@@skm9420 When you're selling snake oil you're allowed make whatever claims you like. Ceramic bearings also don't necessarily last longer as most of them use the same steel races as all steel bearings, which wear faster on ceramic ball bearings. It's mostly serving the world as a means of getting the money from the dentist demographic back circulating in the economy. Have a look at Hambini's channel for a proper discussion of all the market wanketeering related to bearings with plenty of justified swearing. Also you'll hopefully never have the misfortune of buying a Cannondale frame or a SRAM BB after he goes though just how badly the basic engineering is done in these products - I'd add E13 to the list as well - they can't seem to spec a bearing that doesn't seize at the first sight of mud on their BB's or chainguides.
@@peglor Hambini is a bloody hater. He makes good points from time to time, but should better stick to his bottom brackets. He acts as if every engineer but him is a fucking moron and straight up insults entire brands because there was this one time that one of their products had a flaw that caused an issue for ~5 customers.
Hey peeps! First off all massiv thanks for the ton of content you guys put out! So, thanks ladies and gents at pink bike! But one thing to this video in peticular. I can't confirm that stretch on a bike chain is a misconception. They do stretch in length. And it is very obvious that the do. To make it valid i measured it the other day and they stretch quite not only a bit. And the stretch they have is not caused by the wear of the bolts. If someone wrote about the same i am sorry. i have looked for it in the comments. Thanks again! If you want we can talk about it some more.
Love the explainer series! Nice job levy lol I’d like to see a educational video on fork offset. I ride an ibis Ripmo, which we all know was all the hype with the 44mm offset (now yeti is running 42mm offset) but for years the standard was 52mm if I’m not mistaken? I’d just like to know more on the theory behind this. Thanks guys and keep up the good work!
If you're running a small chainring and a long crank (Say 175 mm with a 28T chainring, which has a circumference of 14" (chains have a 0.5" pitch) and a radius of 14"/(2 pi) = 2.23" or 56.5 mm, the law of the lever gives you a 3.09 force multiplication between the pedal force and the chain force), and you weighed 220 lbf (100 kgf or 981 N in non medieval units), you could apply a static load of 3*981 = 3033 N to the chain by putting your whole weight on the lead pedal with the back brake on (Incidentally you can both feel and see chain stretch when you do this, especially if you run a singlespeed where the bottom run of the chain will go visibly slack as the pedals load up - this is elastic stretch though and the chain springs back to its original length as soon as the load is removed - other parts of the bike are bending and stretching to carry this weight too, so less than half the slack you see is likely to be actual chain stretch. A big landing where your lead foot carries your weight onto the freewheel could easily triple this, which believe it or not gets you bang on 9100 N, the lower limit for the tensile strength of the chains in the test quoted in the video, so while normal pedaling will only break a chain if you're a powerlifter running SPDs (Squatting 3 times your bodyweight isn't unheard of in powerlifting circles, especially when you don't have to bend your knee anything like as far as for an actual squat) or the chain is defective (or shifted under load), shock loads can absolutely break perfectly good chains. I should also mention that chain rollers generally don't reduce in diameter as they wear as claimed in the video anything like as significantly as they reduce in thickness, giving the distinctive rattly grinding noise a worn chain makes as the rollers rattle on engaging with the sprocket teeth. This however isn't a problem in wear terms unless the chain pitch also changes. This happens where the chain pin rubs against the inner link plates in the chain, wearing a notch into the chain pin and wearing the inner link plate hole into a slot. Note that only the inner link plate pitch increases as the chain wears as there's no sliding between the outer link plates and the chain pins and therefore no wear. The upshot of this is that if you run an even number of teeth on all sprockets and the chain shifting pattern always puts inner links on the same tooth of every sprocket every time, you can have a drivetrain with every second tooth worn to the new pitch that still runs skip free for much longer than the same setup with odd numbers of sprocket teeth. Also have a look at Shimano's chain wear checker for a tool designed to correctly measure wear on chains by preloading the rollers to get a pin to pin distance rather than almost every other manufacturer's version which measures roller wear and pin to pin changes combined, giving a false impression of the wear level of the chain.
