DSTKO-w7z 2 роки тому +71

      @@damiion666 Most likely it would have hamstrung US capability in the early part of the Pacific war and would have made early retaliatory strikes like the Doolittle raid impossible but yes Japan would still have lost. It would have just prolonged the inevitable.

    • @Sentient.A.I.
      @Sentient.A.I. 2 роки тому +15

      I mean those nukes kinda just shut the whole japan thing down over night.

  • @aspect795
    @aspect795 2 роки тому +489

    The fact that a this is free to watch for anyone is honestly amazing. Such high quality content.

    • @KadeemFucks
      @KadeemFucks 2 роки тому +2

      @Mela (AMAZING CONTENT) Reported IP

    • @Very_Grumpy_Cat
      @Very_Grumpy_Cat 2 роки тому +2

      @@KadeemFucks bot?

    • @KadeemFucks
      @KadeemFucks 2 роки тому +8

      @@Very_Grumpy_Cat Yes

    • @CockpitScenes
      @CockpitScenes 2 роки тому +5

      Except it is mostly BS.

    • @Very_Grumpy_Cat
      @Very_Grumpy_Cat 2 роки тому +3

      @@CockpitScenes I washed a video from Drea and every like EVERY single comment on the video had a comment saying they have won a ps5

  • @Warpcaller
    @Warpcaller 2 роки тому +634

    The problem with all this infrastructure is that it is static and it's possition well known therefore if the conflict ever went hot, considering the US ballistic missile capabilities, I doubt it would stay intact very long

    • @danny90099
      @danny90099 2 роки тому +122

      Dont even need missle . Just paid mercenery group and give them enough c4 . Best part they cant even prove it US . Could just blame it on terrorist group

    • @LaVacheDigue
      @LaVacheDigue 2 роки тому +31

      Problem with using ballastic missile is that it could be interpeted as a nuke....

    • @haikaloronsentnel138
      @haikaloronsentnel138 2 роки тому

      IF UN!TED SNAKES THREATENS, BL0CKADE AND ATTACKS ANY CH!NA C0MMERC!AL SH!PS, TANKER 0R EVEN CH!NA PLA NAVY!!!
      CH!NA W!LL LAUNCH FULL SCALE WAR AGA!NST UN!TED SNAKES, THEY W!LL LAUNCH PREEMPT!VE STR!KE T0 ALL AMER!CA NUCLE4R M!SS!LE S!L0 AND ANN!H!LATE DESTR0Y ENT!RELY AMER!CA H0MELAND W!TH HUGE NUMBERS OF ICBM, HYPERS0N!C MISS!LE, STEALTH B0MBERS!!!
      MANY AMER!C4NS AND WESTERN3RS ST!LL TR0LL!NG N0N SENSE W!TH B!G M0UTH T0 BL0CKADE CH!NA, IT'S JUST ILLUS!0N, FABR!CATED ASSUMPT!0NS AND N0N SENSE!!!
      EVEN AMER!CA CAN'T DETER, DEFEAT 0R BLUFF!NG T4L!B4N ISLAM!C M!L!T!A GR0UPS IN 20 YEARS 0F WAR 0PERAT!0NS, N0W THEY KEEPS DREAMING T0 DETER AND DEFEAT CH!NA!!!
      IT'S THE B!GGEST J0KES 0F 21ST CENTUR!ES!!!

    • @ericsuarez834
      @ericsuarez834 2 роки тому

      They need to invade other countries and set their military bases there too right fool?

    • @mrsam0496
      @mrsam0496 2 роки тому +16

      @@danny90099 So Tom Clancy huh🤣🤣😍

  • @dajosh42069
    @dajosh42069 2 роки тому +31

    The Modern Conflicts series is legit amazing... If i hadn't signed up for the Curiosity stream + Nebula deal through "History Buffs", it 100% would have been through you. Thank you for your videos dude, they're really amazing.

    • @zengmaxxing
      @zengmaxxing 2 роки тому

      It’s just straight up propaganda. You might as well save your money and just watch CNN or any other mainstream corporate media. You’ll get the same elitist narrative.

    • @dajosh42069
      @dajosh42069 2 роки тому +1

      @Mk 🇷🇺 And you're basing this opinion on....??
      Given your reaction, I'm going to presume you haven't watched the series. And if you haven't seen it, how can you accurately critique it?
      The series doesn't shy away from telling of American involvement, or wrong-doing, when it's there, or it's what happened.
      I, however, get the sense that, if it's not Russian-positive, Putin propaganda, then you're probably going to disregard it as; "American propaganda". Though, please correct me if I'm wrong in assuming that about you..!

  • @idkman1442
    @idkman1442 2 роки тому +455

    It's honestly really really impressive how this channel produces such high quality content! Keep it up!!

    • @nixxxon18
      @nixxxon18 2 роки тому +8

      It still needs a proper voice that doesnt sound over enthusiastic

    • @mutualdelusion1798
      @mutualdelusion1798 2 роки тому

      Andaman & Nicobar islands are integral part of Bangladesh which is currently iIIegaIIy occupied by colonial indiaa. Bangladesh claims & demands immediate cessation of all kind of iIIegaII occupation both military & civilian of colonial india & immediate withdrawal of hostile military personal & non Bangladeshi citizens of those claimed territories of Bangladesh according to the UN charter Article 2(7)C. Any person who is Bangladeshi citizen or assumed of being Bangladeshi citizen or being loyal to Bangladesh Constitution abide by Article 3(a)2.5V People's Republic Of Bangladesh shall be deemed as Bangladeshi citizen & should be excluded from the UN charter Article 2(7)C & should be obliged by Bangladesh interest & Law & should cooperate with & aligned with the interest of People's Republic of Bangladesh by taking Oath should be subject to general amnesty. Thank you. BANGLADESH ZINDABAD.

    • @SaretGnasoh
      @SaretGnasoh 2 роки тому +2

      lol yes, high quality murica propaganda.

    • @anypercentdeathless
      @anypercentdeathless 2 роки тому +4

      @Linus 67 "Western"? You keep yourself back with this simple way of thinking.

    • @ericsuarez834
      @ericsuarez834 2 роки тому +4

      It's propaganda, it's has very high people paying for it

  • @j2174
    @j2174 2 роки тому +446

    Malaysia's and Brunei's claims seem the most re seasonable. Obviously they have to work out the overlap that sticks out from Brunei. Give Brunei a bit more fishing area to let Malaysia travel through freely? Vietnam's needs about half cut off from it on the outer parts. And same with the Philippines. Obviously China is nuts.

    • @Spacemongerr
      @Spacemongerr 2 роки тому +95

      Nuts is correct, China is in fact the biggest producer of both walnuts and peanuts

    • @abcddef2112
      @abcddef2112 2 роки тому +31

      That is because they are claiming as 'islands' which extend its reach. However many of these were not islands but shoals and reefs sometimes submerged and obviously inhabited. China though just dredge and reclaim to make them to islands.

    • @vaiyo5117
      @vaiyo5117 2 роки тому +11

      美国最疯,世界警察?😅

    • @范范小帅
      @范范小帅 2 роки тому +1

      😅😅😅

    • @adex7038
      @adex7038 2 роки тому +17

      actually the reason the Vietnamese claims are so vast are due to our millennium long occupation of both the paracel isles and the spratley isles which could go back to upwards of hundreds up to a thousand years in which we were the first and practically only populated integrity of the area, our Fishermans fished there for years and throughout the ages we claimed those isles as part of our civil ruling, until in recent times that is when China, the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei started expanding as well and asserting their claims, relative to them, we have proper documentations from ancient times of when we were first there and were recognized to be apart of our nation by the olden French Empire, the Qing Dynasty and the other powers within the region at the time, now China is claiming they were there first, illegally killing our soldiers stationed there in 79' and has been reasserting themselves ever since.

  • @therichinchins
    @therichinchins 2 роки тому

    Thanks

  • @markadams4593
    @markadams4593 2 роки тому +566

    I might note that the "northern passage" route you describe goes right by Alaska. Yes the gap is a lot wider than 1.5 miles but radar sees a long ways and giant tankers and container ships aren't at all stealthy. If the US was blockading Malacca it wouldn't give ships trying to avoid the blockade by way of Alaska a free pass.

    • @lomiification
      @lomiification 2 роки тому +31

      Russian waters are also right there. Is the us going to risk nuclear war over trade in the Arctic?

