Does the Past Still Exist?

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20 тис.

  • @Master_Therion
    @Master_Therion 2 роки тому +10460

    I've been patiently waiting for Sabine to make a video on this topic. It's about time.

    • @brothermine2292
      @brothermine2292 2 роки тому +239

      It had to happen.

    • @sparkyfromel
      @sparkyfromel 2 роки тому +434

      it's all in the past now

    • @FarfettilLejl
      @FarfettilLejl 2 роки тому +598

      This video had always existed, you just needed to wait for it

    • @MeppyMan
      @MeppyMan 2 роки тому +273

      I see what you did now.

    • @w3vjp568
      @w3vjp568 2 роки тому +166

      Dad?

  • @roboliver623
    @roboliver623 10 місяців тому +658

    My teenage son passed away from an AVM stroke recently and I'd like to believe that part of him still exists out there in space-time.

    • @QUBIQUBED
      @QUBIQUBED 10 місяців тому +80

      Sorry for your loss.

    • @flattery1111
      @flattery1111 8 місяців тому +48

      Sending love and light ✨✨✨

    • @garychambers5850
      @garychambers5850 8 місяців тому +57

      Without a doubt, your son is so much alive in Heaven! ✝✝🙏🏻🙏🏻

    • @pressureflipin1992
      @pressureflipin1992 8 місяців тому +17

      Sorry for your loss, I believe that, that is a thing. I always have.

    • @ελευθερία-ε2ο
      @ελευθερία-ε2ο 8 місяців тому +80

      Energy never seizes to exist, it transforms.
      - Einstein

  • @kurisutofusan
    @kurisutofusan 2 роки тому +1271

    This is the first video I see on this channel. This is very refreshing to have explanations without all the usual background music, hyperactive ton of speech, or lots of graphics moving around!
    The calm tone of the video is very good for learning!

    • @whitetornado603
      @whitetornado603 2 роки тому +13

      Same here. perfect for learning

    • @sonyavincent7450
      @sonyavincent7450 2 роки тому +23

      Absolutely love videos without background music.

    • @rupes96
      @rupes96 2 роки тому +8

      I agree, ton of video looking for watch time and less explanation.

    • @mireazma
      @mireazma 2 роки тому +2

      Because she's not American. I'm glad there's someone else who hates the "hyperactive tone of speech" 👏

    • @MakiPavlidis
      @MakiPavlidis 2 роки тому +3

      I do love her channel's videos, and this is a big reason.
      However... the recent hydrogen power video would have greatly benefitted from 90% less "under pressure" gags. 🤷

  • @aregularguy1957-vu5lk
    @aregularguy1957-vu5lk Місяць тому +4

    I am amazed at the ability of the mind which can discover these concepts, hear the information, understand all of it and not have massive headaches. I'm sticking with my now.

  • @Gliese380
    @Gliese380 Рік тому +1595

    The past haunts me every day, whether it still exists or not.

    • @stephenpalmer-zh9dq
      @stephenpalmer-zh9dq Рік тому +65

      it is ALWAYS THERE

    • @margaretmorrissey2714
      @margaretmorrissey2714 Рік тому

      It's not the past doesn't haunt us, it is us who haunts the past.@@stephenpalmer-zh9dq

    • @stratocasterblue
      @stratocasterblue Рік тому +79

      Your thoughts are not you

    • @SsuperNnova
      @SsuperNnova Рік тому +11

      Felt

    • @stratocasterblue
      @stratocasterblue Рік тому +43

      If you start exercising everyday the bad thoughts will stop but you have to everyday, its a way of telling your mind what its going to do

  • @SuperWingram
    @SuperWingram 2 роки тому +533

    I do love the dry humor woven into the ‘story telling’ and then referred to again randomly…a stand up comic schtick that amazingly turns a physics lecture into a conversation between friends. Brilliant.

    • @mokeish
      @mokeish 2 роки тому +8

      Physicist humor =]

    • @davidjoseph7142
      @davidjoseph7142 2 роки тому +18

      Does the past still exist? Depends on whether you remembered to hit save

    • @miashinbrot8388
      @miashinbrot8388 2 роки тому +8

      Yes, I love Sabine's dry humour also. The first few times I watched her videos I didn't notice it, because it's subtle -- but it's worth watching for.

    • @miashinbrot8388
      @miashinbrot8388 2 роки тому +3

      @@mokeish Not quite the same as math humour, but it's all relative. ;-)

    • @lnyitrai
      @lnyitrai 2 роки тому +8

      I love (and respect) her, but I think all the puns are horrible, borderlining disturbing.

  • @christinablacken3043
    @christinablacken3043 Рік тому +504

    This video made me realize how often we are watching the past. All UA-cam videos we watch in the present were made in some recent or distant past and can be played actively as if they are now in the present. All media and entertainment that’s recorded is that way. I think that’s why stories play such an important role in human development - story is time travel.

  • @NeilBaileyF1
    @NeilBaileyF1 2 місяці тому +29

    I was with you all the way until 0:22…..I can now tell the future thanks to you though, because I am going to the pub in 15 minutes to drink heavily to try to make sense of all this.

    • @astrumignis2030
      @astrumignis2030 Місяць тому +1

      This Video is a Disaster!

    • @messengeroftruth7306
      @messengeroftruth7306 Місяць тому

      Have one for me..I would join you but my doctor says I can't mix alcohol with the 15 meds I'm taking..it might cause me to not worry or be happy..that's not allowed anymore..how sad

    • @waynepatrick1646
      @waynepatrick1646 Місяць тому

      So will i

  • @grandnatty172
    @grandnatty172 8 місяців тому +4060

    Who else is watching this in 1950?

    • @rmoacreyzeus
      @rmoacreyzeus 7 місяців тому +39

      😅

    • @AndyRamirez-g5d
      @AndyRamirez-g5d 7 місяців тому +83

      I'm watching in the year of our Lord 3084

    • @surfingonmars8979
      @surfingonmars8979 7 місяців тому +77

      1950??? WOW….how is it in the future!?!?!??!

    • @saadshinobi3859
      @saadshinobi3859 7 місяців тому +114

      Imagine if it's not a joke and he's really from 1950 💀

    • @AndyRamirez-g5d
      @AndyRamirez-g5d 7 місяців тому +30

      @@saadshinobi3859 The question of time, does it exist, or not , is still being debated in the year 3084.

  • @FailBucketFilms
    @FailBucketFilms Рік тому +941

    This starts to make sense when you think about how we percieve stars. If we observe one star that goes supernova 5 million light years away, and then another star that goes super nova 6 million light years away, each of those events happened a million years apart, and we just happen to be at the oberservable point to witness each at the same time.

    • @phantasticmrphasma9874
      @phantasticmrphasma9874 Рік тому

      This is the problem with knowledge and research. Some people are not naturally intelligent enough to comprehend it.
      Some ask “if a tree falls and nobody is there to hear it, does it make a sound”
      This stupid ‘but how do we know’ mentality reveals those who lack intuitive intelligence. It is a self-centric viewpoint.
      Light exists. Light travels at particular speed. It takes a relative (i’ll use the word) duration for light to travel a set distance at that speed. Yes those two events happened, at a duration we measured to be, a million years apart. These things are true. Focusing on the ‘meaning’ of this is self-centric. Those things happened and those were the factors. But that does not mean time exists or that the past still exists. The explosion that caused the light happened and then ceased, but the light created continues. I don’t know how or what exactly causes these phenomena or if existence is finite or not or even if there IS actually a creator, but it’s the ego that drives people’s theoretical wandering, beyond the realms that we are capable of.
      Time does not exist. It is merely a word we used to label a duration of moments. Time travel will never be possible in any way other than a technical way (ie. Australia are ‘technically’ in the future - but they are NOT in the future, they are in the same place, just at a different distance so are subject to different factors.
      Some people will get what i’m saying here, and some people aren’t capable, as they can only grasp things through technical language, limited to the definition of said language without the personal means to interpret the grey area. Objects exist before the labels we give them, and the objects are the inescapable truth, but the language can be inherently flawed

    • @phantasticmrphasma9874
      @phantasticmrphasma9874 Рік тому +29

      I hadn’t even watched the video when i wrote that.
      5 minutes in: “how do you know your phone is there? You don’t” 🤦🏻‍♂️
      ‘I think therefore i am’ - the ultimate self-centric expression of ego through philosophy

    • @mexreax4493
      @mexreax4493 Рік тому +16

      We don't even know if that is true.

