Trompowsky Attack - Standard chess #36
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 сер 2024
- I played a standard chess game as black with time controls set at 15 minutes with a 2 second increment. The opening played was the Trompowsky Attack. How to react to 2. Bg5? There are aggressive ideas connected with c5 and Qb6 to target the b2 soft spot, however black opts for a modest approach that does not allow a minor piece imbalance with Bxf6. Early play appears tame enough, however white applies some quick pressure before black can castle. Observe how a seemingly natural opening move can be flawed. It's a pawn plus versus the bishop pair and more active pieces in this tightly contested endgame.
lichess.org/3G...
PGN:
1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 { A45 Trompowsky Attack } Ne4 3. Bf4 d5 4. e3 c5 5. Bd3 Nf6 6. c3 Nc6 7. Nd2 Bg4 8. Ngf3 e6 9. Qa4 Nd7 10. Bb5 Qb6 11. O-O Be7 12. Ne5 Ndxe5 13. Bxe5 a6 14. Bxg7 Rg8 15. Bxc6+ Qxc6 16. Qxc6+ bxc6 17. Be5 a5 18. f3 Bf5 19. e4 Bg6 20. Rae1 Kd7 21. Kf2 a4 22. Rc1 Ra7 23. Bf4 Rb7 24. Rc2 Ra8 25. Re1 Ra6 26. g3 Rab6 27. b3 axb3 28. axb3 Ra6 29. dxc5 Bxc5+ 30. Kg2 Bf8 31. h3 h5 32. Rd1 Ke8 33. Bg5 Be7 34. Bxe7 Kxe7 35. Kf2 c5 36. Rcc1 Ra2 37. Ke3 Rba7 38. Kf4 f6 39. exd5 exd5 40. Nf1 Bf7 41. Ne3 Rd7 42. Nf5+ Kf8 43. Ra1 Raa7 44. b4 cxb4 45. cxb4 Be6 46. b5 Bxf5 47. Rxa7 Rxa7 48. Kxf5 Rd7 49. Ke6 Re7+ 50. Kd6 Re3 51. Rb1 d4 52. b6 d3 53. b7
I'm a self-taught National Master in chess out of Pennsylvania, USA who learned how to play from my father in 1988 at the age of 8. The purpose of this channel is to share my knowledge of chess to help others improve their game. I enjoy continuing to improve my understanding of this great game, albeit slowly. Consider subscribing here on UA-cam for frequent content, and/or connecting via any or all of the below social medias. Your support is greatly appreciated. Take care, bye. :D
★ FACEBOOK / chessnetwork
★ TWITTER / chessnetwork
★ GOOGLE+ google.com/+Che...
★ LIVESTREAM / chessnetwork
My favorite aspect of your videos is how you clearly vocalize *how* you're thinking. There's a big difference, for me, between studying chess and being privy to a strong player's thoughts. So thank you for elaborating on these interesting board/piece positions, and especially on what it means to you as you play the game.
I really like that, unlike most chess youtube people, Jerry doesn't behave like a child when someone plays well (even if it is engine level). He just accepts it, instead of whining and crying engine.
I really like that :)
you played well against that engine user.nice work
phanb18 just got banned on lichess... You should be proud Jerry!
@hackmigueluc, I thought there was something suspicious when I saw the analysis xD well played by Jerry!
hackmigueluc yeap, I notice he was a cheater, specifically in the endgame
how did you notice?
The moves he played and the tactics he employed corroborated closely with stockfish. But mostly because his moves were really rigid. For example, on move 51 he didn't take the pawn. He was low on time but still allowed for a loose pawn to go ahead. This either means, in the couple of seconds he took to make the move he had already calculated that he can deliver a check mate no matter what before the anymore promoted queen causes an issue. OR he is using an engine.
33:17 he took 5 seconds to capture the bishop , this is categorically engine.
everyone is stating he was using an engine. in any case, you fought real hard all the way through.
sanitary103 lol Jerry basically played and nearly won against Stockfish rated 3200
Stockfish 8 can barely reach 2600 on an ordinary computer. You would have to have an extremely powerful machine to reach 3200.