    • @markadams4593
      @markadams4593 2 роки тому

      @@lomiification When we are already risking nuclear war by blockading Malacca? Why not? By definition if we are blockading Malacca we either at or willing to be at war with China and it's friends. Hostilities are already happening.

    • @ryanblanch2764
      @ryanblanch2764 2 роки тому +89

      @@lomiification Is Russia going to risk that? You have to keep in mind that Mutually Assured Destruction is still a thing. There is no Nuclear war, only global destruction. It would be ridiculous to suggest one side is risking something that the other isn’t.

    • @peaceraybob
      @peaceraybob 2 роки тому +50

      He also completely ignores that ice isn't the only problem, shallow waters and a lack of decent harbours are also driving forces here. Having to use mini-tankers to load from shore pipelines and then rendezvous with proper mega-tankers AT SEA to cross-load, generates problems that this kind of wishful thinking simply leap-frog. Especially, as you've noted, trying to do so almost literally in sight of a US coastline. Sigh.

    • @Knight3434
      @Knight3434 2 роки тому +12

      Was going to say the same thing. US won’t allow that passage, obviously.

  • @nunyabusiness4752
    @nunyabusiness4752 2 роки тому +36

    To be honest, he also should’ve mentioned the Andaman and Nicobar islands (India) which are close to the malacca trait. Since India is a QUAD ally that has bases there, it’s conceivable that they could move to seize it before the Chinese and then wait for the US Navy to join in from their Diego Garcia base. China is already heavily militarising its land borders with India. I don’t like to think about it, but this whole situation involving at least 3 nuclear powers gives me the shivers

    • @aryanyadav3690
      @aryanyadav3690 2 роки тому +8

      He usually makes USA vs China
      He doesn't know about the cold war between India & China happening in Asia

    • @tedkaczynskiamericanhero3916
      @tedkaczynskiamericanhero3916 2 роки тому

      I'm hoping for a nuclear winter to cut down this population size!

  • @MichaelDouglas-24
    @MichaelDouglas-24 2 роки тому +283

    Absolutely LOVE this channel and the effort put into making every video intriguing and factually based rather than misinformed opinions

    • @mitachi9033
      @mitachi9033 2 роки тому +1

      Most UA-cam channels: Let's throw random opinions put there for fun!
      RealLifeLore: Time to research developing problems in the world! There is a need to know!
      Yep. I love this channel too.

    • @lyricofwise6894
      @lyricofwise6894 2 роки тому +2

      LMFAO all of his vids are FACTUALLY BASED, no misinformation at all!!!

    • @charlesmann7059
      @charlesmann7059 Рік тому

      P

    • @anthonymort5202
      @anthonymort5202 Рік тому

      It's amazing that people are still just now finding this channel. I love that it's expanding. I've been watching this channel for at least four or five years

  • @maxwellmuehleip4919
    @maxwellmuehleip4919 2 роки тому +10

    Always impressed with the quality of the visual aids, this is the most amazing channel on UA-cam.

  • @slidebean
    @slidebean 2 роки тому +262

    Fantastic video, narration, research, and story.
    Felt like 15 minutes.
    - Caya

    • @ellashy6539
      @ellashy6539 2 роки тому

      its obviously such a shortsighted video actually you believe in this CIA paid channel? lol

    • @ugurc
      @ugurc 2 роки тому +1

      Maybe you’ve seen it in ~2x?

    • @atharva_raje
      @atharva_raje 2 роки тому +3

      Ay yo slidebean!!!??? Wtf 😳

    • @ruoyuli4091
      @ruoyuli4091 2 роки тому

      lol this video is full of bullshit! china's inflation is 2 percent because it locked in deal with Russia and Iran and other middle eastern countries.

    • @vinvin1082
      @vinvin1082 2 роки тому

      Everything seemed good until he claimed China commits the genocide killing millions of Uyghurs LOL This channel is not so much different to The US's mainstream media smh

  • @infidelheretic923
    @infidelheretic923 2 роки тому +237

    The fact that nations can imagine new shipping routs for LNG after the ice caps are gone as opposed to imagining a future without burning fossil fuels for energy is a very bad sign.

    • @fhudufin
      @fhudufin 2 роки тому +52

      "lets wait for more pollution to happen, so we can pollute even more!

    • @Praisethesunson
      @Praisethesunson 2 роки тому

      Capitalism is a death cult that will burn the world if it means a handful of already wealthy ghouls get slightly richer

    • @michaelconlon955
      @michaelconlon955 2 роки тому +34

      Also, the Bering Strait replaces one choke point with another, which is half-owned by the U S.A.

    • @ΣτελιοςΠεππας
      @ΣτελιοςΠεππας 2 роки тому

      It's only a matter of time before fossil fuel reserves run out anyway. If no war happens in the next 50-70 years then the facts mentioned in the video won't matter anymore.

    • @davisdf3064
      @davisdf3064 2 роки тому +1

      That's exactly what i thought.

  • @livelxy
    @livelxy 2 роки тому +637

    Being a Chinese I absolutely enjoyed the insightful explanations, which are not available in mainland China. It connects all the dots.

    • @binee4250
      @binee4250 2 роки тому +48

      actually, these contents about energy, straits, harbors, and pipeline constructions already existed in a course named "Military Theory", and every single student must attend this course during their college in PRC. The western world seems to be suddenly caring about Uighurs, they indeed care about the energy.

    • @calvinallan2208
      @calvinallan2208 2 роки тому +20

      As a Chinese citizen what is your view on the current government?

    • @志云-ping
      @志云-ping 2 роки тому

      @@calvinallan2208 我们都没有粮食,饿死了几亿人口。快来摧毁我们的政府,解救我们😱。
      顺便给我一些钱,当然这是最重要的

    • @yuxincai7925
      @yuxincai7925 2 роки тому +21

      But treating Taiwan as a independent country makes me feel bad. It goes against the international consensus recognized by the United Nations.

    • @akar4373
      @akar4373 2 роки тому +1

      @CL ? Really why? I mean why aren't these explanations available. I mean in mainland China you were not aware of the Bri the Gwadar port or the north sea route?

  • @ratneshpaliya52
    @ratneshpaliya52 2 роки тому +88

    You didn't mentioned Andaman Nicobar Islands of India just at opening of Strait of Malacca from Indian Ocean side, it's the choking point of China.

    • @aarin_1704
      @aarin_1704 2 роки тому +16

      Also the Lakshwadeep Islands of India in Arabian Sea which can block the Arabian-South East Asia trade which would evenyually block the chinese oil import

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 2 роки тому +9

      EXACTLY! I never thought I'd ever see a video mentioning Malacca Straits geopolitics without mentioning Andaman and Nicobar islands. But here we are.

    • @elliottparks8762
      @elliottparks8762 2 роки тому +2

      @Death Parade dude, I'd love an in-depth video on this!

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 2 роки тому +9

      @@elliottparks8762 Check out video titled "India's Unsinkable Aircraft Carrier - Andaman and Nicobar Islands" by the channel "Elite Predators". CC for English subtitles.

    • @ashyouknow7420
      @ashyouknow7420 2 роки тому +5

      This has to be done deliberately in the bias against India. I mean you make a 40-min video and didn't even mention the most important blockage points of the Chinese imports!

  • @todo9633
    @todo9633 2 роки тому +78

    27:00 I'd warn against assuming that the north sea route is less dangerous for China than Malacca. After all, it passes right beside Alaska.

    • @AtomicBLB
      @AtomicBLB 2 роки тому

      They can navigate exclusively within Russian waters. No one, including the USA, is gonna trespass into Russia for a 3rd party using Russias waters.

    • @1992kleenex
      @1992kleenex 2 роки тому +7

      Not to mention, Norway, Britain, Iceland and Greenland/Denmark.

    • @tcn9939
      @tcn9939 2 роки тому

      @@1992kleenex If my country of Norway put up a blockade we would be in direct conflict with Russia, since they would have a massive interest in taxing this much shorter route in global trades. Norway as NATO member would be at war with China through the union with the US. But it would be a different beast to aggravate the Russian neighbour. We would effectively help "destroy" Russia's "only" source of trade partner China. This would threaten the existence of both as a superpower. So if the US dont want to fight China in Alaska, and fight Russia in Norway, the easiest step would be to just mine the bering strait or threaten private LNG companies with sanctions/sinking if they use the route.

    • @blugaledoh2669
      @blugaledoh2669 2 роки тому +7

      @@1992kleenex just hug onto Russia coast.

