'I Don't Think That's Right...': John Kennedy Presses Judicial Nominee
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 чер 2024
- At Wednesday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) pressed a judicial nominee on ballot harvesting.
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
Senator Kennedy is a national treasure
YEAH RIGHT...SO BURY THE SENILE RACIST SCUM BAG
@@JOHNSMITH-bi9hr The video is about Senator Kennedy not the guy living in the White House and his cartel of a family.
Indeed.
Yes it is
Mr. Kennedy speaks like just a good ol boy . However, he is very wise and intelligent . A true American ! Much respect!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
He is my favorite Senator!
A true patriot and American. Love you Senator Kennedy.
We need 99 more like him.
He's a good ol boy because he is a racist like Trump
AS WISE AS A POST TURTLE
Where the heck do they find these people?
Bottom of a barrel.
are THEY running our country
Under the whale shit at the bottom of the ocean……
Seems like a skit from SNL.
THANK THE MOST HIGH GOD FOR GIVING US SEN.KENNEDY!!!
lucifer
He's a national treasure.
I never had as much fun watching UA-cam videos than watching SEN Kennedy at work. He is truly an American treasure. I think the entire U.S. Senate will miss him more than any other member when he goes. There has never been one like him, nor will there ever be.
So it looks like we’ve transitioned to the point where the most qualified applicant isn’t the individual with the most experience but rather the applicant that checks the most “equity” boxes.
Exactly and that is one of the reasons this Administration is the Worse ever.
Panel proves it!
It's a good shift from the old way of doing things when all you had to be was white and male to get the job.
@@carlfaucher1543 is that really a "better" shift or just a shift that takes us out of the frying pan and into the fire?
@@loisgilchrist2037 I believe diversity equates to better problem solving.
Very telling on the dems, that these ladies have extreme foreign accents. Not that in itself is bad, but three in a row. Something is very rotten in the dem party.
that was the first thing i noticed also, then i heard PR and i then thought it was something to do with their country and not a judge for the USA, i did not know at first what the hearings were about till the end and with all the people in the USA no men or some other race were smart enough to have been picked alsao, and then the lady says she never handle a case like that wow, that means i could do the job, i am good at plumbing crap runs down hill
Exactly what I was thinking.
Note ownli ayxtreem fohreen ahkzents, bot cohmeecolee aygzaduraytayd fohreen ahkzents.
(Not only extreme foreign accents, but comically exaggerated foreign accents.)
Am latino and noticed also these ladies sound like immigrants instead of 3nd gen or later
Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens.
I honestly don't know what anyone else thinks on the subject, BUT I myself have a BIG PROBLEM with judges in Washington state or Oregon issuing injunctions on rulings affecting the Southern Border. This "JUDGE SHOPPING"NONSENSE should be illegal.
What you actually need is consequences for judges that make decisions based on ideology and not the law. Cases like the ones you're talking about should have been tossed out without even considering them because the people filing the suits lack any standing to bring them and those courts have no valid jurisdiction. If judges were actually held accountable for decisions that are clearly improper then this culture of activist judges would never have been able to take root in the first place. The only reason it continues is that judges are almost entirely unaccountable to anyone once they get appointed.
@@Rowgue51 And who is going to hold these Judges accountable? You will run into the same problem at the next level. They all have their biases and have no problem leaning on them when making decisions. None are bias free, no not one.
We're supposed to hold judges and the administration responsible for nominating them... We are... For the people, of the people, by the people...
It must have a minimum of three judges for such a ruling - to remove this judge shopping.
Only Senator that actually asks technical law questions. He actually knows and understands the nuances of the legal system.
Anyone else notice how weird all these nominees are? I watch all these hearings and these are some bizarre people.
Diversity hires and not even competent ones
There has to be at least one qualified white liberal male judge in the US but I have not seen one nominated yet by Biden.
And MORE THAN LIKELY you won't.
Didn't you know that White Males are White Supremacists
Watch a member of the alphabet people pop up by there is no reason the judge be white. Whites have done enough damage
Because they didn’t check the boxes. What are the boxes ? whites need not to apply.
If any of these people say uhm one more time I’m going to fucking lose it.