G. ShadowBroker my stockfish can beat magnus carlsen at the age 26 and i am using an ipad
G. ShadowBroker regular computer can easily run stockfish around 3000 rating
G. ShadowBroker and stockfish is the second strongest engine in the world with around an estimated rating of 3300
Very cool game. It's heartening to see how often seemingly lost positions are still recoverable.
i way about to type well its nice to see that jerry is human and able to be defeated like the rest of us......but then i read the comments lol
When you said that your opponent is less than a point up, you were right, he was +0.7 :)
Excellent Professor we have there 8)
great work Jerry as usual 😊, watching this opening to prepare for a game at my club 😃
Good luck 🍀
@@ChessNetworkwrtwy7q tu⁸cap😢🎉se7ewoodworker😮😅😂🎉😢🎉😢😮😢😢😅😅😅😅❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤I am ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤4tu dekker3⁴e6 the 6⁴⁴777879780⁰⁰⁰egg 😢
Even if it was against an engine, that was a great game. I got a lot out of watching Jerry play and analyze the game. I think that knowing that it was against an engine would have changed Jerry's point of view and the tactics that he might have tried to employ. He might not have taken on the game at all... Regardless, I think that we should be glad that we got something good out of a cheater. We are not always so lucky and cheaters get what is coming to them eventually.
2016:
0 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, 0 blunders
2021:
4 inaccuracies, 1 mistakes, 0 blunders
(see new analysis of the game)
Very intriguing game, Jerry! Those structures were fascinating! Thank you for posting
the best instructive method …amazing thank you soooo much
Very instructive video!! One of the best i have seen o youtube!!
Trompowsky attack? Dear Lord I don't know how you remember all these openings lol
thousands of hours of playing a game will teach you a lot without having to try!
he doesn't. it's written right there on lichess. (A45). look at the notations.
@Ofek Eliad: 0:28
Ofek Eliad that's only in the analysis
By 02:18 though it quickly transposed into the London System.
A lot of people seem to be getting stuck on the possibility that the opponent was an engine. Although it's less likely than him being an engine considering the circumstances, it's also possible that he used an engine to train and study, and has a strong grasp of endgame play. For example, I've generated about 120 games using stockfish up to depth 50 over a 2 month period, at a rate of 2 per day, for the Indian defenses, and explored possible wrong moves and associated tactics as well. I'm fairly sure I have a high rated player's level of understanding about those openings and the associated structures now, and I feel like a lot of what I've learned is transferable to other positions, as well. Still, I probably have enormous holes for king's pawn openings and stuff like the English.
Considering that phanb18 was playing white and it was a fairly uncommon opening, I'm willing to believe he put a lot of preparation into it. But even if that wasn't the case, Jerry always takes the right attitude towards the game when he plays, which makes him a joy to listen to and learn from. :D
SedoKai well he got banned so yea he was cheating lol. 0 inaccuracies mistakes or blunders? Yea not likely on its own.
It's interesting to watch how time pressure plays an issue here. Not sure that Jerry would've played ...a6 or ...Be7 given more time on the clock. Also amazed at how well Jerry plays the ending under time pressure.
I do like learning from standard time control games, I really do. And lichess is really quick with banning cheaters (this guy has already had his account closed). However, is there possibly another website where you could find a more reputable opponent? It is so easy to create throwaway accounts on lichess. It just disappoints me to watch these player vs. engine games.
I know ICC costs money, and I have never personally used it myself, but I feel like the cheaters are much harder to come by watching others play on it. Just my two cents. Anyways, keep up the good work, thanks for the content :D
James Klimt do chess.com it names thevopening whole u play
Trompowsky, making chess great again.
0 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, 0 blunders - I was expecting 0 ACL but I don't know too much about engines.
My gut is telling me that this guy is using an engine.
The moves he played and the tactics he employed corroborated closely
with stockfish. But mostly because his moves were really rigid. For
example, on move 51 he didn't take the pawn. He was low on time but
still allowed for a loose pawn to go ahead. This either means, in the
couple of seconds he took to make the move he had already calculated
that he can deliver a check mate no matter what before the anymore
promoted queen causes an issue. OR he is using an engine.
Also, because he is now banned from the site....
It's interesting that you're uploading a video from a game played much earlier in the year. It makes me wonder how many videos you have waiting in reserve. Good one to watch.
MrCdm75 I would guess that you could check the out the dude's account and see the date of the game there, not entirely sure, but I think that might work.
When I clicked on the link in the description, right underneath "15+2 - Classical - Rated" It says 1/10/2016. So the game was played in January of this year. Unless the order is D/M/Y Which would be October 1st, but in the states we use M/D/Y. At this moment in time, I'm not sure which lichess uses.
