@@tobeornottobe1056 no, it was a row of ILS antennae elevated by a concrete wall & surrounded/supported by mounds of dirt, going against international regulations for materials & structures recommended for antennae mounts.
Srilankan airlines from its inception in 1979, uses Airbus aircrafts. For 45 years it has Zero fatal accidents associated with Airbus aircrafts. Srilankan's only accident is a landing gear failure in 1992 and it is a Boeing 737. The Airline retired all its Boeing fleet in 1995 and since then it has used only Airbus aircrafts.
To be fair one of the planes that didn't land safely was shot down by Russians, so it's hardly comparable to other cases involving bird strikes/technical problems.
How do you know what is at the end of the airport when you don’t even know what airport it landed? This plane veered off the tarmac, not shot off the end of the runway at high speed. So many blames on the wall of the Jeju crash, seems like a diversion of blame on the Boeing. It’s still too early to judge before the investigation, but there seems to be a lot of issues with the landing gears of the 737s.
@@madsam0320 nobody knows why the gear failed so wait for the investigation before you draw conclusions. That wall on the other hand, it shouldn't have been there, that's for sure.
@@FatHeadDaveNo, he was mentioning the more recent news where another Jeju Air Boeing 737 had to make an emergency landing due to a landing gear malfunction, a day after that plane crash.
Yea, it really does feel like that the fact we had a big accident on just the second day of the year with that A350 collusion in japan was a bad omen for aviation this year, from the top of my head I can remember like 4 or 5 major accidents, the JAL A350 collusion, we then also had the ATR crash in Brazil, then that DHL 737 crash, the Embraer Azerbaijan crash, and then the jeju air 737 crash.
They weren’t. 2 of the 4 incidents were Boeing. 1 was embraer and the other was De Havilland. Considering there are over 7,800 737s operated around the world, it’s not statistically unusual that this would happen to 2 out of the 7,800.
They have mentioned that it probably occurred a tire explosion on the departure due to the finding of rubber debris on the runway. If the debris also damaged some hydraulic or it was the damaged tire that caused the off runway is not clear
Why don't you tell us your theory about a South Korean Boeing, Dutch Boeing, Canadian DeHavilland and Azerbaijani Embraer (which was shot down) professor
@@AB-mw8oz I am not a psychic, but the Oslo Gardermoen accident has given some clues due to the rubber tire parts they achieved from the runway. Do you have any problems with that I mentioned it😳
@@MinusMOD98 They name Torp airport as Oslo airport too. Sometimes customers travel to Oslo Gardermoen and actually should travel to Torp airport at Sandefjord. The failure let you to lose your flight.
@@sundhaug92 It could be just that carriers like Ryanair tricked peoples to believe that they arrived at Gardermoen instead of Torp. The named it as Oslo. Saw recently Ryanair costumers made mistakes about Berlin I think and ended up in a desert outside Berlin😂
@@per995Ryan is the prime offender, sometimes not even landing in the same country. «Vienna» is really Bratislava, «Frankfurt» is closer to Belgium than Frankfurt. Aircraft is still in Sandefjord, no way it has been returned to airworthy already.
Those 800s are usually good work horse commercial airplanes. Not typically known to have MAX type problems. So, and I'm only speculating here, it could have been a maintenance or ageing issue or a combination of both.
This comment confirms you know very little about aviation. There is no reason at all to ground all 737s when both of these incidents occurred on fairly old planes. The likelihood of this being a Boeing issue is very slim especially since the NG -800 was launched in 1994 and isn’t even made anymore. This is most likely a maintenance and/or pilot error but we’ll have to wait for the final report.
@@ThePatgilbertan American Airlines A321 had to make an emergency landing in Philadelphia due to hydraulics failure on Dec 26, 2024. This is not an Airbus or Boeing issue, it’s an airline maintenance issue.
Not for nothing, but another Jeju Air B737-800 encountered landing gear problems, and had to make an emergency landing. Luckily with 0 casualties. ALL the talk by whistleblowers and such about how the 'Boeing Problem' has been a decades long problem preceding the MAX, has it come to fruition? I mean, maintenance could be an issue of course. But Boeing is the one with the spotty track record now, not Jeju Air.
