Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase Full Aventurine Dial an Automatic Lumed Moon Phase New for 2023

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 81

  • @ChristopherWardWatches
    @ChristopherWardWatches 10 місяців тому +50

    Thanks so much for taking the time, Chris!

    • @ahha6304
      @ahha6304 10 місяців тому

      Chris compliment Chris haha

    • @user-fj6cl4qo9i
      @user-fj6cl4qo9i 10 місяців тому

      HEISBEST

    • @Hve801
      @Hve801 10 місяців тому

      The time is the hardest thing to take on this watch, but its so pretty.

    • @enmovimiento3766
      @enmovimiento3766 10 місяців тому

      Beautiful watch and really cool video Chris 👍

    • @DeathaceGames
      @DeathaceGames 10 місяців тому +2

      @ChristopherWardWatches I 've been contantly looking at the Moonglow, and then now this watch arrives but I still don't know which one I will ultimately get. Do you anticipate relaeasing any more variations of either of these watches?

  • @4booger403
    @4booger403 10 місяців тому +13

    Huge dial. Probably should have been 38.5mm or smaller. Surprisingly thick too

  • @philipwollenhaupt3295
    @philipwollenhaupt3295 10 місяців тому +5

    Design homerun. The watch I waited for. Just ordered it.

  • @jimt7292
    @jimt7292 10 місяців тому +2

    This watch is already starting to grow on me. When I saw it first thing this morning I wasn't sure I liked it . I don't think I would buy one but if I was looking for an aventurine moon phase watch this would be it! I am a big fan of CW. I own the chocolate dial, bronze pro that they came out with over the summer. That watch is amazing for the price.

  • @docfluty
    @docfluty 10 місяців тому +3

    I always liked the CW moonphase... I ended up buying a Arnold & Son perpetual moon last week which is very similar. Love the aventurine dial... great watch for the price.

  • @henryto0705
    @henryto0705 10 місяців тому +6

    I still prefer the C1 Moonglow though

  • @timothyfunk1883
    @timothyfunk1883 9 місяців тому +1

    When I saw this in my email my heart skipped a beat. I absolutely love it and hope to afford it one day.

  • @tapirdeaalex7104
    @tapirdeaalex7104 10 місяців тому +12

    Beautiful, but I bought my Venezianico Aventurine with a Sellita 200 for 700 $, I dont see how did they come up with this price outside the "ask for as much as possible" argument. A pass from me

    • @schnaksl
      @schnaksl 10 місяців тому +8

      The CW Movement is a Sellita with a self developed module and the watch is produced in switzerland. The venecianico is without any self developed parts beside the design and the watch is mostly produced in asia. That makes the price difference. And there is even a difference in the brand value.

    • @perolito83
      @perolito83 10 місяців тому +5

      Does it have a moonphase complication?

  • @AQBPlays
    @AQBPlays 10 місяців тому +1

    Love it!

  • @mahtabs7365
    @mahtabs7365 10 місяців тому +1

    Chr ward is on fire. Very cool watch

  • @markwheeler4417
    @markwheeler4417 10 місяців тому +3

    For their third moonphase Christopher Ward turned whimsy up to 10. It's a fascinating watch done very well.

  • @mandomi550
    @mandomi550 10 місяців тому +4

    Beautiful, but definitely not worth $2,475. Sugess does their own version of it for $899...with a tourbillon.

    • @ardiansyahnugraha9688
      @ardiansyahnugraha9688 10 місяців тому +1

      but sugess aint swiss made, so for some people its hard pass too.

  • @fitforfreelance
    @fitforfreelance 9 місяців тому

    This is lovely

  • @sabeaniebaby
    @sabeaniebaby 10 місяців тому +1

    Such a beautiful watch.

  • @WatchesBeAwesome
    @WatchesBeAwesome 10 місяців тому

    Thank you for showing it to us!

  • @craig2100
    @craig2100 10 місяців тому +1

    It is nicely done and something different, which is much welcome

  • @LUV2T8KU
    @LUV2T8KU 10 місяців тому +2

    Nice watch and good video

  • @stuartmenzies3928
    @stuartmenzies3928 3 місяці тому

    Great Review best on this swatch thank you...mine is on back order :)

  • @benjaminbreu
    @benjaminbreu 10 місяців тому +1

    A beautiful watch indeed!

