The Worst BR Changes To Ever Come To War Thunder

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 883

  • @Spitflyer
    @Spitflyer  3 роки тому +73

    Download Top Eleven for free and help support my water cooling addiction: mtchm.de/sa6ug

    • @来自慈父的爱
      @来自慈父的爱 3 роки тому +5

      what ever you do dude, you need some sleep

    • @maurice7433
      @maurice7433 3 роки тому +2

      The f104S never carried AIM-9Js. Just like Germany never bought or used AIM-9Js for their F4Fs ever.

    • @judedeschamps2369
      @judedeschamps2369 3 роки тому +2

      @@maurice7433 honestly, i dont mind certain planes getting a weapon system they didn't have IRL; so long as it only happens for a few planes. I say this because if the F-4F(both early and late) had their Js taken away, gaijin would need to drop their BRs massively to compensate. As funny as it would be, i would hate to see the F-4F(early) drop to 9.7 cause it has worse missiles than the F-100D.

    • @maurice7433
      @maurice7433 3 роки тому

      @@judedeschamps2369 I don’t oppose it. But split had no clue why they are on the 104S.

    • @Walking13
      @Walking13 3 роки тому

      @@maurice7433 The F-104S got AIM-9J as the Turkish Air Force fitted their 104S and 104G with AIM-9J without modification. I believe the wiring and cooling solution on the 104S is actually capable of firing AIM-9J.

  • @rm2569
    @rm2569 3 роки тому +591

    f4 phantom vs mig17.
    Finally, historical matchmaking.

    • @Xiphactinus
      @Xiphactinus 3 роки тому +86

      Vietnam moment Vietnam moment

    • @SaturnL200
      @SaturnL200 3 роки тому +33

      That was the MiG-17F, known to you as the Sheyang F-5/J-5. The Vietnamese did not equip it with missiles however.

    • @adityabora9131
      @adityabora9131 3 роки тому +77

      I'll do you one better
      Yak-28s with R60 vs me-262

    • @MrPanggs
      @MrPanggs 3 роки тому +54

      @@SaturnL200 Absolute madlads. The mig 17 really faced off against fully decked out phantoms with no missiles. That's crazy to even think about

    • @TR33ZY_CRTM
      @TR33ZY_CRTM 3 роки тому +27

      And that's why historical matchmaking is bad. Real life isn't fair and balanced

  • @judedeschamps2369
    @judedeschamps2369 3 роки тому +414

    Ah yes F-4C going to 10.0. good to know my CL-13B, which is *still* 9.7 btw, is going to have to face that in nearly every match. As if watching superior jets go down to 9.0-9.3 wasn't painful enough

    • @TransportSupremo
      @TransportSupremo 3 роки тому +5

      I like killing them in my cl13a. They cant kill you back as you can just out maneuver and out turn them

    • @goldenmitaine4629
      @goldenmitaine4629 3 роки тому +1

      FeelsBadMan

    • @judedeschamps2369
      @judedeschamps2369 3 роки тому +10

      @@TransportSupremo yeah. Although the smarter pilots just energy trap you and wait for an ally to kill you.

    • @CptCrazyWolfMan01
      @CptCrazyWolfMan01 3 роки тому +8

      @@TransportSupremo that's all fine and good if your after a dumb phantom player a smart one will just use speed to kill you

    • @insertname.5985
      @insertname.5985 3 роки тому +3

      CL 13 suffers

  • @imergence9628
    @imergence9628 3 роки тому +477

    Idk man the A4 is a little underpowered I can't kill 20 people without having to return to the airfield

    • @notthatsmart4909
      @notthatsmart4909 3 роки тому +16

      Bruh

    • @mrbehaveing1201
      @mrbehaveing1201 3 роки тому +24

      yha man i cant head on a mig21 its soooo bad let put it at reserve to fix that

    • @roadhigher
      @roadhigher 3 роки тому +43

      Best part is the A4E early is going to 8.3, but the tech tree A4B which is worse in every way stays at 8.7.

    • @amigman7199
      @amigman7199 3 роки тому +16

      @@mrbehaveing1201 no it has to be at least 7.0-8.0 or the missiles won’t work well and that’s unfair for it

    • @Pocahonkers
      @Pocahonkers 3 роки тому

      @@roadhigher They did go back on that luckily.

  • @ZetaReticulian
    @ZetaReticulian 3 роки тому +176

    I’ve been saying it for years…. In fact it’s gotten me PERMANENT BANNED from in game chat……but I will echo it again here……
    “I am convinced whoever at gaijin is tasked with ‘balancing’ the game… must have NEVER played it because this MM is borderline stupid.”

    • @shimakazef.7809
      @shimakazef.7809 3 роки тому +20

      Same reason im perma muted lmfao

    • @SomeOne-pd6vm
      @SomeOne-pd6vm 3 роки тому +12

      funny, i regularly talk in the chat and complain about the game and I've never even gotten a warning. also people who regularly call out "cheating" are generally just bad players who got outplayed and can't accept it, I'm level 100 probably twice over and I've encountered so few cheaters.

    • @StormHornet56
      @StormHornet56 3 роки тому +2

      @@SomeOne-pd6vm I honestly don't know if I've ever fought a cheater in arb. I'm also very vocal in chat rooms and forums about garbage battle rating decisions, but I'm not rude or verbose about it. The people getting banned are getting banned because they're breaking forum rules including abusing mods and developers, I'm sure.

    • @exelciawt
      @exelciawt 3 роки тому +1

      ​@@missingthe80s58 If you are playing any tanks around BR 8.3 or higher, which using APFSDS would suggest, then laser rangefinders and the recently added automatic vertical aim will mean very consistent hits at any range. Also, thermals are effective for spotting through bushes or even behind cover, as it makes engine exhaust visible. Getting scouted by a light tank will also make oneself visible to everyone on the enemy team.

    • @SpriGgEx
      @SpriGgEx 3 роки тому

      Similar reason for me, i had an open discussion with an Admin and he kinda banned me for Lying when i was only telling some thruths back then about cheaters LOL

  • @aaronrose9648
    @aaronrose9648 3 роки тому +62

    daily routine of gaijin balancing team:
    wake up
    snort 3kg of glue
    smoke 4 joints
    eat sand
    do 3 lines of cocaine
    drink heroin
    go to sleep again
    and repeat

    • @Xiphactinus
      @Xiphactinus 3 роки тому +13

      Eating sand is definitely the most contributing factor.

