THANK YOU! Great episode. After a near 25-year hiatus, I started mountain biking again. (Didn’t realize how much I’d missed it. Loving it.) As you can imagine, A LOT has changed; including terms used, varying types of MTBs, components, and more. This episode has provided me with clarity needed.
The seat tube angle has little to nothing to do with taking weight off your hands. That's literally nothing more than where the seat is located in relation to the handlebar & wheels. Rather, the seat tube angle affects how the location of the saddle changes _as you adjust the height of the seatpost_ .
3:55 Yeah I have a flexible BB on my bike, it's the square tapered BB that came with it... I can literally see it flexing from side to side when applying force lol
How about a video about different suspension linkages. Does the shock placement have any real difference? For example Canyon Neuron 2019, AL vs CF. AL has bottom mounted shock, CF has top tube mounted.
17:47 so actually when 29" started it was only 26 existing which usually had around 1.5inch=38mm fork offset. 29 usually had around 2inch=51mm fork offset. so then came 27.5 to split the difference in the middle and it usually had around 1.75inch=44mm fork offset.
I don't know how you make me listen to such a boring subject so intently. You have helped me as a beginner rider with so many of your videos, you and your team. Thank you! I ride a 2015 Diamondback SYNC'R with a 4" bar rise built up an old proflex 96 with a 1x10 as well as a 4"bar rise and I even got the wife out there with me an a 2018 GT aggressor with new hydraulic breaks bar riser pedals upgraded rotors mig shift 1x7 which when I get the money will become a 1x10 and I learned almost all I needed through this channel!! Thanks guys and ride on!
I've been waiting for a comprehensive video like this for so long. Thank you gmbn tech! I love the quick bike anatomy explanation at the beginning. Perfect video to send to friends when they ask about what effects certain measurements have, half the time I never even know myself haha.
Make a video about fitting the mountain bike for really tall riders. In some countries it's not easy to find frames bigger than 21", which is not enough for guys >2m tall. There's no video like that on YT, so it will be great to hear some tips how to make 21" bike feels comfortable. PS. Another great video. Great job guys 💪
This is the video I needed. I am still riding an old DiamondBack Sorrento from around 2003, old school, so know I have an idea on replacement! Now for frame size for my 6'1" and 33 inch inseam. Note, I have monkey arms, I always need 34/35 arms in dress shirts.
Thanks for this video, great and simple explanation about different parts of geometry, there's not that many good vids like this out there so definitely something that was needed.
I came to your channel to search for orientation regarding a vintage bike called the Cannondale M800 Beast of the East. The Beast’s frame has a sloping top tube, a high bottom bracket and a very short seat tube. I guess that the next step is actually riding in one. I come from a Cannondale M400 which has a traditional top tube, with minor sloping. Later I purchased a used AMP Research B4 bike and upgraded the rear damper with Risse air and oil unit. But I never evolved to more expensive and modern bikes and long for this M800. Thanks for the clarification of the elements of the bike!
Thanks. That was awesome. Clear explanations of what the measurements are and how they affect the bike. Was always confused about what exactly offset and trail were.
Just getting back in to cycling.... just found this ENGLISH channel .... FANTASTIC !.... really helpful info. really easy to understand , great presentation THANK YOU ... I just subscribed !
Nice accurate info my dude!!!!! Yeap, and let me just say that trail angles can change how a bike feels almost more than a frame being a little too long or short. When I raced BMX I had an XL frame, but ran with a fork that had the axle at the bottom centre of the fork tubes, not in front. So I had better stability in the frame with quick steering! Got me a trophy at Bexhill back in the day! 😎
They should provide a range of numbers for each key geometry spec, and describe how those ranges change between riding style (XC, Trail, etc) and frame size (S, M, L, ...).
Great video that takes some of the myths and headaches out of all the number crunching you seem to have to be able to do before committing to a certain size bike. Perfectly explained, great stuff!!
Not that any of these measurements wouldn't make a difference to different riding disciplines, but how long ago did manufacture start advertising the engineers notes??? Seems like a mind boggling amount of different things to keep track of vs what your realistically thinking of when one would buy a new or used offroad motorcycle. In any case, I always appreciate a rather diligent effort to make info like this digestible. Top notch content!
