FSU Law Professor Murder Trial Magbanua Defense Closing Argument Part 2

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 62

  • @susanmarquez1109
    @susanmarquez1109 4 роки тому +18

    The defense lawyer is incredibly good, very reasonable presentation

    • @thunderbirdmessenger2813
      @thunderbirdmessenger2813 2 роки тому +2

      He sucks, but maybe it's all he's got to work with.

    • @artieborko4988
      @artieborko4988 Рік тому +1

      @@thunderbirdmessenger2813 he most definitely doesn’t suck. He made a few missteps, sure, but mostly with regard to his pushing the envelope with decorum and respect to the court/judge in some of his cross examinations. He was out of line on more than one occasion, and deserved to be harshly admonished for it, which he seemed to have dodged. Very patient judge, it seems.
      But he has, for the most part, nothing to work with. It’s just a tough case. So looking at it from that light, or if you or I were his client- I’d say I’d want the same vim and vigor from my defense attorney.

  • @nancymcdermott5795
    @nancymcdermott5795 4 роки тому +17

    Very unfortunate that Katie didn't think this through. Katie was living poorly & she stumbled upon a millionaire. She wasnt thinking prison she was thinking MONEY. But because Wendi, DONNA &Charlie set her up so they should also go to prison. Get the Adelsons.

    • @my1vice
      @my1vice 2 роки тому +7

      More than likely, Charlie knew about her gangster "husband" before he started paying attention to her in 2013. That was right after Wendi lost her relocation hearing with Danny.
      Kaddie got played. She's guilty.... But she got played.

    • @juanacastillo7154
      @juanacastillo7154 Рік тому +1

      no one force any one to commit murder, they all agreed and all of them needs to be indicted for murder, life in prison No Parole. period. imo

    • @imaeema3784
      @imaeema3784 Рік тому

      @@my1vice I feel for the Markel kids as well as Katies kids. Katie should have gone to the Police when Charlie approached her about hiring a hitman.

  • @urbanlumberjack
    @urbanlumberjack 5 років тому +20

    Fantastic channel! Love seeing the different trials and real life court proceedings.

  • @bungylove9047
    @bungylove9047 4 роки тому +15

    You are a class act, good presentation but you have not convinced me that Kathrine did not know anything....she seems to still be the link.

    • @sarahlu7797
      @sarahlu7797 2 роки тому +2

      Exactly. She's definitely guilty

    • @thunderbirdmessenger2813
      @thunderbirdmessenger2813 2 роки тому +2

      He's the only good lawyer on the case, he just doesn't have a case to work with.

  • @sassydezines4460
    @sassydezines4460 4 роки тому +20

    Magbanua is clearly the connection. She is just as guilty.

  • @aslek1yels
    @aslek1yels Рік тому +5

    He’s really well spoken and his closing argument sounded really good but it didn’t convince me she’s innocent. I want to see the Adelsons pay for this too. So glad to see they have Charlie adelson now.

    • @artieborko4988
      @artieborko4988 Рік тому +3

      Yeah, lots of bluster, little substance. But in his defense, no pun intended, he doesn’t have much in the way of a defendable position to work from, either.
      With that said, I think he did a fantastic job working with what he had.

    • @wildmercuryfilms
      @wildmercuryfilms Рік тому

      @@artieborko4988He succeeded. His defense led to a mistrial.
      Any trial which ends in anything other than a GUILTY verdict is a win to the defense.
      I don’t know if he was the attorney for the second trial where she was found guilty.

  • @indaybyahera5847
    @indaybyahera5847 4 роки тому +12

    *SHE IS BEYOND GUILTY AND ALL ADELSON FAMILY DESERVES IN JAIL FOR LIFE*

  • @ididntknowthat059
    @ididntknowthat059 4 роки тому +10

    He’s a great lawyer clear concise and too the point that’s what I like to see, no showboating from him facts..... and it’s goodnight Irene!!!! Katherine Not Guilty for sure.

