Fighter JETS For Sale Today - CHEAPER Than The Price Of A Car!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 467

  • @meow1990_2
    @meow1990_2 2 місяці тому +186

    It's not the cost of the airplane that you should be worrying about.
    Sincerely, a retired aircraft mechanic ;)

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +23

      Ain't that the truth, never owned an aircraft outright, only a share in a Cessna 152 many years ago, hoooo weeee, that was expensive.

    • @lcfflc3887
      @lcfflc3887 2 місяці тому +8

      Operation cost are often time blowed out since it's the government paying, someone has to call this out.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +4

      Ain't that the truth.

    • @meow1990_2
      @meow1990_2 2 місяці тому +16

      @@lcfflc3887 Well, if you think hiring an expensive mechanic is costly, just wait untik you hire a cheap one 😜

    • @lcfflc3887
      @lcfflc3887 2 місяці тому +3

      @@meow1990_2 and how many times do you have to open your jet up before each flight? Semi annual and annual checks: avionics, engines, control surface cables, fuel lines and other things, yes you need to pay someone for that, this things aren't done before each flight, this type of in depth overhauls take hours, days and even weeks, this is not done before each flight lol. You aren't sending a rocket in to the moon, before each flight what you would do is your regular walk around, basic maintenance check list that even you can do as a pilot, fuel, landing and parking fees pretty much is all you need to worry about if you are heading and landing somewhere else.

  • @pedroleal7118
    @pedroleal7118 2 місяці тому +81

    The Draken is the most desirable one in the list! with all the Swedish requirements, easy maintenence, short take of, etc, etc

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +11

      Also, probably one of the frighting of the bunch along with the MiG-21, but I would give it a go.

    • @christianwentzien1106
      @christianwentzien1106 2 місяці тому +6

      Svenska Flygvapnet 🇸🇪 Flieger Empor !!

    • @Schlipperschlopper
      @Schlipperschlopper 2 місяці тому +2

      Ukraine needs them NOW!!!

    • @davidmhh9977
      @davidmhh9977 2 місяці тому +3

      It's honestly shocking that they can be bought for so little. They're literally less than most 2 story homes, and while you can sleep in a Draken cockpit, you can't make a house go over mock2

    • @MaskinJunior
      @MaskinJunior 2 місяці тому +4

      Unless a bunch of SAAB105 becomes awaileble. I think the 4-seater would be a good family aircraft.

  • @dwjr5129
    @dwjr5129 Місяць тому +12

    My uncle died in an F-4 crash at Elgin in 1968. That said, I’ve always been fascinated by this beast of a plane.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому +2

      Sorry to hear that. The F4 is quite a machine, I had one as an Airfix model, pride and place in my collection when I were a kid, great looking aircraft. :-) Joe

    • @JrAusborne
      @JrAusborne 28 днів тому +1

      @@AviationRepublic An F4J with J79-10 engine . Ran these up on the flight deck many a night. It was a very forgiving bird. Lots of maintainance hours per flight hour.. But it would take a beating...

  • @thesailjunkie
    @thesailjunkie 26 днів тому +10

    As a former USAF jet engine mechanic, I can assure you that the maintenance will eat through your bitcoin faster that the jet.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  26 днів тому

      Then will shall pay with Doge - But, what a way to spend that BTC - :-) jOE

    • @surfdocer103
      @surfdocer103 6 днів тому

      That was beautiful!

  • @diveforknowledge
    @diveforknowledge Місяць тому +13

    Even if you buy a jet for $100k, you wont keep it long when you realize maintenance is $100k+/year and fuel is $1500+/hour.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому +1

      No doubt deep pockets are required....tonight's videos will solve all our money problems....:-) Joe

  • @philb1167
    @philb1167 2 місяці тому +34

    The old Mig 15's were going for only ~$30k (AUD) a few years back. Getting one with a reliable (not forged) maintenance record was the hard part ... oh, and a working ejector seat!

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +4

      If only we had all bought Bitcoin in 2010

    • @PiDsPagePrototypes
      @PiDsPagePrototypes 2 місяці тому +3

      Give it a few more months, the MiG 15 and 21 will be back in active service...

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +2

      I get your drift, I hope mot.

    • @ArizonaAirspace
      @ArizonaAirspace 2 місяці тому +4

      You don’t want to fly Mig 15s. They have the nasty habit of not being able to pull out of a dive. Plus they have an abrupt stall characteristic. You need to fly that jet fast so you can only fly out of long runways. Same with MiG 21s. It’s the hourly costs of fuel and maintenance that will wipe out your savings account.

    • @philb1167
      @philb1167 2 місяці тому +2

      @@ArizonaAirspace darn it! I’ll cancel the order!!!

  • @chrisbutcher5179
    @chrisbutcher5179 Місяць тому +13

    The phantom by a country mile what an icon of the skies

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому +1

      One of the best century series fighters

    • @gerrycorbino66
      @gerrycorbino66 Місяць тому +1

      My favorite military fighter aircraft. Worked on the fire control system (radar) when I was in the USAF.