(Sounds like this lady doesn’t even understand that the Congress can try to pass legislation but if the Supreme Court finds the legislation unconstitutional they will over ride it)
That and thank you for the question
One of then cant even provide legal definitions
Ughhhh, sorry. Are you OK? YOU clearly must have lost your mind with this "lot".
When you think in one language and having to talk in a different one you will get a lot of umm
Every person in this current administration says umm, or ughh 3 times per sentence!! That's how I know who's a liar! You don't have to think about every word you choose when you're telling the truth!!👍👍
At least the woman from Puerto Rico explained why she did not know much about Universal Injunctions instead of bluffing her way through the questions.
Affirmative action at it's highest level of achievement, good Lord
we will soon be an affirmative action nation on the world stage as russia, china, india and others eat our lunch.
It's / its.
Those are very two different terms.
I would shudder to have any of those judicial nominees perform the duties as an elementary school teacher for my kids !
Wholly unqualified and embarrassing for us all to witness.
FOR CRYING OUT LOUD - CAN WE HAVE A MAN FOR A CHANGE! No wonder this country is turning into an Amazone´s circus!
Most of those women looked like men or men that looked like women. Take your pick !
Fact...most of these appointees have NO experience... hence the umms n lack of knowledge answering questions, which they really don't answer..discusting..and Americans are paying dearly!
He is an amazing man,very searching questions and they don’t even realise.
This is how I felt when I interviewed at Amazon for a software developer position and my background was in Biology.
8iP6,0
At least you could identify what a woman is
What is wo.an?
Woman
Thank you sir for representing we the people
JOHN KENNADY HAS MY RESPECT COMMON SENSE . DOWN TO EARTH. A GO GETTER FOR AMERICANS . NOT A BLAMER FINDING SOLUTIONS NOT MORE PROBLEMS
18th century gun laws in the 21st century is why the USA is a Third World Country. Sad. Bigly. 🤦🏻♂️
XXVIII AMENDMENT
SECTION 1.
The inalienable right of a free people to be kept safe from gun violence and the fear thereof must not be infringed and shall be protected by the Congress and the States. This Amendment thus repeals and replaces the Second Amendment.
SECTION 2.
Congress shall create a mandatory system of firearm registration and licensing for the following limited purposes: (a) licensed hunters of game; (b) licensed ranges for the sport of target shooting; and (c) for the few who can demonstrate a special need for personal protection.
All who seek a firearm will undergo a strict vetting process with a thorough background check, including the written and confidential approval of family members, spouses and ex-spouses and/or partners and ex-partners, co-workers and neighbors. A mental health check will also be required. There will be a waiting period of one month to complete the full background check.
SECTION 3.
Those who meet all the requirements for the restricted gun owners groups and successfully pass the background check must take a firearms safety class and pass a written test on an annual basis.
SECTION 4.
The minimum age for the restricted groups who can own a firearm is 25 years old. Renewal and review of the firearms license will occur on an annual basis.
SECTION 5.
Congress will stipulate and continually update the limited list of approved firearms for civilian use, including weapons in the future that are not yet invented. The following firearms are heretofore banned:
• All automatic and semi-automatic weapons and all devices which can enable a single-shot gun to fire automatically or semi-automatically;
• Any weapon that can hold more than six bullets or rounds at a time or any magazine that holds more than six bullets;
• All guns made of plastic or any homemade equipment and machinery or a 3D printer that can make a gun or weapon that can take a human life.
SECTION 6.
Congress shall regulate all ammunition, capacity of ammunition, the storage of guns, gun locks, gun sights, body armor and the sale and distribution of such items. No weapons of any kind whose sole intention is the premeditated elimination of human life are considered legal. Congress may create future restrictions as this amendment specifically does not grant any American the “right” to own any weapon.
SECTION 7.
Police who are trained and vetted to use firearms shall be subject to comprehensive and continuous monitoring and shall be dismissed if found to exhibit any racist or violent behavior.
SECTION 8.
Persons already owning any of the above banned firearms, and who do not fall into the legal groups of restricted firearms owners, will have one month from the ratification of this Amendment to turn in their firearms for destruction by local law enforcement. These local authorities may organize a gun buy-back program to assist in this effort.
