You are already getting spammed into oblivion I see, but really choosing Manjaro instead of EndeavourOS, ARCO or Garuda is a bad decision nowadays. Although I would not really recommend the last two, as I didn't use ARCO and Garuda is a pain in the as in terms of you not knowing, wtf did your distro do with the base arch system. In Garuda my terminal/VSCode fonts broke once and I couldn't even remotely understand wtf was going on. Nobody on the forums even understood, how the hell did it happen, so I migrated to Endeavour. And to be perfectly honest, if you can use Fedora, Endeavour is easy for you to use. A lot of the stuff you need and nothing you don't out of the box. The Arch base actually never broke on me. I once accidentally uninstalled SDDM, but that was definitely a me problem. I managed to do the same on Fedora afterwards. Therefore, if you ever want an Arch experience without putting the whole car together at the start, Endeavour is a very solid choice. Still not a beginners distro though, as it is a bit terminal oriented.
Surprisingly I had the opposite issue with Garuda just spontaneously functioning more than I would expect and EndeavourOS having inexplicable issues. Garuda is really one of the best linux distros for at least having a working OS at the end of the day.. (if you're not unlucky with your hardware)
Garuda is notorious for having terrible support as well. Imagine all of the condescending douchebaggery of the arch forums, but without even an ounce of the capability. Arch forums will patronize you and insult you and also give you a complete set of instructions for troubleshooting your issue and offer several solutions. Garuda, you'll just be patronized and never offered any assiatance.
I'm currently using Fedora Server on my Server and Nobara (Fedora based gaming distro) on my Laptop and PC. I used arch before but NVIDIA + Wayland + Arch = unusable hell
That part made me laugh. But it's kinda accurate too, except it's not targeting you, it's targeting big businesses that would save money by having red hat solve their technical issues for them
@@panmeekNah he has a point. Manjaro is know for doing oopsies. like DDOSing the AUR. forgeting to renew their keys. imploding when you have mismatched packages due to them delaying packages by 2 weeks in combination when you installed things from the AUR. and the list goes on.
Void is great. Very little bloat and not exactly as bleeding edge as Arch (I don't like broken systems) + it starts faster bc of runit. Öö, Suomea ei mainittu, mutta tavataan torilla kuitenkin!
@@joelkronqvist6089I use arch (btw) and in all 5 years of using it have never once had a breakage i didn’t directly cause. Arch is a hell of a lot more stable than ppl give it credit for.
I have Manjaro installed on a $8 USB drive that I boot to with my laptop. I am currently coding software for a cutting edge particle collider. This is not a joke.
@@Sirfreelancealot On linux USBs you can re-partition the ISO to have another partition that can store data persistently, but if you dont (And dont have external storage for the USB) everything is amnesic and runs in RAM, so a poweroff or reboot erases everything and dosen't leave a trace, this is how the Tails distro achieves amnesia
@@anyvoltage8157 I think he means that usb drives typically use low-quality flash memory, and therefore don't handle many r/w cycles. As a result, data loss is very likely if you don't use backups.
I had quite an adventure with Linux: - Managed to nuke my system via ‘sudo rm -rf /*’ thinking it would only remove everything inside my current dir. - Managed to get trapped inside Vim multiple times. Had to restart the computer to break free, because I didn’t have internet to ask it what to do - Managed to nuke my system answering ‘yes’ to the question ‘Do as I say’…
Trapped inside vim I get, but you managed to install linux in a console setup without being told how to switch tty? That is what saved me a lot of reboots in my starting days. (Alt+Fn (or Ctrl+Alt+Fn if in X), use Alt+sidearrow to scroll through the ttys. X is usually on tty1 or tty7 depending on your setup) That "do as I say" used to be "yes, I understand that this might harm my system" (or something similar) - kinda miss that variant of the prompt, was clearer.
Using fedora minimal is so good that I probably will never switch my workspace to any other distro unless they f* up something really bad imagine getting debian like stability + arch like updates + good package manager + supports mostly everything that is available and can run well on server with no complications I assume well if you got confused : fedora workstation and fedora minimal is different thing it runs on my device with hyprland TWM on 500-700mb of ram and just uses 5gigs of storage with all setup ( it increases as you use system , install stuffs ofc but you got the point : its lightweight )
Since switching to Fedora 18 months ago, I've had the least amount of issues than on many other distros. Every time I've tried to use Linux Mint Cinnamon I always run into some issues. I want to like it but just can't
Contrary to what was said, NixOS is _not_ literally one big configuration file. It _can_ be one big configuration file, but if you've been using it for long enough, you've probably broken that configuration file into several smaller configuration files. (My NixOS is currently 7 configuration files, one of which does nothing but list every single Noto font.) As far as Nix is concerned though, there's no difference (so little difference that it literally won't have anything new to build).