    • @Wriggles1990
      @Wriggles1990 3 роки тому +1

      Swap heroin for krokodil 🤣

    • @aaronrose9648
      @aaronrose9648 3 роки тому

      @@Xiphactinus gotta get their nutrients from somewhere

    • @jenokrivanszki7762
      @jenokrivanszki7762 3 роки тому

      you forgot their favorite food bear shit from russian forest

    • @pancake5830
      @pancake5830 3 роки тому

      no, this is their weekend routine, their typical daily routine includes going to work

  • @bubblesofthecoast6393
    @bubblesofthecoast6393 3 роки тому +153

    If they wish to stick with statistics, they have to add in a variable to account for the players who play the plane, whether that’s the amount who play it and/or the skill of the players who play

    • @Michalinus
      @Michalinus 3 роки тому +5

      But they would need to learn it. Gaijin's doing looks like they think they are masters in statistics after 1h lecture.

    • @leonardoamaro8778
      @leonardoamaro8778 3 роки тому +1

      Welp, they did it with the cl 13 mk4 lmao

    • @adityabora9131
      @adityabora9131 3 роки тому +7

      They seriously need to disclose these statistics if they don't want the playerbase going off on their throats everytime a BR change list is disclosed

    • @bubblesofthecoast6393
      @bubblesofthecoast6393 3 роки тому +2

      @@leonardoamaro8778 not quite; due to the feedback they got, they reverted the change and just moved up all the F-86F’s to 8.7 from 8.3

    • @viktoriyaserebryakov2755
      @viktoriyaserebryakov2755 3 роки тому +2

      They love statistics but are allergic to context. So far as admitting that the points people were making made a lot of sense but it didn't matter because it doesn't say so on the spreadsheet.

  • @coryd4365
    @coryd4365 3 роки тому +212

    I wish they also considered play rate at least when doing BR changes. It would avoid situations like the CL-13 where a few players can move a vehicle up. If few players are playing a vehicle there is usually a reason, and it's only good/high skill players left using it

    • @solanumwindderg
      @solanumwindderg 3 роки тому +5

      they actually did and it has gotten over 2000 plays over many more players than the reddit group mentioned

    • @garrykambimbi
      @garrykambimbi 3 роки тому +4

      gaijins already explained that their spamming of the cl13 made little difference to the br changing of the cl13 it was already being considered to change br before the patch but they chose not to

    • @Ham_CheeseSandwich
      @Ham_CheeseSandwich 3 роки тому +8

      Gaijin is not very honest or responsive with the player base, so whatever they say has to be taken with a grain of salt.

    • @solanumwindderg
      @solanumwindderg 3 роки тому

      @@Ham_CheeseSandwich what proof do you have for them not being honest

    • @Ham_CheeseSandwich
      @Ham_CheeseSandwich 3 роки тому +15

      They lied and said that this would not be a game that has vehicles that extend past the Korean War.
      They lied and said certain vehicles would not go below or above certain BRs.
      They lied and said that they have a "complex way" of assigning BRs. It's largely based on gameplay performance and era of introduction.
      They lied and said that certain bugs on certain vehicles were fixed when they weren't, until they were fixed several patches later.
      Lied and said that bombers were going to benefit from economy changes when they didn't and actually made less money for several patches straight.
      Said that they were going to work on heli game modes (we see where that went).
      Did soft lies by giving certain vehicles armaments that they never had, or by not giving vehicles armaments and equipment that they really did have in real life, while introducing them as the complete historical vehicle on the Thunder Show and in patch notes(Mainly applies to aviation, but the army/tank players have these issues.)
      And much more.
      Actually why do I have to give you proof anyway? Stop simping for this company.

  • @jvoutsas
    @jvoutsas 3 роки тому +161

    They’ve reverted the most ridiculous jet changes as of right now.
    They’ll “continue to monitor their efficiency”.
    Translation: We’ll wait until next patch to piss everyone off.

    • @titanicgames6323
      @titanicgames6323 3 роки тому

      Yeah lmao

    • @pale2502
      @pale2502 3 роки тому +1

      It is truly incredible how poorly developers balance their games. The Biden admin is the only thing to surpass this negligence to a paying player base.

    • @Coliflower185
      @Coliflower185 3 роки тому +13

      @@pale2502 congratulations on shoving politics into a discussion where it does not belong

    • @bigmcjones230
      @bigmcjones230 3 роки тому

      Gotta love how they balance based off of player stats 👌

    • @cookiecraze1310
      @cookiecraze1310 3 роки тому +3

      @@Coliflower185 truly, a feet of mental gymnastics that deserves a Olympic medal.

  • @JustARandomHuman
    @JustARandomHuman 3 роки тому +75

    Tbh, gaijin NEEDS to employ oxy to do the battleratings

    • @davidboy45
      @davidboy45 3 роки тому +11

      Oxy has stated that the reason the F13 and PFM are going down in BR is because they're hard to play, so I wouldn't be surprised if he's fine with the change.

    • @mayonotes9849
      @mayonotes9849 3 роки тому +2

      @@davidboy45 the F-13 and PFM is understandable but still not a good reason to downtier it.

    • @davidboy45
      @davidboy45 3 роки тому +5

      @@mayonotes9849 gaijin shouldn't add trash jets that take huge amounts of skill to play when most other jets like the F3H demon are fine

    • @CircuitCatWT
      @CircuitCatWT 3 роки тому +1

      Yes, and i hope they will but they probs wont because y'know gaijin

    • @mayonotes9849
      @mayonotes9849 3 роки тому +1

      @@davidboy45 More like they shouldn't compress the BRs so tight those jets that require skill to play always face jets that are much better than it or very brain-dead to use.

  • @pkt0827
    @pkt0827 3 роки тому +31

    They also said in the response that they aren't gonna lower the CL-13B's BR bcs of statistics. Great, a Sabre with only 2 AIM-9Bs is still fighting supersonics daily. It can't even catch the Harriers/AV-8s in a straight line & they have a much better missiles + flares + airspawn at the same BR. It literally feels like an uptier in every single match even when you're fully downtiered.

