As jurors decide Karen Read's fate, what can we learn from other high-profile trials?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 чер 2024
- We're taking a look at past cases where trials drew widespread attention and how long jurors deliberated in some of them.
Follow NBC10 Boston on...
Instagram: nbc10boston
TikTok: tiktok.com/@nbc10boston
Facebook: NBC10Boston
X: NBC10Boston
I would be hesitant to call 911 in that town.
Really responsible reporting, thank you NBC10 without a doubt you’ve provided the most accurate coverage throughout. Shout out to Sue!!! 💥💥💥💥💥
Not I hit him, but did I hit him!
A comment reported by people whom would otherwise be considered themselves as people of interest by any competent and unbiased investigative team. One such person whom literally called the victims phone over a dozens times in under 19 minutes yet claimed she “butt dialed” the phone. Which is not only impossible it’s a blatant lie. An individual whom also googled ” hos long dose it take for someone to die in the cld”. During the period in question prior to deleting that search. Then panicked and continued to (re) Google the terminology in the morning. A women whom claims she doesn’t comprehend how to delete a search which is however deleted.
@@ChrisS-oo6flgive it a rest
GREAT coverage on this case !!! 👍
Thank you...
They better figure it out by tomorrow! I don’t wanna keep waiting 😂
Justice for Officer John O'Keefe and his family.🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💅
RIP Jojn J. O'Keefe III B.P.D.
8 December 1975 ~
29 January 2022⚘
🙄
Jurors making mockery of jury process.
How so? They’re simply deliberating. You’re just not getting results you want. She’ll be found guilty on lesser charges. Pretty obvious
Bull doing what there suppose to not what people want them to do they know the law
Plzzz
Weong
If you believe she’s guilty then either you didn’t watch the trial or you automatically have a room temp IQ 🤷♀️
Or you just automatically believe that if a prosecutor charges a person, that means guilty. Just as scary as a low IQ.
When I got back this afternoon and on line to expect to see a verdict saying Karen Read was acquitted; I was surprised to see that did not happen with the OUTSTANDING job the defense team for Karen did and the EVIDENCE shown to the jury that Karen did NOT kill her boyfriend !!!
I am pretty sure the DEFENSE team is as shocked as I was, and certainly Karen must have been.
Now I am wondering if there will be a HUNG JURY... even wondering if one of the jurors was planted by the corrupt people in the system in that county ???? *Or* ...one or more of the jurors didn't like Karen smirking and held THAT against her, ignoring the evidence she was NOT guilty???
yawn
At least one juror
⚖ for J.J. ⚖
Why is this woman always smiling & laughing, enjoying the spotlight?
And why do these strangers treat her like a rock star?
All the people, both sides, involved in this case, are not good people.
Smiling definitely equals guilty. She should be balling her eyes out.. especially 2 Years later. And all those supporters(which are by now in the millions, all over the world) must be delusional. How dare they. We should just go back to the Salem witch trial era.
She's smiling because she knows how ridiculous the charges against her are.
@@4gma59 Exactly 💯 did my reply get erased? It was a sarcastic one.
@@4gma59oh nevermind it's here ( these people are probably friends with the actual perps)
Okay …hypocrite, try….just try putting yourself in her shoes…you wouldn’t make it
Not guilty.
It is absolutely ludacris why this jury didn't immediately have a NOT GUILTY verdict. Now really wondering is Brian Albert was indeed intimidating sitting across from the jurors. Hope the Feds go door to door jailing the whole town.
That is your opinion.. Not everyone's.. I don't think she did it on purpose,but I think she did kill him
You just hate it when things don't go your way
Because she is guilty if you look at the police car dash camera. The tail light is missing. If the cops would have taken it out it would have been at her house and on her house camera. Just saying the evidence is there.
There is more than enough evidence she hit and killed him.
@@rjkool2007what evidence made you think that because everything the prosecutors presented and their bias against Karen Read has showed otherwise
The prosecution and Alberts got a plant in on the case which is why there is no verdict yet. Someone on that jury is on the take.
A ficus? Maybe a fern?
And you can bet there is cash involved
@@Piat65 I’ll bet you cash
Lazy jury ..maybe tainted
Not Guilty but the jury I bet is Hung only takes 1
I agree.....
Yes one smart person, all it takes! She is so guilty
She is NOT guilty!
Not guilty. Stand strong Karen.
Good luck with that. Hope you deal well with disappointment
Jury is tween rock & hard place... find KR not guilty, jury convicts Jen McCabe & 11 family and friends, plus local and state police, even prosecutor are colluding to protect someone or some people who killed a well loved Boston PD officer... some say KR said she did it... still, sleezy local cops, unprofessional MA State Police detective, commander, and accident expert, stupid prosecutor, but she was drunk, she was pissed, maybe she did kill him, maybe McCabes & Albertsons and Canton & MA staties didn't.... who knows? Jury relates to Dedham locals more than hard drinkin pretty cop groupie prof. from Fall River...
