Ex-virgin here, Stormtrooper armor is actually made of a sort of elastic bodysuit, on wich 18 plates of plastoid are magnetized. Assuming you're sauced on Space-Tren and hitting the Space-Gym, the bodysuit would probably just stretch to accomodate your Darth Ronnie physique, but the gap between the plates would probably make you an easier target, if the Rebel manlets are bold enough to try to take you down.
@@kimjongil4497 what is PT141? I’m not familiar with almost any outside of the Wolverine stack and even then very limited. I’m so interested in them tho. I wonder if they have negative effects similar to gear or if they are so different there is no crossover. See this is why I need a trusted source of info!
Whenever someone claims "all the benefits of X but without the side effects!" it ALWAYS triggers my bullshit alarm, There aren't many too many things in life where you get something with zero side effects, its always a compromise/balancing act of giving up something to gain something else.
The corollary to this is what I'll call the Ozempic phenomena. If there is a new drug/supplement that actually does work to a notable and safe degree, you won't need videos to tell you about it, it'll become mainstream very fast. Even if SARMs do end up being safe, odds are the effect is borderline trivial, or else everyone would already know SARMs are the new hot steroids to take.
Sure, but who tf is saying sarms don't have side effects? There's that one dummy Dr huge or tony from Thailand but he's a known quack. Zoomers on tiktok maybe, but Everything else I've heard and read about them plainly lays the cons out and how to combat them.
My doctor told me any pharmaceutical drug he prescribes to me has side effects. He and my cardiologist told me to stay away from steroids or low T supplementation. They said they aren't good for the heart and cardiovascular system.
@@castro619a my point was that they generally have no relation to sarms. Being a doctor has nothing to do with it either. This information is readily available. I wouldn't mind seeing Dr Mike's opinion on some of the more obscure peptides though.
@@JackMott you don't have any degree in medicine, you're just a random guy from the internet who has no idea what he's writing about and you get your information from google stop
lol that was me, I escaped without long term side effects. My friends thought I was superhuman for two years😂 didn’t really gain a lot of mass, just ridiculous strength gains
@@AlfimAlves bro, you don't know if you escaped long term side effects until you died of something else. with this stuff, it's very possible your hearth suddenly remembers after 30 years. not wishing that happens to you of course!
I remember one of my army buddies passing off his SARMS to me, because he couldn't take it across the border where we were stationed. I was honestly not comfortable trying them and I'm glad I never did lol
I believe the issue with SARMS is that they were designed to be partial agonists, relative to T or DHT, which are full agonists of the AR receptor. This makes sense because the original intent was to combat sarcopenia in the elderly. Asking a SARM to behave as T is analogous to Jeff Nippard expecting MVW to have manners and class.
And most of the time fake not to talk about contamination etc because they are not pharma grade in fact most of the time in the sarm they contains ph or some shit underdosed real shit buddy yeah
This is meant with respect, but no. They were not "designed" to be partial agonists, they just are. Ideally they would be full agonists with high selective affinity for muscle . Also, "partial agonist" doesn't mean what it says on the box. It's just a general umbrella term for ligand-receptor interactions that are not simple dose-dependent linear activation curves. Partial agonist =\= selective affinity for particular receptor subtype In addition, that's what real steroids were developed for too, sarcopenia and wasting in chronic illness. "Masteron" is called masteron because it was designed to treat sarcopenia in breast cancer.
In reference to the stormtrooper bit, there are minimum and maximum weight limits in the US military based on height. so its safe to assume the Empire has similar rules, and that Dr. Mike would greatly exceed the maximum weight for his height for standard imperial infantry. However, he could probably fit into a Hazard Trooper suit.
@@Axiomatic75stormtroopers Are basically the marines of the Empire, They Are Not part of the imperial Army so They Are their own branch Like the marines
I get annual blood work and so I did an experiment 3 months out from our physicals with rad 140. Little to no noticeable differences in looks. Maybe some sort of questionable benefit to strength endurance. But it really trashed my lipid panel. 3 months of RAD 140 lipid profile Total 202 HDL 18 Trig 103 LDL 162 One year later (and nearly the same as it was the year prior) Total 151 HDL 55 Trig 75 LDL 80 No dietary or exercises changes in this time. Weight training 5 days a week. 2-3 5k runs a week. Training for around 15 years hard.
I feel for you. Ive done 5 mg rad twice for 8 weeks and even on what the bros say is low dose. Did it once a year for the last the two years. Ive had noticeable size and strength gains while cutting. Like super noticeable and with pct both times I lost some strength and size but came out much with much more than if I wouldn’t have taken it. Did bloods and there was some negative effects but nothing fell out of normal ranges and follow ups 2 months later I was almost back to baseline. Now I know these are research chems and there could he other health issues I am not aware of, but in terms of results on a “low dose” I was pleased. I would do it more often if I wasn’t worried about heath effects.
What was your total test., free test, and SHBG after 3 months? SARMs will temporarily throw your lipid markers out of whack but that's expected and is part of the research literature.
Hahaha😂 you forgot to train. RAD 140 is strong as oral steroids like winsrol and anavar. And mass is good quality not like d-boll. And you do not need month to feel it is quick like orals. You do not have hair loss and gino. Lipids are fucked way more on winsrol and suppersion is individual thing however steroids ale suppresive too. It is more expensive than winsrol but cheaper then anavar. All orals should be avoided long term in my opinion but sarms receive too much hate and they are the same as steroids
I ate nothing but sarms for ten straight years and developed muscles like you wouldn't believe. Women (and men) simply couldn't resist grabbing my 30 inch guns and trying to squeeze them, only to break their hands against the rock that is my body. I needed to sleep in a cryo-chamber to offset the negative effects, but this was a small price to pay to catch the sidelong glances of every stranger.
You’re 100% bang on. SARMS for the most part are a “me too” PED that essentially is in the same class as oral anabolics. What is the Risk/Reward of them compared to known orals anabolics.
This video is very important for teens. I personally started using Ostarine for the gains and it worked so well, after 2 months I figured I might as well do anavar and test. Cover prohormones next
I'm on the same stack now, for me the mast is there just to fix the sides I would get from Deca, they're not that crazy for me but I'd rather feel good
Ozempic actually is brand new, only approved for medical use in 2017. A GLP1 receptor agonist called Liraglutide was invented in 98, and then Semaglutide (Ozempic) in 2008, with 9 years of clinical trials. It was in the 70s that GLP-1 as a hormone started being studied.
Vote for Prohormones/SARMS vs. Prohormones. I took PH by ACCIDENT for 2 months at 16. No lasting side effects, and the doctors say I've gotten my barking down to a reasonable level.
How do you take prohormones by accident? Whoops! I tripped on the dog, landed on my keyboard computer and happened to hit all the keys to order a bottle of prohormones, and then while stumbling back onto my feet, ingested them for two months.
@@Nebulaoblivionback in the Wild West days of supplements, some stuff was shoved into supplements which didn’t appear on the label. Usually it was straight up gear, but pretty sure they also did it with prohormones.
