The Beastly Propeller Fighter that Demolished Modern Jets

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 сер 2024
  • Grumman’s lineage of feline-named naval fighters became synonymous with American aerial prowess during the Pacific Theatre of World War 2. These rugged and heavily armed and armored aircraft could take a beating and fight the enemy head-on with devastating effects.
    As the war neared its end, Grumman introduced the most potent prop-driven fighter, the F8F Bearcat, described by many as an engine with a saddle on it due to its vast powerhouse.
    Despite its smaller size, the Bearcat was a force to be reckoned with, outperforming its iconic predecessors. In fact, it was nearly 2,000 pounds lighter than the formidable F6F Hellcat, yet it packed a punch in terms of performance.
    The Bearcat’s more petite frame outperformed all its peers regarding overall speed, climbing time, takeoff, and, most importantly, combat maneuverability.
    With its ability to take off in less than 1,000 feet, climb to 10,000 feet in under 90 seconds, and execute tight maneuvers, the Bearcat redefined aerial combat. Its unmatched agility and firepower made it a lethal presence in the sky, representing the peak of propeller-driven fighter design just as jets began to take over the skies.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 300

  • @matthewnewnham-runner-writer
    @matthewnewnham-runner-writer 2 місяці тому +308

    Terrifiic fighter... but it clearly didn't "Demolish Modern Jets", so please - no false video titles, please.

    • @michaelpettersson4919
      @michaelpettersson4919 Місяць тому +11

      True, that would have to require going up against jets and win. In the transitional era such a victory could perhaps been possible in an odd engagement. During WW2 prop fighters did have to deal with german jets after all.

    • @josefhunne5500
      @josefhunne5500 Місяць тому +4

      @@michaelpettersson4919 ... and they only had a chance when technical problems occured in the jet or they were in approach for landing.

    • @stuartwillard6558
      @stuartwillard6558 Місяць тому +12

      @@josefhunne5500 there is at least one known downing in air combat of a jet in the Korean War by a Sea Fury, a few others are claimed by piston engined aircraft I believe too. But as rule that statement is true.

    • @robertsmith9810
      @robertsmith9810 Місяць тому

      or the Harries mk one

    • @josefhunne5500
      @josefhunne5500 Місяць тому +6

      @@stuartwillard6558 m petterson was writing about ww2. korean aircombats jet vs prop ended very few times with a prop victory. How do germans speak: a blind chicken sometimes finds a cerial grain too ...

  • @Otokichi786
    @Otokichi786 2 місяці тому +61

    I don't recall ever reading/hearing that Grumman's F8F Bearcat was a "jet killer." Oh well, the influence of "Dark Skies" is wide and pervasive.

    • @brettbuck7362
      @brettbuck7362 Місяць тому +12

      I despise the "dark xxxx" channels, they are garbage from start to finish. This one is a lot less offensive, I think.

    • @kpal2946
      @kpal2946 Місяць тому

      @@brettbuck7362 Why do you think that, I'm not a huge fan of the dark channels but they are better than a lot of other things on you tube.

    • @michaelshore2300
      @michaelshore2300 Місяць тому +3

      They confuse it with the Hawker Sea fury They look similar and the fury shot down Jets

    • @stuartwillard6558
      @stuartwillard6558 Місяць тому +3

      @@michaelshore2300 indeed and was the aircraft that Eric Brown described as almost impossible to choose between it and a Bearcat in their qualities. I would presume by then (Korean War) Sea Furies were used in mostly land attack roles so would be far more likely to confront a Mig than a Bearcat which would really only be for Fleet defence and Nth Korean pilots rarely ventured over the sea leading to Sea Fury pilots if engaged would thus dive low and out to sea and shake them off reasonably comfortably.

    • @erickborling1302
      @erickborling1302 Місяць тому +2

      The Grumman were all in the Pacific theater I believe. The japanese did not have any jets whatsoever. Everyone should already know this!

  • @billywhizz6965
    @billywhizz6965 2 місяці тому +63

    What has the video got to do about demolishing modern fighter jets? Nearly a waste of time especially mine. I thought you had something interesting to say about piston fighters and modern jets

  • @stevenleek1254
    @stevenleek1254 Місяць тому +161

    Stop click Bait video titles. They cheapen your product and piss us off.