Today 2 klm 777's had technical issues and returned back to Amsterdam...so i guess youre right😢. I myself fly many times with KLM to Norway or Schotland....😮
KLM’s maintenance needs to be looked at first, especially since this plane was 24 years old. KLM is planning to retire their 737s and replace them with A321NEOs, so given the little time these 737s have left at KLM, especially older 737s like this one, it is likely that KLM became complacent with maintaining planes that are on their way out, since there is less justification to spend top dollar on quality maintenance for planes that are on their way out, compared to planes that they will keep for a long time.
@@debbypurcell6215 it’s plausible that they would slack on maintenance of an old tube on its way out that will only operate for a relatively few amount of cycles and retire soon. Planes that are on their way out will make less future money than newer planes, so accordingly, it’s plausible that airlines will look at the economics and invest less on maintaining planes that will deliver less return on investment due to imminent retirement.
@@Blank00just stop man. You are just making huge assumptions without any proof or knowledge. Nobody is going to slack their maintenance if the airplane is going to be gone soon. That’s simply not happening.
Last dec 27, 2024 at 7am. A philippine airlines (PAL) turbo prop skidded off the bacolod silay airport runway located at negros occ philipines due to heavy rains. All crew & passenger are safe.
This is clearly a maintenance issue. I've used KLM so many times. I've traveled to 5 different countries using them. I've never had one incident of some sort of issue either minor or major and I've flown through some serious turbulence. One thing is certain, a lot of their planes are old. You can only keep them running for that long on a strict maintenence plan. It may have happened that this specific plane had to do a few extra flights due to another plane failing a few tests. This may have caused the hydraulic issue to get missed during essential checks. The issue with an old fleet is that you eventually run out of redundancy. Hence their need to aquire a new fleet. It's definitely a maintenance issue, but not because of negligence. KLM has never expressed indifference towards the state of their property.
A landing gear failure is not the same as a hydraulics failure. This was a hydraulics failure. The same type of failure that occurred on an American Airlines A321 that had to make an emergency landing in Philadelphia on Dec 26, 2024. It’s not a Boeing or Airbus issue , it’s an airline maintenance issue.
Glad to hear everyone is ok but I'm wondering for the reasons of the following aircrash matters in the same week.. if there is a kind of frequency attacks on over the world?😮
Worst time of year to fly! Equipment stretched along with crew schedules and maintenance shortage due to holidays. Couple that with late schedules and it’s a recipe for disaster. By the way these aircrafts are getting long on the tooth as airlines not buying new equipment.
This 737-800 experienced hydraulic failure for no apparent reason and had difficulty to land. Meanwhile some UA-cam aviation experts and geniuses felt they could land a 737-800 better even after a bird strike affecting the engine and hydraulics.
For all those saying "can't blame Boeing," consider this: If there's a fundamental issue with, say, backup hydraulics on 737's automatically activating, then _the type of emergency doesn't matter._ Bird strike, tire explosions, war, etc. All emergencies with hydraulics will be worse than if the manufacturing or design defect didn't exist. (As with shipwrecks - many mass-casualty events occurred simply because life preservers used to be made with cork - and cork becomes dust. Expired / old life preservers meant people sank like stones when they jumped overboard. See the "Eastland" capsizing disaster, etc. This happened again and again due to greed and not checking safety equip. Many different years, many different types of ships.) I'm not saying Boeing is at fault here - I'm saying "open your mind."
Some self proclaimed experts said that bird strikes cant affect the hydraulics. This plane didn't hit any birds yet the hydraulics failed. It is as if the Korean plane chose to land without its landing gear to show off its drifting skills
This solve the issue that south Korea air plane had ..Boeing is in serious trouble as I said …Thankyou Dutch air safety investigators. This is a crucial information ..
Maintenance seems to be ignored either due to incompetence in current staff, not wanting to spend money, lack of parts, or both. I’m sure increased stress/demand during the holidays plays a role too.