I think its more common than you think, I had no idea my head looked like that till I shaved it. I don't even like chewing without a hat on cause those jaw muscles up there keep bulging out. Even when i was like 150 lbs thats just how my head was 😭
Talking about the improvements in medication over time is so incredibly true. Look at apixaban vs warfarin for blood thinning. Warfarin has been used since the 60s and while it’s a pretty good drug, it interacts harshly with a lot of other things and otherwise makes you incredibly vulnerable to all sorts of bleeding, along with a pretty heavy organ toll and a few other long term effects that may or may not happen. Apixaban comes through, and it stops clots better, interacts with nothing, with less unintended bleeding, with way less known organ recoil. While we don’t necessarily know the ramifications of 30, 40 years on it, in the short term it is VASTLY superior to stopping imminent death. If you’re going to take a brand new shiny drug, it better look like warfarin vs apixaban
RAD140 and Ostarine are way too common in teens today. I’m part of the coaching staff for a high school basketball team this year and the SARM goblins have only multiplied year after year
i agree, i am 18 in 2 months and i am on ostarine and lgd4033 using mk677 as a base and have my pct on standby. most of these kids my age or younger dont study enough or prepare enough leaving their hormones damaged. Edit: what i mean with the mk677 base is, its not a test base but something to help keep my natural test from going low low
@@NotNik99 I wouldn't claim the intellectual high ground while doing something only barely less stupid. Your hormones will almost certainly still be "damaged" by using this shit so young, not to mention other potential damage to your vital organs, etc. I mean, do whatever you want to do, but don't delude yourself that you're doing it "the good way."
The guy who owned my local supplement store told me Big Ramy never ran test and only took SARMs. This guy died of a heart attack a few months after telling me this.
Rad140: 7 cycles. Love it. I feel the best mentally and physically. YK11: 2 cycles. Increased aggression. A little bit of gains. Nutrabol: 2 cycles. Dear God, the hunger. Stenabolic: 4 cycles. Amazing endurance. Rest periods would go from 2 minutes down to 20 seconds. Andarine: 2 cycles. Decent gains. Wrecked my night vision. S23: 2 cycles. I definitely felt a drop in test. That went away when I halved the dose. Ligandrol: 2 cycles. Crazy strength gains. I put 90lbs on my front squat and 50lbs on my bench in 5 weeks. I've never felt like I was fixing to tear tendons before. Plus there was constantly blood in my jizz. Yeah.... That one was kind of scary. Cardarine: 2 cycles. No effect. Ostarine: 2 cycles. I didn't notice enough to discount if there was a placebo effect. Blood work is fine. No BP issues. No hair issues. No skin issues. Joints feel fine.
I did a Cardarine/Sten stack for 8 weeks on a hard cut diet. I hit my loss goals but I definitely didnt feel any kind of endurance gains, but I also didnt feel like I was running a 750cal defecit either.
LOL anecdote is not a good way to handle health. Some people go into remission naturally from pancreatic cancer. Majority die even with the radiation and chemo. I’m not going to accept an anecdote about orange juice stopping pancreatic cancer.
Why are you people so interested in ancient chemistry like pro hormones that for the most part is a complete waste of time. You want to F yourself up but good then pro hormones are the way to do it and see very little benefit for your suffering. and NO Superdrol is not a pro hormone as was claimed when it was marketed. it is a full blown anabolic. I'll bet you can;t even name a single pro hormone and what benefit it is supposed to be!
Loved this, I have taken Anavar to cut for the summer as my first experience of steroids and contemplated doing Sarms as an alternative to bulk. Seems like I'd be better off sticking to a higher dose of Anavar than using Sarms because I at least know what I'm taking. Appreciate the information your always putting out there Dr. Mike 💪
Know someone who took RAD 140 and YK11 freshman year of college. used an over the counter PTC. He got huge gains but months after his PCT he felt like shit and lost a lot of gains. He got his bloodwork he was under 300. He took some clomid and went up to over 1000 but then dropped back down to 400 as his baseline
Over the counter PCT? What a waste. This is why anyone who wants to take SARMs or gear really needs to get educated about them and how to do a proper PCT.
@@VernCrislerwell if it went up to 1000 and then went back down to baseline at 400, then it doesnt matter what it was. It worked exactly as it was supposed to.
@@haydencappsyeah it was the prescription clomid that worked to get him up and running again. i still firmly believe that he long-term (permanently since there’s no getting the years back of low T in your 20s) fucked up his system due to his use of sarms and his natural production was severely disrupted up to this day
Did a 5 week cycle of 10mg/day of rad-140. Not really worth it. I cut to 15% body fat in 2-3 months just working out and eating right so I’m not taking sarms as a chubby fuck. Honestly, sarms probably sped up my gains that I would have gotten 2-3 months later anyway. Not worth it. Tanked my testosterone, my joints felt weak, and got a chronic headache that lasted for 2 years. I was already eating right and working out near daily. It was like taking a high interest pay day loan when you don’t really need the money and you’re getting paid in a couple days.
@ you’re definitely not making optimized gains if you train daily. Sure you will get bigger and stronger, but you can get bigger and stronger at a more efficient rate if you actually utilize rest days.
@@randombrandon315 You can work out every day if you are making sure it's been something like 4 days or however long you need to recover each time you hit a given muscle/muscle group. You don't need to hit literally everything whenever you work out (and that would take forever)
As much as I love your content Dr Mike you did the same thing I've been hearing from steroid guys "Just do gear" The BIG difference for me in Australia is that Sarms are quasi-legal, Steriods are seriously illegal drugs. If I get busted, my career is over, I'll lose the house... etc etc. Could you PLEASE do a video not comparing them to roids, but just a well researched science based video comparing them to natty. What CAN they do? Because the research space online is all either bro-science, wellness clinic marketing materials or pubmed articles that are too dense for me.
You can read the conclusions and results of studies, it's not that hard. Some SARMs do deliver decent results compared to natty. LGD4033 is still the most potent one I think. Trouble is sourcing legitimate ones. Most of them are spiked with anavar lol
Took YK11 for a few months. Slept a lot, otherwise I got away with it. Picked up a fair amount of size, but strength went through the roof. 2ml per day, split by 12hrs as YK has a 12hr half life. Took Ost as well for my knees, that cleared up as well. Guess it depends on your mental makeup & genetics 🤷♂️
@@AlfimAlves I don't want to get "serious" and pin so I don't bother with anything beyond rad140. Maybe he has abnormally high test levels that allows long use of yk11, or i'm missing something.
Only reason i'd consider sarms over oral steroids like anavar would be that some sarms have minimal effects on the CNS whereas orals can cause anxiety, aggression, and depression. LGD 4033 and ostarine are sarms with minimal negative cns effects.Some other ones can cause agitation and aggression like rad 140, yk 11, s23
SARMS are actually great. Not if you want to be a MASSIVE body builder. But with low-med dosages you can get REALLY good results, with no Aromatization, no need for on cycle Arimadex, no Gyno, no hair loss(avoid LDG or RAD) No puffy nipples or risk of gyno, the Test shutdown isn't nearly as bad as a normal test cycle. And after a normal cycle test comes back quickly, while keeping the gains, because most sarms even at higher dosages will cause suppression but not a full shut down like steroids do. I've taken AC-262 recently for 2 months and my blood work shows my test levels are actually a scratch higher than before my cycle( was 730ish then Post cycle was 750-somthing) - (this is specific to AC-262) most likely didn't touch my TEST levels much and the differences in levels might be because of the time of day I did my bloodwork. Also only AC-262 barely touches your test levels, the others will lower your test a bit for sure, but again a SOFT 2 week pct will get most healthy men back to normal in very a short time. SARMS should NEVER be taken at high dosages, basically ever, they work REALLY well at low dosages and with that, little to no side effects for SARMS like AC-262 and Ostarine. Side effects like Dr. Mike said, are from increasing the dosages. Just don't. Easy. Used Sarms 7 times (6-8 weeks) over the last 11 years. Never had an unwanted side effect, even once.