    • @ovrwrldkiler
      @ovrwrldkiler 3 роки тому

      While I agree that it probably shouldnt be at that BR, I still manage a lot of kills in mine when I use it. Granted, this probably says more about farming idiots in premium f-5c/av-8/j35c/harrier gr1 than any ability of the aircraft, but ehh. Its a fairly decent experience to fly them still - at least till you get to the end of a game and get stuck in a 1v1 against someone competent.

    • @jefflei215
      @jefflei215 3 роки тому

      epikc CL-13 mk.6 enjoyer

  • @dmdj8588
    @dmdj8588 3 роки тому +3

    F-104S with Turkish Air Force service were equipped with AIM-9Js onwards since 1982.

  • @ColonelAckerson117
    @ColonelAckerson117 3 роки тому +38

    The mistake is assumeing these BR changes are intended to make anything better. I think Gaijin exactly knows what they are doing. The earn more money, the more we suffer, cause ppl will throw GE at problems.

    • @CircuitCatWT
      @CircuitCatWT 3 роки тому

      Yeah i wish people just voiced their opinions instead of burning their whole entire wallet on op premiums.

    • @bigmcjones230
      @bigmcjones230 3 роки тому

      See they'll just add shitty vehicles here and there in a tree to make you GE past it, or make modules half the cost of a lower tier plane. These God awful changes are what kills players desire to actually play this dumpster fire game.

    • @mamarussellthepie3995
      @mamarussellthepie3995 3 роки тому

      They improve the game greatly, not even sarcastic

    • @nicojokelin5547
      @nicojokelin5547 3 роки тому

      True

  • @OldDeadMan
    @OldDeadMan 3 роки тому +20

    You missed the most important balancing factor... "Does average player make even a tiny amount of SL in vehicle? Is not balanced, tovarich."

  • @gomes389
    @gomes389 3 роки тому +81

    I've been playing warthunder since 2013 and I have all tanks and planes from all nations, but at this point I stopped playing top tier planes because I don't enjoy it. Before the radar missiles still played, but now it is impractical, we are killed without knowing where. There are no longer the famous dogfights that were fun. Top Tier planes in this moment is "Warthunder Radar Missil Kill"
    lately I've been having fun with the SAAB J29F Tunnan (i have the premium J-29D but i dont like), and other planes between the BR 8.3 / 9.7.

    • @astrophotographysometimes2303
      @astrophotographysometimes2303 3 роки тому +7

      yes same, except where i have every plane, but i have completed 3 nations trees and anything above 9.7 is unplayable for me, i hate getting sniped from 8km away from someone i cannot even see, between 7.0 and 9.0 is the best jet experience imo and props are still super fun. Why does f104j have no flares at 10.7?!?!?!!

    • @sinxsideways5900
      @sinxsideways5900 3 роки тому

      @@astrophotographysometimes2303 many ways to avoid what ur saying. Fly to the side or be the last person to leave the runway.

    • @_u0nda928
      @_u0nda928 3 роки тому +1

      I've been playing since 2015 but I only have top tier air in America and almost high tier tanks in Russia and Germany (Leo 2PL tho) and I find myself enjoying tier 2-4 a LOT more than top tier.

    • @monarch970
      @monarch970 3 роки тому +1

      Imo 7.7-8.3 are the most fun (Jet) br's

    • @nighthawk2174
      @nighthawk2174 3 роки тому +5

      Just kind of a fact of life for modern jets, BVR rules from the F4 on. It will only get worse as they add more and more modern stuff. If you think now is bad wait till the AIM-7M (20mile kills are very possible) and AIM-9M with its 40G's of maneuverability and all aspect capabilities. I don't think they'll add the phoneix as that'd be just too op. But well this is Gaijin we're talking about. (imagine a 19G missile with a lethal range of 50NMi on fighters that you don't get a launch warning for)

  • @Mister_Livio
    @Mister_Livio 3 роки тому +73

    I still think they need to have a separate BR for aircraft when taking them into tank battles.

    • @aangxazor5759
      @aangxazor5759 3 роки тому +5

      I was also thinking of this and it's a good idea

    • @DatBoi_TheGudBIAS
      @DatBoi_TheGudBIAS 3 роки тому +5

      Yep, some planes are absurd in ground rb, im talking to u infinite bomb allied ground attackers/fighters

    • @thehayes20
      @thehayes20 3 роки тому

      As a ground player, I agree. The BR around 6.3 to 8.7 especially seems like such a mess in terms of planes vs AA

  • @ItsFinRocket
    @ItsFinRocket 3 роки тому +18

    Gaijin decided that it's time for an april fools event

  • @jakethesnake9621
    @jakethesnake9621 3 роки тому +9

    I have an idea, when you’re stock in let’s say an F-4E phantom. You’re about 10.3, when you unlock the rank III in upgrades such as aim 9js you should then go up to 11.0. So BR depends on mods you get

    • @literallyjustametalhead4747
      @literallyjustametalhead4747 3 роки тому

      only issue would be speed, if you choose to run stock you can literally outrun anything at that br

    • @vortex6818
      @vortex6818 3 роки тому +2

      Stock F-4E should be 10.7 instead of 10.3. But other than that, i totally agree with the idea (also applicable to planes)
      Probable examples would be the F3D-1 having a modification labelled "F3D-1M" that gives it the ability to use AAM-N-6a (aka AIM-7A) + increased BR.
      F-4E could also probably have the leading edge slats changed as a modification instead (as they were only added in the mid 70s, the E existed way back in '65)

  • @Vogelchen
    @Vogelchen 3 роки тому +9

    I love how there are no SB changes at all because RB doesnt even matter in SB anymore they just dont care about it

  • @SWANNwillSUFFICE
    @SWANNwillSUFFICE 3 роки тому +26

    Have you not seen Gaijin's updated BR changes as of yesterday? The more egregious changes (F100, MiG-19,21, Yak-38, etc) are not happening anymore.