  • @efenli
    @efenli 10 місяців тому +1

    👍👍👍 Artistic Watch , Elegant Watch , Nice Watch , Best Review by WatchChris 👍👍👍

  • @TheWatchOut
    @TheWatchOut 10 місяців тому +6

    Nice video!
    It's a very beautiful watch, but 48mm lug to lug and 13.3mm thick makes this a big watch. I don't think it works on "most" wrists.

    • @SamWade
      @SamWade 9 місяців тому

      38mm and make it manual winding to make it a bit thinner?… that would be incredible !!

  • @russell996
    @russell996 10 місяців тому

    Stunner - ordered!

  • @user-kt9ky3tk8w
    @user-kt9ky3tk8w 8 місяців тому +1

    👍👍👍Nice Watch 👍👍👍

  • @stewartmckeand8953
    @stewartmckeand8953 9 місяців тому

    Ordered one yesterday. Gotta wait till December for it.

  • @chrisgrieves1468
    @chrisgrieves1468 10 місяців тому +7

    I have multiple CW watches, love the brand. Love the Moonglow but consider it too big. I was hoping this new release would be a bit smaller. It's not. No indices is a deal breaker for me, been there, hated that. It's a pretty thing but I'm SO disappointed.

    • @neli5p
      @neli5p 10 місяців тому

      Too big at 40mm .... what are you ... a girl?

  • @chi1057
    @chi1057 10 місяців тому +1

    Well done Christopher Ward 👏

  • @Pixelpunch3
    @Pixelpunch3 10 місяців тому +4

    Too big for a dress watch imo. Not a huge fan of the printed, pixelated moon either. Years ago they did a stamped metal moon on their moon phase that looked so much better. Price too is high considering movement and other micros that use adventurine. Idk about this one.

  • @jodysilvia2
    @jodysilvia2 10 місяців тому

    Fantastic 👍

  • @jonathanbonilla7683
    @jonathanbonilla7683 9 місяців тому

    Please tell them to make one with markers to tell time. This is a beautiful watch but i need to be able to tell time.

  • @morgan97475
    @morgan97475 10 місяців тому +2

    Can't go wrong with a CW.

  • @samuelkim2611
    @samuelkim2611 10 місяців тому +1

    Great looking watch, but where is this made ? Day and date combination will be even better !!!

  • @chapaiarcheleme76
    @chapaiarcheleme76 10 місяців тому

    Love it ❤

  • @garycannon1247
    @garycannon1247 6 місяців тому

    8:22 what time is it?
    dunno?

  • @stewartmckeand8953
    @stewartmckeand8953 9 місяців тому

    Just bought one; beautiful piece, but tha clasp is a bit insecure.

  • @lyndonlouie4108
    @lyndonlouie4108 10 місяців тому +1

    Before I started watching I was telling myself that looks very Moser-y. CW…haute horlogerie on a budget. I’d get one I didn’t already have a Bel Canto in order.

  • @StaProduction
    @StaProduction 10 місяців тому +1

    I like it a lot! However, if the hands were lumed, it would have been perfect...I don't understand the point to have the moon lumed and not the hands...

  • @PhilGuidry
    @PhilGuidry 10 місяців тому

    What a stunner!

  • @Red22GS3
    @Red22GS3 9 місяців тому +1

    Where did you get the Fifty Fathoms T-Shirt?
    Nice review...

    • @WatchChris
      @WatchChris  9 місяців тому +1

      Hey the shirt is available in my merch store connected to youtube

  • @yodajenkins808
    @yodajenkins808 10 місяців тому +2

    Damn now I gotta change my underwear 😍

  • @mesteme
    @mesteme 10 місяців тому +2

    Non lumed dress watch is forgivable. But non lumed hands when other elements have been lumed is a massive pet peeve of mine, I've seen it recently elsewhere and I find it irritating. It is a beautiful watch but the absent lume on the hands and the unnecessary swiss made text on the dial make it uninteresting for me.

  • @nathanlikert9866
    @nathanlikert9866 10 місяців тому +3

    The Farer Moonphase is better

  • @thompsonterry4804
    @thompsonterry4804 10 місяців тому +2

    Looks like another great watch from CW. I appreciate the complication and the idea of the module. This new model compares favorably to the Moonglow, which is already very nice. Another one for the wish list. Thanks for the review.