I don't for now, but it's likely by end of summer. Which will mean that half my comments under other stuff will still consist of "I use arch btw" while I don't use arch. Or maybe I'll just remain on arch with home manager forever
Carl Sagon best described what it is like to use Linux From Scratch " IF you want to make apple pie from scratch , first you have to invent the entire universe "
The most cursed setup ever: PC: - Arch Linux for everything except games - Windows 11 for games Laptop: - MacOS (mistakes were made and now I have to hold on to the worst of both hardware and software worlds just to pretend that buying this was not a financial mistake) Honestly, the only saving grace for me is that all of my work-related data gets auto-synced between laptop and PC, so I only have to use mac when I have no access to the PC...
You can also use moonlight or nomachine to access your desktop from your laptop so you don't even have to look at that cursed os for more than a minute
@@lpnp9477 sadly they won't cut it for me, as I often times have to use my laptop outside of the house, and there is no way to get a static IP address for me (at least for now)
I find Alpine Linux is the most resource-efficient, if you want a computer that does only a few things. After the initial installation it took less than 100 MB of disk. I could install XFCE for basic desktop and FireFox, and the disk usage is still about just 1GB. For comparison, when I installed Arch with XFCE, it used about 5GB.
After switching to Arch ive been so happy with doing pc stuff, computing was made actually fun again instead of "this is painful, i just want it to work and nothing more" like on windows, thank god i never have to deal with that level of instability that everyone pretends doesnt exist on windows ever again Linux is a goldmine of enjoyment, amazing video, loved it!!!!
The problem is when you can't make it work, like Fedora was for me. The audio always crackled when I started a game on steam, and I couldn't do anything about it.
@lpnp9477 im sorry but have you seen windows system call graphs? Arch is as stable as you make it, dont just group all unstability together like its the same
I agree with your opinion on Fedora - it is the best of both worlds, stable and advanced. For all the distro-hopping I have done, I consistently come back to Fedora.
The UA-cam algorithm brought me here and I'm glad it did. I've now watched all your videos and I'm very excited to see what else will come here in the future :)
I use FreeBSD, it's like Linux but 10x more frustrating, a challenge to get up to date drivers, and lots of software is unavailable But I'll be damned if I didn't learn a lot and find a cool mascot
@@meci6625 i run freebsd via ghostbsd on my desktop. works well and feels good using bsd over linux. and freebsd has over 30.000 packages. plus the linux compatibility layer. ive used strigaht up freebsd its kinda like arch in the since you setup everything manually but its not hard plus the community for freebsd is imo better. they do not care about if its foss/gpl they just want it to work how they want it. and i like the MIT license allot better over the GPL license
@@meci6625 I believe only hackers who love to tinker would seriously use BSD as their main OS. BSD is mostly for servers with strict resource limitations since they usually take less ram and storage space than linux. BSD is great for a log less vpn on a cloud server, not as a personal OS.
@meci6625 I had to swap wifi chips in my laptop to get very slow wifi working. Plus a bit tricky for graphics drivers since my laptop has dual graphics. But for coding it's fantastic and it's insanely fast. Plus super stable, I've had debian and fedora crash on my laptop a bunch. That said, I can do the majority of things I'd do on a Linux laptop, but honestly it's not quite as convenient for some things
On Xubuntu, if you ever want to feel what smoking crack cocaine is like, have a Bethesda game boot while modded after nine hours of fucking around and chasing down errors, it’s the closest thing to the real thing I’ve found yet
It was a bad simile for how hard arch is to install, you're right. It's closer to assembling a lego death star. But then again that's only true for first time installers. I really need to find a proof reader for my scripts.
The comparison with Arch and not using a manual for Lego is kinda off because iirc the Arch Wiki is huge and by far one of the most well documented distro's
It is really good as long as you don't have any silly bells and whistles on your laptop that are important to you. Then you're pretty much stuck with an arch distro
Arch Wiki isn't a book of Lego instructions, though-it's a *computer science textbook.* Even the install guide says things like, "And now it's time to install a bootloader! You can read about that in this completely separate ~chapter~ webpage."