    • @dzungnguyenduc8556
      @dzungnguyenduc8556 2 роки тому +9

      But it's also next to Russia, which in someway, a Chinese nuclear-power ally. And you don't try to blockage Alaska route when even poor but crazy Russian Navy is nearby.

  • @crunchytoast6007
    @crunchytoast6007 2 роки тому +376

    “China can use this new northern passage to avoid choke points like Mallaka”
    *shows a root passing straight through tiny spaces directly next to Alaska, a US State*

    • @TheVirtualObserver
      @TheVirtualObserver 2 роки тому +89

      If anything, the Bering Strait is probably an even more vulnerable spot than the the Strait of Mallaka if for the sole fact that it shares coastline with the United States. Also Russia doesn't have forces deployed anywhere near the Bering Strait in any sizable numbers while Hawaii (& Pearl Harbor) is relatively nearby.

    • @UnknownKnower2
      @UnknownKnower2 2 роки тому +18

      Excellent point

    • @Guangrui
      @Guangrui 2 роки тому +11

      in 2015, a small Chinese fleet transited though US territoral water of Alaska, and at the time Obama was in Alaska

    • @Akideoni
      @Akideoni 2 роки тому +1

      There are reasons the northern route was deliberately avoided
      1) it's very seasonal.
      2) it runs between 2 major supposed superpowers... Which means a worse off death trap if any of them two prefer to kill off china (citing past century of Russian/Chinese relations)

    • @crunchytoast6007
      @crunchytoast6007 2 роки тому +5

      @@Akideoni the first point isn’t valid for this though because it’s built into the hypothetical that this is in a world where global warming has caused it to be a year round alternative

  • @Bensinkvitto
    @Bensinkvitto 2 роки тому +91

    Your videos give depth and understanding to things that happen worldwide. I really appreciate them and also recommend my kids to watch them. Keep up the good work!

    • @felixgutierrez993
      @felixgutierrez993 2 роки тому +1

      Lol I show my parents and they love just about every one of them!

  • @juliandittrich6336
    @juliandittrich6336 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you for tying all those aspects together

  • @markpukey8
    @markpukey8 2 роки тому +279

    The ultimate problem with BRI is that while it might have some great political and social benefits, when it comes to moving goods... moving by land is 8x to 12x as expensive for $/ton/mile than shipping the same tonnage by sea.
    At some point China has to sell goods to someone else, and their cost to produce those goods is higher if they need to move raw materials in, or finished goods out via land.

    • @peterwall8191
      @peterwall8191 2 роки тому

      @Liver Success
      You think the CCP cares? BRI is a smoke screen, for dominating the former soviet republics in Asia. They 're not looking to make a profit, they want a buffer zone against Russia. You think CCP trusts Putin or his successor(s)? 😂😂 To be a communist is to be paranoid, to be a national socialist( what comrade Xi really is) it is required.

    • @shayanraj7840
      @shayanraj7840 2 роки тому +11

      But oil and gas through pipeline transportation is very easy.

    • @litesp
      @litesp 2 роки тому

      Blockading China will work for a short term, then nuclear war. The American economy is collapsing, USD being the reserve currency is changing.

    • @markpukey8
      @markpukey8 2 роки тому +6

      @@litesp So you are saying that a nuclear war will save the USD from ending as the global reserve currency? You might want to rethink that and decide what point you are trying to make.

    • @VerdeMorte
      @VerdeMorte 2 роки тому

      Considering the entire thing was a Ponzi scheme from the very beginning that no one else would ever benefit from I think you are missing the point...

  • @msonix
    @msonix 2 роки тому +21

    Insane video quality. Connecting all the dots is a hard task, and you've done it masterfully. Thank you!

  • @Someone-mt7mp
    @Someone-mt7mp 2 роки тому +142

    Subscribed to Curiosity stream using your code; your videos are not only long and informative and interesting, but impressively well edited without typographical errors and incorrect maps. Your account is worth supporting and I look forward to buying your geopolitics book in the future!

    • @OutcastAngelV
      @OutcastAngelV 2 роки тому +3

      Agreed wholeheartedly. I just signed up as well.
      Theres a small community of purely wholesome and genuinely caring youtubers and he is certainly on the list.

    • @tomtex9664
      @tomtex9664 2 роки тому +7

      I also just subsrcibed. I am usually very reluctant on buying stuff I don't need, but this could be a great replacement to Netflix.

    • @davidhudson3001
      @davidhudson3001 2 роки тому +1

      @@ericalorraine7943Think long term, personally i ventured into the market so i won’t be stranded after i retire. A colleague of mine introduced me to CFA " Teresa Jensen White " who drew out retirement plans and they all aligned with what i wanted and had to pick one plan and with her exit and entry strategies on commodities, securities and digital assets, my portfolio has really been diversified with good ROI. I am really impressed by how much i have achieved

    • @alhajishehu7037
      @alhajishehu7037 2 роки тому +1

      Despite the economic crisis and the rate of unemployment now is the best time to invest

    • @lezliewhicker8450
      @lezliewhicker8450 2 роки тому +1

      Investment now will be wise but the truth is investing on your own will be a high risk. I think it will be best to get a professional👌

  • @bextex5529
    @bextex5529 Рік тому +9

    I genuinely hope you’ll keep uploading informative videos like this. This is my international affairs class basically

  • @me0101001000
    @me0101001000 2 роки тому +284

    The People's Republic of China has a lot to worry about. Their lack of water, the population crisis, the chaotic weather brought forth by climate change, teetering economic collapse, social unrest, schisms within the ruling party, and now the consequences of Wolf Warrior diplomacy. If the PRC doesn't act carefully, this could cause the CCP to fracture at best, and collapse at worst.

    • @cthomaspeasant3059
      @cthomaspeasant3059 2 роки тому +62

      Collapse would be the better option

    • @axellor9836
      @axellor9836 2 роки тому +22

      Even if they do act carefully serious consequences will take place anyways.

    • @thedukeofchutney468
      @thedukeofchutney468 2 роки тому +25

      And that’s not even mentioning that they may have the most catastrophic population collapse in modern history.

    • @bambou_sacre9799
      @bambou_sacre9799 2 роки тому +19

      @@cthomaspeasant3059 do you even know what collapse mean?

    • @Raul_Menendez
      @Raul_Menendez 2 роки тому

      China fractures?
      What else is new.
      They've been doing that since ancient times.

  • @drayle71
    @drayle71 2 роки тому +308

    Maybe i'm just being dumb but I can't see the Northern sea route being massively better as to get through it you would have to pass the Bering strait which in theory the Americans could stop or atleast make incredibly difficult if tension continued to rise or became a hot war. After all the other path shown just goes back through the strait of Malacca anyway so would this mean China would change from having a Malacca dilemma to a Bering dilemma. After all do we think both the Americans and Russians aren't going to be interested in building a base at such a strategic point when global warming makes the arctic more accessible

    • @maximdryga3374
      @maximdryga3374 2 роки тому

      The US could block Chinese access to the Bering Sea because they control islands in the Bering Strait and there are also many bases in Alaska where ships could be sent to blockade China

    • @jordanvanauken5608
      @jordanvanauken5608 2 роки тому +25

      That's exactly what I was thinking, and I'm surprised he didn't even mention that

    • @BatCaveOz
      @BatCaveOz 2 роки тому

      Half of the Bering Straight is Russian.
      The Russians and the Chinese are allies.
      The Americans could block the East side of the Bering Straight, but would be unlikely to fire on Chinese ships travelling along the coast of Russia, as this could force the Russians to escalate in retaliation.

    • @VG_164
      @VG_164 2 роки тому +39

      As long as they play friendly with Russia that shouldn't be a problem. They just need to hug the Russian coast. The US has no interest is going to war with a nuclear power even if it's a heavily stagnated one like Russia.

    • @rallyrailgun7310
      @rallyrailgun7310 2 роки тому +13

      China is also a nuclear power FYI

  • @felixgutierrez993
    @felixgutierrez993 2 роки тому +311

    Bro this channel was calling shit before it even hit on news for me. The fact this channel is free on YT is absolutely insane! This quality beats out TV and is incredibly informative without dragging on, good stuff man! Hope any sponsor deals you get pull through and UA-cam treats you and your team well!

    • @icmull
      @icmull 2 роки тому +4

      Mate the news is always rubbish. It's a waste of time as it's constantly changing better to understand the why.