  • @Russinh0
    @Russinh0 2 місяці тому +27

    Price of the plane is the minor of the problems, A mechanic, a Trained Pilot and find the Pices for Manutention are the real problem

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +7

      Or you could park in on the front lawn, sit in it and make airplane noises.

    • @jaysdood
      @jaysdood 27 днів тому

      ​@@AviationRepublicBrrrrrrrmmmm 😂😂😂

    • @dman0044
      @dman0044 20 днів тому

      Not to mention needing IFR rating.

  • @HisDudenessTK421
    @HisDudenessTK421 2 місяці тому +11

    If money wasn't an object then... The Phantom. No contest.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому +2

      And the SAAB, and the MIG21, maybe throw in the Albatross?

    • @HisDudenessTK421
      @HisDudenessTK421 Місяць тому +2

      @@AviationRepublic lol why not

  • @ytsam4674
    @ytsam4674 2 місяці тому +18

    I would easily go for that Draken. Even in a unflyable status it would sit well in my front lawn.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +2

      Didn't Clarkson have the EE Lighting on his front lawn.? Imagine what the neighbours would say.

  • @NeurodivergentSuperiority
    @NeurodivergentSuperiority 2 місяці тому +12

    Just finished the video, i think i'm gonna reconsider my dream car list

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +2

      Everyone needs a fighter jet in the garage next to the lambo.

  • @fistingendakenny8781
    @fistingendakenny8781 2 місяці тому +8

    Many pilots learned in the l39, such a good basis

  • @captjinxmarine9832
    @captjinxmarine9832 2 місяці тому +5

    I would buy a Cessna Super Dragonfly. But I still love the Rockwell OV-10 Branco. Man are they fun to fly.

  • @ViacheslavIvantishin-ud7qt
    @ViacheslavIvantishin-ud7qt 2 місяці тому +6

    Draken is absolute beauty. Just fantastic

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +2

      I have to agree, but it's like asking someone to pick a favorite child. They are all special, but the SAAB, is just different

  • @silentblackhole
    @silentblackhole 2 місяці тому +5

    That Saab 35 Draken looks beautiful!

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +2

      She is most definitely something special to look at.

  • @global092
    @global092 2 місяці тому +18

    A4K Skyhawk

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +2

      Yes, if you go to the website in the description they have a TA-4J Skyhawk for sale, only $3,200,000. if you are buying tell them Joe sent you ;-)

    • @Norsenormand
      @Norsenormand Місяць тому

      @@global092 oohhh the jet for junior pilots...The Draken and Viggen laugh in the air and the mig constructur found himself on the way to Siberia.....

  • @PulkaSkurken
    @PulkaSkurken 2 місяці тому +6

    the SAAB 34 Draken (Dragon) is still VERY fast compared to newer Gen jet fighters.

  • @edm2454
    @edm2454 2 місяці тому +10

    I'd love to have the Draken, but I love living more, so Skyhawk. Also, I'm pretty sure I'd get whatever the FAA equivalent is to a speeding ticket for going supersonic somewhere I shouldn't.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +3

      The Draken would be insane to fly, to own...well, I don't want the huge bills.

    • @edm2454
      @edm2454 2 місяці тому +4

      @@AviationRepublic The Draken has a really deadly stall behavior that would probably kill you before you had to worry about the bills. It was so bad that the Saab put a dull knife on the joystick so pilots would let go of the stick when the stall vibration started.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +2

      But what a good looking aircraft. I have it on my list of planes to cover, Although not sure if anyone wants a 40 minute mini documentary on such a stunning plane. One way to find out I suppose.

    • @lcfflc3887
      @lcfflc3887 2 місяці тому +3

      FAA has supersonic restrictions over land, the concord could only do mach two over the Atlantic on its way to Europe.

    • @lcfflc3887
      @lcfflc3887 2 місяці тому +4

      ​@@edm2454 the widow maker F-104 nothing more dangerous. You flight this and dominate, you are Master pilot.

  • @GTOGregory
    @GTOGregory 2 місяці тому +7

    I've long felt the Phantom F4 is the jet I want to own. It has such unusual body contours and can go Mach-2. Moreover, parts should still be available as it is used by some air forces.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +5

      She has to be one of the most beautiful design ever, there is one in my local museum, they have opened the cockpit for visitors to peer into, beast of a machine.

    • @davidcox3076
      @davidcox3076 2 місяці тому +4

      Would love to have an F-4. I live a few minutes from the Phantom Works. But, alas, I couldn't even afford a tank of JP-8 for it.

    • @calvingifford9442
      @calvingifford9442 2 місяці тому +4

      As a plus, that SAGEBURNER record is STILL unbroken. 😉

  • @WychardNL
    @WychardNL 2 місяці тому +6

    Buying is not the biggest issue.... keeping it in a flying state by certified procedures is much more expensive.

  • @ArizonaAirspace
    @ArizonaAirspace 2 місяці тому +3

    Fun video. Few years ago, there were F16s for sale on the Trade a Plane. If I won the lotto, my choice would be either the F16 or the A4 Sky Hawk.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      Thank you, i try to add a little humour. Were the F-16 in good flying conditions or just the shells?

