Queen's Gambit Declined, Tartakower variation - Standard chess #26
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 сер 2016
- I played a standard chess game as white with time controls set at 15 minutes with a 2 second increment. The opening played was the Queen's Gambit Declined, Tartakower variation without h6. It's a game of many even trades! A heavy piece endgame arises where one side holds an extra pawn. One must be very delicate in such positions however if the goal is to convert the full point. Plenty of rook endgames have a high draw rate, and it's paramount to maintain excellent piece activity at all times.
en.lichess.org/Vwcf5WAo
PGN:
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. e3 O-O 6. Nf3 { D55 Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation, Normal Line } b6 7. cxd5 Nxd5 8. Bxe7 Qxe7 9. Nxd5 exd5 10. Be2 Bb7 11. Ne5 Nd7 12. Nxd7 Qxd7 13. O-O c5 14. dxc5 bxc5 15. Rc1 Qd6 16. Bf3 Rfd8 17. Qa4 Qb6 18. h3 h6 19. Rfd1 Rac8 20. Rd2 d4 21. Bxb7 Qxb7 22. exd4 cxd4 23. Rxc8 Rxc8 24. Qxd4 Rc1+ 25. Kh2 Qc7+ 26. f4 Kh7 27. b3 g6 28. Qd6 Qc3 29. Qd7 Qf6 30. Qd6 Qa1 31. Qe5 h5 32. Rd7 Rh1+ 33. Kg3 Qxe5 34. fxe5 Re1 35. Rxf7+ Kh6 36. Rxa7 Rxe5 37. Kf3 Rc5 38. Ra4 Rc2 39. g3 Rc3+ 40. Kf2 Rc2+ 41. Ke3 Rc3+ 42. Kf4 g5+ 43. Ke4 Rxg3 44. Ra6+ Kg7 45. Kf5 g4 46. hxg4 h4 47. Kf4 Rg1 48. Ra5 Rf1+ 49. Ke3 Rg1 50. Kf3 Rg3+ 51. Kf4 Rg1 52. Rh5 Rf1+ 53. Ke3 Ra1 54. Rxh4 Rxa2 55. Rh3 Rb2 56. Kf4 Kg6 57. Rg3 Rb1 58. g5 Rf1+ 59. Ke4 Rc1 60. Kd4 Rc8 61. b4 Rc1 62. b5 Rc2 63. Kd5 Rc1 64. b6 Rb1 65. Kc6 Rc1+ 66. Kd7 Rd1+ 67. Kc7 Rc1+ 68. Kb8 Rb1 69. b7 Rb2 70. Rc3 Kxg5 71. Kc7
I'm a self-taught National Master in chess out of Pennsylvania, USA who learned how to play from my father in 1988 at the age of 8. The purpose of this channel is to share my knowledge of chess to help others improve their game. I enjoy continuing to improve my understanding of this great game, albeit slowly. Consider subscribing here on UA-cam for frequent content, and/or connecting via any or all of the below social medias. Your support is greatly appreciated. Take care, bye. :D
★ FACEBOOK / chessnetwork
★ TWITTER / chessnetwork
★ GOOGLE+ google.com/+ChessNetwork
★ LIVESTREAM / chessnetwork
"Who cares what I feel. Let's see, what I know here" - Jerry.
I'll be honest at first I only watched that Tournaments, but over time these standard games have grown on me over the years and I can better appreciate them. Keep up the good work Jerry!
Great to read that Dragon. :D
Same. I find myself hearing Jerry's voice during my games, and it's very helpful. The thinking aloud in these longer games is very helpful
I've said this before and I say it again: time management. :)
These standard games are some of my favorite chess videos on youtube. Thanks for the great content as always, Jerry!
Lol Jerry has like 5 seconds on his clock and doesn’t even sweat it. Such a calm chess player.
I really enjoyed watching your game and then the analysis afterwards. Thank you!
47:25 - "or even with a pawn" - me every time I have advantage on the board:-D
Fun game -- great analysis! Thanks for the video!
Montsalvat here, remembered you well from the Chess Cube days, remembering how much I missed your games and commentary! Yes endgame technique suspect but you knew it right away. Nice to connect again!
Welcome back Howard. 👍
1. d4! Welcome back!
:D
Thank you Jerry!
Jerry, to turn arrows on, press 'a'.
To turn local analysis on, press 'l'.
Also flip board - 'f'.
Appreciate these slow-time controls man, thanks! I wish I can think as long and as thorough as you do:)
I'm usually playing 5+5 and it's a total mess for me.
15+0 are too long to play tho:(
:(
Ahh. I forgot about those shortcuts. Thanks Nick! :D
Also you can press `?` in analysis to view the list of keyboard shortcuts.
Way to finish the commentary strong Jerry, fxg5 and f6 haha. Anyways, great video as always.
I know right! :D
ChessNetwork vs Daniel Rensch. it has to happen some day.
I hope so! At least one game in all time controls!
Daniel Rensch is another patzer.
they way you're just like "hm."
A little rough around the edges but I like the quiet games! Good game, Jerry.
Just found have been watching mato for months. I love the way you explain what you are thinking and why. Great work very informative. And I have no issue that they played some poor moves or should that be that their played or opponent played but that's too long to type..pun intended
Thanks leigh. :D
Well played
The trick to beating Jerry is to get him in a sharp position
im happy im not the only one who just saya hf for the same reason
;)
I did not realize the time control was 15+2. I thought it was 15+0 and you would get flagged.
Жуда зор
Jesus the time.... xDDD You do it on purpose, don't you ! Makes the game so exciting lol.