    • @erwinz5926
      @erwinz5926 2 роки тому +1

      you can even watch european tv. that was very normal standard until the war started, at least. there is still plenty of knowledge online. just. hurry.

    • @basharstats4482
      @basharstats4482 2 роки тому

      @@erwinz5926 sounds like someone discovered UA-cam for the first time? Felix is new to internet? wait till he discovers PornHub 😂

    • @mattdasys2391
      @mattdasys2391 2 роки тому +2

      But did you donate?

    • @corbeau-_-
      @corbeau-_- 2 роки тому +4

      I learned much of this in school, some 20 years ago. Back then it was mostly about driving a wedge between communist regimes - the latest gas reserves were unknown (like in Ukraine...), but the importance of Taiwan and the region was already abundantly clear. Same for the support for dictators and Israel in the Middle East, or the invasion of Vietnam for that matter. The latter aimed to thwart China above all else - done more successfully in South Korea: creating an ally next door to China (the invasions in Iraq and Afghanistan have a similar origin, right next to Iran).
      The fact you compare this (and books, dedicated journalists - real information) to TV and the news (mostly entertainment) is just baffling. The latter want ratings and are nearly always shallow, short tempered and near sighted... The former often has little money, doesn't get (nor wants) much attention, but loves his/her work. You'd expect them in places like this, or in some obscure magazine/website. People like woodward and attenborough stand out, but it took them a long time to get noticed (since it wasn't about being noticed - not about them, but about their love).
      But better late then never I suppose. Quality takes time. It's easier to just keep peddling fear, temptation and sensational but pointless events. Makes money a lot easier and people who invest money just love that. This is the main problem with MSM (and to some extent politics) these days; their audience became too big and the MSM are offering the lowest common denominator in an effort to maximise profit - the achilles' heel of capitalism.
      Ideals are a lot more difficult to sell, they take effort... The dude here still believes in informing people and objectivity.
      That's rare in big corporations, especially when they are present on wall street, when they have stocks and a lot of people who just want money.
      In the end, all of this is about money. And the power it holds over people and their greed. Finding out the motivation behind a narrative is very important, each and every day - most 'impportant' people tend to be very manipulative. The number one reason why we don't like lawyers and politicians - and these days, oh so many journalists and tv hosts. The majority make a living by selling lies. And now there are conspiracies everywhere as a result...

  • @MYSTERIES_NVH
    @MYSTERIES_NVH 2 місяці тому

    There is so much useful information in this video, combined with the beautiful graphics, it's excellent

  • @safarsaitam
    @safarsaitam 2 роки тому +51

    This was absolutely fantastic. What an amazing job. I am so thankful for this channel's existence and content. Thank you!

  • @dr.batman2530
    @dr.batman2530 2 роки тому +158

    You forgot to mention Indian union territory of Andaman and Nicobar islands which are way closer to Aceh, Indonesia than mainland India. It has a huge military presence and India is increasing that. Andaman and Nicobar Islands are our unsinkable aircraft carrier.
    India and China aren't really friends either and in 2020 there was a deadly skirmish leading to deaths in Himalayas.
    In case war breaks out and India is dragged in, India will inevitably ally with US and give Americans access to Andamans. Through Andamans, Indian Navy itself can choke strait of Malacca.
    A quad imposed blockade of Malacca through Andamans is a logical possibility happening if things go south.

    • @muhammadgemamadhaniputra9804
      @muhammadgemamadhaniputra9804 2 роки тому +20

      That's a very good opinion, my friend, but in my opinion, Indonesia itself will determine the direction of geopolitics in Asia and world powers. So far, Indonesia is still clinging to the non-aligned movement that was formed with India, Yugoslavia. They still have very good relations with China. as evidenced by the abundance of investment and culture in the country, on the other hand, they also have a dispute with China over the Natuna island, just like India, which also has a dispute. Indonesia also maintains good relations with the United States and India. The question is how long will they maintain their neutrality?

    • @muhammadgemamadhaniputra9804
      @muhammadgemamadhaniputra9804 2 роки тому +18

      In my opinion, countries like Indonesia and India must always be neutral in order to maintain the balance of the world because these two countries have a very important influence on the region and the world itself.

    • @jikurinkach.4521
      @jikurinkach.4521 2 роки тому

      well I doubt India will choose for the United States. India does have an alliance with the United States because they want to beat China. I think India doesn't trust the United States either

    • @Peizxcv
      @Peizxcv 2 роки тому +9

      India should realize the US can easily block Malacca, Hormuz, and Bab ai-Mandab from India as well and India have no alternative to Middle East oil and gas.
      Both countries are developing nations seeking to break the world order imposed by centuries of imperialism. India should understand if China isn't there it becomes the prime target of NATO attention

    • @nurityalieva3852
      @nurityalieva3852 2 роки тому +2

      India is too close to Russia now, sounds unlikely

  • @vice.nor.virtue
    @vice.nor.virtue 2 роки тому +12

    It's amazing how your breakout video was a breakdown of how A Game of Thrones' main plotpoints were actually based on notable events in Royalty and Politics of Great Britain hundreds of years ago. And now, today in 2022 you're creating videos about the way way more mind boggling and complex economic geopolitcal relationships of friendly and rival nations of the 21st century. Cracking stuff! What a glow-up!

  • @sunilshrestha657
    @sunilshrestha657 Рік тому +1

    I appreciate your video and insights. I was hooked and watched one video and another. Thank you!

  • @guyranting
    @guyranting 2 роки тому +86

    The visualization animations are impeccable 👌 Excellent job to your team for this insanely good content! 🤗

    • @tommiddlefinger6188
      @tommiddlefinger6188 2 роки тому

      Its antiChina propagnda.

    • @RealEyesRealizeFascists
      @RealEyesRealizeFascists 2 роки тому +2

      I mean it’s propaganda so….

    • @Spartan265
      @Spartan265 2 роки тому

      @@RealEyesRealizeFascists lol

    • @GrigRP
      @GrigRP 2 роки тому

      @@RealEyesRealizeFascists Especially the part about Sri Lanka's port, which is proven to be fake news. Still parroting it.

  • @steadmanuhlich6734
    @steadmanuhlich6734 2 роки тому +95

    This is an OUTSTANDING video! Well done RealLifeLore! I appreciate the length, as it contains many facts (several news to me), and I appreciate the use of graphics to illustrate the content. I like that you included the pie charts while mentioning the levels of consumption and production of oil etc. I also like that you showed on the map the routes for the BELT road and you highlighted the territorial claims on the South China Sea, and you pointed out China's new port arrangements in Pakistan and their naval base in Djibouti. The facts about their past oil production and current needs were especially good. And I like how you pointed out the alliances on the map, and so much more. I also appreciate you brought up the Uyghur issue and while you were limited in how much time you spent on it, the visuals of the "re-education camps" was impressive (chilling). I will share this video on social media and encourage others to watch it and share it too. Well done. Keep up the good work!

    • @cmccabe07921
      @cmccabe07921 2 роки тому

      A cruise missile in strategic places taking out all 3 plus a blockade of Mallorca would completely destabilize China and tank the world economy.

    • @Spacemongerr
      @Spacemongerr 2 роки тому +1

      "I appreciate the length"
      That's what she said

    • @npc2480
      @npc2480 2 роки тому +2

      Genocide means the mass killing of a certain group. If genocide is happening in China then how is this video showing Uyghurs walking around and even having their population grow? Many Americans including myself did not know this but the Han Chinese were limited to one child, meanwhile, the Uyghurs did not have this limitation. The Chinese are pretty bad at genocide if you do your own research. Do these education/concentration camps exists? Probably. But keeping them alive in these camps does not follow the definition of genocide. Furthermore, do people ever wonder why they are in concentration camps? Here is a hint, they did things like what happened on 9/11.

    • @falconerd343
      @falconerd343 2 роки тому +1

      RLL did another video focusing specifically on the Uyghur genocide as part of his Modern Conflicts series over on Nebula. He was necessarily brief about the issue in this video because YT gets REALLY sensitive about conflicts and more coverage would put the whole video at risk of being either demonetized or deplatformed. Definitely worth checking out on Nebula (which is totally worth the subscription).