The piloted noted that the plane was out of control after touchdown and veered of the runway. The passengers didnt now that the plan was ended up in the grass, only after left the airplane. ( that was in the news here in Holland)
On December 25, 2024 klm plane from Amsterdam to Entebbe via Kigali was cancelled I definitely was it was about to take off from Kigali to Entebbe! Same hydraulics problems! Thank God it was detected right before takeoff
*the plane from JEJU airline came from the wrong side of the runway the concretewall with the approaching lights are at the beginning of the runway not at the end !*
It stopped in the grass maybe because there wasn't massive reinforced concrete wall at the end of the runway.
They said it veered off to the right
It wasn't a reinforced concrete wall, just a earth mount at 45 degree. That's already bad enough. There were some concrete on top.
@@tobeornottobe1056 no, it was a row of ILS antennae elevated by a concrete wall & surrounded/supported by mounds of dirt, going against international regulations for materials & structures recommended for antennae mounts.
Mainly because the pilots were competent, and they actually put the landing gear down.
@@John_Redcorn_and the flaps. And probably didn’t touch down two thirds of the way down the runway.
Glad that nobody got injured in this incident.
No wall at the end of the runway.
"luckily nobody was injured" - lucas
Update, a person has died by smoking inhalation.
Srilankan airlines from its inception in 1979, uses Airbus aircrafts. For 45 years it has Zero fatal accidents associated with Airbus aircrafts.
Srilankan's only accident is a landing gear failure in 1992 and it is a Boeing 737. The Airline retired all its Boeing fleet in 1995 and since then it has used only Airbus aircrafts.
2 passanger planes that landed safely
2 passanger planes that didn't land safely.
Tough and rough week for the end of this year. 😞
and there is a crash in brasil too..
and don't forget the close call at LAX
the fact that lion air and sriwijaya air is safer than other airlines this month is crazy
To be fair one of the planes that didn't land safely was shot down by Russians, so it's hardly comparable to other cases involving bird strikes/technical problems.
Great and I’m flying soon across the Atlantic oh god 😢😢😢😢
Glad there were no Walls out of place at Oslo Airport.
Yeah, that damned wall at Muan... so tragic for everyone involved in the Jeju crash
Torp Airport,Sandefjord. not Oslo
How do you know what is at the end of the airport when you don’t even know what airport it landed?
This plane veered off the tarmac, not shot off the end of the runway at high speed.
So many blames on the wall of the Jeju crash, seems like a diversion of blame on the Boeing.
It’s still too early to judge before the investigation, but there seems to be a lot of issues with the landing gears of the 737s.
QI hve never liked the 737 I have often skipped a flight because the 737 was our fluht aurcraft.
@@madsam0320 nobody knows why the gear failed so wait for the investigation before you draw conclusions.
That wall on the other hand, it shouldn't have been there, that's for sure.
Not to mention that another Jeju 737-800 had to make an emergency landing today, fortunately without incident.
Everyone died bar 2? How is that without incident? Or are you being sarcastic....?
@@FatHeadDavekeyword "ANOTHER"
@@FatHeadDaveno, there was another 737-800, also Jeju Air, that had to return after a landing gear issue today
@@FatHeadDaveNo, he was mentioning the more recent news where another Jeju Air Boeing 737 had to make an emergency landing due to a landing gear malfunction, a day after that plane crash.
how funny of you. shame
When it rains, it pours. Terrible week for aviation.
So many aviation accidents and incidents happening towards the end of the 2024.
there was a very close call here at Belfast City airport this week
Most are Boeing planes
@@Ld-wk2qz and?
Yeah wth
Yea, it really does feel like that the fact we had a big accident on just the second day of the year with that A350 collusion in japan was a bad omen for aviation this year, from the top of my head I can remember like 4 or 5 major accidents, the JAL A350 collusion, we then also had the ATR crash in Brazil, then that DHL 737 crash, the Embraer Azerbaijan crash, and then the jeju air 737 crash.
'Hard noise' is a soft term for explosion.
why all of these accidents were all related to Boeing 737?
They weren’t. 2 of the 4 incidents were Boeing. 1 was embraer and the other was De Havilland. Considering there are over 7,800 737s operated around the world, it’s not statistically unusual that this would happen to 2 out of the 7,800.
Boeing seems to skimp on producing a quality aircraft and are only concern about making money. That's why I only fly Airbus.
