2011-2020 Toyota Sienna FMVSS 301 Rear Crash Test (50 Mph)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 вер 2017
- A 50 Mph, 70% overlap rear crash test.
Result: Pass - No Fuel Leak.
This is a test on the fuel system to ensure there is no fuel leakage in a high-speed rear-end collision. There is no instrumentation in the dummies. - Авто та транспорт
Will call the third row the Mother-in-law seat she can have that one all to herself
Lmao
🤣
BAHAHHAHA
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.
Youre evil . Lol
@@dukeofrideshare No. She is evil.
We need more high speed rear end testing
Also, the manufacturer's CEO and board of investors should be used as test dummies.
@@ProleDaddy Not your precious government employees though, right?
@@piggy310 Send them all. Full send. They're all fascists.
These rear end crash tests are for fuel tank integrity. I wish there four crash test dummies in all vehicles for all tests by Insurance Institute For Highway Safety NHTSA and EuroNCAP . Also we need seats tha do not move forward in a crash and stay put and new seatbelts like fighting pilots use or like in rally cars
@@georgevavoulis4758 Congratulations for failing physics.
Whoa. RIP third row
Third rows for the mother-in-law
Test another one, but with a child dummy in thw 3rd row seat. I'd be interested in how much forces such a dummy sustains in that collision.
no more third rows for me
sssmeee same thought with me.
Lol
its called a suburban
I got in an accident exactly like this, sitting in the third row and I was completely fine. Just a few scratches from the glass and whiplash
@@donovan.smi08 50 mph though?
@@crashtests0013 about 45
People dont sit in the trunk. the 3rd row seat is indeed; pushed forward. but the mangled part is in the trunk.
These tests are for fuel leaks... but I kinda feel like it misses the 3-row passenger safety
I have a sienna and I’ve always been reluctant to have people in the third row: the rear of the rear axle is very soft. You can see here the rear seats pushed forward and up violently. The van barely moves forward, instead, the rear crumbles. And that’s without luggage behind.
The seats move forward, but not the seat belt attachments: people would be crushed by the seat belts as well.
I would treat it as an extremely safe 4 or 5 seater. The crumpling of the back of the van will probably save your necks in a crash.
incredible how I stay, I thought I would have reinforcements for being a family vehicle
They kinda did, but the law of physics requires a crumble zone to dissipate the force. As you can see, the collision produced not much impact to the second and first row passengers. The third row is just too far back and there isn’t enough distance behind the 3rd row and the rear end.
That’s horrific.
No back seat for me, but rather be in the Honda than Toyota
If you need a 7+ seater, buy one that has a boot and not one that has seats in the boot space.
You know the sienna has a larger cargo area than the other minivans. I'd like to see an actual picture of the third row.
The cargo area isn't larger but I'd also like to see a picture
3rd row people either bad injuried or killed....no doubt
The third row is not crunched, what you’re seeing is the trunk. The 3rd row seats get moved foward.
you go ahead and seat in the 3rd row and do the test.
Aka a direct hit to the back, how great for people sitting in the back 🙏
Just don't sit anyone beyond the driver
And this is why we bought Honda Odyssey as we use 3rd row.
At that speed , the G's gonna get you anyway , the driver is now watching the movie :O !!!
has anyone noticed that this was posted in 2017?? 😶😏
I saw a rear end accident involving a Sienna last week, and it was the most eye opening thing I’ve ever seen. I will NEVER put my family in one of these! Ever!
Ma'am, this is all mini vans, don't think that it's a Toyota, Toyota are wonderful cars, and are the most reliable in the world
Injuries?
Seme here is not safety at all
I saw a rear end accident involving a Sienna last week, and it was the most eye opening thing i’ve ever seen. I will NEVER put my family in one of these! Ever!
Well, I was in a 2016 Sienna LE that was rear-ended at 45-50mph by a Hyundai Elantra, and I was seated in the third row.
