Thanks YT for randomly recommending this 3 years after the comments were reopened. Why are there only 16 comments? Spooky. Damn, I miss this man so much.
I do like playing games, but I prefer to watch other people play certain games. If no one played these games, then I would have to purchase them and play them. If I watched a puzzle, story game being completed, by a long play, I usually never purchase it because the replay value is quite low. I have to stop watching it, before I will purchase it.
What about bands who license their songs to games collecting ad revenue on youtube videos that feature their song in the gameplay? Do people have an opinion on that? It isnt being changed by the gameplay or people talking over it.
The letsplayers and youtubers should leave a link to the song or have the entire track list easily available but the artists shouldn't claim royalties as the music is an integral part of gameplay in most situations.
@@Jay_Sullivan this only started happening very, very recently. I probably asked this question because of an issue with something i worked on. We actually did make our contracts with the correct language, but AI copyright detection was taking videos down anyway. We had to get every record and publishing company and artist to reach out to the AI companies and request to not have videos associated with our game taken down. The issue was resolved but all the companies acted like this kind of thing was major "uncharted territory" to them. I've only talked to one other person who's had a similar deal made and it's for a game that hasn't even been announced yet.
I'm no legal expert but I would assume so. Typically a model is paid by the brand to endorse their product. Otherwise the brand can legally reach out and request the photo be taken down or blurred since their product is trademarked. We see this often in movies/photos where certain brand logos are blurred out. Otherwise there's no reason why this extra step would need to be done. I'm sure there's more nuances but that's my guess
What if the person doesn’t have commentary or a camera? I’ve definitely looked at videos like that when I don’t want to buy the game but am curious about it. Are people really going to those channels or videos in order to see the personality? Perhaps, the publisher should upload their own video of that.
Thanks YT for randomly recommending this 3 years after the comments were reopened. Why are there only 16 comments? Spooky. Damn, I miss this man so much.
Rest In Peace , you will be missed
Rip Legend
One of TB's best videos, I think.
I do like playing games, but I prefer to watch other people play certain games. If no one played these games, then I would have to purchase them and play them. If I watched a puzzle, story game being completed, by a long play, I usually never purchase it because the replay value is quite low. I have to stop watching it, before I will purchase it.
Damn we miss you TB...
What about bands who license their songs to games collecting ad revenue on youtube videos that feature their song in the gameplay? Do people have an opinion on that? It isnt being changed by the gameplay or people talking over it.
The letsplayers and youtubers should leave a link to the song or have the entire track list easily available but the artists shouldn't claim royalties as the music is an integral part of gameplay in most situations.
They’re already paid and in a contract.
@@Jay_Sullivan this only started happening very, very recently. I probably asked this question because of an issue with something i worked on. We actually did make our contracts with the correct language, but AI copyright detection was taking videos down anyway. We had to get every record and publishing company and artist to reach out to the AI companies and request to not have videos associated with our game taken down. The issue was resolved but all the companies acted like this kind of thing was major "uncharted territory" to them. I've only talked to one other person who's had a similar deal made and it's for a game that hasn't even been announced yet.
I have a question: If you're a model & make photos, should you have to pay a fine to the brand you're wearing?
I'm no legal expert but I would assume so. Typically a model is paid by the brand to endorse their product. Otherwise the brand can legally reach out and request the photo be taken down or blurred since their product is trademarked. We see this often in movies/photos where certain brand logos are blurred out. Otherwise there's no reason why this extra step would need to be done.
I'm sure there's more nuances but that's my guess
What if the person doesn’t have commentary or a camera? I’ve definitely looked at videos like that when I don’t want to buy the game but am curious about it. Are people really going to those channels or videos in order to see the personality? Perhaps, the publisher should upload their own video of that.
Press f
F
Hello World
Boron
e?