@@FlyByWire1 There are 10800 A320 family planes in service
Embraer plane was shot with a missile. Embraer make better planes than US manufacturers. US products are all profit and not on safety and quality
Made in India?😅
Boeing once again ! ! !
daily mail journalist
why airplanes coincidentally having hydraulic issues at the same time recently ?
They have mentioned that it probably occurred a tire explosion on the departure due to the finding of rubber debris on the runway.
If the debris also damaged some hydraulic or it was the damaged tire that caused the off runway is not clear
Why don't you tell us your theory about a South Korean Boeing, Dutch Boeing, Canadian DeHavilland and Azerbaijani Embraer (which was shot down) professor
@@per995 Yeah the wheel-well has a lot of stuff in it
@@AB-mw8oz
I am not a psychic, but the Oslo Gardermoen accident has given some clues due to the rubber tire parts they achieved from the runway.
Do you have any problems with that I mentioned it😳
There was 3 separate incidents with boeing 737 800 landing malfunction in a matter of 2 days
All airports and airplanes all around the world must be investigated . These is getting crazy
I wonder if this is related to the the use of defective parts as revealed by whistleblowers that worked at Boeing
Brain dead people,this 24 years in service
Not a good week for aviation
Not a good week for Boeing
@@Ld-wk2qzmore so not a good week for proper maintenance
@@TheRussianFloofCat nah, 2 737-800's both having hydraulic issues within a couple days, seems like a design flaw
@@SpoopyGamer2 737 out of many hundreds if not thousands experienced a hydraulic failure on that day is more the maintenance fault than Boeing
@@berthebear_real they got brainwashed by amemus
The guy who narrates this has gotta be one of the most recognizable voices in aviation
several hours after the Korean disaster , the same Boeing had landing gear problems..WTF?
Not a big deal, but I believe the aircraft is still situated at Torp airport, not at Oslo Gardermoen.
He literally said that in the video, although he ends the video by citing Oslo. Airport marketing is confusing (see also MMX, VST and NYO)
@@MinusMOD98
They name Torp airport as Oslo airport too. Sometimes customers travel to Oslo Gardermoen and actually should travel to Torp airport at Sandefjord.
The failure let you to lose your flight.
@@per995 TRF/ENTO does not use "Oslo" in its branding, at least not anymore
@@sundhaug92
It could be just that carriers like Ryanair tricked peoples to believe that they arrived at Gardermoen instead of Torp.
The named it as Oslo.
Saw recently Ryanair costumers made mistakes about Berlin I think and ended up in a desert outside Berlin😂
@@per995Ryan is the prime offender, sometimes not even landing in the same country. «Vienna» is really Bratislava, «Frankfurt» is closer to Belgium than Frankfurt.
Aircraft is still in Sandefjord, no way it has been returned to airworthy already.
Those 800s are usually good work horse commercial airplanes. Not typically known to have MAX type problems. So, and I'm only speculating here, it could have been a maintenance or ageing issue or a combination of both.
All Boeing 737 airplanes should be grounded indefinitely,...they have too many issues.
Yeah. They found pieces at Gardermoen airport. This plane lost parts during takeoff.
Imagine 3 incidents on the same day, with 3 same hydraulic problems, with 3 different airlines.
This isn't of the type that has issues. This is a much older plane from the better days of Boeing.
idiotic comment! It's a maintenance issue nothing to do with a Boeing "defect" KLM's 737-800 fleet is 14-17 years old with most over 50,000 hrs!
This comment confirms you know very little about aviation. There is no reason at all to ground all 737s when both of these incidents occurred on fairly old planes. The likelihood of this being a Boeing issue is very slim especially since the NG -800 was launched in 1994 and isn’t even made anymore. This is most likely a maintenance and/or pilot error but we’ll have to wait for the final report.
Today there are 2 other KLM planes with problems, both are 777's and have to return to Amsterdam due to technical problems. Both landed safely.
The words say : boeing ,fly airbus
@@ThePatgilbert fly airbus,new doomed sidesticks!Ignore the boeing 777,trying to save you with its strength!fly airbus!
