Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Zeon Zaku's Battling The Federation Warships.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 лис 2023
  • The Anime Is Gundam The Origin.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 134

  • @tachi1034
    @tachi1034 Місяць тому +263

    funny when i tried doing this with starsector, it led to 90% loss rate of suits against UAF (united Aurorian Federation) CIWS defenses.

    • @prome3439
      @prome3439 Місяць тому +68

      Well Starsector is 2 dimensional, makes it easier for PD. Interesting to find a starsector comment here XD.

    • @tachi1034
      @tachi1034 Місяць тому +42

      @@prome3439 i mean theres also homeworld 2 mod that finally was brought back from the dead. and that one gets silly with the MS formation strike patterns.

    • @jacksiegel9764
      @jacksiegel9764 Місяць тому +28

      @@tachi1034 haha I had made an original reply but it was to everyone. Anyway, I think the minosky particles prevented radar from working effectively, and a lot of the anti aircraft guns were based on line of sight and manual targeting. If you watched the original series and think abiut things from that perspective, as well as the idea that they had to stick with the 1979 universe looking forward 200 years into the future, stuff might make more sense.

    • @trueken4728
      @trueken4728 Місяць тому +16

      Becoming competent at piloting Arma-Armatura's Valkhazard-II made my fantasy of wiping fleets like Char feel so real to me

    • @alvinbonny1562
      @alvinbonny1562 Місяць тому +3

      You definitely can't do such thing in starsector

  • @MrAsaqe
    @MrAsaqe Місяць тому +174

    Not a single Zaku lost in this battle and the Zakus would proceed to win every battle without a single casualty in space until the advent of the Gundam

    • @right584
      @right584 26 днів тому +8

      Nope

    • @icaropassosmissel7435
      @icaropassosmissel7435 23 дні тому +1

      "And the stormtroopers arrived

    • @BlitzkriegOmega
      @BlitzkriegOmega 21 день тому +25

      There were casualties on Earth, sure, but Zeon flatly dominated space until September of the One Year War. 10 months of Victory after Victory, and it only took 2 months to completely turn the tide of the war.

    • @icaropassosmissel7435
      @icaropassosmissel7435 20 днів тому +1

      @@BlitzkriegOmega germany did same thing OO till someone developed tonk

    • @icaropassosmissel7435
      @icaropassosmissel7435 20 днів тому +1

      @@BlitzkriegOmega but it was a matter of strategy then

  • @jacksiegel9764
    @jacksiegel9764 Місяць тому +131

    I think the minosky particles prevented radar from working effectively, and a lot of the anti aircraft guns were based on line of sight and manual targeting. If you watched the original series and think abiut things from that perspective, as well as the idea that they had to stick with the 1979 universe looking forward 200 years into the future, stuff might make more sense.

    • @aceu.c.veteran5167
      @aceu.c.veteran5167 Місяць тому +3

      Well no shit.

    • @jacksiegel9764
      @jacksiegel9764 Місяць тому +17

      @@aceu.c.veteran5167 was actually trying to reply specifically to itachi1034 who mentioned the mod for a game that tried to act out this scenario, but it failed miserably. I just found out with your comment it didn’t respond to it lol

    • @TheTrueAdept
      @TheTrueAdept Місяць тому +22

      ... thing is, if they had proper lasers in the backstory, then they would have proper LIDAR... and to ruin LIDAR, you'll need minvosky particle densities so high that it'll make visual targeting practically impossible.
      However, if a faction with LIDAR showed up, then this attack would be getting into a sort of hell.

    • @bryanrussell1478
      @bryanrussell1478 Місяць тому +9

      @@TheTrueAdeptthing is they did have lasers in UC, however armor tech caught up with semi-transparent coating that while could be used to increase laser weapon power, would basically render lasers useless. Semi-transparent coating would be later developed into beam-resistant coating that would help cushion the damage of beam weapons (beam weapons are energized particles, lasers are photons) but not stop the damage (so basically useless unless used in high amounts on mobile suits directly but if applied on shields, would allow said shields to be of some use)

    • @TheTrueAdept
      @TheTrueAdept Місяць тому +12

      @@bryanrussell1478 yeah, the armor is impossible under physics, as lasers would literally rip such armor apart. That's why the only real material useful against lasers is something dense like tungsten, uranium, iridium, and osmium.
      Then there's the fact that you could make solid-state lasers in the UV spectrum, which would completely nullify that armor, especially if it's an ultra-short pulse laser.
      ... and don't get me started on Xasers (X-Ray Lasers) and Gasers (Gamma Ray Lasers).