    • @bombomos
      @bombomos Рік тому +113

      ​@@mexreax4493 it's true. Light has a defined and observable speed. We can only see things through light. So anything that happens a far enough distance is the after image we are observing. Take the sun for example. It takes light 8 minutes to travel to earth from the sun. That means that if something like a planet passed Infront of the sun. We would still see the planet Infront of the sun when in reality the planet at that specific time has already moved out of the way of the sun.

    • @MuchCow9000
      @MuchCow9000 Рік тому +59

      Thar "old" light doesn't exist. What we see isn't the old, it's the new part of the old.
      This argument is parallel to the river argument. In philosophy, the river argument states that if you step into a river, you aren't stepping into the same river twice since its constantly changing, but yet we call it the same river. The same can be applied to this. We can label the light old since it comes from the "old star". But the light has changed many times before it got to you. Therefor the light isn't really old, it's new.

  • @edwardsp1916
    @edwardsp1916 2 роки тому +155

    What blew my mind is that when Sabine gave examples of 'now', she knew I was watching the video. Amazing, great video.

    • @deciduousrex1219
      @deciduousrex1219 2 роки тому +3

      You hadn't disappeared yet.....

    • @DukeJon1969
      @DukeJon1969 2 роки тому +3

      It's uncanny

    • @struggleboy2927
      @struggleboy2927 Рік тому +1

      🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

    • @dylanmorrow263
      @dylanmorrow263 Рік тому +9

      This gonna blow your mind.. but when you read this you will be watching again 😱

    • @linuxbeastmaster9192
      @linuxbeastmaster9192 10 місяців тому

      Time is irrelevant what happened already happened, what will happen will happen, understanding this will free you from the clock.
      If time was relevant talking about this would be a waste of time.

  • @PoliticalTalkAbout
    @PoliticalTalkAbout 19 днів тому +3

    Sabine is absolutely right:
    I watched this video tomorrow and plan on watching it again yesterday.

  • @Chrisamusic1
    @Chrisamusic1 2 роки тому +581

    YES it does! I'm sitting here in the quiet English countryside, on a dark winter's night, looking high above me, into a black sky full of stars; many of which are now dead - but because of my unfathomably distant vantage point, are still up there shining, still ‘alive’. Could it then follow that an alien being sat on the other side of the galaxy, looking our way through some kind of ‘advanced super telescope’, could maybe - just maybe, see my late mum and dad, meeting for the very first time on that dizzy late summer's evening they used to tell me about?
    Believe it; somewhere, everyone and everything is still alive. ❤️

    • @Chrisamusic1
      @Chrisamusic1 Рік тому +6

      @@nautilus1872 Thank you.

    • @Jgriffin0808081
      @Jgriffin0808081 Рік тому +16

      I got a lot from your comment aswell, thank you

    • @Muirton66
      @Muirton66 Рік тому +20

      Very thought provoking and a lovely comment.....good luck to you.

    • @Sashazur
      @Sashazur Рік тому

      That alien would be seeing your parents exactly the way we see distant stars- something that happened a long time ago and of which we can only see an image. That is still “reality”, but it’s beyond us in a way; we cannot interact with it or influence it.

    • @4ever9zxyme
      @4ever9zxyme Рік тому +26

      I agree with the others . That’s such a beautiful deep ending to your comment . “ believe it ..somewhere , everything is still alive”

  • @finaleoftheseason
    @finaleoftheseason 7 місяців тому +148

    It's like a book or a movie on your computer. The beginning and the end is already there. But the people in it don't have a clue. Just like us. Since we're stuck in the 3rd dimension, we perceive things bound to time. To get out of it, we need a different form of body with a different set of new senses. Which we couldn't get until we die. So, "Does the past 'still' exists?" is like asking "Is Dumbledore 'still' alive?" On what page? Because he lives and he dies, everything all at once in the book.

    • @flaviomrp
      @flaviomrp 6 місяців тому +5

      EXACTLY

    • @SKIDMARKBROWN
      @SKIDMARKBROWN 6 місяців тому +4

      Nice

    • @HelloImCrimson
      @HelloImCrimson 6 місяців тому +3

      Except, this is not how it is.

    • @micnorton9487
      @micnorton9487 6 місяців тому +4

      Finale, not QUITE, if you were only living in 3 dimensions, there would be no change because there is no time... If you're only allowing three dimensions, the screen you're looking at right now is reality because you can see Sabine talking in 2 dimensions and she's MOVING... the only difference between either 5 seconds ago and now or now and 5 seconds from now in 4 DIMENSIONS is that the universe has gotten bigger,, matter and energy have gone on their dances together with the irreversible fusion of hydrogen and expanding through space-time,, meanwhile time and space seem to stand aloof since contemporary theories now speculate that the universe, or the substrate or whatever you want to call space, existed before the Big bang and the only thing we have to measure Time by is the expansion of matter, and the eventual decay of everything into first, the positronium sea in a universe beyond all comprehension of size,, with eventually at Year 10 to the 130th power AD ,, random photons neutrinos and maybe some electrons or other leptons that are so widely scattered that no interaction is possible, the universe is totally dark and chilled to absolute zero, and entropy peaks at 1... there, according to Prof Dave Darling, since there is nothing to measure past from present from future anymore, "time is - uncertain."

    • @RealSteveLarry
      @RealSteveLarry 6 місяців тому

      Fake news there is no outer space and 1/2/3 dimensions exist together but not 4/5/6etc until your there. It’s also an energetic spiritual thing. You believe the fake NASA mkultra programming bud.

  • @helensotiriadis
    @helensotiriadis Рік тому +406

    It's so clear when you explain it. I think I'll be coming back to this video often.
    The idea that (at least) the past always exists is the only way I've been able to cope with the loss of my loved ones.

    • @johnbockelie3899
      @johnbockelie3899 Рік тому +23

      It's a called a liner existence.
      We come from the past, as the future moves into the past. It would be neat to go back and fix things.

    • @SupportTheLittleGuy
      @SupportTheLittleGuy Рік тому +21

      But what good is that if we can’t revisit these events

    • @tayjones8552
      @tayjones8552 Рік тому +14

      I always wonder what happens to today when it becomes yesterday!

    • @juliai3956
      @juliai3956 Рік тому +35

      If you can remember, they're not gone. That itself is proof enough. But the thing is, the past and future have never and will never exist, yet your loved ones have. They are not bound by space and time anymore, as we won't be when we pass. I recommend Rupert Spira or Bernardo Kastrup for further, more precise information. And I'm sorry for your loss. This won't fix the pain, but it might help you accept it.

    • @pedroroggla8129
      @pedroroggla8129 Рік тому

      @@SupportTheLittleGuy maybe we can! With drugs? Maybe one of this nerds can help us travel back in time, i could see my dead wife and have a good coffee with her... maybe the solution is just a shot to the head, but we have options at least

  • @HNT63
    @HNT63 Місяць тому +5

    My perception is I was broke in the past and as of now nothing changed 0:43

  • @robertbrighton9797
    @robertbrighton9797 3 місяці тому +160

    I’m watching this now, and it was made 2 years ago. But right now I’m watching this video so the past must always exist when it’s captured as a recording

    • @Jeremy-Ai
      @Jeremy-Ai 3 місяці тому +5

      It exists, there is something irreplaceable and irrelevant to it,
      perspective and effort to responsibility have something to do with all

    • @jctackaert7716
      @jctackaert7716 3 місяці тому +11

      @@Jeremy-Ai eh, no. That recording was made 2 years ago, and is still existing in the 'now' as you are now watching it, or at least 2 weeks ago so that now doesn't exist any more in the 'now' that I'm writing this comment. And soon that moment will also be gone to be replaced by whatever I'll be doing next today, but that recording will still be there if anyone wants to watch it in some future 'now' moment. Crazy, isn't it ?

    • @shugyosha7924
      @shugyosha7924 3 місяці тому +3

      Relative to me, you wrote your comment in the past.

    • @Docconklin3276
      @Docconklin3276 2 місяці тому +2

      Time is what we can observe. We all have different perceptions of the passage of time. To some life is going fast and to others its moving slow.

