JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES Criminal Law Dean Joe-Santos Balagtas Bisquera BAR Review
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 гру 2021
- JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES CRIMINAL LAW Dean Joe-Santos Balagtas Bisquera BAR Review SELF Defense Defense of a RELATIVE Defense of a STRANGER Criminal Act to Avoid a Greater Evil Criminal Act to fulfill a Lawful Duty Criminal Act to Obey a LAWFUL ORDER UNLAWFUL AGGRESSION Reasonable necessaity of the Means Employed by the Defender to prevent or repeal the Unlawful Aggression, Lack of Sufficient Provocation on the part of the Person Defending himself against the Unlawful Aggression there must be Physical or Material Attack ACTUAL or IMMINENT and UNLAWFUL ACTUAL or MATERIAL UNLAWFUL Aggression versus IMMINENT Unlawful Aggression SELF-DEFENSE vs Unlawful Aggression Reasonable Means RATIONAL EQUIVALENCE - the Emergency, the Imminent Danger, the INSTINCT for the Defense & the proportionateness dependent on the imminent danger Self-Defender NO TIME nor MIND to think, calculate and choose the weapon(s) to be used. INSTINCT for self-preservation Number of Wounds may indicate reasonableness of the need(s) employed Self-Defender no more right to kill when the Unlawful Aggression no longer exists
Any person who acts in obedience to an order issued by a superior for some lawful purpose. Obedience to an order of a superior gives rise to exemption from criminal liability only when the order is for some lawful purpose. The order was illegal, and appellant was not bound to obey it. Moreover, it does not appear that in taking part in the maltreatment of the deceased, appellant was prompted solely by his sense of duty toward his superior. What appears is that he and his companions had a common grievance against the deceased, because the latter had misappropriated a quantity of fish intended for their consumption. It was, therefore, but natural that they should all want to teach the deceased a lesson by making him suffer for the fault he had committed.
Maraming salamat po Dean Joe, sa pagshare ng kwento with Mayor Lim.
Thank you, Dean Joe Santos Bisquera.🥰❤..God bless you always in good health!🙏❤🙏
Pag nakikinig ako sa iyo Dean, lalo kung naintindihan ang batas at lumalawak ang aking pang unawa sa buhay. Salamat sa iyong ambag.
Thank you, Dean. I like your lecture here. More video, please, Dean. Hoping for another video on Exempting, Mitigating, Aggravating, and Alternative Circumstances. Thank you, Dean. Merry Christmas 🎄 🎁
Salamat po ulit din sa inyo. Diyos ti ag ngina. Merry Christmas po sa inyo
👏👏👏 I became an instant fan Dean Joe after watching this video. Mabuhay ka po! 🤩
Thank you sir!
Hello sir, I am Listening everynight .. minsan nakakatulugan ko nlang ang lecture but it was nice .. it helps a lot
Nakakaantok ba, hah hah hah. What Law School are you from, Ming Ming? your friend, Dean Joe
Merry Christmas, Dean. Thank you very much for the lecture.
Happy new year Dean, god bless
⚰️🧒🏻🙄 Imagine Philippines children continues to sleep and die in the North cemetery.Without a bathroom.
atty.may mga grupo pong nais ibenta nanmn ung lupa kung saan ang UP diliman.. ang grupong ito ay sila daw ang tunay n may ari kung saan nkatirik ang up diliman... particular ang kahabaan ng philcoa..may ngbabackup pong judge itong grupo na ito.. posible po ba ito? ano po ba status ng lupa kung saan ang up diliman..sana mapanagot itong mga to. salamat concern citizen lng po
The Group should show a Clean Original Certificate of Title to even start any discussion. Since UP is a government institution, the UP area represents inalienable property because the Government has not declared the same as alienable and disposable. So no valid Contract can ever be entered into without the Government's declaration and that is not forthcoming.
Not even the Philippine President can initiate any Sale so a Judge has no authority whatsoever.