  • @lanceslyd4865
    @lanceslyd4865 8 місяців тому +77

    Thanks for uploading the full battle of loum from Gundam the origin 🎉

  • @donpackundo6953
    @donpackundo6953 25 днів тому +10

    This is like seeing tanks in action for the very first time during WW1

    • @R-XI_Sulla
      @R-XI_Sulla 3 дні тому

      Yes but the other way around You are in a tank but the enemy just came up with anti tank tactics Move firmer then the tank can react and Deal a major blow in its most vulnerable Spot possible

  • @krossbow789
    @krossbow789 Місяць тому +83

    The mind boggling part is how the federation's space fighters are simultaneously slower than flash stepping mobile suits while the battleships are also immobile; if its just a matter of size, the fighters should have been drastically outmaneuvering the suits, so apparently its just "make it a human shape" gives it super speed.
    The battleships are also seemingly made of tin foil while also being horribly undergunned for their size... meaning the ship essentially just made up of empty space and explosive material?
    Even with minisky particle non-sense, the battleship's designs just don't add up. They should either be giant slabs of armor or giant walls of guns, and yet are neither.

    • @beckstiles6595
      @beckstiles6595 Місяць тому +33

      My understanding is that the main takeaway is the Mobile suits' capacity for omni-directional movement with applied HE rockets and heat hawks for when the pilot can close the gap, you do have a point in the long-term, as the Federation ships do go down a little too easily.

    • @supermexican12
      @supermexican12 Місяць тому +16

      Weak spots and basically nukes on bazookas? I’ll take it.

    • @RussOlson-pl3kf
      @RussOlson-pl3kf Місяць тому +20

      People talk a ton about the realism of Gundam but it's only the people that are a masterpiece. The battle is definitely super cool but not at all sensible.

    • @Privatepain1234
      @Privatepain1234 Місяць тому +15

      its about the where the thrusters are located, on a MS they have way more nozzles so they can do more directions while the EAF fighters have most thrust on the rear, same with their ships. plus the big ships designs are obviously designed to engage an enemy to their front so they suffer from these multi directional attacks.

    • @krossbow789
      @krossbow789 Місяць тому +11

      @@Privatepain1234 Here's the thing, there is zero reason that a fighter has to have its thrusters on the back and can't have a thruster on the bottom or the top as well if that's plausible for a mech to have multi-directional thrusters.
      This isn't in air, the wings aren't there to provide lift, so there's no reason that the thrusters have to be all at the back. If multi-directional thrusters will work on a human shape, they'll work on a smaller fighter as well.
      This carries over to the battleships even more: The battleships are something like 75% empty space on their hulls. There is ZERO reason for them to not be making use of that in a space environment.
      Either those "empty spots" should be loaded with guns so they're a 360% capable fighting beast (Which they're clearly not) or the absolute thickest armor and defenses possible (Which, again, they're not... they Really, REALLY aren't. Absolute tissue paper, especially since see tons of giant mobile armors during the war that are borderline immortal from attacks).
      Even modern day warships (Or heck as far back as WW2) are absolutely COVERED In guns wherever they can cram an extra one on, unless their explicit purpose is as a carrier to service planes (And even then they STILL have multi-directional gun batteries on areas outside of the strip).
      Just everything about the federation's carriers would make an engineer pull their hair out shrieking.

  • @SrGex
    @SrGex Місяць тому +36

    Zaku II and it's variants are freaking cool (they are my favourite ms)

  • @davidalfaro1429
    @davidalfaro1429 Місяць тому +9

    Just found your channel and just subscribed gundam my favorite childhood anime ❤ your awesome 🥳

  • @mercenarygundam1487
    @mercenarygundam1487 12 днів тому +3

    I wonder how they would fare against Tie Fighters.

  • @wither5673
    @wither5673 7 днів тому +1

    And suddenly a wall of unstoppable warships that under normal circumstances would have meant COMPLETE domination of space for the federation turned into a formation of sitting sucks for the new Zeon weapon. The feds should have invested in mass production earlier...

  • @nneddenn6207
    @nneddenn6207 19 днів тому +9

    Super stupid one-sided battle)
    Those ships had like x100 firepower and didn't hit a single time at those suits?
    They have a lot of capital ships with thick armour, big guns, anti-rocket defences and no one single fighter to protect them from small, fast moving targets?
    They have laser guns, which hit with speed of light and they miss ALL the shots?
    Thats just plain stupid)

    • @Romanov117
      @Romanov117 19 днів тому +5

      To think of it, the Mobile Suits emitted some kind of radiation particles from the Minovsky Reactors which interfered and jammed many electronic equipments of the Federation, rendering long-rang targeting systems and inter-communications useless.
      Including Early warning systems.
      Also, the fighters in space were also at a disadvantage when Mobile Suits were built with AMBAC System, which allows them to fight in omni-directional combat in space as opposed to a 2D combat.