I've been active in SARMs forums/subreddits 5+ years and people get gyno from SARMs cycles or the associated compounds like MK677 spiking prolactin or SERMs spiking estrogen literally all the time. Hair loss is another common side effect. The test shutdown is way worse on a SARMs cycle because your testosterone and estrogen levels are absolutely crashed versus on a testosterone cycle they are not. You do not keep all the gains either. You're just spreading some BS to make yourself feel better about running SARMs and being afraid to use gear.
@@mattstrickland2190 You aren't objective either. Why would T and E levels be "absolutely crashed" by SARMs in general, when a big part of SARM users report only small drops in T levels, or quickly regenerating T levels? I'd rather suspect that the "shutdown-cases" are cases where people THOUGHT they were taking a SARM but actually got an oral steroid mix instead, which tanks your T without a T base. I do agree about the Gyno risk though - Gyno risk on SARMS is very real! Strangely enough. So keep an countermeasures ready, or lower dose. Also, it is very difficult to talk about SARMs in general, because of the vastly different methods of action. Ostarine for example shouldn't cause any hairloss, LDG on the other hand surely brings that risk along. YK can lead to full shutdown, Ostarine usually slight suppression, if suppression at all. Etc. Many more examples there.
@@mattstrickland2190 I started with gear first. I have great results. I don't abuse them or mess with dosages. I also see people very commonly take 50mg of LGD and stacking with RAD at similarly high dosages on forums. So obviously they will shutdown. Recommended is 10-20 and works well at 5mg. If it didn't work and you didn't keep results no one would use them. Or you abused them and your own test is too low to keep the muscle mass you gained. Like anything you could take. Also, I'm talking from experience, don't be mad.
I took 3 2- month cycles and put on 20. Only side effect i noticed was bacne. I don't see start the big deal is. I took them while going through school and didn't shake anything.
I can say my "friend" experienced fewer side effects with SARMs than with steroids. Not as effective at building muscle for "him" but almost no side effects by comparison.
@@chetlyp Yeah because 99% they are fake most of the time underdosed and 100% contaminated since they are not pharma grade sperimental shit only a retard adhd guy can take them
It’s blows my mind people are willing to take years off their life to have bigger muscles. Absolutely insane. I find most of these guys are under 6’, don’t have any real skills or career path, weren’t popular in high school.
I've done quite a few SARMS cycles, and really like them. I didn't like Rad-140, though. S23 was fantastic, with lgd. And I love ac262 and acp105. I have smooth, lean gains, and get a lot of mass on those. I get so many compliments and people noticing. They're not as strong as traditional steroids, but they're definitely effective. My bloods have always been pretty good on them, too. If you're a competition level body builder, you'd want to stick to steroids, but if you don't compete but take your physique seriously, then Sarms can definitely be an option with the potential of less sides.
A book that changed my life in ways that I never could imagine is "Secret Testosterone Nexus of Evolution".Drop whatever you're doing right now and go find that book. Trust me after I implemented things from the book my testosterone levels went beast mode
If you’re talking about the pro-hormones of the 90s, all they were/are are precursors to known steroids that were never formally banned, like superdrol for instance is a pro-hormone to anadrol. Superdrol is now illegal but in the 90s you could find it at GNC.
@@qui1766 Yeah, now the only pro-hormones that are legally available are the non-methylated ones. Not sure if they really work or not. No randomized human trials.
Yes those pro-hormone were a single stage precursor to known steroids, and some like M1T were just steroids. The " modern" variant are "supposed" to be precursor -to - a- precursor of anabolics. I was wondering how Sarms compare to both modern and previous pro-hormones.
Also the logical flaw with this video as that Mister Mike is trying to tell you to overdose SARMs to get the same results as steroids. That's not how SARMS work or why people use them. SARMS aren't intended to be used at very high dosages because it's not supposed to be as strong as steroids. SARMs have a huge advantage over steroids in such that you get more than natty results and you get to keep them post cycle with a proper PCT, unlike steroids. No matter how hard you train you will lose ALL of your gains post steroid cycle. And because it's selective by nature, you don't get the life threatening effects of steroids with long term use. Hence my prior post of how there is not a single case of a SARMS related death compared to steroids.
Ryan Russo is going to make an angry response to this video or go into a passive aggressive angry rant talking about someone but not really saying their name because he loves sarms
Access is the upside imo. While they're not better for you I have 3 supplement stores near me that sell SARMS in oklahoma. While Roids feel sketchy to obtain.
@@qui1766 Because supplement are not fully controlled i can sell cocaine in a protein powder.. nobody would know that at least whether they analyze them or carry out an investigation, while the drugs must be approved and controlled is a completely different matter
Whats crazy about sarms is they were specifically made to bypass the HPTA and not cause test production shutdowns, but somehow the body STILL treats it like extra testosterone and shuts down the natural production anyway. Also if its going into your bloodstream, that means it's going to your brain and I'd be very interested to see a study that tracks if it affects that as well.
I’m really disappointed of what I’m hearing here. The Dr: should know better than that. Everyone knows that when storm troopers get jacked, they upgrade to shock troopers and heavy gunners.
As a former RAD140 user on-and-off for a number of years, until very recently, I *ignorantly* didn't realise how jacked my cholesterol, LDL's were and liver function was absolutely copping it. Sure, I can probably attribute that partially to lack of any real cardio while on-cycle but having double the normal levels of a 35 year old didn't sit well with me at all. I'm 5-6 weeks completely off and those numbers are already halved and are normalising nicely. Yes, training is harder and I feel like a mortal again, but I'd take that over a shortened lifespan any day. I've needed that mini scare to adjust my diet and increase cardio as well. Win-Win in my books. I hope more people see this video, Mike 👊
The promise isn’t no side effects, the promise is you won’t get arrested for taking felony drugs If you have enough for a full cycle and PCT, you have enough to get hit with a trafficking charge that will ruin your life
@@SeuOuto find a Trt clinic or doctor that will be on board with you is basically impossible and trt isn’t anabolic test it’s something like (don’t quote me) but like 1:4 in potency. So a “sport Trt cycle is like 4 times as much as what a regular anabolic cycle would be. Basic big make trynna grow first cycle looking 250ish test baseline maybe maybe triturate up to 500 if you’re feeling it and comfortable. Where as 250 for Trt is an insane dosage going in twice a week on a 7 day half life whatever just doesn’t work. If you have an imbalance sure but if you’re trynna actually cycle the u.s only has black market
My experience with SARMS was every 5 months I would take 20 Rad140 for 10 weeks and then pct for 12 weeks. It was incredibly effective at letting me blast through plateaus and boost my physique. Even when I hopped off I didn’t really lose too much strength or size and the only side effect I found was a little gyno which I took care of with clomid. I highly recommend that if you’re thinking about SARMS to try Rad140 at 10mg for 6 weeks just to see how your body responds. SARMS was also good for me because I really don’t want to stick myself with a needle.
What about a low dose of sarms during a cut. Would this be a better use? Minimize side effects due to a low dose and help mitigate muscle loss? I believe ostarine was basically made for use of treating cachexia and similar situations.
One thing all SARMS discussions on-line lack are the legal implications. 100% agree that SARMS are not even close however they are technically "legal" and do produce much better results than anything you buy buy off the shelf. Many of us have careers where a felony arrest for steroids would destroy our careers so SARMS are a legit option to fill that gap. As with all things, moderation is key and of course, get your blood work.