I love videos like this because I've taken chains off my bikes where the chain plates then selves have elongated holes and tears in the steel. Just because it isn't likely you can't say that it's not possible.
If chains dont stretch, how do you explain the chain getting more loose after a while of use on my single speed and my dirt jump bike? Also, chains dont break? Again, on my dirt bike (single speed) my chain cracked multiple times even with no shifts. Might be because it was a halflink chain tho.
The side plates of a chain don't stretch. As explained in the video the bearing points at each end of the links wear, resulting in an effective increase in length. The chain hasn't stretched in the sense that a rubber band might, it has worn, and play the worn links accounts for the increase in length. Similarly the tensile strength of the side plates is way higher than the force that even the beefiest rider could exert. Chains don't break in the sense that there is a structural failure and a part of the chain has actually snapped. Failure is due to a pin pulling out of a side plate. Either due to incorrect assembly (Not uncommon in the past when derailleur chains didn't have quick links. A new chain would be installed by a mechanic using a tool to press the rivet pin into the side plates to join the ends of the chain up. If not done correctly the link at the join may be stiff, or worse the rivet may not be correctly fitted in the side plate and pull out under load.) On modern cycles, all rivets are factory installed and should with near 100% certainty be correctly fitted. As explained in the video rivets can be dislodged by clumsy gear changing under full power, eventually leading to the rivet pulling out of the side plate.
Great video. What about cockpit setup? I know often its personal and it can be a big topic as there are a lot of variables. I run a DH, enduro and an ebike and have improved ride feel on them all by shortening stems, moving and changing seats adding riser bars, changing to One Up carbon bars to eliminate vibration , changing grips, using shimano brakes with good lever ergonomics.etc
Please explain how different rear suspension linkages with the same shock stroke length can end up with different amounts of rear wheel travel and vice versa
This is a wonderful video, and I’m really enjoying this new series of explaining it videos. I have a question for you Mike, do you know is there a way to close a SRAM gold eagle 12 speed chain without using a quick link? I guess I’m asking is there a way to pin it closed.
ASD I believe it works the same with Sram but there is specific joining pins with pointed ends. If you got a new chain they should come in a tiny bag with some standard extra links
Luke Schlieper So my chain broke about 12 links after my split link. I want to put it back together without using a split link again in case it gets screwed up in the derailer
The definition of stretch is "capable of being made longer or wider without tearing or breaking." So despite how it's actually happening, the chain is indeed getting longer - therefore "stretch" is an appropriate adjective to describe what's happening.
From what I heard, the ordinary (what some call a penny farthing) had the huge wheel simply for gearing advantage. Before gears and chains, a bigger wheel meant a faster top speed.
Exactly so. A big wheel meant a bigger (higher) gear thus more speed for the same cadence. On the ordinary cycle, this meant that your gearing was dictated by your inside leg measurement. You could perhaps ride a bike with a smaller gear, although this would effectively make your saddle too low, but there was no way you could ride a higher gear, your feet just wouldn't reach the pedals. Chain drive meant that pedal cranks and drive wheels no longer had to turn at the same speed. We still talk about gearing in terms of the equivalent ordinary cycle front wheel size, (in the UK at least). When we speak of a 100" gear, we mean the the chain ring to sprocket ratio is such that our 700c wheel is effectively multiplied in size to carry us the same distance as a 100" wheel on an ordinary would for each turn of the pedals. (Do you know anyone with a 50"+ inside leg? Me neither!)
Yes the wear on the chain is the bigger issue but all chains do stretch. It is subjected to a force that pulls the chain in an axial direction which strains the material i.e. stretches the chain. Although this number could be very small especially with a higher end chain with harder steel
@Pinkbike... Could you please go into how US import taxes based on wheel size affected the wheel size of your mountain bike? (I will give you a hint here, 29ers didn't get adopted by the bike industry because they roll over obstacles better, they got adopted by bicycle manufaters to get around US import duties on 26" wheels and make more profit per bike.)
