Least & Most Efficient Kia EV9s Compared! Don’t Expect That Much More Range On RWD

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лис 2024
  • Get your EV Raffle tickets before Feb. 27 carbonraffle.o...
    Kyle and Jordan compare the efficiency of the EV9 GT-Line and EV9 Light (Long Range) models.
    Please visit www.fortcollin... if you want to buy a new Kia - they'll ship it anywhere in the country for free for an Out of Spec viewer!
    Shoutout to our sponsors for more information find their links below:
    Star Charge:
    www.starcharge...
    Kempower:
    kempower.com/a...
    We would really appreciate it if you subscribe to our channel! The more subscribers we have, the more awesome opportunities we will be able to bring to you!
    Find all of our Amazon must-haves here:
    www.amazon.com...
    Kyle on Twitter: @itskyleconner
    Kyle on Instagram: @Virtualkyle
    For more behind the scenes content:
    Twitter: @Out_of_Spec
    Facebook: / outofspecreviews
    Instagram: @OutofSpecReviews
    Inquiries: info@outofspecstudios.com
    Tesla Referral Code: www.tesla.com/...
    TeslaFI Referral: www.teslafi.co...
    If you liked this video, we recommend checking out some of our other channels!
    Out of Spec Motoring: / outofspecmotoring
    Out of Spec Reviews: / outofspecreviews

КОМЕНТАРІ • 204

  • @kipali1471
    @kipali1471 2 місяці тому +11

    Purchased my wife an EV9 this past Friday....Exactly one week later, I purchased myself one. We were absolutely blown away at how much space it has, the technology, the ride quality, the quietness, the size etc. It's a REALLY great car. IMO

  • @digitalw0lf468
    @digitalw0lf468 8 місяців тому +78

    I just got an EV9 on Saturday. Looked at both the Light LR and GT Line, ended up going with the Light. Loving it so far. Did a drive on Sunday from my house to the EA chargers they have installed at the VW plant in Chattanooga just to feel what a longer trip would feel like. Can't wait for an actual road trip I have coming up in a couple of weeks.

    • @gregb1599
      @gregb1599 8 місяців тому +3

      My wife cannot live without the 360 degree camera and the air at least in our market does not get one only the earth or land as your country calls it and GT Line has that camera.

    • @Chukonu5
      @Chukonu5 8 місяців тому +5

      Congrats on the car! You should make a video about your road to experience.

    • @JamaicanMeCrazy
      @JamaicanMeCrazy Місяць тому

      How was your long trip?

  • @johnlabernik4599
    @johnlabernik4599 8 місяців тому +50

    Please redo this test in subfreezing temperatures. Very interested to know how much the heat pump matters.

    • @sprockkets
      @sprockkets 8 місяців тому +1

      If you mean temps around 0 F it doesn't really matter.

    • @mowcowbell
      @mowcowbell 8 місяців тому +12

      That's easy. Subtract 30% off the range. Saved you watching another video.

    • @FreekHoekstra
      @FreekHoekstra 8 місяців тому +1

      @@mowcowbell with the heat pump should be less bad,

    • @BijanJamshidi
      @BijanJamshidi 8 місяців тому +5

      @@mowcowbellyou must be new to EV’s.

    • @silvy7394
      @silvy7394 8 місяців тому +3

      A heat pump is a heat pump. Its not gonna use that much energy.

  • @zebgraves4562
    @zebgraves4562 8 місяців тому +28

    Judging by the size of those blades. Likely between 3-4MW tower. There’s several study’s into emissions made to produce them and transport/maintain them and it’s anywhere between 6months to a few years to offset the emissions. The bigger the tower, the shorter the time.

    • @justinfischer4282
      @justinfischer4282 8 місяців тому +6

      came here to say this. Thanks! Yes, they produce an insane amount of electricity. I remember when 1.5 MW turbines were the best we had. Now those are being torn down, hopefully recycled.

  • @TheBowerbird
    @TheBowerbird 8 місяців тому +11

    Re: Wind turbines. These are offset with a year or two of operation, with most turbines having a life of about 25 years. Industry figures are about 6 grams of carbon/kwh of energy produced for turbines vs. 900 grams/kwh at a coal plant, so about 99% lower.