    • @falconerd343
      @falconerd343 2 роки тому

      @@npc2480 RLL did another video focusing on the Uyghur genocide over on Nebula. China has imprisoned somewhere between 1 and 3 million of the 12 million Uyghurs, forced mass sterilization on them (the birth rate has fallen 85% in Uyghur dominated areas), enslaved hundreds of thousands, and on all of them have a surveillance state so incredibly invasive that the Chinese government tracks the whereabouts of essentially every Uyghur 24/7. Yes, some Uyghurs have been terrorists and carried out suicide bombings... after China dominated and repressed them, ala the Kurds, the Rohingya, the Jews, and the Native Americans. Is terrorism bad? Yes. Is incarcerating and slowly murdering an entire ethnic group bad? Much more so.

  • @claudiocesar303
    @claudiocesar303 2 роки тому +6

    I have never seen such wide coverage on this topic. Congratulations !

  • @asullivan4047
    @asullivan4047 Рік тому

    Interesting and informative. Excellent photography/map job enabling viewers to better understand what /whom the orator is describing.

  • @duckingghallatious
    @duckingghallatious 2 роки тому +53

    This channel is my go-to for the best explanations of geopolitical issues. Thank you for providing such high quality commentary!

    • @yt9404
      @yt9404 2 роки тому +4

      Then try Caspian Report

    • @williamgray9692
      @williamgray9692 2 роки тому +2

      @@yt9404 much better

    • @gtbkts
      @gtbkts 2 роки тому +2

      What these guys said. Caspian Report definitely presents the information clearer and quicker. This channel is more clickbaity, and likes to fill in gaps with bits of "entertaining", but useless filler.

  • @christopherrseay3148
    @christopherrseay3148 2 роки тому +218

    i’m just some random person but lemme tell y’all that nebula+curiosity is super worth it. took me 2 years (or however long they’ve been promoting it) to try it out but i’ve loved it the past 3 months

    • @penskepc2374
      @penskepc2374 2 роки тому +8

      Hmm, maybe I'll try it, good endorsement

    • @Peizxcv
      @Peizxcv 2 роки тому +12

      You are paying money for propaganda. If I am going to be lied to I'd rather not paying anything

    • @miamijules2149
      @miamijules2149 2 роки тому +3

      Yeah it is. It’s cheap too... worth it

    • @MinedMaker
      @MinedMaker 2 роки тому +29

      @@Peizxcv From my understanding, most of the content on Nebula is documentaries around art, science and history that have nothing to do with modern politics.

    • @christopherrseay3148
      @christopherrseay3148 2 роки тому +24

      @@Peizxcv ok bot

  • @3ormorecharactersmaybe5
    @3ormorecharactersmaybe5 2 роки тому +89

    Bruh, it's still a wonder that the Malacca Strait was, and still is one of the most powerful and influencial economical zones of all time

    • @widodoakrom3938
      @widodoakrom3938 2 роки тому +9

      Bcs Himalayan mountains range both ancient civilizations between china and India can't trade to each other that's why they trade along mallaca strait with nusantara peoples as 3rd middle peoples

    • @falconerd343
      @falconerd343 2 роки тому

      Imagine if a container ship ran aground there and completely blocked it for 6 days. (sure it's 1.5 miles wide, but hypothetically, if it was closed for 6 days...)

    • @ggh_-ts6pn
      @ggh_-ts6pn 2 роки тому +2

      @@widodoakrom3938 the reason why Singapore became so rich.

    • @SiriProject
      @SiriProject 2 роки тому

      Nowadays we have the tech to bomb those islands to smithereens and create 3 or 4 other checkpoints, but let's hope we don't get to that point

    • @akhanddbangladesh8274
      @akhanddbangladesh8274 2 роки тому

      Andaman & Nicobar islands are integral part of Bangladesh which is currently iIIegaIIy occupied by colonial indiaa. Bangladesh claims & demands immediate cessation of all kind of iIIegaII occupation both military & civilian of colonial india & immediate withdrawal of hostile military personal & non Bangladeshi citizens of those claimed territories of Bangladesh according to the UN charter Article 2(7)C. Any person who is Bangladeshi citizen or assumed of being Bangladeshi citizen or being loyal to Bangladesh Constitution abide by Article 3(a)2.5V People's Republic Of Bangladesh shall be deemed as Bangladeshi citizen & should be excluded from the UN charter Article 2(7)C & should be obliged by Bangladesh interest & Law & should cooperate with & aligned with the interest of People's Republic of Bangladesh by taking Oath should be subject to general amnesty. Thanks you. BANGLADESH ZINDABAD.

  • @gabrielcanfield127
    @gabrielcanfield127 Рік тому

    Valeu!

  • @TheHowardian
    @TheHowardian 2 роки тому +99

    Just discovered this channel. Just became my favourite. Thank you for thorough investigation, clear and concise narration and great visuals!

    • @xiacoquoa4057
      @xiacoquoa4057 2 роки тому

      This channel could be one of those paid by USA to misinform...

    • @williamgarcia1909
      @williamgarcia1909 Рік тому

      I AGREE WITH U. THE INFORMATION GIVEN JIBES WITH INFO I HAVE READ FROM OTHER NEUTRAL N FACTUAL SOURCES. EXCEPT ITS SERIOUS ERROR AT THE END OF ITS REPORT. THERE IS NO GENOCIDE AGAINST THE UYGHURS. IN FACT, THE UYGHURS N OTHER MINORITY ETHNIC PEOPLE IN CHINA R HAPPY THE WAY THE GOVERMENT HAS BEEN HELPING THEM IMPROVE THEIR QUALITY OF LIFE.

  • @MusicForHourss
    @MusicForHourss 2 роки тому +38

    Already watched 22 min and felt like 4.. Great video!

  • @OsrsGalfi
    @OsrsGalfi 2 роки тому +77

    you are absolutely great
    we apreciate all the full length explanations and the hard work you put into these, this channel is a staple for staying informed about the world, you sure convey how pasionate you are about what you do, this is rare
    i'm thankfull for your work

  • @aclearlight
    @aclearlight Рік тому

    Great work! (...and I just joined Nebula so as to view your other stuff)

  • @kylewood2715
    @kylewood2715 2 роки тому +102

    Between this video and your "How Geography made the US ridiculously OP" video, which I watched just before this one, I think I have officially discovered my favorite UA-cam channel!

  • @TheCudmaster
    @TheCudmaster 2 роки тому +97

    It is truly amazing to me that the same country that is damming up Mekong River for their own exclusive use, with no regard to the ecological and economic damage they are doing to multiple other countries downstream are also completely dependent on many of those same countries not closing a sea route that is a similarly shared resource.

    • @Bothandle70
      @Bothandle70 2 роки тому

      You think China is the only country in the world who dams rivers?

    • @yitianzhang1525
      @yitianzhang1525 2 роки тому +2

      because they know that would start a war

    • @sleepyjoe4529
      @sleepyjoe4529 2 роки тому

      It is truly amazing to me that the same country (America) that is trying to antagonize the entire world for their own hegemony over influence and resources, with no regard to the ecological and economic damage they are doing to multiple other countries in the last few decades are also completely dependent on many of those same countries for their resources and manufacturing.

    • @TheCudmaster
      @TheCudmaster 2 роки тому +7

      @@sleepyjoe4529 very indeed. But America has long practiced a "use yours first" policy, it might be rocky for a bit if the world cut us off but America has barely tapped its vast trove of natural resources.
      This isn't an endorsement of the policies, just an appreciation of how fucked relatively various nations would be if the world decided to embargo them for whatever reason.
      Honestly I wouldn't be surprised at all if China is trying to trigger a war with the peninsular states, they just don't want to fire the first missile so they can save face and play victim.

    • @aali778
      @aali778 2 роки тому

      I don’t think they thought of how The Meikong dams would affect their diplomacy lmao.

  • @invisible_d_r
    @invisible_d_r 2 роки тому +8

    Thanks for the time and efforts you putting in video to feed us such incredible information 🙏

  • @laxthor09
    @laxthor09 Рік тому

    Amazing video. I hope you do another video exactly like this one year after this video came out kind of as an update.

  • @ArAcHnId777
    @ArAcHnId777 2 роки тому +16

    "uses coal for energy to not be relient on other countries"
    Also "has almost 40% of their coal plants to only work on Australian coal"
    Smart

    • @philsalvatore3902
      @philsalvatore3902 2 роки тому

      No. China imports less than 10% of the coal used in energy production, and some of that less than 10% comes from South Africa and Russia.

  • @zakuradragon
    @zakuradragon 2 роки тому +18

    I learn more from RealLifeLore than all the years of my social studies classes combined!