Bravo! I've long wondered about most of this, and wasn't even aware of some of it. Fascinating stuff. And as others have said, an explanation of differences in suspension design would be most welcome too. Thanks for pulling this together.
Great video. I'm 60 and was riding a Norco Sasquatch back in the early 80s and touring and mountain biking since then. Do I say this to pontificate with my superior knowledge about bike geometry? Not at all! Until this video I have basically been a geometry illiterate and ibnorance has been bliss. I remember putting a suspension fork on a late 90s rigid Cannondale CAAD 600 back in the early 2000s and the LBS guy telling me it would change the bike geometry. I thought "WTF are you jabbering about?!?!" Even with upgrading bikes over the years I just thought this was mumbo jumbo and happily went flying over my handlebars thinking this was expected. Finally, started to clue in it all wasn't just propaganda a couple years ago when I bought a drop bar mountain/adventure bike (Salsa Fargo) that could alternate between fixed fork and suspension with specific specs. This video would have helped me in cobbling together the rudimentary understanding I now have of bike geometry. Any young whippersnappers out there that are poo-pooing this knowledge, listen to the man.
Some manufacturers like Trek, sometimes list geometry at 30% sag for full-suspension bikes. That makes sense, because on hardtail head angle steepens when you start pedalling in normal position, and on full-suspension it actually slackens. So why doesn't every manufacturer provide that info?
Awesome video with important information! Try to do a video for building a new bike from scratch. How to choose the right combination of components according to the measurements of your bike, like crank size, Chainline or the Offset, Suspension travel and Installation height for forks etc. Things that someone has to keep in mind, before buy components and other stuff for his bike. Things that are vital for the stability and geometry. For example when I bought my "unknown" MTB frame from China, it came with the plan of the frame and its measurements. So I had to search a lot on the internet, for information about all the parts of the bike, and then choose the right ones. The thing is that UA-cam is full with videos of "how to replace this", "how to maintain that", but not with videos of how to choose the right fork, crankset and other things, especially when you don't have the old component to compare with.
I still prefer to measure the bike by going by the length of the top tube not by the reach. When I am sitting it is supposed to be comfortable and while I am standing I am supposed to be agile and move around.
@@smalerider1727 I agree as well. It was a bit of a disservice of him to say ETT isn't really important. I feel it's more important than reach. Especially with these steep seat tube angle bikes, if they don't make the reach absolutely huge by old standards, the bike is way too short. It's all preferences and how you ride, but I ride in the saddle probably 80% of the time. It's hard to argue I should size the bike for only 20% of my ride, but that's the going advice these days...
Probably reach is more important for enduro/DH riders where you car about descending and not really on the seat pedaling... I kind of agree about ETT or TT measurement thought... it is probably the first impression if the bike is small or large. Stack is a good one! I never knew I loved a large stack just makes you feel more like in a BMX to me. Shame you are pedal strike prone
True, but you can adjust the seated length of the bike with Saddle adjustment, offset seapost and stem length but the standing reach (ie weight distribution between the wheels when standing) is set by the geometry.
Extremely detailed video, but in my opinion, still one often neglected but important element is missing which affects not only to comfort, but to stability and (should be) to drive setup: the Q-factor.
Nice video and very informativ, I´m a XC rider, but is good to know that kind of information!!......I love your show, keep up like this and please include more videos and info about XC bikes and races!!!!.....(I`m a big fan of your show)
Best geometry analysis I've seen on the web. However, stack is absolutely critical for XC. High bars suck for climbing, especially on 29ers where you're already higher above the ground. It's taken manufacturers too long to figure this out.
Fantastic , Layman's explanation for what really seems complicated till watching this , although I am going to have to watch this about 20 times to take it all in. 10/10 on this one Dodsters . What I would like to watch now is put a trail bike beside an All mountain or cross country and physically show the difference and why as well as you did in this video. You can skip the gravel bike unless Martyn wants todo it . HaHaHa . I think he's an anti gravel bike guy.