(The above constitutional amendment was written by Michael Moore of Michigan and presented to the 117th United States Congress on July 11, 2022)
None of these are qualified .
Unqualified means not not qualified for the position.
None of these women are english speaking?
Where the hell did my America go?
Correct. We are becoming a nation of ONLY immigrants.
@@Shanghaimagic Sad but true
They are from Puerto Rico, I guess.
@@bob733333 ...and never ever get a Puerto Rican woman angry with you!!! You think a millstone around your neck would be bad.
A man thats for America.
From across the border evidently. What a disgrace.
Thought the same thing.
Manatees can get a court appointment?
Amazing how far our American judicial system has slipped, people with heavy accents , understanding American constitution,
The DOJ has slipped right along with the judicial system. I'll be 81 this year and not to much worried for myself but it looks like my Children and grandchildren are going up $hit creek in a hurry.
Wow! All these foreign accents of these judges cause me concern as to what legal ideologies these nominees bring to the bench that are outside the basic principles of the US constitution.
This is where many of our activist judges are possibly coming from, or they are created at law schools where professors espouse legal thoughts that are contrary to our basic constitution.
A few years ago it was a major concern in this country that judges at various levels were trying to recognize principles of Islamic Law in deciding family and criminal law cases, such as
when a father performs an honor killing of a child. Judges were letting these men literally get away with murder.
Very good point.
A very progressive approach i would assume.
Puerto Rico is a U.S. territory. Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens.
Does she not know that you don't use the word to define the word?
So is this what the open border policy has yielded, an applicant pool that can barely speak and understand the English language?
They’re Puerto Ricans, US citizens
He is a bad ass. I wish he was in our state. Philadelphia P.A is going to he'll. Thanks to our Democrats.
agreed! kind of a jimmy stewart hes an american man
Don’t you mean going to she’ll?
Where do they find these people
Affirmative action
Sickos🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Where are all the American nominees? Every one of these are foreign!!!
The constitution explicitly outlines that the federal government is limited to legislating only the things explicitly delegated to it by the constitution and that all other legislative authority lies with the states.
How could it possibly be that all 3 have thick accents???? LETS GO BRANDON!!
Would rather them know the laws of the United States better than English, however- both are lacking
I am an Australian who has lived in Australia all his life and I KNOW that the constitution specifies those areas that congress have legislative power. All other areas are the purview of the States. Don't law students have to study the Constitution? Read the 10th Amendment. A little research goes a long way.
I've never ever seen a Biden candidate who was the least bit Qualified...not even close
Look at Kamala
@@terryroggensee4103 if you're picking a Democratic Vp atleast Liz, Bernie and Beto can make a speech. She was 100% the absolute worst
@@davebielke6319 The entire barrel is full of bad apples.
Where did this person come from? These are easy questions! Wow! Affirmative action!
I not a lawyer. The constitution is the law congress pledge a oath to up hold.
Make it up as you go
How did they pass the bar exam is my question.
This is like a skit from SNL.
You are exactly RIGHT!! Our beautiful Country in jeopardy!!
I don't understand how they can appoint someone to interpret the Constitution when English isn't even their first language.
They are picking an individual from Puerto Rico to represent Puerto Rico. Obviously English is not their first language or at least not the one they use most frequently. No need to be racist.
@@The_Rob_D don't be stupid, the language these laws are written in is English and are meant to be interpreted by the people following these laws. Nothing racist about it just you being ignorant.
@@The_Rob_D Forbes doesn't tell you it's for Puerto Rico. Please stop whipping the "r" word out when someone simply might not have known... Where did you get the info for it being for Puerto Rico so maybe others may know other sources to understand everything more further? I didn't see it at all in the description. Maybe Forbes has another video? Please tell if so.
@@The_Rob_D - Did not know that Puerto Rico was a different race. What exactly is the name of this race?
they come from countries that are falling apart and we expect them to do different here?
"What's the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process?"
"Procedural due process has to do with procedure, and substantive due process has to do with the substance."
Wow. What a fucking scholar.
Wow.