  • @Jeddin
    @Jeddin 8 місяців тому +9

    Kyle you mentioned a few times that EPA testing should allow the car to run eco mode and disconnect the front motor. But remember the new EPA rules don’t allow that. The car maker has to run the car in both the least efficient and most efficient settings and then report the average or if they don’t want to run 2 tests they can choose to report only the least efficient settings result.

  • @lanceareadbhar
    @lanceareadbhar 8 місяців тому +20

    I would only recommend the RWD if you know you won't need AWD and want to save some money because you don't care about 0-60 times as you'll still leave ICE vehicles in the dust at the light.
    The difference in range comes down to which settings that you use, how fast you are going, and the extra weight from the AWD models. Note that you will get more range with smaller tires, but AWD with the smaller tires can go just as far as the RWD with the bigger tires. Hope this helps.

    • @christopheraquino4711
      @christopheraquino4711 6 місяців тому +2

      Glad I bought the RWD, we have Tesla but this is what we need for family trip so we all can fit in 1 vehicle. The performance is great and loving it so far

    • @planb2504
      @planb2504 4 місяці тому

      No i tested drive gtline in eco mode today. Doing 0-100km/h in about 9 sec, It wont leave many ICE vehicles in the dust.

    • @CptAngelKGaming
      @CptAngelKGaming 14 днів тому

      @@planb2504 lmao why are you testing 0-100 in eco mode. Are you confused?..

  • @TeddyBearGaming999
    @TeddyBearGaming999 8 місяців тому +7

    That sign is because of a law Wyoming introduced in 2022, which requires manufacturers testing ADAS to tell the state beforehand, clearly mark the cars on all sides, and carry insurance up to $5m

  • @BremboT
    @BremboT 8 місяців тому +5

    Easy answer to the range discrepancies question Kyle - they conduct their range test in normal mode, or the mode the vehicle defaults to at start. Eco and Sport mode are considered extremes. Same reason Sport modes aren't used for range test by these agencies. Some petrol cars have to get their sport/drag mode uninstalled to be legal in some states.

  • @cordkretzschmar5693
    @cordkretzschmar5693 8 місяців тому +6

    I like this head to head tests. Would also like to see this with different cars from different brands

  • @dandaigle4546
    @dandaigle4546 8 місяців тому +4

    this was an awesome real world test, good job

  • @R56Cooper
    @R56Cooper 6 місяців тому +2

    Yes! The independent lane-centering feature needs to be adopted by more automakers-- 🎉

  • @RichardJoashTan
    @RichardJoashTan 8 місяців тому +4

    Hi Kyle and Jordan, Glad that I am planning to buy thr EV9 in a GT Line trim.

  • @elde667
    @elde667 8 місяців тому +2

    Best part of the channel: these tests.

  • @Banna5589
    @Banna5589 3 місяці тому

    I really enjoy your enthusiasm and the way you presented the two Kia EV9s. So well done! 🙌🏼

  • @JoeUrrata
    @JoeUrrata 8 місяців тому +4

    The large range difference between the two models in the EPA testing is most likely due to the tests being run in key up settings and not the in most efficient drive seting.

  • @ojeskog
    @ojeskog 8 місяців тому +1

    I love these real wold at the same time range comparinson videos. Never mind if its different battery packs, updated vs old model, different wheels or different competing cars for that matter. Just started watching, suspect it will be very little difference in this normal roadtrip usecase despite the EPA numbers...

  • @Eric-om2xs
    @Eric-om2xs Місяць тому

    I think one reason the EPA test shows a big difference between AWD and RWD range is because, for most of the test, the car is not going at a constant speed. A decent amount of the EPA test is under acceleration and deceleration, so the front motor would be triggered to engage sometimes when under hard acceleration (of course the frequency of front motor engagement would also depend on the drive mode selected).

  • @DriveElectricWithDomenick
    @DriveElectricWithDomenick 8 місяців тому +2

    19:04 According to the latest research, the carbon payback for windmills varies from 4.5 to 12.3 months.

  • @tomm5936
    @tomm5936 8 місяців тому +4

    Not surprised they are similar when you set them to eco and only run rear wheel drive. I would expect a difference if you run in normal mode and have more stops and acceleration. For me the choice is much more about the price of the car. My EV6 is the RWD because it’s cheaper. I really don’t think most people have a use for AWD unless the RWD doesn’t have enough power as it sounds like the EV9 may. I say spend that extra money on good winter tires instead (Nokian maybe 🙂)

  • @skyemalcolm
    @skyemalcolm 8 місяців тому

    These triple nerd score videos are my favorite Out of Spec content!