@@GSBarlev ya they are like Wikipedia... They say stuff and assume u know it and if u don't then search for a blue hyperlink u noob... Thats insult but if u get used to it then it's the best as no other distros has a wiki that huge
I've been using Arch for about 6 months now and dunno why but I'm seriously considering switching to Fedora or PopOS since past couple weeks. This will probably offend a lot of people here
No I get it. You prefer a computer to work for your intended use case rather than spend hours going in circles and getting nowhere. I would definitely use pop if I weren't addicted to gimmick laptops
I have made a Network folder at work, so everyone does not have to download their favorite distro from their website, but can just get it from the fileserver. :D It includes every single linux Distro I could find even obscure ones like Redstar OS. It took a lot of work and the downloading wouldve taken even longer if I didnt decide to use torrents which was in my experience often faster. I should make a list of the versions that are included so that if you know any more versions, i can add them. It is not only Linux it also has other operating systems like Haiku, Free BSD or even Windows. Even the Server versions of it. On that regard it is not fully done yet, I would love to add even more but I am currently not at work but at school. But once I return to work I make sure to add many more operating systems and linux distros. I tried some software that allows you to change network folder icons. But once the server restarted they are all broken now. So that didnt work sadly :( It took a really long time to make, really really long and I put a lot of effort in it. Sad it is gone. The isos are there and working tho, just the images gone.
Ubuntu server user here. Just using it cause a few programs i want to run are only availiable for ubuntu and i dont have any issues with the os so far so it works. But can somebody tell me about the privacy concerns please? I have not really heard anything about it.
@@icantcomeupwithnames469Endaveour comes with an installer so you dont have to read a wiki and you get some cool space wallpapers. Also it preconfigures the DE for you so you wont have to set that up either.
I'm already aiming to switch from Windows to Pop_OS, since that one seems to be the best all-around distro, especially for a beginner. Thankfully I'm not the most fond of AAA games or multiplayer games that use anticheat, so that isn't really an issue for me.
This right here is why W10 currently dominates the market, and it's not even close. In Linux everyone thinks they can create whatever they want and there is no unified thing other than the Kernel. Therefore, not many want to bother.
0:16 - communism is not about "make it free and take your property" - it is about "prohibit currency trading on stock exchanges" - and in general using currency as an equivalent with constant value, rather allow people to fluctuate it, all the rest is majourly irrelevant to communism topic
4:30 totally unnecessary and xenophobic comment. Even if you *think* that the CPC is not good, there's no reason to attack the chinese developers of Deepin. These types of comments are such a turn off on videos that were cool like this. Comments like this are so 2003-ish.
Used Fedora for a while and it does look pretty cool, but I found myself putting hours just to make it work and look like Pop out of the box. Also ran into issues while using snap (not my choice). Eventually got back to Pop. I’m more of a functional user, and Pop has provided the perfect balance for me. Still plan to venture with Arch/Manjaro, when I have more time to waste.
I used to use arch btw, then I chilled tf out and didn't feel like running pacman -Syu every 15 minutes and switched to Debian permenantly (until I inevitably find a reason to switch again)
Ive been using fedora and ubuntu for a few months and i just ordered a new laptop so i tried to check some other distros out to play around and see what was out there. The last one i triedwas manjaro. Im sticking with fedora.
I hopped from Mint over to Fedora thinking I'm ready for an advantaged distro. Not that I don't know how to uset Fedora, but hopping distros has been a pain in the *ss. Maybe i did it wrong, but I probably won't change distros just for how bad my experience has been.
I would say the exact opposite of what you say because Arch although it is like a lego set hives you all the instructions that you need to at least get started and in most cases the wiki goes even further.
Used to run Kubuntu and you couldn't pay me to leave KDE but then I discovered Pop_OS :chefskiss: It was one of the smoothest installs I've ever had. Quite an achievement with an Nvidia gpu lol
Puppy linux is an excellent distro for technical support or for a computer with low specs, you can carry it around in a usb, it can run in ram, even its file system, so you don´t need a hard drive, also you can format, cut or copy a hard drive, but its too limited so its a bad option for a desktop main os
While Pop_OS! is advertised as the forefront of gaming on Linux, the before mentioned distro, Linux Mint is a better choice. From my personal experience Ubuntu, besides the controversy is also a decent gaming distro, at least the last time I used it (1-2 years ago).
Thing about Manjaro is: be careful with the AUR. I've used for quite a few months only with flatpak and it was great. Then I started using AUR and things went downhill. That's why I began using normal arch in the desktop.
The AUR does that to literally every single arch distro eventually. That is in no way a Manjaro unique problem. The only way to not have the air break your system eventually is to just not use it. Otherwise you just have to be willing to fix something eventually. That's just the nature of arch.
As the saying goes, if you learn a distro, you learn THAT DISTRO. If you learn Slackware, you learn LINUX. I've never been quite good enough to run straight-up Slack, but I have used and like several Slack-based distros, especially on legacy hardware. I tend more towards Debian-based (but not *buntu; while useful for top-tier hw recognition, runs slower than other distros). After years of reliability with synaptic/*.deb I tried Manjaro (3 different releases) and regretted it. pacman under Manjaro is trash, and I'm dubious about Arch in general because of it. I now rotate between PCLinuxOS, Mageia (both Mandrake derivatives), and Linux Mint (current).