I was completely fine, no immediate injuries. The only issues from that accident are that my neck and back growth need to be monitored because of possible whiplash damage, which put me at greater risk for scoliosis or something. The car even managed to make it home, and it survived the accident and we kept it for another two years until the lease went up in 2019.
Just saying, no matter what car you drive, you can still get hurt or killed in a crash. And all cars involved in a wreck will look bad, but just because they look bad doesn’t mean that the people inside are hurt.
Zero stars. Third row fatality.
It's a fuel leak test and there are no pictures of what actually happened to the third row...
A Ford F2 50 slammed into the back of my mom’s sienna at 50 miles an hour I was in the third and I was completely fine. The seats in the back Were thrown forward but stayed intact
@@somanymods 1:59 use your eyes
@@theblitz1687 you can't actually see the condition of the seats. As far as I can tell the cargo area crumpled, which it's supposed to do.
there is absolutely no way to tell... the 3rd row definitely got messed up but thats mostly trunk damage... these vans have massive trunks, anyone who hasn't owned one has no idea... its a bigger crumple zone than the front end probably. people get rear ended all the time and people buy vans to use a 3rd row generally, if they were death traps we would know by now.
Well that’s a fun way to smash the rear window
same result with the odyssey,watch it!
I wonder if having tow hitch kit installed would make any difference 🤔
Nope didnt make a difference on the old jeeps and probably wont here
@@theclueguy3388 YOU ARE WRONG.
@@captainamericaamerica8090 shut up and stop huffing glue you idiot.
Negligible in such a high speed crash. Lower speeds would help a little.
I imagine a lot of the shock would be sent straight through the chassis and make injury worse.
Why did they put no dummies other than the drivers seat?
FMVSS 301 only requires two front occupants as "ballast."
It does look concerning how much intrusion there is but most critical pictures seem to be omitted. Showing exterior after the crash from multiple perspectives is meaningless to the majority. How difficult was it to place some dummies in the 3rd row and at least show some aftermath pics from the interior?
The pictures shown are all the photos of vehicle available. NHTSA's FMVSS 301 does not require occupant readings to be recorded, nor have more than the two ballast front-seat occupants. Refer to NHTSA Test# 9859 and 49 CFR § 571.301 - Standard No. 301; Fuel system integrity.
@@CarPro1993 Sounds good, thanks for the response.
In most rear crash test, some of the cars get their rear tires flat like this one
Its just mangled
And I was wondering where toyota designer got idea for scion xB :)
It’s a test for the fuel system not injury
Why not evaluate both? There isn't a test in the U.S. for occupant protection in high-speed rear-end collisions (at least not one that the majority of people know about). The IIHS evaluates seat designs, but that is for lower speed collision (about 20 mi/h). This is a realistic situation if you're on the highway and (for example) the engine stalls. Although it is likely to be more severe because you are more likely to get hit by a larger heavier vehicle than a passenger car.
Especially since the target audience for people who buy minivans are families.
First Last - same here in the uk, officials dont test rear impacts!
Seriously- everyone- dont buy 7seat cars where the seats are in the boot space. You go cheap and your putting your little ones at increased risk
Now its a Toyota enna
*Toyota Sien
The third row passengers are now split in half
I think that is nuts that Toyota doesn’t put airbags in the third row
There are, they’re just not active when the car is off
This test in particular was not very accurate as it hits a small part which is offset and unrealistic
@@dannymiller6245 Offset rear collisions are actually far more common than full-on rear collisions because the rear driver most often attempts to swerve too late. Same with offset frontal collisions, more of them occur vs. full head-on collisions. IIHS determined this in the 90s, which is why they have so many different types of crash tests now.
@@dannymiller6245 Airbags have separate power reserves. They are designed to deploy when needed even without the car being on.
The sienna does have airbags in the third row for a side impact
what's wrong with 3rd row???and how that could be "pass"???