    • @ArizonaAirspace
      @ArizonaAirspace 2 місяці тому +3

      @@AviationRepublic They were in good flyable conditions. They were old former Israeli F16s.

  • @Beautifultruthofficial
    @Beautifultruthofficial Місяць тому +2

    MIG 15, MIG 19, MIG 21, Gloster Meteor, F4, Phantom (Still in Iranian service ATM) DeHavilland Vampire, Hawker Hunter, English Electric Lightning, Shooting Star, Hawker Harrier, Folland Gnat, The list goes on and on.. We have a friend who has a Mig 21!

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому +1

      There are so many, but I only included jets which were for sale at the time I was researching the script. I might write another covering a whole bunch more jets, but I have some other cold war jet videos I am working on first. I will get there.

  • @raypurchase801
    @raypurchase801 2 місяці тому +7

    I've dreamed of getting myself an ex-Army armoured car and driving it to the supermarket.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +3

      We share the same dream, only mine involves straight lines to the supermarket.

    • @lcfflc3887
      @lcfflc3887 2 місяці тому +3

      Operation cost 5,000 lol

    • @kittytrail
      @kittytrail 2 місяці тому +2

      wait 'til the supermarket staff gets their little mittens on a cheap container of RPGs or Kornets for parking violations... 😏👌

  • @overcastfriday81
    @overcastfriday81 Місяць тому +2

    If you don't care about fuel and maintenance, you can pick up a non turbo Cessna 310 for $40k which is about 1/3 the price of a comparable Baron or C210. The L39 requires the compensation package of a GM vice chairman.

  • @GeneIpenburg
    @GeneIpenburg Місяць тому +1

    Siai Marchetti- Lovely plane to fly, pretty standard parts although getting harder to get, and a simple Pratt & Whitney engine.

    • @richardkudrna7503
      @richardkudrna7503 Місяць тому +1

      I think there’s an upgrade to JT15D-5. TBO is at least 3500 hours, OH cost I think was about $175,000.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      I'll take two :-) Joe

  • @drcovell
    @drcovell 2 місяці тому +10

    How much for an F5 *Sukoshi Tiger* (aka the “Freedom Fighter”)?

  • @steveconaway774
    @steveconaway774 Місяць тому +2

    “BuNo” is an abbreviation for “Bureau Number” which is similar to a registration or N number on a civilian aircraft. However, no one calls it “BuNo” or “B.U.N.O.” Other than that, nice summary of military aircraft for sale on Controller.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      Thank you, I will bear that in mind. More videos to come,

  • @v0n1b0
    @v0n1b0 Місяць тому +2

    Draken for practicality but gotta love the Brick.

  • @pablopeter3564
    @pablopeter3564 2 місяці тому +1

    EXCELLENT video. Thanks. The A-4 Skyhwak my favorite. Nothing in aviation is cheap, specially spare parts, maintenance, fuel, certificates, training, etc...

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      Couldn't agree more! I want to get back to flying but every time I look at the cost of hiring a Cessna 152 spam can I decide otherwise.

    • @pablopeter3564
      @pablopeter3564 2 місяці тому +1

      @@AviationRepublic Understandable your point of view. Flying is expensive, I have just retired as an A320 airline captain and can tell you that and goes from the training to the end of the flight at the gate. I flied for 43 years.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      Enjoy your retirement, you have earned it.

  • @neilturner6749
    @neilturner6749 2 місяці тому +6

    Loads of technical/factual inaccuracies here so not one to particularly enjoy if you’re already into military jets, but a fun watch for the unfamiliar!

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +4

      Thank you for the comment, I do try to get the technical info right, however, sometimes it does not go to plan.

  • @wendyharbon7290
    @wendyharbon7290 2 місяці тому +3

    The F-4 Phantom, would be my selection.
    Though in Royal Navy 892 Squardon Fleet Air Arm, HMS Ark Royal, FG.1 Phanton colour scheme of the 1978's too.
    Having an airworthy flying Phantom F-4, for the Air Show circuit in the UK and Europe, would be great.
    As well as offering one off VIP flights, for one paid passenger in the rear seat.
    That is to people who could afford, 10 to 15 Thousand Pounds, for a 30 to 40 minute flight.
    To help raise necessary money, for the Phantom on-going maintenance and operational costs etc.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому

      it would definitely be something for the bucket list. Not sure how my missus would feel about 15k missing from the bank account.

  • @casinodelonge
    @casinodelonge 2 місяці тому +1

    As much as I adore the Phantom, Skyhawk for me, more practical for popping to the shops in, but she's a beautiful little bird.

  • @Thunder_6278
    @Thunder_6278 2 місяці тому +9

    Gee, no F-104's. I think there are a few left in Italy, Turkey, etc. 90 days same as cash. Financing available...

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      I think it would take a very brave person to want to fly an F-104, I mean, I ain't saying no......would they take Amazon gift cards?