  • @LunaticHybrid
    @LunaticHybrid 8 місяців тому +2

    Great content as always. That mangekyo sharingan rim on that KIA though 🙏

  • @zachlamoreaux5974
    @zachlamoreaux5974 8 місяців тому +5

    Might be interesting to go to the extreme on this type of test with Ioniq 6 which goes from 361 miles EPA rated (with 18in wheels and RWD) to 270 miles EPA (with 20in wheels and AWD). I think this might be the biggest difference in EPA estimated range in an EV where they have an identical battery.

    • @ayushmalpeddi2793
      @ayushmalpeddi2793 8 місяців тому +1

      Yeah I was a bit confused on why the range discrepancy is so damn high. Sure AWD variant weighs more, has larger wheels, and more drag from the extra motor, but a 25% reduction in range is extreme.

    • @Nigel8Chelsea
      @Nigel8Chelsea 8 місяців тому

      second this!

    • @dpb22
      @dpb22 4 місяці тому

      Engineering Explained has a whole video on the topic of rim size and how badly it impacts efficiency. Very educational.

  • @ericsmith768
    @ericsmith768 8 місяців тому +4

    Did not see the value in this test by only driving 58 miles. Kyle’s conclusion was that both models have same efficiency so no difference. Kyle knows better than this, too short of test to get overall efficiency comparison. Based on OOS’s own range tests of these vehicles, the RWD base did 278 mi 2.8 mi/kw and the AWD GT line did 260 mi (Kyle got 266 mi but he kept putting the car in neutral down hills at the end so did that for at least 6 miles so I adjusted … you can’t counting coasting in N as part of your total range) so 2.6 mi/kw … so that is the difference. Both performed a little worse than EPA estimates. But day-in and day-out the base RWD is more efficient and has a longer range. They are not the same.

  • @Nerd_Bird
    @Nerd_Bird 8 місяців тому +2

    Really really interesting on the odometer difference between the two cars. When we purchased a Niro, I asked the dealership about buying a set of the aerodynamic wheels to put on the higher trim level and they were adamant that the speedometer/odometer is calibrated between the trim lines and the different size tire would cause the speed/odometer to be off. This is kinda showing to me at least that when the tire used is just like 1% different circumference KIA might not even calibrate for the new size.
    And maybe its still not a worry because tire wear will still change the circumference anyway
    Awesome test, really interested to see if you notice a difference with Ioniq trims. Also curious if you have a set of calipers to measure tread wear in the future; I know you mentioned both of these were "broken in" but since you're big on data collection anyway it'd be yet another data point haha

    • @Mr_consuela
      @Mr_consuela 8 місяців тому

      Volvo's are just like this, not sure if tire shops can tell the car of circumference changes but the dealer can flash the gauges to read the right speed for rim/ tire size

    • @sprockkets
      @sprockkets 8 місяців тому

      I know my Soul with 18"s isn't properly calibrated as it is overestimating my speed. And the dealer said they couldn't calibrate it. 2017 Brownstone special edition.

  • @jeffreylonghr
    @jeffreylonghr 8 місяців тому +1

    I trading in the EV6 GT for the EV9. The EV6GT never had any problems and charges so fast. The EV9 I was seeing 346 on a full charge for the long range light in the beginning. 307 at 90%. Now alot lower. Curious on what your says fully charged. Mine went lower miles when I did a pre warm up on the batteries before a charge. There are corks. Min was turning off charging machines creating an error and shutting off in the beginning. During turns bad bump steer. Its a electric Telluride. ITs ok SUV. All should of came with the safety cameras, ambient lighting, and other small features. Its a corky car and I miss the EV6 GT lol

  • @berthogendoorn2133
    @berthogendoorn2133 8 місяців тому +1

    Great test and interesting results, likely the big thing will be heat pump with or without will make a marginally noticeable difference.

  • @LateInAugust
    @LateInAugust 8 місяців тому +1

    I'd love to see you do a road trip with the small and large battery EV9s. More stops with faster charging may out way the initial boost of the larger battery?

  • @Irpilot
    @Irpilot 6 місяців тому +1

    Did you guys check the tire pressure on both? Our ev9 GT Line had 58 PSI on each tire from the dealership. 🙄. Over inflation could of played a role in making one more/less efficient.