Quite the lineup of mediocre tacos here, obviously chosen for their skin color rather than their legal prowess. All filler, no meat.
Plant based tacos?
Turkey
Wow pure cringe
We're in trouble. These people can't answer questions.
I could watch these videos all day. Senator Kennedy does his homework before these hearings. I wouldn’t want to be in front of him being asked questions.
No more laws! We have too many now.
Wow she doesn't even justify womens liberation affirmative action. Where are Cliff Notes when you need them? Get them Mr. Kennedy!
I am all for everyone giving it a shot but not one of these ladies rises to the occasion. Next.
The responses certainly didn't exude confidence in the candidates. It is understandable when listening to each that one would surmise their selection was biased toward identity over substance. Maybe traffic court would have been a more appropriate appointment.
Two question ,,, WHY is their English so bad and have a heavy accent ??? And are judges
are they US citizens?
Senator Kennedy is extremely intelligent. The individuals he’s questioning are clueless. I could give better answers than these candidates.
Ignorance……..WOW
The "affirmative action appointment parade" continues.....
None of these women are qualified.
First time I have seen a witness fail to say "Thank you for your question"... interesting
Are any of these candidates American born? I personally am not, this seems very suspect.
I was thinking the same thing. Biden putting foreigners on the court?
I went to apply for a part time job. Did not get It I didn't speak Mexican. Yet here we are in the US and Americans need to speak Spanish to be hired in their own Country.
@@terryroggensee4103 Maybe you didn’t get the job because you don’t know that Mexican is not a language, therefore it can’t be spoken. Just maybe
How did the first two even graduate law school.
I don't believe there was anything in the Constitution about same sex marriage or abortion, but it does address the right to pursue happiness and that must be what is being considered - maybe wrongly - by these members of congress. Much of the legislation needs to be taken up by each State instead of the SCOTUS.
"pursue happiness" is in the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.
You are batting the same score of these dunces.
Seems like these candidates don't know much!
Any power not explicitly spelled out in the Constitution is reserved to the states.
He is so much smarter than these pukes
Holy cow... they're all Latinas. Accents right down the line!
Are you surprised ? The Mexicans will take over this country. It is just a matter of time.
Not all latinas have those heavy accents
is any of these people even born and raised as American citizens?
Brittany Lewis...How did you get this job?
3:08 hello judge 😍
I wonder which country these judges are from.
What happened to nominating intelligent moral people to positions instead of radical activists
Ask none rehearsed lingo
No I don’t believe it no way. 12:21pm, Seamus from Ireland
How these people got law degree?
They all have accents, which box do they need to check next?
Again, diversity, and equality at its finest, no doubt these people are intelligent, but, I believe American, judicial would have more working, and common sense about our constitution
Would you consider raising little Brittney's volume, so we don't have to turn it up to hear her speak, only to quickly turn it down when the clip starts. Thanks.
Affirmative Action Dunces
requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly.
Oh my god - any first year law student could provide better answers than these three.
How old was that Phone and ringer during the Chevron question? Lol
So… was she confirmed? major fail….
I'm not a lawyer, but listening to those answers, these 'judges' seem to be grasping for answers. None of these nominees seem to be very confident in their answers.
Subject-matter jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong. For example, a bankruptcy court has the authority to hear only bankruptcy cases. Similarly, a small claims court has a monetary limit when it comes to awarding money to a plaintiff.
There are seven subject-matter courts in the United States, six Article I and one Article III. These courts differ from federal courts with territorial jurisdiction, like the United States District Court that hears a wide range of cases that come from defined regional areas, in that they are given a defined type of case on which they can rule. It is possible for territorial jurisdiction to be waived and a case to be heard outside of the region it originated in, however subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be waived without nullifying the case. Some examples of federal courts with subject-matter jurisdiction are the Tax Court, Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, Court of Military Commission Review, Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, Court of Federal Claims, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and the Court of International Trade.
Two ways for federal court to gain subject matter jurisdiction are federal question jurisdiction and diversity jurisdiction. A lawsuit must arise under federal, and not state, law in order for a federal court to have federal question jurisdiction. A federal court has diversity jurisdiction if the amount in controversy is over $75,000 and no plaintiff is a citizen of the same state of any defendant.