    • @Dumb-Comment
      @Dumb-Comment 18 днів тому +4

      missiles cant lock onto the mobile suits because they had Minovsky Reactors
      fighters are not omnidirectional objects like a humaniod fighting unit so they are outmatched
      the rockets are the size of a train that's bigger than anything we had, no amount of armor can protect them from that caliber, they built those ships for suppressive fire power and fleet enagement, the overall designed followed traditional earth ocean vessel.
      The reason why they used thick glass is because monitors are even more fragile, easy to mulfunction, one power outage and you're blind.
      The chances of the bridge getting hit by indiscriminate fire from fleet of ships are so low that the benifits of trading protection with visibility is worth it
      Also those aren't lasers, they are superheated plasma (compressed hot gas)

    • @Antimatter_ray
      @Antimatter_ray 3 дні тому

      @@Romanov117 laser guided weapons were already a thing by the 60s so they could've just pointed a laser at them and pulled the trigger, there was already predictive targeting and proxy fused in ww2 anyway,
      Both in actually planetary dogfighting, and in space omni-directional combat is already a fucking thing so its just more plot bullshit for why fighters do not have multi-directional thrusters.

    • @pageandpencil
      @pageandpencil День тому

      @@Antimatter_ray Current omni-directional combat on earth is much different from what omni-directional combat would be in space. This is one of the first real conflicts in space. Gravity, air resistance, so many factors differ, and therefore the fighters, which have not been truly designed for space combat, lose. And space is still more "omni-directional" than earth aerial combat.

    • @Antimatter_ray
      @Antimatter_ray День тому

      @@pageandpencil did you ignore what I replied to do just to pull a 🤓as an argument?

  • @angerskarin9222
    @angerskarin9222 Місяць тому +18

    Why are the zaku so much faster then jet? the jets should atleast be faster then huge human size mech.

    • @techpriest4043
      @techpriest4043 Місяць тому +19

      Zakus have more thrusters and a tons of smaller Thrusters in the Frame, they can infact outmanevuer some Space Fighters. Given the Space Fighters only have Engines in the Back.

    • @dahandsomeguywithcoolglass8949
      @dahandsomeguywithcoolglass8949 28 днів тому +2

      I think in Gundam space fighters development at statics stages

    • @Asyuuuuu
      @Asyuuuuu 28 днів тому +3

      minovsky particles

    • @SuperRambo1985
      @SuperRambo1985 21 день тому +1

      Space fighters can win in number in ギレンの野望 vs zaku in this battle.

    • @TwiceStruck
      @TwiceStruck 20 днів тому +9

      ​@@dahandsomeguywithcoolglass8949..Mobile suits had an AMBAC system, it's been years, but it's swinging arm right to turn left without using fuel...So yes jets were faster, but MS reacted and turn faster, and with armour no fighters taking out without missiles, which were near useless because of minovsky particles...basically an all around super jammer.

  • @iliaskok5031
    @iliaskok5031 27 днів тому +5

    Go watch some gundam before the world ends!!!

  • @jhonsmith7991
    @jhonsmith7991 22 дні тому +16

    So, bunch of star-fighters would do the same trick then? What do mobile suits have as advantage, the fact that they are small and more maneuverable? I don't get it.

    • @SuperRambo1985
      @SuperRambo1985 21 день тому +1

      Thinking the same thing. Aircraft Carrier without fighters to protect

    • @HermitAeon
      @HermitAeon 20 днів тому +12

      MS have an inbuilt ECM unlike anything before thanks to the Minovsky Particle's radar interference effect. Basically, the Feddie gunnery teams on all these ships were fighting both the MS and their own weapons the whole time, with the gunnery computers being unable to correctly track the machines.

    • @jhonsmith7991
      @jhonsmith7991 20 днів тому +5

      @@HermitAeon So, they could install that technology on small star-fighters and again, have the same effect. Instead they went with: 'Let's invest massive resources and money into large robots, because they will look cool. Ok. XD

    • @HermitAeon
      @HermitAeon 20 днів тому +14

      @@jhonsmith7991 Maybe... if the reactors could actually fit on the small starfighter designs. All preexisting starfighters seem to be fully conventional rocket engines - it's likely that if you tried to retrofit those fighters you'd just get a mobile suit sized fighter craft for no real benefit other than having M-particles. In other series we see the results of this line of thought applied to tanks, and they failed like their superheavy ancestors in WWII. Besides, the AMBAC systems in the limbs allow MS to reorient themselves using inertia faster than flywheel systems and without using thruster propellant, making them more maneuverable than said fighters anyway.