  • @jamespourtoy
    @jamespourtoy 10 місяців тому

    the bracelet is the same as the Tissot balade powermatic 80 cos silicium 😌👌

  • @dylvasey
    @dylvasey 10 місяців тому

    I'm not a huge lover of this watch but CW are really heading in the right direction.

  • @HerrSommerjunge
    @HerrSommerjunge 9 місяців тому

    Love the sweater! Where can I get one?

    • @WatchChris
      @WatchChris  9 місяців тому

      Hey thanks! They're available in my store below the video

  • @jasoncousins8689
    @jasoncousins8689 10 місяців тому +3

    Underwhelming, thick slab sided case, never liked that bracelet and the hands may have been better in white. When are they going to bring out the green dial and bezel full size c60 in bronze with full bronze bracelet? That I would buy 👍

  • @LymanPhillips
    @LymanPhillips 10 місяців тому +1

    This is a statement watch for sure. CW knocking one out of the park in both design and value.
    Is it just me, or is the term "on the wrist" redundant and hysterical. I mean, what other part of your body are you doing to strap it on - your ankle? Your... never mind...

  • @fx3098
    @fx3098 10 місяців тому +2

    if this was done with a polished case, i would have my wallet out in an instant.

  • @MrVitamincpp
    @MrVitamincpp 10 місяців тому

    those dark dials make it almost impossible to eliminate reflections unfortunately

  • @BAF605
    @BAF605 10 місяців тому +2

    Moonphase here is a bit large and the watch too is oversized for a dress watch. Own several CWs but this is a miss for me.

  • @bestboy897
    @bestboy897 10 місяців тому +1

    sup sup

  • @HarshilPandit
    @HarshilPandit 10 місяців тому +7

    40mm is big but the price is very high

  • @Sicarius888
    @Sicarius888 10 місяців тому +2

    What would be the purpose of art watches? No minute markers and too poor hands visibility to tell time but not flashy enough to be jewelry.

  • @ManoloVintage
    @ManoloVintage 10 місяців тому +2

    I would love to see the seconds hands sweep past the moon phase with a kid riding a bycicle and an alien in the basket.

  • @tizombie
    @tizombie 10 місяців тому +1

    Beautiful watch even though not for me.

  • @WMIYC
    @WMIYC 10 місяців тому +1

    Beautiful. But. Why did they have to do this?! I’m still saving for the Bel Canto!

    • @shade8199
      @shade8199 9 місяців тому

      @@paulhitchens7180I think for what it’s worth the bel canto is a pretty unique watch at that price point and does have value. Curious to see if it gets harder to pre-order in the future if it wins the petite aiguille in the next few days.

  • @gaborkalanyos8707
    @gaborkalanyos8707 9 місяців тому

    Moser

  • @meijiturtle3814
    @meijiturtle3814 10 місяців тому +2

    Not for me, thanks. I want a timepiece that actually tells the time to the minute. This is a work of art, not a watch.

  • @voidifremoved
    @voidifremoved 10 місяців тому +3

    I own a few CWards great value. This one however lacks practicality and for the price as a strictly fun watch its a pass for me.

  • @mell3109
    @mell3109 10 місяців тому +1

    I think they missed a trick, should have put a micro CW logo on the moon

  • @TAP1999
    @TAP1999 10 місяців тому

    Christopher Ward on a nato strap

  • @jaskiniamestwa
    @jaskiniamestwa 10 місяців тому +1

    I assume the moon eventually gets covered right? And yet you can see the stars through the moon? Physics anybody?

  • @finesse49
    @finesse49 10 місяців тому

    Interesting. It's too big and too fat for a dress watch and the price is much higher than I'd want to pay. I'm sure they'll sell out, though. 🙂

  • @lordcharfield4529
    @lordcharfield4529 10 місяців тому

    Great channel, horrible tasteless watch!

  • @watching_nyc
    @watching_nyc 10 місяців тому +3

    Looks heavily influenced by Moser’s aventurine moon. I appreciate having something like this at an affordable price point but originality with this and the 12 (czapek/defy)seems lacking.