Chain drive is also lighter and less expensive than belt or shaft, a big advantge on bicycles. The light weight and efficient power transfer is also why chain drive is the norm on any motorcycle where performance and light weight is important (basically any dirt bike and sport bike), the low cost of chain drive is why it is popular on less expensive motorcycles, it is also much cheaper to fix if something breaks.
I have a question what is the best mtb enduro for jumping and aggressive ride in mountain and all mountain bike under 4000 dollar???? And i want is 2020 or 2019 or 2018 made😊 Please notice this comment
The chain stretch thing was hilarious too. The chain doesn't stretch, it just gets longer. Ehh ok. That's what us dummies call stretching but nvm that.
The thing is with Seth Bike Hacks saying that Box’s prime 9 has a stronger chain than a 12 speed chain, let’s say XX1 Eagle bc of how skinny it is. Who is wrong PB or SBH?
Yes, the plates don't stretch, but pin and roller wear manifest as a chain pitch that measures longer, which looks like, and everyone calls, "stretch". Educating about what causes the "stretch" is fine, but we don't need to abolish the term "chain stretch"
Will stick with chains for my mtb, but love the carbon belt on my daily commute; nearly 14,000km on it and still going strong, no cleaning or lubing needed. Also, got to be honest, the ocd in me cringed when you lubed over the cassette.
Someone could definitely crank 1800lb to a chain. There are leverage ratios with the crank length, so you could cut that in half to 900lb pedal force. Get a big dude and have him stomp on the crank, and he could certainly create a 900lb impact force, an impact force that's liable to snap a chain more readily than a static load. That's considering a perfect straight chainline too.
I would say that my headset is the component I think about the least. Something I never think about until it catastrophically fails (which I don't think has ever happened in the nearly 20 years I've been riding mountain bikes.
Ahh, but apparently you can mix-and-match some chains with different drivetrains: many people run a 12 speed SRAM chain on an 11 speed e*thirteen 9-46 and report better overall shifting and performance. So there!
I’ve run 9-speed chain on 8-speed systems, 10-speed chain on 9-speed. But the reverse cannot be done. In both cases, I’m using down tube or bar-end shifters. And, contrary to the explainer, I like to have a bit of pin outside the plate.
Ive snapped BMX chains. you put down a lot of force with the pedals and gears. Its called a mechanical advantage. so yes you can break chains with your legs.
I'm sick of hearing this, "Chains don't stretch but they get longer with wear." Thank you Mr. Minutiae! At any rate, the chain is longer. So, in other words it stretched! Stretch: To stretch is to extend or lengthen something beyond the normal length
Cool shit, but where is the grim doughnut test ride?
EXACTLY
UA-cam User I CANT WAIT ANY LONGER!
general kenobi
Can you do an Explainer on what the Grim Donut is like to ride?
Seth Aandewiel It is coming soon
@@olliechub7931 but that's not soon enough
no name lol yeah I guess not 😂
LOOKS like a low rider!
more of this, like it a lot
do bearings next, wheel, bb, all of them how they wear, how to maintain, ceramic nonsense etc
Ceramic nonsense? They're not supposed to be more efficient with rolling friction or whatever they just last longer.
@@skm9420 When you're selling snake oil you're allowed make whatever claims you like. Ceramic bearings also don't necessarily last longer as most of them use the same steel races as all steel bearings, which wear faster on ceramic ball bearings. It's mostly serving the world as a means of getting the money from the dentist demographic back circulating in the economy. Have a look at Hambini's channel for a proper discussion of all the market wanketeering related to bearings with plenty of justified swearing. Also you'll hopefully never have the misfortune of buying a Cannondale frame or a SRAM BB after he goes though just how badly the basic engineering is done in these products - I'd add E13 to the list as well - they can't seem to spec a bearing that doesn't seize at the first sight of mud on their BB's or chainguides.