Would love to see your heartbeat when you get in those situations
It's funny cause even if you are mostly in control, you still let your time deplete a loooot
Self note: if I’m not behind on time, chances are I am playing too fast
At 21:20 I think Qf6 ist much stronger. But just because of Qc5 the f7-Pawn is hanging :-) Excellent Game with strategically clean ideas. i liked it !
+Jürgen, der Schachstratege Thank you for the compliment Jürgen. :)
well deserved !
Hi Jerry. I was wondering if you ever considered on doing a video (series?) on rook endings. You seem very knowledgeable and confident in your ending play. I usually try to play for sharp or imbalanced middle-games so I can avoid situations where I have to convert a win in a rook ending. I know the Lucena position, but that's about it. Maybe the only way to get better is through experience, but I'm guessing there's got to be tips and general rules to follow.
Thanks SillyPutty. :D There will be some upcoming rook endgame topics in the Beginner to Chess Master series.
Looking forward to it!
Hi Jerry.
Good commentary. Do you ever play the English? Specifically the Botvinic variation?
At 5:10 why wasn't e4 considered? Also, Nxc3 bxc3 strengthens white's pawn centre, right?
Reminds me of Fischer vs Spassky Game 6
Jerry you are always getting low on time! Besides that you are a great Player :)
Hey Jerry, I think your opponent has done two major mistakes besides blundering a pawn. I'm mentioning this because a lot of new players / young players tend to do those as well:
1.) He played too fast
2.) At move 22, after you took the pawn on d4 he immediately recaptured. Timewise (12:30 against 3:30) he should look for moves that keep pieces on the board such as Rd5 followed by e.g. Qb8 (playing for tricks?!). Also drawing chances are higher keeping the Queen (and a-pawn) on the board.
Hey Jerry, you still compete at any chess tournaments anymore? I think it'd be awesome to watch you play live at a tournament.
I haven't in about 6 years now.
ChessNetwork Do you plan on doing any in the future?
8. ... Nxe7 would have kept the long diagonal open. If you want to make sure you trade both the knights and the dark square bishops, it's more accurate to play 8. Nxd5 exd5 9. Bxe7. Note that the in-between move 8. ... Bxg5? fails to the desperado 9. Nxc7! Interestingly, the same tactic would not work if the moves h6 and Bh4 had been inserted earlier as black could then respond to Nxc7 with the "counter-desperado" Bxf2+!
Have fun, but no luck! Luck for me
Wow. Interesting to see an NM play so slowly in the opening. Agonizing over moves that are still in book.
Coffee Weed I think he wants to improve his actual chess decision making by hard breaching openings. really trying to see how they tick is valuable.
6 years ago lichess
Have you ever lose in standard chess by your opponent's well planned strategy?
thumbs up, post more games, get some sleep, thanks!
I was watching this live about 5 hours ago. Does it take too long to upload it to YT?
Not the whole 5 hours for this one, but a good chunk of it.
+ChessNetwork yep
Isn't "chunk" a lovely word?
No luck ! Ahaha
why didnt the black pawn take the c4 at the beginning? newbie here
There is an opening where that happens too, its called queens gambit accepted where black gets a pawn but white gets central majority (2 vs 1 center pawns) supposedly a gambit. But it is not truly a gambit in that after black takes on c4, while true that black is up a pawn temporarily, the pawn can't be maintained and will soon fall.
Who's 'I'?
New chess principle. 4 vs 3 not good for me.
in the 48 move, if black had played kg6 you would have lost
Didnt like it one bit.. you play Queen's gambit for fast development so why take the pawn and give away a tempo instead of for example Q c2 ? You basically (as preferred option) want to take that pawn with a tempo by taking it with yr bisschop after you let yr opponent take your pawn first.. Let yr opponent lose a tempo instead of giving it away. In some variations you take that pawn first , but that comes with a logical and smart strategy behind it, just like the reason you didnt before .. Basically you try to work towards a focused kill with massive attack on the king as ghe vision behind it all , preferably with (sometimes multiple !) sacrifices included.. It's a killer's opening, not a pussyfooting one, and risky , you gotta love it (it's my favorite opening with white, only very strong counterplay on the queens side from an aggressive black player and/ or a very solid tactical and positional player can beat it when played well by white unless you mess the attack up with white.. If you arent prepared to fail in the attack and lose badly by making a miscalculation in f.e. some sacrifice in the attack dont play it. But in those cases you at least went down bravely and your pride remains in tact. In short : A soft gambit isnt gambit at all, you choose this to massacre black in style or go down with your head held high . Anyway, greetings from the Netherlands !
first
kkk leader is first, White is first, therefore kkk leader is White.
Your argument is invalid.
kkk was an old quake 3 klan, it stands for kill krush konquer.
why do i always get this "Mesgen Amanov, professional chess coach" that always pops up at the advertisement. Man, is the guy comes as annoying...
my name is grand master mesgen amov [skip ad] ikr
Man your time managment is horrible ;)
Thinking at some of my games with no time increments and having an extra queen and going for another and a lame internet connection and losing grrr.
yea man I hate that f*** sh** b&&&& ^^&****!!!@!@!!
Or maybe you are "they" as well!
Your time management is unwatchable. Also who is "they". You are playing one person most likely.
Singular they.
They is also a gender-neutral pronoun.
Why do you refer to you opponent as "they"? Do you have reason to suspect you're playing against a team?
Because "he", "she" and "it" (!) have their own problems.
"They" may have "their" problems, but they are not "ours" either! You don't refer to yourself as we so why are they they? My suggestion: "My opponent".
I refer you to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they and I'm done here.
No you're not: This "they" speech in singular is nonsense! He or she have not forgotten their umbrellas. Someone has forgotten his umbrella. Basta,
The reason being: you don't have to be politically correct when playing or commenting on chess. You just have to be good!
you had him earlier. But of course, you almost certainly know that, knew all along.