Dr Mike is thaaaaaaa maaaaaan! Ladies and gentleman, boys, girls, dogs, cats, lemurs. From Moscow, Russia. The froooooozen tundraaaaa. The city that was the undoing of Hitler himself. Lets get ready to rumbleeeeeeeeeeee. Dr Mike "Oi hes jacked" Isreatellllllllll
I think the problem is people comparing SARMs to steroids tbh. LOW dose SARMs can definitely be more effective than LOW dose steroids and with less sides. You just can't scale up the doses like you've alluded to. Anavar is better than any SARM. But SARMs do also have the benefit of being legal (UK at least). I think viewing them as a halfway house between rubbish supplements that do nothing like creatine, and steroids that do mega things. All about using the right tool for the job at hand.
creatine does nothing?? Its the most scientifically tested supplement ever and definitely works as intended. Maybe you're a non responder? or are taking too low a dose. Myself I dont feel much benefit on 5mg a day, but 10mg a day I definitely feel it and see it in my numbers (not to say its on any level with sarms etc) but certainly not a 'rubbish supplement'
Not even close. low dose SARMS are worthless while you can get decent effects from the right combination of low dose anabolics particularly injectable ones over oral!
This channel showed me a world I never knew existed. I used to just go to the gym and lift the weight
To some, that's all you need
Lmao right? My god these days being into weight lifting strains your brain more than your muscles.
You silly goose! Strength, health, and fitness are only for pathetic losers who will never know the touch of a woman (or Dr. Mike).
Check out more plates more dates Channel
@@spinnie0 I like it. At least I like this new era of lower weights, more time under tension to build more muscle stuff.
All I remember from my SARM usage was the nightmares. I miss the bugs under my skin. The bugs were my friends. My only friends. The bugs and Dr. Mike.
lol
😂
ua-cam.com/video/WnpfP9Y8fms/v-deo.html
lub it
Can you, please, make a video about peptides
i understand it now dr.Mike, i must take both steroids AND sarms so the side effects cancel eachother out
Oh yeah I understand it now
PEMDAS baby
I like that logic!
Ofcourse, - and - makes +
Ex-virgin here, Stormtrooper armor is actually made of a sort of elastic bodysuit, on wich 18 plates of plastoid are magnetized.
Assuming you're sauced on Space-Tren and hitting the Space-Gym, the bodysuit would probably just stretch to accomodate your Darth Ronnie physique, but the gap between the plates would probably make you an easier target, if the Rebel manlets are bold enough to try to take you down.
Lol @ ex-virgin
Goat comment.
This is fucking UA-cam commentary. It’s all downhill from here for the rest of the night 😂
I was not prepared for this unhinged comment. And I’m watching a Dr Mike video so that’s saying something…
Virginity is cool 😎
Peptides next! Dying to know more about those from Dr. Mike
Same
Yep, this please.
Tried PT-141... didn't do anything 😕
@@kimjongil4497 what is PT141? I’m not familiar with almost any outside of the Wolverine stack and even then very limited. I’m so interested in them tho. I wonder if they have negative effects similar to gear or if they are so different there is no crossover. See this is why I need a trusted source of info!
There are way to many peptides to cover them all
Whenever someone claims "all the benefits of X but without the side effects!" it ALWAYS triggers my bullshit alarm, There aren't many too many things in life where you get something with zero side effects, its always a compromise/balancing act of giving up something to gain something else.
The corollary to this is what I'll call the Ozempic phenomena. If there is a new drug/supplement that actually does work to a notable and safe degree, you won't need videos to tell you about it, it'll become mainstream very fast. Even if SARMs do end up being safe, odds are the effect is borderline trivial, or else everyone would already know SARMs are the new hot steroids to take.
Sure, but who tf is saying sarms don't have side effects? There's that one dummy Dr huge or tony from Thailand but he's a known quack. Zoomers on tiktok maybe, but Everything else I've heard and read about them plainly lays the cons out and how to combat them.
Diet/ light/ zero anything, more often than not= the memory of what dessert tastes like
My doctor told me any pharmaceutical drug he prescribes to me has side effects. He and my cardiologist told me to stay away from steroids or low T supplementation. They said they aren't good for the heart and cardiovascular system.
Even caffeine baby..you drink too much you die baby
A video about the difference between SARMS and peptides, maybe? Would love to see that.❤
Sarms are dog shit. Peptides are very good. Simple
A peptide is a protein based hormone. A peptide can signal any number of things to happen, both positive and negative.
@which ones, use case, how much, what they do, side affects and you’re not a doctor.
Also no dick jokes in your answer
I second that. Need a video on BPC-157, TB500, etc...
@@castro619a my point was that they generally have no relation to sarms. Being a doctor has nothing to do with it either. This information is readily available. I wouldn't mind seeing Dr Mike's opinion on some of the more obscure peptides though.
I learned so much about the clothing laws and regulations in shopping malls.
Thanks, Mike!
I say this with the utmost respect.
Dr Mike's head is getting more muscular with each video. damn
The secrets to head hypertrophy he keeps to himself lol
It's so misshapen
@@krisryan9181 😮
Simple growth hormone abuse no?
@@morales11191yes
SARMS 1000% less gains than roids and the same side effects not intended for human consumption medicine hardly uses them anywhere
Nah, thats about as wrong a take as them being harmless and side effect free is.
@@JackMott you don't have any degree in medicine, you're just a random guy from the internet who has no idea what he's writing about and you get your information from google stop
@@JackMott u are amoran
@@JackMott JackMott 80 IQ MAX yes you JackMott
@@JackMott the only thing you got fromsarms is unknown long-term side effects that will come in next 10 years
every 15 year old benching 3 plates is sucking down RAD140 like capri sun
lol that was me, I escaped without long term side effects. My friends thought I was superhuman for two years😂 didn’t really gain a lot of mass, just ridiculous strength gains
@@AlfimAlves bro, you don't know if you escaped long term side effects until you died of something else. with this stuff, it's very possible your hearth suddenly remembers after 30 years.
not wishing that happens to you of course!
@@alpenjodel24you don't know that quit trying to scare the kid your just mad because you couldn't afford the shit!
@@justinriley8651 I’m pushing 30 lol
@@alpenjodel24 I will probably die of prostate cancer in my 60s, standard procedure. I’ll probably get it checked in my 30s
I remember one of my army buddies passing off his SARMS to me, because he couldn't take it across the border where we were stationed. I was honestly not comfortable trying them and I'm glad I never did lol
Nothing wrong with em just to get a taste of the darkside, as long as you know what you're doing.
@kingcreed348 piss off nobody knows what they're doing when they use sarms, that's the whole point they're largely un-studied research chems
I love the taste of liquid sarm
Thank you for calling out us one ball gentleman. I feel seen ❤️
I believe the issue with SARMS is that they were designed to be partial agonists, relative to T or DHT, which are full agonists of the AR receptor. This makes sense because the original intent was to combat sarcopenia in the elderly. Asking a SARM to behave as T is analogous to Jeff Nippard expecting MVW to have manners and class.
And most of the time fake not to talk about contamination etc because they are not pharma grade in fact most of the time in the sarm they contains ph or some shit underdosed real shit buddy yeah
This is meant with respect, but no. They were not "designed" to be partial agonists, they just are. Ideally they would be full agonists with high selective affinity for muscle .
Also, "partial agonist" doesn't mean what it says on the box. It's just a general umbrella term for ligand-receptor interactions that are not simple dose-dependent linear activation curves.