@@peglor Hambini is a bloody hater. He makes good points from time to time, but should better stick to his bottom brackets. He acts as if every engineer but him is a fucking moron and straight up insults entire brands because there was this one time that one of their products had a flaw that caused an issue for ~5 customers.
@@peglor okay
@@peglor sure
Please consider doing an explainer on reading the suspension leverage charts!
when he said "your not putting that out from those little toothpicks" it was like he looked into my soul
Hey peeps! First off all massiv thanks for the ton of content you guys put out! So, thanks ladies and gents at pink bike! But one thing to this video in peticular. I can't confirm that stretch on a bike chain is a misconception. They do stretch in length. And it is very obvious that the do. To make it valid i measured it the other day and they stretch quite not only a bit. And the stretch they have is not caused by the wear of the bolts.
If someone wrote about the same i am sorry. i have looked for it in the comments.
Thanks again!
If you want we can talk about it some more.
Love the detail on this. Thank you. Great video. Love the Canadiana with the Tim Horton's donut box in the background!
Great vid. Absolutely learned something here.
The best chain explanation in 10 minutes!
Great explanation! Love this guy coolness 👍🏼
Thank you I always wanted to know more about chains and what’s going on with them. Great video!
I love this style of story telling. Please do this more
Love the explainer series! Nice job levy lol I’d like to see a educational video on fork offset. I ride an ibis Ripmo, which we all know was all the hype with the 44mm offset (now yeti is running 42mm offset) but for years the standard was 52mm if I’m not mistaken? I’d just like to know more on the theory behind this. Thanks guys and keep up the good work!
If you're running a small chainring and a long crank (Say 175 mm with a 28T chainring, which has a circumference of 14" (chains have a 0.5" pitch) and a radius of 14"/(2 pi) = 2.23" or 56.5 mm, the law of the lever gives you a 3.09 force multiplication between the pedal force and the chain force), and you weighed 220 lbf (100 kgf or 981 N in non medieval units), you could apply a static load of 3*981 = 3033 N to the chain by putting your whole weight on the lead pedal with the back brake on (Incidentally you can both feel and see chain stretch when you do this, especially if you run a singlespeed where the bottom run of the chain will go visibly slack as the pedals load up - this is elastic stretch though and the chain springs back to its original length as soon as the load is removed - other parts of the bike are bending and stretching to carry this weight too, so less than half the slack you see is likely to be actual chain stretch.
A big landing where your lead foot carries your weight onto the freewheel could easily triple this, which believe it or not gets you bang on 9100 N, the lower limit for the tensile strength of the chains in the test quoted in the video, so while normal pedaling will only break a chain if you're a powerlifter running SPDs (Squatting 3 times your bodyweight isn't unheard of in powerlifting circles, especially when you don't have to bend your knee anything like as far as for an actual squat) or the chain is defective (or shifted under load), shock loads can absolutely break perfectly good chains.
I should also mention that chain rollers generally don't reduce in diameter as they wear as claimed in the video anything like as significantly as they reduce in thickness, giving the distinctive rattly grinding noise a worn chain makes as the rollers rattle on engaging with the sprocket teeth. This however isn't a problem in wear terms unless the chain pitch also changes. This happens where the chain pin rubs against the inner link plates in the chain, wearing a notch into the chain pin and wearing the inner link plate hole into a slot. Note that only the inner link plate pitch increases as the chain wears as there's no sliding between the outer link plates and the chain pins and therefore no wear.
The upshot of this is that if you run an even number of teeth on all sprockets and the chain shifting pattern always puts inner links on the same tooth of every sprocket every time, you can have a drivetrain with every second tooth worn to the new pitch that still runs skip free for much longer than the same setup with odd numbers of sprocket teeth.
Also have a look at Shimano's chain wear checker for a tool designed to correctly measure wear on chains by preloading the rollers to get a pin to pin distance rather than almost every other manufacturer's version which measures roller wear and pin to pin changes combined, giving a false impression of the wear level of the chain.
this video is so helpful, i resolved one of my problems with my bike because of this video
I love videos like this because I've taken chains off my bikes where the chain plates then selves have elongated holes and tears in the steel. Just because it isn't likely you can't say that it's not possible.