    • @750suzuki
      @750suzuki 2 місяці тому +3

      Have to borrow a stick of Beemans before launching that 104.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      It is indeed the gum of pilots, however, not sure about "borrowing"

    • @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus
      @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus 2 місяці тому +2

      @@AviationRepublic There is a crew out of Florida operating 3 civilian F-104s.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      Going to have to look that up, sounds wild.

  • @justjames9775
    @justjames9775 Місяць тому +2

    Pretty sure that there are mig 29's available on the civilian market.
    That is probably the highest performance plane available.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому +1

      Probably, not seen one advertised for sale, but I am sure they could be .

    • @justjames9775
      @justjames9775 Місяць тому +1

      @@AviationRepublic I saw one advertised for sale a while back. I think it was in Florida, and someone said that Paul Allen had owned it for a while.

  • @halex99
    @halex99 Місяць тому +2

    L-39
    flown one, and for what it costs and whats gonna cost to operate / hour is fucking awesome!!

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому +1

      Me not being jealous.....But I bet that was some experience, one day if and when I finally crack this UA-cam malarkey, I might be able to afford something more glamorous than 30 minutes in a C150 :-) Joe

  • @ryanverplank8212
    @ryanverplank8212 2 місяці тому +5

    All jet powered aircraft require a tyoe rating and at least 1000 hour of flight time to opperate along with a private pilot certificate

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +4

      1,000 hours is doable, i think the most I flew was 40 hours in a month, it's finding the time to get those hours.

  • @rogermoore8977
    @rogermoore8977 27 днів тому +1

    I can’t wait to get my jet. It’s like you’re having a car that needs to be repaired all year long and paying 3 full time mechanics to work on them.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  14 днів тому +1

      Going to need very deep pockets to maintain these beauties :-) Joe

  • @billy1673
    @billy1673 19 днів тому +1

    That Siai Marchetti was the plane(s) used in HOT SHOTS.

  • @allenantrim3676
    @allenantrim3676 Місяць тому +2

    I worked on the f-4c gun in early to mid seventies. So I can't be absolutely certain, but at the time, I was told, there were several hanger queens and several that couldn't fly. These were always breaking down and leaking red oil so we always referred to them as bleeding. The fly to maintenance ratio was bad and I suppose one would need to find a lot of test equipment and buy lots of spares. The f-16 was supposed to end that ratio, if it did I don't know. However, if I had billions in the bank I would definitely buy an f-4.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому +1

      It has always been a question on my mind why some machines are just plagued with issues and an "Identical" one is 100% reliable. I once read that cars built on Friday afternoons would be the least reliable. How true that is, who knows. You are 100% correct, If I had the cash to buy any of these aircraft, I would most definitely have the cash to run them correctly, spares and all - :- )Joe

    • @mike-h5h8p
      @mike-h5h8p 13 днів тому

      @@AviationRepublic I lived in Detroit for a while back in the 1970's. The advice then was to buy a car made on a Wednesday because the workers would take Monday/Tuesday off or Thursday/Friday off so they could have 4 day weekends. --This meant that they had to hire unqualified people (such as high school students) to work on the assembly lines for those periods, resulting in faulty automobiles.

  • @montecorbit8280
    @montecorbit8280 2 місяці тому +4

    At 6:31
    MIG-21
    You said its engine was, "non-afterbirning", and that it could fly at 1,390 mph.
    That is quite a bit faster than the speed of sound, and the mig-21 was not a super cruising fighter jet!! That probably goes doubly for the trainer version....
    Oh, and getting you to heaven faster than a homesick angel?? The airplane was known for an extremely high rate of takeoff and landing accidents....
    Now I will go back to the video....

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +2

      "The airplane was known for an extremely high rate of takeoff and landing accidents..." That's one way to get to heaven :-)

    • @montecorbit8280
      @montecorbit8280 2 місяці тому +2

      @@AviationRepublic
      "I want to go to heaven, but not today!!" A quote from Enos Strate, deputy sheriff on "The Dukes of Hazzard"television series.....

    • @tlevans62
      @tlevans62 2 місяці тому +2

      The engine is afterburning. Those performance numbers are for the afterburning aircraft.

  • @tlevans62
    @tlevans62 2 місяці тому +2

    L39 is the smart buy. Easy to fly and maintain.

  • @stephencastello6553
    @stephencastello6553 Місяць тому +1

    Actually, from a Swedish speaker, draken means the kite. It was given this name because its delta wing shape in the air resembled a kite. It has literally nothing to do with dragons. But yes, draken can also mean the dragon when used in proper context.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      Draken is a much cooler name than Kite. I saw one of these the other day in Newark Air Museam, very cool machine. :-) Joe

  • @TheCoolProfessor
    @TheCoolProfessor 28 днів тому +1

    "Control I have a problem."
    "What's wrong?"
    "The throttle just came off in my hand. It looks like it was held together with...bubble gum!"
    (SQUEEEEEAAAAKKK!!!!!)
    "What the hell was that?!"
    "The tail just fell off!!"