  • @MacTac141
    @MacTac141 2 роки тому +89

    Just want to point out the arctic route goes right through the Bering straight, aka right past Alaska. It would be absolutely no issue for the US to block this route as well if they wanted to meaning in any case America will control all of chokepoints vital to Chinese economics for decades if not longer
    China really just has to cross its fingers and hope the U.S collapses in upon itself due to internal divisions cause that’s about the only way they could hope to solve this issue

    • @nurityalieva3852
      @nurityalieva3852 2 роки тому

      Imagine the US without meth and fentanyl 1 week…

    • @ДмитрийСибиряков-й7д
      @ДмитрийСибиряков-й7д 2 роки тому +2

      I write in Russian. Translate please. Ты как будто в параллельной вселеной находишься. Попробуй открыть огонь в Беринговом проливе. Посмотрим, что останется от вас. Американский блеф, когда боишься войны у себя в доме, но ведёшь себя как будто не боишься.

    • @justinokraski3796
      @justinokraski3796 2 роки тому

      That’s what every enemy of America hopes for: internal division. That’s why foreign powers (like Russia and China) meddle in our affairs

    • @1224chrisng
      @1224chrisng 2 роки тому +4

      Almost. On one hand, Russia controls half of the Bering Strait, but on the other hand, the Russian navy can't do much if the US decides to blockade it anyways, tho that would cause quite the diplomatic situation. Ultimately, for whether or not a blockade is warranted and feasible, it's a matter of US political will and the scale of the conflict

    • @MacTac141
      @MacTac141 2 роки тому +10

      @@ДмитрийСибиряков-й7д Дружище, ты понимаешь, что Россия проигрывает войну Украине, а не США, не НАТО, Украине. Да, им дали западное вооружение, но силы НАТО в этой битве не участвовали.
      Итак, если Россия через 6 месяцев сможет захватить только 1/5 Украины, в какой вселенной они вообще смогут бросить вызов США? Если бы Украина смогла потопить «Москву» без военно-морского флота, представьте, что сделали бы США с самым мощным флотом и авиацией на сегодняшний день.
      Единственное, что Россия могла бы сделать, это запустить ядерное оружие (поскольку ее военно-морской флот жалкий), что да, уничтожило бы большую часть США, но затем США, британцы и французы используют свое ядерное оружие против России. Так готова ли Россия фактически покончить со своей страной и народом просто из-за блокады Берингова пролива?

  • @norbert016045
    @norbert016045 Рік тому

    your vids are supe rinteresting, keep it up, here is another Sub!

  • @nicoleciubal2982
    @nicoleciubal2982 2 роки тому +74

    I just discovered your channel and I like it. It’s packed with information and your simplified but thorough presentation is so much easier to understand. Looking forward to binge watching all your other vids. Thank you so much for all your efforts.

    • @hjohnhome1417
      @hjohnhome1417 2 роки тому

      This video contains many misinformation, and twisted facts.

    • @francisreynolds8543
      @francisreynolds8543 2 роки тому +1

      Hi, may God bless you with the Salvation of the Lord Jesus. That you and your family protect you.Amen.

  • @sammylee4778
    @sammylee4778 2 роки тому +7

    My father was the ambassador of the Philippines to China before his passing. He kept all at peace I sure miss him he was my mentor.

    • @kuyab9122
      @kuyab9122 2 роки тому

      What's your father's name?

    • @sammylee4778
      @sammylee4778 2 роки тому

      @@kuyab9122 sotero Lee

  • @tengkualiff
    @tengkualiff 2 роки тому +81

    As a Malaysian, i'd like to thank you for highlighting this ongoing concern for our country's sovereignity.
    China's growing ambitions has already been a huge thorn to our growth and its almost never properly addressed by our politicians. Hopefully, more people in the SEA region as well, would be more inclined to address this problem too.

    • @PutXi_Whipped
      @PutXi_Whipped 2 роки тому +4

      Okay Radio Free Asia. Enjoy your NED check

    • @harel4u2
      @harel4u2 2 роки тому

      China's CCP intent is to mortgage other Countries growth and prosperity .Effectively grow at the expense of other Countries. That's why they seek to undermine the rules based global order that has given the World an unprecedented expansion of Wealth post WW2.

    • @PutXi_Whipped
      @PutXi_Whipped 2 роки тому +3

      @@harel4u2 You just described the USA. LOL

    • @PutXi_Whipped
      @PutXi_Whipped 2 роки тому +1

      @@harel4u2 LMAO what are the rules in the “rules based order” and which ones are China breaking? Be specific instead of just pushing generic “China bad” bullsh!t
      I’ll save you the trouble, the only rule of the “rules based order” is the USA gets to do whatever it wants and other countries are forced to take it. It’s Mafia rule and countries that are strong enough like China don’t have to put up with this bullsh!t.

    • @lumlangthohrem3847
      @lumlangthohrem3847 2 роки тому

      Beware Malaysia China will give you loan and if you cannot pay you will be in a debt trapped and China will ask you to lease the Mallacca Strait to China as happened to Sri Lanka.

  • @lolzasouruhm179
    @lolzasouruhm179 2 роки тому +6

    The thing about land trade is that it’s easily destroyed. Rail and pipes could be taken out with a couple well placed air strikes and I’m sure they would be put out of service for at least a couple weeks which would give time to make more strikes and with them extending so far you could treat it like futile warfare and attack and pull out all along the lines effectively ruining the supply for good.

    • @scottwebb4722
      @scottwebb4722 Рік тому

      They’re usually quite deep in the country that sending fighter jets would be a one way mission. Should the pipelines run through Afghanistan that place is as far from the sea as one can get. As for railways in Russia the aircraft would need more fuel than its operational range.

    • @richard9436
      @richard9436 Рік тому +1

      @@scottwebb4722 All solved with drones

    • @scottwebb4722
      @scottwebb4722 Рік тому

      @@richard9436 which in turned can be solved by SAM’s, portable systems as old as the Stinger and even 20mm’s with airburst rounds should swarms be sent. Not to mention disrupting the frequencies. I believe Ukraine is using some of these tactics against Russian drone attacks.

    • @LeeDaegon
      @LeeDaegon Рік тому

      It's almost like people forget ships can be sunk...... no method is perfect. The only solution is to use all the methods

  • @terreaterrevideos
    @terreaterrevideos 2 роки тому +21

    4:10 the Malacca strait is not 1.5 miles (2.4km) wide. A quick check on Google Maps shows it's around 30km large, and then small islands divide it in multiple smaller channels of 5-6km width or lower

    • @shzd.pk-gazi
      @shzd.pk-gazi 2 роки тому +16

      It may be that wide in some areas, but what RLL meant is that its most narrowest, the Strait is indeed 1.5 miles wide. I know if I were an American military strategist, I’d be blockading from the narrowest point, not the most widest. It saves resources that could be burned on other stuff.

    • @JayneCobbsBunk
      @JayneCobbsBunk 2 роки тому +14

      It may be that the navigable waters (deep enough for cargo ships) are only 2.4km wide at the narrowest point.

    • @salazar4026
      @salazar4026 2 роки тому

      @@JayneCobbsBunk genius

    • @raycuizon8226
      @raycuizon8226 2 роки тому

      @@shzd.pk-gazi Stick to playing Playstation kid. You gonna actually put your troops where the enemy expect you to be. Not only that on a place with limited space to moved around. You never want your enemy know your location and box in your own forces.

    • @terreaterrevideos
      @terreaterrevideos 2 роки тому +1

      @@JayneCobbsBunk Yep, when looking at a depth map, this seems to be the explanation. The "lane" for cargo ships is much narrower than the strait itself.

  • @Charlie-ii5rr
    @Charlie-ii5rr 2 роки тому +98

    This is all well and good, but it overlooks the elephant in the room. Pipelines are extremely vulnerable. One man with a satchel charge can disable one for months.

    • @thetayz72
      @thetayz72 2 роки тому +38

      Especially since defending a pipeline that stretches thousands of miles over lots of countries from a handful of saboteurs is basically impossible

    • @sogerc1
      @sogerc1 2 роки тому +1

      The other elephant in the room, yes that trade route will thaw but will China even be liveable at that point? Along with a lot of other parts of the world. This channel doesn't recognize climate change. If China and the rest of the world keeps ramping up hydrocarbon usage we all will have to move to Russia and Canada and wtf will we eat? Chicken raised in farms with AC? And what will we feed the chicken with when the planet becomes a giant desert? And how will we even exploit that trade route when tornados will be an everyday phenomenon.