    • @GozXz
      @GozXz 19 днів тому +2

      ​@@jhonsmith7991 also the armor would be denser than the fighters because the power supply allowed for more powerful motors.
      Fighters are more nose to tail, while mobile suits were correctly more tuned for space combat. Their mobility is more omni directional.
      Then their EM sig was masked preventing early radar systems ineffective.

  • @aatantrie7235
    @aatantrie7235 3 дні тому

    this scene remind me ww1 during last polish cavalry charge mowed down by german MG team, get caught unprepared by unconventional warfare and tactics.

  • @MangoTroubles-007
    @MangoTroubles-007 Місяць тому +8

    I was impressed by the origin series, just hope they do not do full HD remake of Mobile Suit Gundam, some of those amazing voice actors are no longer alive and it would ruin it

  • @nl7458
    @nl7458 Місяць тому +9

    tbh if not for the plot armor amuro would be dead or fed wouldnt win at all...
    at the a boa qu battle zeon have dolos class... which till today its the biggest ship that somehow ended up in gundam series its a super ms carrier that zeon created snd only 2 ever been build capable to carry more than 100 ms (forget the exact count)
    downside is its big... soo big that it needs to be protected by mobile suits for its blindspot

    • @MrCreepjo
      @MrCreepjo 12 днів тому +1

      Maybe in the first few episode it's plot armor and sheer luck but later on in series Amuro had the skill and experience to keep up with the later zeon suit but further more a lot of the attributes of why Zeon lost is because of the people in Zeon not feddies.
      Plus the fact Zeons as it may had only a little financial help from the Jupiter Empire against a very rich Feddies that can afford to lose and make more suit. plus their developmetor lead were making deterrent suit to see what is able to take down the trojan horse at their missions instead of focusing on their wide spread troops.

  • @StefanBlagojevic
    @StefanBlagojevic Місяць тому +3

    @tristonthegundamfan811 You aligned the scenes perfectly, well done! Subbed!

    • @thehistoryjedi390
      @thehistoryjedi390 Місяць тому +1

      Thx my brotha this is my second channel I made for this kinda stuff much love ❤

  • @nneddenn6207
    @nneddenn6207 19 днів тому +3

    Also, looks that capital ships are made of 70% paper and 30% HE exposives. No armour. Why then huge ships, if they 1) don't have armour 2) don't have proper defences.
    Also - it's super stupid to make bridges, the most important part of the ships with UNPROTECTED WITH HUGE GLASS WINDOWS.
    Super stupid.

    • @sebastiannelson6355
      @sebastiannelson6355 10 днів тому +1

      Actually, the bridge is not a super important part of a ship, it's mostly used for navigation and visual lookouts. The most important part of any ship is the CIC and power plant. Both of which are heavily protected here

    • @edmarespaniola4241
      @edmarespaniola4241 2 дні тому +1

      we actually see them shooting at vulnerable areas of the ships. Or are you not paying attention?

  • @raoulr3791
    @raoulr3791 15 днів тому +3

    Question..! Knowing how useless this speaceship are why keep building them 😂😂😂 i think they can save more live and materials if they just focus on mobile suit

    • @user-pp6vl3vb1t
      @user-pp6vl3vb1t 14 днів тому +3

      This is early in the war and the federation underestimated mobile suits and were lagging behind in their own development.
      The space ship serve as a base camp for mobile suits to return for repairs and resupply along with providing intel and orders. Think of them as aircraft carriers.

  • @linyenchin6773
    @linyenchin6773 27 днів тому +1

    You mean *Zeon Zaku Battling the Federation.*

  • @ZAR556
    @ZAR556 29 днів тому +3

    How tf mobile suit win against spaceship
    Its like watching human with 50 caliber, won against Battlership
    😅

    • @manojkothwal3586
      @manojkothwal3586 25 днів тому +1

      No close proximity weapons on EFSF and Zaku hit on vulnerable spots of EFSF Ships.
      Tracking Zaku is hard and EFSF lacks close quarter defense.