Omg! Is this a joke?
Not guilty blessing
Social Media has made the judicial system a clown show. How can anyone have a fair trial when there are arm chair quarterbacks on UA-cam, etc., interfering in the process.
The jurors are shielded from social media per the instructions of the court and have already been screened in voir dire.
What’s the difference form erroneous public opinions and social media comments like your own? Often by people whom struggled in school but now believe their opinions are equally valid. Most without a comprehensive understanding of the facts or the cognitive assets required to evaluate such evidence rationally or from an unbiased perspective? Many of the “Yourubers” are highly accredited professionals in the legal profession as it’s 2024 and the “UA-camr” insult has become antiquated as experts and professionals have switched to the media. I mean your entrusting traditional media which is essentially controlled by partisan interests which we can literally trace. It’s simply a different flavor of propaganda. Regardless they are also on social media where your clearly watching it. Your certainly interested in this circus as you are watching content about it. Thus, contributing to the circus from the peanut gallery.
@@ChrisS-oo6flI read a great comment...Hard to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person 😂😂😂
How are they ‘interfering in the process’? Are they out interviewing jurors while the trial is going on?
Social media is what got her the attention… most notably from the “turtle boy”. The defense didn’t come up with her defense strategy. Turtle boy did. This kind of defense is what makes everybody a rock star and believe me the defense attorneys love it. It’s also like a witch hunt, where the mobs of town, in old black and white movies, march around with their torches, deciding who will be hanged and convicted…. According to the evidence, I think she did it. And you are right about social media, maybe they should stop televising courtroom proceedings and trials. Just saying…
Guilty.
Where do these people have the time to hang-out at the court house?
100% GUILTY
100% ignorant
@@lizzeltired2155 100% BLIND
@@lizzeltired2155 @catherinharty3206: you both must be relatives of Proctor.
@@4gma59I think they're disagreeing with the OP
She's had her 15 minutes of fame, now for the guilty verdict. Her and her lawyers made a circus out this.
What a Karen!
She is guilty..
It is clear from the evidence that she is GUILTY.
Yes, some found Trooper Paul with his 6 mo accident reconstruction course more compelling than two PhD’s paid for by the FBI and the Commonwealth’s own witness, the MD coroner who weren’t convinced there was an impact from an SUV.
What evidence are you watching, the irony of criticizing people when you yourself suffer from gullibility and Dunning Kruger. What facts or evidence persuaded your opinion? Unfortunately the general public struggles with the concept of reasonable doubt and the basic principles of the judicial system yet alone grasp evidence. People also struggle to evaluate things without a biased cognition then selectively picking and choosing what “evidence” they chose to except or focus on. This represents everything that’s wrong with system and public perception. It’s extremely easy for the prosecution to convince the less educated or more sheltered and vulnerable fractions of the public of one’s guilt. This is especially true for those fractions whom have an adolescent and naive understanding of police. The evidence on this case is deeply flawed and essentially non existent. Maybe you should watch some of those secondary experts on UA-cam rather then criticize them or selectively find those with the view you want. The reality is you can’t even state any of evidence you claim is worthy of guilty verdict and proves that people lack the fluid intelligence and basic integrity to formulate a worthy opinion. If you think those injuries where caused by the car you probably still put out cookies for Santa. Certainly never been the scene of an accident, homicide or gave experience with automobiles in general. The interpretation of the key cycle data is beyond flawed. A K9 expert like myself will tell anyone that the marks on the victim are from a GSD. Just look at any evaluation by a K9 expert on UA-cam including former officers. It’s without a doubt caused by a K9 not a car. It’s not debatable. The blood stains on the pants care clearly caused by a gravity drip and even a child has enough firing neurons to accept this. The only thing they have is a statement by 4 individuals whom themselves would be considered suspects by a competent investigator making claims that the accused stated she may have hit him. 4 individuals whom all has questionable behavior and have made false statements. People need to leave the security of their home more before they attempt to internet real world data. Reading and education doesn’t hurt either.
@@sarahterry2140watching too much CSI shows…. 😊
Jeeezus christ, were you even paying attention?
If you believe trooper Paul’s testimony please promise me you will never reproduce
MAGA2024🇺🇸
Guilty
GUILTY. SHE HAS A BEAUTIFUL SMILE AND SHE WILL BE POPULAR IN PRISON😂😂😂!!!
The first time I looked at her I thought of the Planet of the Apes🤣To much space between nose and top lip.
I totally disagree with this assessment, I would have no problem finding her guilty because she is