    • @kpal2946
      @kpal2946 Місяць тому +5

      Yet still here you are.

    • @BrimHawk
      @BrimHawk Місяць тому +3

      @@kpal2946 Well.....yeah. Plane.

    • @johnhickman8094
      @johnhickman8094 Місяць тому

      @@kpal2946ò

    • @gregmacdonald7710
      @gregmacdonald7710 Місяць тому +1

      Well, put ya own site up, or shut up!

    • @USCG.Brennan
      @USCG.Brennan 24 дні тому

      @@gregmacdonald7710 He's right Greg and you know it!!

  • @williampage622
    @williampage622 Місяць тому +162

    To many pictures of A1 Skyraiders representing F8F Bearcats.

    • @stuartwillard6558
      @stuartwillard6558 Місяць тому +7

      Yes noticed that.

    • @jayshaw63
      @jayshaw63 Місяць тому +17

      Apparently, since they are both painted blue, it's all the same to the author.🙂 smh

    • @jk-kr8jt
      @jk-kr8jt Місяць тому +5

      Very true and disappointing, but the Skyraider is a special aircraft.

    • @DeereX748
      @DeereX748 Місяць тому +4

      I saw that too. Much larger and slower, not intended as a fighter

    • @gendaminoru3195
      @gendaminoru3195 Місяць тому +11

      STOCK FOOTAGE drives me nuts in documentaries.

  • @davidc831
    @davidc831 Місяць тому +69

    I hate clickbait titles, though this video did introduce the Bearcat to me.

    • @maddhatter3564
      @maddhatter3564 Місяць тому +1

      well that may be its only plus. fascinating history

    • @billfarley9167
      @billfarley9167 Місяць тому

      Introduce? Where in hell have you been?

  • @wmffmw1854
    @wmffmw1854 Місяць тому +17

    My Father ran Grummans Flight Test from 1941-1965. He invented a means of airborne stress testing using radio telemetry. One of the many Grumman practices that earned them the name Iron Works.

    • @joeblow8964
      @joeblow8964 Місяць тому +1

      As an old Grumman Pilot(F-14A/B), I appreciate the Grumman Iron Works...

  • @jameswaldeck1643
    @jameswaldeck1643 Місяць тому +29

    Somebody needs to bone up on their aircraft ID. At .55 seconds they show an A1 Skyraider taking off then a few shots of the Grumman Tbf Avengers. Next, at 7.45 to 8.00 minutes they show more shots of A1 Skyraiders. Bearcat a jet killer? Maybe they can find some evidence, they did not show any in this presentation. I give the site an F!

  • @marvinellis1517
    @marvinellis1517 Місяць тому +70

    No robot speakers please......😮

    • @paulbriggs3072
      @paulbriggs3072 Місяць тому +2

      I am glad to be your 20th thumbs up on that!

    • @kpal2946
      @kpal2946 Місяць тому

      @@paulbriggs3072 What is robot speakers, just wondering?

    • @Ugly_German_Truths
      @Ugly_German_Truths Місяць тому

      @@kpal2946 What does it sound like? A Text to speech software used to produce the "read lines" instead of an actual human being that knows how to put the emphasis on the right syllables and when to read through to a word instead of pausing right before it making the enunciation all weird.

  • @allanwilson8161
    @allanwilson8161 2 місяці тому +23

    End of an era for piston engine aircraft
    Proper aircraft !

  • @syramento
    @syramento Місяць тому +9

    The Bearcat never saw combat service with the US Navy, but the F4U Corsair, a WW2 warrior, saw its combat duty extended into the Korean War. That should tell you all you need to know about the Bearcat.

    • @mudguy1503
      @mudguy1503 Місяць тому +3

      The reason it didn't see service in Korea is due to the fact that it was built as a point defense fighter, not a long range plane like the Corsair. If the US hadn't dropped the atomic bombs and had to invade Japan, the Bearcats would have been fleet defense fighters to counter the kamikaze menace because it was fast, had a hell of a good climb rate and was very maneuverable. It could also be flown off of the escort carriers that couldn't handle the Corsair or Hellcat safely. By the time of Korea, fleet defense was handled by Banshees. My uncle flew Banshees off of Korea as CAP. He did tell me the Bearcat was the most fun prop plane he ever flew though.