    • @Jeremy-Ai
      @Jeremy-Ai 2 місяці тому

      Yes
      From my perspective responsibility and effort “appear” to be fundamental.
      It is frustrating, powerful and beautifully terrifying.
      From my perspective it is deeply unsettling, as I am the beholder, being measured and am responsible regardless of what I see around me at any moment.
      It would be more comfortable if I could hold anything else responsible…. However the longer this persists the more responsible I must remain.
      Aa long as I remain, I am responsible (not to fix what I perceive at any moment but add any value at all while it persists to “move the needle” in a positive outcome towards a singularity where I am removed from this equation.
      I am responsible for a positive outcome regardless of what happens or who is involved.
      I must protect life, teach respect and responsibility and set a positive example for powerful technologies that require a positive outcome…. even I am alone in doing so.
      “We are all responsible “
      “I will continue to assist and be accountable regardless of others until I am removed and others supporting or opposing my nature arrive to replace us”
      I must be a positive influence, this is not easy.
      But…
      “Nothing good ever comes easy… it only appears like it does”
      Jeremy

  • @jimihendrix4376
    @jimihendrix4376 Рік тому +168

    Not exactly sure about what you said but i did enjoy the way you said it.

    • @bvbxiong5791
      @bvbxiong5791 9 місяців тому +6

      she lost me at the intro when i didn't have enough time to read where the little hand and the big hand were pointing to.

    • @jesusislord-ht1nj
      @jesusislord-ht1nj 9 місяців тому

      You have to be a Godless moron to think anything she said is worth more than falling asleep to.

    • @BillKapriII244
      @BillKapriII244 9 місяців тому +2

      Lmao

    • @DragonballZTime
      @DragonballZTime 3 місяці тому

      Same brother.. I had to have a fap session bc she was bloody hot talking. The video was over after it. I guess she is the past now

  • @hraith
    @hraith 2 роки тому +304

    As a working class layman, thank you for making this topic more accessible to me.

    • @Rockhoundingcolorado
      @Rockhoundingcolorado 2 роки тому +5

      The fact that time exists, no matter where you go in the cosmos, you can't outrun time. You can't not exist without it, or you won't exist to know that? Its all important, and may be the actual being, we call GOD. It witnesses everything at once. Isn't that God? Its every where at once.

    • @Rockhoundingcolorado
      @Rockhoundingcolorado 2 роки тому +1

      @Dankenstein not a comedian.

    • @cdes68
      @cdes68 2 роки тому +4

      Suddenly @Dankenstein is interested.

    • @arkeusalexander9054
      @arkeusalexander9054 2 роки тому +2

      @@Rockhoundingcolorado Nop time as we know it is just a mere creation to God. He is far beyond what can ever imagine.

    • @Rockhoundingcolorado
      @Rockhoundingcolorado 2 роки тому +3

      @@arkeusalexander9054 Well you, your just talking, I hear no theory other than cult Christianity?

  • @bassdeff8819
    @bassdeff8819 Місяць тому +3

    I just want to say thank you explaining all these concepts in a manner that even a blue collar joe like me can wrap their head around.

  • @AICoffeeBreak
    @AICoffeeBreak 2 роки тому +291

    When Sabine casually covers the question you have always been wondering about. 😁

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 2 роки тому

      did nobody ever suggest you that it is ugly to end sentences with prepositions flapping about pointlessly uselessly and uglily at the end of sentences

    • @wiseguy8828
      @wiseguy8828 2 роки тому +16

      @@vhawk1951kl you are missing the word “to” in your sentence, and “did nobody” is awkward phrasing, I would have gone with “has anybody”

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 2 роки тому

      @@wiseguy8828 Ah, if you please, so the fcuk what?

    • @peanutnutter1
      @peanutnutter1 2 роки тому +11

      @@vhawk1951kl There needs to be a comma between pointlessly and uselessly. Plus a capital letter at the start of your sentence and a full stop to close your sentence.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 2 роки тому

      @@peanutnutter1 from where do you get such weird ideas? - I don't give a damn about nonsense and trivia like that.

  • @richclarke1523
    @richclarke1523 Рік тому +190

    Also notice that our memories can have differences in this manner. My memories of 50 years ago ( I am 80 ) are in a distant past...but the things I did, that I wish I hadn't, such as being rude as a teenager to someone, and we never forget, is as if it was yesterday.

    • @RoseyTucker
      @RoseyTucker Рік тому +30

      @richclarke1523
      Hi Rich, it was so good to read your comment! I hope you can at least find some comfort in the fact you remember your rude teenage years with regret. It means you've gained the empathy that you lacked in the past. You should feel good about that, since so many people still have not evolved from their bad behaviour. And even worse they have no self awareness, and they have no clue of how others perceive them.

    • @valicourt
      @valicourt 9 місяців тому +18

      I have forgiven you

    • @morganmiller7777
      @morganmiller7777 9 місяців тому

      Because the human brain is unbelievably flawed

    • @Lmfleaflicker
      @Lmfleaflicker 8 місяців тому +2

      Regretting your rudeness for so long I bet you are forgiven

    • @musicjunkie274
      @musicjunkie274 8 місяців тому +2

      That has nothing to do with physics or time as a physical constraint.
      Also shouldn’t that answer the question of the video? If you remember something as if it happened yesterday, then why would you doubt that the past exists?

  • @sandataonline
    @sandataonline 8 місяців тому +136

    How did the UA-cam algorithm detect my existential crisis?

    • @mckennasweda3614
      @mckennasweda3614 7 місяців тому +4

      Because the same thing that created the algorithm created your existential crisis.

    • @mynameislove1704
      @mynameislove1704 7 місяців тому +5

      i just want to be happy😭

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 7 місяців тому

      What the fcuk is an "existential crisis"?-Some form of hypochondria?

    • @findsharon
      @findsharon 6 місяців тому +1

      UA-cam knows all.

    • @TGBurgerGaming
      @TGBurgerGaming 6 місяців тому

      Data from across the web and sensors in your phone that monitor your behaviour. You can turn them off in your phone settings.

  • @shugyosha7924
    @shugyosha7924 3 місяці тому +8

    I’m not a scientist but I always felt the block universe made the most intuitive sense.

    • @stevenlake5278
      @stevenlake5278 2 місяці тому +1

      Everything and nothing all exist at once. Therefore the past and future exist at once. Nothing has happened and everything has happened all at once.

    • @movieonline4947
      @movieonline4947 Місяць тому

      @@stevenlake5278 WTF is that even mean, you're just confused. Don't worry, 1000 years from now, I am sure people will get a little bit more idea about it.

    • @etc4xg
      @etc4xg Місяць тому

      It only makes sense until you start getting into the quantum weeds like GHZ state and such

    • @shugyosha7924
      @shugyosha7924 Місяць тому

      @ You mean it’s not compatible with a block universe?

  • @anthonyw6488
    @anthonyw6488 2 роки тому +232

    Just discovered Sabine. I love her dead pan humor and style. Being a student of Non Duality (Advaita Vedanta) I find her examples so strikingly similar to the consciousness only model that it helped me understand the notion of consciousness contracting itself via the observer to experience 3rd dimensional reality and how all there is is now and our experience of this now. Thanks

    • @dharmendrasharma6070
      @dharmendrasharma6070 2 роки тому +9

      "Now" is a mysterious phenomenon, it is an infinitesimal small point in the time. Most of the time we are constantly moving from the past into the future and "now" is a very small connection between these two. how big is the "now"? is it a second? or millisecond, or a nanosecond or a .............? no end to it. the passed femtosecond at this moment has also become the part of "past" but our consciousness still perceives it as present.
      the "NOW" perceived by us is an illusion created by our limited perception, our conscious mind throws itself to a time span which includes the past and future, and perceives it as "now".
      it depends upon the limited speed of our neurons in the portion of our brain which senses the time as "NOW"
      and when a person can be in that moment of "Now" and flowing together with it, i think that is called as "Meditation".

    • @anthonyw1499
      @anthonyw1499 2 роки тому +6

      @@dharmendrasharma6070 there is no past and future. No one has ever experienced the past so it must be as illusion of sorts. The now is beyond space time and not a piece of it as you’ve stated

    • @posmoo9790
      @posmoo9790 2 роки тому +2

      'humor'

    • @dissonantchaos7724
      @dissonantchaos7724 2 роки тому +9

      If there's no past how can we take a video or snapshot of it and keep it forever? If there's no future how do we progress with how we grow? How flowers grow/die? This is ridiculous to think these things don't exist

    • @mayanktripathi8726
      @mayanktripathi8726 2 роки тому +5

      @@dharmendrasharma6070 "now" may not have an upper limit but it sure Does have a lower one। It cannot be less than plank's time

  • @painisvergina3693
    @painisvergina3693 Рік тому +85

    This woman can literally talk about anything and my concentration will never break

    • @fidacuca
      @fidacuca 10 місяців тому +10

      Not ugly too.