This is a very engaging topic. hehe see what I did there
If chains dont stretch, how do you explain the chain getting more loose after a while of use on my single speed and my dirt jump bike?
Also, chains dont break? Again, on my dirt bike (single speed) my chain cracked multiple times even with no shifts. Might be because it was a halflink chain tho.
He later explained that the pin holes wallow out, get sloppy, and the chain appears to stretch
The side plates of a chain don't stretch. As explained in the video the bearing points at each end of the links wear, resulting in an effective increase in length. The chain hasn't stretched in the sense that a rubber band might, it has worn, and play the worn links accounts for the increase in length. Similarly the tensile strength of the side plates is way higher than the force that even the beefiest rider could exert. Chains don't break in the sense that there is a structural failure and a part of the chain has actually snapped. Failure is due to a pin pulling out of a side plate. Either due to incorrect assembly (Not uncommon in the past when derailleur chains didn't have quick links. A new chain would be installed by a mechanic using a tool to press the rivet pin into the side plates to join the ends of the chain up. If not done correctly the link at the join may be stiff, or worse the rivet may not be correctly fitted in the side plate and pull out under load.) On modern cycles, all rivets are factory installed and should with near 100% certainty be correctly fitted. As explained in the video rivets can be dislodged by clumsy gear changing under full power, eventually leading to the rivet pulling out of the side plate.
Thanks for the clarification guys. Maybe I shouldve payed more attention x)
is that a yeti in the background? Did Mike get a new job?
Extremely informative 📚
Love the videos keep the good work up👍
Great video. What about cockpit setup? I know often its personal and it can be a big topic as there are a lot of variables. I run a DH, enduro and an ebike and have improved ride feel on them all by shortening stems, moving and changing seats adding riser bars, changing to One Up carbon bars to eliminate vibration , changing grips, using shimano brakes with good lever ergonomics.etc
This was great! Keep it up
I want some of whatever your smoking!😂
Please explain how different rear suspension linkages with the same shock stroke length can end up with different amounts of rear wheel travel and vice versa
Great video, anything from Pinkbike i click
I loved this. Do Spokes next!
a little bit of roadie knowledge - Campagnolo uses different widths to Sram and Shimano
Thank you professor Lewi!
Had a connecting link explode just yesterday! It had been reused several times to accommodate gear ratio changes on my SS CX bike...
So have I. I must’ve bent something or maybe it had to do with it often being muddy or dirty when being disconnected and reinstalled.
This is a wonderful video, and I’m really enjoying this new series of explaining it videos. I have a question for you Mike, do you know is there a way to close a SRAM gold eagle 12 speed chain without using a quick link? I guess I’m asking is there a way to pin it closed.
ASD I believe it works the same with Sram but there is specific joining pins with pointed ends. If you got a new chain they should come in a tiny bag with some standard extra links
You can get golden quick links
Ryan P They’re asking how to do it without a quick link for some reason
Luke Schlieper So my chain broke about 12 links after my split link. I want to put it back together without using a split link again in case it gets screwed up in the derailer
ASD It isn’t the quick links fault, they’re just as strong as the rest of the chain. Use a quick link, it’s worth the ease of taking it off.
Great nuts and bolts topic. So, bottom line - chains do get longer, they just don't "stretch"
Derailleur history would be an awesome topic
The definition of stretch is "capable of being made longer or wider without tearing or breaking." So despite how it's actually happening, the chain is indeed getting longer - therefore "stretch" is an appropriate adjective to describe what's happening.
Why does a bigger chainring have the same effect as a smaller gear in the back??
No mention on x-sync / narrow wide drive train??
do one comparing break fluid and bleeding frequency etc...
From what I heard, the ordinary (what some call a penny farthing) had the huge wheel simply for gearing advantage. Before gears and chains, a bigger wheel meant a faster top speed.