    • @thunderbirdmessenger2813
      @thunderbirdmessenger2813 2 роки тому +2

      Again...he sucks, but maybe it's all he's got to work with.

    • @wildmercuryfilms
      @wildmercuryfilms Рік тому +1

      @@ninachandler9890
      Wrong!!! His defense led to a mistrial.
      Anything but a GUILTY verdict is a WIN to the defense.
      She lost the next trial, but I don’t know if he was the attorney.

    • @GA-fz2wt
      @GA-fz2wt Рік тому +1

      @@wildmercuryfilms same lawyers again when she was found Guilty.

  • @othertalk3313
    @othertalk3313 3 роки тому +6

    "There is no amount of money you could pay a mother of 2 to risk never seeing her kids again."
    - Technically, that is half true. Many mothers give up their kids for $0 and a guarantee they'll never see them again. It's called a closed adoption. So, that $0 is "no amount of money" but there are also many mothers who actually do sell their kids. I'm only bringing this up because I think it's stupid how much emotional nonsense gets thrown in to opening/closing arguments that would never be allowed during the trial itself. Another example is the obviously false story about the bullseye arrows on the side of a barn that this defense attorney told the jury in Part 1. That never happened. He may have believed his father when he was told that story as a child, but he's smart enough to know now that the story is allegorical and not factual.

    • @michellegrant6476
      @michellegrant6476 3 роки тому +2

      There is no amount of money an active, engaged, caring, loving mother would take and sacrifice never seeing her children by means of going to prison for life.

    • @carlmorgan8452
      @carlmorgan8452 2 роки тому

      Clear and convincing evidence ...... --- without a doubt --- wouldn't want to be part of the jury !

    • @thunderbirdmessenger2813
      @thunderbirdmessenger2813 2 роки тому

      Some will kill for money, she's one.

  • @chaser1956
    @chaser1956 5 років тому +17

    This lawyer is incredible. Love the looks he gives the prosecutors. He made me believe she is clean. She was being used by Charlie so well. All of her calls and texts were all explained she just happened to be trying to get ahold of her husband for other things unfortunately it was during the murder timeline. The hubby needs to tell who he got the job from, Wendi, Charlie or the parents.

    • @TheDestiny8ball
      @TheDestiny8ball 4 роки тому +6

      shadowrydr1 💯💯👏👏👏🙌 I friggin Love this guy!! Nothing about Katie, the case, etc....he is simply FABULOUS!!! He has been my favorite to listen to this entire trial! ☺️👏👏👏

    • @dudelebowski483
      @dudelebowski483 2 роки тому +2

      Huh? Undoubtedly a great lawyer w a tremendous closing statement defending a 100% guilty client. Shoulda taken the plea and I hope she still has a chance to do just that and get a second chance to tell the truth before sentencing.

    • @thunderbirdmessenger2813
      @thunderbirdmessenger2813 2 роки тому

      Thrice now - he sucks, is anybody listening to this "Maybe martians landed" explaination?

  • @andrearivera3507
    @andrearivera3507 2 роки тому +3

    Same here love ❤ watching these live cases

  • @abetilocos58
    @abetilocos58 3 роки тому +5

    this closing argument is what lead to the jurors deadlock -prosecution desperation I agree 3 years in solitary confinement if ever acquitted must sue the state for millions of dollars -no mother will risk her freedom to be with her children it's really not possible for a mere 50k plus if it doesn't fit you must acquit that famous line by attorney Cochran

    • @my1vice
      @my1vice 2 роки тому +2

      Her retrial is in February. She'll be found guilty or she will flip on Charlie.

    • @my1vice
      @my1vice 2 роки тому +1

      @@jamc666
      They'll get him.

    • @terancetheindomitable9701
      @terancetheindomitable9701 2 роки тому +3

      I'm sick of hearing people say she wouldn't risk her freedom for a "mere" 50k. She obviously did not think she would get caught.