    • @nakoete8521
      @nakoete8521 3 роки тому +2

      Basically feels like I’m being told “hey, I’m actually just going to shoot you in the hand instead of the arm”

    • @davidboy45
      @davidboy45 3 роки тому +10

      This is kinda Spit's shtick, he'll complain for days but he doesn't actually want to do anything that requires more than making a 15 minute rant video. Doesn't encourage boycotting the game, doesn't discourage people from giving Gaijin money, he's just pandering to the community.

    • @mayonotes9849
      @mayonotes9849 3 роки тому +1

      Overall the change is still pretty garbage though.

    • @lhop9583
      @lhop9583 3 роки тому +7

      @@davidboy45 That's basically why I skip over these videos from him except for once in a blue moon. It's a 15-25 minute speel of this and that with "this is the worst ever".

    • @davidboy45
      @davidboy45 3 роки тому +2

      @@lhop9583 it do be like that

  • @arbiterofmtringo2345
    @arbiterofmtringo2345 3 роки тому +18

    I love it when the Yak-38 can now be put into matches with the Me 262 A1a/U1, a WWII jet, thanks Gaijin

    • @rifraf276
      @rifraf276 3 роки тому +2

      It can't, It can only meet the 8.0 Me 262 C-2b, the A1a/U1 is 7.3
      Still, no way should an Me 262 meet supersonics or R-60s

    • @arbiterofmtringo2345
      @arbiterofmtringo2345 3 роки тому

      i was basing of the fact that i have met AI Yak 38s before, but now you say it i have never seen a player controlled one at that BR

    • @normallymute0131
      @normallymute0131 3 роки тому +1

      Let’s not forget the atrocity that is the R3 T20. 40+ year difference in tech against early WWII. Only thing it can’t kill directly is the KV-1

    • @jessemitchell1609
      @jessemitchell1609 3 роки тому

      I have been strictly in my Me 262’s before and those were my best jets at the time 7.3 br overall. I was getting actual players using harriers and A4-E earlys both ranked a entire 2.7 br higher than me in my games!!! Its bullshit

    • @rifraf276
      @rifraf276 3 роки тому

      @@jessemitchell1609 That didn't happen. Also A4E is not 10.0, it's 8.7 (now 8.3) and iirc one of the harriers only recently got brought up to 10.0.

  • @dylanklinaktsis8865
    @dylanklinaktsis8865 3 роки тому +6

    Ok so now supersonic jets are a lower br than my sabre at 9.3 well frick

    • @toast2300
      @toast2300 3 роки тому +4

      Don't you feel the balance?

    • @owosatan8864
      @owosatan8864 3 роки тому

      Yh it’s wonderful…..

  • @thegreatid3595
    @thegreatid3595 3 роки тому +4

    Love it when my F86 F2 Sabre gets put up against MIG 21s,19s, and star fighters

    • @Ham_CheeseSandwich
      @Ham_CheeseSandwich 3 роки тому +1

      Sorry to hear that. I remember when all of my CL-13 Sabers were going up against MIG-21s and event Phantoms. Anyone grinding a saber now is pretty much just a free kill.

  • @richardsantos5981
    @richardsantos5981 3 роки тому +1

    Gaijin has been the reason ive slowly stopped playing War Thunder, but air rb has been so stale it actually caused me to switch over to DCS.

    • @spoon3990
      @spoon3990 3 роки тому

      I’m about at that point but I could still ge an entire research tree for less than the cost of a dcs setup

    • @richardsantos5981
      @richardsantos5981 3 роки тому

      @@spoon3990 oh yeah the amount of money i spent to get a DCS setup. I went extra and got a ful T16000 hotas+pedals setup, that alone was 195. Afterwards its the cost of whatever modules you want but honestly if you really love a aircraft DCS does it justice. Personally ive gotten more enjoyment out of the DCS F5E than i will ever get from the War Thunder variant.

  • @Real_Claudy_Focan
    @Real_Claudy_Focan 3 роки тому +5

    They flat-out lie about their "stats"
    The only stat they really care about is the EARNING RATE !
    Gain too much SL too fast, get the "balance BONK"
    Premiums has to keep earnings high to be "sell-able" and TT ones to barely float above a certain threshold

  • @cheezlweasel4367
    @cheezlweasel4367 3 роки тому +30

    It's funny how the only aircraft in game currently capable of supercruise is not fighting a single top tier due to gaijins statistics (lightning f.6)

    • @marmite8959
      @marmite8959 3 роки тому +13

      In fairness it has a sub-par RADAR, no countermeasures and it can only carry 2 IR missiles. It would be completely outclassed by an F4EJ Kai or the Viggen. The Lightning should be fighting F-104s, early-mid MiG-21s, F-8 crusaders, etc.

    • @julian5857
      @julian5857 3 роки тому +8

      The Viggen can supercruise at high altitude

    • @Wotplaya4
      @Wotplaya4 3 роки тому

      @@marmite8959 sounds like the F-104A/C who do face toptier :D

    • @hyperion9937
      @hyperion9937 3 роки тому

      F104 S can supercruise at all alts

    • @wowdanalise
      @wowdanalise 3 роки тому

      Might 19s Super cruises at high alt

  • @Freezetusk
    @Freezetusk 3 роки тому +3

    A 0.3 decompression means nothing at this point. It will make top tier jets a bit more playable, until next patch at best, but the rest of the jets stay compressed to hell and back. The top BR should be moved to 12.0 as a start, with F-4EJ Kai and the Viggen being the first planes at that BR.

  • @Yeeter_Inbound
    @Yeeter_Inbound 3 роки тому +1

    The Turkish air force did infact equip their F-104 S with AIM-9 J's. It wasn't a modification, it was simply a matter of it could carry them, but Italy never equipped them with it. Kind of the same crap with gaijin giving the F-4 F early AIM-9Js. I absolutely love the F104S now and it is an absolute monster. I put together a pretty epic montage of the F104S, and it definitely needs needs to be at 10.7

  • @guyklette6241
    @guyklette6241 3 роки тому +33

    Never heard more fax in my life

  • @thexenon0017
    @thexenon0017 3 роки тому +15

    About the su17 and all the jet bombers that going up in Br the raison for that is because of the new airfield
    I played a lot of jet bomber and what I do is go fast- bomb base- return to the airfield- either j out or takeoff (only attackers can intercept me)
    I used to do bombing bases in the su17: I can literally spawn - go March 0.99 - bomb 2 bases - turn and return to base (and not a single jet can catch even in 11.0)
    In end the increase of survivablity of those jet lead them to getting up Br
    For me it a positive change

    • @davidboy45
      @davidboy45 3 роки тому

      As someone who did exactly this for the previous event I can tell you this is not going to be viable anymore because of the new Radar missile meta, I could barely do it when only brit Phantoms had pulse doppler.