Partial agonist =\= selective affinity for particular receptor subtype
In addition, that's what real steroids were developed for too, sarcopenia and wasting in chronic illness. "Masteron" is called masteron because it was designed to treat sarcopenia in breast cancer.
Stay clean, natural and eat well - the healthiest, safest thing you can do
In reference to the stormtrooper bit, there are minimum and maximum weight limits in the US military based on height. so its safe to assume the Empire has similar rules, and that Dr. Mike would greatly exceed the maximum weight for his height for standard imperial infantry. However, he could probably fit into a Hazard Trooper suit.
Yeah but in the military there is a waiver for everything.
I always thought of Dr. Mike as a Space Marine, not a stormtrooper
@@odgreen9113not t literally everything. There are far more definitive exclusions than waivers around those exclusions.
Theyre literally clones
@@Axiomatic75stormtroopers Are basically the marines of the Empire, They Are Not part of the imperial Army so They Are their own branch Like the marines
I get annual blood work and so I did an experiment 3 months out from our physicals with rad 140. Little to no noticeable differences in looks. Maybe some sort of questionable benefit to strength endurance. But it really trashed my lipid panel.
3 months of RAD 140 lipid profile
Total 202
HDL 18
Trig 103
LDL 162
One year later (and nearly the same as it was the year prior)
Total 151
HDL 55
Trig 75
LDL 80
No dietary or exercises changes in this time. Weight training 5 days a week. 2-3 5k runs a week.
Training for around 15 years hard.
wow
What about hormones?
I feel for you. Ive done 5 mg rad twice for 8 weeks and even on what the bros say is low dose. Did it once a year for the last the two years.
Ive had noticeable size and strength gains while cutting. Like super noticeable and with pct both times I lost some strength and size but came out much with much more than if I wouldn’t have taken it. Did bloods and there was some negative effects but nothing fell out of normal ranges and follow ups 2 months later I was almost back to baseline.
Now I know these are research chems and there could he other health issues I am not aware of, but in terms of results on a “low dose” I was pleased. I would do it more often if I wasn’t worried about heath effects.
What was your total test., free test, and SHBG after 3 months? SARMs will temporarily throw your lipid markers out of whack but that's expected and is part of the research literature.
Hahaha😂 you forgot to train. RAD 140 is strong as oral steroids like winsrol and anavar. And mass is good quality not like d-boll. And you do not need month to feel it is quick like orals. You do not have hair loss and gino. Lipids are fucked way more on winsrol and suppersion is individual thing however steroids ale suppresive too. It is more expensive than winsrol but cheaper then anavar. All orals should be avoided long term in my opinion but sarms receive too much hate and they are the same as steroids
Can never get over your head shape 😂😂 thanks for the info as always
Yea the horns were really popping in that thumbnail. Must be the SARMs
Mike has a muscular forehead lol
Frieza forehead
Dr Mike's head is on another level.
Is Dr, Mikes skull actually growing?
Brain getting too big for its own skull or just target lifting?
God knows but it's the entity on its own. A sight to lo and behold@@ogadlogadl490
@@ogadlogadl490 You've seen those blinks. Full range of motion w/ contraction.
It has huge delts.
I ate nothing but sarms for ten straight years and developed muscles like you wouldn't believe. Women (and men) simply couldn't resist grabbing my 30 inch guns and trying to squeeze them, only to break their hands against the rock that is my body. I needed to sleep in a cryo-chamber to offset the negative effects, but this was a small price to pay to catch the sidelong glances of every stranger.
worth it?
@@airl0kttv no
@@airl0kttvfor men (and women) squeezing meat it's always worth it
I love you 🫶
nonsense .sarms are nowhwere near steroids results and they utter shite.
You’re 100% bang on. SARMS for the most part are a “me too” PED that essentially is in the same class as oral anabolics.
What is the Risk/Reward of them compared to known orals anabolics.
Dr. Mike is the most honest body builder around. Thanks for the brutal honestly.
Mister you’re so smart and charismatic you could drive people into using steroids instead
This video is very important for teens.
I personally started using Ostarine for the gains and it worked so well, after 2 months I figured I might as well do anavar and test.
Cover prohormones next
Nothing is important for teens. Teens suck.
They do nowadays and some wear lipstick too!
Rubbish! ostarine wouldn't have given you squat for gains. At best you may some increased fat loss at higher doses but again, gains, that's laughable!
I took SARMS once. But I grew up now I take Test Mast Deca. I'm bigger, stronger, leaner, and hungrier!
The usual
@@nyet_maker7948 "Just the basics"
Love that cycle I'm on test NPP and mast . . . Perfect combo
@@robertcifrulak5387 genuine question, how do you ratio them? Do you use test? This is my first time stacking AAS
I'm on the same stack now, for me the mast is there just to fix the sides I would get from Deca, they're not that crazy for me but I'd rather feel good
Ozempic actually is brand new, only approved for medical use in 2017.
A GLP1 receptor agonist called Liraglutide was invented in 98, and then Semaglutide (Ozempic) in 2008, with 9 years of clinical trials.
It was in the 70s that GLP-1 as a hormone started being studied.
Finally, the PED video we were wating for
Vote for Prohormones/SARMS vs. Prohormones. I took PH by ACCIDENT for 2 months at 16. No lasting side effects, and the doctors say I've gotten my barking down to a reasonable level.
Whats barking ?
@@deus6950r/whoosh
@@deus6950 Not much. What's barking with you?
How do you take prohormones by accident? Whoops! I tripped on the dog, landed on my keyboard computer and happened to hit all the keys to order a bottle of prohormones, and then while stumbling back onto my feet, ingested them for two months.
@@Nebulaoblivionback in the Wild West days of supplements, some stuff was shoved into supplements which didn’t appear on the label. Usually it was straight up gear, but pretty sure they also did it with prohormones.
The thumbnail pic is insane mike head looks like theres horns growing out
facts
I think its more common than you think, I had no idea my head looked like that till I shaved it. I don't even like chewing without a hat on cause those jaw muscles up there keep bulging out. Even when i was like 150 lbs thats just how my head was 😭
lmao
punished venom mike
True
Talking about the improvements in medication over time is so incredibly true. Look at apixaban vs warfarin for blood thinning.
Warfarin has been used since the 60s and while it’s a pretty good drug, it interacts harshly with a lot of other things and otherwise makes you incredibly vulnerable to all sorts of bleeding, along with a pretty heavy organ toll and a few other long term effects that may or may not happen.
Apixaban comes through, and it stops clots better, interacts with nothing, with less unintended bleeding, with way less known organ recoil.
While we don’t necessarily know the ramifications of 30, 40 years on it, in the short term it is VASTLY superior to stopping imminent death. If you’re going to take a brand new shiny drug, it better look like warfarin vs apixaban
Could you please do a video on BPC-157! I’m sure a lot of others would love more information & your opinion on this!
Thanks!
Who?
@@luxurybuzz3681me
Mike uses it. He had discussed it on the Full Rom paid forum.
It cured my IBS.
2 years of hell then after 5 weeks of pills gone!!!!
Body protective compound 157.
Those head gains are on point Dr Mike 💪🏾
You also forgot the growth hormone horns that you can develop Mike, you’ve got them.
As a dude who's thought about steroids etc, this video was great. More like it.
A full video on myostatin one day would be glorious
Myostatin: there are no known myostatin inhibitors that actually work. That's it, all you need to know about it!
Dr Mike might not make a great stormtrooper, but a space marine? Absolutely
Maybe a squat 😂 jokes
Goddamn that RP Hypertrophy App AD was dope. Amazing edition right there, Max!