Great video, very informative, and explained a few things I didn't know, and confirmed a few I suspected. I'd like to know some example of "average" and greater / lesser extremes of these dimensions in your next videos: what constitutes a short or long length or tight / wide angle for example. Keep up the good work :)
If you count the welds as gussets then it could be considered a double blunt ended shallow cut diamond frame. Still, these guys are very entertaining and informative. I wouldn't have looked it up had they not made the mistake :)
OK - I think I figured it out by connecting the dots. You get 5 points on the side view of a "Double Diamond"frame - front and rear hubs, headtube junction, BB, and the seattube-toptube-seatstay junction. The 1st diamond is the one we see clearly in metal - seatstays > toptube >downtube > chainstays. The SECOND diamond in the "double-diamond" construction includes one line that doesn't exist in metal, but is critical to modern geometry. It goes like this: seattube > toptube > FORK LEGS > "missing link". So there's the forward-leaning obvious frame diamond, and a second rear-leaning diamond with a missing bottom line that connects the front hub and BB. What? Ok so - imagine a Penny Farthing. Huge front wheel, tiny back wheel, and no chain - the pedals are mounted directly to the front hub. You can't draw that second diamond because there's only 4 total points. Later than the penny farthing you got bikes with equal wheel sizes, but still pedals directly on the front hub - no double diamond. It was only when someone moved the pedals out with the chain drive that we got the 5th point to connect and the modern bicycle. That invisible bottom line in the 2nd diamond is what makes bikes work the way it does, with stable rear for smooth power application and power disconnected from leading-wheel steering = nimble, controllable turns.
Great video! Well explained. Only critique is I wish you would have shown the chain stay length and front center measurements as center BB to center axle as they are measured and not horizontal projection onto the ground. When you do your video on fork trail please remember the potential massive effect the trail can have when leaning the bike and not just riding it straight up.
Nooooooooooo! Hehehe, go 26" fat!!!!!!! That way you get to stay with the old faithful 26ers but experience big tire diameters at the same time. Oh and everybody wants to stop and talk about your spectacular FAT TIRES!!👍 😁😁
Doddy great segment. You spoke about muscle useage briefly with the seat angle. I’m thinking there could be a segment on muscle useage, injury, and setting the bike up to compensate or fit a rider carrying a semi-permanent or permanent injury better e.g. lower back, knee or shoulder. Thanks Jezza.
I am old school. I had a Z1 on a GT LTS Carbon and it was slow responding. Almost chopper like. I moved to a hard tail GT Xizang with a much shorter shock which gave me the best ride. It climbed like a goat just a little small for me so I got a custom fit Seven Cycles Sola. and put a Marzoch Marathon on it 2000 era. But it is still with me, it climbs really really well, it went down as good. But the primary ride was about an hour climb then about 2 hour down so the climb comfort up front was important for enjoyment of the ride.
I had a Schwinn Homegrown, climbed nicely but was it was nervous on the downhill. Also have a Turner Flux that did'nt climb as well bus was fast on the downhill.
Nice vid! Been waiting for this. An idea for a video could be the different stresses that each part takes and has to accommodate. Maybe another one about advances in or about experimental geometry.
So as head angles get slacker the wheelbase gets larger, which then make the bike longer for handling in switchbacks. Especially when climbing and riding technical stuff. And I agree with the comment that although reach is important, a long virtual top tube may not be comfortable on longer rides. We don’t only do technical riding...
19 minutes about geometry. Doddy and the team have outdone themselves!
Awesome!
Was it useful for you?
Absolutely useful. Added to my UA-cam Favorites short list.
Yes!!!! I'm off to buy a new bike tomorrow, so it was
.brilliant to receive this important information
Beforehand !! THANKS GUYS!!! 😀
I feel so privileged that the Dodster has taken time out of his hair modelling career to explain MTB geometry to us!
I really am LAUGHING OUT LOUD
And imagine David Schwimmer is there with him.
His hair is as stiff as a porn stars micky.
top tube? you probably meant nutcracker.
lol
Hell yes
@@Shpektrometer and God help those with large undercarriage
LOL
I actually saw a bicycle brand called nutcracker and it had that written on the top tube :D
THANK YOU! Great episode. After a near 25-year hiatus, I started mountain biking again. (Didn’t realize how much I’d missed it. Loving it.) As you can imagine, A LOT has changed; including terms used, varying types of MTBs, components, and more. This episode has provided me with clarity needed.