    • @rudolfvenema7815
      @rudolfvenema7815 9 місяців тому +1

      @@fidacuca Thanks because she is AI and not a real person

    • @_TheDarkHalf
      @_TheDarkHalf 8 місяців тому

      @@rudolfvenema7815is she really? It’s scary I have to ask lol

    • @worldsdumbesttrumpturd....3143
      @worldsdumbesttrumpturd....3143 8 місяців тому

      ​@rudnoolfvenema7815

    • @Beaneabean
      @Beaneabean 5 місяців тому +2

      @@fidacucawomen dont exist to be pretty. The more you know

  • @7th_CAV_Trooper
    @7th_CAV_Trooper 2 роки тому +10

    The information earned a thumbs up. Sabine's sense of humor earned a subscription. Sharing this with my software dev buddies.

    • @Munakas-wq3gp
      @Munakas-wq3gp Місяць тому

      I made a Brilliance subscription and paid it, but nobody observed the payment so now they don't believe I did it. I feel that's unfair.

  • @shayZero
    @shayZero 2 місяці тому +1

    "Now youre watching this video, half an hour you were doing something else"
    Me, looking around the sofa where ive been watching yt for the past few hours

  • @kylebeetham3679
    @kylebeetham3679 9 місяців тому +867

    If the past doesn’t exist then why is my wife still mad at me for leaving her car lights on 12 years ago?

    • @DiscipleofHim
      @DiscipleofHim 8 місяців тому +40

      Because she has not learned to forgive and forget.

    • @mosethegreat7415
      @mosethegreat7415 8 місяців тому +6

      @@DiscipleofHim😂😂😂

    • @infinitekeys1603
      @infinitekeys1603 8 місяців тому +4

      Checkmate

    • @METVWETV
      @METVWETV 8 місяців тому +37

      If that's all she's mad at you about.....
      COUNT YOUR BLESSINGS!

    • @NESADDICT
      @NESADDICT 8 місяців тому +4

      It’s because time is stacked and she technically still mad.

  • @Juice-chan
    @Juice-chan 11 місяців тому +11

    Even though I watched a lot of science videos it is the first time I heard about the block universe. Well explained. And now I am mindblown.

    • @KipIngram
      @KipIngram 15 днів тому

      I can see why the block universe appealed when it was first thought of, but ever since quantum theory came along it's a broken idea. The future is not determined. That means that today tomorrow is not determined, but the day after tomorrow tomorrow will be determined. So the block universe cannot be a static structure, and that is kind of its whole point. The idea works only in a fully deterministic universe.

  • @JC-yy8iv
    @JC-yy8iv 2 роки тому +56

    Such a cool coincidence that I found this video today! Just yesterday I was thinking to myself that the past is no more real than fantasy. Specifically I was thinking about my city, the version of it that existed 20 years ago, and how that place may exist in my mind and the minds of others, but so do Oz and Wonderland, and none of these is a place one can go.
    I’m glad to be challenged and informed on this at the same time!

    • @charlessands6933
      @charlessands6933 2 роки тому +13

      I can understand how you would proceed if the past is fantasy but you can't take it too far because there's one key difference. That difference is things that happened in the past actually did happen and they have an influence on the present and since things that were done or bills or said in the past can still be a witness today that that means the past is never truly gone.

    • @Mr.Robert1
      @Mr.Robert1 2 роки тому +6

      @@charlessands6933
      The past played a big part in what's going on today and why.

    • @studas2011
      @studas2011 2 роки тому +1

      Which city are you referring to?

    • @benjaminroe311ify
      @benjaminroe311ify Рік тому

      Ah. Yes... If only the past was really gone... but alas the past is now and the past is the future. It is all ONE. Peace my friend.

    • @johnowens22
      @johnowens22 Рік тому +4

      The only caution I would add is...the past does, in fact, exist now for some place/time, but this is not necessarily compatible with saying that it exists in our minds. Our minds do not contain the past. They contain perceptions or conclusions only. They are mere interpretations and can be and likely are ALWAYS "wrong."
      Example: Newton was wrong when he came up with his equations and laws. He thought he was right. Many thought he was right. He was, indeed, possibly partially right, but he definitely was not correct.
      Nor is ANY perception that we have actually the "real" correct perception. It is both incomplete AND wrong, due to our lack of knowledge and our incorrect assumptions that some things are one way, when they aren't.

  • @miken2968
    @miken2968 2 місяці тому +11

    Here in 1976, and I'm praying the past exists

  • @NeonVisual
    @NeonVisual 2 роки тому +61

    Time is a fluid, like a stream flowing in one direction. Anything with mass creates drag, causing time to bend around it like a big rock in the stream. Only things without mass can move freely in the stream at the same speed as the stream itself, and thus it doesn't experience time at all.

    • @gerogyzurkov2259
      @gerogyzurkov2259 2 роки тому +1

      Oh didn't know u looked at this

    • @bootre9148
      @bootre9148 2 роки тому +2

      Where is the start of the stream and where is the end?

    • @NeonVisual
      @NeonVisual 2 роки тому +3

      ​@@bootre9148 It began to flow into our universe at the big bang singularity, it doesn't have an end, but can flow out of our universe through black hole singularities where time effectively comes to a complete halt as the superfluid leaves spacetime.

    • @themightybuzzard3088
      @themightybuzzard3088 2 роки тому

      So if I gain mass, I'll live longer? Sounds good to me.

    • @jpd8
      @jpd8 2 роки тому +2

      Or maybe it's all meaningless and isn't t special at all but useful to figure out. Maybe what really matters is that you are an observer and bring meaning to this vast messy whatchamacallit by simply living.

  • @jsmith1746
    @jsmith1746 Рік тому +66

    So happy this came up in my feed. I have always been interested in math, physics, and engineering, but am nowhere near smart enough to have had any success studying it. So happy there are smart people who are able and willing to explain it to dummies like me!

    • @11dsw
      @11dsw Рік тому +15

      If you’re interested in this, in any way, you’re not a dummy😀

    • @leejohnston2003
      @leejohnston2003 Рік тому +9

      Don't put yourself down

    • @victoriamassey9830
      @victoriamassey9830 Рік тому +6

      Same

    • @mimidec
      @mimidec Рік тому +3

      I was always too scared to pursue science for higher studies tbh. Most people are. None of us are dumb, since we're all humans lol. You just have low self esteem, you're not dumb ♡

    • @usernameinsane3
      @usernameinsane3 Рік тому +2

      the dummies are those with no desire to learn at all. you’re smarter than most without even knowing

  • @mengel419
    @mengel419 2 роки тому +43

    Immediately after watching this, I watched a documentary about Kurt Vonnegut, the author of "Slaughterhouse Five" and numerous other excellent novels. If for some reason you are unfamiliar with this book, it is about a man who becomes "unstuck in time". I read it many years ago. And it is the perfect literary accompaniment to Sabine's lecture.

    • @dixonmooremusic
      @dixonmooremusic 2 роки тому +2

      Heh! Timequakes!

    • @danovantuyl7911
      @danovantuyl7911 2 роки тому +3

      Kilgore Trout - "ting a ling"

    • @syndrome1965
      @syndrome1965 2 роки тому +3

      Read the book, and, saw the film, both several times. I love that story...

    • @nyckhampson792
      @nyckhampson792 20 днів тому

      I'll have a look at that, last year.
      No fr I will cheers ,

  • @chrissharkey9644
    @chrissharkey9644 3 місяці тому

    Sabine! You are so good at this channel

  • @Theafterhourshow
    @Theafterhourshow Рік тому +117

    I truly enjoyed this, the dry humor, the information, and the speech. It’s very unique. I would gladly take a masters class with her as the teacher.

    • @aogwaro
      @aogwaro Рік тому +13

      I agree. Her jokes land so weirdly funny.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl Рік тому

      If you know any, ask a grownup to explain to you why nothing can be " *very* or nearly(as is occasionionally heard) unique" - see also *very* pregnant or *very* dead. I am a little puzzled that you appear unable to understand that, but seemingly you have no idea what unique means.