    • @syramento
      @syramento Місяць тому +1

      ​@@mudguy1503Good info - thanks.

  • @ifga16
    @ifga16 Місяць тому +30

    If you can't provide in-context footage, then don't use random video of Avengers, Skyraiders and other non F8F. It only confuses the viewer.

    • @barnarus2547
      @barnarus2547 Місяць тому +2

      You beat me to the comment. Ridiculous mish mash...maybe the creator doesn't know the difference....

  • @jonathanhorne6503
    @jonathanhorne6503 Місяць тому +11

    Ensign eliminator is what my pre war naval aviator father called it. If it used full throttle when taking off torque would want to flip the plan. The -2 version had a taller tail to tame the slow speed roll near the ground on takeoff. That said he was a LCdr with two completed tours when he first flew it.

    • @shawntailor5485
      @shawntailor5485 Місяць тому

      I had heard it called that , what could it do with a modern engine ?

  • @Grossman2868
    @Grossman2868 Місяць тому +19

    Interestingly though, the Bearcat held the 'time to climb' record until the F16 broke it, that alone is quite telling of the machine's ablities.

    • @HDSME
      @HDSME Місяць тому

      It was a nasty bird but came to late

    • @jackpoage5419
      @jackpoage5419 Місяць тому +1

      A highly modified Bearcat performed that climb.

    • @DelDredd
      @DelDredd 24 дні тому +1

      I imagine the English Electric Lightning did it before the F16.

    • @HDSME
      @HDSME 24 дні тому

      @DelDredd let me guess your from uk lol

    • @DelDredd
      @DelDredd 23 дні тому +1

      @@HDSME So?, I just looked up the Time to Climb, if it came from the Wikipedia page the figures do not make sense anyway, as the F8F-1 that supposedly did it had a lower power engine than the F8F-2 which could only manage 4,464 Ft/Min so no way could it get to 10,000 feet in 94 seconds with a Take off Run, probably Wikipedia errors. The Lightning Could climb over 4 times as fast in any case and came out before the F16.

  • @Marc-dm1fh
    @Marc-dm1fh 2 місяці тому +20

    Gets a downvote for the clickbait title. Didn't bother watching the video after reading the comments.

    • @Ponchoman07
      @Ponchoman07 Місяць тому +1

      Well, it was interesting to learn about the Bearcat, but yes, sadly turned out to be just a clickbait title. Not giving it a thumbs up due to that.

    • @1982nsu
      @1982nsu Місяць тому

      @@Ponchoman07 This video deserves a "thumbs up" but the click bait title compels me to give it a "THUMBS DOWN". I watch to the end expecting that a Bearcat of another air force shot down a jet post WW2.

  • @derek45auto23
    @derek45auto23 2 місяці тому +37

    Lots of skyraider footage

  • @coreyandnathanielchartier3749
    @coreyandnathanielchartier3749 Місяць тому +4

    This is the fighter we needed in 1942- a 450mph Wildcat. Extremely fast at medium altitudes, out-climb anything and out-run most anything, and you can fit a lot of them on a carrier. The 'jet' reference should indicate that the F8F was used for comparison with early jets because of it's climb performance. 'Modern jet' wasn't even a term back then.

  • @paladin0654
    @paladin0654 Місяць тому +15

    The F-8F did not see combat in WW2, so what "modern jets" were "demolished"? You oversold a great airplane. Most people that watched this already have interest, your headline is written for those that don't have a clue.

  • @maurotolari9215
    @maurotolari9215 Місяць тому +31

    The caption had me intrigued, so I watched it until the end .There is no. mention of combat with jets. I'll add this to the list of BS channels on UA-cam .

  • @Tuleyne
    @Tuleyne Місяць тому +12

    I need to find my high school history teacher and scold him for lying to me. Fighter squadron 19 was activated in late May 1945, but only days later the US opted to use atomic bombs to bring WWII to an end. My history teacher told me that was in early August of 1945.

  • @alexandergutfeldt1144
    @alexandergutfeldt1144 Місяць тому +31

    Video doesn't touch what the title promises: channel goes on my 'do not recommend' list.