  • @tom_disagrees451
    @tom_disagrees451 3 роки тому +1

    So I can up the statistics of vehicles if I try?
    Time to make CW21 11.0

  • @realSarge
    @realSarge 3 роки тому +1

    "but muh efficiency statistics that we wont share"

  • @FelipeG4merBRG
    @FelipeG4merBRG 3 роки тому +2

    The BR changes already have changed ( before the release of the video ) and most of the changes in this video isn't happening anymore
    Yak-28b>staying at 9.3
    104's> only the italian going to 10.3
    Vautour > not moving anymore
    Mig's 19/21> not moving
    and much more.

  • @firestarteronyoutube5542
    @firestarteronyoutube5542 3 роки тому +1

    6:56 ah yes the well known F-104D, that well known French Interceptor😂

  • @JustAPairofLegs
    @JustAPairofLegs 3 роки тому +7

    Time to cry in my 9.3 sabre facing the 9.0 mig 21

    • @Xiphactinus
      @Xiphactinus 3 роки тому

      Isn't the F-86F-40 pure pain even without MiG-21s at 9.0?

    • @JustAPairofLegs
      @JustAPairofLegs 3 роки тому +1

      @@Xiphactinus nah its a very good plane but it just shouldnt be facing mig 21s and f104:

    • @SOUNDWAVEPR
      @SOUNDWAVEPR 3 роки тому

      F40 can easily defeat the mig21F13 and PFM.

    • @westernspy561
      @westernspy561 3 роки тому

      @@SOUNDWAVEPR against a bad mig-21 player sure, but everyone that knows what's doing, then the F-40 is basically useless

    • @SOUNDWAVEPR
      @SOUNDWAVEPR 3 роки тому

      @@westernspy561 have you never flown the mig21f13? Even if it is in the hands of an experienced player you got 60 rounds of a Nr30 cannon which loves to spark planes and 2 r3’s which do almost nothing. The Pfm whoever can be a different story but the Gsh it has makes the plane very heavy and can easily be dodged while in the f40

  • @claeswikberg8958
    @claeswikberg8958 3 роки тому +5

    i doubt that the ones that played crap planes, really made all that much of a differance. but on a side note of their F'ed up stats, i played the 109 F4 (BR 4.0) for 15 matches in a row.
    one of the games was BR 4.3
    two was at 4.7
    and the other 12 was at a BR of 5.0
    yay matchmaker

    • @gilcarvalho7744
      @gilcarvalho7744 3 роки тому

      15 matches then 😂

    • @interpl6089
      @interpl6089 3 роки тому

      Yes, but german props are borderline op, pay the repair costs!

    • @claeswikberg8958
      @claeswikberg8958 3 роки тому

      @@gilcarvalho7744 lol yeah. Keyb slipped in a 0 at the end. Will update post

    • @claeswikberg8958
      @claeswikberg8958 3 роки тому

      @@interpl6089 the point is that the BR system is seriously flawed, and not relevant since the matchmaker fucks it up even more. the normal behaviour would be that the plane should face an equal number of uptier as downtiers....
      (Never complained about the repaircosts of the 109 f4!?!)

  • @firewing1319
    @firewing1319 3 роки тому +4

    Having played the yak28b, it is really hard to be killed. You can from spawn using 20/30 minutes of fuel you can rush bases at Mach. You can easily do 2 bomb runs no problem and not die. I will not be surprised if it’s repair cost starts going up.

    • @fakeandgay9592
      @fakeandgay9592 3 роки тому

      And you can surprise people with the one 23mm on it

  • @vestal896
    @vestal896 3 роки тому +1

    i dont understand why they cant just stretch it out to like 15.0 and then decompress from there

    • @lector-dogmatixsicarii1537
      @lector-dogmatixsicarii1537 3 роки тому +1

      Instead of having strokes and migraines with the trash non sequitur digit br system, how about eras for tiers and time model/upgrades for order. I know, heresy, right... tightening things up so certain R3 things don't happen is just so bad and eebil. Getting rid of straight up blatant time traveling saves a lot of hides -German M48 lower than American, stock 1953 F40 Saber with the potential to get plowed in the bussy by Harriers because lol gaijin- .

  • @cmdrpanorpa8631
    @cmdrpanorpa8631 3 роки тому

    With a basic understanding of statistics it's so easy to see the majority of issues seem to be from a lack of controlling for any variables at all, uptiers/downtiers and sample sizes.
    With simple considerations of variables the statistics would be useful, but still not perfect, ideally you get the statistics (controlling for variables) to give suggestions based on the data, then get the data reviewed by people who play the game and understand capabilities.
    The problem seems to be effectively powercreep too fast for the top BR increases, what we need to do is stop asking for newer planes and newer weaponry without getting higher BRs to account for the better weaponry and capabilities.

  • @OumuamuaOumuamua
    @OumuamuaOumuamua 3 роки тому +2

    I wish planes like the g91 and a4b would have different brs in ground rb and air rb, it’ll make the most sense, I honestly feel all attackers should have two brs for air and ground

  • @dumitrescuadrian6594
    @dumitrescuadrian6594 3 роки тому +2

    Even when knowing how dumb gajin is, i never tought id see the day Spit_flyer is boiling angry

  • @elawaids2888
    @elawaids2888 3 роки тому

    They also bumped up the J29F and it faces phantoms mig 21s and yak 38s in bulk and it can’t outrun the missiles, it’s guns don’t stand a chance and it only has aim 9b equivalent. They even bumped up the repair cost as well by almost 5 thousand so now there’s no efficient way to grind the Swedish tree without spending money

  • @Kay_213_
    @Kay_213_ 3 роки тому +2

    I’ve said it before….super mistake, still 9.0
    Everything else always being shifted, but the smb gets shafted.
    Not that I’m losing my mind over it but i guess it gives a little insight into how the battle rating system doesn’t make much sense