Okay. So lichess' format for dating games is D/M/Y So the game was played on October 1st. I apologize for that.
Patricide day month year is correct XD
Good game, and even better analysis. Also, this is just a thought, in the computer analysis, your opponent had no inaccuracies, mistakes, and blunders; it is kind of suspicious. Some might argue that he is using an engine, but he was kind of quick to move in the end game, for him to be using an engine. There is also a possibility that he is that good of a player. For example, John Bartholomew is one the best /quick players there are. So I guess it is possible for someone to be that good and quick. What do you guys think.
After knight E5 you can let him take the Bishop because the knight would be trapped and pawn to H5 would recapture
Jerry is my idol
Jerry, I'm pretty sure phanb18 is not legit. As a matter of fact, his account is closed on lichess now.
I only like the videos where jerry wins
yeah like you said around the 27th minutes, you need to capture in the center (to open up the position, you have bishop pair...)
Nice video
Arent you down an entire tempo in a london system once you move the knight back to f6 on move 5!?? Could help explain why it was such a tough game.
Trompowski is underrated as a way to break up the monotony of Four Knights/Sicilian/Ruy Lopez every game
it transposed into a London ahhaha, so much for an ATTACK!
@7:12, why not put your queen on a5? Would you consider it an improved knight if the knight were on a4 instead of a more centralized c6? 2 ranks higher but not in center.
At 3:48 it says you have 71 spectators 😐
I once played chess with Trump. He used the Trumpowksy opening
Is that the opening where you say you love chess, you know many great chess players, and you're one of the greatest chess players ever, believe me?
Yes. You may not have realised that it is closely related to the famous pigeon opening. The player loses in 4, throws the pieces across the room and declares victory. I think bird shit might also be involved.
liked and GG Jerry
Did he explain why Bd6 wouldn´t work on the 9th move?
on move 13 does f6 work? I know it's ugly but it seems to hold the position together.
twotwotwo Jerry is Coolcoolcool
If you knew you were facing a computer then defeatism would dominate you and you would never could reach that close to the win.See the difference?That was a good test
hungryknowl ??
why not pawn takes bishop at 21:01
I wouldn't even care if it was a computer or not, id still judge it as a human, my only concern is that im playing a strong opponent, if whatevers on the other side of that board is strong than lets get it. I see the "opponent" as the style of the player itself not the actual player and that im playing the board(dont know if that makes sense lol). And if my opponents pride is so low that he has to use an engine to let him win, then that's his concern.
oneoneone! :)
At 4 minute area it went from 70 spectators to 15, any idea why?
Because the game was on the Lichess top rated TV, then someone with higher rate started a game and the TV changed to that other game.
What opening is
d4 Nf6 c4?
And
d4 nf6 e3?
Indian Game
Colle system
jerry opponent is 100 % cheating... o inaccuracies, 0 mistake, 0 blunders wtf
What's the best way to learn openings?
Chessable.com is a very cool site that helps primarily with openings. It is fairly new so that are not as many repertoires as there should be, but defiantly still worth checking out.
Thanks a lot man, it seems like an interesting website.
***** Just noticed I said "defiantly" when I meant "definitely".
U should an asmr video for chess
You accidentally the verb.
why isn´t 13. f6 not good?
I wondered the same. It looks like white has a strong continuation: 14. dxc5 Bxc5 15. Qxg4. Apparently, 15. ... Qxb5 is best for black, and then it can follow 16. Qxg7 Rf8 17. Bxf6 and black will soon be down 3 pawns.
It kinds works but the black Q still gets to come across and will take the E and maybe the F pawns (depending on whether the Bishop is used to retake the C pawn). Black will have the black Bishop and White the Knight plus a pawn. Also Black will have her Queen at E6 and Black can't castle.
JamesBu11 thx
8:15 what about Qd7 as scary as it looks? :)
Engine users. *sigh
TRUMPowsky
Even if it was against an engine, that was a great game. I got a lot out of watching Jerry play and analyze the game. I think that knowing that it was against an engine would have changed Jerry's point of view and the tactics that he might have tried to employ. He might not have taken on the game at all... Regardless, I think that we should be glad that we got something good out of a cheater. We are not always so lucky and cheaters get what is coming to them eventually.