@@ThePatgilbertan American Airlines A321 had to make an emergency landing in Philadelphia due to hydraulics failure on Dec 26, 2024. This is not an Airbus or Boeing issue, it’s an airline maintenance issue.
another Boeing airplane????
been a hard year for aviation💔
Fr
Hard month
It's more like a hard month. Because 2024 is not even among the top 10 deadliest years for aviation.
Always need to pray when getting on a Boeing to arrive safely..
dumb comment! It's a maintenance issue nothing to do with a Boeing "defect" KLM's 737-800 fleet is 14-17 years old with most over 50,000 hrs!
Since when did praying had an effect on aviation?
@@ezragonzalez8936exactly!
@thetruthbehindplanesthen you admit it's not airbuses fault that Malaysia airlines had to ground it's all fleet 🤔
@@Plab1402it was just one a330
AND it was airbus' fault
Happy New Year, Boeing!
Boeing 737 became the flying coffins !!!
Boeing shares dropped 5% this morning
Not for nothing, but another Jeju Air B737-800 encountered landing gear problems, and had to make an emergency landing. Luckily with 0 casualties.
ALL the talk by whistleblowers and such about how the 'Boeing Problem' has been a decades long problem preceding the MAX, has it come to fruition? I mean, maintenance could be an issue of course. But Boeing is the one with the spotty track record now, not Jeju Air.
It's a maintenance issue nothing to do with a Boeing "defect" KLM's 737-800 fleet is 14-17 years old with most over 50,000 hrs!
@@ezragonzalez8936You can’t convince the Airbus paid shills otherwise
The 2024 aviation year is really just ending the way it had started in Haneda to be honest.
It's a maintenance issue nothing to do with a Boeing "defect" KLM's 737-800 fleet is 14-17 years old with most over 50,000 hrs!
Today 2 klm 777's had technical issues and returned back to Amsterdam...so i guess youre right😢.
I myself fly many times with KLM to Norway or Schotland....😮
There are old Emrarer's too but you don't see em dropping out of the sky like flies.
@@KathrynsWorldWildfireTracking your ignorance dkes not merit a reply.
I think we are seeing the downfall of Boeing
What's with the aviation incidents these days
Never been this high before
Coincidence.
Airplane gas absolutely will make you high faster and higher
Sometimes coincidence is real - but it's definitely intellectual laziness if declared before investigations conclude.
The runway ends in a very rocky and steep part in the south end. Sounds bold to land from the north with hydraulic problems.
KLM’s maintenance needs to be looked at first, especially since this plane was 24 years old. KLM is planning to retire their 737s and replace them with A321NEOs, so given the little time these 737s have left at KLM, especially older 737s like this one, it is likely that KLM became complacent with maintaining planes that are on their way out, since there is less justification to spend top dollar on quality maintenance for planes that are on their way out, compared to planes that they will keep for a long time.
It's a maintenance issue nothing to do with a Boeing "defect" KLM's 737-800 fleet is 14-17 years old with most over 50,000 hrs!
@@ezragonzalez8936 It's the 4th identical message of yours i read under 4 comments.
Are you a Boeing bot?
Would they slack off on maintaining an aluminum tube that operates 38,000 feet in the air traveling at such speed? I really hope not.
@@debbypurcell6215 it’s plausible that they would slack on maintenance of an old tube on its way out that will only operate for a relatively few amount of cycles and retire soon. Planes that are on their way out will make less future money than newer planes, so accordingly, it’s plausible that airlines will look at the economics and invest less on maintaining planes that will deliver less return on investment due to imminent retirement.
@@Blank00just stop man. You are just making huge assumptions without any proof or knowledge. Nobody is going to slack their maintenance if the airplane is going to be gone soon. That’s simply not happening.
A hard year end for the Boeing.
They found pieces from the aircraft at the takeoff runway
Last dec 27, 2024 at 7am. A philippine airlines (PAL) turbo prop skidded off the bacolod silay airport runway located at negros occ philipines due to heavy rains. All crew & passenger are safe.
Bro before it was jeju air and azerbaijan, now it’s klm
Air Canada also
In Azerbaijan’s defense, they were shot down
no the more important part is both of the aircraft that crashed are 737-800's. Azerbaijan is an outlier, it was blown out the skies
Another Jeju Air 737-800 had landing gear problems today, and had to emergency land. No casualties.