  • @smackdatapple5926
    @smackdatapple5926 3 роки тому +5

    Nice so now my f86a5 can vs mig 19s cause the su7 wasn’t hard enough to kill

    • @CircuitCatWT
      @CircuitCatWT 3 роки тому

      Yes now the j29f will vs 10.0s which sucks because i love playing it even tho i have got the whole entire swedish aviation tech tree

  • @samspeed6271
    @samspeed6271 3 роки тому +1

    Well, saying this after the BR changes have happened, it's broken. There's no other word for it - broken. There is no reason for the F-4C to be at 10.0 other than to make everything at 9.0 suffer.
    Moving the Spitfire IIa and b to 3.0 and 3.3 is a slap in the face. The only reason they're good is because they turn well and some players climb and most Germany players are thick and turn with the Spitfire. The Bf-109F1 at a lower BR (I'll come to that in a sec) can out climb, outrun and outgun those Spitfires and even the Spitfire Vb that are over a a BR above it. Spitfire Vb Trop to 3.7 is just sad, and with the stolen Italian premium trop at 3.3 it's insulting. Spitfire F.24 to 7.0 is madness. Meteor F.3 to 7.3 makes it useless, it is too slow.
    The Vampire at 7.3 was impotent, it had pitiful thrust levels that meant you were side climbing for most of the match to get energy and nothing is left when you get there. Swedish Vampire at 8.0 is even more sad because its exactly the same as the RAF Vamp.
    There are only 4 BR changes in the last 3 patches (that's as far back as my brain can go XD) are these, and 2 of those changes are reversing cock ups Gaijin made last year with patches: Mig-15bis to 8.7, reversing the decision it made last year to move it to 8.3; Sabre F25 to 8.7, also reversing the move it had to 8.3 last year; ITP to 3.7 where it is still able to wipe the floor with most planes; and the Bf-109F1 to 2.7 where it is apparently equal to the Spitfire Ia even though the F1 has the same climb rate as an F4 and can out run the Vb in level flight.
    They need to stop basing BRs on player stats before the Mig-21F-13 is at 8.0 and facing the F-89D Scorpion. They also need to balance premiums with the tree planes, because I am super salty about the Italian trophy Spit Vb Trop at a lower BR than the UK tree plane even though the only difference is the roundel.

  • @gato_capitalista
    @gato_capitalista 3 роки тому +2

    Gaijin: What if we add a better version of one of the best planes at the same br?

  • @OumuamuaOumuamua
    @OumuamuaOumuamua 3 роки тому +1

    Was there any f4 variation that was very similar to the f4c but had flares? If there was I feel it should be added into a group with the f4c

  • @adityabora9131
    @adityabora9131 3 роки тому +1

    Decompression to 11.3 and +.7/-.7 matchmaking.
    A man can dream.....

  • @CrazyGaming_DCS
    @CrazyGaming_DCS 3 роки тому

    when i see the title “worst BR changes to ever come to war thunder” i know it won’t be the first and it won’t be the last

  • @crackhead8182
    @crackhead8182 3 роки тому +1

    Remember guys, the venom is still at a higher br rating then the mig 15 bis

  • @Quickscope-qb5ei
    @Quickscope-qb5ei 3 роки тому +1

    my poor tu-4 is going up to 8.3 so now ill have to pay its repair cost more since it will be facing higher jets :(

  • @Temb_
    @Temb_ 3 роки тому +1

    how did he lock him at 12:09 can someone please tell me?

  • @janomomo153
    @janomomo153 3 роки тому

    The last time i saw a Mig21PFM it tried to climb with AOA, almost accidentally TK'd me with a missile and then proceeded to die without accomplishing anything. Truly a bad plane indeed

  • @whoknows475
    @whoknows475 3 роки тому +1

    Oh boy, can't wait to face the f4c with my unarmed vautour with no free repairs left

  • @machinech183
    @machinech183 3 роки тому

    I wonder if the jump in BR for various bombers is due to people spamming them out in sim to grind out the newer planes making loads of SL/RP in what often turns into tranquil battles of take-off/fly to target/bomb rinse and repeat.

  • @landarjohnson5741
    @landarjohnson5741 3 роки тому +4

    Honestly happy I quit this game a few months ago. This game is just getting even more broken. Quit while you can people, they’re is so many better games out there. Don’t waste thousands of hours on this broken game. Still going to support you though Spit! Keep up the good work!

    • @interpl6089
      @interpl6089 3 роки тому

      Sprocket is fun, Dirt 2.0 is fun and even WoT is better than WT, it never was but now probably is.

  • @Mister_Livio
    @Mister_Livio 3 роки тому +4

    Looking specifically at the changes to aircraft...
    Bro I absolutely give up on this game lmfao.
    Gaijin are missing more than a few braincells and it is painfully obvious.

  • @fortunato1545
    @fortunato1545 3 роки тому

    I also just want to point out that the F9F-2, and F9F-5 if I’m not mistaken, are still at 8.3. Meaning that straight winged naval planes that can hardly get to 600 mph are going to fight supersonic swept wing aircraft. Now I know not a lot of people play them because they aren’t that good, but I enjoyed playing them. Now I don’t really know what to do with them now that I’m going to be fighting super sabres and mig 19s.

  • @thexenon0017
    @thexenon0017 3 роки тому +1

    Btw this video is a little late
    They putted a Q&A about this Br changes and a lot happen

  • @massimoforesti
    @massimoforesti 3 роки тому

    I was playing this weekend, putting my B-57A to work, and I got at least three matches against Sea Vixen's. I know they're not the same BR's and it was so frustrating whenever I'd be flying and all of a sudden just explode because some guy in a Sea Vixen was taking advantage of a downtier

  • @jonathanzeilenga8425
    @jonathanzeilenga8425 3 роки тому

    Here's a balancing idea. make whatever br the vehicle is originally only face vehicles .3+ or - . and here's another fix, allow players who want more sl and rp to choose to bump up their vehicles br in matchmaking to +.5 for a 15% boost and if they really want a challenge anything over +1 br increase give 30%. but if you want to meme the M22 against top tier its still just 30%. Still need to balance out br of some vehicles but this would satisfy alot of players i think.