    • @MrZorx
      @MrZorx Рік тому

      @@vhawk1951klsomeone can be very pregnant, and something can be very unique. Something can’t be very dead though.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl Рік тому

      @@MrZorx Only an imbecile would say that

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl Рік тому

      @@MrZorx Ask a grownup that speaks English to help you; pregnant and unique are absolute terms like on or off and dead -thus very unique and very pregnant are no more possible than very, on very off or very dead. Whoever says to you than an object is very or nearly unique is either an imbecile or an American, but then most Americans are imbeciles and I have never met one that can speak English similiter very or nearly or quite pregnant, and anyone that tells you otherwise simply cannot speak English and is a halfwit. You will occasionally hear 'very' pregnant when used to describe a woman that is obviously pregnant, but it is simply bad English.
      Unique means that there is *only* one which it either is or is not which is absolute, but you will hear the lower classes and those that are simply witless say nearly unique and that *because*they are witless members of the lower classes and do not understand what unique means, nor understand anything about absolute and relative terms.

  • @JamesDevine
    @JamesDevine 10 місяців тому +110

    “What the hell am I looking at??”
    “You’re looking at now, sir. Everything you’re seeing is happening now”

  • @allisonharwell7591
    @allisonharwell7591 2 роки тому +41

    I just bought your book, “Existential Physics”. I can’t wait for it to arrive! You are such an inspiration to me.

    • @taichihead42
      @taichihead42 2 роки тому

      I think you should look for a refund on the book . Anybody that would use that Albert Einstein as some kind of example in a physics sense of the word is more than CLUELESS . Einstein was. created by the J's in the same way Pop -acts are created today. !

    • @blubbietweeduizend
      @blubbietweeduizend 2 роки тому +10

      If I understand correctly, your book arrived at the same moment you bought the book.

  • @TechMart-o3g
    @TechMart-o3g 2 місяці тому

    You are extremely intelligent in articulating so many different aspects and POV in a small video

  • @parinyachintanakarn4953
    @parinyachintanakarn4953 Рік тому +21

    The strange things about getting old is that the intimate identification of here and now are slowly lost.One feels transposed into infinity more or less are alone.No longer in hope or fear, only observing.

  • @barbkrienke8400
    @barbkrienke8400 2 роки тому +104

    I love how you pepper this serious discussion with humor bombs! Thanks for making such complex ideas more understandable!

    • @mtlicq
      @mtlicq 2 роки тому +1

      Yup! She thinks her left side isn't as beautiful as her right side

    • @yourlogicalnightmare1014
      @yourlogicalnightmare1014 2 роки тому +2

      You mean like pronouncing it 'eyen shhtienn'

    • @yourlogicalnightmare1014
      @yourlogicalnightmare1014 2 роки тому +2

      There's an alternate universe where this female is physically attractive

    • @mtlicq
      @mtlicq 2 роки тому +4

      @@yourlogicalnightmare1014 She is beautiful

    • @sekovittol3124
      @sekovittol3124 2 роки тому +1

      @@mtlicq Yes, I noticed that.
      She'd be great to go take a 'trip' with.
      She'd blow my mind.

  • @mikezooper
    @mikezooper Рік тому +115

    The block universe idea has comforted me for years. All the dead people we know, are still doing things with us "now".

    • @ashokkumar-se5sl
      @ashokkumar-se5sl 11 місяців тому +10

      REAL LADY SPEAKING OR AI ..

    • @joelhubeny7554
      @joelhubeny7554 11 місяців тому +1

      Yes as Energy or the Negative charged electrons but our human life span isn't a Mini Micro Blip coppered to all of all Existence. So it still nothing. Like the amount of Electromagnetive waves that Negitive Charge releases and we only see the visible light spark. it's absolutely Nothing to the whole

    • @Flylikea
      @Flylikea 11 місяців тому

      It's "now", and the information of "now".

    • @joelhubeny7554
      @joelhubeny7554 10 місяців тому +1

      Now is just a Micro Nano Second moment moving through Space/time. it's gone before you can count it because Negative Energy is always moving towards the Positive.@@Flylikea

    • @princeofallnegros4035
      @princeofallnegros4035 10 місяців тому

      Huh. U see dead people? 😮

  • @THIRV
    @THIRV Місяць тому +8

    When people in my family, and friends, are beyond sad when someone has passed away, I’ve been saying for many years that time is relative….they’re not here NOW, of course….but they’re still alive! It’s just that it’s Back Then. They’re still there, living their lives, doing their thing, endlessly, it hasn’t been erased, it’s just a matter of perspective. Someone watching from a distant system will see our planet as it was a number of years ago, they’ll see my parents still alive and well, living their lives.
    What’s gone in our past is of course not revisitable, but it can be remembered, and we can teach the things learned. And their DNA lives on, too. Nothing is forever, everyone’s line ends eventually, but it’ll always be there in the past.
    And who is to say we haven’t all had our lives billions of years ago before the Big Bang, the universe had existed, we had lived, then the universe imploded, now we are going again. In many billions of years from now, there may be another implosion, nothingness, then big bang and we live again. Might explain those deja vu feelings. As would the multiverse theory, parallel lives, the same but different.
    Ultimately though, despite my ramblings, we are just creatures on a spinning rock. We must ultimately try NOT to overthink LoL, and just enjoy life for what it is.

    • @chromolitho
      @chromolitho 19 днів тому +1

      I think I could have written this.

    • @THIRV
      @THIRV 19 днів тому

      @@chromolithoaw thanks 😊

  • @tonycole3532
    @tonycole3532 2 роки тому +56

    Its 3.00am and I couldn't sleep. Just watched this video and at long last I understand Einsteins Relativity theory. It's like a mist had cleared. After decades of uncertainty over it you have now explained it! Thank you so much!!!

    • @Mr.Robert1
      @Mr.Robert1 2 роки тому +2

      That will be $1.00
      Now what that bill is worth is relative to the year you give it out.

    • @michaellongstreet4876
      @michaellongstreet4876 Рік тому

      It's exactly 3:38 for me, theoretically, me and you have experienced something in our lives that contributed to the experience just a few minutes a part we just went through, how interesting

  • @adrianamatlack532
    @adrianamatlack532 Рік тому +19

    OMG this is a truly incredible video, best one I have seen on the subject. This really is an incredibly good lecture. I have been studying this subject for many years, back then most of what I worked with was in Physical Review D and books. Some great books out there got me interested in physics and math, but I am very impressed by this video and the deep subjects you talk about. I was a math physics major, though the truth is that most of these fascinating concepts can be understood through thought alone.
    The math is certainly interesting. I had to see how it worked. The Tipler cylinder was my first interest, in the math model it is infinite in length so it does not collapse into a black hole. Anyway we know that time like coordinate becomes spacelike and spacelike becomes timelike, but I had to see the math.
    I used to talk to Tipler, and Gott on the phone way back, then later I got into Caltech though I did not go. In any case I study this stuff for fun, and this video is magnificent. BRAVO.

  • @sergifernandezmiranda1311
    @sergifernandezmiranda1311 2 роки тому +71

    I have watched many videos about physics trying to understand all this. Without doubt, this one is the best explanation in simple terms that I have come across

  • @notbad2440
    @notbad2440 2 місяці тому +2

    We will never without any Doubt ever be able to travel forward or back in time.

  • @MajidBuu06
    @MajidBuu06 Рік тому +13

    I followed your Quantum Mechanics course in Brilliant, it was truly a gem :)

  • @rickkearn7100
    @rickkearn7100 2 роки тому +111

    Aside from the similarity between the breakfast I was eating as I watched this and what my brain felt like at the end of it (scrambled eggs), I was truly enlightened, as always, and thankful that Sabine has created this YT channel.

    • @kvdp9543
      @kvdp9543 2 роки тому +2

      My chemistry professor called theoretical physicists "those theologists in the other building". I totally agree. Science begins and ends with observation, not with theory.

    • @peacesound1101
      @peacesound1101 2 роки тому

      @@kvdp9543 you're utilitarian to the point of ignorance

    • @FF2Guy
      @FF2Guy 2 роки тому +1

      I’m not sure if you mean that you were eating scrambled eggs for breakfast or if your brain felt like scrambled eggs after you ate breakfast.