Exactly so. A big wheel meant a bigger (higher) gear thus more speed for the same cadence. On the ordinary cycle, this meant that your gearing was dictated by your inside leg measurement. You could perhaps ride a bike with a smaller gear, although this would effectively make your saddle too low, but there was no way you could ride a higher gear, your feet just wouldn't reach the pedals. Chain drive meant that pedal cranks and drive wheels no longer had to turn at the same speed. We still talk about gearing in terms of the equivalent ordinary cycle front wheel size, (in the UK at least). When we speak of a 100" gear, we mean the the chain ring to sprocket ratio is such that our 700c wheel is effectively multiplied in size to carry us the same distance as a 100" wheel on an ordinary would for each turn of the pedals. (Do you know anyone with a 50"+ inside leg? Me neither!)
The Penny Farthing is the origin of "gear inches."
Yes the wear on the chain is the bigger issue but all chains do stretch. It is subjected to a force that pulls the chain in an axial direction which strains the material i.e. stretches the chain. Although this number could be very small especially with a higher end chain with harder steel
This is amazing and I haven't even watched yet.... Yep I was right... This was fantastic
The part I care least about is the crown race.
actually the water bottle holder bolts :)
great vid. Excellent coverage of the info. Could you please shut that music off! Sounds like a mariachi band on speed
@Pinkbike... Could you please go into how US import taxes based on wheel size affected the wheel size of your mountain bike? (I will give you a hint here, 29ers didn't get adopted by the bike industry because they roll over obstacles better, they got adopted by bicycle manufaters to get around US import duties on 26" wheels and make more profit per bike.)
Chain drive is also lighter and less expensive than belt or shaft, a big advantge on bicycles. The light weight and efficient power transfer is also why chain drive is the norm on any motorcycle where performance and light weight is important (basically any dirt bike and sport bike), the low cost of chain drive is why it is popular on less expensive motorcycles, it is also much cheaper to fix if something breaks.
I have a question what is the best mtb enduro for jumping and aggressive ride in mountain and all mountain bike under 4000 dollar???? And i want is 2020 or 2019 or 2018 made😊
Please notice this comment
What's the tune playing ?
Can we please talk about that groovy music piece at the end of this video?
I care least about my seatpost.
My chain is a 10sp stainless ebike chain.
what brand chain do you have? I'd be surprised if you actually have a stainless steel chain besides not rusting, everything else is a downside.
@@c.j.burtwell8430
Wippermann.
Psyrecx rollers, plates, and pins all stainless?
Psyrecx I’m interested
@@c.j.burtwell8430
Seems to be. Haven't had any rust so far, and I take it out in the snow, still.
The chain stretch thing was hilarious too. The chain doesn't stretch, it just gets longer. Ehh ok. That's what us dummies call stretching but nvm that.
If chains only break because of improper shifting, then why do single speed chains break?
Modern 10s chains break like crazy on dh runs, chain brake wasnt even a problem in the 90s when they ran 7s
The thing is with Seth Bike Hacks saying that Box’s prime 9 has a stronger chain than a 12 speed chain, let’s say XX1 Eagle bc of how skinny it is. Who is wrong PB or SBH?
Yes, the plates don't stretch, but pin and roller wear manifest as a chain pitch that measures longer, which looks like, and everyone calls, "stretch". Educating about what causes the "stretch" is fine, but we don't need to abolish the term "chain stretch"
Who gave him a donut 😆 once he starts you know he can’t stop! #bestpinkbiker
Yeah, right, my brand new chain snapped on me when I did a pedal kick across a gap on my trials bike. Only KMC chains for trials
Will stick with chains for my mtb, but love the carbon belt on my daily commute; nearly 14,000km on it and still going strong, no cleaning or lubing needed.
Also, got to be honest, the ocd in me cringed when you lubed over the cassette.
Someone could definitely crank 1800lb to a chain. There are leverage ratios with the crank length, so you could cut that in half to 900lb pedal force. Get a big dude and have him stomp on the crank, and he could certainly create a 900lb impact force, an impact force that's liable to snap a chain more readily than a static load. That's considering a perfect straight chainline too.