But WTF!?
@@deeya it wasnt landing gear problems it was pilot error
Did you say "Boeing?"
This is clearly a maintenance issue.
I've used KLM so many times. I've traveled to 5 different countries using them. I've never had one incident of some sort of issue either minor or major and I've flown through some serious turbulence.
One thing is certain, a lot of their planes are old. You can only keep them running for that long on a strict maintenence plan. It may have happened that this specific plane had to do a few extra flights due to another plane failing a few tests. This may have caused the hydraulic issue to get missed during essential checks.
The issue with an old fleet is that you eventually run out of redundancy. Hence their need to aquire a new fleet.
It's definitely a maintenance issue, but not because of negligence. KLM has never expressed indifference towards the state of their property.
Way too long dude
@PatrickMcmahon-iq5xl you don't have to read it?
There needs to be more stringent checks on hydraulic lines
A part from the aircraft were found on the Oslo Gardermoen runway. "Oslo Torp" is a strange name. Its located in Sandefjord.
3 crashes yesterday??
Nevermind
just one was a hull lost 2 were major incidents.
Not a good week for aviation and a particularly bad couple of days for the 737 although both were getting on in years
It seems like the air crashes season just started...
Its NOT in Oslo, its in Sandefjord thats 120 km from Oslo and 160km from Gardermoen (Oslo Airport)
Do they have maintenance team?
This KLM has the flaps down
And a wall isn’t up …
@ yep :(
So now Three specifically B737-800s have had landing gear failures within a week if this doesn’t call for an investigation I don’t know what does
A landing gear failure is not the same as a hydraulics failure. This was a hydraulics failure. The same type of failure that occurred on an American Airlines A321 that had to make an emergency landing in Philadelphia on Dec 26, 2024. It’s not a Boeing or Airbus issue , it’s an airline maintenance issue.
Glad to hear everyone is ok but I'm wondering for the reasons of the following aircrash matters in the same week.. if there is a kind of frequency attacks on over the world?😮
Thank everyone is safe .
1. Japan Airlines
2. Alaska Airlines
3. Voepass
4. Azerbaijan Airlines
5. KLM
6. Air Canada
7. Jeju Air.
WHAT. THE.
A bad week for aviation fr
Swiss airlines. One crew member died yesterday.
What hydraulic system controls NWS? No pressure, no steering.
there seem to be a lot of issues with KLM.planes. This is not the first time
and probably won't be the last time
at least no one is dead
Anyways
WE NEED TO STOP THE BIAS
More money for CEO and less money for maintenance.😢
Smoke after engine shutdown isn't that weird. It'd have to be a significant amount or accompanied by liquid to be a serious concern.
Not uncommon at all.
BOEING HAVE A BIG PROBLEM OF OUTDATED PROGRAM
If it’s Boeing I’m not going.
Daily mail journalists
You have a single digit iq
@thetruthbehindplanesI know you are jealous of Airbus impeccable safety record. Cry me a river 😅
Boeing/US authorities involved in criminal activities.
Worst time of year to fly! Equipment stretched along with crew schedules and maintenance shortage due to holidays. Couple that with late schedules and it’s a recipe for disaster. By the way these aircrafts are getting long on the tooth as airlines not buying new equipment.
This 737-800 experienced hydraulic failure for no apparent reason and had difficulty to land. Meanwhile some UA-cam aviation experts and geniuses felt they could land a 737-800 better even after a bird strike affecting the engine and hydraulics.
wasnt jal 516 just a few weeks ago??? 😭
JL516 is almost a year ago!
@@nw3191 I know, it's a figure of speech.
bruh
Boeing: i am done….
I have a new respect for Embraer. Things are built like tanks!
For all those saying "can't blame Boeing," consider this:
If there's a fundamental issue with, say, backup hydraulics on 737's automatically activating,
then _the type of emergency doesn't matter._ Bird strike, tire explosions, war, etc.
All emergencies with hydraulics will be worse than if the manufacturing or design defect didn't exist.
(As with shipwrecks - many mass-casualty events occurred simply because life preservers used to be made with cork - and cork becomes dust. Expired / old life preservers meant people sank like stones when they jumped overboard. See the "Eastland" capsizing disaster, etc. This happened again and again due to greed and not checking safety equip. Many different years, many different types of ships.)