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  14 днів тому

      One would hope a quick pre-flight would spot the bubble gum :-) Joe

  • @H0Bahner
    @H0Bahner 2 місяці тому +3

    The Phantom II would be the right choice. My wife would also like to fly with me. The whole plane will be painted in rainbow colors, with big Peace stickers on the wings and tail.
    You can dream sometimes

  • @casinodelonge
    @casinodelonge 2 місяці тому +1

    At last, the YT clip I was looking for!!

  • @peterathbun507
    @peterathbun507 Місяць тому +1

    My heart belongs to the Phantom, but my brain'll go with the Draken.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      I tell you what, as a gesture of goodwill, take them both.

  • @cliffcharpentier34
    @cliffcharpentier34 Місяць тому +2

    You forgot the f5 tiger which goes up for sale randomly. Both in single and double along with the sister t38 trainer

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      I made a new video covering more military aircraft for sale, but no F5, next time. - Joe

  • @derhafi
    @derhafi 2 місяці тому +2

    min 8:10 The J35 is not "strictly" a single seater. There are 2 seater Draken, the Sk 35C trainer version

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +2

      Thank you for pointing that out, noted for a future Draken Video.

  • @strydertheranger58
    @strydertheranger58 Місяць тому +2

    The F-4 Phantom max thrust WITH afterburner is 18,000 pounds

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому +1

      You are correct, I was supposed to write "11,870 pounds-force with afterburner" than add the number after the word "afterburner", but seems I must have gotten distracted.

  • @richardingraham-yy4sz
    @richardingraham-yy4sz 14 днів тому +1

    I would definitely buy the F4 phantom. Great looking fighter jet. If I bought it I painted black and blue.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  13 днів тому

      May I suggest a gold Radome and a nice chrome underside. :-) Joe

  • @glen1555
    @glen1555 12 днів тому +1

    You could just park it on your front lawn. There is a house in Kent, England that has a (I guess) replica Spitfire on the front approach to the house. Couple of great paint jobs in the video

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  11 днів тому

      Didn't Clarkson have the English Electric Lightning on his front lawn, or did I imagine that -Joe

  • @montecorbit8280
    @montecorbit8280 2 місяці тому +2

    At 13:04
    Tail art....
    Any chance you got more video or stills of in this general location. Talking about the pictures of the S-211.
    Whatever they paid the artist to paint art like that, it wasn't enough!! I would prefer to see more of the redhead it was to the side and in the background....but that was still beautiful!!

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      i will see what I can find for you. The art was..................interesting

    • @montecorbit8280
      @montecorbit8280 2 місяці тому +2

      @@AviationRepublic
      The quality of the workmanship looked excellently done, even if you may not care for the subject matter....

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      I care, I am just easily distracted

    • @montecorbit8280
      @montecorbit8280 2 місяці тому +2

      @@AviationRepublic
      "OOOOHHH!!!! New shiney!!"
      Sorry, just was trying to make a small amount of fun....
      I hope this day finds you fantastic!!

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      @@montecorbit8280 It's sunny here in Sunny old UK. Have a great day too.

  • @Timothyshannon-fz4jx
    @Timothyshannon-fz4jx 2 місяці тому +2

    Sounds like a private airforce to me, personally I want a kit plane weighing less then 165 ibs that I can fly with out a pilots license and bring home IN my car.

  • @jonkotze
    @jonkotze 2 місяці тому +1

    Haha, love it. The intro was great!

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      Glad you liked it! Fun to make, one day we will all make it to the moon.

  • @ronwatkins5775
    @ronwatkins5775 Місяць тому +1

    What about the A-10 Warthog? I would love to just have a ride in one...

  • @tomasandersson2182
    @tomasandersson2182 2 місяці тому +1

    The Draken (or The Kite, as is was named of) is capabel of speed more than Mach 2, they didn`t know howe fast is it, because it ran out of fuel long before it has accelerated fully out.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      Any pilot will sell their soul for a fuel tank that will never run dry.

  • @mike59317
    @mike59317 17 днів тому +1

    Nice bit of fun to watch. My choice...... the Skyhawk.🙃

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  15 днів тому

      It was fun to make, a bit of humour once in a while goes a long way :-) Joe

  • @HairyFroglegsYT
    @HairyFroglegsYT 2 місяці тому +2

    “What car ya got?”
    “Fighter jet”

  • @markhubanks3715
    @markhubanks3715 Місяць тому +1

    I'll stay with my 1946 Ercoupe, low maintenance cost, low fuel burn, 100 knots!

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому +1

      Ohh, just did a search for the "1946 Ercoupe" she is' a pretty little aircraft. - Joe

  • @thecooky7744
    @thecooky7744 23 дні тому

    F4 is one of my favorite aircraft 🎉

  • @JBoy340a
    @JBoy340a Місяць тому +2

    Purchasing a plane, boat, motorhome, etc. is cheap. Maintaining them is expensive. Airplanes require annual inspections that eat up 10s of thousands of dollars each year. 10+ year old motorhomes are not allowed in motorhome parks. Boats have high maintenance and/or storage/docking costs. For each the owner has two great days. The day they buy it, and the day they sell it.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      Haha, exactly, the idea of buying one of these is very appealing, the reality is probably a financial blackhole, but as the saying goes, you cant' take it with you. I did not know the about old motorhomes not being allowed in motorhome parks. Although these machines are out of my reach, it's nice to dream. :-) Joe

    • @JBoy340a
      @JBoy340a Місяць тому +1

      @@AviationRepublic as I understand the issue with the old motorhomes is people staying a while and then just abandoning the old clunker motorhome. This leaves the park stuck with the past due rent and an old motorhome with little value and expensive fees to haul it off.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      @@JBoy340a Ah, that makes sense.