  • @patriotic-panda
    @patriotic-panda 3 роки тому

    community: *insults gaijin*
    also community: "why doesnt gaijin listen to us?"

  • @leighcoulson2148
    @leighcoulson2148 3 роки тому

    Agree totally, particularly with the Vautour, IL28, J32A, Canberra and Buccaneer changes ...seems a crazy change.

  • @stoyantodorov2133
    @stoyantodorov2133 3 роки тому

    That moment when the subsonic F-3 demon is at a higher BR than the mach2 F-104...

  • @alessandromazzini7026
    @alessandromazzini7026 3 роки тому

    also check the G91 R/1 and Pre serie keeping their BR and not having all the weapons they had (like AS/AA20 nord)

  • @eldritchgod4308
    @eldritchgod4308 3 роки тому

    me, without even early jets: *Hmm, this is quite horrible indeed.*

  • @Wotplaya4
    @Wotplaya4 3 роки тому

    FYI people, the changes have been updated, most noticeable ones:
    - MiG-15 bis and Sabres F that were 8.3 will go back to 8.7
    - MiG-21F and PFM stay 9.3
    - Su-7B will go to 9.3
    - The supersonic movement to 9.3 (like F-100s) has been reverted
    - ATGM planes like G.91s and A-4E stay 8.7
    - Bombers won't move up
    - Italian F-104G will move to 10.7 (from 10.0)
    - I can't find the F-104S... surely it won't stay at 10.3
    Noticeable ones that did not change
    - F-4C going to 10.0
    - Sagittario to 9.0
    - Spitfire mk24 to 7.0
    There's this one that I didn't see earlier too:
    - A-7D to 10.3

  • @blomgaming6480
    @blomgaming6480 3 роки тому

    The packing up and sweating a vehicle to get It raised is just the ultimate proof that an AI does the BR changes

  • @matthewhunnewell9155
    @matthewhunnewell9155 3 роки тому

    About the F-104S, the Turkish F-104S/ASA could be armed with AIM-9P-3 missiles, or essentially export AIM-9Js, so they went ahead and deemed it okay to add them since there were 104S’ that carried them in real life, even if they weren’t Italian Starfighters. Or at least so I’m told, from the forums

    • @Spitflyer
      @Spitflyer  3 роки тому +1

      I love how they selectively do that. Like where are R60s for the PFM haha

  • @varunkaushik2834
    @varunkaushik2834 3 роки тому

    Gaijin : Makes changes to BR
    Mig 17s and Sabres : Tortured screams

  • @jessemitchell1609
    @jessemitchell1609 3 роки тому

    It was so much fun getting on the game after months and fighting f-80s and other early jets and 7.0 br planes when my best plane is literally a J21A-2 and another J21. Went from a 4.3 to a 5.0 but im still fighting planes a entire 2.0 br above me! Awesome job GAYJIN

  • @Lord.Kiltridge
    @Lord.Kiltridge 3 роки тому

    I swear, sometimes the smartest thing to do in a full up tier is to land and exit. When getting roffle stomped is a virtual certainty AND you are going to be left with a sky high repair cost for the privilege, the best way to protest is to exit.

  • @l.bakker7563
    @l.bakker7563 3 роки тому

    I hate how I am both responsible for getting the PFM from 10.0 to 9.0 and the J21 from 3.3 to 4.0 where it isn't even usable anymore against people who know what they are doing. I am quitting playing the PFM because, while I enjoy flying it, I feel bad for curbstomping 8.0 and 8.3.

  • @ew7626
    @ew7626 3 роки тому +1

    The yak 28 has a total of 60 countermeasures and goes mach 1 +, and since the Rolands guard airfields, you don't get strafed. The aim 9 b's and e's that it faces will easily be dodged or directed by flares/chaff and it can out-climb just about anything at 9.3 so i think (personal opinion) that 9.7 is better than it getting a higher repair cost..

    • @CircuitCatWT
      @CircuitCatWT 3 роки тому +1

      Your talking about a game who has like a 30k repair cost for an sk60b

  • @toqup_inua8023
    @toqup_inua8023 3 роки тому

    Su-17: fly's.
    Enemy missile: smiles at su-17
    Su-17: dies faster than poland and france getting invated by german compined

  • @dapperfield595
    @dapperfield595 3 роки тому

    "The Worst BR Changes To Ever Come To War Thunder"
    yeah heard that about a dozen times now...

  • @ashleyhamman
    @ashleyhamman 3 роки тому

    Some of the difficulties, particularly with American jet BRs, seems to be both because Gaijin refuses to space out the planes more, and that Gaijin wants to get to the planes people love or will want to pay money for. Where's the "Century" fighters, Delta Dagger/Darts, the F-105s, and so on for example? They fit between the Phantom/Harrier generation, and the Saber/Cougar generation, but they're not fan favorites and so are just entirely skipped.
    On the other hand, I do think Gaijin may want to pull from paper and prototypes a bit for smaller nations, as the cold war saw the decline of many nations that produced notable WWII lineups, and I really don't want us to just see copies of the US and USSR stuff at high tier forever.
    Another thing on Gaijin's inability to change based on how stuff plays... they moved the XP-50 up. Think about it, in a world where higher BRs tend to have worse turn rate, they moved a twin-engined fighter that people complain about out-turning... to a position where it will out-turn even more things. The only real nerf I've felt is that it can't keep up with stuff as much, but it shouldn't be able to... except when it comes to altitude camping bombers who should be punished for the excessively passive gameplay that they often exhibit and are even encouraged into.

  • @Skiddyfour12434
    @Skiddyfour12434 3 роки тому

    thakyou for speaking up been waithing since i started, love the updates. keep it up.

  • @miniraptor3211
    @miniraptor3211 3 роки тому

    I feel a little worried that I caused the Yak-30 to go up because I half spaded it, saw no one else use it, and got carried by my team every match, only getting a kill in like 3 of them.

  • @crazyadam9281
    @crazyadam9281 3 роки тому +7

    G.91/R3 going down to 8.3? Well I guess I'll never touch my British 7.3 again thanks Gaijin.