I'm not saying Boeing is at fault here - I'm saying "open your mind."
Boeing again what is going on with them?
anyone mention both case involved boeing aircraft?
Some self proclaimed experts said that bird strikes cant affect the hydraulics. This plane didn't hit any birds yet the hydraulics failed.
It is as if the Korean plane chose to land without its landing gear to show off its drifting skills
This solve the issue that south Korea air plane had ..Boeing is in serious trouble as I said …Thankyou Dutch air safety investigators.
This is a crucial information ..
Seems like alot of incidents in a short period of time
Yes and All Boeing 737
Yes and All Boeing 737
@@Ld-wk2qzbut I doubt the incidents are related.
@@Ld-wk2qz Apart from the Air Canada Dash 8 gear collapse and the Azerbaijan Airlines E190 shootdown
A Boeing 737-800 != 737-max
20+ years between them
Maintenance seems to be ignored either due to incompetence in current staff, not wanting to spend money, lack of parts, or both. I’m sure increased stress/demand during the holidays plays a role too.
"The plane is a 24 year old Boeing 737-800"
Damn that's old
"it was delivered in September 2000"
Damn I'm old
WTF, another one?!
Thrust reverser number one engine, Isnt deployd. Thats why the plane shots to the right.
Boing AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN.
Did the pilots not switch nose wheel steering to alternate, i wonder? Or were multiple systems damaged?
The piloted noted that the plane was out of control after touchdown and veered of the runway. The passengers didnt now that the plan was ended up in the grass, only after left the airplane. ( that was in the news here in Holland)
60.000 flight hours = time to retire
Do u thinck that it's normal ??
A 4th plane!!! There is something more to this!!!
Boeing again ?
2024 started off strong, only to end with tragic accidents.
Is there something fishy that planes are getting out of control end of the year?
Unrelated, except for the fact that there was no fraking wall at the end of the runway.
If it's Boeing, I am not Flyin..It rhymes and will save your life.
Like after an almost an hour trip, why did it go back to Oslo for landing? Weird!
TRF/ENTO is Torp/Sandefjord, not Oslo
Not Oslo airport, but Torp ENTO!
We're a few travellers who strongly dislike both KLM and the 737 family of aircrafts, now I know why.
It was a precautionary landing, not an emergency landing
No way, it was a bird strike,😂😂😂 they say now
It looks as if technical support hasn't been always looking after these issues these several years since the Covid outbreaks
At least they survived.
On December 25, 2024 klm plane from Amsterdam to Entebbe via Kigali was cancelled I definitely was it was about to take off from Kigali to Entebbe! Same hydraulics problems! Thank God it was detected right before takeoff
glad everyone was safe. it's an old aircraft so maybe it is obsolete by now
another 737!
*the plane from JEJU airline came from the wrong side of the runway the concretewall with the approaching lights are at the beginning of the runway not at the end !*
Boings should be investigated properly.
Blame maintenance. 24 year old plane having hydraulic issues is very much a maintenance problem
average airbus sucker
@@TheRussianFloofCatTrue, but it could also be a maintenance schedule problem.
@@TheRussianFloofCatexactly
Worst year in the modern aviation world
Nah not the worst. Its just a major incident as it was not a hull loss. 2014 was the worst
@@planelover234 considering what happened in January this year, it has been a really really bad year for modern aviation.
@@ViktorFromDK i agree to disagree with you. Its ok if you think it was the worst year in aviation since 2010, but i personally think 2014
Why do all of these incidents always come in clusters. It’s unnerving. RIP to all that have lost their lives.
To the common person they pay attention more after one so it may seem like there’s some pattern.
I've been on that plane 🫤
With over 38,070 cycles - many people have been on that plane, probably many even multiple times
Me to 3 months ago Aberdeen to Amsterdam😮.....
Wtf is happening
68 flight hours and 38 flight cycles. Before was only about 737, only after December 19 737-800 appeared to have "problems".
Don't get your comment, the plane flew 60.843 flight hours and 38.070 flight cycles, not just 68 and 38 as you're pointing out!