Substantive due process is a principle in United States constitutional law that allows courts to establish and protect certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if only procedural protections are present or the rights are unenumerated elsewhere in the U.S. Constitution. Courts have asserted that such protections come from the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth amendments to the Constitution, which prohibit the federal and state governments, respectively, from depriving any person of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". Substantive due process demarks the line between those acts that courts hold to be subject to government regulation or legislation and those that courts place beyond the reach of governmental interference. Whether the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendments were intended to serve that function continues to be a matter of scholarly as well as judicial discussion and dissent.
Substantive due process involves determining whether a law is fair or if it violates constitutional protections. Procedural due process is the method of government action or how the law is carried out.
Goodgawd where did they dig up CB?? 😆
wtf they all sound like speedy gonzalez.
When the say thank you of the question,,it means they are not going to answer the question
Kennedy is the best.
18th century gun laws in the 21st century is why the USA is a Third World Country. Sad. Bigly. 🤦🏻♂️
XXVIII AMENDMENT
SECTION 1.
The inalienable right of a free people to be kept safe from gun violence and the fear thereof must not be infringed and shall be protected by the Congress and the States. This Amendment thus repeals and replaces the Second Amendment.
SECTION 2.
Congress shall create a mandatory system of firearm registration and licensing for the following limited purposes: (a) licensed hunters of game; (b) licensed ranges for the sport of target shooting; and (c) for the few who can demonstrate a special need for personal protection.
All who seek a firearm will undergo a strict vetting process with a thorough background check, including the written and confidential approval of family members, spouses and ex-spouses and/or partners and ex-partners, co-workers and neighbors. A mental health check will also be required. There will be a waiting period of one month to complete the full background check.
SECTION 3.
Those who meet all the requirements for the restricted gun owners groups and successfully pass the background check must take a firearms safety class and pass a written test on an annual basis.
SECTION 4.
The minimum age for the restricted groups who can own a firearm is 25 years old. Renewal and review of the firearms license will occur on an annual basis.
SECTION 5.
Congress will stipulate and continually update the limited list of approved firearms for civilian use, including weapons in the future that are not yet invented. The following firearms are heretofore banned:
• All automatic and semi-automatic weapons and all devices which can enable a single-shot gun to fire automatically or semi-automatically;
• Any weapon that can hold more than six bullets or rounds at a time or any magazine that holds more than six bullets;
• All guns made of plastic or any homemade equipment and machinery or a 3D printer that can make a gun or weapon that can take a human life.
SECTION 6.
Congress shall regulate all ammunition, capacity of ammunition, the storage of guns, gun locks, gun sights, body armor and the sale and distribution of such items. No weapons of any kind whose sole intention is the premeditated elimination of human life are considered legal. Congress may create future restrictions as this amendment specifically does not grant any American the “right” to own any weapon.
SECTION 7.
Police who are trained and vetted to use firearms shall be subject to comprehensive and continuous monitoring and shall be dismissed if found to exhibit any racist or violent behavior.
SECTION 8.
Persons already owning any of the above banned firearms, and who do not fall into the legal groups of restricted firearms owners, will have one month from the ratification of this Amendment to turn in their firearms for destruction by local law enforcement. These local authorities may organize a gun buy-back program to assist in this effort.
(The above constitutional amendment was written by Michael Moore of Michigan and presented to the 117th United States Congress on July 11, 2022)
I knew she was going to blow the powers of Congress question
Has the Biden admenstruation nominated an American to any position?
Gotta respect John Kennedy.
Embarrassing.
Subject matter ie constitutional standing
"This nominee looks like
a woman of real "statue"!🤣
"SUBSTANTIVE" DUE PROCESS is PARTICIPATORY. EVERYONE GETS AN OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAR AND SPEAK IN DEFENSE OF THEIR POSITION. PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS IS A "SET" OF "STEPS" THAT MUST BE TAKEN WITHOUT DEVIATION. AND NO ONE GETS THE POWER TO CHANGE THE REQUIRED STEPS, OR THE ORDER IN WHICH THEY MUST BE TAKEN.
"Your Welcome" You already know what it is. lol