I would say that my headset is the component I think about the least. Something I never think about until it catastrophically fails (which I don't think has ever happened in the nearly 20 years I've been riding mountain bikes.
The repeating siege crossbow was made by the Romans it was a game changer
yeah all good and that but where is the grim donut test!!!
So chains don't stretch but when they wear they become longer? Isn't that the definition of stretching?
The material itself doesnt stretch.
Why not cover your chain?
Will last longer & stay clean, may be a bit difficult to get working, but can be made to work!
The middle screw on my platform pedals
Why are half link chains not used in mountain biking? They're the norm in bmx now
Winter sucks so bad that I'm watching a video about fucking chains!
Grrreat!!!👍👍
Why bicycles are the champions of energy efficiency (calorie unit) of any kind of vehicles or mobility method ?
Great!
my first bikes chain needed 4 links removed to run normily
Ahh, but apparently you can mix-and-match some chains with different drivetrains: many people run a 12 speed SRAM chain on an 11 speed e*thirteen 9-46 and report better overall shifting and performance. So there!
I've heard knowledgeable mechanics say they recommend running 12sp chains on 11 speeds.
FindingaBalance what I’ve done they have better flexibility meaning they have a smoother shift
I’ve run 9-speed chain on 8-speed systems, 10-speed chain on 9-speed. But the reverse cannot be done.
In both cases, I’m using down tube or bar-end shifters.
And, contrary to the explainer, I like to have a bit of pin outside the plate.
Be cool to explain why MTB tyres don't last as long as car tyres but cost the same?
Chain bla bla bla... Where the fuck is the bike from the future part 2 ?!
Funny how this would come up on my phone seeing as mine just snapped on me today 😣😅
so basically what im getting here is you made a twelve minute video explaining how chains stretch.
I only swap quicklinks once the chain is worn, but disasemble as much as i want. NEVER broke a chain
Ive snapped BMX chains. you put down a lot of force with the pedals and gears. Its called a mechanical advantage. so yes you can break chains with your legs.
lets do a drinking game
every time he says 'chain' drink a shot
I'm dead now. thanks
The chain is where all the real tech is on the new super drivetrains. Without the precision shapes they wouldn't work
i dreamt about you, mike levy
People are reporting 12spd Eagle chains work perfectly fine and have a longer life on 11spd drivetrains than the 11spd counterparts.
I want to travel back in time to the streets filled with penny farthings and ride around in a Pinarello but with all the brand logos covered up. 🤣
Ooooh so THAT'S why the chain on my brothers bike disintegrated when I was riding. I was a dumbass.
Twenty years too late, but at least now I know.
10 seconds in, nah buddy I hot wax my chains monthly 😁
Wax lube manufacturers claim oke shouldn't remove excess lube with a rag... I just pinch too fingers and rub them along the chain.
pennyfarthing = the OG mullet bike
watching this with my broken drivetrain
Thanks for dispelling the bullshit that narrow chains are weaker.
Hydraulic brakes, dropper posts, and bb’s
how a chain affects the suspension on a full sus
I do care about my chain a lot. I always forget about bottom bracket and headset 😂😂😂
@@RealMTBAddict no I don't give a shit as I'm a deaf as fuck 😂😂😂😂
nah, that's gonna have to go to my seatpost clamp, or just about all the screws lol.
Chains don't stretch!??
Imagine drivetrain was nit created today and we have to pedal with our front wheel
I'm sick of hearing this, "Chains don't stretch but they get longer with wear." Thank you Mr. Minutiae! At any rate, the chain is longer. So, in other words it stretched!
Stretch: To stretch is to extend or lengthen something beyond the normal length
But how does it work tho??
I run my chain until it looks nasty. then i toss it and get a new one. Probably like 2 chains a summer
When you snap a single speed chain, it’s all in the legs. 💪🏽
..so a chain does lengthen, not stretch ;D
That's not how Ice Cube got his chain snatched.