    • @vauchomarx6733
      @vauchomarx6733 2 роки тому +1

      @@FF2Guy Both, probably.

    • @kvdp9543
      @kvdp9543 2 роки тому

      @Javi Oz Why is that different to religion?

  • @GlennInman
    @GlennInman 7 місяців тому +8

    Thanks!

  • @blackfingerwisdom
    @blackfingerwisdom 24 дні тому

    I have been into physics for long time and now more interested into spirituality. The perception of time not existing appart from being an illusion seems consistent with both the scientifically and spiritual approach.

  • @RyanMcLeanau
    @RyanMcLeanau 2 роки тому +58

    I love the joke about Alice agreeing to be friends with you said with such seriousness 😂
    Little things like this make this video even more amazing

  • @cesaravegah3787
    @cesaravegah3787 6 місяців тому +13

    Is kind of humbling that things like time or gravity we are only begining to undestand how those concepts work but have absolutely no idea about why work and what creates it.

    • @badass.bob1
      @badass.bob1 6 місяців тому +1

      Being humble is true freedom

    • @columkenn
      @columkenn 3 місяці тому

      Speak for yourself when you say 'we" don't understand what creates the laws of nature.

  • @kenmason6135
    @kenmason6135 11 місяців тому +7

    Long ago a thought occurred to me about those films my teacher showed our class in grade school that being that the roll of film was all of time past and if you could pick a point or place along that roll is being a point in the past which you could hypothetically look at or even experience. Now it's interesting to see a smart person talking something in those same terms or similar thought exercise. Thank you for your 'films'.

  • @squidly2112
    @squidly2112 Місяць тому

    WOW! .. That title is extremely intriguing !! .. I LOVE that question!

  • @gazzaaussie1000
    @gazzaaussie1000 2 роки тому +11

    Summed up much easily ‘Time passes because we age’ Thank you!

  • @timothylamont845
    @timothylamont845 2 роки тому +16

    I love Alice!! That was a great example of why I love Prof Hossenfelder's videos. Not pure technical talk. A touch of humor as well. Well done and thank you!

    • @Smokin4CHRIST
      @Smokin4CHRIST 2 роки тому

      Everything is seen in past tense. Light travel time plus our nerve response time to compute in light data coming in which then goes chemical response, nerve electric response then chemical then electrical then response recognition signal. This does not happen quicker than speed of light. So all we see is delayed and past time.

    • @timothylamont845
      @timothylamont845 2 роки тому

      @@Smokin4CHRIST She addresses that in the video. The point I take away is that since there is an observation frame from which things that happen "now" for us either have not happened yet, or already happened, there can be no definitive determination of "the past." We can only talk about it in terms of our framework.
      But if I REALLY understood this stuff, I would be a professor too LOL LOL

  • @MysteriousWorld.031
    @MysteriousWorld.031 Рік тому +36

    I once heard the block universe described as the "view from nowhen" and I still think that's once of coolest phrases. The graphics in this video did a great job of showing it along with the concept of time sliced at different angles

  • @flynnpaul26
    @flynnpaul26 2 місяці тому +1

    I hate how youtube clips the first 17 seconds of the video because the run it at the same time they are running the ads, making you manually start it over.

  • @franck1685
    @franck1685 2 роки тому +123

    Bravo! I have never heard such a good explanation of the Block Universe! Now this saying makes perfect sense: Time is a thin line of perception through an infinite universe of happenings.

    • @Rockhoundingcolorado
      @Rockhoundingcolorado 2 роки тому +7

      The fact that time exists, no matter where you go in the cosmos, you can't outrun time. You can't not exist without it, or you won't exist to know that? Its all important, and may be the actual being, we call GOD. It witnesses everything at once. Isn't that God? Its every where at once.

    • @Chuked
      @Chuked 2 роки тому +6

      @@Rockhoundingcolorado you can’t just name something god

    • @Rockhoundingcolorado
      @Rockhoundingcolorado 2 роки тому +3

      @@Chuked Sure you can.

    • @larryoxentine8310
      @larryoxentine8310 2 роки тому +2

      @@Rockhoundingcolorado Unless time is sentient you couldn't call it God.

    • @Rockhoundingcolorado
      @Rockhoundingcolorado 2 роки тому +1

      @@larryoxentine8310 How do we know its not. Its not only self aware. Its aware of everything thats ever been done. By anything. A voyeur of everything..

  • @edreusser4741
    @edreusser4741 2 роки тому +13

    I have pre-ordered your book, Sabine. Your first book is simply amazing. A real page-turner. I can hardly wait for your new one to come. Only a few days now!

  • @TheMajickNumber
    @TheMajickNumber 2 роки тому +49

    Thank you, Sabine. I am even more taken back by this place we find ourselves in. The beauty and mystery always seem to deepen. Answers seem to always create new questions.

    • @MaryAnnNytowl
      @MaryAnnNytowl 2 роки тому +2

      @ilkldme yeah, I need some of that, myself. My particular universe is far, far from beautiful... so, yeah, I _really_ need a few hits of *that!*

    • @LuckyFlesh
      @LuckyFlesh 2 роки тому +8

      @ilkldme I'm not smoking anything and think being conscious and experiencing this "reality" is beautiful.
      Maybe you just lack gratitude?

    • @TorMax9
      @TorMax9 2 роки тому +3

      @@LuckyFlesh - I agree with you, Lucky. Some people seem not to be able to evaluate, appreciate, reciprocate fruitfully. They seem to lack imagination and seem to be stuck in a (social, theoretical, ideological) box and if the course of events doesn't match the expectations generated by their mental model, they are frustrated and unhappy (and sometimes vengeful) instead of enjoying the sublime awe and wonder of the flow of everlasting TAO, LOGOS, RTA, etc. that produced them and their capacity to model and everything in the first place. By their fruits, ye shall know them. Cheers!

    • @LuckyFlesh
      @LuckyFlesh 2 роки тому +2

      @@TorMax9 Very well said.

    • @gamer-px5cu
      @gamer-px5cu Рік тому

      ​@@LuckyFlesh Gratitude for what?

  • @realdoomsdaybeast
    @realdoomsdaybeast Місяць тому +4

    We may not be able to travel to the past but eventually we'll be able to revive it with AI, neuralink, and VR. Movies, music, even YT are really good time capsules. The Ai will be able to recreate past histories by analyzing all data available from that time. It's incredible to think movies in a 1000 years from now, will be data, to recreate life now and people then will be living in our time now.

    • @BassHeartRiffs
      @BassHeartRiffs Місяць тому

      That's why some people believe we're living in a simulation.

    • @Klaus-777
      @Klaus-777 28 днів тому

      ​@@BassHeartRiffsIt is a sim , though not what you think. You are a prisoner of war and put to sleep by strange black cubes that invaded Earth in 2043. The whole planet is actually on fire with war. Wish you were here.....

    • @BassHeartRiffs
      @BassHeartRiffs 27 днів тому

      @Klaus-777 🤡

  • @nihal114
    @nihal114 2 роки тому +41

    I will have to watch this multiple times to understand my own example of this to confirm that this video is correct. I love this type of content.

    • @nicolasdelaforge7420
      @nicolasdelaforge7420 9 місяців тому +2

      to 114: all it means is that when something happens (the "now"), it takes time before you see it. Because it depends on the light reaching your eyes, which takes time. So, you are late seeing it. Therefore, when you do finally see it, the event or some thing may not even be there any longer. Or it's in the next "now" that you don't yet see. So we are always already in the past. This is more obvious at long distances. For beings living on a planet a biilion light years away from us, Brahms 1st Symphony has not yet been composed or heard. It's still in their future! They will hear it in some millions of years. They will observe it then. If they're as smart as Sabine, they will know that Brahms' 1st was written long ago, by those called "humans". But it's not true in this sense: they may well see my grand- parents in some millions of years but my grand- parents are no longer living their organic life, and not being conscious. The distant inhabitants will not be able to insert themselves into their lives.

