10:24 tanong lang po atty. Bakit po homicide? Hindi ba murder at frustrader murder kasi pinag planohan nya yung pag patay at may deliberate intent sya? Yung sa bystander matik na homicide salamat po agad sa sagot
Evident premeditation? Isa kasi sa element is: sufficient lapse of time.. so in the absence of fact apply the doctrine of pro reo. Anyway, it is how you argue. And so far you are on the right track.
I really appreciate your explanation Sir. It is very clear and logical. Thank you very much.
Hello, atty! As a passive learner po, sobrang helpful po ng mga videos niyo. Thank you po.
This is so informative atty. Maraming salamat po!
10:24 tanong lang po atty. Bakit po homicide? Hindi ba murder at frustrader murder kasi pinag planohan nya yung pag patay at may deliberate intent sya? Yung sa bystander matik na homicide salamat po agad sa sagot
Evident premeditation? Isa kasi sa element is: sufficient lapse of time.. so in the absence of fact apply the doctrine of pro reo. Anyway, it is how you argue. And so far you are on the right track.
@@egosumpulcher1 thank you
I think po kaya hindi siya murder kasi hindi nafulfill ni pedro yung elements that will constitute to the crime of murder. Kaya homicide lang po siya.
Yung laway lang problema