    • @frogylocz
      @frogylocz 2 роки тому +4

      @Mela (AMAZING CONTENT) get the help you need before its to late

    • @kathryncrowleybryan5844
      @kathryncrowleybryan5844 2 роки тому

      Or a drone with a bomb from3000 miles away

    • @irimeyilmaz956
      @irimeyilmaz956 2 роки тому +2

      @@thetayz72 Your talking about a country with 1.4 billion people.
      putting a man every quarter mile ain't impossible.

  • @Haxerous
    @Haxerous 2 роки тому +134

    The major problem is that Vietnam lost a bunch of islands there to China during their war

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 2 роки тому +13

      Vietnam began taking the islands in the first place, 1 year before China did and earlier than Philippine, Malaysia, Indonesia…
      Vietnam started the whole situation with encouragement from the US.

    • @zeinwahab9986
      @zeinwahab9986 2 роки тому +29

      @@thomaszhang3101 we Indonesian had nothing to do and no interest at all in the SCS dispute between china and 4 SEA nation, we, Indonesian only care if someone when entering the north Natuna sea, be it Chinese, Vietnam or Malaysia, be it a navy, coast guard, or even civilian ship like fishing ships, or when something are entering our waters like the lighthouse incident with Malaysia years ago.
      In any case, China wouldn't make Indonesia upset over a mere 9 dashline extension. Because anything shipped by sea are cheaper than land. Even if those pipelines are already there, it's still cost more than double than by Sea. And if Malacca strait were blocked, the nearest alternative are all through Indonesia's territorial waters.

    • @cleanerben9636
      @cleanerben9636 2 роки тому +9

      VIETNAM UNDEFEATED

    • @ThwipThwipBoom
      @ThwipThwipBoom 2 роки тому +17

      @@thomaszhang3101 Prove it liar

    • @bababababababa6124
      @bababababababa6124 2 роки тому +28

      @@thomaszhang3101 +1000000 social credit!! Well done!!

  • @elegantclassicalmusic3102
    @elegantclassicalmusic3102 Рік тому +4

    More than 600 years ago, Zheng He Qiqi in the Ming Dynasty of China, and Malacca on the May 57th Festival, he was stationed in Malacca, and his arrival deeply affected the history of this seat. Malacca City An important transit station in Malacca City, when Zheng He was ordered to go to various countries, he parked here many times and established his base camp here. ,, Malacca returned Zheng He’s relics, such as Zheng He’s every time Malacca was stationed at Sanbaoshan, and those at the foot of the mountain were stationed at Sanbaoshan. Zheng He came as an envoy, not only the envoy came to the foundation of an inch of land, an inch of land .

  • @FavMemes
    @FavMemes 2 роки тому +6

    Nice elaboration of problem in the video RealLifeLore
    Keep it up

  • @chidubemnwaohiri113
    @chidubemnwaohiri113 2 роки тому +53

    China has a lot of weaknesses...that China could have resolved by making careful assessment and involving her neighbours to agree on a better deal...but China is obsessed with looking strong therefore preferring to coarse instead of a little understanding and humility.
    Now the international community is awake and her neighbours that have been waiting for good deal are making deals with Powers China has been trying to keep away...
    For a nation that thinks she has long term goals and long term thinkers, this is very shortsighted from Beijing.

    • @gideonmele1556
      @gideonmele1556 2 роки тому +4

      It’s all about saving face and hearkening back to the days where they were on top and everyone nearby was a tributary state. As much as the CCP tried to erase tradition and looking to the past they have fallen hard into it

    • @orbitalpotato9940
      @orbitalpotato9940 2 роки тому

      Maybe things would be different if the US would stop treating every country that challenges their position as a global power like an enemy.

    • @Homer-OJ-Simpson
      @Homer-OJ-Simpson 2 роки тому +1

      It's all the party and the values. Sure, the people of China could be so much better off if China worked properly within the international community. Instead, they are alienating countries that represent half the world GDP (Europe, North America, Oceania, East Asia). Why? Because projecting power is how the party believes it can best keep power. Same reason Putin sent 200k troops into Ukraine.

    • @orbitalpotato9940
      @orbitalpotato9940 2 роки тому

      @@Homer-OJ-Simpson Why? Because all those countries you listed answer directly to the United States. They cannot do anything without prior approval of the United States.

    • @chidubemnwaohiri113
      @chidubemnwaohiri113 2 роки тому

      @Stephen lee China has in fact gone to war against Vietnam...and China is always using her fishing militia to harass her neighbours...
      Yes America has invaded countries etc but China won't do anything different... that's what these big Powers do.

  • @prayankrathour8028
    @prayankrathour8028 2 роки тому +10

    Mind blowing content and sheer brilliance in illustration and narration. You just lit it 🔥 Kudos to your content. My eyes were glued to screen all the time. 👌🏻

    • @user-jn7bq8wh1e
      @user-jn7bq8wh1e 2 роки тому

      Left out any mention of POK and Andaman Nicobar islands n how India could choke the chinese right there 🙄

  • @raznemon
    @raznemon 2 роки тому +1

    Omfg thank you so much!! I had a test coming up, but I didn't have the time to study.. So I asked my teacher: "Is music allowed?" He nodded ands said: "Only with headphones." Thank you honestly so much. I owe you RLR :)))

    • @raznemon
      @raznemon 2 роки тому +1

      We needed to write a 6 page assignment in class, "What are the problems of modern day China?"

  • @zomfgroflmao1337
    @zomfgroflmao1337 2 роки тому +135

    One would think that they would move to massively increase their solar, hydro, and wind power capacity (maybe nuclear as well, but Uranium is also a resource), not for green reasons, but just to curb reliance on oil and gas. In general people that are against green energy seem to miss that this is a national security question, even before the ecological question.

    • @swamidude2214
      @swamidude2214 2 роки тому +18

      Thats what their doing, allready 14% of energy came from renewable sources I meant to hear in this video. Mostly hydro power, but China is also heavily going on solar power.

    • @tommiddlefinger6188
      @tommiddlefinger6188 2 роки тому +1

      Three minutes in to the v1deo and clear antiChina b1as.

    • @tommiddlefinger6188
      @tommiddlefinger6188 2 роки тому

      Natyonal "securty" from who? The U S can't even d e f e n d its own boarder.

    • @tommiddlefinger6188
      @tommiddlefinger6188 2 роки тому

      U S is a j o k e co u n try now. You guys still taking it seriously are de-luded.

    • @zomfgroflmao1337
      @zomfgroflmao1337 2 роки тому +17

      @@swamidude2214 14% is abysmal, especially considering that they started only relatively recently and didn't have to swap.

  • @siriansight
    @siriansight 2 роки тому +6

    This was absolutely phenomenal journalism.
    Thank you

  • @johnnyeatworld
    @johnnyeatworld 2 роки тому +15

    Great analysis - better explanation and visualization than other channels. Well done explaining the unilateral military protection treaties.

  • @monaoconnell5650
    @monaoconnell5650 Рік тому

    Very informative. I hope to hear more from you.

  • @lSeKToRl
    @lSeKToRl 2 роки тому +47

    I'm an avid consumer geo political news. This has gone in to more depth about Russia China relationship than I have seen out of any major European or American media. Good job.

    • @ShiddyTimelineClubMember
      @ShiddyTimelineClubMember 2 роки тому +2

      Do you also watch CaspianReport? He's really good too. He called the Ukrainian war before it happened

    • @lSeKToRl
      @lSeKToRl 2 роки тому +2

      @@ShiddyTimelineClubMember I am subbed to him but only as of this year. I haven't seen his older stuff.

    • @Homer-OJ-Simpson
      @Homer-OJ-Simpson 2 роки тому

      @@lSeKToRl Caspian Report is more detailed but also more boring. RLL lately has a good balance of entertainment and pact with info.

    • @austinfisher1015
      @austinfisher1015 2 роки тому +1

      For news relating to China, you should watch China Uncensored. They are a very good off the cuff youtube news channel.

    • @lSeKToRl
      @lSeKToRl 2 роки тому

      @@austinfisher1015 Ill look into that channel, thanks.