Now I need a vid explaining all the different types of suspension linkage and how they behave (VPP, DW, DELTA, etc)
The seat tube angle has little to nothing to do with taking weight off your hands. That's literally nothing more than where the seat is located in relation to the handlebar & wheels. Rather, the seat tube angle affects how the location of the saddle changes _as you adjust the height of the seatpost_ .
Absolute hero of an episode. We've all been waiting ever since that ask GMBN ep a few months ago
Best geometry explain ever!!
3:55 Yeah I have a flexible BB on my bike, it's the square tapered BB that came with it...
I can literally see it flexing from side to side when applying force lol
How about a video about different suspension linkages. Does the shock placement have any real difference?
For example Canyon Neuron 2019, AL vs CF. AL has bottom mounted shock, CF has top tube mounted.
This please!!
Horst four-point or four-bar rear suspension. Look up Turner bikes.
Merida/Centurion LRS and GT I-drive also was some interesting cookies.
Would be nice to see one retrospective about various soft-tails too.
Yeah that would be really cool. DW Link-Horst-VPP-all the other fun stuff out there. So many cool options these days...
Hi guys how about 26ers frame with 27.5 front fork and 27.5 wheel set?
17:47 so actually when 29" started it was only 26 existing which usually had around 1.5inch=38mm fork offset. 29 usually had around 2inch=51mm fork offset. so then came 27.5 to split the difference in the middle and it usually had around 1.75inch=44mm fork offset.
I don't know how you make me listen to such a boring subject so intently. You have helped me as a beginner rider with so many of your videos, you and your team. Thank you! I ride a 2015 Diamondback SYNC'R with a 4" bar rise built up an old proflex 96 with a 1x10 as well as a 4"bar rise and I even got the wife out there with me an a 2018 GT aggressor with new hydraulic breaks bar riser pedals upgraded rotors mig shift 1x7 which when I get the money will become a 1x10 and I learned almost all I needed through this channel!!
Thanks guys and ride on!
I've been waiting for a comprehensive video like this for so long. Thank you gmbn tech! I love the quick bike anatomy explanation at the beginning. Perfect video to send to friends when they ask about what effects certain measurements have, half the time I never even know myself haha.
Make a video about fitting the mountain bike for really tall riders. In some countries it's not easy to find frames bigger than 21", which is not enough for guys >2m tall. There's no video like that on YT, so it will be great to hear some tips how to make 21" bike feels comfortable.
PS. Another great video. Great job guys 💪
You have made it so much easier for me to understand the dynamics that go into my bike. Thank you for the great information!
This is the video I needed. I am still riding an old DiamondBack Sorrento from around 2003, old school, so know I have an idea on replacement! Now for frame size for my 6'1" and 33 inch inseam. Note, I have monkey arms, I always need 34/35 arms in dress shirts.
Finally a step by step explanation. Most appreciated
I've been waiting for this video without knowing it! Really helpful to know the anticipated handling changes with changes in geometry.
You are a good teacher, I have learned more on bike than I have learnt my whole life, thanks you
I knew all this, but it really made me think about how hard it is to end up with the perfect combination.
Probably one of if not the most helpful MTB vids I’ve seen. Keep up the great work guys!
Thanks for this video, great and simple explanation about different parts of geometry, there's not that many good vids like this out there so definitely something that was needed.
super informative and very clearly presented, big thumbs up!
Really help full video thank you for explaining the confusing nomenclature easily.
Great video Doddy. Been biking for over 35 years and I can honestly say I learned a couple things. Well done sir
Knowledge is a weapon.
GMBN..🙌
This was so helpful, I wondered what all these terms were and how to apply it to riding, now I can. Good speaker too.
This is really helpful, thanks. I paused a lot and took notes. About to buy a new bike and the jargon blows my mind.
I’ve been riding for over 30 years and l’ve learnt so much. Thanks. Brill explanation
I came to your channel to search for orientation regarding a vintage bike called the Cannondale M800 Beast of the East. The Beast’s frame has a sloping top tube, a high bottom bracket and a very short seat tube. I guess that the next step is actually riding in one. I come from a Cannondale M400 which has a traditional top tube, with minor sloping. Later I purchased a used AMP Research B4 bike and upgraded the rear damper with Risse air and oil unit. But I never evolved to more expensive and modern bikes and long for this M800. Thanks for the clarification of the elements of the bike!