    • @sarahlu7797
      @sarahlu7797 2 роки тому +1

      @@terancetheindomitable9701
      You're right

  • @tracygreco6372
    @tracygreco6372 9 місяців тому +2

    Possibly the worse defense attorney I've ever heard. Repetitive, rude, annoying. Not sure how he passed the bar and I lost count of the times the Judge said "move on" to him.

    • @ChristopherDeCoste
      @ChristopherDeCoste 7 місяців тому

      What’s rude-and super weird-is you negatively reviewing my office because you don’t like or understand how the criminal justice system works. You’ve had no personal dealings with my office to warrant a review.

  • @thunderbirdmessenger2813
    @thunderbirdmessenger2813 2 роки тому +2

    He's the only good lawyer on the case, he just doesn't have a case to work with.

    • @GA-fz2wt
      @GA-fz2wt Рік тому

      I prefer the prosecution.

  • @GA-fz2wt
    @GA-fz2wt Рік тому +1

    Prosecutor Georgia didn't grill Wendi as much as katherine as he says because Georgia is still building a case against Charlie, Wendi and her parents..Im sure she will get her time..Shes an excellent lawyer.
    Can't wait for Charlie's trial in October 2023.

  • @mediascribble
    @mediascribble 11 місяців тому +1

    He's very good. It's apparent there are holes in the prosecution's case. I, myself, question the level at which the defendant was actually responsible for any involvement she had. I think it was Charlie pulling the strings, and it went deeper into making the deal himself with the shooter. After all, the shooter had a love relationship with the defendant, which in my mind eliminates the defendant, and puts her into the same bargaining as the murder itself. I feel she shouldn't have received a life sentence.

  • @terancetheindomitable9701
    @terancetheindomitable9701 2 роки тому +2

    I'm surprised by how much Magbanua's attorneys are throwing Garcia under the bus. So much for being a team.

    • @angelaroldan4982
      @angelaroldan4982 2 роки тому +3

      There aren’t a team (from my understanding). Each defendant has his/her own defense team.

    • @normacolon9618
      @normacolon9618 2 роки тому

      Garcia went against magbanawa..that she gave rhen the money...so he didnt cover for her.

  • @betsymarquezc.p.6788
    @betsymarquezc.p.6788 2 роки тому +2

    Wow sick so sad story

  • @normacolon9618
    @normacolon9618 2 роки тому +1

    What did he say about wendi???

  • @eileenie3101
    @eileenie3101 2 роки тому +2

    Defense attorney is a very fine attorney. Some of the evidence does look like she might be involved. I’m not positive. For me the prosecution didn’t prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. My vote would be not guilty.

    • @GA-fz2wt
      @GA-fz2wt Рік тому

      The prosecutor proved it to me, tons of evidence and she was correctly found Guilty, along with Rivera and Garcia, now it's Charlie's turn in October, then hopefully his mother, father & sister Wendi are all charged with this big conspiracy to murder. Only then will Mr Markels family have full justice.

  • @imantofik1455
    @imantofik1455 9 місяців тому

    the best lawyer he expose wendi

  • @seanj5893
    @seanj5893 2 роки тому +3

    Katie and Charlie had this talk already . If Katie gets arrested charlie will make sure her kids are taken care of . He probably put a million dollars a side for them and they will get it when they're old enough to know what to do with it. This is the reason why Katie hasn't talked yet . If she gets off you better believe Charlie will be giving her that money in cash.

    • @dudelebowski483
      @dudelebowski483 2 роки тому +2

      I just had a good buddy of mine do 4 years hard for insider trading. He coulda testified against his boss for a reduced sentence but chose not to and was committed a pot of gold at the end of his rainbow. Of course his old boss turned his back on him and hasn’t spoke to him in 2 yrs post release. This Markel murder is a complete mess and everyone guilty is going down including papa bear.

    • @normacolon9618
      @normacolon9618 2 роки тому

      Well charlies in jail and the whole family may be in jail, how us her family going to help..how are they going to get this miney to the kids.

    • @seanj5893
      @seanj5893 2 роки тому

      @@normacolon9618 very easily . They have someone they gave power of attorney to in case they all get arrested