RAD140 and Ostarine are way too common in teens today. I’m part of the coaching staff for a high school basketball team this year and the SARM goblins have only multiplied year after year
i agree, i am 18 in 2 months and i am on ostarine and lgd4033 using mk677 as a base and have my pct on standby. most of these kids my age or younger dont study enough or prepare enough leaving their hormones damaged.
Edit: what i mean with the mk677 base is, its not a test base but something to help keep my natural test from going low low
@@NotNik99 I wouldn't claim the intellectual high ground while doing something only barely less stupid. Your hormones will almost certainly still be "damaged" by using this shit so young, not to mention other potential damage to your vital organs, etc. I mean, do whatever you want to do, but don't delude yourself that you're doing it "the good way."
@NotNik99 no matter how much you "study" it, you as an 18 year old are waaay to young to use it.
@@NotNik99Bro you clearly didn't do research if you are using Sarms smh
@@NotNik99mk677 as a test base? Where TF did you get that idea from genius
gregging my doucette in anticipation for the reaction video
Believing there's no risks involved with literal sorcery as a product is like believing there's no harm in "just the tip"
Dr. Mike's thumbnail be looking like a Star Trek extra 👽
Great content, as usual! Also enjoyed the 87 UA-cam ads throughout the vid.
Guys if you don’t look great on your own naturally just accept you’re not cut out for bodybuilding and go catch butterfly’s
That's total rubbish. Even people with top shelf genetics can benefit from the correct application of chemistry!
Brother is an Ogryn
The guy who owned my local supplement store told me Big Ramy never ran test and only took SARMs. This guy died of a heart attack a few months after telling me this.
Rad140: 7 cycles. Love it. I feel the best mentally and physically.
YK11: 2 cycles. Increased aggression. A little bit of gains.
Nutrabol: 2 cycles. Dear God, the hunger.
Stenabolic: 4 cycles. Amazing endurance. Rest periods would go from 2 minutes down to 20 seconds.
Andarine: 2 cycles. Decent gains. Wrecked my night vision.
S23: 2 cycles. I definitely felt a drop in test. That went away when I halved the dose.
Ligandrol: 2 cycles. Crazy strength gains. I put 90lbs on my front squat and 50lbs on my bench in 5 weeks. I've never felt like I was fixing to tear tendons before. Plus there was constantly blood in my jizz. Yeah.... That one was kind of scary.
Cardarine: 2 cycles. No effect.
Ostarine: 2 cycles. I didn't notice enough to discount if there was a placebo effect.
Blood work is fine. No BP issues. No hair issues. No skin issues. Joints feel fine.
I did a Cardarine/Sten stack for 8 weeks on a hard cut diet.
I hit my loss goals but I definitely didnt feel any kind of endurance gains, but I also didnt feel like I was running a 750cal defecit either.
what have you run for cycle support and/or pct?
@@TheBuckMuscles I had blood my jiz one time. I wonder if it was when I was on lgd… apparently it’s not uncommon, but I didn’t like it
LOL anecdote is not a good way to handle health. Some people go into remission naturally from pancreatic cancer. Majority die even with the radiation and chemo. I’m not going to accept an anecdote about orange juice stopping pancreatic cancer.
I did a rad 140, lgd stack and put on 8kg of muscle in 7 weeks lol
Thanks for explaining steroids for us. Super duper cool, bro.
Fuck yes! Need this video. 🍿 🍿 🍿 🎬
Also Prohormones would be great to cover too.
DHEA and pregnenolone has helped me a ton - no joke. They have no effect on training, but mood wise and for energy they can be amazing.
Why are you people so interested in ancient chemistry like pro hormones that for the most part is a complete waste of time. You want to F yourself up but good then pro hormones are the way to do it and see very little benefit for your suffering. and NO Superdrol is not a pro hormone as was claimed when it was marketed. it is a full blown anabolic. I'll bet you can;t even name a single pro hormone and what benefit it is supposed to be!
Currently on ‘Targetting the Prostate: vol 4’ right now. Really looking forward to completing it and watching volume 5. I’ve heard its a doozy!!!
@1:20 As a man with one testicle, I approve of this joke.
Loved this, I have taken Anavar to cut for the summer as my first experience of steroids and contemplated doing Sarms as an alternative to bulk. Seems like I'd be better off sticking to a higher dose of Anavar than using Sarms because I at least know what I'm taking. Appreciate the information your always putting out there Dr. Mike 💪
Know someone who took RAD 140 and YK11 freshman year of college. used an over the counter PTC. He got huge gains but months after his PCT he felt like shit and lost a lot of gains. He got his bloodwork he was under 300. He took some clomid and went up to over 1000 but then dropped back down to 400 as his baseline
Over the counter PCT? What a waste. This is why anyone who wants to take SARMs or gear really needs to get educated about them and how to do a proper PCT.
@@VernCrislerwell if it went up to 1000 and then went back down to baseline at 400, then it doesnt matter what it was. It worked exactly as it was supposed to.
@@haydencappsclomid worked not the pct
@@bartmens973 i missed that line
@@haydencappsyeah it was the prescription clomid that worked to get him up and running again. i still firmly believe that he long-term (permanently since there’s no getting the years back of low T in your 20s) fucked up his system due to his use of sarms and his natural production was severely disrupted up to this day
Very well done Dr. Mike. Appreciate the thoughtful content.
Do we get head ridges if we take sarms? I too want to look like a dilophosaurus.
18:14 mike being a silly goose is what keeps me coming back
Just give me whatever Muscle Cow is taking
Selective breeding unfortunately.
i don't watch a lot of your long form vids... but I am realizing just how no fway this channel is monetized.
Did a 5 week cycle of 10mg/day of rad-140. Not really worth it. I cut to 15% body fat in 2-3 months just working out and eating right so I’m not taking sarms as a chubby fuck.
Honestly, sarms probably sped up my gains that I would have gotten 2-3 months later anyway. Not worth it. Tanked my testosterone, my joints felt weak, and got a chronic headache that lasted for 2 years.
I was already eating right and working out near daily. It was like taking a high interest pay day loan when you don’t really need the money and you’re getting paid in a couple days.
Did you do a PCT after each cycle?
If you’re natty and are trying to gain muscle, working out nearly everyday is extremely counterproductive. Recovery is vital to muscle growth.
@@randombrandon315 You can train every day and still recover just fine.
@ you’re definitely not making optimized gains if you train daily. Sure you will get bigger and stronger, but you can get bigger and stronger at a more efficient rate if you actually utilize rest days.
@@randombrandon315 You can work out every day if you are making sure it's been something like 4 days or however long you need to recover each time you hit a given muscle/muscle group. You don't need to hit literally everything whenever you work out (and that would take forever)
Just want to say from listening to you I’ve gained a lot . Thank you Mike . And Rp !!!
As much as I love your content Dr Mike you did the same thing I've been hearing from steroid guys "Just do gear"
The BIG difference for me in Australia is that Sarms are quasi-legal, Steriods are seriously illegal drugs. If I get busted, my career is over, I'll lose the house... etc etc.
Could you PLEASE do a video not comparing them to roids, but just a well researched science based video comparing them to natty. What CAN they do? Because the research space online is all either bro-science, wellness clinic marketing materials or pubmed articles that are too dense for me.
You can read the conclusions and results of studies, it's not that hard. Some SARMs do deliver decent results compared to natty. LGD4033 is still the most potent one I think.