@@lpnp9477 i dont know If it is that Bad. NixOS has a crazy amount of stuff to learn, but Most of is Independent of Linux in General,so might Not be as Bad as it sounds
![PC Master Race Explained in 9 minutes [Animated]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RRY1jrIDhvU/mqdefault.jpg)
You are already getting spammed into oblivion I see, but really choosing Manjaro instead of EndeavourOS, ARCO or Garuda is a bad decision nowadays. Although I would not really recommend the last two, as I didn't use ARCO and Garuda is a pain in the as in terms of you not knowing, wtf did your distro do with the base arch system. In Garuda my terminal/VSCode fonts broke once and I couldn't even remotely understand wtf was going on. Nobody on the forums even understood, how the hell did it happen, so I migrated to Endeavour.
And to be perfectly honest, if you can use Fedora, Endeavour is easy for you to use. A lot of the stuff you need and nothing you don't out of the box. The Arch base actually never broke on me. I once accidentally uninstalled SDDM, but that was definitely a me problem. I managed to do the same on Fedora afterwards. Therefore, if you ever want an Arch experience without putting the whole car together at the start, Endeavour is a very solid choice. Still not a beginners distro though, as it is a bit terminal oriented.
Thank you for the explanation. I haven't run anything arch based in years. I'll pin this to make sure no one tries manjaro for no reason.
@@Sirfreelancealot I am certainly saved. Thank you 👍
Surprisingly I had the opposite issue with Garuda just spontaneously functioning more than I would expect and EndeavourOS having inexplicable issues. Garuda is really one of the best linux distros for at least having a working OS at the end of the day.. (if you're not unlucky with your hardware)
Garuda is notorious for having terrible support as well. Imagine all of the condescending douchebaggery of the arch forums, but without even an ounce of the capability. Arch forums will patronize you and insult you and also give you a complete set of instructions for troubleshooting your issue and offer several solutions. Garuda, you'll just be patronized and never offered any assiatance.
just use arch lol, if you really, really want a gui installer go with endeavour
"Red Hat got rich by giving you free software, then charging you to fix it when you fuck up"
I never looked at it that way.
I think that's fair. Without them linux and foss wouldn't be as good as it is today
That’s why they had to kill CentOS. We started fixing the problems ourselves 😂
I'm currently using Fedora Server on my Server and Nobara (Fedora based gaming distro) on my Laptop and PC. I used arch before but NVIDIA + Wayland + Arch = unusable hell
Well
Ansible is nice, and the redhat Dokumentation is also suitable for Debian
That part made me laugh. But it's kinda accurate too, except it's not targeting you, it's targeting big businesses that would save money by having red hat solve their technical issues for them
As an Arch user, using Manjaro does NOT give you permission to say our sacred mantra.
I run Arch btw :3
Running Arch-based distros also can come with its own issues that I'd rather avoid
What about SteamOS?
@@MrDiarukia At that point you're not even a linux user
@@ELEC7RO well isn't it arch based?
not mentioning UwUntu should be a crime
Not knowing of it was the bigger crime. Lock me up
@@Sirfreelancealot You're under arrest. 👮♂
Ya, I thought you throw in WindowsFX, that Windows Clone Linux OS.
@@SirfreelancealotWe now demand a part 2!
@@cybernit3 its not safe iirc
Manjaro = Speedrun to bricked system any%
thanks for reminding me i need to fix my laptop...
Lmao yep
Endeavor too
But I like
@@lpnp9477 I just switched to endeavor... what's wrong with it?
@@anima94 nothing, this guy is just being weird
@@panmeekNah he has a point. Manjaro is know for doing oopsies. like DDOSing the AUR. forgeting to renew their keys. imploding when you have mismatched packages due to them delaying packages by 2 weeks in combination when you installed things from the AUR. and the list goes on.
Being voidlinux user is like being from a 3rd world country when you see someone mentioning your distro you just lose your mind.
UZBEKISTAN MENTIONED
@@lpnp9477 that's crazy
nixos user here
Void is great. Very little bloat and not exactly as bleeding edge as Arch (I don't like broken systems) + it starts faster bc of runit.
Öö, Suomea ei mainittu, mutta tavataan torilla kuitenkin!
@@joelkronqvist6089I use arch (btw) and in all 5 years of using it have never once had a breakage i didn’t directly cause. Arch is a hell of a lot more stable than ppl give it credit for.
I have Manjaro installed on a $8 USB drive that I boot to with my laptop.
I am currently coding software for a cutting edge particle collider.
This is not a joke.
Do you just not save anything/have everything on github at all times or are you playing sector failure roulette?
Im genuinely interested
@@Sirfreelancealot On linux USBs you can re-partition the ISO to have another partition that can store data persistently, but if you dont (And dont have external storage for the USB) everything is amnesic and runs in RAM, so a poweroff or reboot erases everything and dosen't leave a trace, this is how the Tails distro achieves amnesia
T420? I guess that goes without saying.