  • @davidbaker9943
    @davidbaker9943 8 місяців тому

    Cool to see that. We need the charging test

  • @JulianBrown-h5v
    @JulianBrown-h5v 2 місяці тому

    Hi I always enjoy your videos because you teach us so much. I need help understanding the final analysis. For us non tech people you have to keep it simple. You start out telling us the range of the vehicles are close and you said the test would show they are even closer. At the start one was 270 miles and the other was 304 miles. At the end you didn’t give the projected ranges of the vehicles.

  • @nikidelvalle
    @nikidelvalle 6 місяців тому +1

    I think it'd be much more interesting to see the difference between the non-long range version and the GT Line, as the weight of the battery is of course going to make the biggest difference in efficiency and the amount of time you have to spend at charging stations.

  • @MountainManGuy
    @MountainManGuy 8 місяців тому

    One thing that needs to be tested here is city driving. They may go the same distance on the highway with the motor disconnect on the higher trim, but that might change with stop and go traffic. If you are engaging and disengaging that second motor more frequently, I bet there's a larger difference between the two on overall efficiency.

  • @raemill4089
    @raemill4089 8 місяців тому +4

    Take them both off Eco and see if that makes any difference. I think we will be getting the GT trim and also likely, we will get the vehicle from your Fort Collins Kia. Thanks for the informative video

    • @paulj7181
      @paulj7181 8 місяців тому

      I second this idea and more hilly terrain where the front motor might kick in more..? Thanks for all your testing!!

    • @SkaBob
      @SkaBob 8 місяців тому +3

      On our Ioniq 5 eco makes a very small difference, it changes the listed range from like 256 to 261 on a full charge. It just makes the accelerator pedal less sensitive so the car is less responsive and slower.

    • @raemill4089
      @raemill4089 8 місяців тому

      @@SkaBobYeah, I dont see much of a difference in my Taycan either. Eco disengages the front motor, lowers the car and puts AC/heating in a lower "eco" mode. I havent noticed maybe a couple miles difference, so I stopped using it.

    • @eugenelee9300
      @eugenelee9300 8 місяців тому

      The GT-Line was not being driven in ECO, the gauges show yellow power bars instead of turquoise colored bars.

    • @paulj7181
      @paulj7181 8 місяців тому

      Uh-oh 😮. But I guess that bodes well for the car though results are mostly expected

  • @gregpalmer9949
    @gregpalmer9949 8 місяців тому

    Exploring aspects of efficiency is very interesting. Please do the comparisons of the Ioniq 5 and others to see if all of the EPA estimates are inaccurate. Doing more about regen also would be interesting. I recently tried turning the regen off in my 2019 Kia Niro and according to the guages it seemed to be producing just as much regen using the brakes.

  • @markrichards9792
    @markrichards9792 8 місяців тому +2

    Jordan I wish Tesla would do mi/kWh. My first two EVs were that way, and I hate kwh/mi in my Tesla

  • @KingLoftiVII
    @KingLoftiVII 8 місяців тому

    Great test, thanks guys. New subscriber

  • @commanderroddi7742
    @commanderroddi7742 7 місяців тому +1

    I own Ioniq 5 Limited AWD, and went with that over EV6 (though I preferred the interior of the EV^, liked the look of both) because the Hyundai had more interior cargo room over the Kia. I am SOLD on EV9, and I'm trying to decide between Land and GT-Line trim; trying to decide whether air suspension is worht extra money? AS far as the small battery, Reason to buy besided teh $55k price is as a in town car for a parent driving kids around, and I think it could make a great uber/lyft car as well for that price? I mean, the Land/GT-Line would be nicer for that purpose, but a %55k car to drive around town, which cnan do trips from time to time is a great family value!
    BTW, I am looking for feedback, if you're a GT-Line or Land owner who either things you could have gone for other trim or think your trim is perfect, please reply and let me know? Thanks!
    I love the Ice green color, though I like the blue.

  • @MileHiMiles
    @MileHiMiles 8 місяців тому

    I saw one in Denver today, first time

  • @kevinweber5129
    @kevinweber5129 8 місяців тому

    Next year when they have NACS this will be great.