    • @Wotplaya4
      @Wotplaya4 3 роки тому +1

      not anymore, kinda unfortunate time for this video to come out as a lot of the complaints in this video have been resolved... or rather, delayed

    • @Winterman1337
      @Winterman1337 3 роки тому +3

      @@Wotplaya4 delayed is the right way of saying it yeah
      remember when they said they wouldnt bring the mig21pfm and f13 down to 9.3 and then did it anyways a patch later?

  • @Sevastous
    @Sevastous 3 роки тому +1

    At this point,there must be some sort of indication or report at Gaijin that these player-driven balance is making so much money and making so much positive engagement from playerbase So they Triple down even more while time goes on...

  • @lamborgatti-4783
    @lamborgatti-4783 3 роки тому +1

    9:13 ive gotta say the f100d going to 9.3 is great,its very useless in an uptier but decent and somtimes good at its proper br,but the f104s with aim 9js with one being lower then the other in br is absolutely fucking stupid

  • @chancemiller3414
    @chancemiller3414 3 роки тому

    The A4E early air to air missiles only hit if the enemy is flying straight if they slightly turn the missiles say by im going the other way

  • @Shellcool
    @Shellcool 3 роки тому +1

    What i've picked up from this video is i can't wait to play the lightning at 9.3 and shit on everything even more than it did at 9.7 LOLOLOLOL im not even going to feel sorry, fuck it, Gaijin's fault if you ask me

  • @ricky10807
    @ricky10807 3 роки тому

    I understand that F104S go up to 10.7 since it got AIM9J but I hope they can let it have vulcan and AIM7E at the same time

  • @Onezmhu
    @Onezmhu 3 роки тому

    so much fun flying the german MiG 21 at 10.3, out of my 20 last game with it all were at 11.0 and got killed about 15 times by some phantoms i can't even see from 20km

  • @Walking13
    @Walking13 3 роки тому

    The F-104S got AIM-9J as the Turkish Air Force fitted their 104S' with AIM-9J. I believe the wiring and cooling solution on the 104S is capable of firing AIM-9J.

    • @Spitflyer
      @Spitflyer  3 роки тому

      I mean, I’m sure it’s the same pylon, but thanks for teaching me something new. Shame Gaijin can’t apply that logic to the PFM

  • @alpergunay4101
    @alpergunay4101 3 роки тому

    Can you explain why nothing is being done about J32B? It used to be magnificent when there were a barrier between 9.7 and 10.0 but since it doesn't exist anymore it is extremely sluggish, expensive and slow against its rivals.

  • @FightCain
    @FightCain 3 роки тому

    I hope they reduce the repair cost alongside with Battle Rating adjustment.
    Wanna take out my MiG-21 Bis but its too expensive and not a lot of room to learn.

  • @b0BSh4nk3r
    @b0BSh4nk3r 3 роки тому

    the f-104s never equipped the aim9j sidewinders, only the ASA and ASA-M had aim9Ls. it's a fantasy loadout a-la-F-4F

  • @urban4957
    @urban4957 3 роки тому

    So now that there are more powerful aircraft at 10.0 like the F-4C, the Harrier Gr.1 (Premium one with SRAAMs) will face them. And when it eventually gets bullied because its kinda ass now a days (despite being absolutely fantastic and broken when it came out) it will get moved down to 9.7 and then seeing as they will still likely be forced to 10.0 most matches it migjt even get taken down to 9.3.
    And when it finally gets away from the Phantoms again it will be facing MiG 15s and Sabres again.
    That thing is gonna club once more.

  • @kiryu5499
    @kiryu5499 3 роки тому +1

    They should lower the jaguar gr.1 to 9.3 or keep the mig19’s at 9.7 because the jaguar is the only counter britain has to the mig19 other than the hunters and the only good hunter is now at 10.3 because of its missiles

  • @suprememememachine4508
    @suprememememachine4508 3 роки тому

    What bugs me with the F-4C is they could go back and update it with AIM-7Es and AIM-9Js, maybe let it upgrade the radar into being an F-4D and be pretty on par with the newly updated MiG-21MF and SMT. Maybe give it flares and chaff along with the F-4F early because nothing that sees top tier should not have countermeasures. Like this entire set of changes just never ceases to boggle my mind.

  • @stealthysaucepan2016
    @stealthysaucepan2016 3 роки тому +2

    "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"

  • @ew7626
    @ew7626 3 роки тому +1

    The Jaguar A from France gets 254 countermeasures.

    • @Spitflyer
      @Spitflyer  3 роки тому +1

      Good lawd I didn’t realise

  • @nightshade7745
    @nightshade7745 3 роки тому

    They claim to know statistics but they have no idea what even is Bayes Theorem

  • @thatlass
    @thatlass 3 роки тому

    Also hey the F-86F-35 is 8.7 with absolutely no countermeasures against any sort of missile, and not equipped with any missile... compared to other aircraft at it's BR or a little under who do...

  • @el-cee
    @el-cee 3 роки тому

    Problem: ground and air are linked closely, so increasing the max br of one will affect the other a lot.
    This does not mean I disagree, I would even go further and ad at least 12.0 especially to decompress jets, the BR in ground won't go much higher (just by looked at the technology we are at) BUT it will need to be adjusted to help air decompression .

  • @armablign
    @armablign 3 роки тому

    I think the only props that needs some looking at, would be the Wyvern and XP-50. Maybe I am biased or ignorant, but, personally facing them when I decide to play props, I think they both just don't slot is well (balance) into their current BRs.
    Regarding Jets, I have no idea why the German CL-13 A and CL-13 B are not getting any love at all...

  • @riasuriasu8859
    @riasuriasu8859 3 роки тому

    I bought the premium japanese sabre a few months back to better grind down the japanese air tree, so i've been playing almost exclusively with a sabre for several months and it has been nightmarish. it is an 8.7 vehicle with two aim9bs which for some reason put it up at 9.7 when things like the german G91R/4 are 8.7 with twice as many missiles. At 9.3 you're almost always fighting early mig 21s and other second generation aircraft which vastly outperform any first generation aircraft. This is a problem for every other gen 1 aircraft past 9.0 and for some reason the snail thinks that is okay for gen 1 fighters to face gen 2 interceptors. With the addition of the chinese A-5 it's become even worse. A sabre can't dodge a 30g missile.