This was a test on the fuel system, to make sure there aren't any fuel leaks following a rear-end collision. The FMVSS 301 test does not assess occupant protection.
CarPro1993 it is still a fail. People on the third row seats are dead.
@@passion830217 This happens to any 3rd row vehicle. The 3rd row and the front is an unsafely place in any car.
@@user-fi1xu1pp7p guess you have never seen a suburban
Also the 3rd row was stowed so it broke. Minivan 3rd rows are designed differently
That’s why I am not exactly gonna buy that van. Imagine if a crash happened. One small dent is like it going through a wave of many hits
Atleast it has some sexy and fast acceleration
Wooow pepper
That’s horrible come on Toyota damn
third row this third row that bro whens the last time you were rear ended at 50 mph. not to mention how the thing that hit the van barely deforms or absorbs the impact like an actual car
기아 카니발 똑같이 한번 해봐야..ㅋㅋ
窓の枠が外れたwww
You'd probably fail a 4th grade physics course.
8/18/2011
I guess the Toyota guys thought it was a good idea to put a third-row seat in the middle of a crumple zone.
The trunk is the crumple zone
The Honda odyssey did even poorer
На задних сидень смерть
Well its a toyota....what do you expect
Peter Livingston Toyota is one of the most crash worthy car manufacturers
Toyota is one of the auto makers that beefed up the drivers side for a good crash test and left the passenger side totally exposed. All to save about $300 is steel. So no they are not and have NEVER been a company concerned with the safety of their clients. They were also one of the only makers that ONLY put in side curtain airbags after (and only until) the government regulated it. (In Canada it was to expensive to add airbags, even though they were standard in the USA...)
Toyota has had more safety recalls than any other automotive manufacturer in history. Almost more than all other companies in total....
More than a honda
Buy volvo please
Ubon94 Volvo will do way better than this
Ubon94 I agree or a Honda never the less
volvo same as kie( killed in accident)
@@Mckenzie28007 ?
Minivan to SUV
It did well. Crumble zones did thier job and the seat belts protected the dummys.
SamTheCar So its a couple zone all are like that
@@justenzo6342 ?? other minivans and suvs have 3rd rows intact
¡느낌표! No they didn’t
@@justenzo6342 go look up
¡느낌표! I did they preformed the same
Well, it was a 50 mph crash tho.
Nannestadboy There was a deadly accident in my local town in 2010 involving a semi truck ramming a minivan on the exit ramp of the freeway. The driver of the minivan suffered serious injury, and all of her children were obliterated. While 50 mph is fast, it is still not uncommon for a collision like this to occur.
mato filaro My point of this comment was to say that high speed collisions are more common than one may think. Though, I believe most new cars and trucks with large enough spaces between the back of the car and the occupant space would allow the occupants to survive. One of the major reasons why those children died was due to the third seats being so close to the car’s rear.
Edit: To your point, the chances of survival in a major semi collision are not high. I doubt someone would survive any collusion over 70 mph, though semi-trucks usually max out as 65 mph and most drivers are not that ignorant to be going over 55 or 60. And to respond to your question, there are very few high speed, rear end crash tests out there, so I can’t name many cars that would hold up, though, again, a larger car where the occupants are far away from the rear would improve survival chances considerably. For example, the front seat passenger was the survivor of the 2010 accident; she was the farthest away from the back of the minivan. I am treating you with as much respect as I can, so could you just respect my beliefs a little, even if you believe it’s BS?
It is a toyo tincan.
Wtf that's so unsafe! I think 3rd row is dumb unless your vehicle can pass this test.
Honda for life 😘😘😍♥️ I won't ever lease or purchase a Toyota. Honda's are as safe as Volvo's ♥️!!!
Toyota is better
Especially the reliability and transmissions, because Honda has really weak transmissions, Toyota is much better, more reliable, the Camry, Sienna, Highlander, are much better than Accord, Oddysey, and Pilot
@@askoldr.2932 i totally agree