    • @R-XI_Sulla
      @R-XI_Sulla 25 днів тому +2

      Hard to hit an omnidirectional small objecr with indiscriminate firepower
      They planned an ship on ship fight
      But they got intorduced to an squad of shipkillers

  • @working-protein
    @working-protein 14 годин тому

    So they are capable of building space warships but fail to instal anti missiles?

  • @daweedabest2085
    @daweedabest2085 18 днів тому +7

    Tbh I find it hard to believe that a star fighter couldnt easily do what mobile suits do in space battles

    • @akiranakahara7569
      @akiranakahara7569 6 днів тому +1

      Star fighters can only go one direction while mobile suits have the advantage of omni mobility

    • @edmarespaniola4241
      @edmarespaniola4241 2 дні тому +1

      Fighters don't have legs so they can't do kicks lol😂

  • @Gunplahrazzi
    @Gunplahrazzi Місяць тому +2

  • @nica77maniloco38
    @nica77maniloco38 26 днів тому +1

    lol even my auto windshield wipers can detect better 🎉😂❤

  • @user-kh9ng9zt3x
    @user-kh9ng9zt3x 23 дні тому +1

    테크닉도 피지컬이다..

  • @obied1182
    @obied1182 17 днів тому

    More like a cargo ships

  • @obied1182
    @obied1182 17 днів тому

    A cargo ships could defend themselfs better

  • @joanllinasbas1231
    @joanllinasbas1231 15 днів тому

    If ships are this vulnerable to mobile suits, wouldn't they also be against regular attack wings?

  • @sunkim3999
    @sunkim3999 12 днів тому

    저랬던 샤아가 아무로에게 맨날 털리게 되지. 초반에 아무로가 초짜일땐 건담이 깡깡하니 버텨줘서 경험치 쌓을 동안에도 샤아가 아무로에게 이긴 적이 없어. 샤아 vs 아무로는 샤아의 전패지.

  • @linyenchin6773
    @linyenchin6773 27 днів тому

    Zaku is the correct plural of Zaku, the Zaku are Zaku never "Za-cooz" nor "Zaku's" unless you mean to describe the Zaku's properties~nature(design and its limits).
    The Japanese are not saying "Zakus" as their plural for the word, which is indeed their word and bot ours as English users ao why impose the suffix "s"?

  • @cr0sad3r70
    @cr0sad3r70 11 днів тому +1

    That's just dumb

  • @Colombian120
    @Colombian120 Місяць тому +1

    Anyone know the name of the anime?

  • @moralambush
    @moralambush 19 днів тому +1

    This anime is absolutely nonsense lmao

  • @harshkumbharkar5816
    @harshkumbharkar5816 13 днів тому

    I never understood the gundam fans or universe. Like are the bad guys dumb or something their are so many typpes of gundam why don't they make one for themselves??

    • @masterchieflast
      @masterchieflast 12 днів тому +1

      Thats like saying china should just build an exact copy of a F-35 because the F-35 is so good, gundam's aren't powerful because they are gundams they are just powerful prototype mobile suits. in the original show its just like if someone had developed a F-35 in the 80s. the bad guys do get their own gundam equivalent in the Gelgoog but its not a gundam because it being a gundam doesn't make it all powerful unless we are talking about plot armor but in universe the Gundam and the Gelgoog are almost the same

    • @FakingGold
      @FakingGold 11 днів тому +1

      "I never understood the gundam fans or universe" i think i found the problem

    • @jessfarinas1842
      @jessfarinas1842 5 днів тому

      Gundam as a franchise is massive. So I am kinda confused that you mentioned that the "bad guys" should make their own Gundam. If you are talking about the anime this scene was clipped, I'll give a brief explanation.
      This clip was from the Gundam Origins series, it is the prologue of the original Gundam series that was aired way back in 1979. The RX-78-2 Gundam was already in development during the events of the clip. So basically the so called "bad guys" doesn't even have an idea yet that the Gundam exist.
      But moving into the MS Gundam (the original series), the "bad guys" did try to make their own mobile suit that is comparable to the RX-78-2 Gundam which was mentioned by @masterchieflast, the Gelgoog.

  • @JaythyJazz
    @JaythyJazz 14 днів тому

    where were the gms? this is massacre !

    • @TheWarmachine375
      @TheWarmachine375 14 днів тому

      This battle happened long before Operation V was greenlit.
      The Federation at the time didn't take mobile suits seriously and thought their fleet of ships and starfighters are enough until the Battle of Loum.
      Their defeat made them realize that mistake and had Tem Ray, father of Amuro Ray, to create mobile suits.
      The Gundam, the Guncannon and the Guntank.
      As prototypes before the mass production of GMs.