  • @thanossstewart3800
    @thanossstewart3800 Місяць тому +5

    Love this in a funny way the vid is about the Bearcat but I keep seeing the A-1 Skyraider ....LOL

    • @patriot692
      @patriot692 Місяць тому +2

      Agreed. I know I saw some Skyraiders. In some shots, in motion the Bearcats look quite alot like Skyraiders. 🙏🇺🇸

  • @johnshepherd9676
    @johnshepherd9676 Місяць тому +12

    The F8F-2 was slower than it's contemporary the F4U-5 and the Corsair had a better climb rate. The Bearcat could out turn the -5 but US Navy fighter pilots learned how to deal with the more maneuverable Zero.

  • @thomasschreiber9559
    @thomasschreiber9559 Місяць тому +2

    Bearcats had shorter range and were retired in 1947, but the Corsair continued on in development and production, like the Mustang, into the early 50's. Both served in Korea and the last actve Corsair squadron was taken out of service in 1962(?)

  • @eugeneoreilly9356
    @eugeneoreilly9356 Місяць тому +24

    It never demolished a jet.

    • @RJHINKL64
      @RJHINKL64 Місяць тому +2

      The Bearcat was able to out climb all early jets until turbine technology advanced. It clearly demolished jets in this category.

    • @carlcushmanhybels8159
      @carlcushmanhybels8159 Місяць тому +1

      @@RJHINKL64 They should have mentioned this,

    • @eugeneoreilly9356
      @eugeneoreilly9356 Місяць тому +1

      @@RJHINKL64 it never out climbed any operational WW2 jet.

    • @HDSME
      @HDSME Місяць тому

      No but I believe it cloud

    • @maddhatter3564
      @maddhatter3564 Місяць тому +1

      @@RJHINKL64 different definition of demolish, the text said it was a "jet killer" which it wasnt.

  • @MrShaneSunshine
    @MrShaneSunshine Місяць тому +13

    I love the sea fury!😂

  • @RexusOutfitters
    @RexusOutfitters Місяць тому

    Pinnacles of piston-prop design: F8 Bearcat and A1 Skyraider. An everlasting credit to their designers.

  • @GeoffdeLooze
    @GeoffdeLooze Місяць тому +1

    At 57 sec, you are showing an A1 Skyraider taking while talking about the Bearcat. You don’t know the difference?

  • @edllorca9468
    @edllorca9468 Місяць тому +2

    The beastly propeller fighter didn't demolish jets. sure it won a few fights but demolished is an exaggeration. that''s why we have jets not and not beastly propeller fighters.

    • @williamkowalchik572
      @williamkowalchik572 27 днів тому

      German ME262 first ones were taking down by P51 Mustang. Cosairs to down Migs in Korea. Not devastating but there were out there holding the line.

  • @garyhooper1820
    @garyhooper1820 Місяць тому +1

    Designed specifically as a fleet defence fighter / interceptor . It was a one trick Pony . Short range, no ability to carry munitions , primarily a Kamikaze destroyer. Had the war progressed to invasion of the Japanese home islands I believe it would have been able to prove itself to be the right plane for that mission .

  • @MrAlliecaulfield
    @MrAlliecaulfield Місяць тому +1

    Looks a lot like the A1 Skyraider

  • @user-ez2tq4vi8f
    @user-ez2tq4vi8f Місяць тому +1

    he irony of showing footage of skyraiders repeatedly combined with the click bait title title is that the skyraider DID demolish a pair of mig 17s in air to air combat during the Vietnam war

  • @DavidSmith-ss1cg
    @DavidSmith-ss1cg Місяць тому

    I Love to watch ANYTHING about the SENSATIONAL F-8F Bearcat.

  • @vvvci
    @vvvci Місяць тому +1

    Bearcat had very short range, so, even if jets had not been coming on-line,
    it would never have replaced all the Corsairs (or Hellcats)
    I've always thought Grumman missed the opportunity...
    to stuff a PW R-2800 in a WILDCAT, stretch the tail and lengthen the wings
    put bigger fuel tanks and bigger landing gear on it, then
    put the whole thing in a wind-tunnel to optimize top speed.
    Grumman did put a more powerful motor in the FM-2 "Wilder" Wildcat,
    but that wasn't an PW R-2800!