  • @ouch1011
    @ouch1011 8 місяців тому

    That’s impressive, given that the GT Line uses much larger wheels and tires. The Hankook Ion EV tires are pretty impressive.
    I’m looking forward to getting 2.5mi/kwh. With the rain and (somewhat) cold that we’ve been getting here, I’ve been getting closer to 2.0-2.1 pretty consistently. But my Ioniq5 would only get 2.5-2.6 in the same conditions, so it’s really not substantially worse given how much bigger the car is.
    It’s going to be murder when I have to replace these tires though.

  • @mikereinhardt1244
    @mikereinhardt1244 2 місяці тому

    I think I know why the EPA range is so much lower on the GT. It has 2 motors, and remember that the new rule the EPA made was that you have to rate your vehicle in the worst performing (milage wise) driving mode that persists between starts (i.e. when you get in the vehicle it is still set). So the deference in milage is probably not in the eco mode you were driving in but in sport mode. In Eco mode they probably drive very similar (as you discovered), but in sport mode it will have both motors engaged on the GT pretty much all the time, and it will be much more aggressive than the rear wheel drive version. It is a thought, try them both in sport mode and see. I have been worried ever since the EPA made those changes that though the ratings are now more conservative, what they really do is penalize performance vehicles that allow you to keep the sport mode engaged.

  • @gregkramer5588
    @gregkramer5588 8 місяців тому

    Thanks Kyle!

  • @KeeperOfTheSevenKeys.
    @KeeperOfTheSevenKeys. 8 місяців тому +1

    These are the results that were pretty much expected with the Ioniq 5 and EV6 as well since they do the same thing with the motor disconnect, yet we see a substantial difference in range between those in AWD vs RWD. Do we have any idea why that is?

  • @vlad2838
    @vlad2838 8 місяців тому +5

    Somehow, these range tests won’t seem the same after “Kum and Go” blows its wad and changes its name…

  • @ultimatist
    @ultimatist 8 місяців тому

    Great test! Would love to see the Ionic 5 tested!

  • @dwayneam
    @dwayneam 8 місяців тому

    Thank you so much for this test. I want the versatile of AWD EV over a RWD but was always worry about the real range is always so much lower that the stated range for road trips, but knowing the AWD it's actually gets very close to the stated range because it's basically a RWD in ECO mode on road trips has really calmed that fear. I'm so much more leaning towards a Hyundai/Kia (with V2X) over a Model Y now. Can't wait for the Ionic 7 to come OUT and for the US Hyundai Plan to open ... 2025/2026 will finally be my year to switch to an EV I think.

  • @electric-rideshare
    @electric-rideshare 8 місяців тому +1

    Jordon your comment.. city 250 mile . I do that alot driving Uber in my ID 4. I really need to get some of those vids up. Anyway EV 9, for Minnesota I'd need the awd /heat pump and 70k too rich. But I'll certainly keep an eye on them as they come off leases

    • @markrichards9792
      @markrichards9792 8 місяців тому

      What are your thoughts on the bucket seats while ubering? People expect to pile 3 people in. And then having to get in the 3rd row will delay them getting in

    • @electric-rideshare
      @electric-rideshare 8 місяців тому

      For my market it would work as I generally have just 1-2 passengers (working morning instead nights..16,000 rides ). I have 3 Colleges/University , Hospital, clinics, manufacturing..most people going to or getting off from work or school instead of 4-5 -6 people going partying to the bars or picking up from the bars. That said I believe you can order the bench seat on the EV 9 if you run the night shift. I had mentioned in another post I'd love to haul the College students in the ID Buzz ..pretty cool ride for them (and me..I'd enjoy it) but I'd have a hard time going to less range than I have in the ID 4. Still lots of new EVs coming ,I'm in the iD 4 for another year . So no big rush for me . ID 4 is working really wel at this point. @@markrichards9792

  • @YeOldeTraveller
    @YeOldeTraveller 8 місяців тому

    Good to know.
    In the Wind trim for the EV6, AWD gets you the heat pump, This experiment suggests that this is a win for real world range. My dilemma is that I would need to balance the HUD (which I would like) against the sunroof (which I hate). I expect I will save the money and stay with the Wind.