@@anyvoltage8157 I think he means that usb drives typically use low-quality flash memory, and therefore don't handle many r/w cycles. As a result, data loss is very likely if you don't use backups.
Yep, that's what i meant
I had quite an adventure with Linux:
- Managed to nuke my system via ‘sudo rm -rf /*’ thinking it would only remove everything inside my current dir.
- Managed to get trapped inside Vim multiple times. Had to restart the computer to break free, because I didn’t have internet to ask it what to do
- Managed to nuke my system answering ‘yes’ to the question ‘Do as I say’…
Trapped inside vim I get, but you managed to install linux in a console setup without being told how to switch tty? That is what saved me a lot of reboots in my starting days.
(Alt+Fn (or Ctrl+Alt+Fn if in X), use Alt+sidearrow to scroll through the ttys. X is usually on tty1 or tty7 depending on your setup)
That "do as I say" used to be "yes, I understand that this might harm my system" (or something similar) - kinda miss that variant of the prompt, was clearer.
What distro were you using that doesn't have root protection on rm ;p
I'm sorry but this is like the Linux equivalent of that one gif of Homer making cereal light on fire
- Managed to nuke my system by doing chown -R root:root / because I was new and forgot to add a dot before /
@@MthaMenMon Rip
Probably recoverable, but a huge pain
Using fedora minimal is so good that I probably will never switch my workspace to any other distro unless they f* up something really bad
imagine getting
debian like stability + arch like updates + good package manager + supports mostly everything that is available
and can run well on server with no complications I assume
well if you got confused : fedora workstation and fedora minimal is different thing
it runs on my device with hyprland TWM on 500-700mb of ram and just uses 5gigs of storage with all setup ( it increases as you use system , install stuffs ofc but you got the point : its lightweight )
Debian and Fedora are the best distros.
Since switching to Fedora 18 months ago, I've had the least amount of issues than on many other distros. Every time I've tried to use Linux Mint Cinnamon I always run into some issues. I want to like it but just can't
i am the only existing mageia user 👍
I use Nixos btw
Contrary to what was said, NixOS is _not_ literally one big configuration file.
It _can_ be one big configuration file, but if you've been using it for long enough, you've probably broken that configuration file into several smaller configuration files. (My NixOS is currently 7 configuration files, one of which does nothing but list every single Noto font.) As far as Nix is concerned though, there's no difference (so little difference that it literally won't have anything new to build).
I don't for now, but it's likely by end of summer. Which will mean that half my comments under other stuff will still consist of "I use arch btw" while I don't use arch. Or maybe I'll just remain on arch with home manager forever
nixos-rebuild switch
Nixpkgs and the nix package manager are great if you are caipable of not having a migrane from the nix language
I use Nixos btw
1:30 I thought this was going to be an informative video. I didn't think it'd be a comedy too! Actually laughed out loud
It's titled "by an idiot"
Bruh
Carl Sagon best described what it is like to use Linux From Scratch " IF you want to make apple pie from scratch , first you have to invent the entire universe "
The most cursed setup ever:
PC:
- Arch Linux for everything except games
- Windows 11 for games
Laptop:
- MacOS (mistakes were made and now I have to hold on to the worst of both hardware and software worlds just to pretend that buying this was not a financial mistake)
Honestly, the only saving grace for me is that all of my work-related data gets auto-synced between laptop and PC, so I only have to use mac when I have no access to the PC...
You can also use moonlight or nomachine to access your desktop from your laptop so you don't even have to look at that cursed os for more than a minute
@@lpnp9477 sadly they won't cut it for me, as I often times have to use my laptop outside of the house, and there is no way to get a static IP address for me (at least for now)
0:01 Apple follows the same rule. The catch is that hardware requires your testicles to be sold
Jokes on them, my wife has them securely tucked away 😂
I find Alpine Linux is the most resource-efficient, if you want a computer that does only a few things. After the initial installation it took less than 100 MB of disk. I could install XFCE for basic desktop and FireFox, and the disk usage is still about just 1GB. For comparison, when I installed Arch with XFCE, it used about 5GB.
After switching to Arch ive been so happy with doing pc stuff, computing was made actually fun again instead of "this is painful, i just want it to work and nothing more" like on windows, thank god i never have to deal with that level of instability that everyone pretends doesnt exist on windows ever again
Linux is a goldmine of enjoyment, amazing video, loved it!!!!
Every os is unstable lmao
But at least on Linux I can control the instability and script my way into a working os
@@lpnp9477 maybe I have rose tinted glasses but windows 7 was pretty stable
The problem is when you can't make it work, like Fedora was for me. The audio always crackled when I started a game on steam, and I couldn't do anything about it.