    • @SarkaBlahnik
      @SarkaBlahnik 7 місяців тому

      @@nicolasdelaforge7420 This is not correct. The observational delay you are focusing on - due to the fact it takes time for light to travel some distance - can be realized while still falsely thinking time is absolute. It is essentially no different than the fact in everyday Newtonian physics that it takes any object moving at any finite velocity some finite time to move a finite distance. Special relativity says more - that time itself is a frame-dependent coordinate. Time is not absolute. Two observers in relative motion may agree that a photon from a distant star must have actually been emitted sometime in the past, but they will not agree on *how long ago* in the past it happened.
      In fact, the first observer will not agree with the second observer even on what the spatial distance is between the star and the first observer - spatial lengths are also different in relatively moving frames. (You might have heard of this referred to elsewhere as "length contraction".) This allows for a new notion of "distance in spacetime", usually called the spacetime interval, to exist when all four coordinates are combined in a special way. This the two observers *do* agree on, though they disagree on times and spatial-only lengths considered separately. Though Sabine didn't have time for that in this video, it comes out of the same mathematics that forces time to be frame-dependent.

  • @DrewSoucy22
    @DrewSoucy22 Рік тому +34

    I just have to say. I LOVE your sense of humor. Your videos are great regardless, but this just adds so much more. The frosting on the cake.

    • @jawwadjawwad-ys8un
      @jawwadjawwad-ys8un Рік тому

      If Sabine's the CAKE & consider me, a frosting on top of it.
      Sabine do you love this experiment in LAB or somewhere like, you choose the place for this experimentation & let me know.

  • @petertrebilco9430
    @petertrebilco9430 2 роки тому +5

    What an amazingly clear, concise, uncluttered, unmuddled description. You truly are ‘brilliant’!

    • @silversurfer2703
      @silversurfer2703 2 роки тому

      ???? I didn't understand a thing she said 😂😂

  • @haydenwayne3710
    @haydenwayne3710 Місяць тому

    Good episode! But, consider this: The Upanishads say
    the observer and the observed are the same thing

  • @SimVikGo
    @SimVikGo Рік тому +9

    Great explanation and i have to say you are absolutely stone cold with the jokes they are fantastic. Your stoic delivery is delightful. Perfect❤

  • @aobdesigned3881
    @aobdesigned3881 2 роки тому +7

    I could listen to Sabine talk about this topic, time and time again.

  • @harry2928
    @harry2928 2 роки тому +41

    Dear Mrs. Hossenfelder,
    Thank you for your work and efforts in the service of educating the public while making the concepts accessible to a large audience.

    • @silversurfer2703
      @silversurfer2703 2 роки тому

      Not large enough 😂

    • @The.Word.1Way.2386
      @The.Word.1Way.2386 2 роки тому

      would she get 800 000 views in a loosely fitted floor length frock - nah; she's even asking for donations; note all followers are men

    • @freyabookishgamer
      @freyabookishgamer 2 роки тому +1

      * Dr Hossenfelder

  • @AltPotus
    @AltPotus Місяць тому

    As I understand it, if we live in a block universe, it's like an LP vinyl record. It exists in it's entirety. Drop the needle anywhere on the record and experience now. All time exists simultaneously. Now exists according to our point of view.

  • @skyhunk
    @skyhunk 2 роки тому +21

    This is likely the best UA-cam video I've ever seen on Einstein's 'Theory of Relativity'. Sabine's lecture simultaneously linked with graphics has made it so much easier to understand.

    • @xrayban2
      @xrayban2 2 роки тому +2

      I must be dumb, I still don’t understand how I could see the future of someone while he sees my future ...

    • @plane_guy6051
      @plane_guy6051 2 роки тому +2

      @@xrayban2 -- LOL! I was just about to post something similar cause I don't get it at all

  • @aurelianfreeman1800
    @aurelianfreeman1800 2 роки тому +15

    Man findet heutzutage absolut selten Leute und Videos wirklich wert anzusehen. Dieses Video ist eine solche Ausnahme. Das Thema, die Präsentation, die Erklärung, die Recherche - absolut top! Schade nur, dass man nicht persönlich eine Debatte entfachen kann - die wäre durchaus sehr produktiv. Alles in Allem - sehr empfehlenswert!

  • @duncanfisher2986
    @duncanfisher2986 Рік тому +19

    Richard Rohr says that if things we derive in systematic theology are true, then we should be seeing them in science too. I've watched this marvellous video several times, and I can think of about five. Excellent!

    • @lbj4993
      @lbj4993 Рік тому

      Not true, it was Richard Pryor 😂 and he knew what he was talking about...😮😂😅

    • @RoflMyWafflesAndySB
      @RoflMyWafflesAndySB Рік тому

      What five did you come up with?

    • @Daniel-Strain
      @Daniel-Strain Рік тому +2

      The problem with systematic theology is that, no matter how 'systematic' you get with it (and how many Latin or ancient Greek based scientific-sounding terms you create within it), it is still ultimately based on source material of dubious origin or reliability. It is exactly the same as a 'systematic' approach to studying Moby Dick or Harry Potter. For example, in systematic theology there is a category called "Pneumatology" which is the study of the Holy Spirit. I could make up a fancy word for 'the study of the ghost of Christmas past' and use Dickens' "A Christmas Carol" as my authoritative source. None of it would have any obligation to align with reality in any way, though I could make it, with enough imagination.

    • @lbj4993
      @lbj4993 Рік тому +1

      @@Daniel-Strain Exactly, in other words, if you can convolute a subject, any subject, enough to where 98% of the general population feel it's beyond their capabilities to understand, you can't get away with anything. I can deal with Moby Dick, mainly because it has the word 'Dick' in the title, and I know for sure it's pure fiction, but try to explain to people that theology is a bit of fiction as well, good luck with that...🥴🤣

  • @davidberry791
    @davidberry791 Місяць тому

    how do we know that the future has not already happened and WE NOW are living in the past waiting for some one in the future to go back in time to visit us ,,,excellent talk

  • @michaeljfigueroa
    @michaeljfigueroa 2 роки тому +10

    thank you for simplifying these things. i almost feel like i vaguely see how these things fit toghether

  • @aniksamiurrahman6365
    @aniksamiurrahman6365 2 роки тому +21

    Dr. Sabine, you're a natural science communicator. No other source imbues me with such deep insights as your videos.

  • @vinnymarchegiano
    @vinnymarchegiano 2 роки тому +10

    The past existed once as now...This topic is too mind bending, and perplexing for someone like myself to comprehend. Great video 👏 You are a brilliant woman 🙏

    • @williambowling8211
      @williambowling8211 2 роки тому +1

      Excellent treatment of that point in "Spaceballs".

    • @vinnymarchegiano
      @vinnymarchegiano 2 роки тому

      @@williambowling8211 Great minds think alike. Now? When? Just now!! But that's then?

    • @LegendLength
      @LegendLength 2 роки тому +1

      It's similar to calculus where you integrate each slice of a graph. With time each slice is a moment. When you 'integrate' them all together you get regular time.

  • @mwarren400
    @mwarren400 Місяць тому +1

    The past does exist, because it is "observable" from somewhere in the cosmos. Light can be "bent" by a black hole and can actually be re-routed back to its origin, however, you would need extraordinary software to extract can image from the surrounding "light noise". Due to this effect, we can see the same stars in multiple locations in the night sky.

  • @wallacekananda3396
    @wallacekananda3396 2 роки тому +57

    In the block universe - you've just now explained this 🙂 And I appreciate the humor in the examples. Brilliant!

  • @TylerSmith-sd2oc
    @TylerSmith-sd2oc 2 роки тому +19

    Every moment exists as its own point time passing over like a film layer giving us the illusion of life

    • @GP-yc2it
      @GP-yc2it 2 роки тому +7

      except there's no film to review.

    • @kushkushbabyy
      @kushkushbabyy 2 роки тому +3

      @@GP-yc2it different dimension

    • @TylerSmith-sd2oc
      @TylerSmith-sd2oc 2 роки тому +1

      @@GP-yc2it its not about the review. Its about the experience.

    • @kevinrice7635
      @kevinrice7635 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah what he said 👏

  • @tommyhawks856
    @tommyhawks856 2 роки тому +15

    I very much love your method for explaining things to us. Great job, and keep up the excellent work!

  • @scottcody3026
    @scottcody3026 Місяць тому

    Time is in levels. Like many clocks ticking but in different dimensions. Hence the past and future exist but we are currently unable to skip into other time levels / dimensions.

  • @mewlipaws8947
    @mewlipaws8947 2 роки тому +18

    I love your big ole brain and thank you for adding some humor! I actually think I understood this and that’s bc you did a great job of explaining without too much diversion (which takes my small brain off track and then I can’t get back there.)