GMBN has risen to the top of online MTB publications - just exceptional! Thanks!!
Thanks. That was awesome. Clear explanations of what the measurements are and how they affect the bike. Was always confused about what exactly offset and trail were.
We have an explanation of Low vs. High trail with relation to road and gravel bikes. ua-cam.com/video/L0Kt-c8fG3M/v-deo.html
Just getting back in to cycling.... just found this ENGLISH channel .... FANTASTIC !.... really helpful info. really easy to understand , great presentation THANK YOU ... I just subscribed !
Great to hear Carl!
Nice accurate info my dude!!!!! Yeap, and let me just say that trail angles can change how a bike feels almost more than a frame being a little too long or short. When I raced BMX I had an XL frame, but ran with a fork that had the axle at the bottom centre of the fork tubes, not in front. So I had better stability in the frame with quick steering! Got me a trophy at Bexhill back in the day! 😎
This is outstanding, guys!
Top quality video, thank you!
Brilliant explanation of mtb geometry, the best I've seen.
Thank you.
They should provide a range of numbers for each key geometry spec, and describe how those ranges change between riding style (XC, Trail, etc) and frame size (S, M, L, ...).
I really like the presenter, very clear and concise
Thanks for this, very informative, I have not measured myself up for a bike since the early 90's and things appear to have changed!
This is truly excellent. I feel like Neo from the matrix when he finally realised there is no spoon!! 🥄
That's true because for half the viewers on this channel there is no bike
This is the greatest informational mountain biking video ever made.
Great video that takes some of the myths and headaches out of all the number crunching you seem to have to be able to do before committing to a certain size bike. Perfectly explained, great stuff!!
Not that any of these measurements wouldn't make a difference to different riding disciplines, but how long ago did manufacture start advertising the engineers notes??? Seems like a mind boggling amount of different things to keep track of vs what your realistically thinking of when one would buy a new or used offroad motorcycle. In any case, I always appreciate a rather diligent effort to make info like this digestible. Top notch content!
As a carpenter, that has never got to use that laser level Christmas gift - I finally have a use for it 😬
Great video Doddy! Looking forward to the up coming info.
My 2008 Scott Genius has a nice high BB, especially when I threw a 160mm fork on it... I love its ride now
Bravo! I've long wondered about most of this, and wasn't even aware of some of it. Fascinating stuff. And as others have said, an explanation of differences in suspension design would be most welcome too. Thanks for pulling this together.
Great video. I'm 60 and was riding a Norco Sasquatch back in the early 80s and touring and mountain biking since then. Do I say this to pontificate with my superior knowledge about bike geometry? Not at all! Until this video I have basically been a geometry illiterate and ibnorance has been bliss. I remember putting a suspension fork on a late 90s rigid Cannondale CAAD 600 back in the early 2000s and the LBS guy telling me it would change the bike geometry. I thought "WTF are you jabbering about?!?!" Even with upgrading bikes over the years I just thought this was mumbo jumbo and happily went flying over my handlebars thinking this was expected. Finally, started to clue in it all wasn't just propaganda a couple years ago when I bought a drop bar mountain/adventure bike (Salsa Fargo) that could alternate between fixed fork and suspension with specific specs. This video would have helped me in cobbling together the rudimentary understanding I now have of bike geometry. Any young whippersnappers out there that are poo-pooing this knowledge, listen to the man.
This is a FANTASTIC video! I learned SO MUCH! thank you for making it!
Some manufacturers like Trek, sometimes list geometry at 30% sag for full-suspension bikes. That makes sense, because on hardtail head angle steepens when you start pedalling in normal position, and on full-suspension it actually slackens. So why doesn't every manufacturer provide that info?
Awesome video with important information! Try to do a video for building a new bike from scratch. How to choose the right combination of components according to the measurements of your bike, like crank size, Chainline or the Offset, Suspension travel and Installation height for forks etc. Things that someone has to keep in mind, before buy components and other stuff for his bike. Things that are vital for the stability and geometry.
For example when I bought my "unknown" MTB frame from China, it came with the plan of the frame and its measurements. So I had to search a lot on the internet, for information about all the parts of the bike, and then choose the right ones.