    • @coprolite_steve
      @coprolite_steve 7 місяців тому

      I love the HUD on my GT Line EV6. No regrets going for it. I only wish they would have made it available on lower trims. Heat pumps should also be standard

  • @4literv6
    @4literv6 8 місяців тому

    Reminded me of your r1t large vs max pack tests which caused such a kerfluffle, when you proved how little difference there was. 😀👍🏻

  • @wzDH106
    @wzDH106 8 місяців тому

    Beautiful, sunny, mild 57F day....I wouldn't be surprised if solar cabin heating contributed more over resistive and heat pump to maintain 70F. Great test though!

  • @PeaceChanel
    @PeaceChanel 8 місяців тому +1

    Thank You for All that you are doing for our Planet Earth... Peace.. Shalom.. Salam.. Namaste.. 🙏🏻 😊 🌈 ✌ ☮ ❤

  • @MrAdamscales
    @MrAdamscales 8 місяців тому

    This was a great test, thanks. Even before this, I thought it was odd marketing - 15-20 miles of specified range difference simply isn't significant in anything you're going to do. After watching the video, maybe the "long range" moniker is something of a sweetener (artificial, perhaps?) to offset the dramatically lower engine power numbers. As you show, it's not much of a benefit, though of course you're paying less, too. Thanks, again.

  • @timsheehan8713
    @timsheehan8713 8 місяців тому

    I had really wanted to see this on Ioniq 5. And I guess still do. Was always very confused by the EPA range variance.
    I thought I had read that EPA testing requires use in all modes, which would include sport that always engages the front motor but if it’s all in normal it really doesn’t make sense.

  • @peterburdett8131
    @peterburdett8131 8 місяців тому +2

    No video side mirrors in the US? They are cameras with small LCD screens in Australia on GT Line

    • @boostav
      @boostav 8 місяців тому +1

      Not legal

  • @markrichards9792
    @markrichards9792 8 місяців тому

    If you're using cruise control it automatically disconnects the front motor, you get little extra from eco mode

  • @chehale8020
    @chehale8020 8 місяців тому +1

    The extra weight won’t make much difference on flat straight roads. It will make a bigger difference in the city, start-stop, and in the mountains. You’ll get some of the extra energy you used to accelerate the heavier vehicle in re-gen, but not all.

  • @buckaroobonze
    @buckaroobonze 8 місяців тому

    Please do a video with some light off-roading. Can the EV9 handle USFS trailhead approach roads without damaging the battery or getting stuck.

  • @eloneatmyshorts
    @eloneatmyshorts 8 місяців тому +1

    Pretty impressive of Fort Collins Kia. Will look them up if I’m ever in market for Kia.

  • @Darrenhd2
    @Darrenhd2 8 місяців тому

    I would expect the AWD GT to get lower efficiency when both motors are engaged. This test showed both vehicles in RWD mode only and on highway so obviously the results would be similar.

  • @rhuynh
    @rhuynh 6 місяців тому +1

    Anyone here get a GT-Line and switched tires to smaller tires? Wondering range boost and ride and handling difference.

  • @paris8777
    @paris8777 6 місяців тому

    For winter, hills and steep uphills on ice? Which one would be preferred between AWD and RWD?

  • @manuelwilson9214
    @manuelwilson9214 7 місяців тому

    Great Review

  • @FlatOutFun
    @FlatOutFun 8 місяців тому +2

    I ordered at GT Line and was wondering if I was giving up much range (real world), thanks for doing this test!

    • @lanceareadbhar
      @lanceareadbhar 8 місяців тому +1

      Your driving speed, temperature, elevation, and wind are the biggest factors when it comes to range. Driving it on the highway at 80 mph in sport mode up a mountain at 0 degrees with wind in your face will significantly reduce the range. If you have no question about the range, drive it the way you want to but if it will be close, keep it in Eco mode closer to 65-70 mph.

  • @andrewdoane6558
    @andrewdoane6558 8 місяців тому +3

    Need to add navigation (GPS) measured distance. It sounds like the wheel size may not be properly accounted for by Kia which is a problem for the odometer.

  • @nicolasfortin4216
    @nicolasfortin4216 8 місяців тому +1

    Would the difference be greater on a day to day commute lower speed drive?
    AWD might be on more often.
    I guess... 🙂

  • @MrGMawson2438
    @MrGMawson2438 8 місяців тому

    Hello Kyle and Jordan

  • @elmojito
    @elmojito 8 місяців тому

    Jordan, you asked how long does it take to offset the carbon emissions on the turbine blades. Here in Spain the past 4 days electricity feed-in rates have been negative and even when billed its been low single digits per kWh.

