Rear Crash Tests | 50 mph | (Three Row SUVs)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 тра 2019
- 0:04 - Acura MDX (2014)
0:15- Chevrolet Traverse (2018)
0:24 - Ford Explorer (2011)
0:45 - Kia Sorento (2011)
1:11 - Kia Sorento (2015)
1:20 - Mitsubishi Outlander (2015)
1:31 - Toyota 4Runner (2014)
1:43 - Toyota Highlander (2014)
1:52 - Volkswagen Atlas (2018)
2:07 - Volvo XC90 (2016)
Test speed: 50 MPH.
Visit www.RealSafeCars.com for precise safety/crashworthiness rankings developed by Ivy League PhDs using machine learning/artificial intelligence on real-world traffic accident data.
Subscribe for the latest crash test videos: ua-cam.com/users/RealSafeCar...
Twitter: RealSafeCars
Facebook: / realsafecars
Embed crash test videos on your site (link for spreadsheet with embed code for each video): docs.google.com/spreadsheets/... Founders of RealSafeCars:
Benjamin Shiller (PhD)
UA-cam Channel: / @professor_shiller
Website: BenjaminShiller.com
Bhoomija Ranjan (PhD)
Website: sites.google.com/view/Bhoomij...
Derek Shiller (PhD)
Website: www.DerekShiller.com - Авто та транспорт
Why doesn't the IIHS test like this? People put their kids in those third rows and they're death traps.
Thank you. Don’t buy third row SUVs to begin with. All these people they think their so big and bad with ginormous SUVs and then cry wolf when they can no longer afford the payments.
1:43 I like how the back wheels weren't even bothered by the impact
The 3rd row is part of the crumple zone. Don't put people you care about there.
Yes... put people that are annoying! Just kidding!!!
Thanks for the vid. I can see how the 3rd row seats are not safe at all.
DEFINITELY Not the Volvo that thing is fine might be able to drive a little but still
@@Blahblahblah290 What in the world did you just say?
@@Gabriel-i77 lol
Still a lot safer than the back seat of a sedan
@@user-tb7rn1il3q depends ! If it's a s80 ,s class , a8 or 7 series your safe
Same as in minivans: third row is in the crumpled zone. Add luggage and stuff and the third row is crushed.
The Volvo is a tuff cookie! followed by the Toyota 4Runner.
Don't say tuff cookie unless you're under 3
I wonder why the IIHS doesn't test rear impact. Too much profits in Ford Explorers and Chevy Trailblazers. That's why! Same goes for pick up trucks.
Pickups tend to perform well in rear end crashes because they have huge crush zones.
@@plmn93 You would think they would perform well. But actually they perform poorly. Many pickup trucks are body on frame to support the weight of the load in the bed. That frame doesn't crumple and actually pushes the forces into the cabin. Also the seats in the second row of the pickup truck are right up against the rear glass with no room to fold backwards in the rear crash. Body takes the energy
The problem with SUVs is the 3rd row. Without advanced design that costs big $$$ like on a Volvo those occupants in that row are the crumple zone.
@@morganw8682 I can't speak for all pickups, but I know that the F-150's rear frame is designed to crush horizontally in collisions, kind of reverse telescoping. They also all have head restraints. In any case, I wish the IIHS would test all vehicles in rear impacts.
IIHS is independent of the manufacturers and their main concern is reducing insurance payouts for injuries. Evidently, third row injuries aren't common enough to justify the cost of testing. But, it is obviously a dangerous place to be in a rear end accident. It's likely very safe in forward collisions which are much more common.
Would rather be in a full frame SUV since the rear frame would absorb much of the impact
Well I defiantly won’t get a third row, when I was growing up my mom had a 2004 Buick Rendezvous with the third row and the third row head rest was like a inch away from the tailgate glass. I always wondered what happen if we got rear ended. Now I know
Would be nice if they showed the inside during the impact as well.
how much would it cost to strengthen the front seats? these car companies gamble with lives over dollars and cents. unless shamed into fixing something they will keep profit ahead of all else.
Mqb plataform is the best
Rip child in the 3rd row
Toyota, VW, and Volvo are the only cars built to survive this accident.
No they were all bad, right up the rear wheels in all of them.
I m guessing here but thinking full size spare isn't gonna help
So...it means the person in the third row will die when crash...
Injuries
Well I always sit myself in the front so no worries about getting killed for me. Phew.
well umm, theres the frontal collision
Glad to see that these newer cars have front seats that don't crumple onto the second row... though, there are many cars made in 2020 that will either paralyze front row passengers or kill kids the second row due to front seat failures...
On second thought, the Ford Explorer and Kia Sorento (2011 & 2016), Mitsubishi Outlander front seats move too far back.
Well which cars do you think do the best?
@@heatherrose8480 - European brands did better, actually! But also, it's sometimes model- or country-specific.
did not see mazda cx90 and subaru ascent
as small as they are i wouldnt expect much more than the Sportage
Want 3rd row seats? Only go with VW if you can’t afford suburban.
SUV and Crossover death traps
No they are actually very safe. Sedans are the death traps.
Not impressive. Rather pathetic really. Rear crumple zone is way too soft.
Wow not so good