The thing is that UA-cam is full with videos of "how to replace this", "how to maintain that", but not with videos of how to choose the right fork, crankset and other things, especially when you don't have the old component to compare with.
Clear simple vid doddy, great job. Clear graphics, well done to the doodler with white pen!
I still prefer to measure the bike by going by the length of the top tube not by the reach. When I am sitting it is supposed to be comfortable and while I am standing I am supposed to be agile and move around.
Pillokun I agree, but our opinion about geo might be seen as antiquated
@ Ride Alongside How do you pedal a bike? EET is very much relevant and should be the first measurement considered.
@@smalerider1727 I agree as well. It was a bit of a disservice of him to say ETT isn't really important. I feel it's more important than reach. Especially with these steep seat tube angle bikes, if they don't make the reach absolutely huge by old standards, the bike is way too short. It's all preferences and how you ride, but I ride in the saddle probably 80% of the time. It's hard to argue I should size the bike for only 20% of my ride, but that's the going advice these days...
Probably reach is more important for enduro/DH riders where you car about descending and not really on the seat pedaling... I kind of agree about ETT or TT measurement thought... it is probably the first impression if the bike is small or large. Stack is a good one! I never knew I loved a large stack just makes you feel more like in a BMX to me. Shame you are pedal strike prone
True, but you can adjust the seated length of the bike with Saddle adjustment, offset seapost and stem length but the standing reach (ie weight distribution between the wheels when standing) is set by the geometry.
Brilliant video. One of the most helpful I've found for mountain bikes.
Excellent 101 start video with explanations! Provided new information for my understanding of current designs. Thank You!
you guys should make a video of the different kind of angles and what angles are for different types of mtb
Very comprehensive Doddy, nice one.
Extremely detailed video, but in my opinion, still one often neglected but important element is missing which affects not only to comfort, but to stability and (should be) to drive setup: the Q-factor.
Thanks, Doddy, that was the best intro to geometry I've seen. Bookmarked.
I am just now getting into mountain biking. Very informational.
Great to hear Daniel :)
I waited so long for a video like that! Now i finally understand what it could mean if you talk about some measurements in a bike check...
Excellent explanation. Thank you.👍
Glad you liked it!
Great video and information, Doddy! Of course, I’ll need to watch it a few times to let it sink in. 👌
smartest guy on gmbn...maybe youtube...maybe the world!
I always liked geometry discussions. Whether motorcycle or bicycle.
Fantastic video, very helpful. Thank you!
Very informative. Thx, Doddy!
Great work Doddy. Finally I have a bit of an idea what the geometry of a bike is. Thanks.
I am into stingray chopper models as i feel they are important because for general people such a frame is ideal
Cleanest shop ever!
Nice video and very informativ, I´m a XC rider, but is good to know that kind of information!!......I love your show, keep up like this and please include more videos and info about XC bikes and races!!!!.....(I`m a big fan of your show)
Great info and great way to show measurements. Helps alot when looking at a new bike for sizing or ordering a bike online. Thanks
Do you think when Doddy said "If you're the type of person, who likes to Manual a lot".............. He was thinking about Blake?
They usually mention Blake when talking about durability haha
Best geometry analysis I've seen on the web. However, stack is absolutely critical for XC. High bars suck for climbing, especially on 29ers where you're already higher above the ground. It's taken manufacturers too long to figure this out.
Fantastic , Layman's explanation for what really seems complicated till watching this , although I am going to have to watch this about 20 times to take it all in. 10/10 on this one Dodsters . What I would like to watch now is put a trail bike beside an All mountain or cross country and physically show the difference and why as well as you did in this video. You can skip the gravel bike unless Martyn wants todo it . HaHaHa . I think he's an anti gravel bike guy.
Thank you - excellent explanation, so clear and easy to follow.
Great video, very informative, and explained a few things I didn't know, and confirmed a few I suspected.
I'd like to know some example of "average" and greater / lesser extremes of these dimensions in your next videos: what constitutes a short or long length or tight / wide angle for example.
Keep up the good work :)
It's just diamond frame... there's one diamond. There are two triangles though.
🤣
Yip yip yip yip, uhuh, uhuh.