  • @billietyree2214
    @billietyree2214 28 днів тому +3

    Just like having a wife, it ain’t the price, it’s the upkeep.

  • @dragracingrule
    @dragracingrule Місяць тому +1

    I’m here watching this thinking “that’s not bad”
    I’d choose the phantom. And as one of the comments said something the cost of a mechanic. My dad happens to be a retired air force mechanic. And worked on the phantoms in the Philippines in the mid to late 80s.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      So, you are all set, We can have the Phantom delivered to your doorstep once the cheque clears :-) Joe

  • @pcbondart
    @pcbondart 2 місяці тому +4

    are there any T-37's or better yet A-37's around for sale?

    • @lcfflc3887
      @lcfflc3887 2 місяці тому

      Yes in a museum lol

    • @pcbondart
      @pcbondart 2 місяці тому

      @@lcfflc3887 when I was in the Air Force Art Program I had two rides in the A37, it seemed like a great, simple little jet for somebody with a little extra coin, plus quite a few ended up in other countries where it seems they could show up in the marketplace finally

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      Yes, the A-37 Dragonfly, she's a pretty little aircraft.

  • @caeserromero3013
    @caeserromero3013 2 місяці тому +5

    What do you drive? Porsche. What about you? Me? I'm an Eagle driver 🤣

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      Imagine the "flex" as my kids would say.

    • @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus
      @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus 2 місяці тому +1

      An AMC Eagle?

    • @caeserromero3013
      @caeserromero3013 2 місяці тому +1

      @@AviationRepublic I believe that's Powers Boothe's line from Red Dawn. When asked what he flies, he says: I'm an Eagle driver :)

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому

      @@caeserromero3013Ah, right, It's been a while since I saw Red Dawn (The Original) Great film.

  • @brianwillson9567
    @brianwillson9567 Місяць тому +2

    My choice would be an F4 phantom. Failing that a Phantom, or, as a last resort, a Phantom.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому +1

      But have you considered.........an F-4 Phantom?

  • @innercynic2784
    @innercynic2784 26 днів тому +1

    It's not the buying but the "keeping" that makes them a nightmare.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  26 днів тому

      Very true, i think one has to go into buying one of these knowing it is going to hurt the wallet. :-) Joe

  • @christopherrobinson7541
    @christopherrobinson7541 Місяць тому +1

    How many F-4 Phantoms, did you buy? Well 16 plus spares and support equipment. I was part of a team to acquire another squadron of F-4J Phantoms after the end of the Falkland conflict. Later I was the head of the UK team that modified RAF Phantom weapons system to utilize a digital computer. And flew many sorties in the back seat. As the trial aircraft was a two-sticker, occasionally I got a chance to "drive".

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому +1

      Only one, but it does not count. I am envious that you got to ride and fly in an F4, those are the best memories. - Joe

  • @MarcG7424
    @MarcG7424 28 днів тому +1

    If money were no object
    1. F-4 Phantom II
    2. Mig 21
    3. A-4 Skyhawk ( Marine Variant )

  • @steveshoemaker6347
    @steveshoemaker6347 Місяць тому +1

    Awesome video....Thanks......
    Old F-4 Phantom ll pilot Shoe🇺🇸

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      Thank you, very pleased you liked it, more so from a F-4 driver :-) Joe

  • @FinTomTom
    @FinTomTom 2 місяці тому +3

    Would do with Draken

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      Everyone is going for the Draken or the F4, kinda feel for the other jets, can I interest you in an A4 Skyhawk? :-)

    • @FinTomTom
      @FinTomTom 2 місяці тому +1

      @@AviationRepublic Draken was its time the most advanced jet figther #cobramanouver, and i kinda like its looks better but F4 would be my second choise💪

  • @Hannsfeld
    @Hannsfeld 2 місяці тому +1

    What NATO code name are you giving to the Mig-21? It's a 'Fishbed'. Not sure what that was you were calling it. I've sat in it's cockpit as well as a few of the newer Migs, like the 'Flogger D'.
    I'm also familiar with the SAAB Draken. Excellent aircraft.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      The Mig21U Trainer had the NATO assigned name of Mongol, the single seater was the Fishbed. Have you flown the Draken?