  • @brhutchi
    @brhutchi 8 місяців тому +1

    Get the land version with tow smaller wheels I believe it’s 280 vs your gt 270

  • @BK-tx2vw
    @BK-tx2vw 8 місяців тому +1

    Just bought the cheapest model S Long range 2020, $32K in Chicago! If u want me to do any testing let me know!

  • @CFG39
    @CFG39 8 місяців тому

    The wheels and tires can make a huge difference. In my experience the actual difference between RWD and AWD is not that much at higher speeds since Hyundai/Kia physically disconnect the front motor on their AWD EVs meaning there’s no extra drag (other than the extra weight).

  • @mykaljoseph
    @mykaljoseph 8 місяців тому

    Doin’ the lord’s work.

  • @rinbine2713
    @rinbine2713 8 місяців тому

    The car have more efficient ADAS options.
    You can setting more slow acceleration, slow deceleration.
    It make big difference efficiency in highway.

  • @planb2504
    @planb2504 4 місяці тому

    When you switch from normal to 'eco' , the yellow bars in the speedometer (both left right and bottom position) turn to light-green color, right? But Jordan's screen still showed yellow bar. Does that mean Jordan forgot to switch to 'eco' mode, and leaving the front motor working? If he did forget , you may wanna do this test one more time the result could be even closer, or identical.

  • @mglmouser
    @mglmouser 7 місяців тому

    An interesting test would be to weigh the RWD as much as the AWD and redo this test. Point is, seeing how much the range difference is due to eight and extra motorisation energy cost.

  • @RaZoRChak
    @RaZoRChak 16 днів тому

    Im not sure how people drive, but Ive just owned my EV9 Earth AWD (Land for the states), and driving conservatively been manage to get 16.4kwh/100km over my past 200km journey on Normal mode at level 3 regen. On a 99.8kwh battery, does that mean I can travel 609km (380miles) on a full charge?

  • @kakashi3543
    @kakashi3543 8 місяців тому

    Very good test, I am waiting for Hyundai Ioniq 5 comparison or Kia EV6! Hyundai Ioniq 5 will be more interesting.

  • @MrGMawson2438
    @MrGMawson2438 8 місяців тому

    Cheers guys

  • @andresamson8859
    @andresamson8859 8 місяців тому

    About the wind turbine carbon offset , i was curious so I made the calculation.
    Assuming you are comparing electricity production in comparison to natural gas and coal plant, here are the number :
    This is probably a wind turbine of 6MW , and most windmills runs about 45% efficiency annually, so that produce 23 millions kWH annually with 0 emissions.
    The equivalent coal and natural gas plant would generate respectively 11 000tm and 7000 tm of CO2 annually. Life expectancy of a wind turbine is about 30year, so you will save about 350 000tm of CO2.
    Of course their is emissions from the manufacture and construction of the wind turbine , but so does the coal power plant, not to mention the mining/extraction of the coal itself

    • @Nerd_Bird
      @Nerd_Bird 8 місяців тому

      I think Jordan was mentioning the emissions cost of the transportation; how much carbon is expelled while trucking the turbine blades across the country to the point of installation. Probably fairly small, and may also be similar to the pipelines involved with natural gas

    • @andresamson8859
      @andresamson8859 8 місяців тому

      @@Nerd_Bird in this case, about 1kg /km per tonnes

  • @flyordieinafire
    @flyordieinafire 8 місяців тому

    23% battery used. The difference probably scales over a 100% batter used. But ya probably so that the difference on a nice day is margin of error and discrepancy in mileage. Would be nice to track mileage gps and compare which tires are more accurate.

  • @kimballwhite
    @kimballwhite 8 місяців тому

    I have a 2024 EV9 GT-Line AWD and it’s a fantastic car. Nearly silent inside, and very quick. If you want a fast EV9, get one of the AWD models. The RWD model is underwhelmingly slow, even in comparison to ICE vehicles, and not fun in comparison to the AWD.

  • @silverghini2629
    @silverghini2629 8 місяців тому

    25:39 the cruise control is less strict on Eco mode and allows the speed to rise and fall. This should happen less in the Normal mode.

  • @eugenelee9300
    @eugenelee9300 8 місяців тому

    Jordan did not drive the GT-Line AWD in ECO mode as they intended to. He drove it in NORMAL mode and switched to ECO mode when he pulled into the chargers at the end of the drive.