@lpnp9477 im sorry but have you seen windows system call graphs? Arch is as stable as you make it, dont just group all unstability together like its the same
@@szhadjii8363pipewire??
I agree with your opinion on Fedora - it is the best of both worlds, stable and advanced. For all the distro-hopping I have done, I consistently come back to Fedora.
1:12 "elementary os is great if you're transitioning" -> come on, we all know arch and gentoo are the trans people distros!
Gentoo is the best distro for learning Linux's internals.
The UA-cam algorithm brought me here and I'm glad it did. I've now watched all your videos and I'm very excited to see what else will come here in the future :)
I use FreeBSD, it's like Linux but 10x more frustrating, a challenge to get up to date drivers, and lots of software is unavailable
But I'll be damned if I didn't learn a lot and find a cool mascot
How's the desktop experience with FreeBSD? I know the PS4 uses a custom BSD based software, and it sucks ass
@@meci6625 i run freebsd via ghostbsd on my desktop. works well and feels good using bsd over linux. and freebsd has over 30.000 packages. plus the linux compatibility layer. ive used strigaht up freebsd its kinda like arch in the since you setup everything manually but its not hard plus the community for freebsd is imo better. they do not care about if its foss/gpl they just want it to work how they want it. and i like the MIT license allot better over the GPL license
@@meci6625 I believe only hackers who love to tinker would seriously use BSD as their main OS. BSD is mostly for servers with strict resource limitations since they usually take less ram and storage space than linux. BSD is great for a log less vpn on a cloud server, not as a personal OS.
@meci6625 I had to swap wifi chips in my laptop to get very slow wifi working. Plus a bit tricky for graphics drivers since my laptop has dual graphics.
But for coding it's fantastic and it's insanely fast. Plus super stable, I've had debian and fedora crash on my laptop a bunch.
That said, I can do the majority of things I'd do on a Linux laptop, but honestly it's not quite as convenient for some things
😂
On Xubuntu, if you ever want to feel what smoking crack cocaine is like, have a Bethesda game boot while modded after nine hours of fucking around and chasing down errors, it’s the closest thing to the real thing I’ve found yet
Will try and report back
I don't know how it has happened, but I've just recently been sucked into the void that is Gentoo
Zorin Os Mentioned I’m happy now I can like 😂
With u there. I felt always lost by the sudden embrace of Ubuntu. I thought Fedora Core was perfectly fine.
"Some are reliable"
>Yugo pictured
The arch wiki slander is so uncalled for when its literally one of the most concise and readable wikis out there
It was a bad simile for how hard arch is to install, you're right. It's closer to assembling a lego death star. But then again that's only true for first time installers.
I really need to find a proof reader for my scripts.
This has been fun, refreshing, not too serious - but more of a "so true it became a meme". Great.
Bro, Manjaro? There’s endevour, cachy os and many more that are a lot better.
In the name of your son pop os, amen
The comparison with Arch and not using a manual for Lego is kinda off because iirc the Arch Wiki is huge and by far one of the most well documented distro's
Huh, Linux Mint might be an Ubuntu distro, but then there's the brother, LMDE, the common backup for Linux Mint that omits Ubuntu code entirely.
It’s interesting how people talk about the distros like they’re levels for your character
Mint is always considered the ‘starting point’
Parrot literally flies around, invisible, only hearable (like mc when i try to tame a parrot xd)
Pop!_OS makes my gaming laptop (w/ Nvidia) super performant, can't recommend it enough!
It is really good as long as you don't have any silly bells and whistles on your laptop that are important to you. Then you're pretty much stuck with an arch distro
Nobara better
@@lpnp9477 „bells and whistles“?
@@sirultor648 smaller community tho
@@Autismagus can always look up fedora for niche problem solving. And it is more optimised for gaming. Just my opinion tho
Bro that elementary joke took me out
Hahaha the LoL reference had me lol - btw alistar top lane only or I afk
2:42 u have a instructions manual its the arch wiki...
I was going to say that. Now, if you want something with poor documentation where it feels like there's no guide then go for NixOS.
@@brainstormsurge154 Can confirm
Arch Wiki isn't a book of Lego instructions, though-it's a *computer science textbook.* Even the install guide says things like, "And now it's time to install a bootloader! You can read about that in this completely separate ~chapter~ webpage."
@@GSBarlev ya they are like Wikipedia... They say stuff and assume u know it and if u don't then search for a blue hyperlink u noob... Thats insult but if u get used to it then it's the best as no other distros has a wiki that huge
The elder scrolls
The Slackware one kills me
4:15 oh no youtube compression
I did get the Elementary pun and I did read that drama as it unfolded. Mental health is... Anyway.
fedora, peak
Neckbeards unite!! *Tips Fedora 39*
@@bvd_vlvdIt's on 40 now ;)
Fedora 40 🫡
@@ThatMaverickMojust upgraded to Workstation 40 most of my GNOME extensions worked without issues
been my daily for over 5 years now and i havent had a single problem!