    • @Hannsfeld
      @Hannsfeld Місяць тому +1

      @@AviationRepublic NATO assigns names with the letter 'F' for fighters, 'B' for bombers, 'H' for helicopters, and 'K' for missles (air intercept). How would a name starting with 'M' fit into that?
      I haven't flown any of them, I was an Eaglekeeper, - an F-15 Integrated Avionics Technician. I got to sit in all these foreign aircraft for two reasons. One, my second post was at Nellis AFB Eagle AMU right next to 'Red Flag' and I was a classified code courrier for visiting aircraft, and two, I got to attend what we called 'Adversary Threat Training', which was very, very classified until recently and I wasn't allowed to talk about it. Now that it's no longer classified, Google 'Constant Peg'. I trained in the 'Petting Zoo'.
      About the SAAB, there is a guy in my current field that works in Arizona and there is an airfield near our campus there that still has one of the Drakens that was once on loan to the USAF. He went there and took pictures of it for me. I think you can see it on Google Maps with the proper coordinates.

    • @Hannsfeld
      @Hannsfeld Місяць тому +1

      Oh, btw... My first post was Kadena AFB, Okinawa, Japan. Guess what I got to see there? Habu 1 and Habu 2, SR-71 Blackbirds. I got to watch them spin up a flight with the big block start carts on the SAC side once. This was the late 1980's.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      That's a good question, I need to dig a little deeper in the Mongol name.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      I am envious that you got to experience all of those amazing machines.

  • @mannski5273
    @mannski5273 2 місяці тому +1

    Hi. Are any two seater A-7Ks from ANG for sale? If yes, what is expected price?

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому

      You mean the A-7K Corsair II? If so, then you can pick one up (Non-Flying, airframe only, no engine, or avionics) for $50,000.

  • @ohwell2790
    @ohwell2790 Місяць тому +1

    In the picture they show a F4 Phantom. Try, at take off in burner 47,000 pounds of JP4 times two an hour. The cost of buying may not be much but the cost of flying per hour is horrendous.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      We can dream, I have built an air force in my head with my imaginary billions. :-) Joe

  • @mrbharathkiran.1508
    @mrbharathkiran.1508 2 місяці тому +2

    MAKE MORE OF THIS KIND OF VIDEOS

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      I will do, this was a bit of a fun video to make, I want to see if I can alternate between "Serious in depth" and "Fun, light hearted" content.

  • @newdefsys
    @newdefsys 2 місяці тому +2

    Great video. I award you one sub

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      Awesome, thank you! Very much appreciated. More videos to come.

  • @Jim-z3c
    @Jim-z3c 16 днів тому +1

    Does the phantom come with Aircraft Carrier

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  15 днів тому

      No, but I can throw in some furry dice and some nice seat covers. :-) Joe

  • @babboon5764
    @babboon5764 2 місяці тому +2

    Look - *Its GOT to be the Draaken - Its SHINIEST*

  • @Av8rApollo
    @Av8rApollo Місяць тому +1

    that exact f-4 phantom ii is at my local airport

  • @maestro-zq8gu
    @maestro-zq8gu 22 дні тому +1

    This will go perfect with my new oil tanker. 🤣

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  14 днів тому

      Going to need very deep pockets, no doubt. :-) Joe

  • @jimdavenport8020
    @jimdavenport8020 17 днів тому +1

    1. Good luck finding a Phantom for sale. 2. And try and find people who know how to work on one and keep it airworthy. 3. And you better fly it regularly as they tend to break when parked. Spare parts? Nope. Restricted as the Iranians still phly them. And the Strikemaster... oh boy. Worked for a small company that tried to use those - including the one pictured. Fuel leaks galore. I have 2,000 Phantom hours. Never even tried to snag a ride in one of the Strikes. On the up-side, they were very simple, and had to be, given who was going to fly them and work on them.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  14 днів тому

      I am very envious, 2000 hours, nice... I can only dream :-) Joe

  • @skydiver1013
    @skydiver1013 24 дні тому

    The last fighter jet in this video: F4H-1F (F-4A) Two-seat all-weather aircraft carrier-based fighter for the US Navy & US Marines. J79-GE-2 and -2A engines with 16,100 lbs (71.6 kN) of afterburner thrust each. Named Phantom II in 1959 and redesignated F-4A in 1962; 45 built.

  • @PiDsPagePrototypes
    @PiDsPagePrototypes 2 місяці тому +1

    900mph on the deck sounds fast,... to everyone except an F-111 Pilot.
    You missed the more recent 'must have',.. the MiG-29, which will out turn all of these, and out run most.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому

      I might do another video soon, there are quite a few more I wanted to include, with a little more depth.

  • @mostlyanchors168
    @mostlyanchors168 2 місяці тому +3

    Now add the maintenance cost and you’ll quickly see why owning one of these isn’t a good idea.

  • @craigpennington1251
    @craigpennington1251 2 місяці тому +1

    If ($) was no object/ The Phantom of coarse. Without a doubt. One thing though, F-4 s guzzle fuel at an alarming rate. Be sure to have a tanker waiting when getting to altitude or you'll be coming back down the hard way. I was in 2 F-4 Phantom squadrons on 2 different carriers during Viet Nam.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      Wow, I bet you have some great stories of those times.