Trouble is sourcing legitimate ones. Most of them are spiked with anavar lol
Nobody gets busted unless they are running a drug ring or a serious moron lol
Doc, you’re the best ever at this game. Ever!!💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼
Took YK11 for a few months. Slept a lot, otherwise I got away with it. Picked up a fair amount of size, but strength went through the roof. 2ml per day, split by 12hrs as YK has a 12hr half life. Took Ost as well for my knees, that cleared up as well.
Guess it depends on your mental makeup & genetics 🤷♂️
and starting point. If you're jacked and want to be more jacked for competition... maybe sarms aren't going to cut it.
yk11 with no base?
@@Uphariusmy man living on the edge, playing with fire
@@AlfimAlves I don't want to get "serious" and pin so I don't bother with anything beyond rad140. Maybe he has abnormally high test levels that allows long use of yk11, or i'm missing something.
Only reason i'd consider sarms over oral steroids like anavar would be that some sarms have minimal effects on the CNS whereas orals can cause anxiety, aggression, and depression. LGD 4033 and ostarine are sarms with minimal negative cns effects.Some other ones can cause agitation and aggression like rad 140, yk 11, s23
8:33 Tell us more about your tentacles, Dr. Mike
I thought this was gonna be a commercial, I was pleasantly surprised
SARMS are actually great. Not if you want to be a MASSIVE body builder. But with low-med dosages you can get REALLY good results, with no Aromatization, no need for on cycle Arimadex, no Gyno, no hair loss(avoid LDG or RAD) No puffy nipples or risk of gyno, the Test shutdown isn't nearly as bad as a normal test cycle. And after a normal cycle test comes back quickly, while keeping the gains, because most sarms even at higher dosages will cause suppression but not a full shut down like steroids do.
I've taken AC-262 recently for 2 months and my blood work shows my test levels are actually a scratch higher than before my cycle( was 730ish then Post cycle was 750-somthing) - (this is specific to AC-262) most likely didn't touch my TEST levels much and the differences in levels might be because of the time of day I did my bloodwork. Also only AC-262 barely touches your test levels, the others will lower your test a bit for sure, but again a SOFT 2 week pct will get most healthy men back to normal in very a short time. SARMS should NEVER be taken at high dosages, basically ever, they work REALLY well at low dosages and with that, little to no side effects for SARMS like AC-262 and Ostarine. Side effects like Dr. Mike said, are from increasing the dosages. Just don't. Easy. Used Sarms 7 times (6-8 weeks) over the last 11 years. Never had an unwanted side effect, even once.
I've been active in SARMs forums/subreddits 5+ years and people get gyno from SARMs cycles or the associated compounds like MK677 spiking prolactin or SERMs spiking estrogen literally all the time. Hair loss is another common side effect. The test shutdown is way worse on a SARMs cycle because your testosterone and estrogen levels are absolutely crashed versus on a testosterone cycle they are not. You do not keep all the gains either. You're just spreading some BS to make yourself feel better about running SARMs and being afraid to use gear.
@@mattstrickland2190 You aren't objective either. Why would T and E levels be "absolutely crashed" by SARMs in general, when a big part of SARM users report only small drops in T levels, or quickly regenerating T levels? I'd rather suspect that the "shutdown-cases" are cases where people THOUGHT they were taking a SARM but actually got an oral steroid mix instead, which tanks your T without a T base.
I do agree about the Gyno risk though - Gyno risk on SARMS is very real! Strangely enough. So keep an countermeasures ready, or lower dose.
Also, it is very difficult to talk about SARMs in general, because of the vastly different methods of action. Ostarine for example shouldn't cause any hairloss, LDG on the other hand surely brings that risk along. YK can lead to full shutdown, Ostarine usually slight suppression, if suppression at all. Etc. Many more examples there.
@@mattstrickland2190 I started with gear first. I have great results. I don't abuse them or mess with dosages. I also see people very commonly take 50mg of LGD and stacking with RAD at similarly high dosages on forums. So obviously they will shutdown. Recommended is 10-20 and works well at 5mg. If it didn't work and you didn't keep results no one would use them. Or you abused them and your own test is too low to keep the muscle mass you gained. Like anything you could take. Also, I'm talking from experience, don't be mad.
I had an orchidectomy (left nut cut off) last week, I like to think you were talking directly to me
I've been on and off them for about a year. I've gained 25lbs.
That's a lot for sarms.
I took 3 2- month cycles and put on 20. Only side effect i noticed was bacne. I don't see start the big deal is. I took them while going through school and didn't shake anything.
The Star Wars reference was perfect!!! You’re incredible! 😂
I can say my "friend" experienced fewer side effects with SARMs than with steroids. Not as effective at building muscle for "him" but almost no side effects by comparison.
He also wasn't taking doses of similar size and frequency either. I guessed you missed 99% of what Dr Mike said!
@bigcconservativeguy2534 oh, do you know my friend and the doses he was taking. My mistake.
@@chetlyp Yeah because 99% they are fake most of the time underdosed and 100% contaminated since they are not pharma grade sperimental shit only a retard adhd guy can take them
It’s blows my mind people are willing to take years off their life to have bigger muscles. Absolutely insane. I find most of these guys are under 6’, don’t have any real skills or career path, weren’t popular in high school.
I gave up on SARMs. Complete waste of time and money.
They work amazingly
Smart man. Just pin peds
I've done quite a few SARMS cycles, and really like them. I didn't like Rad-140, though.
S23 was fantastic, with lgd. And I love ac262 and acp105. I have smooth, lean gains, and get a lot of mass on those. I get so many compliments and people noticing.
They're not as strong as traditional steroids, but they're definitely effective. My bloods have always been pretty good on them, too.
If you're a competition level body builder, you'd want to stick to steroids, but if you don't compete but take your physique seriously, then Sarms can definitely be an option with the potential of less sides.
Most of the time fake 100% of the times contaminated because it's not pharma grade dude it's all sperimental garbage also and nah not worth it man
hi, i wanted to ask did you use lets say one sarm for 6weeks or you did them all at once?
@redkreck3284 I usually stack a couple at a time.
A book that changed my life in ways that I never could imagine is "Secret Testosterone Nexus of Evolution".Drop whatever you're doing right now and go find that book. Trust me after I implemented things from the book my testosterone levels went beast mode
It doesn’t exist.
This is an ad? If it was that easy you'd be telling us what to do.
@@RamseyKilani Yeah I've been seeing this type of bot ad recently
Lol, ya, sure they did! That book is absolute rubbish for the weak minded having no actual idea about the science involved Facebook crowd!
I bought the book it was a bunch of pictures of naked guys and my right arm got suddenly jacked as hell
Mike is on so much of "dat dere celltech" his jaw muscles are hypertrophied, I'm in awe.
A video about the difference between SARMS vs. Pro-hormone
If you’re talking about the pro-hormones of the 90s, all they were/are are precursors to known steroids that were never formally banned, like superdrol for instance is a pro-hormone to anadrol. Superdrol is now illegal but in the 90s you could find it at GNC.
@@qui1766 you should check out the new generation of prohormones. Travis Dillard does pretty great coverage of the popular ones.
@@qui1766 Yeah, now the only pro-hormones that are legally available are the non-methylated ones. Not sure if they really work or not. No randomized human trials.
Yes those pro-hormone were a single stage precursor to known steroids, and some like M1T were just steroids. The " modern" variant are "supposed" to be precursor -to - a- precursor of anabolics. I was wondering how Sarms compare to both modern and previous pro-hormones.