The pun, "...they aren't on our level." made me nearly piss myself. Subscribed.
I've been using Arch for about 6 months now and dunno why but I'm seriously considering switching to Fedora or PopOS since past couple weeks. This will probably offend a lot of people here
No I get it. You prefer a computer to work for your intended use case rather than spend hours going in circles and getting nowhere. I would definitely use pop if I weren't addicted to gimmick laptops
Tell me why I got an Apple Pay ad once this video ended
I have made a Network folder at work, so everyone does not have to download their favorite distro from their website, but can just get it from the fileserver. :D It includes every single linux Distro I could find even obscure ones like Redstar OS. It took a lot of work and the downloading wouldve taken even longer if I didnt decide to use torrents which was in my experience often faster. I should make a list of the versions that are included so that if you know any more versions, i can add them. It is not only Linux it also has other operating systems like Haiku, Free BSD or even Windows. Even the Server versions of it. On that regard it is not fully done yet, I would love to add even more but I am currently not at work but at school. But once I return to work I make sure to add many more operating systems and linux distros. I tried some software that allows you to change network folder icons. But once the server restarted they are all broken now. So that didnt work sadly :( It took a really long time to make, really really long and I put a lot of effort in it. Sad it is gone. The isos are there and working tho, just the images gone.
Ubuntu server user here. Just using it cause a few programs i want to run are only availiable for ubuntu and i dont have any issues with the os so far so it works. But can somebody tell me about the privacy concerns please? I have not really heard anything about it.
It isn't a real concern + they reversed the change. There is a comment somewhere here explaining the situation really well.
manjaro is kinda bad now. EndeavourOS is a better arch derivative.
why not just use arch btw
@@icantcomeupwithnames469i value My time
@@icantcomeupwithnames469Endaveour comes with an installer so you dont have to read a wiki and you get some cool space wallpapers. Also it preconfigures the DE for you so you wont have to set that up either.
Linux Mint is the best for beginners. My favourite is probably Guix, but I actually just use Mint with the Guix package manager on top
Gentoo is like arch, but you smelt yor own ore
The whole video was to say that Apple users are eunuchs, amiright?
whaaat? Nooo, who told you that :P
Maybe you're a bit young to know this, but a lot of Mac users are cis women.
I mean it's accurate
At first I thought it was gonna be a joke about trans girls and UNIX based systems.
that lubuntu one was personal edit: the android one is even more personal than ubuntu
I'm already aiming to switch from Windows to Pop_OS, since that one seems to be the best all-around distro, especially for a beginner. Thankfully I'm not the most fond of AAA games or multiplayer games that use anticheat, so that isn't really an issue for me.
This right here is why W10 currently dominates the market, and it's not even close. In Linux everyone thinks they can create whatever they want and there is no unified thing other than the Kernel. Therefore, not many want to bother.
Sigma boomer mindset
By your logic, apple should dominate.
@@curious_banda It would if they came first, if they had actual GPUs and if they didn't force your to buy their overpriced crap hardware.
@@Leonhart_93plus the only game you can run on a Mac is Sims 4
@@damianjblack That's pretty impressive 🤣
0:16 - communism is not about "make it free and take your property" - it is about "prohibit currency trading on stock exchanges" - and in general using currency as an equivalent with constant value, rather allow people to fluctuate it, all the rest is majourly irrelevant to communism topic
Yeah people mix up communism and socialism a lot
No it's about collective ownership of the means of production and distributing all goods in the society based on needs.
You did not make that elementary joke omg
Windows is great distro if you coming from the Linux Mint
😂 😂 😂
Best 20 second intro to any video I’ve every watched
Android is the worst Linux.
but there is no equivalent linux version yet. otherwise i would opt for running linux on my phone too
@@willi1978 yep
It's great if you enjoy spyware
Still better than Apple.
"I use Arch" is the only pickup line that works.
4:30 totally unnecessary and xenophobic comment. Even if you *think* that the CPC is not good, there's no reason to attack the chinese developers of Deepin. These types of comments are such a turn off on videos that were cool like this. Comments like this are so 2003-ish.
This is awesome! Can you make a similar video but it's Desktop environments
As someone that's daily driven Linux for 20 years, ha ha ha! This is bang on!
Used Fedora for a while and it does look pretty cool, but I found myself putting hours just to make it work and look like Pop out of the box. Also ran into issues while using snap (not my choice). Eventually got back to Pop. I’m more of a functional user, and Pop has provided the perfect balance for me. Still plan to venture with Arch/Manjaro, when I have more time to waste.