    • @billdang3953
      @billdang3953 Місяць тому

      Wonder if there was any thought on using the P & W Wasp major engine ?

  • @lrg3834
    @lrg3834 Місяць тому

    Fun fact: I was really surprised to learn the other day that some of the radial engines used to power American WWII fighter planes also found their place on commercial DC--6's and Constellations.

  • @jonb3311
    @jonb3311 Місяць тому +3

    Far too long a video caused by repeating the same quotes over and over again.

  • @dullorb
    @dullorb Місяць тому +1

    I would have given this a thumbs up if the title hadn't been false. I hate being lied to. On the plus side it led me to learn that UA-cam has added "misleading" to the categories which videos can be reported for, and I do like learning new things.

  • @VIctorCarruyo
    @VIctorCarruyo Місяць тому +2

    Ok feature on the plane. However, the text to speech numbers need to improve.

  • @mikechevreaux7607
    @mikechevreaux7607 Місяць тому +4

    Was P-51 Mustang 🐎 That Shot Up a Early ME-262 German Jet.

  • @frankscalzo7048
    @frankscalzo7048 Місяць тому +2

    This is the first time that I have given a thumbs down to any UA-cam video. I watched this to hear about ANY instance where a Bearcat shot down a jet, but DID NOT HEAR EVEN ONE. Everything that was in this video I already knew. There ARE propeller driven planes that have shot down jets, The F4U, P-51, P-47 to name a few, but I have still not heard of ANY jets shot down by a F8F!

  • @rogerrendzak8055
    @rogerrendzak8055 Місяць тому +2

    Misleading title. Needs regulation.

  • @Ivan-pl2it
    @Ivan-pl2it Місяць тому +4

    4400fpm climb rate with the ability to reach 10.000 in 90 seconds, im confused..

  • @brendanpells912
    @brendanpells912 Місяць тому +7

    Not sure it would have really stacked up against the Hawker Sea Fury

  • @kees1705vanwely
    @kees1705vanwely 21 день тому

    I didn't see a demolished jet. But good information about the F8F though.

  • @joep5170
    @joep5170 Місяць тому +3

    click bait title, lots of mistakes, DOWN VOTE.

  • @nevsmate8663
    @nevsmate8663 Місяць тому +3

    Terrific fighter.... when/against who??

  • @Ivan-pl2it
    @Ivan-pl2it Місяць тому +4

    There is 2 things wrong that title

  • @williamcooke6056
    @williamcooke6056 Місяць тому +2

    Click Bait Title. Great plane, didn't need the lies to get people to read it. Pull this video or fix it. Thumbs down.

  • @jamesderickson8225
    @jamesderickson8225 Місяць тому +1

    I'm sure there is not a lot of F8F video footage, but using F6F and Douglas Sky Raider video footage is misleading!

  • @moodberry
    @moodberry 28 днів тому +1

    They have gotten better with robotic narration, but it still has a way to go to become indistinguishable from real human speech.

  • @robin7623
    @robin7623 Місяць тому +1

    If it demolished modern jets ..... how come it's not around now ? , drop the click bait it's childish

  • @centralplains7608
    @centralplains7608 Місяць тому +2

    Why so many images of AD-1 Skyraiders [Douglas] while talking about F-8F Bearcats [Grumman]? This video is clickbait w 1/2 truths.

  • @marcgartner1543
    @marcgartner1543 Місяць тому +2

    Great airplane.
    Cheapened by misleading title, and way too many clips of Skyraiders.

  • @Wolfen443
    @Wolfen443 Місяць тому +8

    Too many technical errors in the video, sorry.

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 Місяць тому +1

    Bad title.
    It did NOT demolish "modern" jets, only some of the EARLY jets.

  • @mtnshooter2487
    @mtnshooter2487 Місяць тому +1

    Hate to tell you this AD-1s are not F8Fs.

  • @thomasryan5394
    @thomasryan5394 Місяць тому +1

    Why the Skyraider footage mixed in with the Bearcat?

  • @Jack-bs6zb
    @Jack-bs6zb Місяць тому +5

    It was the Sea Fury that downed the Mig15. It was faster than the Bearcat.