Ole Mike's head lookin likenthe Alien from Galaxy Quest
3:10 wtf 😂😂😂
Also the logical flaw with this video as that Mister Mike is trying to tell you to overdose SARMs to get the same results as steroids. That's not how SARMS work or why people use them. SARMS aren't intended to be used at very high dosages because it's not supposed to be as strong as steroids. SARMs have a huge advantage over steroids in such that you get more than natty results and you get to keep them post cycle with a proper PCT, unlike steroids. No matter how hard you train you will lose ALL of your gains post steroid cycle. And because it's selective by nature, you don't get the life threatening effects of steroids with long term use. Hence my prior post of how there is not a single case of a SARMS related death compared to steroids.
Sir you cant be serious..
Dr Mike I’m going to find you
What I admire about nature and physiology is complete honesty. You always pay for cheat gains. It's always balanced and double edge sword.
Ryan Russo is going to make an angry response to this video or go into a passive aggressive angry rant talking about someone but not really saying their name because he loves sarms
SARMS are actually good but this steroid morons hate them cause they ruined their lives with old school steroids from 60s ::D ROFL MAO KEKW :D
After a month on rad 140, I could barely stay awake. It was weird.
Hey Dr Mike what's up with your head in the thumbnail love from Canada
Dr Mike never skips head day
Growth Hormone abuse.
@@GravittJeremiah Cattlemaxxing
@@rdrrr true
He’s such a chad he got a jawline on his forehead
One correction. Ibutamoren, which is shown in the thumbnail, isn’t a SARM
Access is the upside imo. While they're not better for you I have 3 supplement stores near me that sell SARMS in oklahoma. While Roids feel sketchy to obtain.
There’s a decent chance that there’s actually gear in those “sarms” and not what’s on the label.
Is there fr sarms in Oklahoma? I can’t imagine sarms are sold over the counter anywhere in the US.
Which ones you like?
@@qui1766 Because supplement are not fully controlled i can sell cocaine in a protein powder.. nobody would know that at least whether they analyze them or carry out an investigation, while the drugs must be approved and controlled is a completely different matter
I never got the head jokes until this thumbnail made me realise Mike is Klingonmaxxing
Dr. Mike's head looking like a trilobite
Whats crazy about sarms is they were specifically made to bypass the HPTA and not cause test production shutdowns, but somehow the body STILL treats it like extra testosterone and shuts down the natural production anyway. Also if its going into your bloodstream, that means it's going to your brain and I'd be very interested to see a study that tracks if it affects that as well.
I’m really disappointed of what I’m hearing here. The Dr: should know better than that.
Everyone knows that when storm troopers get jacked, they upgrade to shock troopers and heavy gunners.
As a former RAD140 user on-and-off for a number of years, until very recently, I *ignorantly* didn't realise how jacked my cholesterol, LDL's were and liver function was absolutely copping it. Sure, I can probably attribute that partially to lack of any real cardio while on-cycle but having double the normal levels of a 35 year old didn't sit well with me at all.
I'm 5-6 weeks completely off and those numbers are already halved and are normalising nicely. Yes, training is harder and I feel like a mortal again, but I'd take that over a shortened lifespan any day. I've needed that mini scare to adjust my diet and increase cardio as well. Win-Win in my books.
I hope more people see this video, Mike 👊
Ahhhh, isnt the Placebo effect fantastic for those without a clue! Bloodwork destroyed so you could play mind games with yourself!
@@bigcconservativeguy2534 I disagree about the placebo claim and bloods are normalising mate but hey thanks!
The promise isn’t no side effects, the promise is you won’t get arrested for taking felony drugs
If you have enough for a full cycle and PCT, you have enough to get hit with a trafficking charge that will ruin your life
I thought folks just went through an anti-aging or men's health clinic in the US and got them through legal Rx?
@@SeuOugod no 😂
@@SeuOua lot of people can’t afford that because they don’t go through insurance which means the clinics are generally very expensive
@@SeuOuto find a Trt clinic or doctor that will be on board with you is basically impossible and trt isn’t anabolic test it’s something like (don’t quote me) but like 1:4 in potency. So a “sport Trt cycle is like 4 times as much as what a regular anabolic cycle would be. Basic big make trynna grow first cycle looking 250ish test baseline maybe maybe triturate up to 500 if you’re feeling it and comfortable. Where as 250 for Trt is an insane dosage going in twice a week on a 7 day half life whatever just doesn’t work. If you have an imbalance sure but if you’re trynna actually cycle the u.s only has black market
It is not illegal to possess full-cycle SARMs in the U.S. though it might be elsewhere.
My experience with SARMS was every 5 months I would take 20 Rad140 for 10 weeks and then pct for 12 weeks. It was incredibly effective at letting me blast through plateaus and boost my physique. Even when I hopped off I didn’t really lose too much strength or size and the only side effect I found was a little gyno which I took care of with clomid. I highly recommend that if you’re thinking about SARMS to try Rad140 at 10mg for 6 weeks just to see how your body responds. SARMS was also good for me because I really don’t want to stick myself with a needle.
What about a low dose of sarms during a cut. Would this be a better use? Minimize side effects due to a low dose and help mitigate muscle loss? I believe ostarine was basically made for use of treating cachexia and similar situations.
Just take roids bro Sarms are ass
Love these vids Dr. Mike! What are your thoughts on Ostarine in particular? Seems to be more well-researched and understood than other SARMS.
Eat steak and eggs, prioritize your sleep and workout.
My man 🤝
I would eat steak daily but colon cancer scares me. I eat 7 eggs daily tho
@@Falco561 youre more likely to get cancer from the phone you typed that on than from steak
@@Falco561 where's the evidence for colon cancer?
Doesn’t always work.
One thing all SARMS discussions on-line lack are the legal implications. 100% agree that SARMS are not even close however they are technically "legal" and do produce much better results than anything you buy buy off the shelf. Many of us have careers where a felony arrest for steroids would destroy our careers so SARMS are a legit option to fill that gap. As with all things, moderation is key and of course, get your blood work.
Dr Mike is thaaaaaaa maaaaaan! Ladies and gentleman, boys, girls, dogs, cats, lemurs. From Moscow, Russia. The froooooozen tundraaaaa. The city that was the undoing of Hitler himself. Lets get ready to rumbleeeeeeeeeeee. Dr Mike "Oi hes jacked" Isreatellllllllll
Yh bro zip it up when youre done
Bro doing flips on it fr
@@JoonasJokiniemiZip it up, and zip it out!
Technically he “undid” himself. Ole Adolf is quaking at the introduction of “the jacked Jew” tho.
This is how steroids make you act boys.
I flocking hate how much i love your videos.
I think the problem is people comparing SARMs to steroids tbh.
LOW dose SARMs can definitely be more effective than LOW dose steroids and with less sides.
You just can't scale up the doses like you've alluded to.
Anavar is better than any SARM.
But SARMs do also have the benefit of being legal (UK at least).
I think viewing them as a halfway house between rubbish supplements that do nothing like creatine, and steroids that do mega things.
All about using the right tool for the job at hand.
creatine does nothing?? Its the most scientifically tested supplement ever and definitely works as intended. Maybe you're a non responder? or are taking too low a dose.
Myself I dont feel much benefit on 5mg a day, but 10mg a day I definitely feel it and see it in my numbers (not to say its on any level with sarms etc) but certainly not a 'rubbish supplement'
Not even close. low dose SARMS are worthless while you can get decent effects from the right combination of low dose anabolics particularly injectable ones over oral!
Your opinion just got disregarded after that creatine take💀
I watch you for the comedy and stay for the knowledge