Kubuntu: babys first desktop Linux, but I liked how the steam deck desktop mode felt.
using arch cuz i love lego
and arch is literaly breaks only when you break it, minimal as fuck as do only what you want it to do
I used to use arch btw, then I chilled tf out and didn't feel like running pacman -Syu every 15 minutes and switched to Debian permenantly (until I inevitably find a reason to switch again)
Loved the Elementary joke. Danielle Foré shall rule us all
2:36 "Some are reliable"
**Shows yugo**
Sarted on manjaro but made the move to Arch. Life is good.
Does anyone actually use Zorin OS?
yes. me.
I use modified mint btw, with my custom package manager from terminal. Im about to use mageia as a server, also, with my package manager.
Happy Linux user here! I've been using it for over 15 years and never got a virus, or malware, or spyware.
Just recently switched from Windows to Bazzite, been a learning curve thus far. But, I don't regret my choice.
Ive been using fedora and ubuntu for a few months and i just ordered a new laptop so i tried to check some other distros out to play around and see what was out there. The last one i triedwas manjaro. Im sticking with fedora.
I hopped from Mint over to Fedora thinking I'm ready for an advantaged distro. Not that I don't know how to uset Fedora, but hopping distros has been a pain in the *ss. Maybe i did it wrong, but I probably won't change distros just for how bad my experience has been.
I would say the exact opposite of what you say because Arch although it is like a lego set hives you all the instructions that you need to at least get started and in most cases the wiki goes even further.
5:55 As someone watching this on a Samsung tablet, that was not expected...
Ha he didn’t talk shit about my Hannah Montana Linux. I win!
I discovered kubuntu after buying a steam deck, which I've heard also runs arch?
The little pauses get me
Used to run Kubuntu and you couldn't pay me to leave KDE but then I discovered Pop_OS :chefskiss:
It was one of the smoothest installs I've ever had. Quite an achievement with an Nvidia gpu lol
Puppy linux is an excellent distro for technical support or for a computer with low specs, you can carry it around in a usb, it can run in ram, even its file system, so you don´t need a hard drive, also you can format, cut or copy a hard drive, but its too limited so its a bad option for a desktop main os
Finally void linux is getting some love
You forgot rhel clones like almalinux, using alma right now
I've been on Linux for 4 years now, and I don't wanna migrate from Linux Mint.
how did you not touch on Oracle Linux, our savior of the RHEL horror??
Anarchy is like manjaro but you can scream i use arch btw louder
Bro, how sad it must be to use Apple devices, the pinnacle of ignorance. I use my own android rom and arch btw
Windows > Apple
While Pop_OS! is advertised as the forefront of gaming on Linux, the before mentioned distro, Linux Mint is a better choice. From my personal experience Ubuntu, besides the controversy is also a decent gaming distro, at least the last time I used it (1-2 years ago).
Actually, Arch is for people who are transitioning.
Где Astra Linux? Я пользуюсь ей каждый день.
Thing about Manjaro is: be careful with the AUR. I've used for quite a few months only with flatpak and it was great. Then I started using AUR and things went downhill. That's why I began using normal arch in the desktop.
The AUR does that to literally every single arch distro eventually. That is in no way a Manjaro unique problem.
The only way to not have the air break your system eventually is to just not use it.
Otherwise you just have to be willing to fix something eventually. That's just the nature of arch.
As the saying goes, if you learn a distro, you learn THAT DISTRO. If you learn Slackware, you learn LINUX. I've never been quite good enough to run straight-up Slack, but I have used and like several Slack-based distros, especially on legacy hardware. I tend more towards Debian-based (but not *buntu; while useful for top-tier hw recognition, runs slower than other distros). After years of reliability with synaptic/*.deb I tried Manjaro (3 different releases) and regretted it. pacman under Manjaro is trash, and I'm dubious about Arch in general because of it. I now rotate between PCLinuxOS, Mageia (both Mandrake derivatives), and Linux Mint (current).
5:27 Cool detail on the fractal.
Isn't Bazzite better than Pop_OS?
Lubuntu joke killed me, I run it on a 2000s laptop that’s from a grocery store that’s got a first gen i3
I love how all the top comments are some equivalent of "as somebody who uses Arch..."
i switched from windows to nixos (i need help)
There's a discourse and a Matrix Channel, mostly helpful people over there.
NixOS might be a quite difficult First time experience, though...
I wonder if this level of masochism extends to other parts of your life
@@lpnp9477 i dont know If it is that Bad. NixOS has a crazy amount of stuff to learn, but Most of is Independent of Linux in General,so might Not be as Bad as it sounds
Sailfish OS on my smartphone... which part of my body do I have to cut off?
Steam Deck user here KDE Plasma needs a mention! It's just like Windows tbh but like better.