  • @USCG.Brennan
    @USCG.Brennan Місяць тому +2

    "Demolished Modern Jets?" Talk about a CLICKBAIT and phony title!!!

  • @sailordude2094
    @sailordude2094 Місяць тому +1

    I missed the part about it "demolishing" jets.

  • @YouTube_user3333
    @YouTube_user3333 Місяць тому +2

    While I think there’s a lot of whingers in the comments section, they are making some pretty valid points 😂

  • @1982nsu
    @1982nsu Місяць тому +2

    This video deserves a "thumbs up" but the click bait title compels me to give it a "THUMBS DOWN".

  • @wbaiv
    @wbaiv Місяць тому +4

    The title is a lie and cannot be defended or expained. And some of the film is Douglas A-1 Skyraider attack / bombers. But the Bearcat was no match for, say, a MiG-15. Interestingly, the UK Sea Fury had one MiG-15 kill, but one has to consider pilot quality. The ability to engage, disengage, and avoid combat entirely were all in the MiG's favor. The MIG pilot must have been inexperienced and over-committed., or remarkably unlucky. That said, an A-1 Skyraider, ground attack-bomber, got one MiG in Vietnam, so maybe its not just the hardware...

    • @billdang3953
      @billdang3953 Місяць тому +1

      I have heard that a Corsair bagged a MiG in Korea as well.

  • @crawford323
    @crawford323 Місяць тому +2

    I would be happy to own a Grumman canoe.

    • @UguysRnuts
      @UguysRnuts Місяць тому

      I have a very pretty Grumman sailing and rowing skiff with a Torqeedo electric motor.

  • @peterweller8583
    @peterweller8583 Місяць тому +1

    Nice clip

  • @tinlizzie37
    @tinlizzie37 Місяць тому

    The Bearcat never seen combat!!!

  • @irigoyenanita
    @irigoyenanita Місяць тому +2

    Warning: CLICKBAIT.

  • @scootergeorge7089
    @scootergeorge7089 14 днів тому

    A lot of great info here, but a lot of those Bearcats are Douglas A-1 Skyraiders! A much larger aircraft with a different mision.

  • @Loki52020
    @Loki52020 Місяць тому

    The postal service LLV is made by Grumman.tough little vehicle.drove it for 12 yrs

  • @jackpoage5419
    @jackpoage5419 Місяць тому

    It was a highly modified Bearcat that climbed to 9,800 feet in 91.9 seconds.

  • @carlpopkins4
    @carlpopkins4 Місяць тому

    If you want see one up close, and have time, go to the Planes of Fame Museum in Chino, CA. They restored one a couple of years ago.

  • @ButcherBird-FW190D
    @ButcherBird-FW190D Місяць тому +2

    My Man... Your title is mis-leading, and for the most part inaccurate. Just a suggestion to focus on the reality of the situation, and to NOT title your videos so that they are.... Effectively, "Clickbait". Peace.

  • @barrybeckford2733
    @barrybeckford2733 Місяць тому +4

    Poor video, click bait

  • @richardkudrna1450
    @richardkudrna1450 Місяць тому

    If I remember right, Rare Bear hit 6000 HP on fuel injected alcohol. I got to talk to one of the men who built up that powerpoint.

  • @Ceemysix
    @Ceemysix Місяць тому +1

    Comparing a reciprocating engined, straight wing WW2 aircraft to a jet propulsion powered fighter jet as being superior? Yeh, OK.

  • @devanishant
    @devanishant 28 днів тому

    In 1968 my father's employer took me for a ride in his Bearcat. They did aerial photography. Later, he crashed the plane and died.

  • @donaldtrout1798
    @donaldtrout1798 Місяць тому +1

    The title says demolished modern jets but you run your mouth about WWII - no jets. This is just click bait

  • @jamesmcclure815
    @jamesmcclure815 Місяць тому +2

    Why show Douglas Skyraiders in a video about Grumman Bearcats? Poor editing!!

  • @AceFreehley
    @AceFreehley Місяць тому

    I'm sitting here and thinking about Trojan T-28. That plane would give most of the jets a run for the money.