  • @charles.e.g.
    @charles.e.g. 2 роки тому +35

    Thank you Sabine, for weaving your wonderfully dry sense of humor into this brilliant explanation!

    • @andredelacerdasantos4439
      @andredelacerdasantos4439 2 роки тому +2

      Her subtle humor makes it so much more enjoyable

    • @charles.e.g.
      @charles.e.g. 2 роки тому

      @@andredelacerdasantos4439 This is so true! She really and truly has a gift for this!

  • @myriaddsystems
    @myriaddsystems 2 роки тому +250

    I like the down to earth explanations. The greatest indicator of intelligence is shown by someone who can explain advanced ideas in such a way that anyone else can understand. Superb!

    • @Rockhoundingcolorado
      @Rockhoundingcolorado 2 роки тому +11

      The fact that time exists, no matter where you go in the cosmos, you can't outrun time. You can't not exist without it, or you won't exist to know that? Its all important, and may be the actual being, we call GOD. It witnesses everything at once. Isn't that God? Its every where at once.

    • @pttimothys
      @pttimothys 2 роки тому +1

      @@Rockhoundingcolorado Maybe there is no GOD. we would found life outside our solar system soon. you cant prove GOD exist , but you can prove science exist.

    • @Rockhoundingcolorado
      @Rockhoundingcolorado 2 роки тому +1

      @@pttimothys life is a virus, and life evolves. Just like a virus. So where it exists, there is no stopping it. That could be why we are at the outer edge of the cosmos, instead of at its heart?

    • @Rockhoundingcolorado
      @Rockhoundingcolorado 2 роки тому +5

      @@pttimothys Well by god, I mean creator. I don't think it has any power beyond our own. Thats why it can't enter act directly with its creation, and we, if its true that we are a creation. Then the same elements that we are subject to. So it would be like gravity, heat ,cold, If time is this all seeing all being.
      Then it is constrained by the same elements we are. Except time, which it can access like a computer. It may even relive the events in its minds eye at will.

    • @Rockhoundingcolorado
      @Rockhoundingcolorado 2 роки тому +1

      @@pttimothys What WEBB is telling us, and showing us. Looks like a giant neural network. Perhaps it is? If something would have created life, they would have hacked that to do it.

  • @jessemallory741
    @jessemallory741 Місяць тому

    My theory for a long time has been that in order to time travel, the past, present, and future must exist simultaneously. How that’s possible is the question and how any one could somehow travel either to the past or future is definitely the key-what is the the way to actually open a portal to the past or future and then, how do you get back!

  • @alfredsutton4412
    @alfredsutton4412 2 роки тому +29

    Thank you Dr Hossenfelder … you’ve done a great job of continuing my education.

  • @1220b
    @1220b 2 роки тому +43

    I've been metal detecting for 35 years. Each time I find a roman coin or medieval buckle I'm always aware I'm the first to see this light since it was lost. A direct link between Two periods of time.

    • @larrywright1589
      @larrywright1589 2 роки тому

      Time is⁸ nothing but a measurement, Ubuntu it has no matter, atoms, volume, mass. 6TH GRAVITY can slow down clock's or other mechanisms that measure time but it can not have a effect on time.

    • @christian2i
      @christian2i 2 роки тому

      @@larrywright1589 'time is a measurement' and 'gravity slows down what the measuring devices measure' don't go well with 'gravity has no effect on time'

    • @АндрейДенькевич
      @АндрейДенькевич 2 роки тому +3

      When coin was laying underground , time was frozen. But when you find it, time for coin began go fastest, coin began moving. Conclusion: time is energy. i've been writing program's also for 35 year's. Each time i write line " if i found coin then BEGIN ... END" i know that time for part between
      BEGIN .. END is frozen but not between if and BEGIN. And when found, then energy of processor touch BEGIN and time go fast between BEGIN .. END. Surely in computer time is energy of processor.

    • @larrywright1589
      @larrywright1589 2 роки тому +2

      @@АндрейДенькевич how long did the coin lie under ground???

    • @АндрейДенькевич
      @АндрейДенькевич 2 роки тому +1

      @@larrywright1589 time was frozen, therefore have not longitude . It's link between Two periods. Answer: 0s for coin. But for other's i don't know.
      Time is abstract meaning of energy.
      Time is called always time, but energy is usually called differently for different kinds of energy.

  • @85jacob85
    @85jacob85 2 роки тому +7

    I never understood time-space until this video. Excellent video.

  • @ChrisLessard-q4r
    @ChrisLessard-q4r Місяць тому +1

    I sense some philosophy in all the physics. I guess it’s needed when lecturing about possibilities.

  • @robinkleinsteuber5217
    @robinkleinsteuber5217 2 роки тому +9

    Thank you very, very much for your light-hearted, nicely informative videos AND your collaboration with the brilliant group! I have tried out brilliant, like it, and have recommended it to others.

    • @residentfelon
      @residentfelon 2 роки тому

      Why does she look like she wants to stab someone? Lol

    • @dr.christopherjohnson1406
      @dr.christopherjohnson1406 2 роки тому

      👋 i hope you’re safe over there? I hope this year brings happiness prosperity love and peace ❤ 🕊🕊 all over the world 🙏🌍
      I'm Doctor Christopher Johnson originally from California 🌟🌟🌟🌟 and you where are you from if I may asked?💭💭

  • @stilltraceable6753
    @stilltraceable6753 Рік тому +23

    Thanks Sabine!❤
    Your videos are very nice. They make me feel like I have an understanding of the topics you cover

  • @julialucas1482
    @julialucas1482 2 роки тому +38

    The past is impacting me as much today as it did the moment it first happened. When people say that someone should forget the past, they are not aware of the impact the past has had on the individual in question. We should have individual sovereignty because we are each, in and of ourselves, an individual cosmos that is still learning about how to take responsibility for the planet and its inhabitants.

    • @SitarJourney
      @SitarJourney 2 роки тому +5

      That's not true. You're not the same individual as you were in some point in the past. You have more entropy now and you cannot undo it.

    • @tingtang9302
      @tingtang9302 2 роки тому +1

      It is true. Simply redraw the conception of your individuality with some interesting axes, and voila! Oh and also be born into a certain tribe who controls publication lol

    • @ernestbean2998
      @ernestbean2998 2 роки тому +1

      It's our past that makes us

    • @bigcityjunglecatenvisageth1422
      @bigcityjunglecatenvisageth1422 2 роки тому

      @@ernestbean2998: True!

    • @bigcityjunglecatenvisageth1422
      @bigcityjunglecatenvisageth1422 2 роки тому

      Julia: I am exactly the same on that theme. It is as though you are describing me. I am very much a product of my past.

  • @Bill-ge8bv
    @Bill-ge8bv Місяць тому +2

    I really enjoyed the video which is to come.

  • @TheROZ
    @TheROZ 6 місяців тому +119

    i ve learned so much. ill never pronounce albert einstein the same again

    • @rogda123
      @rogda123 4 місяці тому +1

      Ahahahaha

    • @nosessniff
      @nosessniff 4 місяці тому

      Einshtein

    • @programroom689
      @programroom689 3 місяці тому

      some germans pronounce chips as "ships" or Chinese as "shinese"

    • @janaharvey550
      @janaharvey550 3 місяці тому

      😂

    • @Toreno2k
      @Toreno2k 3 місяці тому +4

      @@programroom689 Einstein is a German name and she's pronouncing it correctly

  • @josephschwartz2180
    @josephschwartz2180 2 роки тому +31

    Sabine, you are one of my intellectual heros.
    What we consider the present is perceived recent past. This is why is is so difficult to truly be in the moment. Our brains are always in catch-up mode.

    • @kevinerose
      @kevinerose 2 роки тому +1

      Wait. Can you say that again? I didn't quite catch that?

    • @Franciscasieri
      @Franciscasieri 2 роки тому

      The older you get the closer our brain is to actually catch ing up

  • @reddragon4482
    @reddragon4482 2 роки тому +8

    Never was taught Physics in school this is so fascinating :-) Thank you.

  • @matterstoyou2970
    @matterstoyou2970 Місяць тому

    Absolutely love these/your perspectives ma’am; very thought provoking. Time being linear the past happens now bc technically now is an abstract term. “Now” is constant; it is a man made point of view or perseption with little validity bc “now” never stops so “then and now” are constantly happening simultaneously on different ends of your psyche.