  • @peterxyz3541
    @peterxyz3541 2 місяці тому +2

    I’ll be happy with a Cessna Skymaster

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +1

      Right now, I'd be happy flying a shoe box with wings

  • @GarageExperimental
    @GarageExperimental 20 днів тому +1

    Hands off the F4, crypto kings, she (soon to be) mine, lol. (You probably can't afford her unless your bitcoin wallet is substantially HODLed to the max anyway). That 10k/hr "running cost" estimate just barely covers fuel, if you baby her and only fly in perfect weather. Plan 35hrs of maint. per hour of flight, if you live in the 60s and she's new. The completion of the resto will cost closer to $5m than 1, according to the people who did the 80%. And being a pre-poduction unit (11th Phantom completed, in fact), she has early canopy, windscreen and a whole slew of other parts which will be impossible to replace. The USAF *might* sell you some bits for the rest which is common to the later and airforce and export airframes, but only ground up to about the consistency of coffee (not beans), so budget for a circa-1980-mid-tier design and manufacturing capability in case something breaks. On the other hand she does come with some spares, 5 engines,for instance, although J79s go boom on their own occasionally so, y'know, the stash might not last too long in practice...
    So yeah, come to think of it now... by all means folks, beat me to it and see if your talent for picking DeFi winners translates well to aviation. Proof of Stake means something different when its your one and only life and the investment can break up at Mach 1 at sea level if the pitch damper fails... ;)

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  14 днів тому +1

      At the moment with the world in the state it is in with Crypto all over the shop, we may need to scale back on the F4 dreams. :- )Joe

  • @Farweasel
    @Farweasel 2 місяці тому +1

    This IS a deep truth so take note.....
    A flying Instructor once blessed my wallet with these very wise words:
    *'If it Floats, Fsomething ...didn't quite catch that bit, or Flies ITS CHEAPER TO HIRE IT NOT BUY IT*

    • @Farweasel
      @Farweasel 2 місяці тому

      4 knee Kate's - That was the word !

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому +2

      Yeah, I know that one, never had a floater, but I have sure wasted more than enough on the second two.

  • @pedrodiaz5540
    @pedrodiaz5540 Місяць тому +1

    I’ll take the Draken and the MIG-21

  • @nikmwh
    @nikmwh 2 місяці тому +1

    Might-21 definitely has afterburner

  • @kelvinh8327
    @kelvinh8327 22 дні тому

    Why do you keep mixing metric and Imperial measurements together? How about presenting them both together along with engine thrust?

  • @phann860
    @phann860 27 днів тому +1

    I think I would go for a nice tank instead, say a Chieftain, Challenger or a surplus Merkava (The kids can be packed in the back).

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  27 днів тому

      How many of us have wished for a tank during rush hour :-) Joe

  • @Cuccos19
    @Cuccos19 2 місяці тому +1

    Beside the L-29 Delfin the French Fouga Magister should be on the list. Same era, same role, but a way much cooler looking jet. Also Polish PZL TS-11 Iskra and Yugoslavian Soko J-21 Jastreb, Soko G-2 Galeb and Soko G-4 Super Galeb should be in this class.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому

      Thanks for the heads up, I will make a note of those for another video. :-)

    • @robrob9050
      @robrob9050 2 місяці тому

      ​​@@AviationRepublicall these Yugo planes have RR Viper engines and majority of the instruments inside are of Western origin.

  • @darrinbunston5932
    @darrinbunston5932 Місяць тому +1

    So what's in that dollars per hour operating cost list
    In one example you said it cost $10,000 per hour to operate the aircraft why is that

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      Looking at my notes, that would include, fuel, consumables, factoring in maintenance, inspections, annuals, parts, the figures are not always going to be 100% but "a round about estimate"

  • @user-tr8yw2wo6v
    @user-tr8yw2wo6v Місяць тому +1

    U need to scower the net more bud...ur content is great......u can add a version of ai 2that

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      I made another video, covering more aircraft to buy, check out the latest video, lots of crazy machines for sale :-) Joe

  • @snowcats95
    @snowcats95 2 місяці тому +1

    What about the Fouga Magister?

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  Місяць тому

      I was not able to find one for sale when I was researching, there are quite a few jet that have been for sale in the past, but I wanted to keep it to jets for sale at the time of writing.

  • @user-rp2nq1ev6x
    @user-rp2nq1ev6x 13 днів тому +1

    The only fighter jet on this list that is worth having is the F-4 Phantom II. All others suck.

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  11 днів тому

      Ah, want about the MIG or the SAAB, you want not want a quick round the circuit in one of those?

  • @Lowvym
    @Lowvym 26 днів тому

    All of them

  • @user-zh4cq4zy1n
    @user-zh4cq4zy1n 2 місяці тому +2

    "Come on man", if you don't vote for me, you're not BLACK"~ If you've got the $ to buy a jet, you don't really give a sh*t" about how much the gas costs......."COME ON MAN"

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому

      Thank you for your comment, I had to look that up. Crazy times.

  • @rodento3220
    @rodento3220 2 місяці тому +1

    UH... that is a no brainer F4 all the way!

    • @AviationRepublic
      @AviationRepublic  2 місяці тому

      She's a great aircraft, But you would not say no to the others if you absolutely had to?