  • @crowold3025
    @crowold3025 Місяць тому

    F8F was 700 kg lighter than F4U with an engine of the same power, and nearly one ton lighter than Sea Fury with an engine of the same power as the R3350.  There is a record of the prototype taking off at 35 meters.  Air combat performance is determined by speed, climbing ability, and appropriate wing area.

  • @robertdendooven7258
    @robertdendooven7258 Місяць тому

    If the war had continued into the fall of 1945, I think the Bearcat would have been most useful on the Independence-class light carriers replacing the Hellcats and the escort carriers replacing the FM-2 Wildcats. Leave the F6F and F4Us on the Essex-class for strike escort.

  • @steve-ey3rx
    @steve-ey3rx Місяць тому +1

    It beat contemporary jets, NOT "modern" jets.

  • @HDSME
    @HDSME 24 дні тому

    He'll cat killed the most aircraft and was slightly behind the Bearcats in performance

  • @Mrbfgray
    @Mrbfgray Місяць тому

    Rare Bear a Reno Air Race fave for decades.

  • @michaeldavid6284
    @michaeldavid6284 Місяць тому +1

    "Two zero zero horsepower"...really? Your channel and narration blow.

  • @truthseeker9454
    @truthseeker9454 Місяць тому +2

    Clickbait thumbnail and title. No like for you.

  • @easttexan2933
    @easttexan2933 Місяць тому +3

    2000lbs lighter with the same engine as the Hellcat and the Corsair? Yeah, I'd say it would outperform both of them handily. Never saw action for the US, even Korea. Oh well, still one of my favs at the airshows. Round sound is the best.

  • @jerdonsbabbler3515
    @jerdonsbabbler3515 Місяць тому +1

    Don’t clickbait. No share. No sub. Boo.

  • @drtimsmith
    @drtimsmith Місяць тому +1

    WHy footage of Sky Raiders at one point?

  • @Brad-gk9jd
    @Brad-gk9jd Місяць тому +2

    Cool!

  • @ArcticBlues1
    @ArcticBlues1 Місяць тому

    Thank You :)

  • @briansmith7791
    @briansmith7791 Місяць тому +1

    Somewhat interesting, but why the automated narration? After "two zero zero zero horsepower", I had to stop.

    • @jmrodas9
      @jmrodas9 21 день тому

      I agree, he should have said two thousand horsepower. Regards.

  • @williampaz2092
    @williampaz2092 Місяць тому

    If only this fighter had been available for frontline service by mid 1944….

  • @DuhBiggestDog
    @DuhBiggestDog Місяць тому +1

    No Click Bait, please, if you want me to watch any more of your videos

  • @JohnsAircraftWalkarounds
    @JohnsAircraftWalkarounds Місяць тому +4

    Really? I realize that the Sea Fury was not made in America, but it was equal to the Bearcat in performance and actually did go head to head with Migs, shooting one down. I am afraid your video was more click-bait than substance.

    • @paulbantick8266
      @paulbantick8266 Місяць тому

      There has been a debate that it may have been two Migs (or at least the second Mig being damaged) shot down.

    • @UguysRnuts
      @UguysRnuts Місяць тому

      @@paulbantick8266 Even a blind squirrel will find the occasional nut.

    • @paulbantick8266
      @paulbantick8266 Місяць тому +1

      @@UguysRnuts Any chance you could post something related to the 'Topic' in hand. That has nuts in it too.

  • @PurpleDreki
    @PurpleDreki Місяць тому +1

    Misleading title, click bait.

  • @wittwittwer1043
    @wittwittwer1043 26 днів тому

    Click-bait. The title does not justify the content: No mention of the Bearcat even engaging modern jets in combat.

  • @richardmclaugfhlin65
    @richardmclaugfhlin65 Місяць тому +1

    Phony title. Bad dog.

  • @sjsz06
    @sjsz06 Місяць тому +3

    One thumbs down for the click bait title...

  • @jeffreyjacobs390
    @jeffreyjacobs390 Місяць тому

    The F6F Hellcat had a 19 to 1 Kill Ratio IN WAR TIME AIR COMBAT encounters ...... it was not outclassed by ANYTHING THEN* regardless of weight. Secondly THE FIRST WW2 JET ( ME 262 ) was shot down by a BLACK PILOT in a P-51 Mustang !