If you count the welds as gussets then it could be considered a double blunt ended shallow cut diamond frame. Still, these guys are very entertaining and informative. I wouldn't have looked it up had they not made the mistake :)
OK - I think I figured it out by connecting the dots. You get 5 points on the side view of a "Double Diamond"frame - front and rear hubs, headtube junction, BB, and the seattube-toptube-seatstay junction.
The 1st diamond is the one we see clearly in metal - seatstays > toptube >downtube > chainstays.
The SECOND diamond in the "double-diamond" construction includes one line that doesn't exist in metal, but is critical to modern geometry. It goes like this: seattube > toptube > FORK LEGS > "missing link".
So there's the forward-leaning obvious frame diamond, and a second rear-leaning diamond with a missing bottom line that connects the front hub and BB. What? Ok so - imagine a Penny Farthing. Huge front wheel, tiny back wheel, and no chain - the pedals are mounted directly to the front hub. You can't draw that second diamond because there's only 4 total points. Later than the penny farthing you got bikes with equal wheel sizes, but still pedals directly on the front hub - no double diamond. It was only when someone moved the pedals out with the chain drive that we got the 5th point to connect and the modern bicycle. That invisible bottom line in the 2nd diamond is what makes bikes work the way it does, with stable rear for smooth power application and power disconnected from leading-wheel steering = nimble, controllable turns.
Not good when somebody wants to teach us about geometry, but does not know the difference between a triangle and a diamond. :-(
Great video! Well explained. Only critique is I wish you would have shown the chain stay length and front center measurements as center BB to center axle as they are measured and not horizontal projection onto the ground.
When you do your video on fork trail please remember the potential massive effect the trail can have when leaning the bike and not just riding it straight up.
Really useful video, particularly as I am just about to move from an old 26” bike to something more modern.
Nooooooooooo!
Hehehe, go 26" fat!!!!!!! That way you get to stay with the old faithful 26ers but experience big tire diameters at the same time. Oh and everybody wants to stop and talk about your spectacular FAT TIRES!!👍 😁😁
Really helpful video. Thing's became clear🎉
Nice work, Doddy. Frame geometry- I especially like the explanations and name origins.
Doddy great segment. You spoke about muscle useage briefly with the seat angle. I’m thinking there could be a segment on muscle useage, injury, and setting the bike up to compensate or fit a rider carrying a semi-permanent or permanent injury better e.g. lower back, knee or shoulder. Thanks Jezza.
Very informative. Thanks!
Very insightful and informative video. Thank you
I am old school. I had a Z1 on a GT LTS Carbon and it was slow responding. Almost chopper like. I moved to a hard tail GT Xizang with a much shorter shock which gave me the best ride. It climbed like a goat just a little small for me so I got a custom fit Seven Cycles Sola. and put a Marzoch Marathon on it 2000 era. But it is still with me, it climbs really really well, it went down as good. But the primary ride was about an hour climb then about 2 hour down so the climb comfort up front was important for enjoyment of the ride.
I had a Schwinn Homegrown, climbed nicely but was it was nervous on the downhill. Also have a Turner Flux that did'nt climb as well bus was fast on the downhill.
My new favorite video.. Well done folks..
love this..Answered alot of question about modern geometry
Great informative video - well explained. Thanks
love that park tool set up behind you! thanks for the vids!
Nice vid! Been waiting for this.
An idea for a video could be the different stresses that each part takes and has to accommodate. Maybe another one about advances in or about experimental geometry.
VERY GOOOD!!! Thumps up!
Thank you! Easy to understand and good information.
Thanks for the informative video. I'm more of an urban rider than trails. But, this was very informative. Keep up the good work.
So as head angles get slacker the wheelbase gets larger, which then make the bike longer for handling in switchbacks. Especially when climbing and riding technical stuff.
And I agree with the comment that although reach is important, a long virtual top tube may not be comfortable on longer rides. We don’t only do technical riding...
I feel like I'm going to school and doddy is my teacher 😃
izat samian and it is becoming my favorite class of the day! 😉
Great video again
Jeez - this video is so long overdue - thanks for doing it. Things make sense now
Superb Video .. Thanks a ton ..
this channel is so amazing, thx guys!!