  • @pepperVenge
    @pepperVenge 2 роки тому +42

    To pass through the Arctic Ocean, you'd have to pass through the Bering Straight.. Alaskan USA on the east, Russia on the west. It would be really easy for the US Navy to blockade that small passage too. Frankly, I don't see a win here for China as far as Ocean routs are concerned. I think their best bet is to develop land routes.

    • @TheMacC117
      @TheMacC117 2 роки тому +3

      The pipelines are certainly a concern... If they're underground. Aboveground pipelines would be very easy targets for the US Air Force.

    • @calvinnyala9580
      @calvinnyala9580 2 роки тому +7

      @@TheMacC117 using pipelines need some sort of booster pumps. Just bombing those pumps itself is enough to crippled the pipelines

    • @TheMacC117
      @TheMacC117 2 роки тому +1

      @@calvinnyala9580 True, and I don't know a lot about pipeline infrastructer but if those pumps are located in or around Russia, it would be difficult because they have a lot of good AA battery. About the only good thing they do have, it would seem.

    • @LancesArmorStriking
      @LancesArmorStriking 2 роки тому +8

      I don't think the US would risk nuclear war to blockade Russia's arctic trade route. Since the US cannot legally dispute that territory, they have no options to use when justifying a blockade. Russia would also have perfectly legal justification to attack in kind

    • @pepperVenge
      @pepperVenge 2 роки тому +4

      @@LancesArmorStriking Russia would be taking the same risk by attacking. The question isn't if attacking is legal or justified, the question is _Would_ Russia attack the US if they blockaded the the straight. Consider that Russia is no match for the US, and that the risk of nuclear war is true for both sides, I don't think Russia would take the risk.
      The US however would, and I can demonstrate why: The US is already disputing China's territorial water claims by sailing their warships within those respective boundaries.
      If the US is ok with risking war with China, they'll have no problem doing the same against Russia.

  • @Thiione
    @Thiione 2 роки тому +21

    What an incredible in-depth video of the power balance of China and its region. Thank you for making your best video to date!

  • @SerialChronicles
    @SerialChronicles Рік тому +2

    Just found your channel and can’t stop watching, great coverage ❤

  • @Pz16
    @Pz16 2 роки тому +6

    The production of your video's are top notch. Well deserving of your 6 million subs!!

    • @natsterlive
      @natsterlive 2 роки тому

      Western Government funded propaganda

    • @Pz16
      @Pz16 2 роки тому

      @@natsterlive seems pretty objective to me... truth hurts doesn't it?

  • @Azaghal1988
    @Azaghal1988 2 роки тому +6

    Amazing work about a very relevant topic.
    Thanks for the time and effort this surely took!

  • @adamdott
    @adamdott 2 роки тому +54

    Great content! Just please please, stop stressing on each and every word to make the contet sound more dramatic! The content is already great!

  • @cheri238
    @cheri238 Рік тому +1

    I listened to this a ways back, but at that time, I did not know how to save on my cellphone or leave a comment. regretfully, I am not tech savey. I am learning as I go. I have asked many people to view your videos as they are very informative . Thank you for your in-depth research, as I can only assume how much time and effort these are to make

  • @t5ruxlee210
    @t5ruxlee210 2 роки тому +8

    This energy situation also explains why the PRC is especially interested in being one of the leading countries involved in making electric power generation from nuclear fusion a practical reality as soon as possible.

  • @joelsmith9311
    @joelsmith9311 2 роки тому +113

    I wonder if this also speaks to the West's desire to promote emissions reductions to reduce the rate of global warming - and also the probable futility of it, given that the de-icing of the Bering Strait will have huge advantages for Russia and China in terms of energy independence.

    • @rinishan
      @rinishan 2 роки тому +2

      Yeah, this makes me so anxious to think how much China and developing nations will need to keep burning fossil fuels to support their economies. And westerners over consuming these fossil powered affordable commodities doesn't help at all.

    • @jjohnsoc23
      @jjohnsoc23 2 роки тому +4

      how is this not more commonly discussed

    • @danielcannon2191
      @danielcannon2191 2 роки тому +28

      @@jjohnsoc23 It requires a level of geographic, geopolitcal, economic etc. understanding that most Americans do not possess. Most Americans could tell you more about the Kardashians than things that really have the potential to impact their lives. Also, a three minute segment on cable news on topics like this only scratches the surface. But, maybe your statement was rhetorical?......

    • @underarmbowlingincidentof1981
      @underarmbowlingincidentof1981 2 роки тому +3

      @@rinishan I mean the EU for example has started heavily investing in african nations just south of Europe to support renewable energy and infrastructure.
      The package has already gone into action but the effects will have to wait some time of course

    • @daywalker________7677
      @daywalker________7677 2 роки тому +1

      He has a video that talks about how global warming will turn russia into a superpower. You will find your answers there.

  • @suryasanjay5687
    @suryasanjay5687 2 роки тому +24

    At 21:55, you've shown Kolkata as a part of the BRI. It is actually Chittagong in Bangladesh. India is not part of the BRI and strongly opposes the BRI, even more than the US. Please correct your map.

  • @roberthousedorfii1743
    @roberthousedorfii1743 Рік тому

    EXCELLENT video. Thank you.

  • @neverstopexploding4128
    @neverstopexploding4128 2 роки тому +8

    very thorough! Thank you for your effort and time - love your stuff (& narration)

  • @ztaplive615
    @ztaplive615 2 роки тому +23

    Such a freaking great channel. The information and layout is so digestible

    • @churblefurbles
      @churblefurbles 2 роки тому

      because its propaganda, the Tibet narrative fell through last time, now is the claim of "holocaust" where the population continues to increase.

  • @huwzebediahthomas9193
    @huwzebediahthomas9193 2 роки тому +74

    26:50 - Similar to the St. Lawrence/Great Lakes 'seaway' in North America - not open all year traditionally, but is becoming more of the year usable, not iced up so much in Winter.

    • @LeTtRrZ
      @LeTtRrZ 2 роки тому +1

      I wonder if fewer people in the future will want to stop climate change due to potentially millions or hundreds of millions owing their lives to it.

    • @samsunguser3148
      @samsunguser3148 2 роки тому

      @@LeTtRrZ Alas. Things seems dire

    • @redman_10t39
      @redman_10t39 2 роки тому

      @@LeTtRrZ While it's interesting to ponder some of the positives climate change could bring, the negatives we theorize far outweigh any theorized positives. While many millions may benefit from less ice in the northern hemisphere, billions will suffer from exacerbated, frequent, dangerous weather events and rising sea levels.

    • @LeTtRrZ
      @LeTtRrZ 2 роки тому

      @@redman_10t39 And yet humanity does not have the best track record of making sacrifices to benefit people they don’t know. I have some doubts about whether we will be able to make the right decisions in the face of powerful tribal instincts. There are encouraging signs of course, but who knows how the next few generations will think?

    • @redman_10t39
      @redman_10t39 2 роки тому

      @@LeTtRrZ Assuming the people of the future still live in an interconnected world where they can see the plight of others and experience economic losses because of far-off catastrophes, then yes, I assume the next few generations will care a whole heck of a lot more about climate change than even our current youngest generations.
      No matter how tribalistic/ nationalistic humans may be at times, that doesn't change the reality that we all live on the same planet and we will always have to cope with what happens elsewhere. It's never been possible to truly isolate oneself from the world. Even in past eras of isolation in countries around the world, they've always been involved in foreign matters or the subject of foreign matters. The US was mucking about in North America and Japan was trading with the Europeans.

  • @janisdinter3657
    @janisdinter3657 2 роки тому

    Great video! Thank you

  • @ruffrider2626
    @ruffrider2626 2 роки тому +5

    Dude. What a story you came up with. Cheers. Great writing.

  • @kairui8293
    @kairui8293 2 роки тому +49

    Just want to point out that Taiwan is also painted red in the thumbnail, which is incorrect. Taiwan is not a part of China.

    • @Caurab
      @Caurab 2 роки тому +14

      It is

    • @tinienteabanil2922
      @tinienteabanil2922 2 роки тому +33

      @@Caurab nahh bruh they got their own passaporte and currency and military and much more

    • @yitianzhang1525
      @yitianzhang1525 2 роки тому +6

      @@tinienteabanil2922 “republic of china”

    • @J_X999
      @J_X999 2 роки тому

      No one cares. Just enjoy the video and information.
      It's only Indians that cry about wrong maps

    • @threebrosandabiscuit3496
      @threebrosandabiscuit3496 2 роки тому +6

      @@Caurab it’s not bro