  • @mowcowbell
    @mowcowbell 8 місяців тому +1

    Unsold EV9's sitting on lots all over. Dealers here already discounting them $8K off sticker. Buyers not in a rush should wait a few more months and snag an even better price.

    • @rhuynh
      @rhuynh 6 місяців тому

      Where are they selling for $8K not counting the Kia rebate

    • @mowcowbell
      @mowcowbell 6 місяців тому

      @@rhuynh okc

  • @aldarrin
    @aldarrin 8 місяців тому

    Interesting takeaway: we need another digit in mi/kwh figures (e.g. 2.54 vs 2.5 mi/kwh).

  • @SporeVenom
    @SporeVenom 2 місяці тому

    Still waiting for that Ioniq 5 or EV6 AWD vs RWD range test on same size wheels....

  • @cattlerepairmancattlerepai9414
    @cattlerepairmancattlerepai9414 8 місяців тому

    Does the RWD have taller tires? If the instrument cluster is not calibrated to the tire size (e.g. calibrated for 19 inch but running 20) it will think you are going slower and not as far as you actually do

  • @TheBebeluga
    @TheBebeluga 8 місяців тому

    I would like to see the same test with the ioniq 6.

  • @markrichards9792
    @markrichards9792 8 місяців тому +1

    That automated driver assist sign cracked me up the last time I ventured up there.

  • @robp3431
    @robp3431 8 місяців тому

    Seeing $6K off on GT's in S.FL, so $70K ain't all bad for what you get. That said, I bet the discounts continue to increase, given state of economy.

  • @domg7359
    @domg7359 8 місяців тому

    Pretty funny this WH/mi is very similar to the Cybertruck which weighs 7000 pounds!

  • @ericn3221
    @ericn3221 8 місяців тому +1

    Weight makes a difference going up hills.

  • @JeremyAkersInAustin
    @JeremyAkersInAustin 8 місяців тому +1

    Another thing to look at would have been the battery % rather than the miles/kWh because as you discovered: The speedometer/odometer difference between the car can affect the calculation slightly, plus it rounds to the nearest 10th, etc. Looking directly at battery % consumed avoids these issues (assuming you use enough battery)
    Both cars left at 60% state of charge. If you would have driven a bit further you could have used the battery % to get a more accurate idea of the difference in consumption. (Should have also charged to 100% to ensure the BMS in both battery packs were both synced at exactly 100%)
    In this test you didn't drive far enough to get a real accurate measurement... but when you returned: I could see in the video the GT-Line was at 36% and the Light LR was at 37%. That means the GTL used roughly 1kWh more energy for the drive than the Light LR did, which is roughly 4% more energy consumed per mile. Using more battery would increase the precision a bit.

    • @dubzfry
      @dubzfry 8 місяців тому +1

      Even going off percentages might not be enough of a difference. One might be at 36.8% but read 36% while the other is 37.0%. Unless you go into the actual sensors you won’t be able to tell the difference

  • @TeslaPlayz8
    @TeslaPlayz8 8 місяців тому

    When will you post a video on the vindast vf8?

  • @ladykcole5791
    @ladykcole5791 8 місяців тому

    Leased the Wind. Can't wait to drive!!!!

  • @Boomtendo4tw
    @Boomtendo4tw 8 місяців тому

    The added motor for awd shouldnt add that much weight to affect range that much. Maybe like 1 passenger worth of weight

  • @Linuturk
    @Linuturk 8 місяців тому

    What app do you use to GPS verify the speed? How about 0-60 testing?

    • @oflanagans1
      @oflanagans1 6 місяців тому

      Built in GPS will display vehicle speed in addition to the regular speedometer. Haven’t messed around with it to see if it’s generating data via GPS or just mirroring what’s on the speedometer, though.

  • @lilpeppa117G
    @lilpeppa117G 4 місяці тому

    They should be awd from factory these things are tanks 😊

  • @rocketrollsvlogs7625
    @rocketrollsvlogs7625 8 місяців тому

    Riding around in the city for 350 miles is exactly what we all want to see. I've searched and the videos don't exist. 😊

  • @mg7685
    @mg7685 2 місяці тому

    Mileage difference is from the difference in the wheel size - which is surprising. That is an issue for Kia to fix.