BAR 2020-21 - CRIMINAL LAW - Suggested ANSWERS - Dean JOE-SANTOS Balagtas BISQUERA
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 жов 2024
- PRINCIPLES of Criminal Law - PROPOSAL to Commit Murder - Persons Criminal Liable: Principal by Direct Participation, Co-Conspirator versus ACCESSORY After the Facts - Dismissal of a Criminal Action on APPEAL on the Death of the Accused - MALUM PROHIBITUM vs Non-Existent Exempting Circumstance - PRAETER INTENTIONEM, Offense committed more Serious than that Intended, effect on Conviction.
MALUM in SE under the REVISED PENAL CODE - Crime vs CHASTITY, SEDUCTION vs Rape vs Child Abuse, SWEETHEART Theory, Act(s) to debase, demean a Child - THEFT in serving a Search Warrant with aggravating circumstance of TAKING ADVANTAGE of a PUBLIC POSITION - THEFT consummated despite return of the Thing Stolen - ROBBERY through Intimidation with taking Advantage of a Public Position - COMPLEX CRIME of GRAVE COERCION through SERIOUS ILLEGAL DETENTION of a FEMALE.
MALUM PROHIBITUM in SPECIAL CRIMINAL LAWS - Special Protection of CHILDREN against ABUSE, Exploitation and Discriminate Act (RA 7610) - ECONOMIC ABUSE, Anti-VIOLENCE against WOMEN and their CHILDREN, BATTERED WIFE Syndrome (RA 9262) - DATA PRIVACY ACT, SENSITIVE PERSONAL INFORMATION, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONSENT Imperative (RA 10173) - SAFE SPACE "WALANG BASTUSAN" ACT, includes LGBT (RA 11313) - INDETERMINATE SENTENCE LAW, Sentence more than ONE (1) Year, Arresto Menor, Sentence is One(1) Day to Thirty (30) days so excluded from the Indeterminate Sence (RA 4103).
Thank you, Dean Bisquera🥰❤..God bless you always in good health!🙏❤🙏
Salamat po
thank you so much sir for the video lecture you shared, it will help me a lot in my review. i just would want to be cleared in your suggested answer under good faith applicability. is it applicable if the land is registered? Godbless po.
Which Number Teodorico?
I think it should be rape at 49:41, "she repeteadly said no" clearly qualifies that there was no consent, which is the material aspect of rape. Sweetheart defense will not hold up.
People vs. Gecomo - “It should be borne in mind that love is not a license for carnal intercourse through force or intimidation. Even granting that appellant and complainant were really sweethearts, that fact alone would not negate the commission of rape. A sweetheart cannot be forced to have sex against her will. From a mere fiancee, definitely a man cannot demand sexual submission and, worse, employ violence upon her on a mere justification of love. A man can even be convicted for the rape of his common-law wife.”
Thank you, Dean Joe!
Thank you sir for what you do.. love listening to you 🙏🏻❤️
Thank you, Dean♥️
Love to heard your suggested answers.
Jalil, since you will be a UM BAR Warrior, you may wish to make sure your Grammar is in place. With utmost apology, perhaps you short note could have read "Love to HEAR your suggested answers."
Medyo mahina po ang sound volume nito, unlike your other videos po, Dean. Hope this can be remedied. Thanks!
Thanks Dean but the volume is a challenge, it can barely be heard.
Thank you Dean🙂
With due respect, another lawyer considered child abuse in the beaty queen question, as Caloagan vs. PEOPLE is not applicable.
I stand that Child Abuse does not apply because there was no intent to downgrade d status of d child. in fact, they even became lovers.
Thanx for ur "due respect".
♥️♥️♥️